<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Surgical Science</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2157-9407</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ss.2013.41009</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">SS-27087</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Comparison of Malignant Bone Treatments for Reuse
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>asaki</surname><given-names>Yazawa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Taisuke</surname><given-names>Mori</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kazuo</surname><given-names>Kishi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>yazawa@a7.keio.jp(AY)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>23</day><month>01</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>49</fpage><lpage>52</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>November</day>	<month>6,</month>	<year>2012</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>December</day>	<month>8,</month>	<year>2012</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>December</day>	<month>17,</month>	<year>2012</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   The After cancer resection including bone, recently, bone resected with cancer has been considered to be reusable. We newly examined superheated steam treatment for bone reuse and compared it to existing treatments. Forty male C3H/HeN mice were used to establish a model of mandible invasion by oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). The mice were sacrificed to harvest the tumor invading mandible bone. The resected tumor with mandible bone was treated by one of four kinds of treatment, no treatment for the control, the Pasteur method, liquid nitrogen treatment, micro-wave treatment and superheated steam treatment. After each treatment, the resected bone was transplanted into a syn-geneic mouse back. Eight weeks after transplantation, the mice were sacrificed and evaluated pathologically. Grafted tumors showed recurrence: 7/7 in the control, 6/8 in the liquid nitrogen treatment, 1/8 the microwave treatment and 2/8 the superheated steam treatment groups. No recurrence, on the other hand, was observed in the Pasteur method (0/8). The Pasteur method is a good treatment to remove malignant cells. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Pasteur Method; Bone Reuse; Microwave; Liquid Nitrogen</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>After cancer resection including bone, it is basically necessary to compensate for the defect of bone by reconstructive surgery. The bone is generally autologous bone taken from another part of the patient, but is sometimes allograft or artificial bone. In cases where the bone has a complicated shape or is very large in size, adequate recovery of quality of life is not achieved by reconstructive surgery.</p><p>As one solution to this issue, recently, bone resected with cancer has been considered to be reusable. Several treatments were reported and involved attempts to remove malignant cells from the bone, for example, by alcohol treatment, radiation, autoclave, water-bath treatment (Pasteur method), microwave treatment and liquid nitrogen treatment. Each treatment, however, has certain drawbacks as well as advantages. We newly examined superheated steam treatment for bone reuse and compared them to existing treatments.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Animal Care</title><p>The experimental procedure was authorized and reviewed by the Keio University Experimental Animal Center Committee (Approval #11025 (0)). Forty C3H/HeN mice (8-week-old male, body weight 25 to 30 g; purchased from Charles River Laboratories Japan Inc., Tokyo, Japan) were used in the current study. All surgery was performed in an animal-operating suite at the university.</p><sec id="s2_1_1"><title>2.1.1. Cell Culture</title><p>SCC VII cells, derived from a cell line of mouse oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), were cultured in DMEM with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% antibioticantimycotic (Gibco/Invitrogen, MI, USA) in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO<sub>2</sub> at 37˚C.</p></sec><sec id="s2_1_2"><title>2.1.2. Animal Surgery</title><p>Forty male C3H/HeN mice weighing about 25 to 30 g and aged 8 weeks old were used to establish a model of mandible invasion by OSCC as described previously [1,2]. They were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions throughout this experiment. For the mandible invasion model, mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of Avertin (Sigma-Aldrich, #T4, 840-2), and 1 &#215; 10<sup>6</sup> viable SCC VII cells in 150 &#181;l of PBS were injected s.c. into the right masseter region. Three weeks after injection, by which time the tumor had grown to 1 cm in size, the mice were sacrificed to harvest the tumor invading mandible bone. The resected tumor with mandible bone was treated by one of four kinds of treatment. No treatment was applied to the control group (C). The Pasteur method involved immersion in a hot-water bath (65˚C) for 25 minutes (P) [3,4]. Liquid nitrogen treatment involved immersion in liquid nitrogen for 20 minutes, standing at room temperature for 15 minutes, and immersion in distilled water for 10 minutes (N) [5-10]. Microwave treatment involved heating in a microwave oven (1000 W microwave mode: Healsio AX-PX1, Sharp Corporation, Japan) for 2 minutes (M) [11-15]. Finally, superheated steam treatment involved heating in a superheated steam oven (80˚C superheated steam mode: Healsio AX-PX1, Sharp Corporation, Japan) for 10 minutes (S). After each treatment, the resected bone was transplanted into a syngeneic mouse back, and the skin was closed using surgical sutures. Eight weeks after transplantation, the mice were sacrificed and evaluated pathologically.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>The cultured SCC VII injection into masseter muscle at 0.2 ml (1 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup> ml) produced a tumor of 1 cm in diameter in 3 weeks. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, the tumor grew surrounded by mandible and the tumor weight with mandible was 0.45 g on average.</p><p>Grafted tumors showed recurrence: As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, 7/7 in the control (C), 6/8 in the liquid nitrogen treatment (N), 1/8 the microwave treatment (M) and 2/8 the superheated steam treatment (S) groups. No recurrence, on the other hand, was observed in the Pasteur method (P; 0/8).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>In a cancer resection, tumor is sometimes resected with bone. The resected bone contains malignant cells, and it is difficult to remove these cells manually for reuse of the bone. From the standpoint of reconstructive surgery, there are limitations to exchanging the resected bone for autologous bone taken from another part of the patient because of its shape and size. Recently, several kinds of treatment for bone reuse have been studied, for example, alcohol treatment, radiation treatment, autoclave treatment, hot-water-bath treatment (Pasteur method), and liquid nitrogen treatment. In clinical applications, treatments for bone reuse have to remove malignant cells from bone completely and simply. Treatments that are too weak result in malignant cells remaining in bone.</p><p>Treatments that are too intense weaken bone and result in a loss of extracellular matrix, which causes a delay of bone remodeling and can trigger bone infection. In addition, some treatments require special machines, some need complicated temperature control, and others are time-consuming. As such, they are inadequate for surgery in a clinical context. In other words, existing treatments are not perfect. In this study, microwave treatment and superheated steam treatment were applied alongside existing treatments for comparison because they do not need special machines and they are equally able to treat tumors in a few minutes. In clinical applications, bone is treated without malignant soft tissue; in this study, bone with malignant soft tissue, 1 cm in diameter, was treated for reuse and was grafted. The results showed that, in the control group with no treatment, recurrence occurred in 100% (7/7) of tumors. In the liquid nitrogen group, recurrence occurred in 75% (6/8) of tumors, but the tumors were viable and showed high cellularity without necrosis. In the superheated steam group, recurrence occurred in 25% (2/8) of tumors and in the microwave group, recurrence occurred in 12.5% (1/8) of tumors, but tumor recurrences were smaller and developed slower than in the control group. Both treatments showed low probability of tumor regression and very small (&lt;3 mm) tumor formation. Superheated steam resembles heat engineering in providing heat from the surface of a material. In the case of thick bone, the temperature difference between the surface and a certain depth is difficult to determine and depends on its thickness. On this issue, microwaves heat water inside a material, and the temperature of the material at a given depth increases sufficiently. In addition, this treatment is available using a microwave oven for home use, so it is easy and stable to use in a short period of time. In addition, materials are made sterile by treatment with microwaves. We expected that microwave treatment was the best approach for malignant bone reuse but the treatment was not enough at this time. In the Pasteur method group, there was no recurrence. This suggests the possibility that this method can eliminate all malignant cells in a mass of 1 cm diameter. In other words, if malignant tissue remains within bone after manual tumor removal, the Pasteur method could eliminate it within a diameter of 1 cm. This is safer than previous approaches. The Pasteur method is a good treatment to remove malignant cells, but it requires accurate time and temperature control. In a clinical context, it might be complicated.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.27087-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">N. Cui, T. Nomura, H. Noma, K. Yokoo, R. Takagi, S. Hashimoto, M. Okamoto, M. Sato, G. Yu, C. Guo and T. Shibahala, “Effect of YM529 on a Model of Mandibular Invasion by Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Mice,” Clinical Cancer Research, Vol. 11, No. 7, 2005, pp. 2713-2719. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1767</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27087-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. Takayama, T. Mori, T. Nomura, T. Shibahara and M. Sakamoto, “Parathyroid-Related Protein Plays a Critical Role in Bone Invasion by Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma,” International Journal of Oncology, Vol. 36, No. 6, 2010, pp. 1387-1394.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27087-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Manabe, A. R. Ahmed, N. Kawaguchi, S. Matsumoto and H. Kuroda, “Pasteurized Autologous Bone Graft in Surgery for Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Vol. 419, 2004, pp. 258-266. doi:10.1097/00003086-200402000-00042</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27087-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Sakayama, T. Kidani, T. Fujibuchi, J. Kamogawa, H. Yamamoto and T. Shibata, “Reconstruction Surgery for Patients Musculoskeletal Tumor, Using a Pasteurized Autogenous Bone Graft,” International Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2004, pp. 167-173. doi:10.1007/s10147-004-0391-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27087-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Nishida, H. Tsuchiya and K. Tomita, “Re-Implantation of Tumor Tissue Treated by Cryotreatment with Liquid Nitrogen Induces Anti-Tumor Activity against Murine Osteosarcoma,” Journal of Bone &amp; Joint Surgery, Vol. 90-B, No. 9, 2008, pp. 1249-1255. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.90B9.20671</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27087-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Nishida, N. Yamamoto, Y. Tanzawa and H. Tsuchiya, “Cryoimmunology for Malignant Bone and Soft-Tissue Tumors,” International Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2011, pp. 109-117. doi:10.1007/s10147-011-0218-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27087-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. Tanzawa, H. Tsuchiya, T. Shirai, K. Hayashi, Z. Yo and K. Tomita, “Histological Examination of Frozen Autograft Treated by Liquid Nitrogen Removed after Implantation,” Journal of Orthopaedic Science, Vol. 14, No. 6, 2009, pp. 761-768. doi:10.1007/s00776-009-1392-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27087-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Tsuchiya, S. L. Wan, K. Sakayama, N. Yamamoto, H. Nishida and K. Tomita, “Reconstruction Using an Autograft Containing Tumor Treated by Liquid Nitrogen,” Journal of Bone &amp; Joint Surgery, Vol. 87, No. 2, 2005, pp. 218-225. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.87B2.15325</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27087-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Tsuchiya, H. Nishida, P. Srisawat, T. Shirai, K. Hayashi, A. Takeuchi, N. Yamamoto and K. Tomita, “Pedicled Frozen Autograft Reconstruction in Malignant Bone Tumors,” Journal of Orthopaedic Science, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2010, pp. 340-349. doi:10.1007/s00776-010-1458-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27087-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">N. Yamamoto, H. Tsuchiya and K. Tomita, “Effect of Liquid Nitrogen Treatment on the Proliferation of Osteosarcoma and the Biomechanical Properties of Normal Bone,” Journal of Orthopaedic Science, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2003, pp. 374-380. doi:10.1007/s10776-002-0626-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27087-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. A. Dunsmuir and G. Gallacher, “Microwave Sterilization of Femoral Head Allograft,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Vol. 41, No. 10, 2003, pp. 4755-4757. doi:10.1128/JCM.41.10.4755-4757.2003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27087-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Q. Y. Fan, B. A. Ma, X. C. Qiu, Y. L. Li, J. Ye and Y. Zhou, “Preliminary Report on Treatment of Bone Tumors with Microwave-Induced Hyperthermia,” Bioelectromagnetics, Vol. 17, No. 3, 1997, pp. 218-222. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1521-186X(1996)17:3&lt;218::AID-BEM7&gt;3.0.CO;2-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27087-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Liebergall, C. H. Abu-Sneineh, S. Eylon, S. Mendel-son, D. Segal and A. Simkin, “Effect of Microwave Oven Induced Mild Hyperthermia on Bone Viability and Strength,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Vol. 372, 2000, pp. 272-279. doi:10.1097/00003086-200003000-00030</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27087-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. S. Patel, A. A. Owida and Y. S. Morsi, “Microwave Sterilization of Bovine Pericardium for Heart Valve Applications,” Journal of Artificial Organs, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2013, pp. 24-30. doi:10.1007/s10047-010-0489-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27087-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Uchiyama, M. Ujihara, K. Mabuchi, N. Takahira, K. Komiya and M. Itoman, “Development of Heating Method by Microwave for Sterilization of Bone Allograft,” Journal of Orthopaedic Science, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2005, pp. 77-83. doi:10.1007/s00776-004-0857-5</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>