<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2012.38110</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-21695</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Electronic Structure with Rovibrationl and Dipole Moment Study of the NiO Molecule
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>halil</surname><given-names>Badreddine</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nayla</surname><given-names>El-Kork</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mahmoud</surname><given-names>Korek</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Faculty of Science, Beirut Arab University, Riad El Solh, Beirut, Lebanon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Khalifa University, Sharjah, UAE</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>fkorek@yahoo.com(MK)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>14</day><month>08</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>08</issue><fpage>839</fpage><lpage>849</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>June</day>	<month>10,</month>	<year>2012</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>July</day>	<month>9,</month>	<year>2012</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>July</day>	<month>31,</month>	<year>2012</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The potential energy curves have been investigated for the 40 lowest electronic states in the 
  <sup>2s+1</sup>Λ
  <sup>(&#177;)</sup>representation below 25000 cm
  <sup>-1</sup> of the molecule NiO via CASSCF, MRCI (single and double excitation with Davidson correction) and CASPT2 methods. The harmonic frequency 
  ω<sub>e</sub> , the internuclear distance 
  r<sub>e</sub>, the rotational constant 
  B<sub>e</sub>, the electronic energy with respect to the ground state 
  T<sub>e</sub>, and the permanent dipole moment 
  μ have been calculated. By using the canonical functions approach, the eigenvalues 
  E<sub>v</sub>, the rotational constant 
  B<sub>v</sub> and the abscissas of the turning points 
  r<sub>min</sub> and 
  r<sub>max</sub> have been calculated for the considered electronic states up to the vibration level 
  v = 12. Eleven electronic states have been studied theoretically here for the first time. The comparison of these values to the theoretical and experimental results available in literature shows a very good agreement.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;ab Initio&lt;/i&gt; Calculation; NiO Molecule; Potential Energy Curves; Spectroscopic Constants; Dipole Moment; Rovibrational Calculation</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The metal oxide NiO shows complicated electronic spectra because of the presence of large number of electronic states derived from several low-lying configurations but it gives a systematic example of chemical bonding, which depends on the relative energy between the 3d orbital of the metal and the 2p orbital of oxygen [1,2]. The transition metal oxides have interesting applications in many fields such as materials application and the oxidation of metal surfaces. Among these compounds the NiO molecule which is considered as a prototype of ionic crystals, it is classified as a Mott-Hubbard insulator of very low conductivity. The conductivity of nanostructred NiO was found to be enhanced by six to eight orders of magnitude over those of NiO single crystals [3-10]. The magnetic properties of different sizes of NiO nanoparticles reveal the presence of superparamagnetism as evidenced by the increasing magnetization with decreasing size as well as the magnetic hysteresis at low temperatures. Nanomagnetism promises have applications in magnetic storage with nanomagnetic particles, improved battery lifetimes and also quantum computing [11-14]. The nanoarticles formed by the NiO molecule have many applications in electronics, optical, electro-optical devices and photocatalytic reaction. Despite this importance of the nickel oxide NiO, this molecule has been studied experimenttally and theoretically [15-35] where a limited number of electronic states have been obtained with the corresponding molecular constants. The theoretical calculation of the NiO molecule is an extreme computational challenge because of the degeneracy of several energetically low-lying excited states and the open d, p, and s shells. The presence of the d shell implies large multiplicities which are split by spin-orbit interaction. The components of the spin and the many states perturb each other. The prediction and assignment of the electronic configuration in the ground and excited states and the description of the bonding may often be difficult.</p><p>Based on our previous theoretical calculation [36-45], the important connection between energy relations of solids and molecules [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref46">46</xref>], and stimulated by the lack of theoretical calculation of excited electronic states with the existence of preliminary experimental and theoretical data, we performed an ab initio study of the low-lying electronic states of the molecule NiO below 25,000 cm<sup>–1</sup>. In this work, we investigate the potential energy curves (PECs), the electric dipole moment and spectroscopic constants for the 40 <sup>2s+1</sup>Λ<sup>(&#177;)</sup> low-lying electronic states of this molecule obtained by MRCI and RSPT2 calculations. Taking advantage of the electronic structure of the investigated electronic states of the NiO molecule and by using the canonical functions approach [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref47">47</xref>], the eigenvalues E<sub>v</sub><sub>, </sub>the rotational constant B<sub>v</sub> and<sub> </sub>the abscissas of the turning points r<sub>min </sub>and r<sub>max</sub> have been calculated for several vibrational levels of the considered electronic states.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Computational Approach</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Ab Initio Calculation</title><p>The PECs of the lowest-lying electronic states of the NiO molecule have been investigated via CASSCF and CASPT2 methods. The MRCI calculations (single and double excitations with Davidson corrections) were performed. The Nickel atom is treated as a system with 10 inner electrons taken into account using the basis LANL2DZECP [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref48">48</xref>] for s, p and d functions. The 8 electrons of the oxygen atom are considered using the DGauss-a<sub>2</sub>-Xfit [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref49">49</xref>] basis set including s, p and d functions. Among the 26 electrons explicitly considered for the NiO molecule (18 electrons for Ni and 8 for O), 14 inner electrons were frozen in subsequent calculations so that 12 valence electrons were explicitly treated. This calculation has been performed via the computational chemistry program MOLPRO [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref50">50</xref>] taking advantage of the graphical user interface GABEDIT [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref51">51</xref>].</p><p>In the representation <sup>2s+1</sup>Λ<sup>(&#177;)</sup>, 40 electronic states have been investigated for 46 internuclear distances in the range 1.331 &#197; ≤ r ≤ 2.681 &#197; by using the MRCI and RSPT2 calculations. The potential energy curves for the singlet and triplet states, obtained by MRCI calculation, are given in Figures 1-4.</p><p>The spectroscopic constants such as the vibration harmonic constant<img src="24-7500790\c7cc14ec-d0a2-4a63-a05c-eeb419158ff1.jpg" />, the internuclear distance at equilibrium r<sub>e</sub>, the rotational constant B<sub>e</sub> and the electronic transition energy with respect to the ground state T<sub>e</sub> have been calculated by fitting the energy values around the equilibrium position to a polynomial in terms of the internuclear distance. These values are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> together with the available data in the literature either theoretical or experimental.</p><p>An overlap between the 3d and 4s orbitals of the Ni atom and the 2p orbitals of the oxygen atom lead to the formation of the molecular orbitals of the molecule NiO. The ground state of this molecule is confirmed theoreticcally and experimentally to be a<sup>3</sup>S<sup>–</sup> [1,16-23,34-35, 52-58], its electronic configuration can approximately described as 8σ<sup>2</sup> 3π<sup>4</sup> 1δ<sup>4</sup> 9σ<sup>2</sup> 4π<sup>2</sup>. The 9σ and 4π orbitals are antibonding, the 1δ orbital is nonbonding, and the</p><table-wrap-group id="1"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Spectroscopic constants for the electronic states of the molecule NiO</title></caption></table-wrap-group><p>remaining orbitals are bonding [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref53">53</xref>]. The electronic structure of all the open shell 3d oxide are dominated by M<sup>2+</sup>O<sup>2–</sup> zero-order character at low energy, while the NiO molecule has the chance to be represented by Ni<sup>+</sup>O<sup>–</sup> atomic-ion-in-molecule model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref18">18</xref>]. Our calculated values of the internuclear distance r<sub>e</sub> and the vibrational harmonic constant<img src="24-7500790\4ac825a3-4329-499c-b281-1737eb981520.jpg" />, for the ground state, by using the MRCI calculation, are in very good agreement with the experimental values in literature with the relative differences 2.7% (Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref34">34</xref>]) &lt; Δr<sub>e</sub>/r<sub>e</sub> &lt; 3.8% (Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref53">53</xref>]) and 4% (Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref53">53</xref>]) &lt; <img src="24-7500790\9ee3bc81-8b5e-4cd3-aaca-0b8b6536d5ec.jpg" /> &lt; 8.5% (Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref18">18</xref>]) respectively. These relative differences become larger by using the CASPT2 method where 7.3% (Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref34">34</xref>]) &lt; Δr<sub>e</sub>/r<sub>e</sub> &lt; 8.3% (Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref53">53</xref>]) and 20.6% (Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref54">54</xref>]) &lt; <img src="24-7500790\aa75fa6d-de16-4a67-8493-f04c040e7345.jpg" /> &lt; 24.4% (Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref18">18</xref>]), but the value of <img src="24-7500790\a3d90229-0d99-437d-9c9b-29f1ced41a62.jpg" /> given by Huber and Herzberg [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref35">35</xref>] is in very good agreement with our value calculated by CASPT2 method where <img src="24-7500790\b55088c1-718b-47b6-87e1-1b55aa02864e.jpg" /> = 3% and bad agreement with the value calculated by the MRCI method with <img src="24-7500790\6361e8e5-97ca-4c8f-bfbc-7c78e33acd19.jpg" /> = 20%. By comparing our calculated values of r<sub>e</sub> with those calculated theoretically in literature we obtained a very good agreement with relative differences 3.8% (Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref56">56</xref>]) &lt; Δr<sub>e</sub>/r<sub>e</sub> &lt; 5.6% (Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref23">23</xref>]) and 0.5% (Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref23">23</xref>]) &lt; Δr<sub>e</sub>/r<sub>e</sub> &lt; 8.3% (Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref56">56</xref>]) calculated by MRCI and CASPT2 respectively, while the theoretical values of <img src="24-7500790\93ff0a68-c313-425d-8796-2ceb11166602.jpg" /> calculated in literature varies between 748 and 1068 cm<sup>–1</sup> and our values are in agreement with the lower value.</p><p>A large number of low-lying electronic states, many with very high spin multiplicity, of 3d metal oxides are produced by the unpaired electrons, therefore strong state mixing results in spectroscopy which implies difficult theoretical calculation. Another dimension of complexity can be added originating for the large nuclear spin and magnetic moment of the nuclei with odd atomic number. The first excited state of the NiO molecules has long been a matter of controversy. The theoretical calculation of Bauschlicher Jr. and collaborators [21,22,56] and that of Bakalbassis et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref24">24</xref>] found that the first excited state of this molecule is <sup>3</sup>P. Moravec and jarrold [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref53">53</xref>] and Wu and Wang [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref54">54</xref>] confirmed experimentally that <sup>3</sup>P is the first excited state. For Ram and Bernath [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref19">19</xref>] and Freidman-Hill and Field [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref18">18</xref>] this <sup>3</sup>P state is located experimentally above the ground state X<sup>3</sup>S<sup>–</sup> at 4330 and 4293 cm<sup>–1</sup> respectively. From the photoelectron spectroscopy technique, Ramond et al. located the <sup>3</sup>P<sub>2</sub> and <sup>3</sup>P<sub>1</sub> at 3916 and 4327 cm<sup>–1</sup> respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref52">52</xref>]. By a theoretical calculation, Walch and Goddard [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref20">20</xref>] predicted that the first excited state is <sup>1</sup>P rather than <sup>3</sup>P and located this state at 6000 cm<sup>–1</sup> above the ground state X<sup>3</sup>S<sup>–</sup>. This prediction of Walch and Goddard [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref20">20</xref>] for the first excited state <sup>1</sup>Δ is in agreement with the present work but our <sup>3</sup>P state is located at 5068.6 cm<sup>–1</sup> above the ground state. Moreover between the first excited state (1)<sup>1</sup>Δ and the (1)<sup>3</sup>P we found the 4 new singlet electronic states (1)<sup>1</sup>Δ, (2)<sup>1</sup>Δ, <sup>1</sup>Φ or <sup>1</sup>P and (3)<sup>1</sup>Δ by using MRCI calculation and the 2 new triplet electronic states (1)<sup>3</sup>Γ, (1)<sup>3</sup>Φ, and the 3 new singlet electronic states <sup>1</sup>P (1)<sup>1</sup>Γ and <sup>1</sup>Δ by using RSPT2 calculation. The agreement between the 2 ways of calculation is only for the last state <sup>1</sup>Δ. Ramond et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref52">52</xref>] investigated an electronic state at 2525 cm<sup>–1</sup> between X<sup>3</sup>S<sup>–</sup> and <sup>3</sup>P<sub>2</sub> states without assigning the nature of this state. By comparing the data of this state with our calculated values, one can find that, it is either (2)<sup>1</sup>Δ or (1)<sup>3</sup>Φ.</p><p>Also without assigning the name of the state, Ramond et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref52">52</xref>] detected the energy 5230.6 cm<sup>–1</sup> above the <sup>3</sup>P<sub>1</sub>, this energy is in very good agreement with the energy of our calculated (2)<sup>3</sup>Φ state with the relative differences ΔT<sub>e</sub>/T<sub>e</sub> = 0.8% and Δr<sub>e</sub>/r<sub>e</sub> = 5%. Between the values of energy 7659.2 cm<sup>–1</sup> &lt; T<sub>e</sub> &lt; 8788.4 cm<sup>–1</sup>, Ramond et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref52">52</xref>] suggested to these values an assignment to one of the three states <sup>3</sup>Φ<sub>i</sub>, <sup>3</sup>Δ<sub>i</sub> and <sup>3</sup>P<sub>i</sub>. By comparing this data to our calculated values in the present work (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>), the assignment to the states <sup>3</sup>Φ<sub>I</sub> and <sup>3</sup>Δ<sub>I</sub> are excluded since T<sub>e</sub>((2)<sup>3</sup>Φ = 5271.9 cm<sup>–</sup><sup>1</sup>), T<sub>e</sub>((3)<sup>3</sup>Φ = 13911.9 cm<sup>–</sup><sup>1</sup>), T<sub>e</sub>((1)<sup>3</sup>Δ = 10185.1 cm<sup>–</sup><sup>1</sup>), and T<sub>e</sub>((2)<sup>3</sup>Δ = 10243.65 cm<sup>–</sup><sup>1</sup>), therefore the only possible assignment is (2)<sup>3</sup>P. These values of energy obtained by Ramond et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref52">52</xref>] can fit also with the energy of the state (4)<sup>1</sup>Δ in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, but since this state is not suggested by the authors, this assignment is excluded in the present work. The same authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref52">52</xref>] obtained experimentally for the state <sup>1</sup>P the energy T<sub>e</sub> = 10095.1 cm<sup>–1</sup> which fits with our calculated value of the state (2)<sup>1</sup>P with the relative difference ΔT<sub>e</sub>/T<sub>e</sub> = 6.7%.</p><p>The values of the energy T<sub>e</sub> of the states <sup>3</sup>Φ<sub>2,3,4</sub> and <sup>1</sup>Δ obtained experimentally by Moravec and Jarrold [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref53">53</xref>] are respectively in good agreement and assignment with the (2)<sup>3</sup>Φ and (4)<sup>1</sup>Δ of the present work. Our calculated value of <img src="24-7500790\dcbdbb09-e285-4419-a1c3-06e3a1638a02.jpg" /> for the state (4)<sup>1</sup>Δ is in good agreement with that measured by Moravec and Jarrold [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref53">53</xref>] with relative difference <img src="24-7500790\cbaf9352-a98b-4c24-9057-b9bdd165d584.jpg" /> = 5.4%. The <sup>3</sup>P<sub>1,2,3</sub> states detected by Moravec and Jarrold [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref53">53</xref>] are in good agreement and assignment with the (3)<sup>3</sup>P of the present work (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>The assignment of the three states a(<sup>1</sup>Δ), b(<sup>1</sup>S<sup>+</sup>) and c(<sup>1</sup>∏) detected experimentally by Wu and Wang [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref54">54</xref>] are in very good agreement with our assignment of the states (4)<sup>1</sup>Δ, <sup>1</sup>S<sup>+</sup> and (3)<sup>1</sup>P with the relative differences ΔT<sub>e</sub>/T<sub>e</sub><sub> </sub>(a(<sup>1</sup>Δ)) = 6%, ΔT<sub>e</sub>/T<sub>e</sub> (b(<sup>1</sup>S<sup>+</sup>)) = 0.5%, ΔT<sub>e</sub>/T<sub>e</sub> (c(<sup>1</sup>P)) = 1.3% respectively. Baushlicher Jr. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref21">21</xref>] calculated the nearest <sup>1</sup>S<sup>+</sup> state at 8340 cm<sup>–1</sup> above the <sup>3</sup>S<sup>–</sup> which is in disagreement with our calculated value and those of Wu and Wang [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref54">54</xref>]. The MRCI calculated values of T<sub>e</sub>, in the present work, for the (2)<sup>3</sup>Φ and (3)<sup>3</sup>Φ states are respectively 5271.9 and 13911.9 cm<sup>–1</sup>, therefore the possible assignment of the B(<sup>3</sup>Φ) state, where T<sub>e</sub> = 10025.7 cm<sup>–1</sup>, investigated by Wu and Wang [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref54">54</xref>] is the (3)<sup>3</sup>Φ (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). The calculated values of r<sub>e</sub> and <img src="24-7500790\0463a397-d7e2-4f30-a612-ac71241d97b5.jpg" /> by bakalbassiss et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref24">24</xref>] for the states<sup> 3</sup>Δ and <sup>1</sup>S<sup>+</sup>, which are fitting with our (4)<sup>3</sup>Δ and <sup>1</sup>S<sup>+</sup>, are in disagreement with the values calculated in the present work, while there are good agreements between our data and those of Bauschlicher Jr. and Maitre [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref56">56</xref>] for the values of r<sub>e</sub> for these states with the relative differences Δr<sub>e</sub>/r<sub>e</sub>(<sup>3</sup>Δ) = 9% and Δr<sub>e</sub>/r<sub>e</sub>(<sup>1</sup>S<sup>+</sup>) = 5%.</p><p>The <sup>3</sup>S<sup>–</sup> at 16,000 cm<sup>–1</sup> predicted by Friedman-Hill and Field [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref18">18</xref>] is in very good agreement with the (2)<sup>3</sup>S<sup>–</sup> state calculated in the present work with the relative difference ΔT<sub>e</sub>/T<sub>e</sub> = 0.3%. The detected <sup>3</sup>P state by Walch and Goddard [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref20">20</xref>] at ≈6000 cm<sup>–1</sup> fits with our assignment of the state (2)<sup>3</sup>P where the relative difference in energy ΔT<sub>e</sub>/T<sub>e</sub> = 12%. The comparison of our results with the most recent investigation on the molecule NiO [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref58">58</xref>] shows an excellent agreement with our results for the state <sup>3</sup>S<sup>–</sup>, but our assumption for the energies 19452.6 cm<sup>–1</sup> and 19447.3 cm<sup>–1</sup> are in agreement with that given by Wu and Wang [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref54">54</xref>]. Because of the breakdown of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation at the crossing and avoided crossing of the potential energy curves near the minimum of the potential energy curves there is no calculation of the spectroscopic constants of other calculated electronic states where the potential energy curves are given in Figures 1-4.</p><p>The electric dipole moment is an effective gauge of the ionic characters; it is helping for understanding the macroscopic properties of imperfect gases, liquids and solids and is of great utility in the construction of molecular orbital. The expectation value of this operator is sensitive primarily to the nature of the least energetic and most chemically relevant valence electrons. To understand the ionic behavior of the excited electronic states we have presented in Figures 5-8 the adiabatic permanent dipole moment for the investigated electronic states in the range of the considered internuclear distance. It was seen that the variation of the adiabatic dipole moment is very important in the vicinity of the avoided crossings and the position of the peaks corresponds to the positions of these avoided crossings of the adiabatic curves. Each time an adiabatic state loses its ionic character, it becomes neutral and the corresponding dipole moment tends towards zero. One can notice the fit between the positions of the intersections of the permanent dipole moment curves and the position of the avoided crossings of the corresponding potential energy curves for the following states (4)<sup>1</sup>Δ/(5)<sup>1</sup>Δ (6)<sup>1</sup>Δ/(7)<sup>1</sup>Δ and (1)<sup>3</sup>Δ/(3)<sup>3</sup>Δ at 1.631 &#197;, 1.812 &#197; and 1.811 &#197; respectively. These fittings confirm the validity and the accuracy of the investigated data in the present work on the molecule NiO.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. The Vibration-Rotation Calculation</title><p>Within the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, the vibration rotation motion of a diatomic molecule in a given electronic state is governed by the radial Schr&#246;dinger equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.21695-formula71409"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="24-7500790\8ac0571a-b660-49f6-abc6-67b0d5605ff1.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where r is the internuclear distance, v and J are respecttively the vibrational and rotational quantum numbers, <img src="24-7500790\3dd290fb-e0c6-4b20-b05e-7d00ec385730.jpg" /><img src="24-7500790\59155f4c-fd5c-4b82-be06-c5366ad87817.jpg" />and <img src="24-7500790\25e46f7a-463e-4bb8-8b87-d360833c9fd0.jpg" /> are respectively the eigenvalue and the eigenfunction of this equation. In the perturbation theory these functions can be expanded as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.21695-formula71410"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="24-7500790\4744bb14-e262-45af-a73d-1c7b61833fae.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.21695-formula71411"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="24-7500790\0fb4fdde-2a2f-466e-bb8d-55aca23c4a2a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with e<sub>0</sub> = E<sub>v</sub>, e<sub>1</sub> = B<sub>v</sub>, e<sub>2</sub> = –D<sub>v</sub>, f<sub>0</sub> is the pure vibration wave function and f<sub>n</sub> its rotational corrections. By replacing Equations (2) and (3) into Equation (1) and since this equation is satisfied for any value of l, one can write [47,59-63]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.21695-formula71412"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="24-7500790\07fbfc51-303d-482c-85e6-8398082062de.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.21695-formula71413"><label>(5a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="24-7500790\900a016c-95f5-4473-87a7-850a6bcc44e5.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.21695-formula71414"><label>(5b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="24-7500790\bdb5db31-d3e4-4a8d-bd9b-eec1e192f771.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>&#183;&#183;&#183;</p><disp-formula id="scirp.21695-formula71415"><label>(5n)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="24-7500790\65d2f260-adb1-4d7f-9de9-437224e715b0.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<img src="24-7500790\f3d9e9e7-a03a-4f8a-9c17-ca3bc2823de5.jpg" />, the first equation is the pure vibrational Schr&#246;dinger equation and the remaining equations are called the rotational Schr&#246;dinger equations. One may project Equations (7) onto f<sub>0</sub> and find</p><disp-formula id="scirp.21695-formula71416"><label>(6a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="24-7500790\c3ad248e-df4d-4169-93ce-0c31e5cb7847.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.21695-formula71417"><label>(6b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="24-7500790\369e261a-cde0-41c4-b071-32b2af780bfc.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>&#183;&#183;&#183;</p><disp-formula id="scirp.21695-formula71418"><label>(6n)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="24-7500790\ed376ce5-d790-4a98-bc63-e078db7fe183.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Once e<sub>0</sub> is calculated from Equation (4), e<sub>1</sub>, e<sub>2</sub>, e<sub>3</sub>&#183;&#183;&#183; can be obtained by using alternatively Equations (5) and (6). By using the canonical functions approach [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21695-ref47">47</xref>] and the cubic spline interpolation between each two consecutive points of the PECs obtained from the ab initio calculation of the NiO molecule, the eigenvalue E<sub>v</sub>, the rotational constant B<sub>v</sub>, the distortion constant D<sub>v</sub>, and the abscissas of the turning point r<sub>min</sub> and r<sub>max</sub> have been calculated up to the vibrational levels v = 12 for the investigated electronic states in the present work. These values for the state X<sup>1</sup>∑<sup>+</sup> and the (2)<sup>3</sup>Φ (as illustration) are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. The comparison of the investigated values of B<sub>v</sub> and D<sub>v</sub> in literature [18,19,25] with our calculated values for these states showed a good agreement with relative difference ΔB<sub>v</sub>/B<sub>v</sub> ≈ 8% for v = 0, 1 and ΔD<sub>v</sub>/D<sub>v</sub> equal 7.5% and 2.4 % respectively for v = 1 and v = 2.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Conclusion</title><p>In the present work, the ab initio investigation for the 40 low-lying singlet and triplet electronic states of the NiO molecule has been performed via CAS-SCF/MRCI and CASPT2 methods. The potential energy and the dipole moment curves have been determined along with the spectroscopic constants T<sub>e</sub>, r<sub>e</sub>, <img src="24-7500790\5977fce5-ab0b-48ab-a9cc-89cf35ae2ce1.jpg" />, and the rotational constant B<sub>e</sub> for the lowest-lying electronic states. The comparison of our results, for different states, with those obtained experimentally and theoretically shows a good agreement. By using the canonical functions approach [47,59-63], the eigenvalue E<sub>v</sub>, the rotational constant B<sub>v</sub>,</p><table-wrap-group id="2"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Rovibrational calculation of the X<sup>3</sup>Σ<sup>–</sup> and (2)<sup>3</sup>Φ of the molecule NiO</title></caption></table-wrap-group><p>and the abscissas of the turning points r<sub>min</sub> and r<sub>max</sub> have been calculated up to the vibrational level v = 12. Eleven electronic states have been investigated in the present work for the first time.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec><sec id="s5"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.21695-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. J. Merer, “Spectroscopy of the Diatomic 3d Transition Metal Oxides,” Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, Vol. 40, 1989, pp. 407-438.  
doi:10.1146/annurev.pc.40.100189.002203</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. W. Field, D. P. Baldwin, E. J. Hill, M. Li and M. C. McCarthy, “Spectroscopy Beyond Molecular Constants,” Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular Spectroscopy, Vol. 45, No. 1, 1989, pp. 75-89.  
doi:10.1016/S0584-8539(89)80090-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. J. Morin, “Electrical Properties of NiO,” Physical Re- view, Vol. 93, No. 6, 1954, pp. 1199-1204. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. Adler and J. Feinleib, “Electrical and Optical Proper- ties of Narrow-Band Materials,” Physical Review B, Vol. 2, No. 8, 1970, pp. 3112-3134. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. J. Bosman and H. J. Van Daal, “Small-Polaron versus Band Conduction in Some Transition-Metal Oxides,” Advances in Physics, Vol. 19, No. 77, 1970, pp. 1-117. doi:10.1080/00018737000101071</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Pushparajah and S. Radhakrishna, “Transparent Conducting Lithium-Doped Nickel Oxide Thin Films by Spray Pyrolysis Technique,” Journal of Materials Science, Vol. 32, No. 11, 1997, pp. 3001-3006.  
doi:10.1023/A:1018657424566</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. J. Bosman and Crrevecoeur, “Mechanism of the Electrical Conduction in Li-Doped NiO,” Physical Review, Vol. 144, No. 2, 1965, pp. 763-770. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Van Houten, “Semiconduction in LixNi1?xO,” Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, Vol. 17, No. 1-2, 1960, pp. 7-17. doi:10.1016/0022-3697(60)90169-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. R. Heikes and W. D. Johnston, “Mechanism of Con- duction in Li—Substituted Transition Metal Oxides,” Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 26, No. 3, 1957, pp. 582-588. doi:10.1063/1.1743350</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Lunkenheimer, A. Loidl, C. R. Ottermann and K. Bange, “Correlated Barrier Hopping in NiO Films,” Physi- cal Review B, Vol. 44, No. 11, 1991, pp. 5927-5930. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. A. Makhlouf, F. T. Parker, F. E. Spada and A. E. Ber- kowitz, “Magnetic Anomalies in NiO Nanoparticles,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 81, No. 8, 1997, pp. 5561-5564. doi:10.1063/1.364661</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. T. Richardson, D. I. Yiagas, B. Turk, K. Forster and M. V. Twigg, “Origin of Superparamagnetism in Nickel Ox- ide,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 70, No. 11, 1991, pp. 6977-6983. doi:10.1063/1.349826</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. B?dker, M. F. Hansen, C. B. Koch and S. M?rup, “Par- ticle Interaction Effects in Antiferromagnetic NiO Nano- particles,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materi- als, Vol. 221, No. 1-2, 2000, pp. 32-36.  
doi:10.1016/S0304-8853(00)00392-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. H. Kodama, S. A. Makhlouf and A. E. Berkowitz, “Finite Size Effects in Antiferromagnetic NiO Nanoparticles,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 79, No. 7, 1997, pp. 1393-1396. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. Rosen, “Spectra of Diatomic Oxides by the Method of Exploded Wire,” Nature, Vol. 156, 1945, pp. 570-570. doi:10.1038/156570a0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. W. Green, G. T. Reedy and J. G. Kay, “Matrix-Iso- lated FeO, NiO, and CoO Ground-State Vibrational Fre- quencies,” Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, Vol. 78, No. 2, 1979, pp. 257-266.  
doi:10.1016/0022-2852(79)90005-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. I. Srdanov and D. O. Harris, “Laser Spectroscopy of NiO: The 3?? ground State,” Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 89, No. 5, 1988, pp. 2748-2753. doi:10.1063/1.455711</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. J. Friedman-Hill and R.W. Field, “Analysis of the [16.0]3??-X3?? and [16.0]??-[4.3]3Пi Band Systems of the NiO Molecule,” Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, Vol. 155, 1992, pp. 259-276.  
doi:10.1016/0022-2852(92)90516-Q</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. S. Ram and P. F. Bernath, “Fourier Transform Infrared Emission Spectroscopy of a New A3Пi-X3?? System of NiO,” Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, Vol. 155, 1992, pp. 315-325. doi:10.1016/0022-2852(92)90520-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. P. Walch and W. A. Goddard III, “Electronic States of the Nickel Oxide Molecule,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol. 100, No. 5, 1978, pp. 1338-1348. doi:10.1021/ja00473a002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. W. Bauschlicher Jr., “On the Similarity of the Bonding NiS and NiO,” Chemical Physics, Vol. 93, 1985, pp. 399- 404. doi:10.1016/0301-0104(85)87004-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. W. Bauschlicher Jr., C. J. Nelin and P. S. Bagus, “Transition Metal Oxides: CrO, MoO, NiO, PdO, AgO,” Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 82, No. 7, 1985, pp. 3265-3277. doi:10.1063/1.448224</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Dolg, U. Wedig, H. Stoll and H. Preuss, “Ab initi Pseudopotential Study of the First Row Transition Metal Monoxide and Iron Monohydride,“ Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 86, No. 4, 1987, pp. 2123-2131.  
doi:10.1063/1.452110</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. G. Bakalbassis, M. D. Stiakaki, A. C. Tsipis and C. A. Tsipis, “Ground and Low-Lying Excited State Properties of the First-Row Transition-Metal Oxide Diatomics Calculated by an Improved ASED-MO Model,” Chemical Physics, Vol. 205, No. 3, 1996, pp. 389-399. doi:10.1016/0301-0104(95)00417-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Namiki and S. Saito, “Microwave Spectrum of the NiO Radical in the X3??-State,” Chemical Physics Letters, Vol. 252, No. 5-6, 1996, pp. 343-347. doi:10.1016/0009-2614(96)00195-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Y. H. Chan, S. Zou and M. J. Weaver, “Mechanistic Differences between Electrochemical and Gas-Phase Thermal Oxidation of Platinum-Group Transition Metals as Discerned by Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, Vol. 103, No. 50, 1999, pp. 11141-11151. doi:10.1021/jp992500o</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. Sasaki, N. Koshizaki and K. M. Beck, “Comparison of Pt/TiO2 Nanocomposite Films Prepared by Sputtering and Pulsed Laser Deposition,” Applied Physics A: Materials Science &amp; Processing, Vol. 69, No. 7, 1999, pp. S771- S774. doi:10.1007/s003390051526</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. Maya, L. Riester, T. Thundat and C. S. Yust, “Charac- terization of Sputtered Amorphous Platinum Dioxide Films,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 84, No. 11, 1998, pp. 6382-6387. doi:10.1063/1.368883</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">O. L. Shcheka, N. V. Dobrodey and T. B. Emelina, “Quantum Chemical Study of Catalysts Based on Oxides of Transition Metals,” International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, Vol. 50, No. 3, 1994, pp. 181-188.  
doi:10.1002/qua.560500303</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. Boschloo and A. Hagfeldt, “Spectroelectrochemistry of Nanostructured NiO,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, Vol. 105, No. 15, 2001, pp. 3039-3044.  
doi:10.1021/jp003499s</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. C. Su, J. N. Carstens and A. T. Bell, “A Study of the Dynamics of Pd Oxidation and PdO Reduction by H2 and CH4,” Journal of Catalysis, Vol. 176, No. 1, 1998, pp. 125-135. doi:10.1006/jcat.1998.2028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. Biju and M. Abdul Khadar, “Dielectric Properties of Nanostructured Nickel Oxide,” Journal of Materials Sci- ence, Vol.38, 2003, pp. 4055-4063. doi:10.1023/A:1026131103898</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. R. Mc Bride, G. W. Graham, C. R. Peters and W. H. Weber, “Growth and Characterization of Reactively Sput- tered Thin—Film Platinum Oxides,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 69, No. 3, 1991, pp. 1596-1605.  
doi:10.1063/1.347255</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Citra, G. V. Chertihin and L. Andrews, “Reactions of Laser-Ablated Nickel Atoms with Dioxygen. Infrared Spectra and Density Functional Calculations of Nickel Oxides NiO, ONiO, Ni2O2, and Ni2O3, Superoxide NiOO, Peroxide Ni(O2), and Higher Complexes in Solid Argon,” Journal of Physical Chemistry A, Vol. 101, No. 17, 1997, pp. 3109-3118. doi:10.1021/jp970019x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. P. Huber and G. Herzberg, “Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure. IV. Constants of Diatomic Mole- cules,” Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saleh N. Abdul Al, Mahmoud Korek and Abdul Rahman Allouche, “Theoretical Electronic Structure of the Low- est-Lying States of the YI Molecule,” Chemical Physics, Vol. 308, No. 1-2, 2005, pp. 1-6.  
doi:10.1016/j.chemphys.2004.07.032</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Korek, Y. A. Moghrabi and A. R. Allouche, “Theo- retical Calculation of the Excited States of the KCs Molecule Including the Spin-Orbit Interaction,” Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 124, No. 9, 2006, Article ID: 094309. doi:10.1063/1.2173239</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Korek, S. Bleik and A. R. Allouche, “Theoretical Calculation of the Low Laying Electronic States of the Molecule NaCs with Spin-Orbit Effect,“ Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 126, No. 12, 2007, Article ID: 124313. doi:10.1063/1.2710257</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. Taher-Mansour, A. R. Allouche and M. Korek, “Theo- retical Electronic Structure of the Lowest-Lying States of ScCl Molecule below 22,500 cm?1,” Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, Vol. 248, No. 1, 2008, pp. 61-65. doi:10.1016/j.jms.2007.11.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Korek, S. Kontar, F. Taher-Mansour and A. R. Allouche, “Theoretical Electronic Structure of the Mole- cule ScI,” International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, Vol. 109, No. 2, 2009, pp. 236-242.  
doi:10.1002/qua.21779</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Korek, S. Al-Shawa and G. A. Younes, “Theoretical Calculation of the Electronic Structure of the Molecule LiRb Including the Spin-Orbit Interaction,” Journal of Molecular Structure: THEOCHEM, Vol. 899, No. 1-3, 2009, pp. 25-31. doi:10.1016/j.theochem.2008.12.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Korek and S. N. Abdul-Al, “Rovibrational Study and Dipole Moment Calculation of the Molecule YF with Spin-Orbit Interaction,” Chemical Physics, Vol. 355, No. 2-3, 2009, pp. 130-134.  
doi:10.1016/j.chemphys.2008.11.022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Hamdan, M. Korek, “Theoretical Calculation of the Low-Lying Sextet Electronic States of CrF Molecule,” Chemical Physics, Vol. 369, No. 1, 2010, pp. 13-18. doi:10.1016/j.chemphys.2010.01.023</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Hamdan, and M. Korek, “Theoretical Calculation of the Low-Lying Quartet States of the CrF Molecule,” Ca- nadian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 89, No. 10, 2011, pp. 1304-13011. doi:10.1139/v11-082</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Hamdan and M. Korek, “Theoretical Study with Vi- bration-Rotation and Dipole Moment Calculations of Quartet States of the CrCl Molecule,” International Jour- nal of Quantum Chemistry, Vol. 111, No. 12, 2011, pp. 2960-2965. doi:10.1002/qua.22602</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. R. Smith, H. Schlosser, W. Leaf, J. Ferrante and J. H. Rose, “Connection Between Energy Relations of Solids and Molecules,” Physic Review A, Vol. 39, 1989, pp. 514- 517. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Korek, “A One Directional Shooting Method for the Computation of Diatomic Centrifugal Distortion Constants,” Computer Physics Communications, Vol. 119, No. 2-3, 1999, pp. 169-178.  
doi:10.1016/S0010-4655(98)00180-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">W. R. Wadt, P. J. Hay, “Ab initio Effective Core Potentials for Molecular Calculations. Potentials for the Transi- tion Metal Atoms Sc to Hg,” Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 82, No. 1, 1985, pp. 270-284. doi:10.1063/1.448799</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">N. Godbout, D. R. Salahub, J. Andzelm and E. Wimmer, “Optimization of Gaussian-Type Basis Sets for Local Spin Density Functional Calculations. Part I. Boron through Neon, Optimization Technique and Validation,” Canadian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 70, No. 2, 1992, pp. 560-571. doi:10.1139/v92-079</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H.-J. Werner, P. J. Knowles, R. Lindh, F. R. Manby, M. Schütz, P. Celani, T. Korona, G. Rauhut, R. D. Amos, A. Bernhardsson, A. Berning, D. L. Cooper, M. J. O. Deegan, A. J. Dobbyn, F. Eckert, C. Hampel, G. Hetzer, A. W. Lloyd, S. J. McNicholas, W. Meyer, M. E. Mura, A. Nickla?, P. Palmieri, R. Pitzer, U. Schumann, H. Stoll, A. J. Stone, R. Tarroni and T. Thorsteinsson, “MOLPRO Is a Package of Ab initio Programs,”http://www.molpro.net/info/molpro2006.1/molpro_manual</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. R. Allouche, “Gabedit—A Graphical User Interface for Computational Chemistry Softwares,” Journal of Compu- tational Chemistry, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2011, pp. 174-182. doi:10.1002/jcc.21600</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. M. Ramond, G. E. Davico, F. Hellberg, F. Svedberg, P. Salén, P. S?derqvist and W. C. Lineberger, “Photoelec- tron Spectroscopy of Nickel, Palladium, and Platinum Oxide Anions,” Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, Vol. 216, No. 1, 2002, pp. 1-14. doi:10.1006/jmsp.2002.8669</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. D. Moravec and C. C. Jarrold, “Study of the Low- Lying States of NiO? and NIO Using Anion Photoelec- tron Spectroscopy,” Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 108, No. 5, 1998, pp. 1804-18011. doi:10.1063/1.475557</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Wu and L. S. Wang, “A Study of Nickel Monoxide (NiO), Nickel Dioxide (ONiO), and Ni(O2) Complex by Anion Photoelectron Spectroscopy,” Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 107, No. 1, 1997, pp. 16-21.  
doi:10.1063/1.474362</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">O. Gropen, U. Wahlgren and L. Pettersson, “Effective Core Potential Calculation on Small Molecules Containing Transition Metal Atoms,” Chemical Physics, Vol. 66, 1982, pp. 459-464. doi:10.1016/0301-0104(82)88047-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. W. Bauschlicher Jr. and P. Maitre, “Theoretical Study of the First Transition Row Oxides and Sulfides,” Theoretica Chimica Acta, Vol. 90, No. 2-3, 1995, pp. 189- 203. doi:10.1007/BF01113847</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. C. Chung, S. Krüger, G. Pacchioni and N. R?sch, “Relativistic Effects in the Electronic Structure of the Monoxides Andmonocarbonyls of Ni, Pd, and Pt: Local and Gradient-Corrected Density Functional Calculations,”  Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 102, 1995, pp. 3693- 3701. doi:10.1063/1.468551</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. L. Gattinger, E. J. Llewellyn and W. F. J. Evans, “Chemiluminescent NiO Emissions: Band Systems and Spectral Simulation,” Canadian Journal of Physics, Vol. 89, No 8, 2011, pp. 869-874. doi:10.1139/p11-068</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Korek and H. Kobeissi, “Diatomic Centrifugal Distor- tion Constants for a RKR Potential: The Canonical Func- tions Method,” Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, Vol. 145, No. 2, 1991, pp. 448-450.  
doi:10.1016/0022-2852(91)90131-S</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. El-Hajj, H. Kobeissi and M. Korek, “SSM: A Set of Subprograms for Calculating Eigenvalues for a Diatomic Molecule Using a Simplified Shooting Method,” Computer Physics Communications, Vol. 74, No. 2, 1992, pp. 297-302. doi:10.1016/0010-4655(93)90099-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Korek and H. Kobeissi, “Highly Accurate Diatomic Centrifugal Distortion Constants for High Orders and High Levels,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, Vol. 13, No. 9, 1992, pp. 1103-1108.  
doi:10.1002/jcc.540130909</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Kobeissi and M. Korek, “One Compact Analytic Expression of the Diatomic Centrifugal Distortion Constants to Any Order,” Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, Vol. 26, No. 3, 1993, pp. L35-L37. doi:10.1088/0953-4075/26/3/001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21695-ref63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Korek and H. Kobeissi, “Diatomic Centrifugal Distortion Constants for Large Orders at Any Level: Application to the  -I2 State,” Canadian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 71, No. 3, 1993, pp. 313-317.  
doi:10.1139/v93-046</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>