<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Applied Mathematics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-7385</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/am.2012.37112</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AM-19885</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  An Approach for the Construction of Systems That Self-Generate Chaotic Solitons
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>aoying</surname><given-names>Chen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Department of Applied Mathematics, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, P.R. China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>sunnycby@126.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>07</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>755</fpage><lpage>759</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>April</day>	<month>28,</month>	<year>2012</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>May</day>	<month>28,</month>	<year>2012</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>June</day>	<month>5,</month>	<year>2012</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  This paper proposes a method for constructing partial differential equation (PDE) systems with chaotic solitons by using truncated normal forms of an ordinary differential equation (ODE). The construction is based mainly on the fact that the existence of a soliton in a PDE system is equal to that of a homoclinic orbit in a related ODE system, and that chaos of ?i’lnikov homoclinic type in the ODE imply that the soliton in the PDE changes its profile chaotically along propagation direction. It is guaranteed that the constructed systems can self-generate chaotic solitons without any external perturbation but with constrained wave velocities in a rigorously mathematical sense.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Chaotic Solitons; Partial Differential Equation; Homoclinic Orbit</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Chaotic solitons have been a subject of many theoretical papers over the last decades of years. They have been experimentally observed in several physical systems [1- 4]. Despite this large amount of effort, many key issues remain open. The central question addressed in this paper is: How can one construct a partial differential equation (PDE) system that self-generates a chaotic solitary-wave pulse that exists in a rigorous sense? There are few rigorous results that addresses this question. In most cases, rigorous results for the generation of chaotic solitons are obtained through perturbations to a known system, e.g., Schr&#246;dinger equation and Ginzburg-Landau equation [5- 8], that can generate solitons. Unfortunately, this method is not regular since, in practice, it can be applied only to particular examples. Another rigorous approach is that of C. L. Zheng [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.19885-ref9">9</xref>]. In this approach one must find variable separation solutions to a generalized (2 + 1)-dimensional Kotewege de-Vries equation by using B&#228;cklund transformations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.19885-ref10">10</xref>]. The approach can be in nature categorized to perturbation method. A third approach, by Wu et al. in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.19885-ref3">3</xref>] and Ricketts et al. in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.19885-ref4">4</xref>], is an experimental scheme. The former described a related system that deliberately provokes inherently nonlinear dynamics to produce chaotic soliton oscillations. The latter showed that the cancellation does more than simply allow the faithful propagation of digital pulses: in fact, it can be used as part of electrical oscillator to produce pulses in the first place. Both of these systems are purely electronic; their relative ease of manufacture gives them many advantages over the “photonic” devices, involving light waves, that currently dominate soliton research. As defined in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.19885-ref8">8</xref>], a chaotic soliton means that the soliton changes its profile chaotically in time or along propagation direction. From the view of mathematics, a soliton of a PDE system corresponds to a special solution of the PDE, or equally, a soliton corresponds to a homoclinic orbit in a related ordinary differential equation (ODE). Furthermore, if such an orbit is of Shilnikov’s type [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.19885-ref11">11</xref>], that is, some Shilnikov’s inequalities are satisfied, then the ODE system definitely has chaos of Shilnikov’s type. It is not difficult to imagine that the corresponding soliton in the original PDE system should be a chaotic soliton since its profile impossibly behaves regularly in time. Such a relation between some solutions of ODE and PDE systems is the basis of our constructing PDE systems that self-generate chaotic solitons. On the other hand, from an ODE system with homoclinic orbits, one may construct many PDE systems such that they can self-generate solitons corresponding to the homoclinic orbits in the ODE system. Therefore, the construction must be treated carefully so that the resulting systems via the construction are as desired.</p><p>In this paper, we propose a method for constructing a PDE system self-generating chaotic solitons. The construction is based on the truncated normal forms of an autonomous ODE and on the relationship between ODEs and PDEs when solitary waves are under consideration. The constructed system can self-generate a chaotic solitary-wave pulse without any external perturbation. Moreover, the existence of the solitary-wave pulse in the PDE system is ensured by that of one homoclinic orbit of an ODE system whereas its chaotic behavior (i.e., the soliton changes its profile chaotically along propagation direction) results from the chaos property of the ODE system which is guaranteed by Ši’lnikov’s homoclinic theorem [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.19885-ref11">11</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. A Candidate Class of ODE Systems and Their Principle Homoclinic Orbits</title><p>Since finding a soliton in a PDE system can be changed into proving the existence of a homoclinic orbit in a related ODE system, in this section we will introduce a class of autonomous ODE systems as candidates for the construction of PDE systems that can self-generate chaotic solitons. The introduction of the candidate ODE systems is based on amplitude equations which are derived from normal form theory. Then, we discuss the existence of homoclinic orbits in the ODE systems. We do not prove the existence of the homoclinic orbit, and instead obtain some so-called principle homoclinic orbits by applying perturbation theory. Furthermore, we show that such homoclinic orbits are of Ši’lnikov’s type, implying that the ODE systems have chaos of Ši’lnikov’s type.</p><p>We begin by a general theory about the standard form of nonlinear ODE systems. In the analysis of the stability of static states of autonomous nonlinear ODE systems, linear theory produces normal modes that vary like<img src="12-7400824\7c17121a-abc3-4f84-aed4-e4892525b621.jpg" />, where t is time, k is an integer, and <img src="12-7400824\0b9aaef7-c21a-4f54-81c3-8958c737b872.jpg" /> is a root of the characteristic value equation of the linear theory. Consider an autonomous nonlinear ODE system having a polycritical state in which <img src="12-7400824\bd37e62e-012f-43a1-a7a3-a1bcbc5cf919.jpg" /> for l roots and <img src="12-7400824\35df4cab-3a69-4c3e-8407-4e9d643ca49c.jpg" /> with <img src="12-7400824\e286ed74-d393-497e-88b1-af1c4636e206.jpg" /> for m pairs of complex conjugate roots. Suppose that, for this state, <img src="12-7400824\85ed2c51-9559-4ee3-8d95-8797feb067b5.jpg" />is bounded away from zero for all the other roots of the characteristic equation. By using normal form theory, we can obtain amplitude equations of the form:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.19885-formula28519"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-7400824\39db45ba-0dd4-4d5c-a422-6f0d2f4e4c76.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="12-7400824\670825c8-9bdd-4066-a79e-0b55b2646cc0.jpg" /> with <img src="12-7400824\385e454c-30d0-49d6-91b3-6a4fd99e6910.jpg" /> is the amplitude vector, <img src="12-7400824\37402cfa-cdc8-4623-ac26-30214046a88d.jpg" />is a strictly nonlinear vector-valued function, and <img src="12-7400824\2fd80ec6-e29b-46c8-837e-3ba4a6846ff8.jpg" /> is a set of parameters. We restrict ourselves to cases where the number of parameters in the characteristic polynomial for <img src="12-7400824\3566e9cd-3b0b-42c1-a4ba-fccb2e53ff90.jpg" /> is equal to n (called criticality). In this case, the characteristic equation (called the critical polynomial) for matrix <img src="12-7400824\1a0ac799-becd-408a-85b6-723f63170f10.jpg" /> may be expressed as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.19885-formula28520"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-7400824\141db17f-621b-47aa-a7a3-3e6d224b39dc.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We are interested here in the leading-order terms in<img src="12-7400824\74440cfd-4ce2-4a56-bc2b-17dec749a868.jpg" />, e.g., for<img src="12-7400824\d6095585-a6fb-401a-9796-177e7cc9e143.jpg" />, they are of order<img src="12-7400824\3bd8ff0a-ea44-4bd9-8bd7-1f1b2793e4d0.jpg" />. These leading terms in <img src="12-7400824\ae55d729-bef5-463c-bb54-ef2c62ca4ac8.jpg" /> are dictated by<img src="12-7400824\b524e1f9-e331-40b1-a20a-d4b6302a146b.jpg" />. For the critical condition, <img src="12-7400824\41216224-462e-4bd2-bc3a-73d94cff62dd.jpg" />in the case of<img src="12-7400824\466bf86c-30c6-4108-bacd-4d04b51cd681.jpg" />, the characteristic equation has zero as a double root. We refer to this case as <img src="12-7400824\22636df4-406e-4c6f-bfa8-e1c3207f7d95.jpg" /> when <img src="12-7400824\27313700-55c4-425b-a6fa-a8f9593b08eb.jpg" /> is an irreducible <img src="12-7400824\40ec992b-d341-4eb3-b819-3f0661b3bca7.jpg" /> matrix. Similarly, we have other <img src="12-7400824\06b28459-96a8-4735-a4a2-35297bc7c81b.jpg" /> (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.19885-ref12">12</xref>]). In addition, when <img src="12-7400824\88fc2666-60c6-49ff-98e3-573b2142136c.jpg" /> is in Jordan-Arnold form [12,13], we rewrite Equation (1) as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.19885-formula28521"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-7400824\f2cbc26a-26ac-4826-bbb1-efd63584ff00.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the <img src="12-7400824\a13726c3-b73b-46c7-9b64-3869a9717e17.jpg" /> are constants which can be analytically calculated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.19885-ref14">14</xref>].</p><p>Let <img src="12-7400824\69b79e2f-5bd5-42b2-9cd5-bbdc8815485e.jpg" /> be a small positive number and introduce the scaled variables</p><disp-formula id="scirp.19885-formula28522"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-7400824\38834e8e-6b9b-4ea7-b74a-5542e3982f9b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<img src="12-7400824\3e5bc67e-8cef-4287-a852-014f1c358dd4.jpg" />. If we arrange matters so that the <img src="12-7400824\7f47eee2-a337-45d1-8324-240d30c1fc34.jpg" /> are of order unity, the values of <img src="12-7400824\320a7bae-e7bd-4903-a48e-9764b4a9a6c2.jpg" /> are near to the critical condition<img src="12-7400824\ab6e944b-a9fb-44fb-82f2-53a9c1980c16.jpg" />. That is, we position the system in that part of parameter space where, for<img src="12-7400824\8e4fd85f-c09d-4ee0-82ed-08506027992b.jpg" />,<img src="12-7400824\a7ff0f94-d5e1-4891-b1c4-c0bcd152c652.jpg" />. Then Equation (3) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.19885-formula28523"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-7400824\142b7200-7e83-4cbe-bad0-0c825e947183.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>If we keep only the leading order terms in g, we may reduce Equation (5) to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.19885-formula28524"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-7400824\0297ba35-2cab-4b51-93ee-4346226f8f03.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="12-7400824\5c6791e0-38ab-4801-897f-4c3401ebdba0.jpg" /> and we are ignoring terms<img src="12-7400824\f78f56d8-704e-4a73-b59a-050e67b422d0.jpg" />. Once we are within the region of parameter space delimited by<img src="12-7400824\3e384a1b-cca2-453b-9cca-2e981451f037.jpg" />, we may use Equation (6) as the amplitude equation for the configuration<img src="12-7400824\d80b6d97-da63-42d6-985d-70ea29cbb2f0.jpg" />, for any n, with the error of order<img src="12-7400824\a45366ef-1148-4edb-827a-d7ba32f13937.jpg" />.</p><p>We are interested especially in the case of<img src="12-7400824\b3fff9ae-08fa-4fd0-8f94-421e7e8bce11.jpg" />. In this case, we have the following truncated normal form as the amplitude equation for <img src="12-7400824\f679df9f-bb4f-49a4-b5e1-8962c79828c5.jpg" /> (see [13,14]):</p><disp-formula id="scirp.19885-formula28525"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-7400824\98afd107-fbce-4bd0-9c2b-9ad6deed8237.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="12-7400824\1376ba01-bb71-4ae0-a16e-4ec0cee76307.jpg" /> and <img src="12-7400824\0e996342-6fa2-4cac-99ac-4e8fb7e9031e.jpg" /> are constants. Equation (7) has two singular points <img src="12-7400824\11465a40-ab91-4a15-9644-1a1ae88ebfe1.jpg" /> and<img src="12-7400824\373383fd-aebd-4197-a8d2-554e062c52ce.jpg" />. We look for solutions of the form<img src="12-7400824\9c54a1c6-0482-4648-9bec-85771b50c0e5.jpg" />. If <img src="12-7400824\5cbe8515-f25b-4134-8581-6de1d8096191.jpg" /> is small, <img src="12-7400824\b7edf4f8-4370-46b6-8f7a-620b65219339.jpg" />, and we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.19885-formula28526"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-7400824\bed3ce61-0ac0-48d1-856b-260f7fef9b67.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The parameter <img src="12-7400824\60515c5c-c160-4235-b0c0-d4ef48ea9046.jpg" /> is a measure of the dissipation, and assumed to be positive. A change in the sign of <img src="12-7400824\58de0630-7930-4fbb-a182-99d59a3ab4c2.jpg" /> essentially interchanges the rules of the two singular points, so we need consider only<img src="12-7400824\d7e5c727-0b75-4edf-8228-77c6f82b3996.jpg" />. When <img src="12-7400824\2efef1f0-bc01-44f3-b423-e354e37895ac.jpg" /> and<img src="12-7400824\5e025054-d190-4bd7-9fc1-3a47274c9af1.jpg" />, we can obtain some principle homoclinic orbits by applying perturbation theory [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.19885-ref12">12</xref>], e.g., for fixed<img src="12-7400824\1aa09c69-7963-4ca0-8ead-a69bded04a62.jpg" />, there is a principle homoclinic orbit for <img src="12-7400824\4b1bd103-b1ec-4f42-b145-e999f3cea923.jpg" /> when <img src="12-7400824\82521a63-ca0b-42cc-912e-61d631069e7a.jpg" /> is small and the Ši’lnikov condition <img src="12-7400824\f0c1a03d-d381-4276-b192-950e4b49955a.jpg" /> and <img src="12-7400824\4e06b480-9fca-4b05-aef9-c5acc30dada5.jpg" /> is satisfied with<img src="12-7400824\db16d436-241f-430c-94ec-6a3a28e94151.jpg" />, <img src="12-7400824\8a21b012-fbcc-424f-b08d-89253b283917.jpg" />(refer <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The region for existence of principle homoclinic orbits constitutes a cusp in shape, which is given by <img src="12-7400824\62fcca60-c1e5-4214-a5f0-3e4ce3231b28.jpg" /> and the cusp has a vertex at<img src="12-7400824\a9ed6143-ffe8-4593-b204-34c1a6d4fe42.jpg" />, <img src="12-7400824\3f9ca81e-49cf-4863-8ca3-f5d8d42216bc.jpg" />(see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Besides these principle homoclinic orbits, there are many other homoclinic orbits in the problem (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.19885-ref15">15</xref>]). Such a homoclinic orbit will imply the existence of chaos of Ši’lnikov type for an ODE system and ensure the existence of a chaotic soliton for a related PDE (see details in the next section).</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Constructing a PDE System That Self-Generates a Chaotic Soliton</title><p>A particular example is the asymptotic normal form for <img src="12-7400824\7b32364c-3a95-4fd0-b8c8-1c2e6a86d0c4.jpg" /> which is of the form:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.19885-formula28527"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-7400824\53bf3f44-689f-4acf-bf05-a6b4added31d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where X has been scaled to give a convenient coefficient to<img src="12-7400824\24a7085b-4d4b-4f53-bbd2-3f514273ce73.jpg" />. Based on such an ODE and inspired by the relation between ODE and PDE when the travelling waves are considered, we construct the following model:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.19885-formula28528"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-7400824\2d2d249c-4353-41b0-8dde-024fabbf3b24.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where a and <img src="12-7400824\7d5778b8-081d-4a50-b4f1-be0f973707b7.jpg" /> are positive constants. Assume that</p><p>Equation (10) has travelling waves of the standard form<img src="12-7400824\025cd3f1-beea-4956-901c-3cd06386c0db.jpg" />, where <img src="12-7400824\04848fa6-6646-426b-97dd-5c43d011381a.jpg" /> and c represents travelling wave speed (assume c &gt; 0). Then, U satisfies Equation (9) with<img src="12-7400824\feb91b51-44a4-4634-b507-733dfc44d007.jpg" />. Similarly, we can construct the classical Korteweg-de Vries (KdV) equation which has been applied to the optical fibers communication field if we set<img src="12-7400824\9346f423-fb58-4045-b8de-fa4d3c578ad2.jpg" />, <img src="12-7400824\c1a45c8e-abff-48af-a8a5-07e36f30461a.jpg" />, <img src="12-7400824\7203184e-3d24-4856-9ff6-a0d86b118669.jpg" />and<img src="12-7400824\9400494a-4094-46ff-9769-f574fed19918.jpg" />, <img src="12-7400824\f5ff9b4a-03c9-444f-9c14-c9d640b9825d.jpg" />, based on the ODE (8). Now, we seek a solitary wave solution, that is, we find the solution of the following equation <img src="12-7400824\2ed30d1d-d0df-49ff-a228-0cf23dc6ce06.jpg" /> subjective to the constrain <img src="12-7400824\56e42888-9366-4201-bcc7-e79856f75aa9.jpg" /> <img src="12-7400824\923e28fb-83fc-4980-b403-122b4a384591.jpg" /> <img src="12-7400824\6ce92640-a692-493f-b0f5-c474eb58976c.jpg" /> as<img src="12-7400824\46d3c15c-cc34-48a9-becf-1f08d66fe8d0.jpg" />where the subscript stands for derivatives of function U with respect to the argument<img src="12-7400824\b005493a-5dc7-4602-b023-262ef49b877d.jpg" />. For this, we rewrite Equation (9) into an ODE</p><disp-formula id="scirp.19885-formula28529"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="12-7400824\a091ba48-7d52-4a1b-9c8d-16a82ca61983.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with the condition<img src="12-7400824\f305188c-17e1-4fa6-9073-93edfe66fac3.jpg" />, <img src="12-7400824\e3c7bab4-1586-4f1f-a023-0be20ba3a6f8.jpg" />and <img src="12-7400824\7efbc750-115e-444b-9826-1e0a9ba6258a.jpg" /> as<img src="12-7400824\3e0c82f0-b412-4ada-9c5f-8f143189e9ff.jpg" />, where<img src="12-7400824\a48ac7db-09ca-4318-b8f6-0f0891c0f1bd.jpg" />. Note that finding a soliton solution of Equation (10) satisfying the condition is currently changed into finding a homoclinic orbit of Equation (11) based at the equilibrium point<img src="12-7400824\bdaccf26-ef9b-48cf-a014-281f4d2cbb21.jpg" />.</p><p>Fourth-order Rounge-Kutta method is used to solve the system (11) with time step size equal to 0.01, the absolute and relative error equal to<img src="12-7400824\568668d0-98c9-4d8c-ac6e-7028864a5c85.jpg" />. Numerical simulation shows that the system (11) is chaotic when <img src="12-7400824\ad103f43-7b84-49b2-8aa2-6931c461791a.jpg" /> and<img src="12-7400824\a75cdc39-954d-4822-a0a4-1dc614bdf1d9.jpg" />, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. Now, let us fix<img src="12-7400824\37fc0a07-04bd-44ea-920f-c684f1b95832.jpg" />. The numerical simulation also shows that the existence interval of chaos reaches<img src="12-7400824\c5e416b0-5bc6-4c47-92d2-f8ea085fb981.jpg" />. Thus, we can determine the range of the solitary-wave velocity for fixed<img src="12-7400824\2823dcbe-cba0-4a60-adeb-32b181548df7.jpg" />.</p><p>We can verify analytically that Equation (10) indeed has a Ši’lnikov homoclinic orbit and further chaos of Ši’lnikov type from a theorem of Ši’lnikov [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.19885-ref11">11</xref>]. In fact, we have shown the existence of a homoclinic orbit (e.g., the principle homoclinic orbit) of Ši’lnikov type. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> shows the numerical soliton of Equation (10) according to the homoclinic orbit.</p><p>In addition, the characteristic polynomial of Jacobian matrix of Equation (10) evaluated at <img src="12-7400824\d756573e-3d59-4152-b7f9-4be67c1da10e.jpg" /> is <img src="12-7400824\727e9afe-33c7-4174-82b0-2e562d9ab1f6.jpg" /> which has three roots: one negative <img src="12-7400824\387b0163-f8b3-4607-bcf1-9a2b45e8be97.jpg" /> and a conjugate pair of complex <img src="12-7400824\770552d0-4eb4-4ae3-a4d3-13d56e05fd0e.jpg" /> with the positive real part for <img src="12-7400824\26f20738-2304-401c-a9a9-dcab9e2212dd.jpg" /> and<img src="12-7400824\16570444-9fff-4131-bf76-aff5a686563a.jpg" />. A rigorously theoretical proof for the existence of chaos of Ši’lnikov type may be referred to a standard treatment in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.19885-ref16">16</xref>]. A chaotic soliton of Equation (10) with parameter <img src="12-7400824\d1dcae6e-2845-4221-a34d-e3f78a6beb67.jpg" /> and <img src="12-7400824\0f2f0c23-cda8-4410-a162-1c38e0c094cc.jpg" /> is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> (the numerical simulation is performed for <img src="12-7400824\546c742b-499a-48cc-a2df-8389e740ab0d.jpg" /> iterations with a time step of 0.001).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>Based on normal form theory of ODEs, we have proposed a general method of constructing systems that selfgenerate chaotic solitons. By adjusting some system parameters in truncated normal forms of ODEs (e.g., Equation (8)), one can construct many systems with chaotic solitons. Note that the constructed system (10) is conservative. It seems the first example that self-generates chaotic solitons.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.19885-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. H. Lee, “Electrical Solitons Come of Age,” Nature, Vol. 440, 2006, pp. 36-37. doi:10.1038/440036a</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.19885-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Argyris, et al, “Chaos-Based Communications at High Bit Rates Using Commercial Fibre-Optic Links,” Nature, Vol. 438, 2005, pp. 343-346. doi:10.1038/nature04275</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.19885-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Z. Wu, B. A. Kalinikos and C. E. Patton, “Self-Generation of Chaotic Solitary Spin Wave Pulses in Magnetic Film Active Feedback Rings,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 95, No. 23, 2005, 237202. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.237202</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.19885-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. S. Riketts, X. Li and D. Ham, “Electrical Soliton Oscillator,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 54, No. 1, 2006, pp. 373-382. 
doi:10.1109/TMTT.2005.861652</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.19885-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. V. Dmitriev, et al, “Chaotic Character of Two-Soliton Collisions in the Weakly Perturbed Nonlinear Schr?dinger Equation,” Physical Review E, Vol. 66, No. 4, 2002, 046609. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.66.046609</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.19885-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. V. Dmitriev and T. Shigenari, “Short-Lived TwoSoliton Bound States in Weakly Perturbed Nonlinear Schr?dinger Equation,” Chaos, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2002, pp. 324-332. doi:10.1063/1.1476951</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.19885-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. Benvenuto, et al., “Manifestations of Classical and Quantum Chaos in Nonlinear Wave Propagation,” Physical Review A, Vol. 44, No. 6, 1991, R3423. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.44.R3423</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.19885-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">N. Akhmediev, et al., “Pulsating Solitons, Chaotic Solitons, Period Doubling, and Pulse Coexistence in ModeLocking Lasers: Complex Ginzburg-Landau Equation Approach,” Physical Review E, Vol. 63, No. 5, 2001, 056602. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.63.056602</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.19885-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. L. Zheng, “Coherent Soliton Structures with Chaotic and Fractal Behaviors in a Generalized (2+1)-Dimensional Korteweg de-Vries System,” Chinese Journal of Physics, Vol. 41, 2003, pp. 442-456.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.19885-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. P. Novikov and A. P. Veselov, “Two-Dimensional Schr?dinger Operator: Inverse Scattering Transform and Evolutional Equations,” Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, Vol. 18, No. 1-3, 1986, pp. 267-273. 
doi:10.1016/0167-2789(86)90187-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.19885-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. C. P. Silva, “?i'l'nikov Theorem—A Tutorial,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, Vol. 40, 1993, pp. 675-682.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.19885-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. I. Arnold, “Lectures in Bifurcation in Versal Families,” Russian Mathematical Surveys, Vol. 27, No. 5, 1972, pp. 54-123. doi:10.1070/RM1972v027n05ABEH001385</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.19885-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Arneodo, et al., “Asymptotic Chaos,” Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, Vol. 14, No. 3, 1985, pp. 327-347. 
doi:10.1016/0167-2789(85)90093-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.19885-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. H. Coullet and E. A. Spiegel, “Amplitude Equations for Systems with Competing Instabilities,” SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, Vol. 43, No. 4, 1983, pp. 776-821. doi:10.1137/0143052</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.19885-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Arneodo, et al., “Oscillators with Chaotic Behavior: An Illustration of a Theorem by Shilnikov,” Journal of Statistical Physics, Vol. 27, 1982, pp. 171-182. 
doi:10.1007/BF01011745</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.19885-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Wiggins, “Global Bifurcation and Chaos,” SpringerVerlag, New York, 1988.  
doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1042-9</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>