<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2013.42024</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-27718</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Spiky Development at the Interface in Rayleigh-Taylor Instability: Layzer Approximation with Second Harmonic
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ahul</surname><given-names>Banerjee</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Labakanta</surname><given-names>Mandal</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Manoranjan</surname><given-names>Khan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mithil</surname><given-names>Ranjan Gupta</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Instrumentation Science, Centre for Plasma Studies, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>rbanerjee.math@gmail.com(AB)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>05</day><month>02</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>174</fpage><lpage>179</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>June</day>	<month>19,</month>	<year>2012</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>October</day>	<month>20,</month>	<year>2012</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>November</day>	<month>13,</month>	<year>2012</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p><html>
 <head></head>
 
   Layzer’s approximation method for investigation of two fluid interface structures associated with Rayleigh Taylor instability for arbitrary Atwood number is extended with the inclusion of second harmonic mode leaving out the zeroth harmonic one. The modification makes the fluid velocities vanish at infinity and leads to avoidance of the need to make the unphysical assumption of the existence of a time dependent source at infinity. The present analysis shows that for an initial interface perturbation with curvature exceeding <img alt="" src="Edit_44de177b-b117-4713-8dc8-7d775f5bcc2d.bmp" width="34" height="15" />, where A is the Atwood number there occurs an almost free fall of the spike with continuously increasing sharpening as it falls. The curvature at the tip of the spike also increases with Atwood number. Certain initial condition may also result in occurrence of finite time singularity as found in case of conformal mapping technique used earlier. However bubble growth rate is not appreciably affected. 
 
</html></p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Rayleigh Taylor Instability; Bubble; Spike; ICF; Supernova</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Hydrodynamic instabilities such as Rayleigh Taylor instability (RTI) which sets in when a lighter fluid supports a heavier fluid against gravity or Richtmyer Meshkov instability (RMI) which is initiated when a shock passes an interface between two fluids with different acoustic impedances are of increasing importance in a wide range of physical phenomena starting from inertial confinement fusion (ICF) to astrophysical ones like supernova explosions. In ICF, the capsule shell undergoes the RTI both in the acceleration and deceleration phases. RTI can retard the formation of the hot spot by the cold RTI spike of capsule shell resulting in the destruction of the ignition hot spot or autoignition [1-4]. The hydrodynamic instabilities lead to development of heavy fluid “spikes” penetrating into the lighter fluid and “bubbles” of lighter fluid rising through the heavier fluid. Different approaches have been used for the study of such problems. Among these Layzer’s [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27718-ref5">5</xref>] approach applied to single mode potential flow model [6-11] is a useful one giving approximate estimate of both Rayleigh Taylor and Richtmyer Meshkov instability evolution. The bubbles were shown by Zhang [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27718-ref7">7</xref>] to rise at a rate tending asymptotically to a terminally constant velocity while spikes were shown to descend with a constant acceleration. However, whether for bubbles or for the spikes, Zhang’s analysis was applicable only for Atwood number A = 1, i.e., only for fluid-vacuum interface. An extension to arbitrary value of Atwood number A was done by Goncharov [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27718-ref8">8</xref>]. Within limitations of Layzer’s model as pointed out by Mikaelian [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27718-ref12">12</xref>] bubbles were shown to rise with a velocity tending to an asymptotic value dependent on A and having a fairly close agreement with the simulation results of Ramaprabhu et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27718-ref13">13</xref>]. But the spikes were found to descend with a terminal constant velocity in contrast to a constant acceleration as obtained by Zhang [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27718-ref7">7</xref>] for A = 1.</p><p>Asymptotic spike evolution in Rayleigh Taylor instability behaving almost as a free fall was obtained by Clavin and Williams [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27718-ref14">14</xref>] and also by Duchemin et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27718-ref15">15</xref>] by conformal mapping method. Associated with the free fall of the spike, the surface curvature of the spike was also found to increase with time (i.e. the spike sharpens as it falls).</p><p>The present paper described the dynamics of bubble and spike tips arising at the two fluid interfacial structure due to RTI with extended Layzer’s model replacing the zeroth harmonic term [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27718-ref8">8</xref>] by second harmonic term to satisfy the condition that the fluid velocity vanishes at infinity. The obtained asymptotic velocity of the bubble tip is slightly large compared to the classical value derived by Goncharov [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27718-ref8">8</xref>] and coincide when A = 1. Although the asymptotic curvature of the bubble tip remain unchanged. On the other hand, the curvature of the spike tip is an increasing function of time as well as Atwood number. As time increases, the tip of the spike is shown to become sharpen and falling nearly free fall.</p><p>This paper is organized in the following manner. In Section 2, we described the potential flow model with extended Layzer’s approach and derived the governing equations of the interfacial structure. The behavior of the bubble and spike tips are discussed analytically and numerically in Section 3 and finally we conclude the results in Section 5.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Basic Model and Governing Equation</title><p>In the single mode Layzer model with generalization [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27718-ref8">8</xref>] for arbitrary Atwood number the equation to the interface taken in X-Y plane as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27718-formula99920"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500813\c8c89682-5cf6-4495-897e-c75825bdd0e9.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with<img src="4-7500813\26af1424-6e00-4bcf-a84b-f09df4e22359.jpg" />, <img src="4-7500813\0453baf1-50eb-4cd2-8f43-e1fedb8a6af6.jpg" />for bubble while<img src="4-7500813\13d7769a-e189-45dc-a01a-6e0cb2191474.jpg" />, <img src="4-7500813\c5e48069-b816-4265-be86-8a6d1b1cc9e4.jpg" />for spike. The velocity potential describing the motion of the heavier fluid (density<img src="4-7500813\6963319a-e3e7-4259-b7d1-6bcdb711923f.jpg" />) and the lighter fluid (density<img src="4-7500813\381d366b-1250-4aab-a626-80c3839e46f0.jpg" />) are (gravity g is along the negative y direction)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27718-formula99921"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500813\21ac0443-2bea-4dfa-9efb-ccceaba4f749.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.27718-formula99922"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500813\9465b6ad-bf6e-4c36-93cd-a0fab0e9b015.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where k is the wave number and<img src="4-7500813\a81a24cf-10c2-4f66-815c-8786be68fdf1.jpg" />, <img src="4-7500813\cff4eb47-09bb-45ad-849e-9b01bb7484be.jpg" />, <img src="4-7500813\f644ebeb-f0b8-4908-a877-19b88cc7d158.jpg" />are amplitudes. This conventional single mode Layzer model has the drawback that rather than conforming to the physical requirement: <img src="4-7500813\7c85574e-f8ed-46f7-98e3-2a0e100c7687.jpg" />as <img src="4-7500813\cce7a5f0-9c7d-4f1a-bd52-1e837baf1ef6.jpg" /> it necessitates the assumption of a time dependent source at <img src="4-7500813\05f64f77-42c3-4d79-83f8-7435f24e6cc6.jpg" /> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27718-ref16">16</xref>]. To avoid this difficulty we modify the single mode Layzer model by replacing the zeroth mode term <img src="4-7500813\42861c11-d1bd-4b17-847a-09c6c0bfcf4a.jpg" /> in Equation (3) by a second harmonic term viz,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27718-formula99923"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500813\378ef684-fd7d-41ee-9166-8bedf4569e53.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equations (2) and (4) give</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27718-formula99924"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500813\b73a9a2e-9625-444f-abb7-3ac97b560777.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.27718-formula99925"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500813\c6511581-c80b-4da8-8c0f-617513f4e762.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The kinematic boundary conditions at the interface (1) are</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27718-formula99926"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500813\d84bc730-46ef-4310-b7b0-8a3fbaff6c12.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.27718-formula99927"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500813\0eb0ed0f-5a9f-4d32-9418-218fcf588bb4.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Setting the pressure boundary condition <img src="4-7500813\1c706461-d51b-45cc-8ea9-7aa3de8e42e9.jpg" /> in Bernoulli’s equation for the heavier and lighter fluids leads to [7,8,11,17-22]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27718-formula99928"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500813\ea4f75df-68d5-408f-80ca-1b4dac8e4bff.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Following the usual procedure [19-22], i.e., expanding <img src="4-7500813\ae46d39f-4e5c-44c1-b36c-01b9601ec33f.jpg" /> and the velocity potentials in powers of <img src="4-7500813\7291ae62-18e3-45c9-9245-4daed6d2730e.jpg" /> and equating coefficients of<img src="4-7500813\dcb7bbe2-4e0d-4510-942b-670d55d6f71d.jpg" />, <img src="4-7500813\913930f4-625c-4e91-9f42-c8658b300a12.jpg" />we obtain from Equations (7)-(9) the evolution equation for the RT bubbles/spikes (non-dimensionalized) tip elevation <img src="4-7500813\fff49d0d-7733-424b-b7c3-a7cfd9ea3cc1.jpg" />, curvature <img src="4-7500813\75a2b2ac-b16b-48e5-914b-99e28496171f.jpg" /> and velocity <img src="4-7500813\bfedcfc6-93d4-4782-94e3-a92d4882818f.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.27718-formula99929"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500813\a44a78cd-1eba-46e9-9b3a-21286691047c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.27718-formula99930"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500813\2981b80e-3f90-4fd6-bd48-ac19b3a13924.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.27718-formula99931"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500813\962f7aaa-50d1-42ed-98a7-66da1ab443ea.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27718-formula99932"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500813\9a2bbd4a-937b-4f73-8cfc-64829545d477.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27718-formula99933"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500813\09a7b494-125c-40a1-9b17-04ac73bd55be.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is nondimensionalized time.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>Starting from a set of initial values<img src="4-7500813\40550048-ff26-4360-8077-9c849ecf30ea.jpg" />, <img src="4-7500813\0d784fdb-c357-4f23-9b10-1647e402fb12.jpg" />and <img src="4-7500813\27fe6640-a6f4-40a6-a6c2-d383608a6948.jpg" /> which correspond to the description of temporal evolution of the tip of the bubble we arrive at the asymptotic value <img src="4-7500813\cecfe0b5-72dd-453f-a9dc-9441a46a3634.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.27718-formula99934"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500813\4da75590-26fe-446b-97c0-e681d8b0cf8e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27718-formula99935"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500813\93d7b5b1-2d4a-4e59-b382-d673fe2d9b37.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>(by classical we mean the single mode Layzer approximation as used by Goncharov [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27718-ref8">8</xref>]). Two values coincide as<img src="4-7500813\3def7a84-641a-44be-924c-f09b7743e04a.jpg" />. The growth rate of the development of the height of the bubble tip is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> and compared with classical value. It is seen that presence or absence of a source does not give rise to any qualitatively significant change in the growth rate of the bubble height [8,9,17].</p><p>To get spike like behavior of the perturbation of the interface we used</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27718-formula99936"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500813\e09ef2cb-3b43-44a1-ac6c-a6f2b16fb45d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Corresponding to a start from an initial value</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27718-formula99937"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500813\bc65e55c-595b-48aa-af41-9f8881e17891.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (11) shows that <img src="4-7500813\f46e58be-daff-415d-8f1f-a5409043883f.jpg" /> increases monotonically</p><p>(<img src="4-7500813\19ad1cb1-35e9-44d5-9e53-0bede98c34db.jpg" />for all<img src="4-7500813\270e6128-9080-42dc-877c-62dda0758ac8.jpg" />) while from Equation (12) it follows that the depth of the spike tip below the surface of separation increases continuously (<img src="4-7500813\e0f510cc-3a6a-4580-867a-af44e6ee27f5.jpg" />and<img src="4-7500813\05ae5756-1b83-48c7-9e47-4cbafe26d259.jpg" />). These are shown in Figures 2(a) and (b) by plotting <img src="4-7500813\8438379a-d76b-440c-94d6-b0bdbf4d8746.jpg" /> and <img src="4-7500813\8e46636e-ff12-4f26-b10e-d5d0ee81e4b1.jpg" /> as function of <img src="4-7500813\594500f2-10f1-4e1a-a4c5-19c25b3903d6.jpg" /> obtained from numerical solution of Equations (11) and (12) by employing fifth order Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg method. The initial value taken are <img src="4-7500813\98b72a6a-f62a-4d98-ac73-6e27ad31be35.jpg" /> and <img src="4-7500813\d8c8cbc8-991c-4d2e-a453-a35c7b2566ce.jpg" /> −0.5 which satisfy condition (17) for all the following three values of<img src="4-7500813\69ba995e-f386-4019-a516-077c5c43f877.jpg" />, <img src="4-7500813\9cdcff43-3ca0-4b1d-ba02-099241281c1d.jpg" />,</p><p><img src="4-7500813\f4852274-1b21-41d3-860e-8727e23fe2a8.jpg" />. The value of <img src="4-7500813\5d9c99ab-317e-43cf-81b9-16bf308a0846.jpg" /> which represents the curvature at the tip of the spike is an increasing function of <img src="4-7500813\61730f01-878b-400b-8c5c-5f4f6e865211.jpg" /> for every value of the Atwood number A (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a)). Moreover for every given value of <img src="4-7500813\8b46deba-42f9-42cd-9a37-62f0f464c4cb.jpg" /> the curvature <img src="4-7500813\46b18ccc-d9b7-41d9-9ddf-cdaf0ef0a4e1.jpg" /> increases with A. This implies that the spike continues to sharpen with time as well as with increasing</p><p>Atwood number and is explicitly shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(b) shows that except very close to the starting instant the spike descends with a constant acceleration <img src="4-7500813\da97b155-bd42-4a4c-8034-d5a3943dc23b.jpg" /> (i.e., nearly a free fall). This agrees with the conclusions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27718-ref7">7</xref>] for Atwood number A = 1.</p><p>The time development of spiky behavior for <img src="4-7500813\6fc8cad6-c64e-40c6-bf5a-5d7d81c40e9a.jpg" /></p><p><img src="4-7500813\8d5d8c41-7d9f-4069-a811-aaf0c0e5cc40.jpg" />and <img src="4-7500813\3825b311-a491-436a-941e-2adf0d9206d9.jpg" /> is demonstrated in Figures 4(a) and (b). This is shown both for increasing A with fixed <img src="4-7500813\c73a5fe0-71a5-4f92-8094-23e636576bd8.jpg" /> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a)) and with increasing <img src="4-7500813\e70c07b5-8457-48e3-9617-6bb09dd2e513.jpg" /> for given A (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b)). But for <img src="4-7500813\168c0c0b-1af4-4a9a-b48f-4438bebf366c.jpg" /> with</p><p><img src="4-7500813\b71917d5-aa50-4d46-94c2-cc9cbef41d90.jpg" />one encounters development of finite time singularity i.e., <img src="4-7500813\329379b2-047c-4369-a3a6-5b2a6f652027.jpg" />and <img src="4-7500813\b720fc46-2fbb-4353-853c-08fcdde50800.jpg" /> at a finite value of<img src="4-7500813\a7b14c2e-0ab5-4b08-82e9-b663eb545dbe.jpg" />. The possibility of the occurrence of such an eventuality at (or near) the tip of the spike is also found to arise when the RT instability is addressed by conformal mapping method [23,24] as mentioned by Clavin and Williams [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27718-ref14">14</xref>].</p><p>Finally for a trajectory starting from <img src="4-7500813\7a8ce0dc-6d7e-401c-bc46-c72b24a63757.jpg" /> and</p><p><img src="4-7500813\59ac33a3-fe77-49c7-bf25-cc9e81b06ba6.jpg" />one finds that <img src="4-7500813\dd6d72bd-0116-45dc-ae29-2b5792eca7e1.jpg" /> continues to increase towards<img src="4-7500813\b0bf621f-cae3-4510-ba8e-9f8c10f58ead.jpg" />, i.e., the spike continues to sharpen as time progresses and its speed of fall slowly decreases in magnitude. Because of the presence of singularity at <img src="4-7500813\70af9f16-aaa2-4846-aed6-64438d336dd1.jpg" /> (Equation (12)), it is not possible to continue the numerical integration towards and beyond this point. This is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> for initial values in the domain mentioned above.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>In this report, we have extended the Layzer’s model with</p><p>the inclusion of second harmonic term. In asymptotic stage, the velocity of the tip of the bubble becomes</p><p><img src="4-7500813\af57f3a5-27a5-46d5-b59b-5f7fe4924fad.jpg" />which is slightly large compared to classical value and agree with the previous obtained results. However, in case of spike, the curvature of the spike tip is increasing with time as well as the Atwood number</p><p>and as time goes the spike becomes sharpen and behave like a free fall. This is a theoretical work supported by the other previous results.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Acknowledgements</title><p>This work is supported by the C.S.I.R, Government of India under ref. no. R-10/B/1/09.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.27718-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. D. Lindl, P. Amendt, R. L. Berger, S. G. Glendinning, S. H. Glenzer, S. W. Haan, R. L. Kauffmann, O. L. Landen and L. J. Suter, “The Physics Basis for Ignition Using Indirect-Drive Targets on the National Ignition Facility,” Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2004, pp. 339-491.  
doi:10.1063/1.1578638</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27718-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. Batani, W. Nazakov, T. Hall, T. Lower, M. Koenig, B. Faral, A. B. Mounaix, N. Grandjouan, “Foam-Induced Smoothing Studied through Laser-Driven Shock Waves,” Physical Review E, Vol. 62, No. 6, 2000, pp. 3573-3582. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.62.8573</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27718-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Dezulian, F. Canova, S. Barbanotti, et al., “Hugoniot Data of Plastic Foams Obtained from Laser-Driven Shocks,” Physical Review E, Vol. 73, No. 4, 2006, pp. 047401-1-047401-4. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.73.047401</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27718-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Atzeni and J. Meyer-Ter-Vehn, “The Physics of Inertial Fusion: Beam Plasma Interaction, Hydrodynamics, Hot Dense Mater,” Oxford University, London, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27718-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. Layzer, “On the Instability of Superposed Fluids in a Gravitational Field,” Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 122, No. 1, 1955, pp. 1-12. doi:10.1086/146048</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27718-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Hecht, U. Alon and D. Shvarts, “Potential Flow Models of Rayleigh-Taylor and Richtmyer-Meshkov Bubble Fronts,” Physical Fluids, Vol. 6, No. 12, 1994, pp. 4019-4030.  
doi:10.1063/1.868391</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27718-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Q. Zhang, “Analytical Solutions of Layzer-Type Approach to Unstable Interfacial Fluid Mixing,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 81, No. 16, 1998, pp. 3391-3394.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3391</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27718-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. N. Goncharov, “Analytical Model of Nonlinear, Single-Mode, Classical Rayleigh-Taylor Instability at Arbitrary Atwood Numbers,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 88, No. 13, 2002, pp. 134502-1-134502-4.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.134502</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27718-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S.-I. Sohn and Q. Zhang, “Late Time Behavior of Bubbles at Unstable Interfaces in Two Dimensions,” Physical Fluids, Vol. 13, No. 11, 2001, pp. 3493-3495.  
doi:10.1063/1.1410119</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27718-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S.-I. Sohn, “Analytic Solutions of Unstable Interfaces for All Density Ratios in Axisymmetric Flows,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 177, No. 2, 2005, pp. 367-374. doi:10.1016/j.cam.2004.09.026</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27718-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S.-I. Sohn, “Simple Potential-Flow Model of Rayleigh-Taylor and Richtmyer-Meshkov Instabilities for All Density Ratios,” Physical Review E, Vol. 67, No. 2, 2003, pp. 026301-1-026301-5. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.67.026301</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27718-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. O. Mikaelian, “Limitations and Failures of the Layzer Model for Hydrodynamic Instabilities,” Physical Review E, Vol. 78, No. 1, 2008, pp. 015303-1-015303-4.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.78.015303</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27718-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Ramaprabhu, G. Dimonte, Y.-N. Young, A. C. Calder and B. Fryxell, “Limits of the Potential Flow Approach to the Single-Mode Rayleigh-Taylor Problem,” Physical Review E, Vol. 74, No. 6, 2006, pp. 066308-1-066308-10.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.74.066308</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27718-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Clavin and F. Williams, “Asymptotic Spike Evolution in Rayleigh? Taylor Instability,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 525, No. 5, 2005, pp. 105-113.  
doi:10.1017/S0022112004002630</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27718-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. Duchemin, C. Josserand and P. Clavin, “Asymptotic Behavior of the Rayleigh-Taylor Instability,” Physical Review Letter, Vol. 94, No. 22, 2005, pp. 224501-1-224501-4. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.224501</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27718-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. I. Abarzhi, K. Nishihara and J. Glimm, “Rayleigh? Taylor and Richtmyer? Meshkov Instabilities for Fluids with a Finite Density Ratio,” Physical Review A, Vol. 317, No. 5-6, 2003, pp. 470-475.  
doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2003.09.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27718-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S.-I. Sohn, “Bubble Interaction Model for Hydrodynamic Unstable Mixing,” Physical Review E, Vol. 75, No. 6, 2007, pp. 066312-1-066312-12.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.75.066312</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27718-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S.-I. Sohn, “Effects of Surface Tension and Viscosity on the Growth Rates of Rayleigh-Taylor and Richt-Myer-Meshkov Instabilities,” Physical Review E, Vol. 80, No. 5, 2009, pp. 055302-1-55302-4. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.80.055302</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27718-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. R. Gupta, S. Roy, M. Khan, H. C. Pant, S. Sarkar and M. K. Srivastava, “Effect of Compressibility on the Rayleigh? Taylor and Richtmyer? Meshkov Instability Induced Nonlinear Structure at Two Fluid Interface,” Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2009, pp. 032303-1-032303-12. doi:10.1063/1.3074789</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27718-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Betti and J. Sanz, “Bubble Acceleration in the Ablative Rayleigh-Taylor Instability,” Physical Review Letter, Vol. 97, No. 20, 2006, pp. 205002-1-205002-4.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.205002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27718-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. R. Gupta, L. Mandal, S. Roy and M. Khan, “Effect of Magnetic Field on Temporal Development of Rayleigh? Taylor Instability Induced Interfacial Nonlinear Structure,” Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2010, pp. 012306-1-012306-12. doi:10.1063/1.3293120</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27718-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Banerjee, L. Mandal, S. Roy, M. Khan and M. R. Gupta, “Combined Effect of Viscosity and Vorticity on Single Mode Rayleigh? Taylor Instability Bubble Growth,” Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2011, pp. 022109-1-022109-5. doi:10.1063/1.3555523</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27718-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. Yoshikawa and A. Balk, “A Conformal-Mapping Model for Bubbles and Fingers of the Rayleigh-Taylor Instability,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, Vol. 38, No. 1-2, 2003, pp. 113-121.  
doi:10.1016/S0895-7177(03)90009-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27718-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Tanveer, “Singularities in Water Waves and Rayleigh-Taylor Instability,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, Vol. 441, No. 1913, 1993, pp. 501-525.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>