<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2013.41007</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-26869</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Path-Integral Derivation of the Transverse Axial Vector and Vector Anomalies in QED
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>an</surname><given-names>Wang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Aidong</surname><given-names>Bao</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Center for Theoretical Physics, Department of Physics, Jilin University, Changchun, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>baoad433@nenu.edu.cn(AB)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>11</day><month>01</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>35</fpage><lpage>38</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>May</day>	<month>5,</month>	<year>2012</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>September</day>	<month>3,</month>	<year>2012</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>October</day>	<month>18,</month>	<year>2012</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  It is shown that a novel anomaly associated with transverse Ward-Takahashi identity of axial vector current in QED is derived by using Fujikawa’s method
   
  in the path-integral formulation of quantum field theory. 
  Also it is verified that there is no transverse anomaly for the vector current
  .
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Anomaly; Transverse Ward-Takahashi Identity</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Some time ago Takahashi made the argument for the plausible existence of transverse Ward-Takahashi(WT) relation in canonical field theory, which has the potential to restrict the transverse vertex function from gauge symmetry alone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.26869-ref1">1</xref>]. Subsequently these transverse WT relations for the fermion-boson vertex in coordinate space (or in momentum space) are cast in four-dimensional Abelian gauge theory by computing the curl of the time ordered products of three-point Green functions [2,3]. In addition, the proposed transverse WT relation holds at one-loop order level in four dimensions gauge theory [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.26869-ref4">4</xref>]. Up to the effect of quantum anomaly, the possible anomaly for the transverse Ward-Takahashi relations in four dimensional gauge theories is studies by He using the point-splitting method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.26869-ref5">5</xref>]. Recently, the anomaly issue reexamined by means of perturbative method. The conclusion is that there are no transverse anomalies for both the axial vector and vector current [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.26869-ref6">6</xref>]. Also the path-integral derivation of the transverse WT relation for the vector vertex and axial vector vertex is presented due to a set of infinitesimal transverse transformation of field variable in QED in Refs. [7,8], wherein Lie group property of the transverse transformation has been illustrated in Abelian gauge theory. Based on the validity of Fujikawa’s analysis, it seemed to us imperative to reevaluate in detail the transverse anomaly of the transverse WT identity for the axial-vector and vector vertex in the QED, which need to be specified. We have done so and find that a careful application of Fujikawa’s approach leads to a transverse quantum anomaly for the axial vector current.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Calculation of Anomaly Factor in Ward-Takahashi Identity</title><p>From the point of view of path-integral formulation, we proposed a infinitesimal transverse transformation of field variables to derive the WT identities [7,9]. Let us consider a set of infinitesimal local transformation in the QED</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26869-formula137172"><label>(2.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7500740\94a72166-6f54-4c2c-84ad-5a4b1702c0b0.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="7-7500740\fdf2655b-60db-49df-ace8-3f86223e3ede.jpg" /> stands for the antisymmetry tensor, <img src="7-7500740\ccca1ab4-7160-486a-9bd0-44ae250a2d43.jpg" />and <img src="7-7500740\43e8c20f-e9f3-472d-8591-7903da4d75ea.jpg" /> are the fermion and gauge fields, respectively. Here we have suppressed the charge <img src="7-7500740\b102256a-278a-44be-b79c-070c000b0bf3.jpg" /> prescribed to define the variation of gauge field.</p><p>In principle, the variation of the generating functional itself under the transformation of field variables Equation (2.1) can lead to a Ward-Takahashi type’s identities. The change of the function integral due to the transformation (choosing <img src="7-7500740\f70e163d-77e0-4a6c-9c21-18ae1d4d2687.jpg" /> for simplicity) gives the relation in momentum space in QED (in the simpler massless fermion) case [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.26869-ref3">3</xref>].</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26869-formula137173"><label>(2.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7500740\450cf199-6bc6-4233-b0d8-1dbd882ad6ce.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This WT relation for the vector current has been listed in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.26869-ref9">9</xref>]. The integral term in Equation (2.2) may be called the integral-term involving the vertex function <img src="7-7500740\3de00ca5-f920-49ad-a19f-7b25c5123820.jpg" /> with the internal momentum $k$ of the gauge boson appearing in the Wilson line [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.26869-ref10">10</xref>]. The Fourier transformation for vertex function <img src="7-7500740\53298604-5fe7-4304-80bf-29936f04c058.jpg" /> is defined as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26869-formula137174"><label>(2.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7500740\819757ec-b8a6-4315-a1c1-2d9ee0c50a9c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<img src="7-7500740\1f57e94e-442a-4cc9-9ca1-9133ab83ea54.jpg" />.</p><p>Obviously, the full vector function and the full axialvector function are coupled with each other. As shown is Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.26869-ref3">3</xref>], the apparent feature of this transverse identity (2.2) is that the vertex function <img src="7-7500740\76ee09bf-7a73-4753-a396-f8729aadc0cc.jpg" /> (fermion’s three point function) has the transverse component of itself.</p><p>Completely analogous to the calculations above, let us consider the other transverse transformation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26869-formula137175"><label>(2.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7500740\051f8706-5237-465e-b378-aae8a55df876.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The identity for the axial-vector current is rewritten in momentum space as,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26869-formula137176"><label>(2.5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7500740\952b29e9-5296-425f-ae87-6e90ac75bfd1.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>According to Fujikawa’s interpretation, it is argued that the appearance of the quantum anomaly in WT identity is a symptom of the impossibility of defining a suitably invariant functional integral measure due to the relevant transformations on fermionic field variables. The regularization procedure for the variations of the integral measure can provide access to a wider class of such anomaly objects [11-13]. To see how the change of the measure corresponding to the transverse transformation Equation (2.1) gives rise to a possible anomaly factor, let us consider an Abelian gauge field to show our argument. The Lagrangian density for massive QED, which is of the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26869-formula137177"><label>(2.6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7500740\5fe9366e-8025-46df-a9df-6765fd0b118f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="7-7500740\31a070e0-f1ec-41b9-9829-cc65dc674797.jpg" /> and <img src="7-7500740\ea9303a2-c9ec-4464-ab4f-8d3dcba3a9e5.jpg" /> denote, respectively, the charge and mass of the electron. In this case, the gauge field is just the photon field<img src="7-7500740\ed45624d-9713-40b6-b102-19b3ef769d3a.jpg" />.</p><p>Thus jacobian <img src="7-7500740\a418cbae-e116-4247-b667-200b4f45c141.jpg" /> of integral measure due to the transformations Equation (2.1) is evaluated below</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26869-formula137178"><label>(2.7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7500740\7fcb9163-f3bc-4a1b-90cd-aaaf126dfb46.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This is what we set out to calculate.</p><p>Due to the transverse transformation (2.1), the anomaly functions can be written as the limit of a manifestly convergent integral</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26869-formula137179"><label>(2.8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7500740\2de39e32-ad55-4406-be93-c6c3cee024bb.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="7-7500740\72301655-c905-401c-ba5e-016a2144bb97.jpg" /> is the covariant derivative.</p><p>In addition, the transformation of the field <img src="7-7500740\de241736-e95f-4454-ad9a-7376e7c66243.jpg" /> is a translation, so that its Jacobian is trivial.</p><p>The anomaly function <img src="7-7500740\22c3216b-21a4-4f24-8d90-a700f5d7692c.jpg" /> requires regulationwhich is achieved by inserting a regulator</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26869-formula137180"><label>(2.9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7500740\ffd963b7-d8f1-4b2e-b635-aba14d56495a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The expression of the transverse vector anomaly function <img src="7-7500740\a7ccf09c-c02c-46a7-80c8-921416fe4d79.jpg" /> can be put in the regulating form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26869-formula137181"><label>(2.10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7500740\38ec5e16-de85-413a-9555-79a5da1e9bc9.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In terms of the symmetry of metric and antisymmetry of 4-dimensional field strength tensor, we expand the anomaly function and find that it equals zero. Thus the Jacobian Equation (2.7) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26869-formula137182"><label>(2.11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7500740\cfcca9f5-cfd3-49da-b454-cdd9175da254.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By the parallel procedure, for the case of the transformation Equation (2.4), the transverse axial vector anomaly function is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26869-formula137183"><label>(2.12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7500740\2db0ef80-8f60-4f34-ab47-b51eb2bdc660.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The corresponding Jacobian is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26869-formula137184"><label>(2.13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7500740\be3c301f-8066-4391-a4ac-a03ec245d0b3.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In the above calculation, we have employed the following operator identities</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26869-formula137185"><label>(2.14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="7-7500740\03c9807a-4514-4cfe-be2f-7eb733ce7688.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Obviously the Equations (2.11) is perfectly consistent with result of derivation of transverse vector U(1) anomalies in four-dimensional gauge theory using perturbative methods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.26869-ref5">5</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Concluding Remarks</title><p>As already described, Fujikawa’s path-integral method provide a general regularization procedure handling the transverse anomaly factor associated with the WT identity. The calculation shows that there is a quantum anomaly associated with the transverse Ward-Takahashi relation for the axial vector current due to a set of infinitesimal transverse transformation of field variables in QED.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Acknowledgements</title><p>We would like to thank Professor H. X. He for useful help.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.26869-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. Takahashi, “Point Spoitting Technique and Canonical Formalism,” In: F. Mancini, Ed., Quantum Field Theory, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1986, p. 19.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.26869-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K.-I. Kondo and Maris, “Spontaneous Chiral-Symmetry Breaking in Three-dimensional QED with a Chern-Simons Term,” Physical Review D, Vol. 52, No. 2, 1995, pp. 1212-1233. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.52.1212</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.26869-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. X. He, F. C. Khanna and Y. Takahashi, “Transverse Ward-Takahashi Identity for the Fermion-Boson Vertex in Gauge Theories,” Physical Review B, Vol. 480, No. 1-2, 2000, pp. 222-228. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00353-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.26869-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. R. Pennnington and R. Williams, “Checking the Tranverse Ward-Takahashi Relation at One-loop Order in Four Dimensions,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, Vol. 32, No. 11, 2006, p. 2219. 
doi:10.1088/0954-3899/32/11/014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.26869-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. X. He, “Quantum Anomaly on the Transverse Ward-Takahashi Relation for the Axial-Vector Vertex,” Physical Review B, Vol. 507, No. 1-4, 2001, pp. 351-355. 
doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00430-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.26869-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">W. S. Sun, H. S. Zong, X. S. Chen, et al., “A Note on Transverse Axial Vector and Vector Anomalies,” Physics Letters B, Vol. 569, No. 2, 2003, pp. 211-238. 
doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2003.07.033</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.26869-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. D. Bao and S. S. Wu, “Various Full Green Functions in QED,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 46, No. 12, 2007, pp. 3093-3108. 
doi:10.1007/s10773-007-9423-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.26869-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. D. Bao, H. B. Yao and S. S. Wu, “Topological Approach to Examine the Singularity of the Axial-Vector Currnet in an Abelian Gauge Field Theory (QED),” Chinese Physics C, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2009, p. 177. 
doi:10.1088/1674-1137/33/3/003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.26869-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. X. He, “An Introduction to Nuclear Chromodynamics,” China University of Science and Technology Press, Hefei, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.26869-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. X. He, “Transverse Ward-Takahashi Relation for the Fermion-Boson Vertex Function in Four-Dimensional Abelian Gauge theory,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, Vol. 22, No. 11, 2007, pp. 2119-2132.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.26869-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Fujikawa, “Path-Integral Measure for Gauge Invariant Field Theories,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 42, No. 18, 1979, pp. 1195-1198.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.26869-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. B. Einhorn and T. Jones, “Comment on Fujikawa’s Path-Integual Derivation of the Chiral Anomaly,” Physical Review D, Vol. 29, No. 2, 1984, pp. 331-333. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.29.331</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.26869-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Umezawa, “Regularization of the Pth-Integral Measure for Anomalies,” Physical Review D, Vol. 39, No. 12, 1989, pp. 3672-3683.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>