<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Applied Mathematics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-7385</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/am.2012.31008</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AM-16768</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  &lt;i&gt;L&lt;sub&gt;p&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;-Estimations of Vector Fields in Unbounded Domains
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>lexey</surname><given-names>V. Kalinin</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alla</surname><given-names>A. Tyukhtina</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Artem</surname><given-names>A. Zhidkov</given-names></name><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>Artem.Zhidkov@gmail.com(AAZ)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>04</day><month>01</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>45</fpage><lpage>51</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>November</day>	<month>15,</month>	<year>2011</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>December</day>	<month>15,</month>	<year>2011</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>December</day>	<month>23,</month>	<year>2011</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Some new estimations of scalar products of vector fields in unbounded domains are investigated. L
  <sub>p</sub>-estimations for the vector fields were proved in special weighted functional spaces. The paper generalizes our earlier results for bounded domains. Estimations for scalar products make it possible to investigate wide classes of mathematical physics problems in physically inhomogeneous domains. Such estimations allow studying issues of correctness for problems with non-smooth coefficients. The paper analyses solvability of stationary set of Maxwell equations in inhomogeneous unbounded domains based on the proved L
  <sub>p</sub>-estimations.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Estimations; Scalar Product; Vector Field; Functional Spaces; Maxwell Equations; Solvability; Inhomogeneous Domains</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The estimations of scalar products of vector fields and their norms play a significant role in proving the solvability of mathematical physics problems. Many researches are devoted to the study of estimates of the norms of vector functions in different functional spaces [1-4]. But in the most cases such estimations require the homogeneous areas when their parameters don’t depend on space coordinates [5,6].</p><p>For inhomogeneous areas we suggest using estimations of scalar products of vector fields for the mathematical physics problems. In the publications [7-10] some L<sub>p</sub>-estimations of scalar product of vector fields in the limited areas were obtained and was investigated the possibility of their application to study the solvability of different problems of electromagnetic theory.</p><p>It is natural to study problem formulations in non-homogeneous unbounded domains for most problems of mathematical physics. In the publications [11,12] we proved L<sub>2</sub>-estimations of scalar products of vector fields in unlimited areas.</p><p>The paper is dedicated to solvability of a stationary set of Maxwell equations in the whole <img src="8-7400656\605baf56-e2a5-46ab-a198-ba690a4580d8.jpg" /> space, based on the proved L<sub>p</sub>-estimations of scalar product in the weighted functional spaces.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Main Functional Spaces</title><p>Let <img src="8-7400656\3813641f-4d82-4f36-b953-5226ae331cae.jpg" /> be an open subset of <img src="8-7400656\f2513442-18b5-4c4f-97be-f701a19a151e.jpg" /> space (particularly<img src="8-7400656\d0473c02-3b62-4abd-b930-b246e78f1204.jpg" />).</p><p>Let <img src="8-7400656\8265a2ff-f4bd-47d5-bea8-d92769db6c43.jpg" /> be a Banach space of functions<img src="8-7400656\b524e832-bed2-4733-bdf5-0902d814de0c.jpg" />, summable with power<img src="8-7400656\3edefe37-fb08-42f3-bbe8-d3f33a39346f.jpg" />, where a norm is</p><p><img src="8-7400656\b27fd1b2-f213-406d-b729-f87a2211c0e8.jpg" /></p><p>Let <img src="8-7400656\75879f1c-2747-41f2-8771-a26e1ad673cb.jpg" /> be a Banach space of vector-functions<img src="8-7400656\d257573c-51d6-49b2-9939-318bd48cd28d.jpg" />,</p><p><img src="8-7400656\8e0bba12-5760-45ee-8f4a-9df102da895e.jpg" /></p><p>where <img src="8-7400656\1c9d8c14-b90a-4ac9-9dfe-4fa2a3d30ce3.jpg" /> (<img src="8-7400656\8ee52eb2-6dd0-4ed2-a8ab-21132a461b86.jpg" />), with a norm</p><p><img src="8-7400656\8ce2042f-b268-4b93-9819-7e26523f48ba.jpg" />.</p><p>Let <img src="8-7400656\74b259c4-2847-4045-80c4-213c640d7c00.jpg" /> and <img src="8-7400656\c236a06e-bcde-44df-b702-0f3e4f2e9391.jpg" /> be Banach spaces</p><p><img src="8-7400656\c68bcb00-c843-42a6-903b-8416f542ad55.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7400656\a01f261f-81e5-4a39-818f-95a877190e66.jpg" /></p><p>with norms</p><p><img src="8-7400656\410ff890-216a-44c9-b713-c8e39d46790f.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7400656\37d4d371-2749-4967-934c-14a8fe48d322.jpg" />respectively.</p><p>We denote by <img src="8-7400656\2492b4a3-9709-4ef5-9267-a0a872ccbf77.jpg" /> and <img src="8-7400656\1eff4107-49cd-4cd8-9e74-c0c50cd2963d.jpg" /> the closures of the set of test vector-functions in <img src="8-7400656\aaa30626-0d28-4cc6-96b8-dc68a6478244.jpg" /> and<img src="8-7400656\4e612c41-c93d-43d2-b2a5-3fdf481731e3.jpg" />, respectively.</p><p>The following estimates for scalar products of vector fields in the bounded star-shaped domain <img src="8-7400656\5949651f-f035-487d-bcb7-14ef6473d6ef.jpg" /> with the regular boundary were obtaned in [8,9,11].</p><p>Lemma 2.1. Let<img src="8-7400656\60270ff9-9ae0-463a-be84-82c829e81296.jpg" />,<img src="8-7400656\6deadcd2-fdb4-404d-85bc-3a6fb6b5f3d0.jpg" />. There exists a constant<img src="8-7400656\19afaf7e-753c-48af-8110-7e432d097c45.jpg" />, that for any <img src="8-7400656\b686508c-1071-415b-800a-51bda6be19c4.jpg" /> and <img src="8-7400656\9f4b5ee2-4bbf-403a-a4c5-6942d830a007.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7400656\1407728c-899f-49da-908e-c069485641d0.jpg" /></p><p>Lemma 2.2. Let<img src="8-7400656\3ad17df1-041b-4e1c-81da-bb4f740769b1.jpg" />,<img src="8-7400656\160b3400-8a2c-475d-9847-6c7759a8458f.jpg" />. There exists a constant<img src="8-7400656\cda285fe-b153-4bdc-bff9-73ac28f35a77.jpg" />, that for any <img src="8-7400656\8db49a0a-d4a0-454b-b929-9d8645eee0c5.jpg" />, <img src="8-7400656\23372ca4-f7c2-4366-abe0-cf43d3960e1d.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7400656\89a9d178-35f2-4e40-af06-9dc2b7850863.jpg" /></p><p>Lemma 2.3. Let<img src="8-7400656\ae8b368b-b20f-4cdd-bb06-7d1c0d2f939e.jpg" />,<img src="8-7400656\20a6ec0f-b310-4865-8a09-5fbd1487d1a9.jpg" />. There exists a constant<img src="8-7400656\ce386515-3e86-4e7a-ae1c-892884118e99.jpg" />, that for any <img src="8-7400656\c3cbe03c-6728-4fca-ad2e-54b479b763b1.jpg" /> and <img src="8-7400656\b8b4fa34-e35f-45d7-b977-0b4ad6968f72.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7400656\283080c3-a03f-417c-a6e7-fa58773c834a.jpg" /></p><p>The main result of this paper is a proof of similar estimates for<img src="8-7400656\7963ec7b-c69f-4aa9-8a94-4757d365afeb.jpg" />.</p><p>Let<img src="8-7400656\c1395c71-ff01-4fc8-88b8-315dcd05a687.jpg" />. For each <img src="8-7400656\db4ed90e-4c9a-4872-8679-cb4bf4833630.jpg" /> and <img src="8-7400656\f051cfec-8c9a-42c0-8c31-4123f4e0fd48.jpg" /> we define Banach spaces of vector-functions:</p><p><img src="8-7400656\3c93a394-91e0-40df-a862-32933ef2d556.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7400656\922f7b41-07c3-48f2-8cd9-021593c22593.jpg" /></p><p>with the corresponding norms</p><p><img src="8-7400656\ba600bdd-e6a6-47d2-9b4c-af6eee72dd0c.jpg" />,</p><p><img src="8-7400656\22f08a65-9d46-4dda-b096-0bd5a03a57e0.jpg" />.</p><p>For <img src="8-7400656\71f0e5de-8549-48c0-bcec-f8a66feaa479.jpg" /> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.16768-ref12">12</xref>] these spaces are defined as:</p><p><img src="8-7400656\21f43802-daf5-4ad9-9329-971473fa7676.jpg" /></p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Estimations of Scalar Products</title><p>The main result of the current article is Theorem 3.1. Let<img src="8-7400656\61da451f-06d8-4bbb-92c1-d032a0158523.jpg" />, <img src="8-7400656\951d0018-3439-455b-a754-3cf04800c809.jpg" />, <img src="8-7400656\5ff07c2e-1337-460c-b826-89539ecf54c6.jpg" />,<img src="8-7400656\6f3cbe7b-6e6b-417a-92bd-679e7867536d.jpg" />. Then there exists a positive constant <img src="8-7400656\40235662-d830-4401-bdf0-11efaf0201d8.jpg" />, which does not depend on vector-functions <img src="8-7400656\1c1b9166-d282-4690-8f26-a11754c92b24.jpg" /> and<img src="8-7400656\3101455c-475d-4b9b-b784-e1bca3820ed2.jpg" />, and the inequality</p><disp-formula id="scirp.16768-formula144366"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7400656\f5af9980-f44d-437a-b511-cbac99ed5fb8.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is correct.</p><p>In proving Theorem 3.1 the following statement is used.</p><p>Lemma 3.2 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.16768-ref7">7</xref>]. Let <img src="8-7400656\5315ad33-9125-4b4a-b8f7-b992e97d5497.jpg" /> be an open set in <img src="8-7400656\5b39bbef-b46b-4ca5-b5ff-9187df4be34e.jpg" /> (particularly,<img src="8-7400656\71d197a4-1888-4023-8714-25efc90d50c2.jpg" />) star-shaped on<img src="8-7400656\5e73f980-c4f6-44e6-87bb-6df5b9416133.jpg" />. Then the following identities are true for all <img src="8-7400656\31c62876-b597-456e-9986-42168f9b8747.jpg" /> and each function <img src="8-7400656\f663df31-4345-40f3-9219-0d6600f85b34.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.16768-formula144367"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7400656\0bb5a466-5930-4da8-b015-ed23cca7f23c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.16768-formula144368"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7400656\1cfb5f17-666f-417a-982c-57649dc0db9b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Let<img src="8-7400656\db5f9196-e4ce-4e95-a387-24a6d5fca942.jpg" />, <img src="8-7400656\0135854a-99ae-490c-a9e2-50b820b72362.jpg" />,<img src="8-7400656\6f9e0f44-e2e3-4c52-9fa6-b172eb9f0602.jpg" />. Then the identities (2) and (3) are equivalent to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.16768-formula144369"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7400656\28d9e834-7732-45ec-824c-fda92175dc78.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.16768-formula144370"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7400656\a370721c-73ae-472a-856c-3c88ffe6789f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof (Theorem 3.1). Let<img src="8-7400656\73664f10-1557-4605-81de-f53bae9eef98.jpg" />. Let <img src="8-7400656\45abea6f-c6df-4829-82e1-3c1632f4177f.jpg" /> and <img src="8-7400656\73c971e0-a76f-4c17-8cdb-7f3d52184236.jpg" /> be smooth vector-functions on <img src="8-7400656\66e47ba6-bf14-48c9-8f1a-25be12e672d3.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7400656\7fefc2cd-91cd-4c08-95b0-a48ae392f62a.jpg" /></p><p>Let <img src="8-7400656\c45c3847-f0a7-4561-935b-16db75d202ba.jpg" /> denote a closed solid sphere with radius <img src="8-7400656\26ab44d5-1f8b-4179-bb95-3307e67b0a1c.jpg" /> centered at the origin and with the boundary<img src="8-7400656\249a9f5e-d92a-4b60-b680-ee5f058d4387.jpg" />. Consider the integral</p><disp-formula id="scirp.16768-formula144371"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7400656\06d2f17c-811b-491b-9b62-264dc92923b5.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="8-7400656\33a61c48-e7b4-46f6-97a6-d1cf5cb2039a.jpg" /> is a function of scalar argument</p><p><img src="8-7400656\b40e86c6-fbf3-4fda-a825-d374b058c25e.jpg" /></p><p>We use the representation (3) for the vector-function <img src="8-7400656\d7d67237-bcb3-4a77-980f-1acee664cdde.jpg" /> in the integral (6)</p><p><img src="8-7400656\2c1de07b-b5db-4c50-af7a-1b3b5f17ee3b.jpg" /></p><p>For the first of resulting integrals (<img src="8-7400656\69f8d8cf-1377-4659-9c7a-807c3751454b.jpg" />) we use a vector field relation</p><p><img src="8-7400656\f16abe1b-4f79-4f46-9577-6e85b59d113f.jpg" /></p><p>and then we invoke the Gauss-Ostrogradsky theorem and use the fact that <img src="8-7400656\acd38df9-ba91-43b3-99f9-ae440d69aa45.jpg" /> when<img src="8-7400656\02132a60-276f-4fe2-aaf4-44e627f5c330.jpg" />. So</p><p><img src="8-7400656\2fd05113-a6b1-4099-81a2-1845fef984cf.jpg" /></p><p>or passing to spherical coordinates the operator <img src="8-7400656\c3c0d3dd-a6e1-4b7a-91c1-57f65076b017.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7400656\6d912bfb-80df-4c49-978a-0bc6b3b9675f.jpg" /></p><p>We estimate the first integral. Applying H&#246;lder’s inequality to <img src="8-7400656\285ba6d4-ce11-44cb-ae01-7ea7d3bc4e8a.jpg" /> we get</p><p><img src="8-7400656\adf0de4b-9eb0-44df-971e-709d9871f434.jpg" /></p><p>then</p><p><img src="8-7400656\7fde5087-617a-406d-a407-d090b1ee0a80.jpg" /></p><p>Applying H&#246;lder’s inequality to the second inner integral, we have:</p><p><img src="8-7400656\2794063e-607c-4a98-8b6f-a5df4ce2e4f8.jpg" /></p><p>We can write the estimation as</p><p><img src="8-7400656\4189243c-5cab-4987-9a03-c4797629b27d.jpg" /></p><p>It is obvious that if <img src="8-7400656\69c16f49-beee-4f8e-abfe-af31e8213d52.jpg" /> an expression <img src="8-7400656\684bb3c5-635c-4f30-ac50-3741cf29c072.jpg" />, then</p><p><img src="8-7400656\b5f8e987-b086-41ec-926b-77bf36e26a32.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7400656\19ab48e0-7409-4adc-a92f-7488f7a4e5dc.jpg" /></p><p>Let us estimate the integral<img src="8-7400656\8deba59c-2b48-42ef-bc92-51cd04829a51.jpg" />. It is evident the the</p><p><img src="8-7400656\d56f6534-0a7d-4152-acf2-5ca672bcb296.jpg" />, where</p><p><img src="8-7400656\5fd4b327-925e-4f19-b280-872350f46f3a.jpg" /></p><p>Applying H&#246;lder’s inequality several times, we get</p><p><img src="8-7400656\b4e31183-14d4-4063-b959-18a0cf866770.jpg" /></p><p>The following estimation is obvious</p><p><img src="8-7400656\11d1a670-7849-4fe8-a62e-e16a6cc6c2f5.jpg" /></p><p>Hense</p><p><img src="8-7400656\c5b584ad-8d4d-4947-a10d-575af1b971d1.jpg" /></p><p>then <img src="8-7400656\81aee67f-efe3-4a58-8c78-899bd7c5caf2.jpg" /> when<img src="8-7400656\577d801f-77b7-4032-8087-2820937c3d86.jpg" />.</p><p>Next we construct an estimation for integral<img src="8-7400656\c67eaed7-e5be-4abc-a682-28cf7d9d083c.jpg" />. We apply H&#246;lder’s inequality to<img src="8-7400656\58ea266d-0bb8-426d-9260-6352f60b8b67.jpg" />.</p><p><img src="8-7400656\621482e1-368d-4d2c-b37b-a451cb33adc7.jpg" /></p><p>So, we get an estimation for<img src="8-7400656\c89b260e-b215-4b74-9d1b-871059cfeb4f.jpg" />:</p><p><img src="8-7400656\6df0da94-67e9-49e2-8512-0fb1d58d16a0.jpg" /></p><p>We use H&#246;lder’s inequality for the second integral again.</p><p><img src="8-7400656\5610b7ca-fa89-4e5d-b3ff-fba4cc5bbf72.jpg" /></p><p>Let’s estimate the following integral</p><p><img src="8-7400656\c6f0a0e5-6616-4e27-9ac8-fe2d82020886.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7400656\d65ab049-a88c-4a72-91d2-d04f34248866.jpg" /></p><p>Denote <img src="8-7400656\517ce862-d5b0-4f00-a1cc-c4c82c0979b8.jpg" /> and consider</p><p><img src="8-7400656\24803dd5-c65d-4a51-a91f-553bcffd9f07.jpg" /></p><p>When <img src="8-7400656\ef2cb70a-9133-44a4-83f5-3f74b7d91484.jpg" /> (i.e.<img src="8-7400656\6ac385c1-2f08-4ac5-a593-96e7659bd9b4.jpg" />), then</p><p><img src="8-7400656\f6b49d9f-3baa-4c56-b5a9-b54e2db7ba9f.jpg" /></p><p>and, respectively</p><p><img src="8-7400656\bcc3bf3a-e401-4441-8fb2-8ce08213aa9c.jpg" /></p><p>If <img src="8-7400656\535e3c7b-3e3c-4131-8404-908caa7a21b0.jpg" /> we get</p><p><img src="8-7400656\3389e2c4-db7d-433c-ae6d-913ab2ba73de.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7400656\d53838bb-5560-4506-90ac-a7272c18546e.jpg" /></p><p>At last, when<img src="8-7400656\99acb54f-e035-4813-a017-e58eb85e338a.jpg" />, then</p><p><img src="8-7400656\05dc17dc-e6b1-49b3-9f50-59e6532a57a2.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7400656\84325079-d58c-488e-8b53-a849e88c07ff.jpg" /></p><p>Thus, we obtain</p><p><img src="8-7400656\bac4176d-ea0c-436f-b94d-f918202a5356.jpg" /></p><p>and therefore</p><p><img src="8-7400656\999ba9d3-9013-4a04-a931-f7ca7d4bea9f.jpg" /></p><p>Bringing together the constructed estimates, we derive the following inequality for integral (6)</p><p><img src="8-7400656\275e32ce-6a46-4c7d-a53e-fedb60d07067.jpg" /></p><p>where</p><p><img src="8-7400656\01a87922-d815-4b1f-8ec2-0529eb8157d0.jpg" /></p><p>Going to the limit for <img src="8-7400656\20929de5-8423-4f83-8cd9-65c2131a6080.jpg" /> in the last inequality, we will obtain estimation (1).</p><p>Note, that for <img src="8-7400656\94e1fdf3-dbe1-4726-b2dd-4f64d4fa5a92.jpg" /> the theorem may be proved similarly using the Equivalence (2).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion of the Stationary Problem of Electromagnetic Theory</title><p>As an example of using the estimations proved in Section 3, we will consider a problem of determining the magnetic field stretch <img src="8-7400656\6e433be8-fcc1-4ea8-8ec0-725bc1a7aa32.jpg" /> in the whole <img src="8-7400656\fbeea190-128d-431e-b7d6-040de10b3785.jpg" /> space with a bounded conducting subdomain.</p><p>Stationary electromagnetic field is described by the set of stationary Maxwell’s equations</p><disp-formula id="scirp.16768-formula144372"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7400656\fbe4515f-8ea8-459d-9da2-92454c2c724d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.16768-formula144373"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7400656\df7ad5ed-c91b-4b52-aa2b-6705d3c705b5.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.16768-formula144374"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7400656\5ade875b-6ee8-4b96-8c58-c219c759a20f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.16768-formula144375"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7400656\d968d3ac-0531-4a59-b465-8bcca575985c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here<img src="8-7400656\42a965e4-19a2-4753-bdb9-b24b3bd4981f.jpg" />. The conductivity of the atmosphere is denoted as<img src="8-7400656\d4bdb1e5-7cdf-476e-9e8a-d2e686b359e7.jpg" />. Let <img src="8-7400656\8f4be174-3702-4304-9800-295cfe7a1e04.jpg" /> denotes a bounded open star-shaped subset of <img src="8-7400656\8c7f7423-4619-4e94-aedb-d76cdcf16e6b.jpg" /> defined by conditions</p><disp-formula id="scirp.16768-formula144376"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7400656\028bf8fa-4a38-474b-97b8-e94230d4dcd5.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.16768-formula144377"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7400656\382d68f3-76bd-4f6f-a484-d311bd107276.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Functions <img src="8-7400656\16c31892-9d7a-475f-9026-f459b3fdf9de.jpg" /> are permeability and permittivity. They satisfy the following conditions</p><p><img src="8-7400656\114e478e-332b-492b-bd11-1ec29f215714.jpg" /></p><p>The <img src="8-7400656\f2b37063-9bda-4d0b-8fd8-ad752b766042.jpg" /> is a vector-function of the external electromotive force, which is asumed given and satisfying the condition</p><p><img src="8-7400656\a3709d1e-7c82-45ba-a09c-aadd8f88b8e2.jpg" /></p><p>Function <img src="8-7400656\c5c5f8fc-ff1a-455d-bc94-236ba4b670e6.jpg" /> equals zero for almost all <img src="8-7400656\e49baf03-eda2-469f-a76b-67e6b7c11bc0.jpg" />.</p><p>We introduce the necessary functional spaces</p><p><img src="8-7400656\d8acea55-fb31-456a-a2e4-a2025fe5c016.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7400656\69966b55-7ee6-45df-8923-e1fdd1c7efd3.jpg" /></p><p><img src="8-7400656\d600035b-71a1-49e6-8b13-15ebfad0b5d3.jpg" /></p><p>Denote<img src="8-7400656\3aa1be6c-7ce1-475f-81eb-af39cc9ed450.jpg" />. It is readily proved that this functional space will be Hilbert space relatively to scalar product</p><p><img src="8-7400656\2026493e-ba3f-4d8d-85c9-8ed1bf50498c.jpg" /></p><p>We name the solution of the Problem (7)-(10) the functions<img src="8-7400656\12dc11bd-722e-4835-b3d1-6a046f16cff7.jpg" />, <img src="8-7400656\57428cc0-eba6-41bf-809f-5a025c220e13.jpg" />and <img src="8-7400656\b80bce49-e75f-4d62-a7d5-7db99f0557e9.jpg" /> satisfying condition <img src="8-7400656\efa8aefe-9c63-4707-b187-b26681991c2b.jpg" /> for almost all<img src="8-7400656\1e7be885-8eff-41fb-9e8e-5dc59d18dceb.jpg" />.</p><p>The validity of (10) implies the distibution <img src="8-7400656\151529ad-473d-4df2-9b46-adba10ddddbc.jpg" /> for all <img src="8-7400656\d0ce3179-43b4-4803-9331-541a206c3f7e.jpg" /> defined by the formula</p><disp-formula id="scirp.16768-formula144378"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7400656\5621c801-1b05-412d-b823-91fdc3338760.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (7) in conducting subdomain will be</p><p><img src="8-7400656\c9670944-f8e6-4bb8-9889-59db771a8bd1.jpg" /></p><p>and in nonconducting subdomain (<img src="8-7400656\17542562-dc86-4cd7-a56a-8c577e1701c1.jpg" />) it becomes an identity.</p><p>Multiplying the last equation by<img src="8-7400656\40426121-4c72-4a42-a764-ce52e8321b09.jpg" />, <img src="8-7400656\c7e3e804-4dbf-4ed7-8ed9-8817a1baeffa.jpg" />, integrating along<img src="8-7400656\2872c076-ce60-41a7-b26d-01d267464caa.jpg" />, and using <img src="8-7400656\01d091b3-c14a-4646-ba8d-d5ec730c74ad.jpg" /> or</p><p><img src="8-7400656\5829d950-f632-4563-9490-e57093a11208.jpg" />.</p><p>It becomes obvious that the problem of determining the stationary magnetic field can be formulated as follows:</p><p>Determine vector-function <img src="8-7400656\71361f92-3962-4d9c-b1b1-757104a67d56.jpg" /> satisfying the integral identity</p><disp-formula id="scirp.16768-formula144379"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="8-7400656\8ab07e4c-e507-4da3-bd6c-6cc65fd99aed.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>for all functions<img src="8-7400656\aebaf0a1-39c7-41ef-bc4b-f01effaa64c8.jpg" />.</p><p>We need the following statement to prove the theorem of solvability (Theorem 4.2) for the Problem (14).</p><p>Lemma 4.1 (Lax-Milgram [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.16768-ref13">13</xref>]). Let <img src="8-7400656\417dd74f-2644-45a7-b857-32e457fbf123.jpg" /> be a Hilbert space over the field of real numbers. Let <img src="8-7400656\d4abc28e-df9f-4f96-9d22-82727fc9b951.jpg" /> be a symmetric bilinear bounded coercive form,<img src="8-7400656\51ff6b1a-1304-4f61-a5df-7c47cbe3d682.jpg" />—linear bounded functional. Then there exists a unique element <img src="8-7400656\c75daca6-dd96-4261-bf1c-7c68bd8107c4.jpg" /> satisfying the equality</p><p><img src="8-7400656\bab6e8db-8a41-404e-bf96-68e1d7a383e7.jpg" /></p><p>for all<img src="8-7400656\1471dcdb-489d-4c2b-b449-839f018b3b45.jpg" />.</p><p>Theorem 4.2 (Solvability of the Problem (14)). Let</p><p><img src="8-7400656\2e04060e-6f9d-40fb-bf8d-9cb04a7133a2.jpg" />satisfy (11), (12), <img src="8-7400656\003f6112-37fe-477e-8117-6a76b9549158.jpg" />and</p><p><img src="8-7400656\bbf6cbaa-242c-4754-a2c6-4058c05f52a0.jpg" />for almost all<img src="8-7400656\f9552cac-c830-4252-8d7a-33b566cd3213.jpg" />. Then the solution <img src="8-7400656\f738e31b-74c6-41b3-b4bf-1a74bc68ca60.jpg" /> of the generalized Problem (14) exists and is unique.</p><p>Proof. Let’s verify the conditions of the Lax-Milgram lemma.</p><p>Let us denote</p><p><img src="8-7400656\ce077d7b-8dd1-49c9-b210-2163ab349d68.jpg" /></p><p>Obviously, <img src="8-7400656\8d455919-0736-42b8-b9b6-077162ae40f8.jpg" />is a bilinear and symmetric form. The finiteness is easily proved by condition (11):</p><p><img src="8-7400656\5bb436bd-8f2e-47ba-941c-ca69e82b19e3.jpg" /></p><p>Using the Cauchy-Bunyakovsky-Schwarz inequality, we obtain</p><p><img src="8-7400656\b45a5f69-4be2-4d2c-ba10-de4466131f75.jpg" /></p><p>Let’s show coercivity of the form<img src="8-7400656\7c7ad94b-2d68-46fc-8960-2d99dd0e4d15.jpg" />.</p><p>Whereas <img src="8-7400656\f25b925d-966f-4cb5-b890-f1b08fc16982.jpg" /> thus <img src="8-7400656\42de06dc-7a28-46ba-98cd-281cbbc37687.jpg" /> for each<img src="8-7400656\cf200573-8085-4ec9-b17a-dbf9bd0743a0.jpg" />, i.e. the vector-function <img src="8-7400656\e225f93e-7eac-47d2-be32-461a4acdcd30.jpg" /> satisfies estimation</p><p><img src="8-7400656\9c6ea0eb-4418-4f8e-a869-1bb556e75844.jpg" /></p><p>The following notation is used<img src="8-7400656\830ae303-e873-4a59-b766-573b0799a777.jpg" />. Let’s use Estimation (1)</p><p><img src="8-7400656\7488efea-c21d-4dd4-a490-803514e984c4.jpg" /></p><p>Since<img src="8-7400656\95d27db4-4935-459d-bfed-b511a23b1874.jpg" />, the last summand is zero. Then using the H&#246;lder’s inequality, we obtain</p><p><img src="8-7400656\fdb2f0a7-d9c4-47d0-8fc6-a4b99150527d.jpg" /></p><p>Hense</p><p><img src="8-7400656\2068f3cb-b96d-4335-8ccc-5daeae4622ac.jpg" /></p><p>where<img src="8-7400656\f650cd59-57e2-46c4-bbf7-5043ba068dd1.jpg" />. The estimates show the coercivity of the bilinear form, because</p><p><img src="8-7400656\5f1d9b6f-cf21-45ae-bf3b-a891d8673e91.jpg" /></p><p>Now we verify the conditions for functional<img src="8-7400656\609adddf-a7a8-4f15-8e58-057a85f4b451.jpg" />. The linearity is obvious. Let’s show the finiteness using the Cauchy-Bunyakovsky-Schwarz inequality</p><p><img src="8-7400656\a471e9c9-a750-465f-87c9-34693a01a159.jpg" /></p><p>Thus, all the constraints of the Lax-Milgram lemma are satisfied, and the solution of the Problem (14) exists and is unique.</p><p>Remark. The solvability of the studied problem is also true when <img src="8-7400656\5dd74dfa-359f-4e74-83c3-bee6fb796ded.jpg" /> is a positive-definite tensor. The scheme of the proof is similar to Theorem 4.2.</p><p>Let <img src="8-7400656\1a912db2-a43a-4e76-adc1-b9a2dfca63c6.jpg" /> satifies relation (14) for all <img src="8-7400656\7c957aac-8a4e-42c1-a587-2d6317dddaba.jpg" />. Let’s show that other indefinite functions will be defined in <img src="8-7400656\238056e5-e839-45ce-83de-da7b4bfc7000.jpg" /> from equaitons (7)-(10) as values depending on<img src="8-7400656\05e12721-ae5a-44b2-bbf3-40efe91329a4.jpg" />.</p><p>We determine function <img src="8-7400656\c8b40592-099f-42fc-8569-c5e8c552a79a.jpg" /> in the conductivity area by equality</p><p><img src="8-7400656\9320464e-87c3-4758-9273-656795a932a8.jpg" /></p><p>Let<img src="8-7400656\de19c65f-a42c-4489-ba54-2878c2a76da3.jpg" />. Let’s extend <img src="8-7400656\b6074eab-88a9-48c9-97b7-72f999583cd4.jpg" /> by zero in<img src="8-7400656\38a23cd3-7599-40ee-8369-7261f718a7f8.jpg" />. According to the Lax-Milgram lemma there is the unique function<img src="8-7400656\5e79ab0d-c918-4322-9e85-432046cd0d75.jpg" />, which for each <img src="8-7400656\0634fe0c-ba76-46b1-b0f3-6344b454724e.jpg" /> satisfies the equality</p><p><img src="8-7400656\e0e7319b-4280-4b48-bd3d-7d007a1b20f6.jpg" /></p><p>Then <img src="8-7400656\65deaa9e-7575-4ad3-ac3a-dd15dec074db.jpg" /> and as<img src="8-7400656\947ac916-ec0d-4a46-a6ce-d338986ab3d1.jpg" />, then<img src="8-7400656\a71f653f-48d1-4920-9c4f-33b7f379a903.jpg" />. Therefore we obtain that</p><p><img src="8-7400656\ac358df7-5464-41cc-bf55-2ac66b1bae56.jpg" /></p><p>This shows that<img src="8-7400656\70141448-5114-4e84-ac54-1556f42bb081.jpg" />.</p><p>The function <img src="8-7400656\e9b67454-a370-4b16-87d3-524eb5ac0c8a.jpg" /> is defined by relation (13) as shown above.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The paper was devoted to the proof of L<sub>p</sub>-estimation of vector fields in weighted functional spaces. Also we discussed a solvability of the problem of determinig the magnetic field stretch in the whole <img src="8-7400656\131bf054-2a1c-40eb-8ee8-519df8a9ba14.jpg" /> space. The proof of solvability is based on the proved estimation.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by Analytical Departmental Program “Highschool scientific potential growth” (2009- 2011) Russian Ministry of Education and Science (reg. no. 2.1.1/3927), Federal Target Program “Scientific and Scientific-Pedagogical Personnel of Innovative Russia” (2009-2013) (project NK-13P-13) and RFBR Grant (project 09-01-97019-r_povolzhie_a).</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.16768-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. Byhovskii and N. Smirnov, “Orthogonal Decomposition of the Space of Vector Functions square-Summable on a Given Domain, and the Operators of Vector Analysis,” (Russian) Trudy Matematicheskogo Instituta Steklov, Vol. 59, 1960, pp. 5-36.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.16768-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. Duvaut and J. Lions, “Inequalities on Mechanics and Physics,” Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1976.  
doi:10.1007/978-3-642-66165-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.16768-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. Temam, “Navier-Stokes Equations: Theory and Numerical Analysis,” North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.16768-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Weil, “The Method of Orthogonal Projection in Potential Theory,” Duke Mathematics Journal, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1940, pp. 411-444. doi:10.1215/S0012-7094-40-00725-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.16768-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. Girault and P.-A. Raviart, “Finite Element Approximation of the Navier-Stokes Equations,” Springer-Verlag, New-York, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.16768-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. Maslennikova, “Lp Estimates, and the Asymptotics at t→∞ of the Solution of the Cauchy Problem for a Sobolev System,” (Russian) Trudy Matematicheskogo Instituta Steklov, Vol. 103, 1968, pp. 117-141.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.16768-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Kalinin, “Some Estimations in the Theory of Vector Fields,” (Russian) Vestnik UNN Series Mathematical Modeling and Optimal Control, Nizhny Novgorod, No. 20, 1997, pp. 32-38.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.16768-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Kalinin and A. Kalinkina, “Estimates of Vector Fields and Stationary Set of Maxwell Equations,” (Russian) Vestnik UNN Series Mathematical Modeling and Optimal Control, No. 1, 2002, pp. 95-107.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.16768-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Kalinin and A. Kalinkina, “Lp-Estimates for Vector Fields,” Russian Mathematics (Izvestiya Uchebnykh Zavedenii Matematika), Vol. 48, No. 3, 2004, pp. 23-31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.16768-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Kalinin, S. Morozov, “Stationary Problems for the Set of Maxwell Equations in Heterogeneous Areas,” (Russian) Vestnik UNN Series Mathematical Modeling and Optimal Control, No. 20, 1997, pp. 24-31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.16768-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Kalinin, “Estimations of Scalar Products for Vector Fields and Their Application in Some Problems of Mathematical Physics,” (Russian) Izvestiya of Institution of Mathematics and Infomatics UdSU, Vol. 3, No. 37, 2006, pp. 55-56.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.16768-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Zhidkov, “Estimates of the Scalar Products of Vector Fields in Unbounded Regions,” (Russian) Vestnik UNN, Nizhny Novgorod, No. 1, 2007, pp. 162-166.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.16768-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Lax and A. Milgram, “Parabolic Equations,” Annals of Mathematics Studies, Vol. 33, 1954, pp. 167-190.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>