<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.4" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">acs</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Atmospheric and Climate Sciences</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2160-0422</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2160-0414</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/acs.2026.163032</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">acs-152869</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Earth</subject>
          <subject>Environmental Sciences</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Station-Based Characterization of Seasonal Drought across Burkina Faso’s Climatic Zones: Insights from SPI-3 and SPEI-3 (1981-2021)</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0009-0009-0847-4845</contrib-id>
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Compaoré</surname>
            <given-names>Charouna</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0009-0002-6456-895X</contrib-id>
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Kiébré</surname>
            <given-names>Rimyalegdo</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-2025-3430</contrib-id>
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Kébré</surname>
            <given-names>Marcel Bawindsom</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-7819-9705</contrib-id>
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Koalaga</surname>
            <given-names>Zacharie</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label> Laboratoire de Matériaux et Environnement (LA. M. E), Université Joseph Ki-Zerbo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso </aff>
      <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label> Département de Physique et Chimie, Université Lédéa Bernard OUEDRAOGO, Ouahigouya, Burkina Faso </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="conflict" id="fn-conflict">
          <p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>01</day>
        <month>07</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <month>07</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>03</issue>
      <fpage>628</fpage>
      <lpage>657</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>22</day>
          <month>06</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>26</day>
          <month>07</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="published">
          <day>29</day>
          <month>07</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2026 by the authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p> This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link> ). </license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/acs.2026.163032">https://doi.org/10.4236/acs.2026.163032</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p>This study characterizes seasonal drought variability at nine synoptic stations spanning Burkina Faso’s climatic zones over 1981-2021, using the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI-3) and the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI-3) computed at nine synoptic stations representative of the country’s three climatic zones—Sahelian, Sudano-Sahelian, and Sudanian. A multi-indicator approach combining non-parametric trend analysis (Hamed-Rao modified Mann-Kendall test, Sen’s slope) and structural change point detection (Pettitt test) is applied to two intra-seasonal windows: the early rainy season (MJJ: May-June-July) and the late rainy season (ASO: August-September-October). Results reveal three structurally distinct hydroclimatic phases. The period 1981-1990 was dominated by severe and extreme droughts, spatially coherent across all zones and concentrated in the Sahelian sector. A partial rainfall recovery emerged from 1991 onward, consistent with the documented Sahelian re-greening, with significant structural change points clustering in two windows: 1997 and 2007-2009. However, SPEI-3 systematically detects higher moderate and severe drought frequencies than SPI-3 after 2000, revealing an intensification of evapotranspiration-driven water stress decoupled from precipitation trends—particularly in the Sudano-Sahelian zone and at the late-season scale. SPI-3 retains superior sensitivity for extreme drought detection, driven by catastrophic rainfall deficits, while SPEI-3 better captures chronic, low-intensity stress with direct implications for rainfed agriculture. The early season (MJJ) constitutes the primary locus of monsoon onset vulnerability, while the late season (ASO) experiences increasing thermal amplification of drought, particularly in the Sudanian zone. These findings underscore the diagnostic necessity of jointly using SPI-3 and SPEI-3 for drought monitoring in semi-arid West Africa, and provide a spatially differentiated evidence base for climate adaptation strategies in a country where over 80% of the population depends on rainfed agriculture.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated" xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>Meteorological Drought</kwd>
        <kwd>SPI-3/SPEI-3</kwd>
        <kwd>Seasonal Variability</kwd>
        <kwd>Evapotranspiration-Driven Water Stress</kwd>
        <kwd>Burkina Faso</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>Drought is among the most pervasive hydroclimatic hazards in the Sahel, with far-reaching consequences for agricultural productivity, food security, and socio-economic resilience [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>]. In the West African Sahel, the 1970s-1980s were marked by some of the most severe and prolonged droughts on record [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>], and the World Meteorological Organization (2021) estimated that droughts caused over USD 250 billion in global losses between 1970 and 2019, with Africa accounting for 26% of disaster-related losses during that period. While rainfall has partially recovered since the 2000s—a phenomenon documented as the Sahelian “re-greening”—rising temperatures are simultaneously intensifying potential evapotranspiration, leading to an amplification of water stress even under relatively wet conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>]. Beyond climate forcing, anthropogenic pressures—including land-use change, dam construction, and agricultural overexploitation—further exacerbate surface water depletion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]. In Burkina Faso specifically, recurrent drought years (1972-1973, 1983-1984, 1991, 2004, 2010, 2012) have triggered severe crop failures, large-scale migration, and groundwater depletion, underscoring the urgent need for robust, multi-scale drought monitoring frameworks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>].</p>
      <p>Drought is a multidimensional phenomenon typically classified into four cascading types: meteorological, agricultural, hydrological, and socio-economic [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>]<bold>-</bold>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]. Meteorological drought—driven by precipitation deficits—is the primary trigger, propagating to soil moisture depletion (agricultural drought), then to reduced streamflow and reservoir levels (hydrological drought), and ultimately to societal water shortages [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>]. Characterizing drought across these dimensions requires the use of standardized indices that quantify severity, duration, and spatial extent [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]<bold>-</bold>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>]. Among the most widely applied, the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>] captures precipitation anomalies at multiple timescales, while the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>] extends this framework by incorporating the thermal component through potential evapotranspiration (PET). The joint use of both indices is particularly valuable in contexts of climate warming, where the SPI-SPEI divergence can reveal the increasing role of evaporative demand in controlling drought severity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>].</p>
      <p>Several studies have investigated drought variability in Burkina Faso and the broader Sahel using standardized indices. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>] analyzed surface water dynamics in the Nakanbé-Mané basin (2000-2020) using SPI and remote sensing indices, revealing a significant declining trend in water surfaces linked to recurrent droughts. At the basin scale, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>] examined the propagation from meteorological to hydrological drought in the Nakanbé River upstream of Wayen (1971-2014), showing that SPI and SPEI at 12-month timescales best predict streamflow anomalies. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>]<bold>-</bold>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>] further attributed runoff changes in the Sahelian Nakanbé to the combined effects of climate variability and land degradation. At the regional Sahel scale [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>] identified three distinct drought-prone clusters using SHAP-driven machine learning applied to SPEI-12, highlighting the dominant role of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) in shaping drought dynamics. Despite these advances, several gaps remain. Most Burkina Faso studies do not extend beyond 2014, leaving the 2015-2021 period—characterized by marked hydroclimatic shifts—poorly documented.</p>
      <p>This study addresses these gaps by pursuing three complementary objectives: 1) characterizing the spatio-temporal variability of historical meteorological droughts (1981-2021) across nine synoptic stations representative of Burkina Faso’s three climatic zones (Sahelian, Sudano-Sahelian, and Sudanian), using the SPI-3 and SPEI-3 indices computed from ANAM in situ data and CHIRPS reanalysis; 2) detecting structural change points and monotonic trends in drought dynamics using the Pettitt test, the modified Mann-Kendall test, and Sen’s slope estimator.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec2">
      <title>2. Materials and Methods</title>
      <sec id="sec2dot1">
        <title>2.1. Study Area and Datasets</title>
        <p>Burkina Faso is a landlocked country in West Africa, located in the Sahel region. It has a population of approximately 20 million inhabitants. The country extends from 9.25˚N to 15.01˚N in latitude and from 2.22˚E to 5.32˚W in longitude, with its northern part lying within the Sahelian zone of West Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>]. Burkina Faso covers 274,200 km<sup>2</sup> and is characterized by generally flat topography, consisting predominantly of a savanna plateau with elevations ranging from 250 to 400 m (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Rainfall distribution varies across climatic zones, with annual totals ranging from 500 to 800 mm in the semi-arid north and from 900 to 1200 mm in the tropical savanna regions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>]. Burkina Faso experiences two well-defined seasons: a rainy season extending from early June to late September, and a dry season covering the remainder of the year. </p>
        <p>In this study, in situ daily raw records of precipitation and potential evapotranspiration (PET) for the synoptic stations were obtained from ANAM and cover the same historical period (1981-2021). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> illustrates the different climatic zones and the locations of the ten synoptic stations of Burkina Faso. However, only nine stations, excluding Bogandé, were retained for the subsequent analyses. Indeed, as documented by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>], Bogandé exhibited substantially higher missing-data rates than the other stations, notably with more than 40% missing values for potential evapotranspiration, whereas missingness for the key variables considered here, particularly precipitation and potential evapotranspiration, remained </p>
        <fig id="fig1">
          <label>Figure 1</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4701436-rId23.jpeg?20260729014205" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 1.</bold> Topography, station network, and climatic zonation of Burkina Faso. Elevation is derived from a digital elevation model (DEM). The nine ANAM synoptic stations analyzed in this study are indicated by filled symbols. Mean annual rainfall isohyets for 1981-2021 (600 and 900 mm/year, based on CHIRPS v2.0) delimit the three climatic zones: Sahelian (&lt;600 mm/year), Sudano-Sahelian (600 - 900 mm/year), and Sudanian (&gt;900 mm/year).</p>
        <p>generally low to negligible at the retained stations: missing values for precipitation remained negligible at all retained stations, not exceeding 0.5% in any case, and PET missingness was similarly low, generally below 1.5%, with the sole exception of Pô where it reached 8.1%. These levels of missingness are insufficient to compromise the computation of long-term drought indices over a 41-year record. </p>
        <p>Furthermore, a preliminary homogeneity assessment conducted by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>] revealed that precipitation exhibits statistically significant breakpoints at only three stations (Ouagadougou, Dédougou, and Ouahigouya), with break years ranging between 1996 and 2007; these discontinuities may partly reflect genuine hydroclimatic shifts rather than purely instrumental artefacts, given the well-documented post-1990s rainfall recovery across the Sahel. PET breakpoints, detected at six stations, are more likely to reflect the compound effect of changes in its constituent meteorological variables—temperature, humidity, and wind speed—rather than independent instrumental discontinuities, and are therefore not expected to introduce systematic bias into the SPEI-3 computations.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot2">
        <title>2.2. Computation of SPI and SPEI Indices</title>
        <p>2.2.1. Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI)</p>
        <p>The SPI was introduced by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>] to quantify precipitation anomalies at multiple timescales. Its widespread adoption stems from its computational transparency, its reliance on a single variable (precipitation), and its ability to characterize both drought onset and termination. In this study, SPI-3 is computed from monthly in situ precipitation records (1981-2021) provided by ANAM, covering the nine synoptic stations. The 41-year baseline (1981-2021) exceeds the 30-year minimum recommended for robust parameter estimation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>].</p>
        <p>The SPI is derived through a four-step procedure that transforms raw precipitation accumulations into standardized normal deviates via a gamma probability distribution, as detailed below.</p>
        <p><bold>Fitting</bold><bold>the</bold><bold>gamma</bold><bold>distribution</bold></p>
        <p>Monthly precipitation accumulations <italic>u</italic> &gt; 0 at each station and timescale <italic>k</italic> are fitted to the two-parameter Gamma distribution, whose probability density function (PDF) is:</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD1">
          <label>(1)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mfrac>
                <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:msup>
                    <mml:mi>β</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mi>α</mml:mi>
                  </mml:msup>
                  <mml:mi>Γ</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mi>α</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
                  </mml:mrow>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mfrac>
              <mml:msup>
                <mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>α</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:msup>
              <mml:mi>exp</mml:mi>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mi>β</mml:mi>
                  </mml:mrow>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>where <italic>α</italic> &gt; 0 is the shape parameter, <italic>β</italic> &gt; 0 the scale parameter, <italic>u</italic> the precipitation amount, and Γ(<italic>α</italic>) the Gamma function:</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD2">
          <label>(2)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>Γ</mml:mi>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mi>α</mml:mi>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:munderover>
                    <mml:mo>∫</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
                    <mml:mi>∞</mml:mi>
                  </mml:munderover>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:msup>
                      <mml:mi>ν</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mrow>
                        <mml:mi>α</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                        <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                      </mml:mrow>
                    </mml:msup>
                  </mml:mrow>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mstyle>
              <mml:mi>exp</mml:mi>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mi>ν</mml:mi>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext>
              <mml:mi>ν</mml:mi>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>Parameters <italic>α</italic> and <italic>β</italic> are estimated using the maximum likelihood approximation proposed by Thom [1966]:</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD3">
          <label>(3)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>α</mml:mi>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mfrac>
                <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
                  <mml:mi>X</mml:mi>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mfrac>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                  <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                  <mml:msqrt>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                      <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                      <mml:mfrac>
                        <mml:mrow>
                          <mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
                          <mml:mi>X</mml:mi>
                        </mml:mrow>
                        <mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
                      </mml:mfrac>
                    </mml:mrow>
                  </mml:msqrt>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <disp-formula id="FD4">
          <label>(4)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>β</mml:mi>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mfrac>
                <mml:mover accent="true">
                  <mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo>
                </mml:mover>
                <mml:mi>α</mml:mi>
              </mml:mfrac>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <disp-formula id="FD5">
          <label>(5)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>X</mml:mi>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mi>ln</mml:mi>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mover accent="true">
                  <mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo>
                </mml:mover>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
              <mml:mfrac>
                <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                <mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
              </mml:mfrac>
              <mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
                <mml:msub>
                  <mml:mo>∑</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
                </mml:msub>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>ln</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:msub>
                        <mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
                      </mml:msub>
                    </mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
                  </mml:mrow>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mstyle>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi> u </mml:mi><mml:mo> ¯ </mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is the sample mean precipitation and <italic>n</italic> the number of non-zero observations.</p>
        <p><bold>Cumulative</bold><bold>distribution</bold><bold>function</bold><bold>(CDF)</bold></p>
        <p>The CDF of the fitted Gamma distribution is:</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD6">
          <label>(6)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>G</mml:mi>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:munderover>
                    <mml:mo>∫</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
                    <mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
                  </mml:munderover>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                      <mml:mrow>
                        <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mo>;</mml:mo>
                        <mml:mi>α</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
                        <mml:mi>β</mml:mi>
                      </mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
                    </mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext>
                    <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                  </mml:mrow>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mstyle>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>Because the Gamma distribution is undefined at <italic>u</italic> = 0, and precipitation can be zero, the CDF is adjusted to account for the probability <italic>p</italic> = <italic>P</italic>(<italic>u</italic> = 0) of zero precipitation:</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD7">
          <label>(7)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
              <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>G</mml:mi>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p><bold>Normal</bold><bold>quantile</bold><bold>transformation</bold><bold>(SPI</bold><bold>value)</bold></p>
        <p>The SPI value is obtained by transforming <italic>H</italic>(<italic>u</italic>) into the corresponding quantile of the standard normal distribution N(0, 1), using the rational approximation of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>]:</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD8">
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mtext>SPI</mml:mtext>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mfrac>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:msub>
                        <mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
                      </mml:msub>
                      <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                      <mml:msub>
                        <mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                      </mml:msub>
                      <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                      <mml:msub>
                        <mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                      </mml:msub>
                      <mml:msup>
                        <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                      </mml:msup>
                    </mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                      <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                      <mml:msub>
                        <mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                      </mml:msub>
                      <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                      <mml:msub>
                        <mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                      </mml:msub>
                      <mml:msup>
                        <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                      </mml:msup>
                      <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                      <mml:msub>
                        <mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
                      </mml:msub>
                      <mml:msup>
                        <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
                      </mml:msup>
                    </mml:mrow>
                  </mml:mfrac>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <disp-formula id="FD9">
          <label>(8)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
              <mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo>
              <mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>≤</mml:mo>
              <mml:mn>0.50</mml:mn>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <disp-formula id="FD10">
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mtext>SPI</mml:mtext>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mfrac>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:msub>
                        <mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
                      </mml:msub>
                      <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                      <mml:msub>
                        <mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                      </mml:msub>
                      <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                      <mml:msub>
                        <mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                      </mml:msub>
                      <mml:msup>
                        <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                      </mml:msup>
                    </mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                      <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                      <mml:msub>
                        <mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                      </mml:msub>
                      <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                      <mml:msub>
                        <mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                      </mml:msub>
                      <mml:msup>
                        <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                      </mml:msup>
                      <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                      <mml:msub>
                        <mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
                      </mml:msub>
                      <mml:msup>
                        <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
                      </mml:msup>
                    </mml:mrow>
                  </mml:mfrac>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <disp-formula id="FD11">
          <label>(9)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn>
              <mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo>
              <mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>≤</mml:mo>
              <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>The rational approximation constants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>] are:</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD12">
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mtable columnalign="left">
              <mml:mtr>
                <mml:mtd>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
                  </mml:msub>
                  <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>2.515517</mml:mn>
                  <mml:mo>;</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mtext>
                     
                  </mml:mtext>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                  </mml:msub>
                  <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>0.802853</mml:mn>
                  <mml:mo>;</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mtext>
                     
                  </mml:mtext>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                  </mml:msub>
                  <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>0.010328</mml:mn>
                  <mml:mo>;</mml:mo>
                </mml:mtd>
              </mml:mtr>
              <mml:mtr>
                <mml:mtd>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                  </mml:msub>
                  <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>1.432788</mml:mn>
                  <mml:mo>;</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mtext>
                     
                  </mml:mtext>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                  </mml:msub>
                  <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>0.189269</mml:mn>
                  <mml:mo>;</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mtext>
                     
                  </mml:mtext>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
                  </mml:msub>
                  <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>0.001308.</mml:mn>
                </mml:mtd>
              </mml:mtr>
            </mml:mtable>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>By construction, SPI ~ N(0, 1): positive values indicate above-average precipitation, negative values indicate deficit. The timescale <italic>k</italic> (here <italic>k</italic><italic>=</italic><italic>3</italic> months) determines the accumulation window: SPI-3 for May-June-July (MJJ) reflects early-season moisture availability, while SPI-3 for August-September-October (ASO) captures the core of the rainy season.</p>
        <p>2.2.2. Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI)</p>
        <p>The SPEI [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>] extends the SPI by incorporating the climatic water balance, making it sensitive to both precipitation deficits and thermally driven evaporative demand. It is particularly well-suited for detecting the thermal amplification of drought under climate warming [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>]. The SPEI is derived from the monthly climatic water balance <italic>D</italic><italic><sub>i</sub></italic> and fitted to a three-parameter log-logistic distribution, as described below.</p>
        <p><bold>Monthly</bold><bold>climatic</bold><bold>water</bold><bold>balance</bold></p>
        <disp-formula id="FD13">
          <label>(10)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:msub>
                <mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
                <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
              </mml:msub>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:msub>
                <mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
                <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
              </mml:msub>
              <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
              <mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
              <mml:msub>
                <mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
                <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
              </mml:msub>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>where <italic>P</italic><italic><sub>i</sub></italic> is precipitation (mm) and <italic>PET</italic><italic><sub>i</sub></italic> is potential evapotranspiration (mm) for month <italic>i</italic><italic>.</italic></p>
        <p><bold>Temporal</bold><bold>aggregation</bold><bold>at</bold><bold>timescale</bold><italic><bold>k</bold></italic></p>
        <disp-formula id="FD14">
          <label>(11)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:msubsup>
                <mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
                <mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
                <mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
              </mml:msubsup>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
                <mml:msubsup>
                  <mml:mo>∑</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
                  </mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                  </mml:mrow>
                </mml:msubsup>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                      <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                    </mml:mrow>
                  </mml:msub>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mstyle>
              <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
              <mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
              <mml:msub>
                <mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:msub>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>where <italic>k</italic> is the accumulation timescale (here <italic>k</italic> = 3 months) and <italic>n</italic> the reference month.</p>
        <p><bold>Fitting</bold><bold>the</bold><bold>log-logistic</bold><bold>distribution</bold></p>
        <p>The <italic>D</italic> series is fitted to the three-parameter log-logistic distribution, whose PDF and CDF are:</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD15">
          <label>(12)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mfrac>
                <mml:mi>β</mml:mi>
                <mml:mi>α</mml:mi>
              </mml:mfrac>
              <mml:msup>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mfrac>
                        <mml:mrow>
                          <mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
                          <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                          <mml:mi>γ</mml:mi>
                        </mml:mrow>
                        <mml:mi>α</mml:mi>
                      </mml:mfrac>
                    </mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
                  </mml:mrow>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>β</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:msup>
              <mml:msup>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>[</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                      <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                      <mml:msup>
                        <mml:mrow>
                          <mml:mrow>
                            <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                            <mml:mrow>
                              <mml:mfrac>
                                <mml:mrow>
                                  <mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
                                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                                  <mml:mi>γ</mml:mi>
                                </mml:mrow>
                                <mml:mi>α</mml:mi>
                              </mml:mfrac>
                            </mml:mrow>
                            <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
                          </mml:mrow>
                        </mml:mrow>
                        <mml:mrow>
                          <mml:mi>β</mml:mi>
                          <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                          <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                        </mml:mrow>
                      </mml:msup>
                    </mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>]</mml:mo>
                  </mml:mrow>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:msup>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <disp-formula id="FD16">
          <label>(13)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>F</mml:mi>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:msup>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>[</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                      <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                      <mml:mrow>
                        <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                        <mml:mrow>
                          <mml:mfrac>
                            <mml:mi>α</mml:mi>
                            <mml:mrow>
                              <mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
                              <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                              <mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
                            </mml:mrow>
                          </mml:mfrac>
                        </mml:mrow>
                        <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
                      </mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mi>β</mml:mi>
                    </mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>]</mml:mo>
                  </mml:mrow>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:msup>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>The three parameters <italic>α</italic> (scale), <italic>β</italic> (shape), and <italic>γ</italic> (location, lower bound of <italic>D</italic>) are estimated by the L-moments method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>].</p>
        <p><bold>Normal</bold><bold>quantile</bold><bold>transformation</bold><bold>(SPEI</bold><bold>value)</bold></p>
        <p>The exceedance probability <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi> p </mml:mi><mml:mo> = </mml:mo><mml:mn> 1 </mml:mn><mml:mo> − </mml:mo><mml:mi> F </mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo> ( </mml:mo><mml:mi> x </mml:mi><mml:mo> ) </mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is transformed into the SPEI using the same rational approximation as for the SPI:</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD17">
          <label>(14)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mtext>SPEI</mml:mtext>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
              <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
              <mml:mfrac>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
                  </mml:msub>
                  <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                  </mml:msub>
                  <mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                  </mml:msub>
                  <mml:msup>
                    <mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                  </mml:msup>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                  <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                  </mml:msub>
                  <mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                  </mml:msub>
                  <mml:msup>
                    <mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                  </mml:msup>
                  <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
                  </mml:msub>
                  <mml:msup>
                    <mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
                  </mml:msup>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mfrac>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi> W </mml:mi><mml:mo> = </mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mo> − </mml:mo><mml:mn> 2 </mml:mn><mml:mi> ln </mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo> ( </mml:mo><mml:mi> P </mml:mi><mml:mo> ) </mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi> p </mml:mi><mml:mo> ≤ </mml:mo><mml:mn> 0.5 </mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> . If <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi> p </mml:mi><mml:mo> &gt; </mml:mo><mml:mn> 0.5 </mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> , <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi> p </mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is replaced by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn> 1 </mml:mn><mml:mo> − </mml:mo><mml:mi> P </mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the sign of SPEI is reversed. Constants <italic>C</italic><sub>0</sub>, …, <italic>d</italic><sub>3</sub> are identical to those in Equations (8) - (9).</p>
        <p>Positive SPEI values denote wetter-than-average conditions; negative values indicate water deficit. The SPI-SPEI divergence—<italic>i.e.</italic>, cases where SPI ≥ 0 but SPEI &lt; 0—signals drought driven predominantly by evaporative demand rather than precipitation deficit, a signature of thermally amplified drought [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>].</p>
        <p>SPI and SPEI values were computed in Python using the <italic>spei</italic> package [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>], which implements the gamma and log-logistic distribution fitting procedures and normal quantile transformations described in. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>], respectively.</p>
        <p>2.2.3. Drought Classification Criteria</p>
        <p>After computing the SPI and SPEI indices, the resulting values must be converted into discrete drought classes to allow meaningful interpretation. By conventional definition, a drought is considered to begin when the SPI/SPEI value falls below or equals −1, and it ends when the value returns to positive. Consequently, positive SPI/SPEI values indicate wet conditions, while negative values indicate dry conditions. In the present study, we adopt the classification thresholds presented in <bold>Table 1</bold>, which are based on the scheme proposed by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>]. This approach refines the traditional SPI/SPEI categories (e.g., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>]) by distinguishing moderately, severely, and extremely wet or dry conditions within a symmetric range of standardized index values, thereby providing a more nuanced framework for interpreting drought intensity.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec3">
      <title>
        Table 1. SPI/SPEI drought and wet classification thresholds [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>
        ].
      </title>
      <table-wrap id="tbl1">
        <label>Table 1</label>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>SPI/SPEI</bold>
                <bold>threshold</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Drought/wet</bold>
                <bold>category</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>SPI/SPEI &gt; 1.83</td>
              <td>Extremely wet</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>1.43 &lt; SPI/SPEI ≤ 1.83</td>
              <td>Severely wet</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>1.00 &lt; SPI/SPEI ≤ 1.43</td>
              <td>Moderately wet</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>−1.00 ≤ SPI/SPEI ≤ 1.00</td>
              <td>Near normal</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>−1.43 ≤ SPI/SPEI &lt; −1.00</td>
              <td>Moderate drought</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>−1.83 ≤ SPI/SPEI &lt; −1.43</td>
              <td>Severe drought</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>SPI/SPEI &lt; −1.83</td>
              <td>Extreme drought</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p>Once computed, SPI and SPEI values are classified into discrete drought or wet categories using the thresholds of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>], presented in <bold>Table 1</bold>. A drought episode is conventionally defined as beginning when SPI/SPEI ≤ <bold>−</bold>1.00 and ending when the index returns to positive values [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>]. This seven-class scheme refines the original [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>] classification by explicitly distinguishing moderate, severe, and extreme conditions in both the wet and dry regimes, providing a symmetric and more nuanced framework for interpreting drought intensity.</p>
      <sec id="sec3dot1">
        <title>2.3. Trend Analysis and Change Point Detection</title>
        <p>Long-term monotonic trends in the seasonal SPI-3 and SPEI-3 series (MJJ and ASO) were assessed using the modified Mann-Kendall test proposed by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>], which corrects the original Mann-Kendall statistic for the inflation of variance caused by positive serial autocorrelation—a systematic feature of 3-month accumulation indices such as SPI-3 and SPEI-3, where successive seasonal windows overlap and are therefore not independently distributed. Applying the original Mann-Kendall test [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>] to autocorrelated series inflates the test statistic and increases the probability of spurious trend detection (Type I error); the Hamed-Rao correction adjusts the variance of S by a factor derived from the rank-based autocorrelation structure of the series, restoring the nominal significance level.</p>
        <p>The Mann-Kendall statistic <italic>S</italic> is defined as:</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD18">
          <label>(15)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
                <mml:munderover>
                  <mml:mo>∑</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                  </mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                  </mml:mrow>
                </mml:munderover>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
                    <mml:munderover>
                      <mml:mo>∑</mml:mo>
                      <mml:mrow>
                        <mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
                        <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                        <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                      </mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
                    </mml:munderover>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mi>sgn</mml:mi>
                    </mml:mrow>
                  </mml:mstyle>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mstyle>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
                  </mml:msub>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
                  </mml:msub>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>where sgn(<italic>X</italic>) = 1 if <italic>X</italic> &gt; 0, 0 if <italic>X</italic> = 0, and <bold>−</bold>1 if <italic>X</italic> &lt; 0.</p>
        <p>The standardized test statistic <italic>Z</italic> is computed as:</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD19">
          <label>(16)</label>
          <mml:math>
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>Z</mml:mi>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>{</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mtable columnalign="left">
                    <mml:mtr columnalign="left">
                      <mml:mtd columnalign="left">
                        <mml:mrow>
                          <mml:mfrac>
                            <mml:mrow>
                              <mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
                              <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                              <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                            </mml:mrow>
                            <mml:mrow>
                              <mml:msqrt>
                                <mml:mrow>
                                  <mml:msup>
                                    <mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
                                    <mml:mo>*</mml:mo>
                                  </mml:msup>
                                  <mml:mrow>
                                    <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                                    <mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
                                    <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
                                  </mml:mrow>
                                </mml:mrow>
                              </mml:msqrt>
                            </mml:mrow>
                          </mml:mfrac>
                        </mml:mrow>
                      </mml:mtd>
                      <mml:mtd columnalign="left">
                        <mml:mrow>
                          <mml:mtext>if</mml:mtext>
                        </mml:mrow>
                      </mml:mtd>
                      <mml:mtd columnalign="left">
                        <mml:mrow>
                          <mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
                          <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo>
                          <mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
                        </mml:mrow>
                      </mml:mtd>
                    </mml:mtr>
                    <mml:mtr columnalign="left">
                      <mml:mtd columnalign="left">
                        <mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
                      </mml:mtd>
                      <mml:mtd columnalign="left">
                        <mml:mrow>
                          <mml:mtext>if</mml:mtext>
                        </mml:mrow>
                      </mml:mtd>
                      <mml:mtd columnalign="left">
                        <mml:mrow>
                          <mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
                          <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
                          <mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
                        </mml:mrow>
                      </mml:mtd>
                    </mml:mtr>
                    <mml:mtr columnalign="left">
                      <mml:mtd columnalign="left">
                        <mml:mrow>
                          <mml:mfrac>
                            <mml:mrow>
                              <mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
                              <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                              <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                            </mml:mrow>
                            <mml:mrow>
                              <mml:msqrt>
                                <mml:mrow>
                                  <mml:msup>
                                    <mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
                                    <mml:mo>*</mml:mo>
                                  </mml:msup>
                                  <mml:mrow>
                                    <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                                    <mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
                                    <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
                                  </mml:mrow>
                                </mml:mrow>
                              </mml:msqrt>
                            </mml:mrow>
                          </mml:mfrac>
                        </mml:mrow>
                      </mml:mtd>
                      <mml:mtd columnalign="left">
                        <mml:mrow>
                          <mml:mtext>if</mml:mtext>
                        </mml:mrow>
                      </mml:mtd>
                      <mml:mtd columnalign="left">
                        <mml:mrow>
                          <mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
                          <mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo>
                          <mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
                        </mml:mrow>
                      </mml:mtd>
                    </mml:mtr>
                  </mml:mtable>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mrow>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>where <inline-formula><mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi> V </mml:mi><mml:mo> * </mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo> ( </mml:mo><mml:mi> S </mml:mi><mml:mo> ) </mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the autocorrelation-corrected variance of <italic>S</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>]. A positive <italic>Z</italic> indicates an increasing trend and a negative <italic>Z</italic> a decreasing trend; trends are considered significant at p &lt; 0.05 (|<italic>Z</italic>| &gt; 1.96). The magnitude of the trend was estimated using Sen’s non-parametric slope estimator [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>] expressed in index units per decade:</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD20">
          <label>(17)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>β</mml:mi>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mtext>median</mml:mtext>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mfrac>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:msub>
                        <mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
                      </mml:msub>
                      <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                      <mml:msub>
                        <mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
                      </mml:msub>
                    </mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                      <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
                    </mml:mrow>
                  </mml:mfrac>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
              <mml:mo>∀</mml:mo>
              <mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
              <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo>
              <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>Structural change points in the seasonal series were identified using the non-parametric Pettitt test [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>], which detects a single abrupt shift in the mean of a series without requiring any assumption on the distributional form. The Pettitt statistic is:</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD21">
          <label>(18)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:msub>
                <mml:mi>K</mml:mi>
                <mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
              </mml:msub>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:munder>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>max</mml:mi>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                  <mml:mo>≤</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mo>≤</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:munder>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>|</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>U</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
                      <mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
                    </mml:mrow>
                  </mml:msub>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>|</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
              <mml:msub>
                <mml:mi>U</mml:mi>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:msub>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
                <mml:munderover>
                  <mml:mo>∑</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                  </mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                </mml:munderover>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
                    <mml:munderover>
                      <mml:mo>∑</mml:mo>
                      <mml:mrow>
                        <mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
                        <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                        <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                      </mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
                    </mml:munderover>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mi>sgn</mml:mi>
                    </mml:mrow>
                  </mml:mstyle>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mstyle>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
                  </mml:msub>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
                  </mml:msub>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>The approximate probability of a significant change point is given by</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD22">
          <label>(19)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
              <mml:mo>≈</mml:mo>
              <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
              <mml:mi>exp</mml:mi>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mn>6</mml:mn>
                      <mml:mi>K</mml:mi>
                      <mml:msup>
                        <mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                      </mml:msup>
                    </mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mrow>
                        <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                        <mml:mrow>
                          <mml:msup>
                            <mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
                            <mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
                          </mml:msup>
                          <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                          <mml:msup>
                            <mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
                            <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                          </mml:msup>
                        </mml:mrow>
                        <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
                      </mml:mrow>
                    </mml:mrow>
                  </mml:mrow>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>Change points with p &lt; 0.05 are reported as significant.</p>
        <p>All tests were implemented in Python using the pymannkendall [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>] and pyhomogeneity packages on annual MJJ and ASO index values. For a comprehensive treatment of these methods in hydroclimatological applications, the reader is referred to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>].</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec4">
      <title>3. Results and Discussions</title>
      <sec id="sec4dot1">
        <title>3.1. Monthly Drought Dynamics: SPI-3 and SPEI-3 Temporal Evolution (1981-2021)</title>
        <p>The monthly time series of SPI-3 and SPEI-3 show in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> provide a continuous view of drought onset, duration, and cessation at each of the nine synoptic stations across the three climatic zones of Burkina Faso. Three agronomically relevant features emerge from this temporal perspective.</p>
        <p>Across all zones, the early period (1981-1990) is marked by sustained sequences of negative anomalies frequently breaching the severe (≤−1.43) and extreme (≤−1.83) drought thresholds, with the Sahelian stations (Ouahigouya, Dori) and the Sudano-Sahelian stations (Dédougou, Fada Ngourma) displaying the longest consecutive dry spells. The SPEI-3 signal is generally more intense than SPI-3 during this phase at Dori and Boromo, indicating that elevated evaporative demand compounded rainfall deficits even during the most drought-affected decade. From 1991 onward, both indices shift predominantly toward near-normal to positive values, reflecting the partial rainfall recovery documented across the Sahel, though isolated threshold-crossing events persist at all stations. After 2000, episodes where SPEI-3 crosses the severe drought threshold while SPI-3 remains near-normal become increasingly visible, particularly in the Sudano-Sahelian zone (Ouagadougou, Dédougou), confirming a growing decoupling between precipitation deficits and evapotranspiration-driven water stress with direct consequences for rainfed agriculture. The post-2015 period is further characterized by a marked increase in the frequency and amplitude of threshold-crossing events in both directions at all stations, consistent with the intensification of interannual hydroclimatic variability discussed in Section below.</p>
        <p>To complement this monthly perspective and identify the dominant drought years at the seasonal scale, we next examine SPI-3 and SPEI-3 drought categories aggregated over the early rainy season (MJJ: May-June-July) and the late rainy season (ASO: August-September-October).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot2">
        <title>3.2. Seasonal Drought Variability during the Early and Late Rainy Season (1981-2021)</title>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> presents the spatio-temporal variability of SPI-3 and SPEI-3 drought categories at nine synoptic stations in Burkina Faso for the early rainy season (MJJ: May-June-July) and the late rainy season (ASO: August-September-October) over the period 1981-2021. Stations are grouped according to the three climatic zones delineated by the 600 and 900 mm/year mean annual rainfall isohyets (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>): the Sahelian zone (Ouahigouya, Dori), the Sudano-Sahelian zone (Ouagadougou, Dédougou, Boromo, Fada Ngourma), and the Sudanian zone (Bobo-Dioulasso, Gaoua, Pô). Three distinct temporal phases emerge from the heatmaps, each reflecting a different interplay between rainfall variability, evaporative demand, and climatic zone.</p>
        <fig id="fig2">
          <label>Figure 2</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4701436-rId88.jpeg?20260729014213" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 2.</bold> Monthly time series of SPI-3 (left panels) and SPEI-3 (right panels) at nine synoptic stations in Burkina Faso over the period 1981-2021. Positive values (blue) indicate wetter-than-normal conditions; negative values (red) indicate drier-than-normal conditions. Dashed lines mark the severe drought threshold (SPI-3/SPEI-3 ≤ −1.5, orange) and the extreme drought threshold (SPI-3/SPEI-3 ≤ −2.0, red), following the classification of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>].</p>
        <fig id="fig3">
          <label>Figure 3</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4701436-rId89.jpeg?20260729014213" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 3.</bold> Spatio-temporal variability of meteorological drought at nine synoptic stations in Burkina Faso (1981-2021): SPI-3 and SPEI-3 drought categories for the early rainy season (MJJ: May-June-July) and the late rainy season (ASO: August-September-October).</p>
        <p>3.2.1. Early Period (1981-1990): Widespread Drought Dominance with a Northward Amplification</p>
        <p>The first decade is characterized by a marked concentration of severe and extreme drought events across all three climatic zones, with the most persistent and intense signal observed in the Sahelian zone. Ouahigouya recorded extreme drought conditions in both MJJ (SPI-3 = <bold>−</bold>2.11 in 1982; <bold>−</bold>2.08 in 1983) and ASO (SPI-3 = <bold>−</bold>1.99 in 1982; <bold>−</bold>2.05 in 1983), while Dori exhibited extreme drought in MJJ 1984 (SPI-3 = <bold>−</bold>2.42) and a severe drought in ASO 1987 (SPI-3 = <bold>−</bold>2.65). These values reflect the persistence of the pan-Sahelian dry anomaly documented across West Africa during this period [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>]. In the Sudano-Sahelian zone, Fada Ngourma recorded extreme drought in MJJ 1990 and in ASO 1981 (SPI-3 = <bold>−</bold>2.40), and Dédougou in MJJ 1989 (SPI-3 = <bold>−</bold>2.06) and ASO 1981 (SPI-3 = <bold>−</bold>2.41) and 1984 (SPI-3 = <bold>−</bold>1.87). The Sudanian zone was not exempt: Pô experienced extreme drought in ASO 1981 (SPI-3 = <bold>−</bold>2.65) and Bobo-Dioulasso in MJJ 1989 (SPI-3 = <bold>−</bold>2.03), indicating that this early drought episode was spatially coherent across the entire national territory. Crucially, SPI-3 and SPEI-3 signals are broadly consistent during this phase, confirming that the drought was primarily driven by rainfall deficits rather than by elevated evaporative demand, regardless of climatic zone.</p>
        <p>3.2.2. Transitional Period (1991-2010): Attenuation, Partial Recovery, and Emerging Zone-Specific Divergences</p>
        <p>Following 1990, the heatmaps show a widespread shift toward near-normal conditions across all zones and both seasons, consistent with the documented partial recovery of Sahelian rainfall referred to as the “Sahel greening” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>]. In the Sahelian zone, isolated but marked positive anomalies re-emerge, most notably at Dori in MJJ 2005 (SPI-3 = +2.26, extremely wet), signaling the return of episodic intense rainfall events. In the Sudano-Sahelian zone, Fada Ngourma recorded an extremely wet ASO in 1994 (SPI-3 = +2.33), while Boromo presents a strikingly uniform near-normal signal throughout ASO for the entire study period, likely reflecting its central geographic position and exposure to a broader range of mesoscale convective systems that tend to dampen seasonal extremes. In the Sudanian zone, conditions remained predominantly near-normal during this phase, with occasional moderately wet years at Gaoua and Pô. However, this transitional period reveals an important zone-specific divergence between SPI-3 and SPEI-3: in the Sudano-Sahelian zone, SPEI-3 flags severe drought conditions at Ouagadougou in MJJ 1996-1998 and extreme drought in MJJ 2006-2007, while SPI-3 remains near-normal for the same years. Similarly, Dédougou shows severe drought in SPEI-3 for MJJ 1996 and 2015 where SPI-3 is near-normal. These discrepancies indicate that rainfall amounts were not markedly deficient during these episodes, but that increased evapotranspiration demand—consistent with rising temperatures in the Sudano-Sahelian belt—amplified the hydrological stress beyond what precipitation alone would suggest. This finding underlines the added diagnostic value of the SPEI over the SPI under warming conditions, as previously noted by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>].</p>
        <p>3.2.3. Recent Period (2015-2021): Intensification of Extremes and Increased Cross-Zone Synchronicity</p>
        <p>The most recent years reveal a notable increase in interannual variability amplitude across all three climatic zones, with extreme events of both signs occurring in close succession and often simultaneously across zones. On the wet side, 2016 stands out as an exceptional year: extremely wet conditions were simultaneously recorded in the Sahelian zone (Ouahigouya, SPI-3 MJJ = +2.06), the Sudano-Sahelian zone (Boromo, SPI-3 MJJ = +2.12), and the Sudanian zone (Gaoua, SPI-3 MJJ = +2.11; Pô, SPI-3 MJJ = +1.87), indicating a country-wide pluviometric surplus. In ASO, this synchronicity is equally visible in 2020, with extremely wet conditions recorded at Dori (Sahelian, SPI-3 = +2.47) and Ouagadougou (Sudano-Sahelian, SPI-3 = +1.85). On the dry side, contrasting signals emerge: Bobo-Dioulasso (Sudanian zone) experienced extreme drought in ASO 2017 under both indices (SPI-3 = <bold>−</bold>2.24; SPEI-3 = <bold>−</bold>2.23), while Fada Ngourma (Sudano-Sahelian) recorded extreme drought under SPEI-3 MJJ 2015 (<bold>−</bold>2.22) with SPI-3 near-normal, again pointing to an evapotranspiration-driven drought component in the central zone. This alternation between severe dry and wet extremes within short time windows across all zones is consistent with the intensification of rainfall variability projected under climate change scenarios for the West African Sahel [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>], and represents a critical challenge for water resource management and agricultural planning in Burkina Faso.</p>
        <p>3.2.4. North-South Gradient and Index Consistency</p>
        <p>Considered over the full period and both seasons, the three climatic zones exhibit a coherent latitudinal gradient in drought severity: the Sahelian zone is most frequently and most intensely affected during the early period, the Sudano-Sahelian zone shows the strongest SPI-3/SPEI-3 divergence during the transitional period, and the Sudanian zone, while less drought-prone overall, participates in the cross-zone synchronicity of recent extreme events. SPI-3 and SPEI-3 produce broadly comparable drought classifications throughout, reinforcing diagnostic reliability. Where discrepancies occur, they are systematically oriented toward more intense drought classification by SPEI-3, particularly in the Sudano-Sahelian zone after 2000, supporting the hypothesis of an increasing evaporative contribution to drought severity under ongoing warming. One outlier value of SPEI-3 MJJ = <bold>−</bold>7.87 at Gaoua (Sudanian zone) in 2007 is physically implausible and likely results from a missing or erroneous PET value in the source data; this data point must be verified and masked prior to final figure production.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot3">
        <title>3.3. Drought Frequency and Mean Duration by Intensity Class</title>
        <p>The spatial contrasts in drought frequency and mean duration across intensity classes and climatic zones, as detected by both SPI-3 and SPEI-3, are synthesized in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>.</p>
        <fig id="fig4">
          <label>Figure 4</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4701436-rId90.jpeg?20260729014218" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 4.</bold> Radar charts of SPI-3 and SPEI-3 drought frequency (%, upper panels) and mean drought duration (seasonal windows, lower panels) by intensity class at nine synoptic stations in Burkina Faso over the period 1981-2021. Each axis represents one station; values are computed over the early (MJJ: May-June-July) and late (ASO: August-September-October) rainy season windows.</p>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> reveals contrasting detection patterns between SPI-3 and SPEI-3 across the three climatic zones, both in terms of frequency and episode duration.</p>
        <p>SPEI-3 systematically detects higher moderate and severe drought frequencies than SPI-3 across all zones, with the divergence most pronounced in the Sudano-Sahelian zone (Ouagadougou, Dédougou, Fada Ngourma) and, to a lesser extent, in the Sahelian zone (Dori). This pattern is scientifically consistent and well-documented in the literature. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>] demonstrated that the SPEI, by incorporating the evaporative demand through the P-PET balance, captures atmospheric water stress that is invisible to precipitation-only indices such as the SPI. Under the sustained warming observed in West Africa since the 1990s [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">38</xref>], potential evapotranspiration has increased independently of rainfall, generating moderate-to-severe hydric stress even during years of near-normal precipitation. This mechanism is particularly active in the Sudano-Sahelian zone, where temperature anomalies are amplified relative to the wetter Sudanian south [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>]. The higher SPEI-3 frequencies in these two classes are therefore not a statistical artefact but a physically grounded signal of evapotranspiration-driven agricultural drought.</p>
        <p>The pattern reverses for extreme drought: SPI-3 detects higher frequencies than SPEI-3, most visibly at Pô, Bobo-Dioulasso, and Ouahigouya. This is also consistent with known index behavior. Extreme drought events (index &lt; <bold>−</bold>1.83) are typically associated with catastrophic rainfall deficits—as observed during 1982-1984 across the Sahel—where precipitation collapse so severe that the additional evaporative signal of SPEI becomes secondary relative to the raw precipitation anomaly captured by SPI. Under such conditions, the SPI responds more sharply because the gamma distribution fitted to precipitation is more sensitive to deep left-tail events than the log-logistic distribution fitted to the P-PET balance, which integrates a smoother combined signal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">40</xref>]. This explains why SPI-3 leads in the extreme class while SPEI-3 leads in moderate and severe classes.</p>
        <p>The duration panels reveal a complementary contrast. SPI-3 produces longer mean episode durations for extreme drought, driven by the sustained multi-window Sahelian drought of 19821990 visible as the spike at Ouahigouya (∼8 seasonal windows). SPEI-3, by contrast, generates longer durations for moderate and severe classes, particularly in the Sudano-Sahelian zone, reflecting the chronic low-intensity water stress driven by rising PET that persists across multiple consecutive seasonal windows even when rainfall partially recovers. This distinction carries direct agronomic implications: SPI-3 better captures acute, catastrophic drought episodes damaging to annual crop establishment, while SPEI-3 better characterizes the chronic, cumulative water stress that progressively degrades soil moisture reserves and reduces agricultural yields over successive seasons—a process of particular concern for the smallholder farming systems of Burkina Faso [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>].</p>
        <p>In semi-arid Sahelian environments such as Burkina Faso, where rainfall variability remains the primary driver of drought but rising temperatures increasingly amplify evaporative demand, SPEI-3 is the more comprehensive and agronomically relevant indicator for frequency assessment, as it captures both precipitation deficits and evapotranspiration-driven stress that SPI-3 systematically misses, particularly for moderate and severe classes; however, SPI-3 remains the more reliable indicator for detecting extreme drought episodes, whose intensity and duration are overwhelmingly controlled by catastrophic rainfall deficits that render the evaporative component secondary—a complementarity that justifies the joint use of both indices rather than the exclusive adoption of either one.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot4">
        <title>3.4. Intra-Seasonal and Inter-Index Contrasts in Drought Occurrence across Climatic Zones</title>
        <p>The seasonal distribution of drought occurrence across intensity classes and climatic zones, as detected by SPI-3 and SPEI-3, is examined in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>. It reveals marked asymmetries between MJJ and ASO drought occurrence, between SPI-3 and SPEI-3, and across the three climatic zones, with patterns that are both scientifically coherent and agronomically significant.</p>
        <fig id="fig5">
          <label>Figure 5</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4701436-rId91.jpeg?20260729014219" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 5.</bold> Seasonal drought occurrence (%) by intensity class at nine synoptic stations in Burkina Faso (1981-2021), comparing the early rainy season (MJJ: May-June-July, blue bars) and the late rainy season (ASO: August-September-October, red bars) for SPI-3 (upper panels) and SPEI-3 (lower panels). Occurrence is computed as the percentage of seasonal windows classified as Moderate (−1.43 ≤ index &lt; −1.00), Severe (−1.83 ≤ index &lt; −1.43), or Extreme (index &lt; −1.83) drought out of 41 available observations per season and per station. Dashed vertical lines delimit the three climatic zones: Sahelian (Ouahigouya, Dori), Sudano-Sahelian (Ouagadougou, Dédougou, Boromo, Fada Ngourma), and Sudanian (Bobo-Dioulasso, Gaoua, Pô). Values above bars indicate occurrence in percent.</p>
        <p>MJJ dominance across all zones. Under SPI-3, moderate drought occurrence is systematically higher in MJJ than in ASO across the three climatic zones, with the most pronounced contrast observed in the Sudano-Sahelian zone: Boromo (12% MJJ vs 7% ASO), Fada Ngourma (12% MJJ vs 7% ASO), and Dédougou (10% MJJ vs 5% ASO). This MJJ dominance reflects the higher interannual variability of rainfall onset over Burkina Faso, where delayed or insufficient early-season rains—a recurrent feature of the West African monsoon—generate moderate water deficits that normalize by the peak of the rainy season [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>]. In the Sahelian zone, Dori shows the inverse pattern (5% MJJ vs 12% ASO under SPI-3), suggesting that in the northernmost station the late-season rainfall, which is already structurally limited, is more prone to deficits than the early season.</p>
        <p>SPEI-3 dramatically amplifies moderate drought occurrence relative to SPI-3 across all zones, confirming the evapotranspiration-driven component discussed in previous Section. The Sudano-Sahelian zone reaches 17% - 18% at Dori and Bobo-Dioulasso respectively, and the Sudanian zone shows a striking ASO dominance at Pô (5% MJJ vs 16% ASO) and Bobo-Dioulasso (13% MJJ vs 18% ASO). This ASO reversal in the Sudanian zone under SPEI-3 is physically interpretable: by August-October, the accumulated thermal energy of the rainy season drives PET to its seasonal peak, amplifying the atmospheric water demand and generating SPEI deficits even when precipitation remains adequate by SPI standards. This mechanism is consistent with findings by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>] for tropical semi-humid regions under warming conditions.</p>
        <p>Sahelian and Sudano-Sahelian concentration in MJJ. Severe drought under SPI-3 is predominantly a MJJ phenomenon in the Sahelian (Ouahigouya 5%, Dori 5%) and Sudano-Sahelian zones (Ouagadougou 5%, Dédougou 5%, Boromo 5%), with near-zero ASO occurrence except at Dori (7% ASO). Under SPEI-3, severe drought occurrence increases substantially, particularly in ASO for the Sudano-Sahelian zone (Ouagadougou 7%, Dédougou 8%, Fada Ngourma 7%) and for the Sudanian zone at Pô (10% ASO vs 5% MJJ), again reflecting the late-season evaporative amplification.</p>
        <p>For the extreme class, SPI-3 and SPEI-3 produce broadly similar occurrence values (2% - 5% range), with no systematic seasonal asymmetry across zones. This convergence is consistent with the index behavior discussed in Section 3.3: extreme drought episodes are driven by catastrophic precipitation deficits that override the differential evaporative signal, making SPI-3 and SPEI-3 equivalent detectors. The slight SPI-3 lead at Bobo-Dioulasso in MJJ (7%) and the SPEI-3 lead at Pô in ASO (5%) are the only notable exceptions, likely reflecting localized precipitation-PET interactions.</p>
        <p>Across all intensity classes, the MJJ season is the primary locus of drought occurrence under SPI-3, reflecting the sensitivity of rainfall onset to interannual variability. SPEI-3 redistributes and amplifies this signal toward ASO, particularly in the Sudanian zone, where late-season evaporative demand is highest. This seasonal asymmetry has direct implications for agricultural drought risk assessment: early-season SPI-3 deficits threaten crop establishment and germination, while late-season SPEI-3 deficits threaten grain filling and yield consolidation—two distinct vulnerability windows that require differentiated monitoring strategies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot5">
        <title>3.5. Historical Drought Trend Analysis and Change Point Detection (1981-2021)</title>
        <p>3.5.1. Long-Term Drought Trends: Mann-Kendall Test and Sen’s Slope</p>
        <p>The spatial and temporal patterns of SPI-3 and SPEI-3 trends across the nine synoptic stations are illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>. Results from the Hamed-Rao modified Mann-Kendall test [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>] reveal a predominantly positive trend in both indices over 1981-2021, indicating a general shift toward wetter seasonal conditions consistent with the post-1990s Sahelian rainfall recovery documented in the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">44</xref>]. However, the spatial coherence, seasonal asymmetry, and index-specific nature of these trends vary markedly across climatic zones.</p>
        <fig id="fig6">
          <label>Figure 6</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4701436-rId92.jpeg?20260729014220" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 6.</bold> Mann-Kendall Z-statistics for SPI-3 and SPEI-3 seasonal drought trends at nine synoptic stations in Burkina Faso (1981-2021), for the early rainy season (MJJ: May-June-July, upper panels) and the late rainy season (ASO: August-September-October, lower panels). Blue bars indicate significant increasing trends (p &lt; 0.05), red bars significant decreasing trends (p &lt; 0.05), and grey bars non-significant trends. The dashed horizontal lines mark the p = 0.05 significance threshold (|<italic>Z</italic>| = 1.96). Asterisks (*) denote statistical significance. Dashed vertical lines delimit the three climatic zones: Sahelian (Ouahigouya, Dori), Sudano-Sahelian (Ouagadougou, Dédougou, Boromo, Fada Ngourma), and Sudanian (Bobo-Dioulasso, Gaoua, Pô).</p>
        <fig id="fig7">
          <label>Figure 7</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4701436-rId93.jpeg?20260729014220" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 7.</bold> Spatial distribution of SPI-3 and SPEI-3 seasonal drought trends at nine synoptic stations in Burkina Faso (1981-2021). Blue upward triangles indicate significant increasing trends (p &lt; 0.05); red downward triangles indicate significant decreasing trends (p &lt; 0.05); grey circles indicate non-significant trends. Symbol size is proportional to the absolute value of Sen’s slope magnitude (units per decade). Values next to each station indicate Sen’s slope [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>].</p>
        <p>For Sahelian zone (Ouahigouya and Dori), both stations exhibit significant positive SPI-3 trends in both seasons. For MJJ, Ouahigouya shows the strongest signal (<italic>Z</italic> = 3.325, p = 0.0009, Sen’s slope = +0.476/decade) followed by Dori (<italic>Z</italic> = 2.707, p = 0.007, slope = +0.349/decade). In ASO, the trends remain highly significant and of comparable magnitude (Ouahigouya: <italic>Z</italic> = 3.381, p = 0.0007, slope = +0.468/decade; Dori: <italic>Z</italic> = 2.670, p = 0.008, slope = +0.259/decade). Under SPEI-3, Dori retains a significant positive trend in both MJJ (<italic>Z</italic> = 3.605, p = 0.0003, slope = +0.424/decade) and ASO (<italic>Z</italic> = 2.976, p = 0.003, slope = +0.388/decade), while Ouahigouya’s SPEI-3 MJJ trend, though positive, does not reach significance (<italic>Z</italic> = 1.718, p = 0.086), suggesting that the rainfall recovery at this station during the early season is partially offset by an increasing evaporative demand that moderates the net hydric balance improvement. Both stations show significant positive SPEI-3 trends in ASO (Ouahigouya: <italic>Z</italic> = 3.201, p = 0.001; Dori: <italic>Z</italic> = 2.976, p = 0.003), confirming a robust late-season recovery across the Sahelian zone.</p>
        <p>In the Sudano-Sahelian zone, trends vary spatially and display a pronounced seasonal asymmetry. This zone exhibits the most complex trend structure. Under SPI-3 in MJJ, Ouagadougou (<italic>Z</italic> = 2.860, p = 0.004, slope = +0.108/decade), Dédougou (<italic>Z</italic> = 3.597, p = 0.0003, slope = +0.256/decade), and Boromo (<italic>Z</italic> = 2.213, p = 0.027, slope = +0.326/decade) show significant positive trends, while Fada N’Gourma stands out as the only station with a near-zero and non-significant trend (<italic>Z</italic> = −0.194, p = 0.846, slope = <bold>−</bold>0.031/decade). In ASO under SPI-3, the trend field reorganizes: Ouagadougou becomes the strongest signal in the entire dataset (<italic>Z</italic> = 4.208, p &lt; 0.0001, slope = +0.504/decade), Fada Ngourma recovers a significant positive trend (<italic>Z</italic> = 2.684, p = 0.007, slope = +0.405/decade), while Boromo loses significance (<italic>Z</italic> = 1.101, p = 0.271), suggesting that the rainfall recovery in the western Sudano-Sahelian sector is concentrated in the late season rather than at monsoon onset.</p>
        <p>Under SPEI-3, the contrast between MJJ and ASO sharpens further. In MJJ, only Boromo retains a significant positive SPEI-3 trend (<italic>Z</italic> = 4.112, p &lt; 0.0001, slope = +0.376/decade), while Fada Ngourma registers the only significant decreasing trend in the entire dataset (<italic>Z</italic> = <bold>−</bold>2.005, p = 0.045, slope = <bold>−</bold>0.216/decade). This isolated negative SPEI-3 MJJ signal at Fada Ngourma, absent in SPI-3, indicates that at this station early-season moisture stress is increasing due to rising evapotranspiration demand even as precipitation trends remain neutral—a pattern consistent with the thermal amplification observed in the eastern Sudano-Sahelian belt under ongoing warming [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">38</xref>]. In SPEI-3 ASO, Ouagadougou (<italic>Z</italic> = 3.916, p = 0.0001), Dori (<italic>Z</italic> = 2.976), Dédougou (<italic>Z</italic> = 2.791, p = 0.005), and Fada Ngourma (Z = 2.587, p = 0.010) all show significant positive trends, underscoring that late-season hydric conditions have improved across the zone despite the early-season SPEI-3 anomaly at Fada Ngourma.</p>
        <p>Within the Sudanian zone, MJJ trends remain largely absent while ASO signals begin to emerge. The three southern stations (Bobo-Dioulasso, Gaoua, Pô) show no significant SPI-3 or SPEI-3 trend in MJJ under any index, with Z-statistics well below the ±1.96 threshold. This absence of trend at monsoon onset in the Sudanian zone contrasts sharply with the Sahelian and Sudano-Sahelian zones and may reflect the greater stability of early-season rainfall in the humid south, where interannual variability is lower and monsoon onset is less sensitive to large-scale circulation anomalies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>]. In ASO, Pô shows a significant positive SPI-3 trend (<italic>Z</italic> = 3.125, p = 0.002, slope = +0.298/decade), and Bobo-Dioulasso a strong positive SPEI-3 ASO trend (<italic>Z</italic> = 4.001, p = 0.0001, slope = +0.268/decade) without reaching significance under SPI-3 (<italic>Z</italic> = 1.674, p = 0.094)—again pointing to an evapotranspiration-mediated improvement in late-season water balance in the Sudanian zone that SPI-3 alone would underdetect.</p>
        <p>3.5.2. Structural Change Point Analysis: Pettitt Test</p>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref> presents the results of the Pettitt test applied to drought indices over the study period, revealing two distinct temporal clusters of significant change points, the annual time series with annotated change points and pre/post-rupture means for all significant cases are provided in Supplementary <bold>Figure S1</bold>.</p>
        <fig id="fig8">
          <label>Figure 8</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4701436-rId94.jpeg?20260729014221" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 8.</bold> Pettitt test change point years for SPI-3 and SPEI-3 seasonal drought series at nine synoptic stations in Burkina Faso (1981-2021), for the early rainy season (MJJ, upper panels) and the late rainy season (ASO, lower panels). Red bars indicate statistically significant change points (p &lt; 0.05); grey bars indicate non-significant change points. Asterisks (*) denote significance at p &lt; 0.05. Dashed vertical lines delimit the three climatic zones. Values above bars indicate the detected change point year.</p>
        <p>First cluster: 1988-1997 (early recovery phase). Significant change points during this window are concentrated in the Sahelian and Sudano-Sahelian zones in MJJ under SPI-3: Ouahigouya (1997, p = 0.004) and Dori (1997, p = 0.019) both record a structural upward shift in early-season SPI-3 around 1997, consistent with the abrupt intensification of the Sahelian rainfall recovery documented after the mid-1990s [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">44</xref>]. Dédougou also shows a 1997 change point in SPI-3 MJJ, though not significant (p = 0.178), and Fada Ngourma records an early non-significant change point in 1992 for SPI-3 ASO (p = 0.013, significant), suggesting that the late-season recovery in the eastern Sudano-Sahelian sector preceded the early-season shift. Dédougou’s SPI-3 ASO change point occurs earlier, in 1988 (p = 0.035, significant), which may be related to local rainfall redistribution rather than a basin-wide signal. Under SPEI-3, Dori’s change point in MJJ (1997, p = 0.002) and Ouahigouya’s ASO change point (2007, p = 0.002) confirm that the recovery signal propagated progressively from precipitation to the integrated hydric balance index.Second cluster: 2007-2009 (intensification phase). A second cluster of significant change points emerges in the 2007-2009 window, primarily in SPI-3 and SPEI-3 ASO for the Sahelian and Sudano-Sahelian zones. Ouahigouya (SPI-3 ASO, 2007, p = 0.003), Ouagadougou (SPI-3 ASO, 2007, p = 0.005; SPEI-3 ASO, 2007, p = 0.013), and Fada Ngourma (SPEI-3 ASO, 1992, p = 0.031) all record significant shifts, suggesting a second intensification of positive conditions after 2007 that reinforced the earlier recovery. This double-phase structure—initial shift in the mid-1990s followed by a reinforcement around 2007-2009—is consistent with the non-monotonic nature of Sahelian rainfall recovery described by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>], who documented increasing rainfall intensity and frequency of extreme wet events in the 2000s.</p>
        <p>The Sudanian zone shows no significant Pettitt change points under any index or season, reinforcing the interpretation that long-term hydroclimatic reorganization over 1981-2021 is primarily a Sahelian and Sudano-Sahelian phenomenon, with the Sudanian zone remaining structurally stable throughout the period despite the isolated emerging ASO trends noted above.</p>
        <p>The synthetic heatmap (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>) consolidates the Mann-Kendall Z-statistics, Sen’s slopes, and Pettitt change point years for all index-season combinations across the nine stations, providing a direct cross-reading of trend significance, magnitude, and structural timing. Several patterns stand out clearly. The upper panels confirm the northward concentration of significant positive trends, with the Sahelian zone showing the highest Z-values and largest Sen’s slopes in both MJJ and ASO under SPI-3, while the Sudanian zone remains predominantly grey (non-significant). The single red cell at Fada Ngourma under SPEI-3 MJJ—the only negative significant trend in the dataset—is immediately identifiable against the otherwise positive background of the Sudano-Sahelian zone, highlighting its anomalous character. The lower panels reveal that significant Pettitt change points (dark cells) cluster in the 1997-2009 window for the Sahelian and Sudano-Sahelian zones, with a notable absence of significant structural breaks across the entire Sudanian zone, reinforcing the interpretation of a geographically bounded hydroclimatic reorganization that has not yet propagated to the southern sector of Burkina Faso.</p>
        <fig id="fig9">
          <label>Figure 9</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4701436-rId95.jpeg?20260729014221" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 9.</bold> Synthetic heatmap of Mann-Kendall trend statistics and Pettitt change point years for SPI-3 and SPEI-3 seasonal drought series at nine synoptic stations in Burkina Faso (1981-2021). Upper panels display the Mann-Kendall Z-statistic (Hamed-Rao modified test) and Sen’s slope <italic>β</italic> (units per decade) for each station-index-season combination. Lower panels display the Pettitt test change point year for each combination, with the yellow-to-dark colormap indicating earlier (darker) to later (lighter) change points. Asterisks (*) denote statistical significance at p &lt; 0.05 for both the Mann-Kendall trend test and the Pettitt change point test. Dashed horizontal lines delimit the three climatic zones.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot6">
        <title>3.6. Limitations of Spatial Representativeness</title>
        <p>Given the extreme spatial heterogeneity of mesoscale convective systems that drive Sahelian rainfall, the nine synoptic stations used in this study cannot be assumed to provide a spatially continuous or exhaustive characterization of drought across Burkina Faso’s 274,200 km<sup>2</sup> territory. Rather, these stations were selected specifically for their long-term data continuity and their distribution across the country’s three main climatic zones (Sahelian, Sudano-Sahelian, Sudanian), making them representative reference points along the national climatic gradient rather than a dense spatial network capable of resolving sub-regional rainfall variability.</p>
        <p>Consequently, the drought characterizations and trends reported here should be interpreted as indicative of station-level and zone-representative dynamics, not as spatially interpolated or basin-wide drought fields. This approach is consistent with common practice in data-scarce Sahelian contexts, where long, homogeneous synoptic records are prioritized over spatial density; nonetheless, future work integrating satellite-derived precipitation products (e.g., CHIRPS, TAMSAT) or a denser station network would help capture finer-scale spatial variability within each climatic zone.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec5">
      <title>4. Conclusions</title>
      <p>This study characterized the spatio-temporal variability of historical meteorological droughts over the period 1981-2021, using the SPI-3 and SPEI-3 indices computed at nine synoptic stations representative of Burkina Faso’s three climatic zones—Sahelian, Sudano-Sahelian, and Sudanian—and applied to the two key sub-seasonal windows of the rainy season: the early season (MJJ: May-June-July) and the late season (ASO: August-September-October).</p>
      <p>The monthly time series analysis reveals three structurally distinct hydroclimatic phases. The period 1981-1990 was dominated by severe and extreme drought conditions, spatially coherent across all zones and both seasons, with the most persistent and intense signals concentrated in the Sahelian zone. The transitional period 1991-2010 was characterized by a partial but geographically differentiated rainfall recovery—the so-called Sahel greening—accompanied by the progressive emergence of evapotranspiration-driven water stress episodes that SPI-3 alone cannot detect. The post-2015 period exhibits a marked intensification of hydroclimatic variability, with rapid alternations between extreme dry and wet events occurring simultaneously across zones, consistent with a reconfiguration of the West African monsoon system under ongoing climate change.</p>
      <p>The seasonal analysis of drought categories, frequency, and occurrence reveals a dual-mode structure in drought dynamics across Burkina Faso. The early rainy season (MJJ) constitutes the primary locus of drought occurrence under SPI-3, driven by the high interannual variability of monsoon onset—a vulnerability that directly threatens crop establishment and germination. The late rainy season (ASO), by contrast, experiences a systematically amplified drought signal under SPEI-3, particularly in the Sudanian zone, where cumulative thermal loading drives potential evapotranspiration to its seasonal peak by August-October, generating water stress that is invisible to precipitation-only monitoring. This seasonal asymmetry identifies two distinct agronomic vulnerability windows that require differentiated monitoring and early warning strategies. The frequency and duration analysis further demonstrates that SPEI-3 is the more comprehensive indicator for moderate and severe drought assessment, capturing the evapotranspiration-driven stress component that SPI-3 systematically misses, while SPI-3 retains superior sensitivity for detecting extreme drought episodes governed by catastrophic precipitation deficits. This index complementarity is not a methodological redundancy but a diagnostic necessity: in a warming semi-arid environment such as Burkina Faso, where rainfall variability remains the primary driver of drought but rising temperatures increasingly amplify evaporative demand, the joint use of both indices provides a fuller picture of hydroclimatic risk than either alone.</p>
      <p>The trend and change point analysis reveals a predominantly positive long-term evolution in both SPI-3 and SPEI-3 across the Sahelian and Sudano-Sahelian zones, with significant increasing trends concentrated in ASO and structured around two clusters of structural change points: a first shift around 1997 marking the onset of the Sahelian rainfall recovery, and a second reinforcement around 2007-2009 reflecting the intensification of late-season precipitation documented by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>]. These positive trends are, however, spatially bounded: the Sudanian zone shows no significant trends in MJJ and no significant structural breaks under any index or season, indicating that the hydroclimatic reorganization observed since the mid-1990s remains a Sahelian and Sudano-Sahelian phenomenon that has not yet propagated to the southern sector of the country. Against this predominantly positive background, the isolated significant decreasing SPEI-3 MJJ trend at Fada Ngourma—the only negative significant trend in the entire dataset—constitutes a critical outlier, signaling that early-season moisture stress is intensifying at this station under rising evaporative demand even as rainfall trends remain neutral, a pattern that warrants targeted monitoring given its implications for rainfed agriculture in the eastern Sudano-Sahelian zone.</p>
      <p>Several limitations should be acknowledged. The analysis is restricted to meteorological drought; propagation to agricultural and hydrological drought via soil moisture and streamflow was not addressed and warrants future investigation using SPEI-6 and SPEI-12. Land-use and land-cover changes, which significantly alter surface energy balance and runoff generation in the context of the Sahelian paradox [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>], were not incorporated into the drought attribution framework. Additionally, extending the station network to include hydrometric data would enable a joint meteorological-hydrological drought analysis consistent with the Nakanbé basin literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>].</p>
      <p>These findings carry direct operational relevance for drought risk management in Burkina Faso. SPEI-based monitoring should complement or replace SPI-only frameworks in national early warning systems, particularly given the thermal amplification documented here. Spatially differentiated adaptation strategies are required: water conservation and soil moisture management in the central and eastern sectors where evapotranspiration-driven drying trends are emerging, and investment in water storage infrastructure in the northern Sahelian zone where rainfall recovery is documented but early-season vulnerability persists. The compression of the effective growing season and the intensification of late-season water stress identified in this study could critically threaten millet, sorghum, and maize yields—the foundation of food security for a country where more than 80% of the population depends on rainfed agriculture. Integrating the intra-seasonal hydroclimatic dynamics characterized here—and in particular the SPI/SPEI divergence as a thermal amplification signal—into national agricultural planning, groundwater management frameworks, and surface water monitoring programs such as those currently underway in the Nakanbé basin represents an urgent and tractable priority for climate adaptation in the Sahel.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec6">
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>We gratefully acknowledge the PRSA (West Africa Food System Resilience Program) for providing financial support for our research. </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec7">
      <title>Appendix</title>
      <table-wrap id="tbl2">
        <label>Table 2</label>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Station</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Zone</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Index</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Season</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>N</bold>
                <bold>years</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>MK Z</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>MK</bold>
                <bold>p-value</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Sen slope</bold>
                <bold>(/d</bold>
                <bold>ecade)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Trend</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Pettitt CP year</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Pettitt</bold>
                <bold>p-value</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Pettitt</bold>
                <bold>significant</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Ouahigouya</td>
              <td>Sahelian</td>
              <td>SPI-3</td>
              <td>MJJ</td>
              <td>41</td>
              <td>3.325</td>
              <td>0.0009</td>
              <td>0.4758</td>
              <td>Increasing</td>
              <td>1997</td>
              <td>0.0037</td>
              <td>Yes</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Dori</td>
              <td>Sahelian</td>
              <td>SPI-3</td>
              <td>MJJ</td>
              <td>41</td>
              <td>2.707</td>
              <td>0.0068</td>
              <td>0.3493</td>
              <td>Increasing</td>
              <td>1997</td>
              <td>0.0222</td>
              <td>Yes</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Ouagadougou</td>
              <td>Sudano-Sahelian</td>
              <td>SPI-3</td>
              <td>MJJ</td>
              <td>41</td>
              <td>2.86</td>
              <td>0.0042</td>
              <td>0.1077</td>
              <td>Increasing</td>
              <td>2008</td>
              <td>0.0012</td>
              <td>Yes</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Dédougou</td>
              <td>Sudano-Sahelian</td>
              <td>SPI-3</td>
              <td>MJJ</td>
              <td>40</td>
              <td>3.597</td>
              <td>0.0003</td>
              <td>0.2557</td>
              <td>Increasing</td>
              <td>1997</td>
              <td>0.1823</td>
              <td>No</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Boromo</td>
              <td>Sudano-Sahelian</td>
              <td>SPI-3</td>
              <td>MJJ</td>
              <td>41</td>
              <td>2.213</td>
              <td>0.0269</td>
              <td>0.3259</td>
              <td>Increasing</td>
              <td>2008</td>
              <td>0.0337</td>
              <td>Yes</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Fada Ngourma</td>
              <td>Sudano-Sahelian</td>
              <td>SPI-3</td>
              <td>MJJ</td>
              <td>41</td>
              <td>−0.194</td>
              <td>0.8461</td>
              <td>−0.0314</td>
              <td>No trend</td>
              <td>1995</td>
              <td>0.9103</td>
              <td>No</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Bobo-Dioulasso</td>
              <td>Sudanian</td>
              <td>SPI-3</td>
              <td>MJJ</td>
              <td>41</td>
              <td>0.685</td>
              <td>0.4933</td>
              <td>0.0929</td>
              <td>No trend</td>
              <td>1990</td>
              <td>0.681</td>
              <td>No</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Gaoua</td>
              <td>Sudanian</td>
              <td>SPI-3</td>
              <td>MJJ</td>
              <td>41</td>
              <td>0.213</td>
              <td>0.831</td>
              <td>0.0463</td>
              <td>No trend</td>
              <td>1984</td>
              <td>0.6077</td>
              <td>No</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Pô</td>
              <td>Sudanian</td>
              <td>SPI-3</td>
              <td>MJJ</td>
              <td>41</td>
              <td>0.988</td>
              <td>0.3231</td>
              <td>0.1285</td>
              <td>No trend</td>
              <td>1986</td>
              <td>0.5876</td>
              <td>No</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Ouahigouya</td>
              <td>Sahelian</td>
              <td>SPI-3</td>
              <td>ASO</td>
              <td>41</td>
              <td>3.381</td>
              <td>0.0007</td>
              <td>0.4677</td>
              <td>Increasing</td>
              <td>2007</td>
              <td>0.0019</td>
              <td>Yes</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Dori</td>
              <td>Sahelian</td>
              <td>SPI-3</td>
              <td>ASO</td>
              <td>41</td>
              <td>2.67</td>
              <td>0.0076</td>
              <td>0.259</td>
              <td>Increasing</td>
              <td>2009</td>
              <td>0.0495</td>
              <td>Yes</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Ouagadougou</td>
              <td>Sudano-Sahelian</td>
              <td>SPI-3</td>
              <td>ASO</td>
              <td>41</td>
              <td>4.208</td>
              <td>0</td>
              <td>0.5039</td>
              <td>Increasing</td>
              <td>2007</td>
              <td>0.0046</td>
              <td>Yes</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Dédougou</td>
              <td>Sudano-Sahelian</td>
              <td>SPI-3</td>
              <td>ASO</td>
              <td>41</td>
              <td>2.797</td>
              <td>0.0052</td>
              <td>0.3769</td>
              <td>Increasing</td>
              <td>1988</td>
              <td>0.0359</td>
              <td>Yes</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Boromo</td>
              <td>Sudano-Sahelian</td>
              <td>SPI-3</td>
              <td>ASO</td>
              <td>41</td>
              <td>1.101</td>
              <td>0.271</td>
              <td>0.0221</td>
              <td>No trend</td>
              <td>1993</td>
              <td>0.4006</td>
              <td>No</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Fada Ngourma</td>
              <td>Sudano-Sahelian</td>
              <td>SPI-3</td>
              <td>ASO</td>
              <td>41</td>
              <td>2.684</td>
              <td>0.0073</td>
              <td>0.4053</td>
              <td>Increasing</td>
              <td>1992</td>
              <td>0.0123</td>
              <td>Yes</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Bobo-Dioulasso</td>
              <td>Sudanian</td>
              <td>SPI-3</td>
              <td>ASO</td>
              <td>41</td>
              <td>1.674</td>
              <td>0.0942</td>
              <td>0.267</td>
              <td>No trend</td>
              <td>2014</td>
              <td>0.1802</td>
              <td>No</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Gaoua</td>
              <td>Sudanian</td>
              <td>SPI-3</td>
              <td>ASO</td>
              <td>41</td>
              <td>1.359</td>
              <td>0.1741</td>
              <td>0.2124</td>
              <td>No trend</td>
              <td>2018</td>
              <td>0.5636</td>
              <td>No</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Pô</td>
              <td>Sudanian</td>
              <td>SPI-3</td>
              <td>ASO</td>
              <td>41</td>
              <td>3.125</td>
              <td>0.0018</td>
              <td>0.2975</td>
              <td>Increasing</td>
              <td>1991</td>
              <td>0.081</td>
              <td>No</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Ouahigouya</td>
              <td>Sahelian</td>
              <td>SPEI-3</td>
              <td>MJJ</td>
              <td>41</td>
              <td>1.718</td>
              <td>0.0857</td>
              <td>0.2287</td>
              <td>No trend</td>
              <td>1991</td>
              <td>0.0468</td>
              <td>Yes</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Dori</td>
              <td>Sahelian</td>
              <td>SPEI-3</td>
              <td>MJJ</td>
              <td>41</td>
              <td>3.605</td>
              <td>0.0003</td>
              <td>0.4237</td>
              <td>Increasing</td>
              <td>1997</td>
              <td>0.0021</td>
              <td>Yes</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Ouagadougou</td>
              <td>Sudano-Sahelian</td>
              <td>SPEI-3</td>
              <td>MJJ</td>
              <td>41</td>
              <td>0.348</td>
              <td>0.7277</td>
              <td>0.0617</td>
              <td>No trend</td>
              <td>2008</td>
              <td>0.3982</td>
              <td>No</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Dédougou</td>
              <td>Sudano-Sahelian</td>
              <td>SPEI-3</td>
              <td>MJJ</td>
              <td>38</td>
              <td>1.621</td>
              <td>0.1049</td>
              <td>0.1648</td>
              <td>No trend</td>
              <td>1997</td>
              <td>0.574</td>
              <td>No</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Boromo</td>
              <td>Sudano-Sahelian</td>
              <td>SPEI-3</td>
              <td>MJJ</td>
              <td>41</td>
              <td>4.112</td>
              <td>0</td>
              <td>0.3757</td>
              <td>Increasing</td>
              <td>2008</td>
              <td>0.017</td>
              <td>Yes</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Fada Ngourma</td>
              <td>Sudano-Sahelian</td>
              <td>SPEI-3</td>
              <td>MJJ</td>
              <td>41</td>
              <td>−2.005</td>
              <td>0.045</td>
              <td>−0.2162</td>
              <td>Decreasing</td>
              <td>2010</td>
              <td>0.3849</td>
              <td>No</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Bobo-Dioulasso</td>
              <td>Sudanian</td>
              <td>SPEI-3</td>
              <td>MJJ</td>
              <td>40</td>
              <td>0.361</td>
              <td>0.718</td>
              <td>0.0425</td>
              <td>No trend</td>
              <td>2016</td>
              <td>0.9599</td>
              <td>No</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Gaoua</td>
              <td>Sudanian</td>
              <td>SPEI-3</td>
              <td>MJJ</td>
              <td>41</td>
              <td>−0.056</td>
              <td>0.9552</td>
              <td>−0.0015</td>
              <td>No trend</td>
              <td>1984</td>
              <td>0.7427</td>
              <td>No</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Pô</td>
              <td>Sudanian</td>
              <td>SPEI-3</td>
              <td>MJJ</td>
              <td>37</td>
              <td>0.719</td>
              <td>0.4719</td>
              <td>0.1366</td>
              <td>No trend</td>
              <td>1991</td>
              <td>0.617</td>
              <td>No</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Ouahigouya</td>
              <td>Sahelian</td>
              <td>SPEI-3</td>
              <td>ASO</td>
              <td>41</td>
              <td>3.201</td>
              <td>0.0014</td>
              <td>0.4512</td>
              <td>Increasing</td>
              <td>2007</td>
              <td>0.0012</td>
              <td>Yes</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Dori</td>
              <td>Sahelian</td>
              <td>SPEI-3</td>
              <td>ASO</td>
              <td>41</td>
              <td>2.976</td>
              <td>0.0029</td>
              <td>0.3875</td>
              <td>Increasing</td>
              <td>2009</td>
              <td>0.0088</td>
              <td>Yes</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Ouagadougou</td>
              <td>Sudano-Sahelian</td>
              <td>SPEI-3</td>
              <td>ASO</td>
              <td>41</td>
              <td>3.916</td>
              <td>0.0001</td>
              <td>0.4575</td>
              <td>Increasing</td>
              <td>2007</td>
              <td>0.0142</td>
              <td>Yes</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Dédougou</td>
              <td>Sudano-Sahelian</td>
              <td>SPEI-3</td>
              <td>ASO</td>
              <td>38</td>
              <td>2.791</td>
              <td>0.0053</td>
              <td>0.265</td>
              <td>Increasing</td>
              <td>2006</td>
              <td>0.2117</td>
              <td>No</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Boromo</td>
              <td>Sudano-Sahelian</td>
              <td>SPEI-3</td>
              <td>ASO</td>
              <td>41</td>
              <td>1.37</td>
              <td>0.1706</td>
              <td>0.1627</td>
              <td>No trend</td>
              <td>1993</td>
              <td>0.3468</td>
              <td>No</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Fada Ngourma</td>
              <td>Sudano-Sahelian</td>
              <td>SPEI-3</td>
              <td>ASO</td>
              <td>40</td>
              <td>2.587</td>
              <td>0.0097</td>
              <td>0.3726</td>
              <td>Increasing</td>
              <td>1992</td>
              <td>0.0274</td>
              <td>Yes</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Bobo-Dioulasso</td>
              <td>Sudanian</td>
              <td>SPEI-3</td>
              <td>ASO</td>
              <td>38</td>
              <td>4.001</td>
              <td>0.0001</td>
              <td>0.2676</td>
              <td>Increasing</td>
              <td>2014</td>
              <td>0.1906</td>
              <td>No</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Gaoua</td>
              <td>Sudanian</td>
              <td>SPEI-3</td>
              <td>ASO</td>
              <td>41</td>
              <td>1.438</td>
              <td>0.1505</td>
              <td>0.2133</td>
              <td>No trend</td>
              <td>2018</td>
              <td>0.4264</td>
              <td>No</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Pô</td>
              <td>Sudanian</td>
              <td>SPEI-3</td>
              <td>ASO</td>
              <td>37</td>
              <td>1.711</td>
              <td>0.087</td>
              <td>0.1705</td>
              <td>No trend</td>
              <td>1989</td>
              <td>0.4204</td>
              <td>No</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <fig id="fig10">
        <label>Figure 10</label>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4701436-rId135.jpeg?20260729014225" />
      </fig>
      <p><bold>Figure S1.</bold> Annual SPI-3 and SPEI-3 time series for all station-index-season combinations exhibiting a statistically significant Pettitt change point (p &lt; 0.05), Burkina Faso, 1981-2021. Blue bars indicate positive index values (wetter than normal); red bars indicate negative values (drier than normal). The vertical black line marks the Pettitt change point year (CP); the Pettitt p-value is indicated above the line. Horizontal lines show the pre-change point mean (blue) and post-change point mean (red), with numerical values annotated. Dashed orange and red horizontal lines indicate the severe drought threshold (SPI-3/SPEI-3 ≤ −1.43) and extreme drought threshold (SPI-3/SPEI-3 ≤ −1.83), respectively, following the classification of McKee <italic>et al.</italic> (1993) as adapted by WMO (2012). The Mann-Kendall Z-statistic (Hamed-Rao correction) and Sen’s slope <italic>β</italic> (per decade) are reported in each panel title; asterisks (*) denote significance at p &lt; 0.05. Panels are ordered by climatic zone (Sahelian, Sudano-Sahelian, Sudanian) and station name.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Mbaye, M.L., Bodian, A., Kimambo, O.N., Rouamba, F.I. and Gaveta, E. (2021) Analyses of Past Extremes Precipitation-Evapotranspiration Indices over Sub-Saharan Countries. <italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Extreme</italic><italic>Events</italic>, 8, Article ID: 2250002. https://doi.org/10.1142/s2345737622500026 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1142/s2345737622500026</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1142/s2345737622500026">https://doi.org/10.1142/s2345737622500026</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Mbaye, M.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bodian, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kimambo, O.N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rouamba, F.I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gaveta, E.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Analyses of Past Extremes Precipitation-Evapotranspiration Indices over Sub-Saharan Countries</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Extreme Events</source>
            <volume>8</volume>
            <fpage>225000</fpage>
            <elocation-id>ID</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1142/s2345737622500026</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Peng, J., Dadson, S., Hirpa, F., Dyer, E., Lees, T., Miralles, D.G., <italic>et al</italic>. (2020) A Pan-African High-Resolution Drought Index Dataset. <italic>Earth</italic><italic>System</italic><italic>Science</italic><italic>Data</italic>, 12, 753-769. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-753-2020 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/essd-12-753-2020</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-753-2020">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-753-2020</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Peng, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Dadson, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Hirpa, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Dyer, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lees, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Miralles, D.G.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>A Pan-African High-Resolution Drought Index Dataset</article-title>
            <source>Earth System Science Data</source>
            <volume>12</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/essd-12-753-2020</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Sarr, M., Moussa, A.M., Wade, M., Deme, E.H. and Diop, B. (2024) Regional Climate Models in the Simulation of the Drought of the 1970’s and 1980’s Years in Senegal (in West Africa). <italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Water</italic><italic>Resource</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Protection</italic>, 16, 585-604. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2024.169034 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jwarp.2024.169034</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2024.169034">https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2024.169034</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Sarr, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Moussa, A.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wade, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Deme, E.H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Diop, B.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>Regional Climate Models in the Simulation of the Drought of the 1970’s and 1980’s Years in Senegal (in West Africa)</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Water Resource and Protection</source>
            <volume>16</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jwarp.2024.169034</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Taylor, R.G., Todd, M.C., Kongola, L., Maurice, L., Nahozya, E., Sanga, H., <italic>et al</italic>. (2013) Evidence of the Dependence of Groundwater Resources on Extreme Rainfall in East Africa. <italic>Nature</italic><italic>Climate</italic><italic>Change</italic>, 3, 374-378. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1731 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nclimate1731</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1731">https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1731</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Taylor, R.G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Todd, M.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kongola, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Maurice, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Nahozya, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sanga, H.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2013</year>
            <article-title>Evidence of the Dependence of Groundwater Resources on Extreme Rainfall in East Africa</article-title>
            <source>Nature Climate Change</source>
            <volume>3</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nclimate1731</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Sogno, P., Klein, I. and Kuenzer, C. (2022) Remote Sensing of Surface Water Dynamics in the Context of Global Change—A Review. <italic>Remote</italic><italic>Sensing</italic>, 14, Article No. 2475. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14102475 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/rs14102475</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14102475">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14102475</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Sogno, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Klein, I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kuenzer, C.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>Remote Sensing of Surface Water Dynamics in the Context of Global Change—A Review</article-title>
            <source>Remote Sensing</source>
            <volume>14</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/rs14102475</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kingsford, R.T., Bino, G., Finlayson, C.M., Falster, D., Fitzsimons, J.A., Gawlik, D.E., <italic>et al</italic>. (2021) Ramsar Wetlands of International Importance-improving Conservation Outcomes. <italic>Frontiers</italic><italic>in</italic><italic>Environmental</italic><italic>Science</italic>, 9, Article ID: 643367. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.643367 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fenvs.2021.643367</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.643367">https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.643367</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Kingsford, R.T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bino, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Finlayson, C.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Falster, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Fitzsimons, J.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gawlik, D.E.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Ramsar Wetlands of International Importance-improving Conservation Outcomes</article-title>
            <source>Frontiers in Environmental Science</source>
            <volume>9</volume>
            <fpage>643367</fpage>
            <elocation-id>ID</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fenvs.2021.643367</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Fowé, T., Yonaba, R., Mounirou, L.A., Ouédraogo, E., Ibrahim, B., Niang, D., <italic>et al</italic>. (2023) From Meteorological to Hydrological Drought: A Case Study Using Standardized Indices in the Nakanbe River Basin, Burkina Faso. <italic>Natural</italic><italic>Hazards</italic>, 119, 1941-1965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06194-5 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11069-023-06194-5</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06194-5">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06194-5</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Yonaba, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mounirou, L.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ibrahim, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Niang, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Basin, B</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>From Meteorological to Hydrological Drought: A Case Study Using Standardized Indices in the Nakanbe River Basin, Burkina Faso</article-title>
            <source>Natural Hazards</source>
            <volume>119</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11069-023-06194-5</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Bambio, Y. (2013) Aid and Environment in Burkina Faso. WIDER Working Paper No. 2013/139, United Nations University World Institute for Development Eco-nomics Research (UNU-WIDER).</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Bambio, Y.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2013</year>
            <article-title>Aid and Environment in Burkina Faso</article-title>
            <source>WIDER Working Paper No. 2013/139</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Le, P.V.V., Phan‐Van, T., Mai, K.V. and Tran, D.Q. (2019) Space-Time Variability of Drought over Vietnam. <italic>International</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Climatology</italic>, 39, 5437-5451. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6164 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/joc.6164</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6164">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6164</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Le, P.V.V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Van, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mai, K.V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tran, D.Q.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2019</year>
            <article-title>Space-Time Variability of Drought over Vietnam</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of Climatology</source>
            <volume>39</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/joc.6164</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Li, J., Wang, Y., Li, Y., Ming, W., Long, Y. and Zhang, M. (2022) Relationship between Meteorological and Hydrological Droughts in the Upstream Regions of the Lancang-Mekong River. <italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Water</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Climate</italic><italic>Change</italic>, 13, 421-433. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2021.445 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2166/wcc.2021.445</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2021.445">https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2021.445</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Li, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wang, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Li, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ming, W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Long, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhang, M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>Relationship between Meteorological and Hydrological Droughts in the Upstream Regions of the Lancang-Mekong River</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Water and Climate Change</source>
            <volume>13</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2166/wcc.2021.445</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Zhou, Z., Shi, H., Fu, Q., Ding, Y., Li, T. and Liu, S. (2021) Investigating the Propagation from Meteorological to Hydrological Drought by Introducing the Nonlinear Dependence with Directed Information Transfer Index. <italic>Water</italic><italic>Resources</italic><italic>Research</italic>, 57, e2021WR030028. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021wr030028 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2021wr030028</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021wr030028">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021wr030028</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Zhou, Z.</string-name>
              <string-name>Shi, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Fu, Q.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ding, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Li, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Liu, S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Investigating the Propagation from Meteorological to Hydrological Drought by Introducing the Nonlinear Dependence with Directed Information Transfer Index</article-title>
            <source>Water Resources Research</source>
            <volume>57</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2021wr030028</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Hasan, H.H., Mohd Razali, S.F., Muhammad, N.S. and Ahmad, A. (2021) Hydrological Drought across Peninsular Malaysia: Implication of Drought Index. <italic>Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences Discussions</italic>. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2021-249 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/nhess-2021-249</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2021-249">https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2021-249</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Hasan, H.H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Razali, S.F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Muhammad, N.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ahmad, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Hydrological Drought across Peninsular Malaysia: Implication of Drought Index</article-title>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/nhess-2021-249</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Morid, S., Smakhtin, V. and Moghaddasi, M. (2006) Comparison of Seven Meteorological Indices for Drought Monitoring in Iran. <italic>International</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Climatology</italic>, 26, 971-985. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1264 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/joc.1264</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1264">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1264</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Morid, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Smakhtin, V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Moghaddasi, M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2006</year>
            <article-title>Comparison of Seven Meteorological Indices for Drought Monitoring in Iran</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of Climatology</source>
            <volume>26</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/joc.1264</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <label>14.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Zargar, A., Sadiq, R., Naser, B. and Khan, F.I. (2011) A Review of Drought Indices. <italic>Environmental</italic><italic>Reviews</italic>, 19, 333-349. https://doi.org/10.1139/a11-013 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/a11-013</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1139/a11-013">https://doi.org/10.1139/a11-013</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Zargar, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sadiq, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Naser, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Khan, F.I.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2011</year>
            <article-title>A Review of Drought Indices</article-title>
            <source>Environmental Reviews</source>
            <volume>19</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/a11-013</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <label>15.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="confproc">McKee, T.B., Doesken, N.J. and Kleist, J. (1993) The Relationship of Drought Frequency and Duration to Time Scales. <italic>Proceedings of the</italic>8 <italic>th Conference on Ap-plied Climatology</italic>, Anaheim, 17-22 January 1993, 179-183.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="confproc">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>McKee, T.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Doesken, N.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kleist, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Climatology, A</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1993</year>
            <article-title>The Relationship of Drought Frequency and Duration to Time Scales</article-title>
            <source>Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Ap-plied Climatology</source>
            <volume>17</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <label>16.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Vicente-Serrano, S.M., Beguería, S. and López-Moreno, J.I. (2010) A Multiscalar Drought Index Sensitive to Global Warming: The Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index. <italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Climate</italic>, 23, 1696-1718. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009jcli2909.1 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1175/2009jcli2909.1</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009jcli2909.1">https://doi.org/10.1175/2009jcli2909.1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Vicente-Serrano, S.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Moreno, J.I.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2010</year>
            <article-title>A Multiscalar Drought Index Sensitive to Global Warming: The Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Climate</source>
            <volume>23</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1175/2009jcli2909.1</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <label>17.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Beguería, S., Vicente-Serrano, S.M., Reig, F. and Latorre, B. (2014) Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) Revisited: Parameter Fitting, Evapotranspiration Models, Tools, Datasets and Drought Monitoring. <italic>International</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Climatology</italic>, 34, 3001-3023. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3887 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/joc.3887</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3887">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3887</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Vicente-Serrano, S.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Reig, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Latorre, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Fitting, E</string-name>
              <string-name>Models, T</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) Revisited: Parameter Fitting, Evapotranspiration Models, Tools, Datasets and Drought Monitoring</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of Climatology</source>
            <volume>34</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/joc.3887</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <label>18.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Yameogo, W.V.M., Kabore, O., Sanon, Z., Akpa, Y.L., Traore, F., Tankoano, B., <italic>et al</italic>. (2023) Dynamique spatio-temporelle des surfaces en eau du bassin du Nakanbé-Mané au Burkina Faso. <italic>International</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Biological</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Chemical</italic><italic>Sciences</italic>, 17, 233-246. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v17i1.17 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4314/ijbcs.v17i1.17</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v17i1.17">https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v17i1.17</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Yameogo, W.V.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kabore, O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sanon, Z.</string-name>
              <string-name>Akpa, Y.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Traore, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tankoano, B.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Dynamique spatio-temporelle des surfaces en eau du bassin du Nakanbé-Mané au Burkina Faso</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences</source>
            <volume>17</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4314/ijbcs.v17i1.17</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <label>19.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="confproc">Gbohoui, Y.P., Paturel, J., Fowe, T., Karambiri, H. and Yacouba, H. (2021) Impacts des changements climatique et environnemental sur la réponse hydrologique du bassin du Nakanbé à Wayen (Burkina Faso) à travers le cadre de budyko. <italic>Proceedings</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>the</italic><italic>International</italic><italic>Association</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Hydrological</italic><italic>Sciences</italic>, 384, 269-273. https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-384-269-2021 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/piahs-384-269-2021</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-384-269-2021">https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-384-269-2021</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="confproc">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Gbohoui, Y.P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Paturel, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Fowe, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Karambiri, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Yacouba, H.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Impacts des changements climatique et environnemental sur la réponse hydrologique du bassin du Nakanbé à Wayen (Burkina Faso) à travers le cadre de budyko</article-title>
            <source>Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences</source>
            <volume>384</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/piahs-384-269-2021</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <label>20.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Yonaba, R., Biaou, A.C., Koïta, M., Tazen, F., Mounirou, L.A., Zouré, C.O., <italic>et al</italic>. (2021) A Dynamic Land Use/Land Cover Input Helps in Picturing the Sahelian Paradox: Assessing Variability and Attribution of Changes in Surface Runoff in a Sahelian Watershed. <italic>Science</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>the</italic><italic>Total</italic><italic>Environment</italic>, 757, Article ID: 143792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143792 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143792</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33280876</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143792">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143792</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Yonaba, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Biaou, A.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tazen, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mounirou, L.A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>A Dynamic Land Use/Land Cover Input Helps in Picturing the Sahelian Paradox: Assessing Variability and Attribution of Changes in Surface Runoff in a Sahelian Watershed</article-title>
            <source>Science of the Total Environment</source>
            <volume>757</volume>
            <fpage>143792</fpage>
            <elocation-id>ID</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143792</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33280876</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <label>21.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Yonaba, R., Mounirou, L.A., Tazen, F., Koïta, M., Biaou, A.C., Zouré, C.O., <italic>et al</italic>. (2024) Future Climate or Land Use? Attribution of Changes in Surface Runoff in a Typical Sahelian Landscape. <italic>Comptes</italic><italic>Rendus</italic><italic>.</italic><italic>Géoscience</italic>, 355, 411-438. https://doi.org/10.5802/crgeos.179 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5802/crgeos.179</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5802/crgeos.179">https://doi.org/10.5802/crgeos.179</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Yonaba, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mounirou, L.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tazen, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Biaou, A.C.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>Future Climate or Land Use? Attribution of Changes in Surface Runoff in a Typical Sahelian Landscape</article-title>
            <source>Comptes Rendus. Géoscience</source>
            <volume>355</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5802/crgeos.179</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <label>22.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Di Nunno, F., Yildiz, M.B. and Granata, F. (2025) Decoding the Architecture of Drought: SHAP-Enhanced Insights into the Climate Forces Reshaping the Sahel. Copernicus GmbH.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Nunno, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Yildiz, M.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Granata, F.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2025</year>
            <article-title>Decoding the Architecture of Drought: SHAP-Enhanced Insights into the Climate Forces Reshaping the Sahel</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <label>23.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Millogo, Z.N., Okogbue, E.C., Diasso, J.U., Ochei, M.C. and Sawadogo, W. (2025) Projection of Heatwave Characteristics over Burkina Faso under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways Scenarios—SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5. <italic>Theoretical</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Applied</italic><italic>Cli</italic><italic>matology</italic>, 156, Article No. 461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-025-05676-9 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00704-025-05676-9</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-025-05676-9">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-025-05676-9</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Millogo, Z.N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Okogbue, E.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Diasso, J.U.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ochei, M.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sawadogo, W.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2025</year>
            <article-title>Projection of Heatwave Characteristics over Burkina Faso under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways Scenarios—SSP2-4</article-title>
            <source>5 and SSP5-8.5. Theoretical and Applied Climatology</source>
            <volume>156</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00704-025-05676-9</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <label>24.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ki, G.Z., Kébré, M.B., Somda, W., Gandema, S. and Dabilgou, F. (2026) Exploratory Data Analysis of Burkina Faso’s Raw Daily Meteorological Records (1981-2021): Data Quality Insights and Potential Outlier Screening. <italic>Environmental Research</italic>: <italic>Climate</italic>, 8, Article ID: 051012.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ki, G.Z.</string-name>
              <string-name>Somda, W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gandema, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Dabilgou, F.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2026</year>
            <article-title>Exploratory Data Analysis of Burkina Faso’s Raw Daily Meteorological Records (1981-2021): Data Quality Insights and Potential Outlier Screening</article-title>
            <source>Environmental Research: Climate</source>
            <volume>8</volume>
            <fpage>051012</fpage>
            <elocation-id>ID</elocation-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <label>25.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I.A. (1964) Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. Applied Mathematics Series 55, National Bureau of Standards, Washington DC.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Abramowitz, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Stegun, I.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Formulas, G</string-name>
              <string-name>Standards, W</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1964</year>
            <article-title>Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables</article-title>
            <source>Applied Mathematics Series 55</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <label>26.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Vonk, M.A. (2025) SPEI: A Python Package for Calculating and Visualizing Drought Indices. <italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Open</italic><italic>Source</italic><italic>Software</italic>, 10, Article No. 8454. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.08454 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21105/joss.08454</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.08454">https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.08454</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Vonk, M.A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2025</year>
            <article-title>SPEI: A Python Package for Calculating and Visualizing Drought Indices</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Open Source Software</source>
            <volume>10</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21105/joss.08454</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <label>27.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="confproc">Xiong, X., Zhou, J., Liu, X. and Cui, Y. (2022). The Potential of Using Dynamic Surface Water Products for Drought Monitoring. <italic>IGARSS</italic> 2022-2022 <italic>IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium</italic>, Kuala Lumpur, 17-22 July 2022, 6308-6311. https://doi.org/10.1109/igarss46834.2022.9884112 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/igarss46834.2022.9884112</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/igarss46834.2022.9884112">https://doi.org/10.1109/igarss46834.2022.9884112</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="confproc">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Xiong, X.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhou, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Liu, X.</string-name>
              <string-name>Cui, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Symposium, K</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/igarss46834.2022.9884112</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <label>28.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hamed, K.H. and Ramachandra Rao, A. (1998) A Modified Mann-Kendall Trend Test for Autocorrelated Data. <italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Hydrology</italic>, 204, 182-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1694(97)00125-x <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0022-1694(97)00125-x</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1694(97)00125-x">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1694(97)00125-x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Hamed, K.H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rao, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1998</year>
            <article-title>A Modified Mann-Kendall Trend Test for Autocorrelated Data</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Hydrology</source>
            <volume>1694</volume>
            <issue>97</issue>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0022-1694(97)00125-x</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B29">
        <label>29.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Mann, H.B. (1945) Nonparametric Tests against Trend. <italic>Econometrica</italic>, 13, 245-259. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907187 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/1907187</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/1907187">https://doi.org/10.2307/1907187</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Mann, H.B.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1945</year>
            <article-title>Nonparametric Tests against Trend</article-title>
            <source>Econometrica</source>
            <volume>13</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/1907187</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B30">
        <label>30.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="book">Kendall, M.G. (1975) Rank Correlation Methods. 4th Edition, Charles Griffin.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="book">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Kendall, M.G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Edition, C</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1975</year>
            <article-title>Rank Correlation Methods</article-title>
            <source>4th Edition</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B31">
        <label>31.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Sen, P.K. (1968) Estimates of the Regression Coefficient Based on Kendall’s Tau. <italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>the</italic><italic>American</italic><italic>Statistical</italic><italic>Association</italic>, 63, 1379-1389. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1968.10480934 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/01621459.1968.10480934</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1968.10480934">https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1968.10480934</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Sen, P.K.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1968</year>
            <article-title>Estimates of the Regression Coefficient Based on Kendall’s Tau</article-title>
            <source>Journal of the American Statistical Association</source>
            <volume>63</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/01621459.1968.10480934</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B32">
        <label>32.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Pettitt, A.N. (1979) A Non-Parametric Approach to the Change-Point Problem. <italic>Applied</italic><italic>Statistics</italic>, 28, 126-135. https://doi.org/10.2307/2346729 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/2346729</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/2346729">https://doi.org/10.2307/2346729</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Pettitt, A.N.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1979</year>
            <article-title>A Non-Parametric Approach to the Change-Point Problem</article-title>
            <source>Applied Statistics</source>
            <volume>28</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/2346729</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B33">
        <label>33.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hussain, M. and Mahmud, I. (2019) pyMannKendall: A Python Package for Non Parametric Mann Kendall Family of Trend Tests. <italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Open</italic><italic>Source</italic><italic>Software</italic>, 4, Article No. 1556. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01556 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21105/joss.01556</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01556">https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01556</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Hussain, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mahmud, I.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2019</year>
            <article-title>pyMannKendall: A Python Package for Non Parametric Mann Kendall Family of Trend Tests</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Open Source Software</source>
            <volume>4</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21105/joss.01556</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B34">
        <label>34.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">Pohlert, T. (2023) trend: Non-Parametric Trend Tests and Change-Point Detection. R Package Version 1.1.6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=trend</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Pohlert, T.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>trend: Non-Parametric Trend Tests and Change-Point Detection</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B35">
        <label>35.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Militino, A.F., Moradi, M. and Ugarte, M.D. (2020) On the Performances of Trend and Change-Point Detection Methods for Remote Sensing Data. <italic>Remote</italic><italic>Sensing</italic>, 12, Article No. 1008. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12061008 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/rs12061008</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12061008">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12061008</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Militino, A.F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Moradi, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ugarte, M.D.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>On the Performances of Trend and Change-Point Detection Methods for Remote Sensing Data</article-title>
            <source>Remote Sensing</source>
            <volume>12</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/rs12061008</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B36">
        <label>36.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Nicholson, S. (2005) On the Question of the “Recovery” of the Rains in the West African Sahel. <italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Arid</italic><italic>Environments</italic>, 63, 615-641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.03.004 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.03.004</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.03.004">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.03.004</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Nicholson, S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2005</year>
            <article-title>On the Question of the “Recovery” of the Rains in the West African Sahel</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Arid Environments</source>
            <volume>63</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.03.004</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B37">
        <label>37.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Biasutti, M. (2019) Rainfall Trends in the African Sahel: Characteristics, Processes, and Causes. <italic>WIREs</italic><italic>Climate</italic><italic>Change</italic>, 10, e591. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.591 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/wcc.591</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31341517</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.591">https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.591</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Biasutti, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Characteristics, P</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2019</year>
            <article-title>Rainfall Trends in the African Sahel: Characteristics, Processes, and Causes</article-title>
            <source>WIREs Climate Change</source>
            <volume>10</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/wcc.591</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31341517</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B38">
        <label>38.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Sylla, M.B., Nikiema, P.M., Gibba, P., Kebe, I. and Klutse, N.A.B. (2016) Climate Change over West Africa: Recent Trends and Future Projections. In: Yaro, J.A. and Hesselberg, J., Eds., <italic>Adaptation</italic><italic>to</italic><italic>Climate</italic><italic>Change</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Variability</italic><italic>in</italic><italic>Rural</italic><italic>West</italic><italic>Africa</italic>, Springer International Publishing, 25-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31499-0_3 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-319-31499-0_3</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31499-0_3">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31499-0_3</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Sylla, M.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Nikiema, P.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gibba, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kebe, I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Klutse, N.A.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Yaro, J.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Hesselberg, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Africa, S</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>Climate Change over West Africa: Recent Trends and Future Projections</article-title>
            <source>In: Yaro</source>
            <volume>25</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-319-31499-0_3</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B39">
        <label>39.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Fontaine, B., Gaetani, M., Ullmann, A. and Roucou, P. (2011) Time Evolution of Observed July-September Sea Surface Temperature-Sahel Climate Teleconnection with Removed Quasi-Global Effect (1900-2008). <italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Geophysical</italic><italic>Research</italic>, 116, D04105. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014843 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2010jd014843</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014843">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014843</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Fontaine, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gaetani, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ullmann, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Roucou, P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2011</year>
            <article-title>Time Evolution of Observed July-September Sea Surface Temperature-Sahel Climate Teleconnection with Removed Quasi-Global Effect (1900-2008)</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Geophysical Research</source>
            <volume>116</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2010jd014843</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B40">
        <label>40.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Stagge, J.H., Tallaksen, L.M., Gudmundsson, L., Van Loon, A.F. and Stahl, K. (2015) Candidate Distributions for Climatological Drought Indices (SPI and SPEI). <italic>International</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Climatology</italic>, 35, 4027-4040. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4267 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/joc.4267</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4267">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4267</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Stagge, J.H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tallaksen, L.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gudmundsson, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Loon, A.F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Stahl, K.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>Candidate Distributions for Climatological Drought Indices (SPI and SPEI)</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of Climatology</source>
            <volume>35</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/joc.4267</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B41">
        <label>41.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Salack, S., Sarr, B., Sangare, S.K., Ly, M., Sanda, I.S. and Kunstmann, H. (2015) Crop-climate Ensemble Scenarios to Improve Risk Assessment and Resilience in the Semi-Arid Regions of West Africa. <italic>Climate</italic><italic>Research</italic>, 65, 107-121. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr01282 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3354/cr01282</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/cr01282">https://doi.org/10.3354/cr01282</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Salack, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sarr, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sangare, S.K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ly, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sanda, I.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kunstmann, H.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>Crop-climate Ensemble Scenarios to Improve Risk Assessment and Resilience in the Semi-Arid Regions of West Africa</article-title>
            <source>Climate Research</source>
            <volume>65</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3354/cr01282</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B42">
        <label>42.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Sivakumar, M.V.K. (1992) Empirical Analysis of Dry Spells for Agricultural Applications in West Africa. <italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Climate</italic>, 5, 532-539. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1992)005&lt;0532:eaodsf&gt;2.0.co;2 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1175/1520-0442(1992)005&lt;0532:eaodsf&gt;2.0.co;2</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1992)005%3C0532:eaodsf%3E2.0.co;2">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1992)005&lt;0532:eaodsf&gt;2.0.co;2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Sivakumar, M.V.K.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1992</year>
            <article-title>Empirical Analysis of Dry Spells for Agricultural Applications in West Africa</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Climate</source>
            <volume>0442</volume>
            <issue>1992</issue>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1175/1520-0442(1992)005&lt;0532:eaodsf&gt;2.0.co;2</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B43">
        <label>43.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Zhao, T. and Dai, A. (2015) The Magnitude and Causes of Global Drought Changes in the Twenty-First Century under a Low-Moderate Emissions Scenario. <italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Climate</italic>, 28, 4490-4512. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-14-00363.1 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1175/jcli-d-14-00363.1</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-14-00363.1">https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-14-00363.1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Zhao, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Dai, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>The Magnitude and Causes of Global Drought Changes in the Twenty-First Century under a Low-Moderate Emissions Scenario</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Climate</source>
            <volume>28</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1175/jcli-d-14-00363.1</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B44">
        <label>44.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Lebel, T. and Ali, A. (2009) Recent Trends in the Central and Western Sahel Rainfall Regime (1990-2007). <italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Hydrology</italic>, 375, 52-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.11.030 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.11.030</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.11.030">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.11.030</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Lebel, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ali, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2009</year>
            <article-title>Recent Trends in the Central and Western Sahel Rainfall Regime (1990-2007)</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Hydrology</source>
            <volume>375</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.11.030</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B45">
        <label>45.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Panthou, G., Lebel, T., Vischel, T., Quantin, G., Sane, Y., Ba, A., <italic>et al</italic>. (2018) Rainfall Intensification in Tropical Semi-Arid Regions: The Sahelian Case. <italic>Environmental</italic><italic>Research</italic><italic>Letters</italic>, 13, Article ID: 064013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac334 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1748-9326/aac334</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac334">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac334</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Panthou, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lebel, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Vischel, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Quantin, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sane, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ba, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2018</year>
            <article-title>Rainfall Intensification in Tropical Semi-Arid Regions: The Sahelian Case</article-title>
            <source>Environmental Research Letters</source>
            <volume>13</volume>
            <fpage>064013</fpage>
            <elocation-id>ID</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1748-9326/aac334</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>