Even with rigorous environmental regulations, phenol still is a major contaminant. One possible solution is the use of heterogeneous photocatalysis due to low chemical addition, feasibility and reliability to be implanted on cost-effective industrial process. TiO 2 is the most employed photocatalyst because of its favorable (photo) chemical properties and ZnO is considered one of the best alternative for that. Other oxides were tested in lesser proportions, like CuO and Ga 2O 3. When the photocatalyst is dispersed as slurry, higher degradation rates are achieved due to high solid to liquid contact area when compared with supported form. The aim of this work was to develop a batch recirculating photocatalytic reactor and evaluate its efficiency when assisted by the photocatalysts TiO 2 P25, ZnO, CuO and β-Ga 2O 3. TiO2 achieved 95% mineralization after 200 min reaction in an average degradation rate of 0.68 mg·L ﹣1·min ﹣1 and ZnO was less efficient (0.41 mg·L ﹣1·min ﹣1). Ga 2O 3 and CuO presented poor performance, mainly due to low surface area for the CuO syntesized and the absorption of the UV radiation by the reactor walls, decreasing Ga 2O 3 activity. Degradation intermediates were detected in diverse concentrations and at different operational times for each oxide tested, which indicate different degradation mechanisms.
Despite the increase of rigor about environmental regulations, phenols persist as one of the major contaminants to aquatic life [1,2]. These compounds are highly carcinogenic and toxic to all forms of life and can be detected in higher concentrations on the industrial wastewater from petrochemical, oil-refineries, paper-making, coking and iron-smelting processes [
The AOPs are process that generate high reactive radicals, mainly hydroxyl (•OH), which could mineralize organic pollutants completely if all chemical and engineerng conditions are well stabilished. Between them, ozonization, Fenton process and heterogeneous photocatalysis (HP) are the most promising technologies for final wastewater treatment stage, but HP is becoming the future of water treatment due to low chemical addition, easibility to be implanted on cost-effective industrial process [3,4]. This technique combines the use of a radiation with adequate energy to activate a semiconductor resulting on the generation of oxidative and reuductive sites on the photocatalyst surface.
TiO2 P25 (70% anatase, 30% rutile) is the most employed photocatalytic semiconductor because of its chemical inertness, photostability, low cost, and atoxicity [
Other oxides were tested in lesser proportions, like CuO and Ga2O3. Copper oxide (II) has low cost and toxicity, in addition to high availability. This oxide is among the few with the band gap energy near to visible light, on the degradation of methylene blue [
The photocatalyst could be used in slurry or supported forms. When the photocatalyst is dispersed as slurry inside the reactor, higher degradation rates are achieved due to high solid to liquid contact area and high axial flow rates are necessary to prevent the catalyst from settling. If the conversion per pass is low, recycling of the process fluid becomes necessary [
In this context, the aim of this work was to develop a batch recirculating photocatalytic reactor and evaluate its efficiency when assisted by the photocatalysts TiO2 P25, ZnO, CuO and β-Ga2O3.
All the experiment were carried out in a batch recirculation mode. It was built a reactor with recirculation fluid composed by three main elements: 1) Photoreactor: consisting of PyrexTM cylindrical glass with hollow center formed by three concentric 3.5 mm layers isolating two chambers, the first with a 290 mL volume for the test solution flow and the second for a cold water stream to exchange heat between fluids and maintaining the system temperature at 30˚C. In the reactor central annulus it was coupled a mercury vapor lamp (250 W, Osram) without bulbe involucres. The reactor was covered with aluminum to prevent radiation loss, and thus allowing a greater use of the emitted photons. The diagram of photoreactor with some measures is showed on
throughout the system, and to provide an adequate turbulence to keep catalyst in suspension; 3) Recycling tank: a 550 mL cylindrical glass container where the test solution passed through during the recirculation process in order to create enlightened and non-illuminated regimes during the process.
Before each experiment, a catalyst (TiO2 P25, ZnO, CuO or β-Ga2O3) amount of 0.3 g was added to distilled water and the resulting slurry was sonicated for 10 min to ensure an uniform catalyst dispersion and the recirculation flow was setted to 80 L∙h−1, verified (checked) with a online rotameter. 1.2 mL of a phenol stok solution (50 g∙L−1) was added to this slurry and mixed well to get the initial phenol concentration (100 mg∙L−1). P25 and ZnO were purchased from Degussa and Sigma-Aldrich, respectively. CuO and Ga2O3 samples were synthesized in accord [17,18], respectively. The photocatalytic reaction was initiated once the Hg-lamp was turned on. Under these conditions, illuminated working volume was 290 mL, and trials time was standardized at 135 min after phenol addition. Preliminary tests were performed in order to recycle, where the solution was continuously through the reactor, and samples of 3 mL were withdrawn periodically and immediately filtered through 0.45 µm syringe filter (PTFE) for further analysis.
During the experiments, three different processes were evaluated and two of them used as controls the photocatalytic experiment: 1) photolysis: test solution treatment without using catalyst, but with the light on; 2) photocatalysis: It involved the treatment of test solution with the use of a catalyst, and the light on; 3) adsorption: consisted of test solution with the same amount of catalyst of photocatalysis but with the lamp off.
The concentration of phenol and the intermediates (hydroquinone, benzoquinone and catechol) formed during the processes were evaluated by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) on a Shimadzu (SCL 10AVP) with C18 column and photodiode array detector (DAD, SPD-M10VP). Methanol-water at gradient elution of 40% - 100% in 10 min was used as the solvent. The injection volume was 20 µL.
UV intensity was measured using a radiometer Cole-
Parmer Instruments Company, at a wavelength of 254 nm (model 9811-56), 312 nm (model 9811-54) and 365 nm (model 9811-50). Measurements were performed 15 minutes after the lamp accionament and also for the radiation transmitted through the glassy walls (three 3.5 mm layers and 0.5 cm of flowing water). The integral radiant flux of the incident light was measured with a power-meter (Newport 1830-C USA).
The reactor was operated in batch mode to prevent catalyst settling and simultaneously provide atmospheric oxygen absorption to guarantee the minimal leves necessary to generate hydroxyl radicals [
Control experiments using the photocatalysts without radiation exposition (dark) showed adsorption values varying from 0.8% to 3.2% (not showed here).
Despite the use of lamp with an irradiation spectrum varying from UV to visible regions, it is observed on
Analyzing Figures 3 and 4 simultaneously it is possible to relationate mineralization with phenol degradation, and also adquire information about mechanisms differences. Photolysis graphs indicate 15% TOC remotion and 20% degradation, respectively. Considering high volatility of phenol and the fact that reactor used operated
not sealed, it is adequate consider this value as a combination of photolysis plus volatilization process. The indicative of phenol partial photolysis is the higher degradation than mineralization and the detection of hidroquinone intermediate in trace levels (1 to 2.5 mg∙L−1).
TiO2 achieved more than 95% mineralization after 200 min reaction in an average degradation rate of 0.68 mg∙L−1∙min−1. During the first hour, after achieved 30% mineralization and 60% degradation it is observed the intermediates generation peak (catechol 2 mg∙L−1; benzoquinone 4 mg∙L−1; hifroquinone 14 mg∙L−1). The intermediates profile for TiO2 is unique because all intermediates are formed at the same time, suggesting that the generation of radicals is different from the other catalysts and the intermediates considered here are the main formed compounds after phenol degradation, since mass balance between mineralization, degradation and intermediates generated are perfectly accurate. These results are similar to other studies using different reactor, as [
Degradation results with ZnO were similar to TiO2, but mineralization was less efficient (0.41 mg∙L−1∙min−1). This fact reflected on intermediates profile, starting with catechol (1.5 mg∙L−1) after 30 min, followed by hidroquinone (2 mg∙L−1) at 120 min and benzoquinone (0.9 mg∙L−1). Considering mass balance it is possible to infer that other intermediates might be present than the substances considered here. Organic acids such as the formic acid, acetic acid, oxalic acid and succinic acid are substances already reported in other works using different process as final intermediates before CO2 formation [
Gallium oxide is expected to be stimulated by UV-C and copper oxide is activated by visible radiation, but despite the radiation source be adequate to activate these photocatalysts, its performances were similar to mineralization behaviors for photolysis process. The poor performance of Ga2O3 could be due to glass absorption of the UV-C radiation from 30 to 10 mW∙cm−2, even with
the use of PYREX glass. Zhang et al. [
The difference between CuO and Ga2O3 degradation mechanisms is evident on
The process described here is ecofriendly, cost-effective, and reusable for the treatment of phenol-contaminated water. Results showed that when feeding the reactor with TiO2 the efficiency is higher than the other oxides but very similar to ZnO. Other interesting information about degradation mechanisms is that the degradation intermediates concentration varies differently for each photocatalyst tested, inferring different mechanism even when reaction rates were similar.
This project was financially supported by National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) and National Council for the Improvement of Higher Education (CAPES).