<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JSIP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Signal and Information Processing</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2159-4465</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jsip.2012.34059</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JSIP-24962</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  PAPR Distribution Analysis at the Output of Nonlinear PAPR Reducers
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ésiré</surname><given-names>Guel</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jacques</surname><given-names>Palicot</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>SUPELEC/IETR, Campus de Rennes Avenue de la Boulaie CS 47601 F-35576 Cesson-Sévigné cedex</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>gueldesi@yahoo.fr(ÉG)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>29</day><month>11</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>465</fpage><lpage>468</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>July</day>	<month>23rd,</month>	<year>2012</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>August</day>	<month>27th,</month>	<year>2012</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>September</day>	<month>6th,</month>	<year>2012</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Nonlinear PAPR reducers, such as clipping and companding techniques, are some simple methods used to reduce the Peak-to-Average Power Ratio (PAPR). In this paper, assuming that the baseband OFDM signal is characterized as a band-limited complex Gaussian process, we investigate the PAPR distribution of an OFDM signal when it is passed through a nonlinear PAPR reducer. The obtained PAPR distribution depends on the nonlinear function which characterizes the PAPR reducer. Later in this paper, we apply the obtained PAPR distribution in the clipping case. The comparisons made between the proposed distribution and that obtained thanks to computer simulations show good agreement.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM); Peak-to-Average Power Ratio (PAPR); Distribution; Nonlinear PAPR Reducers</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) is an attractive modulation technique for the next generation of high bit rate wireless transmission due to its high robustness to multipath fading and its great simplification of channel equalization [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24962-ref1">1</xref>]. However, one of the main problems of the OFDM modulation technique is the large peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) of the transmitting signals. This high PAPR causes in-band and out-band interferences when the OFDM signals are passed through a high power amplifier (HPA) which does not have enough linear range. Several PAPR reduction techniques have been proposed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24962-ref2">2</xref>] to reduce the PAPR of OFDM signals. To well understand this PAPR problem and to predict possible gain thanks to reduction techniques, many papers were interested in the PAPR distribution analysis. The pionneer work was the work of R. van Nee and A. de Wild in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24962-ref3">3</xref>]. But this expression was obtained at the Nyquist frequency and therefore did not represent a realistic value of the continuous signal PAPR distribution. Then, using a probabilistic approach, Ochiai et Imai proposed a more realistic expression in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24962-ref4">4</xref>]. Later, Zhou et Caffery in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24962-ref5">5</xref>] proposed an upper bound of the Complementary Cumulative Distribution Function (CCDF) of the PAPR. Louet and Hussain in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24962-ref6">6</xref>] proposed a new expression for continuous baseband OFDM signals. This latter expression was very close to the continuous signal PAPR simulation.</p><p>But, only few papers are dealing with PAPR distribution analysis at the output of PAPR reducers. Some researchers proposed a PAPR distribution analysis when there is unequal power allocation between carriers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24962-ref7">7</xref>]. In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24962-ref8">8</xref>], YOO et al. studied the PAPR distribution at the ouput of probabilistic PAPR reducer. In this paper we are interrested in the PAPR distribution analysis at the output of PAPR reducers. We will, first of all, focus on the class of PAPR reduction techniques known as nonlinear PAPR reducers, i.e. the schemes for PAPR reduction that use spectrum distortion or spectral regrowth. This class of nonlinear PAPR reducers includes mainly clipping techniques [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24962-ref9">9</xref>] and companding techniques [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24962-ref10">10</xref>]. We derive a general expression of the CCDF at the ouput of non-linear reducers. Then, we apply this expression to the Soft Envelop Clipping (SEC) reducer.</p><p>The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: Section 2 briefly introduces nonlinear PAPR reducers. In Section 3, the PAPR distribution is analyzed through its Complementary Cumulative Distribution Function (CCDF). Then in Section 4 results of previous analysis is applied to Soft Enveloppe Clipping reducer. In this section, we provided some results which show good agreement between simulation and theoretical expressions. Finally in Section 5, a conclusion is drawn.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Characterization of Nonlinear PAPR Reducers</title><p>Let<img src="5-3400232\5ed15fd3-e00b-4f2a-ab43-f29ac2be202e.jpg" />, be the baseband equivalent time-domain OFDM signal. <img src="5-3400232\d265d24d-fb60-41a9-9de2-76a3da925390.jpg" />can be written as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24962-formula109606"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="5-3400232\27eb650a-6c3b-44c2-9b4f-639d2e6dbd69.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="5-3400232\10d87d8f-a95b-4323-8dd5-21662db68f58.jpg" /> is the OFDM magnitude, <img src="5-3400232\26b48e6c-1065-42e8-afeb-814b19bbadd6.jpg" />is the OFDM phase and <img src="5-3400232\1a907e44-1bb1-45d4-a90f-7ec469cd2bca.jpg" /> is the OFDM symbol period.</p><p>The PAPR of <img src="5-3400232\b2b0da05-228e-49a1-bdcd-9542bfd8b943.jpg" /> may be defined as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24962-formula109607"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="5-3400232\d393016c-bffc-4cd6-b6fa-5ad66071716e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="5-3400232\2655eab1-5a6c-40b0-b7cd-93f8c4824cc7.jpg" /> is the signal <img src="5-3400232\5235ff61-beb3-4c31-9d9b-3c088def3e36.jpg" /> average power.</p><p>In nonlinear PAPR reducers (clipping, companding techniques), the data signal PAPR is reduced by a nonlinear function as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p><p>Now, let us suppose <img src="5-3400232\ba4346fd-9fe3-4d21-804a-6f0e1d47aea0.jpg" /> the nonlinear function that characterizes the nonlinear PAPR reducer shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, the PAPR reduced signal <img src="5-3400232\d49248ad-8f29-4d51-b128-0b554c214932.jpg" /> at the output of PAPR reduction scheme is expressed as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24962-formula109608"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="5-3400232\ea898102-10f4-4514-8393-fabb0ae68b6a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="5-3400232\35752999-aae4-48c2-b4e1-db2ee6a59222.jpg" /> is nonlinear positive function also called function for PAPR reduction.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. PAPR Distribution Analysis</title><p>In the literature, it is customary to use the Complementary Cumulative Distribution Function (CCDF) of the PAPR as a performance criterion. Let us consider <img src="5-3400232\220aa80b-1bee-47f6-bce3-7fdd412f735f.jpg" /> and <img src="5-3400232\64fcabe1-474d-4c18-8364-0c544c0c5ab2.jpg" /> the discrete-time signals at the Nyquist rate of the OFDM signal <img src="5-3400232\f5f27f2a-3971-43e0-856f-471a15626bfd.jpg" /> and its PAPR reduced version <img src="5-3400232\24730272-9091-483c-b59c-100d470cd81e.jpg" /> respectively. For a large number of subcarriers, the OFDM envelope converges to a Rayleigh envelope distribution. Therefore, the probability density function (PDF) <img src="5-3400232\8b87509e-ceb3-4570-a8a1-0b8e5e396185.jpg" />of the OFDM envelope can be expressed as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24962-formula109609"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="5-3400232\9cf1f7ed-bdd3-4bf9-8b2f-608ed293a2e9.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="5-3400232\467b6c87-1ac4-4902-8891-7fb4e8743350.jpg" /> is the mean power OFDM signal.</p><p>Using (4), it was shown in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24962-ref4">4</xref>] that, the OFDM PAPR CCDF could be approximated by the following expression:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24962-formula109610"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="5-3400232\badb4de7-226f-446e-bd47-eacee9c14d14.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where, <img src="5-3400232\008cece7-6cf5-4eef-b48d-14cf4e3935ba.jpg" />is the number of samples per OFDM symbol period. This PAPR CCDF expression has been proved for the first time by R. van Nee and A. de Wild in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24962-ref3">3</xref>].</p><p>In the same way as (5), we show that the PAPR distribution of the ouput signal <img src="5-3400232\af193afc-f672-438c-907f-e7133c3c17e6.jpg" /> could be approximated by Equation (6):</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24962-formula109611"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="5-3400232\48a41927-f610-415b-9af7-1a4d34b7aeef.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using (2), it can be shown that, <img src="5-3400232\9cc20890-2294-4813-936d-eefeab287331.jpg" />and Equation (6) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24962-formula109612"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="5-3400232\e7972eac-bf27-44d4-97d4-39fe277436be.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (7) shows that, the expression of <img src="5-3400232\e21c247a-416c-4efd-8b7c-71b0232f50c2.jpg" /> depends on the function <img src="5-3400232\4bf7ed4c-665c-40f7-b79f-8e0de80957ac.jpg" /> for PAPR reduction. In the following section of this paper, an exact expression of <img src="5-3400232\cd014071-beaf-4ce6-9faa-4b8e32d967ff.jpg" /> is given in the soft envelop clipping’s case [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24962-ref9">9</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. PAPR Distribution in the Soft Envelope Clipping Technique’s Case</title><p>In this section, in order to illustrate the theoretical results obtained for nonlinear PAPR reducers, we consider one nonlinear PAPR reducer which is commonly studied in the literature: The Soft Envelop Clipping (SEC) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24962-ref9">9</xref>].</p><p>The nonlinear function <img src="5-3400232\fc5ffc9a-473d-4bb0-8916-4676e0fce06a.jpg" /> of SEC is expressed as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24962-formula109613"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="5-3400232\2af9628b-f49d-415e-8f1f-4ad8f9c229d6.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="5-3400232\e9279b42-fa7d-4987-aa5f-3547b7aca159.jpg" /> is the magnitude threshold and commonly known as clipping threshold.</p><p>It is shown in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24962-ref11">11</xref>] that the PDF <img src="5-3400232\49fdd6f0-27de-44d4-9f57-139d405a6947.jpg" /> of the clipped signal envelope can be written as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24962-formula109614"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="5-3400232\3d8f5b5b-60ea-4bce-afbc-de3651897693.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="5-3400232\8b4c1bcd-240c-41d9-b412-70b92428d5c4.jpg" /> is the Dirac impulse. From (9), we show that,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24962-formula109615"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="5-3400232\154b9c24-a194-4e3c-beba-a86d6a61e776.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="5-3400232\090ea7e2-7ffa-4f54-9089-cdcc8f71cea2.jpg" /> is the clipping ratio (CR) and <img src="5-3400232\8b91c025-db18-4f86-aea3-d612e6055cdd.jpg" /> is the output-to-input average power ratio defined as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24962-formula109616"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="5-3400232\d55d4814-5b5c-4844-bad0-6412832ffc31.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="5-3400232\7a79b282-fc7b-4a90-bfbe-10dcbad33259.jpg" /> is the function for PAPR reduction defined in (8) and <img src="5-3400232\c5c08b0d-f76b-4434-8551-50a5d3f5f0d2.jpg" /> is the PDF of the OFDM signal expressed in (4).</p><p>Substituting (10) into (7), we show that, the expression of <img src="5-3400232\eec21b29-1adb-45ca-8116-db81d9615fd8.jpg" /> for SEC is expressed as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24962-formula109617"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="5-3400232\7fc88624-d9b9-4354-8f11-7b5ff43599e6.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>when <img src="5-3400232\f7a58fff-0134-49fa-ad8d-f678cae57e5a.jpg" /> becomes great and tends to infinity, then <img src="5-3400232\3b674aa3-a917-42f2-98f3-45fb908b160c.jpg" /> tends to <img src="5-3400232\a7c863b4-0efb-411b-9a47-192e648a1547.jpg" /> and expression 12 is equal to classical expression 5 of the CCDF at the input of the clipping.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> compares the theoretical CCDF of the signal’s PAPR at the output of the PAPR reduction scheme expressed by (7), and this for simulation results obtained with three different values of<img src="5-3400232\39485876-d420-4e0a-ae9a-913a9f22e4a6.jpg" />. The OFDM signal comprises <img src="5-3400232\2e001317-8630-4bba-88a3-abf21a64f7e5.jpg" /> subcarriers and is simulated with an oversampling factor of<img src="5-3400232\3d86ec5c-0892-4cb8-80f5-080b6c1a8f36.jpg" />. It should be noted that, the theoretical <img src="5-3400232\153c37f5-b00c-41b8-b227-2182cb630f71.jpg" /> shows good agreement with the simulation results. Nevertheless, where <img src="5-3400232\d6fc4c0d-e307-4e75-adb6-825934aa92fc.jpg" /> dB and 5 dB, the theoretical <img src="5-3400232\442651a3-9c08-43e5-b06a-e209a3d304de.jpg" /> is less accurate with the simulation results where <img src="5-3400232\48fc23a2-95aa-44f8-a4ee-b6a954db391a.jpg" /> dB. The reason for this is that, for low values of<img src="5-3400232\94435e1c-3a00-483a-87a1-ce517c8535db.jpg" />, the theoretical <img src="5-3400232\b6435596-9627-4465-b6ae-4d96df998f4a.jpg" /> tends to be a Dirac and becomes very sensitive to approximation errors.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>In this paper, assuming that the baseband OFDM signal is characterized as a band-limited complex Gaussian process, we have investigated the PAPR distribution of an OFDM signal at the output of a nonlinear PAPR reducer. The obtained PAPR distribution has been applied in the clipping case, which is a well-known example of nonlinear PAPR reducer used for OFDM PAPR reduction.</p><p>The comparisons made between the proposed PAPR</p><p>distribution at the output of clipping and with that obtained thanks to computer simulations show good agreement.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.24962-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. R. S. Bahai and B. R. Saltzberg, “Multi-Carrier Digital Communications: Theory and Applications of OFDM,” Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24962-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. Louet and J. Palicot, “A Classification of Methods for Efficient Power Amplification of Signals,” Annals of Telecom, Vol. 63, No. 7-8, 2008, pp. 351-368.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24962-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. J. Van Nee and A. De Wild, “Reducing Peak-To-Average Power Ratio of OFDM,” Proceedings of IEEE VTC 96, Atlanta, 1996, pp. 2072-2076.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24962-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Ochiai and H. Imai, “On the Distribution of the Peak-to-Average Power Ratio in OFDM Signals,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. 49, No. 2, 2001, pp. 282-289. doi:10.1109/26.905885</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24962-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">X. Zhou and J. J. Caffery, “A New Distribution Bound and Reduction Scheme for OFDM PAPR,” Proceedings of 5th International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications, Vol. 1, 2002, pp. 158-162. 
doi:10.1109/WPMC.2002.1088152</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24962-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. Louet and S. Hussain, “Peak-To-Mean Envelope Power Ratio Statistical Analysis of Continuous OFDM Signal,” Proceedings of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference VTC Spring 2008, 11-14 May 2008, pp. 1681-1685. doi:10.1109/VETECS.2008.387</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24962-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. Jiang, D. M. Qu and P. Gao, “Distribution of Peak-To-Average Power Ratio and Its Applications in OFDM Systems with Unequal Power Allocation,” 2010. 
doi:10.4108/ICST.WICON2010.8618</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24962-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Yoo, F. Guilloud and R. Pyndiah, “Amplitude PDF Analysis of OFDM Signal Using Probabilistic PAPR Reduction Method,” EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, Vol. 2011, 2011, Article ID: 983915. doi:10.1155/2011/983915</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24962-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">X. Li and L. J. Cimini, Jr., “Effects of Clipping and Filtering on the Performance of OFDM,” IEEE on Communications Letters, Vol. 2, No. 5, 1998, pp. 131-133. 
doi:10.1109/4234.673657</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24962-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">X. Wang, T. Tjhung and C.S. Ng, “Reduction of Peak to Average Power Ratio of OFDM System Using A Companding Technique,” IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, Vol. 45, No. 3, 1999, pp. 303-307.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24962-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Banelli, G. Leus and G. B. Giannakis, “Bayesian Estimation of Clipped Gaussian Processes with Applicaiton to OFDM,” Proceedings of the European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), Toulouse, 3-6 September 2002, pp. 181-184.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>