<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JWARP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Water Resource and Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1945-3094</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jwarp.2012.411113</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JWARP-24729</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Phenol Removal from Aqueous Solutions by Electrocoagulation Technology Using Iron Electrodes:Effect of Some Variables
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ohammad</surname><given-names>Ali Zazouli</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mahmoud</surname><given-names>Taghavi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Faculty of Health and Health Sciences Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>Taghavim66@yahoo.com(MT)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>15</day><month>11</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>980</fpage><lpage>983</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>July</day>	<month>16,</month>	<year>2012</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>September</day>	<month>8,</month>	<year>2012</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>October</day>	<month>9,</month>	<year>2012</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The aim of this study was to determine the effect of electrocoagulation technology using iron electrodes on phenol removal in aqueous solutions. The removal of phenol was investigated in terms of various parameters, namely, current density, phenol and NaCl concentration, pH, and alginic acid concentration. The results showed that the removal efficiency of phenol increased with increasing the current density, pH and NaCl concentration, whereas it was inversely associated with initial concentration of phenol and alginic acid concentration. According to the results, electrocoagulation is a promising process for treatment of wastewater containing high concentration of phenol.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Phenol; Electrocoagulation; Water Treatment; Water Pollution</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>One of the most prevalent forms of organic chemical pollutants in industrial wastewaters are Phenol and phenolic compounds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24729-ref1">1</xref>]. High concentrations of phenol and phenolic compounds typically are found in aqueous effluents of oil refineries, petrochemical, ceramic, and steel plants, coal conversion processes, phenolic resin and pharmaceutical industries [1-4] . Since phenol and its derivatives are toxic and harmful to living organisms even at low concentrations, they are known as noxious pollutants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24729-ref4">4</xref>]. The most widely used methods for phenol removal from aqueous solutions are adsorption, chemical oxidation, biological treatment, precipitation, distillation, solvent extraction, ion exchange, membrane processes, reverse osmosis, and electrochemical methods [2,4-6] . However, these methods have some problems such as high cost, low efﬁciency, and generation of toxic byproducts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24729-ref6">6</xref>]. On the other hand, electrochemical methods have little or no harmful effects on the environment and electrochemical reactions are more or less independent of the conditions of the wastewater [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24729-ref6">6</xref>].</p><p>Electrocoagulation is an alternative technology for wastewater treatment in addition to its other conventional applications. The most important advantages of electrocoagulation compared with other conventional techniques are “in situ” delivery of reactive agents, no generation of secondary pollution, and compact equipment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24729-ref7">7</xref>]. In this study, electrocoagulation using iron electrodes was conducted to investigate the removal of phenol from aqueous solutions.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><p>The phenol used in the experiments was provided from Merck Chemical Company; it was 98.5% pure. Furthermore, Alginate acid sodium salt from brown algae was purchased from Fluka Biochemical and the synthetic wastewater containing the phenol was prepared using distilled water. pH and conductivity were adjusted to a desired value using 0.1 M HCl and NaOH. The electrolyte (NaCl) concentration of 2 g was kept constant initially. The Plexiglas cell as electrolytic reactor having dimensions of 12 cm &#215; 12 cm &#215; 16 cm with a working volume of about 1.5 L was used to conduct the experiments, and a magnetic stirrer was applied for mixing (200 rpm). Iron sheets with the dimensions of 0.10 m&#215; 0.10 m &#215; 0.002 m were also used as electrodes. Between two tests, electrolytic cell (including the electrodes) was cleaned with 15% (W/V) hydrochloric acid solution. The gap between the anode and cathode was 2 cm. A Singleoutput Adjustable DC Power Supply (MPS-3005D) was used as the power supplier. Retention time, pH, current density, and initial phenol, NaCl, and alginic acid concentrations were selected as parameters. At different time intervals, the samples were taken from the reactor and centrifuged for 30 min at 4000 rpm before analysis. Analyses were performed according to the standard methods for examination of water and wastewater [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24729-ref8">8</xref>]. Briefly, the concentrations of phenol were determined by spectrophotometer (Hach DR2800 spectrophotometer) according to the analysis of the color resulted from the reaction of phenol with 4-aminoantipyrine at 500 nm.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Result and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Effect of pH</title><p>In this study, the phenol removal efficiency was determined in the pH range from 3 to 11. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows the influence of solution pH on phenol removal. It shows that the phenol removal efficiency increased with pH until it reached to 7, and after this point, further increase of pH, the removal efficiency decreased. Maximum removal occurred at pH 7 value, thus pH = 7 was the optimum pH. In agreement with our findings, Yavuz et al. reported that pH adjustment is not necessary because the most appropriate results are achieved when initial pH was 7 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24729-ref9">9</xref>]. The kinetics of Fe<sup>2+ </sup>conversion to Fe<sup>3+</sup> are strongly affected by the pH; the surface charge of the coagulating particle also varies with pH. In general, at lower and higher pH Fe is increasingly soluble. At lower pH the protons in the solution are reduced to H<sub>2</sub> at the cathode and the same proportion of hydroxide ions cannot be produced. At lower pH, Fe(OH)<sup>2+</sup> and <img src="8-9401462\b5b846e3-f999-4ea4-a398-c00110d70830.jpg" /><sup> </sup>were produced which are disadvantageous for phenol precipitation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24729-ref10">10</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Effect of Current Density</title><p>The supply of current density to the electrocoagulation system is a determining factor for the amount of Fe<sup>2+</sup> ions released from the electrodes. To investigate the effect of current density on metal removal, electrocoagula-</p><p>tion process was carried out using various current densities varying from 5 to 25 A at pH 7. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows the effect of current density on phenol removal in the electrocoagulation process. As shown in this Fig, the removal rate of phenol increased with increasing current density, and the highest current density (25 mA/cm<sup>2</sup>) had the maximum removal efficiency. That is because increasing the current density caused higher coagulant dissolution, and OH<sup>−</sup> production resulted in a more efficient and faster removal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24729-ref11">11</xref>]. A large current density means a small electrocoagulation unit. However, when so large a current density is used, there is a high chance of wasting electrical energy in heating up the water. More importantly, it would result in a signiﬁcant decrease in current efficiency [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24729-ref12">12</xref>]. Therefore, to ensure a high current efficiency, the current density selection should be made along with including other operating parameters such as pH and temperature as well as ﬂow rate.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Effect of Initial Phenol Concentration</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> depicts the effect of initial phenol concentration on the efficiency of phenol removal. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, increasing the concentration of phenol led to decreasing the removal efficiency from 91% to 70.1%. This is attributed to the fact that at a constant current density, the same number of iron ions passes to the solution at dif-</p></sec></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.24729-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Bodalo, J. L. Gomez, M. Gomez, G. Leon, A. M. Hidalgo and M. A. Ruiz, “Phenol Removal from Water by Hybrid Processes: Study of the Membrane Process Step,” Desalination, Vol. 223, 2008, pp. 323-329.  
doi:10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.219</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24729-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. A. Rodriguesa, M. L. C. P. D. Silvab, M. O. Alvarez-Mendesc, A. D. R. Coutinhoc and G. P. Thima, “Phenol Removal from Aqueous Solution by Activated Carbon Produced from Avocado Kernel Seeds,” Chemical Engineering Journal, Vol. 174, 2011, pp. 49-57.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24729-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Caetano, C. Valderrama, A. Farran and J. L. Cortina, “Phenol Removal from Aqueous Solution by Adsorption and Ion Exchange Mechanisms onto Polymeric Resins,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, Vol. 388, 2009, pp. 402-409. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2009.06.062</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24729-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. B. Senturka, D. Ozdesa, A. Gundogdua, C. Durana and M. Soylakb, “Removal of Phenol from Aqueous Solutions by Adsorption onto Organomodi?ed Tirebolu Bentonite: Equilibrium, Kinetic and Thermodynamic Study,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 172, 2009, pp. 353-362. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24729-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Aravindhan, J. R. Rao and B. U. Nair, “Application of a Chemically Modi?ed Green Macro Alga as a Biosorbent for Phenol Removal,” Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 90, 2009, pp. 1877-1883.  
doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24729-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">O. Abdelwahaba, N. K. Aminb and E.-S. Z. El-Ashtoukhy, “Electrochemical Removal of Phenol from Oil Re?nery Wastewater,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 163, 2009, pp. 711-716. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24729-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Saleem, A. A. Bukhari and M. N. Akram, “Electrocoagulation for the Treatment of Wastewater for Reuse in Irrigation and Plantation,” Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2011, pp. 11-20.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24729-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">APHA, AWWA and WEF, “Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater,” American Public Health Association American Water Work Association Water Environment Federation, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24729-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. Yavuz and A. S. Koparal, “Electrochemical Oxidation of Phenol in a Parallel Plate Reactor Using Ruthenium Mixed Metal Oxide Electrode,” Journal of Hazardous Materials B, Vol. 136, 2006, pp. 296-302.  
doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.12.018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24729-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. A. Azengil and M. Azacar, “The Decolorization of c.I. Reactive Black 5 in Aqueous Solution by Electrocoagulation Using Sacrificial Iron Electrodes,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 161, No. 2-3, 2009, pp. 1369-1376.  
doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.04.100</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24729-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. Akbal and S. Camc?, “Treatment of Metal Plating Wastewater by Electrocoagulation,” Environmental Progress &amp; Sustainable Energy, 2011, in press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24729-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. Chen, “Electrochemical Technologies in Wastewater Treatment,” Separation and Purfication Technology, Vol. 38, 2004, pp. 11-41. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2003.10.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24729-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. Jeon, J. Y. Park and Y. J. Yoo, “Characteristics of Metal Removal Using Carboxylated Alginic Acid,” Water Research, Vol. 36, 2002, pp. 1814-1824.  
doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00389-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24729-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. H. Min and J. G. Hering, “Arsenate Sorption by Fe(iii)-Doped Alginate Gels,” Water Research, Vol. 32, No. 5, 1998, pp. 1544-1552.  
doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00349-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24729-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. A. Zazouli, M. Taghavi and E. Bazrafshan, “Influences of Solution Chemistry on Phenol Removal from Aqueous Environments by Electrocoagulation Process Using Aluminum Electrodes,” Journal of Health Scope, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2012. pp. 65-70. doi:10.5812/jhs.5462</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>