<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.4" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ijg</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>International Journal of Geosciences</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2156-8367</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2156-8359</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ijg.2026.178027</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ijg-153335</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Earth</subject>
          <subject>Environmental Sciences</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>The Kolun Hillfort (Mrežica, Bosnia and Herzegovina): An Integrated High-Resolution Geospatial Documentation of a Fortification Provisionally Attributed to the Illyrian and Medieval Periods</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0009-0009-7737-6480</contrib-id>
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Osmanagich</surname>
            <given-names>Sam</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label> Archaeological Park: Bosnian Pyramid of the Sun Foundation, Visoko, Bosnia and Herzegovina </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="conflict" id="fn-conflict">
          <p>The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>04</day>
        <month>08</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <month>08</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>17</volume>
      <issue>08</issue>
      <fpage>567</fpage>
      <lpage>587</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>25</day>
          <month>07</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>21</day>
          <month>08</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="published">
          <day>24</day>
          <month>08</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2026 by the authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p> This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link> ). </license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2026.178027">https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2026.178027</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p>The Kolun Hillfort, located near the village of Mrežica in the municipality of Foča, Bosnia and Herzegovina, is a recently recognized fortified site provisionally attributed to the Illyrian period, with probable reuse during the Middle Ages based on surface morphology and typological comparison with regional hillforts; this chronological attribution has not yet been confirmed by excavation or absolute dating. Despite its archaeological potential, the locality has not previously been investigated through systematic archaeological, geodetic, or geospatial research. No detailed topographic survey, LiDAR dataset, UAV photogrammetric model, or GIS documentation has been available. A comprehensive geospatial survey was therefore undertaken using RTK-GNSS measurements, Total Station surveying, UAV photogrammetry, airborne LiDAR, digital terrain modeling, and Geographic Information Systems (GIS). The integrated survey produced a centimeter-level digital model of the hillfort and its surrounding landscape. The resulting dataset documents the preserved dry-stone fortifications, natural defensive cliffs, internal plateau, terrain morphology, and principal access routes. Rather than offering archaeological interpretations, this paper establishes a reliable spatial framework for future investigations. The digital documentation provides an objective reference for archaeological excavation, landscape analysis, architectural reconstruction, defensive studies, and other multidisciplinary research. The workflow presented here may also serve as a practical model for documenting fortified archaeological sites elsewhere in the western Balkans.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated" xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>Kolun Hillfort</kwd>
        <kwd>Illyrian Hillfort</kwd>
        <kwd>Bosnia and Herzegovina</kwd>
        <kwd>Geodetic Survey</kwd>
        <kwd>RTK-GNSS</kwd>
        <kwd>UAV Photogrammetry</kwd>
        <kwd>LiDAR</kwd>
        <kwd>GIS</kwd>
        <kwd>Digital Terrain Model</kwd>
        <kwd>Dry-Stone Fortification</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>Fortified hilltop settlements represent one of the most characteristic archaeological features of the western Balkans. Built primarily during the Late Bronze Age and Iron Age, these sites occupied naturally elevated positions that offered extensive visibility over surrounding valleys and communication routes. Massive dry-stone walls were commonly combined with steep cliffs and rugged terrain, creating defensive systems that relied on both natural and constructed barriers. Many of these settlements continued to be occupied or reused during later historical periods, including the Roman and medieval eras, reflecting their long-term strategic value [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>].</p>
      <p>Despite more than a century of archaeological investigations throughout southeastern Europe, a considerable number of hillforts remain only partially documented. Earlier studies concentrated primarily on excavation results, architectural descriptions, pottery assemblages, and cultural chronology. Precise three-dimensional documentation of entire fortified landscapes has often remained secondary, largely because modern surveying technologies were not yet available. Consequently, many published plans are based on conventional field measurements and simplified topographic sketches, limiting detailed spatial analyses and comparisons between sites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>].</p>
      <p>During the last two decades, archaeological documentation has undergone a major technological transformation. High-precision RTK-GNSS surveying, robotic Total Stations, UAV photogrammetry, airborne laser scanning (LiDAR), and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) now permit the production of highly accurate digital terrain models and three-dimensional representations of archaeological landscapes. These methods reveal subtle topographic features hidden beneath vegetation, document preserved architectural remains with centimeter-level accuracy, and provide permanent digital records suitable for future excavation and multidisciplinary research. Integrated geospatial datasets have therefore become an essential component of archaeological documentation rather than simply a supporting mapping tool [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>].</p>
      <p>Bosnia and Herzegovina possesses hundreds of prehistoric hillforts, yet only a limited number have been documented using an integrated geospatial approach. One of the least investigated examples is the hillfort situated on Kolunsko Brdo near the village of Mrežica, Municipality of Foča, in the southeastern Dinaric Alps (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The fortified plateau occupies the summit at approximately 1190 m above sea level, overlooking the surrounding mountain landscape and controlling natural communication corridors through the region. The settlement of Kolun lies at 43˚34'48"N and 18˚39'22"E, while the summit of the hillfort is situated at approximately 43.5949˚N and 18.6443˚E. The present geospatial documentation was carried out using the integrated UAV/LiDAR platform shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p>
      <fig id="fig1">
        <label>Figure 1</label>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2802809-rId17.jpeg?20260824014704" />
      </fig>
      <p><bold>Figure 1.</bold> Location of the Kolun Hillfort near the village of Mrežica, Municipality of Foča, Bosnia and Herzegovina. The fortified hilltop occupies the summit of Kolunsko Brdo (approximately 1190 m above sea level) in the southeastern Dinaric Alps. The settlement of Kolun is located at 43˚34'48"N, 18˚39'22"E (43.5800˚N, 18.6561˚E), while the summit of the hillfort is situated at approximately 43.5949˚N, 18.6443˚E. The map illustrates the regional setting of the archaeological site within the western Balkans.</p>
      <p>The locality was recognized only recently during field reconnaissance conducted by the Foundation “Čuvari baštine-Bassania.” A recent anthropological assessment has discussed the landscape setting, defensive characteristics, and possible symbolic significance of the hillfort, while emphasizing that its chronological attribution remains provisional pending archaeological excavation and absolute dating [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]. Before this project, no archaeological excavations, professional geodetic survey, UAV photogrammetric documentation, airborne LiDAR survey, GIS database, or detailed geomorphological analysis had been undertaken. Existing knowledge was therefore limited to visual observations of preserved dry-stone wall remains and natural limestone cliffs that define the defensive character of the hilltop (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figures 3-8</xref>).</p>
      <p>This contribution provides the first comprehensive geospatial documentation of the Kolun Hillfort. Rather than attempting archaeological interpretation of a site that has never undergone systematic excavation, the study establishes a high-resolution spatial reference framework based on complementary surveying technologies. The resulting dataset provides an objective record of the site’s morphology, preserved architectural remains, terrain configuration, and defensive landscape, while creating a scientific baseline for future archaeological, architectural, geological, and environmental investigations.</p>
      <p>This work intentionally focuses on documenting the site rather than interpreting it. Establishing a reliable spatial reference framework represents the necessary first step before archaeological excavation, architectural analysis, geophysical investigation, environmental reconstruction, or archaeoastronomical evaluation can be undertaken.</p>
      <p>Recent work has demonstrated that GIS can be applied not only to conventional archaeological mapping but also to the quantitative evaluation of geometric relationships, constrained spatial hypotheses, and network organization within complex archaeological landscapes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>].</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec2">
      <title>2. Materials and Methods</title>
      <sec id="sec2dot1">
        <title>2.1. Study Area</title>
        <p>The Kolun Hillfort is situated on Kolunsko Brdo near the village of Mrežica, Municipality of Foča, in southeastern Bosnia and Herzegovina. The fortified summit reaches approximately 1190 m above sea level within the Dinaric mountain system (survey-derived elevations within the fortified enclosure range from 1158 to 1191 m). The locality occupies a naturally defended limestone plateau bounded by steep escarpments on several sides, while gentler approaches occur along the northeastern sector. The topographic position provides extensive visual control over the surrounding valleys and mountain passes, characteristics typical of prehistoric, fortified settlements throughout the western Balkans.</p>
        <p>The visible archaeological remains consist primarily of dry-stone wall segments preserved along the margins of the plateau together with prominent natural limestone cliffs that formed an integral part of the defensive system. At present, no excavated architectural remains or stratigraphically documented archaeological deposits have been reported from the site. The survey therefore focused exclusively on non-destructive documentation of the visible landscape and terrain morphology.</p>
        <p>The current study extends previously developed GIS methodologies by applying high-resolution RTK-GNSS surveying, UAV photogrammetry, airborne LiDAR, and integrated spatial analysis to a newly documented archaeological site [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot2">
        <title>2.2. Survey Strategy</title>
        <p>The survey was designed to produce a complete high-resolution geospatial record of the hillfort using complementary surveying methods. Each technique documented a different aspect of the archaeological landscape while all datasets were integrated within a common coordinate reference framework.</p>
        <p>Field documentation included:</p>
        <p>RTK-GNSS measurements for establishing precise ground control.Total Station observations for detailed mapping of visible archaeological and topographic features.UAV photogrammetry for high-resolution aerial imagery and surface reconstruction.Airborne LiDAR acquisition for generation of terrain models independent of vegetation cover.GIS integration of all spatial datasets into a unified geodatabase.</p>
        <p>The combination of these techniques minimized positional uncertainty while allowing direct comparison between independently acquired datasets.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot3">
        <title>2.3. Geodetic Survey</title>
        <fig id="fig2">
          <label>Figure 2</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2802809-rId18.jpeg?20260824014708" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 2.</bold> DJI Matrice 350 RTK unmanned aerial vehicle equipped with the DJI Zenmuse L2 LiDAR/RGB sensor, used during the integrated geospatial survey of the Kolun Hillfort. The platform was employed for simultaneous airborne laser scanning and UAV photogrammetric data acquisition. Photograph taken during the field campaign, 10 July 2026.</p>
        <p>Field data collection employed the UAV/LiDAR platform shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> and was carried out between 10 and 21 July 2026 by GeoGIS Studio d.o.o. (Sarajevo), covering a surveyed extent of approximately 14.1 ha across the hillfort and its immediate surroundings (elevation range of the surveyed extent: 1082 - 1248 m a.s.l.). Ground control was established using real-time kinematic (RTK) GNSS positioning, referenced to the national geodetic coordinate system, in order to secure high absolute positional accuracy for all collected data; GNSS receivers (Leica GS14 and South G1+) and Total Stations (FOIF RTS362 and Trimble S6) were used for detail surveying. Five ground-control/orientation points (GG1-GG5), used to orient and check the LiDAR point cloud, were measured by RTK-GNSS across the site; their coordinates are listed in <bold>Table 1</bold>. A network of nine pre-existing national trigonometric points was used to compute the datum transformation parameters for the survey area, and the official transformation parameters published for the Foča area were applied during coordinate processing.</p>
        <p>All spatial data are referenced to the Bosnia-Herzegovina State Coordinate System, using the Bessel 1841 ellipsoid on a Gauss-Krüger (Transverse Mercator) projection, central meridian 18˚E—equivalent to EPSG:3908 (“MGI 1901/Balkans zone 6”). Transformation between WGS84/GRS80 and the Bessel 1841 datum was performed using a seven-parameter Helmert transformation, whose parameters (as computed for the project area from the national trigonometric network) are given in <bold>Table 2</bold>. Real-time GNSS corrections were obtained from the permanent reference stations of the Federal Geodetic Administration of Bosnia and Herzegovina via RTCM correction messages; residuals at the ground-control points, measured with a Leica GNSS receiver, were approximately 2 cm. Comparison of the LiDAR-derived terrain model against the five RTK-GNSS check points (GG1-GG5) indicated a horizontal RMSE of 0.031 m and a vertical RMSE of 0.019 m.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 1</bold><bold>.</bold>Ground-control/orientation points (GG1-GG5), measured by RTK-GNSS, used to orient and check the LiDAR point cloud.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl1">
          <label>Table 1</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Point</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Y (m)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>X (m)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>H (m)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>GG1</td>
                <td>6551764.567</td>
                <td>4826539.883</td>
                <td>1119.734</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>GG2</td>
                <td>6551717.244</td>
                <td>4826564.270</td>
                <td>1117.852</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>GG3</td>
                <td>6551627.656</td>
                <td>4826624.762</td>
                <td>1113.416</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>GG4</td>
                <td>6551753.036</td>
                <td>4826572.540</td>
                <td>1125.780</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>GG5</td>
                <td>6551807.261</td>
                <td>4826568.902</td>
                <td>1135.782</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p><bold>Table 2</bold><bold>.</bold>Seven-parameter datum transformation (WGS84/GRS80 → Bessel 1841) applied to the survey area.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl2">
          <label>Table 2</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Parameter</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Value</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Unit</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Translation ΔX</td>
                <td>−198.110713</td>
                <td>m</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Translation ΔY</td>
                <td>33.886804</td>
                <td>m</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Translation ΔZ</td>
                <td>−517.365630</td>
                <td>m</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Rotation RX</td>
                <td>1.944726</td>
                <td>arc-seconds</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Rotation RY</td>
                <td>11.130053</td>
                <td>arc-seconds</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Rotation RZ</td>
                <td>−9.019356</td>
                <td>arc-seconds</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Scale factor ΔS</td>
                <td>−42.433074</td>
                <td>ppm</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot4">
        <title>2.4. UAV Photogrammetry</title>
        <p>UAV photogrammetric data were acquired using a DJI Matrice 350 RTK platform on 10 July 2026 between 12:59 and 13:30 local time, yielding 580 overlapping aerial photographs georeferenced directly from the platform’s onboard RTK-GNSS positioning. The platform was flown at a constant altitude of 45 m above the terrain surface, with 70% along-track and 40% cross-track image overlap. Camera exposure settings were controlled automatically by the platform. The photographs were processed together with the LiDAR data in DJI Terra, which generated a digital orthophoto in TIFF format. UAV imagery provided detailed visual documentation of preserved dry-stone walls, natural cliffs, vegetation cover, and the overall configuration of the fortified plateau (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figures 3-6</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="fig3">
          <label>Figure 3</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2802809-rId19.jpeg?20260824014709" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 3.</bold> Location and general view of the Kolun Hillfort obtained from UAV photogrammetry. The photograph illustrates the elevated plateau, surrounding cliffs, and the strategic topographic position of the fortified settlement.</p>
        <fig id="fig4">
          <label>Figure 4</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2802809-rId20.jpeg?20260824014709" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 4.</bold> Natural limestone cliffs forming the western defensive sector of the hillfort. These steep escarpments significantly reduced access to the settlement and formed part of its natural defensive system.</p>
        <fig id="fig5">
          <label>Figure 5</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2802809-rId21.jpeg?20260824014709" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 5.</bold> Aerial view of the central plateau showing preserved dry-stone wall remains and the principal occupation area enclosed within the fortification.</p>
        <fig id="fig6">
          <label>Figure 6</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2802809-rId22.jpeg?20260824014709" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 6.</bold> UAV photograph of the central plateau showing the preserved dry-stone wall and the principal interior area of the hillfort.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot5">
        <title>2.5. Airborne LiDAR</title>
        <p>The locality presents markedly complex morphology, with substantial elevation differences across the fortified enclosure and dense vegetation and low undergrowth covering much of the site. This required careful UAV flight-path planning to maintain a constant sensor height above the ground surface and ensure uniform point-cloud density across the variable terrain. The site’s karstic character further motivated the choice of airborne LiDAR: multiple-return laser scanning allowed elimination of vegetation returns during post-processing and recovery of precise ground elevations in areas that were not visible to photogrammetric reconstruction alone. The combined LiDAR/RGB sensor package also allowed simultaneous acquisition of laser returns for terrain definition and high-resolution RGB imagery for photogrammetric processing within a single flight.</p>
        <p>Airborne laser scanning was performed at a constant flight altitude of 45 m above the terrain surface, using a DJI Zenmuse L2 sensor mounted on the DJI Matrice 350 RTK platform (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>), capable of registering up to five returns per laser pulse. Compared with earlier UAV-mounted LiDAR systems, the Zenmuse L2 provides higher point density, improved ranging accuracy, and multi-return capability, making it particularly suitable for documenting archaeological landscapes beneath dense vegetation. This configuration achieved a point density exceeding 150 points/m<sup>2</sup>, enabling penetration through vegetation cover on the karstic terrain and recovery of ground elevations not visible to photogrammetry alone. LiDAR and photogrammetric data were fused, and the resulting point cloud was ground-classified in DJI Terra to separate terrain returns from vegetation and other above-ground objects. Ground-classified points were then used in ArcGIS Pro to generate raster terrain models at a spatial resolution of 0.3 m × 0.3 m (per the DEM product specification; a directly confirmed value for the DSM was not available, though it was generated by the same processing pipeline). The principal products used in this study include:</p>
        <p>Hillshade model (light source azimuth 315˚, altitude 45˚ above the horizon).Digital Elevation Model (DEM).Slope model (expressed in degrees).</p>
        <p>These products significantly enhanced the visibility of subtle terrain features, preserved wall alignments, scarps, and geomorphological structures that are difficult to identify through conventional aerial photography alone (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figures 8-11</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot6">
        <title>2.6. Geographic Information System (GIS)</title>
        <p>Vectorization of visible fortification and terrain features was performed directly on the classified LiDAR point cloud, first in AutoCAD and subsequently refined as three-dimensional polylines in Autodesk Civil 3D, so that each digitized line retained its true elevation. Vectorized elements were assigned unique feature codes by category: BW (bedemi/walls), EN (ulazi/entrances), PT (karakteristične tačke/characteristic points), CL (litice/cliffs), TR (terase/terraces), and RK (izdvojene stijene/isolated rocks). Digitized features were cross-checked against the orthophoto and the digital terrain model during vectorization to reduce misinterpretation, particularly where stone walls were partially obscured by vegetation. The resulting CAD dataset (DWG format) was then converted into a File Geodatabase in ArcGIS Pro, preserving the original feature codes and attributes, to produce the first comprehensive digital archive of the Kolun Hillfort and provide the spatial framework for future site management and conservation planning.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot7">
        <title>2.7. Research Limitations</title>
        <p>This study documents only the visible morphology and topography of the site. Since no archaeological excavations, geophysical surveys, or stratigraphic investigations have yet been conducted, the paper intentionally avoids chronological or cultural interpretations beyond those supported by visible surface evidence. The geospatial documentation presented here is intended as a baseline dataset for future excavation planning and site conservation.</p>
        <p>The chronological attribution of the hillfort to the Illyrian period, with probable reuse during the Middle Ages, follows the preliminary field assessment of the Foundation “Čuvari baštine-Bassania” and the general typological similarity of the preserved dry-stone construction to other Illyrian hillforts documented in the western Balkans [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]. This attribution is provisional, based on surface morphology and regional comparison rather than on stratigraphic or artifactual evidence; confirmation will require future excavation and absolute dating.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec3">
      <title>3. Results</title>
      <sec id="sec3dot1">
        <title>3.1. General Morphology of the Hillfort</title>
        <p>The integrated geospatial survey demonstrates that the Kolun Hillfort occupies a naturally defended limestone hilltop overlooking the surrounding mountainous landscape of southeastern Bosnia and Herzegovina (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The site is positioned on the summit of Kolunsko Brdo (approximately 1,190 m above sea level), where steep escarpments form substantial natural obstacles along much of the perimeter. Only a limited number of approaches provide relatively easy access to the plateau, explaining the strategic value of the locality as a prehistoric, fortified settlement.</p>
        <p>UAV photogrammetry clearly illustrates the relationship between the central plateau, surrounding cliffs, and adjacent terrain (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). The plateau occupies the highest part of the hill, while abrupt limestone outcrops define several sectors of the site’s perimeter. These natural landforms significantly reduced the need for continuous artificial fortifications and probably influenced the overall layout of the settlement.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot2">
        <title>3.2. Preserved Architectural Features</title>
        <p>The aerial imagery documents several preserved segments of dry-stone construction distributed along the margins of the central plateau (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). Although no archaeological excavation has yet been undertaken, the visible remains are consistent with defensive wall construction traditionally associated with prehistoric hillforts in the western Balkans. The preserved structures follow the natural configuration of the terrain rather than imposing a regular geometric plan.</p>
        <p>A ground photograph obtained during the initial field reconnaissance by the Foundation “Čuvari baštine - Bassania” provides additional documentation of one of the principal limestone escarpments forming the hillfort’s natural defensive system (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). The image records the condition of the site before the commencement of systematic geospatial documentation and complements the UAV observations by illustrating the vertical character of the exposed rock face.</p>
        <fig id="fig7">
          <label>Figure 7</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2802809-rId23.jpeg?20260824014716" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 7.</bold> Principal limestone escarpment at the Kolun Hillfort photographed during the initial field reconnaissance by the Foundation “Čuvari baštine-Bassania” (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://fondacijabassania.org/blog/kolun-mrezica-foca/">https://fondacijabassania.org/blog/kolun-mrezica-foca/</ext-link>). The steep natural cliff forms one of the site’s principal defensive features and illustrates the geomorphological setting prior to systematic geospatial documentation.</p>
        <p>In addition to the dry-stone walls and cliffs, the detailed geodetic vectorization (§2.6) identified two further surface features within the fortified enclosure: a linear channel or ditch, and the remains of a wooden construction, both digitized directly from the classified point cloud together with the wall segments, terraces, and isolated rocks described above. As with the wall remains, these features are documented here strictly as visible surface morphology, without distinguishing construction phase or period.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot3">
        <title>3.3. Geodetic Documentation</title>
        <p>The RTK-GNSS and Total Station survey established the first high-precision geodetic reference framework for the Kolun Hillfort. The survey accurately recorded the visible archaeological structures, cliff edges, terrain breaks, pathways, and other significant topographic features. The resulting geodetic dataset provides the spatial control necessary for integrating all subsequent photogrammetric and LiDAR products within a common coordinate system.</p>
        <p>Unlike conventional archaeological site plans, which often rely on manual field sketches or simplified topographic surveys, the present dataset offers centimeter-level positional accuracy suitable for future archaeological excavation planning, architectural reconstruction, and GIS-based spatial analyses.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot4">
        <title>3.4. LiDAR-Based Terrain Analysis</title>
        <p>The airborne LiDAR survey produced a detailed representation of the hillfort independent of vegetation cover. The hillshade model (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>) enhances subtle variations in surface morphology and reveals terrain features that are only partially visible in aerial photographs. Linear embankments, preserved wall alignments, abrupt scarps, and natural limestone ridges become considerably more distinct through hillshade visualization.</p>
        <fig id="fig8">
          <label>Figure 8</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2802809-rId25.jpeg?20260824014718" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 8</bold><bold>.</bold> LiDAR-derived hillshade model of the Kolun Hillfort, revealing topographic discontinuities, cliff edges, and linear surface features interpreted as probable components of the hillfort’s defensive system that are difficult to recognize in conventional aerial imagery.</p>
        <p>The hillshade model with coordinate grid (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>) provides an accurate spatial framework for future mapping and archaeological interpretation. It also facilitates comparison with other spatial datasets by preserving the precise location of individual terrain features.</p>
        <fig id="fig9">
          <label>Figure 9</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2802809-rId26.jpeg?20260824014718" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 9</bold><bold>.</bold>Hillshade model with coordinate grid, used to spatially reference the terrain features visible in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref> for subsequent GIS analysis and site-management planning.</p>
        <p>The Digital Elevation Model (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig10">Figure 10</xref>) illustrates the relative elevation of the fortified plateau and the surrounding landscape. The highest elevations correspond to the central occupation area, while pronounced elevation differences occur along the natural defensive escarpments.</p>
        <fig id="fig10">
          <label>Figure 10</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2802809-rId27.jpeg?20260824014719" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 1</bold><bold>0</bold><bold>.</bold>Digital Elevation Model (DEM) of the Kolun Hillfort and its immediate surroundings, showing the elevated central plateau and the escarpments that define its natural defensive perimeter.</p>
        <p>The slope model (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig11">Figure 11</xref>) further emphasizes the defensive characteristics of the locality by distinguishing steep natural cliffs from the gently inclined surfaces of the central plateau. These terrain relationships explain why prehistoric builders selected the summit for fortification and demonstrate the close interaction between natural topography and defensive architecture.</p>
        <fig id="fig11">
          <label>Figure 11</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2802809-rId28.jpeg?20260824014718" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 1</bold><bold>1</bold><bold>.</bold>Slope model derived from the LiDAR dataset, distinguishing the steep natural cliffs that form the site’s principal defensive barrier from the gently inclined surfaces of the occupied plateau.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot5">
        <title>3.5. Integrated Geospatial Dataset</title>
        <p>One of the principal outcomes of the project is the creation of the first integrated geospatial database for the Kolun Hillfort. The database combines RTK-GNSS measurements, Total Station observations, UAV photogrammetry, airborne LiDAR products, orthophotography, and GIS layers within a single spatial framework. Such integration enables precise comparison of archaeological features, topography, and landscape morphology while preserving a permanent digital archive for future multidisciplinary investigations.</p>
        <p>Rather than representing the final stage of research, this database establishes the foundation for subsequent archaeological excavation, architectural analysis, landscape modeling, environmental reconstruction, and spatial-statistical investigations. It also provides a reproducible reference dataset that can be expanded as new archaeological information becomes available.</p>
        <p>The scale of the delivered dataset is unusually comprehensive for a newly documented archaeological site. The complete product set comprises approximately 36 GB of airborne LiDAR data, approximately 37 GB of UAV photogrammetric data, and an approximately 7 GB GIS geodatabase, together with a dedicated technical report, all produced by GeoGIS Studio d.o.o. (Sarajevo). This volume of centimeter-level digital documentation, assembled prior to any excavation, is not typical of first-season archaeological reconnaissance and instead reflects a level of geospatial investment more commonly associated with established, long-term research programs. To the authors’ knowledge, this represents one of the most comprehensive integrated geospatial surveys conducted on a previously undocumented hillfort in Bosnia and Herzegovina prior to archaeological excavation.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 3</bold> summarizes the principal parameters of the integrated survey and the resulting deliverable package.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 3.</bold>Summary of the integrated geospatial survey conducted at the Kolun Hillfort.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl3">
          <label>Table 3</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Parameter</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Value</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Source</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Study area</td>
                <td>Kolun Hillfort, Mrežica, Municipality of Foča, Bosnia and Herzegovina</td>
                <td>Present study</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Survey area</td>
                <td>≈14.1 ha</td>
                <td>GeoGIS Studio d.o.o.</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Fortified enclosure elevation range</td>
                <td>1158 - 1191 m a.s.l. (≈1,190 m at the highest preserved wall points)</td>
                <td>Present study</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Approximate hillfort summit coordinates</td>
                <td>43.5949˚N, 18.6443˚E</td>
                <td>Present study</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Settlement coordinates</td>
                <td>43˚34'48"N, 18˚39'22"E</td>
                <td>Geographic reference</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Survey dates</td>
                <td>10 - 21 July 2026</td>
                <td>GeoGIS Studio d.o.o.</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Survey methods</td>
                <td>RTK-GNSS, Total Station, UAV photogrammetry, airborne LiDAR</td>
                <td>GeoGIS Studio d.o.o.</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>UAV/LiDAR platform</td>
                <td>DJI Matrice 350 RTK with DJI Zenmuse L2 sensor</td>
                <td>GeoGIS Studio d.o.o.</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>GNSS receivers</td>
                <td>Leica GS14, South G1+</td>
                <td>GeoGIS Studio d.o.o.</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Total Stations</td>
                <td>FOIF RTS362, Trimble S6</td>
                <td>GeoGIS Studio d.o.o.</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Coordinate reference system</td>
                <td>MGI 1901/Balkans zone 6 (EPSG:3908); Bessel 1841 ellipsoid, Gauss-Krüger projection, central meridian 18˚E</td>
                <td>GeoGIS Studio d.o.o.</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>UAV acquisition time</td>
                <td>10 July 2026, 12:59 - 13:30 local time</td>
                <td>Present study (UAV geotag log)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>UAV photographs acquired</td>
                <td>580</td>
                <td>Present study (UAV geotag log)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Flight altitude (UAV/LiDAR platform)</td>
                <td>45 m above terrain surface</td>
                <td>GeoGIS Studio d.o.o.</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Image overlap</td>
                <td>70% along-track/40% cross-track</td>
                <td>GeoGIS Studio d.o.o.</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>RTK correction source</td>
                <td>Permanent GNSS reference stations, Federal Geodetic Administration of Bosnia and Herzegovina (RTCM correction messages)</td>
                <td>GeoGIS Studio d.o.o.</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>GCP residuals</td>
                <td>≈2 cm (Leica GNSS receiver)</td>
                <td>GeoGIS Studio d.o.o.</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>LiDAR point density</td>
                <td>
                  &gt;150 points/m
                  <sup>2</sup>
                </td>
                <td>GeoGIS Studio d.o.o.</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>LiDAR terrain-model accuracy (vs. 5 GNSS check points)</td>
                <td>Horizontal RMSE = 0.031 m; vertical RMSE = 0.019 m</td>
                <td>GeoGIS Studio d.o.o.</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>DEM raster resolution</td>
                <td>0.3 m × 0.3 m</td>
                <td>GeoGIS Studio d.o.o. (DEM product legend)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Survey provider</td>
                <td>GeoGIS Studio d.o.o., Sarajevo</td>
                <td>Present study</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Digital terrain products presented in this paper</td>
                <td>Hillshade, DEM, slope models</td>
                <td>GeoGIS Studio d.o.o.</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Additional GIS/CAD deliverables in the full dataset</td>
                <td>Orthophoto, DSM, CAD (DWG/DXF), point cloud, GIS geodatabase</td>
                <td>GeoGIS Studio d.o.o.</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Airborne LiDAR dataset volume</td>
                <td>≈36 GB</td>
                <td>GeoGIS Studio d.o.o.</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>UAV photogrammetric dataset volume</td>
                <td>≈37 GB</td>
                <td>GeoGIS Studio d.o.o.</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>GIS geodatabase volume</td>
                <td>≈7 GB</td>
                <td>GeoGIS Studio d.o.o.</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Technical report</td>
                <td>≈4 MB (PDF)</td>
                <td>GeoGIS Studio d.o.o.</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Camera exposure settings were controlled automatically by the UAV platform.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec4">
      <title>4. Discussion</title>
      <p>This paper establishes the first comprehensive geospatial documentation of the Kolun Hillfort. It creates a permanent spatial framework that can support future archaeological excavation, architectural analysis, archaeoastronomical investigations, and spatial-statistical modeling.</p>
      <sec id="sec4dot1">
        <title>4.1. Significance of Integrated Geospatial Documentation</title>
        <p>The integrated geospatial survey carried out at the Kolun Hillfort represents the first comprehensive digital documentation of the site. Prior to this investigation, knowledge of the locality was limited to field observations and visual descriptions. No professional geodetic survey, UAV photogrammetry, airborne LiDAR acquisition, or GIS database had previously been produced. The present project therefore establishes the first objective spatial record of the monument and its surrounding landscape.</p>
        <p>Unlike conventional archaeological plans based primarily on field sketches and selective measurements, integrated geospatial documentation records the entire landscape with a consistent level of positional accuracy. The combination of RTK-GNSS measurements, Total Station observations, UAV photogrammetry, and airborne LiDAR provides complementary information that cannot be obtained using a single surveying technique. The resulting digital products (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figures 8-11</xref>) document both visible archaeological features and the geomorphological characteristics of the surrounding terrain, creating a permanent digital archive that can be re-examined as new archaeological information becomes available.</p>
        <p>The value of such documentation extends beyond simple mapping. High-resolution terrain models permit quantitative analyses of settlement morphology, defensive architecture, visibility, accessibility, and landscape organization that were previously difficult or impossible to perform. The digital dataset generated during this investigation therefore represents not only documentation of an archaeological site but also a reproducible scientific resource suitable for future multidisciplinary research.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot2">
        <title>4.2. Implications for Future Research</title>
        <p>As noted in §2.7, this survey does not attempt archaeological interpretation. Establishing the chronology of individual wall segments, distinguishing separate construction phases, and determining the settlement’s internal organization will require excavation supported by stratigraphic, chronological, and material analyses.</p>
        <p>The geospatial framework established in this study provides the foundation for those future investigations. High-resolution orthophotography, LiDAR-derived terrain models, and precise geodetic measurements will facilitate the planning of excavation trenches, detailed architectural recording, volumetric analysis of preserved wall remains, and objective comparison with other prehistoric, fortified settlements in the western Balkans.</p>
        <p>The integrated dataset also creates opportunities for future GIS-based investigations that extend beyond the scope of this study. These include viewshed analysis, least-cost path modeling, morphometric analysis of defensive architecture, spatial-statistical evaluation of settlement organization, and landscape archaeological investigations of the relationship between the hillfort and its surrounding environment. Because all datasets share a common spatial reference system, additional analytical layers can be incorporated without repeating the original field survey.</p>
        <p>Finally, the methodology presented here demonstrates how modern geospatial technologies can be applied to poorly documented archaeological sites where little or no previous scientific documentation exists. The workflow developed for the Kolun Hillfort may therefore serve as a practical model for the documentation of similar fortified settlements throughout Bosnia and Herzegovina and the wider western Balkans.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot3">
        <title>4.3. Methodological Significance</title>
        <p>The integrated workflow applied at Kolun addresses three recurring constraints in the documentation of hillfort archaeology: sites that are only recently identified and lack any prior survey record, terrain that is topographically inaccessible or hazardous for conventional ground-based mapping, and vegetation cover that obscures architectural remains from direct observation and from standard aerial photography. Each of these constraints has been addressed individually in earlier methodological literature; the present workflow combines the corresponding techniques within a single, centimeter-accurate spatial framework.</p>
        <p>Doneus and Briese [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>] demonstrated that airborne laser scanning can recover ground-surface detail beneath forest canopy that is otherwise invisible to aerial photography, a limitation directly relevant to the densely vegetated karstic terrain at Kolun; the LiDAR point density and ground-classification results obtained here (§2.5, §3.4) are consistent with that earlier finding and extend it to a previously undocumented site. Campana [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>], reviewing the state of the art in UAV-based archaeological prospection, highlighted the growing role of drone photogrammetry in documenting sites with limited prior investigation; the present survey’s integration of UAV photogrammetry with airborne LiDAR, rather than treating the two as alternatives, responds to that trajectory by combining their complementary strengths. Verhoeven [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>] showed that Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry can generate reliable three-dimensional reconstructions from aerial imagery without specialized survey-grade cameras; the UAV-derived orthophoto and surface products described in §2.4 follow the same principle within an RTK-georeferenced workflow. Opitz and Cowley [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>] argued for treating airborne laser scanning, three-dimensional data, and ground observation as complementary rather than competing sources of topographic evidence, particularly for interpreting archaeological terrain; the combination of hillshade, DEM, and slope products presented here (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figures 8-11</xref>), cross-checked against ground-based Total Station and RTK-GNSS measurements, applies that same principle to a fortified hilltop landscape rather than to open or lowland terrain, where most prior LiDAR-based hillfort studies have been concentrated.</p>
        <p>Taken together, these comparisons suggest that the principal contribution of the Kolun workflow is not any single technique in isolation, but the integration of RTK-GNSS, Total Station, UAV photogrammetry, and airborne LiDAR into one internally consistent spatial framework, applied from the outset to a site with no prior documentation. This integrated approach may be particularly transferable to other undocumented or inaccessible hillforts in mountainous, heavily vegetated landscapes of the western Balkans, where the individual constraints addressed by Doneus and Briese [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>], Campana [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>], Verhoeven [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>], and Opitz and Cowley [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>] frequently occur together rather than separately.</p>
        <p>More broadly, the workflow presented here demonstrates that comprehensive digital documentation can precede excavation rather than follow it. Such an approach allows archaeological interventions to be planned using an objective spatial framework, while preserving a permanent digital archive of the site’s initial condition.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec5">
      <title>5. Conclusions</title>
      <p>The Kolun Hillfort represents one of the least documented fortified archaeological sites in southeastern Bosnia and Herzegovina. Prior to this project, no professional geodetic survey, UAV photogrammetric documentation, airborne LiDAR survey, or integrated GIS database had been produced. Consequently, the site’s morphology, defensive configuration, and topographic setting had never been documented using modern geospatial methods.</p>
      <p>The integrated survey presented in this paper combines RTK-GNSS measurements, Total Station observations, UAV photogrammetry, airborne LiDAR, digital terrain modeling, and Geographic Information Systems within a single spatial framework. The resulting dataset provides the first high-resolution digital documentation of the hillfort and establishes a reliable reference model for future excavation and archaeological documentation.</p>
      <p>The generated geospatial products document the preserved dry-stone fortifications, natural limestone escarpments, central plateau, and surrounding terrain with a level of precision that substantially exceeds conventional archaeological mapping. These data provide an objective basis for future analyses of defensive architecture, settlement morphology, landscape organization, and environmental context.</p>
      <p>Rather than presenting definitive archaeological interpretations, this study establishes the essential spatial infrastructure upon which future multidisciplinary investigations can be built. As archaeological excavations and additional analytical studies are undertaken, the geospatial database will provide a consistent framework for integrating new observations while preserving the integrity and reproducibility of the original survey.</p>
      <p>The approach described in this paper demonstrates the scientific value of combining complementary geospatial technologies in the documentation of complex archaeological landscapes. Beyond the Kolun Hillfort itself, the workflow presented here demonstrates how integrated RTK-GNSS, Total Station surveying, UAV photogrammetry, airborne LiDAR, and GIS can establish a permanent, high-resolution spatial archive for archaeological sites before excavation. The approach is readily transferable to other hillforts and fortified landscapes throughout the western Balkans, and more broadly to comparable mountainous, vegetated, or otherwise inaccessible archaeological terrain elsewhere, providing an objective foundation for future multidisciplinary archaeological research.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec6">
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>The author gratefully acknowledges the cooperation of GeoGIS Studio d.o.o., Sarajevo, for conducting the high-precision geodetic survey, UAV photogrammetric acquisition, airborne LiDAR survey, and preparation of the geospatial datasets used in this investigation.</p>
      <p>Special appreciation is extended to the members of the Foundation “Čuvari baštine-Bassania” for recognizing the archaeological significance of the Kolun Hillfort and conducting the initial field reconnaissance that brought the site to scientific attention. Their preliminary observations provided the starting point for the present multidisciplinary investigation.</p>
      <p>The author also thanks all field personnel and technical specialists who participated in the acquisition and processing of the geospatial data.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec7">
      <title>Funding</title>
      <p>This research received no external governmental or institutional research funding. The geospatial survey and related scientific investigations were supported by the author, with the geospatial survey services provided by GeoGIS Studio d.o.o., Sarajevo.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec8">
      <title>Data Availability</title>
      <p>The geospatial datasets generated during this project, including RTK-GNSS measurements, Total Station survey, UAV photogrammetric products, LiDAR-derived terrain models, and GIS datasets, are maintained by the author. Selected datasets may be made available upon reasonable request for scientific research purposes, subject to the protection of the archaeological site and applicable data-sharing agreements. The complete LiDAR dataset is not made publicly available in order to protect the archaeological integrity of the site and to prevent unauthorized activity at the locality.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec9">
      <title>Author Contributions</title>
      <p>Sam Osmanagich, Ph.D. conceived the project, designed the research methodology, interpreted the results, and wrote the manuscript.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec10">
      <title>Ethical Approval</title>
      <p>The investigation consisted exclusively of non-destructive geospatial documentation and surface observations. No archaeological excavation, intervention, or testing involving human or animal subjects was undertaken. Ethical approval was therefore not required.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Čović, B. (1983) Praistorija jugoslavenskih zemalja IV: Bronzano doba. Akademija nauka i umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <year>1983</year>
            <article-title>Praistorija jugoslavenskih zemalja IV: Bronzano doba</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Harding, A. (2007) Warriors and Weapons in Bronze Age Europe. Archaeolingua.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Harding, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2007</year>
            <article-title>Warriors and Weapons in Bronze Age Europe</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Moore, T. (2017) The Archaeology of Hillforts: Europe in the First Millennium BC. Oxbow Books.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Moore, T.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2017</year>
            <article-title>The Archaeology of Hillforts: Europe in the First Millennium BC</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Doneus, M. and Briese, C. (2011) Airborne Laser Scanning in Forested Areas—Potential and Limitations of An Archaeological Prospection Technique. In: Cowley, D., <italic>Remote Sensing for Archaeological Heritage Management</italic>, EAC, 59-76.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Doneus, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Briese, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Cowley, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Management, E</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2011</year>
            <article-title>Airborne Laser Scanning in Forested Areas—Potential and Limitations of An Archaeological Prospection Technique</article-title>
            <source>In: Cowley</source>
            <volume>59</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Campana, S. (2017) Drones in Archaeology. State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives. <italic>Archaeological Prospection</italic>, 24, 275-296. https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.1569 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/arp.1569</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.1569">https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.1569</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Campana, S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2017</year>
            <article-title>Drones in Archaeology</article-title>
            <source>State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives. Archaeological Prospection</source>
            <volume>24</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/arp.1569</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Doneus, M., Doneus, N., Briese, C., Pregesbauer, M., Mandlburger, G. and Verhoeven, G. (2013) Airborne Laser Bathymetry—Detecting and Recording Submerged Archaeological Sites from the Air. <italic>Journal of Archaeological Science</italic>, 40, 2136-2151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.12.021 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jas.2012.12.021</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.12.021">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.12.021</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Doneus, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Doneus, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Briese, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Pregesbauer, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mandlburger, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Verhoeven, G.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2013</year>
            <article-title>Airborne Laser Bathymetry—Detecting and Recording Submerged Archaeological Sites from the Air</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Archaeological Science</source>
            <volume>40</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jas.2012.12.021</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">De Reu, J., Plets, G., Verhoeven, G., De Smedt, P., Bats, M., Cherretté, B., <italic>et al</italic>. (2013) Towards a Three-Dimensional Cost-Effective Registration of the Archaeological Heritage. <italic>Journal of Archaeological Science</italic>, 40, 1108-1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.08.040 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jas.2012.08.040</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.08.040">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.08.040</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Reu, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Plets, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Verhoeven, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Smedt, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bats, M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2013</year>
            <article-title>Towards a Three-Dimensional Cost-Effective Registration of the Archaeological Heritage</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Archaeological Science</source>
            <volume>40</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jas.2012.08.040</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Opitz, R. and Cowley, D. (2013) Interpreting Archaeological Topography: Airborne Laser Scanning, 3D Data and Ground Observation. Oxbow Books.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Opitz, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Cowley, D.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2013</year>
            <article-title>Interpreting Archaeological Topography: Airborne Laser Scanning, 3D Data and Ground Observation</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Verhoeven, G. (2011) Taking Computer Vision Aloft—Archaeological Three‐Dimensional Reconstructions from Aerial Photographs with Photoscan. <italic>Archaeological</italic><italic>Prospection</italic>, 18, 67-73. https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.399 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/arp.399</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.399">https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.399</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Verhoeven, G.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2011</year>
            <article-title>Taking Computer Vision Aloft—Archaeological Three‐Dimensional Reconstructions from Aerial Photographs with Photoscan</article-title>
            <source>Archaeological Prospection</source>
            <volume>18</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/arp.399</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Osmanagich, S. (2026) Landscape, Defense, and Symbolism: An Anthropological Interpretation of the Kolun Hillfort, Bosnia and Herzegovina. <italic>Advances in Anthropology</italic>, 16, 108-129. https://doi.org/10.4236/aa.2026.163006 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/aa.2026.163006</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/aa.2026.163006">https://doi.org/10.4236/aa.2026.163006</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Osmanagich, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Landscape, D</string-name>
              <string-name>Hillfort, B</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2026</year>
            <article-title>Landscape, Defense, and Symbolism: An Anthropological Interpretation of the Kolun Hillfort, Bosnia and Herzegovina</article-title>
            <source>Advances in Anthropology</source>
            <volume>16</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/aa.2026.163006</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Osmanagich, S. (2026) The Bosnian Pyramid of the Dragon: A GIS-Based Spatial Analysis of Alignments, Triangular Configurations, Fibonacci Structures, and Network Centrality. <italic>International</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Geosciences</italic>, 17, 449-477. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2026.177022 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ijg.2026.177022</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2026.177022">https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2026.177022</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Osmanagich, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Alignments, T</string-name>
              <string-name>Configurations, F</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2026</year>
            <article-title>The Bosnian Pyramid of the Dragon: A GIS-Based Spatial Analysis of Alignments, Triangular Configurations, Fibonacci Structures, and Network Centrality</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of Geosciences</source>
            <volume>17</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ijg.2026.177022</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Osmanagich, S. (2026) Evaluating a Posteriori Geometric Hypotheses in Spatial Data: Constrained Logarithmic Curve Patterns in a Summit Landscape. <italic>International Journal of Recent Advances in Multidisciplinary Research</italic>, 13, 12229-12235. https://zenodo.org/records/19659242</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Osmanagich, S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2026</year>
            <article-title>Evaluating a Posteriori Geometric Hypotheses in Spatial Data: Constrained Logarithmic Curve Patterns in a Summit Landscape</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of Recent Advances in Multidisciplinary Research</source>
            <volume>13</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Osmanagich, S. (2026) A GIS-Based Spatial Null Model Framework for Evaluating Logarithmic Spiral Patterns in Point Sets. <italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Geographic</italic><italic>Information</italic><italic>System</italic>, 18, 107-127. https://doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2026.182006 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jgis.2026.182006</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2026.182006">https://doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2026.182006</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Osmanagich, S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2026</year>
            <article-title>A GIS-Based Spatial Null Model Framework for Evaluating Logarithmic Spiral Patterns in Point Sets</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Geographic Information System</source>
            <volume>18</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jgis.2026.182006</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>