Usually coracoid-fractures are “chain-injuries” in association with complex shoulder injuries. Coracoid fractures have been described as uncommon injuries [1-3]. The incidence has been assessed at between 3% and 13% of all scapular fractures; these constitute 1% of all fractures and 5% of those of the shoulder [4]. Isolated injuries of coracoid are a rare occurrence with few scattered reports in literature [5-7].

An office goer, presented to our tertiary referral centre, with history of severe pain in the right infraclavicular region and difficulty in moving his right shoulder and using right upper limb. He had sustained a motor vehicle accident (MVA) three days back after his car crashed on the highway. He was initially treated at a community hospital where the shoulder x rays were done and he was treated with analgesics and a sling. He had no injuries in the cranium, cervical spine or chest.

The examination revealed fullness in the right infraclavicular region. He supported his right arm flexed at the elbow, with the left hand. Tenderness was elicited over the coracoid with credits on deeper palpation. All movements of the shoulder were severely painful and were restricted. There was no distal neurovascular deficit.

The anteroposterior and axial x-ray of the shoulder showed a displaced fracture of the coracoid (Figure 1). The cervical spine and chest x ray were unremarkable. A CT scan with 3dimensional reconstruction of the shoulder was done to look for any associated injuries in the shoulder girdle. This showed only a displaced fracture at the base of the coracoid process without any other injuries (Figures 2 and 3).

Patient was placed under general anesthesia and examination of shoulder joint was done. There were no signs of instability. At this time patient was placed in a beach chair position and parts were cleaned and draped in standard orthopedic fashion. An anterior delto pectoral approach was used for exposure of the fracture site. After identifying the cephalic vein in the Deltopectoral interval and moving it laterally, the clavicpectoral fascia was divided and the coracoid process and the fracture site were identified. The coracoid fragment was found avulsed from the base with the pectoralis minor and short head of biceps attached to it. The fragment was reduced on to the

scapula and provisionally held with a K wire, which was placed under x ray guidance. The coracoclavicular and coraco acromial ligaments were found to be intact. The definitive fixation of the fragment was done with two 6 mm partially threaded cancellous screws with washer (Figure 4). The fixation was checked under image intensifier.

Post operatively patient was on a shoulder arm pouch with gentle shoulder move ments started from second post operative day. The post operative radiograph showed good reduction of the fracture with implants in

situ. (Figure 5) The sutures were removed at two weeks post op. The abduction and external rotations were however commenced from third week post surgery.

The fracture went on to unite at 8 weeks post operatively and patient had achieved full range of moments of the affected shoulder. At two years follow up the fracture was found well united and clinically the patient had normal shoulder function (Figures 6 and 7).

Isolated Fractures of the coracoid occur from direct blow to the coracoid or to the point of the shoulder [8,9]. Coracoid fractures may occur in association with acromioclavicular dislocation with the coracoclavicular ligaments remaining intact [10-12]. The various modes of coracoid fractures include avulsion by muscle pull of biceps and coracobrachialis [13], direct contact of dislocating humeral head [14,15], fatigue fractures [16], as a complication of tape fixation of acromioclavicular joint [15] or from medial migration of humeral head from cuff arthropathy. In our patient the mechanism of injury was an injury sustained as the car he was driving toppled in a highway.

Though the exact mechanism of injury in a motor vehicle accident may be difficult to explain, the most likely mechanism is that severe muscle contraction forces by the short head of biceps and the pectoralis minor, on the coracoid process, as the person was fastened with seatbelt, have avulsed the base of the coracoid from the scapula. An indirect muscle contraction forces rather than a direct injury to the shoulder explains the absence of associated “chain injuries” with this rare injury.

Coracoid fractures can be missed on the normal routine AP view. It is best visualized by the following views Axillary View, An Anteroposterior Cephalic Tilt View, Stryker Notch view [17] and a Goldberg view [18].

However the best investigation remains Ct scan with 3 d reconstruction which can show associated injuries as well. In the current situation the extent of fracture and degree of displacement was well appreciated on the 3-D CT.

The fracture sites reported in adults are: the base of the process [2], sometimes this fracture line may extend across the suprascapular notch into the upper third of glenoid [19]. The other sites include the mid substance of the coracoid [1] and the tip [3,20].

A critical review of literature suggests that the treatment modalities are dictated by the degree of displacement, associated injuries and location of fracture. There is near consensus that undisplaced/minimally displaced fractures of the coracoid base should be treated by conservative means [21,22]. In injuries in which coracoid base is displaced excellent results have been obtained following open reduction [23-25] The jury is divided when it comes to coracoid process injury with acromiclavicular injury with both conservative and operative treatment offering equally favorable results [8,26-28]. Wilbur [26] et al. recommend that surgery should be done if there is significant displacement and compression of brachial plexus. Eyres [29] et al. recommend that in patients with significant separation of Ac joint and displacement of coracoid both should be treated by open reduction and fixed using the transacromial threaded pin. They have also recommended that open reduction is the preferred treatment modality if fracture extends into glenoid fossa or if there is an obstruction to reduction of anterior shoulder dislocation.

OGAWA [30] et al. described 67 consecutive fractures of the coracoid in their report [8] and they classified them based on the relationship between the fracture site and the coracoclavicular ligament. Fifty three fractures were behind the ligament (type 1) and the remaining 11 fractures were front of the ligament (type 2). They described type 1 fractures were associated with a wide variety of shoulder injuries and consequent dissociation between the scapula and the clavicle. The fractures anterior to the ligament were treated conservatively. They concluded that the operative treatment should be reserved for patients with multiple shoulder injuries with severe disruption of the scapuloclavicular connection. For fractures involving the tip few authors [31,32] have recommended that the tip be excised followed by reattachment of the conjoined tendons to the remaining coracoid process.

In summary, there is no consensus about the treatment of isolated coracoid fractures. One has to adopt a la carte approach and treat every patient on a case to case basis. In our case the young adult had significant displacement; hence surgery was a reasonable option.

We recommend that a displaced, isolated fracture of the coracoid be treated with open reduction and osteosynthesis, to avoid immobilization of the extremity and for good radiological union and clinical function.

^*Corresponding author.