<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2012.39128</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-22608</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Telegraph Equations and Complementary Dirac Equation from Brownian Movement
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>alwant</surname><given-names>Singh Rajput</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Physics Department, Kumaon University, Nainital, India</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>bsrajp@gmail.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>24</day><month>09</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>09</issue><fpage>989</fpage><lpage>993</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>June</day>	<month>15,</month>	<year>2012</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>August</day>	<month>1,</month>	<year>2012</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>August</day>	<month>10,</month>	<year>2012</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Telegraph equations describing the particle densities in Brownian movement on a lattice site have been derived and it has been shown that the complementary classical Dirac equation appears naturally as the consequence of correlations in particle trajectories in Brownian movement. It has also been demonstrated that Heisenberg uncertainty relation between energy and time is the necessary and sufficient condition to transform this classical equation into usual Dirac’s relativistic quantum equation.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Telegraph Equation; Dirac Equation; Brownian Motion; Analytic Continuation; Schr&#246;dinger Equation; Uncertainty Relations</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The relativistic propagator for a free particle in <img src="13-7500145\87cfecbc-5eae-41c8-b14e-de719355fa9d.jpg" /> space can be obtained [1-5] from the considerations of the statistics of random walks in space and time without restoring to formal analytic continuation. It has been shown [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.22608-ref6">6</xref>] that the wave functions and propagators that occur in classical equations are themselves observables on the lattice in contrast to quantum mechanics where wave functions are rather mysterious objects which only facilitate calculations and which are not themselves observables. It has also been shown [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.22608-ref7">7</xref>] that the free particle classical Schr&#246;dinger’s equation in <img src="13-7500145\9c2d5e70-dcbe-4fe4-8f48-b36adef1dd75.jpg" /> space occurs naturally in the description of correlations in random walks on the lattice where the wave-function solutions describe the features of ensembles of random walks. In recent attempt a stochastic model of the telegraph equation due to Kac [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.22608-ref8">8</xref>] and Gaveau et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.22608-ref9">9</xref>] has been extended [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.22608-ref10">10</xref>] to obtain Dirac Equation for a particle in electromagnetic field using Brownian motion in time as well as space. Recently, the relativistic diffusion processes have been discussed in random walk models [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.22608-ref11">11</xref>] and the quantization of Brownian motion have been worked out [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.22608-ref12">12</xref>].</p><p>In our earlier papers [13-15] the diffusion equation and classical Schr&#246;dinger’s equation for free particle and also for a particle under a force field have been derived as complementary equations from the Brownian motion and it has been shown that the continuum limit which transforms this classical Schr&#246;dinger’s equation into the usual Schr&#246;dinger’s quantum equation without using any formal analytic continuation and the wave-particle duality, is simply Heisenberg’s uncertainty relation between position and momentum of the Brownian particle. Extending this work in the present paper by putting a finite speed cutoff into the diffusion process we have obtained telegraphic equations to describe particle densities in Brownian movement on a lattice site and showed that the complementary classical Dirac equation appears naturally as the consequence of correlations in particle trajectories in Brownian movement. Here the constituents of wave-function describe the features of ensembles of random walks on lattice and hence the observables are easily interpreted. We have also derived the condition which transforms this classical Dirac equation for Brownian movement into usual Dirac’s relativistic quantum equation and it has been demonstrated that this condition is basically Heisenberg’s uncertainty relation for energy and time.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Telegraphic Equations from Brownian Movement</title><p>Let us work in 2-dimensional spatial-temporal space <img src="13-7500145\287e585f-d316-4e6e-a759-e136e0464d3d.jpg" /> on a lattice with spatial and temporal spacings d and e respectively and assume <img src="13-7500145\fae21c67-658c-455a-a1cd-a946a5b04f71.jpg" /> as the probability that a particle arrives in the state <img src="13-7500145\e01e3a15-9eeb-4a79-8f0c-6435f4134e81.jpg" /> at x, t where these four states have been assigned to the particles to keep the track of correlation in the trajectories as they move between lattice sites such that the state- 1 and state-3 correspond to the particle moving to the right and state-2 and state-4 correspond to the left moving particles. The state-1 and state-3 are separated by an odd number of transitions from right moving to the left moving and similarly, state-2 and state-4 are separated by an odd number of left to right transitions. At each lattice site, the Brownian particles choose whether to go left or right at the next step. Let us assume that the particles maintain the same direction with probability p and change the direction with probability q such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33652"><label>(2.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\a40958f3-4d26-4426-a338-5496de3329b9.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then we write the difference equations for the ensemble of particles as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33653"><label>(2.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\5922be3d-027f-4522-bcd3-425ebf911a1a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which is the master set of equations for the ensemble of random walks giving the distribution of particles in the four states.</p><p>Let us have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33654"><label>(2.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\baa4bfc9-3fc1-422d-a0ff-131893422f01.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which is proportional to the probability that a particle arrives at <img src="13-7500145\2b62d33b-fc56-437b-a694-05eed1d1a1ce.jpg" /> in any state.</p><p>Let us also define</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33655"><label>(2.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\11682e78-db57-4e61-9f47-5e1cdf1e7a43.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which gives the direction difference. If the number of left moving and right moving particles are the same in the beginning then we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33656"><label>(2.5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\5736bfb8-2a3d-4d2b-be66-49d76d95ecbc.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Let E be the shift operator with respect to x coordinate. i.e.,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33657"><label>(2.6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\267deb01-bedd-4ecb-a3b9-bb7c35ff5783.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then using Equations (2.1) to (2.6), we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33658"><label>(2.7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\40d70d63-10d2-4c26-a57e-49a80520ce51.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>If we choose</p><p><img src="13-7500145\9c5de9df-ded8-4fc8-a9bf-71036a2608c5.jpg" /></p><p>then Equation (2.7) reduce to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33659"><label>(2.8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\d4e98ee2-59c1-4730-8f4d-845739abd347.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Expanding shift operator in terms of differential operator<img src="13-7500145\9ff894f5-589f-47d2-916f-05de30b094a3.jpg" />, we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33660"><graphic  xlink:href="13-7500145\dcddd57d-4285-4a94-8bd7-722ce1067b89.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Ignoring the term of order higher than d, it gives</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33661"><label>(2.9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\44088e0f-37b2-4b28-9431-c88ca039679f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where n is any integer. Then Equation (2.7) reduce to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33662"><label>(2.10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\f6cc058d-bb18-4640-8eeb-2644dcca420b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>If each particle persists at constant speed c along its current direction for an average time <img src="13-7500145\33a2bc77-8450-4abf-a64f-76223546ad30.jpg" /> then</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33663"><label>(2.11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\85bdd07a-7c5f-4b8f-9f25-f39c897b513a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33664"><label>(2.11a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\00a2e3eb-11e9-4d99-beef-b87841573ca8.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which gives</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33665"><label>(2.11b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\c3618b6c-6438-474c-b675-440ab69761bf.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>These equations show that each particle changes its direction with the average frequency μ and persists at constant speed c between two consecutive changes of directions. For such a periodic motion the mean free path</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33666"><label>(2.12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\2805a071-3bf9-494e-a3e1-3361a7d55e55.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>plays the role of the wave length.</p><p>Substituting the limits (2.11) and values of p and q from Equations (2.11a) and (2.11b) into Equation (2.10), we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33667"><label>(2.13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\2e5f3b2b-21df-4dfb-a9fe-2856d874e546.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then Equations (2.8) reduce to the following form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33668"><label>(2.14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\4989ab54-e0bb-4675-b7b2-71f477e42c75.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="13-7500145\c43478ea-3859-4a8b-ad46-e9ee959bd0fd.jpg" /> and it may be ignored if we retain the terms of only first order in d and then Equations (2.13) and (2.14) respectively reduce to the following forms:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33669"><label>(2.15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\728ad603-6a07-4240-94b1-31cf60a54659.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33670"><label>(2.16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\a60a7094-9b63-4f52-9bb5-8ddf6154b50a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where Equations (2.16) give a particular form of Telegraph equations.</p><p>Imposing the condition (2.5), Equations (2.15) are further reduced to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33671"><label>(2.17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\ee4e550c-a66d-4d11-8172-6b2891c5b083.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which give another form of Telegraph equations.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Classical Dirac Equation</title><p>Let us denote the expected excess in the number of Brownian particles moving in a given direction by parity,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33672"><label>(3.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\4c2a518c-b8bb-442f-809e-85b5cce52d1d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which correspond to the expected difference in the number of even and odd parity paths to a given point. Then using Equation (2.2) we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33673"><label>(3.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\614cfb11-5bcc-411f-8348-fbe11cecd961.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The ensemble of particles, described by master Equations (2.2), change its state with each step and it takes eight time steps for the ensemble to return to its initial statistical state in the sense that the expected number of direction changes per particle is four [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.22608-ref6">6</xref>]. Thus the Equation (3.2) in the continuum limit is iterated for eight time steps i.e.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33674"><label>(3.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\7be3bc53-ff58-45af-aea1-a47d19cd4fa1.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where k = 1, 2, and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33675"><label>(3.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\f870886e-ec5b-4e19-beb1-bdbd5f97085f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with</p><p><img src="13-7500145\79740e7e-5b01-44eb-a361-261738998e76.jpg" /></p><p>or</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33676"><label>(3.5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\4c16d822-1afb-478b-9f87-5f74e4274d63.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>under the approximation (2.9). Here under the first order approximation various powers of p, given by (2.11b) may be written as</p><p><img src="13-7500145\4c950a17-b1ed-478f-8040-fa43b9816534.jpg" /></p><p>and then Equation (3.5) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33677"><label>(3.6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\32bb85d5-eb38-47a8-ab02-98760efe20d5.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting this result into Equation (3.4) and using Equation (3.3), we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33678"><label>(3.7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\a23a5a23-a258-4ff9-a747-e333330f324c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Let us write</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33679"><label>(3.8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\5d1b3889-4d4d-40bd-bde8-5c915b1b6fd0.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then Equation (3.7) become</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33680"><label>(3.9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\aa39bfbd-00ab-46e7-b121-6a5b6b544ae4.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Let us revert the Brownian motion such that the statesone and three correspond to particles moving to the left while the states-two and four correspond to right moving particles. In this case the states-one and three will be separated by an odd number of transitions from left moving to right moving and the states-two and four will be separated by an odd number of right to left transitions. Then the master Equations (2.2) will be transformed to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33681"><label>(3.10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\47cc02bc-bca3-406a-9529-378e9a7423db.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>If <img src="13-7500145\3b3dc365-1227-42b0-8dfd-21d58590825b.jpg" /> and <img src="13-7500145\e0d73b18-e7f3-4347-87ef-737a33fcc9b6.jpg" /> are the expected excesses in the number of left moving and right moving particles respectively, then we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33682"><label>(3.11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\1c5946be-7c3c-4009-83cd-afe0b6566e5d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then Equation (3.4) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33683"><label>(3.12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\31de45ac-cbe5-4eec-adf5-1b8608224e87.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33684"><label>(3.13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\b145207e-0f3d-4b4f-b638-56cfce92dff6.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus in place of Equations (3.7), we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33685"><label>(3.14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\39a1a427-3348-4fef-9ccb-b3c68be681d2.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Let us choose</p><p><img src="13-7500145\38edeaaf-bc5b-47a1-86a8-1ece689cd425.jpg" /></p><p>Then Equation (3.14) reduce to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33686"><label>(3.15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\d7afe146-f424-4006-b21d-c1d955895735.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>If we define the function</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33687"><label>(3.15a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\428918be-f20d-44a0-9f3f-5754d7f2a9fd.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>then Equations (3.9) and (3.15) may be written as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33688"><label>(3.16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\08b588b8-d50a-4d9d-a66b-e2808cdaeb6d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="13-7500145\0b67289b-c060-4045-9cd9-7afd97716884.jpg" /> and g<sub>1 </sub>and g<sub>4</sub> are 4 &#215; 4 matrices defined as&#160;</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33689"><label>(3.17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\152c0935-dbf8-479d-a726-bd1d0ee2cfa5.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>satisfying the conditions</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33690"><label>(3.18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\0e2937f9-9de3-403c-8eb8-254eb0b30894.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>These equations may be generalized in to the following form in three dimensional spatial coordinates;</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33691"><label>(3.19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\171ff88a-a826-460f-a929-40e841bde88a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where m = 1, 2, 3, 4 with <img src="13-7500145\a6e21a48-92d5-4495-9736-ed144bba044a.jpg" /> and g<sub>2</sub> and g<sub>3</sub> are given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33692"><label>(3.20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\66c01e7f-ba3d-40dd-aa4d-71b85b46403e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which satisfy the following conditions</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33693"><label>(3.18a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\b3f1237d-103f-4440-9d37-079f53cd9c40.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>These matrices also satisfy the following conditions with matrices g<sub>1</sub> and g<sub>4</sub> given by Equation (3.17);</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33694"><label>(3.18b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\ebcebf97-6d12-4dbc-adc2-2cbef5c3a99d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The conditions (3.18), (3.18a) and (3.18b) may be combined into following form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33695"><label>(3.21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\3be27c91-2351-417f-ad4b-413bbb19fb27.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>These matrices constitute Majorana representation of Dirac operators and hence Equation (3.19) may be called classical Dirac equation which becomes usual relativistic Dirac equation for</p><p><img src="13-7500145\7441ec58-261d-4034-b060-c16f7a304cd2.jpg" />,(3.22)</p><p>where c is the velocity of light and <img src="13-7500145\e3af73a4-a95c-4159-aee6-345b47db1cb4.jpg" /> with h as Planck’s constant</p><p>This condition may be interpreted as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33696"><graphic  xlink:href="13-7500145\580ac7e5-3481-4c9e-96df-594d770e534e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>But we have already seen that <img src="13-7500145\a620a58f-29a7-412e-96e4-1a1e53e4a6af.jpg" /> where ∆t is the average time for which each particle in the Brownian motion persists at constant speed c along its current direction. moc<sup>2</sup> is its rest energy during ∆t and thereafter it changes the direction. In other words in the time interval ∆t the change of energy is ∆E = moc<sup>2</sup>. Then the condition (3.22), under which the classical Dirac equation becomes the Dirac’s relativistic quantum equation, is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.22608-formula33697"><label>(3.23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="13-7500145\73691622-ecb7-4c95-981a-b27a431e532a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which is Heisenberg’s uncertainty relation for energy and time.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Equations (2.16) and (2.17), obtained from the Brownian movement represented by master Equations (2.2), give two different forms of Telegraph equation. The classical Dirac Equation (3.16) in one spatial dimension and its generalization into the form given by Equation (3.19) appear naturally as the consequence of master Equations (2.2) and (3.10) of Brownian movement, where the constituents of y, given by Equation (3.15a), have the meaning on the lattice and denote the limits of ensemble averages of excess parities. These functions are not just the calculational tools and the function y describes the features of ensembles of random walks on lattice and hence the observables are easily interpreted in contrast to the usual quantum mechanics.</p><p>The conditions (3.22) which transforms the classical Dirac equation for Brownian movement into usual Dirac’s relativistic quantum equation, is basically Heisenberg’s uncertainly relation (3.23) for energy and time. The usual formal analytic continuation which is necessary to relate the classical and quantum equation is completely absent here and hence the interpretation of quantum mechanics here is direct one without the problems of measurements usually associated with quantum mechanics. Here the derivation of Dirac equation is a sensible classical scheme to produce many particle simulations of quantum mechanics where quantum equation exists as a description of classical theory (Brownian movement).</p><p>In our earlier papers [13-15] it has been shown that for transforming the classical Schr&#246;dinger’s equations, obtained as the consequence of Brownian movement, into usual Schr&#246;dinger’s quantum equation the necessary condition is Heisenberg’s uncertainty relation between position and momentum of the Brownian particle. In the light of this result and the forgoing discussion it may be concluded that the classical equations for ensemble averages of excess parity in Brownian movement can be transformed into usual Schr&#246;dinger’s equation by imposing Heisenberg’s uncertainty relation between position and momentum of Brownian particle and the similar classical equations can be transformed into usual Dirac’s equation by imposing the uncertainty relation between energy and time associated with Brownian particle without using a formal analytic continuation and wave-particle quality. These results support the recent work [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.22608-ref16">16</xref>] on the role of generalized uncertainty principle in the development of quantum mechanics from classical context. These results partially support the earlier work [1-5] showing that the quantum mechanical equations are the derived properties of the binomial distribution and no formal analytic continuation is required to produce them. Some results of this paper shall be helpful in framing the foundation of space-time path formalism [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.22608-ref17">17</xref>] for relativistic quantum mechanics. We shall undertake the study of this problem in our forthcoming paper.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec><sec id="s6"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.22608-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. N. Ord, “Classical Analog of Quantum Phase,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 31, No. 7, 1992, pp. 1177-1195. doi:10.1007/BF00673919</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.22608-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. G. C. McKeon and G. N. Ord, “Time Reversal in Stochastic Processes and the Dirac Equation,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 69, No. 1, 1992, pp. 3-4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.22608-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. N. Ord, “A Reformulation of the Feynman Chessboard Model,” Journal of Statistical Physics, Vol. 66, No. 1-2, 1992, pp. 647-659. doi:10.1007/BF01060086</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.22608-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. N. Ord, “Quantum Interference from Charge Conservation,” Physics Letters A, Vol. 173, No. 4-5, 1993, pp. 343-346. doi:10.1016/0375-9601(93)90247-W</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.22608-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. N. Ord, “Schr?dinger’s Equation and Discrete Random Walks in a Potential Field,” Annals of Physics, Vol. 250, No. 1, 1996, pp. 63-68. doi:10.1006/aphy.1996.0088</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.22608-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. N. Ord, “The Schrodinger and Dirac Free Particle Equations without Quantum Mechanics,” Annals of Phy- sics, Vol. 250. No. 1, 1996, pp. 51-62. 
doi:10.1006/aphy.1996.0087</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.22608-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. N. Ord and A. S. Deakin, “Random Walks, Continuum Limits, and Schr?dinger’s Equation,” Physical Review A, Vol. 54, No. 5, 1996, 3772-3778.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.54.3772</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.22608-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Kac and Mt. Rocky, “A Stochastic Model Related to the Telegrapher’s Equation,” Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 4, No. 3, 1974, pp. 494-510.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.22608-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Kac, B. Gaveau, T. Jacobson and L. Schulman, “Relativistic Extension of the Analogy between Quantum Mechanics and Brownian Motion,” Physical Review Letters, 53, No. 5, 1984, pp. 419-422.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.22608-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. G. C. McKeon and G. N. Ord, “Time Reversal and a Stochastic Model of the Dirac Equation in an Electromagnetic Field,” Canadian Journal of Physics, Vol. 82, No. 1, 2004, pp. 19-27.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.22608-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Dunkel, P. Talkner and P. Hanggi, “Relativistic Diffusion Processes and Random Walk Models,” Physical Review D, Vol. 75, No. 4, 2007, Article ID: 043001. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.043001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.22608-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. M. Rabei, A.-W. Ajlouni and B. Humam, “Quantization of Brownian Motion,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 45, No. 9, 2006, 1613-1623. 
doi:10.1007/s10773-005-9001-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.22608-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. S. Rajput, “Telegraph Equations and Complementary Dirac Equation from Classical Approach,” Acta Ciencia Indica, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2010, pp. 81-88.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.22608-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. S. Rajput, “Quantum Equations from Brownian Motion,” Canadian Journal of Physics, Vol. 89, No. 2, 2011, pp. 185-191. doi:10.1139/P10-111</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.22608-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. S. Rajput, “Quantum Equations from Classical Approach,” Indian Journal of Physics, Vol. 85, No. 12, 2010, pp. 1817-1828. doi:10.1007/s12648-011-0195-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.22608-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Y. Bang and M. S. Berger, “Possible Equilibria of Interacting Dark Energy Models,” Physical Review D, Vol. 74, No. 12, 2006, Article ID: 125012. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.125012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.22608-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ed. Seidewitz, “Foundations of a Spacetime Path Formalism for Relativistic Quantum Mechanics,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, Vol. 47, No. 11, 2006, Article ID: 112302.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>