<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Microphysics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2162-2450</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojm.2012.23006</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJM-21694</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Second Thoughts about the &lt;i&gt;τ-θ&lt;/i&gt; Puzzle
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ozo</surname><given-names>Aoki</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Grande_Maison_Hosoyama 110, 5-25-7 Hosoyama, Asao-ku, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa 215-0001, Japan</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>kozoaoki@gmail.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>16</day><month>08</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><volume>02</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>46</fpage><lpage>48</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>April</day>	<month>24,</month>	<year>2012</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>June</day>	<month>3,</month>	<year>2012</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>June</day>	<month>28,</month>	<year>2012</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The new parity value of 
  π
  <sup>0 </sup>was determined according to the hypothesis of conservation of particle number. The theo-retical pentaquark proton’s parity value was also determined, and it was found that the conservation of parity is account nicely for the 
  τ-θ puzzle.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Conservation of Parity; Parity of Pion; Parity of Pentaquark Proton; Parity of Deuteron; &lt;i&gt;τ-θ&lt;/i&gt;Puzzle; Conservation of Particle Number</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In 1951, Panofsky et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21694-ref1">1</xref>] reported on the parities of pions from the reaction of <img src="3-1220025\27d4f77c-7a9c-494d-8164-3b885a3bab44.jpg" /> and<img src="3-1220025\532e03e1-e545-4ed2-9f51-8429d891a901.jpg" />. The reaction between proton (p) and charged pion (<img src="3-1220025\e4c1b123-8675-4b04-b8c8-7d3cc75f65eb.jpg" />) is</p><p><img src="3-1220025\33cfdb99-2f3d-4b0a-ada8-46dddb0e506b.jpg" /></p><p>In the general two-body system, the parity formula is</p><p><img src="3-1220025\59e4f58c-3104-47d0-935b-3e153f29d3e9.jpg" /></p><p>where P<sub>a</sub> and P<sub>b</sub> are the intrinsic parities, l is the angular momentum. The traditional proton, neutron, and meson’s parity values in common use are +1, +1, and –1, respectively. The parity is a multiplicative quantum number. Since the initial state (<img src="3-1220025\bfa6e95e-f3f2-4536-a4d3-62a07074939a.jpg" />) is S state (l = 0) and the angular momentum is 0, the initial state’s parity is</p><p><img src="3-1220025\92bb70c4-416a-4e73-8e0f-653744f983b7.jpg" /></p><p>The final state’s parity is</p><p><img src="3-1220025\af915c40-bd0d-4048-a56e-8d3416161ad8.jpg" /></p><p>It was considered that the two parities are same by the conservation of parity.</p><p><img src="3-1220025\e1c26e00-b1b9-4164-aef0-42601beab294.jpg" /></p><p>In 1954, Chinowsky and Steinberger [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21694-ref2">2</xref>] obtained the parity value (–1) of <img src="3-1220025\0884c8b9-c8fe-4e45-97bc-06aae50dcc4c.jpg" /> from the absorption of negative pions in deuterium. In 1959, Plano et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21694-ref3">3</xref>] determined the parity value (–1) of neutral pion (<img src="3-1220025\a4139a6c-b3c4-4c58-879d-5fd545d3d09c.jpg" />). However the quark numbers by the traditional formula are not add up between the initial state and the final state. It is thought of as a serious problem.</p><p>By the way, the two different decays were found for the positively charged strange mesons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21694-ref3">3</xref>]:</p><p><img src="3-1220025\f189c2c8-6c84-4117-b83d-77c1e95f5e7d.jpg" /></p><p>The charged kaon (K<sup>+</sup>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21694-ref4">4</xref>] used to be called <img src="3-1220025\05c536cf-3d62-49aa-9a5d-e7bf97d67a63.jpg" /> and<img src="3-1220025\62034045-5ce7-44cb-a2fb-e9070925f133.jpg" />. Both the <img src="3-1220025\ce2f4063-1017-4db2-8645-576eb8adeb7c.jpg" /> and <img src="3-1220025\d8e95398-876b-4773-8d51-322e70c5ce06.jpg" /> particles were supposed to be two different particles, but they are the same particles. The two final states have different parities, and it is known as the <img src="3-1220025\bb887e47-ce6b-461a-a4c6-9b5542db261e.jpg" /> puzzle [5-8].</p><p>In this paper, the parities of the pentaquark proton, deuteron, and neutral pion are re-searched based on the hypothesis of conservation of particle number [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21694-ref9">9</xref>]. It is attested to the conservation of parity for the <img src="3-1220025\a45ae54f-7364-4f0a-9eb4-850019ecdd1e.jpg" /> puzzle.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. The Parity of <img src="3-1220025\2ae52c1b-1c1b-4d9e-91ce-b8535977da6f.jpg" /> for the <img src="3-1220025\f8506ce3-c5b3-4871-8242-8a6add8fb8b6.jpg" /> Reaction</title><p>The traditional formula and quark contents by experiment [1,3] are</p><p><img src="3-1220025\68eaff1d-4df4-4ec8-b634-25b62e44616b.jpg" /></p><p>The numbers of down and anti-down quarks, d and d-bar, are not add up between the left-hand member and the right-hand member. It is necessary for the adjustment of particle numbers. To adjust their member, the pentaquark proton (<img src="3-1220025\6f40f82b-12d9-43c7-83d3-ed882e0f537a.jpg" />) is adopted [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21694-ref9">9</xref>]. According to the hypothesis of conservation of particle number, the above formulae for <img src="3-1220025\af59aec5-9cf5-4535-b55f-d41a99257cfd.jpg" /> are as indicated below.</p><p><img src="3-1220025\a2f2c290-152e-4ce6-9b38-2dd55284e820.jpg" /></p><p><img src="3-1220025\62a54ff4-b056-46d2-aec1-87c2a1cabc57.jpg" /></p><p>where the {(<img src="3-1220025\4bf0ab7b-64a7-4764-aedf-3feb6066045d.jpg" />), (n)} is a pentaquark proton (<img src="3-1220025\93041700-efb5-4c86-bf72-18dd1a4e2310.jpg" />), the quark content is {u, d-bar} {u, d, d} [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21694-ref9">9</xref>]. The pentaquark proton’s parity (<img src="3-1220025\25f9820d-5a4e-48dc-b7f5-1761db66c5db.jpg" />) is –1, since the parity formula is</p><p><img src="3-1220025\24eb3c8a-d2b5-4117-86e1-7d4adc41b2fd.jpg" /></p><p>The initial state’s parity is</p><p><img src="3-1220025\39a44814-aad6-4196-af12-06b3747b9d1c.jpg" /></p><p>By the conservation of parity,</p><p><img src="3-1220025\9644df2e-2fe4-497d-aa8d-c4ee62b898bd.jpg" /></p><p>The new parity value of <img src="3-1220025\d62f753d-fd01-458e-9e2e-2b039e1ce4ed.jpg" /> is +1, not –1 in common use.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. The Parity of <img src="3-1220025\5a9550ef-362c-4477-8df6-c517dd1d09bc.jpg" /> for the <img src="3-1220025\6a19da1e-d526-4fb9-8293-5210a4697400.jpg" /> Reaction</title><p>The numbers of down and anti-down quarks are not add up between the left-hand member and the right-hand member by experiment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21694-ref1">1</xref>].</p><p><img src="3-1220025\4b39adcd-f4f7-4410-a2d3-797c1349a448.jpg" /></p><p>It is necessary for the adjustment of particle numbers. To adjust their member, the pentaquark proton (<img src="3-1220025\219370ef-6ceb-4d7c-9f3e-293b404405bb.jpg" />) is adopted [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21694-ref9">9</xref>]. According to the hypothesis of conservation of particle number, the above formulae for <img src="3-1220025\ba37c516-8665-4554-85f9-7f07affe821b.jpg" /> are as indicated below. The reaction between the deuteron (<img src="3-1220025\28dbede0-8a66-4020-b951-09046afff501.jpg" />) and charged pion (<img src="3-1220025\e59a5e44-18e9-410d-926a-9b47d8f6d942.jpg" />) is</p><p><img src="3-1220025\823dc4f3-142b-4a55-a123-c500e80a1037.jpg" /></p><p>where the {(<img src="3-1220025\77fd11c1-dd4b-4e9f-a14f-53b648930dac.jpg" />),(n)} is the deuteron(D′) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21694-ref9">9</xref>].</p><p>The deuteron’s parity (P<sub>D′</sub>) is –1, since the parity formula is</p><p><img src="3-1220025\70f7ecdf-2f5f-4c45-a873-8f9c2399879a.jpg" /></p><p>The initial state’s parity is</p><p><img src="3-1220025\a95007a8-6e4b-4a92-93be-3f18398326f3.jpg" /></p><p>The final state’s parity is</p><p><img src="3-1220025\12fc8586-49a9-49e7-ad32-96a218760cc8.jpg" /></p><p>By the conservation of parity,</p><p><img src="3-1220025\0d840645-7143-4f38-a231-28a975fd5344.jpg" /></p><p>The new parity value of <img src="3-1220025\1f489eac-0e31-4988-a9db-4dd1321a4bcb.jpg" /> in this reaction is also +1.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. The Parity of <img src="3-1220025\2318c3c9-4c5e-4373-a0db-50eded80d86f.jpg" /> Reaction</title><p>The reaction between the <img src="3-1220025\d5d342ea-691d-47d7-950f-11ae94d27afd.jpg" /> and <img src="3-1220025\6a2bca57-df6f-4ade-b1be-4008957c8c3d.jpg" /> by experiment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21694-ref10">10</xref>] is</p><p><img src="3-1220025\8d9e3e5f-53a1-49ec-9c86-ab8ff2fb50e3.jpg" /></p><p>This reaction was not considered by Aoki [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21694-ref9">9</xref>]. The formula for the quark content<img src="3-1220025\5ab00b06-dca5-4fc6-b5d5-62ee698900d3.jpg" /> of the traditional proton is</p><p><img src="3-1220025\eb9780dd-908e-488f-8c01-a2f2c8f5334b.jpg" /></p><p>However the numbers of down and anti-down quarks are not add up between the left-hand member and the right-hand member. The parity is not conserved. The formula of the left-hand parity is</p><p><img src="3-1220025\5ac8f73d-483e-4c84-846b-803f84a62dcd.jpg" /></p><p>The formula of the right-hand parity is:</p><p><img src="3-1220025\843a7604-cb1f-44f3-8fa0-8002b7c0a779.jpg" /></p><p>To adjust their member, the pentaquark proton (p′) is adopted [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21694-ref9">9</xref>].</p><p><img src="3-1220025\a6ef8388-ab2a-4053-b517-75277f9917b8.jpg" /></p><p>The formula of the left-hand parity is</p><p><img src="3-1220025\77990d3e-b0f0-4938-ba8a-4c8e92b8f616.jpg" /></p><p>The formula of the right-hand parity is</p><p><img src="3-1220025\b1b4f567-22e2-49f4-9a74-553d0e1b732a.jpg" /></p><p>The parity is conserved by the hypothesis of conservation of particle number.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. The Validation of Conservation of Parity for the <img src="3-1220025\a58f80a2-a748-4ce9-8619-709468fecf1a.jpg" /> Puzzle</title><p>In the <img src="3-1220025\431ada35-998b-4f2a-8612-f616e57a1dbb.jpg" /> puzzle [5-8], the two parities of <img src="3-1220025\4831291a-17a1-45fd-bb4e-f776cb0b33c8.jpg" /> and <img src="3-1220025\043c3fe0-cf88-41bb-a27a-db708c7d4028.jpg" /> have same value (–1), since the positively charged Kaon (K<sup>+</sup>) is a meson. The K<sup>+</sup> was shown as follows by Aoki [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21694-ref9">9</xref>].</p><p><img src="3-1220025\43c6066f-8211-4b93-9ca9-9c1671880412.jpg" /></p><p>where the anti-strange quark (s-bar) is the composite particle consisting of the anti-down quark(d-bar) and<img src="3-1220025\53504b36-a0c3-4098-9dc8-9449824be208.jpg" />, the <img src="3-1220025\365c2866-1c87-454c-99e2-96a8119f42fe.jpg" /> is the <img src="3-1220025\dd0a0247-6fd5-4e8e-9845-e0f3e41804c1.jpg" /> and <img src="3-1220025\3366b9cf-4f37-4bc4-a2b8-f83a5d422ebe.jpg" /> pair, the <img src="3-1220025\df220237-f2d2-4cc3-8ed3-1a4a4c25f774.jpg" /> is the neutrino-antineutrino pair, and the <img src="3-1220025\04e245ce-814f-4691-8c58-f170343b922d.jpg" /> is the muonneutrino-antimuonneutrino pair. The parity of <img src="3-1220025\6e3c33d1-46da-4ea8-9293-a2105baaa44e.jpg" /> is +1. The <img src="3-1220025\ba7c3025-4d3b-4b63-afe7-6da880080874.jpg" /> may be the two photons.</p><p><img src="3-1220025\eb58833b-84c3-4c55-968b-ccfe749f1cc1.jpg" /></p><p><img src="3-1220025\27bd6c98-c41a-43e9-80b2-aa10e4d19b77.jpg" /></p><p><img src="3-1220025\c0f19be3-cf3a-4135-8d06-34a2d84c60d0.jpg" /></p><p>The <img src="3-1220025\25377167-81c7-448e-81de-94faaa0ef040.jpg" /> and <img src="3-1220025\19c2bce6-57e8-415b-b3cb-ef99216ddc00.jpg" /> masses, lifetimes, and spins are no difference with each other. In the traditional expression, the parities are</p><p><img src="3-1220025\06c334c4-b439-4dbf-9bcc-3c4c813dfa66.jpg" /></p><p><img src="3-1220025\c9fc1d20-bcb5-471a-a88e-dc43f6adf3fd.jpg" /></p><p>where l is the angular momentum between <img src="3-1220025\caa85312-1c25-4d8a-9e14-2132709d01be.jpg" /> and<img src="3-1220025\51ffbf2e-fe99-4c76-9b38-d7422b0d84cb.jpg" />, L is the angular momentum between <img src="3-1220025\4239fdfc-6d3a-4515-a469-29a63f576d9f.jpg" /> and the center of<img src="3-1220025\1bae9ddd-f2c9-453f-be36-f9e3181db69a.jpg" />,<img src="3-1220025\71e32ab9-091e-466a-b6e6-15f605cc5a63.jpg" />.</p><p>The two final states have the different parities, +1 and –1. The parity for <img src="3-1220025\96454b7a-b4cf-4884-8f93-909f36e9ac4b.jpg" /> is not conserved. It is considered as the parity violation in weak interactions. However the parity is conserved as follows by the new parity value (+1) of<img src="3-1220025\93446001-452a-47db-95e4-55eba0231663.jpg" />.</p><p><img src="3-1220025\f6ec51b1-6dbe-4442-8b47-89a48d36e72d.jpg" /></p><p><img src="3-1220025\cc990617-83a4-45c3-ac1e-472b1fcaf9d9.jpg" /></p><p><img src="3-1220025\d719e3de-7d99-4c1f-9cb8-eafba9c39558.jpg" /></p><p>The neutral pions of both initial states were added by the hypothesis of conservation of particle number. The <img src="3-1220025\b3c75dea-0bcd-4ca8-a221-202f00ef56d3.jpg" /> for <img src="3-1220025\aa886c42-7149-4ab7-bc67-968abbc690b1.jpg" /> is corresponding to the<img src="3-1220025\bf94211e-5079-44ce-aa9f-ca1b7d4bd9fd.jpg" />. The initial state’s parities for <img src="3-1220025\5f4366ca-db9c-40a5-b68e-6fdf63f4c46e.jpg" /> and <img src="3-1220025\90a16991-f1aa-4c63-b5d5-072945546dd7.jpg" /> are –1.</p><p><img src="3-1220025\6bd71575-e446-4b7b-a217-6d9e446c0602.jpg" /></p><p>The final state’s parity for <img src="3-1220025\0dc766ed-5b50-43ac-ada0-36724860392b.jpg" /> is –1.</p><p><img src="3-1220025\bb64f856-18f7-4927-a206-540595e4291e.jpg" /></p><p>The final state’s parity for <img src="3-1220025\8caa9b2b-38d9-41d3-9676-942d0e8311c8.jpg" /> is –1.</p><p><img src="3-1220025\0b52b048-85d1-4024-9147-57f511a3a6dd.jpg" /></p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Conclusions</title><p>The new parity values of the the pentaquark proton (p′)deuteron (D′), and neutral pion (<img src="3-1220025\dbeede29-c672-4dfe-98a3-a695a4591b00.jpg" />), are –1, –1, and +1, respectively.</p><p>It was attested to the conservation of parity for the <img src="3-1220025\df87b2d3-ba61-48a4-8070-662260d808c0.jpg" /> puzzle.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.21694-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">W. K. H. Panofsky, R. L. Aamodt and J. Hadley, “The Gamma-Ray Spectrum Resulting from Capture of Negative π-Mesons in Hydrogen and Deuterium,” Physical Review, Vol. 81, No. 4, 1951, pp. 565-574. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRev.81.565</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21694-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">W. Chinowsky and J. Steinberger, “Absorption of Negative Pions in Deuterium: Parity of the Pion,” Physical Review, Vol. 95, No. 6, 1954, pp. 1561-1564. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRev.95.1561</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21694-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Plano, A. Prodell, N. Samios, M. Schwartz and J. Steinberger, “Parity of the Neutral Pion,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 3, No. 11, 1959, pp. 525-527. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.3.525</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21694-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. Amsler, et al., “Review of Particle Physics,” Physics Letters B, Vol. 667, No. 1-5, 2008, pp. 1-6. 
doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.07.018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21694-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. H. Dalitz, “The Decay of the ?-Meson,” Proceedings of the Royal Society, Section A, Vol. 66, No. 8, 1953, pp. 710-713.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21694-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. H. Dalitz, “On the Analysis of ?-Meson Data and the Nature of the Meson,” Philosophical Magazine, Vol. 44, No. 357, 1953, pp. 1068-1080.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21694-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. H. Dalitz, “Decay of ?-Mesons of Known Charge,” Physical Review, Vol. 94, No. 4, 1954, pp. 1046-1051. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRev.94.1046</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21694-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. K. Wróblewski, “The Downfall of Parity: The Revolution That Happened Fifty Years Ago,” Acta Physica Polonica B, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2008, pp. 251-264.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21694-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Aoki, “Hypothesis of Conservation of Particle Number,” Open Journal of Microphysics, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2011, pp. 1-12. doi:10.4236/ojm.2011.11001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21694-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Durbin, H. Loar and J. Steinberger, “The Spin of the Pion via the Reaction ?+ + d ?p + p,” Physical Review, Vol. 83, No. 3, 1951, pp. 646-648.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>