<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JEMAA</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Electromagnetic Analysis and Applications</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1942-0730</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jemaa.2010.28060</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JEMAA-2589</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Engineering</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  A New Formulation of Electrodynamics
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>rbab</surname><given-names>I. Arbab</given-names></name><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Faisal</surname><given-names>A. Yassein</given-names></name><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>arbab.ibrahim@gmail.com;aiarbab@uofk.edu(RIA)</email>;<email>f.a.yassein@gmail.com(FAY)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>15</day><month>09</month><year>2010</year></pub-date><volume>02</volume><issue>08</issue><fpage>457</fpage><lpage>461</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>December</day>	<month>27th,</month>	<year>2009</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>July</day>	<month>22nd,</month>	<year>2010</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>July</day>	<month>30th,</month>	<year>2010</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  A new formulation of electromagnetism based on linear differential commutator brackets is developed. Maxwell equations are derived, using these commutator brackets, from the vector potential, the scalar potential φ and the Lorentz gauge connecting them. With the same formalism, the continuity equation is written in terms of these new differential commutator brackets.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Mathematical formulation</kwd><kwd> Maxwell’s equations</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Maxwell equations are first order differential equations in space and time. They are compatible with Lorentz transformation which guarantees its applicability to any inertial frame. A symmetric space-time formulation of any theory will generally guarantee the universality of the theory. With this motivation, we adopt a differential commutator bracket involving first order space and time derivative operators to formulate the Maxwell equations and quantum mechanics. This is in addition to our recent quaternionic formulation of physical laws, where we have shown that many physical equations are found to emerge from a unified view of physical variables [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.2589-ref1">1</xref>]. In such a formulation, we have found that Maxwell equations emerge from a single equation. Maxwell equations were originally written in terms of quaternions. They were initially written in twenty equations [a]. However, later on Maxwell equations are then written in terms of vector in the way that we are familiar today. In our present formulation, Maxwell equations are described by a set of two wave equations representing the evolution of the electric and magnetic fields. This is instead of having four equations. We aim in this paper to write down (derive) the physical equations by vanishing differential commutator brackets. We know that second order partial derivatives commute for space-space variables. We don’t assume here this property is a priori for space and time. To guarantee this, we eliminate the time derivative of a quantity that is acted by a space (<img src="1-9801015\a23fad53-debc-4f0a-bd07-27c28f643fdf.jpg" />) derivative followed by a time derivative, and vice-versa. In expanding the differential commutator bracket, we don’t commute time and space derivative, but rather eliminate the time derivative by the space derivative, and vice versa. This differential commutator bracket may enlighten us to quantize these physical quantities. By employing the differential commutator brackets of the vector <img src="1-9801015\d74c790e-59e4-4642-ad74-83c02853c4e6.jpg" /> and scalar potential φ, we have derived Maxwell equations without invoking any a priori physical law. Maxwell arrives at his theory of electromagnetism by combing the Gauss, Faraday and Ampere laws. For mathematical consistency, he modified Ampere’s law. He then came with the known Maxwell equations.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Relativistic Prelude</title><p>From Lorentz transformations one obtain,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15539"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\39eaa3a5-9d5f-4bc1-ab48-02b693f699fb.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We see that the commutator bracket</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15540"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\6ea98e4f-c4a0-43c8-9827-87aec6b0c243.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where we have taken into account in the order of multiplication of the space and time differences, (<img src="1-9801015\5ed4b386-a47c-4c5f-b890-6ea39234a9a9.jpg" />). This shows that the commutator is Lorentz invariant. This is a new invariant quantity in relativity. We, however, already knew that the square interval is Lorentz invariant, i.e., <img src="1-9801015\c071f47d-ca29-4ad8-b6d5-f8bc5936cdb5.jpg" />[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.2589-ref2">2</xref>]. It follows from Equation (1) that the differential commutator bracket <img src="1-9801015\2db8449a-0362-4d94-b707-1eeceb91c2de.jpg" /> is Lorentz invariant too, i.e.,<img src="1-9801015\4ea1f0e9-2d95-4b8a-8820-14e306aeb765.jpg" /><img src="1-9801015\7973364b-1e85-4714-afb6-eba9790eafda.jpg" />. We know that the spatial second order derivatives of a function, <img src="1-9801015\1810b64a-1ebc-4e93-b9fb-943d91062c70.jpg" />, is commutative, i.e.,<img src="1-9801015\5a99d7db-17f2-4cc9-b801-47ae36132416.jpg" />. We wonder if the commutations of space and time derivatives are equally valid for all physical quantities. Motivated by this hypothesis, we propose the following differential commutator brackets to formulate the physical laws. In particular, we apply these differential commutator brackets, in this work to derive the continuity equation, Maxwell equations.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Differential Commutators Algebra</title><p>Define the three linear differential commutator brackets as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15541"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\22a7d0f6-b1ca-4d05-9b14-d0f95894743d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (3) is correct, since partial derivatives commute, i.e.,<img src="1-9801015\d6d3713a-c139-4a97-b658-b22c13cf2911.jpg" />. For a scalar <img src="1-9801015\cd2b10c5-4cce-4711-8dbc-7e056f87f180.jpg" /> and a vector<img src="1-9801015\749ef385-93f6-400b-9641-a36a924f05f8.jpg" />, one defines the three brackets as follows:<sup>1</sup></p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15542"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\f1aae1bd-fdd7-4b6e-a20e-58e2e7159beb.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15543"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\52c08610-7994-47d1-8207-1bf01669d733.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15544"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\0457bb92-547d-4e45-9e49-bda4882be35a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>It follows that</p><p><img src="1-9801015\66d6b8ec-07d1-467f-b226-4d69597572b0.jpg" />(7)</p><p><img src="1-9801015\9f5de836-e1b0-4b14-91b1-ef80c708bab1.jpg" />(8)</p><p><img src="1-9801015\25280548-7ab8-452c-805c-2ef5c7c6dbac.jpg" />(9)</p><p>for any vector<img src="1-9801015\138c5710-1b5b-434d-af9c-5bb814ba1de7.jpg" />. The differential commutator brackets above satisfy the distribution rule</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15545"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\4245188b-ebae-4e42-8c32-0bf091dd2d2d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="1-9801015\846dbcef-8cba-4650-9156-f9f725c5e7b9.jpg" /> are<img src="1-9801015\9937a033-f601-47a8-81d1-8ea3e2f541f1.jpg" />. It is evident that the differential commutator brackets identities follow the same ordinary vector identities. We call the three differential commutator brackets in Equation (3) the grad-commutator bracket, the dot-commutator bracket and the cross-commutator bracket respectively. The prime idea here is to replace the time derivative of a quantity by the space derivative <img src="1-9801015\f135b42a-99d2-43ba-bfee-2fdc71900d3d.jpg" /> of another quantity, and vice-versa, so that the time derivative of a quantity is followed by a time derivative with which it commutes. We assume here that space and time derivatives don’t commute. With this minimal assumption, we have shown here that all physical laws are determined by vanishing differential commutator bracket.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. The Continuity Equation</title><p>Using quaternionic algebra [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.2589-ref3">3</xref>], we have recently found that generalized continuity equations can be written as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15546"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\4986cf08-fe08-457a-a652-51c488de3345.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15547"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\d5201378-6d00-42a1-8da5-bbbbaaa9ed86.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15548"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\9a3439ec-439b-4b5b-a0a3-adb0276fbd8d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now consider the dot-commutator of <img src="1-9801015\8d2e0003-c1c0-483a-bccf-fb440602b0ef.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15549"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\f6358f34-6e81-4221-96e4-079403718909.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using Equations (11)-(13), one obtains</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15550"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\baf7f094-d6a9-4b95-bbab-cee860e545aa.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>For arbitrary <img src="1-9801015\b353f714-8341-4a64-9364-7f1b7962ab63.jpg" /> and<img src="1-9801015\c503b319-3181-448d-b7f5-990d6f867080.jpg" />, Equation (15) yields the two wave equations</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15551"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\ec9691a3-f81c-4e27-b099-62372f48769d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15552"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\4f31a9d1-13e7-41c6-9a6e-1875a68446f2.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equations (16) and (17) show that the charge and current density satisfy a wave equation traveling at speed of light in vacuum. It is remarkable to know that these two equations are already obtained in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.2589-ref3">3</xref>]. Hence, the currentcharge density wave equations are equivalent to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15553"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\e5997c4c-e4ef-4885-9378-50580210ec4f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Maxwell’s Equations</title><p>Maxwell’s equations are first order differential equations in space and time of the electromagnetic field, viz.,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15554"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\96c29aea-a689-404d-8203-3ac7466a4a4c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15555"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\01ce6752-f3b4-4930-8ea4-df030f0ae2c2.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15556"><label>(21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\d7b37955-55bb-4705-ba8e-8e56b7700f90.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15557"><label>(22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\5f5639c1-c4c9-48ee-b876-541144682e58.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>These equations show that charge (<img src="1-9801015\d6ad349b-2425-4eb2-90fe-94b52cca6552.jpg" />) and current (<img src="1-9801015\1fc96b1a-dc28-4552-a107-81dd0a3f8090.jpg" />) densities are the sources of the electromagnetic field. Differentiating Equation (20) and using Equation (21), one obtains</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15558"><label>(23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\0a1cbf62-1afe-46aa-b099-3f86053f6840.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Similarly, differentiating Equation (21) and using Equation (20), one obtains</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15559"><label>(24)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\d578f16c-3866-4430-ba52-cadb0c91354a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>These two equations state that the electromagnetic field propagates with speed of light in two cases:</p><p>1) charge and current free medium (vacuum), i.e., <img src="1-9801015\3b30f758-01db-4a38-bf3e-5ed06f24d139.jpg" />, or 2) if the two equations</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15560"><label>(25)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\3f582d66-b640-470f-8d9f-499cc5ddc5ba.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15561"><label>(26)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\c3564efb-2ded-45b0-9b5a-817c6fe02991.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>besides the familiar continuity equation in Equation (11)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15562"><label>(27)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\298e7947-b1a3-4cd2-b390-aab6367af03c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>are satisfied. Equation (23) and (24) resemble Einstein's general relativity equation where space-times geometry is induced by the distribution of matter present. We see here that the electromagnetic field is produced by any charge and current densities distribution (in space and time). Now define the electromagnetic vector <img src="1-9801015\8f625aac-b584-4a2a-877b-38a30541a7d4.jpg" /> as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15563"><label>(28)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\0e94e3a8-0c8b-44d4-8391-14ceae048693.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Adding Equation (25) and Equation (26) according to Equation (28), one obtains</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15564"><label>(29)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\eb2e04e0-70b2-4086-bdcd-3e62743e7029.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Applying Equations(25), (26) (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.2589-ref3">3</xref>]) in Equation (29) yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15565"><label>(30)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\bc376a2e-d705-425b-bd79-5a2d491e934e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This is a wave equation propagating with speed of light in vacuum (<img src="1-9801015\8a2c283e-8333-4e90-a1c8-1f8d99d33db6.jpg" />). Hence, Maxwell wave equations can be written as a pure single wave equation of an electromagnetic sourceless complex vector field<img src="1-9801015\463aac15-f377-4915-a422-7b0a4bc42f42.jpg" />. We call Equations (25)-(27) the generalized continuity equations. We have recently obtained these generalized continuity equations by adopting quaternionic formalism for fluid mechanics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.2589-ref3">3</xref>]. It is challenging to check whether any real fluid satisfies these equations or not. We have recently shown that Schrodinger, Dirac and Klein-Gordon and diffusion equations are compatible with these generalized continuity equations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.2589-ref3">3</xref>]. Using Equations (19) and (20), the electric field dot-commutator bracket yields</p><p><img src="1-9801015\9a44b0de-3010-4d3f-a550-a084a3a321e0.jpg" />(31)</p><p>This is the familiar continuity equation. Hence, the continuity equation in the commutator bracket form can be written as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15566"><label>(32)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\c788b058-eba3-4097-9783-2e8769c77644.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Similar, using Equations (21) and (22), the magnetic field dot-commutator bracket yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15567"><label>(33)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\a013b63c-167f-47cc-bb9e-ef3bb05c3832.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The electric field cross-commutator bracket gives</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15568"><label>(34)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\76b1a5e3-ccbb-4df8-b4a7-34064b785f60.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using Equations (20) and (21), this yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15569"><label>(35)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\4822e7c1-86d9-46ab-8f37-68626a11a9d5.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This equation is nothing but Equation (24) above. Similarly, the magnetic field cross-commutator bracket gives</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15570"><label>(36)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\6f364785-68d5-49c4-b004-504f146614fb.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using Equations (20) and (21) this yields,</p><p><img src="1-9801015\34da5ffe-e237-4e32-a4be-f5fd928279dc.jpg" />(37)</p><p>This equation is nothing but Equation (23) above. Hence, Equations (35) and (37), i.e.,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15571"><label>(38)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\ac31d24f-9fb8-464d-9b52-405aa57d0b9d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>represent the combined Maxwell equations. In terms of the vector <img src="1-9801015\97cd37ef-3c67-4091-9e60-35a29f7027a7.jpg" /> defined in Equation (33), the wave equation in Equation (35) can be written as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15572"><label>(39)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\f5fa5e3e-921f-4fd8-b79d-72c7f88d576c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which is also evident from Equation (28).</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Derivation of Maxwell Equations from the Vector and Scalar Potentials, <img src="1-9801015\577bf622-6dec-4a8a-a038-11f94eda779c.jpg" /></title><p>The electric and magnetic fields are defined by the vector <img src="1-9801015\151288d0-49f4-4099-843c-b74451029e0d.jpg" /> and the scalar potential <img src="1-9801015\e833ccce-334a-491e-b404-4abcb2e42abd.jpg" /> as follows</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15573"><label>(40)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\42c2fd9e-3f7c-4873-bc6f-3c81aaeb9a80.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>These are related by the Lorentz gauge as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15574"><label>(41)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\8ec87a22-3219-4733-b355-9d90e1a22a4f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Comparing this equation with Equation (11) reveals that the continuity equation is nothing but a gauge condition. This means that a new current density <img src="1-9801015\60e41386-092f-40af-b188-b8ea01f3134d.jpg" /> can be found so that the equation is still intact. We have recently explored such a possibility which showed that it is true [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.2589-ref3">3</xref>]. With this motivation the physicality of the gauge <img src="1-9801015\48c75589-e340-41b0-ac32-ad25af0bed29.jpg" /> exhibited by Aharonov–Bohm effect is tantamount to that of the current density <img src="1-9801015\ad86be9c-3fc8-400b-ab08-81cc8e2de74c.jpg" /> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.2589-ref5">5</xref>]. The grad-commutator bracket of the scalar potential <img src="1-9801015\6a45f804-ded3-4f2e-8c41-db5d91dfd378.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15575"><label>(42)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\462f489c-0f1e-45cd-8f0c-887ae830f88f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using Equations (40) and (41), one obtains</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15576"><label>(43)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\cfa0cc1f-85db-400b-90e0-8bebd939f40c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This yields the wave equation of the vector field <img src="1-9801015\95acc45c-413b-4c20-a77c-d0e1c0333bdb.jpg" /> as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15577"><label>(44)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\e293feca-70bb-4b7b-8838-92e359ec8238.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Similarly, the dot-commutator bracket of the vector <img src="1-9801015\9202dc0a-0668-4b73-9cbf-247f887e5166.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15578"><label>(45)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\c5650d99-20d9-458c-a253-6358965751de.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using Equations (40) and (41), one obtains</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15579"><label>(46)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\bdaf09f8-b3e7-470a-b5e4-7266b8977016.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This yields the wave equation of <img src="1-9801015\64186a3d-482f-4cfd-8d37-b77cb11e799f.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15580"><label>(47)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\b81b9955-9a1b-4fd7-a53f-f269d0e4977e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The cross-commutator bracket of the scalar potential <img src="1-9801015\968b21a8-3bd2-4730-82bd-ca8ba3265d85.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15581"><label>(48)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\767009df-3257-4da2-9dc2-40b5df719eca.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using Equation (40), one finds</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15582"><label>(49)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\29115c41-71dc-44e8-be93-1649b8bdb645.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This yields the Faraday’s equation,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15583"><label>(50)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\ff5d2d1d-db02-4e84-be18-607770ff737e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>It is interesting to arrive at this result by using the definition in Equation (40) only. Now consider the dotcommutator bracket of <img src="1-9801015\47f92e85-6bde-44b1-a3f6-8796ad53b8d0.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15584"><label>(51)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\1618ebef-ef06-4405-9083-79d731ee6c95.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using Equations (40), (41) and the vector identities</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15585"><label>(52)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\e3fdbbe2-0048-471b-bfd8-d612fcab1bfa.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (51) yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15586"><label>(53)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\6a1fd739-61be-41e0-9368-2ac124d7b198.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>For arbitrary <img src="1-9801015\17fcc04b-2a52-4cd5-913b-d8a8ca03de02.jpg" /> and<img src="1-9801015\ef85a876-a231-46a0-9b5b-935950f78c62.jpg" />, Equation (53) yields the two equations</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15587"><label>(54)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\e13666a6-4083-4bbe-9560-503091bcbc5d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15588"><label>(55)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\bfd0e318-7049-4629-9777-94f2b90d6adc.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equations (54) and (55) are the Gauss and Ampere equations.</p><p>Similarly, the cross-commutator bracket of <img src="1-9801015\6b5f73b9-f646-4241-9c8a-44e2abe33328.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15589"><label>(56)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\f2fe54ef-dcca-4c25-ae43-09f78faeea0e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using Equations (40), (41) and the vector identity</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15590"><label>(57)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\3c94828b-b3b6-45e8-b91e-22424b4ba79d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (56) yields</p><p><img src="1-9801015\e4770ffd-7ba1-4ef0-adcc-bcdf69cfcf04.jpg" />(58)</p><p>For arbitrary <img src="1-9801015\b7c5ab86-4f71-47d6-9d4d-a5296273e8fd.jpg" /> and<img src="1-9801015\e0b00e79-c8f1-4cf1-ac37-018fa88e81b4.jpg" />, Equation (58) yields the two equations</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15591"><label>(59)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\3d751cea-793a-485a-b22a-a2e581a2e80f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15592"><label>(60)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\b8e76495-0cb1-4ec2-be36-277579d57c3a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Once again, Equations (59) and (60) are the Faraday and Ampere equations, respectively. Hence, the four Maxwell equations are completed. To sum up, Maxwell equations are the commutator brackets</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15593"><label>(61)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\19ff02ca-85c6-4353-b996-89100d38290b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s7"><title>7. Energy Conservation Equation</title><p>In electromagnetism, the energy conservation equation for electromagnetic field is written as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15594"><label>(62)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\9cb3ed6c-566e-497c-89bb-fe458c9187ef.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15595"><label>(63)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\c102ef8c-be69-48b8-8481-c72b111b04bd.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The energy conservation equation of the electromagnetic field can be easily obtain using the following vector identity</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15596"><label>(64)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\dfb3d4d0-9860-4738-99be-0b57e17f6e1c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Let now<img src="1-9801015\72ba3ca9-b5dc-4e95-9a35-a41a0babe92b.jpg" />, so that Equation (64) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15597"><label>(65)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\1594a231-fcd1-4c6c-881c-fd7f4dc6aed9.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Employing Equations (20), (21) and (63), Eq.(65) yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15598"><label>(66)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\79d62ca9-c1c2-4045-9bbc-701b400dde08.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which is the familiar energy conservation equation of the electromagnetic field [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.2589-ref5">5</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>8. Concluding Remarks</title><p>By introducing three vanishing linear differential commutator brackets for scalar and vector fields, <img src="1-9801015\7e13c930-b76f-4f09-b382-197e9dbc48df.jpg" />and <img src="1-9801015\cdad3494-801e-4370-88ff-0be895eec750.jpg" /> and the Lorentz gauge connecting them, we have derived the Maxwell’s equations and the continuity equation without resort to any other physical equation. Using different vector identities, we have found that no any independent equation can be generated from the three differential commutators brackets.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>9. Acknowledgements</title><p>Equations (14) and (15) are in the form of coupled wave equations known as inhomogeneous Helmholtz equations. We see that the current density J enters into these equations in a relatively complicated way, and for this reason these equations and are not readily soluble in general. This work is supported by the university of Khartoum research fund. We are grateful for this support.</p></sec><sec id="s10"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec><sec id="s11"><title>Appendix</title><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15599"><label>(A1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\10bd2df0-7a95-428a-a565-54bfacb75413.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.2589-formula15600"><label>(A2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-9801015\7be37129-b285-484c-a96c-b72b7743b67e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.2589-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. I. Arbab, and Z. Satti, “Progress in Physics,” Vol. 2, 2009, pp. 8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.2589-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">W. Rindler, “Introduction to Special Relativity,” Oxford University Press, USA, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.2589-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. I. Arbab and H. M. Widatallah, “The Generalized Continuity Equations,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.0071.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.2589-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. D. Jackson, “Classical Electrodynamics,” 2nd Edition, Wiley, New York, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.2589-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, “Significance of Electro- magnetic Potentials in Quantum Theory,” Physical Review, Vol. 115, 1959, pp. 485-491.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>