<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Applied Mathematics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-7385</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/am.2013.41016</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AM-27204</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Certain &lt;i&gt;pl&lt;/i&gt;(&lt;i&gt;m&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt;)-Kummer Matrix Function of Two Complex Variables under Differential Operator
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>yman</surname><given-names>Shehata</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
Department of Basic Applied Sciences, Unaizah Community College, Qassim University, 
Qassim, KSA</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>drshehata2006@yahoo.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>25</day><month>01</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>91</fpage><lpage>96</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>October</day>	<month>3,</month>	<year>2012</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>November</day>	<month>3,</month>	<year>2012</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>November</day>	<month>11,</month>	<year>2012</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   The main aim of this paper is to define and study of a new matrix functions, say, the pl(m,n)-Kummer matrix function of two complex variables. The radius of regularity, recurrence relation and several new results on this function are established when the positive integers p is greater than one. Finally, we obtain a higher order partial differential equation satisfied by the pl(m,n)-Kummer matrix function and some special properties. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Hypergeometric Matrix Function; &lt;i&gt;pl&lt;/i&gt;(&lt;i&gt;m&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd>&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt;)-Kummer Matrix Function; Matrix Differential Equation;</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Many Special matrix functions appear in connection with statistics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27204-ref1">1</xref>], mathematical physics, theoretical physics, group representation theory, Lie groups theory [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27204-ref2">2</xref>] and orthogonal matrix polynomials are closely related [3-5]. The hypergeometric matrix function has been introduced as a matrix power series and an integral representation and the hypergeometric matrix differential equation in [6-9] and the explicit closed form general solution of it has been given in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27204-ref10">10</xref>]. The author has earlier studied the Kummer’s and Horn’s <img src="16-7401156\f43865fd-291d-4dad-a125-c9d34e208159.jpg" /> matrix function of two complex variables under differential operators [11-13]. In [14-16], extension to the matrix function framework of the classical families of p-Kummer’s matrix function, <img src="16-7401156\25e085f1-03f0-4d0e-a8ec-a3de42083ff9.jpg" />and q-Appell matrix function and Humbert matrix function have been proposed.</p><p>Throughout this paper for a matrix <img src="16-7401156\08ce0af7-b943-47ce-92ad-d100c3d0aecc.jpg" /> in<img src="16-7401156\121c2951-3a14-45f6-bf0b-1ac8b41fe1ab.jpg" />, its spectrum <img src="16-7401156\ff2e85e0-6793-4798-bec3-37241b2afc65.jpg" /> denotes the set of all the eigenvalues of<img src="16-7401156\d71d439d-6672-49e0-9b9a-882bf10edc43.jpg" />. If <img src="16-7401156\d3163452-2d2d-488a-9458-e10c13325a98.jpg" /> is a matrix in<img src="16-7401156\34611f29-5eb8-488c-a961-2d849e84516f.jpg" />, its two-norm denoted by <img src="16-7401156\a9f3d891-b913-4564-99ca-e1520d28cc7e.jpg" /> is defined by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27204-ref17">17</xref>]</p><p><img src="16-7401156\6813fb45-122c-4e9a-af87-84b9851adb7a.jpg" /></p><p>where for a vector <img src="16-7401156\afe080b5-d09a-40ec-9839-b47d01966518.jpg" /> in<img src="16-7401156\62eee5ff-12ac-4d22-896e-85e2eb9bb8f4.jpg" />, <img src="16-7401156\02d2e7ff-fd74-4100-8fd8-e7d8d028aa92.jpg" />is the Euclidean norm of<img src="16-7401156\f2224f4a-7b83-4c1b-acf7-91962ee0b5df.jpg" />.</p><p>If <img src="16-7401156\4a648e43-a53c-42fc-96d3-7b0a0c1b89a9.jpg" /> and <img src="16-7401156\2adae91f-7367-45f0-b145-df408a9140c5.jpg" /> are holomorphic functions of the complex variable<img src="16-7401156\4ba27995-ef5a-49f6-8cb5-590769eca830.jpg" />, defined in an open set <img src="16-7401156\d7aa4824-256c-4e2d-b59e-041ee2e235f5.jpg" /> of the complex plane, and if <img src="16-7401156\0bdfad6a-506c-450c-94dc-bc82830a4a19.jpg" /> and <img src="16-7401156\05d43cee-ea5d-4bf8-9962-555f59a94aba.jpg" /> are a matrix in <img src="16-7401156\003f374b-6d59-400a-af14-f0818baf33a3.jpg" /> with <img src="16-7401156\e1021573-6d84-4cf9-b9a8-321b81b0f3ca.jpg" /> and <img src="16-7401156\542f9081-e09c-446d-8a34-8206bcf6f0de.jpg" /> also and if<img src="16-7401156\a8dfa6bb-b1c1-4a8e-9fbd-1d32b6023490.jpg" />, then from the properties of the matrix functional calculus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27204-ref18">18</xref>], it follows that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27204-formula40863"><label>(1.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7401156\ac2cb870-eed1-4983-b9d2-d93379d1766c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The reciprocal gamma function denoted by</p><p><img src="16-7401156\71e03ba0-cbe5-427b-8eda-c8559267fc22.jpg" />is an entire function of the complex variable<img src="16-7401156\28a0f978-6864-4bd7-9a84-8b2228a2cf19.jpg" />. Then for any matrix <img src="16-7401156\c02ffee1-7f56-42ce-b191-919c371460e7.jpg" /> in<img src="16-7401156\aa592e94-74f0-496d-9fc9-e012ae3116c6.jpg" />, the image of <img src="16-7401156\44e4445e-30eb-4c80-9534-33d479e6a0a5.jpg" /> acting on <img src="16-7401156\c553f8c3-5269-4c1e-bbed-408333e2eb08.jpg" /> denoted by <img src="16-7401156\d6830481-9d14-4b0e-b049-695421811034.jpg" /> is a well defined matrix. Furthermore, if &#160;</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27204-formula40864"><label>(1.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7401156\c62d5836-026e-43f0-b845-5a50468e92b4.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="16-7401156\b9ff7e8d-533f-4d30-8492-7817445660c8.jpg" /> is the identity matrix in<img src="16-7401156\7df9db62-b178-4a96-870b-ba7599498cca.jpg" />, then <img src="16-7401156\147b3837-c93c-4d9a-9321-d4eeca920308.jpg" /> is invertible, its inverse coincides with <img src="16-7401156\cd3b83ba-efd4-4ea3-887a-d1ba3c4570c9.jpg" /> and one gets [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27204-ref6">6</xref>]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27204-formula40865"><label>(1.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7401156\c6172e44-7a4d-4566-a000-bf47ac87a9a5.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>J&#243;dar and Cort&#233;s have proved in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27204-ref6">6</xref>], that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27204-formula40866"><label>(1.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7401156\c229b637-6081-4083-8d43-f4aabf6ead57.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. On pl(m, n)-Kummer Matrix Function</title><p>We We define the pl(m, n)-Kummer matrix function <img src="16-7401156\9c1bbe1f-9190-4130-af11-8a8c19de5a62.jpg" /> of two complex variables in the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27204-formula40867"><label>(2.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7401156\eb12b7ae-9073-4a96-9e0a-81f36d8cd80e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><p><img src="16-7401156\5ec1160b-269f-4cba-a33d-4ed00175c790.jpg" />,</p><p><img src="16-7401156\909dfd1b-044d-4f27-abe4-88421928c31a.jpg" /></p><p><img src="16-7401156\11380c4b-b35f-48f7-892a-601402f87547.jpg" /> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27204-ref19">19</xref>] and<img src="16-7401156\4b795372-9010-4418-8b6c-1feb6fddba1d.jpg" />, <img src="16-7401156\b230184e-99a4-43a6-85b6-9c898586590f.jpg" />and</p><p><img src="16-7401156\aa346235-223e-467a-bd33-3ac111f95d98.jpg" />are non-negative integer numbers. Notice that <img src="16-7401156\51952695-be67-46c4-8e81-7df809a28898.jpg" /> is a non-negative integer number.</p><p>For simplicity, we can write the <img src="16-7401156\cd89e0d0-edf3-4b7d-bb28-eed62010b3a7.jpg" /> in the form<img src="16-7401156\b169affb-c515-4338-95ad-b169891ce970.jpg" />, <img src="16-7401156\6cc39a04-4547-4aa0-a086-ccd6ee850f25.jpg" />in the form <img src="16-7401156\b5b1a218-211c-45e9-bce4-fe97223fac15.jpg" /> and <img src="16-7401156\f6c890e0-c57b-43a7-b416-761bfff47e24.jpg" /> in the form<img src="16-7401156\5ab53367-3e67-44a6-bb56-b8f3d65ded80.jpg" />.</p><p>We begin the study of this function by calculating its radius of regularity <img src="16-7401156\fd186eb4-2dd2-40ff-aac8-0335dac08276.jpg" /> of such function for this purpose we recall relation (1.3.10) of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27204-ref19">19</xref>] and keeping in mind that<img src="16-7401156\2785f0ae-7db6-4a73-a023-8cb61cdbdda2.jpg" />. Hence</p><p><img src="16-7401156\a8aaa677-e880-4985-ab7e-17968b5c23f3.jpg" /></p><p>where</p><p><img src="16-7401156\73b0e067-d0f3-4740-9d81-8d7a630791e0.jpg" /></p><p>Summarizing, the following result has been established.</p><p>Theorem 2.1. Let <img src="16-7401156\e67cf882-4ab1-4a44-a2d0-1f5cdda49020.jpg" /> and <img src="16-7401156\fb8a3384-4fc9-42c1-8413-df0ce66989b2.jpg" /> be matrices in <img src="16-7401156\fc0510ab-bab2-4edb-829f-e33450ca5f3e.jpg" /> such that <img src="16-7401156\c35e9f69-8e26-4512-ae4c-6e66b08e9761.jpg" /> are invertible for all integer <img src="16-7401156\33501223-91cf-4484-bb5d-1429a66e3228.jpg" />. Then, the pl(m, n)-Kummer matrix function is an entire function.</p><p>For<img src="16-7401156\a5d17b78-30be-46ab-8e35-4805553cd113.jpg" />, we have</p><p><img src="16-7401156\c6ac93bd-d36c-4713-9040-c52179c7810c.jpg" /></p><p>i.e., the l(m, n)-Kummer matrix function is an entire function.</p><p>Some matrix recurrence relations are carried out on the pl(m, n)-Kummer matrix function. In this connection the following matrix contiguous functions relations follow, directly by increasing or decreasing one in original relation</p><p><img src="16-7401156\058d9df3-4394-4ff3-9a5b-0080ce5d488b.jpg" /></p><p>(2.2)</p><p>Similarly</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27204-formula40868"><label>(2.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7401156\35589b72-6d12-4fbe-b38c-757ac6e0ddcb.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By the same way, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27204-formula40869"><label>(2.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7401156\ee009251-ac7f-4dee-9e96-ef2472d46335.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now, we consider the following differential operators</p><p><img src="16-7401156\fc1474ae-5803-44b1-bc7b-7d07117d84ca.jpg" /></p><p>where<img src="16-7401156\b315e365-18f7-4c56-baea-99bf87f4e566.jpg" />, <img src="16-7401156\db9a7122-028d-4837-8408-82192e04e660.jpg" />and<img src="16-7401156\fedd0be1-16cc-43e3-ab9a-459cba5623ce.jpg" />.</p><p>It is clear that</p><p><img src="16-7401156\e179dbe2-a5e1-44f7-aba5-4dfc39184ce2.jpg" /></p><p>(2.5)</p><p>So that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27204-formula40870"><label>(2.6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7401156\defcf64d-e6ac-42b1-8489-3654fedbcf32.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Putting in this relation <img src="16-7401156\782fca19-7788-4e0a-9634-e84320c715d6.jpg" /> and <img src="16-7401156\b9b46873-a0a2-42db-8329-d02d0f3ad62e.jpg" /> instead of <img src="16-7401156\35f5f228-0347-4eb7-9ad1-ca0b8a5b4ecc.jpg" /> and <img src="16-7401156\f7b93cfc-a7cb-4211-997c-0e892374008b.jpg" /> respectively, then</p><p><img src="16-7401156\04e0d793-e3c8-44e1-93f1-ec1adf21b4da.jpg" /></p><p>and so that we can be written the relation <img src="16-7401156\0dbe94ea-f6e2-4496-b435-c42bef8244d7.jpg" /> and <img src="16-7401156\2b6177d6-4575-488e-b51e-5b3d065c5f24.jpg" /> instead of <img src="16-7401156\86e2d140-bad6-4113-8ec5-bbf51171e7e0.jpg" /> and <img src="16-7401156\0c55cf46-bfab-4c8a-a160-01cc0b5e70f5.jpg" /> yields</p><p><img src="16-7401156\fae50e3a-ab0b-4f61-b46d-7e5b1c24e5f4.jpg" /></p><p>Therefore, the power series<img src="16-7401156\96015802-d1e2-4640-a168-3bfb5a5861e8.jpg" />, as follows</p><p><img src="16-7401156\8bcf2b75-aeec-4c56-94ff-0dcdb8fe771d.jpg" /></p><p>i.e., the pl(m, n)-Kummer matrix function is a solution of the matrix differential equation</p><p><img src="16-7401156\88e0c6d1-5eef-4c23-a890-eba534b38c14.jpg" /></p><p>(2.7)</p><p>In this paper, we affect by differential operator D the pl(m, n)-Kummer matrix function, successively, then we have</p><p><img src="16-7401156\d7d26ba9-dbe0-4c06-91e8-4150be826b23.jpg" /></p><p>i.e. the (m, n)-Kummer matrix function is a solution to this matrix differential equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27204-formula40871"><label>(2.8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7401156\8995c202-21f0-4057-8370-b03e8b078e7b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then</p><p><img src="16-7401156\fd6fb552-c33c-416e-a239-214fd5bc679d.jpg" /></p><p>Therefore, the following result has been established.</p><p>Theorem 2.2. Let <img src="16-7401156\bd608e35-b787-4021-adff-a7b6a90cbe86.jpg" /> and <img src="16-7401156\1d927b23-5a98-442d-86cf-2ecc6dea8d0c.jpg" /> be matrices in<img src="16-7401156\992e72cf-a1cf-40f8-af62-2e1285170298.jpg" />. Then the pl(m, n)-Kummer matrix function is solution of this matrix differential equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27204-formula40872"><label>(2.9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7401156\d3b262a3-2634-4c82-afcc-fdec7dd62b4f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The <img src="16-7401156\f98f2cf3-5b04-4c7b-ad99-8d08ee80bc6c.jpg" /> differential operator has been defined by Sayyed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27204-ref19">19</xref>] in the form</p><p><img src="16-7401156\355e9364-e0b1-4169-a02a-88e76e758a64.jpg" /></p><p>From (2.1), (2.3) and (2.5), we obtain</p><p><img src="16-7401156\e72bfde7-8110-4cfa-b9cd-c512c5c6d4d6.jpg" /></p><p>(2.10)</p><p>hence</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27204-formula40873"><label>(2.11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7401156\e7d4b46c-ebd9-4272-a64a-2e934cc1ede8.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27204-formula40874"><label>(2.12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7401156\d59ba04f-dc77-4972-9978-663b8870c708.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus by mathematical induction, we have the following general form</p><p><img src="16-7401156\5e8873c6-f3ae-4051-95fc-226656130308.jpg" /></p><p>(2.13)</p><p>where <img src="16-7401156\bb4f264c-cb10-4807-ad1d-3cfee0f4efdc.jpg" /> is a finite positive integer.</p><p>Special cases: we can be written the matrix function <img src="16-7401156\ee3c8d28-4a56-4915-acc1-eb8880436801.jpg" /> in the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27204-formula40875"><label>(2.14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7401156\04f350fc-fa83-4510-94e1-efd798a849f3.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>we see that</p><p><img src="16-7401156\08424991-6c34-40a3-a0bd-96d128baafd7.jpg" /></p><p>i.e., the <img src="16-7401156\8a7c031e-73c7-48dc-82ca-b16d119c1ba2.jpg" /> is a solution to this matrix differential equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27204-formula40876"><label>(2.15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="16-7401156\d9cc323d-8e7b-468e-8e72-fde9c9ec2835.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Also</p><p><img src="16-7401156\dfc72e72-09df-49c7-8daf-806a750128dd.jpg" /></p><p>i.e., the <img src="16-7401156\2dca9cda-185d-4423-9103-c1c6d03bd737.jpg" /> is a solution for the matrix partial differential equations</p><p><img src="16-7401156\0fac512e-5968-4e14-aba8-56a7fc026809.jpg" /></p><p>The results of this paper are variant, significant and so it is interesting and capable to develop its study in the future. One can use the same class of differential operators for some other function of several complex variables. Hence, new results and further applications can be obtained.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Acknowledgements</title><p>The Author expresses his sincere appreciation to Dr. M. S. Metwally, (Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science (Suez), Suez Canal University, Egypt) for his kind interest, encouragements, help, suggestions, comments and the investigations for this series of papers.</p><p>The author would like to thank the referees for his comments and suggestions on the manuscript.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.27204-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. G. Constantine and R. J. Mairhead, “Partial Differential Equations for Hyper-Geometric Functions of Two Argument Matrices,” Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1972, pp. 332-338.  
doi:10.1016/0047-259X(72)90020-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27204-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. T. James, “Special Functions of Matrix and Single Argument in Statistics in Theory and Application of Special Functions,” Academic Press, New York, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27204-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. Jódar and J. C. Cortés, “Some Properties of Gamma and Beta Matrix Functions,” Applied Mathematics Letters, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1998, pp. 89-93.  
doi:10.1016/S0893-9659(97)00139-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27204-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. M. Mathai, “A Handbook of Generalized Special Functions for Statistical and Physical Sciences,” Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27204-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. M. Mathai, “Jacobians of Matrix Transformations and Functions of Matrix Argument,” World Scientific Publishing, New York, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27204-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. Jódar and J. C. Cortés, “On the Hypergeometric Matrix Function,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 99, No. 1-2, 1998, pp. 205-217.  
doi:10.1016/S0377-0427(98)00158-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27204-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. A. M. Sayyed, M. S. Metwally and M. T. Mohamed, “Certain Hypergeometric Matrix Function,” Scientiae Mathematicae Japonicae, Vol. 69, No. 3, 2009, pp. 315-321.  
http://www.jams.or.jp/notice/scmjol/2009.html#2009-21</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27204-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. T. Mohamed and A. Shehata, “A Study of Appell’s Matrix Functions of Two Complex Variables and Some Properties,” Advances and Applications in Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2011, pp. 23-33.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27204-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Z. M. G. Kishka, A. Shehata and M. Abul-Dahab, “A New Extension of Hypergeometric Matrix Functions,” Advances and Applications in Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2011, pp. 349-371.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27204-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. Jódar and J. C. Cortés, “Closed form General Solution of the Hypergeometric Matrix Differential Equation,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, Vol. 32, No. 9, 2000, pp. 1017-1028. doi:10.1016/S0895-7177(00)00187-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27204-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Shehata, “A Study of Some Special Functions and Polynomials of Complex Variables,” Ph.D. Thesis, Assiut University, Assiut, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27204-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Shehata, “On p- and q-Horn’s Matrix Function of Two Complex Variables,” Applied Mathematics, Vol. 2, No. 12, 2011, pp. 1437-1442. doi:10.4236/am.2011.212203</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27204-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Shehata, “On Pseudo Legendre Matrix Polynomials,” International Journal of Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Applications (IJMSEA), Vol. 6, No. 6, 2012, pp. 251-258.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27204-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Z. M. G. Kishka, M. A. Saleem, S. Z. Radi and M. Abul- Dahab, “On the p- and q-Appell Matrix Function,” South-East Asian Bulletin of Mathematics, Vol. 35, 2011, pp. 807-818.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27204-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. S. Metwally, “On p-Kummers Matrix Function of Complex Variable under Differential Operators and Their Properties,” South-East Asian Bulletin of Mathematics, Vol. 35, 2011, pp. 1-16.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27204-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Shehata and M. Abul-Dahab, “A New Extension of Humbert Matrix Function and Their Properties,” Advances in Pure Mathematics, Vol. 1, No. 6, 2011, pp. 315-321. doi:10.4236/apm.2011.16057</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27204-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. Golub and C. F. Van Loan, “Matrix Computations,” The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27204-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">N. Dunford and J. Schwartz, “Linear Operators, Part I,” Interscience, New York, 1955.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27204-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. A. M. Sayyed, “Basic Sets of Polynomials of Two Complex Variables and Convergence Properties,” Ph.D. Thesis, Assiut University, Assiut, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>