Primary health care is recognized globally as the foundation of equitable, accessible, and people-centered health systems and is essential for achieving Universal Health Coverage (UHC). The World Health Organization defines primary health care as a whole-of-society approach that integrates health promotion, disease prevention, treatment, rehabilitation, and palliative care; addresses broader determinants of health; and empowers individuals, families, and communities [1]. The 2018 Declaration of Astana reaffirmed primary health care as a cornerstone of sustainable health systems, UHC, and the health-related Sustainable Development Goals [2].

Strong primary health care systems are associated with better outcomes, greater equity, improved efficiency, and stronger continuity and coordination of care [1][3][4]. Evidence from low- and middle-income countries also identifies community involvement, accountable management, adequate resources, and quality-linked improvement strategies as important conditions for stronger Primary Health Centers (PHC) performance [5][6]. Consequently, strengthening primary health centers has become a central strategy for expanding access to quality care while managing limited resources.

In Nigeria, PHCs serve as the first point of contact with the formal health system for many rural and underserved populations [7][8]. National revitalization priorities emphasize functional infrastructure, an adequate and trained workforce, essential medicines and equipment, ward-based services, reliable power and water, community engagement, and improved service utilization [7][9].

Despite these efforts, substantial challenges remain. National facility assessments have documented gaps in essential drugs, medical equipment, power sources, and rural service readiness [10][11]. Weak financing, under-resourced community health workers, fragmented systems, and insufficient accountability can further constrain comprehensive, people-centered primary health care in low- and middle-income settings [6][12]-[14]. These limitations can reduce service readiness, continuity, utilization, and public confidence.

Community trust and participation are important influences on healthcare-seeking and PHC utilization [8][15]. A 2025 quasi-experimental study in Bayelsa State found that strengthened ward development committees, accompanied by funding, commodities, outreach, workforce support, and technical assistance, were followed by substantial increases in family planning use, facility delivery, antenatal attendance, and postnatal care [15]. These findings support approaches that combine facility investment with active community governance and engagement.

An emerging area of global-health practice is the contribution of diaspora health professionals to health-system strengthening. African nurse diaspora members have been identified as strategic stakeholders who can mobilize local and global partners, engage communities in preventive care, and build trust through professional and cultural connections [16][17]. This creates opportunities for mentorship, education, technology transfer, advocacy, research collaboration, and institutional capacity building beyond short-term missions [16][17].

The National Association of Nigerian Nurses in North America (NANNNA) is one such organization. Through its “Take Me to Your Village” initiative, NANNNA members conducted community health missions that provided health education, preventive screenings, treatment support, and medication distribution in underserved communities across multiple Nigerian states. Although these missions addressed immediate community needs, organizational leaders recognized that sustainable improvements in community health required a longer-term approach focused on strengthening existing PHC infrastructure and systems rather than relying solely on episodic outreach activities.

To address this need, NANNNA developed the Adopt-A-Primary Health Center (Adopt-A-PHC) Initiative, a diaspora nurse-led model that links professional volunteerism with sustainable health system strengthening. The initiative supports selected PHCs through facility assessment, infrastructure improvement, equipment provision, workforce development, community engagement, health information strengthening, and sustainability planning. Rather than creating parallel healthcare structures, the model seeks to complement government-led PHC revitalization efforts by strengthening locally governed facilities through collaboration among diaspora nurses, health workers, community leaders, local governments, and other stakeholders [7][9][16][17].

This article describes the development, implementation, and expansion of the Adopt-A-PHC Initiative and examines its relevance as a potentially scalable nursing-led model for strengthening primary health care in Nigeria. The program’s conceptual framework, implementation approach, geographic reach, and lessons learned are presented while exploring the potential role of diaspora nursing organizations in advancing PHC strengthening and progress toward Universal Health Coverage in resource-constrained settings [1][2][16][17].

This descriptive program report summarizes the design, implementation, reach, and early outputs of a practice-based health-systems-strengthening initiative. The program used a participatory approach that combined diaspora nursing expertise with local stakeholder engagement and existing government PHC structures. Reporting draws on organizational implementation records, facility updates, stakeholder reports, and available service-utilization information. Because the report was not designed as a controlled study and includes no comparison group or pre-intervention outcome series, it describes feasibility and reach but does not estimate causal effects.

Program records and implementation report available through 2025 were reviewed. The participating PHC was the unit of analysis. Facility-level information was summarized across implementation phases. Reporting periods differed by outcome: adoption, renovation, equipment, and training status were summarized through 2025, whereas the service-reach total was limited to complete records from contributing pilot PHCs in 2022.

Operational definitions. A PHC was classified as supported when program records documented any NANNNA-facilitated technical, material, financial, training, mentoring, documentation, telehealth, or stakeholder-engagement assistance, irrespective of formal adoption status. A PHC was classified as adopted after it met the eligibility criteria; completed a baseline needs assessment; documented facility, community, government, and NANNNA chapter support; received PHC Review Committee approval; developed implementation and sustainability plans; entered a minimum two-year partnership with routine progress reporting and at least one annual site visit by a project lead; and began delivery of the minimum intervention package. That package comprised baseline assessment and stakeholder engagement, at least one assessment-prioritized activity in each of five domains—infrastructure and environment of care, equipment and service readiness, workforce development, health information and documentation, and community partnership—and documented monitoring and sustainability arrangements. A PHC was classified as completed when records verified delivery of the approved intervention plan and minimum package, submission of required progress and before-and-after documentation, confirmation that planned equipment and infrastructure activities were functional or in use, and transition to local maintenance and oversight. Categories were sequential: completed PHCs were also adopted and supported; supported PHCs were not necessarily adopted; and adopted PHCs could remain under implementation.

Data sources, contributing facilities, and outcome ascertainment. Adoption and geographic reach were ascertained from Adopt-A-PHC applications, PHC Review Committee approval records, facility master lists, implementation plans, and project-status reports. These outcomes included the 29 PHCs listed in Table A1 and were summarized by recorded state and geopolitical zone. Infrastructure outcomes were ascertained from baseline and follow-up assessments, approved scopes of work, completion and expenditure records, site-visit notes, and dated photographs. Equipment outcomes were ascertained from needs assessments, procurement and delivery records, inventories, installation or handover documents, and records confirming receipt and use. Workforce activities were documented in training agendas, attendance registers, facilitator reports, mentorship or telehealth logs, and reports from project leads and PHC managers. Community engagement was documented in meeting minutes, attendance lists, Ward Development Committee or community-leader reports, letters of support, government correspondence, outreach reports, and project updates. Completion and sustainability status were determined from implementation and maintenance plans, progress and completion reports, site-visit records, stakeholder confirmation, and evidence that planned infrastructure and equipment activities had been delivered and transferred to local oversight.

Service-utilization records. The 2022 service-reach outcome comprised patient visits reported by pilot PHCs in Ogun, Edo, Abia, and Imo States with complete utilization records for that year. Visits were extracted from outpatient or daily attendance registers and monthly facility service-summary reports. When a facility summary already incorporated service-specific registers, antenatal, maternity, immunization, chronic-disease, and other clinic encounters were not added separately. The program archive identified contributing facilities by name and state, and the facility-level list used to calculate the total was retained with the extraction file rather than inferred from the later 29-facility roster. Thus, the 20,813 visits represent the contributing pilot PHCs only, not all PHCs supported by 2025.

Data extraction, checking, and aggregation. Two authors independently abstracted facility-level data into a structured form capturing facility name, local government area, state, geopolitical zone, reporting period, adoption status, intervention domain, source document, and reported count and completion status. Facility names and locations were standardized against Table A1. Duplicate submissions for the same facility, reporting period, and activity were identified using facility, date, and activity descriptors and counted once. Extracted values were verified against source records and, when multiple sources were available, cross-checked across applications, approval records, progress reports, inventories, photographs, registers, and stakeholder reports. Discrepancies, missing periods, implausible values, and inconsistencies between narrative and numeric reports were referred to the relevant project lead or facility contact. Values were included only after reconciliation; unresolved values were treated as unavailable, were not imputed, and were excluded from the relevant denominator or summary. Facility counts were summed by state and geopolitical zone, and monthly service totals were summed across contributing pilot PHCs to obtain the annual visit total. Qualitative stakeholder statements were grouped by implementation domain and reported as perceptions rather than independently measured outcomes. No patient-level records or identifiers were extracted.

The intervention was guided by a conceptual framework integrating WHO primary health care principles, health systems strengthening theory, and community partnership approaches. The framework informed facility assessment, intervention planning, implementation, monitoring, and sustainability activities.

Operational Model

Implementation followed a structured sequence beginning with facility identification and assessment. Facilities were selected based on community need, service relevance, leadership readiness, accessibility, and opportunities for sustained collaboration. Following selection, baseline assessments were conducted to identify infrastructure gaps, equipment needs, workforce challenges, documentation practices, and service delivery priorities. Stakeholder consultations and SWOT analyses were subsequently used to guide planning and resource allocation.

Implementation occurred through phased interventions that allowed projects to align with available resources and local priorities. Early phases typically focused on infrastructure rehabilitation and environmental improvements, while later phases emphasized equipment provision, capacity building, documentation enhancement, and sustainability planning. Continuous communication among NANNNA members, facility leadership, community stakeholders, and government partners supported implementation and monitoring efforts.

The initiative also incorporated telehealth and remote mentorship where feasible, enabling diaspora nurses to provide ongoing professional support to local healthcare providers. This approach extended engagement beyond periodic site visits and promoted continuity of professional collaboration.

Logic Model

The logic model underlying the Adopt-A-PHC Initiative is presented in Figure 1. Inputs—including diaspora nursing expertise, financial resources, community partnerships, government collaboration, and PHC leadership engagement—support facility assessment, infrastructure rehabilitation, workforce development, community engagement, and information-system strengthening. These activities produce implementation outputs such as adopted and renovated facilities, deployed equipment, provider-support activities, and strengthened documentation processes. Expected outcomes include improved facility functionality, provider performance, service readiness, community trust, and continuity of care; these outcomes require prospective evaluation. Longer-term effects on PHC systems, population health, and Universal Health Coverage remain hypothesized rather than established.

Figure 1.Logic Model for the NANNNA Adopt-A-PHC Initiative: A diaspora nurse-led framework for strengthening primary health care in Nigeria.

Setting

The Adopt-A-PHC Initiative was implemented in public primary health centers located across multiple states in Nigeria. The program was initially piloted in Abia, Edo, Imo, and Ogun States and subsequently expanded to Akwa Ibom, Anambra, Ekiti, Ondo, and Osun States. By 2025, the initiative had adopted 29 PHCs distributed across three geopolitical zones of Nigeria.

Most participating facilities served rural or semi-urban communities and represented the primary point of access to healthcare services for local populations. Facilities varied considerably in infrastructure condition, staffing levels, equipment availability, documentation practices, and service readiness.

Facility Selection

Facility selection was based on community health needs, service relevance, leadership readiness, accessibility, and opportunities for long-term partnership. Candidate facilities were identified through NANNNA health missions, member recommendations, relationships with community leaders, and consultations with local government authorities. Priority was given to facilities serving underserved populations and demonstrating willingness to participate in collaborative improvement efforts.

The initiative focused on strengthening existing public PHCs rather than creating parallel healthcare delivery structures, consistent with national PHC revitalization priorities and health systems strengthening principles.

Baseline Assessment

Following facility selection, baseline assessments were conducted to identify strengths, deficiencies, and priority areas for intervention. Assessments included direct observation of facility infrastructure and review of available clinical and non-clinical resources. Areas assessed included:

Physical condition of buildings and groundsWater and sanitation facilitiesAvailability of electricity and power sourcesEquipment and supply inventoriesMaternal and child health infrastructureDocumentation and reporting practicesReferral systemsWorkforce capacity and training needsCommunity engagement mechanisms

Assessment findings were supplemented by consultations with PHC staff, facility leadership, community representatives, and local government officials to ensure interventions reflected local priorities and operational realities.

Stakeholder Engagement

Stakeholder engagement was a central component of program implementation. NANNNA representatives collaborated with PHC managers, nurses, community health workers, community leaders, ward development committees, local government authorities, and other relevant stakeholders throughout project implementation.

These consultations served multiple purposes, including:

Identification of priority facility needsEstablishment of local ownership and accountabilityClarification of stakeholder roles and responsibilitiesDevelopment of sustainability plansAlignment with local and governmental priorities

This participatory approach was intended to promote community ownership, support implementation, and enhance the sustainability of interventions.

Planning and Prioritization

Assessment findings were reviewed through a structured planning process that incorporated SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) analyses. The SWOT framework was used to identify internal and external factors affecting facility performance and to prioritize interventions based on feasibility, stakeholder priorities, anticipated impact, and available resources.

Planning activities included development of renovation priorities, equipment procurement plans, training needs assessments, budgeting, identification of funding sources, and implementation timelines. Intervention plans were developed collaboratively to ensure alignment with facility needs and stakeholder expectations.

Implementation

Intervention Components

Implementation used five integrated domains: infrastructure strengthening, equipment support, workforce development, health-information strengthening, and community engagement. The Methods section describes how each domain was delivered; program reach and observed outputs are reported in the Results section.

Infrastructure Strengthening

Infrastructure improvement represented the initial phase of implementation in most facilities. Renovations were designed to improve the safety, functionality, and usability of healthcare environments. Depending on facility needs, interventions included:

Roof replacement and repairsCeiling rehabilitationFloor repairsPainting and beautificationDrainage improvementWindow and door replacementSecurity enhancementsRenovation of labor and maternity wardsSanitation improvements

The scope of renovations varied according to baseline assessment findings and available funding.

Equipment Procurement and Facility Readiness

To improve service readiness, participating facilities received essential clinical and operational equipment identified through baseline assessments. Equipment support was tailored to local facility needs and frequently included:

Delivery bedsInfant weighing scalesFetal monitoring devicesBlood pressure monitorsSuction machinesDelivery kitsRefrigeratorsGeneratorsDressing trolleysDrip standsStorage equipment and clinical furnishings

Equipment acquisition was intended to support maternal and child health services, chronic disease management, preventive care, and routine clinical activities.

Workforce Development

Capacity-building activities were integrated throughout implementation to support healthcare providers and strengthen service delivery. Educational activities included:

Clinical mentoringHealth education trainingQuality improvement supportDocumentation and reporting trainingPatient communication and counseling supportMaternal and child health educationChronic disease screening and follow-up guidance

The workforce development strategy reflected the program’s emphasis on strengthening human resources alongside infrastructure investment.

Health Information Strengthening

Recognizing the importance of data systems for accountability and quality improvement, the initiative supported documentation and reporting practices within participating facilities. Efforts focused on:

Improving clinical documentationStrengthening patient record managementEnhancing reporting processesSupporting referral trackingPromoting data use for quality improvement activities

Where feasible, telehealth and communication technologies were used to facilitate ongoing mentorship and support from diaspora nurse leaders.

Community Engagement and Partnership Development

Community engagement activities were embedded throughout implementation. Stakeholders participated in project planning, monitoring, implementation, and sustainability efforts. Community outreach activities included health education sessions, stakeholder meetings, public awareness campaigns, and collaboration with traditional and community leaders.

This approach sought to strengthen trust between facilities and communities while fostering local ownership of PHC improvement efforts.

Monitoring and Sustainability

Program monitoring relied on routine communication with facility leadership, stakeholder reports, implementation documentation, and periodic progress updates. Monitoring activities focused primarily on implementation outputs, including completion of renovations, equipment deployment, training activities, community engagement efforts, and facility utilization information where available.

To enhance sustainability, NANNNA incorporated ongoing stakeholder engagement, workforce support, community participation, and partnership development into implementation activities. Sustainability planning emphasized local ownership, continued government involvement, facility maintenance, and integration of improvements within existing PHC governance structures.

Program Expansion and Geographic Reach

The Adopt-A-Primary Health Center Initiative expanded from an initial pilot in four Nigerian states to a multi-state primary health care strengthening program spanning three geopolitical zones. By 2025, the initiative had adopted 29 PHCs across nine states: Abia, Akwa Ibom, Anambra, Edo, Ekiti, Imo, Ogun, Ondo, and Osun. This expansion documents the program’s geographic reach and the participation of diaspora nurse leaders, community stakeholders, and government partners in facility-strengthening activities.

Of the 35 facilities assessed, 29 met the stipulated application criteria and were formally adopted. At the time of reporting, renovation had been completed at 26 adopted PHCs and remained in progress at three. Each adopted facility received equipment selected according to needs identified through its baseline assessment. Staff from all 29 adopted PHCs also completed initial training in environment of care, care coordination, data management, customer service, and infection prevention and control.

The 26 completed PHCs were commissioned by the relevant government authorities, which affirmed their commitment to sustaining the facility improvements.

The initiative was implemented across diverse geographic and administrative contexts using a common implementation framework. The largest concentration of adopted facilities was in the South-East geopolitical zone (n = 13), followed by the South-West (n = 9) and South-South (n = 7) (Table 1); the state-level distribution is shown in Table 2. Because facilities were purposively selected and represented only three of Nigeria’s six geopolitical zones, this distribution describes program reach rather than national coverage.

Table 1.Distribution of adopted primary health centers by geopolitical zone.

Table 2.Distribution of adopted primary health centers by state.

Infrastructure Strengthening Outcomes

Baseline assessments conducted across participating facilities identified deficits in physical infrastructure that affected service delivery, patient experience, and facility functionality. Common deficiencies included deteriorating roofs and ceilings, damaged floors, poor drainage systems, inadequate sanitation facilities, deteriorated labor wards, and insufficient clinical space.

Infrastructure interventions focused on creating safer and more functional care environments. Renovation activities included roof replacement, ceiling rehabilitation, repainting, installation of windows and doors, floor repairs, drainage improvements, compound beautification, security enhancements, and renovation of maternity and labor wards. These interventions were implemented according to locally identified priorities and available resources.

Among completed projects, several facilities underwent substantial physical transformation intended to improve facility appearance and operational readiness. Local stakeholder reports associated these changes with greater community confidence and continued PHC use; however, these perceptions were not assessed with standardized measures.

Equipment Support and Service Readiness

To improve service readiness and strengthen routine service delivery, the initiative supplied a range of essential clinical and operational equipment to participating facilities. Equipment support was informed by baseline assessments and adapted to local clinical needs.

Commonly provided items included:

Delivery bedsInfant weighing scalesFetal monitoring equipmentBlood pressure monitorsSuction machinesDelivery kitsDressing trolleysRefrigeratorsGeneratorsDrip standsClinical storage unitsBedside lockers and patient linens

These resources were intended to support maternal and child health services, chronic disease screening and management, infection prevention activities, and routine outpatient care. Equipment provision complemented the infrastructure improvements and expanded the clinical resources available at participating facilities.

Workforce Development and Capacity Building

Capacity-building activities were incorporated throughout implementation to strengthen the knowledge and skills of local health workers. Training and mentorship activities focused on patient education, chronic disease prevention and management, maternal and child health services, infection prevention, documentation practices, and quality improvement processes.

In addition to formal educational activities, diaspora nurse leaders provided ongoing professional support through consultation, mentoring, and collaboration with PHC staff. Telehealth and remote communication approaches were used where feasible to support continuity of engagement and reinforce quality improvement efforts.

Although standardized competency assessments were not conducted across all sites, implementation reports indicated strong participation from local healthcare providers and consistent engagement in capacity-building activities.

Community Engagement and Partnership Development

Stakeholder engagement remained a central feature of program implementation. Across participating sites, implementation activities involved consultation and collaboration with:

PHC leadership teamsNurses and community health workersCommunity leadersTraditional leadersWard Development CommitteesLocal government authoritiesCommunity representatives

These partnerships contributed to priority setting, project planning, implementation oversight, and sustainability planning. Community participation also facilitated local ownership and strengthened relationships between healthcare facilities and the populations they served.

The initiative illustrates how community partnership can be integrated into facility-strengthening activities rather than treated as a separate or downstream component.

Case Example:ItalapoPrimary Health Center

The implementation experience at Italapo PHC in Ogun State illustrates the practical application of the Adopt-A-PHC model. Following stakeholder consultation and approval from appropriate authorities, infrastructure improvements were implemented in phases. Phase 1 focused on rehabilitation of roofs, ceilings, floors, drainage systems, gates, windows, doors, labor wards, female wards, and general facility beautification. Phase 2 focused on procurement and installation of clinical equipment and supplies.

The project was completed at an estimated cost of approximately US$10,000, supported through NANNNA member contributions. Sustainability planning included continued engagement with facility leadership, local government authorities, PHC boards, and community stakeholders.

The SWOT analysis conducted during planning identified strong leadership communication and stakeholder engagement as key facilitators of implementation, while infrastructural deterioration and evidence-based practice knowledge gaps represented important barriers. Opportunities included restoration of clinical services and improved community engagement, whereas leadership turnover was recognized as a potential threat to sustainability.

Service Reach

Program records from pilot facilities in Ogun, Edo, Abia, and Imo States documented 20,813 patient visits in 2022.

The reported service volume illustrates the role of participating PHCs as platforms for preventive, promotive, maternal-child, chronic disease, and routine outpatient services in underserved communities. Because no baseline or comparison data were available, the volume should not be attributed to the initiative.

Implementation Monitoring and Sustainability

Program monitoring focused primarily on implementation outputs rather than causal outcome evaluation. Monitoring activities included documentation of completed renovations, equipment deployment, provider support activities, stakeholder engagement efforts, facility updates, and service utilization information where available.

Sustainability efforts emphasized local ownership, continuing stakeholder engagement, workforce support, collaboration with government authorities, and integration of improvements into existing PHC operations. The program’s transition from short-term outreach missions to long-term facility adoption represents a key implementation outcome and illustrates the feasibility of sustained diaspora engagement in community health system strengthening.

Summary of Key Results

Overall, the Adopt-A-PHC Initiative achieved:

Assessment of 35 facilities, with 29 meeting the stipulated application criteria and being adopted across nine states and three geopolitical zones.Completion of renovation at 26 adopted PHCs, with renovation in progress at three.Provision of essential clinical equipment to participating facilities.Initial training for staff from all 29 adopted PHCs in environment of care, care coordination, data management, customer service, and infection prevention and control, followed by ongoing workforce development and mentorship activities.Strong stakeholder and community engagement.Documentation of 20,813 patient visits in pilot facilities during 2022.Establishment of a diaspora nurse-led framework with potential for further evaluation and expansion.

Together, these findings document the operational reach and implementation feasibility of a diaspora nurse-led approach to PHC revitalization and health-systems strengthening across the participating sites. They do not establish effectiveness, causal impact, or generalizability beyond the selected facilities.

The Adopt-A-PHC Initiative shows that a diaspora nursing organization can coordinate sustained support for public PHCs across multiple jurisdictions. Its principal contribution is operational: it links facility rehabilitation, equipment provision, workforce support, information-system improvement, and community partnership within a continuing adoption relationship. The observed expansion and service reach support the feasibility of the model and its potential relevance to PHC revitalization and progress toward Universal Health Coverage; prospective evaluation is needed to establish scalability and effectiveness.

The Adopt-A-Primary Health Center Initiative demonstrates the feasibility of a diaspora nurse-led model for strengthening primary health care systems in Nigeria. By integrating infrastructure rehabilitation, equipment support, workforce development, community engagement, and strengthening health information, the initiative provides a practical framework for supporting sustainable PHC improvement within existing public health systems.

The program illustrates how professional nursing organizations can move beyond episodic humanitarian outreach to support long-term institutional strengthening and community health system development. Through strategic partnerships among diaspora nurses, local healthcare providers, community stakeholders, and government agencies, the initiative has established a potentially scalable model for promoting PHC revitalization and advancing progress toward Universal Health Coverage. Future research should evaluate the model using standardized implementation, workforce, service utilization, quality, and population health indicators to determine its effectiveness, scalability, and broader applicability.

The initiative was conducted as a programmatic quality-improvement and health-systems-strengthening activity; no identifiable patient-level data were collected or reported. The available records do not indicate whether the responsible institution required or issued formal ethics approval, a written quality-improvement or non-research determination, or equivalent authorization. Program activities were undertaken in collaboration with facility leadership, community representatives, and relevant government stakeholders.

Publication authorization for the named facilities and identifiable site images must be confirmed in writing by the appropriate facility, community, governmental, and organizational authorities. The manuscript records reviewed do not document this authorization; the final submission should state the authorizing parties, scope of permission, and date once verified.

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available because they consist primarily of organizational implementation records but may be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request and organizational approval.

The Adopt-A-PHC Initiative was supported through member contributions, organizational resources of the National Association of Nigerian Nurses in North America (NANNNA), and support from the Health Carousel Foundation. No external funding was received for preparation of this manuscript.

The authors acknowledge all NANNNA members, participating PHCs, community leaders, local government authorities, healthcare workers, and community stakeholders whose partnership and commitment contributed to the success of the Adopt-A-PHC Initiative.

GOE conceived the manuscript and led program implementation. EI, EO, NM, TT, SA, and IZA contributed to program implementation, manuscript development, critical revisions, and approval of the final version. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Supplementary program details are presented in the appendix in the following order: the roster of adopted facilities in Table A1, the seven domain-specific monitoring and evaluation tables, and a representative rehabilitation image in Figure A1.

Table A1. Adopted PHCs with facility-level details.