This was a descriptive and analytical study focusing on selected ready-to-eat dishes commonly consumed by the Togolese population. The study was conducted from March 2024 to July 2025 and aimed to determine the glycemic index and glycemic load of these foods. A preliminary dietary survey was conducted among 500 male and female students aged 18 - 35 years at the University of Lomé, which was selected because of the cosmopolitan nature of its student population, comprising individuals from different regions of Togo. To identify commonly consumed foods, an online questionnaire was developed and administered using the KoboCollect platform. The questionnaire was disseminated through the communication groups of faculties and schools. It collected sociodemographic information, food preferences, and food consumption frequency. The foods investigated included maize, rice, sorghum, millet, fonio, wheat, cassava, yam, sweet potato, taro, plantain, cowpea, and Bambara groundnut (voandzou), as well as their accompanying sauces [7][8]. Foods reported as being consumed at least four times per week were considered frequently consumed. Among these, locally consumed foods considered to make a significant contribution to daily nutritional intake were selected [9]. A total of 90 starchy-based dishes and 35 accompanying sauces were selected.

2.1.1. Culinary Preparation and Sampling

The selected dishes were prepared according to their usual local recipes and culinary practices. The ingredients used in each preparation were weighed before cooking to determine the proportions incorporated into the dishes. Porridges were prepared without added sugar. For sauces containing meat or fish, 100 g of meat or fish were incorporated according to the corresponding recipe. After cooking, the dishes were allowed to cool to room temperature. Portions weighing approximately 220 g on average were collected and weighed into clean containers. Each sample was immediately sealed and identified by the name of the dish. Samples were collected in successive batches, with an average of 12 samples per collection. The dishes studied represented foods commonly consumed at lunch and dinner, including cereal-based doughs, rice, cowpea, tubers, and plantain, together with their accompanying sauces.

2.1.2. Sample Transport and Storage

Following collection, the samples were placed in a cooler and transported to the laboratory for analysis. Upon arrival, each sample was registered and assigned a unique identification code. The samples were then prepared for the planned nutritional analyses and stored under refrigerated conditions until analysis.

2.1.3. Ethical Considerations

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Comité de Bioéthique pour la Recherche en Santé (CBRS) under Opinion No. 005/2024/CBRS dated January 18, 2024. Authorization to conduct the preliminary dietary survey was also obtained from the Presidency of the University of Lomé prior to data collection.

Inclusion criteria: this study included local Togolese dishes based on starchy foods, as well as the various accompanying sauces consumed locally.

Exclusion criteria: non-traditional, imported and industrially processed ready-to-eat dishes were excluded from this study.

A comprehensive analysis of the nutritional composition was carried out on 125 starchy dishes and local sauces. The following parameters were measured: water content, ash, fat, protein, total dietary fibre, available carbohydrates and the energy value of the meals consumed at lunch and dinner.

2.2.1. Laboratory Analyses

Non-homogeneous samples were ground using a mill (Retsch GM 300) prior to analysis.

The water content was determined using the ISO 665:2020 method, based on drying at 103˚C ± 2˚C for four hours in an oven until a practically constant mass was obtained [10]. The water content content was calculated using the following formula:

H: water content (g/100);

m0: mass, in grams, of the empty crucible;

m1: mass, in grams, of the crucible containing the test specimen, before drying;

m2: mass, in grams, of the crucible with the test sample, after drying.

The ash content represents the total inorganic residue remaining after the incineration of a food sample.

The ash content was determined using AOAC method 923.03. This involves incinerating the food samples in a muffle furnace at a temperature of 500˚C ± 50˚C until a whitish ash is obtained [11]. The ash content was calculated using the formula:

m0: mass, in grams, of the test sample;

m1: mass, in grams, of the incineration residue.

The total protein content is determined using the Kjeldahl method in accordance with ISO 20483:2013 [12]. The principle involves the digestion of organic matter using concentrated sulfuric acid in the presence of a protein catalyst, followed by alkalization of the reaction products. The ammonia released is distilled and collected in a boric acid solution, then titrated with a standard sulfuric acid solution (0.5 N). The conversion factor used for nitrogen to total protein was 6.25. The total protein content is determined using the formula:

T_p: Total protein content (g/100 g);

V: Volume of sulphuric acid used for the blank test (ml);

V₀: Volume of sulphuric acid used for the blank (ml);

T: Concentration of the sulphuric acid solution used for titration (1 N);

P: Test sample (g);

β: Conversion factor for nitrogen to total protein (6.25);

0.014: Conversion factor from the titre of the sulphuric acid solution used (normality) to mass titre.

Lipidswere extracted using the Soxhlet method (AOAC 960.39). A test sample of 2 g of meal was placed in an extraction cartridge. The cartridge was sealed with cotton wool and then placed in the Soxhlet apparatus. The entire extraction system was mounted on a pre-tared beaker containing diethyl ether or hexane. The fat was recovered after extraction [13]. The mass of the lipids was obtained by the difference after drying. The lipid content was determined using the formula:

Tl: lipid content (g/100g);

mf: mass, in grams, of fat + capsule;

m0: empty weight, in grams;

me: mass, in grams, of the test sample.

The available carbohydrate content in the meals was determined by differential calculation using the formula [14]:

The energy valueof the various dishes is calculated using the Atwater factors according to the formula [14]:

The total dietary fibre (crude fibre) contentswere determined using the Fibretherm system based on the Weende method [15].

The sample was brought to the boil in sulfuric acid and then in caustic soda. The resulting residue was dried at 105˚C overnight and then ashed at 550˚C for 4 hours. The total dietary fiber content is expressed as a percentage of dry matter. The total dietary fiber content is expressed as a percentage of dry matter using the formula:

%CBW: the total dietary fibre content in g/100 g;

PE: the mass of the test sample, in grams;

S0: the mass, in grams, of the empty sample bag;

S1: the mass, in grams, of the empty sample bag containing the residue;

M0: the mass, in grams, of the empty crucible;

M1: is the mass, in grams, of the crucible containing the ash;

0.004: the correction factor for the ash in the bag.

2.2.2. Laboratory Quality Control

Quality control procedures were implemented throughout the laboratory analyses to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the analytical results. All analyses were carried out in triplicate under the same laboratory conditions, and the reported values correspond to the mean of the three determinations.

For protein determination by the Kjeldahl method, reagent blanks were included to account for potential contributions from the reagents. The distillation step was also verified using a known amount of ammonium sulfate (NH₄)₂SO₄(NH₄)₂SO₄. This control was performed in triplicate, and an average nitrogen recovery of 95% was considered acceptable.

For lipid determination by Soxhlet extraction, the laboratory quality-control procedure included extraction blanks, duplicate analyses, monitoring of an internal control sample, and control of constant mass of the extraction vessel before weighing the lipid residue. External quality control was also performed through BIPEA interlaboratory comparison when an appropriate test sample was available.

For external quality control, BIPEA interlaboratory comparison results were evaluated by comparing the laboratory results with the assigned values and by monitoring the corresponding z-scores. Internal control results were considered valid when they complied with the established laboratory criteria and the validity and repeatability conditions of the analytical methods.

2.2.3. Data Processing and Analysis

The results obtained were processed using Excel 2016, which was used to calculate the mean values from three trials and the standard deviation for the following measured parameters: moisture content, ash, protein, carbohydrates, lipids and total dietary fiber. Calculations were carried out for each parameter in order to establish comprehensive and comparable nutritional profiles.

3.1.1. Carbohydrate, Lipid, Protein and Energy Profiles of Maize Flour Dough

The water content of maize flour dough was generally high, ranging from 56.73 g/100g to 85.99 g/100g.

Corn-based doughs exhibited varied nutritional profiles depending on the method of preparation. The fat content remained low, ranging from 0.1 g/100g for akpan to 1.08 g/100g for the fermented maize flour dough. The protein content was higher in some preparations, reaching 4.24 g/100g for Khom maize, whilst crude fibre varied from 0.57 g/100g for akpan to 1.59 g/100g for “Emakoumè”, a fermented dough made from unhusked maize flour. Carbohydrates, the main source of energy in these meals, ranged from 10.81 g/100g to 35.41 g/100g, resulting in a total energy value of between 55.42 kcal and 164.57 kcal (Table 1).

Table 1. Macronutrient composition in g/100g of fresh matter and energy content of maize flour dough.

Figure 1.Ash content of maize doughs.

3.1.2. Ash Content of Maize Doughs

Ash contents, ranged from 0.01 for Akpan to 2.79 g/100g for maizeablo (Figure 1).

3.2.1. Carbohydrate, Lipid, Protein and Energy Profiles of Millet, Sorghum, Rice and Maize Flour Dough

The moisture content ranged from 62.00 g/100g for rice and maize to 72.16 g/100g for the fermented sorghum flour dough Epomakoumè. The millet, sorghum, rice and maize pastes analyzed had low fat contents, ranging from 0.00 to 0.46 g/100g, as well as moderate protein (1.59 to 3.78 g/100g) and fibre (0.67 to 1.50 g/100g) contents. Carbohydrate content varied between 18.50 and 33.61 g/100g, resulting in energy values ranging from 86.60 kcal/100g for the Epokoumè sorghum dough to 149.36 kcal/100g for the rice and maize ablo (Table 2).

Table 2. Macronutrient composition (g/100 g fresh matter) and energy content of doughs made from millet, sorghum, rice, and maize.

3.2.2. Ash Content of Millet, Sorghum, Rice and Maize Doughs

Ash contents ranged from 0.85 for “Ablo” rice to 1.17 g/100g for Khom millet (Figure 2).

Figure 2.Ash content of millet, sorghum, rice and maize dough.

3.3.1. Lipid, Protein and Energy Profiles of Dough Served with Protein-Free Sauces

Dough served with vegetable-based sauces containing neither meat nor fish had higher moisture contents, ranging from 75.96 g/100g for maize dough served with meat- and fish-free moringa sauce to 82.62 g/100g for maize dough served with meat- and fish-free Adémè sauce. The values were lower for protein (3.49 to 4.64 g/100g) and fat (1.15 to 4.98 g/100g), with fibre contents ranging from 1.86 to 3.67 g/100g. The available carbohydrate content ranged from 2.74 g/100g for the maize dough with Adémè sauce to 14.51 g/100g for the maize dough with okra sauce, while the energy values remained between 78.30 and 93.44 kcal/100g (Table 3).

Table 3. Nutritional composition in g/100g of fresh matter and energy content of the doughs + sauces without protein.

3.3.2. Ash Content of Dough Served with Protein-Free Sauce

The ash content of dough served with protein-free sauces ranged from 1.35 g/100g in the maize pasta with Adémè sauce (containing no meat or fish) to 2.36 g/100g of fresh weight in the maize dough with okra sauce (containing no meat or fish) (Figure 3).

Figure 3.Ash content of doughs + sauces without protein.

3.4.1. Carbohydrate, Fat, Protein and Energy Profiles of Dough Served with Protein-Containing Sauces

Dough served with sauces containing sources of animal protein (fish, meat or smoked fish) had water contents ranging from 68.10 g/100g for maize Khom served with tomato and fried fish sauce to 82.14 g/100g for maize pasta with baobab leaf sauce and small fish. Protein contents ranged from 4.57 to 8.90 g/100g, with the highest values observed in dishes containing smoked fish or small fish, while fat contents ranged from 1.25 to 7.68 g/100g depending on the type of sauce and method of preparation.

Table 4. Nutritional composition in g/100g of fresh matter and energy content of dough + sauces with animal proteins.

Fibre content ranged from 0.57 to 5.13 g/100g, with higher values in leaf-based sauces such as gboma, gnato (sorrel) and essrou (basil) sauces. Available carbohydrates ranged from 4.42 to 21.23 g/100g, whilst energy values ranged from 67.32 kcal/100g for maize dough served with baobab leaf sauce and small fish to 179.02 kcal/100g for maize ablo served with tomato stew, nougbagba and fried fish (Table 4).

3.4.2. Ash Content of Dough + Sauces with Animal Proteins

Dough served with sauces containing sources of animal protein (fish, meat or smoked fish) had ash contents ranging from 1.26 g/100g in the maize flour pasta with peanut sauce and smoked fish to 3.22 g/100g in the maize flour dough with Essrou (basil) sauce and small fish doèvi (Figure 4).

Figure 4.Ash content of dough + sauces with animal proteins.

3.5.1. Lipid, Protein and Energy Profiles of Rice Dishes

The various rice dishes had a range of nutritional profiles. The water content averaged between 51.36 and 67.31 g/100g. Fat was present in varying amounts, reaching a maximum of 14.17 g/100g in the Ayimolou with tomato sauce, egg and fish. The protein content was also high in the jollof rice with beef, at 11.21 g/100g. Crude fibre ranged from 0.67 g/100g in white rice to 2.77 g/100g in jollof rice with beef, while available carbohydrates ranged from 5.13 g/100g for Ayimolou served with tomato sauce, egg and fish, to 29.39 g/100g for white rice. In terms of energy, the rice dishes were high in calories, with a maximum of 231.25 kcal in the jollof rice with chicken (Table 5).

Table 5. Composition in g/100g of fresh weight and energy content of rice-based dishes.

3.5.2. Ash Content of Rice Dishes

The ash content ranged from 0.53 g/100g in white rice to 1.87 g/100g in rice with fat and beef (Figure 5).

Figure 5. Ash content of rice dishes.

3.6.1. Lipid, Protein and Energy Profiles of Wheat-Based Dishes

The water content of wheat-based dishes ranged from 58.89 g/100g for couscous with fish sauce to 71.88 g/100g for spaghetti with beef and vegetables.

The nutritional composition varied depending on the presence of sauces, vegetables or animal protein sources. Simple dishes such as boiled spaghetti and plain couscous had high levels of available carbohydrates, at 29.19 g/100g and 30.60 g/100g, respectively, with energy values of 136.66 kcal/100g and 145.38 kcal/100g. Fat content remained low in these simple dishes, ranging from 0.25 to 0.71 g/100g, while protein content remained moderate, ranging from 3.38 to 3.60 g/100g.

The addition of rich sauces, fish, meat or vegetables significantly altered the nutritional profile of the dishes. Protein content reached up to 10.89 g/100g for Jollof spaghetti and beef, whilst fat content varied from 3.32 to 4.88 g/100g in the enriched dishes. Fibre content was higher in dishes containing vegetables, with a maximum value of 5.82 g/100g observed for jollof couscous, vegetables and fish. In contrast, carbohydrate content decreased in dishes served with sauces and animal proteins, ranging from 11.52 to 23.12 g/100g. The energy values of the enriched dishes ranged from 111.15 to 175.88 kcal/100g, with couscous with fat, fish and vegetables having the highest energy content (Table 6).

Table 6. Composition in g/100g of fresh matter and energy content of wheat-based dishes.

3.6.2. Ash Content of Wheat-Based Dishes

The ash content ranged from 0.28 g/100g in white couscous to 3.24 g/100g in couscous with fats, vegetables and fish (Figure 6).

Figure 6.Ash content of wheat-based dishes.

3.7.1. Lipid, Protein and Energy Profiles of Fonio-Based Dishes

The Fonio-based dishes analysed had moisture contents ranging from 48.91 g/100g in Fonio with fat and “akpala” fish’ (100g) to 59.83 g/100g in steamed fonio. Steamed fonio had the highest available carbohydrate content (38.02 g/100) with a fibre content of 3.59 g/100g and a protein content of 4.44 g/100g. The addition of accompaniments such as fish or beans altered the nutritional profile of the dishes. Fonio with oil and “akpala” fish had the highest protein content (8.04 g/100g) and an energy value of 198.591 kcal, whilst fonio with fat and beans had the highest fat content (5.95 g/100g). Carbohydrate content was lower in the fortified dishes, ranging from 24.37 to 38.02 g/100g, whilst the energy values remained moderately high, ranging from 157.92 to 194.35 kcal/100g (Table 7).

Table 7. Composition in g/100g of fresh matter and energy content of fonio-based dishes.

3.7.2. Ash Content of Dishes Made from Fonio

The Ash content ranged from 2.19 g/100g for steamed fonio to 3.94 g/100g for fonio cooked in fat with fish (Figure 7).

Figure 7.Ash content of dishes made with fonio.

3.8.1. Lipid, Protein and Energy Profiles of Cowpeas and Voandzou Dishes

The cowpeas and voandzou dishes, served without accompaniments, had a water content ranging from 61.20 g/100g for Kpédji gaou to 79.84 g/100g for Alélé. Boiled voandzou had the highest protein (8.24 g/100g) and fibre (6.96 g/100g) contents, whilst Kpédji gaou had the highest available carbohydrate content (27.13 g/100g) with an energy value of 145.92 kcal/100g. In contrast, dishes such as:

Timbaniand Alélé had lower carbohydrate and energy contents, with energy values below 90 kcal/100g (Table 8).

Table 8. Composition in g/100g of fresh matter and energy content of dishes made with cowpeas and voandzou.

3.8.2. Ash Content Profile of the Cowpea and Voandzou Dishes

The Ash content ranged from 1.1 g/100g for boiled cowpea to 2.1 g/100g for boiled voandzou (Figure 8).

Figure 8.Ash content of cowpea and voandzou dishes.

3.9.1. Lipid, Protein and Energy Profiles of Cowpea and Voandzou Dishes with Side Dishes

The cowpea and voandzou dishes with accompaniments had a lower water content, ranging from 46.07 g/100g for boiled voandzou + oil + gari to 73.93 g/100g for Alélé + red oil. Dishes made from cowpea and voandzou served with oil or gari had high fat contents and significant energy values. Fat contents ranged from 5.78 g/100g for Alélé + red oil to 19.85 g/100g for Kpédji gaou with chilli powder and oil, with energy values reaching 292.69 kcal/100g.

Protein contents ranged from 5.22 to 9.76 g/100g, whilst available carbohydrates varied from 11.34 to 26.46 g/100g. Timbani and oil had the highest protein content (9.76 g/100g), whilst boiled cowpea, oil, gari had a high energy density due to its high fat and carbohydrate content (Table 9).

Table 9. Composition (g/100 g fresh matter) and energy content of cowpea- and voandzou-based dishes with accompaniments.

3.9.2. Ash Content Profile of Cowpea and Voandzou Dishes with Accompaniments

The Ash content, shown in Figure 9, ranged from 1.41 g/100g for boiled cowpea, oil and gari to 2.61 g/100g for bean paste Djongoli.

Figure 9.Ash content of beans and voandzou dishes with side dishes.

3.10.1. Lipid, Protein and Energy Profiles of Dishes Based on Tubers and Plantains

Meals based on tubers and plantains contained a water content ranging from 55.88 g/100g in boiled taro to 63.28 g/100g in boiled yam. Dishes made from tubers and plantains without sauce had low fat contents, generally below 1 g/100g, and moderate levels of available carbohydrates ranging from 22.06 to 36.94 g/100g. Boiled taro had the highest energy value (169.21 kcal/100g) and the highest carbohydrate content, whilst yam foufou had the lowest energy value (100.77 kcal/100g).

Protein content was low across all dishes, ranging from 1.23 to 2.56 g/100g. Boiled yam stood out for its high fibre content (9.70 g/100g), compared with the other dishes, whose fibre contents generally remained below 3 g/100g (Table 10).

Table 10. Composition in g/100g of fresh matter and energy content of dishes made with tubers and plantains, without sauce.

3.10.2. Ash Content of Dishes Made from Tubers and Plantains

The Ash content ranged from 0.48 g/100g in yam foufou to 1.2 g/100g in boiled plantain (Figure 10).

Figure 10.Ash content of tuber- and plantain-based dishes.

3.11.1. Lipid, Protein and Energy Profiles of Dishes Made from Tubers and Plantains, Either Fried or with Added Fat

The analysed dishes made from tubers and plantains, either fried or with added fat, had a water content ranging from 33.57 g/100g for fried plantain to 59.38 g/100g for taro and tomato stew (nougbagba). Fat contents were high, ranging from 2.92 to 8.80 g/100g, and energy content from 191.14 to 293.34 kcal/100g respectively, with fried plantain having the highest energy and carbohydrate values. Fibre content ranged from 0.57 g/100g to 3.90 g/100g (Table 11).

Table 11. Composition in g/100g of fresh matter and energy content of the dishes based on tubers and fried plantains or containing added fats.

3.11.2. Ash Content of Dishes Based on Tubers and Plantains, Either Fried or with Added Fat

The Ash content of dishes made from tubers and fried plantains ranged from 1.14 g/100g for fried yams to 2.14 g/100g for fried plantains (Figure 11).

Figure 11.Ash content of dishes made from tubers and fried plantains or with added fat.

3.12.1. Lipid, Protein and Energy Profiles of Dishes Made from Tubers and Plantains with Tomato and Chilli Sauce and Protein

Dishes made from tubers and plantains with tomato sauce had a water content ranging from 62.22 g/100g for Pinon and chili and chicken to 83.33 g/100g for yam foufou with clear beef sauce. These dishes have relatively high protein contents, ranging from 3.58 to 9.15 g/100g, with the highest values observed for yam with tomato sauce, egg and sardines, as well as foufou dishes served with meat or fish. Fat contents remained moderate (1.59 to 5.20 g/100g), whilst energy values ranged from 77.03 to 133.65 kcal/100g.

The available carbohydrates were generally low to moderate in these dishes, particularly in foufou served with clear sauces, whilst yam with tomato sauce and fried fish stood out for its high fibre content (8.39 g/100g). Combining tubers with sauces enriched with fish, meat or eggs thus improved the protein and nutritional density of these traditional dishes (Table 12).

Table 12. Composition in g/100g of fresh matter and energy content of dishes based on tubers and plantains with tomato/chilli sauce and protein.

Figure 12. Ash content of dishes based on tubers and plantains with tomato/chilli sauce and protein.

3.12.2. Ash Content of Dishes Based on Tubers and Plantains with Tomato and Chilli Sauce and Protein

The Ash content ranged from 1.02 g/100g for the yam and fish (horse mackerel) stew to 2.53 g/100g for the yam foufouwith tomato sauce and fried fish (Figure 12).

3.13.1. Lipid, Protein and Energy Profiles of Dishes Based on Tubers and Plantains with Vegetable/Seed/Chilli Sauce and Animal Proteins

The dishes analysed contained a water content ranging from 69.16 g/100g for yam with taro leaf sauce and fried fish, to 77.99 g/100g for yam foufou with okra sauce and smoked fish. Protein contents ranged from 3.40 to 10.71 g/100g. Cassava foufouserved with peanut sauce and smoked fish had the highest protein content (10.71 g/100g).

Fat contents ranged from 0.64 to 7.61 g/100g, with the highest values observed in sauces made from peanuts or palm nuts (dékoudéssi). Available carbohydrates remained moderate (2.56 to 27.59 g/100g), whilst energy values ranged from 92.90 to 134.16 kcal/100g, reflecting the effect of the addition of sauces and animal proteins on the energy density of the dishes (Table 13).

Table 13. Composition in g/100g of fresh matter and energy content of dishes based on tubers and plantains with vegetable/seed/chilli sauce and animal proteins.

3.13.2. Ash Content of Dishes Based on Tubers and Plantains with Vegetable/Seed/Chilli Sauce and Animal Protein

The Ash content of dishes based on tubers and fried plantains ranged from 1.08 g/100g for yamfoufou with a vegetable sauce (cabbage, carrot) and smoked fish to 3.97 g/100g for Gari dough (Pinon), chilli and chicken (Figure 13).

Figure 13.Ash content of dishes based on tubers and plantains with vegetable/seed/chilli sauce and animal protein.

3.14.1. Lipid, Protein and Energy Profile of Leafy Vegetable-Based Sauces

Table 14 summarises the macronutrient and energy composition of leafy vegetable sauces consumed in Togo. Sauces containing fish and fats, such as the Alomaand fried fish sauce (152.57 kcal/100g) and the taro leaves and fried fish sauce (145.81 kcal/100g), are the most calorific. Protein content was particularly high in the sorrel sauce (Gnato) with small fish (18.07 g/100g), whilst fibre content ranged from 1.15 g/100g (cabbage and carrot sauce with smoked fish) to 1.12 g/100g (baobab leaf sauce). Fat content remained low in sauces such asmoringa sauce (0.10 g/100g), in contrast to the gboma sauce with fried fish, which had a content of 8.86 g/100g.

Table 14. Composition in g/100g of fresh weight and energy content of leafy vegetable sauces.

Figure 14.Ash content of leafy vegetable-based sauces.

3.14.2. Ash Content of Leafy Vegetable-Based Sauces

Figure 14 showed the ash content of the various leafy vegetable-based sauces. It reveals considerable variability depending on the ingredients used, with values generally ranging from approximately 1.45 to 2.86 g/100g; sauces served with fish and vegetables generally had higher ash contents, reflecting a higher ash content.

3.15.1. Lipid, Protein and Energy Profiles of Tomato, Chili, and Seed Sauces

Tomato and seed-based sauces exhibited varied nutritional profiles, influenced by the ingredients used. The water content was high, ranging from 60.57 g/100g for the crushed green chilli and sardine sauce to 93.36 g/100g for the clear sauce. The ash content varied from 0.98 to 2.83 g/100g. Sauces high in fat, such as those containing sardines or added oils, had high values, with a maximum of 18.84 g/100g for the crushed green chilli with sardines and oil. Sauces containing fish, meat or eggs had protein levels of up to 14.08 g/100g in the tomato juice and fried fish sauce. The total dietary fibre content ranged from 0.67 to 3.36 g/100g. Carbohydrate concentrations ranged from 2.52 g/100g for the clear sauce without meat or fish to 24.24 g/100g for the tomato and smoked fish sauce. The oil-rich sauces also had the highest energy values, reaching up to 233.9 kcal/100g (Table 15).

Table 15. composition in g/100g of fresh matter and energy content of tomato and seed sauces.

3.15.2. Ash Content of Tomato Sauces, Chilli Sauces and Seed Sauces

The Ash content of the tomato, chilli and seed sauces ranged from 1.63 g/100g for Yébésséssi and smoked fish to 3.08 g/100g for crushed chilli and chicken (Figure 15).

Figure 15.Ash content of selected tomato, seed and chilli sauces and animal proteins.

Certain limitations must be taken into account when interpreting the results. Furthermore, the study focused primarily on the most frequently consumed dishes identified during the preliminary survey, without covering the full range of national dietary habits.