<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Applied Mathematics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-7385</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/am.2013.42048</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AM-28200</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Analytical Expressions of Concentration of VOC and Oxygen in Steady-State in Biofilteration Model
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ayakkannan</surname><given-names>Sivasankari</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lakshmanan</surname><given-names>Rajendran</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Mathematics, The Madura College, Madurai, India</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>raj_sms@rediffmail.com(LR)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>22</day><month>02</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>314</fpage><lpage>325</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>October</day>	<month>8,</month>	<year>2012</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>November</day>	<month>8,</month>	<year>2012</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>November</day>	<month>15,</month>	<year>2012</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   Mathematical models of steady-state biofilteration are discussed. The theoretical results are much useful for the design of biofilters. This model is based on the system of non-linear reaction/diffusion equations contains a non-linear term related to Monod kinetics, Andrews kinetics, interactive model from Monod kinetics and Andrews kinetics. Analytical expression of concentration of VOC (Volatile organic compounds) and oxygen are derived by solving the system of non-linear equations using Adomian decomposition method (ADM) method. Our analytical results are also compared with the simulation results. Satisfactory agreement is noted. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Biofilters; Volatile Organic Compounds; Oxygen; Adomian Decomposition Method; Mathematical Modeling; Non-Linear Reaction/Diffusion Equations</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Biological system for elimination of volatile organics have been explored on experimental studies [1-3]. However, researches into the theoretical studies regarding biofilter models is rather limited. The pioneering contribution of Ottengraf and co-workers [1,2] of this model is based on some rather simplistic assumptions. The closed analytical expression have been used in validating-scale experimental data and actual design of pilot-scale biofilter units. Recently Zarook et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28200-ref3">3</xref>], extended the work of Ottengraf et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28200-ref1">1</xref>] and presented a detailed steady-state biofilteration model for single volume. Allen and Phatak [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28200-ref4">4</xref>] have extended their model to describe the biofilteration of VOC mixtures under steady-state conditions. Dehusses and Dunn [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28200-ref5">5</xref>] reports a transient biofilteration model which is based on the assumption that oxygen is in excess and the kinetics are of the Michaelis-Menten or Monod type. The steady-state model of Zarook et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28200-ref3">3</xref>] was extended to describe the transient performance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28200-ref6">6</xref>] of the biofilters. All the steady-state and transient biofilteration models [1-6] are based on the assumption that substrates are transported into the biofilm through diffusion. Biological systems for elimination of VOCs have been explored both on the experimental and mathematical modeling levels primarily in the Netherlands by Ottengraf et al. [6-8] followed by many researches even though land area requirements and lack of process control still restrict the industrial use of these systems. Several researchers [1,3,6,9-13] developed models to predict biodegradability of organic compounds in biofilters. The three general plans for biological treatment systems are biofilters, biotrickling filters and bioscrubbers. In biofilters, the porous medium is kept damp by maintaining the humidity of the incoming air and by occasional sprinkling. The reliability of biological processes and in particular of biofilteration for the treatment of waste gas streams containing VOC has been demonstrated by a very large number of experimental studies.</p><p>Recently Zarook et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28200-ref14">14</xref>] obtained the concentration of VOC and oxygen only for the limiting cases (zeroorder kinetics and first-order kinetics) for monoid kinetics. However, to the best our knowledge, no analytical expressions pertaining to the steady state concentrations of VOC, oxygen and effectiveness factor have been reported. The purpose of this paper is to derive the analytical expression of concentration of VOC and oxygen for all values of parameters and all reaction mechanisms, using the Adomian decomposition method.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Mathematical Formulation of the Problem</title><p>A steady-state biofilteration model (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1"><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>1</xref>) constitutes a set of mass balances within the biofilm. The mass balance equations in the biofilm are [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28200-ref14">14</xref>]:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144515"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\3a76da2b-bb7d-4a15-8ff7-66cee82b0589.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144516"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\a1d7edf7-a0e3-4db3-93d3-c7480b5b67b1.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with the boundary conditions</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144517"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\0f64a2bb-2b60-4768-a81f-a75f4b976ae0.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144518"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\596a7022-4e05-437c-bce3-f49e16796e9f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="8-7401165\686da76d-9f66-430d-b0a0-91f3233d931e.jpg" /> and <img src="8-7401165\90226a21-f903-4ab4-b5f6-10cfb7392ebd.jpg" /> are the concentration of VOC and oxygen at a position x in the biofilm, <img src="8-7401165\a2e2e73e-fca2-4846-8ba1-5dcc0b2d81fd.jpg" />and <img src="8-7401165\2270cb5c-5f12-4d63-8dc1-c07198b8e28a.jpg" /> are the effective diffusion coefficient of VOC and oxygen in the biofilm. <img src="8-7401165\83e1be01-bfb0-4deb-8a16-b3213d78dcce.jpg" />denotes biofilm density, <img src="8-7401165\6acaa4ec-9380-4669-9475-a46399fef184.jpg" />and <img src="8-7401165\a8ed5948-2f5b-4ac2-be20-3f9717c0a567.jpg" /> is the amount of biomass produced per amount of VOC consumed and amount of biomass produced per amount of oxygen consumed. For biological systems, The growth rate<img src="8-7401165\d2dda2be-120b-46b7-8331-e17c490a1da6.jpg" />, for various reaction kinetics are given as follows:</p><p>Monod kinetics:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144519"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\ed9e8713-c816-45a5-95bb-e9cbafd85f34.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Andrews kinetics:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144520"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\5901fffd-3abf-494d-b128-ff373992f5a8.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>When oxygen limits the biodegradation rate, the growth rate is given by interactive model. The above Equations (5) and (6) are written as follows:</p><p>Interactive model from Monod kinetics:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144521"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\2d68b9ce-be12-432e-8190-95b2763bc1d5.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Interactive model from Andrews kinetics:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144522"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\5baa710b-df49-484a-b0c9-22523ce7526c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In order to obtain numerical solution of model these equations are brought in dimensionless form through the dimensionless variables and groups. We make the above non-linear partial differential Equations (1) and (2) in dimensionless form by defining the following dimensionless parameters:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144523"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\e3d2d52d-a617-4cb8-a855-caf11ba7dd17.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="8-7401165\4dd04cde-4062-4079-b18c-7dc7e5391f76.jpg" /> and <img src="8-7401165\44931db4-6156-4e2b-babb-09438e867c44.jpg" /> denotes the dimensionless concentration of VOC and oxygen, X is the dimensionless position in the biolayer. <img src="8-7401165\a8dbdb86-5e1d-4a71-8916-43f9e71eb579.jpg" />represents the Thiele modulus, <img src="8-7401165\e3e5eff1-81a8-4861-9946-6a8c06ae8c56.jpg" />, M, L and N are dimensionless constants. By substituting the Equation (9) in Equations (1) and (2), we can obtain the following dimensionless non-linear equation for Monod kinetics:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144524"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\1a8172e2-64d2-49ad-927e-7e2e4339bac7.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144525"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\7ea3b8e2-8b4d-4c45-97e0-acf81db46d96.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using Equation (9), in the non-linear Equations (1) and (2), we can obtain the following dimensionless nonlinear equation for Andrews kinetics:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144526"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\dcd9a161-12a2-4bc4-966e-017b31636cbf.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144527"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\101cd023-79b5-48a8-ad48-84a6b5c18150.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using Equation (9), the dimensionless non-linear equation for Interactive model of Monod kinetics becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144528"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\08d62143-8eef-47e1-963a-b2e5ed654528.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144529"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\a6667b6b-93f5-4aed-bb6e-c11d52e83944.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The dimensionless non-linear equation for Interactive model of Andrews kinetics of the Equations (1) and (2) is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144530"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\68a5d37d-6b80-4ede-9330-f57dbba76c50.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144531"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\3fe5565c-4c6c-450a-be69-675def14741f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now the boundary condition in dimensionless form may be represented as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144532"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\73ce3e6f-07e7-46fa-9234-fc9e2c86b638.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144533"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\ef726efe-052b-4264-be7f-bf33e5eea912.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>For all the above cases, we can obtain the relation between <img src="8-7401165\3437164f-7861-4622-9cfd-eb695752fec8.jpg" /> and <img src="8-7401165\26245529-0164-4dc2-8d45-96a370dacbe6.jpg" /> as follows:</p><p><img src="8-7401165\8e6d0885-e4b3-436f-abec-ac3940e588ee.jpg" /></p><p>Integrating the above equation twice and using the boundary condition (18) and (19) we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144534"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\be758c7c-358f-4f30-9edd-de8b4e4b2e34.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>When<img src="8-7401165\9a0ce886-7e56-40d7-bd26-9384b8387ce5.jpg" />, the concentration of VOC <img src="8-7401165\1875c9f4-37df-44b5-b200-4d495d98175a.jpg" /> and oxygen <img src="8-7401165\132148a0-e2fe-4869-93ae-75f63836a4e8.jpg" /> becomes equal. When<img src="8-7401165\eab8cbcf-4cd7-4b11-9c07-e8e41aa20e83.jpg" />, the concentration of oxygen<img src="8-7401165\a757522a-93ff-4a3d-b745-261a8792d9b3.jpg" />. When<img src="8-7401165\9c57a044-9fdd-470d-9854-8a0d3c174ad0.jpg" />, the concentration of VOC <img src="8-7401165\32726ab5-4d7b-4552-9935-cd2b785b36b5.jpg" /> becomes one.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Analytical Solutions of the Concentrations Using the Adomian Decomposition Method (ADM)</title><p>Nonlinear phenomena play a crucial role in physical chemistry and biology (heat and mass transfer, filtration of liquids, diffusion in chemical reactions, etc.). Constructing a particular, exact solution for these equations remains an important problem. Finding an exact solution that has a physicochemical or biological interpretation is of fundamental importance. This model is based on a non-stationary system of diffusion equations containing a nonlinear reaction term. It is not possible to solve these equations using standard analytical techniques. The investigation of an exact solution of nonlinear equations is interesting and important. In the past several decades, many authors mainly paid attention to studying the solution of nonlinear equations by using various methods, such as the Backlund and the Darboux transformation [15,16], the inverse scattering method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28200-ref17">17</xref>], the bilinear method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28200-ref18">18</xref>], the tanh method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28200-ref19">19</xref>], the variational iteration method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28200-ref20">20</xref>], the HPM [21-25], ADM [26-30]. The ADM was successfully applied to autonomous ordinary differential equations for nonlinear polycrystalline solids and to other fields. This method has been proved by many authors to be a powerful mathematical tool for various kinds of nonlinear problems. It is a promising and evolving method. The ADM is unique in its applicability, accuracy and efficiency. In this method, the solution procedure is very simple and only few iterations lead to highly accurate solutions that are valid for the whole solution domain. Using this method (see Appendix A), the concentration of VOC and oxygen for all the four cases can be obtained. The concentration of VOC for Monod kinetics in the biofilm is,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144535"><label>(21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\2b560d82-c31c-4d35-932b-919b4b9f92f4.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By solving the Equation (12), we can obtain the concentration of VOC for Andrews kinetics as follows,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144536"><label>(22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\4a64bded-7664-448a-aae7-eb42ad7c5beb.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Solving the dimensionless form of Interactive model from Monod kinetics Equation (14), we get the concentration as,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144537"><label>(23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\c590c9b5-2592-4956-97a8-4059225e1334.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Solving the dimensionless form of Interactive model from Andrews kinetics Equation (16), we get the concentration as,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144538"><label>(24)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\7162c451-dd90-469e-99a8-df774a9edc97.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><p><img src="8-7401165\6782299c-3fb1-4456-a3f3-10ea24f7fbe4.jpg" />,</p><p><img src="8-7401165\15da71c4-393c-4081-8b55-426a83bf3f49.jpg" />,</p><p><img src="8-7401165\22e89619-8c65-47cd-b3ce-e38a871bed93.jpg" />, and</p><p><img src="8-7401165\fcdf9fe4-1d45-4857-9aef-78cd0f774511.jpg" />.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Effectiveness Factor</title><p>The effectiveness factor is defined as the ratio of actual rate of reaction to the rate of reaction that would result if the entire biofilm was exposed to the concentration at the gas/biofilm interface. The effectiveness factor of various kinetics are as follows:</p><p>Monod kinetics</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144539"><label>(25)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\46823f1b-7d00-4a99-9d6e-c9ac1b9d2415.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Andrews kinetics</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144540"><label>(26)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\77b398de-0dbc-4e85-b779-1c44edab1d78.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Interactive model from Monod kinetics</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144541"><label>(27)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\4ca78ac5-de7e-44b8-a2b0-9c9007edfc16.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Interactive model from Andrews kinetics</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144542"><label>(28)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\44359172-7ecf-42f1-8b21-241b798dc681.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Numerical Simulation</title><p>The dimensionless form of Equations (10)-(17) corresponding to the boundary conditions (18) and (19) were solved by numerical methods. We have used pdex4 to solve these equations (Pdex4 in MATLAB is a function to solve the initial-boundary value problems of differential equations. Matlab program to find the numerical solution of Equations (10) and (11) is given in the Appendix B. The numerical solution is compared with our analytical results and is shown in Figures 2-9. A satisfactory agreement is noticed for various values of the Thiele modulus and possible small values of reaction/ diffusion parameters.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Discussion</title><p>Equations (21)-(24) represents the new analytical expressions of the concentration of VOC for Monoid, Andrews, Interactive Monoid and Interactive Andrews kinetics for all values of the parameter. Using the relation (Equation (20)), we can also obtain the concentration of oxygen <img src="8-7401165\41d1dacd-aa97-47ba-8317-1afcefc9eda3.jpg" /> for all the kinetics. Zarook et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28200-ref17">17</xref>] obtained the</p><p>analytical expressions of concentration of VOC and oxygen only for the limiting cases (Zero kinetics and First-order kinetics). Concentration of VOC <img src="8-7401165\44703a73-9810-47e7-be03-9abc1a3ba774.jpg" /> and oxygen <img src="8-7401165\7a578164-6e15-4ede-add7-b1f3c7f0700a.jpg" /> depends upon the value of parameters<img src="8-7401165\a0da008b-c30d-43fc-a020-4df7593877c9.jpg" />, <img src="8-7401165\6d8bec9c-588d-4d09-97d8-d346e720a85f.jpg" />, L, N and<img src="8-7401165\36a95ab0-1e34-4dbe-b4c4-c5f226b9e5d9.jpg" />.</p><sec id="s6_1"><title>6.1. The Thiele Modulus</title><p>The Thiele module<img src="8-7401165\c73c1ebb-f391-4319-9f21-537550e51181.jpg" />, essentially compares biodegradation rate <img src="8-7401165\41d57ee9-feb9-4d02-81a9-3825fd4f93b8.jpg" /> with diffusion rate<img src="8-7401165\4cf66e03-4dad-4524-af9b-29cd6f126e49.jpg" />. We observe the rise and downfall of concentration profiles in two cases. 1) If Thiele modulus is small<img src="8-7401165\36541582-9180-4f0a-b390-9582331bf08a.jpg" />, then enzyme kinetics predominate. The overall kinetics is governed by the total amount of active enzyme; 2) The response is under diffusion control, if the Thiele module is large<img src="8-7401165\61fb91db-e8e7-4ed4-aabd-56bfd868eca6.jpg" />, which is observed at high catalytic activity and active membrane thickness or at low reaction kinetic constant <img src="8-7401165\911f4d98-d805-40d5-ad6d-43e879ce78f7.jpg" /> or diffusion coefficient values<img src="8-7401165\fde94876-b589-40ee-abeb-fd1d25172288.jpg" />.</p></sec><sec id="s6_2"><title>6.2. Monod Kinetics</title><p>Equation (21) represents the concentration of VOC for Monod kinetics in the biofilm.</p><p>Figures 2(a)-(d) is the plot of dimensionless concentration <img src="8-7401165\b726b2ea-2fa6-4c85-9e3b-b510c4dcad5b.jpg" /> versus dimensionless distance X for various values of Thiele modulus <img src="8-7401165\39e9d8d6-c019-4a03-a8bd-1adc19fd9f80.jpg" /> and the dimensionless quantity M using Equation (21). From this <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>it is inferred that, the concentration of VOC, at<img src="8-7401165\8cc8b84a-990d-4b03-ae24-2079eda8055b.jpg" />, increase when the value of <img src="8-7401165\07d5d31b-111b-4239-be6d-1b2c73366637.jpg" /> or bio-filter thickness decreases. Also the concentration is uniform when <img src="8-7401165\4892e8a7-88ab-480b-a389-ce66d1243d47.jpg" /> and all values of<img src="8-7401165\d43593ae-91d7-4e09-9bdd-867a997bda59.jpg" />.</p><p>Figures 3(a)-(d) is the plot of dimensionless concentration <img src="8-7401165\b5fbe97a-f8cf-40ca-b3d5-41eefcd7507e.jpg" /> for various values of dimensionless quantity<img src="8-7401165\8b11e21f-b3d9-4212-ab98-2b8c4cd0e87c.jpg" />,<img src="8-7401165\35eb5c5b-94dd-4bbb-920c-3cd3cd987a3e.jpg" /> and the Thiele modulus<img src="8-7401165\36222214-706f-4a8a-bf32-7f1962dddf0e.jpg" />. From this figure it is observed that the concentration of oxygen is decreases when <img src="8-7401165\1387481f-075e-4dfc-ab7b-7235852c4fe7.jpg" /> increases.</p></sec><sec id="s6_3"><title>6.3. Andrews Kinetics</title><p>Equation (22) is the concentration of VOC for Andrews-type kinetics.</p><p>Figures 4(a)-(d) is the plot of dimensionless concentration <img src="8-7401165\6ca88205-eba1-4bb6-9ff9-367701ada725.jpg" />versus dimensionless distance X for various values of dimensionless parameters. From this figure, it is noted that the concentration of VOC decreases when<img src="8-7401165\e547a003-176d-4713-9b86-9d87d2c54fc6.jpg" />, <img src="8-7401165\dd32278f-8d68-4d2d-8ed0-3b84c106c667.jpg" />, <img src="8-7401165\0c0f9fd7-daaa-49cc-8543-effd7bedcff6.jpg" />increases.</p><p>Figures 5(a)-(d) represents the dimensionless concentration <img src="8-7401165\941deda1-ca70-4cce-b882-6ddf24e24ffd.jpg" /> for various values of dimensionless quantity<img src="8-7401165\442fb8d3-12b2-4afe-ac1e-aaeed18df87b.jpg" />, <img src="8-7401165\6684d218-c646-4ddb-93b9-caf744c9f46f.jpg" />, <img src="8-7401165\a53af504-c7f3-4a20-902d-dbaedb8871a9.jpg" />and<img src="8-7401165\badf77fc-c01e-465b-8045-0ed0135be0b1.jpg" />.</p></sec><sec id="s6_4"><title>6.4. Interactive Monod Kinetics</title><p>Equation (23) represents the concentration of VOC of Interactive model from Monod kinetics.</p><p>Figures 6(a)-(d) is the dimensionless concentration <img src="8-7401165\af429348-5a0f-4691-96a9-c37c2c5bbf7a.jpg" /> versus dimensionless distance X for various values</p><p>of parameters using Equation (23). From this <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>it is noted that, the concentration of <img src="8-7401165\e20a41f7-a7af-459f-a266-ab496512e3f7.jpg" /> is uniform when<img src="8-7401165\d57a9ad0-4874-49dc-9821-aa3a952f0c6d.jpg" />. Also <img src="8-7401165\978791dd-bbf4-42e2-b16f-8f3b40dff6ea.jpg" />decreases when θ increases whereas the Figures 7(a)-(d) for the dimensionless concentration <img src="8-7401165\9447697c-993c-46d9-875f-dfb9ac4034cb.jpg" /> for various values of dimensionless quantity<img src="8-7401165\144a3d82-d185-4540-91be-85917432341e.jpg" />, <img src="8-7401165\6ec47b3e-8a98-4fc3-be2d-4488939cf147.jpg" />, <img src="8-7401165\fe8c89cf-e9f8-4331-93eb-c61045113193.jpg" />and<img src="8-7401165\2a377df8-dbca-4f81-ba1c-600b1dddcc8c.jpg" />. From this figure it is inferred that the concentration of VOC <img src="8-7401165\9f589dca-fdac-4796-bc18-4b22ba13287c.jpg" /> is equal to one when <img src="8-7401165\b354423a-5812-4fe5-bba9-e994b3c97b7a.jpg" /> for all values of parameters.</p></sec><sec id="s6_5"><title>6.5. Interactive Andrews Kinetics</title><p>Equation (24) is the concentration of VOC of Interactive model from Andrews kinetics.</p><p>Figures 8(a)-(d) is the dimensionless concentration <img src="8-7401165\ac3f7383-a90e-4764-b15d-04644d39b670.jpg" /> versus dimensionless distance X for various values of Thiele modulus<img src="8-7401165\746d5c56-9110-409c-a4c6-cc1161b44773.jpg" />, <img src="8-7401165\c2f28c76-07ae-4508-acc0-306c5e489c5c.jpg" />, <img src="8-7401165\5742fdd4-7e8e-4432-9db2-5a44fb83d5b7.jpg" />, <img src="8-7401165\ede1d025-6e26-4f43-b243-dc490b76f282.jpg" />and <img src="8-7401165\cc390ec1-aaf0-4b60-adef-00afab21c043.jpg" /> using Equation (24).</p><p>Figures 9(a)-(d) is the dimensionless concentration <img src="8-7401165\0b00b765-6c11-4e71-a48a-ed1bdead434f.jpg" /> for various values of dimensionless parameters. From this figure it is inferred that the concentration of VOC <img src="8-7401165\52c8ec29-cd87-45bb-be12-c8e5ee1f315b.jpg" /> is constant when bio-filter thickness <img src="8-7401165\a3b509e5-ded5-4eb8-8601-3fc5f9b13aa4.jpg" /> decreases.</p></sec><sec id="s6_6"><title>6.6. Effectiveness Factor</title><p>Figures 10(a)-(d) represent the effectiveness factor <img src="8-7401165\04f9f4fc-0817-4c03-a7e8-6fcf4a8858a1.jpg" /> versus the Thiele modulus <img src="8-7401165\57f1c129-90ef-4c77-8ed6-95ba72a00665.jpg" /> using Equations (25)-(28). From this figure it is observed that the effectiveness factor = 1 when <img src="8-7401165\fc799260-9ebe-4cee-a7b2-08a3c47d7ebd.jpg" /> for all mechanisms. Also the effectiveness factor decreases when <img src="8-7401165\aa8d872e-d4b8-45f6-82c8-15758414fe81.jpg" /> increases and the values of parameters <img src="8-7401165\ad1f9f06-bdf0-441f-a4fb-77de077d6c87.jpg" /> and <img src="8-7401165\707490b6-4d8c-4268-999a-c6c9290c8c3f.jpg" /> decreases.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s7"><title>7. Conclusion</title><p>The non-linear differential equations in biofilter models have been solved analytically for various kinetics using the Adomian decomposition method. Analytical expression of concentration of VOC and oxygen and corresponding effectiveness factor have been obtained for Monoid, Andrews, Interactive Monoid and Andrews kinetics and for all values of parameters. These analytical reactions very much useful for designing or scaling-up of biofilters.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>8. Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by the University Grants Commission (F. No. 39-58/2010(SR)), New Delhi, India and Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR No.: 01(2442)/10/EMR-II), New Delhi, India. The authors are thankful to Dr. R. Murali, The Principal, The Madura College, Madurai and The Secretary, Madura College Board, Madurai for their encouragement.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec><sec id="s10"><title>Appendix A</title><p>Analytical Solution of Non-Linear (Equation (16)) Using The Adomian Decomposition Method In the operator form, Equation (16) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144543"><label>(B1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\27c7fcf9-7210-4cb7-a24c-41c045b03862.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><p><img src="8-7401165\7ce667d1-df39-42da-b056-f5293bd7008c.jpg" /></p><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144544"><label>(B2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\a0a1c596-205d-449a-9ebe-7e67b69e8ebd.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Applying <img src="8-7401165\85f28c71-929a-42af-975f-edcf227974eb.jpg" /> to both sides of (B1) yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144545"><label>(B3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\9775afe5-1eac-45c7-84fb-3e6dd68bee9d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where a and b are constants of integration. To solve (B3) by the Adomian method, we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144546"><label>(B4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\701131ac-375b-490f-835e-2be7f2b0c43e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144547"><label>(B5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\3aa47c85-be36-49f9-8607-6822066e1aec.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In view of the Equations (B4)-(B5), Equation (B3) gives</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144548"><label>(B6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\dcb65767-ff0e-4306-b6ec-3c4f029dd3dc.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>we identify the zeroth component as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144549"><label>(B7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\d81ac4e5-2a3d-4e35-a9ff-77df3b934dd6.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and the remaining components as the recurrence relation,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144550"><label>(B8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\e71ce6a1-2613-496e-ba7e-0ca5251fafc5.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="8-7401165\37d089b0-bd89-492b-96d5-a20db70e0d50.jpg" /> are the Adomian polynomials that represent the non-linear term in (B8).</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144551"><label>(B9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\1aa487f7-1dca-4f36-9fdf-7164685528c6.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using (B9) we can find the first few <img src="8-7401165\baacb3e4-644d-44a7-96f9-cedf579140e9.jpg" /> as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144552"><label>(B10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\d252efd9-d004-4f47-a302-5bbf2ad99de4.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144553"><label>(B11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\17b0ef92-ed2c-4fe1-b3bc-eeaf2e8130aa.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The remaining polynomials can be generated easily. The corresponding boundary condition becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144554"><label>(B12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\fb4c8c61-246a-45dc-8985-619d872efdd2.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substitution of (B10) and (B11) in (B8) and operating with <img src="8-7401165\cc03be6b-4958-45e1-bc20-6be15e5ddb9e.jpg" /> in conjunction with the boundary conditions (B12) in each case separately, we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144555"><label>(B13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\e079d735-8ad3-46f6-906a-2e14606000fb.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144556"><label>(B14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\6d9227d0-766c-4aa2-85ea-81fafeb07600.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144557"><label>(B15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\cac84c12-54c8-415b-b81b-c72deac65def.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144558"><label>(B16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\1c425f5a-9ce1-4641-a07a-b0ef74196328.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144559"><label>(B17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\134c3d21-4362-4567-bfa7-139a2d98c837.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting the Equations (B13)-(B15) in</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28200-formula144560"><label>(B18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7401165\fcf7d658-62bf-494d-bc52-95cb1d1789c9.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>we can obtain the Equation (24) in the text. Similarly, applying the above same procedure, we obtain the Equations (21)-(23).</p></sec><sec id="s11"><title>Appendix B</title><p>Matlab/Scilab program to find the numerical solution of the Equations (10)-(11).</p><p><img src="8-7401165\a19d6cc0-273f-4971-8931-cde355822e2d.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7401165\db2e69a8-b377-41b9-9638-a98f30c5e3c7.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7401165\87143824-cd88-4405-9766-8e16b1fdbbbb.jpg" /></p></sec><sec id="s12"><title>Nomenclature and Units</title><p><img src="8-7401165\c041e680-3812-4db6-bed0-aedfd50aca2a.jpg" /></p></sec><sec id="s13"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.28200-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. P. P Ottengraf, H. J. Rehm and G. Reed, Eds., “Exhaust Gas Purification,” Biotechnology, Vol. 8, 1986, pp. 425-452.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28200-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. P. P. Ottengraf and A. H. C. Van den Oever, “Kinetics of Organic Compound Removal from Waste Gases with a Biological Filter,” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol. 25, No. 12, 1983, pp. 3089-3102. 
doi:10.1002/bit.260251222</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28200-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. M. Zarook, B. C. Baltzis, Y.-S. Oh and R. Bartha, “Biofiltration of Methanol Vapor,” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol. 41, No. 5, 1993, pp. 512-524. 
doi:10.1002/bit.260410503</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28200-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. R. Allen and S. Phatak, “Control of Organosulfur Ompound Emissions Using Biofiltration. Methyl Mercaptan,” Proceedings of the 86th, Air and Waste Management Association Annual Meeting and Exhibition, Denver, 13-18 June 1993.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28200-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. A. Deshusses and I. J. Dunn, “Modeling Experiments on the Kinetics of Mixed-Solvent Removal from Waste Gas in a Biofilter,” Proceedings of the 6th European Congress in Iotechnology, Florence, 13-17 June 1993.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28200-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. M. Zarook and B. C. Baltzls, “Biofiltration of Toluene Vapour under Steady State and Transient Conditions,” Chemical Engineering Science, Vol. 49, 1994, pp. 4347-4360. doi:10.1016/S0009-2509(05)80026-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28200-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. P. P. Ottengraf, R. M. M. Diks, “Biotechniques for Air Pollution Abatement and Odor Control Policies,” Process Technology of Biotechniques, Elsevier Science, New York, 1992, pp. 17-31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28200-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. Van Lith, S. L. David and R. Marsh, “Design Criteria for Biofilters,” Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers, Vol. 68, 1990, pp. 127-132.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28200-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. S. Hodge and J. S. Devinny, “Modeling Removal of Air Contaminants by Biofiltration,” Journal of Environmental Engineering, Vol. 121, No. 1, 1995, pp. 21-32.  
doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1995)121:1(21)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28200-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. A. Deshusses, G. Hamer and I. J. Dunn, “Behavior of Biofilters for Waste Air Biotreatment,” Journal of Environmental Science Technology, Vol. 29, No. 4, 1995, pp. 1048-1068. doi:10.1021/es00004a027</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28200-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. Morgenroth, E. D. Schroeder, D. P. Y. Chang and K. M. Scow, “Modeling of a Compost Biofilter Incorporating Microbial Growth,” American Society of Civil Engineers, 1995, pp. 473-480.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28200-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. S. Cherry and D. N. Thompson, “The Shift from Growth to Nutrient limited Maintenance Kinetics during acclimation of a Biofilter,” Journal of Biotechnology Bioengineering, Vol. 56, No. 3, 1997, pp. 330-339. 
doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19971105)56:3&lt;330::AID-BIT11&gt;3.0.CO;2-K</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28200-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. M. Zarook, A. A. Shaikh and Z. Ansar, “Development, Experimental Validation and Dynamic Analysis of a General Transient Biofilter Model,” Journal of Chemical Engineering Science, Vol. 529, No. 5, 1997, pp. 759-773. 
doi:10.1016/S0009-2509(96)00428-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28200-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. M. Zarook and A. A. Shaikh, “Analysis and Comparison of Biofilter Models,” Chemical Engineering Journal, Vol. 65, No. 1, 1997, pp. 55-61. 
doi:10.1016/S1385-8947(96)03101-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28200-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Coely, Eds., et al., “Backlund and Darboux Transformation,” American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28200-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Wadati, H. Sanuki and K. Konno, “Relationships among Inverse Method, Backlund Transformation and an Infinite Number of Conservation Laws,” Progress of the Theoretical Physics, Vol. 53, No. 2, 1975, pp. 419-436. 
doi:10.1143/PTP.53.419</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28200-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. S. Gardener, J. M. Green, M. D. Kruskal and R. M. Miura, “Method for Solving the Korteweg-de Vries Equation,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 19, No. 19, 1967, pp. 1095-1097. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.19.1095</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28200-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Hirota, “Exact Solution of the Korteweg-De Vries Equation for Multiple Collisions of Solitons,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 27, No. 18, 1971, pp. 1192-1194. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.27.1192</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28200-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">W. Malfliet, “Solitary Wave Solutions of Nonlinear Wave Equations Solitons,” American Journal of Physics, Vol. 60, No. 7, 1992, p. 650. doi:10.1119/1.17120</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28200-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. H. He, “Approximate Analyticalsolution for Seepage Flow with Fractionalderivatives in Porous Media,” American Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 167, No. 1-2, 1998, pp. 57-68. 
doi:10.1016/S0045-7825(98)00108-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28200-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. H. He, “Chaos Solitons Fractals,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 26, No. 3, 2005, p. 695.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28200-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. H. He, “Homotopy Perturbation Method for Solving Boundary Value Problems,” Physics Letters A, Vol. 350, No. 1-2, 2006, pp. 87-88.  
doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2005.10.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28200-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. H. He, “A Simple Perturbation Approach to Blasius Equation,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 140, No. 2-3, 2003, pp. 217-222. 
doi:10.1016/S0096-3003(02)00189-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28200-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. D. Ganji and M. Rafei, “Solitary Wave Solutions for a Generalized Hirota-Satsuma Coupled KdV Equation by Homotopy Perturbation Method,” Physics Letters A, Vol. 356, No. 2, 2006, pp. 131-137. 
doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2006.03.039</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28200-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. D. Ariel, “Homotopy Perturbation Method and the Natural Convection Flow of a Third Grade Fluid through a Circular Tube,” Nonlinear Science Letters A, Vol. 1, 2010, pp. 43-52.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28200-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. Jang, “Two-Point Boundary Value Problems by the Extended Adomian Decomposition Method,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 219, No. 1, 2008, pp. 253-262. doi:10.1016/j.cam.2007.07.036</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28200-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. Adomian, “Solutions of Nonlinear PDE,” Applied Mathematics, Vol. 11, No. 3, 1998, pp. 121-123.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28200-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. Adomian, “A Global Method for Solution of Complex Systems,” Mathematical Modelling, Vol. 5, No. 4, 1984, pp. 251-263. doi:10.1016/0270-0255(84)90004-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28200-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. Adomian, “Stochastic Nonlinear Modeling of Fluctuations in a Nuclear Reactor—A New Approach,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, Vol. 8, No. 7, 1981, pp. 329-330. 
doi:10.1016/0306-4549(81)90053-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28200-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Saufyane and M. Boulmalf, “Solution of Linear and Nonlinear Parabolic Equations by the Decomposition Method,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 162, No. 2, 2005, pp. 687-693. 
doi:10.1016/j.amc.2004.01.005</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>