Wound infection is a common problem among hospitalized patients. Indeed, a breach in the skin barrier caused by surgery, trauma, or burns facilitates the entry of pathogens [1][2]. To fight bacteria, the body’s immune system sends defense cells to the site of the infection. When these cells accumulate, pus forms, leading to a pyogenic or suppurative infection that actually delays wound healing and can result in complications such as wound breakdown [3]. That is why one of the most easily recognizable signs of a suppurative infection is the presence of pus [4]. The microbial agents responsible for suppuration are primarily Gram-positive cocci (Staphylococcus aureus,Streptococcus pyogenes,Enterococcus, etc.) and Gram-negative bacilli (Escherichia coli,Klebsiella pneumoniae,Proteus, and Pseudomonas, etc.) [5]. Suppurative or pyogenic infections are common in developing countries, and their management remains a challenge despite advances in microbiological techniques and surgical treatments [6]. In Africa and the West African subregion, several studies have already identified cases of nosocomial wound infections and postoperative site infections caused by these pathogens [7]-[9]. It should be noted that the virulence of these pathogenic bacteria is defined by their ability to cause harmful effects in humans, which is facilitated by access to a suitable target tissue and the ability to evade the host’s defense mechanisms [10]. The cost of bacterial culture prevents widespread access to laboratory results needed to identify the causative pathogen in developing countries in Africa [11].

In the Republic of Guinea, the lack of precise data on the various bacterial species involved in purulent infections in hospital settings hinders the effectiveness of patient care. To ensure appropriate and effective treatment, it is necessary to identify the types of bacterial species causing these purulent infections. It is within this context that the present study was conducted, with the overall objective of identifying the pathogenic bacterial species isolated from suppurative infections and their distribution across the care units of the Kindia Regional Hospital (Guinea).

Suppurative infections remain a public health problem, particularly in developing countries. The objective of this study is to identify the pathogenic bacterial species isolated from suppurative infections in the wards of the Kindia Regional Hospital.

This study shows a predominance of female patients (81.7%) with suppurative wounds. Our results are substantially higher than the 53.7% of women observed in a study among patients suffering from infectious otitis at the Cocody University Hospital in Ivory Coast [7], but contrast with the low representation of 24.5% for females among patients with infected wounds admitted to a hospital in northeastern Tanzania [12]. In our context, this female predominance can be explained by the fact that female patients account for the entirety of the Maternity ward and the majority of the General Medicine ward at the Kindia Regional Hospital.

In our study, the 20 - 29 and 30 - 39 age groups were the most represented, accounting for 58% of cases. This distribution is comparable to that reported in a study conducted in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, where patients aged 20 to 40 constituted the most represented category among surgical site infection cases [11]. Similarly, a predominance of the 18 - 59 age group (89.11%) was observed among surgical patients presenting with surgical site infections in the DRC [13]. In contrast, Suragul et al. [14] reported a mean age of 59.98 ± 10.79 years in Thailand, reflecting a predominance of older subjects. The high representation of young adults in our study could be explained by the fact that this age group constitutes the most professionally, economically, and reproductively active population, making them more exposed to trauma, surgical emergencies, and procedures [15].

Regarding the educational level of the patients, the results showed a predominance of participants with a primary education level (40%), followed by those who were uneducated (35%). Furthermore, the analysis of occupation revealed a predominance of housewives (49%) and traders (19%). This distribution could be explained by the socioeconomic characteristics of the studied population, particularly the prominent role of domestic activities and the informal sector in low-resource communities. These observations are comparable to those reported in the same study in Tanzania, which showed that individuals with no formal education or who had not completed primary school presented with more comorbidities [12]. These authors suggest that a low level of education could constitute a major social determinant of health.

In our study, parietal suppurations represented the main localization of suppurative infections, accounting for 70%, followed by cutaneous suppurations. Similar observations have been reported in several studies devoted to wound infections and surgical site infections, where superficial and parietal infections rank among the most frequently encountered clinical forms, particularly in resource-limited settings [16][17]. This predominance could be explained by environmental factors and care practices that strongly influence the occurrence and progression of skin and wound infections [15][18].

Microbiological analysis revealed that 53% of the samples were positive for at least one pathogen. Among the microorganisms isolated, Staphylococcus aureus was the predominant species (22%), followed by Escherichia coli (10%). Several authors consider S. aureus to be the bacterial species most frequently associated with wound infections, and this predominance has been reported in India, South Africa, and Ethiopia [19]-[21]. Indeed, its strong ability to colonize the skin, its capacity to produce numerous virulence factors, and its aptitude for forming biofilms all contribute to the persistence of infection [22]. Our results differ from those reported in Pakistan, where E. coliand P. aeruginosa were the most frequently isolated bacteria from pus samples [23][24]. These differences could be explained by geographic variations in bacterial ecology, differences in the population studied, the type of wounds included, and the hygiene conditions.

The correlation between the isolated bacterial species and the different hospital wards highlighted a specific distribution of pathogens depending on the care units. The maternity ward was mainly associated with Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus pyogenes, Proteus mirabilis, and Proteus vulgaris. This predominance is consistent with the characteristics of obstetrical and neonatal infections, where enterobacteria, particularly E. coli and K. pneumoniae, constitute the primary causes of urinary tract infections, postpartum endometritis, neonatal sepsis, and obstetrical wound infections [25][26]. Furthermore, S. agalactiae is widely recognized as one of the main agents responsible for early-onset neonatal infections and maternal-fetal infections, while P. aeruginosa and Proteus species are frequently involved in nosocomial infections among hospitalized patients or those with medical devices [27]. Our observations are in line with those of Allegranzi et al. [16], who showed that maternity services in low- and middle-income countries have a high prevalence of Enterobacteriaceae and Gram-positive cocci, mainly due to invasive procedures, complicated deliveries, and care practices. Similarly, Magill et al. [28] reported that E. coli,K. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa are among the pathogens most frequently involved in healthcare-associated infections in hospital settings.

The General Medicine and General Surgery departments mainly shared the presence of Staphylococcus aureus. This observation is consistent with the literature, which identifies S. aureus as one of the main agents responsible for surgical site infections, skin infections, and healthcare-associated bloodstream infections. Its ability to colonize the skin and nasal passages of healthcare personnel and patients facilitates its transmission across multiple hospital departments [22][27].

In this study, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacteriaceae (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, and Proteus vulgaris) were isolated from patients of both sexes, reflecting their ubiquitous nature and their involvement in a wide range of community-acquired and nosocomial infections [28][29]. In contrast, Streptococcus agalactiae and Streptococcus pyogenes were isolated exclusively from female patients. This observation could be explained by the predominance of these species in gynaecological and obstetrical infections. In particular, S. agalactiae (Group B Streptococcus) is a common colonizer of the female genital tract and represents a major agent of maternal, neonatal, and urinary tract infections in women [30]. Likewise, although S. pyogenes is mainly associated with respiratory tract and soft tissue infections, it is also involved in certain invasive postpartum infections, notably endometritis and puerperal sepsis, which could explain its exclusive detection in women in our series [31]. However, this distribution could also be influenced by the nature of the analysed specimens as well as the distribution of clinical presentations between both sexes, and warrants cautious interpretation.

All these findings highlight the crucial role of local microbiological surveillance and should serve to optimize strategies for managing wound infections.

At the conclusion of this study, we highlighted the key sociodemographic factors as well as the bacterial species associated with suppurative (pyogenic) infections among patients managed at the Kindia Regional Hospital. The bacteriological profile revealed a diversity of pathogens involved in these infections, with a predominance of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli, confirming their major roles in suppurative infections. The distribution of isolates across hospital departments showed that Enterobacteriaceae were mainly isolated in the Maternity department, whereas S. aureus predominated in the General Medicine and General Surgery units.

These insights are essential to strengthening the microbiological surveillance of suppurative infections and contribute to improved management of patients suffering from pyogenic infections.

In this study, some patients had previously received antibiotics or other antiseptic treatments, which could partially explain the proportion of sterile cultures.

Prior to the start of this study, formal approval was obtained from the relevant authorities at the Kindia Regional Hospital, thereby ensuring institutional authorization. In addition, a rigorous informed consent process was established for each participant. Individuals requested to provide samples were fully informed about the study objectives, collection procedures, sample usage, and data confidentiality. Their free and informed consent was collected verbally on a survey form and marked accordingly for non-literate participants. It was explicitly specified that individual analysis results would be communicated to the participants in accordance with medical confidentiality, enabling them to receive relevant information regarding their health status.

The authors thank the biomedical staff of the Regional Hospital of Kindia involved in this study.

Ouo-ouo Balamou: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing original draft.

Gbago Onivogui: Validation, Writing-review & editing.

Akim Socohouand Jerome Anani Houngue: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data analysis, Validation, Writing-review & editing.

Sinata Dounamouand Aïssatou Boiro: Data collection and investigation, funding acquisition, and review.

Ramatoulaye Baldeand Mamadou Ciré Diallo: Formal analysis, Writing-original draft.

Roger Kolamou, Nyankoye Youssouf Loua,andNathalie Kolie: Investigation, review of the first draft, and editing.

Mamadou Yero Boiro and Mohamed Sahar Traore: Supervision.

IRBAG: Institute for Applied Biology Research in Guinea.

CHU: University Hospital Centre.