<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJMS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Marine Science</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-7384</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojms.2013.31002</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJMS-27164</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Somatic Condition, Growth and Reproduction of Hake, &lt;i&gt;Merluccius merluccius&lt;/i&gt; L., in the Portuguese Coast
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>na</surname><given-names>Maria Costa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Divisao de Gestao e Recursos da Pesca, Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Lisbon, Portugal</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>amcosta@ipma.pt</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>25</day><month>01</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>12</fpage><lpage>30</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>September</day>	<month>4,</month>	<year>2012</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>October</day>	<month>18,</month>	<year>2012</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>November</day>	<month>9,</month>	<year>2012</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   Weight/length relationships, condition factor, gonadosomatic and hepatosomatic indices, conversion factor for gutted to total weight and spawning season of hake in the Portuguese Coast (36.92 to 42.22 degrees latitude N; 9.61 to 6.07 degrees longitude W) were investigated for the first time, aiming to fill the lack of information on the biology of hake of the Portuguese waters. Data were obtained from commercial samples collected between 2005 and 2010 and pooled by month. Sex ratio observed in fish below 40 cmwas close to 1:1; females were always dominant above50 cmlength. All the parameters were analysed by month and by sex and by combined sexes. The relationships obtained for combined sexes for the entire period concerning the growth in length and weight were: total length-total weight =0.0038L<sup>3.172</sup>, total length-gutted weight =0.0052L<sup>3.059</sup>. The relationship total weight-gutted weight was W<sub>t</sub> = 15.8112 + 0.8480W<sub>g</sub> and the conversion factor was of 1.1524. The growth rate is similar for both sexes but different when based on total weight or gutted weight. The analysis of the condition factor, gonadosomatic index, hepatosomatic index and the monthly distribution of the maturity stages seem to indicate that hake from thePortugueseCoasthas a long spawning season, with three spawning peaks in March, May and August but the start of the spawning season seems independent of the fish length.  
     
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Merluccius merluccius&lt;/i&gt;; Portuguese Coast; Biology; Somatic Condition; Spawning Season</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The main target of the investigation of the marine resources is to give new information on the biology and dynamics of the explored populations, by knowing the life cycle and biological characteristics (e.g., recruitment, spawning biomass and fishing mortality) of the species, in order to determine the real conditions of those resources (Pi&#241;eiro, 2011) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref1">1</xref>]. Two important nursery areas for European hake have been identified north-east Atlantic waters (ICES, 1996) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref2">2</xref>]: one area is located off the French coast in the Bay of Biscay and is known as “Le Grand Vasi&#233;r&#232;” and another one is in the Celtic sea between the south-west of England and southeast of Ireland; there is no such information for Portugal.</p><p>Several technical measures are taken to manage the stocks status. In Portugal those management measures are based on information given by the National Biological Sampling Program, co-financed by the EU within the Data Collection Framework (PNAB-DCF), on the landing composition (by sampling at the fish market), discards at sea (with scientific observers on board commercial vessels) and biology (from biological sampling at the laboratory). Indices of abundance and recruitment are obtained by the research surveys (acoustics, demersal and crustaceans) carried out by IPIMAR (Instituto de Investiga&#231;&#227;o das Pescas e do Mar).</p><p>Hake in Portuguese coast is caught mainly by the polyvalent fishing (hooks and purse seine) and trawl, together with some other species of fish and crustaceans: horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus), monkfish (Lophius spp.), megrim (Lepidorhombus spp.), chub mackerel (Scomber colias), Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus), blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou), shrimp (Penaeus spp.) and Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus). An important feature about hake is the fact that most of the larger individuals are landed gutted because ovaries get a very high price at the fish market.</p><p>In Portugal hake is studied since the middle of the 1960 decade (Monteiro and Dias, 1965 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref3">3</xref>]; 1966 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref4">4</xref>]) and several papers have been produced since then regarding many different areas, much of them related to abundance and distribution of adults, eggs and larvae (Cardador, 1995 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref5">5</xref>]; Ibaibarriaga et al., 2007 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref6">6</xref>]), fisheries, stock assessment and selectivity (Campos and Fonseca, 2003 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref7">7</xref>]; Cardador, 1988 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref8">8</xref>], 1991 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref9">9</xref>]; Dias and Cunha, 1984 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref10">10</xref>]; Fonseca et al., 2005 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref11">11</xref>]; Moura and Cardador2005 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref12">12</xref>]; Santos et al., 2002 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref13">13</xref>]) and recruitment (Caramelo, 1983 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref14">14</xref>]; Cardador et al., 2005 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref15">15</xref>]; Mendes et al., 2008 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref16">16</xref>]). Although in the beginning of the eighties years Marecos et al. (1982) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref17">17</xref>] have developed some work on age and growth of the Portuguese hake, only later the biological study of the species increased, with particular interest on age and growth (Godinho et al., 2001 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref18">18</xref>]; Jardim et al., 2004 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref19">19</xref>]; Salgado et al., 2003 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref20">20</xref>]) and maturity (Costa et al., 2009) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref21">21</xref>], with special reference to the first microscopic maturity scale proposed by Gon&#231;alves et al. (2004) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref22">22</xref>] for the portuguese component of the Southern stock of hake, similar to the one used by IEO (Instituto Espa&#241;ol de Oceanograf&#237;a) that also studies the same hake stock, and implemented to distinguish correctly immature from resting females (Costa and Gon&#231;alves, 2009 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref23">23</xref>]; Costa et al., 2009 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref21">21</xref>]), which are, as for many other species, not possible to distinguish macroscopically (Dom&#237;nguez-Petit, 2007 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref24">24</xref>]; Saborido-Rey and Junquera, 1998 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref25">25</xref>]). Some other subjects have also been studied by Portuguese researchers, like parasites (Marques, 1985 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref26">26</xref>]; Silva, 1984 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref27">27</xref>]), feeding (Cabral and Murta, 2001 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref28">28</xref>]; Hill and Borges, 2000 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref29">29</xref>]) or lipid content (Gon&#231;alves et al., 2004 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref30">30</xref>]).</p><p>In the bibliography there are no references to important issues on the Portuguese hake, such as, sex ratio, physical condition or length-weight relationships. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to present the results of a biological study on the reproduction of the hake of the Portuguese coast for the last six years, based on the length distribution of captured fish, sex ratio, total length-total weight and total length-gutted weight relationships and the conversion factor between total and gutted weights. The somatic condition of the individuals was assessed by the condition factor, the gonadosomatic and the hepatosomatic indices and the spawning season was identified by the annual evolution of the maturity stages and the monthly changes in the gonads weights.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>This work reports the results of the analysis of a 6-year time series (January 2005-December 2010) of some of the biological parameters that characterize the physical condition and reproduction of the Portuguese hake.</p><p>Our study was based on two sources of data:</p><p>1) random samples collected from landings at 12 fishing ports distributed by the portuguese NUTS II: Matosinhos and P&#243;voa do Varzim (North), Aveiro and Figueira da Foz (Center), Nazar&#233;, Peniche, Sesimbra and Set&#250;bal (Lisbon and Tagus Valley), Sines (Alentejo), Portim&#227;o, Olh&#227;o and Vila Real de Santo Ant&#243;nio (Algarve), which location is shown in Map 1.</p><p>2) samples collected by IPIMAR technicians on board</p><p>of commercial vessels operating in this sea area, in order to obtain information on the smaller individuals rejected to the sea by the fishing fleet.</p><p>In total 8212 samples were collected and after being screened to exclude those presenting sampling errors, such as total weight lower than gutted weight, 4935 were analysed. Given the large amount of information, impossible to present entirely in this kind of work, annual data were pooled by month and dealt by sex and by combined sexes, since hake stock assessment is based on combined sexes.</p><p>The number of individuals caught by year and the correspondent length range is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>When possible the data collected from each sample were: total length (cm), total and gutted weight (g), sex, maturity stage and gonad weight (0.1 g). Since many of the fish over 40 cm are usually gutted, total weight, sex, maturity stage and gonad weight of 1395 individuals were not recorded. Data were pooled by month.</p><p>Weight-length relationships were estimated by fitting an exponential curve, W = a L<sup>b</sup>, to the data (Ricker, 1973 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref31">31</xref>], 1975 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref32">32</xref>]). Weights and total lengths were logtransformed and the parameters a (the initial condition factor) and b (the allometric coefficient) of the W-L relationships were estimated by linear regression analysis, using the least-squares method. The degree of association between the variables W and L was calculated by the coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>). The conversion factor for gutted to total weight was also calculated by forcing the linear relationships through the co-ordinates origin.</p><p>For fish with all data, total, gutted and gonad weight, the condition factor (CF), the gonadosomatic index (GSI) and the hepatosomatic index (HSI) were also calculated, in this way: CF<sub>t</sub> = W<sub>t</sub>/L<sup>3</sup> <sub>* </sub>100 and CF<sub>g</sub> = W<sub>g</sub>/L<sup>3</sup> <sub>*</sub> 100 (Fulton, 1902) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref33">33</xref>]; GSI<sub>t</sub> = W<sub>gon</sub>/W<sub>t</sub> <sub>*</sub> 100 and GSI<sub>g</sub> = W<sub>gon</sub>/W<sub>g</sub> <sub>*</sub> 100; HSI<sub>t</sub> = W<sub>liv</sub>/W<sub>t</sub> <sub>*</sub> 100 and HSI<sub>g</sub> = W<sub>liv</sub>/W<sub>g</sub> <sub>*</sub> 100 (West, 1990) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref34">34</xref>], where CF<sub>t</sub> = condition factor obtained with total weight, CF<sub>g</sub> = condition factor obtained with gutted weight; GSI<sub>t</sub> = gonadosomatic index obtained with total weight, GSI<sub>g</sub> = gonadosomatic index obtained with gutted weight; HSI<sub>t</sub> = hepatosomatic index obtained with total weight, HSI<sub>g</sub> = hepatosomatic index obtained with gutted weight; W<sub>t</sub> = total weight (g), W<sub>g</sub> = gutted weight (g), L = total length (cm), W<sub>gon</sub> = gonad weight (g), W<sub>liv</sub> = liver weight (g). Condition factor, gonadosomatic and hepatosomatic indices were analysed by sex and within each sex the individuals were also split into immature and mature. Females were considered to be immature with less than 38 cm total length and males were considered immature with less than 26 cm total length, based on the mean of the L<sub>50</sub> calculated for the years from 2006 to 2009 from the individuals obtained with visceras (Costa et al., 2009) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref21">21</xref>].</p><p>Conversion factors between gutted and total weights were calculated by sex for all fish sampled.</p><p>The weight of the viscera was calculated by sex, as a percentage of the total weight. The spawning season was estimated by studying the percentages of maturity stages assigned de visu to each specimen, based on the macroscopic maturity scale key for hake (ICES, 2007) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref35">35</xref>] (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) along with the ovary weight and the obtained GSI and HSI.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>Although the studied period started in January 2005 and finished in December 2010, to understand the importance of this species along the years, the hake landings and fish auction market price were analysed for the all decade (2000-2010) and are presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p><p>The annual length distribution of sampled hake landed by the different fishing gears in the studied period is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p><p>Total lengths of fish sampled ranged from 7.3 to 93.3 cm, with 49.8% of the fish belonging to 30 to 50 cm length. Total length of females ranged from 20.0 cm (with 44.0 g weight) in April, to 82.8 cm (with 5304.0</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. Number of M. merluccius caught during 2005-2010 in the Portuguese coast.</p><p><img src="2-1470059\8b3ef63f-34fa-465f-9ede-3c21462f5ef9.jpg" /></p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. Hake macroscopic maturity stages (ICES, 2007).</p><p><img src="2-1470059\d55bf113-1eb8-4447-81b7-e73aff182198.jpg" /></p><p>g weight) in July. Total length of males ranged from 20.0 cm (with 46.0 g weight) in April to 66.1 cm (with 2057.9 g weight) in May. Fish smaller than 25 cm length, with high numbers in 2005, decreased greatly in the samples of 2006, but from 2007 onwards their abundance raised and in 2010 the number of fish sampled with less than 25 cm was very high. The number of sampled fish bigger than 55 cm length was in general low in all the years.</p><p>Fish smaller than 20.0 cm length were not sexedwhatled to a total of 5215 fish macroscopically sexed (3592 females and 1623 males). Individuals whose sex assign ment presented doubts were not considered. Most of the fish sexed belonged to length range 20 - 30 cm (86.8%) and 30 - 40 cm (91.5%), showing a sex ratio close to 1:1 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). In length classes bigger than 40</p><p>cm the proportion of fish sexed was smaller but there was a high predominance of females, in particular among the individuals over 50 cm length (97.3%).</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Length-Weight Relationships</title><p>The relationships between total length and total weight were determined for both sexes by month in a total of 5471 specimens (1889 males and 3582 females). The estimated parameters of the total length-total weight relationships, the number of fish, length and weight ranges and the correlation coeficients are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> (years are pooled by month).</p><p>The same parameters were estimated for the total length-gutted weight relationships, with a total of 6657 fish, which are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>. In this table, where</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. Monthly total length-total weight relationships for hake in the Portuguese coast for the period 2005-2010 (years are pooled by month).</p><p><img src="2-1470059\a465fa7a-c8bb-4e10-a4f8-02ab57bfd9d2.jpg" /></p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>. Monthly total length-gutted weight relationships for hake in the Portuguese coast for the perid 2005-2010 (years are pooled by month).</p><p><img src="2-1470059\f9d5e2c6-2671-4e9d-863b-bc50a96e6ca6.jpg" /></p><p><img src="2-1470059\1bf70d11-7e72-46d8-ae06-bdf7d75d7925.jpg" /></p><p>years are pooled by month, the values of sexes combined were obtained not only with the sexed fish but also with the adult fish (over 20 cm length) landed already gutted.</p><p>The total length and weights relationships for the total individuals sampled and by sexes are shown in Tables 5 and 6.</p><p>Length-weight relationships were statistically compared to determine whether there were differences in growth rate between males and females, considering the same length ranges for comparison. The results seem to indicate that the annual growth is similar for males and females (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>).</p><p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref> are shown the monthly relationships between total and gutted weights for males, females and sexes combined, the length and weight ranges, number of fish sampled and the correlation coefficient obtained (years are pooled by month).</p><p>Grouping together the monthly values of total and gutted weights the relationships found are: W<sub>t</sub> = 7.0261 + 0.892W<sub>g</sub> for males, W<sub>t</sub> = 16.3313 + 0.845W<sub>g</sub> for females and W<sub>t</sub> = 15.8112 + 0.848W<sub>g</sub> for sexes combined.</p><p>Considering the same length ranges, total weightgutted weight relationships were also statistically compared for both sexes, showing that the annual growth is different for total weight and gutted weight (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>).</p><p>According to these results the growth rates of males and females are similar for both sexes although higher when calculated with total weight than with gutted weight.</p><p>Conversion factors between gutted and total weights are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref>.</p><p>Grouping together the monthly conversion factors between gutted and total weights the values obtained are: 1.0980 for males, 1.1585 for females and 1.1524 for sexes combined.</p><p>As seen in the <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>, and particularly in females, in the length classes over 30 cm viscera represent more than 10% of the total weight and more than 15% in length classes over 60 cm. Considering the mean weight of all length classes viscera account for 13.28% of total weight. The monthly evolution of the visceras weights show for both sexes an increasing trend from January to August, then decreasing until November rising again in December, particularly in females.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Somatic Condition</title><p>Condition factor (Fulton factor) was calculated with total weight (TW) and gutted weight (GW). Mature females (&#179;38 cm) showed always higher values than immature females (&lt;38 cm) during the entire period, with a similar but smoother oscillation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>).</p><p>Both immature (&lt;26 cm) and mature males (&#179;26 cm) didn’t show high variations of this index along the year.</p><p>The gonadosomatic index, obtained either with the total weight (TW) or the gutted weight (GW), showed the same general pattern for males and females along the year (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). The values of both indices for females were about 3 times higher of the values of the same indices for males. Immature and mature females showed an opposite variation of GSI during the first semester but in the second half of the year the variation was similar for all the females. Due to the lack of samples this comparison could not be done for males.</p><p>The monthly evolution of the hepatosomatic index obtained with the total weight (HSI<sub>t</sub>) and the gutted weight (HSI<sub>g</sub>) was similar for mature and immature fish, with the HSI<sub>g</sub> values slightly higher (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). Females’ maximum values of these indices were found in the beginning of the 4th quarter (October) while mature males (&#179;26 cm) showed a sharp increase in June.</p><p>For both sexes the Pearson coefficient (r) shows stronger correlations (Cohen, 1988) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref36">36</xref>] between GSI and CF or HSI when using gutted weight (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0). With total weight those relationships are in general medium and between HSI and CF they are weak, either for males or females.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>. Total length-total weight relationships for hake in the Portuguese coast for the period 2005-2010.</p><p><img src="2-1470059\dd3025c8-730c-4bc5-92ae-0955011833ae.jpg" /></p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>. Total length-gutted weight relationships for hake in the Portuguese coast for the period 2005-2010.</p><p><img src="2-1470059\4466cab1-70af-44c4-8a98-5ce44c98bcfe.jpg" /></p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>. Statitical analysis of the growth rate of Portuguese hake.</p><p><img src="2-1470059\56209045-14df-436c-ae98-a585909a9876.jpg" /></p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Spawning Season</title><p>The annual evolution of the maturity stages is a good indicator of the spawning period of a species.</p><p>The analysis by sex of the proportion of each maturity stage along the year (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>) shows that immature females were present in higher proportions than immature males in every month. In the mature stages (2, 3 and 4) males were in general present at higher proportions, except for maturity stage 3. The months with the highest proportion of mature stages were May for females (74%) and November for males (94%). Considering both sexes May showed the highest proportion of mature stages (76%).</p><p>Another indicator of the spawning season is the monthly evolution of the ovary weight (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>).</p><p>In this graphic the 4 peaks of higher ovaries weights (averages) are signalised (sp.) and interpreted as “spawning peaks” and the ascending lines are considered as following recovering periods. Although 2727 ovaries were weighted, the low values observed in December and January are probably due to an insufficient number of individuals sampled (7 and 123, respectively), while in the rest of the year a mean of 260 ovaries were weighted per month.</p><p>According to the length class, females spawn mainly three times per year, in January-March, May-June and August, as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>1. These observations seem to indicate that the start of the spawning is independent of fish length, since the spawning peaks occur at the same time for all the fish lengths. The ascending lines shown in the previous figure in October, November and December may represent only false spawning peaks, due to the small number of individuals analysed in those months.</p><p>Another fact that can be observed is the increase of the weights of the ovaries with length, which can be explained since normally the gonads are bigger on bigger exemplars.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>One of the most important and exploited fish species in western demersal fisheries is the european hake (Merluccius merluccius L., 1758) (Casey and Pereiro, 1995) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref37">37</xref>], not only due to its high abundance and large distribution but also because of its role in the food chain. Since 1978 the ICES Working Group on the Assessment of Southern Shelf Demersal Stocks (WGSSDS) distinguishes two hake stocks for assessment purposes: the northern stock and the southern stock (ICES, 1979) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref38">38</xref>]. Both stocks are outside safe biological limits and EU has developed in 2006 a recovery plan for the southern stock of this species (EU, 2011) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref39">39</xref>]. Taking this into account, the administration authorities need cientific advice to ensure the sustainable management of those species, in order to protect the spawning stock. Therefore, in particular during the spawning season, management measures must be taken, which may consist of seasonal bans, the reduction of fishing effort and the update of the estimation of length at first maturity (L<sub>50</sub>), since this parameter can change as a result of the fishing intensity or exploitation pattern (BIOSDEF, 1998) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref40">40</xref>]. One of the most important management measures for a certain species is the establishment of its minimum landing size, along with the obligation of discarding to the sea all the individuals with smaller sizes. In order to have a biological meaning this minimum size must allow the individuals to reach the size of reproduction, but it must also take into account the characteristics of the fishing gear that captures that species, in other words, its selectivity. The Council Regulation (EC) No. 850/98 of 30 March 1998 established for the european hake the minimum landing size of 27 cm.</p><p>Due to the economical importance of hake there are abundante studies about several subjects, such as, biology, maturity, fecundity, reproduction, distribution and growth, not only on the species Merluccius merluccius (Biagi et al., 1995 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref41">41</xref>]; de Pontual et al., 2006 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref42">42</xref>]; Dom&#237;nguez-Petit et al., 2008 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref43">43</xref>]; El Habouz et al., 2011 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref44">44</xref>]; Korta et al., 2010 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref45">45</xref>]; Murua and Motos, 2006 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref46">46</xref>]; Murua et al., 1998 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref47">47</xref>]; Pi&#241;eiro and Sainza, 2003 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref48">48</xref>]; Velasco and Olaso, 1998 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref49">49</xref>], among others) as on the other species of Merluccius (e.g. Balbontin and Fischer, 1981 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref50">50</xref>]; Fern&#225;ndez-Peralta et al., 2011 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref51">51</xref>]; Honji et al., 2006 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref52">52</xref>]; Relini et al., 2002 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref53">53</xref>]). Although in Portugal there has been a directed trawl fishery for white hake for many years and substantial quantities are catch with different fishing gears, biological investigations have been rather limited. Thereby, in the present study some parameters are presented and discussed in order to clarify some characteristics related to the biology of Merluccius merluccius that inhabits the waters along the portuguese coast.</p><p>Regarding the length distribution of hake along the years, fish smaller than 25 cm, present in 2005, almost desappeared in 2006, increasing again in 2007, what might be explained by the fluctuations of the recruitment indices in those years. The oscillations in hake catches are not a portuguese problem in particular. Since the 1960s (FAO, 2010) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref54">54</xref>] European hake catches have been decreasing and the commercial viability of aqua</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>. Monthly total weight (W<sub>t</sub>)-gutted weight (W<sub>g</sub>) relationships for hake in the Portuguese coast for the period 2005- 2010 (years are pooled by month).</p><p><img src="2-1470059\b10053ef-8485-46f6-b4f0-8435c2a314fc.jpg" /> <img src="2-1470059\f22674b2-02cf-4446-ad0e-27d49bcbb951.jpg" /></p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref>. Conversion factor for gutted weight (Wg) to Total Weight (Wt) by sex and by month for hake in the Portuguese coast in the period 2005-2010 (years are pooled by month).</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27164-formula51218"><graphic  xlink:href="2-1470059\28ef03a1-33e2-4574-8d27-d847e11535d2.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><img src="2-1470059\7fc50759-fba5-4797-a491-72a997f16df6.jpg" /> <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0. Pearson correlation coeficient of GSI, HSI and K for hake of the Portuguese coast calculated using the total and gutted weight in the period 2005-2010.</p><p><img src="2-1470059\8c6a98b7-0f86-410d-a0a4-d1483815db94.jpg" /></p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>1. Peaks of hake spawning in the Portuguese coast in the period 2005-2010. <img src="2-1470059\3a7c6149-d0c6-4c51-af8d-85c6b96a29c5.jpg" /></p><p>culture production has recently increased (Groison, 2010 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref55">55</xref>]; Hiney et al., 2002 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref56">56</xref>]; Kjesbu et al., 2006 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref57">57</xref>]). some researchers have even stated that the hake is one of the most promising new species for marine aquaculture (Engelsen et al., 2004) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref58">58</xref>]. Recruitment indices of hake in the portuguese coast have been varying in the last decades, showing a decreasing trend from 1990 to 1995, followed by a strong oscillation from 1995 onwards (Cardador et al., 2009) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref59">59</xref>]. Maybe this is responsible for the decreasing catches verified at the middle of the 2000 decade. However, the recovery plan for the southern stock of hake implemented by the E.U. in 2006, as well as the ban on fishing in the portuguese waters between Milfontes and Arrifana, from the 1st of December to the last day of February for the protection of the juveniles, are most likely contributing to the increase of the abundance indices in the most recent years—an increase of 65% in 2007 compared with the previous years. Unlike juveniles, that distribute between 100 and 200 meters depth (Cardador et al., 2009) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref59">59</xref>], bigger individuals, living at higher depths, are always caught in smaller numbers. In the present study fish with more than 50 cm total length corresponded to 19% and those with more than 60 cm corresponded to 5% of all the sampled specimens. Yet, these numbers may not reflect the size structure of the exploited population since the discards of the species Merluccius merluccius were very high in the years 2004-2005, 18% (Fernandes et al., 2008) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref60">60</xref>], while in 2007-2008 the discards of hake, mainly of individuals smaller then 27 cm (the legal minimum length) were higher then the species landings (Cardador et al., 2009) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref59">59</xref>].</p><p>Similar observations are referred by Lucio et al. (1998) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref61">61</xref>] for the Bay of Biscay, where only 10% of the captured fish were 45 - 49 cm and less than 5% had more than 60 cm. Pi&#241;eiro et al. (1998) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref62">62</xref>] also mention that very few individuals were caught with more than 60 cm in the ICES Div. VIIIc and IXa.</p><p>In the present study sex ratio for the length classes smaller than 40 cm was close to 1:1. In the individuals over 40 cm length females were predominant (1:0.13) while in the classes over 50 cm the abundance of females almost reached the 100% (1:0.03). The several authors that refer the sex ratio of the different hake populations present, in some cases, results different from ours, stating that in length classes under 40 cm males are predominant. Pi&#241;eiro et al. (1998) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref62">62</xref>], Sainza and P&#233;rez (1998) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref63">63</xref>] and Lucio et al. (1998) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref61">61</xref>], studied the biology of demersal fish of the Bay of Biscay and the Cantabrian Sea, within the project BIOSDEF, and refer that in the length classes 25 - 45 cm prevailed the males, while in length classes 45 - 55 cm the proportion of the two sexes was of 1:1. A similar result was observed by Pi&#241;eiro and Sainza (2003) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref48">48</xref>] in Iberian Atlantic waters corresponding to ICES divisions VIIIc and IXa for the individuals under 45 cm length, but for the bigger classes observations were slightly different, with the males outnumbering the females, after which females predominated and rapidly increased in relative abundance to reach 100% in fish larger than 60 cm. Also El Habouz et al. (2011) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref44">44</xref>], working with hake from the eastern central Atlantic, refer that the evolution of the sex ratio in the length class interval 17 to 45 cm was close to 1:1 and that only females were found over 45 cm length. Higher number of males for intermediate sizes and higher number of females for larger sizes has been observed by Fari&#241;a and Fern&#225;ndez (1986) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref64">64</xref>] in the West of Ireland, in the Portuguese coast by Portuguese researchers during five years of surveys (ICES, 1982 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref65">65</xref>], 1983 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref66">66</xref>], 1986 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref67">67</xref>], 1987 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref68">68</xref>], 1988 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref69">69</xref>]), as well as in the bay of Biscay by Martin (1991) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref70">70</xref>] and Lucio et al. (1998) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref61">61</xref>]. Sarano (1983) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref71">71</xref>] states that in the Gulf of Gascony most of the smaller individuals were males, while the bigger fish were predominantly females. Finally, Angelescu et al. (1958) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref72">72</xref>] show a proportion of 2:1 in favor of the females of the Argentine Sea. Despite these different observations, the results of all the authors indicate, just like ours, that in length classes over 60 cm the percentage of females reaches almost the 100%. This can be due to the differences in the growth rates of the two sexes, the natural mortality rate of old males may be much higher than that of females or to the different behaviour and consequently different acessibility of fish (Pi&#241;eiro, 2011) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref1">1</xref>]. Likewise, if male grow at a smaller rate, particularly after the start of reproduction the effect of growth and the mortality rate at length would lead to a bigger percentage of females at bigger length (Martin, 1991) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref70">70</xref>]. Indeed, a recent study of the growth of European hake using tagging and recapture techniques (Mellon-Duval et al., 2010) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref73">73</xref>] shows that from the second year of life, females grow faster than males.</p><p>The allometry coefficient is expressed by the exponent b of the linear weight-length relationship equation. This relationship reflects an isometric growth when b = 3, i.e., when the relative growth of both variables is perfectly identical (Mayrat, 1970 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref74">74</xref>]; Ricker, 1973 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref31">31</xref>], 1975 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref32">32</xref>]). If b &lt; 3 we are in presence of a negative allometric growth and if b &gt; 3 we have a positive allometric growth (Sokal and Rohlf, 1987) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref75">75</xref>]. In general, the estimates of length-weight relationships obtained in this study, based either on the total weight or the gutted weight, are close to those obtained by other authors in previous studies, not only for the portuguese coast but also for the adjacent areas of hake distribution (Cardador, 1988 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref8">8</xref>]; Cardenas and Fern&#225;ndez, 1981 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref76">76</xref>]; Godinho and Afonso, 1998 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref77">77</xref>]; ICES, 1991 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref78">78</xref>]; Lucio et al., 1998 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref61">61</xref>]; Morey et al., 2003 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref79">79</xref>]; Moutopoulos and Stergiou, 2002 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref80">80</xref>]; Pi&#241;eiro et al., 1998 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref62">62</xref>]; Pi&#241;eiro and Sainza, 2003 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref48">48</xref>]; Santos et al., 2002 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref13">13</xref>]). Most of the results reported are related to the relationships between total length and total weight and to both sexes combined. Only few authors present these relationships between total length and gutted weight and with reference to males and females separately (Godinho and Afonso, 1998 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref77">77</xref>]; Lucio et al., 1998 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref61">61</xref>]; Pi&#241;eiro and Sainza, 2003 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref48">48</xref>]; Pi&#241;eiro et al., 1998 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref62">62</xref>]). We also could not find any reference to these relationships on a monthly basis, which we consider to be important since the gonads weights, mainly the ovaries, may vary considerably according to the time of the year, in particular along the spawning season, when the ovaries undergo a high increase in weight. Other factors, such as food availability on fish growth (Mommsen, 1998) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref81">81</xref>], spatial variation due to the influence of water quality (Sparre et al., 1989) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref82">82</xref>] or feeding rate (Santos et al., 2002 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref13">13</xref>]) can also affect the length-weight relationships. However, the parameter b is characteristic of the species (Mayrat, 1970) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref74">74</xref>] and generally does not vary significantly throughout the year, unlike the parameter a, which may very daily, seasonally and/or between different habitats (Bagenal and Tesch, 1978) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref83">83</xref>]. So, we conclude that the observed differences with the values reported in other studies can be due to differences in the number of samples at length distribution margins, by the time of the year when sampling took place or to the selective characteristics of fishing gear. The conversion factor between gutted and total weights found in our study is of the same kind of the ones presented by Cardenas and Fern&#225;ndez (1981a) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref84">84</xref>] for the ICES Divisions VIIIc and IXa and by Lucio et al. (1998) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref61">61</xref>] for the Bay of Biscay in particular.</p><p>The condition factor gives a general idea of the body condition, in terms of weight, of the fish along the year. The results of the present study, similar to the results presented by other authors (Lucio et al., 1998 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref61">61</xref>]; Murua, 2006 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref85">85</xref>]; P&#233;rez and Pereiro, 1985 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref86">86</xref>]) seem to show that hake condition, considering either the total or the gutted weight, is higher in autumn (November/December), decreasing in winter and reaching its minimum in spring (April). The general pattern observed, similar for both sexes, although for males with less marked fluctuations, maybe due to the fact that in females there is a higher transfer of energy, expressed in terms of weight, to the development of the ovaries.</p><p>There are several indicators that, along with the condition factor, allow us to define the spawning season of a certain species, including the indexes of the somatic condition (GSI and HSI), the annual distribution of the maturity stages and the gonads weight. In the present study the distribution of the maturity stages along the year, in particular the occurrence of maturity stages 2 (maturing) and 3 (spawning), as well as the annual distribution of the gonads weight, seem to indicate that spawning lasts from January to August, although with several peaks. Gonadosomatic index expresses the maturity of the gonads and its higher values indicate that the gonads are developing, while its lower values indicate the end of the spawning period (Lahaye, 1972) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref87">87</xref>]. During maturation the fat reserves accumulated in the liver during the HSI peaks are mobilized to the ovaries oogenesis and the hepatosomatic index decreases rapidly (Billard, 1979 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref88">88</xref>]; Lahaye, 1972 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref87">87</xref>]). In the present study, although this observation is not very clear, an increasing trend of the GSI can be seen along the first semester, while HSI showed a decreasing tendency. These observations are in accordance to the fact that the European hake is reproductively active for almost the entire year and spawning females are found all the year round (Murua and Motos, 2006) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref46">46</xref>] and so the annual evolution of the two indexes is not as clear as in species with a shorter spawning season (El Habouz et al., 2011) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref44">44</xref>].</p><p>The analysis of the total results of this study and considering the presence of maturity stage 1 (Immature or Resting), present throughout the year, and the monthly distribution of the weights of the gonads, it seems that the hake of the portuguese coast has a long spawning season, but where three stronger spawning peaks seem to be identified, March, May and August, and a weeker one in October. The same results are presented by Monteiro and Dias (1965) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref3">3</xref>], who refer that female hakes from the Portuguese coast spawn all year around, with a higher intensity in Spring and Summer. Similar observations are pointed out by other authors that refer a long spawning season for the species Merluccius merluccius, as well as the presence of individuals mature and immature throughout the year (Al-Absawey, 2010 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref89">89</xref>]; El Habouz et al., 2011 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref44">44</xref>]; Pi&#241;eiro and Sainza, 2003 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref48">48</xref>]). The winter spawning season has been observed previously in the Moroccan Atlantic (El Habouz, 1995 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref90">90</xref>]; Ramos et al., 1990 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref91">91</xref>], 1991 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref92">92</xref>]), while Maurin (1954) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref93">93</xref>] refered for the same area a longer spawning season, from December to the beginning of summer. Two peaks have also been observed in winter and summer in the CECAF area (Cervantes and Go&#241;i, 1986) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref94">94</xref>], January-February, and a secondary peak in summer, July-August, while a maximum spawning peak was observed from January to March on the north Atlantic Spanish coast (Perez and Pereiro, 1981 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref95">95</xref>]) Pi&#241;eiro and Sainza, 2003 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref48">48</xref>]) and in the Bay of Biscay (Murua and Motos, 2006 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref46">46</xref>]). In the Mediterranean Sea, Bouhlal (1973) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref96">96</xref>] observed a maximum spawning peak in winter and two othersmaller peaks in spring and late summer in the Gulf of Tunis, while &#193;lvarez et al. (2001) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref97">97</xref>] refer for the NE Atlantic that the spawning season extends from February to July. Other studies into the reproductive biology of European hake have indicated that this species spawns from January through July, along the shelf edge from the Bay of Biscay to the southwest of Ireland (&#193;lvarez et al., 2004 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref98">98</xref>]; Lucio et al., 2000 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref99">99</xref>]; Martin, 1991 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref70">70</xref>]). Other species of Merluccius, living in other geographical areas, also present long spawning seasons. M. hubbsi Marini, 1933, from the Patagonian waters, spawns from December to March, with a peak in January-February (Macchi et al., 2004 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref100">100</xref>]); the spawning season of M. productus Ayres, 1855, from Canada, extends from February to June (Mason, 1986 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref101">101</xref>]), while the results of Pay&#225; and Ehrhardt (2005) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref102">102</xref>] and Landaeta and Castro (2012) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref103">103</xref>] studying M. gayi gayi Guichenot, 1848 and M. australis Hutton, 1872, from the Chile indicate that the spawning season lasts from late summer to early autumn. In the NW Pacific M. albidus Mitchill, 1818, spawns from April to July (Traver et al., 2012 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref104">104</xref>]). M. senegalensis Cadenat, 1950 and M. polli Cadenat, 1950, also called black hakes, are two species which distribution area overlaps with the European hake M. merluccius and which spawning season lasts from November to February (Fern&#225;ndez-Peralta et al., 2011 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27164-ref51">51</xref>]).</p><p>This study addresses a set of reliable parameters that can be used to undertake new assessments filling the gap of information available on the reproductive biology of European hake inhabiting the Portuguese coast. After a detailed analysis we did not find significant differences in relation to the results presented by other authors, either for the Iberian Peninsula or the adjacent areas. This work can therefore be the basis for the development of other fields of study, more delimited in space or in time.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by the PNAB/EU DCR-Data Collection Regulation. The author is grateful to Doctor Alberto Murta for his help with statistical analysis and all the technicians that along these years have performed the biological sampling that made this work possible.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.27164-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. Pineiro, “Edad y Crecimiento de la Merluza Europea Merluccius merluccius (Linnaeus, 1758) del Noroeste de la Península Ibérica: Evolución de un Paradigma,” Tesis Doctoral, Universidade de Vigo, Vigo, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">International Council for the Exploration of the Sea “Report of the Working Group on the Assessment of Southern Shelf Demersal Stocks,” International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Koepenhamn, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Monteiro and M. Lima Dias, “On Some Aspects of the Ovary Development in the Hake (Merluccius merluccius L.) of the Portuguese Coast,” International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Koepenhamn, 1965.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Monteiro and M. Lima Dias, “On Some Aspects of the Fecundity of the Hake (Merluccius merluccius L.) of the Portuguese Coast,” International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Koepenhamn, 1966.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. F. Cardador, “Factors Influencing the Distribution and Abundance of Hake (Merluccius Merluccius) in the Portuguese Waters (ICES, Div. IXa) Based on Groundfish Surveys Data,” International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Koepenhamn, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. Ibaibarriaga, X. Irigoien, M. Santos, L. Motos, J. M. Fives, C. Franco, A. Lago de Lanzos, S. Acebedo, M. Bernal, N. Bez, G. Eltink and A. Farinha, “Egg and Larvae Distribution of Seven Fish Species in the North East Atlantic Waters,” Fisheries Oceanography, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2007, pp. 284-293.  
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2419.2007.00430.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Campos and P. Fonseca, “Selectivity of Diamond and Square Mesh Cod Ends for Horse Mackerel (Trachurus trachurus), European Hake (Merluccius merluccius) and Axillary Seabream (Pagellus acarne) in the Shallow Groundfish Assemblage off the South-West Coast of Portugal,” Scientia Marina, Vol. 67, No. 2, 2003, pp. 249-260.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. F. Cardador, “Estratégias de Exploracao do Stock de Pescada (Merluccius merluccius L.) das águas Ibero-Atlanticas. Efeitos em Stocks Associados. Dissertacao Para Provas de Acesso à Categoria de Investigador Auxiliar,” Instituto Nacional de Investigacao das Pescas, Lisboa, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. F. Cardador, “Southern Stock of Hake (ICES Divisions VIIIc + IXa): Simulations of Different Fishing Strategies,” International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Koepenhamn, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. L. Dias and M. F. Cunha, “The Portuguese Fishery in the Southeast Atlantic (1982-1983) and Biological Studies on Hakes Merluccius capensis and M. paradoxus during 1984,” Collection of Scientific Papers ICSEAF, Vol. 13, 1984, pp. 37-87.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Fonseca, R. Martins, A. Campos and P. Sobral, “Gill-Net Selectivity off the Portuguese Western Coast,” Fisheries Research, Vol. 73, No. 3, 2005, pp. 323-339.  
doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2005.01.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">O. Moura and F. Cardador, “Pescada, Lagostim, Carapau E Sardinha da Costa Continental Portuguesa: Situacao e Propostas de Gestao Para 2005,” IPIMAR Divulgacao, Lisboa, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. N. Santos, M. B. Gaspar, P. Vasconcelos and C. C. Monteiro, “Weight/Length Relationship for 50 Selected Fish Species of the Algarve Coast (Southern Portugal),” Fisheries Research, Vol. 59, No. 1-2, 2002, pp. 289-295.  
doi:10.1016/S0165-7836(01)00401-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. M. Caramelo, “Results of the Young Hake Surveys in Portuguese Waters in October-November 1981-1982,” International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Koepenhamn, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. Cardador, M. F. Borges, C. Chaves and S. Groom, “Hake (Merluccius merluccius L.) Spatial and Temporal Recruitment Variability as a Key Species in the Portuguese Upwelling Ecosystem,” International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Koepenhamn, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Mendes, M. F. Borges, C. L. Scott and C. Frid, “Climatic Impact on Hake Recruitment in Iberian Peninsula and Implications for Fisheries Management: An Inexfish Project Study,” International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Koepenhamn, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. L. Marecos, M. E. Vasconcelos, M. H. Diniz and C. C. Monteiro, “Reuniao Sobre o Crescimento da Pescada, Verdinho e Carapau,” Relatórios Técnicos e Científicos INIP, Lisboa, No. 18, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. L. Godinho, M. H. Afonso and C. Morgado, “Age and Growth of Hake Merluccius merluccius Linnaeus, 1758 from the Northeast Atlantic (ICES division Ixa),” Boletino del Instituto Espa?ol de Oceanografia, Vol. 17, No. 3-4, 2001, pp. 255-262. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. Jardim, V. Trujillo and P. Sampedro, “Uncertainties in Sampling Procedures for Age Composition of Hake and Sardine in Iberian Atlantic Waters,” Scientia Marina, Vol. 68, No. 4, 2004, pp. 561-569.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Salgado, E. Jardim and M. A. Dias, “Study of Methods to Evaluate the Determination of Age Applied to Hake Merluccius merluccius of the Portuguese Coast,” Relatórios Científicos e Técnicos, IPIMAR, Série Digital, Lisboa, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. M. Costa, E. Jardim, P. Goncalves and C. Morgado, “Imaturo ou em Repouso? Implicacoes Nas Ogivas de Maturacao da Pescada do Stock Sul,” 2009. 
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/39081.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Gon?alves, M. E. Cunha and A. M. Costa, “Escala de Maturacao Microscópica E Macroscópica Das Gónadas Femininas de Pescada (Merluccius merluccius),” Relatórios Científicos e Técnicos do IPIMAR, Série digital, Lisboa, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. M. Costa and P. Gon?alves, “Immature/Resting Macroscopic Misclassification: What Happens with the European Hake Males (Southern Stock Case)?” 2009. 
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/24937. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Dominguez-Petit, “Study of Reproductive Potential of Merluccius merluccius in the Galician Shelf,” Doctoral Thesis, University of Vigo, Vigo, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. Saborido Rey and S. Junquera, “Histological Assessment of the Variations in Sexual Maturity of Cod (Gadus morhua) in Flemish Cap (Northwest Atlantic),” ICES Journal of Marine Science, Vol. 55, No. 3, 1998, pp. 515-521. doi:10.1006/jmsc.1997.0344</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. Marques, “A Copepod Parasite in the Hake,” Garcia de Orta: Serie de zoologia, Vol. 12, No. 1-2, 1985, pp. 17-18.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. P. Silva, “Kudoa Sp. in the Muscle of Whiting (Merluccius merluccius (L.)),” Repositório de Trabalhos do Laboratório Nacional de Investigacao Veterinária (Portugal), Vol. 16, 1984, pp. 151-154.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. N. Cabral and A. G. Murta, “The Diet of Blue Whiting, Hake, Horse Mackerel and Mackerel off Portugal,” Journal of Applied Ichthyology, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2001, pp. 14-23. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0426.2002.00297.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. Hill and M. F. Borges, “A Comparison of the Seasonal Abundance of Hake (Merluccius merluccius) and Its Main Prey Species off the Portuguese Coast,” International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Koepen- hamn, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Goncalves, N. M. Bandarra, M. Monteiro, A. M. Costa and E. Cunha, “Evolution of the Total Lipids in Muscle and Gonads of Hake (Merluccius merluccius) during Gonadal Development,” International Council for the Ex- ploration of the Sea, Koepenhamn, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">W. E. Ricker, “Linear Regressions in Fishery Research,” Journal of Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Vol. 30, No. 3, 1973, pp. 409-434. doi:10.1139/f73-072</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">W. E. Ricker, “Computation and Interpretation of Biological Statistics of Fish Populations,” Journal of Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Vol. 191, 1975, pp. 202-233.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. Fulton, “Rate of Growth of Sea Fish,” 20th Annual Report of the Fishery Board for Scotland, London, 1902.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. West, “Methods of Assessing Ovarian Development in Fishes: A Review,” Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, Vol. 41, No. 2, 1990, pp. 199-222.  
doi:10.1071/MF9900199</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, “Report of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea/GLOBEC Working Group on Cod and Climate Change (WGCCC),” International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Koepenhamn, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Cohen, “Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences,” Erlbaum, Hillsdale, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">J. Casey and J. Pereiro, “European Hake (M. merluccius) in the Northeast Atlantic,” In: J. Alheit and T. J. Pitcher, Eds., Hake: Fisheries, ecology and markets, Chapman and Hall, London, 1995, pp. 125-148.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, “Report of the Working Group on Assessment of Hake Stocks,” International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Koepenhamn, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">EU, “Relatório da Comissao ao Parlamento Europeu, ao Conselho, ao Comité Económico e Social Europeu e ao Comité das Regioes. Aplicacao do Plano de Recuperacao das Unidades Populacionais de pescada do Sul e de Lagostins,” 2011. 
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0418:FIN:PT:PDF</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">BIOSDEF, “Biological Studies of Demersal Fish,” Final Report to the Commission of European Communities, Study Contract DGXIV, Bruxelles, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. Biagi, A. Cesarini, M. Sbrana and C. Viva, “Reproductive Biology and Fecundity of Merluccius merluccius (Linnaeus 1758) in the Northern Tyrrhenian Sea,” Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes, Vol. 10, 1995, pp. 47-48.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. de Pontual, A. L. Groison, C. Pineiro and M. Bertignac, “Evidence of Underestimation of European Hake Growth in the Bay of Biscay, and Its Relationship with Bias in the Agreed Method of Age Estimation,” International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Journal of Marine Science, Vol. 63, No. 9, 2006, pp. 1674-1681.  
doi:10.1016/j.icesjms.2006.07.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Domínguez-Petit, M. Korta, F. Saborido-Rey, H. Murua, M. Sainza and C. Pineiro, “Changes in Size at Maturity of European Hake Atlantic Populations in Relation with Stock Structure and Environmental Regimes,” Journal of Marine Systems, Vol. 71, No. 3-4, 2008, pp. 260-278. doi:10.1016/j.jmarsys.2007.04.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. El Habouz, L. Recasens, S. Kifani, A. Moukrim, A. Bouhaimi and S. El Ayoubi, “Maturity and Batch Fecundity of the European Hake (Merluccius merluccius, Linnaeus, 1758) in the Eastern Central Atlantic,” Scientia Marina, Vol. 75, No. 3, 2011, pp. 447-454.  
doi:10.3989/scimar.2011.75n3447</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Korta, R. Domínguez-Petit, H. Murua and F. Saborido-Rey, “Regional Variability in Reproductive Traits of European Hake Merluccius merluccius L. Populations,” Fi- sheries Research Special Issue, Vol. 104, No. 1-3, 2010, pp. 64-72.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Murua and L. Motos, “Reproductive Strategy and Spawning Activity of the European Hake Merluccius merluccius (L.) in the Bay of Biscay,” Journal of Fish Biology, Vol. 69, No. 5, 2006, pp. 1288-1303.  
doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2006.01169.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Murua, L. Motos and P. Lucio, “Reproductive Modality and Batch Fecundity of the European Hake (Merluccius merluccius L.) in the Bay of Biscay,” CalCOFI Reports, Vol. 39, 1998, pp. 196-203.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. Pi?eiro and M. A. Saínza, “Age Estimation, Growth and Maturity of the European Hake (Merluccius merluccius (Linnaeus, 1758)) from Iberian Atlantic waters,” International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Journal of Marine Science, Vol. 60, No. 5, 2003, pp. 1086-1102. doi:10.1016/S1054-3139(03)00086-9 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. Velasco and I. Olaso, “European Hake Merluccius merluccius (L., 1758) Feeding in the Cantabrian Sea: Seasonal, Bathymetric and Length Variations,” Fisheries Research, Vol. 38, No. 1, 1998, pp. 33-44.  
doi:10.1016/S0165-7836(98)00111-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. Balbontin and W. Fischer, “Sexual Cycle and Fecundity of the Hake, Merluccius gayi gayi, from the Coasts of Chile,” Revue de Biologie Marine, Vol. 17, No. 3, 1981, pp. 285-334.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. Fernandéz-Peralta, F. Salméron, J. Rey, M. A. Puerto and R. García-Cancela, “Reprodutive Biology of Black Hakes (Merluccius polli and M. senegalensis) off Mauritania,” Ciencias Marinas, Vol. 37, No. 4B, 2011, pp. 527-546</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. M. Honji, A. M. Vaz-dos-Santos and C. Rossi-Wongtschowski, “Identification of the Stages of Ovarian Maturation of the Argentine Hake Merluccius hubbsi Marini, 1933 (Teleostei: Merlucciidae): Advantages and Disadvantages of the Use of the Macroscopic and Microscopic Scales,” Neotropical Ichthyology, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2006, pp. 329-337. doi:10.1590/S1679-62252006000300004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. O. Relini, C. Papaconstantinou, S. Jukic-Peladic, A. Souplet, L. G. de Sola, C. Piccinetti, S. Kavadas and M. Rossi, “Distribution of the Mediterranean Hake Populations (Merluccius merluccius smiridus Rafinesque, 1810) (Osteichthyes: Gadiformes) Based on Six Years Monitoring by Trawl-Surveys: Some Implications for Management,” Scientia Marina, Vol. 66, No. S2, 2002, pp. 21-38.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">FAO “Global Statistical Collections,” 2010. 
http://www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/global-capture-production/query/en.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A.-L. Groison, “Male Reproductive Biology of European Hake Merluccius merluccius,” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Bergen, Bergen, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Hiney, H. Rodger, I. Brickell, P. Casburn and D. Mulcahy, “Aquaculture Development and Regulation: Incompatibility or Harmony?” Bulletin of the European Association of Fish Pathologists, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2002, pp. 178-184.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">O. S. Kjesbu, G. L. Taranger and E. A. Trippel, “International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Gadoid Mariculture: Development and Future Challenges,” Journal of Marine Science, Vol. 63, No. 2, 2006, pp. 187-191.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Engelsen, F. Asche, F. Skjennum and G. Adoff, “New Species in Aquaculture: Some Basic Economic Aspects,” In: E. Moksness, E. Kjorsvik and Y. Olsen, Eds., Culture of Cold-Water Marine Fish, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 2004, pp. 487-515.  
doi:10.1002/9780470995617.ch12</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. Cardador, C. Chaves, C. Morgado and E. Jardim, “Recrutamento de Pescada em águas Continentais Portuguesas,” IPIMAR Divulgacao, Lisboa, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. C. Fernandes, S. Barbosa, D. Silva and G. Pestana, “Composicao dos Desembarques e das Rejeicoes por Espécie da Frota Portuguesa de Arrasto de Fundo,” Relatórios Científicos e Técnicos do IPIMAR, Série digital, Lisboa, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Lucio, M. Santurtún and H. Murua, “Growth and Reproduction of Hake (Merluccius merluccius) in the Bay of Biscay during 1996-1997,” International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Koepenhamn, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. Pineiro, M. Sainza, J. Fontenla and I. Loureiro, “European Hake (Merluccius merluccius) from International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Division VIIIc and IXa and Sub-Areas VII,” Final Report to the Commission of European Communities, Study Contract DGXIV, Bruxelles, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Sainza and N. Pérez, “Preliminary Result of the Hake Reproduction (Merluccius merluccius) in International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Sub-Area VII,” Final Report to the Commission of European Communities, Study Contract DGXIV, Bruxelles, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. C. Farina and A. Fernández, “Datos Biologicos de la Merluza del Oeste de Irlanda,” Informes Técnicos del Instituto Espanol de Oceanografia, Vol. 47, 1986, pp. 1-13.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, “Report of the Working Group on Assessment of Hake Stocks,” International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Koepenhamn, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, “Report of the Working Group on Assessment of Hake Stocks,” International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Koepenhamn, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, “Report of the Working Group on Assessment of Hake Stocks,” International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Koepenhamn, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, “Report of the Working Group on Assessment of Hake Stocks,” International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Koepenhamn, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, “Report of the Working Group on Assessment of Hake Stocks,” International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Koepenhamn, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">I. Martin, “A Preliminary Analysis of Same Biological Aspects of Hake (Merluccius merluccius L. 1758) in the Bay of Biscay,” International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Koepenhamn, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. Sarano, “La Reproduction du Merlu Merluccius merluccius (L.): Cycle Ovarien et fécondité. Cycle Sexual de la Population du Golfe de Gascogne. These Présentée pour Obtenir le Titre de Docteur de 3e Cycle, ” Université de Poitiers, Rochelle, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. Angelescu, F. S. Gneri, A. Nani, “La Merluza del Mar Argentino (Biologia y Taxonomia),” Universia, Buenos Aires, 1958.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. Mellon Duval, H. de Pontual, L. Metral and L. Quemener, “Growth of European Hake (Merluccius merluccius) in the Gulf of Lions Based on Conventional Tagging,” ICES Journal of Marine Science, Vol. 67, No. 1, 2010, pp. 62-70. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsp215</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Mayrat, “Allometrie et Taxonomie,” Révue de Statistique Appliquée, Vol. 18, No. 4, 1970, pp. 47-58.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. R. Sokal and F. J. Rohlf, “Introduction to Biostatistics, 2nd Edition, Freeman, New York, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. Cardenas and A. Fernández, “Length/Girth and Length/ Weight Relationships of Hake in Divisions VIIIc + IXa,” International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Koepenhamn, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. L. Godinho and M. H. Afonso, “European Hake (Merluccius merluccius) from Portuguese Waters /International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Division IXa),” Final Report to the Commission of European Communities, Study Contract DGXIV, Bruxelles, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, “Report of the Working Group on the Assessment of the Stocks of Hake,” International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Koepenhamn, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. Morey, J. Moranta, E. Massuti, A. Grau, M. Linde, F. Riera and B. Morales-Nin, “Weight-Length Relationships of Littoral to Lower Slope Fishes from the Western Mediterranean,” Fisheries Research, Vol. 62, No. 1, 2003, pp. 89-96. doi:10.1016/S0165-7836(02)00250-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. K. Moutopoulos and K. I. Stergiou, “Length-Weight and Length-Length Relationships of Fish Species from the Aegean Sea (Greece),” Journal of Applied Ichthyology, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2002, pp. 200-203.  
doi:10.1046/j.1439-0426.2002.00281.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. P. Mommsen, “Growth and Metabolism,” In: D. H. Evans, Ed., The Physiology of Fishes, CRC Press, New York, 1998, pp. 65-97.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Sparre, E. Ursin and S. C. Venema, “Introduction to Tropical Fish Stock Assessment. Part I. Manual,” FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, New York, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. B. Bagenal and F. W. Tesh, “Age and growth,” In: T. Bagenal, Ed., Methods for Asssessment of Fish Production in Freshwaters, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. Cardenas and A. Fernández, “La Relación Talla/Peso en la Merluza del Cantábrico y Galicia y su Evolución Annual,” Boletin del Instituto Espanol de Oceanografia, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1981, pp. 61-67.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Murua, “Reproductive Fundamentals for the Estimation of Egg Production of the European Hake, Merluccius merluccius, in the Bay of Biscay,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Universidad del País Vasco, Bilbao, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">N. Perez and F. J. Pereiro, “Reproductive Aspects of Hake (Merluccius merluccius L.) on the Galician and Cantabrian Shelves,” Boletin del Instituto Espanol de Oceanografia, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1985, pp. 39-47.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Lahaye, “Cycles Sexuels de Quelques Poissons Plats Des Cotes Bretonnes” Revue des Travaux de l’Institute des Pêches Maritimes, Vol. 36, No. 2, 1972, pp. 191-207.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Billard, “La Gamétogenèse, le Cycle Sexuel et le Controle de la Reproduction chez les Poissons Téleosteens,” Bulletin Francais de la Pêche et de la Pisciculture, Vol. 273, 1979, pp. 117-136. doi:10.1051/kmae:1979008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Al-Absawey, “The Reproductive Biology and the Histological and Ultrastructural Characteristics in Ovaries of the Female Gadidae Fish Merluccius merluccius from the Egyptian Mediterranean Water,” African Journal of Biotechnology, Vol. 9, No. 17, 2010, pp. 2544-2559.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. El Habouz “étude de la Biologie Et la Dynamique Des Populations Du Merlu Blanc (Merluccius merluccius, Linnaeus 1758) Débarqué par les Chalutiers Cotiers au Port d’Agadir. Thèse de troisième Cycle. Option Océanographie Biologique,” University Ibn Zohr, Agadir, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Ramos, A. Cervantes and I. Sobrino, “Estudios Biológicos Sobre la Merluza Europea (Merluccius merluccius L. 1758) del área de CECAF,” FAO, COPACE/ PACE, New York, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Ramos, I. Sobrino and Y. L. Fernández, “Oceanography and Marine Resources in the Eastern Central Atlantic,” ICCM, Palmas, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. Maurin, “Les Merlus du Maroc et Leur Pêche,” Bulletin de l’Institut des Pêches Maritimes du Maroc, Vol. 2, 1954, pp. 7-65.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Cervantes and R. Go?i, “Composición por Tallas de la Captura Espa?ola de Merluza Senegalesa (Merluccius senegalensis Cadenat 1950) y Merluza Negra (Merluccius cadenati Doutre, 1960) en el área de CECAF, A?o 1982,” FAO, COPACE/PACE, New York, 1986. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">N. Perez and F. J. Pereiro, “First Data on Sexual Maturation and Sex Ratio of Hake (Merluccius merluccius L.) from International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Divisions VIIIc and IXa,” International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Koepenhamn, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Bouhlal, “Le Merlu des Cotes Nord de la Tunisie: Etude Economique et Biologique (Reproduction, Sex-Ratio et Répartition Bathymétrique),” Bulletin de l’Institut Océanographique et Pêche, Vol. 2, No. 4, 1973, pp. 579-603.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. álvarez, J. Fives, L. Motos, and A. Uriarte, “Onshelf Transport of Hake, Merluccius merluccius, Eggs and Larvae in the NE Atlantic,” International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Koepenhamn, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. álvarez, J. Fives, L. Motos, and M. Santos, “Distribution and Abundance of European Hake Merluccius merluccius (L.) Eggs and Larvae in the NorthEast Atlantic Waters in 1995 and 1998 in Relation to Hydrographic Conditions,” Journal of Plankton Research, Vol. 26, No. 7, 2004, pp. 811-826. doi:10.1093/plankt/fbh074</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Lucio, H. Murua and M. Santurtún, “Growth and Reproduction of Hake (Merluccius merluccius) in the Bay of Biscay during 1996-1997,” Ozeanografika, Vol. 3, 2000, pp. 325-354.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. Macchi, M. Pájaro and M. Ehrlich, “Seasonal Egg Production Pattern of the Patagonian Stock of Argentine Hake (Merluccius hubbsi),” Fisheries Research, Vol. 67, No. 1, 2004, pp. 25-38. doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2003.08.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. C. Mason, “Fecundity of the Pacific Hake, Merluccius Productus, Spawning in Canadian Waters,” Fishery Bulletin, Vol. 84, No. 1, 1986, pp. 209-216.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">I. Payá and N. M. Ehrhardt, “Comparative Sustainability Mechanisms of Two Hake (Merluccius gayi gayi and Merluccius australis) Populations Subjected to Exploitation in Chile,” Bulletin of Marine Science, Vol. 76, No. 2, 2005, pp. 261-286.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. F. Landaeta and L. R. Castro, “Seasonal and Annual Variation in Chilean Hake Merluccius gayi Spawning Locations and Egg Size off Central Chile,” Progress in Oceanography, Vol. 92, No. 1, 2012, pp. 166-177.  
doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2011.07.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Traver, L. Alade and K. A. Sosebee, “Population Biology of a Data Poor Species, Offshore Hake (Merluccius albidus) in the Northwest Atlantic, United States,” Fisheries Research, Vol. 114, 2012, pp. 42-51.  
doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2011.08.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">DGPA, “Recursos da Pesca. Série Estatística, 1999” Direccao Geral das Pescas e Aquicultura, Brasília, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">DGPA, “Recursos da Pesca. Série Estatística, 2000,” Direccao Geral das Pescas e Aquicultura, Brasília, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">DGPA, “Recursos da Pesca. Série Estatística, 2001,” Direccao Geral das Pescas e Aquicultura, Brasília, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">DGPA, “Recursos da Pesca. Série Estatística, 2002,” Direccao Geral das Pescas e Aquicultura, Brasília, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">DGPA, “Recursos da Pesca. Série Estatística, 2003,” Direccao Geral das Pescas e Aquicultura, Brasília, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">DGPA, “Recursos da Pesca. Série Estatística, 2004,” Direccao Geral das Pescas e Aquicultura, Brasília, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">DGPA, “Recursos da Pesca. Série Estatística, 2005. Dirccao Geral das Pescas e Aquicultura, Brasília, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">DGPA, “Recursos da Pesca. Série Estatística, 2006,” Direccao Geral das Pescas e Aquicultura, Brasília, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">DGPA, “Recursos da Pesca. Série Estatística, 2007,” Direccao Geral das Pescas e Aquicultura, Brasília, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">DGPA, “Recursos da Pesca. Série Estatística, 2008,” Direccao Geral das Pescas e Aquicultura, Brasília, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27164-ref115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">DGPA, “Recursos da Pesca. Série Estatística, 2009,” Direccao Geral das Pescas e Aquicultura, Brasília, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>