A set of signals are triggered when a plant has any damage caused by a biotic or abiotic agent. These signals provide complex responses in accordance to the nature of the causative agent [1].

These signals are transmitted in a systematic way to the whole plant [2]. They may be chemical (oligosaccharides, abscisic acid or sistemin) or physical (electrical signs) [3,4]. In response to these signals, plants are able to synthesize toxic or repellent metabolites with antimicrobial, antifungal and insecticidal activity [5-7].

Secondary metabolites like terpenes, alkaloids, phenols [8] and volatile compounds are involved in direct or indirect defense of plants against phytopathogen actions are among the highlights synthesized metabolites.

Has been found that plants are able to differentiate the wounds caused by biotic or abiotic agents what implies the recognition and defense response in each case [9]. This fact was confirmed by different researchers in studies performed to Arabidopsis thaliana, Nicotiana attenuata and Populus trichocarpa × deltoides, where they found out that plant were able to differentiate between a mechanical abiotic damage and one caused by insects. This ability of discrimination, prevent unnecessary energy consumption in the biosynthesis of defense compounds against herbivores [10-12].

It has also been found that plants have an alternative defense system known as “indirect defense”. When a plant is attacked by a phytopathogen it releases volatile terpenes phenolics type compounds or/and derived from phenyl propane which act as signals that attract pathogen’s parasitoids and predator [13,14].

Parasitoids attraction was experimentally proved in laboratory by Bukovinszky et al., [15] and Lou et al., [16]. It was also proved in natural conditions through studies performed by Kessler and Baldwin [17]. They quantified the mix of three compounds (cis-3-hexen-1-ol, linalool and cis-α-bergamotene) in Nicotinia attenuata, the results showed that this compounds increase the predation level of Manduca sexta eggs (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae), by Geocoris pallens (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae), a general predator.

Among the stimuli that induce the release of volatile compounds are the biotic external factors. It has been tested that volatiles from flowers and leaves of undamaged plants show different emission pattern of those which have been attacked by herbivores [18,19].

Thus, plants continuously release small amounts of volatile compounds, but this amount will increase when herbivorous insects attack and damage the plants. Studies with several plant-insect combinations have shown that insect feeding or application of oral secretions of them in spots where it has caused an injury; induce a different or more intense response of volatile than attributable solely to mechanical damages [19].

Other studies such as those performed with larvae of Helicoverpa zea, have shown that salivary secretions of insects qualitatively affect the defense response in plants [20]. However, experiments performed by Mithöfer et al., [21] which used mechanical devices that mimic the damage caused by Spodoptera littoralis on the leaves of Phaseolus lunatus showed that wounds induced the emission of volatile compounds similar to those emissions from the damage caused by the insect.

In ours atudy, we selected to Ctenarytaina Eucalypti (blue gum Psyllid), specie present in Chile since 1999 [22], one of the best known of the genus Ctenarytaina, due to the economic importance of some of their hosts, showing a marked preference for species of the genus Eucalyptus, within which is E. globulus [23,24]. E. globulus is one of the most abundant species introduced to Chile by the forestry sector, with more than 458,611 hectares planted.

However in Chile there are not studies, focused on the knowledge about of inducible defense mechanisms, of E. globulus specie against the C. eucalypti action. The species of Eucalyptus genus accumulate essential oils in the glands of those leaves that have shown antifungal, antimicrobial and insecticidal activity [6,25,26], which facilitates a study of this type.

The main objective of this work was to clarify and evaluate E. globulus capability to express secondary metabolic defense responses against stimuli caused direct and indirectly by C. eucalypti.

Thirty-two compounds were found and identified (Figure 1). Mainly oxygenated monoterpenes, an aromatic carboxylic acid and a quinone, were also found but in less amount (Table 1). In the T1 treatment, (direct entomological induction), the plants expressed four different compounds, in comparison with the control. They were; borneol, exo-2-hydroxy cineole, thymol and the quinone 6-acethyl-flaviolin. For the treatment T2, (indirect ento-

mological induction) plants synthetized two compounds that differed from the control; borneol and benzoic acid. In T3 treatment (induction by exposure to volatile) plants synthesized borneol, the only one compound which was not detected in the control.

The biosynthesis of specific compounds (Figure 1), as is the case of oxygenated monoterpenes exo-2-hydroxy cineole, thymol and the quinone 6-acetyl-flaviolin, presented only in treatment with direct entomological induction (T1), consistent with those found by Reymond et al. [28] in Arabidopsis thaliana plants treated with larvae of Pieris rapae and by Korth and Dixon [29], in Solanum tuberosum, induced with larvae of Manduca sexta. This selectivity in the expression of compounds is attributable only to changes in gene expression and in most defensive secondary metabolites [1].

Effects of oral secretions from herbivorous insects, have considered the role of insect saliva in plant-insect interactions, which enables the plant to differentiate insect damage from mechanical damages. For example, by damaging Tobacco plants (Nicotiana tabacum) with larvae of Helicoverpa zea, in that the salivary gland was removed, they have shown evidences that salivary secretions qualitatively affect the defense responses of plant against this insect [20]. Recently, a new class of sulfated fatty acid called caeliferin was identified in oral secretions of Shistocerca americana, caeliferins induce the release of volatile terpenes in corn seedlings [30]. The background stated above are closely related to the response found in T2 (indirect entomological induction) and benzoic acid biosynthesis.

This volatile compound has been documented in chemical defenses of the plants, in studies of beetles that attack willow leaves [31-33]. It is very likely that the expression of this compound is due, to the insect macerate used for this induction has had compounds belonging to the saliva of C. eucalypti insect, and these have been perceived by the treated plants, promoting the synthesis of benzoic acid.

The oxygenated monoterpene borneol, detected in the treatments of direct entomological induction (T1), indirect entomological induction (T2) and also in the induction by exposure to volatile (T3) has been described as an effective repellent insects [34]. The presence of this compound in these three treatments, places it as widespread action to the different biotic stimuli.

Some monoterpene hydrocarbons, which although are present in the control treatment, they were presented at a higher concentration (overexpression), at least in one of the other treatments (Table 1). This is the case of α- pinene and p-cymene, which showed a higher relative concentration in T1, T2 and T3, these compounds have a A proven insecticide effect. In the case of α-pinene during studies on adult females of Musca domestica [35] and p-cymene as adulticide females and larvae of Thrips Frankliniella occidentalis [36], while the carene compound that showed a higher relative concentration in T2 and T3 is a volatile compound that acts within the indirect defenses of the plant, causing the attraction of insect predators of insects that cause damage to the plant [37].

The same happened with the oxygenated monoterpenes cineole, linalool and α-terpenil-acetate. The compound cineole which was overexpressed in T1, T2 and T3, as linalool that was overexpressed in T2 possess insecticidal effect [6], while α-terpenil-acetate, with repellent effectiveness [38], was overexpressed in T1, T2 and T3.

Although the results of this study demonstrate the capability of plants to express defensive responses to different stimuli, there remain at least three stages of research to develop, those that allow the application of knowledge found. A major research phase to develop, is to isolate from the saliva of the insect C. eucalypti, which are the compounds that act as chemical signal, recognizable by plants and that trigger defensive responses from the secondary metabolism, as the compound “volicitina” isolated from oral secretions of Spodoptera exigua larvae, a substance that has the capability to induce the release of volatile compounds in corn plants, found by Halitschke et al., (2001) [39], or as the studios made by Schmelz et al., (2007) [40] which sought to induce ethylene production in Vigna unguiculata plants and identified proteolytic fragments of the subunit ATP synthase-g into oral secretions from larvae of Spodoptera frugiperda.

An important aspect in a second stage of research is to determine whether these compounds from oral secretions of the insect C. eucalypti can be replicated synthetically, in order to apply them in young plants to induce defense responses artificially.

Be seen from the above a third stage of research, unavoidable, which is the determination of the persistence of defensive responses in time (as an immunological memory). While, the defensive success of a plant against an attack provoked by a pathogen or an insect is based on the speed with which the plant is able to recognize aggression and trigger the defensives chemical responses, there an unresolved question yet, is whether the plants remain predisposed to react more rapidly to future attacks, acquiring a certain level of resistance (systemic) higher, at least during the first years of life that are most important to protect. These are questions to be resolved in future studies.

The E. globulus plants, induced by different types of entomological stimuli, expressed defense compounds coming from the secondary metabolism. The biosynthesis of defense compounds in plants with inductions in which there was not a wound in the tissues, show their capability to perceive stimuli and express defensive compounds, without any previous mechanical damage.

Although most of the detected compounds are constitutive secondary metabolites of E. globulus species, was observed an over expression in their relative concentrations in front of the different performed inductions, when were compared with the control, while a smaller number of compounds were synthesized in plants only in front to stimuli caused.

Considering that in our country, a large number of plants of E. globulus are produced by vegetative propagation, the importance of the results found, challenges us to continue studies to elucidate whether these defensive responses persists in the vegetative propagation, in order to be able to produce seedlings with a higher level resistance to C. eucalypti, from mother plants previously induced.

We thank CONICYT and the Graduate Council of the University of Concepcion for funding granted during the development of Mr. Troncoso’s doctoral studies, CONICYT INSERCION 79100025 and Proyecto de Financiamiento Basal PFB-27.