<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJCM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Computational Mathematics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-1203</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajcm.2012.24036</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJCM-25494</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Nonconforming &lt;i&gt;H&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;-Galerkin Mixed Finite Element Method for Pseudo-Hyperbolic Equations
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>adong</surname><given-names>Zhang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yuqi</surname><given-names>Niu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dongwei</surname><given-names>Shi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>School of Mathematics and Statistics, Xuchang University, Xuchang, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Mathematics, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>yadzhang@126.com(AZ)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>18</day><month>12</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><volume>02</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>269</fpage><lpage>273</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>July</day>	<month>22,</month>	<year>2012</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>October</day>	<month>1,</month>	<year>2012</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>October</day>	<month>17,</month>	<year>2012</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Based on 
  H
  <sup>1</sup>-Galerkin mixed finite element method with nonconforming quasi-Wilson element, a numerical approximate scheme is established for pseudo-hyperbolic equations under arbitrary quadrilateral meshes. The corresponding optimal order error estimate is derived by the interpolation technique instead of the generalized elliptic projection which is necessary for classical error estimates of finite element analysis.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Pseudo-Hyperbolic Equation; Nonconforming; H1-Galerkin Mixed Finite Element; Error Estimate</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Consider the following initial-boundary value problem of pseudo-hyperbolic equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.25494-formula77664"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-20537\60eb09bf-5a47-40d6-8ff5-9d29a8f75bdd.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="3-20537\bdb93f51-ef68-4b4f-a711-f2de8de95606.jpg" /> <img src="3-20537\3f8eaf49-0293-4430-b5b9-259a31deeace.jpg" /> is bounded convex polygonal domain in <img src="3-20537\b4e87d4d-eb5b-4427-bbf0-26f3707ff30e.jpg" /> with Lipschitz continuous boundary<img src="3-20537\ab838c5e-d7e3-4483-96a4-7d07d492da33.jpg" />.</p><p><img src="3-20537\d44b5fe8-59c1-4fa6-9ec5-a4e959c5d1c8.jpg" />is smooth function with bounded derivatives,</p><p><img src="3-20537\d5611867-255e-4797-9f3d-59fb761608d7.jpg" />, <img src="3-20537\8f3731f8-fda9-486c-9c59-95d056b326da.jpg" />and f are given functions, and</p><p><img src="3-20537\c2ac877c-43d1-4906-bb8d-07f9551e28e2.jpg" />for positive constants <img src="3-20537\b7f46d68-1536-4c20-873c-6dcc7cb3a1d5.jpg" /> and<img src="3-20537\8651357c-18df-4c76-b497-175b76ad0605.jpg" />.</p><p>The pseudo-hyperbolic equation is a high-order partial differential system with mixed partial derivative with respect to time and space, which describe heat and mass transfer, reaction-diffusion and nerve conduction, and other physical phenomena. This model was proposed by Nagumo et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.25494-ref1">1</xref>]. Wan and Liu [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.25494-ref2">2</xref>] have given some results about the asymptotic behavior of solutions for this problem. Guo and Rui [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.25494-ref3">3</xref>] used two least-squares Galerkin finite element schemes to solve pseudo-hyperbolic equations.</p><p>On the other hand, H<sup>1</sup>-Galerkin mixed finite element method (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.25494-ref4">4</xref>]) has been under rapid progress recently since this method has the following advantages over classical mixed finite element method. The method allows the approximation spaces to be polynomial spaces with different orders without LBB consistency condition and there is no requirement of the quasi-uniform assumption on the meshes. For example, Pani [4,5] proposed an H<sup>1</sup>-Galerkin mixed finite element procedure to deal with parabolic partial differential equations and parabolic partial integro-differential equations, respectively. Liu and Li [6,7] applied this method to deal with pseudohyperbolic equations and fourth-order heavy damping wave equation. Further, Shi and Wang [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.25494-ref8">8</xref>] investigated this method for integro-differential equation of parabolic type with nonconforming finite elements including the ones studied in [9,10].</p><p>It is well-known that the convergence behavior of the well-known nonconforming Wilson element is much better than that of conforming bilinear element. So it is widely used in engineering computations. However, it is only convergent for rectangular and parallelogram meshes. The convergence for arbitrary quadrilateral meshes can not be ensured since it passes neither Irons Patch Test [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.25494-ref11">11</xref>] nor General Patch Test [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.25494-ref12">12</xref>]. In order to extend this element to arbitrary quadrilateral meshes, various improved methods have been developed in [13-24]. In particular, [19-24] generalized the results mentioned above and constructed a class of Quasi-Wilson elements which are convergent to the second order elliptic problem for narrow quadrilateral meshes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.25494-ref23">23</xref>].</p><p>In the present work, we will focus on H<sup>1</sup>-Galerkin nonconforming mixed finite element approximation to problem (1) under arbitrary quadrilateral meshes. We firstly prove the existence and uniqueness of the solution for semi-discrete scheme. Then, based on a very special property of the quasi-Wilson element i.e. the consistency error is one order higher than interpolation error, we deduce the optimal order error estimates for semidiscrete scheme directly without using the generalized elliptic projection which is a indispensable tool in the tradition finite element methods.</p><p>This paper is arranged as follows. In Section 2, we briefly introduce the construction of nonconforming mixed finite element. In section III, we will discuss the H<sup>1</sup>-Galerkin mixed finite element scheme for pseudohyperbolic equations. At last, the corresponding optimal order error estimates are obtained for semi-discrete scheme.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Construction of Nonconforming Mixed Finite Element</title><p>Assume <img src="3-20537\67b44cd7-9ab6-4a03-aa7e-a05ed15bef8a.jpg" /> to be the reference element in the <img src="3-20537\f52c201f-2c2f-4410-a025-34877f03984f.jpg" /> plane with vertices</p><p><img src="3-20537\be71cc2f-c6fb-4008-960c-280910242d1c.jpg" />and<img src="3-20537\cc899101-32a5-4c9f-8762-adc4f1a7fd0d.jpg" />.</p><p>Let <img src="3-20537\7e7a8787-52e1-4772-b211-f34068b22fdb.jpg" /> and <img src="3-20537\87a57cd2-14be-42db-b875-b0eef981fe9b.jpg" /> be the four edges of<img src="3-20537\ba993b03-a32e-422e-85f5-f25b7b045488.jpg" />.</p><p>We define the finite elements <img src="3-20537\c955ea53-98d6-4413-bf7c-37c4f68195f4.jpg" /> by</p><p><img src="3-20537\b511ff0c-ebb2-40ed-a282-dc9ffd997dab.jpg" /><img src="3-20537\fe3a053c-738c-4d54-98ce-88336337379f.jpg" /></p><p><img src="3-20537\8d08f14b-e34b-42cb-84a6-e4836632c6f8.jpg" /></p><p><img src="3-20537\a0e8bbec-5b5f-4d45-89d6-1805b7e7e0f9.jpg" /></p><p>where<img src="3-20537\fb9fea0d-4e4f-4ee2-8acb-51dad6e8e776.jpg" />, <img src="3-20537\7bddaefb-2ac8-4c08-a5f4-c5b2384d8f5b.jpg" />, <img src="3-20537\f967106b-9f03-4cc9-ac6c-ddd1d032e468.jpg" />,</p><p><img src="3-20537\d9deb1f9-8733-4af4-a837-cfa4de7a6738.jpg" /></p><p><img src="3-20537\37b2e703-26b9-43e2-9adb-f775cf5ad769.jpg" /></p><p><img src="3-20537\ddcece4c-e392-4c7f-a42c-4a8d792c3a19.jpg" /></p><p>and</p><p><img src="3-20537\0993cb09-047d-4009-9ccb-6229e45647bd.jpg" /></p><p>When<img src="3-20537\08b6203d-9768-4f84-847b-1c105b96b3fe.jpg" />, it is the so-called Wilson element.</p><p>The interpolations defined above are properly posed and the interpolation functions can be expressed as</p><p><img src="3-20537\53ad787e-8aaf-4fa9-9f35-b4b6c2089bf9.jpg" /></p><p>and</p><p><img src="3-20537\201b7b6e-fe7d-4747-b8e7-b5279b74044d.jpg" /></p><p>Given a convex polygonal domain<img src="3-20537\3d2eda9a-88b5-478c-ab13-8ce0a1396893.jpg" />, Let</p><p><img src="3-20537\be0e81f3-b2d3-43a4-99d9-2f089d842b81.jpg" />be a decomposition of <img src="3-20537\8ef4392f-9471-40a1-bcbb-266a8c88b0f2.jpg" /> such that <img src="3-20537\293c4f52-01de-4020-a90b-d4b05d499f26.jpg" /></p><p>satisfies the regularity assumption [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.25494-ref11">11</xref>], where K denotes a convex quadrilateral with vertices</p><p><img src="3-20537\4866bf17-fbcd-4c18-85ea-72de670e933b.jpg" />, <img src="3-20537\292b0f3e-7422-4c35-aada-d7362a04f8a1.jpg" /><img src="3-20537\8b874a7e-e2b5-48dc-98e5-66b1475f88c7.jpg" />is the diameter of the finite element K.</p><p>Then there exists a invertible mapping <img src="3-20537\b20b4a7f-5deb-470a-bc8f-e47c9fbd6472.jpg" /></p><p><img src="3-20537\987fe4d2-67aa-4bd1-86ac-dade5fd60d6a.jpg" /></p><p>The associated finite element space <img src="3-20537\9878a28d-37d3-4161-9953-39041d78e76d.jpg" /> and <img src="3-20537\2e966e5a-f7ba-42fc-bc41-5d54a6c02500.jpg" /> are defined as</p><p><img src="3-20537\289102a8-981b-4bbf-861e-981a7c7a1ba0.jpg" /></p><p>and</p><p><img src="3-20537\93443f36-a6a3-44f3-bcac-1633726814fa.jpg" /></p><p>Then for all<img src="3-20537\5faf1cfc-c536-4e7c-837d-38902f7f21a2.jpg" />we define the interpolation operators <img src="3-20537\98d107f9-742b-4d6d-9347-69f9cf74c98e.jpg" /> and <img src="3-20537\6d60b62a-f405-408e-b2c2-2326b5b50aec.jpg" /> by</p><p><img src="3-20537\7aeb89df-6cdb-40f4-b0eb-73969cd5f624.jpg" /></p><p>and</p><p><img src="3-20537\fad82dfd-934c-4582-8e20-e32c9c82ab05.jpg" /></p><p><img src="3-20537\540cdf92-1ed0-466c-9f82-81c6cd04a425.jpg" /></p><p>Let <img src="3-20537\9a9babff-5af3-4397-99c5-26649e5213f4.jpg" /> be the set of square integrable functions on <img src="3-20537\7e3d3ab4-b51c-4a69-b230-53d0525468e8.jpg" /> and <img src="3-20537\ad11a7a9-6692-466b-8e41-8b04ac7fb5ac.jpg" /> the space of two dimensional vectors which have all components in <img src="3-20537\f951567f-fadc-4319-838f-d32eebf0a94c.jpg" /> with its norm<img src="3-20537\0f90812a-f2e9-4578-b7a7-8f532a30b58c.jpg" />. Let <img src="3-20537\ddbf5e08-5a77-459e-8614-754adbb69e00.jpg" /> be the space of vectors in</p><p><img src="3-20537\ada61b13-2c91-44eb-9e9b-aef7c617b6b2.jpg" />which has divergence in <img src="3-20537\1ea83a0a-0b18-46be-a327-64007cb69f0b.jpg" /> with norm <img src="3-20537\1469da8d-4d81-4ae5-adc2-75c9fd389d64.jpg" /> <img src="3-20537\39329d8f-64b6-4716-85d1-217bc21d5dda.jpg" /> denotes the <img src="3-20537\b9525bc8-3d81-479d-ab2c-4a63adcd9da0.jpg" /> inner product. For our subsequent use, we also use the standard sobolve space <img src="3-20537\c3a58223-b612-4025-9267-641bddd2a5e6.jpg" /> with a norm <img src="3-20537\871ef45a-c42e-4b28-b51d-d67da22dcec4.jpg" /> Especially for<img src="3-20537\ee50d6a5-5dcd-4fc1-ace0-e846d0e426af.jpg" />, we denote <img src="3-20537\bb2ee26f-edd7-42b1-9330-a59e1dd20a67.jpg" /> and</p><p><img src="3-20537\9dbede5b-b717-4425-8b06-461622f3a789.jpg" /></p><p>Throughout this paper, C denotes a general positive constant which is independent of h.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Nonconforming H<sup>1</sup>-Galerkin Mixed Finite Element Method for the Semi-Discrete Scheme</title><p>Let <img src="3-20537\4cd38473-8eb9-41ba-aec6-93c1b44ed09b.jpg" /> and<img src="3-20537\e10035e9-3f83-4e10-a6bc-c68d6f6264fc.jpg" />, then the corresponding weak formulation is: Find <img src="3-20537\8c09ea64-3394-497e-ad03-419d9f57b2c0.jpg" />, such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.25494-formula77665"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-20537\7c1f128e-1b92-4ff3-9b6d-a46d1e3722c0.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The corresponding semi-discrete finite element procedure is: Find<img src="3-20537\5f1fb47e-2b9b-47ec-8e2c-b56154f5af82.jpg" />, such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.25494-formula77666"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-20537\170a6520-3b9c-404f-979c-7269b01c3f6b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>For all<img src="3-20537\8e344412-2a46-4869-a19b-8c2df2d20a6d.jpg" />, we define</p><p><img src="3-20537\989a0f97-027b-4180-b80d-8a1ea6027765.jpg" /></p><p>and</p><p><img src="3-20537\2e352617-8b75-44db-b75d-5894b03cc343.jpg" /></p><p>It is easy to see that <img src="3-20537\4a5e0f1b-1c27-4c74-b384-eeb58a4de681.jpg" /> and <img src="3-20537\34dcb0d4-07ac-4b0b-9002-1f65cb35b846.jpg" /> are norms of</p><p><img src="3-20537\1ce5a152-e5e4-4867-b679-917be8889cbc.jpg" />and<img src="3-20537\e04d1b9a-6c7a-4739-864b-a70bc26a34e4.jpg" />, respectively.</p><p>Theorem 1. Problem (3) has a unique solution.</p><p>Proof. Let <img src="3-20537\53160709-4c9a-4c3b-abc9-78e6b7fc614b.jpg" /> and <img src="3-20537\e08bffc9-4b86-4bed-9dca-2fc1d12313df.jpg" /> the basis of <img src="3-20537\17672b95-e6d4-4637-8674-0c7b71e07fa0.jpg" /> and</p><p><img src="3-20537\4a9c29a2-ce7b-49df-9964-40abfb55bb1d.jpg" />. Suppose that</p><p><img src="3-20537\348be8cc-8d64-44e9-b136-840f183d698a.jpg" /></p><p>then (3) can be written as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.25494-formula77667"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-20537\d5c47a32-1544-463c-ab27-2da39c8094be.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><p><img src="3-20537\c969e967-5059-4e27-876b-be3932226795.jpg" /></p><p><img src="3-20537\9ae871f5-0c85-4511-9860-3fdb771eed93.jpg" /></p><p><img src="3-20537\b8ec55b5-85ed-4db6-802a-c5dc355adbf2.jpg" /></p><p><img src="3-20537\9f7d7224-28db-46d7-a58f-909972f8df0a.jpg" /></p><p><img src="3-20537\188f35fe-adee-4ee0-984d-0847fd13a2b0.jpg" /></p><p><img src="3-20537\a2a42b59-4525-4cdc-8007-7bb7a0a29ffe.jpg" /></p><p>Sine (4) gives a system of nonlinear ordinary differential equations (ODEs) for the vector function <img src="3-20537\0cb3c860-0352-4201-b523-ba43a4da1431.jpg" /> and<img src="3-20537\aa5d7dab-4989-4ede-88c7-6bb920973a61.jpg" />, by the assumptions on <img src="3-20537\ca1affd9-d05d-4e6a-8e91-ad999bf7000d.jpg" /> and the theory of ODEs, it follows that <img src="3-20537\15ab72d2-d1b5-4c7d-8caa-83311e461f88.jpg" /> and <img src="3-20537\ef8eed0f-5791-4e46-98d7-db5d9e6f81b8.jpg" /> has the unique solution for <img src="3-20537\c794b45c-b007-4b5b-8ee5-0f2a232af290.jpg" /> (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.25494-ref25">25</xref>]). Therefore the proof is complete.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Error Estimates</title><p>In order to get the error estimates the following lemma which will play an important role in our analysis and can be found in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.25494-ref24">24</xref>].</p><p>Lemma 1. For all<img src="3-20537\8aec41ae-b685-472d-9939-292a07e434b0.jpg" />, then there holds</p><p><img src="3-20537\c63d15ef-13f2-4ea3-8d0c-cc7c814c8df2.jpg" /></p><p>where <img src="3-20537\7267d239-d0d7-4590-95c2-bb0a1bd3fc2b.jpg" /> denotes the outward unit normal vector to<img src="3-20537\247cbc46-800b-4053-b40d-4689ec91285a.jpg" />.</p><p>Now, we will state the following main result of this paper.</p><p>Theorem 2. Suppose that <img src="3-20537\55ebaacc-9787-4145-933d-2a3f60d387b8.jpg" /> and <img src="3-20537\dc8f90db-af42-4215-8686-7763da18da7c.jpg" /> be the solutions of the (2) and (3), respectively,</p><p><img src="3-20537\4a53831e-dae6-4004-bf95-64d950760145.jpg" />, <img src="3-20537\ac2b3d9b-e1e4-4451-9c11-12059ce442b6.jpg" />and</p><p><img src="3-20537\7ff0a8ac-0c55-40bd-9b60-8851ed00d0d1.jpg" />, then we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.25494-formula77668"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-20537\6506c056-4f89-48ce-9bea-bf11326ee2fd.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.25494-formula77669"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-20537\3bb9e7cf-74bf-4f32-b7f7-c9d567a258a1.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><p><img src="3-20537\6af5a409-cd88-46ee-8367-04ead8c450ac.jpg" />.</p><p>Proof. Let <img src="3-20537\be478db7-7f26-434f-9856-fc6652d51640.jpg" /></p><p><img src="3-20537\85b50657-78a7-4573-94e0-558af8aa5a4d.jpg" /></p><p>It is easy to see that for all<img src="3-20537\b9b59f4f-38dd-44e6-a228-9a9ca240f570.jpg" />, there hold the following error equations</p><disp-formula id="scirp.25494-formula77670"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-20537\aa85848c-079d-4d31-bffc-1c48495a3020.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Choosing <img src="3-20537\cffbc41b-de23-46d6-9c78-da8990f42dcb.jpg" /> in (7(a)) and using the CauchySchwartz’s inequality yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.25494-formula77671"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-20537\4427d021-61d7-4b94-a63d-a38e7cef3a6c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Further, choosing <img src="3-20537\0d000ada-e451-4e73-829f-b75e76c29153.jpg" /> in (7(b)) leads to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.25494-formula77672"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-20537\55f68335-8f3b-4435-95fd-09c5663cc5d5.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>For the right side of (9), applying <img src="3-20537\7f2304aa-99a9-4136-817b-b9e4cc80e654.jpg" />-Young’s inequality and noting that <img src="3-20537\793f780d-b31e-48ac-baeb-7653fa1a8125.jpg" /> is a smooth function with bounded derivatives, we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.25494-formula77673"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-20537\a16b2465-3368-4763-bca9-7dd83cf7c9b6.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.25494-formula77674"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-20537\f258dd9e-3f44-4d7a-829d-59361193c247.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By Lemma 1 and <img src="3-20537\77316503-231d-4b3c-9498-565908abf0e0.jpg" />-Young’s inequality, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.25494-formula77675"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-20537\4f62a94f-da0f-476a-9b8f-69746f588515.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Choosing small <img src="3-20537\fa379ad7-a409-4792-b94a-ad7a7db20c34.jpg" /> and combining (9)-(12), we can derive</p><disp-formula id="scirp.25494-formula77676"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-20537\fcecb9d4-8142-4e2d-a95e-a89c728dd880.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Integrating the both sides of (13) with respect to time from 0 to t, by Gronwall’s lemma and noting <img src="3-20537\6514c209-8184-4404-a6db-0ffef60b181c.jpg" />, we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.25494-formula77677"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-20537\d96ef5f9-0016-453c-9e7a-732f2c672eff.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>together with (8), there yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.25494-formula77678"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="3-20537\10d0617f-f6ec-4633-aa25-388d1e4d5a2d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Finally, by use of the triangle inequality, (14) and (15), we get (5) and (6). The proof is completed.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Acknowledgements</title><p>This research is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.10971203); Tianyuan Mathematics Foundation of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.11026154) and the Natural Science Foundation of the Education Department of Henan Province (Grant Nos.2010A110018; 2011A110020).</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.25494-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Nagumo, S. Arimoto and S. Yoshizawa, “An Active Pulse Transmission Line Simulating Nerve Axon,” Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers, Vol. 50, 1965, pp. 91-102.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25494-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">W. M. Wan and Y. C. Liu, “Long Time Behaviors of Solutions for Initial Boundary Value Problem of Pseudo-Hyperbolic Equations,” Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica, Vol. 22, No. 2, 1999, pp. 311-355. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25494-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Guo and H. X. Rui, “Least-Squares Galerkin Procedures for Pseudo-Hyperbolic Equations,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 189, 2007, pp. 425-439. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2006.11.094</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25494-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. K. Pani, “An H&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;-Galerkin Mixed Finite Element Methods for Parabolic Partial Differential Equations,” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, Vol. 35, No. 2, 1998, pp. 721-727. doi:10.1137/S0036142995280808</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25494-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. K. Pani and G. Fairweather, “H&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;-Galerkin Mixed Finite Element Methods for Parabolic Parial Integro-Differential Equations,” IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2002, pp. 231-252.  
doi:10.1093/imanum/22.2.231</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25494-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. Liu and H. Li, “H&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;-Galerkin Mixed Finite Element Methods for Pseudo-Hyperbolic Equations,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 212, No. 2, 2009, pp. 446-457. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2009.02.039</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25494-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. Liu and H. Li, “A New Mixed Finite Element Method for Fourth-Order Heavy Damping Wave Equation,” Mathematica Numerica Sinica, Vol. 32, No. 2, 2010, pp. 157-170. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25494-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. Y. Shi and H. H. Wang, “An H1-Galerkin Nonconforming Mxied Finite Elment Method for Integro-Differential Equation of Parabolic Type,” Journal of Mathematical Research and Exposition, Vol. 29, No. 5, 2009, pp. 871-881. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25494-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. Y. Shi, S. P. Mao and S. C. Chen, “An Anisotropic Nonconforming Finite Element with Some Superconvergence Results,” Journal of Computational Mathematics, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2005, pp. 261-274. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25494-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Q. Lin, L. Tobiska and A. H. Zhou, “Super Convergence and Extrapolation of Non-Conforming Low Order Finite Elements Applied to the Possion Equation,” IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2005, pp. 160-181.  
doi:10.1093/imanum/drh008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25494-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. G. Ciarlet, “The Finite Element Method for Elliptic Problem,” Northe-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25494-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. Stummel, “The Generalized Patch Test,” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, Vol. 16, No. 3, 1979, pp. 449-471.  
doi:10.1137/0716037</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25494-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. L. Wachspress, “Incompatible Basis Function,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 12, 1978, pp. 589-595.  
doi:10.1002/nme.1620120404</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25494-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Z. C. Shi, “A Convergence Condition for the Quadrilateral Wilson Element,” Numerische Mathematik, Vol. 44, No. 3, 1984, pp. 349-363. doi:10.1007/BF01405567</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25494-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. S. Jiang and X. L. Cheng, “A Conforming Element like Wilson’s for Second Order Problems,” Journal of Computational Mathematics, Vol. 14, No. 3, 1992, pp. 274- 278. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25494-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. Q. Long and Y. Xu, “Generalized Conforming Quadrilateral Membrance Element of Shecht,” Mathematica Numerica Sinica, Vol. 4, 1989, pp. 73-79. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25494-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. Y. Shi and S. C. Chen, “A kind of Improved Wilson Arbitrary Quadrilateral Elements,” Numerical Mathematics. A Journal of Chinese Universities, Vol. 16 No. 2, 1994, pp. 161-167.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25494-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. Y. Shi and S. C. Chen, “A Class of Nonconforming Arbitrary Quadrilateral Elements,” Journal of Applied Mathematics of Chinese Universities, Vol. 11, No. 2, 1996, pp. 231-238.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25494-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. Y. Shi, “Research on Nonconforming Finite Element Problems,” Ph.D. Thesis, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25494-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. L. Taylor, P. J. Beresford and E. L. Wilson, “A Nonconforming Element for Stress Analysis,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 6, 1980, pp. 1211-1219.  
doi:10.1002/nme.1620100602</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25494-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Lesaint and M. Zlamal, “Convergence for the Nonconforming Wilson Element for Arbitrary Quadrilateral Meshes,” Numerische Mathematik, Vol. 36, No. 1, 1980, pp. 33-52. doi:10.1007/BF01395987</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25494-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. C. Chen and D. Y. Shi, “Accuracy Analysis for Quasi-Wilson Element,” Acta Mathematica Scientia, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2000, pp. 44-48.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25494-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. C. Chen, D. Y. Shiand and Y. C. Zhao, “Anisotropic Interpolation and Quasi-Wilson Element for Narrow Quadrilateral Meshes,” IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2004, pp.77-95.  
doi:10.1093/imanum/24.1.77</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25494-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. Y. Shi, L. F. Pei and S. C. Chen, “A Nonconforming Arbitrary Quadrilateral Finite Element Method for Approximating Maxwell’s Equations,” Numerical Mathematics. A Journal of Chinese Universities, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2007, pp. 289-299.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25494-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. K. Hale, “Ordinary Differential Equations,” Willey-Inter Science, New York, 1969.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>