<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2012.38095</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-21680</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Exact Projective Excitations of Nonautonomous Nonlinear Schr&#246;dinger System in (1 + 1)-Dimensions
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ianfeng</surname><given-names>Ye</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chunlong</surname><given-names>Zheng</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Physics, Shaoguan University, Shaoguan, Guangdong, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>clzheng@yahoo.cn(CZ)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>14</day><month>08</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>08</issue><fpage>702</fpage><lpage>708</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>May</day>	<month>8,</month>	<year>2012</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>June</day>	<month>1,</month>	<year>2012</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>June</day>	<month>28,</month>	<year>2012</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  With the aid of a direct projective approach, a general transformation solution for the nonautonomous nonlinear Schr?dinger (NLS) system is derived. Based on certain known exact solutions of the projective equation, some periodic and localized excitations with novel properties are correspondingly revealed by entrancing appropriate system parameters. The integrable constraint conditions for the nonautonomous NLS system derived naturally here are consistent with the compatibility condition via the Painlev&#233; analysis in other literature. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Nonautonomous NLS System; Projective Approach; Exact Solution; Localized Excitation</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Nonlinear science is believed, by many outstanding scientists, to be the most deeply important frontier for understanding nature and applications in reality. For example, nonlinear optical solitons are regarded as the natural data bits and an important alternative for the next generation of ultrahigh speed optical telecommunication systems. It is known that the propagation of electromagnetic waves in nonlinear optical waveguides and the ground state wave functions of Bose-Einstein condenstates (BECs) can be described by nonlinear Schr&#246;dinger (NLS) system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21680-ref1">1</xref>], which is actually one of the fundamental dynamical models in nonlinearity [2,3]. The nonautonomous NLS system in (1 + 1)-dimensional form is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.21680-formula153187"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500746\97e7a371-e7fe-4484-b695-1a61ecc33908.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="9-7500746\828a248f-4ae5-4444-a085-8beb3b26c232.jpg" /> is the complex wave envelope in a comoving frame, with time-modulated dispersion<img src="9-7500746\2e486676-c38d-4bf2-9ae3-669d606c75fa.jpg" />, nonlinearity<img src="9-7500746\2390c036-e167-4d4f-8a44-ab9be74f3252.jpg" />, net gain (&gt;0) or loss (&lt;0)<img src="9-7500746\4a3813cb-7dd9-49cd-ad58-075d346461d0.jpg" />, and external harmonic trap potential <img src="9-7500746\a03973b2-c87c-47e5-8f54-7268aecd43b7.jpg" /> in BECs, which is usually absent in nonlinear optical transmission aspect [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21680-ref4">4</xref>]. The subscripts x and t denote the spatial and temporal partial derivatives. These coefficients are often assumed to be real. In the contexts of many physical fields, the BECs and nonlinear optics provide excellent proving grounds for exploring nonlinear systems with distributed coefficients. It has been reported that specific dependencies of the equation coefficients on time variables can enhance the stabilities of the solutions [5,6]. Moreover, timemodulated nonlinearities and/or dispersions can facilitate the manipulation of the soliton behaviors. These facts have greatly enlarged our knowledge on nonlinear excitations and given an origin to some important concepts such as nonautonomous soliton [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21680-ref7">7</xref>], and Feschbach resonance, which has been used to control some nonlinearities of matter waves by manipulating the scattering length either in time or space, and have led to certain proposals of many novel nonlinear phenomena. Dispersion management (DM) for BBCs has also proposed recently and has induced plenty of consequent studies. In nonlinear optics, nonlinear management (NM) and DM are also both used for experiments and theories with temporal or spatial optical solitons, soliton lasers, ultrafast soliton switches [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21680-ref7">7</xref>]. Furthermore, some recent progresses on inhomogeneous nonlinear media have generated novel concepts such as the optical similariton [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21680-ref8">8</xref>]. However, the nonautonomous NLS system (1) and/or its similar versions are very difficult to be solved because of the presence of the time-dependent dispersion, nonlinear interaction managements and external potential. Up to now, a general exact solution to the nonautonomous NLS system (1) has been rarely found although the knowledge of such exact solutions is very valuable for various purposes. Certainly, some special exact solutions have been obtained by the Lax par method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21680-ref7">7</xref>], the similarity transformation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21680-ref8">8</xref>] and so on. In the short note, we try to give a general exact solution to the nonautonomous NLS system via a selfsimilarity projective approach (SPA), which can convert all exact solutions of selfsimilar well-known models to corresponding solutions of the nonautonomous NLS system. In the following section, we first briefly describe the projective approach. In Section 3, a general exact solution to the nonautonomous NLS system will be derived via the SPA. A brief summary and discussion is given in the last section.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. A Brief Review on the Projective Approach</title><p>In recent decades, many powerful approaches have been devised, such as inverse scattering theory, B&#228;cklund transformation, Hirota’s bilinear method, Darboux transformation, the hyperbola function method, the mixed exponential method, homogeneous balance method, and multilinear variable separation approach et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21680-ref9">9</xref>]. Besides these methods, one can also obtain solutions of a nonlinear partial differential equations (NLPDEs) by the technical of establishing and making full advantage of a direct projective relation between the given NLPDE and other NLPDE and its known solutions sometimes. For example, using a deformation projective method first presented by Lou and his coworkers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21680-ref10">10</xref>], some scholars [11-13] obtained many soliton solutions and periodic solutions of nonlinear models through finding some relations between the exact solutions of the given models and those of the cubic nonlinear Klein-Gordon (NKG) system which has been studied widely in the previous literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21680-ref10">10</xref>]. The basic idea of the algorithm is as follows: For a general nonlinear physical system</p><disp-formula id="scirp.21680-formula153188"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500746\583b5e9f-7191-4e37-8abd-05ba5d546333.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<img src="9-7500746\8e13932c-35a4-4a6f-95e4-55bcba808711.jpg" />,</p><p><img src="9-7500746\f2a16d5f-be27-434a-9dce-73e6248d8009.jpg" />,</p><p><img src="9-7500746\0ab0e769-3068-4db0-9b12-629ef6b3c0e3.jpg" />are polynomials of <img src="9-7500746\3e0ae88e-7ef0-4550-b50f-3cbad88d2912.jpg" /> and their derivatives, (T indicates the transposition of a matrix). By using a travelling wave transformation based on the following ansatz<img src="9-7500746\6b15b13c-d091-4a46-9f2c-695970c7b0c8.jpg" />, where <img src="9-7500746\9a9c4968-f2c9-4d1e-97cc-78d5e61b5ff0.jpg" /> are real arbitrary constants, and substituting the ansatz into Equation (2) yields an ordinary differential equation system. Then <img src="9-7500746\ee9e2a18-c17c-47f6-a783-ea51a00e4d4a.jpg" /> is expanded into a polynomial in <img src="9-7500746\5bd4715a-5bd0-47e3-85fa-8431c3f20437.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.21680-formula153189"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500746\f44f3a4e-ec0b-4fb7-80b0-4e36c3c6302c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="9-7500746\954d73ce-6d3e-4241-bbab-a84ea1085873.jpg" /> are constants to be determined and N is fixed by balancing the linear term of the highest order with the nonlinear term in Equation (2). If we suppose <img src="9-7500746\f075c220-b8fb-452a-84bc-4b3ba38564e7.jpg" />, <img src="9-7500746\12fd888f-faed-4881-b6e9-c7732d3e71da.jpg" />and <img src="9-7500746\f899c1a1-f4d9-4e94-ad69-a9a56d56bb4d.jpg" /> or <img src="9-7500746\9ad7ca32-b2be-475f-a888-43c97ae50902.jpg" /> respectively, then the corresponding approaches are usually called the tanh-function method, the sech-function method and the Jacobian-function method. Although the Jacobian elliptic function method is more improved than the tanh-function method and the sech-function method, the repeated calculations are often tedious since the different function <img src="9-7500746\bc69e4fb-c7a7-495f-88a3-08a120294b72.jpg" /> should be treated in a repeated way. The idea of deformation projective approach is that, <img src="9-7500746\5d8225f3-1578-42da-8da4-b4cf0a2de8f6.jpg" />is not assumed to be a specific function, such as tanh, sech, sn and cn, etc., but a solution of the projective equation, such as the Riccati equation<img src="9-7500746\1f01df93-bc31-40b0-995a-6a723d3d4e04.jpg" />, (<img src="9-7500746\56ad3eb3-6dcc-41f4-8aac-f4884ef8c838.jpg" />is a constant and the prime denotes differentiation with respect to<img src="9-7500746\74174595-4336-45bd-a54a-65a700b79cc8.jpg" />), the cubic nonlinear KG equation<img src="9-7500746\ff28380b-8261-4695-9343-6bc91ae3a575.jpg" />, (here c, <img src="9-7500746\539e88aa-41ce-4456-b03c-9462a92bf357.jpg" />and <img src="9-7500746\27b1f9e2-5817-4c66-9b49-0ab7fb183668.jpg" /> are all arbitrary constants), or the Jacobian elliptic equation. Using the projective relation (3) and the solutions of the related projective equations, one can obtain many explicit and exact travelling wave solutions of system (2). Along with this line, some scholars further assume that the projective function <img src="9-7500746\05bd6ed6-8cfc-46a6-9d99-df19f10100b3.jpg" /> is an exact excitation of the generalized Jacobian elliptic equation <img src="9-7500746\0fbb5e36-37f8-410d-a682-cdcb1419301f.jpg" />where <img src="9-7500746\c608c39e-e7e0-47f4-99c6-2715f36ac334.jpg" /> are all arbitrary constants. Because the generalized Jacobian elliptic equation possesses more exact solutions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21680-ref14">14</xref>], one may derive more travelling wave solutions of system (2) than previous ones.</p><p>Recently, the above projective transformation approach is further extended for finding novel localized excitations of a physical model [15-17]. With the help of projective transformation idea and based on the general reduction theory, the projective algorithm is extended that: For the system (2) we assume its solution in an extended symmetric form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.21680-formula153190"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500746\57077e64-176a-40d9-bf7c-52367828eea0.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<img src="9-7500746\804cd6d0-b1e0-4fee-a398-88acb89d9dbf.jpg" />, <img src="9-7500746\7cc7de19-9023-4d2a-b345-4a467376c639.jpg" />are arbitrary functions to be determined, <img src="9-7500746\57d43077-c25d-4eb1-851f-affa9e167d43.jpg" />is a solution of the Riccati equation or the generalized Jacobian elliptic equation. N is also determined by balancing the highest nonlinear terms and the highest-order partial terms in the given nonlinear system. Substituting the ansatz (4) together with the related projective equations into Equation (2), collecting coefficients of polynomials of<img src="9-7500746\852643fa-79b1-4e0f-adad-675b3904ee6e.jpg" />, then setting each coefficient to zero, yields a set of partial differential equations concerning <img src="9-7500746\ca7ac593-8ded-4f79-b4fc-4cdbed8cded6.jpg" /> and<img src="9-7500746\2396befb-217f-456b-9d86-7de2e122ddf4.jpg" />. Solving the system of partial differential equations to obtain <img src="9-7500746\85f51365-3600-4fe2-8b30-bb14ec908fd5.jpg" /> and<img src="9-7500746\f4f7ee53-c657-4bb6-b72b-cfd0a84a063f.jpg" />, substituting the derived results and the solutions of the related projective equations into Equation (4), one can derive many exact solutions to the given nonlinear system.</p><p>Motivated by the above ideas, one may assume a selfsimilar family model as the projective equation, which has been extensively studied in other literature [18,19]. For instant, when discussing a nonautonomous Korteweg-de Vries (KdV) system, we may use the classical (1 + 1)- dimensional KdV equation as a projective equation since the autonomous KdV equation has been widely explored. In the following part of the paper, the (1 + 1)-dimensional nonautonomous NLS system is selected to illustrate the selfsimilarity projective approach, and a general exact solution to the nonautonomous NLS system is derived, which can convert all exact solutions of self-similar well-known standard nonlinear Schr&#246;ding equation to the corresponding exact solutions of the nonautonomous NLS system.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. An Exact Projective Solution to the Nonautonomous NLS System</title><p>The standard nonlinear Schr&#246;dinger (NLS) equation can be used as a self-similar projective equation of the nonautonomous NLS system assumed, the dimensionless autonomous NLS form is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.21680-formula153191"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500746\d257bd9d-d5c6-47d9-91c7-b68f95c55faf.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="9-7500746\73981476-d517-4308-8f56-280444a03cf4.jpg" /> are system parameters, <img src="9-7500746\524a1610-ea60-4e1c-b832-5a70bedbdffc.jpg" />is a complex wave function of related system dynamics in physical fields such as BBCs and nonlinear optics. As is known, the nature of NLS equation has been widely explored via different approaches before, and its exact solutions are vast in related literature. For example, when <img src="9-7500746\e8dddd03-b45d-44f0-be7c-9844680af463.jpg" /> and<img src="9-7500746\c0d14a4b-427c-4ddd-8348-69c77e281c5d.jpg" />, the NLS equation possesses a canonical bright soliton solution<img src="9-7500746\c16e5fcc-edcd-47e5-9f1e-941cf6abda4f.jpg" />, while <img src="9-7500746\3fbd7a16-a5d9-491d-abcb-7b6d47d53fa4.jpg" /> and<img src="9-7500746\e0bc23fb-1928-4470-83b9-a49ff288b66f.jpg" />, the NLS equation has a fundamental dark soliton solution</p><p><img src="9-7500746\2fca0f77-41da-49af-a5c4-385bfa8326f3.jpg" />.</p><p>For more detailed information, one may refer to a review in reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21680-ref20">20</xref>]. Actually, in (1 + 1) dimensions, it has been proven when a physical system can be expressed by a partial differential equation, then under some suitable approximations, one can always find nonlinear Schr&#246;dinger type equation [21,22]. This is why the (1 + 1)-dimensional nonlinear Schr&#246;dinger system can be successfully used in almost all the physical branches.</p><p>In order to build a direct projective relation between the nonautonomous NLS system (1) and the standard NLS Equation (5), we construct an ansatz to the nonautonomous NLS system as follows</p><disp-formula id="scirp.21680-formula153192"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500746\4983cd79-5d07-4216-ba90-50c1cd9d8642.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="9-7500746\42c89ead-864c-4c51-8021-80b403504b79.jpg" /> is an exact complex solution to the standard NLS Equation (5), <img src="9-7500746\637dfe77-44bf-4291-852d-00a0541d1188.jpg" />are similarity variables, <img src="9-7500746\917970de-e211-4611-adf1-45f8cbc9d583.jpg" />is a similarity wave phase, and <img src="9-7500746\dd2edd83-b0d0-4e66-b669-be52f684b8e0.jpg" /> is a time-dependent function to modulate the wave amplitude to be determined. The reason for <img src="9-7500746\970a9f71-5b03-4405-a60c-ade10972c1bb.jpg" /> to be factored out of <img src="9-7500746\d1085119-034f-4add-9527-ea8c63100a01.jpg" /> in format (6) is the existence of the coefficients functions of time t in Equation (1). All the parameters all real differential functions, and should be well chosen to avoid some singularity of the complex wave function<img src="9-7500746\fea2e3fa-40aa-40c4-8a6c-0640c8f92c30.jpg" />. Substituting Equation (6) together with Equation (5) into the nonautonomous NLS system (1), collecting coefficients of polynomials of <img src="9-7500746\bae5b3f8-4b17-47cf-b6e5-722e65f762b5.jpg" /> and its derivatives, then setting each coefficient to zero, yields a set of partial differential equations</p><disp-formula id="scirp.21680-formula153193"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500746\b07d03e3-961f-4b6f-a69f-fbcb515ed902.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.21680-formula153194"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500746\9f0c61b7-6b79-4f39-98ad-66f3e9e2bbbc.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.21680-formula153195"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500746\9ad7a18b-7e73-4f64-8512-06aaf5933ecc.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.21680-formula153196"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500746\e4378afe-dc6d-40c1-ac34-90fe9bb94cf2.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.21680-formula153197"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500746\2938cbfa-32fb-4ab8-9cf9-cc400e0d6a25.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.21680-formula153198"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500746\5674f2ae-c0d5-4ad7-9f17-53fecc441c5b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>After some careful and direct algebra, one can obtains the amplitude, self-similarity variables and phase of the complex wave pulse</p><disp-formula id="scirp.21680-formula153199"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500746\79f4e02f-9476-44dc-9f05-8b3bab3e90fd.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.21680-formula153200"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500746\dd4b7645-77b2-4130-8d6d-e001fc1705c1.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.21680-formula153201"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500746\99e03370-4879-479a-88cb-3a6f6232e2bc.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.21680-formula153202"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500746\aee2b072-3e5d-480d-9ceb-b1e6431be342.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="9-7500746\771be7af-cb2b-4b2f-b8b8-4edc4d4399eb.jpg" /> are integrable constants, <img src="9-7500746\abb24854-c4cf-4432-9d9c-971a5875d75a.jpg" />is defined by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.21680-formula153203"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500746\9410b9e8-fc1c-456e-8c78-ef6a451ad2a3.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and with a constraint condition</p><disp-formula id="scirp.21680-formula153204"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500746\92b800c1-57ef-46d9-8cea-886c0ee542f0.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>It is interesting to note that when the net gain coefficient<img src="9-7500746\d3c2203f-9977-40b6-89f4-326ab7dce2d3.jpg" />, the constraint condition (18) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.21680-formula153205"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500746\708cda1f-071d-440d-86a3-741f14f9433d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which is just the completely integrable compatibility condition via the Painlev&#233; analysis [4,7], i.e., a subtle balance condition to keep the nonautonomous NLS system integrable.</p><p>From the management viewpoint of the solitons, Equation (18) provides an effectively way to manipulate soliton dynamics. When any three parameters among <img src="9-7500746\2cf1a499-5099-4aee-bbe3-e0d47ac35525.jpg" /> and <img src="9-7500746\68d4a4a2-86ff-4f5e-bd74-a7a0261b49ae.jpg" /> are set, the remaining one can be tuned correspondingly via Eqaution (18) to control the coherent dynamics of solitons. Actually, some special applications of equation (18) have been explored in reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21680-ref7">7</xref>]. However, the general selfsimilarity projective transformations (13)-(16) were not reported in the previous literature. Such transformations are quite systematic in obtaining the exact solutions of the nonautonomous NLS system. For a given nonautonomous NLS system or its similar versions, we first check if the coefficients satisfy the constrain condition Equation (18). If it is true, then the nonautonomous NLS system can be reduced to the standard NLS Equation (5). All allowed exact solutions, including canonical solitons, of the standard NLS Equation (5) can be converted into the corresponding exact solutions of the nonautonomous NLS system. In the sense, the canonical soliton of the standard NLS equation can be naturally viewed as a seed solution of the corresponding localized solutions of Equation (1) under the compatibility condition Equation (18). For example, when <img src="9-7500746\e2964cf8-cf8f-4e7c-8912-c3640d2cf799.jpg" /> and<img src="9-7500746\fd97f9da-afce-489d-ad13-4e0c2e47b2c9.jpg" />, a simple exact solution of the NLS Equation (5) is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.21680-formula153206"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500746\599d26dd-71dc-473b-b5a7-30261dd30c14.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.21680-formula153207"><label>(21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500746\0e08df63-25d2-455f-aa70-a01194dbd87b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and <img src="9-7500746\83bd6749-0619-4823-b580-ab1fa67abf3f.jpg" /> are arbitrary constants, dn(&#183;, m) denotes the dn type Jacobian elliptic function with <img src="9-7500746\68817958-fcf7-414e-8b55-80cba19a2f5a.jpg" /> being its modulus. This leads to the following family of double periodic wave solutions to the nonautonomous NLS system (1)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.21680-formula153208"><label>(22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500746\194316ce-17ca-4e48-a4dd-623649dedecf.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.21680-formula153209"><label>(23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500746\e56fb011-2498-4e7e-b333-03e25ff0ce7f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.21680-formula153210"><label>(24)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500746\7e47f92a-fb98-4cf4-8b79-1d6d5368eba5.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and the integrable constants <img src="9-7500746\de56d26c-addc-4220-a327-508c6166310b.jpg" /> in Equations (13)-(16) are set to be zero for simplicity. In the limit case<img src="9-7500746\5295663a-c513-4aad-909a-816b7d1ba70b.jpg" />, the above double periodic wave solution (22) will be reduced to a solitary wave solution</p><disp-formula id="scirp.21680-formula153211"><label>(25)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500746\e0bb27f0-138c-40a6-81b2-6c4e75918297.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with the constraint condition (18). As a special case, if <img src="9-7500746\86a129fe-10fb-4a6b-9de1-6c64bcd6ae97.jpg" /> and<img src="9-7500746\f0827720-19f0-45d2-8cc8-898d5773c738.jpg" />, the constrain condition (18) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.21680-formula153212"><label>(26)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500746\bfead277-8aa2-4e81-8098-3db49a62bd9a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="9-7500746\84f66c5e-1834-4558-b90e-39b44d350c4a.jpg" /> is a integrable constant, then the above corresponding exact solutions read</p><disp-formula id="scirp.21680-formula153213"><label>(27)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500746\c7e2663a-dbcf-4b51-b262-4ff11ee409ca.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.21680-formula153214"><label>(28)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500746\bf3a7e00-0684-4ccc-aa52-8a51d3483a06.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.21680-formula153215"><label>(29)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500746\3a14d0ea-bbaf-4bc4-9c15-496815b6198b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with</p><disp-formula id="scirp.21680-formula153216"><label>(30)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500746\1dbb69a9-3497-4604-aef0-a358f4b3ad9d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Once the nonlinear parameter <img src="9-7500746\199028d4-c146-40d3-8b78-dc22465d9934.jpg" /> is explicitly given, then all the exact solutions and their related dynamic behaviors of the nonautonomous NLS system are correspondingly determined. For integrality and readability, some remarks are given as follows:</p><p>Firstly, as a special situation, if<img src="9-7500746\2184bc02-8b72-46af-b6f3-1fe45b2e70c6.jpg" />, <img src="9-7500746\74bffbb9-5d54-4f8c-a1bc-b7a61db48cac.jpg" />and<img src="9-7500746\5aface83-946f-44e7-9158-2a56df244de2.jpg" />, i.e., <img src="9-7500746\d2637482-1a97-48b0-ad09-3275e6e8698b.jpg" />in Equation (26), the nonautonomous NLS system (1) has the canonical soliton solutions regardless of the explicit form of the timedependent nonlinearity and dispersion. This is because in this case the the constraint condition is identified and the scale factor <img src="9-7500746\bad36590-f1c1-46f2-8e4a-fd2680569f78.jpg" /> is a constant<img src="9-7500746\161bfade-071a-437f-a506-98a2428a1d41.jpg" />. In this sense the soliton solution of Equation (1) is a fundamental canonical soliton. While<img src="9-7500746\1e8ba48e-aad9-4492-a091-82109a602d93.jpg" />, i.e., <img src="9-7500746\8cf51e8b-424f-48db-8624-13979e682790.jpg" />in Equation (26), the original balance between nonlinearity and dispersion is broken down. In the case the canonical soliton must deform itself to build new balance between nonlinearity and dispersion, and the soliton-like solution of Equation (1) is a deformed canonical soliton or a similariton due to the amplitude of the soliton scaled by the factor<img src="9-7500746\bcec8e07-648b-4a04-bd0e-fcdbd9aef958.jpg" />. And it actually means that if <img src="9-7500746\7ef2fd4d-154a-41ce-a093-33654b360bc1.jpg" /> and<img src="9-7500746\dc807ed1-9e84-4e8c-a3ad-8915ac6e5c50.jpg" />, the exact solitons of the nonautonomous NLS system (1) are quasi-canonical or deformed solitons depending on if <img src="9-7500746\3299d564-a884-4d84-ba87-08121d559e3f.jpg" /> is equal to <img src="9-7500746\05182efb-ee10-4c0a-831f-1d278d183883.jpg" /> or not as mentioned above.</p><p>Secondly, for more general cases, if <img src="9-7500746\0ae86a02-752b-41c8-b00b-28431bfc501b.jpg" /> and<img src="9-7500746\ccac25df-c91d-404e-8baf-fe7f6b33f09a.jpg" />, the constraint condition (18) indicates that<img src="9-7500746\8d631983-4dff-48ab-ac06-e753aa2665bc.jpg" />, which means the amplitude of the soliton must vary with factor<img src="9-7500746\3f977642-14f2-4927-bd03-a90d4750b28e.jpg" />. This leads to an important and a novel phenomenon that there does not exist the canonical and even quasi-canonical matter-wave solitons under the constraint condition (18). However, when we set<img src="9-7500746\14df57db-d9ab-47ca-a7a2-e67ed245b12c.jpg" />, (<img src="9-7500746\52ebb438-23f8-4fa9-969c-a0fc28c2aaac.jpg" />is an arbitrary constant), i.e., <img src="9-7500746\9c714eac-6c46-4a0d-92a4-69e546355fce.jpg" />,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.21680-formula153217"><label>(31)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500746\5dd71298-61a8-4b27-9d15-7f2de558f12b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and <img src="9-7500746\1d18368c-5180-4163-a6a1-640915240af4.jpg" /> is tuned by the constraint condition (18) as follows</p><disp-formula id="scirp.21680-formula153218"><label>(32)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500746\b72ba3ef-1138-44cf-af2d-849a2f8721fb.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>then we can rederive fundamental canonical solitons, which distinctly indicates the influence of the dispersion, nonlinear managements and net gain to the localized excitation behaviors.</p><p>Finally, it is also interesting to mention that the external trap potential <img src="9-7500746\8c23d777-f437-4d91-8b1b-a37d846cdefe.jpg" /> is absent in the selfsimilarity projective transformations (13)-(16). However, the presence of the potential affects the balance between nonlinearity, dispersion and net gain via the constraint condition (18), and builds a deep relation between the optical solitons and the matter-waves.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Summary and Discussion</title><p>In summary, the direct self-similarity projective approach is successfully applied to the nonautonomous nonlinear Schr&#246;dinger system. In terms of the known exact solutions of the self-similarity projective equation, i.e., the standard nonlinear Schr&#246;ding equation, some significant types of localized excitations with novel properties are correspondingly revealed by entrancing appropriate system parameters. The present analysis can be applied to all exact solutions of the nonautonomous nonlinear Schr&#246;dinger system. The self-similarity projective approach provides an effective and a systematical way to investigate the nonlinear dynamics of the nonautonomous nonlinear Schr&#246;dinger system. By the way, as a comparison it is helpful to mention some techniques to find the localized excitation solutions of the nonautonomous NLS equation in previous literature. The Lax pair analysis is very useful in discussing integrability conditions. And a widely used approach is the deformation projective method, which introduces some explicit transformation parameters. These parameters are determined by a set of partial differential equations, which in general case are little solved analytically as emphasized in reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21680-ref23">23</xref>]. Another similarity transformation reducing the nonautonomous nonlinear Schr&#246;dinger equation to a stationary NLS one has also been introduced [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21680-ref24">24</xref>]. Alternatively, by the Lie point symmetry group analysis, the nonautonomous nonlinear Schr&#246;dinger system or its similar versions can be classified into different classes and each one can be converted into the corresponding representative equation by some allowed transformations. As a result, some exact solutions of the representative equation can be transformed into the corresponding solutions of the equations in the same class. However, it was also pointed out in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.21680-ref25">25</xref>] that in most cases it is still difficult to obtain the exact solutions of these representative equations and the integrability of certain representative equations is not clear. Quite different from the above mentioned techniques, the present work builds a direct connection between the nonautonomous NLS equation and its autonomous counterpart, which provides a more systematical way to find exact solutions of the nonautonomous NLS equation. The corresponding transformation formulas are explicit and straightforward. Furthermore, one can naturally derive the integrable constrain condition (18) via the SPA rather than some integrable conditions via Painlev&#233; analysis first in previous discussions. From the control viewpoint, the self-similarity projective approach provides an effective and a powerful way to control the soliton dynamics as mentioned above. In addition, the SPA that we use to solve the nonautonomous nonlinear Schr&#246;dinger system will pave the way to new methods for solving high-dimensional partial differential equations.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors are in debt to Professors Y. M. Liu and J. F. Zhang, Doctors C. Q. Dai and T. T. Jia for their fruitful discussions. The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No.11172181, the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province of China under Grant No. 101512005- 01000008, the Special Foundation of Talent Engineering of Guangdong Province of China, and the Scientific Research Foundation of Key Discipline of Guangdong Shaoguan University.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.21680-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. E. Strecker, G. B. Partridge, A. G. Truscott and R. G. Hulet, “Formation and Propagation of Matter-Wave Soli- ton Trains,” Nature, Vol. 417, 2002, pp. 150-153. doi:10.1038/nature747</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21680-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. F. Mollenauer, R. H. Stolen and J. P. Gordon, “Experimental Observation of Picosecond Pulse Narrowing and Solitons in Optical Fibers,” Physics Review Letter, Vol. 45, No. 13, 1980, pp. 1095-1098.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.1095</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21680-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. Q. Dai, X. G. Wang and J. F. Zhang, “Nonautonomous Spatiotemporal Localized Structures in the Inhomogene- ous Optical Fibers: Interaction and Control,” Annals of Physics, Vol. 326, No. 3, 2011, pp. 645-656. doi:10.1016/j.aop.2010.11.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21680-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. Zhao, X. G. He and H. G. Luo, “Transformation from the Nonautonomous to Standard NLS Equations,” Physics and Astronomy, Vol. 53, No. 2, 2009, pp. 213-216. doi:10.1140/epjd/e2009-00051-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21680-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">I. Towers and B. A. Malomed, “Stable (2+1)-Dimen- sional Solitons in a Layered Medium with Sign-Alter- nating Kerr Nonlinearity,” Journal of the Optical Society of America B, Vol. 19, 2002, pp. 537-543.  
doi:10.1364/JOSAB.19.000537</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21680-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. Gao and S. Y. Lou, “Analytical Solitary Wave Solutions to a (3+1)-Dimensional Gross-Pitaevskii Equation with Variable Coefficients,” Communications in Theore- tical Physics, Vol. 52, 2009, pp. 1030-1035.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21680-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. N. Serkin, A. Hasegawa and T. L. Belyaeva, “No- nautonomous Solitons in External Potentials,” Physics Review Letter, Vol. 98, No. 7, 2007, Article ID: 074102. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.074102</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21680-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. A. Ponomarenko and G. P. Agrawal, “Do Solitonlike Self-Similar Waves Exist in Nonlinear Optical Media?” Physics Review Letter, Vol. 97, No. 1, 2006, Article ID: 013901. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.013901</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21680-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Y. Lou, H. C. Hu and X. Y. Tang, “Interactions among Periodic Waves and Solitary Waves of the (N+1)-Di- mensional Sine-Gordon Field,” Physics Review E, Vol. 71, No. 3, 2005, Article ID: 036604.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.71.036604</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21680-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Y. Lou and G. J. Ni, “The Relations among a Special Type of Solutions in Some (D+1)-Dimensional Nonlinear Equations,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, Vol. 30, No. 7, 1989, pp. 1614-1620. doi:10.1063/1.528294</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21680-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. M. Li, “Searching for (3+1)-Dimensional Painlevé Integrable Model and Its Solitary Wave Solution,” Chi- nese Physics Letters, Vol. 19, No. 6, 2002, pp. 745-747. doi:10.1088/0256-307X/19/6/301</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21680-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. L. Zheng, H. P. Zhu and L. Q. Chen, “Exact Solution and Semifolded Structures of Generalized BroerKaup System in (2+1)-Dimensions,” Chaos, Solitons &amp; Fractals, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2004, pp. 181-194.  
doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2004.12.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21680-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sirendaoreji and S. Jiong, “Auxiliary Equation Method for Solving Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations,” Physics Letters A, Vol. 309, No. 5-6, 2003, pp. 387-396. doi:10.1016/S0375-9601(03)00196-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21680-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. G. Fan, “An Algebraic Method for Finding a Series of Exact Solutions to Integrable and Nonintegrable Nonlinear Evolution Equations,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, Vol. 36, No. 25, 2003, p. 7009. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/36/25/308</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21680-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. L. Zheng and L. Q. Chen, “Some Novel Evolutional Behaviors of Localized Excitations in the Boiti-Leon- Martina-Pempinelli System,” International Journal of Modern Physics B, Vol. 22, No. 6, 2008, pp. 671-682. doi:10.1142/S0217979208038879</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21680-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Y. Wu, J. X. Fei and C. L. Zheng, “Self-Similar Solutions of Variable-Coefficient Cubic-Quintic Nonlinear Schr?dinger Equation with an External Potential,” Communications in Theoretical Physics, Vol. 54, 2010, pp. 55-59.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21680-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. X. Fei and C. L. Zheng, “Chirped Self-Similar Solutions of a Generalized Nonlinear Schr?dinger Equation,” Verlag der Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, Vol. 66, 2011, pp. 1-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21680-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. Q. Dai, Y. Y. Wang and X. G. Wang, “Ultrashort Self-Similar Solutions of the Cubic-Quintic Nonlinear Schr?dinger Equation with Distributed Coefficients in the Inhomogeneous Fiber,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, Vol. 44, No. 15, 2011, Article ID: 155203. doi:10.1088/1751-8113/44/15/155203</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21680-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. Q. Dai, R. P. Chen and G. Q. Zhou, “Spatial Solitons with the Odd and Even Symmetries in (2+1)-Dimensional Spatially Inhomogeneous Cubic-Quintic Nonlinear Media with Transverse W-Shaped Modulation,” Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, Vol. 44, No. 14, 2011, Article ID: 145401. doi:10.1088/0953-4075/44/14/145401</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21680-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. Sulem and P. L. Sulem, “The Nonlinear Schr?dinger Equation: Self-focusing and Wave Collapse,” Springer- Verlag, New York, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21680-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. Calogero, A. Degasperis and J. Xiaoda, “Nonlinear Schr?dinger-Type Equations from Multiscale Reduction of PDEs. I. Systematic Derivation,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, Vol. 41, No. 9, 2000, p. 6399. doi:10.1063/1.1287644</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21680-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. Calogero and A. Degasperis, “Nonlinear Schr?dinger- type Equations from Multiscale Reduction of PDEs. II. Necessary Conditions of Integrability for Real PDEs,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, Vol. 42, No. 6, 2001, pp. 2635-2652. doi:10.1063/1.1366296</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21680-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. He and Y. Li, “Designable Integrability of the Variable Coefficient Nonlinear Schr?dinger Equations,” Studies in Applied Mathematics, Vol. 126, No. 1, 2011, pp. 1-15. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9590.2010.00495.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21680-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. B. Beitia, V. M. Perez-Garcia and V. Brazhnyib, “Solitary Waves in Coupled Nonlinear Schr?dinger Equations with Spatially Inhomogeneous Nonlinearities,” Commu- nications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2011, Article ID: 158172. doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2010.02.024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.21680-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. Gagnon and P. Winternitz, “Symmetry Classes of Variable Coefficient Nonlinear Schr?dinger Equations,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, Vol. 26, No. 23, 1993, p. 7061. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/26/23/043</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>