<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.4" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">gep</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2327-4344</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2327-4336</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/gep.2026.147009</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">gep-152700</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Earth</subject>
          <subject>Environmental Sciences</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Risk Analysis of Coal and Gas Outburst of Single Coal Seam in China: A Case Study</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Xue</surname>
            <given-names>Weichao</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label> Gas Technology Research Branch, China Coal Technology and Engineering Group Shenyang Research Institute, Liaoning, China </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="conflict" id="fn-conflict">
          <p>The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>08</day>
        <month>07</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <month>07</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>14</volume>
      <issue>07</issue>
      <fpage>147</fpage>
      <lpage>160</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>31</day>
          <month>05</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>19</day>
          <month>07</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="published">
          <day>22</day>
          <month>07</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2026 by the authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p> This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link> ). </license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2026.147009">https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2026.147009</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p>Determination of coal and gas outburst proneness in a coal seam is an important fundamental task for coal mine safety production. Based on the engineering geological conditions of a single coal seam in the Beiliu Area of Xi’an Coal Mine, Jilin Province, the coal and gas outburst risk of the Danyi Coal Seam was comprehensively assessed by observing and testing indicators, such as coal damage type, initial velocity of gas diffusion (Δ<italic>p</italic>), coal hardness coefficient (<italic>f</italic>), virgin relative gas pressure (<italic>P</italic>), and coal seam gas content (<italic>W</italic>). The results show that the coal damage type is Class II, the maximum initial velocity of gas diffusion is 9.2 mmHg, the minimum coal hardness coefficient is 0.60, the maximum relative gas pressure is 0.14 MPa, the maximum gas content is 2.92 m<sup>3</sup>/t, and the average gas content is 1.85 m<sup>3</sup>/t. None of the individual outburst risk indicators reached the critical values, and no gas dynamic phenomena such as blowout or drill pipe jamming occurred within the assessment zone. Accordingly, it was determined that the coal seam has no coal and gas outburst risk within the area at a burial depth of less than 806.2 m (elevation −496.2 m). The research results can provide a reference for outburst risk determination of single coal seams under similar geological conditions.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated" xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>Coal and Gas Outburst</kwd>
        <kwd>Single Coal Seam</kwd>
        <kwd>Outburst Risk</kwd>
        <kwd>Gas Pressure</kwd>
        <kwd>Gas Content</kwd>
        <kwd>Xi’An Coalmine</kwd>
        <kwd>Jilin Province</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>Coal and gas outburst is one of the major hazards in gas mines, often resulting in mass casualties and severely restricting the coal mine safe and efficient production. China is the country with the most severe coal and gas outburst disasters in the world ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>]). The combined-action hypothesis, which involves multiple factors such as <italic>in</italic>-<italic>situ</italic> stress, gas, and the strength of coal and rock mass, dominates the understanding of the mechanism of coal and gas outburst occurrence ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>]). Numerous scholars have attempted to explain the mechanism of coal and gas outburst from an energy perspective ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>]; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>]; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>]); on the basis of the combined-action hypothesis, Chinese scholars have developed new views and theories, including the rheological hypothesis, the spherical shell instability theory, and the mechanical action hypothesis ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]). Outburst prediction based on gas indicators exhibits a one-to-one correspondence, but this correspondence varied among different coal samples, making it difficult to establish a unified critical value for coal seams with different degrees of metamorphism ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>]). To this end, many researchers have conducted extensive simulation experiments to better understand the mechanism of coal and gas outburst ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>]).</p>
      <p>Determination of coal and gas outburst proneness in coal seams is a fundamental task for coal mine’s newly building, reconstructing and expanding. In recent years, with the increase in mining depth and mining intensity, coal and gas outburst has occurred in some seams that never experienced outburst during shallow mining, and some low-gas mines have also experienced coal and gas outburst ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]). Therefore, in order to take preventive measures, avoid blindness in gas prevention and control, and achieve effective, reliable, and foreseeable outcomes, it is essential to measure basic gas parameters of a single coal seam and, on this basis, analyze the coal and gas outburst risk. </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec2">
      <title>2. Mine Engineering Geological Conditions</title>
      <sec id="sec2dot1">
        <title>2.1. Regional Location</title>
        <fig id="fig1">
          <label>Figure 1</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2173820-rId11.jpeg?20260722023902" />
        </fig>
        <p>The base map is sourced from the Standard Map Service of the Ministry of Natural Resources of China (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://bzdt.ch.mnr.gov.cn/browse.html?picId=%224o28b0625501ad13015501ad2bfc0288%22">http://bzdt.ch.mnr.gov.cn/browse.html?picId=%224o28b0625501ad13015501ad2bfc0288%22</ext-link>), Approval No. GS(2019)1673. The map has been modified only for visualization purposes (coloring and annotation). </p>
        <p><bold>Figure 1.</bold> Schematic diagram showing the location of the mining area.</p>
        <p>Xi’an Coal Mine, Beiliu Area is located within Liaoyuan City, Jilin Province, at the northwestern end of the Liaoyuan Coalfield, extending 6.31 km from east to west and 1.66 km from north to south. The location of the mining area is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot2">
        <title>2.2. Rock Strata and Geological Structure</title>
        <p>The Beiliu Area is located within the Tianshan-Xing’an Geosynclinal Fold System, the Jihei Fold System (Grade I), the Jilin Eugeosynclinal Fold Belt (Grade II), and the Shiling Uplift (Grade III) in the northwestern part of the Liaoyuan Coalfield.</p>
        <fig id="fig2">
          <label>Figure 2</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2173820-rId13.jpeg?20260722023903" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 2</bold><bold>.</bold> Structural outline of the mine.</p>
        <p>The Beiliu Area is an asymmetric syncline opening to the northwest. The axis of the syncline trends northwest and plunges to the northwest. In this section, the entire southwestern limb in the southeastern part and most of the southwestern limb in the northwestern part are missing, leaving only the northeastern limb in the southeastern part of the syncline and most of the syncline at the northwestern end. Most of the rock strata dip at 297˚ with a dip angle of 10˚ - 25˚, forming the main structural framework of the Beiliu area. Additionally, ten strike or oblique faults have developed in this syncline. Most of the faults trend northwest, with a few trending northeast and nearly east-west. Based on the cross-cutting relationships among the faults, the earliest formed faults are the northwest- and nearly east-west-trending faults (F<sub>2</sub>, F<sub>4</sub>, F<sub>9</sub>, F<sub>10</sub>), followed by the northwest-trending faults (F<sub>5</sub>, F<sub>6</sub>, F<sub>8</sub>), while the latest formed is the northeast-trending fault (F<sub>1</sub>). The faults were generated after the Late Jurassic and before the Tertiary. The structural outline of the coal mine is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p>
        <p>The main faults characteristics are shown in <bold>Table 1</bold>.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 1.</bold>Summary of faults in the Beiliu Area.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl1">
          <label>Table 1</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">Fault No.</td>
                <td rowspan="2">Location</td>
                <td rowspan="2">Extension length (m)</td>
                <td rowspan="2">Type</td>
                <td colspan="3">Fault Attitude</td>
                <td rowspan="2">Throw (m)</td>
                <td rowspan="2">Controlled Degree</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Strike</td>
                <td>Dip</td>
                <td>Dip Angle (˚)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  F
                  <sub>1</sub>
                </td>
                <td>Eastern part of the minefield</td>
                <td>&gt;3700</td>
                <td>Strike-slip</td>
                <td>50</td>
                <td>320</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>370</td>
                <td>Inferred</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  F
                  <sub>2</sub>
                </td>
                <td>Southern part of the minefield</td>
                <td>&gt;5200</td>
                <td>Normal</td>
                <td>108</td>
                <td>18</td>
                <td>55 - 74</td>
                <td>&gt;650</td>
                <td>Inferred</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  F
                  <sub>3</sub>
                </td>
                <td>Southwestern part of the minefield</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>Reverse</td>
                <td>110</td>
                <td>20</td>
                <td>70</td>
                <td>30</td>
                <td>Controlled</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  F
                  <sub>4</sub>
                </td>
                <td>Central part of the minefield</td>
                <td>1300</td>
                <td>Normal</td>
                <td>140</td>
                <td>230</td>
                <td>55 - 65</td>
                <td>40 - 50</td>
                <td>Inferred</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  F
                  <sub>5</sub>
                </td>
                <td>Central part of the minefield</td>
                <td>750</td>
                <td>Normal</td>
                <td>150</td>
                <td>240</td>
                <td>70</td>
                <td>&lt;60</td>
                <td>Inferred</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  F
                  <sub>6</sub>
                </td>
                <td>Central part of the minefield</td>
                <td>2200</td>
                <td>Reverse</td>
                <td>0 - 150</td>
                <td>240 - 270</td>
                <td>55 - 60</td>
                <td>70 - 110</td>
                <td>Controlled</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  F
                  <sub>7</sub>
                </td>
                <td>Northwest of the minefield</td>
                <td>&gt;300</td>
                <td>Normal</td>
                <td>Northwest</td>
                <td>Southwest</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>15</td>
                <td>Inferred</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  F
                  <sub>8</sub>
                </td>
                <td>Central part of the minefield</td>
                <td>&gt;2600</td>
                <td>Normal</td>
                <td>0 - 135</td>
                <td>225 - 270</td>
                <td>55 - 70</td>
                <td>46 - 66</td>
                <td>Inferred</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  F
                  <sub>9</sub>
                </td>
                <td>Central part of the minefield</td>
                <td>&gt;450</td>
                <td>Normal</td>
                <td>280</td>
                <td>190</td>
                <td>67</td>
                <td>&lt;40</td>
                <td>Controlled</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  F
                  <sub>10</sub>
                </td>
                <td>Northeastern part of the minefield</td>
                <td>&gt;1500</td>
                <td>Normal</td>
                <td>300 - 325</td>
                <td>30 - 55</td>
                <td>50 - 60</td>
                <td>60 - 70</td>
                <td>Controlled</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  F
                  <sub>11</sub>
                </td>
                <td>Western side of the minefield</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>Normal</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>Northeast</td>
                <td>30 - 45</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>Inferred</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot3">
        <title>2.3. Coal Seam and Its Roof and Floor</title>
        <p>Danyi Coal Seam is the single minable coal seam in the Beiliu Area, which occurs at the bottom of the mudstone sub-member of the lower coal-bearing section (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi> J </mml:mi><mml:mn> 3 </mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn> 2 </mml:mn><mml:mo> − </mml:mo><mml:mn> 1 </mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ) of the Liaoyuan coal-bearing group (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi> J </mml:mi><mml:mn> 3 </mml:mn><mml:mn> 2 </mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ). Danyi Coal Seam is mostly minable in the mining area. The coal seam is relatively well-developed and its strata horizon is stable. The controlled strike length is about 1.5 km, and the controlled dip extension is about 2.4 km. The dip of the coal seam is 297˚, the dip angle is 10˚ - 25˚. The coal seam thickness is 0.70 - 6.06 m, with an average thickness of 2.68 m. The variation coefficient of the coal seam thickness is 63%, and the occurrence elevation is from −130 m to −1000 m. The coal seam structure is simple, generally containing 1 - 3 layers of parting. The thickness of the parting is generally about 0.2 m, with a maximum thickness of 0.48 m. The parting is mostly mudstone and carbonaceous mudstone. The coal seam is relatively thin and the thickness variation is not large. From the limb to the axis of the syncline, the coal seam thickness gradually increases, and the number and thickness of the parting in the coal seam also tend to increase.</p>
        <p>The roof of the coal seam is a black mudstone marker layer, with a thickness of 2.70 - 75.00 m and an average thickness of 35.00 m. The floor of the coal seam is thin-layer mudstone, carbonaceous mudstone, tuffaceous sandstone, and tuff, with a thickness of 0 - 11.20 m.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot4">
        <title>2.4. Gas Occurrence Conditions</title>
        <p>The absolute gas emission of the mine is 13.53 m<sup>3</sup>/min, and the relative gas emission is 3.79 m<sup>3</sup>/t. The maximum absolute gas emission of the coal-mining face is 7.18 m<sup>3</sup>/min, and the maximum absolute gas emission of the tunneling face is 1.45 m<sup>3</sup>/min. It is a high-gas mine. No gas dynamic phenomena such as hole-spraying and drill-jamming have occurred during the daily mining process.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec3">
      <title>3. Implementation Plan</title>
      <p>In accordance with the relevant provisions of China’s “Specifications for Identification of Coal Mine Gas Grade” (GB 40880-2021), “Detailed Rules for Prevention and Control of Coal and Gas Outbursts,” and “Measures for Identification of Coal Mine Gas Grade,” for coal seams where no gas dynamic phenomena have occurred, the identification of outburst risk shall be carried out using the actually measured outburst risk indicators.</p>
      <p>Since no coal and gas dynamic phenomena have occurred in the Danyi Coal Seam of the Xi’an Coal Mine, the determination and analysis are carried out using the initial velocity of gas emission (Δ<italic>p</italic>), the firmness coefficient of coal (<italic>f</italic>), the original gas pressure (relative) in the coal seam (<italic>P</italic>), and the coal destruction type. Combined with the actual underground measurement of the original gas content of the coal seam (<italic>W</italic>), the coal and gas outburst risk of the Danyi Coal Seam in the mine was tested and analyzed. The critical values for each indicator are based on the Chinese standard “Specification for Identification of Coal Mine Gas Grade” (GB 40880-2021). Among them, gas content serves as an auxiliary indicator, which is determined by the assessment agency based on experience combined with specific regional conditions.</p>
      <fig id="fig3">
        <label>Figure 3</label>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2173820-rId18.jpeg?20260722023905" />
      </fig>
      <p><bold>Figure 3.</bold> Identification implementation plan.</p>
      <p>The Beiliu Area, only the area below the −400 m station contains original coal bodies unaffected by mining. In this area, the −400 m station to the −550 m level is currently in the stage of development and extension, with only two rock roadways in the coal seam floor—the belt conveyor dip and the second-stage dark return air shaft extension—under construction. Therefore, the zone for carrying out coal and gas outburst identification is limited. Based on the drilling capability of the mine’s cross-layer pressure-measuring boreholes, the work can only be carried out within the area delineated by inflection points A to G. This area is irregular in shape, with a length of only 220 m and a width of only 50 m. The identification zone, pressure-measuring boreholes, and sampling point layout are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec4">
      <title>4. Determination of Identification Indicators</title>
      <sec id="sec4dot1">
        <title>4.1. Investigation of Coal Failure Type</title>
        <p>Coal failure type refers to the category formed due to different degrees of destruction of the coal body structure under the action of tectonic stress, resulting in different physical and mechanical properties and characteristics of the coal. The more severe the coal failure, the greater the outburst risk. When determining the coal failure type, the following aspects are generally considered: coal luster, coal structure and structural characteristics, coal joint properties, coal joint surface properties, coal strength, and coal fracture properties. According to the “Regulations on Prevention and Control of Coal and Gas Outbursts,” coal failure types are classified into Types I, II, III, IV, and V. The outburst risk of coal increases gradually from Type I to Type V. Generally, Types I and II belong to the non-outburst-prone type, Type III belongs to the outburst-prone type (tending to be dangerous), and Types IV and V belong to the outburst-prone type.</p>
        <p>On-site observations were carried out on newly exposed coal seams at locations such as the Belt Decline Roadway (BDR) in the Danyi Coal Seam of the Beiliu Area. The observation points are arranged as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, numbered TCJD20170174, TCJD20170175, TCJD20170176, TCJD20170177, and TCJD20170178. Coal samples at these points were mainly collected from the soft sub-layer within the observed coal seam, representing the portion of the entire seam most prone to outburst. Through methods such as visual inspection and hand manipulation, it was found that the Danyi Coal Seam exhibits a vitreous to greasy luster, belonging to the semi-bright to semi-dark type. In terms of structure and texture, the coal seam shows relatively obvious horizontal bedding and is basically layered in structure. Regarding joint properties, secondary joint surfaces are relatively developed and irregular. In terms of joint surface properties, the joint surfaces are slippery and can be easily broken apart by hands. As for fracture properties, the fractures are conchoidal and irregular. A comprehensive judgment indicates that the Danyi Coal Seam belongs to Type II failure type.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot2">
        <title>4.2. Initial Velocity of Gas Emission and Firmness Coefficient</title>
        <p>The initial velocity of gas emission (Δ<italic>p</italic>) is one of the indicators for predicting the risk of coal and gas outburst. This indicator reflects the coal’s ability to adsorb gas under atmospheric pressure and the speed of gas emission (the transition of gas from adsorbed state to free state) when the gas-bearing coal body is exposed. The initial velocity of gas emission can reflect the pore structure and microscopic degree of failure of the coal. The performance of coal in emitting gas is determined by the physical and mechanical properties of the coal. It is a single indicator reflecting the risk of outburst in a coal seam area. In the development process of coal and gas outburst, the movement and destructive force of gas largely depend on the desorption and emission capacity of gas when the gas-bearing coal body is destroyed. Under the same gas content conditions, the greater the initial velocity of gas emission of the coal, the more favorable it is for the occurrence and development of outbursts.</p>
        <p>The firmness coefficient of coal (<italic>f</italic>) is a comprehensive indicator representing the ability of coal to resist external destructive forces. In essence, it reflects the amount of energy consumed per unit mass of coal when destroyed. The firmness coefficient of coal is mainly determined by the physical and mechanical properties of the coal. The greater the strength of the coal body, the higher the firmness coefficient, the greater the resistance encountered during coal and gas outburst, and the lower the possibility of outburst occurrence.</p>
        <p>Coal samples of the Danyi Coal Seam were collected at five sampling points from exposed coal seams or through core drilling, and the sampling and tested results are detailed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> and <bold>Table 2</bold>.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 2</bold><bold>.</bold>Tested results of initial velocity of gas emission (Δ<italic>p</italic>) and firmness coefficient (<italic>f</italic>).</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl2">
          <label>Table 2</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Coal Seam</td>
                <td>Coal Sample No.</td>
                <td>Sampling Location</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Δ</bold>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>p</bold>
                  </italic>
                  (mmHg)
                </td>
                <td>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>f</bold>
                  </italic>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="5">Danyi Coal Seam</td>
                <td>TCJD20170174</td>
                <td>226 m at of Belt Decline Roadway</td>
                <td>5.8</td>
                <td>0.60</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>TCJD20170175</td>
                <td>310 m at of Belt Decline Roadway</td>
                <td>4.4</td>
                <td>0.86</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>TCJD20170176</td>
                <td>Borehole 3-1, 178 m at of Belt Decline Roadway</td>
                <td>4.6</td>
                <td>1.03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>TCJD20170177</td>
                <td>Borehole 4-2, 260 m at of Belt Decline Roadway</td>
                <td>5.6</td>
                <td>1.33</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>TCJD20170178</td>
                <td>Borehole 4-1, 260 m at of Belt Decline Roadway</td>
                <td>9.2</td>
                <td>1.25</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <fig id="fig4">
          <label>Figure 4</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2173820-rId19.jpeg?20260722023906" />
        </fig>
        <p>(a) TCJD20170174 (b) TCJD20170175</p>
        <fig id="fig5">
          <label>Figure 5</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2173820-rId20.jpeg?20260722023906" />
        </fig>
        <p>(c) TCJD20170176 (d) TCJD20170177</p>
        <fig id="fig6">
          <label>Figure 6</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2173820-rId21.jpeg?20260722023906" />
        </fig>
        <p>(e) TCJD20170178</p>
        <p><bold>Figure 4.</bold> Gas emission curve of Danyi coal seam coal samples.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot3">
        <title>4.3. Determination of Coal Seam Gas Pressure</title>
        <p>Coal seam gas pressure is one of the main indicators for judging the risk of coal and gas outburst. Gas pressure is also an important indicator of the level of gas compression energy contained in the coal body, serves as the necessary driving force for the occurrence of coal and gas outburst, and is a necessary condition for the occurrence of coal and gas outburst.</p>
        <p>Based on the existing roadway layout and coal seam exposure conditions in the mine within the identification zone, and after comprehensive analysis of rock fracture development, coal seam exposure time, roadway cross-section size, and other factors, two rock roadways—the Extension of the Second-stage Blind Return Air Shaft (ESBRAS) and the Belt Decline Roadway (BDR)—were adopted to carry out a total of 5 measurement points (10 cross-layer boreholes) to determine the coal seam gas pressure, among which measurement point No. 5 is located at the deepest part of this identification zone. The starting point of upward boreholes is 1.5 m to 2.0 m from the roadway floor, while that of downward boreholes is about 0.5 m from the roadway floor. The completion parameters of the boreholes are listed in <bold>Table 3</bold>. The borehole diameter is 113 mm, and the cross-layer pressure-measuring boreholes penetrate the full thickness of the coal seam. During the construction of all boreholes, no gas dynamic phenomena such as bit pulling or blowout were encountered in the Danyi Coal Seam. The passive pressure measurement method was adopted for this identification to measure the gas pressure of the Danyi Coal Seam.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 3</bold><bold>.</bold>Completion parameters of boreholes for gas outburst identification.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl3">
          <label>Table 3</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">Borehole No.</td>
                <td rowspan="2">Measurement Location</td>
                <td colspan="3">Borehole Parameters</td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  CIP
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="2">Rock Part (m)</td>
                <td rowspan="2">Coal Part (m)</td>
                <td rowspan="2">Whole Length (m)</td>
                <td rowspan="2">Sealing Length (m)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Azimuth</td>
                <td>Inclination</td>
                <td>
                  SPE
                  <sup>b</sup>
                  (m)
                </td>
                <td>
                  CSFE
                  <sup>c</sup>
                  (m)
                </td>
                <td>
                  CSBD
                  <sup>e</sup>
                  (m)
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>1-1</td>
                <td rowspan="2">Intersection of ESBRAS and BDR</td>
                <td>291</td>
                <td>25</td>
                <td>−390.1</td>
                <td>−367.9</td>
                <td>677.9</td>
                <td>53.25</td>
                <td>3.75</td>
                <td>57</td>
                <td>30</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>1-2</td>
                <td>304</td>
                <td>25</td>
                <td>−390.1</td>
                <td>−368.6</td>
                <td>678.6</td>
                <td>54</td>
                <td>9</td>
                <td>63</td>
                <td>40</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>2-1</td>
                <td rowspan="2">120 m, BDR</td>
                <td>349</td>
                <td>28</td>
                <td>−437.5</td>
                <td>−416.4</td>
                <td>726.4</td>
                <td>48</td>
                <td>2.5</td>
                <td>50.5</td>
                <td>30</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>2-2</td>
                <td>10</td>
                <td>33</td>
                <td>−437.5</td>
                <td>−409.7</td>
                <td>719.7</td>
                <td>54</td>
                <td>1.5</td>
                <td>55.5</td>
                <td>30</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>3-1</td>
                <td rowspan="2">170 m, BDR</td>
                <td>33</td>
                <td>38</td>
                <td>−452.6</td>
                <td>−436.0</td>
                <td>746.0</td>
                <td>29.5</td>
                <td>4.5</td>
                <td>34</td>
                <td>20</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>3-2</td>
                <td>66</td>
                <td>43</td>
                <td>−452.6</td>
                <td>−413.7</td>
                <td>723.7</td>
                <td>59.25</td>
                <td>6.75</td>
                <td>66</td>
                <td>20</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>4-1</td>
                <td rowspan="2">265 m, BDR</td>
                <td>20</td>
                <td>−15</td>
                <td>−477.7</td>
                <td>−485.7</td>
                <td>795.7</td>
                <td>32.5</td>
                <td>4.5</td>
                <td>37</td>
                <td>20</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>4-2</td>
                <td>45</td>
                <td>−10</td>
                <td>−477.7</td>
                <td>−482.9</td>
                <td>792.9</td>
                <td>31</td>
                <td>3.5</td>
                <td>34.5</td>
                <td>20</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>5-1</td>
                <td rowspan="2">290 m, BDR</td>
                <td>15</td>
                <td>−15</td>
                <td>−488.0</td>
                <td>−496.2</td>
                <td>806.2</td>
                <td>32.5</td>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>36.5</td>
                <td>20</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>5-2</td>
                <td>45</td>
                <td>−10</td>
                <td>−488.0</td>
                <td>−494.3</td>
                <td>804.3</td>
                <td>37</td>
                <td>4.5</td>
                <td>41.5</td>
                <td>20</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>a. Coal Intersection Point; b. Starting Point Elevation; c. Coal Seam Floor Elevation; d. Coal Seam Burial Depth; e. Coal Seam Burial Depth.</p>
        <fig id="fig7">
          <label>Figure 7</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2173820-rId22.jpeg?20260722023907" />
        </fig>
        <p>(a) Cross-section of Upward Borehole (b) Cross-section of Downward Borehole</p>
        <p><bold>Figure 5.</bold> Typical borehole cross-section.</p>
        <p>Cement slurry was used as the sealing material. The sealing length of cross-layer boreholes depends on the lithology of the coal seam roof (or floor) and the borehole length. The pressure measuring pipe is connected using 4-point seamless steel pipes with threads at both ends. At the bottom section of the borehole, within 0.5 m from the end, sieve holes are made to serve as the gas inlet channel. Each section of the pressure measuring steel pipe is 2 m in length. To ensure the airtightness, the pipe joints are wrapped with PTFE tape. The end of the pressure measuring tail pipe is wrapped with fine copper gauze to prevent coal chips and debris from entering and clogging the pipeline. The cross-section of the completed boreholes is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>.</p>
        <p>The gas pressure observation results were recorded on a coal seam gas pressure measurement record sheet, and plotted on a coordinate graph with time (T/d) as the horizontal axis and gas pressure (P/MPa) as the vertical axis. If the pressure observation time meets the above principles and the pressure change is less than 0.015 MPa within 3 days, the pressure measurement work can be concluded, and the current pressure is the final gas pressure (relative pressure) of that pressure-measuring borehole. The general pressure observation period should be no less than 30 days.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 4.</bold> Summary of coal seam gas pressure determination results.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl4">
          <label>Table 4</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Borehole No.</td>
                <td>Measurement Location</td>
                <td>CSFE (m)</td>
                <td>CSBD (m)</td>
                <td>
                  Coal Seam Gas Pressure (Relative)
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  (MPa)
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>1-1</td>
                <td rowspan="2">Intersection of ESBRAS and BDR</td>
                <td>−367.9</td>
                <td>677.9</td>
                <td>0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>1-2</td>
                <td>−368.6</td>
                <td>678.6</td>
                <td>0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>2-1</td>
                <td rowspan="2">120 m, BDR</td>
                <td>−416.4</td>
                <td>726.4</td>
                <td>0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>2-2</td>
                <td>−409.7</td>
                <td>719.7</td>
                <td>0.140</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>3-1</td>
                <td rowspan="2">170 m, BDR</td>
                <td>−436.0</td>
                <td>746.0</td>
                <td>0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>3-2</td>
                <td>−413.7</td>
                <td>723.7</td>
                <td>0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>4-1</td>
                <td rowspan="2">265 m, BDR</td>
                <td>−485.7</td>
                <td>795.7</td>
                <td>0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>4-2</td>
                <td>−482.9</td>
                <td>792.9</td>
                <td>0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>5-1</td>
                <td rowspan="2">290 m, BDR</td>
                <td>−496.2</td>
                <td>806.2</td>
                <td>0.040</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>5-2</td>
                <td>−494.3</td>
                <td>804.3</td>
                <td>0.105</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <fig id="fig8">
          <label>Figure 8</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2173820-rId23.jpeg?20260722023907" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 6</bold><bold>.</bold> Gas pressure rise curve of pressure-reading boreholes in the Danyi coal seam.</p>
        <p>Ultimately, the readings of pressure gauges at Borehole 1-1#, 1-2#, 2-1#, 3-1#, 3-2#, 4-1#, and 4-2# were 0 MPa; 5-1# was 0.040 MPa, 5-2# was 0.105 MPa, and 2-2# was 0.140 MPa, as shown in <bold>Table 4</bold>. The observation results were plotted, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot4">
        <title>4.4. Coal Seam Gas Content</title>
        <p>For gas content determination, coal samples were taken using a fixed-point sampling device at a sampling depth of 25 m. The determination results of the coal seam gas content are shown in <bold>Table 5</bold>.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 5</bold><bold>.</bold>Summary of gas content determination results.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl5">
          <label>Table 5</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Coal Seam</td>
                <td>Coal Sample No.</td>
                <td>
                  Coal Gas Content (m
                  <sup>3</sup>
                  /t)
                </td>
                <td>Burial Depth (m)</td>
                <td>Test Method</td>
                <td>Evaluation</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="5">Danyi Coal Seam</td>
                <td>−270 m Level Return Air Crosscut</td>
                <td>2.92</td>
                <td>580</td>
                <td>Direct method</td>
                <td>Reference</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>230 m, E103 Working Face Headgate</td>
                <td>1.95</td>
                <td>710</td>
                <td>Direct method</td>
                <td>Adopted</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>45 m, E104 Working Face Tailgate</td>
                <td>1.33</td>
                <td>547</td>
                <td>Indirect method</td>
                <td>Adopted</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>170 m, E103 Working Face Tailgate</td>
                <td>1.19</td>
                <td>525</td>
                <td>Indirect method</td>
                <td>Adopted</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Average</td>
                <td>1.85</td>
                <td>590.5</td>
                <td>/</td>
                <td>/</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>It can be seen that the gas content of the Danyi Coal Seam ranges from 1.19 m<sup>3</sup>/t to 2.92 m<sup>3</sup>/t, with a maximum gas content of 2.92 m<sup>3</sup>/t and an average gas content of 1.85 m<sup>3</sup>/t. Gas is generated in and stored in the coal seam. The magnitude of gas content is also closely related to the burial depth of the coal seam: the deeper the burial depth, the less likely the gas is to escape, so more gas is stored in the coal seam, resulting in a higher gas content, and vice versa.</p>
        <p>In <bold>Table 5</bold>, the gas content at the −270 m level return air crosscut significantly deviates from the overall gas distribution in the area, indicating that this point is influenced by local geological structures and should only be used as a reference for analyzing gas distribution patterns. The analysis of gas distribution patterns was conducted using the other three measurement points.</p>
        <fig id="fig9">
          <label>Figure 9</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2173820-rId24.jpeg?20260722023908" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 7.</bold>Relationship between gas content and burial depth.</p>
        <p>Using the <italic>Adopted</italic> data of the Single Coal Seam gas content in <bold>Table 5</bold>, the relationship curve between gas content and burial depth for the single coal seam is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>.</p>
        <p>As can be seen from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>, the gas content of the Danyi Coal Seam in the Beiliu Area of Xi’an Coal Mine increases with the increase of coal seam burial depth. There is a good linear statistical relationship between the gas content and burial depth of this coal seam (correlation coefficient R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9958), as shown in Equation (1).</p>
        <p><italic>W</italic> = 0.004<italic>H</italic> − 0.8824 (1)</p>
        <p>where:</p>
        <p><italic>W</italic>—coal seam gas content, m<sup>3</sup>/t;</p>
        <p><italic>H</italic>—coal seam burial depth, m.</p>
        <p>Gas content gradient refers to the average increase in gas content for every 100 m increase in coal seam burial depth. From Equation (1), it can be seen that the gas content growth gradient of the Danyi Coal Seam is 0.4 (m<sup>3</sup>/t)/(100 m), that is, for every 100 m increase in depth, the coal seam gas content increases by 0.4 m<sup>3</sup>/t.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec5">
      <title>5. Outburst Risk Analysis</title>
      <p>During the construction of the test boreholes, no gas abnormal phenomena such as blowout or bit pulling were observed. The summary of coal and gas outburst identification indicators is shown in <bold>Table 6</bold>.</p>
      <p><bold>Table 6.</bold> Determination results of identification indicators.</p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl6">
        <label>Table 6</label>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>Coal Seam</td>
              <td>Identification Indicators</td>
              <td>Coal Destruction Type</td>
              <td>
                Initial Gas Emission Velocity Δ
                <italic>p</italic>
                (mmHg)
              </td>
              <td>
                Coal Firmness Coefficient
                <italic>f</italic>
              </td>
              <td>
                Relative Gas Pressure
                <italic>P</italic>
                (MPa)
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="3">Danyi Coal Seam</td>
              <td>Critical Value</td>
              <td>III, IV, V</td>
              <td>≥10</td>
              <td>≤0.5</td>
              <td>≥0.74</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Measured Value</td>
              <td>Type II</td>
              <td>9.2</td>
              <td>0.60</td>
              <td>0.14</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Whether the critical value is reached</td>
              <td>Not Reached</td>
              <td>Not Reached</td>
              <td>Not Reached</td>
              <td>Not Reached</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p>For the single coal seam (Danyi Coal Seam) in the Beiliu Area, Xi’an Coal Mine, it is located within the same gas-geological unit. The gas pressure measurement points include no fewer than 3 points along the strike direction and no fewer than 3 points along the dip direction, with measurement points also arranged at the lowest elevation and maximum burial depth within the identified area. This arrangement complies with the requirements of the Chinese standard “Specification for Identification of Coal Mine Gas Grade” (GB 40880-2021). Therefore, the test results are representative of the entire identified area. All the four individual indicators of the coal seam outburst risk measured within the identification zone did not reach the critical values for determining single coal seam outburst risk indicators stipulated in the outburst prevention regulations. Moreover, no coal and gas outburst dynamic phenomena have ever occurred in the mining activities in the Beiliu Area. Consequently, it is hereby determined that, within the delineated area of the Danyi Coal Seam in Beiliu Area, the region at a burial depth of 806.2 m (elevation −496.2 m) and shallower exhibits no proneness to coal and gas outburst.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec6">
      <title>6. Conclusions</title>
      <p>1) In the Danyi Coal Seam of the Beiliu Area, the maximum coal failure type is Type II, the maximum initial velocity of gas emission is 9.2 mmHg, the minimum firmness coefficient of coal is 0.6, and the maximum original gas pressure (relative) in the coal seam is 0.14 MPa.</p>
      <p>2) The average gas content of the Danyi Coal Seam in the Beiliu Area is 1.85 m<sup>3</sup>/t, and the maximum gas content is 2.92 m<sup>3</sup>/t. The gas content shows an increasing trend with the increase of coal seam burial depth, and the gas content growth gradient of the Danyi Coal Seam is 0.4 (m<sup>3</sup>/t)/100 m.</p>
      <p>3) In Beiliu Area of Xi’an Coal Mine, within the identification zone, the area with a burial depth of less than 806.2 m (elevation −496.2 m) has no risk of coal and gas outburst.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec7">
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>Xi’an Coal Mine is thanked for its support of this project.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">An, F., Yuan, Y., Chen, X., Li, Z., &amp; Li, L. (2019). Expansion Energy of Coal Gas for the Initiation of Coal and Gas Outbursts. <italic>Fuel, 235,</italic> 551-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.07.132 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fuel.2018.07.132</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.07.132">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.07.132</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>An, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Yuan, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chen, X.</string-name>
              <string-name>Li, Z.</string-name>
              <string-name>Li, L.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2019</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fuel.2018.07.132</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Cheng, Y. P., &amp; Zhou, H. X. (2021). Research Progress of Sensitive Index and Critical Values for Coal and Gas Outburst Prediction. <italic>Coal Science and Technology, 49,</italic> 146-154. (In Chinese) https://doi.org/10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2021.01.009 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2021.01.009</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2021.01.009">https://doi.org/10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2021.01.009</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Cheng, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhou, H.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2021.01.009</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Fan, C. J., Jiang, X. F., Liu, T., Luo, M. K., Han, J., &amp; Lan, T. W. (2026). Recent Advances on Mechanism and Prevention Technology of Coal and Gas Outburst Disasters in China. <italic>Coal Science and Technology, 54,</italic> 1-38. (In Chinese) https://doi.org/10.12438/cst.2025-1564 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12438/cst.2025-1564</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.12438/cst.2025-1564">https://doi.org/10.12438/cst.2025-1564</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Fan, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Jiang, X.</string-name>
              <string-name>Liu, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Luo, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Han, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lan, T.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2026</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12438/cst.2025-1564</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hu, Q., Zhou, S., &amp; Zhou, X. (2008). Mechanical Mechanism of Coal and Gas Outburst Process. <italic>Journal of</italic><italic>China</italic><italic>Coal Society, 33,</italic> 1368-1372. (In Chinese) https://doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2008.12.018 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2008.12.018</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2008.12.018">https://doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2008.12.018</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Hu, Q.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhou, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhou, X.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2008</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2008.12.018</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Li, X. J., &amp; Lin, B. Q. (2010). Status of Research and Analysis on Coal and Gas Outburst Mechanism. <italic>Coal Geology &amp; Exploration, 38,</italic> 7-13. (In Chinese) https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2010.01.002 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2010.01.002</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2010.01.002">https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2010.01.002</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Li, X.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lin, B.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2010</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2010.01.002</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ma, Y., Nie, B., He, X., Li, X., Meng, J., &amp; Song, D. (2020). Mechanism Investigation on Coal and Gas Outburst: An Overview. <italic>International</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Minerals,</italic><italic>Metallurgy</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Materials,</italic><italic>27,</italic> 872-887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-019-1956-9 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12613-019-1956-9</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-019-1956-9">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-019-1956-9</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ma, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Nie, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>He, X.</string-name>
              <string-name>Li, X.</string-name>
              <string-name>Meng, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Song, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Minerals, M</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12613-019-1956-9</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Sobczyk, J. (2014). A Comparison of the Influence of Adsorbed Gases on Gas Stresses Leading to Coal and Gas Outburst. <italic>Fuel,</italic><italic>115,</italic> 288-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.07.016 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fuel.2013.07.016</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.07.016">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.07.016</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Sobczyk, J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fuel.2013.07.016</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Wang, C., &amp; Cheng, Y. (2023). Role of Coal Deformation Energy in Coal and Gas Outburst: A Review. <italic>Fuel, 332,</italic> Article ID: 126019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126019 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126019</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126019">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126019</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Wang, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Cheng, Y.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <fpage>126019</fpage>
            <elocation-id>ID</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126019</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Wang, E. Y., Zhang, G. R., Zhang, C. L., &amp; Li, Z. H. (2022). Research Progress and Prospect on Theory and Technology for Coal and Gas Outburst Control and Protection in China. <italic>Journal of</italic><italic>China</italic><italic>Coal Society, 47,</italic> 297-322. (In Chinese) https://doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.yg21.1846 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.yg21.1846</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.yg21.1846">https://doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.yg21.1846</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Wang, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhang, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhang, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Li, Z.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.yg21.1846</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Xu, T., Tang, C. A., Yang, T. H., Zhu, W. C., &amp; Liu, J. (2006). Numerical Investigation of Coal and Gas Outbursts in Underground Collieries. <italic>International</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Rock</italic><italic>Mechanics</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Mining</italic><italic>Sciences,</italic><italic>43,</italic> 905-919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.01.001 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.01.001</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.01.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.01.001</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Xu, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tang, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Yang, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhu, W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Liu, J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2006</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.01.001</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Yuan, L., Wang, E. Y., Ma, Y. K., Liu, Y. B., &amp; Li, X. L. (2023). Research Progress of Coal and Rock Dynamic Disasters and Scientific and Technological Problems in China. <italic>Journal of</italic><italic>China</italic><italic>Coal Society, 48,</italic> 1825-1845. (In Chinese) https://doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2023.0264 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2023.0264</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2023.0264">https://doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2023.0264</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Yuan, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wang, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ma, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Liu, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Li, X.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2023.0264</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Yuan, L., Xue, Y., Wang, H. P., Ma, Z. W., Yu, G. F., &amp; Kang, J. H. (2020). New Progress in Physical Simulation Experiment of Coal and Gas Outburst. <italic>Hazard</italic><italic>Control</italic><italic>in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2,</italic> 1-10. (In Chinese) https://doi.org/10.19952/j.cnki.2096-5052.2020.01.001 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.19952/j.cnki.2096-5052.2020.01.001</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.19952/j.cnki.2096-5052.2020.01.001">https://doi.org/10.19952/j.cnki.2096-5052.2020.01.001</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Yuan, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Xue, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wang, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ma, Z.</string-name>
              <string-name>Yu, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kang, J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.19952/j.cnki.2096-5052.2020.01.001</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Zhang, C. L., Wang, P. Z., Wang, E. Y., Xu, J., Li, Z. H., &amp; Liu, X. F. (2023). Coal and Gas Outburst Mechanism: Research Progress and Prospect in China over the Past 70 Years. <italic>Coal Geology &amp; Exploration, 51,</italic> 59-94. (In Chinese) https://doi.org/10.12363/issn.1001-1986.23.02.0054 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12363/issn.1001-1986.23.02.0054</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.12363/issn.1001-1986.23.02.0054">https://doi.org/10.12363/issn.1001-1986.23.02.0054</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Zhang, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wang, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wang, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Xu, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Li, Z.</string-name>
              <string-name>Liu, X.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12363/issn.1001-1986.23.02.0054</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <label>14.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Zhang, C. L., Wang, Y. B., Wang, E. Y., Song, S., Ceng, W., &amp; Wang, P. Z. (2022). Spatial-Temporal Evolution Law of Temperature in Coal Seam and Roadway during Coal and Gas Outburst. <italic>Safety in Coal Mines, 53,</italic> 57-63. (In Chinese) https://doi.org/10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.2022.10.008 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.2022.10.008</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.2022.10.008">https://doi.org/10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.2022.10.008</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Zhang, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wang, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wang, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Song, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ceng, W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wang, P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.2022.10.008</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>