<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2012.329144</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-23041</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Astrophysical Constraints on the Scale of Left-Right Symmetry in Inverse Seesaw Models
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ebasish</surname><given-names>Borah</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Department of Physics, Tezpur University, Tezpur, India</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>dborah@tezu.ernet.in</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>28</day><month>09</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>09</issue><fpage>1097</fpage><lpage>1102</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>July</day>	<month>1,</month>	<year>2012</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>August</day>	<month>9,</month>	<year>2012</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>August</day>	<month>17,</month>	<year>2012</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  We revisit the recently studied supersymmetric gauged inverse seesaw model [1] to incorporate astrophysical constraints on lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP) lifetime such that LSP constitutes the dark matter of the Universe. The authors in [1] considered light sneutrino LSP that can play the role of inelastic dark matter (iDM) such that desired iDM mass splitting and tiny Majorana masses of neutrinos can have a common origin. Here we consider a generalized version of this model without any additional discrete symmetry. We point out that due to spontaneous R-parity(R
  <sub>p</sub>=(-1)
  <sup>3(B-L)+2s</sup>) breaking in such generic supersymmetric gauged inverse seesaw models, LSP can not be perfectly stable but decays to standard model particles after non-renormalizable operators allowed by the gauge symmetry are introduced. We show that strong astrophysical constraints on LSP lifetime makes sneutrino dark matter more natural than standard neutralino dark matter. We also show that long-livedness of sneutrino dark matter constrains the left right symmetry breaking scale M
  <sub>R</sub>＜10
  <sup>4</sup> GeV.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>PACS Numbers; 12.10.-g; 12.60.Jv; 11.27.+d</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Left-Right Symmetric Models (LRSM) [2-6] provide a framework within which spontaneous parity breaking as well as tiny neutrino masses [7-10] can be successfully implemented without reference to very high scale physics such as grand unification. Incorporating Supersymmetry (SUSY) into it comes with other advantages like providing a solution to the gauge hierarchy problem, and providing a Cold Dark Matter candidate which is the lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP). In Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM), the stability of LSP is guaranteed by R-parity, defined as <img src="1-7500915\4c3439b1-e697-4440-bdaf-c0900ba14b87.jpg" /> where <img src="1-7500915\48787d02-d2d1-4a28-9434-18caeade10d8.jpg" /> is the spin of the particle. This is a discrete symmetry put by hand in MSSM to keep the baryon number (B) and lepton number (L) violating terms away from the superpotential. In generic implementations of Left-Right symmetry, R-parity is a part of the gauge symmetry and hence not ad-hoc like in the MSSM. In one class of models [11-14], spontaneous parity breaking is achieved without breaking R-parity. This was not possible in minimal supersymmetric left right (SUSYLR) models where the only way to break parity is to consider spontaneous R-parity violation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.23041-ref15">15</xref>]. In minimal SUSYLR model parity, <img src="1-7500915\c7b0b9cd-a5ee-40e7-a93b-09efc4dbbbc3.jpg" />gauge symmetry as well as Rparity break simultaneously by the vacuum expectation value of right handed sneutrino.</p><p>Here we study a different SUSYLR model which belong to a more general class of models where both R-parity and D-parity break spontaneously [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.23041-ref16">16</xref>] by the vacuum expectation value (vev) of a Higgs field carying <img src="1-7500915\16393c6f-4509-421f-bfc6-6955a68b1edc.jpg" /> gauge charge <img src="1-7500915\ad68f59b-9b19-419d-96e3-78a5ec8f3080.jpg" /> and hence odd under Rparity. Spontaneous R-parity breaking models have received lots of attention recently due to their rich phenomenology [17-19]. In such generic spontaneous Rparity breaking models, the scalar superpartner of righthanded neutrino acquire a non-zero vev which breaks <img src="1-7500915\6d539d88-16bd-4e8f-b68b-019074f7b9ad.jpg" /> symmetry spontaneously. Such a scenario gives rise to tree level mixing between neutralinos and light neutrinos and hence the neutralino dark matter candidate is lost in such a model unless one talks about long lived gravitino dark matter. However the model we study in this letter, although breaks R-parity spontaneously, does not give rise to tree level mixing terms between LSP and standard model fermions. Thus we can have a dark matter candidate in such a model without introducing the least understood gravity sector into account. Recently right handed sneutrino dark matter in such a model was discussed in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.23041-ref1">1</xref>]. However, the authors in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.23041-ref1">1</xref>] (also in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.23041-ref20">20</xref>])</p><p>considered an additional discrete <img src="1-7500915\9530768d-cdd4-46bc-8411-9d4ddf8fbac4.jpg" /> symmetry so as to guarantee a perfectly stable LSP. Here we consider a generalized version of this model without any additional symmetries apart from the gauge symmetry. We point out that LSP dark matter, although stable at the renormalizable level, decays after higher dimensional gauge invariant terms are introduced. The strength of such operators will be tightly constrained from the fact that LSP lifetime should be longer than the age of the Universe and large enough so as to agree with astrophysical observations of nearby galaxies and clusters [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.23041-ref21">21</xref>]. Astrophysical constraints on such operators within the framework of MSSM was studied in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.23041-ref22">22</xref>]. Here we follow a similar analysis in our model and show that astrophysical constraints not only put an upper bound on the left-right symmetry breaking scale but also make the sneutrino dark matter more natural than standard neutralino dark matter. It is worth mentioning that constraints on the left-right symmetry breaking scale in such a model were derived recently in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.23041-ref23">23</xref>] from the requirement of successful gauge coupling unification and disappearance of transitory domain walls formed as a result of spontaneous discrete symmetry breaking.</p><p>This letter is organized as follows. In Section 2 we briefly review the model. In Section 3 we discuss the higher dimensional operators in the model and astrophysical constraints. We summarise the constraints from gauge coupling unification and domain wall disappearance from our earlier work [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.23041-ref23">23</xref>] in Section 4 and finally conclude in Section 5.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. The Model</title><p>Spontaneous R-parity breaking can be achieved even without giving vev to the sneutrino fields. If the <img src="1-7500915\08266f11-7474-44cc-bb6a-f3e22e52bcaa.jpg" /> symmetry is broken by a Higgs field which has odd <img src="1-7500915\b99f987e-2eea-493e-b135-98a640384ede.jpg" /> charge then R-parity is spontaneously broken. We call this model as Minimal Higgs Doublet (MHD) Model. The minimal such model [16,24] has the following particle content</p><p><img src="1-7500915\bfe932f6-7a97-4993-ae25-84bfcded3d4c.jpg" /></p><p><img src="1-7500915\fc753da9-b3cc-4a6a-8118-d5c0628d8581.jpg" /></p><p><img src="1-7500915\a8dd34da-e09f-4748-acee-f488b7876f96.jpg" /></p><p><img src="1-7500915\74e682ec-5f37-42af-a35f-bb005e1620d0.jpg" /></p><p>where the numbers in brackets correspond to the quantum numbers corresponding to</p><p><img src="1-7500915\fbaf9fe0-04eb-4ed9-bb37-ac3a9811f3e6.jpg" />.</p><p>The symmetry breaking pattern is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.23041-formula11634"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500915\70806c12-1812-4d21-8352-ba7bd8a91a54.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Neutrino masses arise naturally in this model by so called inverse seesaw mechanism by virtue of the presence of singlet superfields <img src="1-7500915\4ed8c062-79c0-46ce-aec3-8df405233f1a.jpg" /> (one per generation). The renormalizable superpotential relevant for the spontaneous parity violation and neutrino mass is given as follows</p><p><img src="1-7500915\b7c11355-fea6-49ed-9b1b-5f44d0e99444.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.23041-formula11635"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500915\6ee9689c-15d8-4859-bc9d-380af7a0127f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We denote the vev of the neutral components of <img src="1-7500915\0f364f6e-1345-4054-b587-2baab2cceb0b.jpg" /> as</p><p><img src="1-7500915\5b2e8dac-a6d2-4c82-9e21-0db50f06776b.jpg" /></p><p>The neutrino mass matrix in the basis <img src="1-7500915\1cc33123-709c-461f-aae9-535f94cb410e.jpg" /> is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.23041-formula11636"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500915\8e87c837-0fb4-4723-a204-d9775c824684.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><p><img src="1-7500915\7c998e56-20c1-4a7a-b998-6042d0dd362f.jpg" />.</p><p>After orthogonalization we get the following expression for <img src="1-7500915\bd0fb365-51d9-4b91-a43d-30fdc86130ff.jpg" /> mass</p><disp-formula id="scirp.23041-formula11637"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500915\ceb4c5f3-c059-4ab6-86eb-63054a1f3e8b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.23041-formula11638"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500915\ce76e472-c96b-41cb-bf94-0f6792b1b9ff.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>It should be noted from the neutrino mass matrix that these mass terms allow the mixing of an R-parity odd singlet fermion <img src="1-7500915\47405ac9-66c7-4821-9dab-9a9b8f90a946.jpg" /> with an R-parity even neutrino. Note that the superpotential preserves R parity. The mild R parity violation occurring in the neutrino mass matrix should be understood as an accidental consequence of <img src="1-7500915\e0654b26-301b-405e-ad38-aa1c779f2274.jpg" /> gauge symmetry breakdown.</p><p>Neutrino mass can arise from type III seesaw mechanism [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.23041-ref25">25</xref>] if we introduce fermionic triplets instead of singlets. However when we have a TeV scale intermediate <img src="1-7500915\a5393068-8339-4b2e-8765-d34d839a32ba.jpg" /> symmetry, the fermion triplets will spoil the gauge coupling unification [16,26] and hence fermion singlets will serve a better purpose in this case.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Non-Renormalizable Operators and Astrophysical Constraints</title><p>The authors of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.23041-ref22">22</xref>] considered explicit R-parity violating terms in the MSSM superpotential of the form <img src="1-7500915\d9d92d4d-864d-4099-a147-00818816d00d.jpg" /> which lead to the decay of LSP dark matter candidate in the model. Similar analysis within the framework of grand unified theories can be found in [27,28]. We take the conservative lower bound <img src="1-7500915\9d16fb3b-19cd-4275-947f-d767fef042ad.jpg" />on LSP lifetime coming from the recent Fermi telescope observation of nearby galaxy and clusters [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.23041-ref21">21</xref>].</p><p>In the model we are studying, the effective terms in the superpotential leading to LSP decay can arise after introduing dimension four and dimension five operators as follows:</p><p><img src="1-7500915\c1021db1-c08b-4f93-b2cf-3e8822719100.jpg" /></p><p>The first term give rise to terms like <img src="1-7500915\0eb51ea5-d79b-4355-9cfc-04bf2b6f1f2f.jpg" /> in the low energy effective theory after gauge symmetry is spontaneously broken. The strength of such a term is dictated by<img src="1-7500915\ad968d65-54b7-4d3d-bbea-aebfb9b86d87.jpg" />. Here <img src="1-7500915\8aba249e-a469-4c53-b098-6841f3929054.jpg" /> is the leftright symmetry breaking scale which has a lower bound of <img src="1-7500915\9f9cffa4-e24d-48d1-9a07-0fa8637b3aad.jpg" /> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.23041-ref29">29</xref>]. And, the cut-off scale <img src="1-7500915\46168bdf-51b2-4259-be97-fa5ea4bf800b.jpg" /> is the generic grand unified theory (GUT) scale <img src="1-7500915\14047b7b-f2f8-4143-a3d0-eafa2e4ad7b9.jpg" />. Using these values and assuming generic order one dimensionless coefficients<img src="1-7500915\a41b35fd-1fb1-4c58-9a03-cdf112cce349.jpg" />, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.23041-formula11639"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500915\fc9ec787-a331-4472-8e8e-459de8f6dd6f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>As shown in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.23041-ref22">22</xref>], the decay width of neutralino corresponding to a term <img src="1-7500915\5cbade87-4ad7-43ca-8ff4-05aba0c7e029.jpg" /> in the superpotential is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.23041-formula11640"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500915\7c7c50c6-20cf-4eb9-a5f0-d8aab5c22b67.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with constant of proportionality of order unity. Now, for generic neutralino dark matter with mass of the order of<img src="1-7500915\2aa9847b-8162-4df6-96e1-014dc8be8762.jpg" />, the astrophysical constraint on LSP lifetime <img src="1-7500915\ffaecce7-1f70-4403-ad05-42dbe3f1c2ae.jpg" /> gives rise to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.23041-formula11641"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500915\3aabf1ee-26eb-421e-a5c9-d21b3536cd3c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Clearly the astrophysical bound (8) does not agree with the strength of <img src="1-7500915\04464758-0d25-40bb-9735-188c25df2bb0.jpg" /> arising from generic nonrenormalizable operators in the theory. If we fine tune <img src="1-7500915\e29757e5-f091-437f-bc63-8e3efe4042ee.jpg" /> to be as small as electron Yukawa coupling<img src="1-7500915\cc54c617-d988-4a42-b935-43b5246a870c.jpg" />, then <img src="1-7500915\303cfa48-384d-4df5-88e9-467dd335b721.jpg" /> can be as small as<img src="1-7500915\c7a01045-f356-4059-9dfe-697c1939d0e1.jpg" />. But this lies around seven orders of magnitude above the upper bound set by astrophysical constraints (8). Thus, standard neutraino dark matter is very unlikely in these models unless we have unnatural fine tuning of the dimensionless coefficients in the non-renormalizable operators. It should be noticed that a term like <img src="1-7500915\d007024e-882e-430e-a72a-c7e4acd41a80.jpg" /> arise at tree level in generic spontaneous R-parity violating models with nonzero right handed sneutrino vev [17-19].</p><p>The second term in the non-renormalizable superpotential gives rise to an effective term of the form <img src="1-7500915\b461b657-abc9-4dd2-902f-12953c6cc6a9.jpg" /> which opens the decay channel of sneutrino into two standard model fermions. The strength of such a term is given by <img src="1-7500915\062bf269-f50e-4369-b49f-710b7b539386.jpg" /> where <img src="1-7500915\a10816f5-6daf-4b4d-b012-10899b086fb0.jpg" /> and<img src="1-7500915\cdce84e3-1e3f-40ca-af96-758b003e37ed.jpg" />. For <img src="1-7500915\1644799c-7b9a-48dc-9dcb-0b8b387485b4.jpg" /> such a term is of strength</p><disp-formula id="scirp.23041-formula11642"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500915\6fdddcb6-d850-43c1-9285-d767dca58bcf.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The decay width of a sneutrino to standard model fermion-antifermion pairs is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.23041-formula11643"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500915\4a8fecac-09cc-4ebe-963f-5e29622b33a9.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now, for sneutrino LSP mass of the order of<img src="1-7500915\77786c33-f1e9-4421-9ae2-2beca37678dd.jpg" />, the astrophysical constraint on LSP lifetime <img src="1-7500915\a43c12e8-ad49-459f-b80d-2b1a0d9c6f97.jpg" /> gives rise to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.23041-formula11644"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500915\e57c61fe-c1ea-4310-b2df-c2305efbde3a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which agrees with the generic <img src="1-7500915\5d3d04fa-2c64-4d84-b267-926b0899d5bc.jpg" /> arising from the non-renormalizable operators in the theory (9). Thus sneutrino LSP in such a model can be a viable dark matter candidate provided it satisfies other relevant constraints of relic density, direct detection etc. Recently it was shown that such a right handed sneutrino dark matter (within the framework of a similar left right model) can satisfy relic density as well as direct detection constraints [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.23041-ref1">1</xref>].</p><p>For right handed sneutrino dark matter to obey the relevant astrophysical constraints (11), the left right symmetry breaking scale should however have an upper bound. Requiring <img src="1-7500915\273834a1-1347-430a-bb32-f648ff085e53.jpg" /> gives rise to a bound on the left-right symmetry breaking scale</p><disp-formula id="scirp.23041-formula11645"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500915\1a560248-976e-4175-8157-fdb3367e606c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>for generic GUT scale and order one dimensionless couplings. However, as studied in [16,23] and summarised in the next section, successful gauge coupling unification in such a minimal model puts a lower bound on left-right symmetry breaking scale<img src="1-7500915\2a27dbde-5295-46ab-a86f-23e08128b1d7.jpg" />.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Constraints on M<sub>R</sub> from Unification and Domain Wall Disappearance</title><p>Similar to generic SUSYLR models, here also the intermediate symmetry breaking scales are constrained by demanding successful gauge coupling unification at a very high scale<img src="1-7500915\db5b4c71-9f12-4a5b-93e5-686410e85d77.jpg" />. The couplings of <img src="1-7500915\59b70058-b4dd-4126-bd6a-df5d69b4dc55.jpg" /> and <img src="1-7500915\722c3a38-c692-407e-ab83-9a038e2699fe.jpg" /> meet much before the allowed Unification scale if the intermediate symmetry breaking scale <img src="1-7500915\1b182d38-d8b3-4263-8888-44a5bb1224c2.jpg" /> is lower than a certain value. For the minimal SUSYLR model with Higgs doublets, this lower bound on <img src="1-7500915\f17f7c7a-7f40-49be-a86c-ff3c38b67dbf.jpg" /> is found to be of the order of <img src="1-7500915\a218fcaa-17ef-44cc-89eb-a4cc654b29c2.jpg" /> GeV. We also consider two additional heavy colored superfields so that the <img src="1-7500915\1dbf39e8-da63-48b1-9a4d-27a6182856f6.jpg" /> coupling meet the other two couplings at one point. They are denoted as <img src="1-7500915\a2da8002-ecfa-448a-93f8-cee0f38e9d0b.jpg" />and can be accommodated within <img src="1-7500915\3d3f5791-1885-4b35-ab85-1925d06f1721.jpg" /> GUT theory in the representations<img src="1-7500915\e40c0874-0dbf-431a-bc36-18cc67ffa3ab.jpg" />. Here we assume that the structure of the GUT theory is such that these fields survive the symmetry breaking and can be as light as the <img src="1-7500915\e0ec8208-4f88-469c-b057-047b93de798a.jpg" /> breaking scale. The resulting gauge coupling unification as shown in the <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p><p>As discussed in details in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.23041-ref23">23</xref>], the succesful disappearance of domain walls in this model do not put any strict constraints on the left-right symmetry breaking scale and can be anywhere between a TeV scale and the Planck scale. Thus unification and domain wall disappearance constraints are compatible with each other. The discrepancy between the astrophysical limit <img src="1-7500915\929b7409-cc8e-4f4b-b6a1-2395c3ad77fd.jpg" /> and the limit from successful unification <img src="1-7500915\c8c56101-9788-4110-835d-681666bec813.jpg" /></p><p>can be removed by including a parity odd singlet to our model. As studied in [16,26,30], such a framework allows even a TeV scale <img src="1-7500915\4fcc4260-e47a-4908-9c2d-7214aa2dce3d.jpg" /> from the requirement of successful gauge coupling unification as can be seen from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. It should be noted that the authors of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.23041-ref1">1</xref>] indeed considered such a model with parity odd singlet which allows a TeV scale<img src="1-7500915\7d28b40d-2c9f-4817-971b-167ac23ba3dd.jpg" />. Such TeV scale <img src="1-7500915\187d1b11-4a70-4c0f-8ba3-ff2fc0ff185c.jpg" /> is not just a requirement from astrophysical constraints as we have found above, but these TeV scale gauge bosons also contribute to the dark matter annihilations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.23041-ref1">1</xref>] in the early universe producing the correct relic density at present.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Results and Conclusions</title><p>We have discussed the issue of stability of LSP dark matter in a specific version of SUSYLR model with inverse seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass where both D-parity and R-parity are spontaneously broken. We point out that, although LSP is a stable particle in the renormalizable version of the model, it can decay into standard model fermions after the non-renormalizable terms are introduced. The requirement that LSP dark matter should be long lived so as to satisfy strict astrophysical and cosmological bounds constrains the strength of these higher dimensional operators suppressed by</p><p>GUT scale. We point out that standard neutralino dark matter (decaying through dimension four operators in the superpotential) scenario is disfavored in this model unless one considers unnatural fine-tuning of the dimensionless coefficients in the higher dimensional operators. However, right handed sneutrino dark matter (decaying through dimension five operators in the superpotential) satisfy the astrophysical bounds more naturally and can be a viable dark matter candidate provided it satisfies other relevant constraints like relic density, direct detection etc.</p><p>Interestingly, the dimension five operators leading to sneutrino decay involve the left right symmetry breaking scale. The requirement that the strength of such an operator should be small enough to satisfy astrophysical bounds constrains the left right symmetry breaking scale. For generic GUT scale and order one dimensionless couplings, we find this bound to be<img src="1-7500915\cb88f2a3-3ad6-4a30-93ea-cc792889a2aa.jpg" />. However, as studied in [16,23], successful gauge coupling unification puts a lower bound<img src="1-7500915\21a03443-40dc-4b99-9df7-53432b73ea76.jpg" />. The mismatch between these two bounds can be fixed by introducing a parity odd singlet [16,26,30] which allow <img src="1-7500915\3ddf0dbe-a885-45b8-9bd6-f99281523097.jpg" /> as low as a TeV from the requirement of successful gauge coupling unification. Such TeV scale gauge bosons, apart from satisfying the astrophysical constraints also opens up new dark matter annihilation channels [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.23041-ref1">1</xref>] producing the correct relic density in the present Universe.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Acknowledgements</title><p>I would like to thank Prof Urjit A. Yajnik, IIT Bombay for useful comments and discussions.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.23041-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. An, P. B. Dev, Y. Cai and R. N. Mohapatra, “Sneutrino Dark Matter in Gauged Inverse Seesaw Models for Neutrinos,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 108, 2012, Article ID: 081806. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.081806</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.23041-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. C. Pati and A. Salam, “Lepton Number as the Fourth Color,” Physical Review, Vol. D10, 1974, pp. 275-289.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.23041-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. N. Mohapatra and J. C. Pati, “A Natural Left-Right Symmetry,” Physical Review, Vol. D11, 1975, pp. 2558-2569.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.23041-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. Senjanovic and R. N. Mohapatra, “Exact Left-Right Symmetry and Spontaneous Violation of Parity,” Physical Review, Vol. D12, 1975, pp. 1502-1513.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.23041-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. N. Mohapatra and R. E. Marshak, “Local B-L Symmetry of Electroweak Interactions, Majorana Neutrinos and Neutron Oscillations,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 44, 1980, pp. 1316-1319. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.44.1316</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.23041-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">N. G. Deshpande, J. F. Gunion, B. Kayser and F. I. Olness, “Left-Right Symmetric Electroweak Models with Triplet Higgs,” Physical Review, Vol. D44, 1991, pp. 837-858.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.23041-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Fukuda, et al., (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), “Constraints on Neutrino Oscillations Using 1258 Days of Super-Kamiokande Solar Neutrino Data,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 86, 2001, pp. 5656-5660. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5656</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.23041-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Q. R. Ahmad, et al., (SNO Collaboration), “Direct Evidence for Neutrino Flavor Transformation from Neutral Current Interactions in the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 89a, 2002, Article ID: 011301. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.011301</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.23041-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Q. R. Ahmad, et al., (SNO Collaboration), “Measurement of Day and Night Neutrino Energy Spectra at SNO and Constraints on Neutrino Mixing Parameters,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 89b, 2002, pp. 011302. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.011302</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.23041-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. N. Bahcall and C. Pena-Garay, “Solar Models and Solar Neutrino Oscillations,” New Journal of Physics, Vol. 6, 2005, pp. 63-79. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/6/1/063</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.23041-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. S. Aulakh, A. Melfo and G. Senjanovic, “Minimal Supersymmetric Left-Right Model,” Physical Review, Vol. D57, 1998, pp. 4174-4178.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.23041-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. S. Aulakh, K. Benakli and G. Senjanovic, “Reconciling Supersymmetry and Left-Right Symmetry,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 79, 1997, pp. 2188-2191. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.2188</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.23041-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. S. Babu and R. N. Mohapatra, “Minimal Supersymmetric Left-Right Model,” Physics Letters, Vol. B668, 2008, pp. 404-409.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.23041-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Patra, A. Sarkar, U. Sarkar and U. Yajnik, “Spontaneous Parity Violation in a Supersymmetric Left-Right Symmetric Model,” Physics Letters, Vol. B679, 2009, pp. 386-389.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.23041-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Kuchimanchi and R. N. Mohapatra, “No Parity Violation without R-Parity Violation,” Physical Review, Vol. D48, 1993, pp. 4352-4360.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.23041-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. Borah, “Supersymmetric Left-Right Models with B - L odd Higgs Doublets,” International Journal of Modern Physics, Vol. A26, 2011, pp. 1305-1326.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.23041-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Fileviez Perez and S. Spinner, “Spontaneous R-Parity Breaking and Left-Right Symmetry,” Physics Letters, Vol. B673, 2009, pp. 251-254.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.23041-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. Barger, P. Fileviez Perez and S. Spinner, “Minimal Gauged U(1)(B-L) Model with Spontaneous R-Parity Violation,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 102, 2009, Article ID: 181802. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.181802</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.23041-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Fileviez Perez and S. Spinner, “The Minimal Theory for R-parity Violation at the LHC,” Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2012, No. 4, 2012, pp. 118-155. 
doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2012)118</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.23041-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. S. Bhupal Dev and R. N. Mohapatra, “Electroweak Symmetry Breaking and Proton Decay in SO(10) SUSY-GUT with TeV W(R),” Physical Review, Vol. D82, 2010, Article ID: 035014.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.23041-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. Dugger, T. E. Jeltema and S. Profumo, “Constraints on Decaying Dark Matter from Fermi Observations of Nearby Galaxies and Clusters,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 1012, 2010, pp. 015-037.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.23041-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. Berezinsky, A. S. Joshipura and J. W. F. Valle, “Gravitational Violation of R-Parity and Its Cosmological Signatures,” Physical Review, Vol. D57, 1998, pp. 147- 151.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.23041-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. Borah and S. Mishra, “Spontaneous R-Parity Breaking, Left-Right Symmetry and Consistent Cosmology with Transitory Domain Walls,” Physical Review, Vol. D84, 2011, Article ID: 055008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.23041-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. Borah and S. Patra, “Type III Seesaw and Dark Matter in a Supersymmetric Left-Right Model,” arXiv:0910.0146.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.23041-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Foot, H. Lew, X. G. He and G. C. Joshi, “Seesaw Neutrino Masses Induced by a Triplet of Leptons,” Zeitschrift fur Physik, Vol. C44, 1989, pp. 441.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.23041-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. Borah, S. Patra and U. Sarkar, “TeV scale Left Right Symmetry with Spontaneous D-Parity Breaking,” Physical Review, Vol. D83, 2011, Article ID: 035007.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.23041-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Arvanitaki, et al., “Astrophysical Probes of Unification,” Physical Review, Vol. D79, 2009, Article ID: 105022.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.23041-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Arvanitaki, et al., “Decaying Dark Matter as a Probe of Unification and TeV Spectroscopy,” Physical Review, Vol. D80, 2009, Article ID: 055011.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.23041-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Maiezza, M. Nemevsek, F. Nesti and G. Senjanovic, “Left-Right Symmetry at LHC,” Physical Review, Vol. D82, 2010, Article ID: 055022.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.23041-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. S. B. Dev and R. N. Mohapatra, “TeV Scale Inverse Seesaw in SO(10) and Leptonic Non-Unitarity Effects,” Physical Review, Vol. D81, 2010, Article ID: 013001.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>