<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.4" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Oalib</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Open Access Library Journal</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2333-9721</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2333-9705</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oalib.1116014</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">Oalib-154840</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Biomedical</subject>
          <subject>Life Sciences</subject>
          <subject>Business</subject>
          <subject>Economics</subject>
          <subject>Chemistry</subject>
          <subject>Materials Science</subject>
          <subject>Computer Science</subject>
          <subject>Communications</subject>
          <subject>Earth</subject>
          <subject>Environmental Sciences</subject>
          <subject>Engineering</subject>
          <subject>Medicine</subject>
          <subject>Healthcare</subject>
          <subject>Physics</subject>
          <subject>Mathematics</subject>
          <subject>Social Sciences</subject>
          <subject>Humanities</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Determination of Wood Density of Selected Plant Species from the Luki Biosphere Reserve in the Democratic Republic of the Congo for Reforestation</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Muisangie</surname>
            <given-names>Jeannette Luboya</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Ongala</surname>
            <given-names>Denis Lopema</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Zola</surname>
            <given-names>Marie Tuluenga</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">4</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Bigabwa</surname>
            <given-names>Don de Dieu Mulunda</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Muturi</surname>
            <given-names>Willy Samuel</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Impofi</surname>
            <given-names>Jean Claude Liyandja</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Ongala</surname>
            <given-names>Francis Onangomo</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Nsimba</surname>
            <given-names>Ali Lemba</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">5</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Hamisi</surname>
            <given-names>Pacifique Irenge Lya</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6">6</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Mbenza</surname>
            <given-names>Therese Mabondo</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Mankaru</surname>
            <given-names>Dieu Merci Efa</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Wasam</surname>
            <given-names>Bertin Dingadia</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Masonga</surname>
            <given-names>Forturnette Kombo</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Salamu</surname>
            <given-names>Stephanie Songolo</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff7">7</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Lituli</surname>
            <given-names>Thouthou Bonganga</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Falanga</surname>
            <given-names>Junior Matondo</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff8">8</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Tango</surname>
            <given-names>Eustache Kidikwadi</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Mpia</surname>
            <given-names>Patience Ngelinkoto</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff9">9</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Ayingweu</surname>
            <given-names>Constatin Lubini</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label> Center for Water and Environmental Research, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo </aff>
      <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label> Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo </aff>
      <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label> Higher Pedagogical and Technical Institute of Lusambo, Lusambo, Democratic Republic of the Congo </aff>
      <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label> Faculty of Petroleum, Gas and Renewable Energy, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo </aff>
      <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label> Interdisciplinary Research Center, National Pedagogical University, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo </aff>
      <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label> General Secretariat for Regional Integration, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo </aff>
      <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label> National Institute of Building and Public Works, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo </aff>
      <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label> Higher Institute of Education of Mbandaka, Mbandaka, Democratic Republic of the Congo </aff>
      <aff id="aff9"><label>9</label> Faculty of Science and Technology, National Pedagogical University, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="conflict" id="fn-conflict">
          <p>The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>08</day>
        <month>10</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <month>10</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>13</volume>
      <issue>10</issue>
      <fpage>1</fpage>
      <lpage>10</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>
          </day>
          <month>
          </month>
          <year>
          </year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>
          </day>
          <month>
          </month>
          <year>
          </year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="published">
          <day>08</day>
          <month>10</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2026 by the authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p> This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link> ). </license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1116014">https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1116014</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p>This study was conducted on wood fragments of the forest species <italic><bold>Canarium schweinfurthii</bold></italic>, <italic><bold>Gilletiodendron kisantuense</bold></italic>, <italic><bold>Milicia excelsa</bold></italic>, <italic><bold>R</bold></italic><italic><bold>au</bold></italic><italic><bold>volfia vomitoria</bold></italic>, <italic>and</italic><italic><bold>Ricinodendron heudelotii</bold></italic>, collected from the Luki Biosphere Reserve in Kongo Central Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo, with the aim of determining the wood density of the different plant species under study. These parameters were determined using an experimental method involving oven-drying and water displacement techniques in an Erlenmeyer flask filled with water. The results obtained varied from one species to another and followed the following descending order: <italic><bold>Gilletiodendron kisantuense</bold></italic><italic>(0.90)</italic>, <italic><bold>Milicia excelsa</bold></italic><italic>(0.78)</italic>, <italic><bold>Ricinodendron heudelotii</bold></italic><italic>(0.63)</italic>, <italic><bold>Rauvolfia vomitoria</bold></italic><italic>(0.61)</italic>,<italic>and</italic><italic><bold>Canarium schweinfurthii</bold></italic> (0.59). These values will contribute to the development of allometric equations necessary for estimating the amount of carbon sequestered in the tissues of the five species studied.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated" xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>Density</kwd>
        <kwd>Wood</kwd>
        <kwd>Deforestation</kwd>
        <kwd>Carbon</kwd>
        <kwd>Biomass</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>Global warming is a major concern, partly because of the increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide. The capacity of undisturbed Amazonian forests to absorb atmospheric carbon has been declining for approximately three decades, owing to increased tree mortality attributed to climate change [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]. African forests play an increasingly recognized global role in climate regulation by sequestering approximately 40 Gt of carbon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>]. With an estimated area of about 200 million ha in January 2020, including 184.7 million ha without visible signs of disturbance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>], they have become a major tropical forest massif for carbon sequestration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>].</p>
      <p>Nearly 9% of the area of Central Africa’s humid tropical forests has disappeared since 2000, corresponding to approximately 18 million ha [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>]. Dense humid forests require further study to improve knowledge of biomass production and their capacity to produce organic matter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]. Implementing mitigation strategies and combating climate change require accurate estimates of aboveground biomass and carbon stocks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>]. The objective of our study is to determine the wood density of some plant species from the Luki Biosphere Reserve, such as <italic>Cana</italic><italic>rium schweinfurthii</italic>, <italic>Milicia excelsa</italic> (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) and others. This parameter is involved in establishing allometric equations necessary for the evaluation of carbon sequestered in wood tissues.</p>
      <fig id="fig1">
        <label>Figure 1</label>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1116014-rId15.jpeg?20261027024111" />
      </fig>
      <p><bold>Figure 1.</bold><italic>Canarium schweinfurthii</italic><italic>Engl.</italic>(<italic>Burseraceae</italic>) in its natural habitat. Photograph taken in the field in January 2026 in the Luki Biosphere Reserve, Kongo Central Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Photo: J. Luboya Muisangie.</p>
      <fig id="fig2">
        <label>Figure 2</label>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1116014-rId16.jpeg?20261027024111" />
      </fig>
      <p><bold>Figure 2.</bold><italic>Milicia excelsa</italic> (<italic>Welw.</italic>)<italic>C</italic><italic>.C. Berg</italic> (<italic>Moraceae</italic>) in its natural habitat. Photograph taken in the field in January 2026 in the Luki Biosphere Reserve, Kongo Central Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Photo: J. Luboya Muisangie.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec2">
      <title>2. Materials and Methods</title>
      <sec id="sec2dot1">
        <title>2.1. Study Area</title>
        <p>The Luki Biosphere Reserve, located in Kongo Central Province (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>), constitutes an important natural laboratory for research. It covers approximately 32,700 to 33,000 hectares and contains 1050 to 1530 plant species distributed among 146 families. It has a humid tropical climate (AW5 according to the Köppen classification), characterized by two seasons: an eight-month rainy season and a four-month dry season.</p>
        <p>Four soil types are found in the reserve: red soils, reddish-purple soils, yellow soils, and alluvial soils.</p>
        <fig id="fig3">
          <label>Figure 3</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1116014-rId17.jpeg?20261027024111" />
        </fig>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref><bold>.</bold> Map of the Luki Biosphere Reserve, Kongo Central Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Data source: LBR shapefiles, Geographic coordinate system, WGS 1984 datum. Produced by Bumbulu KHONDE.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot2">
        <title>2.2. Materials</title>
        <p>The biological material used in this study consisted of wood fragments from the forest species <italic>Canarium schweinfurthii</italic>, <italic>Gilletiodendron kisantuense</italic>, <italic>Milicia excelsa</italic>, <italic>Rauvolfia vomitoria</italic>,<italic>and</italic><italic>Ricinodendron heudelotii</italic> (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>), collected from the Luki Biosphere Reserve in Kongo Central Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Their systematic positions and botanical descriptions are presented below.</p>
        <fig id="fig4">
          <label>Figure 4</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1116014-rId18.jpeg?20261027024111" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 4.</bold> Wood samples of five species (<italic>Canarium schweinfurthii</italic>, <italic>Gilletiodendron kisantuense</italic>, <italic>Milicia excelsa</italic>, <italic>Rauvolfia vomitoria</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Ricinodendron heudelotii</italic>) were collected in January 2026 in the Luki Biosphere Reserve, Mayombe, Kongo Central Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo, in collaboration with a team of environmentalists, agronomists and indigenous peoples<italic>.</italic></p>
        <p>Taxonomic Classification of the Five Studied Forest Species</p>
        <p><bold>Table 1.</bold> Taxonomic classification of the five studied forest species according to the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>].</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl1">
          <label>Table 1</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Division</td>
                <td>Spermatophyta</td>
                <td>Spermatophyta</td>
                <td>Spermatophyta</td>
                <td>Spermatophyta</td>
                <td>Spermatophyta</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Sub Division</td>
                <td>Angiospermae</td>
                <td>Angiospermae</td>
                <td>Angiospermae</td>
                <td>Angiospermae</td>
                <td>Angiospermae</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Class</td>
                <td>Dicotyledonae</td>
                <td>Dicotyledonae</td>
                <td>Dicotyledonae</td>
                <td>Dicotyledonae</td>
                <td>Dicotyledonae</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Order</td>
                <td>Sapindales</td>
                <td>Fabales</td>
                <td>Rosales</td>
                <td>Gentianales</td>
                <td>Malpighiales</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Family</td>
                <td>Burseraceae</td>
                <td>Fabaceae</td>
                <td>Moraceae</td>
                <td>Apocynaceae</td>
                <td>Euphorbiaceae</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Genus</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>Canarium</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <italic>Gilletiodendron</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <italic>Milicia</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <italic>Rauvolfia</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <italic>Ricinodendron</italic>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Species</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>Canarium schweinfurthii</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <italic>Gilletiodendron kisantuense</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <italic>Milicia excelsa</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <italic>Rauvolfia vomitoria</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <italic>Ricinodendron heudelotii</italic>
                </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p><bold>Table 1</bold> presents the taxonomic classification of the five forest species studied in the Luki Biosphere Reserve.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot3">
        <title>2.3. Data Collection</title>
        <p>Wood fragments from the following plant species were used: <italic>Canarium schweinfurthii</italic>, <italic>Gilletiodendron kisantuense</italic>, <italic>Milicia excelsa</italic>, <italic>Rauvolfia vomitoria</italic>, and <italic>Ricinodendron heudelotii</italic>. Samples from these five species were collected in the Luki Biosphere Reserve, located in the Mayombe region of Kongo Central Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo, by a team of environmental scientists and agronomists, with the assistance of local indigenous communities. Three samples from each species were used as experimental material for laboratory analysis (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="fig5">
          <label>Figure 5</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1116014-rId19.jpeg?20261027024111" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 5.</bold> Different wood fragments of the five species under study. Photograph taken in February 2026 by Mrs. Luboya Muisangie Jeannette at the Analytical Chemistry Laboratory, University of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.</p>
        <p>The wood density of the studied forest species was determined by measuring the mass and volume of each sample. The samples were wrapped in aluminum foil and placed in an oven set at 105˚C. They were weighed regularly using an HRBE303 precision electronic balance until a constant mass was obtained (see <bold>Tables 2-6</bold>). To determine the volume, each sample was immersed in a water-filled container, and the displaced overflow water was collected in a graduated cylinder to measure the corresponding volume (see <bold>Table 7</bold>) This procedure was repeated three times for each forest species, and the mass-to-volume ratio was used to calculate wood density (see <bold>Table 8</bold>).</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec3">
      <title>3. Results</title>
      <p>This section presents the results of the experiments conducted on the fresh mass of wood, changes in wood mass over time, wood volume, and wood density of the studied species.</p>
      <sec id="sec3dot1">
        <title>3.1. Fresh Mass and Changes in the Mass of Wood Fragments over Time</title>
        <p><italic>This</italic><italic>section</italic><italic>presents</italic><italic>the</italic><italic>results</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>the</italic><italic>experiments</italic><italic>conducted</italic><italic>on</italic><italic>the</italic><italic>fresh</italic><italic>mass</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>wood</italic>, <italic>changes</italic><italic>in</italic><italic>wood</italic><italic>mass</italic><italic>over</italic><italic>time</italic>, <italic>wood</italic><italic>volume</italic>, <italic>and</italic><italic>wood</italic><italic>density</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>the</italic><italic>studied</italic><italic>species</italic>.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 2.</bold> Constant mass of fresh and oven-dried wood fragments of <italic>Canarium schweinfurthii</italic>.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl2">
          <label>Table 2</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Canarium</italic>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>schweinfurthii</bold>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td>Fresh mass (g)</td>
                <td>Mass after 24 h (g)</td>
                <td>Mass after 48 h (g)</td>
                <td>Mass after 72 h (g)</td>
                <td>Mass after 96 h (g)</td>
                <td>Mass after 120 h (g)</td>
                <td>Mass after 144 h (g)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Wood sample 1</bold>
                </td>
                <td>1350</td>
                <td>1300.9</td>
                <td>1283.7</td>
                <td>1265.8</td>
                <td>1250.8</td>
                <td>1250</td>
                <td>1250</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Wood sample 2</bold>
                </td>
                <td>1300</td>
                <td>1270.6</td>
                <td>1234.5</td>
                <td>1200.3</td>
                <td>1200</td>
                <td>1200</td>
                <td>1200</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Wood sample 3</bold>
                </td>
                <td>1250</td>
                <td>1210.9</td>
                <td>1160.7</td>
                <td>1120.8</td>
                <td>1100.8</td>
                <td>1100</td>
                <td>1100</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>The result shows that a constant dry mass of <italic>Canarium schweinfurthii</italic> wood samples was reached after 96 hours.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 3.</bold> Constant mass of fresh and oven-dried wood samples of <italic>Gilletiodendron kisantuense</italic><italic>.</italic></p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl3">
          <label>Table 3</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>Gilletiodendron kisantuense</bold>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td>Fresh mass (g)</td>
                <td>Mass after 24 h (g)</td>
                <td>Mass after 48 h (g)</td>
                <td>Mass after 72 h (g)</td>
                <td>Mass after 96 h (g)</td>
                <td>Mass after 120 h (g)</td>
                <td>Mass after 144 h (g)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Wood sample 1</td>
                <td>850</td>
                <td>820</td>
                <td>808.5</td>
                <td>800.6</td>
                <td>800</td>
                <td>800</td>
                <td>800</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Wood sample 2</td>
                <td>800</td>
                <td>792 .5</td>
                <td>787.1</td>
                <td>780.6</td>
                <td>780</td>
                <td>780</td>
                <td>780</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Wood sample 3</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>780</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <italic>776</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>4</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <italic>772</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>8</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <italic>770</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>2</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <italic>770</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <italic>770</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <italic>770</italic>
                </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>The results showed that a constant dry mass of <italic>Gilletiodendron kisantuense</italic> wood samples was reached after 96 hours.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 4.</bold> Constant mass of fresh and oven-dried wood samples of <italic>Milicia excelsa</italic>. </p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl4">
          <label>Table 4</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>Milicia excelsa</bold>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td>Fresh mass (g)</td>
                <td>Mass after 24 h (g)</td>
                <td>Mass after 48 h (g)</td>
                <td>Mass after 72 h (g)</td>
                <td>Mass after 96 h (g)</td>
                <td>Mass after 120 h (g)</td>
                <td>Mass after 144 h (g)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Wood sample 1</italic>
                </td>
                <td>1400</td>
                <td>1357.8</td>
                <td>1305.6</td>
                <td>1258. 3</td>
                <td>1250</td>
                <td>1250</td>
                <td>1250</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Wood sample</italic>
                  <italic>2</italic>
                </td>
                <td>1300</td>
                <td>1250.9</td>
                <td>1228.6</td>
                <td>1200.7</td>
                <td>1200</td>
                <td>1200</td>
                <td>1200</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Wood sample</italic>
                  <italic>3</italic>
                </td>
                <td>1000</td>
                <td>905.8</td>
                <td>870.4</td>
                <td>855 .2</td>
                <td>850</td>
                <td>850</td>
                <td>850</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p><bold>Table 4</bold> shows that a constant dry mass of <italic>Milicia excelsa</italic> wood samples was reached after 96 hours.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 5.</bold> Constant mass of fresh and oven-dried wood samples of <italic>Rauvolfia vomitoria</italic>.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl5">
          <label>Table 5</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>Rauvolfia vomitoria</bold>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td>Fresh mass (g)</td>
                <td>Mass after 24 h (g)</td>
                <td>Mass after 48 h (g)</td>
                <td>Mass after 72 h (g)</td>
                <td>Mass after 96 h (g)</td>
                <td>Mass after 120 h (g)</td>
                <td>Mass after 144 h (g)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Woodsample 1</td>
                <td>1430</td>
                <td>1400.4</td>
                <td>1370.7</td>
                <td>1360.2</td>
                <td>1350</td>
                <td>1350</td>
                <td>1350</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Wood sample 2</td>
                <td>1400</td>
                <td>1350.6</td>
                <td>1310.8</td>
                <td>1300.4</td>
                <td>1300</td>
                <td>1300</td>
                <td>1300</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Woodsample 3</td>
                <td>1300</td>
                <td>1260.3</td>
                <td>1240.7</td>
                <td>1205.2</td>
                <td>1200</td>
                <td>1200</td>
                <td>1200</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>The results showed that a constant dry mass of <italic>Rauvolfia vomitoria</italic> wood samples was reached after 96 hours.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 6.</bold> Constant mass of fresh and oven-dried wood samples of <italic>Ricinodendron heudelotii</italic>.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl6">
          <label>Table 6</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>Ricinodendron heudelotii</bold>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td>Fresh mass (g)</td>
                <td>Mass after 24 h (g)</td>
                <td>Mass after 72 h (g)</td>
                <td>Mass after 72 h (g)</td>
                <td>Mass after 96 h (g)</td>
                <td>Mass after 120 h (g)</td>
                <td>Mass after 144 h (g)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Wood sample</italic>
                  <italic>1</italic>
                </td>
                <td>900</td>
                <td>850</td>
                <td>835.5</td>
                <td>800.7</td>
                <td>800</td>
                <td>800</td>
                <td>800</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Wood sample</italic>
                  <italic>2</italic>
                </td>
                <td>850</td>
                <td>750</td>
                <td>725.6</td>
                <td>705.8</td>
                <td>700</td>
                <td>700</td>
                <td>700</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Wood sample</italic>
                  <italic>3</italic>
                </td>
                <td>800</td>
                <td>450.9</td>
                <td>420.5</td>
                <td>400.8</td>
                <td>400</td>
                <td>400</td>
                <td>400</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p><bold>Table 6</bold> presents the changes in the moisture content of <italic>Ricinodendron heudelotii</italic> wood and shows that a constant dry mass of the wood samples was reached after 96 hours.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot2">
        <title>3.2. Wood Volume of the Studied Species</title>
        <p><bold>Table 7</bold><bold>.</bold> Wood volume of the studied species.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl7">
          <label>Table 7</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>Studied Species</bold>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td>Volume of wood sample 1 (ml)</td>
                <td>Volume of wood sample 2 (ml)</td>
                <td>Volume of wood sample 3 (ml)</td>
                <td>Total volume (ml)</td>
                <td>Mean volume (ml)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>1.</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>Canarium</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>schweinfurthii</bold>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td>2070</td>
                <td>1970</td>
                <td>1880</td>
                <td>5920</td>
                <td>1973</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>2.</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>Gilletiodendron kisantuense</bold>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td>880</td>
                <td>860</td>
                <td>850</td>
                <td>2590</td>
                <td>863</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>3.</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>Milicia excelsa</bold>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td>1500</td>
                <td>1420</td>
                <td>1280</td>
                <td>4200</td>
                <td>1400</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>4.</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>Rauvolfia vomitoria</bold>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td>2140</td>
                <td>2070</td>
                <td>2025</td>
                <td>6235</td>
                <td>2078</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>5.</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>Ricinodendron heudelotii</bold>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td>1100</td>
                <td>1005</td>
                <td>750</td>
                <td>2855</td>
                <td>951</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>The results presented in <bold>Table 7</bold> show that the mean wood volumes of the species considered range from 863 to 2078 ml. The highest mean wood volume was recorded for <italic>Rauvolfia vomitoria</italic>, followed by <italic>Canarium schweinfurthii</italic> and <italic>Milicia excelsa</italic>, them <italic>Ricinodendron heudelotii</italic>, and finally <italic>Gilletiodendron kisantuense</italic><italic>.</italic></p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot3">
        <title>3.3. Wood Density of the Studied Species</title>
        <p><bold>Table 8.</bold> Wood density of the studied species descriptive statistics by species.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl8">
          <label>Table 8</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>Studied Species</bold>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td>N</td>
                <td>Mean</td>
                <td>Median</td>
                <td>Minimum</td>
                <td>Maximum</td>
                <td>Standard deviation (SD)</td>
                <td>Coefficient of variation (CV%)</td>
                <td>Variance</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>1.</bold>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>Canarium</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>schweinfurthii</bold>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>0.595</td>
                <td>0.600</td>
                <td>0.585</td>
                <td>0.600</td>
                <td>0.009</td>
                <td>10.19</td>
                <td>0.00008</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>2.</bold>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>Gilletiodendron kisantuense</bold>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>0.907</td>
                <td>0.900</td>
                <td>0.890</td>
                <td>0.930</td>
                <td>0.021</td>
                <td>2.30</td>
                <td>0.00043</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>3.</bold>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>Milicia excelsa</bold>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>0.780</td>
                <td>0.800</td>
                <td>0.660</td>
                <td>0.880</td>
                <td>0.111</td>
                <td>14.28</td>
                <td>0.01240</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>4.</bold>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>Rauvolfia vomitoria</bold>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>0.613</td>
                <td>0.600</td>
                <td>0.590</td>
                <td>0.650</td>
                <td>0.032</td>
                <td>5.24</td>
                <td>0.00103</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>5.</bold>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>Ricinodendron heudelotii</bold>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>0.630</td>
                <td>0.690</td>
                <td>0.500</td>
                <td>0.700</td>
                <td>0.113</td>
                <td>17.89</td>
                <td>0.01270</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>The results presented in <bold>Table 8</bold> show that the wood-density values obtained show that density varies among species. <italic>Gilletiodendron kisantuense</italic> had the highest mean value (0.907 ± 0.021 g/cm<sup>3</sup>), followed by <italic>Milicia excelsa</italic> (0.78 ± 0.111 g/cm<sup>3</sup>) and <italic>Ricinodendron heudelotii</italic> (0.63 ± 0.113 g/cm<sup>3</sup>), while <italic>Rauvolfia vomitoria</italic> (0.613 ± 0.032 g/cm<sup>3</sup>) and <italic>Canarium schweinfurthii</italic> (0.59 ± 0.009 g/cm<sup>3</sup>) had lower values. The mean wood-density values ranged from 0.59 to 0.90 g/cm<sup>3</sup>, with <italic>Gilletiodendron kisantuense</italic> showing the highest mean density.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 9.</bold> Comparison of wood density values obtained in this study with reference values from the literature.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl9">
          <label>Table 9</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>No</td>
                <td>Studies species</td>
                <td>
                  Our wood density (g/cm
                  <sup>3</sup>
                  )
                </td>
                <td>
                  Reference value (g/cm
                  <sup>3</sup>
                  )
                </td>
                <td>Source and year</td>
                <td>
                  Absolute difference (g/cm
                  <sup>3</sup>
                  )
                </td>
                <td>Difference (%)</td>
                <td>Density class according to our study</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>Canarium schweinfurthii</italic>
                </td>
                <td>0.595</td>
                <td>0.41 ± 0.06</td>
                <td>GWDD-Zanne et al. (2009)</td>
                <td>+ 0.185</td>
                <td>+45.1</td>
                <td>Mean density</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>Gilletiodendron kisantuense</italic>
                </td>
                <td>0.90</td>
                <td>0.86</td>
                <td>GWDD-Zanne et al. (2009)</td>
                <td>+ 0.040</td>
                <td>+4.7</td>
                <td>Heavy wood</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>Milicia excelsa</italic>
                </td>
                <td>0.78</td>
                <td>0.58 ± 0.06</td>
                <td>GWDD-Zanne et al. (2009)</td>
                <td>+0.200</td>
                <td>+34.5</td>
                <td>Heavy wood</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>Rauvolfia vomitoria</italic>
                </td>
                <td>0.61</td>
                <td>0.472</td>
                <td>Data reference 2016</td>
                <td>+0.138</td>
                <td>+29.2</td>
                <td>Mean density</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>5</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>Ricinodendron heudelotii</italic>
                </td>
                <td>0.63</td>
                <td>0.25</td>
                <td>ITTO-Data reference</td>
                <td>+0.380</td>
                <td>+152.0</td>
                <td>Mean density</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>The results presented in <bold>Table 9</bold>demonstrate that <italic>Gilletiodendron kisantuense</italic> (0.90 g/cm<sup>3</sup>) is very close to the GWDD value of 0.86 g/cm<sup>3</sup>. The difference is only 0.04 g/cm<sup>3</sup>, which suggests good agreement between our measurement and the literature. In contrast, our values for <italic>Canarium schweinfurthii</italic> 0.595 g/cm<sup>3</sup> and <italic>Milicia excelsa</italic> 0.78 g/cm<sup>3</sup> are significantly higher than the respective GWDD mean values.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec4">
      <title>4. Discussion</title>
      <p>Wood density can vary depending on geographical origin, ecological conditions, tree age, the position of the sample within the trunk, moisture content, and the method used to determine volume. Depending on the species, wood density ranges from 0.1 to 1.5 g/cm<sup>3</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>]. Species with high wood density generally exhibit slower growth because of their higher construction costs, but they tend to have longer lifespans due to the physical and biological resistance associated with high wood density [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]. In the present study, the mean wood densities obtained ranged from 0.567 g/cm<sup>3</sup> for <italic>Canarium schweinfurthii</italic> to 0.907 g/cm<sup>3</sup> for <italic>Gilletiodendron kisantuense</italic>. <italic>Milicia excelsa</italic> showed a mean wood density of 0.780 g/cm<sup>3</sup>, whereas <italic>Rauvolfia vomitoria</italic> and <italic>Ricinodendron heudelotii</italic> had mean values of 0.613 and 0.630 g/cm<sup>3</sup>, respectively.</p>
      <p>Because of their relatively low wood densities, <italic>Ricinodendron heudelotii</italic>, <italic>Rauvo</italic><italic>lfia vomitoria</italic>, and <italic>Canarium schweinfurthii</italic> may exhibit relatively rapid growth and, consequently, may contribute to relatively rapid atmospheric carbon dioxide uptake during biomass accumulation. However, low wood density should not be considered the sole determinant of carbon sequestration capacity, as carbon storage also depends on biomass production, tree size, growth rate, longevity, and stand dynamics.</p>
      <p>The values obtained in this study therefore constitute reference data that could be incorporated into allometric models for the species studied in the Luki Biosphere Reserve. However, the present study was not designed to directly establish allometric equations. Nevertheless, these results provide a useful scientific basis for future studies aimed at estimating biomass and carbon stocks and supporting the sustainable management of forest resources in the Luki Biosphere Reserve, in line with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 13 and 15.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec5">
      <title>5. Conclusion</title>
      <p>In this study, we determined the wood density of five forest species: <italic>Canarium schweinfurthii</italic>, <italic>Gilletiodendron kisantuense</italic>, <italic>Milicia excelsa</italic>, <italic>Rauvolfia vomitoria</italic>, and <italic>Ricinodendron heudelotii</italic>. The results show a variation in wood density among the species, with the highest mean values observed for <italic>Gilletiodendron kisantuense</italic> (0.90 g/cm<sup>3</sup>) and <italic>Milicia excelsa</italic> (0.78 g/cm<sup>3</sup>), while <italic>Ricinodendron heudelotii</italic> (0.63 g/cm<sup>3</sup>), <italic>Rauvolfia vomitoria</italic> (0.61 g/cm<sup>3</sup>), and <italic>Canarium schweinfurthii</italic> (0.59 g/cm<sup>3</sup>) had lower values. The values obtained thus constitute reference data that can be used for the development or improvement of future allometric equations adapted to the species of the Luki Biosphere Reserve and, consequently, for a more accurate estimation of stored carbon. However, this study did not allow for the direct establishment of allometric equations, as these require a larger sample size and additional dendrometric and biomass data. Nevertheless, the results obtained constitute a useful scientific basis for future work dedicated to biomass and carbon estimation and to the sustainable management of forest resources in the Luki Biosphere Reserve. Finally, extending the study to a large number of species and a greater number of individuals would help to strengthen knowledge on the variability of wood density and to develop allometric models that are more representative of the ecological conditions of the Luki Biosphere Reserve.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec6">
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>The authors express their sincere gratitude to the Luki expert team for their support during fieldwork devoted to the identification, description, and sampling of plant species in the Luki Biosphere Reserve.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec7">
      <title>Ethical Considerations</title>
      <p>This article was prepared in accordance with research ethics principles and in strict compliance with applicable scientific and ethical standards.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec8">
      <title>Author Contributions</title>
      <p>Conceptualization, E.K.T., P.N.M. and C.L.A.; supervision, E.K.T. and C.L.A.; investigation and data curation, M.T.Z.; writing—review and editing, D.L.O. and J.M.F.; software and laboratory analysis, T.B.L., T.M.M., D.M.E.M., B.D.W., F.K.M. and S.S.S.; writing—original draft preparation, D.D.M.B., M.S.W. and J.C.L.I.; visualization and formal analysis, F.O.O., A.L.N. and P.I.L.H.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Brienen, R.J., Phillips, O.L., Feldpausch, T.R., Gloor, E., Baker, T.R., Lloyd, J., Lopez-Gonzalez, G., Monteagudo-Mendoza, A., Malhi, Y. and Lewis, S.L. (2015) Long-Term Decline of the Amazon Carbon Sink. <italic>Nature</italic>, 519, 344-348.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Brienen, R.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Phillips, O.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Feldpausch, T.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gloor, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Baker, T.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lloyd, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lopez-Gonzalez, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Monteagudo-Mendoza, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Malhi, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lewis, S.L.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>Long-Term Decline of the Amazon Carbon Sink</article-title>
            <source>Nature</source>
            <volume>519</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="confproc">Saatchi, S.S., Harris, N.L., Brown, S., Lefsky, M., Mitchard, E.T.A., Salas, W., <italic>et al</italic>. (2011) Benchmark Map of Forest Carbon Stocks in Tropical Regions across Three Continents. <italic>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</italic>, 108, 9899-9904. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1019576108 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1019576108</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21628575</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1019576108">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1019576108</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="confproc">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Saatchi, S.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Harris, N.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Brown, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lefsky, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mitchard, E.T.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Salas, W.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2011</year>
            <article-title>Benchmark Map of Forest Carbon Stocks in Tropical Regions across Three Continents</article-title>
            <source>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</source>
            <volume>108</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1019576108</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21628575</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Vancutsem, C., Achard, F., Pekel, J.-F., Vieilledent, G., Carboni, S., Simonetti, D., Gallego, J., Aragao, L. and Nasi, R. (2020) Long-Term (1990-2019) Monitoring of Tropical Moist Forests Dynamics. <italic>Science Advances</italic>, 7, eabe1603.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Vancutsem, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Achard, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Pekel, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Vieilledent, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Carboni, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Simonetti, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gallego, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Aragao, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Nasi, R.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>Long-Term (1990-2019) Monitoring of Tropical Moist Forests Dynamics</article-title>
            <source>Science Advances</source>
            <volume>7</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Hubau, W., Lewis, S.L., Phillips, O.L., Affum-Baffoe, K., Beeckman, H., Cuní-Sanchez, A., <italic>et al</italic>. (2020) Asynchronous Carbon Sink Saturation in African and Amazonian Tropical Forests. <italic>Nature</italic>, 579, 80-87. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2035-0 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41586-020-2035-0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32132693</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2035-0">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2035-0</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Hubau, W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lewis, S.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Phillips, O.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Affum-Baffoe, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Beeckman, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sanchez, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>Asynchronous Carbon Sink Saturation in African and Amazonian Tropical Forests</article-title>
            <source>Nature</source>
            <volume>579</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41586-020-2035-0</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32132693</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Eba’a Atyi, R., Hiol Hiol, F., Lescuyer, G., Mayaux, P., Defourny, P., Bayol, N., Saracco, F., Pokem, D., Sufo Kankeu, R. and Nasi, R. (2021) The Forests of the Congo Basin: State of the Forests 2021. CIRAD.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Atyi, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Hiol, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lescuyer, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mayaux, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Defourny, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bayol, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Saracco, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Pokem, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kankeu, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Nasi, R.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>The Forests of the Congo Basin: State of the Forests 2021</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Mwene-Mbeja, T.M., Jeannette, L.M., Katanku, B.K., Junior, K.K., N’senda, B.K.K., Gaby, K.K., <italic>et al</italic>. (2023) Wood Density Determination with the Perspective to Decarbonisation of Tropical Forest Species from the Luki Biosphere Reserve in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. <italic>Green and Sustainable Chemistry</italic>, 13, 162-169. https://doi.org/10.4236/gsc.2023.132009 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/gsc.2023.132009</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/gsc.2023.132009">https://doi.org/10.4236/gsc.2023.132009</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Mwene-Mbeja, T.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Jeannette, L.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Katanku, B.K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Junior, K.K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gaby, K.K.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Wood Density Determination with the Perspective to Decarbonisation of Tropical Forest Species from the Luki Biosphere Reserve in the Democratic Republic of the Congo</article-title>
            <source>Green and Sustainable Chemistry</source>
            <volume>13</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/gsc.2023.132009</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Gibbs, H.K., Brown, S., Niles, J.O. and Foley, J.A. (2007) Monitoring and Estimating Tropical Forest Carbon Stocks: Making REDD a Reality. <italic>Environmental Research Letters</italic>, 2, Article 045023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/2/4/045023 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1748-9326/2/4/045023</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/2/4/045023">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/2/4/045023</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Gibbs, H.K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Brown, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Niles, J.O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Foley, J.A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2007</year>
            <article-title>Monitoring and Estimating Tropical Forest Carbon Stocks: Making REDD a Reality</article-title>
            <source>Environmental Research Letters</source>
            <volume>2</volume>
            <elocation-id>045023</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1748-9326/2/4/045023</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2016) An Update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group Classification for the Orders and Families of Flowering Plants: APG IV. <italic>Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society</italic>, 181, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12385 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/boj.12385</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12385">https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12385</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>An Update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group Classification for the Orders and Families of Flowering Plants: APG IV</article-title>
            <source>Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society</source>
            <volume>181</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/boj.12385</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Chave, J., Coomes, D., Jansen, S., Lewis, S.L., Swenson, N.G. and Zanne, A.E. (2009) Towards a Worldwide Wood Economics Spectrum. <italic>Ecology Letters</italic>, 12, 351-366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01285.x <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01285.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19243406</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01285.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01285.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Chave, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Coomes, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Jansen, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lewis, S.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Swenson, N.G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zanne, A.E.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2009</year>
            <article-title>Towards a Worldwide Wood Economics Spectrum</article-title>
            <source>Ecology Letters</source>
            <volume>12</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01285.x</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19243406</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Clough, B.J., Curzon, M.T., Domke, G.M., Russell, M.B. and Woodall, C.W. (2017) Climate‐Driven Trends in Stem Wood Density of Tree Species in the Eastern United States: Ecological Impact and Implications for National Forest Carbon Assessments. <italic>Global Ecology and Biogeography</italic>, 26, 1153-1164. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12625 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/geb.12625</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12625">https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12625</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Clough, B.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Curzon, M.T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Domke, G.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Russell, M.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Woodall, C.W.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2017</year>
            <article-title>Climate‐Driven Trends in Stem Wood Density of Tree Species in the Eastern United States: Ecological Impact and Implications for National Forest Carbon Assessments</article-title>
            <source>Global Ecology and Biogeography</source>
            <volume>26</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/geb.12625</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>