<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2013.41016</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-27242</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Electric Multipole Polarizabilities of Quantum Bound Systems in the Transition Matrix Formalism
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ladyslav</surname><given-names>F. Kharchenko</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>vkharchenko@bitp.kiev.ua</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>11</day><month>01</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>99</fpage><lpage>107</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>October</day>	<month>5,</month>	<year>2012</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>November</day>	<month>6,</month>	<year>2012</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>November</day>	<month>14,</month>	<year>2012</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   A new general formalism for determining the electric multipole polarizabilities of quantum (atomic and nuclear) bound systems based on the use of the transition matrix in momentum space has been developed. As distinct from the conventional approach with the application of the spectral expansion of the total Green’s function, our approach does not require preliminary determination of the entire unperturbated spectrum; instead, it makes possible to calculate the polarizability of a few-body bound complex directly based on solving integral equations for the wave function of the ground bound state and the transition matrix at negative energy, both of them being real functions of momenta. A formula for the multipole polarizabilities of a two-body bound complex formed by a central interaction potential has been derived and studied. To test, the developed t-matrix formalism has been applied to the calculation of the dipole, quadrupole and octupole polarizabilities of the hydrogen atom. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Electric Multipole Polarizabilities; Few-Body Quantum Systems; Hydrogen Atom</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Study of the few-body quantum systems persists a perspective line of the advancement of the modern physics. In atomic physics, the Efimov effect for the three-body system, the existence of which was predicted in 1970 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27242-ref1">1</xref>], has been experimentally verified using ultracold atoms and tuning the atom-atom scattering length by the magnetic field near a Feshbach resonance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27242-ref2">2</xref>] (see, for example, the reviews [3-5]). In nuclear physics, extensive investigations of few-body nuclei advantageously undertaken over the past fifty years make it possible to gain new important information about the nuclear force.</p><p>The investigation of the behaviour of the few-body nuclei in the external electromagnetic field permits to obtain additional data on their properties, specifically, on the electric polarizabilities and magnetic susceptibilities as important fundamental quantities of complex systems. In spite of the fact that the study of the electric polarizabilities of the few-body nuclei has attracted considerable interest from both the experimental [6-11] and theoretical [11-24] points of view and definite progress in the field has been reached, a great deal needs to be done in this area.</p><p>Up to now, there exists a discrepancy between the direct experimental result for the electric dipole polarizability of the nucleus <sup>3</sup>He (determined by measuring deviations from the Rutherford scattering law of the lowenergy elastic <sup>3</sup>He scattering by the Coulomb field of the heavy nucleus <sup>208</sup>Pb [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27242-ref8">8</xref>]) and the result deduced from the data for the total <sup>3</sup>He photoabsorption cross section using the sum rule <img src="16-7501034\1023ba33-d2f9-4be9-afee-380a3192c23b.jpg" /> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27242-ref9">9</xref>].</p><p>The conventional formula for the electric dipole polarizability of the <img src="16-7501034\48c4d80a-0b57-4db3-ad8a-28a2fdf9872f.jpg" />-particle bound complex has the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41678"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\c46fbcd4-c9c6-4a0c-9c0c-d91bd1a61c3d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="16-7501034\e6dee549-c2bd-4c96-acf1-7e70dcf9668d.jpg" /> is the dipole moment operator, <img src="16-7501034\be4c1b46-5273-402c-a9f8-59e10e33528c.jpg" />and <img src="16-7501034\251c0acb-d83c-4150-932e-8146293780db.jpg" /> are the energy and the wave function of the v-excited state, <img src="16-7501034\ead7034e-af24-4e3a-89b0-3610a8bf3246.jpg" />and <img src="16-7501034\ef1be30a-4305-4a83-97b5-82c20e87259c.jpg" /> are the radius vectors of the particle 1 relative to the center of mass of the bound complex and the center of mass of the complex relative to the charged particle 0 creating the electric field, and the summation is taken over all possible excited discrete bound and continuum states.</p><p>Although the Formula (1) using the spectral expansion can be practically applied in the case of the two-body complex<img src="16-7501034\ae80bab4-56e1-430a-8116-ec698abcf9a0.jpg" />, the direct determination of <img src="16-7501034\01acac33-e588-4836-b9ce-bbd971be9914.jpg" /> for three and more body complexes <img src="16-7501034\94f5b110-7f82-408c-858b-65de59287652.jpg" /> by this relation with the performed beforehand calculation of all discrete and continuum states is not feasible. The known method of Dalgarno and Lewis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27242-ref25">25</xref>] permits to bypass the difficulty related with taking account of the intermediate continuum states in all possible channels in Equation (1) introducing an additional function<img src="16-7501034\28612e0e-1b7c-4523-8b32-46382368ce2d.jpg" />,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41679"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\dd9af467-7267-4cea-8ca4-795d20ef5256.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="16-7501034\dd2340d2-b2b6-4dc7-8055-ad168acbd935.jpg" /> being the first-order correction to the unperturbated state satisfies an inhomogeneous differential equation. Dalgarno-Lewis method has been effectively applied in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27242-ref12">12</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27242-ref22">22</xref>] to calculate the electric polarizabilities of hydrogen and helium isotopes. Though the result for <img src="16-7501034\db477b56-c5c1-4619-aef9-4e28ccdc1b7a.jpg" /> obtained therewith supports the value deduced using the sum rule <img src="16-7501034\2bcfdcef-b0c7-4616-88f5-0d0a3a4d1337.jpg" /> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27242-ref9">9</xref>], the subject of the discrepancy of the experimental data for <sup>3</sup>He under discussion may not be considered as conclusively established since indispensable consistent calculations of the electric dipole polarizabilities of the three-body nuclei on the basis of the rigorous mathematical Faddeev’s [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27242-ref26">26</xref>] formalism have not be performed yet.</p><p>In this paper we formulate the direct t-matrix approach to determination of the electric polarizabilities of a bound system that relies on the solution of the integral equations for both the bound-state wave function and corresponding components of the partial transition matrix of the system. In Section 2, following the Watson-Feshbach method, we express the polarization potential describing interaction between a charge particle and a bound complex consisting of <img src="16-7501034\fb1ee966-3a10-47a9-a70d-24769ed8f29a.jpg" /> particles in terms of a “truncated” Green’s operator of the system. In this way we obtain a general expression for the electric multipole polarizability of the system. In Section 3 the t-matrix approach to determination of the electric polarizabilities is formulated and simplifications of the general formula assuming conservation of the space parity and the total orbital moment of the system are considered. Section 4 is devoted to the application of the elaborated formalism to the two-body bound systems with the central interaction. It is shown that the electric <img src="16-7501034\a168da57-43b5-4f4b-bc96-2600c3120df9.jpg" />-pole polarizability of the two-particle <img src="16-7501034\8db545a5-0ed6-4cc7-9f2d-204aa2e62380.jpg" />-state bound complex contains information both on derivatives (of the order <img src="16-7501034\ed6a8695-388c-41c7-9da6-808c93ca3237.jpg" /> and lower) of the wave function in momentum space and on the partial component of the transition matrix that corresponds to the orbital state with<img src="16-7501034\17a827cb-570d-48e9-a9cd-1b9739241c52.jpg" />. Section 5 contains the application of the t-matrix formalism to determination of the electric multipole polarizabilities of the hydrogen atom and discussion. Section 6 is devoted to conclusion.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Polarization Potential</title><p>The formula for the polarization potential describing the interaction between a charged particle 0 and a bound complex consisting of <img src="16-7501034\a16503b4-0e69-4343-9161-f69571652c3c.jpg" /> particles follows immediately when treating the <img src="16-7501034\a63a3bd4-26dc-4e65-a75b-6fd7a00ef318.jpg" /> body problem, namely, the low-energy scattering of the complex by the Coulomb field of the charged particle 0 with the kinetic energy of the relative motion of the particle 0 and the complex <img src="16-7501034\f2ddf9a3-5452-444b-a12f-3faf3d0ee22c.jpg" /> being well below the breakup threshold energy of the complex. Experimentally, to determine the polarizability of the complex in the direct way a heavy nucleus (the particle 0) is used as a source of the intense electric field. For simplicity sake assume that the <img src="16-7501034\c48218a7-0102-427a-87cc-4cada4f1d1c1.jpg" />-body complex contains only one charged particle 1, the other particles <img src="16-7501034\5327b19a-d46b-4a3c-8fd2-643faa4c7c3c.jpg" /> being neutral.</p><p>The Hamiltonian of whole system of <img src="16-7501034\d981c7c8-57e0-478a-9a03-f6a74c021772.jpg" /> particle has the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41680"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\3378b384-a8ee-4ff3-b357-467b4d48d8ee.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="16-7501034\90060de7-08c6-4e4b-a6f7-5ca7f94e746b.jpg" /> is the operator of the kinetic energy of the relative motion of the particle 0 and the center of mass of the complex, <img src="16-7501034\a2d7082f-a76a-46bc-9c40-15a18fc78fd9.jpg" />is the total Hamiltonian of the <img src="16-7501034\ff0c9df1-153c-4d74-864a-f5e5035cb26e.jpg" />- body complex, <img src="16-7501034\a539d580-4f58-4025-b147-edd58305e315.jpg" />, <img src="16-7501034\2eb812ad-5dc0-4ed3-aba2-3a583f446be0.jpg" />is the kinetic energy operator of the relative motion of the particles inside the complex, <img src="16-7501034\513a9c60-dbfe-4223-9516-7da15ba1afa8.jpg" />is the total interaction potential of the complex, <img src="16-7501034\d4bc63a3-4308-439a-8581-dfb411ef8eaf.jpg" />, <img src="16-7501034\279e3a40-d391-48b1-a6a7-5a3ac55bac79.jpg" />is the operator of the Coulomb interaction between the charge particles 0 and 1 (with the charges <img src="16-7501034\0a60c3da-0281-4b81-8af7-ea7a88f88a9e.jpg" /> and<img src="16-7501034\859ea54e-db4c-4c37-83fe-a19b9990b2f1.jpg" />), <img src="16-7501034\01341573-30d0-4d67-9f7d-4edf520151d1.jpg" />is the operator of the interaction between the particles of the complex <img src="16-7501034\a44c9ddf-57ed-4f91-8fc7-d40984dea750.jpg" /> and<img src="16-7501034\deef24a4-766e-4cd6-86da-9222c7552b8c.jpg" />.</p><p>Using the known Watson-Feshbach projection technique [2,27,28] with the projection operators <img src="16-7501034\4e2a1432-fc00-47b9-8555-fed0537d8741.jpg" /> and<img src="16-7501034\598c4dcf-4cd0-4a6b-82fb-853999218296.jpg" />, where <img src="16-7501034\8da03bef-9f8e-4051-9bb1-74f2bcf6aff8.jpg" /> is the wave function of the ground bound state of the complex of <img src="16-7501034\36eb307b-79dd-47ae-b782-27bae1b201bf.jpg" /> particles <img src="16-7501034\9afc78c4-b8a8-45b8-acd2-c066858a195b.jpg" /> with the binding energy <img src="16-7501034\dde9eb65-3a43-4707-bdc5-b4a4fcd3016c.jpg" /> (normalized to one), the operator of the effective interaction may be written as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41681"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\74cd3bce-deb7-4fc8-8965-60b391806cc7.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the averaging is taken over the variables of the relative motion of the particles of the complex. The operator <img src="16-7501034\efa1ed06-481f-4472-ba20-433c4d71cd9e.jpg" /> satisfies the integral equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41682"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\f4356daa-e383-4acc-93cd-6c8e993c4c24.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>in which the potential energy operator is the “external” Coulomb interaction potential between the field source (the particle 0) and the charged particle 1 of the complex, <img src="16-7501034\7fe2ec6c-7efd-45e8-977b-aebc9feeaa31.jpg" />, and the propagator is a “truncated” Green’s operator containing the “internal” interaction potential of the complex<img src="16-7501034\e0eca9b4-342b-457d-8082-f6a4e07592ff.jpg" />,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41683"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\e5653337-d386-49fe-b14f-925c541c6243.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="16-7501034\f18df898-a079-4900-a98d-bcd9a76dfa26.jpg" /> is the free Hamiltonian of the complete system (of <img src="16-7501034\db04d6f6-5e4a-4ab1-92c2-1025394fe68b.jpg" /> particles), <img src="16-7501034\2639fe9a-90cc-4438-8259-8e7ce8e7c920.jpg" />, <img src="16-7501034\5a77b723-c941-4ddd-8c0d-edcbcfe13eb7.jpg" />is the total energy of the system,<img src="16-7501034\948fdfdb-50c6-4ece-b8a3-b532fc7d743f.jpg" />.</p><p>Introducing the transition operator <img src="16-7501034\9c1d7aca-fdf5-4157-99cf-653af607df24.jpg" /> which satisfies the integral Lippmann-Schwinger equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41684"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\5e29b7a3-c5d4-4835-98f9-44f62e57a366.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>the operator <img src="16-7501034\c170bbb7-b0c8-46b6-9a0a-1ed17ff22554.jpg" /> can be written in the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41685"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\051bdbf9-233b-4db7-9ec3-681290d98932.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the free propagator <img src="16-7501034\067b4681-ce3d-4eda-8ef7-be5b35adc2c2.jpg" /> is given by</p><p><img src="16-7501034\2d96e391-c7a7-400b-a87e-6be7c4b49701.jpg" />.</p><p>The polarization potential that corresponds to the second order of the perturbation expansion (in powers of the Coulomb interaction<img src="16-7501034\1d135e7f-772d-49ca-9773-2646d66671e4.jpg" />) of the operator <img src="16-7501034\33bcde35-d4d3-4243-aaee-a815347e332d.jpg" /> in the expression for the effective potential (4) is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41686"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\e6a7fcf9-1122-461b-82be-38de77cc79c1.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41687"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\40ae129f-5976-4299-b4da-64a2a2872728.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>According to the uncertainty principle, in the case of asymptotically large (in comparison with the complex size) distances between the particle 0 and the complex, <img src="16-7501034\52f02870-8980-4b8a-8321-5a4903f8c8a1.jpg" />, the momentum variables of relative motion among particles inside the complex considerably exceed the momentum variable of relative motion of the particle 0 and the center of mass of the complex. In such a case, in the expression for the “truncated” Green’s function <img src="16-7501034\ef7a10c4-6317-47e7-a051-37dbdf9d004f.jpg" /> in Equation (9) we can neglect with the variable quantity that corresponds to the operator <img src="16-7501034\5556ed1a-cf9b-4307-afab-3c7fbfef9ff2.jpg" /> in comparison to the variable quantity that corresponds to the operator<img src="16-7501034\ccb21d1c-e468-420b-9ad9-d24bd62a592a.jpg" />. Then the polarization potential takes the known local form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41688"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\52865625-7ff1-4da5-a1c8-937b84b5072e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where each of coefficients in the sum (11), <img src="16-7501034\b69637b6-6c03-4b49-a490-1b2ee266245c.jpg" />, that characterizes the strength of the individual term of the polarization potential with the asymptotic <img src="16-7501034\c1a37b26-1ed0-4497-aae1-7c26d2004d63.jpg" /> is the electric polarizability of the <img src="16-7501034\e05e64cc-efec-4b7f-8087-fa6c6f8fac2d.jpg" />-particle complex of the multipolarity <img src="16-7501034\665b777c-dabc-48da-9c3f-2b0b82656dec.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41689"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\cc3df059-0d81-4f3f-8830-a926d6ec1e39.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here <img src="16-7501034\b26c3387-aacf-4e45-8941-64c84de6e2c6.jpg" /> is the multipole moment operator of the charged constituent particle 1,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41690"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\799099d8-5c8f-4acb-b81b-3dc73c33d08d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><img src="16-7501034\c69128d6-0cd5-48ef-a283-664d4db54262.jpg" />is the radius vector of the particle 1 relative to the center of mass of the bound complex; the radius vector <img src="16-7501034\29e66956-f407-4d7b-88be-e3159beb305e.jpg" /> describes the position of the center of mass of the bound complex relative to the charged particle 0 creating the electric field, <img src="16-7501034\b2f1cf8d-fe03-43eb-94c6-9ded15469a41.jpg" />is Legendre polinomial (the unit vectors are marked with a hat,<img src="16-7501034\a405af71-aa95-47c6-abc7-28e6e34b6e26.jpg" />); the quantity <img src="16-7501034\7ea34154-416f-415c-bef7-09bf6dc0504e.jpg" /> is the “truncated” Green’s operator of the complex <img src="16-7501034\6c9df12e-f7b9-4292-a6e2-9ba42aa487bd.jpg" /> at the bound state energy<img src="16-7501034\62adc333-a693-47ce-99d5-972ad26cfe7b.jpg" />, <img src="16-7501034\0be3ca84-e790-4698-a315-2612e4a11ea0.jpg" />is the total Green’s function of the complex.</p><p>Note that Formula (1) readily follows from the general Formula (12) after applying the spectral expansion of the total Green’s operator <img src="16-7501034\b74cf5cd-8805-40ef-9d6b-3addccb11c20.jpg" /> in the complete set of the eigenfunctions of the total <img src="16-7501034\93f3d0d3-ce62-4b73-bd5a-3d6af181b4f0.jpg" />-particle Hamiltonian<img src="16-7501034\90357927-5e5b-4f6d-8b21-b62bb4c405e3.jpg" />.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. T-Matrix Method of Determination of the Electric Multipole Polarizabilities of a Bound Complex</title><p>In this Section we formulate a method for the direct calculation of the polarizability of a few-particle bound system starting immediately from the definition (12) without recourse to expansion in terms of a set of excited discrete and continuum wave functions.</p><p>The general Formula (12) for the electric multipole polarizability of a bound complex of <img src="16-7501034\3cd24873-e941-4ebe-bd7d-4f01c0f2d3e2.jpg" /> particles <img src="16-7501034\c1384551-54f9-44f4-a9a4-718463d68695.jpg" /> contains the ground-state wave function <img src="16-7501034\f4b72b32-8d95-4410-960e-196530376140.jpg" /> and “truncated” propagator</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41691"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\767da702-8d8b-4be6-8eed-a278eb4fed77.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>at the energy of the bound state<img src="16-7501034\fa627703-64c3-45bd-ab3b-d02b77e16a99.jpg" />. The wave function <img src="16-7501034\36354e5d-45fa-4f05-bf3f-a7b986c396b1.jpg" /> satisfies the Schr&#246;dinger equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41692"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\3a3fa4a2-43b1-4e11-91e0-8ec053a53b4b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>or the equivalent homogeneous integral equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41693"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\84552b25-ba79-43bb-9afe-395a990d49b9.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We shall restrict our consideration to the case that the complex is in the ground bound state.</p><p>The “truncated” propagator<img src="16-7501034\20f7b5f9-a806-4109-b5e3-32448def37ba.jpg" />, as distinct from the total one<img src="16-7501034\b336cf89-76be-4838-8648-6d13ec4322fe.jpg" />, does not contain the pole singularity at<img src="16-7501034\b138e226-ce28-46dd-9e96-51ef32df87dd.jpg" />. In an explicit form, we find the expression for <img src="16-7501034\e7fe1de1-050f-4e07-9b5f-9da553040788.jpg" /> writing the total Green operator <img src="16-7501034\4049d17c-d3bb-4d89-9c99-2029cf537b91.jpg" /> in terms of the free propagator</p><p><img src="16-7501034\b4639a9a-1950-4a14-af57-36278ca4b17c.jpg" /></p><p>and the transition operator<img src="16-7501034\9ccd0936-b303-48b2-9de0-82fcc65a997d.jpg" />,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41694"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\5d3fb173-32ed-4515-948a-d6f8ad2a8389.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the operator <img src="16-7501034\e84d6d6e-f4dd-418d-a279-4896e45a1892.jpg" /> is determined by the LippmanSchwinger integral equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41695"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\1b04c6e4-adf3-435d-b8a8-6c4230981df8.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In view of Equation (17) and the equality</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41696"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\a349afa8-6a7a-459d-8f0d-f8b22d253301.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>the expression (14) takes the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41697"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\b7d92c6a-ce15-44be-bc5a-55d2a7043306.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Separating out from the total transition operator <img src="16-7501034\3381fadc-c767-432d-9952-b7a5a90e4e49.jpg" /> the singular pole part that corresponds to the ground bound state of the system at the energy<img src="16-7501034\2f85e2c5-cce8-455b-bf2a-9dc85861d669.jpg" />, we write</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41698"><label>(21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\e3c12d6a-c247-43e9-ac08-d086bdbc1b84.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the vertex function <img src="16-7501034\2af1018e-51f5-4e3d-bc9a-c4c9d28f46ae.jpg" /> is expressed through the wave function of the ground bound state of the system,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41699"><label>(22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\d8780d1a-672d-4d91-89dc-72c2b0785337.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>satisfying the homogeneous integral equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41700"><label>(23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\5d52d22b-37b7-4ee8-b70b-a04549133fd8.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and <img src="16-7501034\505545c4-df33-4c37-a1de-4f5ada81c483.jpg" /> denotes the smooth (non-singular) part of the transition operator.</p><p>Taking into account Expression (21) we write Formula (20) for the operator <img src="16-7501034\7ea7ae67-ede8-454f-ba99-bad17d4b3fd0.jpg" />in the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41701"><label>(24)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\b37e9ce5-a634-4a36-b62e-a611728c329c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Cancelling the pole terms in Equation (24) with the use of the identity</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41702"><label>(25)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\1a6a84f6-f3a9-4134-aa5d-78d029ca5b98.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>we may write Expression (24) in the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41703"><label>(26)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\f483801c-6d8c-45f2-a526-e56ef00b986d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>At the point of the negative energy of the bound state of the <img src="16-7501034\56da11c8-e61c-4171-bffa-22ed90bfe5fe.jpg" />-particle complex, <img src="16-7501034\47f46cae-eca6-4dc2-8204-a0b253ce6b9b.jpg" />, the operator <img src="16-7501034\c8b00538-2c72-4d27-8b21-f40d7977a3e6.jpg" /> in the general formula for the electric dipole polarizability (12) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41704"><label>(27)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\1a8da5d0-be5a-45f4-8b07-c90f0287266d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>With the use of Expression (27) the formula for the polarizability (12) takes the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41705"><label>(28)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\a66a4112-e129-41f4-ab27-ecad872fe7de.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>A noticeable simplification of the general formula for the electric multipole polarizability (28) takes place, if the interaction potential <img src="16-7501034\76ac4eed-7699-4cf9-bffe-3eea6b8ed701.jpg" /> is invariant relative to the space reflection (for example, for the systems with the Coulomb or nuclear interactions). In this case the wave function of the bound complex is characterized by a definite parity. The conservation of the parity leads to nullification of the matrix elements</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41706"><label>(29)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\2dab7a71-d64e-428d-8919-668bddb5561e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which are present in the second and third summands of Formula (28), at odd values of<img src="16-7501034\236019c5-7366-428e-95be-e3b83d7ee552.jpg" />.</p><p>Formula (28) is also simplified in the case of the invariance of the interaction relative to rotations that leads to conservation of the angular momentum. In such a situation the matrix elements (29) are proportional to the Clebsh-Gordan coefficient <img src="16-7501034\6cc9f629-8400-472d-b694-23898074377a.jpg" /> satisfying the triangle condition<img src="16-7501034\227a1377-e676-46d5-8ae1-725803d7f8e9.jpg" />. Specifically, they vanish after integrating in angular variables for all<img src="16-7501034\07cb00a3-3515-4f57-8c4c-5e3d039be696.jpg" />, if the total orbital moment of the complex is equal to zero,<img src="16-7501034\93fac27d-4c40-4f04-aef8-0f83cba44972.jpg" />.</p><p>In the case when the ground bound state of the complex is characterized with the total orbital momentum<img src="16-7501034\c2a79d93-3d42-4c41-a769-39be4f9c1c71.jpg" />, what is realized for the simplest atomic and few-hadron systems, the formula for the electric multipole polarizability (28) is simplified to the expression</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41707"><label>(30)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\7c55bda6-3b50-43bf-82c7-43204aa95df0.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>As is evident from (28) or (30), to determine the electric dipole polarizability of the bound complex, it is necessary to know not only its wave function, but the smooth part of the transition matrix at negative energy of the bound state <img src="16-7501034\f6a3ffc8-0531-4860-9c0a-9fbba1de4e05.jpg" /> as well. The corresponding transition matrix can be determined by solving the Lippmann-Schwinger integral equation for the two-particle system, the Faddeev integral equations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27242-ref26">26</xref>] for the threeparticle system or the Faddeev-Yakubovsky equations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27242-ref29">29</xref>] for more complex systems.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Electric Multipole Polarizabilities of the Two-Particle Bound Complex</title><p>In the case of two-particle bound complexes, the derived formula for the electric multipole polarizability (30) is simplified. Considered here is a stable bound complex consisting of a charged particle 1 and a neutral particle 2. The interaction potential between the particles is taken to be central, the complex is in S-wave ground bound state. We denote quantities describing the two-particle system by small letters as distinct to notations by capital letters in the general case of quantities for the <img src="16-7501034\51d064af-97cf-4f82-8709-4b132a68a6ae.jpg" />-particle complex used in the foregoing Sections: <img src="16-7501034\17a1d4d0-9e88-43f9-990e-784c5594065e.jpg" />and <img src="16-7501034\60e0fa8a-105f-4d70-8b55-33a8d85e5da3.jpg" /> are the binding energy and the wave function of the two-particle bound complex, <img src="16-7501034\8846c950-a6cb-4f89-877b-429eb0162929.jpg" /></p><p>is the free Green’s operator, <img src="16-7501034\0aecfa03-b3cf-4c57-96a6-2d4892d27607.jpg" />is the two-particle transition operator, <img src="16-7501034\9b6348cd-c8fd-47f3-b7f9-9f857ee1ea76.jpg" />is the reduced mass of the particles 1 and 2. Further consideration we perform in the momentum space.</p><p>Starting from (30) and taking into consideration that the smooth part of the two-particle transition matrix <img src="16-7501034\3fe7db84-4a9d-4e22-a34c-e161dfa8645f.jpg" /> has form of the sum of the smooth part of its <img src="16-7501034\1b7a3327-23a6-498a-81ac-19acfc246710.jpg" />-wave partial component (with<img src="16-7501034\f4b89de5-27b0-4bd5-b6b1-6ea68bd28c6f.jpg" />), <img src="16-7501034\b385bbaf-539c-432a-8b71-a755748e8b85.jpg" />, and the sum of all higher partial orbital components (with<img src="16-7501034\9da31a89-be0f-4606-bc03-a54c59991817.jpg" />), <img src="16-7501034\ba2f9a18-6c81-47e0-9bfb-8b6bec697c4f.jpg" />, which are non-singular at the energy of the bound state,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41708"><label>(31)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\3452dd98-68cc-4200-a0cb-9ccf626b6525.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>we write the formula for the electric multipole polarizability of the two-particle system in the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41709"><label>(32)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\a64a366f-3ebb-47f2-8c49-96e24a9126ff.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The wave function of the complex in the S-wave bound state satisfies the homogeneous integral equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41710"><label>(33)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\664c273a-0b68-4626-9d1b-2d1045f7dd52.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and each of the partial components of two transition matrix <img src="16-7501034\84b94990-2f0d-41df-87b7-2248075ee10f.jpg" /> satisfies the inhomogeneous integral Lippmann-Schwinger equations</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41711"><label>(34)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\9807fe2d-742b-484f-84a4-4d5216995792.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="16-7501034\14790b58-6e92-4b4f-9aa8-c364f0d7ac98.jpg" /> is the partial component of the interaction potential, <img src="16-7501034\06970670-734d-4ad5-9c6e-b34e928748b8.jpg" />is the energy of the relative motion of the particles.</p><p>The solution of the equation for the partial transition matrix (34) that corresponds to the orbital moment of the ground state <img src="16-7501034\89454da4-1d4b-4b27-900b-5ba6d89a6acf.jpg" /> has the form of the sum of the pole and smooth operators</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41712"><label>(35)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\aeed0326-e4a4-46a8-8a91-aa78daf6257a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the vertex function</p><p><img src="16-7501034\d7384597-f309-4b16-b73e-990ef672e6e4.jpg" /></p><p>satisfies the homogeneous integral equations that follows from the Equation (33),</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41713"><label>(36)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\ba54dc7b-a615-4bb7-a8ea-23ae42f13f68.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using the operator<img src="16-7501034\19d82ced-0ecb-4384-aa9c-1d943fe9893a.jpg" />, which is determined by the inhomogeneous equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41714"><label>(37)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\700894f5-c4d7-4f05-9bbe-95efa74b90fe.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>we write the smooth part of the transition operator, <img src="16-7501034\728e5006-fa9c-4489-977d-e39ce0c27b91.jpg" />in the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41715"><label>(38)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\25b6b060-3503-4d01-8b1c-c54c003e0b7b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>At the point<img src="16-7501034\f8f0672a-7ce5-4fc1-b7b4-6233583305b7.jpg" />, the inhomogeneous Equation (37) becomes homogeneous one,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41716"><label>(39)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\b45e0c97-4cac-447a-a118-d444ab227faf.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Since the kernels of the equations for the function <img src="16-7501034\147ffe67-3795-4cd4-b4ed-b46333cc421c.jpg" /> (36) and the operator <img src="16-7501034\001a88d7-5af5-4fe4-b003-e55649130216.jpg" /> (37) coincide, the solution of the operator Equation (39) may be written as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41717"><label>(40)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\47bc4495-e39e-4ab6-b5c8-1dbb3c7cef24.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>According to (38), the operator<img src="16-7501034\981c0117-d86c-41d8-9c4c-46b86c064674.jpg" />, which is contained in the formula for polarizability (32), is related to the operator <img src="16-7501034\50ae5356-a92a-4211-bb4f-44ee7097cea5.jpg" /> by the expression</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41718"><label>(41)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\90f10321-bbd2-4372-86cb-18d7a79a9ae6.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The operator <img src="16-7501034\1ee648b1-c731-4d01-8c4d-747f19e3b5cc.jpg" /> can be deduced by performing the differentiation of the Equation (37) with respect to <img src="16-7501034\f851daf5-68dd-4cc9-a07e-5f8695269994.jpg" /> and the inverted transition from <img src="16-7501034\688499e3-ac2f-4a24-ab82-014f8abaad23.jpg" /> to <img src="16-7501034\e733c5cc-a944-4941-8c4b-77e858e4f105.jpg" /> and<img src="16-7501034\af75f39c-a4e3-4b57-9ba1-890fbedf22c3.jpg" />,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41719"><label>(42)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\cc89bb48-cb73-4e76-b743-7a0278c04327.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Evaluating on the right-hand side of (42) the inderterminacy of the type <img src="16-7501034\30693fb8-223a-42eb-98ea-71ca0fbe4caf.jpg" /> at the point<img src="16-7501034\a443c6d4-e264-420a-ab37-2044fc4d7e98.jpg" />, which appears in view of the relation (40) and the normalization condition</p><p><img src="16-7501034\c9e04b9e-651e-4164-bfa2-23a3bb4b0655.jpg" />we obtain the expression for the operator<img src="16-7501034\3449319a-5e81-44a0-8274-96246158b68b.jpg" />,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41720"><label>(43)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\462798b8-1126-4538-ab98-06ffaa87c0df.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41721"><label>(44)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\869ea153-ac1c-4fd9-918d-290d867f6773.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In case of the central interaction, the part of the transition matrix <img src="16-7501034\ffd2907b-fb81-4dc6-9fbb-ae668302e262.jpg" /> in (32) may be written in the form of expansion in the set of the spherical functions of the angular variable momenta (with<img src="16-7501034\840f744d-38e7-4856-b198-010987df0b0b.jpg" />),</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41722"><label>(45)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\efd0865e-7c71-43de-a110-8cad3a9159d4.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting the expressions (43) and (45) for <img src="16-7501034\793051d2-4164-4d54-ba6f-15dbe0db4d20.jpg" /> and <img src="16-7501034\9a6bbe0f-4233-4524-9674-86133fdcb8e4.jpg" /> into the formula for the electric polarizability (32) and taking account of the action of the multipole moment operator <img src="16-7501034\4f3d6bcc-2c9d-4ef4-85b5-5085a4902b69.jpg" /> (12) on the function <img src="16-7501034\47cf5048-cd84-4763-af88-8732842fbee3.jpg" /> in the momentum space (with<img src="16-7501034\3c65297c-b22e-4543-81a4-323291f57840.jpg" />),</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41723"><label>(46)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\05c77653-1bcf-4f66-82b8-1f5fb23a2279.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the notations</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41724"><label>(47)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\5c9365ef-c631-41cc-9c8a-2686c57f59c5.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and <img src="16-7501034\1401b5ad-9321-4833-867a-76b482b77507.jpg" /> are used, we perform the integration with respect to angular variables.</p><p>Notice that the contribution of the smooth part of the <img src="16-7501034\8162515f-75cf-4936-ad24-586d5fe1d142.jpg" />-wave components of the transition matrix, <img src="16-7501034\f80a3490-fa8b-485e-b830-54d745c266ff.jpg" />, which is of the separable form (43), proves to be equal to zero as a result of the conservation of the space parity and the orbital moment of the relative motion (similar to zero contributions in the general case from other factorable terms of the “truncated” Green’s operator (27), see comments below Formula (28)). Non vanishing contribution in (32) makes only the partial component with <img src="16-7501034\20be5d8c-e069-4e43-95d4-c4173a6b968f.jpg" /> from Equation (45), <img src="16-7501034\c08b65b7-4d73-42b3-b2cd-3c67ceea3027.jpg" />, that satisfies the Lippmann-Schwinger integral Equation (34),</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41725"><label>(48)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\71335646-1cb4-4abc-8066-50bd193e0ae6.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="16-7501034\27e538a2-c7de-4d2f-83ad-09cc62281a69.jpg" /> is the partial component of the interaction potential.</p><p>The final result for the electric multipole polarizability of the two-particle complex with a central interaction between particles following from Equation (32) is written in the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41726"><label>(49)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\c78038b9-0348-4eea-a0d0-007e50a4c74d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>According to (47), the functions <img src="16-7501034\f5a0592f-991d-47d7-8173-5f5480c11fe8.jpg" /> in (49) are expressed in terms of the derivatives of the wave function of the ground bound state <img src="16-7501034\c877bf6c-b305-4621-af16-3054cb31317f.jpg" /> with respect to the relative momentum variable<img src="16-7501034\01013a1a-190d-45d5-99c8-e44048be700a.jpg" />. In the cases of the dipole<img src="16-7501034\628d507b-a31c-4598-966a-536e3f077dad.jpg" />, quadrupole <img src="16-7501034\180841c6-315f-4825-bf25-76d7aaf92f61.jpg" /> and octupole <img src="16-7501034\24ef0c81-b342-40df-8b1d-20c78c55249b.jpg" /> polarizabilities they are of the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41727"><label>(50)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\b01e59da-e408-4b94-9bdf-3f77ed95f841.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Formula (49) derived in the case of the central interaction between the constituents of the two-body complex demonstrates that the electric <img src="16-7501034\76b43949-af20-4972-9c8f-706e00fc5ef2.jpg" />-pole polarizability of the complex contains information not only on the derivatives (of the order <img src="16-7501034\04ef1559-8d1b-40b9-bafc-d54dce2bc7b9.jpg" /> and lower) of its wave function, but on the partial component of the transition matrix, <img src="16-7501034\b0c8332f-c048-4cde-9ac8-e570ec35694f.jpg" />, as well.</p><p>It is advantageous to write Formula (49) in the form more convenient for the practical use. In order to do this, instead of the two-particle t-matrix, which is the function of two momentum variables <img src="16-7501034\9dcad920-e4a0-4b3f-8122-684456685e91.jpg" /> and<img src="16-7501034\defc6a40-bb09-4dfa-8c0c-1df8a6838169.jpg" />, we introduce in (49) the function of one variable</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41728"><label>(51)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\4f55f540-7c06-479d-b180-52dd1c81bf14.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>that satisfies the inhomogeneous integral equation with the kernel of the Lippmann-Schwinger Equation (48)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41729"><label>(52)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\e7c1fe15-185f-42ee-a618-c5731d3add1e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>in which the free term is determined by the formula</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41730"><label>(53)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\64129f86-01af-4e27-a9ff-b11283a5894d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In such a case, Formula (49) takes the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41731"><label>(54)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\bd7d41eb-eb34-440b-ba4d-5c38fe2aaead.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Application of the Direct T-Matrix Approach and Discussion</title><p>Advantages of the t-matrix approach are manifested in calculation of polarizabilities of a quantum system, even if it is two-particle (the deuteron nucleus or the hydrogen atom). In the special case that the interaction between particles is purely S-wave (for example, the separable interaction potential [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27242-ref30">30</xref>], in Formula (49) only the first term persists. The corresponding reduced formula for the dipole polarizability of the two-particle bound complex has been earlier derived in the framework of the threebody formalism of the effective interaction of a charged particle and a complex [13,14,31]. Applications of the t-matrix approach to calculation of the electric dipole polarizabilities of the deuteron, the triton and the lambda hypertriton as two cluster systems with purely <img src="16-7501034\efc81d6e-a803-4de1-87a0-89d2fa4ef88c.jpg" />-wave interaction have been carried out in the preceding our papers [23,24].</p><p>For the deuteron with noncentral interaction between the proton and the neutron (in the state with the total angular momentum 1) the polarization in the electric field is anisotropic. Using the separable tensor potential [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27242-ref32">32</xref>] the longitudinal and transverse (relatively to the direction of the electric field) components of the dipole polarizability of the deuteron have been calculated in the work [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27242-ref15">15</xref>]. The results of the further calculations of the components of the deuteron electric dipole polarizability obtained in the framework of the chiral effective field theory [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27242-ref18">18</xref>] are in agreement with the results of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27242-ref15">15</xref>].</p><p>In the case of the hydrogen atom H (assuming that the proton mass is infinitely great when compared to the electron mass), the exact values of the electric multipole polarizabilities <img src="16-7501034\0c758a61-9971-4c33-bf89-8305ae546424.jpg" /> are known [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27242-ref25">25</xref>]. This is why it is possible to test directly the validity of the general formula for the polarizability of the two-particle system (49)— both of the term with free propagation in intermediate state and of the terms with the multiple scattering in the higher orbital intermediate states (with <img src="16-7501034\aa638c04-aa1f-4c64-9e15-6008f2fad7e8.jpg" /> for the dipole, quadrupole, octupole and higher multipole polarizabilities, respectively).</p><p>Inserting the analytical expression for the partial components of the Coulomb transition matrix, obtained from the representation for the three-dimensional t-matrix <img src="16-7501034\6ae74ca4-dd9d-49b0-937f-a0d4c3200f48.jpg" /> derived in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27242-ref33">33</xref>] with the use of the O(4) rotation symmetry in four-dimensional Fock space [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27242-ref34">34</xref>], into Formula (49) and separating out the Born term from the Coulomb <img src="16-7501034\e8cd59fa-54cc-48e4-af60-a906d750f933.jpg" />-matrix,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41732"><label>(55)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\6774b6a9-5b6b-4de4-8bea-fa8f927a855b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>we write <img src="16-7501034\46a23bd9-a996-4647-b8bb-5f3228703eb8.jpg" /> as a sum of three terms,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27242-formula41733"><label>(56)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7501034\63c1c6e5-e595-4329-82af-029a34ce0df9.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="16-7501034\b0dc5f0b-0a06-4b1b-a18f-129fc82e59b8.jpg" /> is the first term in Equation (49) that describes free virtual propagation, <img src="16-7501034\0464c0f6-a40a-4d70-996b-b7c119f8ceb4.jpg" />is a part of the second term that contains only the Born term of the partial Coulomb t-matrix, <img src="16-7501034\8b94321e-8103-43b3-8b37-6092e4df5028.jpg" />, describing the single scattering in the intermediate state, and <img src="16-7501034\1949c5e2-4823-4efe-9132-7ac1d55781b2.jpg" /> takes into account the multiple scattering contributions (of the order 2 and more).</p><p>We show in the <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> the values of the components<img src="16-7501034\fb0bdd12-e50a-48dc-ae30-44ed0e60afb9.jpg" />, <img src="16-7501034\b47438e2-7ad7-41e9-8dfc-a60b7d73b450.jpg" />, <img src="16-7501034\879218ab-a95c-4f4c-945b-e908d929d9d9.jpg" />and their sum (56) (in a.u.) that determines the electric dipole<img src="16-7501034\ac5e7626-bc29-4732-a10b-ff025ee90924.jpg" />, quadrupole<img src="16-7501034\cc4472e6-ed12-49d7-bbaf-fe4b90f70e9d.jpg" />, and octupole <img src="16-7501034\15b2af75-56b9-4c2f-b011-11b81f52dc37.jpg" /> polarizabilities of the hydrogen atom, <img src="16-7501034\aef17602-9ef2-4ce2-9e9a-190c04e62f4c.jpg" />, obtained applying the direct t-matrix approach, together with the exact values of the polarizabilities derived by Dalgarno and Lewis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27242-ref25">25</xref>]. Here, values of the quantities <img src="16-7501034\a4616c6c-d2ea-414e-9dfd-19141ec44c1f.jpg" /> and <img src="16-7501034\17343716-92a1-401a-8de1-ec515f5cea9a.jpg" /> are derived from (49) analytically, and the values of <img src="16-7501034\e95ce882-ebfb-45d1-baca-9d21e1d67a0c.jpg" /> are obtained numerically calculating the integral with <img src="16-7501034\37b172be-5cdb-4b3e-8cc1-a9b0489bdc38.jpg" /> that describes the multiple scattering in intermediate states.</p><p>Data given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> indicate that the dipole polarizability of the hydrogen atom consists of two nearly equal parts—the first term with the free propagator, <img src="16-7501034\52985de6-6cde-43f7-b45d-1081e8369092.jpg" />, and the sum of two others with the <img src="16-7501034\249f5713-5194-4c0c-972e-df453aea7072.jpg" />-wave component of the Coulomb transition matrix,</p><p><img src="16-7501034\558df174-8208-4119-9491-05cbe7a0de03.jpg" />. For polarizabilities of higher polarity the contribution of the term with the free propagator <img src="16-7501034\9efc728f-9c90-46c0-b0c7-db6d1e8fe1d3.jpg" /> still further increases reaching <img src="16-7501034\dfcff51e-7e13-4a7c-99a4-d92b253bbd70.jpg" /> in the case <img src="16-7501034\b21f734f-8158-4a4e-a13c-7c3d583b8935.jpg" /> and <img src="16-7501034\fac2ae60-6df0-4531-b648-266c77b09a26.jpg" /> in the case<img src="16-7501034\4e48c6eb-506f-4a69-ae88-acfc70b98d3e.jpg" />. The contribution of the Born term <img src="16-7501034\073f1227-3949-4099-9c87-3f204aaa61c1.jpg" /> to the polarizability <img src="16-7501034\a9b547e5-5086-4c92-bf5f-f6ba4bdd5487.jpg" /> diminishes slowly with <img src="16-7501034\4f6a15ab-3fc6-4b5f-997f-3ac69cacea6a.jpg" /> being equal to <img src="16-7501034\dace609f-8d34-49cf-b34c-26715575ec56.jpg" /> for<img src="16-7501034\f9b9ab49-cecd-4d1f-b188-b91b5dce6261.jpg" />, <img src="16-7501034\e2c5d8f3-6d6b-4904-bbda-7db7b6e3ea63.jpg" />for <img src="16-7501034\a74862d8-1623-4ae9-95b8-6ae028d4fcf0.jpg" /> and <img src="16-7501034\63e6bd69-9e27-4695-8f4b-64acdf0af66c.jpg" /> for<img src="16-7501034\4e24968f-5221-4dc4-851a-976c1dd0dbe1.jpg" />. The contribution of the term describing multiple virtual scattering, <img src="16-7501034\cb032d07-35e3-418b-88c5-db4af075dc33.jpg" />, lowers with increasing <img src="16-7501034\10669369-c4f6-46e8-9fa1-4d37a998d818.jpg" /> accounting for <img src="16-7501034\b3600fb3-0b3e-4dc7-89c4-47e0031a9826.jpg" /> when<img src="16-7501034\0dc56c3b-0987-4700-a3a8-0e2ac7f1dae1.jpg" />, <img src="16-7501034\aa8e03ce-5d82-47a3-b600-e42eb8018181.jpg" />when <img src="16-7501034\404386f5-96d6-41ea-8043-0bb860dcec50.jpg" /> and <img src="16-7501034\e66c6803-6764-4207-b97e-114853048e2c.jpg" /> when<img src="16-7501034\d231c0aa-d90b-4f79-bfc3-cd8c6bb2ac50.jpg" />. It is worthy of note that contribution of the sum of the analytically tractable terms, <img src="16-7501034\2db80a83-ea56-4fa8-ac70-b4025ee18195.jpg" />, to the polarizabilities of the hydrogen atom <img src="16-7501034\a8a6449d-b1ac-4627-85a4-0ce2b77439e9.jpg" /> is prevailing, it accounts for <img src="16-7501034\2dd41cdc-893d-40c5-ae1f-f78b831ddc1b.jpg" /> (if<img src="16-7501034\afc347b8-141e-4089-893e-7b095cd8d3eb.jpg" />), <img src="16-7501034\ba944784-9fae-4b7e-a260-8385a1fe44af.jpg" />(if<img src="16-7501034\7a7f9d2b-1619-438c-bb9e-8750ce5cc3c4.jpg" />) and <img src="16-7501034\443d76ff-4a40-48ba-9b11-fae11215b95b.jpg" /> (if<img src="16-7501034\a619c97f-d85c-47be-82d4-3a0a4e872cbb.jpg" />) of the total amount.</p><p>The elaborated approach to determination of the electric multipole polarizabilities that relies on the two-particle t-matrix differs radically from the traditional</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. The components<img src="16-7501034\28fad518-0988-4c1a-a10d-cc2973f5d5d9.jpg" />, <img src="16-7501034\ddf2cfd1-6888-4b96-84a1-90f8889e86d6.jpg" />and <img src="16-7501034\86772b73-499b-4de2-a406-2c354242fb7b.jpg" /> determining the electric dipole<img src="16-7501034\4def0170-e260-42ba-b760-c70e92c7cc00.jpg" />, quadrupole <img src="16-7501034\72e32eaa-7a67-42db-9db1-9a800562f8f5.jpg" /> and octupole <img src="16-7501034\f47ec766-a789-4eae-a497-ae5dc62df4a3.jpg" /> polarizabilities of the hydrogen atom, <img src="16-7501034\348a2e10-5eea-4978-8c71-275b2223c1f8.jpg" />, calculated with the use of the direct t-matrix approach (Equations (49), (55) and (56)) together with the exact values of the polarizabilities (taken from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27242-ref25">25</xref>]) (in a.u.).</p><p><img src="16-7501034\acdbee79-b3c8-4860-868f-3e6bfd6f472c.jpg" /></p><p>approach based on the spectral expansion of the Green’s function of the system that considers contributions from an infinite number of excited bound and continuum states. As evidenced by the results of the spectral-expansion calculations by Castillejo et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27242-ref35">35</xref>], 65.8% of the magnitude of the electric dipole polarizability of the hydrogen atom comes from the <img src="16-7501034\74021921-74ac-4b7f-a6b6-933762fcb998.jpg" />-wave excited bound states. Inclusion of all the excited bound states accounts for 81.4%. The rest 18.6% is provided taking into consideration the continuum states.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusions</title><p>In conclusion, a new approach to the determination of the electric multipole polarizabilities of quantum bound systems (both atomic and nuclear) that is based on the use of the transition matrix has been developed. The most important advantage of the t-matrix formalism is that its application allows to avoid cumbersome calculations of individual contributions from infinitely large number of discrete and continuum excited states. Instead, the determination of one or several (depending on the interaction mode) partial components of the transition matrix is now required. It is also essential that the transition matrix in the main Formula (30) depends on the negative energy of the bound state being therefore a real function of momenta.</p><p>To test the validity of the proposed method, the calculation of the electric dipole, quadrupole and octupole polarizabilities of the hydrogen atom has been performed. The obtained results precisely reproduce the known analytically derived values of the polarizabilities. In nuclear physics, in the special case of purely S-wave separable interaction potential, the general Formula (49) is simplified and reduced to one obtained earlier for the deuteron.</p><p>The developed method can be immediately extended to more complicated interactions between constituents, specifically, to the case of tensor interactions that gives rise to anisotropic polarization properties of the system. Finally, it is quite important that the proposed approach is suitable for more complicated threeand <img src="16-7501034\3fb91020-8936-4daf-a5b0-7a3867049a65.jpg" />-body systems described by the Faddeev and Faddeev-Yakubovsky integral equations, since the electric polarizabilities of the few-body nuclei are important characteristics containing additional independent information about the fundamental nuclear force. In the first place, we plan to apply the t-matrix approach to study the deformation properties of the <sup>3</sup>H and <sup>3</sup>He nuclei in the electric field.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.27242-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. Efimov, “Energy Levels Arising from Resonant Two-Body Forces in a Three-Body System,” Physics Letters, Vol. 33B, No. 8, 1970, pp. 563-564.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Feshbach, “A Unified Theory of Nuclear Reactions II,” Annals of Physics, Vol. 19, No. 2, 1962, pp. 287-313.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. Braaten and H.-W. Hammer, “Universality in Few-Body Systems with Large Scattering Length,” Physics Reports, Vol. 428, No. 5-6, 2006, pp. 259-390. 
doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2006.03.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. Kraemer, et al., “Evidence for Efimov Quantum States in an Ultracold Gas of Caesium Atoms,” Nature (London) Vol. 440, No. 7082, 2006, pp. 315-318. 
doi:10.1038/nature04626</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. Chin, P. Grimm, P. Julienne and E. Tiesinga, “Feshbach Resonance in Ultracold Atoms,” Reviews of Modern Physics, Vol. 82, No. 2, 2010, pp. 1225-1286. 
doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1225</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">N. L. Rodning, L. D. Knutson, W. G. Lynch and M. B. Tsang, “Measurement of the Electric Polarizability of the Deuteron,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 49, No. 13, 1982, pp. 909-912. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.909</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. L. Friar, S. Fallieros, E. L. Tomusiak, D. Skopik and E. G. Fuller, “Electric Polarizability of the Deuteron,” Physical Review C, Vol. 27, No. 3, 1983, pp. 1364-1366. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.27.1364</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. Goeckner, L. O. Lamm and L. D. Knutson, “Measurement of the Electric Polarizability of 3He,” Physical Review C, Vol. 43, No. 1, 1991, pp. 66-72.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. A. Rinker, “Nuclear Polarization in Muonic Helium,” Physical Review A, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1976, pp. 18-29. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.14.18</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. L. Friar, “Nuclear Polarization Corrections in μ&lt;sup&gt;-4&lt;/sup&gt; He Atoms,” Physical Review C, Vol. 16, No. 4, 1977, pp. 1540- 1548. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.16.1540</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Pachucki and A. M. Moro, “Nuclear Polarizability of Helium Isotopes in Atomic Transitions,” Physical Review A, Vol. 75, No. 3, 2007, pp. 25211-25214.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. L. Friar and S. Fallieros, “Deuteron Electric Polarizability,” Physical Review C, Vol. 29, No. 1, 1984, pp. 232- 239. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.29.232</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. F. Kharchenko, S. A. Shadchin and S. A. Permyakov, “Non-Perturbative Theory of the Polarization Interaction in Three-Body Systems,” Physics Letters B, Vol. 199, No. 1, 1987, pp. 1-4. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91451-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. F. Kharchenko and S. A. Shadchin, “Theory of Polarization Particle-Complex Interaction in the Three-Body Approach,” Ukrainian Journal of Physics, Vol. 42, No. 8, 1997, pp. 912-920.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. V. Kharchenko, “Effect of the Deuteron Anisotropy: Longitudinal and Transverse Components of the Electric Dipole Polarizability,” Nuclear Physics A, Vol. 617, No. 1, 1997, pp. 34-44. doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(97)00011-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. L. Friar and G. L. Payne, “Nuclear Polarizabilities and Logarithmic Sum Rules,” Physical Review C, Vol. 55, No. 6, 1997, pp. 2764-2767. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.55.2764</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. D. Efros, W. Leidemann and G. Orlandini, “PhotodisIntegration of the Three-Nucleon Systems and Their Polarizabilities,” Physics Letters B, Vol. 408, No. 1, 1997, pp. 1-6. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(97)00772-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J.-W. Chen, H. W. Grie?hammer, M. J. Savage and R. P. Springer, “The Polarizability of the Deuteron,” Nuclear Physics A, Vol. 644, No. 3, 1998, pp. 221-234. 
doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(98)80012-2 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. R. Phillips, G. Rupak and M. J. Savage, “Improving the Convergence of NN Effective Field Theory,” Physics Letters, Vol. B473, No. 3-4, 2000, pp. 209-218.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">X. Ji and Y. Li, “Sum Rules and Spin-Dependent Polari- zabilities of the Deuteron in Effective Field Theory,” Physics Letters, Vol. B591, No. 1-2, 2004, pp. 76-80.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. Gazit, N. Barnea, S. Bacca, W. Leidemann and G. Orlandini, “Photonuclear Sum Rules and the Tetrahedral Configuration of 4He,” Physical Review C, Vol. 74, No. 6, 2006, pp. 10011-10015.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">I. Stetcu, S. Quaglioni, J. L. Friar, A. C. Hayes and P. Navratil, “Electric Dipole Polarizabilities of Hydrogen and Helium Isotopes,” Physical Review C, Vol. 79, No. 6, 2009, pp. 40011-40016.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. F. Kharchenko and A. V. Kharchenko, “Electric Polarization of the Lambda Hypertriton Nucleus,” Collected Physical Papers (Lviv), Vol. 7, 2008, pp. 432-443.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. F. Kharchenko and A. V. Kharchenko, “Electric Dipole Polarizabilities of the Triton and Lambda Hypertriton,” International Journal of Modern Physics E, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2010, pp. 225-242.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Dalgarno and J. T. Lewis, “The Exact Calculation of Long-Range Forces between Atoms by Perturbation Theory,” Proceeding of the Royal Society A (London), Vol. 233, No. 1192, 1955, pp. 70-74. 
doi:10.1098/rspa.1955.0246</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. D. Faddeev, “Scattering Theory for a Three-Particle System,” Soviet Physics JETP, Vol. 12, 1961, pp. 1014-1019.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">N. C. Francis and K. M. Watson, “The Elastic Scattering of Particles by Atomic Nuclei,” Physical Review, Vol. 92, No. 2, 1953, pp. 291-303. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.92.291</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. J. Joachain, “Quantum Collision Theory,” North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, American Elsevier Publishing Co., Inc., New-York, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">O. A. Yakubovsky, “On the Integral Equations in the Theory of N Particle Scattering,” Soviet Journal of Nuclear Physics, Vol. 5, 1967, pp. 937-942.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. Yamaguchi, “Two-Nucleon Problem when the Potential Is Nonlocal but Separable,” Physical Review, Vol. 95, No. 6, 1954, pp. 1628-1634. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRev.95.1628</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. F. Kharchenko and S. A. Shadchin, “Three-Body Theory of the Effective Interaction between a Particle and a Two-Particle Bound System,” Institute for Theoretical Physics, ITP-93-24E, Kyiv, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. Yamaguchi and Y. Yamaguchi, “Two-Nucleon Problem When the Potential Is Nonlocal But Separable II,” Physical Review, Vol. 95, No. 6, 1954, pp. 1635-1643.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRev.95.1635</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. A. Shadchin and V. F. Kharchenko, “The Analytical Expression for the Two-Particle Coulomb Green’s Function with Explicitly Separated Singularities,” Journal Physics B, Vol. 16, No. 8, 1983, pp. 1319-1322. 
doi:10.1088/0022-3700/16/8/009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. A. Fock, “On the Theory of the Hydrogen Atom,” Zeitschrift für Physik, Vol. 98, No. 3-4, 1935, pp. 145-154. 
doi:10.1007/BF01336904</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27242-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. Castillejo, I. C. Percival and M. J. Seaton, “On the Theory of Elastic Collisions between Electrons and Hydrogen Atoms,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A (London), Vol. 254, No. 1277, 1960, pp. 259-272. 
doi:10.1098/rspa.1960.0019</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>