<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.4" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">aim</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Advances in Microbiology</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2165-3410</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2165-3402</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/aim.2026.168019</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">aim-153442</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Biomedical</subject>
          <subject>Life Sciences</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Epidemiology, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Molecular Characterisation of Campylobacter Isolates from Diarrheic Patients and Poultry in a Rural Sub-Saharan African Setting</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Ouko</surname>
            <given-names>Tom</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Kimanga</surname>
            <given-names>Andrew Nyerere</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Fèvre</surname>
            <given-names>Eric Maurice</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">4</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Kariuki</surname>
            <given-names>Sam</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Njeru</surname>
            <given-names>John Mwaniki</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Katana</surname>
            <given-names>Japheth Sifa</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Kinaro</surname>
            <given-names>Maryanne Muthoni</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Kiiru</surname>
            <given-names>John</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label> Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya </aff>
      <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label> Institute of Environmental and Energy Technology (IEET), Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya </aff>
      <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label> International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya </aff>
      <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label> Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="conflict" id="fn-conflict">
          <p>All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>12</day>
        <month>08</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <month>08</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>08</issue>
      <fpage>334</fpage>
      <lpage>357</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>03</day>
          <month>07</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>23</day>
          <month>08</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="published">
          <day>26</day>
          <month>08</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2026 by the authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p> This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link> ). </license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/aim.2026.168019">https://doi.org/10.4236/aim.2026.168019</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p><bold>Background:</bold>Campylobacteriosis is a leading cause of bacterial gastroenteritis worldwide, with poultry serving as the primary zoonotic reservoir. In sub-Saharan Africa, the burden is compounded by limited sanitation, widespread backyard poultry keeping, and weak antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance. The prevalence, demographic distribution, and homestead risk factors for <italic>C</italic><italic>ampylobacter</italic>infection among diarrheic patients at Busia County Hospital, western Kenya, have been documented in a preceding publication from this dataset (Ouko <italic>et al</italic>.) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]. Building on those findings, this study extends the analysis to characterize antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles and molecular epidemiology of <italic>Campylobacter</italic>isolates from diarrheic patients and poultry in Busia County, western Kenya. <bold>Methods:</bold>Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed on 114 isolates (98 <italic>C. jejuni</italic>, 16 <italic>C. coli</italic>) from human and poultry sources against 11 antibiotics using disc diffusion and broth microdilution methods. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was conducted using published seven-locus <italic>Campylobacter</italic>MLST scheme on 87 representative isolates based on AMR phenotype and resistance marker profiles. Genotypic resistance determinants were identified through whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of 24 selected isolates representing each identified MLST profile. <bold>Results:</bold>Resistance to tetracycline (100%) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (95% - 100%) was universal across all isolate groups. Erythromycin resistance was 57.1% in human <italic>C. jejuni</italic>but absent in poultry <italic>C. jejuni</italic>(0%). Human <italic>C.</italic><italic>coli</italic>exhibited extensively drug-resistant (XDR) profiles, with resistance exceeding 50% in 10 of 11 antibiotics. MLST identified predominant lineages (ST-353, ST-1036, ST-1932) shared between human and poultry isolates, suggesting a possible zoonotic transmission pathway. Isolates belonging to ST-1038 and ST-7784 were unassigned to known clonal complexes, suggesting the need for further evaluation as potential novel African lineages. <bold>Conclusions:</bold>This study documents substantial <italic>Campylobacter</italic>AMR burden in western Kenya. Universal tetracycline and sulfonamide resistance renders these agents therapeutically obsolete for use in clinical scenarios. The emergence of XDR <italic>C. coli</italic>and evidence of shared ST and clone types between humans and animals suggest a possible zoonotic transmission pathway. These data demand urgent One Health interventions, including an enhanced AMR surveillance, a robust antimicrobial stewardship program, and targeted sanitation improvements to reduce infection and transmission rates.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated" xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>Campylobacteriosis</kwd>
        <kwd>Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR)</kwd>
        <kwd>Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST)</kwd>
        <kwd>Zoonotic Transmission</kwd>
        <kwd>One Health</kwd>
        <kwd>Sub-Saharan Africa</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>In sub-Saharan Africa, the epidemiological burden of campylobacteriosis is amplified by structural determinants, including limited access to safe water, inadequate sanitation infrastructure, and widespread backyard poultry husbandry with close human-animal contact. These factors facilitate the easier spread of enteric diseases in countries with fragile health systems that have minimal capacity for enteric disease surveillance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>]. A pooled prevalence of 9.9% (95% CI: 8.4% - 11.6%) has been reported across 20 sub-Saharan African countries, though this likely underestimates the true burden given diagnostic limitations and under-reporting [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]. In Kenya specifically, <italic>Campylobacter</italic> has been identified as a leading bacterial pathogen among diarrheic children, with prevalence estimates ranging from 7.1% to 20.3% depending on the study population and diagnostic methodology [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>]. Despite these vulnerabilities, microbiological data documenting species-specific prevalence, zoonotic transmission pathways, phylogenetic diversity of isolates, and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) patterns in the region remain sparse and geographically fragmented [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>]. A preceding study from this same dataset characterized the prevalence and homestead risk factors for <italic>Campylo</italic><italic>bacter</italic> infection among 1200 diarrheic patients at Busia County Hospital, western Kenya, documenting an overall isolation rate of 11.6%, the predominance of <italic>C. jejuni</italic> (89.2%), and poultry farming as the leading risk factor across all age groups [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>].</p>
      <p>The emergence and global dissemination of antimicrobial-resistant <italic>Ca</italic><italic>mpylobacter</italic> strains represent an escalating threat to clinical management and public health. Fluoroquinolones and macrolides, the antimicrobials of choice for severe campylobacteriosis, are increasingly compromised by rising resistance rates driven by veterinary antibiotic use, particularly in poultry production, and subsequent zoonotic transmission to humans [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]. Resistance to fluoroquinolones is primarily mediated by point mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining region (QRDR) of <italic>gyrA</italic>, while macrolide resistance involves 23S rRNA mutations or the horizontally acquired <italic>erm</italic>(B) methylase gene [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>]. Tetracycline resistance, mediated by the plasmid-borne ribosomal protection protein <italic>tet</italic>(O), has reached near-universal prevalence in many low- and middle-income settings [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>]. The convergence of these resistance mechanisms within individual strains has given rise to multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) <italic>Campylobacter</italic> phenotypes that severely constrain therapeutic options [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]. Recognising this trajectory, the World Health Organization classified fluoroquinolone-resistant <italic>Campylobacter</italic> among the high-priority pathogens requiring urgent research and development of new antimicrobials [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>].</p>
      <p>Molecular epidemiological tools have substantially advanced our understanding of <italic>Campylobacter</italic> population structure, host association, and resistance gene dissemination. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST), based on allelic variation at seven housekeeping loci, enables standardized genotyping and source attribution by linking human clinical isolates to specific animal reservoirs through shared clonal complexes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]. MLST-based source attribution studies have consistently implicated poultry-associated clonal complexes, particularly CC-21, CC-45, CC-257, CC-353, and CC-828, as the predominant contributors to human campylobacteriosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>]. More recently, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has provided enhanced resolution for tracking resistance gene flow, identifying novel genomic islands, and resolving transmission networks at the strain level [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]. However, molecular data from sub-Saharan African settings remain disproportionately underrepresented in global databases such as PubMLST, limiting the resolution of regional transmission networks and hampering the development of context-specific control strategies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>].</p>
      <p>Building on the epidemiological and risk factor analyses reported by Ouko <italic>et al</italic>. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>], this study aimed to: 1) characterise the antimicrobial resistance profiles and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions of <italic>Campylobacte</italic><italic>r</italic> isolates from clinical and poultry sources in western Kenya; and 2) investigate the molecular epidemiology, clonal structure, and genotypic resistance determinants of circulating <italic>Campylobacter</italic> sequence types using MLST. Together, these objectives provide a comprehensive One Health perspective on campylobacteriosis AMR dynamics at the human-poultry interface in a sub-Saharan African context, addressing a critical evidence gap for the region.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec2">
      <title>2. Materials and Methods</title>
      <sec id="sec2dot1">
        <title>2.1. Study Design, Setting, and Population</title>
        <p>A cross-sectional study was conducted among 1200 participants seeking out-patient treatment for acute diarrhea (≥3 loose stools within 24 hours) from February 2017 to April 2019 at participating health facilities in Busia County, western Kenya. This region is characterized by smallholder mixed farming, ubiquitous backyard poultry keeping, and limited veterinary antimicrobial stewardship [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]. Busia County borders Uganda and represents a high-traffic cross-border zone with potential for trans-boundary pathogen dissemination.</p>
        <p>Only patients who provided written informed consent were enrolled in the study, while consent was sought from parents or guardians on behalf of participating minors. In addition, participants must not have used antibiotics in the 5 days preceding enrollment. Non-diarrheal cases and those who declined to participate were excluded from the study.</p>
        <p>Alongside clinical sampling, poultry isolates were obtained from commercial and backyard poultry sources within the same catchment area to enable comparative molecular analysis across the human-animal interface. Ethical approval was obtained from the Kenya Medical Research Institute review board (IRB number 27/09/2016_3320). The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and national research ethics guidelines.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot2">
        <title>2.2. Bacteriological Isolation and Species Identification</title>
        <p>In the original study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>], stool specimens were collected in sterile containers and transported to the laboratory within 4 hours under cold-chain conditions. Specimens were processed using selective enrichment in Bolton broth supplemented with antimicrobial supplements (cefoperazone, vancomycin, trimethoprim, and amphotericin B) at 42˚C under microaerophilic conditions (5% O<sub>2</sub>, 10% CO<sub>2</sub>, 85% N<sub>2</sub>) for 24 hours, followed by subculture onto modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar (mCCDA; Oxoid, UK) and incubation at 42˚C under microaerophilic conditions for 48 hours. Presumptive <italic>Campylobacter</italic> colonies; grey, flat, and spreading with a metallic sheen, were confirmed by Gram staining (curved Gram-negative rods), oxidase positivity, catalase production, and absence of aerobic growth at 25˚C. Species-level identification as <italic>C. jejuni</italic> or <italic>C. coli</italic> was performed by multiplex PCR targeting the <italic>hipO</italic> gene (<italic>C. jejuni</italic>-specific hippuricase) and <italic>ask</italic> gene (<italic>C. coli</italic>-specific aspartokinase) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>]. Pure cultures were preserved at −80˚C in Microbank<sup>TM</sup> beads (Prolab Diagnostics) mixed with sterile cryopreservation media.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot3">
        <title>2.3. Recovery of Archived Isolates</title>
        <p>For the current study, archived isolates were subcultured onto mCCDA (Oxoid, UK) and incubated at 42˚C under microaerophilic conditions for 48 hours. For isolates that failed to grow, recovery was attempted by transferring the archival beads into the selective enrichment Bolton broth enriched with antimicrobials and <italic>campylobacter</italic> growth factors, followed by incubation at 42˚C under microaerophilic conditions for 24 hours before subculturing onto mCCDA (Oxoid, UK).</p>
        <p>Of the 124 <italic>C. jejuni</italic> and 15 <italic>C. coli</italic> isolates obtained in the previous study, only 84 <italic>C. jejuni</italic> and 12 <italic>C. coli</italic> were successfully recovered for the current study, with the remainder lost to culture. Similarly, of the original 16<italic>C</italic>. <italic>jejuni</italic> and 6 <italic>C. col</italic><italic>i</italic> isolates recovered from poultry, only 14 and 4 isolates, respectively, were recovered for the current study. The identity of the recovered isolates was confirmed using PCR schemes as described for the original study.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot4">
        <title>2.4. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing</title>
        <p>Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined on the 114 confirmed isolates (98 <italic>C. jejuni</italic>, 16 <italic>C. coli</italic>) using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 5% defibrinated horse blood, incubated at 42˚C under microaerophilic conditions for 24 hours. The following antimicrobial agents representing six pharmacological classes were tested: tetracycline (TET, 30 µg); sulfonamides/diaminopyrimidines, represented by trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT, 1.25/23.75 µg); macrolides, represented by erythromycin (ERY, 15 µg); fluoroquinolones, represented by ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 µg); penicillins and <italic>β</italic>-lactam/<italic>β</italic>-lactamase inhibitor combinations, including ampicillin (AMP, 10 µg) and amoxicillin-clavulanate (AMC, 20/10 µg); and cephalosporins, including cefoxitin (FOX, 30 µg), cefotaxime (CTX, 30 µg), ceftazidime (CAZ, 30 µg), cefuroxime (CXM, 30 µg), and ceftriaxone (CRO, 30 µg). In this panel, ERY, CIP, TET, AMP and AMC were chosen based on their frequent use to treat clinical and veterinary cases, while the rest of the antimicrobial panel was included in order to gain a clearer AMR phenotypic landscape that guided further molecular work on the isolates.</p>
        <p>Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined based on broth microdilution method using cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth supplemented with 2.5% lysed horse blood. Custom-designed panels (Sensititre™ EUCAMP2, Thermo Fisher Scientific) or equivalent were used following the EUCAST guidelines for <italic>Campylobacter</italic> (EUCAST, 2023). Results were interpreted according to EUCAST epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) or based on CLSI breakpoints for agents without EUCAST criteria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>]. <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> ATCC 33560 served as the quality control strain. Multidrug resistance (MDR) was defined as acquired non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories, and extensive drug resistance (XDR) as non-susceptibility to at least one agent in all but two or fewer categories, following internationally standardized definitions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot5">
        <title>2.5. Detection and Characterization of Resistance Genes</title>
        <p>Genomic DNA extracted from each isolate served as template for gene-specific PCR assays targeting chromosomal resistance loci (<italic>gyr</italic>A, the domain V region of 23S rRNA, and the ribosomal protein genes <italic>rplD</italic> and <italic>rplV</italic>) as well as acquired resistance determinants [<italic>tet</italic>(O), <italic>β</italic>-lactam<italic>ases</italic>, and <italic>erm</italic>(B)]. All assays were adapted from previously validated protocols for <italic>Campylobacter</italic> antimicrobial resistance genotyping, as detailed below.</p>
        <p>2.5.1. Fluoroquinolone Resistance—<italic>gyr</italic>A</p>
        <p>The quinolone resistance-determining region (QRDR) of <italic>gyrA</italic> was interrogated using the mismatch amplification mutation assay (MAMA)-PCR [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>], which permits selective amplification of the C257T point mutation encoding the Thr-86-Ile substitution in GyrA; the principal determinant of high-level ciprofloxacin resistance in <italic>C. jej</italic><italic>uni</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>]. All amplicons were confirmed by bidirectional Sanger sequencing to discriminate this mutation from other less common QRDR substitutions (e.g., Asp-90-Asn, Ala-70-Thr) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>].</p>
        <p>2.5.2. Macrolide Resistance—23S rRNA, <italic>rplD</italic>(L4), and <italic>rplV</italic>(L22)</p>
        <p>Domain V of the 23S rRNA gene was amplified using the primer pair 5’-GTAAACGGCG GCCGTAACTA-3’ (forward) and 5’-GACCGAACTGTCTCACGACG-3’ (reverse) under the conditions described before [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>], enabling detection of the A2074C and A2075G transitions (corresponding to <italic>E. coli</italic> positions A2058 and A2059) that confer high-level erythromycin resistance through disruption of macrolide binding in the peptidyl transferase loop [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>].</p>
        <p>Ribosomal protein genes <italic>rplD</italic> (encoding L4) and <italic>rplV</italic> (encoding L22), in which insertions or amino acid substitutions can contribute to macrolide resistance synergistically with 23S rRNA mutations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>], were amplified with the following primer pairs:</p>
        <p>1) <italic>rplD</italic>: 5’-GTAGTTAAAGGTGCAGTACCA-3’/5’-GCGAAGTTTGAATAACTACG-3’</p>
        <p>2) <italic>rplV</italic>: 5’-GAATTTGCTCCAACACGC-3’/5’-ACCATCTTGATTCCCAGTTTC-3’</p>
        <p>Thermal cycling consisted of initial denaturation at 94˚C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94˚C for 30 s, 52˚C for 30 s, and 72˚C for 45 s, with a final extension at 72˚C for 10 min [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>].</p>
        <p>2.5.3. Tetracycline Resistance—<italic>tet</italic>(O)</p>
        <p>The ribosomal protection gene <italic>tet</italic>(O) was detected by gene-specific PCR using primer sequences and conditions previously validated in <italic>Campylobacter</italic> resistance surveys [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>]. This gene, which encodes a GTPase that displaces tetracycline from the ribosomal A-site, is the sole determinant of acquired tetracycline resistance documented in <italic>Campylobacter</italic> spp. and may be plasmid- or chromosomally encoded.</p>
        <p>2.5.4. <italic>β</italic>-Lactam Resistance—<italic>bla</italic><sub>OXA-</sub> Genes</p>
        <p>The class D <italic>β</italic>-lactamase gene <italic>blaXA</italic><sub>OXA</sub><italic><sub>-</sub></italic> located at the Cj0299 locus, was amplified using primers originally designed by Alfredson and Korolik [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>], who first characterized this enzyme from <italic>C. jejuni</italic>, who demonstrated that strain GC015. Primer specificity and the expected 372-bp diagnostic amplicon were validated following the protocol of Griggs <italic>et al</italic>. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>].</p>
        <p>2.5.5. Macrolide Resistance by rRNA Methylation—<italic>erm</italic>(B)</p>
        <p>The horizontally transferable rRNA methylase gene <italic>erm</italic>(B) was detected using primers targeting the conserved coding region of the methyltransferase, as originally described by Wang <italic>et al</italic>. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>], who provided the first report of <italic>erm</italic>(B)-mediated macrolide resistance in Campylobacter coli strain ZC113 harbored on a multidrug resistance genomic island. Amplification and sequence confirmation followed the conditions of subsequent surveillance studies that documented <italic>erm</italic>(B) dissemination in both<italic>C. coli</italic>and <italic>C. jejuni</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>].</p>
        <p>2.5.6. Amplicon Analysis and Sequence Confirmation</p>
        <p>All amplicons were resolved by electrophoresis on 1.5% (w/v) agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide, excised, purified using a commercial gel extraction kit, and subjected to bidirectional Sanger sequencing. Resulting sequences were aligned to the <italic>C. jejuni</italic> NCTC 11168 reference genome (GenBank accession AL111168) using ClustalW to confirm gene identity and identify specific resistance-associated point mutations or insertions.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot6">
        <title>2.6. Multilocus Sequence Typing and Genotypic Resistance Characterisation</title>
        <p>MLST was performed on 87 representative isolates (76 <italic>C. jejuni</italic>, 11 <italic>C. coli</italic>). These isolates were selected based on their phenotypic resistance profiles and source origins. Genomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Germany). The seven housekeeping loci of the <italic>Campylobacter</italic> MLST scheme (<italic>aspA</italic>, <italic>glnA</italic>, <italic>gltA</italic>, <italic>glyA</italic>, <italic>pgm</italic>, <italic>tkt</italic>, <italic>uncA</italic>) were amplified by PCR and sequenced bidirectionally using Sanger sequencing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>]. Allelic profiles and sequence types (STs) were assigned by querying the PubMLST <italic>Campylobacter</italic> database (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://pubmlst.org/campylobacter/">https://pubmlst.org/campylobacter/</ext-link>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>]. Clonal complex (CC) assignments were determined using the eBURST algorithm and PubMLST definitions.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot7">
        <title>2.7. Whole-Genome Sequencing of Representative MLST Types</title>
        <p>Genotypic resistance determinants were identified through whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of 24 selected isolates representing each identified MLST profile. Libraries were prepared using the Nextera XT DNA Library Preparation Kit (Illumina) and sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq platform, generating 2 × 250 bp paired-end reads. Raw reads were quality-filtered (Q ≥ 30), assembled <italic>de nov</italic><italic>o</italic> using SPAdes v3.15, and resistance genes identified by <italic>in silico</italic> screening against the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>] and ResFinder 4.0 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">38</xref>]. Point mutations in <italic>gyrA</italic> (fluoroquinolone resistance), 23S rRNA (macrolide resistance), and ribosomal protein genes (<italic>rplD</italic>, <italic>rplV</italic>) were identified by alignment against reference sequences (<italic>C. jejuni</italic> NCTC 11168). The presence of <italic>tet</italic>(O), <italic>bla</italic><sub>OXA-61</sub>, and <italic>erm</italic>(B) was confirmed by gene-specific PCR and sequence verification.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot8">
        <title>2.8. Statistical Analysis</title>
        <p>Statistical comparisons of AMR proportions between species (<italic>C. jejuni</italic> vs. <italic>C. coli</italic>) and sources (human vs. poultry) employed Fisher’s Exact Test for pairwise comparisons and the Mann-Whitney U Test for overall resistance score distributions. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to quantify associations between source/species and resistance phenotypes. Simpson’s diversity index (1-D) was used to assess MLST diversity within and between populations. Phylogenetic relationships among STs were visualised using minimum spanning trees generated in PHYLOViZ 2.0 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>]. A two-tailed p-value &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using SPSS v26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) and R v4.2 as previously described by Borchani <italic>et al</italic>. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">40</xref>].</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec3">
      <title>3. Results</title>
      <sec id="sec3dot1">
        <title>3.1. Isolation Rates, Demographic Distribution, and Risk Factors: Summary of Previously Published Findings</title>
        <p>The isolation rates, species distribution, demographic characteristics, and age-stratified risk and protective factors for <italic>Campylobacter</italic>infection in this patient cohort have been described in detail in Ouko <italic>et al</italic>. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]. In brief, 139 <italic>Ca</italic><italic>mpylobacter</italic>isolates were recovered from 1200 diarrheic patients (overall isolation rate 11.6%), with <italic>C. jejuni</italic>accounting for 89.2% of isolates and <italic>C. coli</italic>for 10.8%. Isolation rates declined progressively with age: children under two years had the highest rate (13.7%), followed by 2 - 5 years (10.2%) and those older than five years (9.4%), though differences across age groups were not statistically significant (p &gt; 0.05). Rates were comparable between sexes and between urban and rural residents.</p>
        <p>Homestead poultry farming was the most consistent risk factor across all age strata (OR range: 6.47 - 10.05, all p &lt; 0.001). Additional age-specific risks included untreated pond water consumption (under-five age groups), contact with domestic pets and chicken meat consumption (2 - 5 years), and raw milk consumption and household contact with a diarrheal person (over-five years). Breastfeeding (OR: 0.24, p &lt; 0.001) and regular toilet use (OR: 0.08, p &lt; 0.001) were independently protective in children under two years. Urban residence was protective in children aged 2 - 5 years (OR: 0.47, p = 0.041). Full details of these findings, including the study design, recruitment strategy, and multivariable logistic regression models, are reported by Ouko<italic>et al</italic>. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot2">
        <title>3.2. Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles</title>
        <p>Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed on 114 <italic>Campylobacter</italic>isolates comprising 98 <italic>C. jejuni</italic> (84 human, 14 poultry) and 16 <italic>C. coli</italic> (12 human, 4 poultry). Resistance prevalence varied substantially by species, source, and antimicrobial class (<bold>Table 1</bold>).</p>
        <p>3.2.1. Universal Resistance to Tetracycline and Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole</p>
        <p>Resistance to tetracycline was observed in 100% of all isolate groups regardless of species or source, representing the most uniformly distributed resistance phenotype in this study (<bold>Table 2</bold>). Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance was similarly near-ubiquitous, recorded in 95.2% of human <italic>C. jejuni</italic>and 100% of all other groups. </p>
        <p><bold>Table 1.</bold>Antimicrobial resistance in <italic>C. Jejuni</italic> and <italic>C. coli</italic> obtained from the study population.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl1">
          <label>Table 1</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Antimicrobial Agent</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Class</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Human</bold>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>C. jejuni</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <bold>(n = 84)</bold>
                  <bold>n (%)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>Poultry C. jejuni</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <bold>(n = 14)</bold>
                  <bold>n (%)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>p-value,</bold>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>C. jejuni</bold>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Human</bold>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>C. coli</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <bold>(n = 12)</bold>
                  <bold>n (%)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Poultry</bold>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>C. coli</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <bold>(n = 4)</bold>
                  <bold>n (%)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>p-value,</bold>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>C. coli</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <bold>(n = 16)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Tetracycline</bold>
                  (TET)
                </td>
                <td>TET</td>
                <td>84 (100.0)</td>
                <td>14 (100.0)</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td>12 (100.0)</td>
                <td>4 (100.0)</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>—</italic>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole</bold>
                  (SXT)
                </td>
                <td>FOL</td>
                <td>80 (95.2)</td>
                <td>14 (100.0)</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>12 (100.0)</td>
                <td>4 (100.0)</td>
                <td>—</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Erythromycin</bold>
                  (ERY)
                </td>
                <td>MAC</td>
                <td>48 (57.1)</td>
                <td>0 (0.0)</td>
                <td>&lt;0.001</td>
                <td>12 (100.0)</td>
                <td>3 (75.0)</td>
                <td>0.25</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Ciprofloxacin</bold>
                  (CIP)
                </td>
                <td>FQ</td>
                <td>31 (36.9)</td>
                <td>4 (28.6)</td>
                <td>0.769</td>
                <td>10 (83.3)</td>
                <td>2 (50.0)</td>
                <td>0.245</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Ampicillin (AMP)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>PEN</td>
                <td>31 (36.9)</td>
                <td>14 (100.0)</td>
                <td>&lt;0.001</td>
                <td>12 (100.0)</td>
                <td>4 (100.0)</td>
                <td>—</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Amoxicillin-clavulanate</bold>
                  (AMC)
                </td>
                <td>BL/BLI</td>
                <td>7 (8.3)</td>
                <td>14 (100.0)</td>
                <td>&lt;0.001</td>
                <td>9 (75.0)</td>
                <td>2 (50.0)</td>
                <td>0.547</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Cefoxitin</bold>
                  (FOX)
                </td>
                <td>CEPH-2</td>
                <td>35 (41.7)</td>
                <td>14 (100.0)</td>
                <td>&lt;0.001</td>
                <td>2 (16.7)</td>
                <td>2 (50.0)</td>
                <td>0.525</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Cefotaxime</bold>
                  (CTX)
                </td>
                <td>CEPH-3</td>
                <td>9 (10.7)</td>
                <td>0 (0.0)</td>
                <td>0.352</td>
                <td>7 (58.3)</td>
                <td>3 (75.0)</td>
                <td>1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Ceftazidime</bold>
                  (CAZ)
                </td>
                <td>CEPH-3</td>
                <td>31 (36.9)</td>
                <td>0 (0.0)</td>
                <td>0.006</td>
                <td>10 (83.3)</td>
                <td>3 (75.0)</td>
                <td>1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Cefuroxime</bold>
                  (CXM)
                </td>
                <td>CEPH-2</td>
                <td>5 (6.0)</td>
                <td>4 (28.6)</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>7 (58.3)</td>
                <td>4 (100.0)</td>
                <td>0.245</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Ceftriaxone</bold>
                  (CRO)
                </td>
                <td>CEPH-3</td>
                <td>18 (21.4)</td>
                <td>3 (21.4)</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>10 (83.3)</td>
                <td>4 (100.0)</td>
                <td>1</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Frequency and percentage of antimicrobial resistance among <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> (n = 98) and <italic>Campylobacter coli</italic> (n = 16) isolates stratified by species and source of isolation (human clinical vs. poultry). Antimicrobial agents tested were tetracycline (TET), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT), erythromycin (ERY), ciprofloxacin (CIP), ampicillin (AMP), amoxicillin-clavulanate (AMC), cefoxitin (FOX), cefotaxime (CTX), ceftazidime (CAZ), cefuroxime (CXM), and ceftriaxone (CRO). Agents were grouped into the following antimicrobial classes: tetracyclines (TET), folate pathway inhibitors (FOL), macrolides (MAC), fluoroquinolones (FQ), penicillins (PEN), <italic>β</italic>-lactam/<italic>β</italic>-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BL/BLI), second-generation cephalosporins (CEPH-2), and third-generation cephalosporins (CEPH-3). Values are expressed as number resistant (%) out of isolates tested per group. p-values were calculated using Fisher’s exact test to compare resistance rates between human and poultry isolates within each species; a dash (—) indicates that statistical comparison was not applicable due to uniform resistance (100%) across both sources. Significance was set at p &lt; 0.05.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 2.</bold>Antimicrobial resistance rates among <italic>C. Jejuni</italic> and <italic>C. coli</italic>.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl2">
          <label>Table 2</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Antibiotic Class</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Combination of</bold>
                  <bold>Resistance</bold>
                  <bold>to</bold>
                  <bold>Different Agents</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Human</bold>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>C. jejun</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <bold>(%)</bold>
                  <bold>n</bold>
                  <bold>=</bold>
                  <bold>84</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>Poultry</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>C. jejuni</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <bold>(%)</bold>
                  <bold>n</bold>
                  <bold>=</bold>
                  <bold>14</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Human</bold>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>C. coli</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <bold>(%)</bold>
                  <bold>n</bold>
                  <bold>=</bold>
                  <bold>12</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>Poultry</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>C. coli</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <bold>(%)</bold>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>n</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>=</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <bold>4</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Resistance</bold>
                  <bold>Distribution</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Tetracyclines</bold>
                </td>
                <td>TET</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>100</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>100</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>100</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>100</bold>
                </td>
                <td>All groups</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Folate inhibitors</bold>
                </td>
                <td>SXT and TRIM</td>
                <td>95.2</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>100</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>100</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>100</bold>
                </td>
                <td>All groups(except Human CJ)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Macrolides</bold>
                </td>
                <td>ERY</td>
                <td>57.1</td>
                <td>0.0</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>100</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>75</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  Human
                  <italic>C. coli</italic>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Fluoroquinolones</bold>
                </td>
                <td>CIP</td>
                <td>36.9</td>
                <td>28.6</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>83.3</bold>
                </td>
                <td>50</td>
                <td>
                  Human
                  <italic>C. coli</italic>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>BL/BLI</bold>
                </td>
                <td>AMP and AMC</td>
                <td>7.0</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>100</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>75</bold>
                </td>
                <td>50.0</td>
                <td>
                  Poultry
                  <italic>C. jejuni</italic>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>2nd-generation cephalosporins</bold>
                </td>
                <td>FOX and CXM</td>
                <td>65.0</td>
                <td>29.0</td>
                <td>58.0</td>
                <td>50.0</td>
                <td>
                  Poultry
                  <italic>C. coli</italic>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>3rd-generation cephalosporins</bold>
                </td>
                <td>CTX, CAZ, and CRO</td>
                <td>9.0</td>
                <td>0.0</td>
                <td>7.0</td>
                <td>3.0</td>
                <td>Poultry C. coli</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Resistance to different combinations of antimicrobials (%) among <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> (n = 98) and <italic>Campylobacter coli</italic> (n = 16) isolates from human clinical and poultry sources, stratified by species and host origin. Antimicrobial agents tested included tetracycline (TET), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT), erythromycin (ERY), ciprofloxacin (CIP), ampicillin (AMP), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (AMC), cefoxitin (FOX), cefuroxime (CXM), cefotaxime (CTX), ceftazidime (CAZ), and ceftriaxone (CRO). Penicillins/BLI denotes penicillin-class agents tested in combination with a <italic>β</italic>-lactamase inhibitor. <italic>β</italic>-lactam/<italic>β</italic>-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BL/BLI).</p>
        <p>3.2.2. Macrolide and Fluoroquinolone Resistance</p>
        <p>Species-specific differences were most pronounced for erythromycin. Resistance was detected in 57.1% of human <italic>C. jejuni</italic>isolates but was entirely absent in poultry <italic>C. jejuni</italic>(0.0%). In contrast, <italic>C. coli</italic>isolates demonstrated substantially higher macrolide resistance: 100% of human and 75.0% of poultry isolates were erythromycin-resistant. Ciprofloxacin resistance was also markedly higher in <italic>C. coli</italic>than <italic>C. jejuni</italic>in human isolates (83.3% vs 36.9%, p = 0.004), consistent with the overall pattern of elevated resistance in <italic>C. coli</italic>.</p>
        <p>3.2.3. <italic>β</italic>-Lactam and Cephalosporin Resistance</p>
        <p>Ampicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate resistance patterns revealed a striking source-specific contrast in <italic>C. jejuni</italic>: poultry isolates showed 100% resistance to a combination of both agents, compared to only 7% in human <italic>C. jejuni</italic>isolates respectively. All <italic>C</italic><italic>. coli</italic>isolates, both human and poultry, were fully resistant to ampicillin (100%). Cephalosporin resistance patterns were more variable. Resistance to third-generation cephalosporins (cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone) was substantially higher in <italic>C. c</italic><italic>oli</italic> than in <italic>C. jejuni</italic>across all source groups, with ceftriaxone resistance reaching 83.3% in human and 100% in poultry <italic>C. coli</italic>isolates.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot3">
        <title>3.3. Statistical Comparisons of AMR Profiles</title>
        <p>Fisher’s Exact Test and Mann-Whitney U Test were used to compare resistance proportions between species and sources. <italic>C. coli</italic> isolates demonstrated significantly higher overall resistance than <italic>C. jejuni</italic>across all 11 antibiotics (mean 78.6% vs 46.5%; median 80.0% vs 36.9%; U = 130.0, p = 0.008). In human isolates, <italic>C. coli</italic>showed significantly higher resistance in 8 of 11 agents, with the most pronounced differences for ampicillin (100.0% vs 36.9%, p &lt; 0.001), amoxicillin-clavulanate (75.0% vs 8.3%, p &lt; 0.001), ceftriaxone (80.0% vs 21.4%, p &lt; 0.001), cefuroxime (60.0% vs 6.0%, p &lt; 0.001), and cefotaxime (60.0% vs 10.7%, p &lt; 0.001).</p>
        <p>In poultry isolates, significant differences between species were detected for erythromycin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and ceftriaxone (all in favour of higher resistance in <italic>C. coli</italic>), whereas <italic>C. jejuni</italic>poultry isolates showed significantly higher resistance to amoxicillin-clavulanate and cefoxitin (both p = 0.039). Comparison of <italic>C.</italic><italic>jejuni</italic>isolates by source (human vs. poultry) revealed that poultry isolates had significantly higher resistance to ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, and cefoxitin (all p &lt; 0.001), while human isolates showed paradoxically higher erythromycin resistance (57.1% vs 0.0%, p &lt; 0.001). No overall significant difference in resistance was detected between human and poultry sources when both species were combined (U = 209.5, p = 0.443).</p>
        <p>Multidrug Resistance Classification</p>
        <p>All isolate groups fulfilled the criteria for MDR (resistance to three or more antibiotic classes) (<bold>Table 3</bold>). Human <italic>C. coli</italic> isolates exhibited the most alarming profile, with resistance exceeding 50% in 10 of 11 individual antibiotics and spanning all six antibiotic classes, consistent with classification as extensively drug-resistant (XDR). Poultry <italic>C. jejuni</italic> demonstrated MDR across four to five classes, primarily attributable to near-universal penicillin, cephalosporin, tetracycline, and sulfonamide resistance. Human <italic>C. jejuni</italic>met the MDR threshold principally through macrolide, tetracycline, and sulfonamide resistance.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 3.</bold> Distribution of MDR phenotypes in <italic>C. Jejuni</italic> and <italic>C. coli</italic> from humans and poultry.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl3">
          <label>Table 3</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Isolate Group</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>n</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Antibiotics with &gt;50%</bold>
                  <bold>Resistance</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>No. Classes with &gt;50% Mean Resistance</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Classification</bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sup>a</sup>
                  </bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Classes Implicated</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  Human
                  <italic>C. jejuni</italic>
                </td>
                <td>84</td>
                <td>3/11</td>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>MDR</td>
                <td>MAC, TET, FOL</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  Poultry
                  <italic>C. jejun</italic>
                  i
                </td>
                <td>14</td>
                <td>5/11</td>
                <td>4 - 5</td>
                <td>MDR</td>
                <td>PEN, BL/BLI, CEPH-2, TET, FOL</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  Human
                  <italic>C. coli</italic>
                </td>
                <td>12</td>
                <td>10/11</td>
                <td>6</td>
                <td>XDR</td>
                <td>FQ, MAC, PEN, CEPH, TET, FOL</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  Poultry
                  <italic>C. coli</italic>
                </td>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>8/11</td>
                <td>5</td>
                <td>MDR</td>
                <td>MAC, PEN, CEPH, TET, FOL</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Overall</td>
                <td>114</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td>MDR (all groups)</td>
                <td>—</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Summary of multidrug resistance classification among <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> (n = 98) and <italic>Campylobacter coli</italic> (n = 16) isolates stratified by species and source of isolation. “Antibiotics with &gt;50% Resistance” indicates the number of individual antimicrobial agents (out of 11 tested) for which group-level resistance exceeded 50%. “No. Classes with &gt;50% Mean Resistance” denotes the number of distinct antimicrobial classes in which the mean resistance rate surpassed 50%. Classification was assigned according to the criteria of Magiorakos <italic>et al</italic>. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>]: <sup>a</sup>Multidrug-resistant (MDR), defined as acquired non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories; and extensively drug-resistant (XDR), defined as non-susceptibility to at least one agent in all but two or fewer antimicrobial categories. Antimicrobial classes are abbreviated as follows: tetracyclines (TET), folate pathway inhibitors (FOL), macrolides (MAC), fluoroquinolones (FQ), penicillins (PEN), <italic>β</italic>-lactam/<italic>β</italic>-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BL/BLI), and cephalosporins (CEPH; encompassing second- and third-generation agents). A dash (—) indicates that a summary statistic was not applicable for the pooled “Overall” row. </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot4">
        <title>3.4. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Distributions</title>
        <p>MIC distributions were determined for six antimicrobial agents and provided quantitative characterisation of resistance levels beyond categorical classifications (<bold>Table 4</bold>). </p>
        <p>3.4.1. Tetracycline and Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole</p>
        <p>Both agents demonstrated complete population shifts above the susceptibility breakpoints across virtually all groups. Tetracycline MICs ranged from 4 mg/L to 128 mg/L in human <italic>C. jejuni</italic>, with 53.6% of isolates exhibiting MICs of 32 - 128 </p>
        <p><bold>Table 4.</bold>MIC profiles of <italic>C. jejuni</italic> and <italic>C. coli</italic> from human and poultry.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl4">
          <label>Table 4</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Antimicrobial</bold>
                  <bold>Agent</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Breakpoint</bold>
                  <bold>(S/R, mg/L)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Source</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>n</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>MIC</bold>
                  <bold>Distribution</bold>
                  <bold>, mg/L: n (%)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Resistant,</bold>
                  <bold>n (%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="6">
                  <italic>
                    <bold>Campylobacter jejuni</bold>
                  </italic>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">Erythromycin</td>
                <td rowspan="2">S ≤ 4/R &gt; 4</td>
                <td>Human</td>
                <td>84</td>
                <td>0.25 - 2: 36 (42.9%); 8: 28 (33.3%); 16 - 64: 20 (23.8%)</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>48 (57.1%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Poultry</td>
                <td>14</td>
                <td>0.5 - 2: 14 (100%)</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>0 (0%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">Ciprofloxacin</td>
                <td rowspan="2">S ≤ 0.5/R &gt; 0.5</td>
                <td>Human</td>
                <td>84</td>
                <td>0.25: 53 (63.1%); 1: 9 (10.7%); 8 - 128: 22 (26.2%)</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>31 (36.9%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Poultry</td>
                <td>14</td>
                <td>0.25: 10 (71.4%); 16 - 128: 4 (28.6%)</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>4 (28.6%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">Tetracycline</td>
                <td rowspan="2">S ≤ 2/R &gt; 2</td>
                <td>Human</td>
                <td>84</td>
                <td>4: 31 (36.9%); 16: 8 (9.5%); 32 - 128: 45 (53.6%)</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>84 (100%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Poultry</td>
                <td>14</td>
                <td>16 - 128: 14 (100%)</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>14 (100%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">Ampicillin</td>
                <td rowspan="2">S ≤ 8/R &gt; 8</td>
                <td>Human</td>
                <td>84</td>
                <td>≤4: 53 (63.1%); 16: 16 (19.0%); 32 - 128: 15 (17.9%)</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>31 (36.9%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Poultry</td>
                <td>14</td>
                <td>16 - 64: 14 (100%)</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>14 (100%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">Amoxicillin-clavulanate</td>
                <td rowspan="2">S ≤ 8/R &gt; 8</td>
                <td>Human</td>
                <td>84</td>
                <td>≤4: 77 (91.7%); 16 - 32: 7 (8.3%)</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>7 (8.3%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Poultry</td>
                <td>14</td>
                <td>16 - 64: 14 (100%)</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>14 (100%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole</td>
                <td rowspan="2">S ≤ 2/R &gt; 2</td>
                <td>Human</td>
                <td>84</td>
                <td>≤2: 4 (4.8%); 4 - 8: 80 (95.2%)</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>80 (95.2%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Poultry</td>
                <td>14</td>
                <td>4 - 8: 14 (100%)</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>14 (100%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="6">
                  <italic>
                    <bold>Campylobacter coli</bold>
                  </italic>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">Erythromycin</td>
                <td rowspan="2">S ≤ 8/R &gt; 8</td>
                <td>Human</td>
                <td>12</td>
                <td>16: 3 (25.0%); 32 - 128: 9 (75.0%)</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>12 (100%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Poultry</td>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>≤8: 1 (25.0%); 16 - 64: 3 (75.0%)</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>3 (75.0%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">Ciprofloxacin</td>
                <td rowspan="2">S ≤ 0.5/R &gt; 0.5</td>
                <td>Human</td>
                <td>12</td>
                <td>0.25: 2 (16.7%); 8 - 128: 10 (83.3%)</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>10 (83.3%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Poultry</td>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>0.25: 2 (50.0%); 32 - 128: 2 (50.0%)</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>2 (50.0%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">Tetracycline</td>
                <td rowspan="2">S ≤ 2/R &gt; 2</td>
                <td>Human</td>
                <td>12</td>
                <td>16 - 128: 12 (100%)</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>12 (100%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Poultry</td>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>16 - 128: 4 (100%)</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>4 (100%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">Ampicillin</td>
                <td rowspan="2">S ≤ 8/R &gt; 8</td>
                <td>Human</td>
                <td>12</td>
                <td>16 - 128: 12 (100%)</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>12 (100%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Poultry</td>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>16 - 128: 4 (100%)</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>4 (100%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">Amoxicillin-clavulanate</td>
                <td rowspan="2">S ≤ 8/R &gt; 8</td>
                <td>Human</td>
                <td>12</td>
                <td>≤8: 3 (25.0%); 16 - 32: 9 (75.0%)</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>9 (75.0%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Poultry</td>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>≤8: 2 (50.0%); 16 - 32: 2 (50.0%)</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>2 (50.0%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole</td>
                <td rowspan="2">S ≤ 2/R &gt; 2</td>
                <td>Human</td>
                <td>12</td>
                <td>4 - 8: 12 (100%)</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>12 (100%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Poultry</td>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>4 - 8: 4 (100%)</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>4 (100%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Breakpoints are expressed in mg/L. <bold>S</bold>, susceptible; <bold>R</bold>, resistant. n = number of isolates tested per source. MIC distribution values are grouped by tested dilution range as reported; percentages are of the source-specific total (n) and may not sum to 100% due to rounding. “Resistant, n (%)” is the sum of isolates with MIC values above the resistance break-point.</p>
        <p>mg/L, indicative of high-level resistance mediated by acquired determinants. Similarly, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole MICs were uniformly concentrated at 4 - 8 mg/L across all groups, with no susceptible isolates detected in most categories.</p>
        <p>3.4.2. Erythromycin</p>
        <p>Erythromycin MIC distributions revealed a bimodal pattern in human <italic>C.</italic><italic>jejuni</italic>: 42.9% of isolates were susceptible (MIC: 0.25 - 2 mg/L), while 33.3% showed MICs at 8 mg/L and 23.8% exhibited high-level resistance (MIC: 16 - 64 mg/L). Poultry <italic>C. jejuni</italic>isolates were entirely susceptible (MIC: 0.5 - 2 mg/L), starkly contrasting with the human isolate pattern. Human <italic>C. coli</italic>isolates showed uniformly high MICs, with 75.0% above 32 mg/L, confirming clinically significant macrolide resistance.</p>
        <p>3.4.3. Ciprofloxacin</p>
        <p>Ciprofloxacin MIC distributions were bimodal across most groups, with resistant populations showing markedly elevated MICs (predominantly 8 - 128 mg/L), suggesting step-wise accumulation of resistance mutations (<italic>gyrA</italic> T86I) without significant intermediate populations. Human <italic>C. coli</italic>isolates had the highest ciprofloxacin MICs, with 83.3% exceeding the susceptibility breakpoints.</p>
        <p>3.4.4. Ampicillin and Amoxicillin-Clavulanate</p>
        <p>Ampicillin MIC distributions mirrored the categorical resistance data. All poultry <italic>C. jejun</italic><italic>i</italic>and all <italic>C. coli</italic> isolates had MICs of ≥16 mg/L. Amoxicillin-clavulanate MIC distributions were notable for the marked contrast between human <italic>C. jejuni</italic>(91.7% susceptible, MIC ≤ 4 mg/L) and poultry <italic>C. jejuni</italic> (100% resistant, MIC: 16 - 64 mg/L), potentially reflecting differential selective pressure from veterinary <italic>β</italic>-lactam use.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot5">
        <title>3.5. Multilocus Sequence Typing and Molecular Epidemiology</title>
        <p>MLST was successfully assigned to 76 <italic>C. jejuni</italic>(62 human, 14 poultry) and 11 <italic>C. coli</italic>(7 human, 4 poultry) isolates (<bold>Table 5</bold>). Five <italic>C. jejuni</italic> sequence types were identified, dominated by ST-353 (32 human, 3 poultry; CC-353) and ST-1036 (16 human, 6 poultry; CC-353). ST-1932 (CC-460), identified in 12 human and 2 poultry isolates, demonstrated a broad MDR genotype encompassing <italic>β</italic>-lactams, fluoroquinolones, macrolides, and tetracyclines. ST-2084 (CC-353), identified exclusively in poultry isolates, exhibited an equally broad MDR profile and harboured multiple resistance determinants, including <italic>bla</italic><sub>OXA-605</sub>, <italic>gyr</italic>A T86I conferring resistance to quinolones, 50S ribosomal protein L22 mutation A103V confering resistance to macrolides, and <italic>tet</italic>(O) confering resistance to tetracylines. ST-1036 was notable for its susceptible phenotype across all tested antimicrobials.</p>
        <p><italic>C. jejuni</italic>strains in the ST-353 (CC-353), ST-2084 (CC-353), and ST-1932 (CC-460) all exhibited fluoroquinolone resistance and carried the <italic>gyrA</italic> T86I mutation that is widespread across both CC-353 and CC-460 lineages (<bold>Table 5</bold>). Resistance against <italic>β</italic>-lactams such as ampicillin/cefotaxime was observed among isolates belonging to ST-353, ST-2084, ST-1932, and ST-1038/ST-7784 and this resistance was associated with carriage of <italic>bla</italic><sub>OXA-61</sub> gene that is common across multiple clonal complexes (CC-353, CC-460, and unassigned STs), indicating it is a core or widely disseminated resistance determinant.</p>
        <p>Tetracycline resistance in <italic>C. coli</italic>. strains belonging to ST-2084 (CC-353) and ST-1932 (CC-460), as well as ST-830 (CC-828) was associated with the <italic>tet</italic>(O). Macrolide resistance that was observed in strains belonging to ST-2084 (CC-353) </p>
        <p><bold>Table 5.</bold> MLST types and associated AMR phenotypes and resistance markers.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl5">
          <label>Table 5</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>ST Type</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Clonal Complex</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Species</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>AMR Phenotype (</bold>
                  <bold>Resistance Marker Detected</bold>
                  <bold>)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Source</bold>
                  <bold>Distribution</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>ST-353</td>
                <td>CC-353</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>C. jejuni</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <italic>β</italic>
                  -lactams [
                  <italic>
                    <bold>bla</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <bold>
                    <sub>OXA-605</sub>
                  </bold>
                  <bold>, or</bold>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>bla</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <bold>
                    <sub>OXA-61</sub>
                  </bold>
                  ] Fluoroquinolones (FQ) [
                  <italic>
                    <bold>gyrA</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <bold>T86</bold>
                  ]
                </td>
                <td>Human (32), Poultry (3)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>ST-2084</td>
                <td>CC-353</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>C. jejuni</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <italic>β</italic>
                  -lactams [
                  <italic>
                    <bold>bla</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <bold>
                    <sub>OXA-605</sub>
                  </bold>
                  ], FQ [
                  <italic>
                    <bold>gyrA</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <bold>T86</bold>
                  ], Macrolides [
                  <italic>erm</italic>
                  (B)], Tetracycline [
                  <italic>tet</italic>
                  (O)], TMP-SMX [
                  <italic>
                    <bold>dfr1.df</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <bold>r</bold>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>9</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <bold>]</bold>
                </td>
                <td>Poultry (3)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>ST-1932</td>
                <td>CC-460</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>C. jejuni</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <italic>β</italic>
                  -lactams [
                  <italic>
                    <bold>bla</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <bold>
                    <sub>OXA-61</sub>
                  </bold>
                  ], FQ [
                  <italic>
                    <bold>gyrA</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <bold>T86</bold>
                  ], Macrolides [
                  <bold>A103V</bold>
                  ], Tetracycline [
                  <italic>
                    <bold>tet(</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <bold>O</bold>
                  )]
                </td>
                <td>Human (12), Poultry (2)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>ST-1036</td>
                <td>CC-353</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>C. jejuni</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                  Tetracycline [
                  <italic>
                    <bold>tet</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <bold>(O</bold>
                  )], TMP-SMX [
                  <italic>
                    <bold>dfr9</bold>
                  </italic>
                  ]
                </td>
                <td>Human (16), Poultry (6)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>ST-1038, ST-7784</td>
                <td>Not determined</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>C. jejuni</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                  TMP-SMX [
                  <italic>
                    <bold>dfr1.dfr9</bold>
                  </italic>
                  ]
                  <italic>β</italic>
                  -lactams [
                  <italic>
                    <bold>bla</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <bold>
                    <sub>OXA-61</sub>
                  </bold>
                  ]
                </td>
                <td>Human (2)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>ST-8043</td>
                <td>Related to CC-828</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>C. coli</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                  Macrolides [
                  <italic>
                    <bold>gyrA</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <bold>A103V</bold>
                  ], Tetracycline [
                  <italic>
                    <bold>tet(</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <bold>O</bold>
                  )], TMP-SMX [
                  <italic>
                    <bold>dfr1</bold>
                  </italic>
                  ]
                </td>
                <td>Human (3), Poultry (2)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>ST-830</td>
                <td>CC-828</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>C. coli</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                  Tetracycline [
                  <italic>
                    <bold>tet</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <bold>(O</bold>
                  )], TMP-SMX [
                  <italic>
                    <bold>dfr9</bold>
                  </italic>
                  ]
                </td>
                <td>Poultry (1)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>ST-607</td>
                <td>CC-460</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>C. coli</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                  Tetracycline [
                  <italic>
                    <bold>tet</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <bold>(O</bold>
                  )] TMP-SMX [
                  <italic>
                    <bold>dfr1</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <bold>or</bold>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>dfr9</bold>
                  </italic>
                  ]
                </td>
                <td>Human (3), Poultry (2)</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Distribution of multilocus sequence types (STs), clonal complex (CC) assignments, and associated antimicrobial resistance (AMR) phenotypes among <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> (n = 76) and <italic>Campylobacter coli</italic> (n = 11) isolates from human clinical and poultry sources. Species identification was confirmed by multiplex PCR. Sequence types and clonal complexes were assigned using the PubMLST <italic>Campylobacter</italic> database (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://pubmlst.org/campylobacter">https://pubmlst.org/campylobacter</ext-link>). AMR phenotype indicates the antimicrobial class(es) to which isolates of each ST demonstrated phenotypic resistance; “Susceptible” denotes susceptibility to all agents tested. Source distribution shows the number of isolates recovered from each host origin. Antimicrobial classes are abbreviated as follows: fluoroquinolones (FQ), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), and multidrug-resistant (MDR); defined as non-susceptibility to at least one agent in ≥3 antimicrobial categories, per Magiorakos <italic>et al</italic>. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>]. ST, sequence type; CC, clonal complex; MLST, multilocus sequence typing.</p>
        <p>and ST-1932 (CC-460) and those belonging to <italic>C. coli</italic> ST-8043 (related to CC-828) was attributed to carriage of <italic>erm</italic>(B) or 23S rRNA mutations.</p>
        <p>Among <italic>C. coli</italic>, three sequence types were identified. ST-8043 (related to CC-828) and ST-607 (CC-460) were both associated with MDR profiles and were recovered from both human and poultry sources. ST-830 (CC-828), found exclusively in a single poultry isolate, demonstrated resistance only to tetracycline. The shared distribution of ST-353, ST-1932, and ST-8043 across human and poultry sources provides molecular evidence of zoonotic circulation between animal reservoirs and human populations.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot6">
        <title>3.6. MLST and Clonal Diversity</title>
        <p>MLST analysis of Kenyan Campylobacter isolates revealed a clear link to global poultry-associated lineages (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). In <italic>C. jejuni</italic>, the predominant STs (ST-353, ST-2084, ST-1036) belong to CC-353, a known chicken-specialist complex, while ST-1932 (CC-460) mirrors prevalent West African types. Notably, ST-1038 and ST-7784 are unassigned, potentially representing novel African lineages. In <italic>C. coli</italic>, ST-8043 (MDR) and ST-830 fall within the dominant CC-828 complex, with ST-830 extending its African distribution eastward. The data show a strong human-poultry interface, with poultry isolates matching human clinical types, and a total of 62 human <italic>C. jejuni</italic> cases versus 7 <italic>C. coli</italic> cases.</p>
        <fig id="fig1">
          <label>Figure 1</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2272292-rId17.jpeg?20260826031630" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 1.</bold> Genetic relationship of locally isolated Camplobacter isolates belonging to various MLST types with those published in other studies. Unrooted neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree depicting the clonal relationships among <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> and <italic>Campylobacter coli</italic> sequence types (STs) identified in this study, constructed from concatenated multilocus sequence typing (MLST) allelic profiles of seven housekeeping loci. Kenyan isolates are positioned in the context of globally recognized clonal complexes (CCs) curated in the PubMLST database (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://pubmlst.org/campylobacter">https://pubmlst.org/campylobacter</ext-link>). Node colours denote clonal complex membership: orange, CC-353 (chicken-associated lineage); teal/dark green, CC-460 (dominant global clone); dark navy blue, CC-828 (<italic>C. coli</italic> lineage); grey, STs unassigned to a recognized CC. Node size is proportional to the number of isolates sharing that ST. Dashed branches indicate uncertain phylogenetic placement due to the absence of a formal CC assignment. A red asterisk (*) denotes multidrug-resistant (MDR) status; a blue asterisk (*) denotes STs unassigned to a known clonal complex. The deep bifurcation separating the upper (<italic>C. jejuni</italic>) and lower (<italic>C. coli</italic>) branches reflects the established interspecific divergence within the genus <italic>Campylobacter</italic>. ST, sequence type; CC, clonal complex; MDR, multidrug-resistant.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec4">
      <title>4. Discussion</title>
      <sec id="sec4dot1">
        <title>4.1. Prevalence and Risk Factors</title>
        <p>The Campylobacter isolation rate of 11.6%, with <italic>C. jejuni</italic> predominance (89.2%), is consistent with sub-Saharan African hospital-based surveillance reporting pooled prevalence of 9.9% (CI: 8.4% - 11.6%) and <italic>C. jejuni</italic> as the most prevalent species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]. The highest isolation in children under two years (13.7%) reflects immunological immaturity compounded by frequent faecal-oral exposures in low-resource settings, where community-based studies demonstrate that up to 60,000 per 100,000 children under five are affected [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>]. Homestead poultry farming emerged as the strongest risk factor across all age strata (OR: 6.47 - 10.05), implicating the domestic poultry environment as the primary transmission reservoir; a finding corroborated by the shared MLST genotypes between human and poultry isolates in this study and consistent with broader evidence that colonized broiler chicks may be the primary vector for transmitting Campylobacter to humans [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>]. Full risk factor analyses are detailed in Ouko <italic>et al</italic>. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot2">
        <title>4.2. Antimicrobial Resistance</title>
        <p>Universal resistance to tetracycline (100%) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (95% - 100%) confirms resistance saturation for these agents in this setting, rendering them clinically obsolete for treating this pathogen. This pattern is well-documented across sub-Saharan Africa and is partially attributable to decades of unregulated use in human and veterinary medicine [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">44</xref>] with global antimicrobial consumption in livestock estimated at 63,151 tons in 2010. These volumes are projected to rise by 67% by 2030, with chicken production consuming 148 mg∙kg<sup>−1</sup> of antimicrobials annually [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>].</p>
        <p>Erythromycin resistance in human <italic>C. jejuni</italic> (57.1%) reported in the current study substantially exceeds rates in Western Europe (&lt;5%) and North America (3% - 10%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">46</xref>]. This scenario probably represents a critical therapeutic concern given that macrolides remain the drugs of choice for severe campylobacteriosis following increasing fluoroquinolone resistance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]. The absence of erythromycin resistance in poultry <italic>C. jejuni</italic> observed in this study suggests macrolide selection pressure operates predominantly at the human medicine interface, or that resistant strains originate from unsampled reservoirs; a hypothesis requiring whole-genome sequencing and source attribution modeling to resolve.</p>
        <p>Ciprofloxacin resistance in human <italic>C. jejuni</italic>(36.9%) and<italic>C. coli</italic> (80.0%) observed in the current study aligns with global escalation trends following fluoroquinolone introduction in poultry production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">47</xref>]. Third-generation cephalosporin resistance in <italic>C. coli</italic> (ceftriaxone 80% - 100%; cefotaxime 60% - 75%) is consistent with emerging extended-spectrum <italic>β</italic>-lactamase-like patterns reported from Ethiopia and Nigeria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">44</xref>]. This finding is particularly alarming as these agents serve as reserve antibiotics for severe paediatric infections in resource-limited settings.</p>
        <p>The classification of human <italic>C. coli</italic> as extensively drug-resistant (XDR), resistant to 10 of 11 antibiotics across all six classes tested, represents a grave public health threat. XDR Campylobacter may necessitate the use of carbapenems or tigecycline, agents rarely accessible or affordable in sub-Saharan African clinical settings. Similar Multidrug-resistant Campylobacter outbreaks with resistance to all commonly used antibiotics have been documented in the United States linked to animal reservoirs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]. The CDC estimates that over 300,000 drug-resistant Campylobacter infections are reported annually [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">46</xref>].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot3">
        <title>4.3. Molecular Epidemiology of Resistance Determinants</title>
        <p>Fluoroquinolone resistance across <italic>C. jejuni</italic>ST-353 (CC-353), ST-2084 (CC-353), and ST-1932 (CC-460) was primarily mediated by the <italic>gyrA</italic> T86I mutation, which shows 100% concordance with phenotypic ciprofloxacin resistance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">48</xref>]. Its distribution across two distinct clonal complexes indicates independent selection events rather than clonal expansion alone. The T86I substitution additionally confers a fitness advantage, explaining its persistence without ongoing antibiotic pressure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">49</xref>].</p>
        <p><italic>β</italic>-lactam resistance in ST-353, ST-2084, ST-1932, and ST-1038/ST-7784 was largely associated with <italic>bla</italic><sub>OXA-61</sub>, a class D <italic>β</italic>-lactamase carried by 91% of ampicillin-resistant campylobacters globally [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>]. The <italic>bla</italic><sub>OXA-605</sub> also detected in some isolates is now considered a variant of <italic>bla</italic><sub>OXA-61</sub> conferring almost an identical resistance phenotype. Its detection across CC-353, CC-460, and unassigned STs confirms <italic>bla</italic><sub>OXA-61</sub>-like <italic>β</italic>-lactamass may be the core resistance determinants whose expression is modulated by a promoter single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). This differential expression accounts for variable phenotypic resistance levels observed in different strains [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">50</xref>]. Higher prevalence of <italic>bla</italic><sub>OXA-61</sub> in chicken faeces compared with human clinical isolates supports the poultry as possible reservoir of strains harboring these <italic>β</italic>-lactam resistance genes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">51</xref>].</p>
        <p>Tetracycline resistance in various strains largely affiliated to the ST-2084 (CC-353), ST-1932 (CC-460), and<italic>C. coli</italic>ST-830 (CC-828) was mediated by the plasmid-borne <italic>tet</italic>(O) gene, encoding a ribosomal protection protein originally characterized on conjugative plasmids in <italic>C. jejuni</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">52</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">53</xref>]. Its presence across phylogenetically divergent lineages and both species suggests horizontal gene transfer via conjugative plasmids, including, as reported in previous studies, megaplasmids carrying Type IV secretion systems, as the primary dissemination mechanism [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">54</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">55</xref>]. Mosaic variants such as <italic>tet</italic>(O/M/O) further expand the diversity of tetracycline resistance determinants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">56</xref>]. This explains the universal tetracycline resistance observed phenotypically, as <italic>tet</italic>(O)-bearing plasmids spread independently of clonal background [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>].</p>
        <p>Macrolide resistance in most strains, especially those belonging to ST-2084 (CC-353), ST-1932 (CC-460), and <italic>C. coli</italic>ST-8043 (CC-828) was attributed to <italic>erm</italic>(B) or 23S rRNA mutations (A2075G/A2074T). The <italic>erm</italic>(B) gene has been reported to reside on transferable multidrug resistance genomic islands (MDRGIs) of Gram-positive origin and is consistently co-located with determinants conferring resistance to multiple drug classes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>]. Horizontal transfer of <italic>erm</italic>(B) via natural transformation has been confirmed experimentally and epidemiologically, with recent genomic studies identifying horizontal gene transfer as the predominant mechanism driving <italic>er</italic><italic>m</italic>(B) dissemination across diverse ecological reservoirs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">57</xref>]. The 23S rRNA A2075G substitution and <italic>erm</italic>(B) have been reported in 4.2% and 4.9% of isolates respectively in central China, correlating with erythromycin resistance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">58</xref>]. Critically, ST-1036 (CC-353) remained fully susceptible, demonstrating that resistance within CC-353 reflects differential gene acquisition at the sequence type level rather than lineage-intrinsic properties.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot4">
        <title>4.4. Potential Zoonotic Transmission and Clonal Dynamics</title>
        <p>The dominance of CC-353 and CC-460 in both human and poultry isolates, with shared sequence types ST-353, ST-1932, and ST-8043 recovered from both sources, strongly suggests a potential zoonotic transmission pathway between humans and poultry. The ST-353 (CC-353) reported in this study is a globally disseminated poultry-associated genotype consistently identified in source attribution studies and recently shown to cause localized gut inflammation and extra-intestinal spread in broiler chickens [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">59</xref>]. Other strains belonging to ST-1932 (CC-460), carrying a four-class MDR profile in both hosts, raise concern about a possible active dissemination of multiply resistant lineages through the food chain. These findings are consistent with other studies that have confirmed shared population structures between human and poultry <italic>Campylobacter</italic> isolates in the region [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">60</xref>].</p>
        <p>Based on our current findings, the ST-2084 (CC-353) is apparently restricted to poultry with the most complete resistance gene repertoire (<italic>bla</italic><sub>OXA-61</sub>, <italic>gyrA</italic> T86I, L22 A103V, <italic>tet</italic>(O)), which may represent early-stage reservoir colonization with potential for subsequent human transmission. ST-1038 and ST-7784, unassigned to established clonal complexes, potentially represent novel African lineages not yet captured in global databases, warranting expanded whole-genome sequencing and integration into international MLST surveillance networks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot5">
        <title>4.5. Policy Implications</title>
        <p>These findings strongly suggest the need for: 1) removal of tetracycline and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole from empirical campylobacteriosis treatment guidelines, with updated protocols reflecting high fluoroquinolone and macrolide resistance; 2) urgent escalation of AMR surveillance using standardised methodologies, as recommended by WHO’s designation of fluoroquinolone-resistant <italic>Campylobacter</italic> as a high-priority pathogen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]; 3) targeted One Health interventions; hygienic poultry husbandry, restricted veterinary antimicrobial access, household education on food safety, and reinforced WASH infrastructure; and 4) integrated genomic surveillance platforms linking clinical, veterinary, and food safety laboratories to monitor resistance gene flow across the livestock-human interface [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">61</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">62</xref>].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot6">
        <title>4.6. Limitations</title>
        <p>The small poultry <italic>C. coli</italic> sample (n = 4) limits source-specific inference while some isolates recovered in the original study were lost to culture. The cross-sectional design precludes causal conclusions, and self-reported exposures are subject to recall bias. Furthermore, some isolates could not be assigned to established sequence types, warranting a deeper molecular analysis using advanced techniques such as WGS. Non-poultry animal reservoirs were not assessed, limiting source attribution resolution.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec5">
      <title>5. Conclusion</title>
      <p>This study documents substantial <italic>Campylobacter</italic> AMR burden and molecular evidence of zoonotic transmission in western Kenya. Universal resistance to first-line agents, XDR <italic>C. coli</italic> emergence, and shared MDR genotypes circulating between poultry and humans collectively demand urgent One Health responses integrating antimicrobial stewardship, enhanced surveillance, and targeted interventions at the livestock-human interface.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec6">
      <title>Data Availability</title>
      <p>The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon request.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec7">
      <title>Funding</title>
      <p>This work was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, the Department for International Development, the Economic &amp; Social Research Council, the Medical Research Council, the Natural Environment Research Council and the Defence Science &amp; Technology Laboratory, under the Zoonoses and Emerging Livestock Systems (ZELS) programme, grant reference BB/L019019/1.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec8">
      <title>Acknowledgments</title>
      <p>We acknowledge the ESEI project and CMR KEMRI team for their support with field sampling and laboratory analysis. Molecualr work was also supported by the National Public Health Reference Laboratories (NPHs), Nairobi.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec9">
      <title>Author Contributions</title>
      <p>TO was responsible for the project design, field and laboratory sampling, and manuscript preparation. SK and ANK contributed supervisory oversight and assisted with manuscript development. EMF secured funding through the ESEI project, contributed to the study design, and assisted in manuscript preparation. JMN provided laboratory support and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. JSK edited the tables, validated the statistics and revised the final version. MMK performed data analysis and prepared the manuscript tables and figures. JK offered supervisory guidance, supported molecular analysis, and participated in manuscript preparation and revisions.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec10">
      <title>Declarations</title>
      <p>This work was approved by KEMRI independent Scientific and Ethical Research Unit (SERU) under approval number <italic>27/09/2016_3320</italic>. Standard guidelines for recruitment and ethical access of literature cited were adhered to. No animals were used or harmed during the course of this study.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ouko, T.T., Nyerere, A.K., Njeru, J.M., Fèvre, E.M. and Kariuki, S. (2021) Prevalence and Risk Factors Associated with <italic>Campylobacter</italic> Infection in Diarrheal Patients in Busia County, Kenya. <italic>Advances in Microbiology</italic>, 11, 657-680. https://doi.org/10.4236/aim.2021.1111048 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/aim.2021.1111048</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/aim.2021.1111048">https://doi.org/10.4236/aim.2021.1111048</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ouko, T.T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Nyerere, A.K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Njeru, J.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kariuki, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>County, K</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Prevalence and Risk Factors Associated with Campylobacter Infection in Diarrheal Patients in Busia County, Kenya</article-title>
            <source>Advances in Microbiology</source>
            <volume>11</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/aim.2021.1111048</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Platts-Mills, J.A. and Kosek, M. (2014) Update on the Burden of Campylobacter in Developing Countries. <italic>Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases</italic>, 27, 444-450. https://doi.org/10.1097/qco.0000000000000091 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/qco.0000000000000091</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25023741</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1097/qco.0000000000000091">https://doi.org/10.1097/qco.0000000000000091</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Platts-Mills, J.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kosek, M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Update on the Burden of Campylobacter in Developing Countries</article-title>
            <source>Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases</source>
            <volume>27</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/qco.0000000000000091</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25023741</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hlashwayo, D.F., Sigaúque, B., Noormahomed, E.V., Afonso, S.M.S., Mandomando, I.M. and Bila, C.G. (2021) A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Reveal That Campylobacter spp. and Antibiotic Resistance Are Widespread in Humans in Sub-Saharan Africa. <italic>PLOS ONE</italic>, 16, e0245951. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245951 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0245951</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33503068</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245951">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245951</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Hlashwayo, D.F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Noormahomed, E.V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Afonso, S.M.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mandomando, I.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bila, C.G.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Reveal That Campylobacter spp</article-title>
            <source>and Antibiotic Resistance Are Widespread in Humans in Sub-Saharan Africa. PLOS ONE</source>
            <volume>16</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0245951</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33503068</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Randremanana, R.V., Razafindratsimandresy, R., Andriatahina, T., Randriamanantena, A., Ravelomanana, L., Randrianirina, F., <italic>et al</italic>. (2016) Etiologies, Risk Factors and Impact of Severe Diarrhea in the Under-Fives in Moramanga and Antananarivo, Madagascar. <italic>PLOS ONE</italic>, 11, e0158862. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158862 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0158862</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27411101</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158862">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158862</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Randremanana, R.V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Razafindratsimandresy, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Andriatahina, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Randriamanantena, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ravelomanana, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Randrianirina, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Etiologies, R</string-name>
              <string-name>Antananarivo, M</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>Etiologies, Risk Factors and Impact of Severe Diarrhea in the Under-Fives in Moramanga and Antananarivo, Madagascar</article-title>
            <source>PLOS ONE</source>
            <volume>11</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0158862</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27411101</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Hlashwayo, D.F., Sigaúque, B. and Bila, C.G. (2020) Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Resistance of <italic>Campylobacter</italic>spp. in Animals in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review. <italic>Heliyon</italic>, 6, e03537.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Hlashwayo, D.F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bila, C.G.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp</article-title>
            <source>in Animals in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review. Heliyon</source>
            <volume>6</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Luangtongkum, T., Jeon, B., Han, J., Plummer, P., Logue, C.M. and Zhang, Q. (2009) Antibiotic Resistance in <italic>Campylobacter</italic>: Emergence, Transmission and Persistence. <italic>Future Microbiology</italic>, 4, 189-200. https://doi.org/10.2217/17460913.4.2.189 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2217/17460913.4.2.189</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19257846</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2217/17460913.4.2.189">https://doi.org/10.2217/17460913.4.2.189</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Luangtongkum, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Jeon, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Han, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Plummer, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Logue, C.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhang, Q.</string-name>
              <string-name>Emergence, T</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2009</year>
            <article-title>Antibiotic Resistance in Campylobacter: Emergence, Transmission and Persistence</article-title>
            <source>Future Microbiology</source>
            <volume>4</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2217/17460913.4.2.189</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19257846</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Luo, N., Sahin, O., Lin, J., Michel, L.O. and Zhang, Q. (2003) <italic>In Vivo</italic> Selection of Campylobacter Isolates with High Levels of Fluoroquinolone Resistance Associated with gyrA Mutations and the Function of the CmeABC Efflux Pump. <italic>Antimicrobial</italic><italic>Agents and Chemotherapy</italic>, 47, 390-394. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.47.1.390-394.2003 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aac.47.1.390-394.2003</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12499221</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.47.1.390-394.2003">https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.47.1.390-394.2003</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Luo, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sahin, O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lin, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Michel, L.O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhang, Q.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2003</year>
            <article-title>In Vivo Selection of Campylobacter Isolates with High Levels of Fluoroquinolone Resistance Associated with gyrA Mutations and the Function of the CmeABC Efflux Pump</article-title>
            <source>Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy</source>
            <volume>47</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aac.47.1.390-394.2003</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12499221</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Wang, Y., Zhang, M., Deng, F., Shen, Z., Wu, C., Zhang, J., <italic>et al</italic>. (2014) Emergence of Multidrug-Resistant Campylobacter Species Isolates with a Horizontally Acquired rRNA Methylase. <italic>Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy</italic>, 58, 5405-5412. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.03039-14 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aac.03039-14</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24982085</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.03039-14">https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.03039-14</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Wang, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhang, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Deng, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Shen, Z.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wu, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhang, J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Emergence of Multidrug-Resistant Campylobacter Species Isolates with a Horizontally Acquired rRNA Methylase</article-title>
            <source>Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy</source>
            <volume>58</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aac.03039-14</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24982085</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Gibreel, A., Tracz, D.M., Nonaka, L., Ngo, T.M., Connell, S.R. and Taylor, D.E. (2004) Incidence of Antibiotic Resistance in <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> Isolated in Alberta, Canada, from 1999 to 2002, with Special Reference to <italic>tet</italic>(O)-Mediated Tetracycline Resistance. <italic>Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy</italic>, 48, 3442-3450. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.48.9.3442-3450.2004. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aac.48.9.3442-3450.2004</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15328109</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.48.9.3442-3450.2004">https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.48.9.3442-3450.2004</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Gibreel, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tracz, D.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Nonaka, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ngo, T.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Connell, S.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Taylor, D.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Alberta, C</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2004</year>
            <article-title>Incidence of Antibiotic Resistance in Campylobacter jejuni Isolated in Alberta, Canada, from 1999 to 2002, with Special Reference to tet(O)-Mediated Tetracycline Resistance</article-title>
            <source>Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy</source>
            <volume>48</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aac.48.9.3442-3450.2004</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15328109</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="report">Montgomery, M.P., Robertson, S., Koski, L., Salehi, E., Stevenson, L.M., Silver, R., <italic>et al</italic>. (2018) Multidrug-Resistant <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> Outbreak Linked to Puppy Exposure—United States, 2016-2018. <italic>Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report</italic>, 67, 1032-1035. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6737a3 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15585/mmwr.mm6737a3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30235182</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6737a3">https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6737a3</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="report">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Montgomery, M.P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Robertson, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Koski, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Salehi, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Stevenson, L.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Silver, R.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2018</year>
            <article-title>Multidrug-Resistant Campylobacter jejuni Outbreak Linked to Puppy Exposure—United States, 2016-2018</article-title>
            <source>Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report</source>
            <volume>67</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15585/mmwr.mm6737a3</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30235182</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">WHO (2024) WHO Bacterial Priority Pathogens List, 2024: Bacterial Pathogens of Public Health Importance to Guide Research, Development and Strategies to Prevent and Control Antimicrobial Resistance. World Health Organization, 72 p. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240093461</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Research, D</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>WHO Bacterial Priority Pathogens List, 2024: Bacterial Pathogens of Public Health Importance to Guide Research, Development and Strategies to Prevent and Control Antimicrobial Resistance</article-title>
            <source>World Health Organization</source>
            <volume>72</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Dingle, K.E., Colles, F.M., Wareing, D.R.A., Ure, R., Fox, A.J., Bolton, F.E., <italic>et al</italic>. (2001) Multilocus Sequence Typing System for <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic>. <italic>Journal of Clinical Microbiology</italic>, 39, 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.39.1.14-23.2001 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/jcm.39.1.14-23.2001</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11136741</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.39.1.14-23.2001">https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.39.1.14-23.2001</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Dingle, K.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Colles, F.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wareing, D.R.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ure, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Fox, A.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bolton, F.E.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2001</year>
            <article-title>Multilocus Sequence Typing System for Campylobacter jejuni</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Clinical Microbiology</source>
            <volume>39</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/jcm.39.1.14-23.2001</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11136741</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Sheppard, S.K., Jolley, K.A. and Maiden, M.C.J. (2012) A Gene-by-Gene Approach to Bacterial Population Genomics: Whole Genome MLST of Campylobacter. <italic>Genes</italic>, 3, 261-277. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes3020261 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/genes3020261</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24704917</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/genes3020261">https://doi.org/10.3390/genes3020261</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Sheppard, S.K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Jolley, K.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Maiden, M.C.J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2012</year>
            <article-title>A Gene-by-Gene Approach to Bacterial Population Genomics: Whole Genome MLST of Campylobacter</article-title>
            <source>Genes</source>
            <volume>3</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/genes3020261</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24704917</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <label>14.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Sheppard, S.K., Dallas, J.F., Strachan, N.J.C., MacRae, M., McCarthy, N.D., Wilson, D.J., <italic>et al</italic>. (2009) <italic>Campylobacter</italic> Genotyping to Determine the Source of Human Infection. <italic>Clinical Infectious Diseases</italic>, 48, 1072-1078. https://doi.org/10.1086/597402 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/597402</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19275496</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1086/597402">https://doi.org/10.1086/597402</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Sheppard, S.K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Dallas, J.F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Strachan, N.J.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>MacRae, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>McCarthy, N.D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wilson, D.J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2009</year>
            <article-title>Campylobacter Genotyping to Determine the Source of Human Infection</article-title>
            <source>Clinical Infectious Diseases</source>
            <volume>48</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/597402</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19275496</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <label>15.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kittl, S., Heckel, G., Korczak, B.M. and Kuhnert, P. (2013) Source Attribution of Human Campylobacter Isolates by MLST and Fla-Typing and Association of Genotypes with Quinolone Resistance. <italic>PLOS ONE</italic>, 8, e81796. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081796 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0081796</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24244747</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081796">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081796</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Kittl, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Heckel, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Korczak, B.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kuhnert, P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2013</year>
            <article-title>Source Attribution of Human Campylobacter Isolates by MLST and Fla-Typing and Association of Genotypes with Quinolone Resistance</article-title>
            <source>PLOS ONE</source>
            <volume>8</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0081796</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24244747</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <label>16.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Mughini-Gras, L., Smid, J.H., Wagenaar, J.A., <italic>et al</italic>. (2014) Campylobacteriosis in Returning Travellers and Potential Secondary Transmission of Exotic Strains. <italic>Epidemiology &amp; Infection</italic>, 142, 1277-1288.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Mughini-Gras, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Smid, J.H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wagenaar, J.A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Campylobacteriosis in Returning Travellers and Potential Secondary Transmission of Exotic Strains</article-title>
            <source>Epidemiology &amp; Infection</source>
            <volume>142</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <label>17.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Denis, M., Soumet, C., Rivoal, K., Ermel, G., Blivet, D., Salvat, G., <italic>et al</italic>. (1999) Development of a m-PCR Assay for Simultaneous Identification of <italic>Campyloba</italic><italic>cter jejuni</italic> and <italic>C</italic>. <italic>coli</italic>. <italic>Letters in Applied Microbiology</italic>, 29, 406-410. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-765x.1999.00658.x <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1472-765x.1999.00658.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10664985</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-765x.1999.00658.x">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-765x.1999.00658.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Denis, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Soumet, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rivoal, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ermel, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Blivet, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Salvat, G.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1999</year>
            <article-title>Development of a m-PCR Assay for Simultaneous Identification of Campylobacter jejuni and C</article-title>
            <source>coli. Letters in Applied Microbiology</source>
            <volume>29</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1472-765x.1999.00658.x</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10664985</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <label>18.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Linton, D., Lawson, A.J., Owen, R.J. and Stanley, J. (1997) PCR Detection, Identification to Species Level, and Fingerprinting of <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> and <italic>Campylobacter coli</italic> Direct from Diarrheic Samples. <italic>Journal of Clinical Microbiology</italic>, 35, 2568-2572. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.35.10.2568-2572.1997 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/jcm.35.10.2568-2572.1997</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9316909</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.35.10.2568-2572.1997">https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.35.10.2568-2572.1997</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Linton, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lawson, A.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Owen, R.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Stanley, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Detection, I</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1997</year>
            <article-title>PCR Detection, Identification to Species Level, and Fingerprinting of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli Direct from Diarrheic Samples</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Clinical Microbiology</source>
            <volume>35</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/jcm.35.10.2568-2572.1997</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9316909</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <label>19.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="book">CLSI (2021) Methods for Antimicrobial Dilution and Disk Susceptibility Testing of Infrequently Isolated or Fastidious Bacteria. 3rd Edition, CLSI Guideline M45.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="book">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Edition, C</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Methods for Antimicrobial Dilution and Disk Susceptibility Testing of Infrequently Isolated or Fastidious Bacteria</article-title>
            <source>3rd Edition</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <label>20.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Magiorakos, A.P., Srinivasan, A., Carey, R.B., Carmeli, Y., Falagas, M.E., Giske, C.G., <italic>et al</italic>. (2012) Multidrug-Resistant, Extensively Drug-Resistant and Pandrug-Resistant Bacteria: An International Expert Proposal for Interim Standard Definitions for Acquired Resistance. <italic>Clinical Microbiology and Infection</italic>, 18, 268-281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21793988</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Magiorakos, A.P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Srinivasan, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Carey, R.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Carmeli, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Falagas, M.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Giske, C.G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Multidrug-Resistant, E</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2012</year>
            <article-title>Multidrug-Resistant, Extensively Drug-Resistant and Pandrug-Resistant Bacteria: An International Expert Proposal for Interim Standard Definitions for Acquired Resistance</article-title>
            <source>Clinical Microbiology and Infection</source>
            <volume>18</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21793988</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <label>21.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Sweeney, M.T., Lubbers, B.V., Schwarz, S. and Watts, J.L. (2018) Applying Definitions for Multidrug Resistance, Extensive Drug Resistance and Pandrug Resistance to Clinically Significant Livestock and Companion Animal Bacterial Pathogens. <italic>Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy</italic>, 73, 1460-1463. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dky043 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jac/dky043</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29481657</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dky043">https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dky043</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Sweeney, M.T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lubbers, B.V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Schwarz, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Watts, J.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Resistance, E</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2018</year>
            <article-title>Applying Definitions for Multidrug Resistance, Extensive Drug Resistance and Pandrug Resistance to Clinically Significant Livestock and Companion Animal Bacterial Pathogens</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy</source>
            <volume>73</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jac/dky043</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29481657</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <label>22.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Zirnstein, G., Helsel, L., Li, Y., <italic>et al</italic>. (2000) Characterization of gyrA Mutations Associated with Fluoroquinolone Resistance in <italic>Campylobacter coli</italic> by DNA Sequence Analysis and MAMA PCR. <italic>FEMS Microbiology Letters</italic>, 190, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1097(00)00306-2 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0378-1097(00)00306-2</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1097(00)00306-2">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1097(00)00306-2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Zirnstein, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Helsel, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Li, Y.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2000</year>
            <article-title>Characterization of gyrA Mutations Associated with Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Campylobacter coli by DNA Sequence Analysis and MAMA PCR</article-title>
            <source>FEMS Microbiology Letters</source>
            <volume>1097</volume>
            <issue>00</issue>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0378-1097(00)00306-2</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <label>23.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Zirnstein, G., Li, Y., Swaminathan, B. and Angulo, F. (1999) Ciprofloxacin Resistance in <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> Isolates: Detection of gyrA Resistance Mutations by Mismatch Amplification Mutation Assay PCR and DNA Sequence Analysis. <italic>Journal of Clinical Microbiology</italic>, 37, 3276-3280. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.37.10.3276-3280.1999 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/jcm.37.10.3276-3280.1999</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10488192</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.37.10.3276-3280.1999">https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.37.10.3276-3280.1999</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Zirnstein, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Li, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Swaminathan, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Angulo, F.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1999</year>
            <article-title>Ciprofloxacin Resistance in Campylobacter jejuni Isolates: Detection of gyrA Resistance Mutations by Mismatch Amplification Mutation Assay PCR and DNA Sequence Analysis</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Clinical Microbiology</source>
            <volume>37</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/jcm.37.10.3276-3280.1999</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10488192</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <label>24.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Wang, Y., Huang, W.M. and Taylor, D.E. (1993) Cloning and Nucleotide Sequence of the <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> Gyra Gene and Characterization of Quinolone Resistance Mutations. <italic>Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy</italic>, 37, 457-463. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.37.3.457 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aac.37.3.457</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8384814</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.37.3.457">https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.37.3.457</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Wang, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Huang, W.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Taylor, D.E.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1993</year>
            <article-title>Cloning and Nucleotide Sequence of the Campylobacter jejuni Gyra Gene and Characterization of Quinolone Resistance Mutations</article-title>
            <source>Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy</source>
            <volume>37</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aac.37.3.457</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8384814</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <label>25.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Cagliero, C., Mouline, C., Cloeckaert, A. and Payot, S. (2006) Synergy between Efflux Pump CmeABC and Modifications in Ribosomal Proteins L4 and L22 in Conferring Macrolide Resistance in <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> and <italic>Campylobacter coli</italic>. <italic>Antimicrob</italic><italic>ial Agents and Chemotherapy</italic>, 50, 3893-3896. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00616-06 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aac.00616-06</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16940070</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00616-06">https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00616-06</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Cagliero, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mouline, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Cloeckaert, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Payot, S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2006</year>
            <article-title>Synergy between Efflux Pump CmeABC and Modifications in Ribosomal Proteins L4 and L22 in Conferring Macrolide Resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli</article-title>
            <source>Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy</source>
            <volume>50</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aac.00616-06</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16940070</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <label>26.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Gibreel, A., Kos, V.N., Keelan, M., Trieber, C.A., Levesque, S., Michaud, S., <italic>et al</italic>. (2005) Macrolide Resistance in <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> and <italic>Campylobacter col</italic><italic>i</italic>: Molecular Mechanism and Stability of the Resistance Phenotype. <italic>Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy</italic>, 49, 2753-2759. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.49.7.2753-2759.2005 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aac.49.7.2753-2759.2005</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15980346</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.49.7.2753-2759.2005">https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.49.7.2753-2759.2005</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Gibreel, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kos, V.N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Keelan, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Trieber, C.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Levesque, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Michaud, S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2005</year>
            <article-title>Macrolide Resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli: Molecular Mechanism and Stability of the Resistance Phenotype</article-title>
            <source>Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy</source>
            <volume>49</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aac.49.7.2753-2759.2005</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15980346</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <label>27.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Vacher, S., Ménard, A., Bernard, E. and Mégraud, F. (2003) PCR-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis for Detection of Point Mutations Associated with Macrolide Resistance in <italic>Campylobacter</italic>spp. <italic>Antimicrobial Agents and Chemot</italic><italic>herapy</italic>, 47, 1125-1128. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.47.3.1125-1128.2003 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aac.47.3.1125-1128.2003</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12604552</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.47.3.1125-1128.2003">https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.47.3.1125-1128.2003</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Vacher, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bernard, E.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2003</year>
            <article-title>PCR-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis for Detection of Point Mutations Associated with Macrolide Resistance in Campylobacter spp</article-title>
            <source>Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy</source>
            <volume>47</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aac.47.3.1125-1128.2003</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12604552</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <label>28.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Pratt, A. and Korolik, V. (2005) Tetracycline Resistance of Australian <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> and <italic>Campylobacter coli</italic> Isolates. <italic>Journal of Antimicrobial Chemother</italic><italic>apy</italic>, 55, 452-460. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dki040 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jac/dki040</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15743900</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dki040">https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dki040</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Pratt, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Korolik, V.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2005</year>
            <article-title>Tetracycline Resistance of Australian Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli Isolates</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy</source>
            <volume>55</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jac/dki040</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15743900</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B29">
        <label>29.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Connell, S.R., Tracz, D.M., Nierhaus, K.H. and Taylor, D.E. (2003) Ribosomal Protection Proteins and Their Mechanism of Tetracycline Resistance. <italic>Antimicrobial</italic><italic>Agents and Chemotherapy</italic>, 47, 3675-3681. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.47.12.3675-3681.2003 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aac.47.12.3675-3681.2003</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14638464</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.47.12.3675-3681.2003">https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.47.12.3675-3681.2003</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Connell, S.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tracz, D.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Nierhaus, K.H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Taylor, D.E.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2003</year>
            <article-title>Ribosomal Protection Proteins and Their Mechanism of Tetracycline Resistance</article-title>
            <source>Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy</source>
            <volume>47</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aac.47.12.3675-3681.2003</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14638464</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B30">
        <label>30.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Avrain, L., Vernozy-Rozand, C. and Kempf, I. (2004) Evidence for Natural Horizontal Transfer of Teto Gene between <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> Strains in Chickens. <italic>Journal of Applied Microbiology</italic>, 97, 134-140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02306.x <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02306.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15186450</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02306.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02306.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Avrain, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Vernozy-Rozand, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kempf, I.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2004</year>
            <article-title>Evidence for Natural Horizontal Transfer of Teto Gene between Campylobacter jejuni Strains in Chickens</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Applied Microbiology</source>
            <volume>97</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02306.x</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15186450</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B31">
        <label>31.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Alfredson, D.A. and Korolik, V. (2005) Isolation and Expression of a Novel Molecular Class D <italic>β</italic>-Lactamase, OXA-61, from <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic>. <italic>Antimicrobial Agent</italic><italic>s and Chemotherapy</italic>, 49, 2515-2518. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.49.6.2515-2518.2005 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aac.49.6.2515-2518.2005</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15917560</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.49.6.2515-2518.2005">https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.49.6.2515-2518.2005</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Alfredson, D.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Korolik, V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lactamase, O</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2005</year>
            <article-title>Isolation and Expression of a Novel Molecular Class D β-Lactamase, OXA-61, from Campylobacter jejuni</article-title>
            <source>Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy</source>
            <volume>49</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aac.49.6.2515-2518.2005</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15917560</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B32">
        <label>32.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Griggs, D.J., Peake, L., Johnson, M.M., Ghori, S., Mott, A. and Piddock, L.J.V. (2009) <italic>β</italic>-Lactamase-Mediated <italic>β</italic>-Lactam Resistance in Campylobacter Species: Prevalence of Cj0299 ( <italic>bla</italic><sub>OXA-61</sub>) and Evidence for a Novel <italic>β</italic>-Lactamase in <italic>C</italic>. <italic>jejuni</italic>. <italic>Antimic</italic><italic>robial Agents and Chemotherapy</italic>, 53, 3357-3364. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01655-08 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aac.01655-08</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19506058</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01655-08">https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01655-08</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Griggs, D.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Peake, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Johnson, M.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ghori, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mott, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Piddock, L.J.V.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2009</year>
            <article-title>β-Lactamase-Mediated β-Lactam Resistance in Campylobacter Species: Prevalence of Cj0299 (blaOXA-61) and Evidence for a Novel β-Lactamase in C</article-title>
            <source>jejuni. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy</source>
            <volume>53</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aac.01655-08</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19506058</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B33">
        <label>33.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Cheng, Y., Zhang, W., Lu, Q., Wen, G., Zhao, Z., Luo, Q., <italic>et al</italic>. (2020) Point Deletion or Insertion in CmeR-Box, A2075G Substitution in 23S rRNA, and Presence of erm(B) Are Key Factors of Erythromycin Resistance in <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> and <italic>Campylobacter coli</italic> Isolated from Central China. <italic>Frontiers in Microbiology</italic>, 11, Article 203. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00203 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2020.00203</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32194516</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00203">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00203</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Cheng, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhang, W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lu, Q.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wen, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhao, Z.</string-name>
              <string-name>Luo, Q.</string-name>
              <string-name>CmeR-Box, A</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>Point Deletion or Insertion in CmeR-Box, A2075G Substitution in 23S rRNA, and Presence of erm(B) Are Key Factors of Erythromycin Resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli Isolated from Central China</article-title>
            <source>Frontiers in Microbiology</source>
            <volume>11</volume>
            <elocation-id>203</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2020.00203</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32194516</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B34">
        <label>34.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="report">Qin, S., Wang, Y., Zhang, Q., Zhang, M., Deng, F., Shen, Z., <italic>et al</italic>. (2014) Report of Ribosomal RNA Methylase Gene erm(B) in Multidrug-Resistant <italic>Campylobacter coli</italic>. <italic>Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy</italic>, 69, 964-968. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkt492 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jac/dkt492</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24335515</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkt492">https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkt492</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="report">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Qin, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wang, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhang, Q.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhang, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Deng, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Shen, Z.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Report of Ribosomal RNA Methylase Gene erm(B) in Multidrug-Resistant Campylobacter coli</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy</source>
            <volume>69</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jac/dkt492</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24335515</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B35">
        <label>35.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Miller, W.G., On, S.L.W., Wang, G., Fontanoz, S., Lastovica, A.J. and Mandrell, R.E. (2005) Extended Multilocus Sequence Typing System for <italic>Campylobacter coli</italic>, <italic>C</italic>. <italic>lari</italic>, <italic>C</italic>. <italic>upsaliensis</italic>, and <italic>C</italic>. <italic>helveticus</italic>. <italic>Journal of Clinical Microbiology</italic>, 43, 2315-2329. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.43.5.2315-2329.2005 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/jcm.43.5.2315-2329.2005</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15872261</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.43.5.2315-2329.2005">https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.43.5.2315-2329.2005</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Miller, W.G.</string-name>
              <string-name>On, S.L.W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wang, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Fontanoz, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lastovica, A.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mandrell, R.E.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2005</year>
            <article-title>Extended Multilocus Sequence Typing System for Campylobacter coli, C</article-title>
            <source>lari</source>
            <volume>43</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/jcm.43.5.2315-2329.2005</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15872261</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B36">
        <label>36.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Jolley, K.A., Bray, J.E. and Maiden, M.C.J. (2018) Open-Access Bacterial Population Genomics: BIGSdb Software, the PubMLST.org Website and Their Applications. <italic>Wellcome Open Research</italic>, 3, 124. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14826.1 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14826.1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30345391</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14826.1">https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14826.1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Jolley, K.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bray, J.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Maiden, M.C.J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2018</year>
            <article-title>Open-Access Bacterial Population Genomics: BIGSdb Software, the PubMLST</article-title>
            <source>org Website and Their Applications. Wellcome Open Research</source>
            <volume>3</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14826.1</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30345391</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B37">
        <label>37.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Alcock, B.P., Raphenya, A.R., Lau, T.T.Y., Tsang, K.K., Bouchard, M., Edalatmand, A., <italic>et al</italic>. (2020) CARD 2020: Antibiotic Resistome Surveillance with the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database. <italic>Nucleic Acids Research</italic>, 48, D517-D525. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz935 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkz935</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31665441</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz935">https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz935</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Alcock, B.P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Raphenya, A.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lau, T.T.Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tsang, K.K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bouchard, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Edalatmand, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>CARD 2020: Antibiotic Resistome Surveillance with the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database</article-title>
            <source>Nucleic Acids Research</source>
            <volume>48</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkz935</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31665441</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B38">
        <label>38.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bortolaia, V., Kaas, R.S., Ruppe, E., Roberts, M.C., Schwarz, S., Cattoir, V., <italic>et al</italic>. (2020) ResFinder 4.0 for Predictions of Phenotypes from Genotypes. <italic>Journal of Antimicrob</italic><italic>ial Chemotherapy</italic>, 75, 3491-3500. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaa345 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jac/dkaa345</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32780112</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaa345">https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaa345</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Bortolaia, V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kaas, R.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ruppe, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Roberts, M.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Schwarz, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Cattoir, V.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>ResFinder 4</article-title>
            <source>0 for Predictions of Phenotypes from Genotypes. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy</source>
            <volume>75</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jac/dkaa345</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32780112</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B39">
        <label>39.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Francisco, A.P., Vaz, C., Monteiro, P.T., Melo-Cristino, J., Ramirez, M. and Carriço, J.A. (2012) PHYLOViZ: Phylogenetic Inference and Data Visualization for Sequence Based Typing Methods. <italic>BMC Bioinformatics</italic>, 13, Article No. 87. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-87 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2105-13-87</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22568821</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-87">https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-87</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Francisco, A.P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Vaz, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Monteiro, P.T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Melo-Cristino, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ramirez, M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2012</year>
            <article-title>PHYLOViZ: Phylogenetic Inference and Data Visualization for Sequence Based Typing Methods</article-title>
            <source>BMC Bioinformatics</source>
            <volume>13</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2105-13-87</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22568821</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B40">
        <label>40.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Borchani, H., Varando, G., Bielza, C. and Larrañaga, P. (2015) A Survey on Multi-output Regression. <italic>WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery</italic>, 5, 216-233. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1157 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/widm.1157</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1157">https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1157</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Borchani, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Varando, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bielza, C.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>A Survey on Multi-output Regression</article-title>
            <source>WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery</source>
            <volume>5</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/widm.1157</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B41">
        <label>41.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kaakoush, N.O., Castaño-Rodríguez, N., Mitchell, H.M. and Man, S.M. (2015) Global Epidemiology of Campylobacter Infection. <italic>Clinical Microbiology Reviews</italic>, 28, 687-720. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00006-15 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/cmr.00006-15</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26062576</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00006-15">https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00006-15</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Kaakoush, N.O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mitchell, H.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Man, S.M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>Global Epidemiology of Campylobacter Infection</article-title>
            <source>Clinical Microbiology Reviews</source>
            <volume>28</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/cmr.00006-15</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26062576</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B42">
        <label>42.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Hermans, D., Pasmans, F., Messens, W., Martel, A., Van Immerseel, F., Rasschaert, G., <italic>e</italic><italic>t al</italic>. (2012) Poultry as a Host for the Zoonotic Pathogen <italic>Campylobacter jejun</italic><italic>i</italic>. <italic>Vector</italic>- <italic>Borne and Zoonotic Diseases</italic>, 12, 89-98. https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2011.0676 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/vbz.2011.0676</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22133236</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2011.0676">https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2011.0676</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Hermans, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Pasmans, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Messens, W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Martel, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Immerseel, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rasschaert, G.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2012</year>
            <article-title>Poultry as a Host for the Zoonotic Pathogen Campylobacter jejuni</article-title>
            <source>Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases</source>
            <volume>12</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/vbz.2011.0676</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22133236</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B43">
        <label>43.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Skarp, C.P.A., Hänninen, M.L. and Rautelin, H.I.K. (2016) Campylobacteriosis: The Role of Poultry Meat. <italic>Clinical Microbiology and Infection</italic>, 22, 103-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2015.11.019 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cmi.2015.11.019</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26686808</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2015.11.019">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2015.11.019</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Skarp, C.P.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rautelin, H.I.K.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>Campylobacteriosis: The Role of Poultry Meat</article-title>
            <source>Clinical Microbiology and Infection</source>
            <volume>22</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cmi.2015.11.019</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26686808</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B44">
        <label>44.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Smith, S.I., Sansa, T.I. and Coker, A.O. (1999) Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns and Beta-Lactamase Production of Animal and Human Isolates of Campylobacter in Lagos, Nigeria. <italic>Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C</italic>, 54, 583-586. https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-1999-7-820 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1515/znc-1999-7-820</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10488568</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-1999-7-820">https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-1999-7-820</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Smith, S.I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sansa, T.I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Coker, A.O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lagos, N</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1999</year>
            <article-title>Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns and Beta-Lactamase Production of Animal and Human Isolates of Campylobacter in Lagos, Nigeria</article-title>
            <source>Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C</source>
            <volume>54</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1515/znc-1999-7-820</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10488568</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B45">
        <label>45.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="confproc">Van Boeckel, T.P., Brower, C., Gilbert, M., Grenfell, B.T., Levin, S.A., Robinson, T.P., <italic>et al</italic>. (2015) Global Trends in Antimicrobial Use in Food Animals. <italic>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</italic>, 112, 5649-5654. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503141112 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1503141112</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25792457</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503141112">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503141112</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="confproc">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Boeckel, T.P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Brower, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gilbert, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Grenfell, B.T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Levin, S.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Robinson, T.P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>Global Trends in Antimicrobial Use in Food Animals</article-title>
            <source>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</source>
            <volume>112</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1503141112</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25792457</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B46">
        <label>46.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">CDC (2019) Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States, 2019, Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Center for Disease Control and Prevention.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Atlanta, G</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2019</year>
            <article-title>Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States, 2019, Atlanta, GA: U</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B47">
        <label>47.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Dai, L., Sahin, O., Grover, M. and Zhang, Q. (2020) New and Alternative Strategies for the Prevention, Control, and Treatment of Antibiotic-Resistant <italic>Campylobacter</italic>. <italic>Translational Research</italic>, 223, 76-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2020.04.009 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.trsl.2020.04.009</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32438073</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2020.04.009">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2020.04.009</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Dai, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sahin, O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Grover, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhang, Q.</string-name>
              <string-name>Prevention, C</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>New and Alternative Strategies for the Prevention, Control, and Treatment of Antibiotic-Resistant Campylobacter</article-title>
            <source>Translational Research</source>
            <volume>223</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.trsl.2020.04.009</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32438073</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B48">
        <label>48.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Haldenby, S., Bronowski, C., Nelson, C., Kenny, J., Martinez-Rodriguez, C., Chaudhuri, R., <italic>et al</italic>. (2020) Increasing Prevalence of a Fluoroquinolone Resistance Mutation amongst <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> Isolates from Four Human Infectious Intestinal Disease Studies in the United Kingdom. <italic>PLOS ONE</italic>, 15, e0227535. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227535 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0227535</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31999701</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227535">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227535</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Haldenby, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bronowski, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Nelson, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kenny, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Martinez-Rodriguez, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chaudhuri, R.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>Increasing Prevalence of a Fluoroquinolone Resistance Mutation amongst Campylobacter jejuni Isolates from Four Human Infectious Intestinal Disease Studies in the United Kingdom</article-title>
            <source>PLOS ONE</source>
            <volume>15</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0227535</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31999701</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B49">
        <label>49.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Han, J., Wang, Y., Sahin, O., Shen, Z., Guo, B., Shen, J., <italic>et al</italic>. (2012) A Fluoroquinolone Resistance Associated Mutation in Gyra Affects DNA Supercoiling in <italic>Campylo</italic><italic>bacter jejuni</italic>. <italic>Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology</italic>, 2, Article 21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2012.00021 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fcimb.2012.00021</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22919613</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2012.00021">https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2012.00021</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Han, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wang, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sahin, O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Shen, Z.</string-name>
              <string-name>Guo, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Shen, J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2012</year>
            <article-title>A Fluoroquinolone Resistance Associated Mutation in Gyra Affects DNA Supercoiling in Campylobacter jejuni</article-title>
            <source>Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology</source>
            <volume>2</volume>
            <elocation-id>21</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fcimb.2012.00021</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22919613</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B50">
        <label>50.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Zeng, X., Brown, S., Gillespie, B. and Lin, J. (2014) A Single Nucleotide in the Promoter Region Modulates the Expression of the <italic>β</italic>-Lactamase OXA-61 in <italic>Campylobacter jej</italic><italic>uni</italic>. <italic>Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy</italic>, 69, 1215-1223. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkt515 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jac/dkt515</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24408987</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkt515">https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkt515</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Zeng, X.</string-name>
              <string-name>Brown, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gillespie, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lin, J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>A Single Nucleotide in the Promoter Region Modulates the Expression of the β-Lactamase OXA-61 in Campylobacter jejuni</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy</source>
            <volume>69</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jac/dkt515</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24408987</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B51">
        <label>51.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Reddy, S. and Zishiri, O.T. (2017) Detection and Prevalence of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in <italic>Campylobacter</italic>spp. Isolated from Chickens and Humans. <italic>Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research</italic>, 84, a1411. https://doi.org/10.4102/ojvr.v84i1.1411 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4102/ojvr.v84i1.1411</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28582978</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4102/ojvr.v84i1.1411">https://doi.org/10.4102/ojvr.v84i1.1411</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Reddy, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zishiri, O.T.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2017</year>
            <article-title>Detection and Prevalence of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Campylobacter spp</article-title>
            <source>Isolated from Chickens and Humans. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research</source>
            <volume>84</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4102/ojvr.v84i1.1411</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28582978</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B52">
        <label>52.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Manavathu, E.K., Hiratsuka, K. and Taylor, D.E. (1988) Nucleotide Sequence Analysis and Expression of a Tetracycline-Resistance Gene from <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic>. <italic>Gene</italic>, 62, 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(88)90576-8 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0378-1119(88)90576-8</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2836268</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(88)90576-8">https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(88)90576-8</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Manavathu, E.K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Hiratsuka, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Taylor, D.E.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1988</year>
            <article-title>Nucleotide Sequence Analysis and Expression of a Tetracycline-Resistance Gene from Campylobacter jejuni</article-title>
            <source>Gene</source>
            <volume>1119</volume>
            <issue>88</issue>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0378-1119(88)90576-8</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2836268</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B53">
        <label>53.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Taylor, D.E. and Courvalin, P. (1988) Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance in <italic>Campylobacter</italic> Species. <italic>Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy</italic>, 32, 1107-1112. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.32.8.1107 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aac.32.8.1107</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">3056250</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.32.8.1107">https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.32.8.1107</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Taylor, D.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Courvalin, P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1988</year>
            <article-title>Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance in Campylobacter Species</article-title>
            <source>Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy</source>
            <volume>32</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aac.32.8.1107</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">3056250</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B54">
        <label>54.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Batchelor, R.A., Pearson, B.M., Friis, L.M., <italic>et al</italic>. (2004) Nucleotide Sequences and Comparison of Two Large Conjugative Plasmids from Different <italic>Campylobacter</italic> Species. <italic>Microbiology</italic>, 150, 3507-3517. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.27112-0 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/mic.0.27112-0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15470128</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.27112-0">https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.27112-0</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Batchelor, R.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Pearson, B.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Friis, L.M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2004</year>
            <article-title>Nucleotide Sequences and Comparison of Two Large Conjugative Plasmids from Different Campylobacter Species</article-title>
            <source>Microbiology</source>
            <volume>150</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/mic.0.27112-0</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15470128</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B55">
        <label>55.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Marasini, D., Karki, A.B., Bryant, J.M., Sheaff, R.J. and Fakhr, M.K. (2020) Molecular Characterization of Megaplasmids Encoding the Type VI Secretion System in <italic>Cam</italic><italic>pylobacter jejuni</italic>Isolated from Chicken Livers and Gizzards. <italic>Scientific Reports</italic>, 10, Article No. 12514. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69155-z <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-020-69155-z</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32719325</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69155-z">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69155-z</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Marasini, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Karki, A.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bryant, J.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sheaff, R.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Fakhr, M.K.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>Molecular Characterization of Megaplasmids Encoding the Type VI Secretion System in Campylobacter jejuni Isolated from Chicken Livers and Gizzards</article-title>
            <source>Scientific Reports</source>
            <volume>10</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-020-69155-z</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32719325</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B56">
        <label>56.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Hormeño, L., Campos, M.J., Vadillo, S. and Quesada, A. (2020) Occurrence of tet(O/M/O) Mosaic Gene in Tetracycline-Resistant Campylobacter. <italic>Microorganisms</italic>, 8, Article 1710. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8111710 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms8111710</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33142824</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8111710">https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8111710</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Campos, M.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Vadillo, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Quesada, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>Occurrence of tet(O/M/O) Mosaic Gene in Tetracycline-Resistant Campylobacter</article-title>
            <source>Microorganisms</source>
            <volume>8</volume>
            <elocation-id>1710</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms8111710</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33142824</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B57">
        <label>57.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Gao, F., Tu, L., Chen, M., Chen, H., Zhang, X., Zhuang, Y., <italic>et al</italic>. (2023) Erythromycin Resistance of Clinical <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic>and <italic>Campylobacter coli</italic> in Shanghai, China. <italic>Frontiers in Microbiology</italic>, 14, Article 1145581. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1145581 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2023.1145581</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37260688</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1145581">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1145581</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Gao, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tu, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chen, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chen, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhang, X.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhuang, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Shanghai, C</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Erythromycin Resistance of Clinical Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in Shanghai, China</article-title>
            <source>Frontiers in Microbiology</source>
            <volume>14</volume>
            <elocation-id>1145581</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2023.1145581</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37260688</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B58">
        <label>58.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Deng, F., Shen, J., Zhang, M., Wu, C., Zhang, Q. and Wang, Y. (2015) Constitutive and Inducible Expression of the rRNA Methylase Gene erm(B) in <italic>Campylobacter</italic>. <italic>Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy</italic>, 59, 6661-6664. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01103-15 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aac.01103-15</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26259800</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01103-15">https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01103-15</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Deng, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Shen, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhang, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wu, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhang, Q.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wang, Y.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>Constitutive and Inducible Expression of the rRNA Methylase Gene erm(B) in Campylobacter</article-title>
            <source>Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy</source>
            <volume>59</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aac.01103-15</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26259800</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B59">
        <label>59.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Chick, H.M., Williams, L.K., Sparks, N., Khattak, F., Vermeij, P., Frantzen, I., <italic>et a</italic><italic>l</italic>. (2025) <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> ST353 and ST464 Cause Localized Gut Inflammation, Crypt Damage, and Extraintestinal Spread during Large-and Small-Scale Infection in Broiler Chickens. <italic>Applied and Environmental Microbiology</italic>, 91, e01614-24. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01614-24 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aem.01614-24</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39964091</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01614-24">https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01614-24</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Chick, H.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Williams, L.K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sparks, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Khattak, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Vermeij, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Frantzen, I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Inflammation, C</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2025</year>
            <article-title>Campylobacter jejuni ST353 and ST464 Cause Localized Gut Inflammation, Crypt Damage, and Extraintestinal Spread during Large-and Small-Scale Infection in Broiler Chickens</article-title>
            <source>Applied and Environmental Microbiology</source>
            <volume>91</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aem.01614-24</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39964091</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B60">
        <label>60.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">French, N.P., Thomas, K.M., Amani, N.B., Benschop, J., Bigogo, G.M., Cleaveland, S., <italic>et al</italic>. (2024) Population Structure and Antimicrobial Resistance in <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> and <italic>C</italic>. <italic>coli</italic> Isolated from Humans with Diarrhea and from Poultry, East Africa. <italic>Emerging Infectious Diseases</italic>, 30, 2079-2089. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid3010.231399 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3201/eid3010.231399</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39320160</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3201/eid3010.231399">https://doi.org/10.3201/eid3010.231399</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>French, N.P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Thomas, K.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Amani, N.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Benschop, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bigogo, G.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Cleaveland, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Poultry, E</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>Population Structure and Antimicrobial Resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and C</article-title>
            <source>coli Isolated from Humans with Diarrhea and from Poultry</source>
            <volume>30</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3201/eid3010.231399</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39320160</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B61">
        <label>61.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Zhang, Q., Beyi, A.F. and Yin, Y. (2023) Zoonotic and Antibiotic-Resistant <italic>Campylobacter</italic>: A View through the One Health Lens. <italic>One Health Advances</italic>, 1, Article No. 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44280-023-00003-1 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s44280-023-00003-1</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s44280-023-00003-1">https://doi.org/10.1186/s44280-023-00003-1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Zhang, Q.</string-name>
              <string-name>Beyi, A.F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Yin, Y.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Zoonotic and Antibiotic-Resistant Campylobacter: A View through the One Health Lens</article-title>
            <source>One Health Advances</source>
            <volume>1</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s44280-023-00003-1</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B62">
        <label>62.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Dessouky, Y.E., Elsayed, S.W., Abdelsalam, N.A., Saif, N.A., Álvarez-Ordóñez, A. and Elhadidy, M. (2022) Genomic Insights into Zoonotic Transmission and Antimicrobial Resistance in <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic> from Farm to Fork: A One Health Perspective. <italic>Gut Pathogens</italic>, 14, Article No. 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-022-00517-w <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13099-022-00517-w</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36471447</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-022-00517-w">https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-022-00517-w</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Dessouky, Y.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Elsayed, S.W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Abdelsalam, N.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Saif, N.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Elhadidy, M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>Genomic Insights into Zoonotic Transmission and Antimicrobial Resistance in Campylobacter jejuni from Farm to Fork: A One Health Perspective</article-title>
            <source>Gut Pathogens</source>
            <volume>14</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13099-022-00517-w</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36471447</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>