<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJI</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Immunology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2162-450X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oji.2012.22009</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJI-20128</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  α&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;-macroglobulin co-administered &lt;i&gt;in vivo&lt;/i&gt; promotes antigen delivery and presentation
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>dith</surname><given-names>V. Bowers</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jennifer</surname><given-names>E. Bond</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>George</surname><given-names>J. Cianciolo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Salvatore</surname><given-names>V. Pizzo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, USA</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>Pizzo001@mc.duke.edu(SVP)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>22</day><month>06</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><volume>02</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>72</fpage><lpage>77</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>10</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2012</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>1</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2012</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>9</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2012</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Administered in vivo, covalent receptor-recognized α
  <sub>2</sub>-macroglobulin (α
  <sub>2</sub>M
  <sup>*</sup>)-antigen complexes enhance humoral and cell-mediated immunity. We hypothesized that 
  in vivo α
  <sub>2</sub>M
  <sup>*</sup>-encapsulation could be promoted in the setting of vaccines that co-deliver α
  <sub>2</sub>M
  <sup>*</sup> with unbound antigen, thereby eliminating the need to prepare complexes in vitro. Mice immunized intradermally with co-delivered α
  <sub>2</sub>M
  <sup>*</sup> and OVA demonstrated antigen-specific immune responses, including anti-tumor responses, similar to those elicited by conjugated α
  <sub>2</sub>M
  <sup>*</sup>-OVA complexes. Enhanced immunity appears to result from in vivo α
  <sub>2</sub>M
  <sup>*</sup>-encapsulation of antigen. This finding represents a significant advancement in the development of α
  <sub>2</sub>M
  <sup>*</sup> as an antigen delivery vehicle capable of enhancing the presentation of subunit vaccines.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>α&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;-Macroglobulin-Antigen Complexes; Antigen Presentation/Processing; Vaccination; Cytokines; Spleen</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. INTRODUCTION</title><p>Previous studies have demonstrated that antigen encapsulation by α<sub>2</sub>-macroglobulin (α<sub>2</sub>M)<sup>1</sup> enhances antigen-specific immune responses, both in vitro and in vivo [1-7 ]. For these studies, α<sub>2</sub>M-encapsulated antigen complexes were typically prepared by in vitro incubation of amine-activated α<sub>2</sub>M, designated α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>, with an 8 to 100-fold-molar excess of antigen in the presence of heat [3,4,7 ]. These α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>-antigen complexes were then purified by size-exclusion chromatography to remove unbound antigen. While producing α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>-antigen complexes is not extremely difficult on a small scale, it would be more challenging to produce the complexes and perform the necessary quality control on an industrial scale.</p><p>While the maximal incorporation of antigen into α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> occurs following 24 h of incubation at 37˚C, some incorporation of antigen occurs at much earlier time periods [8,9]. It is thought that α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>-encapsulation occurs naturally in vivo as a mechanism of targeting antigen for uptake, processing, and presentation by professional antigen presenting cells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.20128-ref1">1</xref>]. It, however, is unknown whether in vivo α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>-encapsulation could be promoted in the setting of a vaccine that co-delivers α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> with unbound antigen. A high local concentration of antigen may be necessary to drive incorporation into α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>. Because most routes of injection result in rapid dissipation of antigen, conditions that result in a depot effect, for example intradermal injection and alum absorption, should promote α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>-encapsulation in vivo. In this study, we investigate the ability of α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>, co-administered with unbound antigen, to enhance antigen-specific immune responses through in vivo encapsulation, resulting in enhanced antigen delivery.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. MATERIALS AND METHODS</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Purification and Activation of Murine and Human α<sub>2</sub>M</title><p>Purification and amine-activation of murine α<sub>2</sub>M was performed as previously described [7,8,10,11]. Human α<sub>2</sub>M was purified from fresh, frozen human plasma, obtained from the American Red Cross (Durham, NC, USA), according to a previously published protocol [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.20128-ref12">12</xref>].</p><p>Native human α<sub>2</sub>M was converted to the “amine-activated” form (α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>) by incubation in 200 mM ammonium bicarbonate at room temperature for 1 h. Buffer exchange into PBS was achieved using a 5 mL disposable de-salting column. Native human α<sub>2</sub>M was converted to the “trypsin-activated” form (α<sub>2</sub>M-T) by incubation with a 5-fold molar excess of trypsin (Worthington Biochemical, Lakewood, NH) for 1 h at room temperature. The Halt protease inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL) was then added to inhibit proteolytic activity. Excess trypsin and protease inhibitors were removed by consecutive passes over a 100 kDa centrifugal concentrator (Pall Life Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI). Purified protein contained less than 10 pg of endotoxin per mg of protein, as determined by a commercial assay kit (Limulus Amebocyte Lysate Kinetic-QCL by Cambrex, Walkersville, MD).</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Encapsulation of OVA into Murine α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup></title><p>Complexes of amine-activated α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> and Alexa Fluor<sup>&#210;</sup> 647-conjugated ovalbumin (OVA) (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) were prepared as previously described [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.20128-ref7">7</xref>]. Molar ratio of incorporation was approximately 3:1 OVA: α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>, as determined by fluorescence quantification.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Time-Dependent Study of OVA Encapsulation into Human α<sub>2</sub>M</title><p>A 3-fold molar excess of OVA was incubated at 37˚C with either α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> or α<sub>2</sub>M-T for 0.5 to 24 h. Samples were then immediately analyzed by native PAGE.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Cells and Cell Culture</title><p>The MO5 cell line, an OVA-transfected subclone of B16 melanoma, was a kind gift from Dr. Kenneth Rock (University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA). MO5 cells were cultured in complete media supplemented with 2 mg/mL G418. Murine splenocytes were harvested and cultured as previously described [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.20128-ref7">7</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Mice</title><p>Female C57/BL6 mice were obtained from Charles River Laboratories (Raleigh, NC). All mice were housed in the Duke University Animal Facility, an AAALAC approved facility. All experiments were conducted under an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee-approved protocol.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Intradermal Immunization and Tumor Challenge</title><p>Prior to tumor challenge, C57/BL6 mice were immunized by intradermal injection into the right ear pinna with 10 μL antigen or PBS, with or without the addition of α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> or CpG 1826, 5’-TCCATGACGTTCCTGACGTT-3’ (Midland Certiﬁed Reagent Co., Midland, TX, USA). The treatment groups (n = 5; each receiving 1.35 μg OVA/ injection) included the following: OVA alone; OVA administered with 10 μg CpG 1826; α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>-OVA; α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>-OVA administered with 10 μg CpG 1826; α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> co-administered with unbound OVA; and α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> co-administered with unbound OVA with 10 μg CpG 1826. The quantity of α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> administered with unbound OVA was equivalent to the amount of α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> present in the α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>-OVA preparations (6 μg).</p><p>Preparations of α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> and OVA were kept in separate containers on ice until immediately prior to injection in order to minimize the possibility of in vitro α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>-encapsulation. Mice were subsequently boosted at days 35 and 63, consistent with our previously published immunization protocol [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.20128-ref7">7</xref>]. Control groups (n = 5) received intradermal injections of PBS, CpG 1826, or α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> alone. Serum anti-OVA IgG was monitored every 2 weeks by ELISA, as previously described [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.20128-ref7">7</xref>]. Mice were injected s.c. in the left ﬂank with 10<sup>4</sup> MO5 tumor cells in Matrigel™ basement membrane matrix (BD Biosciences PharMingen) at week 14. Staining of mouse PBLs with iTAg&#212; MHC Tetramer H2-K<sup>b</sup> SIINFEKL-PE (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA) and Caltag&#212; FITC-conjugated Rat anti-Mouse CD8a antibody (Invitrogen Corp., Carlsbad, CA) was performed 2 weeks following tumor implantation, as previously described [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.20128-ref7">7</xref>], in order to quantify the proportion of CD8+ T cells specific for the H2- K<sup>b</sup>-restricted CTL epitope of OVA, the SIINFEKL peptide (OVA<sub>257-264</sub>). Tumor diameters were measured using digital calipers, and tumor volume was calculated using the equation V = 0.4 ab<sup>2</sup>, where a and b are the longest and shortest diameters, respectively. Mice were euthanized when tumor volume reached 2 cm<sup>3</sup>.</p><p>For the detection of fluorescently-labeled OVA encapsulated by α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> in vivo, three mice were injected intradermally in the right ear pinnae with 3:1 OVA:α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> (30 μg:10 μg) in PBS. For comparison, one mouse was injected with only OVA (30 μg) and another was injected with only α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> (10 μg). After 1.5 h, mice were euthanized, and ear pinnae were flushed with 3 &#215; 20 μL PBS. The collected fluid samples were analyzed by native PAGE, and incorporation of antigen was measured directly by fluorescence imaging using an Odyssey infrared imaging system (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA).</p></sec><sec id="s2_7"><title>2.7. [<sup>3</sup>H]-Thymidine Proliferation Assay</title><p>Splenocytes harvested from mice that had been previously immunized with OVA and CpG 1826 (as above) were pulsed for 6 h with 2.5 μM OVA, either free or codelivered with amine-activated α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> or trypsin-activated α<sub>2</sub>M-T (7.5 μM), in serum-free media. As controls, cells were also pulsed with Con A (5 μg/mL) and α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> containing no antigen. Cells were then washed, resuspended in complete media, loaded at 2.5 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup> cells per well onto a 96-well flat-bottom plate and cultured for 3 d at 37˚C in a humidified 5% CO<sub>2</sub> incubator. Cultured cells were treated with 1 μCi/well [methyl-<sup>3</sup>H]thymidine (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA) 18 h prior to harvesting. Incorporation of [<sup>3</sup>H]thymidine was measured using a Tri-Carb 2100 TR liquid scintillation counter (PerkinElmer, Boston, MA).</p></sec><sec id="s2_8"><title>2.8. Statistical Analysis</title><p>For in vitro studies, the Student’s t-test was performed to determine P values and ascertain statistical significance between two treatments. For in vivo studies (antibody titers, tetramer staining, and tumor growth), ANOVA was performed, followed by multiple comparison procedures (Tukey) to determine differences between groups. Significance between Kaplan-Meier survival curves was determined by log-rank Mantel-Cox analysis. The level of significance used was 0.05.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. RESULTS</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Antigen Encapsulation by α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> Occurs Rapidly and Can Be Detected Following as Little as 30 min of Incubation</title><p>Consistent with a previous report [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.20128-ref8">8</xref>], maximal incorporation of antigen by α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> occurs after 24 h of incubation at 37˚C (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). However, some association of antigen with α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> can be observed at 30 min. This association likely represents covalent antigen incorporation by α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> because it is not observed with proteolyticallyactivated α<sub>2</sub>M-T. Although proteolytic thiol ester cleavage in α<sub>2</sub>M is irreversible, thiol ester cleavage by primary amines can be reversed with heat, allowing the incorporation of new antigens by α<sub>2</sub>M [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.20128-ref11">11</xref>]. A small association between OVA and α<sub>2</sub>M-T was observed following 24 h of incubation.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Co-Administration of α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> with Unbound Antigen Enhances Humoral and Cell-Mediated Immunity to a Similar Degree as Conjugated α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>-Antigen Complexes</title><p>To determine if co-delivery of antigen with unbound α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> could enhance immune responses in vivo, groups of na&#239;ve C57/BL6 mice (n = 5) were immunized intradermally with OVA and unbound α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>, with or without the addition of an immunostimulatory adjuvant, CpG 1826. This study was performed concurrently with a previously reported experiment investigating immune responses to prepared α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>-OVA complexes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.20128-ref7">7</xref>]. Separate unbound α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> and OVA preparations were kept on ice and combined immediately prior to injection in order to minimize the possibility of α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>-encapsulation occurring in vitro. Following two booster injections (days 35 and 63), mice were challenged with a subcutaneously implanted OVAexpressing B16 melanoma flank tumor.</p><p>For both conjugated α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>-OVA and unconjugated α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> + OVA groups, the development of anti-OVA IgG antibody was first observed 8 weeks following initial injection (result not shown). End-point titers (antibody titers at the time of tumor implantation; week 14) are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a). OVA administered either with unbound α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> or the well-characterized adjuvant CpG 1826 produced similar antibody titers in immunized mice.</p><p>Although the mean antibody titers produced by conjugated α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>-OVA were greater than those elicited with OVA and unbound α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>, the difference between these groups was not found to be statistically significant.</p><p>Tetramer staining of PBLs was performed 2 weeks following tumor implantation in order to observe expansion of the antigen-specific CD8+ T cell population in these mice (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(b)). Mice treated with OVA and unbound α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> with the addition of CpG, however, did elicit expansion of the OVA-specific CD8+ T cell population, which was significant compared to the control groups. Although the OVA with unbound α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> without CpG group appeared to elicit some degree of expansion of the OVA-specific CD8+ T cell population, the tetramer staining population for this group was not significantly greater than that of the control groups (PBS, CpG, or α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> alone). Conjugated α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>-OVA treatment groups appeared to elicit greater expansion of antigen-specific CTLs than the OVA with unbound α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> groups, the differences between these treatment groups were not found to be statistically significant. The greatest expansion of OVA-specific CD8+ T Cell population was observed in the α<sub>2</sub>M conjugated-OVA with the addition of CPG.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Co-Administration of α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> with Unbound Antigen Enhances Anti-Tumor Immune Responses</title><p>To investigate the anti-tumor response of co-administered α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> vaccinated mice were challenged with OVA</p><p>expressing BIG melanoma flank tumors. Anti-tumor responses elicited by the co-delivery of α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> with unbound OVA were found to be similar to those observed with α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>-OVA. Observable growth of OVA-expressing tumors over time is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(c). Mice immunized with OVA and unbound α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>, with or without CpG, demonstrated delayed tumor growth compared to each of the control groups, tumor growth for these groups was not significantly different from the α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>-OVA treatment groups. Survival of mice treated with co-delivered α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> and unbound OVA, either with or without CpG, was significantly prolonged (P &lt; 0.005) compared to OVA treatment alone (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(d)). However, survival of these mice did not differ significantly from that of mice treated with conjugated α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>-OVA.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Encapsulation of Antigen by α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> Occurs in Vivo in the Setting of Intradermal Injection</title><p>We hypothesized that enhanced in vivo immune responses with α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> and OVA co-delivery were the result of in vivo encapsulation of antigen. The conditions of antigen delivery, including the depot effect caused by intradermal injection and the 37˚C environment of the mouse, are similar to the conditions used to successfully incorporate antigen into α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> in vitro [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.20128-ref8">8</xref>]. To determine if such in vivo encapsulation of antigen could occur in this setting, we similarly intradermally injected the ear pinnae of mice with a 3:1 molar ratio of OVA:α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>. For comparison, mice were injected with either OVA or α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> alone. After 1.5 h, the mice were euthanized, and the ear pinnae were flushed with 3 &#215; 20 μL PBS. The fluid that was recovered was analyzed by native PAGE (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). The detection of fluorescently labeled OVA co-migrating with α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> dimers in these mice confirmed the occurrence of in vivo encapsulation of OVA into α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Enhanced Immune Responses with α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> Co-Administration Result from Encapsulation of Antigen, Rather than Ligation of α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> Receptors</title><p>The detection of in vivo α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> encapsulation suggests a mechanism for the enhanced in vivo immune responses discussed above, it was also possible that ligation of the α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> receptor, low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP-1)/CD91, in the absence of antigen encapsulation, may also contribute to this enhanced immunity. To investigate this possibility, splenocytes harvested from OVA-immunized mice were treated for 6 h with OVA and either unconjugated amine-activated α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> or proteolytically-activated α<sub>2</sub>M-T. After 3 days, cell proliferation was measured by [<sup>3</sup>H]thymidine incorporation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). Cell proliferation was increased approximately two-fold following co-delivery of α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> with antigen. However, co-delivery of α<sub>2</sub>M-T, which is receptor-recognized but incapable of incorporating new antigen, did not enhance proliferation. Therefore, we concluded that this enhanced response is secondary to α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>-encapsulation and not ligation of the α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> receptor, (LRP-1)/CD91.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. DISCUSSION</title><p>It has been suggested that new generation vaccines</p><p>will largely consist of purified recombinant proteins [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.20128-ref13">13</xref>]. However, formulations of purified protein are frequently poor at eliciting humoral and cell-mediated immunity. Therefore, the development of adjuvants and antigen delivery vehicles that are efficacious, as well as costeffective and practical, is of extreme importance.</p><p>The highly conserved proteinase inhibitor α<sub>2</sub>M has received attention in recent years for its ability to entrap diverse macromolecules and target them for rapid receptor-mediated uptake by professional antigen presenting cells. Antigen delivery by α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> elicits 100 to 1000-fold enhanced antibody titers against protein and peptide based vaccines and vaccine candidates, such as hepatitis B surface antigen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.20128-ref3">3</xref>] and the HIV envelope gp120 C4- V3 peptide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.20128-ref4">4</xref>]. Complexes of α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> and trypanosomal proteinases have been shown to activate CD4+ T cells more efficiently than antigen alone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.20128-ref14">14</xref>] and to stimulate the production of antibodies that effectively inhibit activity of the enzyme [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.20128-ref15">15</xref>]. Furthermore, our laboratory has recently demonstrated that α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>-encapsulation enhances antigen-specific CTL responses and protection against antigen-presenting tumors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.20128-ref7">7</xref>]. Although these studies have established that α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>-encapsulation can be achieved with relative ease on a small scale, assuming adequate resources and training in biochemical techniques, the large scale production of α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>-antigen complexes may present new challenges. Therefore, achieving enhanced immunologic responses with co-administered α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>, avoiding the steps of in vitro incorporation and isolation of complexes, represents a significant advance for this antigen delivery vehicle.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. CONCLUSION</title><p>Our findings demonstrate that co-delivery of α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> with unbound antigen can enhance humoral and cellmediated immunity, resulting in improved anti-tumor responses, to similar degree as α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>-antigen complexes prepared in vitro. These enhanced immune responses with α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> co-delivery appear to result from in vivo encapsulation of antigen, rather than a direct effect of ligating LRP by α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> not carrying bound antigen α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> receptors. The capacity of α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> to promote antigen delivery in vivo results from the rapidity with which it encapsulates local macromolecules. Antigens encapsulated by α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> are targeted for rapid receptor-mediated uptake by professional antigen presenting cells, resulting in efficient antigen processing and presentation. We conclude that administration of α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> in the context of a high localized concentration of antigen, such as that which can be achieved with a depot, facilitates antigen delivery and presentation. These findings represent a significant advancement in the use of α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup> as an antigen delivery vehicle.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS</title><p>This work was supported by grant #HL-24066 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. We thank Dr. K. Rock for his kind gift of the MO5 tumor cell line. Many thanks to Sturgis Payne, Yvonne Mowery, Steve Conlon, and Marie Thomas for their contributions to this work.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec><sec id="s8"><title>ABBREVIATIONS</title><p>α<sub>2</sub>M: α<sub>2</sub>-macroglobulin;</p><p>α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>: amine-activated α<sub>2</sub>M;</p><p>α<sub>2</sub>M-T: trypsin-activated α<sub>2</sub>M;</p><p>α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>-OVA: α<sub>2</sub>M<sup>*</sup>-encapsulated ovalbumin;</p><p>CpG 182: 5’-TCCATGACGTTCCTGACG-TT-3’;</p><p>LRP-1: low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1;</p><p>OVA: ovalbumin;</p><p>OVA<sub>257-264</sub>: H2-K<sup>b</sup>-restricted CTL epitope of OVA (SIINFEKL peptide).</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.20128-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chu</surname><given-names> C.T.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Oury</surname><given-names> T.D.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Enghild</surname><given-names> J.J. and Pizzo</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> S.V. </surname><given-names>  </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1994</year>)<article-title>Adjuvant-free in vivo targeting. Antigen delivery by alpha 2-macroglobulin enhances antibody formation</article-title><source> Journal of Immunology</source><volume> 152</volume>,<fpage> 1538</fpage>-<lpage>1545</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20128-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chu</surname><given-names> C.T. and Pizzo</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> S.V. </surname><given-names>  </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1993</year>)<article-title>Receptor-mediated antigen delivery into macrophages. Complexing antigen to alpha2-macroglobulin enhances presentation to T cells</article-title><source> Journal of Immunology</source><volume> 150</volume>,<fpage> 48</fpage>-<lpage>58</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20128-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cianciolo, G.J., Enghild, J.J. and Pizzo, S.V. (2001) Co-valent complexes of antigen and alpha2-macroglobulin: Evidence for dramatically-increased immunogenicity. Vaccine, 20, 554-562. doi:10.1016/S0264-410X(01)00361-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20128-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liao, H.X., Cianciolo, G.J., Staats, H.F., Scearce, R.M., Lapple, D.M., Stauffer, S.H., Thomasch, J.R., Pizzo, S.V., Montefiori, D.C., Hagen, M., Eldridge, J. and Haynes, B.F. (2002) Increased immunogenicity of HIV envelope subunit complexed with alpha2-macroglobulin when combined with monophosphoryl lipid A and GM-CSF. Vaccine, 20, 2396-2403. doi:10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00090-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20128-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname> 
Binder</surname><given-names> R.J.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Karimeddini</surname><given-names> D. and Srivastava</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> P.K. </surname><given-names>  </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2001</year>)<article-title>Adjuvanticity of alpha2-macroglobulin, an independent ligand for the heat shock protein receptor CD91</article-title><source> Journal of Immunology</source><volume> 166</volume>,<fpage> 4968</fpage>-<lpage>4972</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20128-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Binder, R.J., Kumar, S.K. and Srivastava, P.K. (2002) Naturally formed or artificially reconstituted non-covalent alpha2-macroglobulin-peptide complexes elicit CD91-dependent cellular immunity. Cancer Immunity, 2, 16.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20128-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bowers, E.V., Horvath, J.J., Bond, J.E., Cianciolo, G.J. and Pizzo, S.V. (2009) Antigen delivery by alpha(2)- macroglobulin enhances the cytotoxic T lymphocyte response. Journal of Leukocyte Biology, 86, 1259-1268. doi:10.1189/jlb.1008653</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20128-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gron</surname><given-names> H. and Pizzo</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> S.V. </surname><given-names>  </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1998</year>)<article-title>Nonproteolytic incorporation of protein ligands into human alpha2-macroglobulin: Implications for the binding mechanism of alpha 2-macroglobulin</article-title><source> Biochemistry</source><volume> 37</volume>,<fpage> 6009</fpage>-<lpage>6014</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20128-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple"> 
Adlakha, C.L., Hart, J.P. and Pizzo, S.V. (2001) Kinetics of nonproteolytic incorporation of a protein ligand into thermally activated alpha2-macroglobulin: Evidence for a novel nascent state. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 276, 41547-41552. doi:10.1074/jbc.M106357200</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20128-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bhattacharjee, G., Gron, H. and Pizzo, S.V. (1999) Incorporation of non-proteolytic proteins by murine alpha2- macroglobulin. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) —Protein Structure and Molecular Enzymology, 1432, 49-56. doi:10.1016/S0167-4838(99)00072-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20128-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gron</surname><given-names> H.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Thogersen</surname><given-names> I.B.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Enghild</surname><given-names> J.J. and Pizzo</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> S.V. </surname><given-names>  </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1996</year>)<article-title>Structural and functional analysis of the spontaneous reformation of the thiol ester bond in human alpha 2-macroglobulin, rat alpha1-inhibitor-3 and chemically modified derivatives</article-title><source> Biochemical Journal</source><volume> 318</volume>,<fpage> 539</fpage>-<lpage>545</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20128-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chu</surname><given-names> C.T. and Pizzo</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> S.V. </surname><given-names>  </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1994</year>)<article-title>alpha2-Macroglobulin, complement, and biologic defense: Antigens, growth factors, microbial proteases, and receptor ligation</article-title><source> Laboratory Investigation</source><volume> 71</volume>,<fpage> 792</fpage>-<lpage>812</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20128-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname> 
O’Hagan</surname><given-names> D.T. and De Gregorio</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> E. </surname><given-names>  </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2009</year>)<article-title>The path to a successful vaccine adjuvant—“The long and winding road”</article-title><source> Drug Discovery Today</source><volume> 14</volume>,<fpage> 541</fpage>-<lpage>551</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20128-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Morrot, A., Strickland, D.K., Higuichi Mde, L., Reis, M., Pedrosa, R. and Scharfstein, J. (1997) Human T cell responses against the major cysteine proteinase (cruzipain) of Trypanosoma cruzi: Role of the multifunctional alpha 2-macroglobulin receptor in antigen presentation by monocytes. International Immunology, 9, 825-834. doi:10.1093/intimm/9.6.825</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.20128-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huson, L.E., Authie, E., Boulange, A.F., Goldring, J.P. and Coetzer, T.H. (2009) Modulation of the immunogenicity of the Trypanosoma congolense cysteine protease, congopain, through complexation with alpha(2)-macroglobulin. Veterinary Research, 40, 52. doi:10.1051/vetres/2009036</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>