<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Applied Mathematics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-7385</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/am.2012.312A290</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AM-26037</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  On Continuous Limiting Behaviour for the &lt;i&gt;q(n)&lt;/i&gt;-Binomial Distribution with &lt;i&gt;q(n)&lt;/i&gt;→1 as n→∞
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>alvina</surname><given-names>Vamvakari</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Department of Informatics and Telematics, Harokopio University of Athens, Athens, Greece</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>mvamv@hua.gr</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>28</day><month>12</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>2101</fpage><lpage>2108</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>September</day>	<month>28,</month>	<year>2012</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>October</day>	<month>28,</month>	<year>2012</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>November</day>	<month>5,</month>	<year>2012</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   Recently, Kyriakoussis and Vamvakari [1] have established a q-analogue of the Stirling type for q-constant which have lead them to the proof of the pointwise convergence of the q-binomial distribution to a Stieltjes-Wigert continuous distribution. In the present article, assuming  a sequence q(n) of n with q(n)→1 as n→∞, the study of the affect of this assumption to the q(n)-analogue of the Stirling type and to the asymptotic behaviour of the q(n)-Binomial distribution is presented. Specifically, a q(n) analogue of the Stirling type is provided which leads to the proof of deformed Gaussian limiting behaviour for the q(n)-Binomial distribution. Further, figures using the program MAPLE are presented, indicating the accuracy of the established distribution convergence e<em></em>ven for moderate values of n. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Stirling Formula; &lt;i&gt;q(n)&lt;/i&gt; -Factorial Number of Order &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt;; Saddle Point Method;  &lt;i&gt;q(n)&lt;/i&gt;-Binomial Distribution; Pointwise Convergence; Gauss Distribution</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction and Preliminaries</title><p>In last years, many authors have studied <img src="14-7401147\bbce20a2-cce0-41d1-8441-20db8a8e127e.jpg" />-analogues of the binomial distribution (see among others [2-4]). Specifically, Kemp and Kemp [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.26037-ref3">3</xref>] defined a <img src="14-7401147\3857cecc-407b-4a4c-bb3d-65c58b99fcdf.jpg" />-analogue of the binomial distribution with probability function in the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36244"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\c6651e74-0382-4bd2-817a-fc6cb614384f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="14-7401147\13cdbf13-77db-4481-ba80-9586c3582f82.jpg" /> by replacing the loglinear relationship for the Bernoulli probabilities in Poissonian random sampling with loglinear odds relationship. Also, Kemp [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.26037-ref4">4</xref>] defined (1) as a steady state distribution of birth-abort-death process.</p><p>Futhermore, Charalambides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.26037-ref2">2</xref>] considering a sequence of independent Bernoulli trials and assuming that the odds of success at the ith trial given by</p><p><img src="14-7401147\b28e3426-b0d2-45fa-a2ed-3a2e9c84ea3f.jpg" /></p><p>is a geometrically decreasing sequence with rate q, derived that the probability function of the number X of successes up to n-trail is the q-analogue of the binomial distribution with p.f. given by Equation (1).</p><p>For q constant, the q-binomial distribution has finite mean and variance when<img src="14-7401147\28ee0ca3-e69e-4e33-b65c-8168a542b33c.jpg" />.Thus, the asymptotic normality in the sense of the DeMoivre-Laplace classical limit theorem did not conclude, as in the case of ordinary hypergeometric series discrete distributions. Also, asymptotic methods—central or/and local limit theorems—are not applied as in Bender [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.26037-ref5">5</xref>], Canfield [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.26037-ref6">6</xref>], Flajolet and Soria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.26037-ref7">7</xref>], Odlyzko [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.26037-ref8">8</xref>] et al.</p><p>Recently, Kyriakoussis and Vamvakari [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.26037-ref1">1</xref>], for q constant, established a limit theorem for the q-binomial distribution by a pointwise convergence in a q-analogue sense of the DeMoivre-Laplace classical limit theorem. Specifically, the pointwise convergence of the q-binomial distribution to a Stieltjes-Wigert continuous distribution was proved. In detail, transferred from the random variable <img src="14-7401147\f6d667b0-b261-4406-a66f-270cb21db6e4.jpg" /> of the q-binomial distribution (1) to the equal-distributed deformed random variable<img src="14-7401147\ddee8ca5-1541-4132-8beb-8e684ebd016c.jpg" />, then, for <img src="14-7401147\f9fa8f9d-9248-407e-b0c2-a864a6a5372a.jpg" /> the q-binomial distribution was approximated by a deformed standardized continuous Stieltjes-Wigert distribution as follows</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36245"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\cf437eff-f5eb-4fb0-899f-f36d1720835c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="14-7401147\ba2e3e50-9c4e-4e7a-a1e5-6aabac81afa9.jpg" /> such that <img src="14-7401147\2fd4545d-afbc-4714-b096-42bd1acae877.jpg" /> with <img src="14-7401147\157981f3-782c-4e80-8eef-eeb8820560d5.jpg" /> constant and <img src="14-7401147\0ed54e41-5b2f-4dd0-9bb1-83d4ba2a69e5.jpg" /> and <img src="14-7401147\32494f7a-0617-4ddf-af19-2e778fb4b116.jpg" /> the mean value and variance of the random variable <img src="14-7401147\d599cd7f-3afb-4b5d-8003-81b5cd1dac7b.jpg" /> respectively. To obtain the above pointwise convergence (2), a qanalogue of the well known Stirling formula for the <img src="14-7401147\96ff6271-231e-4db8-8bac-b4bc0715acd9.jpg" /> factorial <img src="14-7401147\c103472a-7045-4342-bbd8-3fd255f6eb03.jpg" /> has been provided.</p><p>In statistical mechanics and in computer science such as in probabilistic and approximation algorithms, applications of the <img src="14-7401147\16bddbf9-ec7e-46cf-821a-806f14461ccb.jpg" />-binomial distribution involve sequences of independent Bernoulli trials where in the geometrically decreasing odds of success at the <img src="14-7401147\8691cf1b-3d7f-4196-9232-35fa4b9a2a89.jpg" />th trial, the rate <img src="14-7401147\ea1a4f9e-30b7-4061-89f9-8e0606e49bd8.jpg" /> is considered to be a sequence of <img src="14-7401147\68104423-3411-4fe7-95ac-a090404727a2.jpg" /> with <img src="14-7401147\5ba5713e-84c4-407f-9b15-ced0ce46910c.jpg" /> as <img src="14-7401147\b74657a2-96b9-4a15-a3e0-c40f3d14d135.jpg" /> In this work, under this consideration, a question arises. How this assumption affects the continuous limiting behaviour of this q-binomial distribution?</p><p>The answer to this question is given in this manuscript by establishing a deformed Gaussian limiting behaviour for the <img src="14-7401147\bc3306da-9d0b-4fba-ba8a-49a3ec56b0b4.jpg" />-Binomial distribution is proved. The proofs are concentrated on the study of the sequence <img src="14-7401147\cab224a9-879e-4c8f-b7c7-5cd0e2f2a8b8.jpg" /> and the parameters of the considered distribution as sequences of<img src="14-7401147\a1a9b244-4bf6-410b-824a-926cbbb11bc4.jpg" />. Further, figures using the program MAPLE are presented, indicating the accuracy of the established distribution convergence even for moderate values of<img src="14-7401147\536e1c52-360b-4b06-938e-88cdd6391435.jpg" />.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Main Results</title><p>2.1. An Asymptotic Expansion of the q(n)-Factorial Number of Order n with <img src="14-7401147\5b472cf1-0fc7-43a9-b4af-b9196b44ea9d.jpg" /> as <img src="14-7401147\79ce4e02-bace-4f44-b377-e7b220fc56b7.jpg" /></p><p>To initiate our study we need to derive an asymptotic expansion for <img src="14-7401147\1c6cee90-050e-4d1d-9233-75ebd7c1d3a1.jpg" /> of the q-factorial number of order <img src="14-7401147\1a8e2c44-4e5c-40cc-8819-ed7b674e09fb.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36246"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\3ee4867b-6e75-4e4d-984d-7dcffaa76f0a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="14-7401147\a32d1232-9a3a-4c0d-a3f4-b73d6e4ada61.jpg" /> with <img src="14-7401147\408f370d-43bf-438d-a305-fee376e4d8a4.jpg" /> as <img src="14-7401147\aba4a75f-7e90-41ec-9e44-d02876d1fba8.jpg" /> and</p><p><img src="14-7401147\2302d792-9185-41b5-95b7-e76ad216fb9f.jpg" />, the q-number t.</p><p>The derived estimate for the <img src="14-7401147\091fd9a6-1fe2-4d60-a533-5047f6be155d.jpg" />-factorial numbers of order<img src="14-7401147\bffce035-a490-4071-90d4-738810f91f37.jpg" />, is based on the analysis of the <img src="14-7401147\6172e2f3-5573-4b38-9a3c-1f7fe1cfc34e.jpg" />-Exponential function</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36247"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\e6d26cb6-8634-4153-8ef2-328bc59baecc.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which is the ordinary generating function (g.f.) of the numbers<img src="14-7401147\b071b217-fa41-4bf8-9074-7c4a831d3bfd.jpg" />.</p><p>Rewriting <img src="14-7401147\85a2bb26-d964-4bad-b6c5-f5c92ef7f058.jpg" /> as follows</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36248"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\01bea399-db2f-414d-828d-4cc28d079e03.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36249"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\dba30952-a269-43c5-b867-f6afe447f35e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>because of the large dominant singularities of the generating function<img src="14-7401147\99d58b46-f9ba-45ae-a2c6-ef15a71bb00a.jpg" />, a well suited method for analyzing this is the saddle point method.</p><p>Using an approach of the saddle point method inspired from [9-12] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.26037-ref1">1</xref>], the following theorem gives an asymptotic for the <img src="14-7401147\d4066cef-1445-4b15-b5b9-add528c9c5c9.jpg" />-factorial number of order n.</p><p>Theorem 1. The q-factorial numbers of order<img src="14-7401147\41901f6d-7253-4f97-8eed-435ee9d907ec.jpg" />,<img src="14-7401147\357cf03e-dedc-4bd4-b276-016da953e848.jpg" /> , where A) <img src="14-7401147\1a7a9bd9-c4e7-4383-8c94-627c9d4b927b.jpg" /></p><p><img src="14-7401147\951b079f-6642-4ee5-9d58-d13767fca262.jpg" /></p><p>or B) <img src="14-7401147\fa77fc13-e3ed-42ff-8ead-cc26c3e7fac3.jpg" /></p><p>have the following asymptotic expansion for <img src="14-7401147\7e02a415-7c94-47c6-a264-41a3b8650dad.jpg" /></p><p><img src="14-7401147\7a400239-c4ed-44a9-89b3-947233ac7e4f.jpg" /></p><p>(7)</p><p>where <img src="14-7401147\40fb59a5-e813-4883-97d5-5f86223b8985.jpg" /> is a positive integer, <img src="14-7401147\0d2b1189-8635-4ea4-82f6-97463ccbac22.jpg" />is the real solution of the equation</p><p><img src="14-7401147\02635193-b4c8-4e50-bc98-daf9f57bba9f.jpg" /></p><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36250"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\ae7493aa-599e-4388-9d31-20c336b0276b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with <img src="14-7401147\36856962-64f5-41e7-b069-ec6d5b22a4b8.jpg" /> the partial Bell polynomials, <img src="14-7401147\aef2da95-cb24-4a1e-8a7c-a934c2bd1380.jpg" />the Stirling numbers of the second kind and<img src="14-7401147\d2e1ca1b-f199-4685-a443-f9c1e3593d91.jpg" />.</p><p>Proof. We shall study the asymptotic behaviour of the <img src="14-7401147\b3aeaa7b-b2f0-405e-9cf0-fe3cbfb63f31.jpg" />-factorial numbers of order<img src="14-7401147\7822edbc-98bf-4668-80ba-1c64e0df7992.jpg" />, <img src="14-7401147\fb1c15eb-b3ee-4103-8ca2-8732add85f0d.jpg" />, by expressing them via Cauchy’s integral formula that gives the coefficients of a power series:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36251"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\9bcdd60f-0308-4535-a8ef-af9606fbc2e7.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the contour of integration is taken to be a circle of radius<img src="14-7401147\4a8babc2-82ed-4441-831c-4c92a4050217.jpg" />. This integral will be estimated with the saddle point method. The saddle point is defined by the equation<img src="14-7401147\b325a6ce-d6cf-4df3-a072-95075a107c47.jpg" />. It turns out that it is convenient to switch to polar coordinates, setting<img src="14-7401147\f89e2e4a-a237-499e-bc08-2ed94dfe6560.jpg" />. Then the original integral becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36252"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\83aa1cd1-3c77-4c9a-b142-7c4030dff900.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In accordance with the saddle point method principles, we choose the radius <img src="14-7401147\7aa3e55c-2f89-40a4-a340-6d1e7b937ca2.jpg" /> to be the solution of</p><p><img src="14-7401147\71064ccd-4d35-406f-b372-a980c28b825a.jpg" />. Setting <img src="14-7401147\8875d56c-e676-4e54-a9da-b91e2bbbfeee.jpg" /> with a Maclaurin series expansion about <img src="14-7401147\5c9a9665-73b2-4547-aec9-5f08ab75416c.jpg" /> we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36253"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\714e2fbe-0610-41e9-ba57-1e52fea9cc92.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36254"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\1a9ca130-e731-483c-b113-bb6465835b36.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36255"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\4947157b-badd-4e1f-9a85-e8409373cd05.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><p><img src="14-7401147\a9409293-aff4-4d7d-ba5b-79f1fc0eaad1.jpg" /></p><p>The absence of a linear term in <img src="14-7401147\6e58b5c9-5a9a-4c10-8354-b338c7edbf7e.jpg" /> indicates a saddle point. The function <img src="14-7401147\a7af5b02-3642-4495-abef-874f84913834.jpg" /> is unimodal with its peak at<img src="14-7401147\bb9c053e-be53-4240-8f01-0e4952264167.jpg" />.</p><p>An estimation of the<img src="14-7401147\984c6dce-f826-4e86-bfc4-d6e1f7b87c46.jpg" />-factorial numbers of order <img src="14-7401147\285f1894-17fd-41e0-8ce6-bda3418c5b21.jpg" /> with <img src="14-7401147\48cf78fd-941e-49d2-b33a-97ba8feda490.jpg" /> defined by conditions (A) or (B) should naturally proceed by isolating separately small portions of the contour (corresponding to <img src="14-7401147\11772d85-d342-409a-b625-7b68f4656cba.jpg" /> near the real axis) as follows.</p><p>A) For <img src="14-7401147\86e1044d-6dfb-4302-9d21-f5800ead410c.jpg" /> with <img src="14-7401147\c6bc9326-4c03-4a48-988f-abaa397ef9a3.jpg" /> we set</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36256"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\93d31dcc-73f4-4101-acdf-335fd45357fc.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and choose <img src="14-7401147\d065d30a-43a3-4cd6-8f99-764b3177cfb4.jpg" /> such that the following conditions are true (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.26037-ref12">12</xref>]):</p><p>C1)<img src="14-7401147\ff9b361b-4559-4d4a-9823-571671856829.jpg" />, that is <img src="14-7401147\c31aef23-ea57-4cae-b0cb-f7ce8de85c58.jpg" /></p><p>C2)<img src="14-7401147\7ba1c0b7-be6c-4f75-b657-700b991954e2.jpg" />, that is<img src="14-7401147\ce259592-2f7f-4e93-9674-e6b1e78f38b2.jpg" />where “<img src="14-7401147\2beacedf-5238-4b32-923a-ce12e66c38e3.jpg" />” means “much smaller than”. A suitable choice for <img src="14-7401147\2754e269-4fa3-4fbb-96d2-e40c2158b5a9.jpg" /> is<img src="14-7401147\8f8843be-a245-4790-b238-0d769e35f1e7.jpg" />.</p><p>As <img src="14-7401147\ff7d11c9-cbd8-4168-b1c0-a7455271a465.jpg" /> decreases in<img src="14-7401147\81545ff1-e815-413b-a75b-aeb1865ba376.jpg" />,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36257"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\b338b19d-0fbc-4b7c-ab2f-65fc4933b0c2.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We will show in the sequel that from C1) and C2) it follows that <img src="14-7401147\5967bc3f-8664-4af9-9ca4-5500cb980d1f.jpg" /> is exponentially small, being dominated by a term of the form<img src="14-7401147\66cf6024-f7fd-44b3-a7db-b59436ef66e0.jpg" />.</p><p>Indeed we have</p><p><img src="14-7401147\a94a64eb-c64c-41c4-8ca8-c00cb4e99c15.jpg" /></p><p><img src="14-7401147\6102f05f-c5b1-48a8-adc5-9df21bc344fc.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36258"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\a9cfe10a-be78-497d-8a28-63452f80dca1.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>But</p><p><img src="14-7401147\956b3647-ff00-43e1-ae03-1ca7b89fdc55.jpg" /></p><p>or</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36259"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\94134a60-a7e6-4903-9993-b9b1f4f72645.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>For <img src="14-7401147\a5b8d016-0b7d-4641-9a43-c9f81cbe6371.jpg" /> with <img src="14-7401147\cbb3c7eb-6452-4640-a385-f7ba65ce31b2.jpg" /> we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36260"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\4f893c26-66f6-4339-bd80-1d45d0b94d69.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From which we find that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36261"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\064990cc-47f7-4367-9620-b40c0ebed810.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus, by C1), <img src="14-7401147\2ca00319-cada-4b9e-915d-16c5cc0c9819.jpg" />has been taken large enough so that the central integral <img src="14-7401147\d3beb88a-eca8-48b7-8fb2-b7ab03ae4f51.jpg" /> “captures” most of the contribution, while the remainder integral <img src="14-7401147\95df99f1-130e-44ef-921e-9aed403bc672.jpg" /> is exponentially small by (19).</p><p>We now turn to the precise evaluation of the central integral<img src="14-7401147\0c6bfcbf-770f-4aff-84c9-cf701ea77167.jpg" />. We have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36262"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\829102a8-6f97-4519-b5c9-1cbea53d8572.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36263"><label>(21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\b1cee49b-542b-48bd-90a5-2c7a1c1a2db8.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Note that <img src="14-7401147\042c1dd1-901d-4568-92ff-262763b4672c.jpg" /> as<img src="14-7401147\e2e0bf2b-7b95-4f9d-bb08-bcda5664b52b.jpg" />, since</p><p><img src="14-7401147\e5251a0a-9063-4d8a-b56b-cd0ad0111ec1.jpg" /></p><p>where <img src="14-7401147\f8061481-c43e-43a9-ba45-5e3bc0b37565.jpg" /> a positive constant.</p><p>B) For <img src="14-7401147\0ef58516-1dea-4e8c-b0a3-4f4105fa0f52.jpg" /> with <img src="14-7401147\698210d2-1e45-4710-90b6-3082a148485c.jpg" /> we set</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36264"><label>(22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\f4968adb-4c89-4194-8a1f-5eb9aad0a1f4.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and choose <img src="14-7401147\f44cf6e7-698f-47ec-b21d-61dde6363ca7.jpg" /> such that the conditions C1) and C2) are true. We suitably select<img src="14-7401147\7e623172-b395-4212-92bf-50679e3db3ad.jpg" />.</p><p>As <img src="14-7401147\35f3ac53-66c6-4317-8805-25c377d162e4.jpg" /> decreases in<img src="14-7401147\edeaf75b-739b-4b3c-a3e9-236ae2778fbb.jpg" />,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36265"><label>(23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\148c1eb5-fe67-48f5-88af-554605df68c7.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We will now show that <img src="14-7401147\33c666a9-e25d-4ab5-a65a-46c28e7a5fe8.jpg" /> is dominated by a term of the form<img src="14-7401147\956a675e-d1f3-4ad0-aee2-8b9e2773f2d0.jpg" />. Indeed, form C1), C2), 16) and 17) it follows that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36266"><label>(24)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\62819adf-22f6-40f0-8855-093da26f16a8.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From which we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36267"><label>(25)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\3f65b9bd-d167-4fac-9bf3-5ed6e3142a3c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus, for <img src="14-7401147\5700d9bf-4234-48c7-ac25-6718d14cd704.jpg" /> with <img src="14-7401147\9a681d04-f816-4249-b64c-f4e84a1027ce.jpg" /> the integral <img src="14-7401147\ae8fd069-1192-4460-bbb1-db0642009cf2.jpg" /> is negligibly small. We now turn to the precise evaluation of the central integral<img src="14-7401147\5745da6e-d36e-4172-9787-c6a2805d5c6e.jpg" />. Since</p><p><img src="14-7401147\310cac72-3d7f-40e1-8444-3963c07537ef.jpg" /></p><p>we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36268"><label>(26)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\055c822b-e631-4296-82c3-0126be5c42bc.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We now unifiable proceed our proof for both conditions A) and B) and working analogously as in Kyriakoussis and Vamvakari [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.26037-ref1">1</xref>] we get our final estimation (7).<img src="14-7401147\225f1744-f50a-4b3e-ac94-4d75eca8cc0e.jpg" /></p><p>In the previous theorem due to saddle point method principles, we have chosen the radius r of the derived asymptotic expansion (7) to be the solution of <img src="14-7401147\b100719c-b14d-4660-8786-d8015fa5445e.jpg" />. By solving this saddle point equation we get that</p><p><img src="14-7401147\24ea206c-74c8-43ba-8a59-945d3a1344df.jpg" /></p><p>and</p><p><img src="14-7401147\0c4165b2-db10-4e8d-b4ca-399f742a49ea.jpg" /></p><p>So, by substituting these to our estimation (7) the following corollary is proved.</p><p>Corollary 1. The q-factorial numbers of order <img src="14-7401147\897001a1-9888-4d90-ac8c-30e8352dd6a5.jpg" /> where A) <img src="14-7401147\07712a5a-b568-45d0-8839-067b811098d2.jpg" /></p><p><img src="14-7401147\3892ac22-1e09-4165-bd83-4a19a34c3166.jpg" /></p><p>or B) <img src="14-7401147\0c533503-b240-4826-a3fa-1cd784b60483.jpg" /></p><p>have the following asymptotic expansion for <img src="14-7401147\5d947fc2-0fdf-4a27-b190-653884730056.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36269"><label>(27)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\c79b097e-3a74-4276-9ae5-d70771539c5b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>2.2. Deformed Gaussian Limiting Behaviour for the q(n)-Binomial Distributions with <img src="14-7401147\fad3a5f1-6b43-4525-b564-a5d117c86e3f.jpg" /> as <img src="14-7401147\8d1cbdb0-c420-465c-afc8-c9d30d54b6e1.jpg" /></p><p>Transferred from the random variable X of the qbinomial distribution (1) to the equal-distributed deformed random variable<img src="14-7401147\bcd0102f-fc52-43dd-9ee2-09e42759624c.jpg" />, the mean value and variance of the random variable<img src="14-7401147\eac8ecf0-7d35-4b2b-8847-54c381cfbcf2.jpg" />, say <img src="14-7401147\4b226b93-5d64-49d2-8f48-017dc5cb08da.jpg" /> and <img src="14-7401147\b9f8ecc2-01ea-4378-88ca-86942adae6eb.jpg" /> respectively, are given by the next relations</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36270"><label>(28)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\46c20340-1195-476e-b117-867a702ebf85.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36271"><label>(29)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\79826305-a4d5-42c7-b3f4-ccf9958706fa.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>(see Kyriakoussis and Vamvakari [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.26037-ref1">1</xref>]).</p><p>Using the standardized r.v.</p><p><img src="14-7401147\4f6631c6-a315-49c8-9d21-66aaa8599828.jpg" /></p><p>with <img src="14-7401147\fd5d4397-8a5b-43da-a278-5a728b8d8956.jpg" /> and <img src="14-7401147\c2f1a0b4-6308-411f-8674-942d1eb207da.jpg" /> given in (28) and (29), the <img src="14-7401147\32aed6f2-2e9c-4904-a27e-9761130c2326.jpg" />-analogue Stirling asymptotic formula (27) and inspired by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.26037-ref1">1</xref>], the following theorem explores the continuous limiting behaviour of the <img src="14-7401147\e9803193-4218-48b7-9440-d0a9f7c34f19.jpg" />-binomial distribution with <img src="14-7401147\e69dafe5-c7b9-456b-a45e-6f7afbee9180.jpg" /> as<img src="14-7401147\ae06ce06-630a-48d2-a0a6-d563fcda07ca.jpg" />.</p><p>Theorem 2. Let the p.f. of the q-binomial distribution be of the form</p><p><img src="14-7401147\d9e26a04-f63e-49ec-8a53-68d577bfcda3.jpg" /></p><p>where <img src="14-7401147\17ba3795-ce63-4543-ae06-d112df70857e.jpg" /> &#160;such that <img src="14-7401147\19bada05-1c16-43a8-a6a2-0c266b52791e.jpg" /> as<img src="14-7401147\fa1bff6c-05a1-4b3c-9811-fd63703d1653.jpg" />. Then, for A) <img src="14-7401147\ec028b98-cf73-47e5-8ca7-f35bc50b3b9c.jpg" /></p><p>or B)<img src="14-7401147\fe6d2422-7c69-4761-94ba-8ee1f5fc36ba.jpg" /></p><p><img src="14-7401147\10cbf6f5-381f-4a37-8b10-351f3f00fc75.jpg" /></p><p>the <img src="14-7401147\bd6c0264-5f6d-4011-8ee2-b6e56522696e.jpg" />-binomial distribution is approximated, for <img src="14-7401147\ea5db715-4840-4064-8581-6d5b4d6d7547.jpg" /> by a deformed standardized Gauss distribution as follows</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36272"><label>(30)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\a23f22bb-8fb7-4c3d-9c3f-64b09152c4b0.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. Using the <img src="14-7401147\2e793e3e-0d5f-4dbc-8738-619496cc9e0b.jpg" />-analogue of Stirling type (27), for</p><p><img src="14-7401147\6e879c72-abe7-4d93-80ca-7adb2eec17c0.jpg" />with <img src="14-7401147\a94042a2-9a34-406f-a127-4921cc48b328.jpg" /> and <img src="14-7401147\e21465ac-5571-4487-aaed-33cb2a210f16.jpg" /> or</p><p><img src="14-7401147\b6f3333a-5be4-424e-b280-61ce9ece7e6c.jpg" />, the <img src="14-7401147\81cf93ae-6250-41b0-a117-b83d1c1547ab.jpg" />-binomial distribution (1), is approximated by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36273"><label>(31)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\010ebe9d-cfa5-4a91-aca5-674241318bdd.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Let the random variable <img src="14-7401147\03b65a6e-a773-4682-8054-87eb97923813.jpg" /> and the qstandardized r.v. <img src="14-7401147\85bd4ca0-b775-4784-8380-7ffc873b1edf.jpg" />with <img src="14-7401147\db05c636-0879-41b2-ae31-e35adf5c5d6a.jpg" /> and <img src="14-7401147\a9094cdf-949e-48c6-bdd7-e586fa7b792d.jpg" /></p><p>given by (28) and (29) respectively, then all the following listed estimations are easily derived</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36274"><label>(32)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\ce32926e-ccbd-4495-b297-edbc1bda2ca4.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36275"><label>(33)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\93865600-e79b-452a-99a6-94bf985457b0.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36276"><label>(34)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\bf9e96df-7e28-4798-9a67-fbfccb53a8f1.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36277"><label>(35)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\266c3f3d-e942-4b42-9749-28914e07261c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Also, the estimation of the next product</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36278"><label>(36)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\9834deb1-b579-4096-8874-95c76a8572b9.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is derived by applying the Euler-Maclaurin summation formula (see Odlyzko [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.26037-ref8">8</xref>], p. 1090) in the sum of the above Equation (36) as follows</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36279"><label>(37)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\3d175468-a6ef-459a-9cf2-a427c143d602.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="14-7401147\a9f2eb69-9642-43b3-a44f-097e35f3b456.jpg" /> the dilogarithmic function and <img src="14-7401147\77cd5bcd-230e-4fc7-a634-5cc7ee4f81ab.jpg" /> the Bernoulli number of order 2.</p><p>Moreover, working similarly for the sum appearing in the product</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36280"><label>(38)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\57dcf8c9-aa86-496c-8742-55b7d890fecd.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>the next estimation is obtained</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36281"><label>(39)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\42332ff6-0553-4164-91a1-bc9f0dffeb80.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Applying all the previous the estimations (32)-(39) to the approximation (31), carrying out all the necessary manipulations and for<img src="14-7401147\0c7ec981-60bd-466a-8638-7752263d7cbf.jpg" />, by both conditions A) and B), we derive our final asymptotic (30). <img src="14-7401147\f40c4cbf-08b3-4920-9fc3-8cd86a7400d3.jpg" /></p><p>Remark 2. A realization of the sequence <img src="14-7401147\39a6a754-ddaf-47aa-9389-1df3cdcf88e6.jpg" /> considered in the above theorem 1A) is</p><p><img src="14-7401147\56a021c0-e223-4243-abba-49e9e60d0216.jpg" /></p><p>with</p><p><img src="14-7401147\d6c814a6-2149-4fd3-8111-a235ac36e6aa.jpg" /></p><p>Remark 3. Possible realizations of the sequence <img src="14-7401147\d00291b7-26de-4bda-9ed7-2acd3df9a7ef.jpg" /> considered in the above theorem 2B) are among others the next two ones</p><p><img src="14-7401147\83b2b087-17ab-4cdf-8c57-9c497e10501a.jpg" /></p><p>Corollary 2 Let the random variable <img src="14-7401147\235f66bc-ae0c-4139-bb4c-87e79e31f66f.jpg" /> with p.f. that of the <img src="14-7401147\f3ac13a9-95cb-4bc1-9776-783712afe61f.jpg" />-binomial distribution as in Theorem 2. Then for <img src="14-7401147\20d88f8c-953d-4a40-a942-41053a72cf8c.jpg" /> the following approximation holds</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36282"><label>(40)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\dffdcc0c-4ad9-4039-bcad-f98bcc643650.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36283"><label>(41)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\01edf2b7-e3a8-4638-8b5a-7397f875c5e4.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with <img src="14-7401147\993c79bf-4bb7-4f2c-97dc-999967f74c04.jpg" /> the Gauss error function.</p><p>Proof. Using the approximation (2) and the classical continuity correction we have that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36284"><label>(42)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\a5005925-3db5-49e6-8ea2-12dbf78b3d5e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Setting</p><p><img src="14-7401147\6aa4a36a-9f09-4915-b0e0-f8af8734442c.jpg" /></p><p>the approximation (42) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36285"><label>(43)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\83eba4ee-b0b4-476e-958d-296cabcdc441.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Carrying out all the necessary manipulations, we get the final approximation (40). <img src="14-7401147\c5383738-bfb0-4f4a-a95d-0b3658d08a0c.jpg" /></p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Figures Using Maple</title><p>In this section, we present a computer realization of approximation (30), by providing figures using the computer program MAPLE and the <img src="14-7401147\dddceb6f-a909-43f7-b47d-e8920de0e59e.jpg" />-series package developed by F. Garvan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.26037-ref13">13</xref>] which indicate good convergence even for moderate values of n. Analytically, for the random variable X, we give the Figures 1 and 2 realizing Theorem 2(A), by demonstrating with diamond blue points the exact probability</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36286"><label>(44)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\ab1d5989-d28e-4911-a615-a6cec6ae7a7e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and with diamond green points the continuous probability approximation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.26037-formula36287"><label>(45)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-7401147\eac757de-cc9a-48e9-b48a-64414aecb450.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with <img src="14-7401147\95309fbd-d7a9-4c45-acb2-1902dcb6adc3.jpg" /> and <img src="14-7401147\83d1c903-02c6-4f08-b3bd-88000f38b43f.jpg" /> given by Equation (41), for</p><p><img src="14-7401147\84262a54-c253-46ad-a8c8-de06f922581f.jpg" /></p><p>and <img src="14-7401147\fb9ed462-af59-43c2-b254-d71dcf9c5aaf.jpg" /></p><p>Note that similar good convergence even for moderate values of <img src="14-7401147\a6eea8ed-5f77-4574-ad59-a55ac7da19d1.jpg" /> have been implemented for Theorem 2B).</p><p>The procedure in MAPLE which realizes the exact probability (44) and its approximation (45) for given <img src="14-7401147\7b8865d1-a735-4667-805f-69ab31035238.jpg" /> and theta for both Theorem 2A) and 2B), is available under request.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Concluding Remarks</title><p>In this article, a deformed Gaussian limiting behaviour</p><p>for the <img src="14-7401147\9471b0ba-da85-4722-85e1-db74c81a3bd9.jpg" />-Binomial distribution has been established. The proofs have been concentrated on the study of the sequence <img src="14-7401147\eb219ba9-fea9-496d-8444-bc79d2ad1d63.jpg" /> and the parameters of the considered distributions as sequences of <img src="14-7401147\4e937b4a-4f14-4c20-b8b6-7af49127fa99.jpg" /> Further, figures using the program MAPLE have been presented, indicating the accuracy of the established distribution convergence even for moderate values of n.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Acknowledgements</title><p>The author would like to thank Professor A. Kyriakoussis for his helpful comments and suggestions.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.26037-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Kyriakoussis and M. G. Vamvakari, “On a q-Analogue of the Stirling Formula and a Continuous Limiting Behaviour of the q-Binomial Distribution-Numerical Calculations,” Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, 2011, pp. 1-27.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.26037-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ch. A. Charalambides, “Discrete q-Distributions on Bernoulli Trials with a Geometrically Varying Success Probability,” The Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, Vol. 140, No. 9, 2010, pp. 2355-2383.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.26037-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. W. Kemp and C. D. Kemp, “Welson’s Dice Data Revisited,” The American Statistician, Vol. 45, No. 3, 1991, pp. 216-222.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.26037-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. W. Kemp, “Steady-State Markov Chain Models for Certain q-Confluent Hypergeometric Distributions,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, Vol. 135, No. 1, 2005, pp. 107-120. doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2005.02.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.26037-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. A. Bender, “Central and Local Limit Theorem Applied to Asymptotic Enumeration,” Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1973, pp. 91-111.  
doi:10.1016/0097-3165(73)90038-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.26037-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. R. Canfield, “Central and Local Limit Theorems for the Coefficients of Polynomials of Binomial Type,” Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, Vol. 23, No. 3, 1977, pp. 275-290.  
doi:10.1016/0097-3165(77)90019-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.26037-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Flajolet and M. Soria, “Gaussian Limiting Distributions for the Number of Components in Combinatorial Structures,” Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A, Vol. 53, No. 2, 1990, pp. 165-182.  
doi:10.1016/0097-3165(90)90056-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.26037-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. M. Odlyzko, “Handbook of Combinatorics,” In: R. L. Graham, M. Grotschel and L. Lovász, Eds., Asymptotic Enumeration Methods, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1995, pp. 1063-1229.? </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.26037-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. M. Kirousis, Y. C. Stamatiou and M. Vamvakari, “Upper Bounds and Asymptotics for the q-Binomial Coefficients,” Studies in Applied Mathematics, Vol. 107, No. 1, 2001, pp. 43-62. doi:10.1111/1467-9590.1071177</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.26037-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Kyriakoussis and M. Vamvakari, “On Asymptotics for the Signless Noncentral q-Stirling Numbers of the First Kind,” Studies in Applied Mathematics, Vol. 117, No. 3, 2006, pp. 191-213.  
doi:10.1111/j.1467-9590.2006.00352.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.26037-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ch. A. Charalambides and A. Kyriakoussis, “An Asymptotic Formula for the Exponential Polynomials and a Central Limit Theorem for Their Coefficients,” Discrete Mathematics, Vol. 54, No. 3, 1985, pp. 259-270.  
doi:10.1016/0012-365X(85)90110-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.26037-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Flajolet and R. Sedgewick, “Analytic Combinatorics, Chapter V: Application of Rational and Meromorphic Asymptotics, Chapter VIII: Saddle Point Asymptotics,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.26037-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. Garvan, “The Maple QSERIES Package,” 2010.  
http:www.math.ufl.edu/ frank/qmaple/qmaple.html</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>