<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMF</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Mathematical Finance</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2162-2434</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmf.2012.24035</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMF-25081</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  The SAFEX-JIBAR Market Models
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ictor</surname><given-names>Gumbo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Department of Finance, National University of Science &amp;amp; Technology, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>victor.gumbo@gmail.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>19</day><month>11</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><volume>02</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>321</fpage><lpage>326</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>June</day>	<month>8,</month>	<year>2012</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>July</day>	<month>12,</month>	<year>2012</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>July</day>	<month>28,</month>	<year>2012</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  It is possible to construct an arbitrage-free interest rate model in which the LIBOR rates follow a log-normal process leading to Black-type pricing formulae for caps and floors. The key to their approach is to start directly with modeling observed market rates, LIBOR rates in this case, instead of instantaneous spot rates or forward rates. This model is known as the LIBOR Market Model. We formulate the SAFEX-JIBAR market model based on the fact that the forward JIBAR rates follow a log-normal process. Formulae of the Black-type are deduced.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>LIBOR; SAFEX-JIBAR; Market Models; Caps; Floors; Collars</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Instantaneous rate models, although theoretically satisfying, are less so in practice. Instantaneous rates are not observable and calibration to market data is complicated. Hence, the need for a market model where one models LIBOR rates seems imperative. In this modeling process, we aim at regaining the Black-76 formula [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.25081-ref1">1</xref>] for pricing caps and floors since these are the ones used in the market. To regain the Black-76 formula we have to model the LIBOR rates as log-normal processes. The whole construction method means calibration by using market data for caps, floors and swaptions is straight-forward. Brace, Gatarek and Musiela [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.25081-ref2">2</xref>] and, Miltersen, Sandmann and Sondermann [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.25081-ref3">3</xref>] showed that it is possible to construct an arbitrage-free interest rate model in which the LIBOR rates follow a log-normal process leading to Black-type pricing formulae for caps and floors. The key to their approach is to start directly with modeling observed market rates, LIBOR rates in this case, instead of instantaneous spot rates or forward rates. Thereafter, the market models, which are consistent and arbitrage-free [2,4,5], can be used to price more exotic instruments. The resulting model is known as the LIBOR Market Model.</p><p>Some of the advantages of market models as compared to other traditional models are that market models imply pricing formulae for caplets, floorlets or swaptions that correspond to market practice. Consequently, calibration of such models is relatively simple.</p><p>The plan of this work is as follows. Based on an improved version of the standard risk-neutral valuation approach, the forward risk-adjusted valuation approach, and on an elaborate process of computing forward riskadjusted measures, a proposition is made to apply the technique to the pricing of South African caps and floors. Secondly, based on general interest rate modeling [6-25] and the formulation of the LIBOR, the technique used will enable us to formulate and name a new model for the South African market, the SAFEX-JIBAR model.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. The JIBAR</title><p>Each day at 10:30 am, each of the 14 South African and South African-based foreign banks are asked to provide the midpoint between Bid and Offer of their 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 month deposit National (Negotiable) Certificate of Deposit (NCD) rates quoted as yield. In each category, e.g., in the 1 month category, the 14 rates are arranged in order. The top two and the bottom two are eliminated and the remaining 10 are averaged and rounded to 3 decimal places. The resulting rate is termed a k-month JIBAR rate where<img src="6-1490085\f33a07f8-d04e-4693-a8f5-9eb77f31acd5.jpg" />. JIBAR stands for Johannesburg Inter Bank Agreed Rate. It is the rate at which banks buy and sell short-term money among themselves and is traditionally a wholesale and not a retail rate. It is reset every quarter and is fixed for the duration of the quarter. Let <img src="6-1490085\51d6db9b-6150-49eb-abd6-97457d0beb3f.jpg" /> represent the <img src="6-1490085\75d3f30c-d24c-4642-a50d-694faf325133.jpg" />-month SAFEX-JIBAR rate. Let <img src="6-1490085\47778790-39b1-445a-843b-4094737ca071.jpg" /> represent the <img src="6-1490085\dd351089-ae19-4de4-a37f-fa1aa0ba5a3e.jpg" />-month SAFEX-JIBAR rate. Then</p><p><img src="6-1490085\3177935a-f3a7-474f-a2bf-0b230da53e5b.jpg" /></p><p>where<img src="6-1490085\2a2e3cda-2759-454d-b6f6-2c387dced49f.jpg" />, <img src="6-1490085\ca6335a1-7752-4ddc-a45e-5b30497ef337.jpg" />is the midpoint corresponding to bank<img src="6-1490085\c2c4bfd9-b4d1-462b-ac1b-2120bce2c8ac.jpg" />.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Background to Interest Rate Caps and Floors: The South African Context</title><p>In many circumstances, corporate treasurers in South Africa are hesitant to enter into interest rate derivative agreements which involve an element of optionality. The main deterrent factor is that many of them do not necessarily have access to sophisticated pricing models to accurately price these derivatives. However, for many corporate treasurers, caps and floors have been the preferred method of achieving disaster insurance against incidents like the 1998 emerging markets crisis. This sterms from the fact that caps and floors are highly adaptable to the particular needs and requirements of companies wishing to manage and hedge against interest rate reset risk on interest-sensitive assets and liabilities. On the exercise date of the cap or floor agreement, the prespecified strike rate is compared to the standard reference floating rate, that is the 3-month SAFEX-JIBAR rate. The interest differential is then applied to the contractually specified notional principal amount (amount to be borrowed/lent) in order to calculate the amount to be paid by the writer/seller to the holder/buyer (the settlement). The notional principal amount is normally at least R1 million.</p><p>Settlement of a single period cap/caplet is done in the following manner. The seller of a cap agrees to pay the buyer the difference between the fixed strike rate and the reference floating rate (JIBAR), based on the notional principal amount, when the JIBAR reset exceeds the fixed strike rate. Settlement occurs on each reset date according to the formula:</p><p><img src="6-1490085\769d53b8-6cc7-4ac2-b78a-46bbf22d8328.jpg" /></p><p>where <img src="6-1490085\006b6c5b-9dfc-42bf-a3f9-59fb984a6426.jpg" /> is the settlement amount in Rands, <img src="6-1490085\666db4d7-5220-498d-be9f-519327072552.jpg" />is the JIBAR rate for that period/quarter, <img src="6-1490085\16be951c-2bdd-4822-9235-379e761876b3.jpg" />is the cap strike rate, <img src="6-1490085\4b93475a-28f5-4fda-9edb-e6731f1b9ffc.jpg" />is the notional principal amount, and <img src="6-1490085\63897dfb-4a6f-4f5f-bb8d-4245117b1f67.jpg" /> is the exposure period in days (usually 91 or 92).</p><p>In the majority of cases, settlement takes place in arrears, in which case the settlement amount is then present-valued to the exercise date.</p><p>In a similar fashion, the settlement amount of a single period floor/floorlet is given by the formula:</p><p><img src="6-1490085\15dadc94-d00d-4b68-8b9a-c61f5f536dba.jpg" /></p><p>where <img src="6-1490085\1f4c195b-ab3a-4e07-b713-a90f8bc49272.jpg" /> is the settlement amount in Rands, <img src="6-1490085\6ce839b5-5164-4903-bd2d-f9224c8e9edf.jpg" />is the JIBAR rate for that period, <img src="6-1490085\116a0793-c051-426e-9d01-b97da18d8176.jpg" />is the floor strike rate, <img src="6-1490085\7d26feef-7379-42b7-8dd1-06ce3b3d4f2c.jpg" />is the notional principal amount, and <img src="6-1490085\5a10be46-83ca-4a03-b8d9-975fb0cedaf9.jpg" /> is the exposure period in days.</p><p>In this case, the seller of a floor agrees to pay the buyer the difference between the fixed strike rate and the SAFEX-JIBAR, based on the notional principal amount, when the SAFEX-JIBAR rate resets below the fixed strike rate. Settlement also takes place on each reset date. To get a better feeling of this, take a company that expects a surplus cash receipt of R1 million in a month’s time which it will wish to invest. The company fears rates will be lower in future and therefore decides to buy a T1m-T4m at-the-money floorlet with a maturity of 3 months, to hedge against the risk of losing money.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Pricing Caps, Floors and Collars</title><p>Each caplet/floorlet is priced from the implied 3-month forward rate for that period, from the yield curve. Hence, the at-the-money price of a caplet/floorlet is just the forward rate for that period. A strike price lower than that implied by the forward rate will result in an in-the-money caplet with both intrisic and time values, whereas a strike price above the forward rate will result in an out-themoney caplet. Similarly as with most option-styled derivative instruments, the more time to expiry, the greater the time value inherent in the option. This means that a T3m-T6m period caplet has time value of 3 months while a T21m-T24m period caplet has time value of 21 months. Volatility (annualized) is another factor that affects the value of a cap/floor. There is a positive correlation between volatility and the price of both caps and floors. The more volatile the price or rate of an asset, the more likely it is to reach the option strike price, and so the more valuable the option. In brief, higher volatility implies higher option value. Standard option pricing theory postulates that the spot price or rate of the underlying follows a lognormal random walk. The fact that there are so many factors impacting on the price of a cap/floor makes it practically impossible for market-makers to hedge caps and floors. Cap and floor values also change as the shape of the yield curve changes, something which is not a factor in equity derivatives. Basically, the pricing of caps and floors in the South African market follows an extension of the Black-Scholes option valuation formula and is done in the following manner.</p><p>Suppose we have an interest rate cap with strike rate <img src="6-1490085\9d4f672e-ce2a-4056-93cc-c73410ce0ae9.jpg" /> and reset at times<img src="6-1490085\f23f4f90-9ffc-412f-9478-4c5914abb7b9.jpg" />, with a final payment to be made at time<img src="6-1490085\cfd3e743-fca3-4a82-ac59-b8f713d16a4d.jpg" />. If we let <img src="6-1490085\b9cbba25-566f-4144-b80d-dc737b09c5de.jpg" /> and <img src="6-1490085\6e80d06d-c966-430c-9bd7-99d128905f1d.jpg" /> be the <img src="6-1490085\fc5419fb-02fe-4895-8b00-f4059b13b777.jpg" /> maturity forward rate observed at time <img src="6-1490085\4ba39b5b-c79d-4e99-aca5-4e02d2ae76af.jpg" />, then the time-t of the kth caplet <img src="6-1490085\e65134b3-fac4-420e-8abe-70d5b3286131.jpg" /> is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.25081-formula119496"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-1490085\61a2a678-0817-44f7-a26a-1fdf0a9ca92f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="6-1490085\e64a1e67-5def-4cda-9216-d92938fdfc4a.jpg" /> is the nominal amount.</p><p>Similarly for a floor, the price of the kth floorlet <img src="6-1490085\04e7f364-f6dc-4784-8be9-8c58cc9f31c1.jpg" /> with strike <img src="6-1490085\a8d79ce9-9569-46a4-ae4b-d1f9b3287963.jpg" /> is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.25081-formula119497"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-1490085\3e48ce2b-890a-4ed4-84f8-16d29f095754.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In both cases,</p><p><img src="6-1490085\66ff0377-5890-4094-9301-3dec834ba475.jpg" /></p><p><img src="6-1490085\29081361-a333-4f5d-9290-74577622c287.jpg" />is the continuously compounded rate at the caplet/ floorlet payment time <img src="6-1490085\544948c4-f71d-44a7-9011-369f61f54b3a.jpg" /> The cap/floor price is the sum of the prices of the caplets/fllorlets.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. The SAFEX-JIBAR Market Models</title><p>Consider a fixed set of increasing maturities</p><p><img src="6-1490085\49dcceb3-8771-498b-bb9d-6f97f0a27eb6.jpg" />such that <img src="6-1490085\7bf062c6-77d0-4dba-94b4-62d1b22d84e7.jpg" /> = exposure period in days. Define <img src="6-1490085\6c818ef4-f0bd-4483-ac93-310d8b2e932c.jpg" /> as the daycount factor (usually 91/365 or 92/365). Denote by <img src="6-1490085\c2066e6b-0fa9-48b2-9d62-67e56933f0dc.jpg" /> the 3-month SAFEX-JIBAR rate corresponding to the period<img src="6-1490085\386f01f9-bd6e-4a5e-bbf6-8b648cc3964d.jpg" />. We can therefore define a caplet with strike <img src="6-1490085\75453f73-1b1a-44a2-8d1c-fd456aaf7f20.jpg" /> and resettlement dates <img src="6-1490085\9ebb41a8-2c8b-44d3-80da-439b0c56439d.jpg" /> as a contract which at time <img src="6-1490085\f395d285-c294-4886-adcd-ff3beaf36170.jpg" /> gives the holder a pay-off or settlement amount of</p><disp-formula id="scirp.25081-formula119498"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-1490085\e087f973-ff80-41e4-8f24-3280f7552bc5.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="6-1490085\89e05298-cc48-4b3d-b809-04c8acb49f2d.jpg" /> is the reference floating SAFEX-JIBAR rate for the period<img src="6-1490085\f5ec8c34-9a9b-4865-b40a-19f83ac0e913.jpg" />; <img src="6-1490085\2b0291b2-ba36-4d4c-b3e0-c7b65317c2db.jpg" />is the caplet strike. <img src="6-1490085\0c97fd42-48ea-4fa7-81db-4d54446cf001.jpg" />is normally termed the tenor. Both the floating and strike rates are in decimal form.</p><p>Thus, for a portfolio of <img src="6-1490085\00d99f57-ace5-40e2-9184-0967b7036941.jpg" /> caplets we would have the following settlements:</p><p><img src="6-1490085\b9695dfc-1070-4b7d-b52f-337ff81fd0d8.jpg" /></p><p>Since by definition, <img src="6-1490085\c63ff07c-a987-47c1-a265-cf89d5d735ec.jpg" />is an average, for every</p><p><img src="6-1490085\f969884b-79bd-4099-afd2-cfd7ba24975d.jpg" />, the JIBAR-SAFEX process <img src="6-1490085\d86e9b89-defb-4d7f-acba-27a73b2b36e5.jpg" /> is a martingale under the corresponding forward measure <img src="6-1490085\db726f76-563a-4980-8c04-3d289725b0bf.jpg" /> on the interval <img src="6-1490085\423bec79-4187-420c-9164-3b98c574f570.jpg" /> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.25081-ref6">6</xref>]. Standard option pricing theory postulates that the spot price or the rate of the underlying follows a log-normal random walk. If for each <img src="6-1490085\cd6daf93-5902-4ae2-851c-de450530d762.jpg" /> the SAFEX-JIBAR rate <img src="6-1490085\02e1290b-5bd2-454c-8a54-ee746c2fcdfd.jpg" /> is log-normal under its measure, we assume <img src="6-1490085\d0942563-eee5-4556-8a94-9a5c2733e3b7.jpg" /> is a Geometric Brownian Motion, then we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.25081-formula119499"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-1490085\14e13a71-d727-47b9-ad62-4dfe65bd1ff1.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.25081-formula119500"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-1490085\f8e01037-a0d4-44ed-b8ea-73ffd6eb09ff.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Define <img src="6-1490085\d7bdc278-94d7-4fa8-a136-e746f0a8acd5.jpg" /> where <img src="6-1490085\918ad5c0-c741-479b-bc30-07ba79f60cad.jpg" /> is the continuously compounded forward rate for the period<img src="6-1490085\ef25fac8-698f-4372-83e4-ba82a140bb9a.jpg" />. We propose the following new results.</p><p>Proposition 5.1 In the SAFEX-JIBAR market, the time-t price of a caplet with strike <img src="6-1490085\2c53c404-9790-46b3-af1d-fce6c59f65a2.jpg" /> is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.25081-formula119501"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-1490085\96f8ee10-a12a-4cfe-b79d-293f4f654767.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><p><img src="6-1490085\abbfb44e-4a17-4bc4-9147-b99a636570e7.jpg" /></p><p>Here,</p><p><img src="6-1490085\3492c05c-f888-4448-a07e-2ec4fed11e64.jpg" /></p><p>and</p><p><img src="6-1490085\5c72512a-16ff-433f-840e-ee40912bb083.jpg" /></p><p>Proof: Since</p><disp-formula id="scirp.25081-formula119502"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-1490085\443ddc36-0a1c-498f-9134-21a1a2c36fe8.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>the value of caplet <img src="6-1490085\69f79e33-713c-41b9-82ba-337619357b3d.jpg" /> is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.25081-formula119503"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-1490085\b1228cbf-788f-400a-82e7-3c7ee4d25516.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Write <img src="6-1490085\f4e1d516-1e2b-4e5b-a561-d319d9f38af2.jpg" /> as <img src="6-1490085\98083912-4efe-41f3-a8a0-2b52687efac9.jpg" /> where<img src="6-1490085\2cac7462-cee8-4bd6-9481-b02e17c1c805.jpg" />. Thus</p><p><img src="6-1490085\61cdc257-52be-42b4-a840-155e9f1bdd24.jpg" /></p><p>and</p><p><img src="6-1490085\14358865-6f2f-47f2-a2c1-46079c07c897.jpg" /></p><p>Hence</p><p><img src="6-1490085\7e8086bd-6415-4476-a2d2-3d48dff931c0.jpg" /></p><p>becomes</p><p><img src="6-1490085\87f71e45-2e23-40fc-bac0-9f226dd654cf.jpg" /></p><p>Let</p><p><img src="6-1490085\283c0a99-9a5e-4bbd-89f9-225b90b060cf.jpg" /></p><p><img src="6-1490085\5da981d7-122d-4d4c-83c1-22dee333f541.jpg" /></p><p>Now completing the square,</p><p><img src="6-1490085\00f1f42d-ba51-498b-a065-aa7c7c616655.jpg" /></p><p>Thus</p><p><img src="6-1490085\bb76f7ca-ecc0-43c9-b5a8-703f3ea247ee.jpg" /></p><p>Let <img src="6-1490085\3cda3369-1371-4d01-8129-c01da248408f.jpg" /> Then <img src="6-1490085\789ce6c9-0753-4da7-ae1e-f0ebafd233ba.jpg" /> and</p><p><img src="6-1490085\ad52cfd5-795d-401f-99c8-058204062aa8.jpg" /></p><p>Hence</p><disp-formula id="scirp.25081-formula119504"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-1490085\88200fd2-3317-4ac0-bc4a-01ca696afd82.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Since</p><p><img src="6-1490085\1e7dd9fe-9689-4d93-a4b8-4b75d33b25f0.jpg" /></p><p>and</p><p><img src="6-1490085\f4376477-2ac0-424a-9c04-adae2c63c570.jpg" /></p><p>Now letting <img src="6-1490085\0a893ae0-d303-4b8a-81f5-c9c214e03086.jpg" /> and<img src="6-1490085\8bbc9ac4-411f-41b3-b313-8a89e3ae1435.jpg" />, we have, as required that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.25081-formula119505"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-1490085\05e702e2-8808-49d1-a210-8512efa50b5a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Definition 5.2 A floorlet with strike <img src="6-1490085\7817adbe-0ff1-4287-985b-b63d1189ec39.jpg" /> and resettlement dates <img src="6-1490085\e4ed6378-2766-4089-a32e-43e18ff5c257.jpg" /> is a contract which at time <img src="6-1490085\63cbe309-f36e-4234-bf30-ed928ab45324.jpg" /> gives the holder a settlement amount of</p><disp-formula id="scirp.25081-formula119506"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-1490085\fa1af843-6c0e-48d2-8c89-d20ac3dea6af.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proposition 5.3 In the SAFEX-JIBAR market, the price of a floorlet whose settlement amount is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.25081-formula119507"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-1490085\c6c05f0f-9ada-4fa2-b394-ff15d9c30a7c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is given by the formula</p><disp-formula id="scirp.25081-formula119508"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="6-1490085\641bd72b-23cb-40f5-9862-83f485fb53a1.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><p><img src="6-1490085\5ea0e4b6-361a-498e-9908-d0191b43abde.jpg" /></p><p>where <img src="6-1490085\e379fd1b-13e4-4257-a4f2-e9c1d5553a74.jpg" /> is the volatility of the interest rate of the period<img src="6-1490085\f34a59be-f6aa-47cc-b532-19d14f57f102.jpg" />.</p><p>Proposition 5.4 The time-t price of a SAFEX-JIBAR collar with resettlement dates <img src="6-1490085\7f6d8464-7bd9-4db8-bb78-0b7e6730d962.jpg" /> is given by</p><p><img src="6-1490085\4af09328-0a82-42a5-9f25-1cb55db0586e.jpg" /></p><p>where <img src="6-1490085\75f4d764-3273-4844-961b-14634051e1ca.jpg" /> and <img src="6-1490085\4127c666-b8a2-4064-914a-85e994391873.jpg" /> are the cap and floor strike rates respectively,</p><p><img src="6-1490085\eeac6bdb-3290-45e5-a0a7-59ec4373df93.jpg" /></p><p><img src="6-1490085\b74ef032-4a36-43e8-9987-3ff4ff59baea.jpg" /></p><p><img src="6-1490085\3f0b0f7f-826f-413c-97bf-4307c84b3051.jpg" />is the volatility of the interest rate of the period<img src="6-1490085\46619bb2-2fd8-4549-a69d-a4c68fdbb02b.jpg" />.</p><p>Equations (6) and (9) show that the numeraire for the pricing of caps and floors in the JIBAR market is<img src="6-1490085\e4f26a93-d2f9-47ee-8162-49e0e56c2662.jpg" />.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. The Greeks</title><p>In this section, we intend to derive formulae for some hedging measures for our model. Most traders employ sophisticated hedging schemes which involve the calculation of such measures as delta, gamma and vega. The delta of an option measures the rate at which the option price changes with respect to the price of the underlying forward rate. Gamma is the rate of change of the option’s delta with respect to the forward rate. Vega is the rate of change of option price with respect to the volatility of the underlying. If vega is high in absolute terms, then the option value is sensitive to small changes in volatility. In contrast, if vega is small in absolute terms, volatility changes have relatively little impact on the value of the option. We will recall that</p><p><img src="6-1490085\dcc698ac-ec9b-4ebb-be58-1f0b89f06201.jpg" /></p><p>and that</p><p><img src="6-1490085\2258dc9e-8577-4d17-8ee7-4d8cf3f43bc5.jpg" /></p><p>This fact will help us deduce our measures in the following manner. For a caplet,</p><p><img src="6-1490085\e4f642a8-98a5-4fba-9b8f-d93a8700e27a.jpg" /></p><p><img src="6-1490085\8caf5dc6-7a3a-480b-9cb5-df85d861c365.jpg" /></p><p><img src="6-1490085\0d8df663-8ea7-412d-8d95-976765386caf.jpg" /></p><p>Similarly, it can be shown that for floorlets,</p><p><img src="6-1490085\3d54855e-b4b9-4fdd-8397-36f76861e38f.jpg" /></p><p><img src="6-1490085\c35651b0-c85a-48cc-9b99-f4d89545c4ed.jpg" /></p><p><img src="6-1490085\99a99e5f-620a-43f6-bff6-1cfbd8f288ea.jpg" /></p><p>Note that the delta, gamma and vega of a cap/floor is simply the arithmetic sum of the respective delta, gamma and vega for the caplets involved.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>7. Conclusion</title><p>The present work has made some notable contribution in the interest rate modeling arena. A clear understanding of the LIBOR theory enabled an easy extension of the same ideas to the construction of the SAFEX-JIBAR market model which gives prices consistent with both economic practicality and with other Black-type models.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.25081-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. Black, “Pricing of Commodity Contracts,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, No. 1-2, 1976, pp. 167-179.  
doi:10.1016/0304-405X(76)90024-6 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25081-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Brace, D. Gatarek and M. Musiela, “The Market Model of Interest rate Dynamics,” Mathematical Finance, Vol. 7, No. 2, 1997, pp. 127-155.  
doi:10.1111/1467-9965.00028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25081-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Miltersen, K. Sandmann and D. Sondermann, “Closed Form Solutions for Term-Structure Derivatives with Log-normal Interest Rates,” Finance, Vol. 52, No. 1, 1997, pp. 407-430.  
doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03823.x </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25081-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. Jamshidian, “Libor and Swap Market Models and Measures,” Finance and Stochastics, Vol. 1, No. 4, 1997, pp. 293-330. doi:10.1007/s007800050026 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25081-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. Bjork, “Arbitrage Theory in Continuous Time,” 2nd Edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004.  
doi:10.1093/0199271267.001.0001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25081-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. Gumbo, “The LIBOR Market Model and Its Application in the SAFEX-JIBAR Market,” Lap Publishing, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25081-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Schoenmakers and B. Coffey, “LIBOR Rate Models, Related Derivatives and Model Calibration,” WIAS Preprint No. 480, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25081-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Rebonato, “Modern Pricing of Interest Rate Derivatives—The LIBOR Market Model and Beyond”, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25081-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Spangenberg, “The Mechanics of Option-Styled Interest Rate Derivatives—caps and floors,” 1999. 
www.actsa.org.za/articles </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25081-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">W. Drobetz, “Interest Rate Derivatives,” University of Basel and Otto Beisheim Graduate School of Management (WHU), Basel, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25081-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Kuprianov, “Over-the-Counter Interest Rate Derivatives,” Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, Richmond, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25081-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Musiela and M. Rutkowski, “Martingale Methods in Financial Modelling,” Springer, New York, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25081-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. J?ckel and R. Rebonato, “Accurate and Optimal Calibration to Co-Terminal European Swaptions in a FRA-Based BGM Framework,” QUARC Paper, Royal Bank of Scotland Group, Edinburgh, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25081-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. Brigo and F. Mercurio, “Interest Rate Models: Theory and Practice,” Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25081-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. Brigo, F. Mercurio and M. Morini, “The LIBOR Model Dynamics: Approximations, Calibration and Diagnostics,” European Journal of Operations Research, Vol. 163, No. 1, 2005, pp. 30-51.  
doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2003.12.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25081-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. Brigo, F. Mercurio, C. Capitani, “On the joint calibration of the LIBOR market model to caps and swaptions market volatilities” July 2001 version.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25081-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Bhar, C. Chiarella, H. Hung and W. J. Runggaldier, “The Volatility of the Instantaneous Spot Interest Rate Implied by Arbitrage Pricing—A Dynamic Bayesian Approach,” Automata, Vol. 42, No. 8, 2006, pp. 1381-1393.  
doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2005.12.027</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25081-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. C. Rogers, “The Potential Approach to the Term Structure of Interest Rates and Foreign Exchange Rates,” Mathematical Finance, Vol. 7, No. 2, 1997, pp. 157-176.  
doi:10.1111/1467-9965.00029</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25081-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. J. Hunter, P. Jackel and M. S. Joshi, “Drift Approximations in a Forward-Risk-Base LIBOR Market Model,” Market Model. Getting the Drift, Risk, Vol. 14, No. 7, 2001, pp. 81-84.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25081-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. S. Joshi and T. Jocken, “Bounding Bermudan Swaptions in a Swap-Rate Market Model,” Quantitative Finance, Vol. 2, No. 5, 2002, pp. 370-377. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25081-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. J?ckel, “Non-Recombining Trees for the Pricing of Interest rate Derivatives in the BGM/J Framework”, Working Paper, Quantitative Research Centre, Royal Bank of Scotland, Edinburgh, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25081-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. Duffie and K. J. Singleton, “An Econometric Model of Term Structure of Interest-Rate Swap Yields,” Finance, Vol. 52, No. 4, 1997, pp. 1287-1321.  
doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb01111.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25081-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. De Jong, J. Driessen and A. Pelsser, “LIBOR and Swap Market Models for the Pricing of Interest Rate Derivatives: An empirical comparison,” Working Paper, Center for Economic Research, Tilburg University, Tilburg, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25081-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Glasserman and N. Merener, “Numerical Solution of Jump-Diffusion LIBOR Market Models,” Finance &amp; Stochastics, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2001, p. 1. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.25081-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Glasserman and N. Merener, “Cap and Swaption Approximations in LIBOR Market Models with Jumps,” Journal of Computational Finance, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2003, pp. 1-36.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>