<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ICA</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Intelligent Control and Automation</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-0653</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ica.2012.31008</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ICA-17575</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  H&lt;sub&gt;∞&lt;/sub&gt; Control of Uncertain Fuzzy Networked Control Systems with State Quantization
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>agdi</surname><given-names>S. Mahmoud</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Systems Engineering Department, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>msmahmoud@kfupm.edu.sa</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>28</day><month>02</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>59</fpage><lpage>70</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>September</day>	<month>11,</month>	<year>2011</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>October</day>	<month>11,</month>	<year>2011</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>October</day>	<month>18,</month>	<year>2011</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The problem of robust H
  <sub>∞</sub> control for uncertain discrete-time Takagi and Sugeno (T-S) fuzzy networked control systems (NCSs) is investigated in this paper subject to state quantization. By taking into consideration network induced delays and packet dropouts, an improved model of network-based control is developed. A less conservative delay-dependent stability condition for the closed NCSs is derived by employing a fuzzy Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional. Robust H
  <sub>∞</sub> fuzzy controller is constructed that guarantee asymptotic stabilization of the NCSs and expressed in LMI-based conditions. A numerical example illustrates the effectiveness of the developed technique.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Networked H&lt;sub&gt;∞&lt;/sub&gt; Control; Fuzzy Systems; Discrete Time-Varying Delay; Linear Matrix Inequality (LMI)</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Fuzzy system models have been widely adopted to represent certain classes of nonlinear dynamic systems following the T-S fuzzy model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.17575-ref1">1</xref>]. Since then there have been several approaches for the study of stability analysis and robust controller synthesis using the so-called parallel distributed compensation (PDC) method for uncertain nonlinear systems [2,3]. Sufficient conditions have been derived based on the feasibility testing of a linear matrix inequality (LMI) in [4-7] and extended for classes of nonlinear discrete-time systems with time delays in [8-10] via different approaches. Recently, much attention has been paid to the stability issue of network based control systems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.17575-ref11">11</xref>]. Several results pertaining to the analysis and design of networked control systems (NCSs) enhanced their wide benefits such as reducing system wiring, ease of system diagnosis and maintenance, and increasing system agility, to name a few. However, communication network in the control loops gave rise to some new issues, especially the intermittent losses or delays of the communicated information due to use of a network, which imposes a challenge to system analysis and design. To address this challenge, many results have been developed in consideration of network-induced delay and packet dropout [12-18], with focus on stability analysis and controller design with random delays.</p><p>Further consideration of the communication of the NCSs over the channel emphasized the importance of signal quantization, which has significant impact on the performance of NCSs. In this regard, the problem of guaranteed cost control and quantized controller design were discussed in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.17575-ref17">17</xref>] by using two quantizers in the network both from sensor to controller and from controller to actuator, and the network-induced delay and data dropped were considered as well.</p><p>Recent advances converted the quantized feedback design problem into a robust control problem with sector bound uncertainties, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.17575-ref11">11</xref>] and [16-18]. Parallel investigations to the class of switched discrete-time systems with interval time-delays were developed in [19-23].</p><p>Despite the potential of these developments, the problem of how to analyze the stability of nonlinear NCSs with data drops still open. On the other hand, most industrial plants have severe nonlinearities, which lead to additional difficulties for the analysis and design of control systems. Though some issues on nonlinear NCSs have been investigated [23,24], limited work has been found on robust <img src="8-7900120\193577c0-af8c-4599-ac15-bbec2edddfeb.jpg" /> state feedback controller design of networks for fuzzy systems with consideration of both network conditions and signal quantization.</p><p>The guaranteed cost networked control and robust <img src="8-7900120\6df3b3e1-77c7-4778-a101-fdf776c86687.jpg" /> problem based on the T-S fuzzy model was treated in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.17575-ref25">25</xref>]. The results were derived by using a single Lyapunov function (SLF) method, which in general leas to a conservative result. Designing fuzzy controllers for a class of nonlinear networked control systems was considered in [26-28] by solving approximate uncertain linear networked Takagi-Sugeno (T-S) models with both network induced-delay and packet dropout. However, they do not quantize the signals. The foregoing facts motivate the present study.</p><p>In this research work, we address the robust <img src="8-7900120\50987e72-6c48-4510-bcb0-c67ecb27d0a7.jpg" /> state feedback control problem for discrete-time networked systems with state quantization and disturbances. The T-S fuzzy systems with norm-bounded uncertainties are utilized to characterize the nonlinear NCSs. Since the computation available is often limited, the quantized feedback controller is designed under consideration of effect of network-induced delay and data dropout, the employed quantizer is time-varying. By using a new fuzzy Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional (LKF), we provide a sufficient LMI-based condition for the existence of a fuzzy controller. A numerical example shows the feasibility of the developed technique.</p><p>Notations and facts: In the sequel, the Euclidean norm is used for vectors. We use <img src="8-7900120\a1fc52f3-b25d-4c70-b3a6-fa498bb7eba4.jpg" /> and <img src="8-7900120\16a1d4ef-2e69-4884-bcfb-5c417d9cd0b2.jpg" /> to denote the transpose and the inverse of any square matrix<img src="8-7900120\b247c2b7-9fdc-4817-a9e3-c14227770f4d.jpg" />, respectively. We use <img src="8-7900120\4f6dbce6-6d40-4b22-b7d1-3d1fc1e231cf.jpg" /> <img src="8-7900120\5f20d55f-6c0b-4c08-89f3-1c40ebf71913.jpg" /> to denote a symmetric positive definite (positive semi-definite, negative, negative semi-definite matrix <img src="8-7900120\c24470fa-48e6-4398-a250-03d46b05f3d3.jpg" /> and <img src="8-7900120\92de3380-de24-4803-b951-b2e85e071d3a.jpg" /> to denote the <img src="8-7900120\8a7062f6-5c00-48b0-9c80-81e480cd1d1f.jpg" /> identity matrix. Matrices, if their dimensions are not explicitly stated, are assumed to be compatible for algebraic operations. In symmetric block matrices or complex matrix expressions, we use the symbol (<img src="8-7900120\4a5149b0-9848-45c6-acc3-52057782420a.jpg" />) to represent a term that is induced by symmetry.</p><p>Fact 1: For any real matrices <img src="8-7900120\65441f61-bd30-49e7-acfb-0ab9ce3b9afe.jpg" /> and <img src="8-7900120\b80108e0-ae75-4588-872e-b69b049a3519.jpg" /> with appropriate dimensions and<img src="8-7900120\3db59dcd-d95f-4553-bdb4-521008f8bdde.jpg" />, it follows that</p><p><img src="8-7900120\efbaf652-4df5-4ff2-96fb-f2302ea70999.jpg" /></p><p>Sometimes, the arguments of a function will be omitted when no confusion can arise.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Problem Description</title><p>A typical networked control system typically has a clockdriven sampler and a quantizer, controller, a zero-order hold (ZOH) which is event-driven. The sampling period is assumed to be <img src="8-7900120\fd865b63-bf0e-4444-81bb-a6e1206837b4.jpg" /> with the sampling instants as<img src="8-7900120\e542841d-5c9a-4310-b784-28afa8728015.jpg" />. The plant belongs to class of uncertain discrete-time systems where the parametric uncertainties are norm-bounded.</p><p>In what follows, we consider that this class is represented by Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy model composed of a set of fuzzy implications, and each implication is expressed by a linear system model. The <img src="8-7900120\0d9b9e81-2d78-42eb-91c5-9fb3554a9351.jpg" /> rule of this TakagiSugeno model has the following form:</p><p><img src="8-7900120\1e7b769e-dcc7-40e9-80ab-b7cdefa06c44.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\34f6becb-01b0-42f6-a5d1-70e677638448.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\a698fab6-5abf-419f-bd74-c39feb6fbe72.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.17575-formula146787"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7900120\c3ec9e83-54c0-427a-9b38-9ac0858248e7.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="8-7900120\476e8d7c-8fcf-4558-8877-3d9f8dbf627f.jpg" /> are the premise variables, each <img src="8-7900120\ad03bc9b-c6e6-4a48-a1b7-30983cd76d94.jpg" /> are the fuzzy sets, <img src="8-7900120\e7c34c4f-e105-4e47-8d35-02ff94a9211c.jpg" />is the number of if-then rules and <img src="8-7900120\623d38bf-d3f6-4394-9adc-a800a4be944b.jpg" /> is the state vector, <img src="8-7900120\872994f0-df6b-4445-bd8d-970434462919.jpg" />is the control input, <img src="8-7900120\f29c601d-fb18-4f1f-940c-4817c5fd0a94.jpg" />is the output, <img src="8-7900120\1599837c-7d9a-4925-8975-df799cf6e2eb.jpg" />is the disturbance input which belongs to <img src="8-7900120\784bb407-4cc1-4739-92d5-ef3dd2020446.jpg" /> and <img src="8-7900120\c881d267-8be9-4408-b756-65c4f6611385.jpg" /> indicates the maximum allowable signal transmission delay. The uncertain matrices <img src="8-7900120\844d5e6b-7a8c-4779-a1fb-db987f369586.jpg" /> are represented by:</p><p><img src="8-7900120\5c17dfba-f11d-4815-aa03-5a9fe8a95c22.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.17575-formula146788"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7900120\b88e33c4-bb0b-4877-a0d3-7328e3f5b3de.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the matrices <img src="8-7900120\644a8617-b974-436e-8019-32db7aa4a9f1.jpg" /> describe the nominal dynamics and <img src="8-7900120\4b1ea453-e722-4b66-a8ee-afba489be440.jpg" /> are known constant real matrices with appropriate dimensions. The matrices <img src="8-7900120\316a7d21-6c91-410c-9e45-e36e2a7bd7b3.jpg" /> are unknown time-varying and satisfying<img src="8-7900120\0c5b6bc1-d354-417d-8bb1-06779696d733.jpg" />.</p><p>Using a center average defuzzifier [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.17575-ref1">1</xref>], product inference, and incorporating fuzzy “blending”, the fuzzy system under consideration can be cast into the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.17575-formula146789"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7900120\022d406f-8722-446d-bf3c-ab6cb691915f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.17575-formula146790"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7900120\5d3c30c6-71f8-402f-85ad-8bafbf19ec51.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="8-7900120\946f88ab-e60d-4b97-95ab-a4d31e095362.jpg" /> is the grade of membership of <img src="8-7900120\320622ea-f586-46ce-9c6d-74e63c318ff2.jpg" /> in<img src="8-7900120\7699ee5e-abe4-4d25-aab4-2191ca1515d2.jpg" />. In the sequel, we assume that</p><p><img src="8-7900120\af77d5fd-943d-49b3-b5f3-ac7403c99c49.jpg" /></p><p>and therefore</p><p><img src="8-7900120\b4bd408a-0054-42a1-a942-1909ac6e56a2.jpg" /></p><p>Our objective in this paper is to design a fuzzy <img src="8-7900120\6db81688-486e-4389-9d65-d1e4c19e64b9.jpg" /> state feedback controller with state quantization.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Controlled Fuzzy System</title><p>In what follows, we proceed to consider establish the main result for the uncertain discrete-time fuzzy networked control systems described by (3) and design the quantized fuzzy <img src="8-7900120\3a9c7a0b-bd2d-4050-bfff-2cf5c4c8f979.jpg" /> state feedback controller. We consider a limited capacity communication channel and for reducing the amount of data rate of transmitting in the network, which led to the increase quality of service of the network, we assume that the state vector <img src="8-7900120\280540a6-e47b-4f14-bf56-d0fd91f69171.jpg" /> is measurable. The state signal from sensor to the controller is quantized via a quantizer, and then transmitted with a single packet. To reflect realty, network-induced time delay is modeled as an input delay and the packet dropout will be considered.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. State-Feedback Control</title><p>In effect, we seek to design the state-feedback controller:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.17575-formula146791"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7900120\afd91995-d48c-4c44-b5a0-062cb85d5087.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="8-7900120\b23e67fb-c226-4f47-afe5-96ecf49ae4b0.jpg" /> is the feedback law to be defined in the sequel and <img src="8-7900120\91c5d292-c517-4caf-a7f0-20264f483c12.jpg" /> are some integers such that<img src="8-7900120\48260ec8-6166-4d16-9a8e-23c47c66068e.jpg" />. Introduce <img src="8-7900120\25f3c537-9e98-4579-9773-7c71d3d771c3.jpg" />which contains the information of packet dropouts and improper packet sequence in the control signal. Note that<img src="8-7900120\21bc903a-0ec8-40b3-8787-a98833f562bf.jpg" />.</p><p>It has been pointed out in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.17575-ref19">19</xref>] that when <img src="8-7900120\f0c59b61-cb70-4121-b6dd-193de3ab9465.jpg" /> there would be no packets dropout and the case <img src="8-7900120\500bc2dd-fba7-4750-b508-5fe8fe2fcda6.jpg" /> represents continuous packets lost. In addition, when <img src="8-7900120\3435d982-da88-44d9-a183-d8af8b369c1e.jpg" /> the new packet reaches the destination before the old one. This case might lead to a less conservative result. In the sequel, we assume that <img src="8-7900120\d2ada3f8-9e1e-46a8-9662-a1e5850b398d.jpg" /> and it is readily seen that</p><p><img src="8-7900120\3371903c-3854-41d2-8fac-2c0cc25a596b.jpg" /></p><p>It should be observed that <img src="8-7900120\c1f30c2a-410a-446d-94d9-e6697dcf4c65.jpg" /> accounts for the time from the instant <img src="8-7900120\88e3a1cd-be24-49c8-838a-5360378ce4a5.jpg" /> when sensor nodes sample the sensor data from the plant to the instant when actuator transfer data to the plant. Extending on this, we remark that</p><p><img src="8-7900120\73fbccd8-d7b3-4be8-be7f-672dfa0c4b98.jpg" /></p><p>Consequently, we define</p><p><img src="8-7900120\d3393d0a-9f7b-4f84-9599-363f1bfdc2e9.jpg" /></p><p>where <img src="8-7900120\7cb66bfb-6c6f-422d-bd3d-e370c63c3f7f.jpg" /> are known finite integers.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Quantizer</title><p>Let the quantizer be described as</p><p><img src="8-7900120\40dbc8f6-2128-414c-abe7-9698072e53e7.jpg" /></p><p>where <img src="8-7900120\ce0f7d59-0eeb-42d7-bf60-f88b19d7c57a.jpg" /> is a symmetric, static and and time-invariant quantizer and the associated set of quantization levels is expressed as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.17575-formula146792"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7900120\589e73a2-04c0-4803-b2f0-3fd54d4e7d05.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Note that the quantization regions are quite arbitrary. In case of logarithmic quantizer, the set of quantization levels <img src="8-7900120\6f827649-959a-40b6-a6ab-7e5afec35e7a.jpg" /> becomes</p><p><img src="8-7900120\234643b4-669a-4717-b2f2-7691f9dc81dd.jpg" /></p><p>where <img src="8-7900120\54bc85ff-96b3-40db-be45-989c7d102d02.jpg" /> is the initial state of the quantizer and <img src="8-7900120\d2ebad74-aab7-45fb-93b5-3d2d91c5594f.jpg" /> is a parameter associated with the quantizer<img src="8-7900120\303d9e5e-1b06-4be7-831d-d00242cdea2b.jpg" />. In this regard, a particular characterization of the quantizer is given by</p><p><img src="8-7900120\7504e8fa-d9ad-4e62-b69d-d901c8ad2bf0.jpg" /></p><p>where<img src="8-7900120\f526953f-13fd-4791-938a-e889ce124f33.jpg" />. It follows from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.17575-ref19">19</xref>] that, for any<img src="8-7900120\80cc1b0e-abe9-47ad-8afe-86e5f5f4fba7.jpg" />, a sector bound expression can be expressed as:</p><p><img src="8-7900120\fabb3fc7-1ab1-4205-8afa-3509efd7a3d4.jpg" /></p><p>For simplicity in exposition, we use <img src="8-7900120\42e8c79f-bfde-4e7f-abf6-c808ae8f0480.jpg" /> to denote<img src="8-7900120\ecf4efb3-d30b-433c-968a-c0790a5885a1.jpg" />. Thus, <img src="8-7900120\1c3fa110-4471-4695-aaa8-145426c91403.jpg" />can be written as</p><p><img src="8-7900120\13786abf-a629-4c19-9844-4bee3701463e.jpg" /></p><p>We assume henceforth that the updating signal at the instant <img src="8-7900120\cbb4da9d-8da0-4da2-914a-8c8468e5f84b.jpg" /> has experienced signal transmission delay<img src="8-7900120\03bda4b0-c8ce-4232-9736-5375b5a85a3c.jpg" />, however the delay between the sensor and quantizer is neglected. In view of the limited capacity in communication channel, the state signal from sensor to the controller is quantized via a logarithmic quantizer <img src="8-7900120\4c90904c-dd60-4992-aab3-16745a6eb895.jpg" /> for reducing the amount of data rate of transmitting in the network. When the static and time-invariant quantizer<img src="8-7900120\bfebf2bb-3dfb-49b0-ba41-91f17c9fb216.jpg" />, the state feedback controller would be in the form of<img src="8-7900120\7dc64bcf-6e58-4201-9637-c969af557d46.jpg" />, which is the same as a traditional one.</p><p>Incorporating the notion of parallel distributed compensation, the following fuzzy state-feedback stabilizing control law is used:</p><p><img src="8-7900120\a83c4ff6-5968-4005-9158-9ab00e3b1772.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.17575-formula146793"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7900120\beac5978-3e01-4f20-a9ba-6f58a1e6c98a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="8-7900120\c4ded57b-16c3-4278-8bab-442b0509a746.jpg" /> is the control gain for rule<img src="8-7900120\ba0a051c-ef14-420a-9899-a97152994ce7.jpg" />. Accordingly, the overall fuzzy control law is expressed by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.17575-formula146794"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7900120\b9b1db47-59fa-49bf-b54b-bfdd7ab66f2e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Applying controller (8) to system (3) with some mathematical manipulations, the resulting closed-loop system can be cast into the form:</p><p><img src="8-7900120\de9374ba-b3d4-4b54-83fd-1053bec4e000.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.17575-formula146795"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7900120\5d64eeb6-2615-416c-8048-835da5f9c73e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which belongs to the class of switched time-delay system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.17575-ref15">15</xref>], where</p><p><img src="8-7900120\8a925d8c-210a-4cf9-9ae3-83a90d3ccc4c.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.17575-formula146796"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7900120\e3f85570-fd62-4874-b773-ff52524822aa.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><img src="8-7900120\4f757450-eca4-48a9-aeca-44e9ee034fff.jpg" /></p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Quantized Fuzzy Control Design</title><p>In this section, we seek to establish a sufficient condition for the solvability of the robust <img src="8-7900120\d9720718-0607-4623-9f70-b7b609ac4c08.jpg" /> control problem. This condition will be expressed in an LMI framework to facilitate the design of the desired fuzzy state feedback controllers. Based on the so-called parallel distributed compensation scheme, the following theorem establishes a delay-dependent stabilization condition for the closedloop fuzzy networked control system (9):</p><p>Theorem 4.1 Consider system (9). Given the bounds <img src="8-7900120\b4f8d10c-56df-4cb5-9678-714902c566f6.jpg" /> and a scalar constant<img src="8-7900120\62683c17-ec5b-4e7c-bc88-a2024bd72df4.jpg" />, there exists a fuzzy controller in the form of (8), such that the uncertain closedloop fuzzy system (9) with an <img src="8-7900120\6f9564a2-9997-4623-8be4-d3bfecdc0331.jpg" /> disturbance attention level <img src="8-7900120\70a00a67-c28e-46d8-81a7-9d308822fb5e.jpg" /> is asymptotically stable, if there exist matrices <img src="8-7900120\c005e5f1-f40d-47f7-bb18-eba6b6327c31.jpg" />matrices <img src="8-7900120\e15532d4-c307-43f1-9b23-6657bb88429b.jpg" /> and scalars <img src="8-7900120\0cf7e557-2cad-477c-a8bf-1ee6cb2026f7.jpg" /> <img src="8-7900120\89147818-8b0a-4f44-a3a9-701749e894ee.jpg" />satisfying</p><disp-formula id="scirp.17575-formula146797"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7900120\aaabd162-89ad-4c3e-aeb3-f5dfe74d1093.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><img src="8-7900120\0bf1d746-ba5d-4fdc-a144-f95cbd332452.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.17575-formula146798"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7900120\ae4201e0-7e05-45a8-b0a6-751528f5f173.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><img src="8-7900120\24959fab-2fa8-47b5-aa1c-6f45f470da1f.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\b96dea99-a865-44c7-8df9-99f695a3e6b9.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\4c75480c-620b-4fc7-860d-1cd738026068.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\822a5f47-4dac-46c0-bb80-bca170b77e6f.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.17575-formula146799"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7900120\e1c6f57b-4354-4b22-b4c9-307fd8bd5fad.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof: In what follows, we adopt a parameterdependent approach [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.17575-ref15">15</xref>]. Consider system (9) with <img src="8-7900120\24b453ba-300b-46d8-b312-36d6987553e7.jpg" /> and define</p><p><img src="8-7900120\55f2e204-e4ec-4340-a541-add4b6d50be8.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\29008589-eb32-421f-b8bd-34b2b969f66d.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.17575-formula146800"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7900120\94241619-827c-4b9e-abd2-cde2b58db977.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><img src="8-7900120\63738268-3f96-4ac7-a779-8dcf1838bfec.jpg" /></p><p>where <img src="8-7900120\f5fab3e2-9c99-4758-8b5b-eacb8f468c2d.jpg" /> are matrices of appropriate dimensions and <img src="8-7900120\ea59ef25-35eb-4a28-92df-0f6e049318d2.jpg" /> <img src="8-7900120\34c20cd4-6ac8-4e59-b0ab-c64494dc801d.jpg" />are fuzzy weighting matrices that are directly include the membership functions instead of a single matrix, a fact that aims at relaxing the conservatism. For simplicity in notation, we let</p><p><img src="8-7900120\13967cc0-eee6-496e-9833-4271c0886336.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\5e0ddb23-9ee3-4b4f-8526-fd56ffe2224c.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\9cc6477c-1726-4c1c-99ba-fae0180bc263.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\688e81a4-ce4b-4d52-8589-7ffbea7a5056.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\d276c42d-1ad5-4bb2-a266-d63ac27d1679.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.17575-formula146801"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7900120\7bb12242-4e6a-4348-84e7-a6bcf7c529ff.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In terms of the state increment <img src="8-7900120\4c033d99-4d7d-40cb-9872-553a4435d6b3.jpg" /> and the time-span<img src="8-7900120\64edd23a-8a9b-49d0-9e80-67b15a62ed36.jpg" />we consider the Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional (LKF):</p><p><img src="8-7900120\036d8eed-0a44-413b-839a-8569cc305812.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\a02a4ba9-0492-47c0-b7d7-4c9200062e6f.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\28cff17b-0416-45ab-b631-07f29d5257a8.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\f18920af-f8f1-46bf-9223-01803391dceb.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\01a4b9f5-6df8-4fd4-a273-fc8e5a9c10e8.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.17575-formula146802"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7900120\0a16b353-7f23-4c33-96d6-0ecd36cb9c83.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We focus initially on the case<img src="8-7900120\382225ad-7f6b-4899-9186-1cc60de771dd.jpg" />. A straightforward computation gives the first-difference of</p><p><img src="8-7900120\e038f6f0-113b-453d-a820-256c72d39a2f.jpg" />along the solutions of (17) with the help of (9) and (10) as:</p><p><img src="8-7900120\d0187047-1aaf-4ea7-b152-cf27d9c9aa1f.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\c0741af8-16f8-497c-93e8-bda54d0fd535.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\bddbafd9-d6b0-4674-b863-30bdcc8d06cb.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\9985202b-510d-40a7-80c0-5fb4ef8eb7bb.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\369b78cb-1298-472a-b0fc-5ab9de29b451.jpg" />&#160;&#160;&#160;(19)</p><p>To facilitate the delay-dependence analysis, we invoke the following identities</p><p><img src="8-7900120\85f8daaa-5c21-4c92-86ac-41855bcb6bd9.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\729372a9-fcb7-4a12-aef7-73b7588d8eb9.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.17575-formula146803"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7900120\dc7138cb-2df1-44fc-bca0-183c28e638d1.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>for some matrices<img src="8-7900120\ea4d7a0a-7eea-4299-b89b-0fe27e46e318.jpg" />, and proceed to get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.17575-formula146804"><label>(21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7900120\75703a67-56c9-42f1-a70c-378bb58ad514.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In terms of</p><p><img src="8-7900120\561e235c-873c-4149-a0ae-99d78159466b.jpg" /></p><p>we cast (31) with <img src="8-7900120\c60feb78-a4e2-4946-910f-00148ed4d38b.jpg" /> into the form:</p><p><img src="8-7900120\ae398c15-f8af-490f-a401-4193b9bb24c6.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\f0fc61be-a21f-4255-88b8-ed32b9245f60.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\64c0c154-d24e-4755-9468-c6146804ecbf.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.17575-formula146805"><label>(22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7900120\e94ea0e6-46f3-4364-905b-1258fe05ee0a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="8-7900120\ad45dda7-0051-434a-878c-36f31d2f1f86.jpg" /> are given by (15). If <img src="8-7900120\2e432ce6-332b-42f7-9ee3-ae3a7668bcc6.jpg" /> for all admissible uncertainties satisfying (2), then by Schur complements it follows from (32) that <img src="8-7900120\febf9006-bd26-477e-87d5-2d76b049f7a1.jpg" /> for any <img src="8-7900120\a46b3ced-ff7c-49df-8121-9bd640a52910.jpg" /> guaranteeing the internal stability. Proceeding further and to assure the closed-loop stability with <img src="8-7900120\552b22f3-5203-4396-bd4f-dd4ce68b0a59.jpg" />-disturbance attenuation, we follow [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.17575-ref15">15</xref>] to get:</p><p><img src="8-7900120\58369b29-03b8-4b4f-8a6b-a89f63065bfb.jpg" /> &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;(23)</p><p>when <img src="8-7900120\0410f794-a767-42e7-9563-ba42c9537cff.jpg" /> where</p><p><img src="8-7900120\3e31fa35-dd9b-4e13-ae37-8cd31c3830cb.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\a549f349-b45e-415b-babd-ef1c6e5e1bd1.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.17575-formula146806"><label>(24)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7900120\2b7fb9cd-d028-4b7d-b9d8-b0f82743ef63.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Next, by applying Fact 1, we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.17575-formula146807"><label>(25)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7900120\30052e43-735c-4824-bac9-5c9ba23d0e93.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>for some scalars<img src="8-7900120\41cf94f5-7c67-4c38-88d3-d558a0d0e715.jpg" />. Note that</p><p><img src="8-7900120\a81c9122-d7fa-4ccb-bac3-a026fca3ac1a.jpg" />The quantities <img src="8-7900120\807266a5-7ad4-47df-9a4a-c51a1b45fb67.jpg" /> correspond to <img src="8-7900120\21d5949e-166d-4c98-afe2-3398589d64d3.jpg" /> given by (13) after deleting the last element, and</p><p><img src="8-7900120\902f9d47-a680-4f1f-b5ab-47b4880c1187.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.17575-formula146808"><label>(26)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7900120\dc4ee80b-88aa-4681-b0cb-ed3a8a73b182.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="8-7900120\20e5022a-56b6-4d45-a686-822514083819.jpg" /> are given by (15). Further convexification of <img src="8-7900120\84a02daa-ad60-4abd-9d3c-5143be15858b.jpg" /> in (35) yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.17575-formula146809"><label>(27)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7900120\622a7658-199b-4634-b1f4-8a4a89d031fe.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By Schur complements using the algebraic inequality <img src="8-7900120\d9fceae7-f0e6-43fc-a9d6-9654d36c86a0.jpg" /> for any matrix<img src="8-7900120\577495e9-4591-4afb-a4db-61346de141c4.jpg" />, the desired stability condition can then be cast into the LMI (11), which concludes the proof.</p><p>Remark 4.1 It is significant to observe that Theorem 4.1 provides a delay-dependent condition for the design of robust <img src="8-7900120\9c101e94-d307-43ba-b4a2-773348f2beee.jpg" /> for fuzzy NCS in terms of feasibility testing of a family of strict LMIs with a total number of LMIvariables as<img src="8-7900120\a3ec769b-e4ab-4ec0-a14b-bab9122dc836.jpg" />. The key feature is that the matrix gain <img src="8-7900120\daaabf4e-d0ee-4546-86a7-ba0a1daea0a8.jpg" /> is treated as a direct LMI variable. This will eventually lessen the conservatism in robust fuzzy control design.</p><p>Remark 4.2 It is worthy to note that the number of LMIs increases linearly with the number of rules <img src="8-7900120\8636c606-e15a-486e-a4cb-6d256d84e48e.jpg" /> which limits the applicability of the method for very large values of<img src="8-7900120\de5e62e0-f80e-4a65-bf7c-c7b55743be74.jpg" />. Had we used</p><p><img src="8-7900120\c3316128-9bb0-4bd3-af80-682cb8525701.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\cc98009c-d80c-49a9-bedc-ab1a583c1842.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\81925406-d1d4-419f-977f-83ab9e4adcc8.jpg" /></p><p>then Theorem 4.1 reduces to the following corollary:</p><p>Corollary 4.1 Given the bounds <img src="8-7900120\24882fdd-7880-402e-a539-80d4a5e1f1d3.jpg" /> and a scalar constants<img src="8-7900120\331ed4ae-6ce4-4562-9e6b-23a600929f10.jpg" />, there exists a fuzzy controller in the form of (8), such that the uncertain closed-loop fuzzy system (9) with an <img src="8-7900120\27c63a79-40d3-4ba4-8f32-e2fb88c51540.jpg" /> disturbance attention level <img src="8-7900120\d6cb4c96-db2b-4c8b-903a-45027f39bb14.jpg" /> is asymptotically stable, if there exist matrices <img src="8-7900120\0f4b524a-e533-4eff-8c6c-4f43f88e8cc8.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\a2eb142b-2b7d-4a67-8bdd-c766530a3b29.jpg" />matrices <img src="8-7900120\f77b4bd5-d547-4514-a141-65a22bc3d851.jpg" /> <img src="8-7900120\0beacdbd-8ad5-4aae-b7e1-b8c74c3cadf4.jpg" /> and scalars <img src="8-7900120\d0d4568d-0198-496f-b5bc-00b29c271c72.jpg" /> satisfying</p><disp-formula id="scirp.17575-formula146810"><label>(28)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7900120\f931d944-c161-4c96-bd9e-b684ca7c4012.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><img src="8-7900120\e986294d-6cc6-45a1-a105-e4e076351fcd.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\17973b91-ebdd-4055-b251-91c3ee4a7316.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\b219b305-155c-4698-b05b-c644a5ffee0d.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\7f8b4baa-3c4d-4000-b5b6-d4dddd8b0135.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\dd2bc056-6369-4979-9ba7-2310e7cc121e.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\f177aaa9-01f9-46ad-b97c-660a7f4c7f25.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\7e236e0e-1c5d-4274-a49b-e227cd1d665a.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.17575-formula146811"><label>(29)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7900120\bbc14b11-67c1-4565-ae79-8dbf6c3919df.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.17575-formula146812"><label>(30)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7900120\340dfc22-25c6-4211-8595-fa007579bd49.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><img src="8-7900120\a4e6001f-3ce8-438b-8b61-827ad0a3401a.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\f83ca2b9-3bc9-4df1-9093-aa33a84847f7.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.17575-formula146813"><label>(31)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7900120\61ba009b-8ae3-499f-ba65-c740f3ab971f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and the number of LMI variables would be<img src="8-7900120\912ad45b-622e-496f-b688-bf41dae54878.jpg" />. The price paid is that the LKF becomes non-fuzzy.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Special Cases</title><p>In this section, we seek to derive a sufficient condition for the solvability of the robust <img src="8-7900120\aed75f0f-9dea-4a48-97a2-8a3189c5ec7c.jpg" /> control problem for NCS without quantizer.</p>NCS without Quantizer<p>In this case, the resulting closed-loop fuzzy system can be expressed as:</p><p><img src="8-7900120\ff68c234-c00d-462b-91c7-65286350bacc.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.17575-formula146814"><label>(32)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7900120\c7b09377-36a4-4788-914c-7e0a8f8da5cb.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The corresponding control design is given by the following corollary:</p><p>Corollary 5.1 Given the bounds <img src="8-7900120\6e794f66-1b5b-4569-9ca4-2fce7d9f50e1.jpg" /> and a scalar constants<img src="8-7900120\870280d0-0b2a-481f-968b-cc76406a2e0b.jpg" />, there exists a fuzzy controller in the form of (8), such that the uncertain closed-loop fuzzy system (23)</p><p>with an <img src="8-7900120\189b6396-0a9a-4898-ae0e-c3bd4667367a.jpg" /> disturbance attention level <img src="8-7900120\dddb88dc-cd8e-4fda-8e72-162db2f3bf98.jpg" /> is asymptotically stable, if there exist matrices <img src="8-7900120\7df1a404-1cef-46d7-9c6c-ba7a35715448.jpg" /> <img src="8-7900120\cbc584a2-9edf-41be-b1d8-1ffd8f0dd0c4.jpg" /> matrices <img src="8-7900120\232613e2-a4d8-432f-9842-1042bf64c7f4.jpg" /> <img src="8-7900120\ae17e2d6-cce7-4f07-b502-6d92cdce56dc.jpg" /> and scalars <img src="8-7900120\064dc0fa-9dae-4acb-be35-c8d8ddec1e14.jpg" /> satisfying</p><disp-formula id="scirp.17575-formula146815"><label>(33)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7900120\c1a1e470-b5b3-44b1-8c0a-86bf93f22845.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><img src="8-7900120\8d93477b-6771-48c9-816d-f3790d0860ff.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.17575-formula146816"><label>(34)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7900120\6eb03d83-9c72-430b-86a7-6717e9172385.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the various terms are as in (13)-(15).</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Example</title><p>In what follows, a typical simulation example is considered to illustrate the fuzzy controller design procedure developed in Theorem 4.1. A class of discrete-time fuzzy networked control systems model with state quantization is described by:</p><p><img src="8-7900120\8616dbb3-0df9-4698-8fce-dd552102a5f9.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\a8c642f2-6498-4f23-a4cf-0c556cb27550.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\c061e5a1-ea29-4314-92c0-7ef7458e4765.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\4b545c85-4b45-4e74-ac00-c8f3d8aaf6e5.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\8d040689-615f-41d9-b8a4-15ceb1be306e.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\4f2cbbc7-7d57-41b6-a3f7-3848f28da6b8.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\02199b5e-a10c-424f-9de0-36a9724dcb12.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\e59e0c9c-3fb5-4087-8a13-b2d59eb9eaf0.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\68aef88d-a88d-4a8d-b153-3cbbfdc230c6.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\dacd4ca8-01e3-4e09-b5e5-d70eb4b82bc7.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\211c209c-d5e0-4d7e-954e-98c132251547.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\9a0e5f6a-8942-4dc7-8d48-d7e8348b374b.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\d030391c-187b-4e33-a5e5-f82433dcf1bf.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\aa650d82-4210-4681-a8ae-eca31fc58a64.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\5a6a4f7a-2da8-4fd4-a460-3c4d23d734f1.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\d22493aa-416b-4847-a4f3-e9d72ffa8dfe.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\3c9551b4-c696-4597-998a-2389aec06dd6.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\c3450a9d-0033-4ef4-a130-3e10fa1820ba.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\a3fdf9b4-99a0-45da-99e1-72ee19544df4.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\58d2e600-a4aa-4f21-a1d9-abcf7a2c516e.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\9143019a-40e6-4390-a216-778c1eea076f.jpg" /></p><p>The membership functions for the rules 1, 2, 3 are</p><p><img src="8-7900120\23c71230-54f7-415f-826d-d6a2baf9b635.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\566ae588-8520-4832-a12f-1a8bf7811c3d.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7900120\a364777f-137a-4bc7-952e-fe98759965f7.jpg" /></p><p>For the purpose of implementation, we consider the fuzzy system to be controlled through a network. A quantizer <img src="8-7900120\ced4fe41-2f7d-4b81-83c0-b1b29c535bc6.jpg" /> is selected to be of of logarithmic type with <img src="8-7900120\fa04bfdd-f436-4ff9-b252-d6990d40d21f.jpg" /> leading to <img src="8-7900120\9e6905ce-b993-4ec3-9c6b-6a9dcef97b03.jpg" /> <img src="8-7900120\a0ffb262-61b2-4573-b3d4-9753c9608b44.jpg" />. The bounds on data packet dropout are selected as <img src="8-7900120\8551bc42-0d60-43c1-a7e7-b3b4c0896aad.jpg" /> respectively. Using the Matlab LMI solver, the feasible solution of</p><p>Theorem 4.1 yields the fuzzy <img src="8-7900120\b95f3754-71a5-43de-bd34-a2fd069c3964.jpg" /> state-feedback controller gains of the form:</p><p><img src="8-7900120\a601921e-b1a2-4674-81c6-c01c3496f41c.jpg" /></p><p>The simulation results of the state and controlledoutput trajectories are plotted in Figures 1-3. It is quite evident that all the state and output variables of the fuzzy system settle at the equilibrium level within 20 sec.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>7. Conclusion</title><p>We have addressed the problem of robust <img src="8-7900120\4523fe64-ca9f-4c64-b03d-a9ec4f8c3e4f.jpg" /> statefeedback controller design for discrete-time TakagiSugeno (T-S) fuzzy networked control systems including state quantization. A quantized feedback fuzzy controller has been designed under consideration of effect of network-induced delay and data dropout, and the timevarying quantizer has been selected to be logarithmic. By employing a fuzzy Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional, we have derived some LMI-based sufficient conditions for the existence of fuzzy controller. A numerical example has been given to illustrate the efficiency of the theoretic results.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>8. Acknowledgements</title><p>The author would like to thank the deanship of scientific research (DSR) at KFUPM for financial support through research group project RG1105-1.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.17575-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. Takagi and M. Sugeno, “Fuzzy Identification of Systems and Its Applications to Modeling and Control,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1985, pp. 116-132.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.17575-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Tanaka, T. Ikeda and H. Wang, “Robust Stabilization of a Class of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems via Fuzzy Control: Quadratic Stabilizability,   Control Theory, and Linear Matrix Inequalities,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1996, pp. 1-13.  
doi:10.1109/91.481840</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.17575-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">X. Guan and C. Chen, “Delay-Dependent Guaranteed Cost Control for T-S Fuzzy Systems with Time Delays,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2004, pp. 236-249. doi:10.1109/TFUZZ.2004.825085</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.17575-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. Cao and P. Frank, “Analysis and Synthesis of Nonlinear Time-Delay systems via Fuzzy Control Approach,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2000, pp. 200211. doi:10.1109/91.842153</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.17575-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Zhou and T. Li, “Robust Stabilization for Delayed Discrete-Time Fuzzy Systems via Basis-Dependent Lyapunov-Krasovskii Function,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 151, No. 1, 2005, pp. 139-153.  
doi:10.1016/j.fss.2004.08.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.17575-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Xu and J. Lam, “Robust   Control for Uncertain Discrete-Time-Delay Fuzzy Systems via Output Feedback Controllers,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2005, pp. 82-93.  
doi:10.1109/TFUZZ.2004.839661</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.17575-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. J. Lee, J. B. Park and G. Chen, “Robust Fuzzy Control of Nonlinear Systems with Parametric Uncertainties,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2001, pp. 369-379. doi:10.1109/91.919258</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.17575-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Chen, W. Chang and S. Su, “Robust Static OutputFeedback Stabilization for Nonlinear Discrete-Time Systems with Time Delay via Fuzzy Control Approach,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2005, pp. 263272.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.17575-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. Cao and P. Frank, “Robust   Disturbance Attenuation for a Class of Uncertain Discrete-Time Fuzzy Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2000, pp. 406-415. doi:10.1109/91.868947</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.17575-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Wu, “Delay-dependent Stability Analysis and Stabilization for Discrete-Time Fuzzy Systems with State Delay: A Fuzzy Lyapunov-Krasovskii Functional Approach,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2006, pp. 954-962.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.17575-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Gao, T. Chen and J. Lam, “A New Delay System Approach to Network-Based Control,” Automatica, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2008, pp. 39-52.  
doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2007.04.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.17575-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Wu and T. Chen, “Design of Networked Control Systems with Packet Dropouts,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 52, No. 7, 2007, pp. 1314-1319.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.17575-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Zhang and L. Yu, “Output Feedback Stabilization of Networked Control Systems with Packet Dropouts,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 52, No. 9, 2007, pp. 1705-1710. doi:10.1109/TAC.2007.904284</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.17575-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. Zhang, Y. Shi, T. Chen and B. Huang, “A New Method for Stabilization of Networked Control Systems with Random Delays,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 50, No. 8, 2005, pp. 1177-1181.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.17575-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. S. Mahmoud, “Switched Time-Delay Systems,” Springer-Verlag, New York, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.17575-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. Tian, D. Yue and C. Peng, “Quantized Output Feedback Control for Networked Control Systems,” Information Sciences, Vol. 178, 2008, pp. 2734-2749.  
doi:10.1016/j.ins.2008.01.019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.17575-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. Yue, C. Peng and G. Tang, “Guaranteed Cost Control of Linear Systems over Networks with State and Input Quantizations,” IET Control Theory and Application, Vol. 153, No. 6, 2006, pp. 658-664.  
doi:10.1049/ip-cta:20050294</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.17575-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Chen and C. Yu, “Networked   Control of Linear Systems with State Quantization,” Information Sciences, Vol. 177, 2007, pp. 5763-5774.  
doi:10.1016/j.ins.2007.05.025</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.17575-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. S. Mahmoud, “Delay-Dependent   Filtering of a Class of Switched Discrete-Time State-Delay Systems,” Signal Processing, Vol. 88, No. 11, 2008, pp. 2709-2719. doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2008.05.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.17575-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. S. Mahmoud, A. W. Saif and P. Shi, “Stabilization of Linear Switched Delay Systems:   and   Methods,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 142, No. 3, 2009, pp. 583-607.  
doi:10.1007/s10957-009-9527-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.17575-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. Zhang, Y. Xia and M. S. Mahmoud, “Robust Generalized   and   Static Output Feedback Control for Uncertain Discrete-Time Fuzzy Systems,” IET Control Theory and Applications, Vol. 3, No. 7, 2009, pp. 865-876. doi:10.1049/iet-cta.2008.0146</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.17575-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Gao, P. Shi and J. Wang, “Parameter-Dependent Robust Stability of Uncertain Time-Delay Systems,” Computational &amp; Applied Mathematics, Vol. 206, No. 1, 2007, pp. 366-373. doi:10.1016/j.cam.2006.07.027</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.17575-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Gao, J. Lam, C. Wang and Y. Wang, “Delay-Dependent Output-Feedback Stabilization of Discrete-Time Systems with Time-Varying State Delay,” IEE Proceedings of Control Theory and Applications, Vol. 151, No. 6, 2004, pp. 691-698. doi:10.1049/ip-cta:20040822</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.17575-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Gao and T. Chen, “A New Approach to Quantized Feedback Control Systems,” Automatica, Vol. 44, No. 2, 2008, pp. 534-542. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2007.06.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.17575-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. Walsh and H. Ye, “Scheduling of Networked Control Systems,” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2001, pp. 57-65. doi:10.1109/37.898792</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.17575-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Zhang, D. Yang and T. Chai, “Guaranteed Cost Networked Control for T-S Fuzzy Systems with Time Delays,” Applications and Reviews, Vol. 37, No. 2, 2007, pp. 160-172.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.17575-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. Zhang and H. Fang, “Fuzzy Controller Design for Networked Control System with Time-Variant Delays,” Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2006, pp. 172-176.  
doi:10.1016/S1004-4132(06)60030-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.17575-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">X. Jiang and Q. Han, “On Designing Fuzzy Controllers for a Class of Nonlinear Networked Control Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2008, pp. 1050-1060. doi:10.1109/TFUZZ.2008.917293</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>