<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.4" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Oalib</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Open Access Library Journal</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2333-9721</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2333-9705</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oalib.1115846</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">Oalib-154131</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Biomedical</subject>
          <subject>Life Sciences</subject>
          <subject>Business</subject>
          <subject>Economics</subject>
          <subject>Chemistry</subject>
          <subject>Materials Science</subject>
          <subject>Computer Science</subject>
          <subject>Communications</subject>
          <subject>Earth</subject>
          <subject>Environmental Sciences</subject>
          <subject>Engineering</subject>
          <subject>Medicine</subject>
          <subject>Healthcare</subject>
          <subject>Physics</subject>
          <subject>Mathematics</subject>
          <subject>Social Sciences</subject>
          <subject>Humanities</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Determinants of Maternal Deaths among Women with Obstetric Complications in Kasai Province from 2022 to 2024</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Mamba</surname>
            <given-names>Célestin</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Mukendi</surname>
            <given-names>Richard</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Mawaw</surname>
            <given-names>Paul Makan</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Mpoyi</surname>
            <given-names>Tabitha Ilunga</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Kalenga</surname>
            <given-names>Joséphine Monga</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Much’apa</surname>
            <given-names>Bienfait Mwarabu</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0009-0000-8804-4478</contrib-id>
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Kandolo</surname>
            <given-names>Simon Ilunga</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Tambwe</surname>
            <given-names>Albert Mwembo</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">4</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">5</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label> Higher Institute of Medical Techniques of Luebo, Luebo, Democratic Republic of Congo </aff>
      <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label> Faculty of Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of Congo </aff>
      <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label> School of Public Health, University of Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of Congo </aff>
      <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label> Health Knowledge Center in the DRC, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo </aff>
      <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label> Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of Congo </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="conflict" id="fn-conflict">
          <p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>02</day>
        <month>09</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <month>09</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>13</volume>
      <issue>09</issue>
      <fpage>1</fpage>
      <lpage>14</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>05</day>
          <month>08</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>20</day>
          <month>09</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="published">
          <day>23</day>
          <month>09</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2026 by the authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p> This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link> ). </license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1115846">https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1115846</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p><bold>Introduction:</bold>Maternal mortality remains a major public health problem worldwide. According to recent estimates from the World Health Organization, approximately 287,000 maternal deaths were recorded globally in 2020, with more than 95% occurring in low- and middle-income countries. In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), the maternal mortality ratio remains high, estimated at 760 deaths per 100,000 live births. The objective of our study was to identify the factors explaining maternal deaths among women who experienced obstetric complications in the Kasai Province. <bold>Methods:</bold> This was a mixed-methods study, combining quantitative and qualitative approaches. A case-control analytical design was complemented by a phenomenological design. The study was conducted in the Kasai Province from 2022 to 2024 and included 708 records of women who experienced obstetric complications. <bold>Results:</bold>Among women who experienced obstetric complications, 25% died, reflecting a high obstetric mortality rate. Reports from the Provincial Health Directorate (DPS) indicate a maternal mortality rate of 119 deaths per 100,000 live births. The main factors associated with maternal deaths were maternal age over 40 years, lack of skilled birth attendants, lack of follow-up antenatal care, interpregnancy interval of less than 2 years, and delayed access to care (p &lt; 0.05). Postpartum hemorrhage was the direct obstetric cause, while gestational malaria was the indirect cause (p &lt; 0.05). Responsibility for maternal deaths was shared among the community, healthcare facility administration, and healthcare providers. <bold>Conclusion:</bold> Maternal mortality remains high in the DRC, particularly in Kasai Province. The observed maternal deaths are linked to largely preventable factors and involve multiple responsibilities. An integrated approach, taking into account community, institutional, and professional dimensions, is essential for a sustainable reduction in maternal mortality.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated" xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>Maternal Deaths</kwd>
        <kwd>Explanatory Factors</kwd>
        <kwd>Kasai Province</kwd>
        <kwd>DRC</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>A maternal death is defined as the death of a woman occurring during pregnancy or within 42 days of its termination, regardless of the duration or location of the pregnancy, resulting from a cause related to or aggravated by the pregnancy, excluding accidental or incidental causes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>].</p>
      <p>Globally, maternal mortality remains a major public health challenge. In 2020, approximately 287,000 women died from maternal causes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>]. Hemorrhage remains the predominant direct cause [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>].</p>
      <p>In sub-Saharan Africa, maternal mortality remains particularly alarming [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>]. Several major explanatory factors have been identified, including limited access to quality obstetric care and insufficient prenatal monitoring; low coverage of prenatal consultations and the persistence of risky practices; unassisted childbirth by qualified personnel; and demographic and geographic variables, such as region or extreme maternal age [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>]. In the Democratic Republic of Congo, the maternal mortality ratio is estimated at 760 deaths per 100,000 live births [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>]. The surveillance system reveals significant regional disparities. Some provinces have critical ratios exceeding 300 deaths per 100,000 live births [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]. Hemorrhages, cardiovascular diseases, and structural weaknesses in the health system are cited as contributing factors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>].</p>
      <p>Despite the severity of the overall situation, published scientific data on the factors contributing to maternal deaths remain scarce in Kasai Province. Yet, identifying these local factors is essential for guiding prevention interventions, improving the quality of obstetric care, and strengthening strategies to reduce maternal mortality.</p>
      <p>The present study aimed to identify the factors explaining maternal deaths among women who experienced obstetric complications in the Kasai Province, in order to provide evidence that could support the decision-making of health authorities and contribute to the sustainable reduction of maternal mortality.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec2">
      <title>2. Methods</title>
      <sec id="sec2dot1">
        <title>2.1. Study Design</title>
        <p>This was a mixed-methods study with a comprehensive design. The quantitative component consisted of a case-control study that established links between maternal deaths and underlying factors. We matched one case with three controls (1:3). The qualitative component, of a phenomenological nature, complemented the quantitative component. This research took place in the 18 health zones of Kasai Province and covered a three-year period, from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2024.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot2">
        <title>2.2. Study Framework</title>
        <p>The study took place in Kasai Province.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot3">
        <title>2.3. Study Population</title>
        <p>The study population included women who died from a cause related to (or aggravated by) pregnancy and those who experienced obstetric complications in Kasai Province.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot4">
        <title>2.4. Sampling and Selection Criteria</title>
        <p>Regarding the sampling method, the quantitative component adopted an exhaustive approach by including all maternal deaths recorded in documentary sources (maternity registers, partograms, ANC and death review forms) from the 18 health zones of the Kasai Provincial Health Division. Therefore, no sampling was carried out. However, 708 death and complication records were retained. For the qualitative component, purposive sampling was applied to select participants in order to capture the diversity of their perspectives. The data were obtained from primary stakeholders (community members, community relays, and leaders) and secondary stakeholders (healthcare providers and health zone management teams), from 10 focus groups of 8 to 10 participants. Inclusion criteria were the records of pregnant women, women who had given birth, or women who had had abortions, women with obstetric complications, and/or women who died between January 2022 and December 2024 in Kasai for the quantitative component, and healthcare providers and community members who agreed to participate voluntarily in the study for the qualitative component. Exclusion criteria were incomplete or unusable records, or records lacking the information necessary for analysis for the quantitative component, and individuals who had not formally given their informed consent or who chose to withdraw.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot5">
        <title>2.5. Study Variables</title>
        <p>The dependent variable was maternal death, and the independent variables were place of residence, age, marital status, education level, parity, interpregnancy interval, prematurity, attendance at antenatal care, the three delays (delay in deciding to seek care, delay in accessing care, and delay in receiving appropriate care), obstetric hemorrhage, maternal infections, dystocia, eclampsia, and abortion.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot6">
        <title>2.6. Data Collection and Statistical Analysis</title>
        <p>Quantitatively, data were collected directly in healthcare settings through a review of patient records. A pretest of the questionnaire was conducted. Qualitatively, data were collected through semi-structured interviews (individual and focus groups), conducted until saturation was reached.</p>
        <p>Regarding the quantitative component, the data were processed using Epi Info (v7.2.6.0). Measures of frequency, incidence, central tendency (means), dispersion (variance, standard deviation), contingency tables, 95% confidence intervals, odds ratios, and chi-square tests formed the basis of the analysis. For the qualitative component, the verbatim transcripts underwent open coding. The codes were then grouped into categories, sub-themes, and main themes focused on the perceived causes of maternal deaths and potential courses of action to reduce them.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot7">
        <title>2.7. Ethical Considerations</title>
        <p>The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Lubumbashi (No. UNILU/CEM/036/2025). Informed consent of the participants, anonymity, and fairness were ensured.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec3">
      <title>3. Results</title>
      <p><bold>Table 1</bold><bold>.</bold> Sociodemographic characteristics of the women interviewed in Kasai Province from 2022 to 2024.</p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl1">
        <label>Table 1</label>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Parameters</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Frequency (N)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Percentage (%)</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Mother’s age</td>
              <td>&lt;18 Years</td>
              <td>26</td>
              <td>3.67%</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>18 à 40 years</td>
              <td>648</td>
              <td>91.53%</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>&gt;40 Years</td>
              <td>34</td>
              <td>4.80%</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>Means ± SD</td>
              <td>29.40 ± (6.80)</td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Origine</td>
              <td>Rural</td>
              <td>507</td>
              <td>71.61%</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>Urban</td>
              <td>201</td>
              <td>28.39%</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Educational level</td>
              <td>Primary</td>
              <td>480</td>
              <td>67.80%</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>Secondary</td>
              <td>216</td>
              <td>30.51%</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>University</td>
              <td>12</td>
              <td>1.69%</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Number of children</td>
              <td>Primiparous</td>
              <td>424</td>
              <td>59.89%</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>Pauciparous</td>
              <td>132</td>
              <td>18.64%</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>Multiparous</td>
              <td>152</td>
              <td>21.47%</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>matrimonial Statut</td>
              <td>Single</td>
              <td>39</td>
              <td>5.51%</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>Maried</td>
              <td>669</td>
              <td>94.49%</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p>A total of 708 women who experienced obstetric complications were included in the study. The majority were between 18 and 40 years old (91.53%), with a mean age of 29.4 ± 6.8 years. Nearly three-quarters of them lived in rural areas (71.61%). Primary education was the most common level (67.80%), followed by secondary education (30.51%) and, to a very small extent, university education (1.69%). More than half of the women were primiparous (59.89%), while 21.47% were multiparous (See <bold>Table 1</bold>).</p>
      <p>Data from the period 2022-2024 reveal two distinct realities depending on the data collection source. The overall data for Kasai Province (DHIS2) indicates 873 maternal deaths and 730,934 live births recorded, representing a maternal mortality ratio of 119 per 100,000 live births (See <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Meanwhile, data from the targeted survey (Healthcare Facilities &amp; Community) reveal a high mortality rate in emergency situations: 177 maternal deaths out of 708 recorded obstetric complications, representing a mortality rate of 25% (<italic>i.e.</italic>, 1 death for every 4 complications).</p>
      <fig id="fig1">
        <label>Figure 1</label>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1115846-rId15.jpeg?20260923022631" />
      </fig>
      <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref><bold>.</bold> Frequency of maternal deaths in Kasai Province from 2022 to 2024. Source: (DHIS2) and our surveys.</p>
      <p>All three levels of delay significantly increased the maternal mortality rate compared to the “close call” status (p &lt; 0.05). Women who did not receive skilled personnel during delivery had more than twice the mortality rate (OR = 2.25; 95% CI: 1.56 - 3.25; p &lt; 0.0001). Failure to attend prenatal care increased the mortality rate by 1.81 times (95% CI: 1.22 - 2.70; p = 0.0031). A delay of less than two years between pregnancies doubled the mortality rate (OR = 2.10; 95% CI: 1.48 - 2.97; p &lt; 0.0001). Mothers over 40 years of age had more than twice the mortality rate compared to the 18 - 40 age group (OR = 2.21; 95% CI: 1.09 - 4.47; p = 0.0246). (See <bold>Table 2</bold>)</p>
      <p>Place of origin, marital status, and gestational age did not show a statistically significant association with maternal mortality in this sample (p &gt; 0.05).</p>
      <p>Obstetric hemorrhage emerged as the leading direct cause of death in this study. Its prevalence was significantly higher among women who died (76.84%) than </p>
      <p><bold>Table 2</bold><bold>.</bold> Determinants of maternal deaths among women interviewed in Kasai Province from 2022 to 2024.</p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl2">
        <label>Table 2</label>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="2">
                <bold>Parameters</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Deceased</bold>
                <bold>n (%)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Near missed</bold>
                <bold>n (%)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>OR (CI 95%)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>p</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>First delay</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>0.0017</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>Yes</td>
              <td>139 (78.53%)</td>
              <td>350 (71.57%)</td>
              <td colspan="2">1.89 (1.267 - 2.83)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>No</td>
              <td>38 (21.47%)</td>
              <td>181 (34.09%)</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="2">Second delayed</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>0.0011</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>Yes</td>
              <td>138 (77.97%)</td>
              <td>344 (64.78%)</td>
              <td colspan="2">1.92 (1.29 - 2.86)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>No</td>
              <td>39 (22.03%)</td>
              <td>187 (35.22%)</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="2">Third delay</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>0.0076</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>Yes</td>
              <td>170 (96.05%)</td>
              <td>475 (89.45%)</td>
              <td colspan="2">2.86 (1.28 - 6.40)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>No</td>
              <td>7 (3.95%)</td>
              <td>56 (10.55%)</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="2">Mother’s age</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>&lt;18 years</td>
              <td>7 (3.95%)</td>
              <td>19 (3.58%)</td>
              <td>1.16 (0.48 - 2.82)</td>
              <td>0.7393</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>18 à 40 years</td>
              <td>156 (88.14%)</td>
              <td>492 (92.66%)</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>&gt;40 years</td>
              <td>14 (7.91%)</td>
              <td>20 (3.77%)</td>
              <td>2.21 (1.09 - 4.47)</td>
              <td>0.0246</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="2">Age of pregnancy</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>&lt;33 Semaines</td>
              <td>35 (19.77%)</td>
              <td>73 (13.75%)</td>
              <td>1.64 (0.94 - 2.85)</td>
              <td>0.0812</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>33 à 36 Semaines</td>
              <td>108 (61.02%)</td>
              <td>342 (64.41%)</td>
              <td>1.08 (0.69 - 1.67)</td>
              <td>0.7393</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>&gt;36 Semaines</td>
              <td>34 (19.21%)</td>
              <td>116 (21.85%)</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="4">Skilled childbirth assistance</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>0.0000</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>No</td>
              <td>126 (71.19%)</td>
              <td>278 (52.35%)</td>
              <td colspan="2">2.25 (1.56 - 3.25)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>Yes</td>
              <td>51 (28.81%)</td>
              <td>253 (47.65%)</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="2">Prenatal consultation followed</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>0.0031</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>No</td>
              <td>138 (77.97%)</td>
              <td>351 (66.10%)</td>
              <td colspan="2">1.81 (1.22 - 2.70)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>Yes</td>
              <td>39 (22.03%)</td>
              <td>180 (33.90%)</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="3">Inter-genetic space</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>0.0000</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>&lt;2 years</td>
              <td>86 (48.59%)</td>
              <td>165 (31.07%)</td>
              <td colspan="2">2.10 (1.48 - 2.97)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>≥2 years</td>
              <td>91 (51.41%)</td>
              <td>366 (68.93%)</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="2">Place of origin</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>0.4133</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>Rural</td>
              <td>131 (74.01%)</td>
              <td>376 (70.81%)</td>
              <td colspan="2">1.17 (0.80 - 1.72)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>Urbain</td>
              <td>46 (25.99%)</td>
              <td>155 (29.19%)</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="2">Study level</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>Primairy</td>
              <td>127 (26.46%)</td>
              <td>353 (73.54%)</td>
              <td>1.80 (0.39 - 8.32)</td>
              <td>0.4462</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>Secondary</td>
              <td>48 (22.22%)</td>
              <td>168 (77.78%)</td>
              <td>1.43 (0.30 - 6.74)</td>
              <td>0.6508</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>University</td>
              <td>2 (16.67%)</td>
              <td>10 (83.33%)</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Parity</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>Multiparous</td>
              <td>115 (64.97%)</td>
              <td>309 (58.19%)</td>
              <td>1.62 (0.10 - 2.63)</td>
              <td>0.0488</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>Pauciparous</td>
              <td>25 (14.12%)</td>
              <td>107 (20.15%)</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>Primiparous</td>
              <td>37 (20.90%)</td>
              <td>115 (21.66%)</td>
              <td>1.40 (0.79 - 2.48)</td>
              <td>0.2443</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="2">Matrimonial Status</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>0.2163</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>Single</td>
              <td>13 (7.34%)</td>
              <td>26 (4.90%)</td>
              <td colspan="2">1.54 (0.77 - 3.07)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>Maried</td>
              <td>164 (92.66%)</td>
              <td>505 (95.10%)</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p>among those who survived (35.03%), demonstrating a statistically significant association (p &lt; 0.05). Other recorded obstetric complications were less frequent, including eclampsia, dystocia, and maternal infections. Furthermore, none of these showed a statistically significant link with maternal deaths in this sample. (See <bold>Table 3</bold>)</p>
      <p><bold>Table 3</bold><bold>.</bold> Direct causes of maternal deaths among women interviewed in Kasai Province from 2022 to 2024.</p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl3">
        <label>Table 3</label>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="2">
                <bold>Parameters</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Deceased</bold>
                <bold>n (%)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Near missed</bold>
                <bold>n (%)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>OR (CI 95%)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>p</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="2">Abortion</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>0.8175</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>Yes</td>
              <td>6 (3.39%)</td>
              <td>20 (3.77%)</td>
              <td colspan="2">0.90 (0.35 - 2.27)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>No</td>
              <td>171 (96.61%)</td>
              <td>511 (96.23%)</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Dystocia</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>0.3855</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>Yes</td>
              <td>18 (10.17%)</td>
              <td>67 (12.62%)</td>
              <td colspan="2">0.78 (0.45 - 1.36)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>No</td>
              <td>159 (89.83%)</td>
              <td>464 (87.38%)</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Eclampsia</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>0.5559</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>Yes</td>
              <td>2 (1.13%)</td>
              <td>5 (0.94%)</td>
              <td colspan="2">1.20 (0.23 - 6.25)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>No</td>
              <td>175 (98.87%)</td>
              <td>526 (99.06%)</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="3">Obstetric hemorrhages</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>0.0000</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>Yes</td>
              <td>136 (76.84%)</td>
              <td>186 (35.03%)</td>
              <td colspan="2">6.15 (4.16 - 9.11)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>No</td>
              <td>41 (23.16%)</td>
              <td>345 (64.97%)</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p>Indirect causes of maternal death revealed significant differences between the group of women who died and the group of survivors, particularly for malaria and anemia. Malaria was the most frequent condition, significantly affecting more women who died (93.79%) than those who survived (79.66%) (p &lt; 0.05). Conversely, anemia of pregnancy was observed in 3.95% of women who died compared to 10.55% of those who survived, also showing a statistically significant difference (p &lt; 0.05). All other conditions (asthma, heart disease, pneumonia, tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS) remained rare and showed no statistically significant association with maternal death (See <bold>Table 4</bold>).</p>
      <p><bold>Table 4</bold><bold>.</bold> Indirect causes of maternal deaths among women surveyed in Kasai Province from 2022 to 2024.</p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl4">
        <label>Table 4</label>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="2">
                <bold>Parameters</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Deceased</bold>
                <bold>n (%)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Near missed (%)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>OR (CI 95%)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>p</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Anemia</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>0.0076</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>yes</td>
              <td>7 (3.95%)</td>
              <td>56 (10.55%)</td>
              <td colspan="2">2.86 (1.28 - 6.40)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>No</td>
              <td>170 (96.05%)</td>
              <td>475 (89.45%)</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="2">Heart disease</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>0.0779</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>yes</td>
              <td>1 (0.56%)</td>
              <td>14 (2.64%)</td>
              <td colspan="2">0.21 (0.03 - 1.61)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>No</td>
              <td>176 (99.44%)</td>
              <td>517 (97.36%)</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="3">Maternal infections</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>0.8396</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>yes</td>
              <td>20 (11.30%)</td>
              <td>63 (11.86%)</td>
              <td colspan="2">0.95 (0.55 - 1.62)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>No</td>
              <td>157 (88.70%)</td>
              <td>468 (88.14%)</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="2">Malaria</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>0.0000</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>yes</td>
              <td>166 (93.79%)</td>
              <td>423 (79.66%)</td>
              <td colspan="2">3.85 (2.02 - 7.35)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>No</td>
              <td>11 (6.21%)</td>
              <td>108 (20.34%)</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p>After adjustment, the multivariate analysis shows four main factors independently and significantly associated with maternal mortality: The absence of skilled assistance at delivery multiplies the odds of death by more than two (AOR = 2.3558; 95% CI [1.55 - 3.57]; p = 0.0001). An interpregnancy interval of less than two years triples the odds of maternal death (aOR = 3.3039; 95% CI [1.99 - 5.48]; p = 0.0000), obstetric hemorrhage nearly sevenfold (aOR = 6.7209; 95% CI [4.25 - 10.62]; p = 0.0000), and multiparity nearly halves the odds of maternal death due to a professional care deficit (aOR = 0.6590; 95% CI [0.49 - 0.89]; p = 0.0071). The other variables studied did not show a significant association with maternal mortality after adjustment. (See <bold>Table 5</bold>)</p>
      <sec id="sec3dot1">
        <title>Perceptions of Levels of Responsibility for Maternal Deaths</title>
        <p>The interview data reveal that responsibility for maternal deaths is perceived as shared and multidimensional. It simultaneously implicates the community, the hospital administration, and healthcare providers.</p>
        <p>This distribution highlights the systemic nature of maternal mortality, fitting directly into the analytical model of the three delays (delay in decision-making, delay in access, and delay in care).</p>
        <p>Within the community, the main factors identified concern the delayed recourse to care and the refusal of certain critical interventions. Many women only </p>
        <p><bold>Table 5</bold><bold>.</bold> Adjustment for confounding variables.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl5">
          <label>Table 5</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>AOR</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>95%</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>C.I.</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Coefficient</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>S.E.</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Z-statistic</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>p-value</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Maternal age</td>
                <td>0.7026</td>
                <td>0.3602</td>
                <td>1.3701</td>
                <td>−0.3530</td>
                <td>0.3408</td>
                <td>−1.0359</td>
                <td>0.3002</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Anemia</td>
                <td>0.5660</td>
                <td>0.2268</td>
                <td>1.4125</td>
                <td>−0.5691</td>
                <td>0.4666</td>
                <td>−1.2198</td>
                <td>0.2226</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Non-assistance during labor</td>
                <td>2.3558</td>
                <td>1.5547</td>
                <td>3.5698</td>
                <td>0.8569</td>
                <td>0.2121</td>
                <td>4.0408</td>
                <td>0.0001</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Antenatal care follow-up</td>
                <td>0.0000</td>
                <td>0.0000</td>
                <td>&gt;1.0E12</td>
                <td>−26.8648</td>
                <td>1044.9652</td>
                <td>−0.0257</td>
                <td>0.9795</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Interpregnancy interval</td>
                <td>3.3039</td>
                <td>1.9894</td>
                <td>5.4836</td>
                <td>1.1948</td>
                <td>0.2587</td>
                <td>4.6192</td>
                <td>0.0000</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Obstetric hemorrhage</td>
                <td>6.7209</td>
                <td>4.2537</td>
                <td>10.6192</td>
                <td>1.9052</td>
                <td>0.2334</td>
                <td>8.1633</td>
                <td>0.0000</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Malaria</td>
                <td>1.9418</td>
                <td>0.9272</td>
                <td>4.0669</td>
                <td>0.6636</td>
                <td>0.3772</td>
                <td>1.7595</td>
                <td>0.0785</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Parity</td>
                <td>0.6590</td>
                <td>0.4863</td>
                <td>0.8929</td>
                <td>−0.4171</td>
                <td>0.1550</td>
                <td>−2.6909</td>
                <td>0.0071</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>CONSTANT</td>
                <td>*</td>
                <td>*</td>
                <td>*</td>
                <td>−0.0287</td>
                <td>0.6267</td>
                <td>−0.0458</td>
                <td>0.9635</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>attend prenatal appointments in the third trimester or once complications have developed, which limits preventive interventions. The weight of sociocultural norms, women’s lack of financial autonomy, and families’ inability to cover the costs of care (medications, blood transfusions) hinder decision-making and constitute financial and cultural barriers. The interviews revealed medical reluctance, including initial refusals of emergency procedures such as blood transfusions or cesarean sections. Participants reported the positive impact of family planning and a corresponding decrease in deaths in health areas where adherence to FP and follow-up to ANC are progressing.</p>
        <p>“Many maternal deaths are due to women’s negligence; they don’t attend prenatal care. They only come in during the third trimester.”</p>
        <p>“Other families are impoverished; they can’t afford the prescribed medications, especially blood for transfusions, because the blood bank is empty and donors are struggling to find the money…”</p>
        <p>“Since women started using family planning methods and limiting their pregnancies, deaths have decreased in our health district.”</p>
        <p>Institutional and organizational failures within health facilities constitute a major obstacle to patient safety. These failures consist of critical stock shortages (facilities suffer from a recurring lack of essential medicines, blood transfusion supplies, and obstetric emergency kits), infrastructure and training problems (the lack of maintenance of medical equipment is accompanied by a lack of practical training on the use of resuscitation kits), the perverse effects of poorly funded free healthcare (the implementation of free healthcare without adequate financial compensation or salary increases demotivates staff, encouraging negligent behavior), and geographical isolation (the distance from functional health centers, particularly in rural areas, worsens transport times during emergencies).</p>
        <p>“The woman has been here for a long time, but there’s no medication. By the time the hospital authorities intervene to get the medication from a private pharmacy, it’s already too late…”</p>
        <p>“Here, maternity care is free, but people aren’t paid well. This leads to negligence and mistreatment of women by the providers.”</p>
        <p>“We have plenty of equipment and resuscitation kits. When we’re given this equipment, there isn’t a single technician to teach us how to use it.”</p>
        <p>Finally, the interviews highlighted direct shortcomings in the delivery of care and the caregiver-patient relationship. These include clinical delays and assessment errors (participants reported errors in diagnosing the severity of emergencies and a lack of responsiveness in initiating care), late referrals (registered nurses in health centers often transfer patients to referral hospitals at a stage that is too advanced in the complication), a detrimental relational climate (attitudes perceived as directive, moralizing, or stigmatizing on the part of caregivers discourage women from using health facilities), and exhaustion and demotivation (work overload coupled with perceived insufficient remuneration deteriorates the overall quality of care).</p>
        <p>“The maternal deaths we see here are cases referred late by Registered Nurses.”</p>
        <p>“We, the providers, are also too capricious. We waste a lot of time judging the women who come to us instead of starting their care. Some women don’t come to the facility anymore because of this behavior.”</p>
        <p>“People say we work hard, but we aren’t paid enough. This is the root cause of the neglect.”</p>
        <p>La réduction durable de la mortalité maternelle dans la Province du Kasaï ne peut s’appuyer sur une réponse isolée. Elle exige une approche intégrée agissant simultanément sur les trois leviers identifiés: communautaire, institutionnel et professionnel.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec4">
      <title>4. Discussion</title>
      <p>The profile of the 708 women analyzed highlights a context of marked social vulnerability. A low level of education was observed among the women, with 67.80% having not progressed beyond primary school. There is a predominantly rural population, with 71.61% of the respondents residing in remote areas, zones characterized by geographical isolation and limited access to healthcare. The majority of the women were between 18 and 40 years old (91.53%) and were first-time mothers (59.89%) (<bold>Table 1</bold> and <bold>Table 2</bold>).</p>
      <p>A discrepancy exists between the provincial ratio of the health information system (DHIS2: 119 deaths per 100,000 live births) and the hospital mortality rate observed in the study (25%, or 1 death for every 4 obstetric emergencies). This difference is explained by systemic underreporting within the DHIS2, linked to deaths occurring at home (outside of the healthcare system), gaps in the completeness of reports, and the absence of systematic audits. The 25% case fatality rate reflects the extreme severity of the cases treated and the inability of hospital facilities to manage major obstetric emergencies. These results are consistent with data from the Demographic and Health Survey in the Democratic Republic of Congo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>], which confirm the persistence of a high level of maternal mortality in the country.</p>
      <p>Multivariate analysis identified four independent determinants of maternal death. Obstetric hemorrhage (ORa = 6.72; 95% CI [4.25 - 10.62]) (<bold>Table 3</bold> and <bold>Table 5</bold>) was the leading direct cause of death (76.84% of women who died). The mortality rate from an obstetric emergency is nearly seven times higher in the presence of uncontrollable bleeding. This finding reflects the lack of availability of safe blood products, the absence of emergency kits, and the delayed administration of uterotonics (e.g., oxytocin, misoprostol). This prevalence is widely documented internationally, in both low-resource and high-income countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]. Comparable results have been reported in Abidjan, where hemorrhages accounted for approximately one-third of direct causes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>].</p>
      <p>In contrast, eclampsia and maternal infections were not significantly associated with deaths in our study. This finding differs from some previous research [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>] and could be explained either by the low frequency of these conditions during the study period or by diagnostic difficulties in peripheral settings, which often lack appropriate laboratory equipment.</p>
      <p>A short interpregnancy interval (&lt;2 years) triples the mortality rate (aOR = 3.30; 95% CI [1.99 - 5.48]). This leads to “maternal exhaustion syndrome,” characterized by uncorrected nutritional deficiencies and an increased risk of uterine atony, severe anemia, and placental complications [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>] (<bold>Table 5</bold>).</p>
      <p>Regarding the lack of skilled assistance, it has been noted that giving birth without the help of trained personnel (midwife, physician) more than doubles the mortality rate (aOR = 2.36; 95% CI [1.55 - 3.57]) (<bold>Table 5</bold>). The failure to detect dystocia or residual bleeding early transforms a manageable complication into a fatal one. The lack of skilled assistance during childbirth has been identified as a key factor in several African contexts, notably in Senegal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>].</p>
      <p>The analysis shows a protective effect of multiparity compared to pauciparity (ORa = 0.6590; 95% CI [0.49 - 0.89]). This counterintuitive result may reflect a survival bias (Healthy Mother Effect): women who have experienced several pregnancies without major complications have developed more effective use of healthcare services or exhibit less vulnerable obstetric physiology than primiparous women who are confronted from the outset with unrecognized emergencies. Previous research shows an association between high multiparity and maternal deaths [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>].</p>
      <p>The bivariate analysis reveals a very high prevalence of malaria among the women who died (93.79% vs. 79.66%, p &lt; 0.0001). Malaria caused by Plasmodium falciparum promotes hemolysis and maternal-fetal distress. This condition was thus the main indirect cause of death, which corroborates the data reported in Cameroon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>].</p>
      <p>Clinical anemia was reported in 3.95% of deaths compared to 10.55% of survivors (p = 0.0076). This contrasts sharply with the findings of many previous studies that have linked this condition to maternal deaths [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]. This paradoxical reversal is probably due to imputation or documentation bias: in patients who died rapidly from fulminant hemorrhage, the diagnosis of underlying chronic anemia was often not recorded in the medical file, unlike in stabilized patients (survivors) who underwent a complete blood count.</p>
      <p>Regarding the three-delay model and the reality on the ground, qualitative data confirmed that mortality in Kasai stems from dysfunction at each stage of care: The first delay (decision to seek medical attention) is exacerbated by low levels of education, women’s financial dependence on their partners, and late access to prenatal consultations (often initiated in the third trimester). The second delay (access to care) is compounded by the isolation of rural areas, the cost of transportation, and the time it takes to transfer patients from health centers to general referral hospitals. The third delay (hospital care) is marked by drug shortages, the absence of functioning blood banks, a lack of expertise in resuscitation equipment, and staff demotivation (cemented by free maternity care not compensated by effective state subsidies). This systemic approach aligns with the findings of Bohoussou <italic>et al</italic>. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>], who emphasized the combined involvement of individual, institutional, and professional factors. These observations reinforce the importance of a maternal mortality surveillance system that integrates these three levels of analysis.</p>
      <p>These results can be extrapolated to other similar contexts, as the organization of the health system and the structural constraints of Kasai Province are comparable to those of other provinces in the DRC and many resource-limited countries.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec5">
      <title>5. Study Limitations</title>
      <p>Despite the relevance of its results, this study had some limitations:</p>
      <p>1) Data collection relied on routine registers, exposing the study to a risk of information bias (variable completeness and rigor among healthcare providers). This bias was mitigated, however, by the use of cross-referenced secondary sources (partograms and death review forms).</p>
      <p>2) The lack of detail regarding the time to treatment and the actual quality of care at the time of the complication prevented a detailed analysis of the impact of the “three delays” (decision, access, and treatment). Triangulation with community member testimonies helped to mitigate this limitation.</p>
      <p>3) The scarcity of published studies specific to Kasai Province limited direct comparisons with previous local data, a constraint partially offset by the use of national surveys (DHS).</p>
      <p>4) The difficulty in clinically differentiating malaria from other febrile syndromes may have influenced the attribution of indirect causes. Nevertheless, the application of a strict operational definition (fever associated with a positive laboratory test) has strengthened the validity of the diagnoses made.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec6">
      <title>6. Conclusions</title>
      <p>Maternal mortality remains a major public health problem in Kasai Province. This study highlighted the persistence of largely preventable causes, revealing shortcomings both at the community level and within the health system.</p>
      <p>The data collected revealed several critical factors. Three delays in delivery, lack of skilled birth attendants, low attendance at antenatal care services, delayed access to healthcare, maternal age over 40, and interpregnancy intervals of less than two years (closely spaced pregnancies) were the risk factors associated with maternal deaths. Direct obstetric causes were largely dominated by postpartum hemorrhage. Indirect causes were primarily related to gestational malaria (See <bold>Table 6</bold>).</p>
      <p><bold>Table 6.</bold>To sustainably reverse the trend of maternal mortality in Kasai, interventions must jointly target the three identified levers.</p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl6">
        <label>Table 6</label>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Level</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Priority Action Areas</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Community</td>
              <td>Active promotion of Family Planning (to space births by more than 2 years), awareness of early ANC follow-up from the 1st trimester, and functional literacy of women.</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Institutional</td>
              <td>Effective funding for free childbirth, creation of a provincial network of blood banks (or emergency blood depots) and securing supplies of essential medicines (oxytocics, antimalarials).</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Professional</td>
              <td>Mandatory continuing education in the management of obstetric and neonatal emergencies (SONU), strict supervision of the referral system by Registered Nurses (IT) and awareness of the humanized reception of patients.</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">Organisation Mondiale de la Santé (2022) Maternal and Perinatal Death Surveillance and Response (MPDSR): Materials to Support Implementation. OMS. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240036666</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>Maternal and Perinatal Death Surveillance and Response (MPDSR): Materials to Support Implementation</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">Organisation Mondiale de la Santé (2023) Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2020: Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and UNDESA/Population Division. OMS. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240108462</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>WHO, U</string-name>
              <string-name>NICEF, U</string-name>
              <string-name>NFPA, W</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2020: Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and UNDESA/Population Division</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Mairiga, A. and Saleh, W. (2009) Maternal Mortality at the State Specialist Hospital Bauchi, Northern Nigeria. <italic>East</italic><italic>African</italic><italic>Medical</italic><italic>Journal</italic>, 86, 25-30. https://doi.org/10.4314/eamj.v86i1.46924 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4314/eamj.v86i1.46924</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19530545</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4314/eamj.v86i1.46924">https://doi.org/10.4314/eamj.v86i1.46924</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Mairiga, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Saleh, W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bauchi, N</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2009</year>
            <article-title>Maternal Mortality at the State Specialist Hospital Bauchi, Northern Nigeria</article-title>
            <source>East African Medical Journal</source>
            <volume>86</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4314/eamj.v86i1.46924</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19530545</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">de Bernis, L., Dumont, A., Bouillin, D., Gueye, A., Dompnier, J. and Bouvier-Colle, M. (2000) Maternal Morbidity and Mortality in Two Different Populations of Senegal: A Prospective Study (MOMA Survey). <italic>BJOG</italic>: <italic>An</italic><italic>International</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Obstetrics</italic><italic>&amp;</italic><italic>Gynaecology</italic>, 107, 68-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11581.x <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11581.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10645864</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11581.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11581.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Bernis, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Dumont, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bouillin, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gueye, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Dompnier, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bouvier-Colle, M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2000</year>
            <article-title>Maternal Morbidity and Mortality in Two Different Populations of Senegal: A Prospective Study (MOMA Survey)</article-title>
            <source>BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynaecology</source>
            <volume>107</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11581.x</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10645864</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="report">Pierre-Marie, T., Gregory, H., Maxwell, D.I., Robinson, E.M., Yvette, M. and Nelson, F.J. (2015) Maternal Mortality in Cameroon: A University Teaching Hospital Report. <italic>Pan</italic><italic>African</italic><italic>Medical</italic><italic>Journal</italic>, 21, Article 16. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2015.21.16.3912 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11604/pamj.2015.21.16.3912</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26401210</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2015.21.16.3912">https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2015.21.16.3912</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="report">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Pierre-Marie, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gregory, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Maxwell, D.I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Robinson, E.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Yvette, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Nelson, F.J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>Maternal Mortality in Cameroon: A University Teaching Hospital Report</article-title>
            <source>Pan African Medical Journal</source>
            <volume>21</volume>
            <elocation-id>16</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11604/pamj.2015.21.16.3912</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26401210</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ujah, I.A.O., Aisien, O.A., Mutihir, J.T., Vanderjagt, D.J., Glew, R.H. and Uguru, V.E. (2005) Factors Contributing to Maternal Mortality in North-Central Nigeria: A Seventeen-Year Review. <italic>African</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Reproductive</italic><italic>Health</italic>, 9, 27-40. https://doi.org/10.2307/3583409 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/3583409</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16623187</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/3583409">https://doi.org/10.2307/3583409</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ujah, I.A.O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Aisien, O.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mutihir, J.T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Vanderjagt, D.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Glew, R.H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Uguru, V.E.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2005</year>
            <article-title>Factors Contributing to Maternal Mortality in North-Central Nigeria: A Seventeen-Year Review</article-title>
            <source>African Journal of Reproductive Health</source>
            <volume>9</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/3583409</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16623187</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Mahbouli, S., Basli, M., Messaoudi, F., Messaoudi, I., Chibani, M. and Rachdi, R. (2003) La mortalité maternelle: Épidémiologie, facteurs de risque et évitabilité. À propos de dix cas. <italic>Gynécologie</italic><italic>Obstétrique</italic><italic>&amp;</italic><italic>Fertilité</italic>, 31, 1018-1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gyobfe.2003.08.018 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gyobfe.2003.08.018</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14680782</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gyobfe.2003.08.018">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gyobfe.2003.08.018</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Mahbouli, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Basli, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Messaoudi, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Messaoudi, I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chibani, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rachdi, R.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2003</year>
            <article-title>La mortalité maternelle: Épidémiologie, facteurs de risque et évitabilité</article-title>
            <source>À propos de dix cas. Gynécologie Obstétrique &amp; Fertilité</source>
            <volume>31</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gyobfe.2003.08.018</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14680782</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">Walraven, G., Telfer, M., Rowley, J. and Ronsmans, C. (2000) Maternal Mortality in Rural Gambia: Levels, Causes and Contributing Factors. <italic>Bulletin of the World Health Organization</italic>, 78, 603-613. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/268147</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Walraven, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Telfer, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rowley, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ronsmans, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Levels, C</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2000</year>
            <article-title>Maternal Mortality in Rural Gambia: Levels, Causes and Contributing Factors</article-title>
            <source>Bulletin of the World Health Organization</source>
            <volume>78</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">Institut National de la Statistique, École de Santé Publique de Kinshasa and ICF (2024) RDC, Enquête Démographique et de Santé (EDS-RDC III) 2023-24: Rapport des indicateurs clés. INS/ESP/ICF. https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/PR156/PR156.pdf</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>RDC, E</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>RDC, Enquête Démographique et de Santé (EDS-RDC III) 2023-24: Rapport des indicateurs clés</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">UNFPA-RDC (2018) Bulletin Semestriel n°1 de la Surveillance des décès maternels et ri-poste (SDMR) en RD Congo. UNFPA. https://drc.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/BULLETIN%20SEMESTRIEL%20N%201%20SDMR-RDCONGO.pdf</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <year>2018</year>
            <article-title>Bulletin Semestriel n°1 de la Surveillance des décès maternels et ri-poste (SDMR) en RD Congo</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Woolf, K., Célestin, M. and Justin N, K. (2018) Insight into Audit Reports on the Causes of Maternal Deaths in Poor Health Settings: The Case of North Kivu Province in Democratic Republic of Congo. <italic>International</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Women</italic>’ <italic>s</italic><italic>Health</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Wellness</italic>, 4, Article 79. https://doi.org/10.23937/2474-1353/1510079 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.23937/2474-1353/1510079</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.23937/2474-1353/1510079">https://doi.org/10.23937/2474-1353/1510079</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Woolf, K.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2018</year>
            <article-title>Insight into Audit Reports on the Causes of Maternal Deaths in Poor Health Settings: The Case of North Kivu Province in Democratic Republic of Congo</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of Women’s Health and Wellness</source>
            <volume>4</volume>
            <elocation-id>79</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.23937/2474-1353/1510079</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Saucedo, M. and Deneux-Tharaux, C. (2021) Maternal Mortality, Frequency, Causes, Women’s Profile and Preventability of Deaths in France, 2013-2015. <italic>Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertilité &amp; Sénologie</italic>, 49, 9-26. (In French)</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Saucedo, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Deneux-Tharaux, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mortality, F</string-name>
              <string-name>Causes, W</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Maternal Mortality, Frequency, Causes, Women’s Profile and Preventability of Deaths in France, 2013-2015</article-title>
            <source>Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertilité &amp; Sénologie</source>
            <volume>49</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">Bohoussou, M.K., Djanhan, Y., Boni, S., Koné, N., Welffens-Ekra, C. and Touré, C.K. (1992) La mor-talité maternelle à Abidjan en 1988. <italic>Médecine d</italic>’ <italic>Afrique noire</italic>, 39, 480-484. https://www.santetropicale.com/biblio.asp?id=907&amp;action=lire</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Bohoussou, M.K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Djanhan, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Boni, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Welffens-Ekra, C.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1992</year>
            <article-title>La mor-talité maternelle à Abidjan en 1988</article-title>
            <source>Médecine d’Afrique noire</source>
            <volume>39</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <label>14.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Garenne, M., Mbaye, K., Bah, M.D. and Correa, P. (1997) Risk Factors for Maternal Mortality: A Case-Control Study in Dakar Hospitals (Senegal). <italic>African</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Reproductive</italic><italic>Health</italic>, 1, 14-24. https://doi.org/10.2307/3583271 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/3583271</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10214399</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/3583271">https://doi.org/10.2307/3583271</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Garenne, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mbaye, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bah, M.D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Correa, P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1997</year>
            <article-title>Risk Factors for Maternal Mortality: A Case-Control Study in Dakar Hospitals (Senegal)</article-title>
            <source>African Journal of Reproductive Health</source>
            <volume>1</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/3583271</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10214399</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <label>15.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Tran, N.T., Yameogo, W.M.E., Gaffield, M.E., Langwana, F., Kiarie, J., Mashinda Kulimba, D.M., <italic>et al</italic>. (2018) Postpartum Family-Planning Barriers and Catalysts in Burkina Faso and the Democratic Republic of Congo: A Multiperspective Study. <italic>Open</italic><italic>Access</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Contraception</italic>, 9, 63-74. https://doi.org/10.2147/oajc.s170150 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2147/oajc.s170150</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30519124</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2147/oajc.s170150">https://doi.org/10.2147/oajc.s170150</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Tran, N.T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Yameogo, W.M.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gaffield, M.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Langwana, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kiarie, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kulimba, D.M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2018</year>
            <article-title>Postpartum Family-Planning Barriers and Catalysts in Burkina Faso and the Democratic Republic of Congo: A Multiperspective Study</article-title>
            <source>Open Access Journal of Contraception</source>
            <volume>9</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2147/oajc.s170150</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30519124</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <label>16.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Lin, L., Lu, C., Chen, W., Li, C. and Guo, V.Y. (2021) Parity and the Risks of Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Retrospective Study among Chinese. <italic>BMC</italic><italic>Pregnancy</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Childbirth</italic>, 21, Article No. 257. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03718-4 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12884-021-03718-4</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33771125</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03718-4">https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03718-4</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Lin, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lu, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chen, W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Li, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Guo, V.Y.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Parity and the Risks of Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Retrospective Study among Chinese</article-title>
            <source>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth</source>
            <volume>21</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12884-021-03718-4</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33771125</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>