<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ACES</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-0392</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/aces.2012.23037</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ACES-20817</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Enhanced Electrochemical Properties of LiFePO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; as Positive Electrode of Li-Ion Batteries for HEV Application
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>hristian</surname><given-names>M. Julien</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Karim</surname><given-names>Zaghib</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alain</surname><given-names>Mauger</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Henri</surname><given-names>Groult</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Institut de Recherche d’Hydro-Québec, Varennes, Canada</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Physicochimie des Electrolytes, Collo?des et Systèmes Analytiques, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Institut de Minéralogie et Physique de la Matière Condensée, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>christian.julien@upmc.fr(HMJ)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>24</day><month>07</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><volume>02</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>321</fpage><lpage>329</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>August</day>	<month>3,</month>	<year>2011</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>February</day>	<month>29,</month>	<year>2012</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>March</day>	<month>9,</month>	<year>2012</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  LiFePO
  <sub>4</sub> materials synthesized using FePO
  <sub>4</sub>(H
  <sub>2</sub>O)
  <sub>2</sub> and Li
  <sub>2</sub>CO
  <sub>3</sub> blend were optimized in view of their use as positive electrodes in Li-ion batteries for hybrid electric vehicles. A strict control of the structural properties was made by the combination of X-ray diffraction, FT-infrared spectroscopy and magnetometry. The impact of the ferromagnetic clus-ters (γ-Fe
  <sub>2</sub>O
  <sub>3</sub> or Fe
  <sub>2</sub>P) on the electrochemical response was examined. The electrochemical performances of the opti-mized LiFePO
  <sub>4</sub> powders investigated at 60℃ are excellent in terms of capacity retention (153 mAh&#183;g
  <sup>-1</sup> at 2C) as well as in terms of cycling life. No iron dissolution was observed after 200 charge-discharge cycles at 60℃ for cells containing Li foil, Li
  <sub>4</sub>Ti
  <sub>5</sub>O
  <sub>12</sub>, or graphite as negative electrodes.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Olivine; Nanostructured Compounds; Local Structure; Magnetometry; Lithium-Ion Batteries</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Since the introduction of lithium-ion batteries based on lithium cobaltate (LiCoO<sub>2</sub>) by Sony in 1991, great efforts have been addressed to find an alternative material with both sides of the battery. However, the expansion of their applications from the portable market to the electric (EVs) and hybrid vehicles (HEVs) requests lower cost and better safety characteristic electrode material. Among the well-known Li-insertion compounds, the olivine LiFePO<sub>4</sub> (LFP) compound is being extensively investigated as a positive electrode material for Li-ion batteries because of its low cost, low toxicity, and relatively high theoretical specific capacity of 170 mAh&#183;g<sup>–</sup><sup>1</sup> [1,2]. The current debate for the utilization of LiFePO<sub>4</sub> in large-size batteries (for HEV, for instance), is mainly focused on the perceived poor rate capability because of a low electronic conductivity. Another aspect concerns the material purity and the non-migration of iron ions through the electrolyte. The high-temperature performance is also a critical issue because batteries may be operated at elevated temperatures (around 60˚C). The early drawback of highly resistive LiFePO<sub>4</sub> has been resolved by painting the particle surface with carbon [3-6].</p><p>Recently, significant effort has been underway to improve LiFePO<sub>4</sub> by developing a new synthesis route via carbon coating [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.20817-ref7">7</xref>]. The 1D Li channels make the olivine performance sensitive not only to particle size, but also to impurities and stacking faults that block the channels. Various types of iron-based impurities have been identified in the olivine framework: for examples γ-Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>, Li<sub>3</sub>Fe<sub>2</sub>(PO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>3</sub>, Fe<sub>2</sub>P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>7</sub>, Fe<sub>2</sub>P, Fe<sub>3</sub>P, Fe<sub>75</sub>P<sub>15</sub>C<sub>10</sub>, etc. Critical quality control of the product is necessary to obtain a complete understanding of synthesis conditions using combination of experiments such as Raman spectroscopy and magnetic measurements [8-12].</p><p>In this paper, we report the results obtained on several samples of LiFePO<sub>4</sub> (LFP) with special attention to the new generation of phospho-olivine materials used in lithium cells operating at 60˚C. The magnetic properties are correlated with the electrochemical performance of the positive electrode materials. Magnetization and susceptibility measurements appear to be a powerful probes for impurity detection at very low concentration of trivalent iron (&lt;1 ppm). Electrochemical performances of Liion cells with Li<sub>4</sub>Ti<sub>5</sub>O<sub>12</sub> (LTO) negative electrode are reported with a strict control of iron dissolution by postmortem analysis.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental</title><p>The optimized LiFePO<sub>4</sub> material was synthesized by solidstate reaction. Samples were prepared from FePO<sub>4</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub> and Li<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>. A stoichiometric amount of precursors was thoroughly mixed together in isopanol. After drying, the blend was heated at 500˚C - 800˚C for 8 h under reducing atmosphere. Four samples have been considered heated at carbon-coated LiFePO<sub>4</sub> (C-LFP) was prepared with sucrose and cellulose acetate as the carbon precursors in acetone solution according to the following procedure. The carbon-free powder was mixed with the carbon precursors. The dry additive corresponded to 5 wt% carbon in LiFePO<sub>4</sub>. After drying, the blend was heated at 700˚C for 4 h under argon atmosphere. The quantity of carbon coat represents about 1 wt% of the material (C-detector, LECO Co., CS 444). It should be noted that the choice of this moderate sintering temperature minimizes the amount of Fe<sup>3+</sup> ions present in the powder since the presence of Fe<sup>3+</sup> has been detected by M&#246;ssbauer experiments at sintering temperatures below 500˚C, and both trivalent Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and Li<sub>3</sub>Fe<sub>2</sub>(PO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>3</sub> are formed in such large quantities that they are detected by X-rays by sintering above 800˚C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.20817-ref13">13</xref>]. Nevertheless, we know from our prior work [10,11] that LiFePO<sub>4</sub>, even with an intermediate sintering temperature in the range 500˚C - 800˚C, does contain Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> nanoparticles, although in such small quantities that they can be detected only by investigation of magnetic properties.</p><p>X-ray diffractometry (XRD) was carried out with a Philips X’Pert apparatus equipped with a CuKα X-ray source (λ = 1.5406 &#197;). Slice views were examined with a scanning electron microscope (SEM, Philips XL30). Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) absorption spectra were recorded with a Fourier transform interferometer (model Bruker IFS113v) in the wavenumber range 150 - 1400 cm<sup>–</sup><sup>1</sup> at a spectral resolution of 2 cm<sup>–</sup><sup>1</sup>. Magnetic measurements (susceptibility and magnetization) were carried out with a fully automated magnetometer (MPMS-5S from Quantum Design) using an ultra-sensitive Superconducting Quantum Interference Device (SQUID) in the temperature range 4 - 300 K. The experimental details are given elsewhere [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.20817-ref11">11</xref>]. The electrochemical properties of LiFePO<sub>4</sub> were measured at 60˚C in cells with metallic lithium as the negative electrode. The electrolyte was 1 M LiPF<sub>6</sub> in EC/DEC (1/1) solvent. The measurements were carried out following the experimental procedure previously described [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.20817-ref14">14</xref>] using the coffee-bag technology developed at Hydro-Qu&#233;bec. Coffee-bag or laminated battery technology was described by Zaghib and Armand [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.20817-ref15">15</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Structure and Morphology of LiFePO4</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows the typical XRD patterns of the LiFePO<sub>4</sub> electrode material. The XRD pattern of sample synthesized from the mixture FePO<sub>4</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub> + Li<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> agrees very well with that of phospho-olivine LiFePO<sub>4</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.20817-ref16">16</xref>] and no impurity was detected. The XRD diagram of the new</p></sec></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.20817-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. K. Padhi, K. S. Nanjundaswamy and J. B. Goodenough, “Phospho-Olivines as Positive-Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, Vol. 144, No. 4, 1997, pp. 1188-1194. doi:10.1149/1.1837571</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20817-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">N. Ravet, Y. Chouinard, J. F. Magnan, S. Besner, M. Gauthier and M. Armand, “Electroactivity of Natural and Synthetic Triphylite,” Journal of Power Sources, Vol. 97-98, 2001, pp. 503-507.  
doi:10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00727-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20817-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">N. Ravet, A. Abouimrane and M. Armand, “From Our Readers: On the Electronic Conductivity of Phospho-Olivines as Lithium Storage Electrodes,” Nature Materials, Vol. 2, 2003, pp. 702-703. doi:10.1038/nmat1009b</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20817-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">N. Ravet, S. Besner, M. Simoneau, A. Vallee, M. Armand and J. F. Magnan, “Electrode materials with high surface conductivity,” US Patent No. 6962666, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20817-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. Hu, M. M. Doeff, R. Kostecki and R. Finones, “Electrochemical Performance of Sol-Gel Synthesized LiFePO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; in Lithium Batteries,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, Vol. 151, No. 8, 2004, pp. A1279-A1285.  
doi:10.1149/1.1768546</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20817-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. L. Bewlay, K. Konstantinov, G. X. Wang, S. X. Dou and H. K. Liu, “Conductivity Improvements to Spray-Produced LiFePO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; by Addition of a Carbon Source,” Materials Letters, Vol. 58, No. 11, 2004, pp. 1788-1791. 
doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2003.11.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20817-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Zaghib, V. Battaglia, P. Charest, V. Srinivasan, A. Guerfi and R. Kostecki, Extended Abstract of the International Battery Association &amp; Hawaii Battery Conference, Wailoloa, 9-12 January 2006.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20817-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. A. Salah, P. Jozwiak, J. Garbarczyk, F. Gendron, A. Mauger and C. M. Julien, “FTIR Features of Lithium Iron Phosphates Used as Positive Electrodes in Rechargeable Lithium Batteries,” 207th ESC Meeting, Quebec City, 15-20 May 2005. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20817-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. M. Doeff, Y. Hu, F. McLarnon and R. Kostecki, “Effect of Surface Carbon Structure on the Electrochemical Performance of LiFePO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;,” Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, Vol. 6, No. 10, 2003, pp. A207-A209. 
doi:10.1149/1.1601372</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20817-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Ait-Salah, A. Mauger, F. Gendron and C. M. Julien, “Magnetic Studies of the Carbothermal Effect on LiFePO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;,” Physica Status Solidi (a), Vol. 203, No. 1, 2006, pp. R1-R3.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20817-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Ait-Salah, A. Mauger, C. M. Julien and F. Gendron, “Nano-Sized Impurity Phases in Relation to the Mode of Preparation of LiFePO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;,” Materials Science and Engineering: B, Vol. 129, No. 1-3, 2006, pp. 232-244. 
doi:10.1016/j.mseb.2006.01.022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20817-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Ait-Salah, A. Mauger, K. Zaghib, J. B. Goodenough, N. Ravet, M. Gauthier, F. Gendron and C. M. Julien, “Reduction Fe&lt;sup&gt;3+&lt;/sup&gt; of Impurities in LiFePO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; from Pyrolysis of Organic Precursor Used for Carbon Deposition,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, Vol. 153, No. 9, 2006, pp. A1692-A1701. doi:10.1149/1.2213527</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20817-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Yamada, S. C. Chung and K. Hinokuma, “Optimized LiFePO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; for Lithium Battery Cathodes,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, Vol. 148, No. 3, 2001, pp. A224-A229. doi:10.1149/1.1348257</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20817-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Zaghib, J. Shim, A. Guerfi, P. Charest and K. A. Striebel, “Effect of Carbon Source as Additives in LiFePO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; as Positive Electrode for Lithium-Ion Batteries,” Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2005, pp. A207-A210. doi:10.1149/1.1865652</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20817-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Zaghib and M. Armand, “Electrode Covered with a Film Obtained from an Aqueous Solution Containing a Water Soluble Inder, Manufacturing Process and Usesthereof,” Canadian Patent No. CA 2411695, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20817-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Striebel, J. Shim, V. Srinivasan and J. Newman, “Comparison of LiFePO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; from Different Sources,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, Vol. 152, No. 4, 2005, pp. A664-A670. doi:10.1149/1.1862477</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20817-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Ait-Salah, P. Jozwiak, J. Garbarczyk, K. Benkhouja, K. Zaghib, F. Gendron and C. M. Julien, “Local Structure and Redox Energies of Lithium Phosphates with Olivine- and Nasicon-Like Structures,” Journal of Power Sources, Vol. 140, No. 2, 2005, pp. 370-375. 
doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.08.029</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20817-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Bacewicz, P. Woroniecki and J. Garbarczyk, “Raman Scattering in AgI-Ag&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;O-P&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; Glasses,” Physics and Chemistry of Glasses, Vol. 40, No. 3, 1999, pp. 175-176.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20817-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Adamczyk, M. Handke and W. Mozgawa, “FTIR Studies of BPO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;2SiO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;, BPO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;SiO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; and 2BPO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;SiO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; Joints in Amorphous and Crystalline Forms,” Journal of Molecular Structure, Vol. 511-512, 1999, pp. 141-144. doi:10.1016/S0022-2860(99)00152-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20817-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. P. Santoro and R. E. Newnham, “Antiferromagnetism in LiFePO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;,” Acta Crystallographica, Vol. 22, 1967, pp. 344-347. doi:10.1107/S0365110X67000672</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20817-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. Arnold, J. Garche, R. Hemmer, S. Strobele, C. Vogler and M. Wohlfahrt-Mehrens, “Fine-Particle Lithium Iron Phosphate LiFePO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; Synthesized by a New Low-Cost Aqueous Precipitation Technique,” Journal of Power Sources, Vol. 119-121, 2003, pp. 247-251. 
doi:10.1016/S0378-7753(03)00241-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20817-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. M. Julien, K. Zaghib, A. Mauger, M. Massot, A. Ait-Salah, M. Selmane and F. Gendron, “Characterization of the Carbon Coating onto LiFePO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; Particles Used in Lithium Batteries,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 100, No. 6, 2006, Article ID: 063511. doi:10.1063/1.2337556</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20817-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. H. Yu, C. K. Park, H. Jang, C. B. Shin and W. II Cho, “Prediction of Lithium Diffusion Coefficient and Rate Performance by Using the Discharge Curves of LiFePO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; Materials,” Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2011, pp. 852-856.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20817-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Zaghib, P. Charest, M. Dontigny, A. Guerfi, M. Petitclerc and M. Duchesne, “Olivines: 10 Years R &amp; D at Hydro-Québec in Li-Ion Batteries,” Rechargeable Lithium and Lithium Ion Batteries Battery/Energy Technology, Washington DC, 7-12 October 2007, Abstract No. 637.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>