<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.4" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Oalib</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Open Access Library Journal</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2333-9721</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2333-9705</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oalib.1115515</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">Oalib-154355</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Biomedical</subject>
          <subject>Life Sciences</subject>
          <subject>Business</subject>
          <subject>Economics</subject>
          <subject>Chemistry</subject>
          <subject>Materials Science</subject>
          <subject>Computer Science</subject>
          <subject>Communications</subject>
          <subject>Earth</subject>
          <subject>Environmental Sciences</subject>
          <subject>Engineering</subject>
          <subject>Medicine</subject>
          <subject>Healthcare</subject>
          <subject>Physics</subject>
          <subject>Mathematics</subject>
          <subject>Social Sciences</subject>
          <subject>Humanities</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Morphological Characterization of Two Categories of Earthworms under the Agroecological Conditions of Mali</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Sangaré</surname>
            <given-names>Seydou</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Sidibé</surname>
            <given-names>Fousseyni</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Traoré</surname>
            <given-names>Astan</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Tangara</surname>
            <given-names>Moussa</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label> Ecole Doctorale des Sciences et Technologies du Mali, Kabala, Mali </aff>
      <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label> Institut Polytechnique Rurale de Formation et de Recherche Appliquée, Koulikoro, Mali </aff>
      <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label> Laboratoire d’Entomologie et Parasitologie, USTTB-FST, Bamako, Mali </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="conflict" id="fn-conflict">
          <p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>02</day>
        <month>09</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <month>09</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>13</volume>
      <issue>09</issue>
      <fpage>1</fpage>
      <lpage>15</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>20</day>
          <month>05</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>27</day>
          <month>09</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="published">
          <day>30</day>
          <month>09</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2026 by the authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p> This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link> ). </license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1115515">https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1115515</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p>This study, conducted in Badougou Djoliba, aimed to investigate the optimal conditions for vermicomposting and to characterize the morphological traits of two earthworm species: the exotic or manure worm, <italic>Eisenia</italic><italic>foetida</italic>, and the local strain, <italic>Eisenia</italic><italic>eugeniae</italic>, within the agropedological context of Mali. Manure was collected from domestic livestock on peri-urban farms in Bamako. Two experimental setups were implemented: one in a natural environment and the other under controlled conditions. During the vermicomposting process, three individuals of each species,<italic>E.</italic><italic>foetida</italic> and <italic>E.</italic><italic>eugeniae</italic>, were introduced into the pre-compost bins for 40 days. Five substrates were tested for vermiculture: 100% urban waste, a mixture of 5% poultry manure and 95% urban waste, a combination of 2/3 plant waste and 1/3 urban waste, a mixture of 1/3 plant waste and 2/3 urban waste, and bare soil. Additionally, a control group without earthworms was included. The results indicated that the viability of the worms in the small ruminant manure mixed with soil was 100% for the proportions FPR-1/1, FPR-1/3, and FPR-1/4. In contrast, a viability rate of 67% was observed in the FPR-1/0 proportion. In the poultry manure mixed with soil, a viability rate of 0% was recorded for the FPR-1/1 proportion, resulting in three deaths. However, a viability rate of 67% was noted for the FV-1/3 proportion, with only one mortality, while the FV-1/4 proportion showed a 100% viability rate, with no deaths reported. In terms of vermiculture, a 100% viability rate was observed for both <italic>E.</italic><italic>eugeniae</italic> and <italic>E.</italic><italic>foetida</italic> in the 100% urban waste treatment. Similarly, a viability rate of 100% was achieved for both earthworm species in the 2/3 plant waste and 1/3 urban waste mixture. <italic>E.</italic><italic>eugeniae</italic> also exhibited a 100% viability rate in the 1/3 plant waste and 2/3 urban waste mixture. This study successfully characterized the observable, structural, and measurable morphological traits of the earthworm species by analyzing their shape, structure, and physical variability in an agro-pedo-ecological environment.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated" xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>Morphological Characterization</kwd>
        <kwd>Earthworms</kwd>
        <kwd>Agro-Pedo-Ecology</kwd>
        <kwd>Mali</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>In the Sudano-Sahelian region, earthworms, which reside permanently in the mineral layers of the soil, are one of the most significant sources of biomass and play a crucial role in maintaining soil health. These organisms serve as a highly nutritious ingredient in poultry and livestock feed, effectively enhancing soil aeration, structure, stability, and nutrient availability across various soil layers. Earthworms have increasingly gained importance due to their multifaceted roles in the economy, environment, agronomy, and animal husbandry, making them a valuable asset in organic waste management, agricultural land fertilization, and animal feed production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>].</p>
      <p>As a natural source of animal protein, earthworms contain approximately 63% protein, which is vital for the growth, health, and egg production of poultry. By residing in the soil, they stimulate foraging activity, thereby enhancing the well-being of birds while supplying essential amino acids, lipids, and minerals. Furthermore, endogeic earthworms contribute significantly to their environment through various physicochemical and biological mechanisms, which improve soil fertility and preserve soil structure. They represent a substantial portion of soil animal biomass, playing a central role in maintaining soil functioning [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]<bold>.</bold></p>
      <p>Research indicates that around 5000 species of earthworms have been described, making them a major component of terrestrial animal biomass worldwide; however, many species, particularly in tropical regions, remain undiscovered [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>]. Among these, the species <italic>E.</italic><italic>foetida</italic> is frequently recognized in studies as the most effective in the waste bioconversion process [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>]. Distinct characteristics define each species; for instance, <italic>E.</italic><italic>foetida</italic> is the smallest, measuring 90 mm in length and exhibiting colors that range from red to green to brown [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]. In contrast, <italic>E.</italic><italic>eugeniae</italic> measures between 130 and 150 mm in length, has a dark red body, and contains 145 to 207 body segments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>]. </p>
      <p>Earthworms also fulfill critical roles within agroecosystems by influencing the physical, chemical, and biological dynamics of soil through three primary functions: the creation of burrows and the formation of casts, which are characteristic features of endogeic and anecic earthworms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>]. Endogeic earthworms inhabit most terrestrial ecosystems, especially in temperate and tropical regions, with <italic>E.</italic><italic>eugeniae</italic> holding a notable economic significance in poultry farming [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>].</p>
      <p>Soil is home to one of the most complex assemblages of living organisms, which engage in interactions with both the organic and inorganic components of the soil. Among the biotic components, terrestrial invertebrates are essential players in these interactions, significantly impacting the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of soil and ensuring its capacity to provide vital ecosystem services [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>]. </p>
      <p>This study aims to undertake a morphological characterization of two categories of earthworms under the agroecological conditions of Mali.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec2">
      <title>2. Materials and Methods</title>
      <p>The animal research ethics committees of the École Doctorale des Sciences et Technologies du Mali and the Laboratoire d’Entomologie et Parasitologie, USTTB-FST have approved this research protocol. This approval is in line with the guidelines established by both academic and research institutions.</p>
      <sec id="sec2dot1">
        <title>2.1. Experimental Site</title>
        <p>The study was carried out in Badougou Djoliba (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) in collaboration with the Institut Polytechnique Rurale de Formation et de Recherche Appliquée de Katibougou, the Laboratoire d’Entomologie et Parasitologie at USTTB-FST, and the École Doctorale des Sciences et Technologies du Mali. </p>
        <fig id="fig1">
          <label>Figure 1</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1115515-rId13.jpeg?20260930024743" />
        </fig>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref><bold>.</bold>Map of the study area.</p>
        <p>Biological and technical materials were used to conduct this research. The experimental site was surveyed to identify areas for earthworm collection, which was facilitated by the presence of casts on the soil surface.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot2">
        <title>2.2. Biological Materials</title>
        <p>The biological materials included earthworms, indigenous epigeic worms, and manure worms.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot3">
        <title>2.3. Technical Equipment</title>
        <p>Earthworms were identified and characterized through the morphological observation of their external features. For this, we used binocular magnifying glasses, tweezers, a precision electronic scale, a ruler, alcohol, a camera, Petri dishes, data sheets, and pens.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec3">
      <title>3. Methods</title>
      <sec id="sec3dot1">
        <title>3.1. Sampling and Collection of Earthworms</title>
        <p>Earthworm sampling primarily uses chemical methods for anecic species and physical methods for endogeic and epigeic species. </p>
        <p>The sampling took place at the experimental site during the rainy season, from June to July 2024. Earthworms were collected following the methods outlined by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>], which involved digging at the sampling point, manually sorting through manure piles, or examining the surface layers of the soil (up to 15 cm deep) in areas known to harbor earthworms. This was done to minimize biotype variation within the same plot of land. </p>
        <p>The earthworms were collected three weeks before the experiment began (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). After collection, the samples were stored in a cool place in containers filled with moist soil from the sampling site, taking into account the soil’s physicochemical properties.</p>
        <fig id="fig2">
          <label>Figure 2</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1115515-rId14.jpeg?20260930024743" />
        </fig>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref><bold>.</bold> Sampling and collection of earthworms on site.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot2">
        <title>3.2. Pre-Composting</title>
        <p>Pre-composting is an initial stage in the accelerated decomposition of organic matter that occurs before final composting or vermicomposting. This process can reduce waste volume by nearly 60%, minimize odors, and sanitize the material. </p>
        <p>In this study, traditional pre-composting was essential before introducing earthworms (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). This phase, characterized by high heat generation, achieved sufficient temperatures to eliminate most pathogens, prevent harmful fermentation that could impede worm development [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]. And sanitize the material.</p>
        <fig id="fig3">
          <label>Figure 3</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1115515-rId15.jpeg?20260930024743" />
        </fig>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref><bold>.</bold>Different types of pre-compost.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot3">
        <title>3.3. Assessment of Earthworm Viability in Different Substrates</title>
        <p>A test was conducted to evaluate the viability of earthworms based on the ratio of pre-compost to soil. This test utilized the optimal compost-to-soil ratio for promoting earthworm development, focusing on their survival, growth, and reproduction across various substrates, including soil, compost, and manure. </p>
        <p>The viability of the earthworms in these different substrates was assessed using a specific formula.</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD1">
          <mml:math>
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
              <mml:mtext>
                 
              </mml:mtext>
              <mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mfrac>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mtext>
                     
                  </mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mtext>
                     
                  </mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mtext>
                     
                  </mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mtext>
                     
                  </mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mfrac>
              <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
              <mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>Three types of pre-compost manure were utilized. For each type of manure, we prepared four different percentages, varying from raw manure to a mixture of one part pre-compost and four parts soil (<bold>Table 1</bold>).</p>
        <p><bold>Table 1.</bold>Substrate report for the viability test.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl1">
          <label>Table 1</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Manure/soil pre-composts</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Report</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  Pre-compost/soil
                  <bold>T0</bold>
                </td>
                <td>1/0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  Pre-compost/soil
                  <bold>T1</bold>
                </td>
                <td>1/1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  Pre-compost/soil
                  <bold>T2</bold>
                </td>
                <td>1/3</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  Pre-compost/soil
                  <bold>T3</bold>
                </td>
                <td>1/4</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Each container was filled with substrate (pre-compost/soil from the experimental site) and three earthworms.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot4">
        <title>3.4. Setting Up of Experimental Apparatus</title>
        <p>Two types of studies were conducted: one in a natural environment and the other under controlled conditions.</p>
        <p>3.4.1. Field Tests of Vermicomposting</p>
        <p>Vermicomposting is an eco-friendly method that breaks down organic waste into compost using macro- and microorganisms, such as bacteria and worms. The experiments were conducted in rural areas with animal waste to determine the environmental conditions conducive to vermicomposting.</p>
        <p><bold>Experimental Setup:</bold></p>
        <p>The experimental setup consisted of specific materials, experimental units, and organizational arrangements. Trenches measuring 40 cm wide, 50 cm long, and 10 cm deep were dug. The spacing between the trenches was 60 cm in width and 1 m in length (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). </p>
        <p>A total of 9 pits were filled with substrates and arranged in a completely randomized block design. Each experimental unit was covered with a mosquito net featuring a 2 mm square mesh to prevent earthworms from escaping and to exclude other macroinvertebrates from entering.</p>
        <p>Indigenous earthworms <italic>(</italic><italic>Eudrilus</italic><italic>eugeniae</italic><italic>)</italic> and exotic earthworms <italic>(Eisenia</italic><italic>foetida</italic><italic>)</italic> were introduced at a density of 3 individuals per unit, based on their weight. The pits were filled with substrate, either containing or lacking earthworms, arranged in a completely randomized block design with 9 treatments, each replicated 3 times.</p>
        <fig id="fig4">
          <label>Figure 4</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1115515-rId18.jpeg?20260930024743" />
        </fig>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref><bold>.</bold> Experimental block design in a natural environment.</p>
        <p>3.4.2. Tests Conducted under Controlled Conditions in Vermiculture</p>
        <p>The controlled-condition vermiculture test aims to optimize the decomposition of organic matter using epigeic worms. This study also measures the degradation rate, worm reproduction rate, and the quality of the compost produced. The research was conducted in a controlled environment utilizing animal waste, municipal waste, and green waste at varying incorporation rates. The objective was to determine the pre-compost/soil ratio that is most favorable for earthworm survival and to assess the effect of earthworms on the substrate. </p>
        <p><bold>Setting up and monitoring the experiments:</bold></p>
        <p>The experiments were carried out in plastic bins (45 at each site) arranged horizontally as compost bins. Each bin had dimensions of 45 × 45 × 20 cm and contained three earthworms. To maintain moisture for the worms, the bins were covered with straw. Following Chaoui’s method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>], the total duration of the experiment was 40 days. This period included not only the active decomposition phase (spanning from days 22 to 32) but also a necessary maturation period for the organic waste to transform into compost. In this experiment, two types of waste were utilized: plant waste and municipal waste, which were prepared into the following substrate types: (i) T Du: municipal waste (100%) (ii) T fv: manure poultry (5%) + plant waste (95%) (iii) T v + u: plant waste (2/3) + municipal waste (1/3) (iv) T u + v: plant waste (1/3) + municipal waste (2/3) (v) T n: bare soil.</p>
        <p>Experimental design: The study tested two categories of earthworms (native and exotic), five types of substrates, and conducted three replicates for each substrate, along with a control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). The fifteen treatments were arranged in a full factorial design (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>).</p>
        <p>3.4.3. Method for Identifying Earthworms</p>
        <p>The two categories of earthworms were identified at the Laboratoire d’Entomologie et de Parasitologie at the Faculté des Sciences et Technique of the Université des Sciences Techniques et Technologies de Bamako.</p>
        <fig id="fig5">
          <label>Figure 5</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1115515-rId19.jpeg?20260930024743" />
        </fig>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref><bold>.</bold>Block design in a controlled environment.</p>
        <fig id="fig6">
          <label>Figure 6</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1115515-rId20.jpeg?20260930024743" />
        </fig>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref><bold>.</bold> Installation of experimental setups in a controlled environment.</p>
        <fig id="fig7">
          <label>Figure 7</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1115515-rId21.jpeg?20260930024743" />
        </fig>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref><bold>.</bold> Different stages of earthworm identification.</p>
        <p>The collected earthworms were identified using the identification key from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>]. </p>
        <p>A total of twenty samples were selected, consisting of ten individuals of <italic>Eisenia</italic><italic>foetida</italic> and ten of <italic>Eudrilus</italic><italic>eugeniae</italic>. The worms were rinsed with water in a Petri dish before being fixed in alcohol to immobilize them. This step facilitated the observation of various morphological characteristics under a binocular magnifying glass, including color, number of segments, arrangement of setae, shape of the prostomium, and shape of the tail. Weight and size were measured using a precision balance and a graduated ruler, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec4">
      <title>4. Results</title>
      <sec id="sec4dot1">
        <title>4.1. Viability of Worms in Different Substrates under Natural Conditions</title>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref> shows that the observed viability rate was 100% for the proportions FPR-1/1, 1/3, and 1/4. A 67% viability rate was noted for the FPR-1/0 proportion.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot2">
        <title>4.2. Viability of Worms in Poultry Manure Substrates + Soil</title>
        <p>The results presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref> indicate that the FV-1/1 group had a viability rate of 0%, resulting in three recorded deaths. In contrast, the FV-1/3 group exhibited a viability rate of 67%, with one death recorded. The FV-1/4 group achieved a 100% viability rate, with no deaths reported. Similarly, the FV-1/0 group also showed a viability rate of 67%, with one death recorded.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot3">
        <title>4.3. Viability of Worms in Cattle Manure Substrates + Soil</title>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig10">Figure 10</xref><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig10">Figure 10</xref> displays the following viability rates: 67% for the FB-1/1 ratio (indicating recorded mortality), 100% for the FB-1/3 ratio (indicating no mortality), 100% for the FB-1/4 ratio, and 67% for the FB-1/0 ratio.</p>
        <fig id="fig8">
          <label>Figure 8</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1115515-rId22.jpeg?20260930024743" />
        </fig>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref><bold>.</bold>Viability of worms according to the proportion rate of FPR substrates + soil.</p>
        <fig id="fig9">
          <label>Figure 9</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1115515-rId23.jpeg?20260930024743" />
        </fig>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref><bold>.</bold>Viability of worms according to the proportion rate of poultry manure substrates + soil.</p>
        <fig id="fig10">
          <label>Figure 10</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1115515-rId24.jpeg?20260930024743" />
        </fig>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig10">Figure 10</xref><bold>.</bold> Viability of worms according to the proportion rate of cattle manure substrates + soil.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot4">
        <title>4.4. Viability of Worms in Different Substrates under Controlled Conditions</title>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig11">Figure 11</xref><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig11">Figure 11</xref> indicates a 100% survival rate for the species <italic>E.</italic><italic>eugeniae</italic> and <italic>E.</italic><italic>foetida</italic> when treated in urban waste.</p>
        <fig id="fig11">
          <label>Figure 11</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1115515-rId25.jpeg?20260930024743" />
        </fig>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig11">Figure 11</xref><bold>.</bold> Worm viability in the urban manure (100%).</p>
        <p>An analysis of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig12">Figure 12</xref><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig12">Figure 12</xref> indicates a 100% viability rate for both categories of earthworms in the mixture of plant waste (2/3) and municipal waste.</p>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig13">Figure 13</xref><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig13">Figure 13</xref> presents a survival rate of 100% for <italic>Eudrilus</italic><italic>eugeniae</italic> when using a mixture of one-third plant waste and two-thirds municipal waste. In contrast, <italic>Eisenia</italic><italic>foetida</italic> showed a survival rate of 67% with the same mixture of one-third plant waste and two-thirds municipal waste.</p>
        <fig id="fig12">
          <label>Figure 12</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1115515-rId26.jpeg?20260930024743" />
        </fig>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig12">Figure 12</xref><bold>.</bold> Worm viability in Tv (2/3) + DU (1/3).</p>
        <fig id="fig13">
          <label>Figure 13</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1115515-rId27.jpeg?20260930024743" />
        </fig>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig13">Figure 13</xref><bold>.</bold> Worm viability in T-DU (2/3) + DV (1/3).</p>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig14">Figure 14</xref><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig14">Figure 14</xref> illustrates a viability rate of 67% for the species <italic>Eudrilus</italic><italic>eugeniae</italic> and <italic>Eisenia</italic><italic>foetida</italic> when using a mixture of 95% plant waste and 5% poultry manure.</p>
        <fig id="fig14">
          <label>Figure 14</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1115515-rId28.jpeg?20260930024743" />
        </fig>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig14">Figure 14</xref><bold>.</bold> Worm viability in the DV (95%) + FV (5%).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot5">
        <title>4.5. Viability of Worms in the Bare Soil Test Substrates</title>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig15">Figure 15</xref><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig15">Figure 15</xref> displayed a mortality rate of 100%, which corresponds to 3 deaths, for the species <italic>Eisenia</italic><italic>foetida</italic>. In contrast, the survival rate for the species <italic>Eudrilus</italic><italic>eugeniae</italic> was 67%, indicating one death.</p>
        <fig id="fig15">
          <label>Figure 15</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1115515-rId29.jpeg?20260930024743" />
        </fig>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig15">Figure 15</xref><bold>.</bold> Viability of worms in bare soil.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot6">
        <title>4.6. Identification and Characterization of Earthworm Species</title>
        <p>In this study, two species of earthworms were identified and described using the identification keys from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>] (<bold>Table 2</bold>), (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig16">Figure 16</xref><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig16">Figure 16</xref>), (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig17">Figure 17</xref><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig17">Figure 17</xref>).</p>
        <p><bold>Table 2.</bold>Comparison of the morphological characteristics of the different collected earthworm species.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl2">
          <label>Table 2</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">
                  <bold>Morphological characteristics</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>Species</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Eisenia</italic>
                  <italic>foetida</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <italic>Eudrilus</italic>
                  <italic>eugeniae</italic>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Weight (2)</td>
                <td>0.79</td>
                <td>2.33</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Length (size) cm</td>
                <td>9.26</td>
                <td>16.68</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p><bold>Continued</bold></p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl3">
          <label>Table 3</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Number of segments</td>
                <td>158.7</td>
                <td>267</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Clitellum</td>
                <td>Saddle</td>
                <td>Saddle</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Color</td>
                <td>Red</td>
                <td>Black</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Setae</td>
                <td>Distant pair</td>
                <td>Close pair</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Prostomium shape</td>
                <td>Epilobous</td>
                <td>Zygolobous</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Clitellum shape</td>
                <td>Saddle</td>
                <td>Saddle</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Tail shape</td>
                <td>Flattened</td>
                <td>Circular</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Species type</td>
                <td>Epigeic</td>
                <td>Anecic</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <fig id="fig16">
          <label>Figure 16</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1115515-rId30.jpeg?20260930024743" />
        </fig>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig16">Figure 16</xref><bold>.</bold>Identification of the species <italic>Eisenia</italic><italic>foetida</italic><italic>.</italic></p>
        <fig id="fig17">
          <label>Figure 17</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1115515-rId31.jpeg?20260930024743" />
        </fig>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig17">Figure 17</xref><bold>.</bold>Identification of the species <italic>Eudrilus</italic><italic>eugeniae</italic><italic>.</italic></p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec5">
      <title>5. Discussion</title>
      <p><bold>The zootechnical importance of earthworms:</bold></p>
      <p>Earthworm production in livestock farming is a sustainable and cost-effective alternative for poultry feed. Expanding the use of earthworms in livestock farming necessitates a deeper understanding of the subject to optimize both earthworm production and vermicomposting.</p>
      <sec id="sec5dot1">
        <title>5.1. Identification and Characterization of Earthworm Species</title>
        <p>Earthworms play a crucial role in the dynamics of soil nutrients by changing the physical, chemical, and biological properties of the soil. They consume decomposing organic matter and soil mixed with organic materials, which enhances soil fertility, recycles organic matter, and enriches the soil with nutrients through their castings.</p>
        <p>5.1.1. Morphological Characteristics of the Species <italic>Eisenia</italic><italic>foetida</italic></p>
        <p>The average size of *<italic>E.</italic><italic>foetida</italic>* recorded in this study is 9.26 cm, which is comparable to the values reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>] at 9 cm and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>] at 8.5 cm. It exceeds the value reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>], which was 8 cm. The study also found an average weight of 0.79 g, higher than the weights reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>], which were 0.699 g, and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>], which was 0.078 g.</p>
        <p>In terms of coloration, the observed red hue aligns with findings from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>], who described it as purplish-red with stripes and dark red, respectively. However, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>] reported brown coloration, while [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>] noted yellow-striped patterns.</p>
        <p>Additionally, the study revealed that the prostomium type is Epilobic, consistent with observations by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>], who also reported the same Epilobic shape. In contrast, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>] described the prostomium as zygolobic. </p>
        <p>The investigation further indicated that the bristle position observed was of the Distant Pair type. This contrasts with findings from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>], who reported Germinate and Separate bristle positions, respectively.</p>
        <p>The average number of segments noted was 159, which is higher than the counts documented by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>], at 90 and 101 segments, respectively. However, it is slightly lower than the 162 segments reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>].</p>
        <p>The tail shape observed was flattened, similar to the cylindrical shape with slight caudal flattening reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>] and the cylindrical shape with flattening noted by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]. </p>
        <p>Finally, the study identified the clitellum shape as saddle-shaped, which does not align with the annular shape observed by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>].</p>
        <p>5.1.2. Morphological Characteristics of the Species <italic>Eudrilus</italic><italic>eugeniae</italic></p>
        <p>The average number of segments obtained was 267. This value is higher than those reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>], which were 207, 175, and 207 segments, respectively.</p>
        <p>The average size observed was 16.68 cm. This result corroborates that reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>], which is 17 cm. It is lower than that reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>], which is 11.2 cm. It is higher than those obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>], who obtained 15 cm.</p>
        <p>The shape of the clitellum observed was saddle-shaped. This result contrasts with that obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>], which was annular.</p>
        <p>The position of the setae observed was close-set. However, this is contrary to the findings reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>], who found the setae to be separated.</p>
        <p>The prostomium shape is zygolobic. This result contradicts that obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>], which is open epilobic.</p>
        <p>The observed coloration is black. This result does not corroborate those observed by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>], who obtained dark pink to violet and dark red, respectively.</p>
        <p>The average weight obtained was 2.33 g. This result is similar to that obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>], which is 2 g, and is lower than that obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>], which is 4 g.</p>
        <p>The shape of the tail observed was circular.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec6">
      <title>6. Conclusions</title>
      <p>This study highlights that vermiculture is emerging as a strategic and sustainable solution for animal production. Additionally, soil-dwelling earthworms play a crucial role in enhancing soil fertility, improving drainage, and recycling organic matter in tropical agrosystems. A deeper understanding of their biology and ecology is essential for harnessing their benefits in agricultural, agrosilvopastoral, and economic productivity, particularly in the Sudano-Sahelian zone. By synthesizing the existing knowledge on earthworms, we can facilitate their application in improving livestock productivity.</p>
      <p>Based on the findings, the Badougou Djoliba area in Mali, which is characterized by a Sudano-Sahelian climate, presents significant potential for earthworm farming due to the availability of raw materials. Considering all factors, utilizing earthworms as a protein source could provide both zootechnical and economic advantages for animal production, with further development opportunities that remain to be explored through additional studies.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec7">
      <title>Abbreviations and Acronyms</title>
      <p>Fpr (small ruminant manure), </p>
      <p>Fv (poultry manure), </p>
      <p>Fb (cattle manure), </p>
      <p>Sol nu (soil), </p>
      <p>DU (urban waste), </p>
      <p>DV (plant waste), </p>
      <p>T (test).</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Coulibaly, S.S., Tondoh, J.E., Kouassi, K.I., <italic>et al</italic>. (2016) Vermicomposts Improve Yields and Seeds Quality of <italic>Lagenaria siceraria</italic> in Côte d’Ivoire. <italic>International Journal of Agronomy &amp; Agricultural Research</italic>, 8, 26-37.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Coulibaly, S.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tondoh, J.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kouassi, K.I.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>Vermicomposts Improve Yields and Seeds Quality of Lagenaria siceraria in Côte d’Ivoire</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of Agronomy &amp; Agricultural Research</source>
            <volume>8</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Temgoua, E., Ngnikam, E., Dameni, H. and Kouedeu Kameni, G.S. (2014) Valorisation des ordures ménagères par compostage dans la ville de Dschang, Cameroun. <italic>Tropicultu</italic><italic>ra</italic>, 32, 28-36.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Temgoua, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ngnikam, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Dameni, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kameni, G.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Dschang, C</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Valorisation des ordures ménagères par compostage dans la ville de Dschang, Cameroun</article-title>
            <source>Tropicultura</source>
            <volume>32</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Zirbes, L., Mescher, M., Vrancken, V., Wathelet, J., Verheggen, F.J., Thonart, P., <italic>et</italic><italic>al</italic>. (2011) Earthworms Use Odor Cues to Locate and Feed on Microorganisms in Soil. <italic>PLOS ONE</italic>, 6, e21927. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021927 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0021927</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21799756</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021927">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021927</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Zirbes, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mescher, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Vrancken, V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wathelet, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Verheggen, F.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Thonart, P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2011</year>
            <article-title>Earthworms Use Odor Cues to Locate and Feed on Microorganisms in Soil</article-title>
            <source>PLOS ONE</source>
            <volume>6</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0021927</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21799756</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Francis, F., Haubruge, É., Thang, P.T., Lebailly, P. and Gaspar, C. (2003) Technique de lombriculture au Sud Vietnam. <italic>Biotechnologie</italic>, <italic>agronomie</italic>, <italic>société et</italic><italic>environne</italic><italic>ment</italic>, 7, 171-175.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Francis, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Thang, P.T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lebailly, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gaspar, C.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2003</year>
            <article-title>Technique de lombriculture au Sud Vietnam</article-title>
            <source>Biotechnologie</source>
            <volume>7</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Vodounnou, D., Kpogue, D.N.S., Tossavi, C.C., <italic>et al</italic>. (2016) Effet des déchets animaux et du compost vegetal sur la production et la croissance du vers ( <italic>Eisenia</italic><italic>fetida</italic>) lors de la lombriculture. <italic>The international Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agricult</italic><italic>ure</italic>, 5, 1-6. (In English)</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Vodounnou, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kpogue, D.N.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tossavi, C.C.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>Effet des déchets animaux et du compost vegetal sur la production et la croissance du vers (Eisenia fetida) lors de la lombriculture</article-title>
            <source>The international Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture</source>
            <volume>5</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Basma, A.B. and Khaoula, M. (2019) L’impact du glyphosate à l’égard du ver <italic>Aporrectodea</italic><italic>caliginosa</italic>.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Basma, A.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Khaoula, M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2019</year>
            <article-title>L’impact du glyphosate à l’égard du ver Aporrectodea caliginosa</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ansari, A.A. and Saywack, P. (2011) Identification and Classification of Earthworm Species in Guyana. <italic>International Journal of Zoological Research</italic>, 7, 93-99. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijzr.2011.93.99 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3923/ijzr.2011.93.99</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3923/ijzr.2011.93.99">https://doi.org/10.3923/ijzr.2011.93.99</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ansari, A.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Saywack, P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2011</year>
            <article-title>Identification and Classification of Earthworm Species in Guyana</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of Zoological Research</source>
            <volume>7</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3923/ijzr.2011.93.99</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Pelosi, C. (2008) Modélisation de la dynamique d’une population de vers de terre lumbricusterrestris au champ contribution à l’étude de l’impact de sys-tèmes de culture sur les communautés lombriciennes. Sciences de la Terre. AgroParisTech.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Pelosi, C.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2008</year>
            <article-title>Modélisation de la dynamique d’une population de vers de terre lumbricusterrestris au champ contribution à l’étude de l’impact de sys-tèmes de culture sur les communautés lombriciennes</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Lavelle, P. (2002) Functional Domains in Soils. <italic>Ecological Research</italic>, 17, 441-450. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2002.00509.x. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1440-1703.2002.00509.x</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2002.00509.x">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2002.00509.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Lavelle, P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2002</year>
            <article-title>Functional Domains in Soils</article-title>
            <source>Ecological Research</source>
            <volume>17</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1440-1703.2002.00509.x</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Bachelier, G. (1978) La faune des sols, son écologie et son action.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Bachelier, G.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1978</year>
            <article-title>La faune des sols, son écologie et son action</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Chaoui, H. (2010) Vermicompostage (ou lombricompostage): Le traitement des déchets organiques par les vers de terre. Ministère de l’Agriculture, de l’Alimentation et des Affaires rurales.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Chaoui, H.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2010</year>
            <article-title>Vermicompostage (ou lombricompostage): Le traitement des déchets organiques par les vers de terre</article-title>
            <source>Ministère de l’Agriculture</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Garg, V., Chand, S., Chhillar, A. and Yadav, A. (2005) Growth and Reproduction of <italic>Eisenia</italic><italic>foetida</italic> in Various Animal Wastes during Vermicomposting. <italic>Applied Ecology and Environmental Research</italic>, 3, 51-59. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/0302_051059 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15666/aeer/0302_051059</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/0302_051059">https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/0302_051059</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Garg, V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chand, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chhillar, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Yadav, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2005</year>
            <article-title>Growth and Reproduction of Eisenia foetida in Various Animal Wastes during Vermicomposting</article-title>
            <source>Applied Ecology and Environmental Research</source>
            <volume>3</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15666/aeer/0302_051059</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Basma, S. and Mezhoud, H. (2023) La toxicité d’un herbicide commercialisé à l’égard de deux espèces de vers de terre [Mémoire de master]. Université Ec-hahid Cheikh Larbi Tebessi-Tebessa-Faculté des sciences exactes et scienc-es de la nature et de la vie.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Basma, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mezhoud, H.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>La toxicité d’un herbicide commercialisé à l’égard de deux espèces de vers de terre [Mémoire de master]</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <label>14.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ben Aida, B. and MakhlouF, K. (2019) L’impact du glyphosate à l’égard du ver Aporrectodea caliginosa [Mémoire de Master]. Université Laarbi Tébessi-Tébessa Faculté des Sciences Exactes et des Sciences de la Nature et de la Vie.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Aida, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>MakhlouF, K.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2019</year>
            <article-title>L’impact du glyphosate à l’égard du ver Aporrectodea caliginosa [Mémoire de Master]</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <label>15.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Bouché, M.B. (1972) Lombriciens de France. Ecologie et systématique (Vol. 72, Numéro HS). INRA Editions.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <year>1972</year>
            <article-title>Lombriciens de France</article-title>
            <source>Ecologie et systématique (Vol. 72</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <label>16.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Gabriac, Q., James, S., Dupont, L., Csuzdi, C. and Coulis, M. (2024) Biodiversité des vers de terre (Annelida, Clitellata) des milieux cultivés des Antilles françaises. <italic>Zoosystema</italic>, 46, 411-415. https://doi.org/10.5252/zoosystema-2024v46a17 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5252/zoosystema-2024v46a17</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5252/zoosystema-2024v46a17">https://doi.org/10.5252/zoosystema-2024v46a17</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Gabriac, Q.</string-name>
              <string-name>James, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Dupont, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Csuzdi, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Coulis, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Annelida, C</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>Biodiversité des vers de terre (Annelida, Clitellata) des milieux cultivés des Antilles françaises</article-title>
            <source>Zoosystema</source>
            <volume>46</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5252/zoosystema-2024v46a17</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <label>17.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Traoré, F.B. (2017) Conception et évaluation de l’efficacité épuratoire d’un system d’assainissement par vermi-compostage pour le traitement des boues de vidange [MASTER]. Institut International d’Ingénierie de l’Eau et de l’Environnement.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <year>2017</year>
            <article-title>Conception et évaluation de l’efficacité épuratoire d’un system d’assainissement par vermi-compostage pour le traitement des boues de vidange [MASTER]</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>