<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2013.42036</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-27910</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Physiological Studies on Ratoonability of Sugarcane Varieties under Tropical Indian Condition
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>aju</surname><given-names>Gomathi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Polur</surname><given-names>Nagaraja Gururaja Rao</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Palaniappan</surname><given-names>Rakkiyappan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Babu</surname><given-names>Poojary Sundara</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Srinivasan</surname><given-names>Shiyamala</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Agronomy, Division of Crop Production, Sugarcane Breeding Institute (ICAR), Coimbatore, India</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Soil Science, Division of Crop Production, Sugarcane Breeding Institute (ICAR), Coimbatore, India</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Plant Physiology, Division of Crop Production, Sugarcane Breeding Institute (ICAR), Coimbatore, India</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>gomathi_sbi@yahoo.co.in(AG)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>02</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>274</fpage><lpage>281</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>December</day>	<month>16th,</month>	<year>2011</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>November</day>	<month>5th,</month>	<year>2012</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>November</day>	<month>12th,</month>	<year>2012</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The ratoon crop occupies approximately 40% of the total area of sugarcane crop in tropical India. The main reason for the lower average cane productivity is the yield decline in ratoon crops (40
   - 
  50
   
  t/ha) despite the release of the high yielding varieties and advanced cane production technology. The physiological factors associated with ratooning per
  formance and the variation in growth and yield were studied in 11 sugarcane varieties in two cycles of one plant and two ratoon crops each.
   The first ratoon and second ratoon crop showed 17.0% and 28.1% reduction in tiller production and 15.5% and 15.7% reduction in NMC, respectively, over plant crop. The differences in growth parameters between the plant and ratoon crops at the formative phase were lesser than that of grand growth and maturity phases. Varieties Co 86032, Co 97008, Co 95020 Co 99004 and Co 2000-10 showed better physiological efficiency in terms of plant height, shoot population, leaf size, TDMP, partitioning efficiency, chlorophyll content and nitrate reductase activity and significantly higher yield components such as NMC, SCW, cane length, internodal length as well as cane yield com
  pared to other varieties. The higher reduction in ratoon yield in Co 99008, Co 94012, Co 8021 and Co 97009 (&gt;35.00% reduction) was due to higher reduction in tiller production associated with stunted plant growth and root system, reduce
  tion in individual leaf size and LAI, TDMP, total chlorophyll content, NMC, internodal length and SCW. The results obtained indicated that the plant height, TDMP, stem partitioning, leaf size, total chlorophyll content, SCW, cane length and cane girth were highly associated with yield of first and second ratoon crops than that of plant crop. Therefore the difference in the association between physiological parameters with yield of plant and ratoon crops therefore decides the ratooning potential of the crop.
  
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Sugarcane; Ratoon; Physiological Efficiency; LAI; TDMP; SCW; Yield</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Ratooning of sugarcane is a common practice throughout the world and ratoon occupies almost 50 per cent of the total area under sugarcane cultivation and contributes 30% to the total cane production in the country [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27910-ref1">1</xref>]. The area under ratoons is relatively greater in the tropical states (50% - 55%) than in the sub-tropical states (40% - 45%). The decline in cane yield in successive ratoons is common in most of the sugarcane growing areas. The average yield gap between plant and ratoon crop in the country is 20% - 25%. One of the major bottlenecks in increasing the productivity of ratoon crops in the sub tropics is the poor sprouting of stubbles in winter-harvested cane. Reports are available that the poor sprouting, uneven and continuous tillering during entire period of crop results in sixty percent mortality of tillers and thus less millable canes at harvest [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27910-ref2">2</xref>]. A number of attempts have been made to increase the yield of winter-initiated ratoons and ethrel (500 ppm) proved the best among the different hormones tested<sup> </sup>[3-6]. Also, investigations on different aspects of ratoon viz., physiology, genetics, biochemistry etc., have not been given due attention to unravel the reasons for low ratoonability and productivity potential of different sugarcane genotypes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27910-ref7">7</xref>].</p><p>Ratoon productivity is the ultimate expression of interplay of several factors such as the ratooning ability of a given variety, the influence of environment and ratoon management. Ratooning ability is one of the important economic considerations in many sugarcane growing countries to decide the suitability of sugarcane varieties for commercial cultivation. Good ratooning ability of cane cultivars is an essential pre-requisite determined by a number of factors. Various plant characters were associated with ratooning ability of sugarcane varieties and success of the variety depended on its ability to give more profitable ratoons [8-10]. Identification of physiological plant traits that are responsible for better ratoonabilty therefore helps the breeders to screen a large number of clones for better ratooning types. The research work on physiological aspects of ratoonability is rather meagre. The present study aiming on identification of physiological traits associated with ratooning performance of sugarcane varieties.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><p>Field experiments were conducted at Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore during 2006-2010 in two cycles of one plant and two ratoon crops each. The first cycle plant crop and its ratoon crops was conducted during 2006-09 with eleven popular sugarcane varieties viz., Co C 671, Co 8021, Co 85019, Co 86032, Co 94012, Co 95020, Co 97008, Co 97009, Co 99004, Co 99008 and Co 2000-10 in randomized block design (RBD, replicated thrice. The second cycle of experiments was conducted during 2007- 2010 with the same set of varieties. The cultural operations of ratoon crop were followed as per the local recommendations. No gap-filling was done in any of the ratoon crops.</p><p>Plant samples were made periodically for recording various morphological, physiological, growth characters, dry matter production and its partitioning. The total chlorophyll content was estimated as per method suggested by Yoshida [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27910-ref11">11</xref>]. Nitrate reductase activity was assayed following the method of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27910-ref12">12</xref>] at 60, 90 and 120 days after planting. Number of millable canes per plot was recorded at harvest and the data on cane height, cane thickness, internode number, internodal length and single cane weight were recorded in 5 canes in each genotype and the mean was calculated. The cane yield per plot was recorded and expressed as tonnes/ha. On completion of 2 cycles of plant and ratoon crops each, data were pooled and analysed statistically to test the significance of the parameters.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results &amp; Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Tillering and Stalk Population</title><p>The tiller population was maximum at 90 DAP and it was significant among the crops and the varieties studied. Results obtained from the first ratoon and second ratoon crop showed 17.0% and 28.1% reduction in tiller production and 16.5% and 15.7% reduction in NMC over the plant crop. However, the reduction was less than 15% in varieties Co 86032, Co 97008, Co 95020, Co 2000-10 and Co 85019 (Figures 1(a) and (c)). In the first ratoon crop, tiller mortality (30.0%) was almost similar to that of plant crop (29.6%), while in the II ratoon crop, the tiller mortality was 28.50% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(b)). Varieties, Co 8021 and Co 97009 recorded significantly higher tiller mortality of 48.3% and 44.0% in first ratoon and 47.7% and 40.0% in second ratoon crop respectively. The results suggested that the production of tiller itself limiting factor for poor NMC in ratoon crops than the tiller mortality per se. Tilllering behaviour of ratoon crops was extensively studied under sub-tropical condition [9,13- 15]. According to them, tillering of ratoon crops was earlier and more profuse than in corresponding plant crop and the early formed tillers have greater chance of survival than the later shoots. Further they reported that the tiller mortality was determined by the time of emergence of individual tillers and tiller growth type. However, the early formed tillers have grater chance of survival than the later shoots. It was even suggested that varietal variation in tiller production was up to 120 - 135 DARI in ratoon crops; however, in plant crop exhibited more such variation during 85 - 90 days after planting [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27910-ref14">14</xref>].</p><p>The reduction in tiller production in ratoon crops was</p><p>associated with gappiness in ratoons particularly in varieties Co 8021, Co 94012, Co 97009 and Co C 671. Tiller production was highly associated with yield of first ratoon (r = 0.630<sup>*</sup>) and second ratoon crops (0.553<sup>*</sup>). (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). A significant difference in association of NMC with yield of plant and ratoon crops was also observed. NMC was highly and significantly associated with yield in first (r = 0.750<sup>**</sup>) and second ratoon crops (r = 0.809<sup>**</sup>). A similar result was reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27910-ref7">7</xref>].</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. Correlation coefficients between physiological parameters with yield of plant and ratoon crops.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27910-formula27558"><graphic  xlink:href="12-2600289\0ef1215d-b229-469f-bdaa-2b14a67db123.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.27910-formula27559"><graphic  xlink:href="12-2600289\c8f2d66f-20b8-4024-aaa9-f8b198059ecf.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><sup>*</sup>FPFormative phase, <sup>*</sup>GGPGrand growth phase, NS-Not significant; <sup>*</sup>P = 0.05; <sup>**</sup>P = 0.01.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Growth Observations</title><p>Data on plant height, leaf production, leaf size and LAI at different growth phases of plant and ratoon crop indicated that the differences in growth parameters at formative phase was narrow than at grand growth and maturity phases. At grand growth phase, the first and second ratoon crop recorded an average reduction in plant height of 12.8% and 22.0%, respectively, over plant crop, while at maturity phase the reduction was 12.42% and 17.8%, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Reports were available that the ratoon shoots in initial stages grew faster than the plant crop but the plant crop had overtaken during monsoon season<sup> </sup>[13,15-17]. Significant variation was observed among the varieties in plant height. Varieties, Co 97008, Co 99004, Co 95020, Co 2000-10 and Co 86032 maintained better stem growth than the other varieties studied. Similar varietal variation in stem growth was reported in sugarcane [7,9]. The ability of varieties to develop shoots quickly and rapidly early in the season in the ratoon crop had a distinct advantage over the plant crop.</p><p>Leaf development in sugarcane is important for the study of photosynthesis, canopy closure and light interception. Among the physiological attributes, the leaf area had significant positive association with cane yield and dry matter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27910-ref18">18</xref>]. In present study, leaf growth parameters viz., LAI, leaf production (data not sown) and individual leaf size was recorded at important growth phases of plant and ratoon crops. However, the magnitude of variation of these parameters in plant and ratoon crops was significant at grand growth phase and maturity phase. LAI of first and second ratoon crop at grand growth phase showed 13.0% and 26.6% mean reduction over plant crop (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a)). This might be due to the difference in leaf growth pattern between plant and ratoon crops, i.e., decline in LAI at maturity phase was more sharp in plant crop as compared to ratoon crops (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(b)). The higher reduction in LAI at grand growth phase was mainly due to the reduction in individual leaf size (29.7%) and leaf number (17.20%) over plant crop. Varietal variation in individual leaf size was highly significant in ratoon crops than the plant crop (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(c)). Varieties Co 99008, Co 94012 and Co 97009 showed higher reduction in leaf size of 44.3%, 41.5% and 36.5% over plant crop. However, varieties Co 99004, Co 97008, Co 95020 and Co 86032 maintained better leaf growth in terms of LAI, leaf size and leaf production (Figures 2(a) and (c)). Similar varietal variation in leaf growth parameters was reported in sugarcane [7,19]. The rate of leaf production of ratoon crop increased as age advanced and it continued even during the maturity phase of the crop as that of earlier report [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27910-ref17">17</xref>]. A significant association of leaf production with yield between plant and ratoon crops was observed at all the growth phases. In ratoon crops, leaf production (r = −0.415<sup>*</sup> and −0.506<sup>*</sup>) and LAI</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. Plant height (cm) at different growth phases of plant and ratoon crops.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27910-formula27560"><graphic  xlink:href="12-2600289\dbcf6aed-bbc0-4cab-a7b7-59553bf70c81.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><sup>*</sup>P = 0.05; <sup>**</sup>P = 0.01.</p><p>(r = −0.310<sup>*</sup> and −0.436<sup>*</sup>) were negatively but significantly associated with yield while the plant crop showed non-significant results (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Hence, the differences in leaf growth among the varieties in both plant and ratoon crops significantly influenced the source-sink relationship.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Total Chlorophyll Content and Nitrate Reductase Activity</title><p>Total chlorophyll content was estimated at different physiological stages of ratoon crop. A significant reduction in total chlorophyll content was noticed over plant crop; however the reduction was high at early growth phase (26.50%) compared to grand growth phase (22.45%) and maturity phase (18.45%). This is also evident in prominent expression of yellowing symptoms in poor ratooners CoC 671, Co 97009, Co 94012 and Co 99008 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). However, in both the ratoons, varieties Co 86032, Co 99004, Co 97008 and Co 95020 maintained higher chlorophyll content. The total chlorophyll content at formative phase was highly significantly associated with yield of first (r = 0.785<sup>**</sup>) and second ratoon (r = 0.810<sup>**</sup>) crops. Nitrate reductase (NRase) activity at 120 days in the first and second ratoon crops showed 20.5% and 23.5% reduction over plant crop respectively. Varieties Co 97008, Co 85019, Co 99004 and Co 86032 possessed higher NRase activity than the other varieties (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). Similar varietal variation in nitrate reductase activity between poor ratooners (CoC 671 &amp; Co 775) and good ratooners (Co 8021 and Co 1148) was reported in sugarcane<sup> </sup>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27910-ref20">20</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Biomass Production and Partitioning Efficiency (%) of Ratoon Crop</title><p>At early growth phase, production of biomass was comparable in both plant crop and ratoon crops because of faster early growth. However, at the later stages of the crop, the difference in biomass production was marked between plant and ratoon crops (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). At grand growth phase, the reduction in total dry matter production was 23.4% and 32.5% in first and second ratoon crops, respectively. At maturity phase the reduction was 25.1% and 31.0% respectively. Higher reduction in total dry matter production in ratoon crops might be due to higher reduction in tiller production, shoot growth, LAI and higher tiller mortality over plant crop particularly in varieties Co 97009, Co 99008 and Co 94012. A similar varietal difference in biomass production was reported in sugarcane [7,19]. At maturity phase both the ratoon crops showed higher leaf and sheath partitioning efficiency compared to plant crop (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). However, the partitioning efficiency towards stem was less in first (79.0%)</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. Total Dry matter production (kg&#183;m<sup>−2</sup>) at different growth phases of plant and ratoon crops.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27910-formula27561"><graphic  xlink:href="12-2600289\646c7e00-4a39-457c-b697-9f2475c0622f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><sup>*</sup>P = 0.05; <sup>**</sup>P = 0.01.</p><p>and second (72.0%) ratoon crop than the plant crop (89.0%). In both the ratoon crops, varieties Co 86032, Co 97008, Co 99004 and Co 95020 showed higher partitioning efficiency towards stem.</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Yield and Yield Components</title><p>Data on yield and its components viz., NMC, cane length, inernodal length, cane girth, single cane weight and cane yield were recorded at harvest. First ratoon crop showed 16.5, 15.06, 12.5, 6.32, 20.4 &amp; 22.20 mean reductions in NMC, cane length, inernodal length, cane girth, single cane weight, respectively and 27.38% reduction in cane yield. The reduction in yield and yield components was comparatively higher in second ratoon crop, with a mean reduction of 16.0%, 22.4%, 22.3%, 15.2% and 32.4% in NMC, cane length, inernodal length, cane girth, single cane weight. Varieties varied significantly in cane yield and yield components excepting cane girth of both first and second ratoon crops. Varieties, Co 86032, Co 97008, Co 95020 Co 99004 and Co 2000-10 showed better physiological efficiency in terms of plant height, shoot population, leaf size, TDMP, partitioning efficiency, chlorophyll content and nitrate reductase activity and significantly higher yield components (NMC, SCW, cane length, internodal length) and cane yield as compared to poor ratooners Co 99008, Co 94012, Co 8021 and Co 97009. Reports are available that the good ratooning cultivars are those which had attributes for rapid canopy development, early development of adequate stalk numbers for increased interception of light in the early growth, stability of harvested stalk weights to maintain yields over ratoon cycles [8,21,22]. In the subtropical region, sugarcane is harvested under low temperature (early harvesting) and high temperature (late harvest) conditions. The yield of ratoon crop is affected and much influenced by environmental factors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27910-ref14">14</xref>]. However, in present study Co 94012, Co 97009, Co 671 and Co 99008 were appeared stunted in all the growth phases of ratoon crops which resulted in higher reduction of SCW (Tables 2 and 4). Further, higher reduction in ratoon yield in Co 99008, Co 94012, Co 8021, and Co 97009 (&gt;35.00% reduction) due higher reduction in tiller production associated with stunted plant growth and root system, reduction in individual leaf size and LAI, TDMP, total chlorophyll content, poor NMC, intermodal length and SCW. The result obtained in correlation analysis suggested that the variation in the growth, physiological and yield attributing parameters such as plant height, TDMP, stem partitioning efficiency, leaf size, total chlorophyll content, SCW, cane length and cane girth) were highly associated with yield of first and second ratoon crops than that of plant crop (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Hence, the difference in the association between physiological parameters with yield of plant and ratoon crops therefore decides the ratooning potential of the crop.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>To conclude that the identified physiological markers in the present study such as higher plant height, shoot population, leaf size, LAI, TDMP, partitioning efficiency, chlorophyll pigment content and NMC, SCW, cane length, &amp; internodal length could help the breeders to</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>. Cane yield and yield components of plant and ratoon crops.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27910-formula27562"><graphic  xlink:href="12-2600289\92e9e34b-af5e-4990-a927-097e0e17c976.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><sup>*</sup>P = 0.05; <sup>**</sup>P = 0.01.</p><p>screen large number of clones for better ratooning types. On the basis of four years of multi ratooning field experiments, the varieties Co 86032, Co 97008, Co 95020 Co 99004 and Co 2000-10 proved as good ratooners in tropical India.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank the Director, Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore and Head, Division of Crop Production for providing facilities and support.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.27910-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. Sundara, “Sugarcane Ratoons, Their Importance and Establishment,” In: T. R. Shanthy and D. P. Prathap, Eds., Ratoon Management in Sugarcane, Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore, 2008, pp. 6-11.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27910-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. M. G. Bhale, “Effect of Growth Regulators and Cultural Treatment on Productivity of Ratoon Cane,” Indian Sugar, Vol. 44, No. 8, 1994, pp. 645-651.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27910-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. S. Kanwar and H. Kaur, “Further Studies on Improving Productivity of Stubble Crop in Low Temperature Area of North India,” Proceedings of National Seminar on Ratoon Management, Lucknow, 14-15 March 1981, pp. 27-34.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27910-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">N. Singh, R. S. Kanwar and O. Singh, “Effect of Ethrel and Emission on Ratoon Cane Crop Harvested during Low Temperature Period,” Cooperative Sugar, Vol. 19, No. 6, 1988, pp. 391-392.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27910-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">O. Singh and R. S. Kanwar, “Hormonal Efficiency to Trigger Activity of Subterranean Buds of Sugarcane Ratoon under Low Temperature Conditions,” Proceedings of 41st Annual Convention of the Deccan Sugar Technologists’ Association (India), Agricultural Papers Part I, Vol. 1, 1991, pp. 1-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27910-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. P. Verma and R. L. Yadav, “Transfer of Ratoon Management Technology: A Case Study,” Indian Journal of Sugarcane Technology, Vol. 5, No. 1, 1988, pp. 50-53.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27910-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. M. Pol and S. B. Deshmukh, “Comparative Physiological Studies of Seasonal Plant and Ratoon Crops of Six Sugarcane Varieties. 1: Co740 &amp; Co 7219,” Bharatiya Sugar, Vol. 25, No. 1, 1999, pp. 81-88.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27910-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. S. Chapman, R. Ferraris and M. M. Ludlow, “Ratooning Ability of Cane Varieties, Variation in Yield and Yield Components,” Proceedings of Australian Society Sugar Technolaogy, Vol. 14, 1992, pp. 130-138.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27910-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. C. Raheja, “Physiological Research in Rela-tion to Agronomy in India,” Proceedings of the 9th International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists (ISSCT) Congress, New Delhi, 6 January-2 February 1956, pp. 400-418.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27910-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. K. Tripathi, S. S. Gill, G. P. Misra and S. Lal, “Screening of Sugarcane (Saccharum Hybrids) Genotypes for Ratooning Ability,” Indian Sugar, Vol. 32, No. 9, 1982, pp. 577-581.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27910-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Yoshida, D. A. Farmo and K. A. C. Gomez, “Laboratory Manual for Physiology Studies of Rice,” International Rice Research Newsletter, 1972, p. 70.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27910-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. C. Nicholas, J. E. Harper and R. H. Hageman, “Nitrate Reductase Activity in Soybean. I. Effects of Light and Temperature,” Plant Physiology, Vol. 58, No. 6, 1976, pp. 731-735. doi:10.1104/pp.58.6.731</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27910-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">N. Berding, A. P. Hurney, B. Salter and G. D. Bonnet, “Agronomic Impact of Sucker Development in Sugarcane under Different Environmental Conditions,” Field Crops Research, Vol. 92, No. 2-3, 2005, pp. 203-217. 
doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2005.01.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27910-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. K. Shrivastava, A. K. Ghosh and V. P. Agnihotri, “Sugarcane Ratoons,” Oxford &amp; I.B.H. Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 1992, p. 182.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27910-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. K. Shrivastava, K. Singh, A. K. Ghosh and Y. R. Saxena, “Leaf Initiation as Influenced by Growth and Development in Plant and Ratoon Crop of Sugarcane,” Journal of Sugarcane Technology, Vol. 5, No. 1, 1985, pp. 5-10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27910-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. C. Raheja and G. N. Misra, “Growth of Ratoon Crop as Affected by Spacings,” Proceedings of Bien. Conference Research and Development Workers, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1954, pp. 404-414.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27910-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. K. Shrivastava, Y. R. Saxena and K. Singh, “Production Physiology of sugarcane cultivar Co 1148,” Technical Bulletin No. 15, Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow, 1985, p. 128.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27910-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. M. Gajera, H. S. Patel, M. P. Patel, P. L. Nair and N. J. Mehta, “Correlation Studies in Sugarcane,” Indian Sugar, Vol. 15, No. 12, 1991, pp. 875-876.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27910-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Nalini, “Studies on Enzymology of Sucrose Accumulation in Plant and Ratoon Crop of Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) Varieties,” MS. Dissertation, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27910-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. Ramanujam and P. N. Gururaja Rao, “Performance of Sugarcane Genotypes in Rationing,” Annual Report, Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore, 1991, p. 41.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27910-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. Sundara, “Studies on Multiratoon-ng Potential of Sugarcane Varieties,” 58th Annual Convention, STAI, 14-16 September 1996, pp. 3-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27910-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. Sundara, P. Sankaranarayanan, and M. B. G. R. Batcha, “Varietal Characteristics Affecting Ratooning Potential of Sugarcane,” Sugarcane, No. 6, 1992, pp. 1-4.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>