<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JEMAA</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Electromagnetic Analysis and Applications</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1942-0730</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jemaa.2013.51002</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JEMAA-27031</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Engineering</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Effects of Variable Viscosity on Hydromagnetic Boundary Layer along a Continuously Moving Vertical Plate in the Presence of Radiation and Chemical Reaction
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>tpal</surname><given-names>Jyoti Das</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>23</day><month>01</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>5</fpage><lpage>9</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>November</day>	<month>6th,</month>	<year>2012</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>December</day>	<month>7th,</month>	<year>2012</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>December</day>	<month>18th,</month>	<year>2012</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   The flow and heat transfer of an incompressible viscous electrically conducting fluid over a continuously moving vertical infinite plate with uniform suction and heat flux in porous medium, taking account of the effects of the variable viscosity, has been considered. The solutions are obtained for velocity, temperature, concentration and skin friction. It is found that the velocity increases as the viscosity of air or porous parameter increases whereas velocity decreases when Schmidt number increases. The skin friction coefficient is computed and discussed for various values of the parameters.
     
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>MHD; Variable Viscosity; Radiation; Porous Medium; Schmidt Number</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The problem of heat and mass transfer in the boundary layer induced by a moving surface in a quiescent fluid is important in many engineering applications. For examples, in the extrusion of polymer sheet from a dye, the cooling of an infinite metallic plate in a cooling path, glass blowing continuous casting and spinning of fibers. Sakiadis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27031-ref1">1</xref>] studied the boundary layer flow over a continuous solid surface moving with constant velocity in an ambient fluid. The flow is quite different from the boundary layer flow over a semi-infinite flat plate due to the entrainment of the ambient fluid. Tsou et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27031-ref2">2</xref>] presented a combined analytical and experimental study of the flow and temperature fields in the boundary layer on a continuous moving surface. Erickson et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27031-ref3">3</xref>] extended Sakiadis problem to include blowing or suction at the moving surface. Crane [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27031-ref4">4</xref>] studied the boundary layer flow caused by a stretching sheet whose velocity varies linearly with the distance from a fixed point on the surface. The magnetohydrodynamics of an electrically conducting fluid is encountered in many problems in geophysics, astrophysics, engineering applications and other industrial areas. Engineers employ magnetohydrodynamics principles in the design of heat exchangers, pumps, in space vehicle propulsion, thermal protection, control and re-entry and in creating novel power generating systems. In many metallurgical processes involve the cooling of many continuous strips or filaments by drawing them through an electrically conducting fluid subject to a magnetic field, the rate of cooling can be controlled and final product of desired characteristics can be achieved. Another important application of hydromagnetics to metallurgy lies in the purification of molten metals from non-metallic inclusions by the application of a magnetic field. Kumar et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27031-ref5">5</xref>] studied hydromagnetic flow and heat transfer on a continuously moving vertical plate. Sharma and Mathur [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27031-ref6">6</xref>] investigated steady laminar free convection flow of an electrically conducting fluid along a porous hot vertical infinite plate in the presence of heat source or sink. On the other hand, at high temperature the effects of radiation in space technology, solar power technology, space vehicle re-entry, nuclear engineering applications are very significant. Many processes in industrial areas occur at high temperature and the knowledge of radiation heat transfer in the system can perhaps lead to a desired product with a desired characteristic. Raptis and Massalas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27031-ref7">7</xref>] studied the radiation effect on the unsteady magnetohydrodynamic flow of an electrically conducting viscous fluid past a plate. Chamkha [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27031-ref8">8</xref>] investigated thermal radiation and buoyancy effects on hydromagnetic flow over an accelerating permeable surface with heat source or sink. Raptis et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27031-ref9">9</xref>] discussed the effect of thermal radiation on MHD asymmetric flow of an electrically conducting fluid past a semi-infinite plate. All the above studies were confined to a fluid with constant viscosity. However, it is known that this physical property may change significantly with temperature. Hossain and Munir [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27031-ref10">10</xref>] analyzed a two-dimensional mixed convection flow of a viscous incomepressible fluid of temperature dependent viscosity past a vertical plate. Fang [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27031-ref11">11</xref>] studied the influence of fluid property variation on the boundary layers of a stretching surface. Hossain et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27031-ref12">12</xref>] discussed the effect of radiation on free convection flow of a fluid with variable viscosity from a porous vertical plate. Mahmoud [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27031-ref13">13</xref>] studied the effects of radiation and variable viscosity on hydromagnetic boundary layer flow along a continuously moving vertical plate with suction and heat flux.</p><p>Many transport processes exist in nature and in Industrial applications in which the simultaneous heat and mass transfer occurs as a result of combined buoyancy effects of diffusion of chemical species. Chemical reaction effects on heat and mass transfer laminar boundary layer flow have been discussed by various authors [14-18] in various situations.</p><p>In this paper, the effects of variable viscosity on hydromagnetic boundary layer flow along a continuously moving vertical plate with uniform suction and heat flux has been studied.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Mathematical Formulation</title><p>Consider a steady boundary layer convective flow through porous medium of an electrically conducting visco-elastic fluid on a continuous surface, issuing from a slot and moving vertically with a uniform velocity <img src="2-9801387\c02d2ed8-630f-4960-b59c-3789462619c8.jpg" />in a fluid and heat is supplied from the plate to the fluid at a uniform rate, in the presence of a uniform magnetic field of strength<img src="2-9801387\fbb013ef-4c9f-4aca-b9a8-14e9899aebb0.jpg" />. Let the x-axis be taken along the direction of motion of the sheet and the y-axis be normal to the surface. The induced magnetic field is assumed to be negligible. It is assumed that there exists a first order chemical reaction between the fluid and the fluid species concentration. The physical model of the problem is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p><p>Under the above assumption, the equations for boundary layer flow are as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27031-formula67812"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-9801387\fa3eec0c-40fb-4b67-93f9-732f80585fff.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.27031-formula67813"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-9801387\a316ce07-2c8b-4ef1-8549-90d88de46a96.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation of heat transfer:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27031-formula67814"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-9801387\c241122c-f4f0-4fd7-a406-f877d1c76ce6.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation of concentration:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27031-formula67815"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-9801387\771947f7-42d6-45b6-a01a-e6e37b48aa13.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The corresponding boundary conditions are</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27031-formula67816"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-9801387\71cf0107-18f1-4bca-89d1-0c2ba8f53f2a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="2-9801387\08b82af3-28ca-44be-a995-add069d74866.jpg" /> are the velocities along <img src="2-9801387\460cee8c-125b-4e12-8f53-b4d235e01fd2.jpg" /> coordinates, respectively, <img src="2-9801387\d7849aab-fc5e-48fd-94cd-3075ae14f714.jpg" />is the acceleration due to gravity, <img src="2-9801387\baef9907-90c8-458a-98da-55d765bf7909.jpg" />is the coefficient of thermal expansion, <img src="2-9801387\6fb580cf-0713-4da3-b8d9-e0333e8fab28.jpg" />is the concentration coefficient, <img src="2-9801387\628af32c-3e6f-4d24-981f-c3c0c9a6f475.jpg" />is the fluid&#160; temperature, <img src="2-9801387\2ae3d296-c226-4790-ad19-7aea0b214082.jpg" />is the temperature of the fluid far away from the plate, <img src="2-9801387\09d7c09d-e6bb-4153-9eb1-fab0639168c1.jpg" />is the electrical conductivity, <img src="2-9801387\9a593e6f-9011-4b18-a348-eb18ca5d260d.jpg" />is the ambient density, <img src="2-9801387\68d1cbab-fa66-4d04-8ebb-bbfb1fed97e4.jpg" />is the fluid viscosity, <img src="2-9801387\48ac298b-2c71-412b-8c13-a795c5a58c43.jpg" />is the heat flux, <img src="2-9801387\366ebe54-f546-4daa-a13b-e3a2cc3018c7.jpg" />is the thermal conductivity, <img src="2-9801387\43f211db-0146-410c-89a8-02cc8e276b50.jpg" />is the specific heat at constant pressure, <img src="2-9801387\79d0d9b0-e73b-4416-b1f7-5a6e174e4a2b.jpg" />is the radiative heat transfer, <img src="2-9801387\1c605219-6fd5-456b-bf2c-d846d0c5a864.jpg" />is the normal velocity at the plate, <img src="2-9801387\c8d4f59c-c697-478e-b151-882513fbec12.jpg" />is the concentration, <img src="2-9801387\71b533e3-e287-4658-be63-025e389971c8.jpg" />is the concentration in the fluid far away from the plate, <img src="2-9801387\584c9535-c0db-4c14-9bb4-c03fdcd3ae4a.jpg" />is the permeability of the porous medium.</p><p>From the Equation (1), we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27031-formula67817"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-9801387\b5ee3ee4-c002-4cda-94a4-6baa907939ab.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By using Rosseland approximation, <img src="2-9801387\632f3c76-fed1-45b8-ae3f-fb3021f953c8.jpg" />takes the form [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27031-ref3">3</xref>]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27031-formula67818"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-9801387\1b0f2c98-362b-474f-ba44-12b33189e0a6.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="2-9801387\98e730e6-cdde-4a2d-88b7-9bb7c951578a.jpg" /> is the mean absorption coefficient and <img src="2-9801387\40e2eae0-cfcf-4e5b-a98d-ae56a7607245.jpg" /> is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant.</p><p>The temperature differences within the fluid assumed sufficiently small such that <img src="2-9801387\88cbbfce-5933-4809-ae4b-88df2e715b71.jpg" /> may be expressed as a linear function of the temperature. Expanding <img src="2-9801387\95eb30a4-36a3-4884-b569-bac84d5195e1.jpg" /> in Taylor series about <img src="2-9801387\f604b6dc-9c4c-4a65-b2a4-1a5d98efaa5e.jpg" />and neglecting the higher order terms, we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27031-formula67819"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-9801387\36bd1f6e-f5b3-40d9-9d0b-132427f4dfa3.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By using Equations (6)-(8) then Equation (3) gives</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27031-formula67820"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-9801387\ef69391c-ead2-464b-9b17-aa51b529b6b2.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Introducing the following non-dimensional quantities:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27031-formula67821"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-9801387\ed4ce4c1-dde8-4470-98c0-9aa85df0b4e8.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In view of Equation (10), Equations (2), (9), and (4) reduce to the following non-dimensional form:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27031-formula67822"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-9801387\1256bf7b-fdf7-4146-855f-c736d8bde2c9.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.27031-formula67823"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-9801387\b179a023-62e2-4a47-af22-2f8ea5a50c32.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.27031-formula67824"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-9801387\c923ba6f-5485-48dd-a9db-f60610bcf361.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The corresponding boundary conditions are</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27031-formula67825"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-9801387\dbee9d51-48e1-4b8b-a19f-d94c17e0740b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the prime denote differentiation with respect to <img src="2-9801387\f7485464-5d40-4930-95cd-b7cc3720f566.jpg" />&#160; and <img src="2-9801387\ed7a7f9a-f71e-4448-852d-524bdfbae848.jpg" /> is the thermal Grashof number, <img src="2-9801387\037fa061-5e9e-4505-806d-6a209c91aff4.jpg" />is the solutal Grashof number, <img src="2-9801387\d47c787e-320a-414b-bf8e-161ae18b5757.jpg" />is the Prandtl number, <img src="2-9801387\1ec40417-c062-4526-a5c8-4f36ae1a7308.jpg" />is the Hartmann number, <img src="2-9801387\f8bbde30-8122-441b-a224-b1c9c74a5584.jpg" />is the Schmidt number,&#160; <img src="2-9801387\c47cedc6-20a7-40a6-8b00-720f77c33114.jpg" />is the porous parameter, <img src="2-9801387\c95f3e25-8ebd-415c-9d6b-d1e3737d3ad8.jpg" />the radiation parameter.</p><p>The fluid viscosity <img src="2-9801387\2f270836-d82b-4a6c-a57b-a9e0caf40c47.jpg" /> was assumed to obey the Reynolds model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.27031-ref13">13</xref>],</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27031-formula67826"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-9801387\5a42e3ce-caa6-4c9c-b6ba-ff2eb03433dc.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="2-9801387\43a70f7c-d87e-43b4-af20-78cb664ffa26.jpg" /> is a parameter depending on the nature of the fluid.</p><p>Using, Equation (13) in the Equation (11) we obtain,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27031-formula67827"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-9801387\b435d843-ffd6-4c7b-b2d0-cfd85584038e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Method of Solution</title><p>1) Case of constant viscosity:</p><p>For<img src="2-9801387\809ce8a9-a34a-4635-91bf-3e8644d81445.jpg" />, from Equation (16), we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27031-formula67828"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-9801387\fb166751-bc06-4349-a7f6-edfde09a05e1.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Solving (17) under boundary condition (14), we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27031-formula67829"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-9801387\01df7207-1552-41f3-b773-dabf6b790567.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><p><img src="2-9801387\f8d37f0d-9a73-47f0-b272-12a2ceb7970f.jpg" /></p><p>2) Variable viscosity case:</p><p>On taking into account the solution for temperature and concentration, we solved numerically the Equation (16) under the boundary conditions (14) using the RungeKutta fourth order technique with guessing <img src="2-9801387\731c0c46-851c-46aa-93d3-a8b5e11dd22f.jpg" /> by shooting technique.</p><p>The skin friction coefficient is defined as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.27031-formula67830"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="2-9801387\18e661f2-ca84-44de-9c82-e0c356baa32c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results and Discussion</title><p>In order to see the physical impact of the variable viscosity <img src="2-9801387\03a79635-8dc4-4bc4-9b5a-700661235b02.jpg" /> on the velocity field, the graphical representation of results is important. For the purpose of discussing the effect of variable viscosity on the flow profiles within the boundary layer, numerical calculations have been carried out for various values involved in the problem with fixed values of<img src="2-9801387\2d185f5b-b74e-4fb5-8ed6-352a0922e5ad.jpg" />. The value of <img src="2-9801387\f1653335-919f-4734-b838-31064901e0d8.jpg" /> is taken to be <img src="2-9801387\c9ca7ba9-53af-48f7-a4b6-2b484e29012c.jpg" /> for air. The effect of <img src="2-9801387\fa3b05f9-0cb4-452e-a341-bb4c3de23617.jpg" /> on dimensionless velocity <img src="2-9801387\74d81e02-9ca5-4425-81b4-bfaf8a7d647b.jpg" /> are illustrated in Figures 2-4 with <img src="2-9801387\ddb1b1d4-39e5-4785-bb58-204defd7315b.jpg" /></p><p>It is observed from the <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> that velocity <img src="2-9801387\a72c1aa9-66d2-46d9-bddf-48a338bdf15c.jpg" />increases as the viscosity <img src="2-9801387\a55e9d17-b274-45a1-b1d8-df837acfb4c1.jpg" /> of air decreases. The velocity distribution attains a distinctive maximum value in the vicinity of the plate and then decreases to approach a free stream value.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> shows the effects of Schmidt number on the velocity profile. As the Schmidt number increases there is reduction in the fluid velocity. The fluid velocity increased and reached its maximum value at very short distance from the plate and then decreases to approach a free stream value.</p><p>The effect of the porous parameter on velocity profile is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>. From the figure it is observed that fluid velocity increases with the increase in the porous parameter. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> present the variation of the skin friction<img src="2-9801387\463c95b7-11be-4eb7-9395-58a108f6826a.jpg" />for various values of <img src="2-9801387\a339ae5b-d5ac-4c9a-ab5d-93ba67d9a249.jpg" /> Hartmann number<img src="2-9801387\d20d7abb-bfaf-4d2a-82fe-e6fc966836ef.jpg" />radiation parameter<img src="2-9801387\55ad4d6a-47d8-4f6f-b7b3-616c768c1001.jpg" /> thermal Grashof number<img src="2-9801387\041015dc-98fd-48d5-9222-e08533f12e6a.jpg" /> solutal Grashof number <img src="2-9801387\db363968-9025-4cf3-bd07-1a5714e686cc.jpg" /> Schmidt number<img src="2-9801387\030bb049-0a62-4aff-8c95-9609739f624d.jpg" />porous parameter<img src="2-9801387\a480167c-e432-4054-a0f7-6d3040bd3287.jpg" /> with<img src="2-9801387\d3c4a9f1-03a3-4e12-95c2-e510d3707779.jpg" />.</p><p>It is seen from the <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> that the skin-friction coefficient increases as the viscosity parameter, the radiation parameter, thermal Grashof number or solutal Grashof number increases. But the increasing of the magnetic parameter, Schmidt number or porous parameter leads to a decrease in the skin-friction.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The governing equations for boundary layer flow and mass transfer of a steady viscous, incompressible elec-</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. Numerical values of <img src="2-9801387\331129d1-23f4-4306-a36d-11eb5321c019.jpg" /> for different<img src="2-9801387\0aa1c306-4eed-4a68-94e5-6673496c02d2.jpg" />.</p><p><img src="2-9801387\6408dc79-c05f-4e0a-9c68-2c8d7e4b3b81.jpg" /></p><p>trically conducting fluid with variable viscosity over a continuously moving vertical porous plate in the presence of magnetic field and radiation has been investigated. It was found that when viscosity parameter and porous parameters were increased, the fluid velocity increased. However, velocity decreases as the Schmidt number decrease. In addition, it was found that the skin-friction coefficient increased due to increase in the viscosity parameter, the radiation parameter, thermal Grashof number or solutal Grashof number. But the increasing of the magnetic parameter, Schmidt number or porous parameter leads to a decrease in the skin-friction.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.27031-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. C. Sakiadis, “Boundary Layer Behaviour on Continuous Solid Surface: II. The Boundary Layer on a Continuous Flat Surface,” AIChE Journal, Vol. 7, No. 2, 1961, pp. 221-225. doi:10.1002/aic.690070211</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27031-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. K. Tsou, F. M. Sparrow and R. J. Golldstien, “Flow and Heat Transfer in the Boundary Layer in Continuous Moving Surface,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1967, pp. 219-235.  
doi:10.1016/0017-9310(67)90100-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27031-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. E. Erickson, L. T. Fan and V. G. Fox, “Heat and Mass Transfer on a Moving Continuous Flat Plate with Suction and Injection,” Industrial &amp; Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals, Vol. 5, No. 1, 1966, pp. 19-25.  
doi:10.1021/i160017a004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27031-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. J. Crane, “Flow Past a Stretching Plate,” Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Physik, Vol. 21, No. 4, 1970, pp. 645-647. doi:10.1007/BF01587695</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27031-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. Rajesh Kumar, D. R. S. Raghuraman and R. Muthucumaraswamy, “Hydromagnetic Flow and Heat Transfer on a Continuously Moving Vertical Surface,” Acta Mechanica, Vol. 153, No. 3-4, 2002, pp. 249-253.  
doi:10.1007/BF01177455</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27031-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. R. Sharma and P. Mathur, “Steady Laminar Free Convection Flow of an Electrically Conducting Fluid along a Porous Hot Vertical Plate in the Presences of Heat Source/ Sink,” Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 26, No.11, 1995, pp. 1125-1134.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27031-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Raptis and C. V. Massalas, “Magnetohydrodynamic Flow Past a Plate by the Presence of Radiation,” Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 34, No. 2-3, 1998, pp. 107-109.  
doi:10.1007/s002310050237</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27031-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. J. Chamkha, “Thermal Radiation and Buoyancy Effects on Hydromagnetic Flow over an Accelerating Permeable Surface with Heat Source or Sink,” International Journal of Engineering Science, Vol. 38, No. 15, 2000, pp. 1699-1712. doi:10.1016/S0020-7225(99)00134-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27031-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Raptis, C. Perdikis and H. S. Takhar, “Effect of Thermal Radiation on MHD Flow,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 153, No. 15, 2004, pp. 645-649.  
doi:10.1016/S0096-3003(03)00657-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27031-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Md. Anwar Hossain and Md. S. Munir, “Mixed Convection Flow from a Vertical Plate with Temperature Dependent Viscosity,” International Journal of Thermal Sciences, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2000, pp. 173-183.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27031-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. Fang, “Influences of Fluid Property Variation on the Boundary Layers of a Stretching Surface,” Acta Mechanica, Vol. 171, No. 1-2, 2004, pp. 105-118.  
doi:10.1007/s00707-004-0125-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27031-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Anwar Hossain, K. Khanafer and K. Vafai, “The Effect of Radiation on Free Convection Flow of Fluid with Variable Viscosity from a Porous Vertical Plate,” International Journal of Thermal Sciences, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2001, pp. 115-124. doi:10.1016/S1290-0729(00)01200-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27031-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. A. A. Mahmoud, “Variable Viscosity Effects on Hydromagnetic Boundary Layer Flow along a Continuously Moving Vertical Plate in the Presence of Radiation,” Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 17, 2007, pp. 799-814.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27031-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">U. N. Das, R. K. Deka and V. M. Soundalgekar, “Effect of Mass Transfer on Flow Past an Impulsively Started Vertical Plate with Constant Heat Flux and Chemical Reaction,” Forschung im Ingenieurwesen, Vol. 60, No. 10, 1994, pp. 284-287.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27031-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Muthucumarswamy and P. Ganesan, “Diffusion and First-Order Chemical Reaction on Impulsively Started Infinte Vertical Plate with Variable Temperature,” International Journal of Thermal Sciences, Vol. 41, No. 5, 2002, pp. 475-479. doi:10.1016/S1290-0729(02)01340-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27031-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. V. Prasad, S. Abel and P. S. Datti, “Diffusion of Chemically Reactive Species of a Non-Newtonian Fluid Immersed in a Porous Medium over a Stretching Sheet,” International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, Vol. 38, No. 5, 2003, pp. 651-657.  
doi:10.1016/S0020-7462(01)00122-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27031-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Y. Ghaly and M. A. Seddeek, “Chebyshev Finite Difference Method for the Effect of Chemical Reaction, Heat and Mass Transfer on Laminar Flow along a Semi-Infinite Horizontal Plate with Temperature Dependent Viscosity,” Chaos, Solitons &amp; Fractals, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2004, pp. 61-70. doi:10.1016/S0960-0779(03)00069-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.27031-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. T. Akyildiz, H. Bellout and K. Vajravelu, “Diffusion of Chemically Reactive Species in a Porous Medium over a Stretching Sheet,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Application, Vol. 320, No. 1, 2006, pp. 322-339.  
doi:10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.06.095</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>