<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.4" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ojapps</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Open Journal of Applied Sciences</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2165-3925</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2165-3917</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojapps.2026.167137</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ojapps-152682</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Biomedical</subject>
          <subject>Life Sciences</subject>
          <subject>Chemistry</subject>
          <subject>Materials Science</subject>
          <subject>Computer Science</subject>
          <subject>Communications</subject>
          <subject>Engineering</subject>
          <subject>Physics</subject>
          <subject>Mathematics</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Comparative Study of the Nutritional and Functional Properties of Flours from Three Varieties of Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) from the Korhogo Market</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0009-0002-9808-9754</contrib-id>
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Oulaï</surname>
            <given-names>Patricia Penan Dehegnan</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Bamba</surname>
            <given-names>Stephanie Mandoue</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Ouattara</surname>
            <given-names>Silvere Gninfanni</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Bidiga</surname>
            <given-names>Inoussa</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Bamba</surname>
            <given-names>Bruno Sigui Bio</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label> Laboratory of Biotechnology and Valorization of Agroresouces and Natural Substances, Peleforo GON COULIBALY University, Korhogo, Côte d’Ivoire </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="conflict" id="fn-conflict">
          <p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>03</day>
        <month>07</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <month>07</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>07</issue>
      <fpage>2440</fpage>
      <lpage>2456</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>12</day>
          <month>06</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>19</day>
          <month>07</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="published">
          <day>22</day>
          <month>07</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2026 by the authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p> This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link> ). </license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/ojapps.2026.167137">https://doi.org/10.4236/ojapps.2026.167137</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p>The bean, <italic>Phaseolus vulgaricus</italic> L., is a legume that is still not among the most widely consumed plant species in Côte d’Ivoire. The aim of this study is to compare the nutritional and functional potential of flours from three bean varieties with a view to promoting their use. The biochemical, antioxidant, and the functional properties parameters were analyzed using standard methods. White bean flours had higher ash, protein, fiber, lipid, potassium, magnesium, calcium, zinc, polyphenol, and swelling power contents than red and black bean flours, with contents ranging from 3.4 to 5.2%; 17.89 to 32.58%; 14.5 to 32%; 1.2 to 1.4%; 12,780 to 19,350 mg/kg; 1793 to 2670 mg/kg; 719.70 to 1000 mg/kg; 43.10 to 47.20 mg/kg; 151.08 EAG/100g to 234.34 EAG/100g and 206.91% to 650.42%. Red bean flour had the highest iron and flavonoid content and greater water and oil absorption capacity compared to black and white bean flours, whose values ranged from 172 to 336.30 mg/kg; 46.58 EQ/100g to 56.33 EQ/100g; 176.58% to 318.86% and 81.65% to 100.95%. Black bean flour had the highest carbohydrate content compared to black and white bean flours, with values ranging from 19.63% to 51.16%. The flours from the three bean varieties studied are an important nutritional and functional source that could be exploited.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated" xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>Bean</kwd>
        <kwd>Legume</kwd>
        <kwd>Nutritional and Functional Potential</kwd>
        <kwd>Valorization</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>Among the diets recommended in the context of food security, legumes are an important lever in the quest for a balanced diet and nutrition for consumers. In Africa and Latin America, dry beans (<italic>Phaseolus</italic><italic>vulgaris</italic> L.) are one of the most important and commonly consumed food legumes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>] because they are an essential food for rural populations. According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>], dry bean production in East Africa is estimated at 4.8 million tons, 1.22 million tons in Central Africa, 0.78 million tons in West Africa, and 0.68 million tons in Southern Africa. Nutritionally, dry beans are rich in protein. They contain significant amounts of essential amino acids such as leucine, lysine, phenylalanine, isoleucine, threonine, methionine, and tryptophan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>]. Dried beans are also a good source of starch, dietary fiber, minerals, and vitamins, and are rich in bioactive compounds that promote healthy development [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]. This legume is therefore recommended for populations suffering from food insecurity, in order to compensate for the lack of animal protein due to financial constraints or health concerns related to the consumption of animal protein [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>]. Bean seeds, whether fresh or dried and ground into flour, can be consumed in various forms. In Côte d’Ivoire, beans are mainly grown in the north, a region where they are particularly well suited. The most commonly consumed varieties of beans are white beans, followed by red beans and finally black beans [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>]. It should be noted that each variety has its own specific composition. White beans, for example, are distinguished by their high content of resistant starch, which is beneficial for intestinal health. Red and black beans are particularly rich in antioxidants, especially anthocyanins, which give them their color and help fight oxidative stress [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>]. Low in carbohydrates and calories, beans are ideal for low-calorie diets. They are also a good source of soluble fiber when eaten fresh or dried, and are therefore beneficial for intestinal transit. Despite their importance in terms of food and nutrition, the value of beans remains limited due to a lack of comparative data between different varieties. This legume is still not widely used among the most commonly cultivated plant species, even though its popularization could help ensure food security for the most vulnerable populations. The objective of this study was to compare the nutritional and functional potential of flours from three varieties of beans consumed in the department of Korhogo (Côte d’Ivoire) with a view to promoting their use.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec2">
      <title>2. Materials and Methods</title>
      <sec id="sec2dot1">
        <title>2.1. Biological Material</title>
        <p>The biological material used consisted of seeds from three varieties of beans purchased from seven women at the main market in Korhogo. These seeds were purchased between September and November 2024. After purchase, the seeds from the different varieties were transported to the laboratory in clean, airtight plastic jars. The botanical identification of the bean seeds was verified by a botanist from Péléforo GON COULIBALY University in Korhogo. The bean seeds were then sorted by color and placed in clean, airtight plastic jars for subsequent analysis.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot2">
        <title>2.2. Collection and Preparation of Samples for Analysis</title>
        <p>Once in the laboratory, the bean seeds contained in the different jars by variety (red, white, and black) were ground using a micro-grinder equipped with a 10 μm sieve. The resulting flours were packaged in plastic boxes and stored at room temperature for analysis.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot3">
        <title>2.3. Evaluation of the Nutritional Properties of Flours from Three Bean Varieties</title>
        <p>2.3.1. Moisture Content</p>
        <p>Moisture content was determined using the [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>] method. 5 g were weighed into a pre-weighed crucible and dried at 105˚C for 24 hours until a constant weight was achieved. After drying, the crucible was removed from the oven, cooled in a desiccator, and weighed. Moisture content was calculated using the formula: </p>
        <disp-formula id="FD1">
          <label>(1)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mrow>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>where, <italic>m</italic>1: Mass of the crucible + sample before drying; <italic>m</italic>2: Mass of the crucible + sample after drying; <italic>me</italic>: mass of the dried powdered samples.</p>
        <p>2.3.2. Ash </p>
        <p>Ash content was determined using the method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]. 5 g of dried powdered samples were weighed into a pre-weighed crucible and incinerated in a muffle furnace at 550˚C for 12 hours. After incineration, the crucible containing the ash was cooled in a desiccator and weighed. Ash content was calculated as follows: </p>
        <disp-formula id="FD2">
          <label>(2)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mrow>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>where, <italic>m</italic>0: Mass of the crucible; <italic>m</italic>1: Mass of the crucible + Ash; <italic>me</italic>: Mass of the dried powdered samples. </p>
        <p>2.3.3. Proteins</p>
        <p>Proteins content was determined using the Kjeldahl method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]. 1 g of dried powdered samples was digested in 20 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid at 400˚C for two hours with a mineralization catalyst (potassium sulfate + selenium). After digestion, the digest was diluted to 100 mL with distilled water. A 10 mL aliquot was mixed with 10 mL of 40% NaOH, and the mixture was distilled. Distillate was collected in 20 mL of 4% boric acid containing a mixed indicator (methyl red + bromocresol green) and titrated with 0.1 N sulfuric acid. Protein content was calculated as follows: </p>
        <disp-formula id="FD3">
          <label>(3)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
              <mml:mn>14</mml:mn>
              <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
              <mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
              <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mn>6.25</mml:mn>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mrow>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>where, <italic>V</italic>1: Volume of sulfuric acid for the sample; <italic>V</italic>0: Volume of sulfuric acid for the blank; <italic>N</italic>: Normality of sulfuric acid; <italic>me</italic>: Mass of the sample.</p>
        <p>2.3.4. Fibres Content </p>
        <p>For crude fibers, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>] method was used. 2 g of bean seed flour were weighed into separate 250 mL round-bottom flasks, and 50 mL of 0.25 M sulfuric acid solution was added. The mixture obtained was boiled under reflux for 30 min. Thereafter, 50 mL of 0.3 M sodium hydroxide solution was added and the mixture was boiled again under reflux for 30 min and filtered through Whatman paper. The insoluble residue was then incinerated, and weighed for the determination of crude fibers content. </p>
        <disp-formula id="FD4">
          <label>(4)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>F</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
                <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
              </mml:mrow>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>2.3.5. Lipids Content </p>
        <p>Lipids content was determined using the [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>] Soxhlet extraction method. 10 grams of bean seed flour were weighed into a cellulose extraction cartridge, sealed with cotton, and placed in the Soxhlet extractor with 300 mL of hexane. Extraction was carried out under reflux for seven hours. After extraction, the hexane was evaporated using a rotary evaporator, and the pre-weighed flask containing the oil was dried at 100˚C for 20 minutes, cooled in a desiccator, and weighed lipid content was calculated as follows:</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD5">
          <label>(5)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>L</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mrow>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>2.3.6. Carbohydrates and Energy Value</p>
        <p>Carbohydrates content and calorific value were calculated and expressed on a dry matter basis using the following formulas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]: </p>
        <disp-formula id="FD6">
          <label>(6)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
              <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>[</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
                  </mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mi>L</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
                  </mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
                  </mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
                  </mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mi>F</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
                  </mml:mrow>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>]</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <disp-formula id="FD7">
          <label>(7)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
                    </mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
                      <mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
                    </mml:mrow>
                  </mml:mrow>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>2.44</mml:mn>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>3.57</mml:mn>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>8.37</mml:mn>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>2.3.7. Mineral Analysis </p>
        <p>The dried powdered samples 5 g were burned to ashes in a muffle furnace (Pyro-labo, France). The ashes obtained were dissolved in 10 mL of HCL/HNO3 and trans-ferred into 100 mL flasks and the volume was made up using deionized water. The mineral composition of each sample was determined using an Agilent 7500 c induc-tively coupled argon plasma mass spectrometer ICP-MS method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>]. Calibrations were performed using external standards prepared from a 1000 ppm single stock solution made up with 2% (v/v) nitric acid.</p>
        <p>2.3.8. Polyphenol Content </p>
        <p>Phenolic compounds are extracted with methanol using the method of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>]. 1 gram of bean seed flour is homogenized in 10 mL of 70% (v/v) methanol. The resulting mixture is centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 10 min. The pellet is recovered in 10 mL of 70% (v/v) methanol and centrifuged again. The supernatants are collected in a 50 mL flask and made up to the mark with distilled water. The resulting solution is called the methanolic extract. 1 mL of methanolic extract is introduced into a test tube and 1 mL of Folin-ciocalteu reagent is added. The tube is left to stand for 3 min, then 1 mL of 20% (w/v) sodium carbonate solution is added. The contents of the tube are made up to 10 mL with distilled water and placed in the dark for 30 min. Optical density is read at 725 nm against a blank. A standard range established from a stock solution of gallic acid (1 mg/mL) under the same conditions as the assay is used to determine the amount of phenols in the sample.</p>
        <p>2.3.9. Flavonoid Content </p>
        <p>The method for determining flavonoid content is that of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>]. A volume of 0.5 mL of methanolic extract is introduced into a test tube. To the contents of the tube are successively added 0.5 mL distilled water, 0.5 mL aluminum chloride and 0.5 mL sodium nitrite. The tube is left to stand for 30 min in the dark, and the optical density (OD) is read at 415 nm against a blank. The flavonoid content of the samples was determined by means of a calibration line performed under the same conditions as the assay, using a quercetin stock solution at 0.1 mg/mL.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot4">
        <title>2.4. Evaluation of the Functional Properties of Bean Flour</title>
        <p>2.4.1. Water Absorption Capacity and Water Solubility Index</p>
        <p>Water absorption capacity (<italic>WAC</italic>) and water solubility index (<italic>WSI</italic>) are determined according to the method of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>]. 1 g of bean seed flour (<italic>M</italic>0) is dispersed in 10 ml of distilled water in a centrifuge tube, and the mixture is agitated for 30 min using a shaker. After shaking, the mixture is placed in a water bath at 37˚C for 30 min, then centrifuged at 4500 rpm for 15 min. After centrifugation, the pellet obtained was weighed (<italic>M</italic>1) and then dried at 105˚C to obtain a constant mass (<italic>M</italic>2). The water absorption capacity and water solubility index are calculated by the following equations:</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD8">
          <label>(8)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                      <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                      <mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                    </mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
                  </mml:mrow>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
              <mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <disp-formula id="FD9">
          <label>(9)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
                      <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                      <mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                    </mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
                  </mml:mrow>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
              <mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>2.4.2. Determination of Oil Absorption Capacity </p>
        <p>Oil absorption capacity is determined using the [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>]. 1 g (<italic>M</italic>0) of bean seed flour is dispersed in 10 mL of refined palm oil. After stirring for 30 min, the mixture is centrifuged at 4500 rpm for 10 min and the resulting sediment is weighed (<italic>M</italic>1). The oil absorption capacity (<italic>OAC</italic>) is calculated using the following formula:</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD10">
          <label>(10)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>O</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                      <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                      <mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
                    </mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
                  </mml:mrow>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
              <mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>2.4.3. Swelling Power</p>
        <p>Swelling capacity was determined using the method described by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>], with modifications. One (1) gram (M) of bean seed flour was dispersed in 10 ml of distilled water in a centrifuge tube and then placed in a water bath at 50˚C. After stirring for 1 hour under agitation. The mixture was centrifuged at 4500 rpm for 10 min. The sediment (<italic>M</italic>1) and supernatant were placed in different containers, then placed in an oven at 105˚C for 24 hours for the supernatant (MS) and 48 hours for the sediment (<italic>M</italic>2). The supernatant was used to determine solubility (S), while the pellet was used to determine swelling power (<italic>SP</italic>) according to the following relationships: </p>
        <disp-formula id="FD11">
          <label>(11)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                      <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                      <mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                    </mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
                  </mml:mrow>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
              <mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot5">
        <title>2.5. Statistical Analysis</title>
        <p>The tests were carried out in triplicate and the statistical analysis of the data was performed using SPSS software (for Windows, Version 25). The statistical processing consisted of performing an analysis of variance with a single classification criterion (ANOVA 1): the color of the bean seeds. When significant differences were observed, at a 5% error threshold, the means were classified using the Student Newman Keuls (SNK) test. The results are presented as means followed by standard deviations, illustrated by figures (graphs) and tables.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec3">
      <title>3. Results and Discussion</title>
      <sec id="sec3dot1">
        <title>3.1. Results</title>
        <p>3.1.1. Proximate Composition of Flours from Three Bean Varieties</p>
        <p><bold>Table 1</bold> shows the proximate characteristics of the flour from the seeds of three bean varieties. Analysis of the data indicates a significant difference in the values obtained for all parameters evaluated between samples at P &lt; 5%. The moisture content of bean seed flour varied according to color. This variation ranged from 9.20 ± 0.20 to 12.10 ± 0.3%. White bean seed flour had the lowest water content 9.20% compared to black and red bean flour, with values of 10.40 ± 0.2 and 12.10 ± 0.300%, respectively. The dry matter content of bean seed flour ranged from 88 ± 0.30 to 90.40 ± 0.20%. In terms of dry matter, white bean seed flour 90.80% had the highest content, followed by black bean flour 89.60% and red bean flour 87.70%. The ash content of the different bean seed flours varied depending on the variety, ranging from 3.40 ± 0.00 to 5.20 ± 0.20%. The lowest ash content was found in the black variety 3.4% and the highest content recorded 5.20% was in the white variety. In terms of protein content, the proportions varied according to the color of the bean seeds. The highest protein content was obtained with white beans 32.58%, followed by red beans 18.50% and black beans 17.89%. There was no significant variation in lipid content between the three bean varieties studied. The values obtained ranged from 1.20 ± 0.20 to 1.40 ± 0.20% for the different samples. As for fiber content, it varied significantly, with averages ranging from 14.5 ± 0.71 to 15.7 ± 0.35 and 32 ± 0.71. The highest fiber content was observed in white bean seeds, and the lowest in red bean seeds. The carbohydrate content varied significantly depending on the bean variety, with averages ranging from 19.63 ± 0.25 to 51.16 ± 0.01%. White beans had the lowest content 19.63%, followed by red beans 49.9% and black beans 51.16%. The energy value also varied depending on the bean variety. This variation ranged from 221.35± 1,50 to 288.8 ± 0.80%. The variety with the lowest energy value 221.53 kcal was white bean flour, while the variety with the highest caloric potential 288.80 kcal was black. </p>
        <p>Table 1. Physicochemical and biochemical composition of flours from three bean varieties studied.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl1">
          <label>Table 1</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="4">
                  <bold>Samples</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>FGHN</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>FGHR</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>FGHB</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Moisture</bold>
                  <bold>%</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  10 .40 ± 0.2
                  <sup>b</sup>
                </td>
                <td>12.10 ± 0.30a</td>
                <td>9.20 ± 0.20c</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Ash</bold>
                  <bold>%</bold>
                </td>
                <td>3.40 ± 0.00c</td>
                <td>3.80 ± 0.20b</td>
                <td>5.20 ± 0.20a</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Lipids</bold>
                  <bold>%</bold>
                </td>
                <td>1.40 ± 0.20a</td>
                <td>1.20 ± 0.20a</td>
                <td>1.39 ± 0.30a</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Proteins</bold>
                  <bold>%</bold>
                </td>
                <td>17.89 ± 0.00c</td>
                <td>18.50 ± 0.00b</td>
                <td>32.58 ± 0.05a</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Fibres</bold>
                  <bold>%</bold>
                </td>
                <td>15.75 ± 0.35b</td>
                <td>14.5 ± 0.71c</td>
                <td>32 ± 0.71a</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Carbohydrates</bold>
                  <bold>%</bold>
                </td>
                <td>51.16 ± 0.01a</td>
                <td>49.9 ± 0.10b</td>
                <td>19.63 ± 0.25c</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Calorific value</bold>
                  <bold>Kcal/100g</bold>
                </td>
                <td>288.8 ± 0.80b</td>
                <td>284.4 ± 0.01c</td>
                <td>221.35 ± 1.50a</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Averages with the same superscript letter in the same row are not significantly different at the 5% level. However, different letters in the same column are significantly different at the 5% level. FGHN: Black bean seed meal; FGHR: Red bean seed meal; FGHB: White bean seed meal.</p>
        <p>3.1.2. Mineral Composition of Flours from Three Bean Varieties</p>
        <p>The results of the analyses showed that the mineral content of black, red, and white bean flours varies depending on the elements measured (<bold>Table 2</bold>). With regard to macroelements, the magnesium content in white beans is higher (2670 ± 3.30 mg/kg) than in black and red beans (1922 ± 2.00 mg/kg) and (1793 ± 3.00 mg/kg), respectively. Calcium was also higher (1000 ± 0.30 mg/kg) in white beans than in red beans (793.8 ± 0.60 mg/kg) and black beans (719.7 ± 0.70 mg/kg). In terms of potassium, white beans had the highest content (19,350 ± 2.00 mg/kg), while black beans had the lowest content (12,780 ± 2.00 mg/kg). In terms of trace elements, white bean seed flour had the highest content (47.20 ± 1.00 mg/kg) and black bean seed flour had the lowest content (43.10 ± 0.10 mg/kg). In terms of iron content, red bean seed flour had the highest content (336.30 ± 0.30 mg/kg) and white bean seed flour had the lowest content (172 ± 1.00 mg/kg). As for manganese, white bean seed flour had the highest content 76 ± 1.00 mg/kg, followed by red bean seed flour at 36.90 ± 0.10 mg/kg and black bean seed flour at 27.60 ± 0.10 mg/kg.</p>
        <p>Table 2. Mineral composition of flours from three bean varieties studied.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl2">
          <label>Table 2</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="4">
                  <bold>Samples</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>FGHN</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>FGHR</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>FGHB</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Mg (mg/kg)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>1922 ± 2.00b</td>
                <td>1793 ± 3.00c</td>
                <td>2670 ± 3.30a</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>K (mg/kg)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>12,780 ± 2.00c</td>
                <td>13,390 ± 3.00b</td>
                <td>19,350 ± 2.00a</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Fe (mg/kg)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>289.30± 0.30b</td>
                <td>336.30 ± 0. 30a</td>
                <td>172 ± 1.00c</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Ca (mg/kg)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>719.70 ± 0.70c</td>
                <td>793.80 ± 0.60b</td>
                <td>1000 ± 0.30a</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Mn (mg/kg)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>27.60 ± 0.10c</td>
                <td>36.90 ± 0.10b</td>
                <td>76 ± 1.00a</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Zn (mg/kg)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>43.10 ± 0.10c</td>
                <td>46.80 ± 0.20b</td>
                <td>47.20 ± 1.00a</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Averages with the same superscript letter in the same row are not significantly different at the 5% level. However, different letters in the same column are significantly different at the 5% level. FGHN: Black bean seed meal; FGHR: Red bean seed meal; FGHB: White bean seed meal.</p>
        <p>3.1.3. Determination of the Antioxidant Properties of Flours from Three Bean Varieties</p>
        <p>Regarding the polyphenol content of the flours from the different bean seeds, the study revealed a variation ranging from 151.08 ± 1.25 EAG/100g to 234.34 ± 21.91 EAG/100g. The seed flour with the highest content was that of the white variety with 234.34 EAG/100g, and those with the lowest contents were the red varieties with 169.86 EAG/100g and black with 151.08 EAG/100g (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1(A)</xref>). As for the flavonoid content of the flour from different bean seeds, analysis of the results showed a variation from 46.58 ± 0.91 to 56.33 ± 0.91 EQ/100g. Red bean seeds contained more flavonoids (56.33 EQ/100g) than black beans (54.20 EQ/100g) and white beans (46.58 EQ/100g) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1(B)</xref>). </p>
        <fig id="fig1">
          <label>Figure 1</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2313870-rId37.jpeg?20260722111527" />
        </fig>
        <p>Figure 1. Polyphenols (A) and Flavonoid (B) content of flours from three bean varieties.</p>
        <p>3.1.4. Fonctional Properties of Flours from Three Bean Varieties</p>
        <p>The results of the analysis of the functional properties of flours from the three bean varieties are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figures 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figures 3</xref>. Analysis of the data indicates a significant difference in the values obtained for all parameters evaluated between samples at P &lt; 5%. For the water absorption capacity (WAC) of the different bean seed flours, Red beans had the highest WAC (318.58%) compared to white beans (181%) and black beans (176.5%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2(A)</xref>). Regarding oil absorption capacity (OAC), the black variety had the lowest rate (81.65%), the red variety had the highest (100.95%), followed by the white variety (89.60%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2(B)</xref>). As for the water solubility index (WSI), the white variety recorded the highest WSI (34.60%) compared to the black variety (21.40%) and red variety (19.05%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3(A)</xref>). In terms of the swelling power (SP) of bean seed flours, the values observed were 216.81%, 217.20%, and 650.98% for black, red, and white bean flours, respectively. White bean seed flour expressed the highest PG (650.98%) compared to black and red seeds (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3(B)</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="fig2">
          <label>Figure 2</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2313870-rId38.jpeg?20260722111527" />
        </fig>
        <p>Figure 2. Oil absorption capacity (A) and water absorption capacity (B) of flours from three varieties studied.</p>
        <fig id="fig3">
          <label>Figure 3</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2313870-rId39.jpeg?20260722111527" />
        </fig>
        <p>Figure 3. Water solubility index (A) and swelling index (B).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot2">
        <title>3.2. Discussion</title>
        <p>The results of the study show that the moisture content of bean flours ranges from 9.20% to 12.10%. These values are lower than those reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>], who obtained levels between 22.53% and 35.36% with cereal flours. The relatively low moisture content obtained with white bean seed flour would suggest a longer shelf life than that of red and black bean seeds. However, it is important to note that the three types of beans studied had relatively low moisture contents, which is favorable for the long-term storage of these seeds. </p>
        <p>The ash content of the various bean flours studied ranges from 3.40% to 5.20%, which corroborates the values obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>], which range from 3.64% to 5.23% for the control pigeon pea flour and the sprouted and roasted flours grown in the Gontougo region of Côte d’Ivoire. The highest content was observed in white bean flour, followed by red and black bean flours, which would suggest a much higher mineral content in white beans, followed by black and red beans. The ash content in the flour from the white bean seeds studied is also higher than that reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>] in flours from dry red bean seeds (4.6%). This difference in ash content could be explained by the quality of the cultivated soil, which affects the mineral absorption of plants, and varietal differences [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>]. These flours contain minerals such as magnesium, potassium, iron, calcium, and zinc, which are essential for the functioning of the human body. </p>
        <p>In terms of macroelements such as Ca, although white bean seed flour had the highest content compared to red and black bean seed flours, consumption of the three bean varieties studied could contribute to the growth and maintenance of bones, muscles, and teeth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>]. Potassium is a major mineral element in cultivated soils, and its high presence in the soil would justify its high absorption by roots and its storage in seeds. The results of this study are higher than those reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>], who obtained potassium contents ranging from 1232 mg/100g to 1603 mg/100g for the study of different germination and roasting processes of pigeon pea flour grown in the Gontougo region of Côte d’Ivoire. The results of this study are also higher than those obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>], 582.28 mg/100g for African breadfruit seeds (Treculia Africana) from Nigeria. The high potassium content in the white bean seeds studied will be of paramount importance for health because, according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>], Potassium is required for the maintenance of osmotic balance of the body fluids, the pH of the body to prevent muscle and nerve irritability.</p>
        <p>Regarding micronutrients, red bean seed flour is richer in iron than black and white bean seed flour. Given the high iron content in red and black bean seed flour, it could be recommended for people suffering from anemia. It is important to note that the bioavailability of iron could be influenced by the presence of antinutritional factors such as phytates and tannins, which are common in legumes. Further analysis of these compounds would therefore be necessary to assess the real nutritional potential of these flours in terms of bioavailable iron. The amount of zinc in bean flours ranges from 43.10 mg/kg for black beans to 47.20 mg/kg for white beans, showing that white beans are richer in zinc than black and red beans. The zinc contents in this study are lower than those of the local variety L120 (101.60 mg/kg) and higher than those of the local variety L10 (24.17%) reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>] in the nutritional study of the common bean seed collection. The differences in content observed from one location to another and from one variety to another could be explained by several factors, including the variety of beans, soil and climate conditions, cultivation practices, and methods of processing into flour. By providing sufficient amounts of these micronutrients in the human diet, it is possible to ensure normal pregnancies, as well as adequate growth and development of the child, proper functioning of the immune system, and neurobehavioral development [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>].</p>
        <p>The protein content of the different bean seeds ranged from 17.89% to 32.58%, with the highest content observed in white bean flour. The protein content of white bean seed flour is higher than that reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>], who obtained protein contents ranging from 24.65% to 26.15% for certain varieties of wild and edible beans in Nigeria. Given the protein content of the white bean seed flour obtained in this study, it could be used to alleviate protein-energy malnutrition problems. The bean seed flour studied, and more specifically white bean seed flour, could be used in animal feed, which would reduce the cost of modern livestock farming, which is heavily dependent on imported soybean meal and corn.</p>
        <p>In terms of fiber content, white bean flour has the highest value (32%), but the fiber content recorded in red and black bean seed flour is not insignificant. The fiber contents obtained in this study for the three bean varieties are higher than those reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>], with proportions ranging from 11% to 12.29% in fresh and sprouted pigeon pea flour. This high fiber content in bean flours, particularly white bean flour, makes them an essential asset for consumer well-being, as fiber increases stool volume and facilitates bowel movements [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>]. Fiber also helps control blood sugar levels. </p>
        <p>The lipid content of bean seed flour ranged from 1.20% to 1.40%. These results are higher than those reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>], who obtained a lipid content of modern and local varieties of common beans (<italic>Phaseolus vulgaris</italic> L.) ranging from 0.33% to 1.33% and from 0.33% to 1.00%, respectively. Given the low lipid content of the flour from the bean seeds studied, they could be recommended for a low-fat diet. These results also show that bean seeds are not sources of lipids. </p>
        <p>The carbohydrate content obtained at the end of this study ranged from 19.63% to 51.16%, with black beans having the highest content. Black beans would be an excellent choice for the formulation of energy-rich foods that can help combat caloric malnutrition, especially in rural areas. White beans, on the other hand, could be recommended in the diets of people with diabetes due to their low carbohydrate content. The results of this study are lower than those of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>], who obtained carbohydrate contents ranging from 54.05% to 64.50% for the seeds of seven cultivars of voandzou (Vigna subterranea) grown in Côte d’Ivoire.</p>
        <p>The high phenolic compound content observed in bean flours sold in the Korhogo market, with values of 233.34 mg EAG/100g for white beans, followed by red beans at 169.86 mg EAG/100g and finally black beans at 151.08 mg EAG/100g, shows how rich in antioxidants the beans studied are. The values found in this study contradict the results [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>], who observed that black and red beans are richer in phenolic compounds than white beans. However, antioxidant capacity varies widely depending on the color and origin of the seeds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>]. Thus, the differences observed in this study may reflect regional specificities of beans sold in Korhogo. These high levels of phenolic compounds are beneficial to the body as they help fight the free radicals that are constantly generated by our bodies. The flavonoid content of bean seed flour varies significantly depending on the variety. The red variety contains 56.33 mgEQ/100g, the black variety 54.20 mg EQ/100g, and the white variety 46.56 mgEQ/100g. Data from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>] confirm that red and black beans generally contain more flavonoids than white bean varieties. This superiority of red and black beans may be due to the strong pigmentation of their skins, which are often colored by a high concentration of flavonoids and other antioxidant compounds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>]. Thanks to the high flavonoid content in the flour of the beans studied, regular consumption could help neutralize free radicals, which helps reduce oxidative stress, protect cells from premature aging, and prevent certain chronic diseases such as cancer, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.</p>
        <p>The water absorption capacity of the different bean seed flours in this study ranges from 176.58% to 318.86%, with red bean seed flour having the highest water absorption capacity. The values obtained in this study are higher than those obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>], with values ranging from 199.26% to 239. Water absorption capacity determines whether flours can be incorporated into aqueous food formulations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>]. The high water absorption capacity of the various bean flours studied, particularly red bean flour, suggests that may serve as functional ingredients in liquid and semi liquid foods like soups, gravies and baked products where water absorption/thickening is a critical factor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>].</p>
        <p>The solubility indices of the different bean seed flours range from 19.05% to 34.60%, which shows that bean seed flours could be used in the formulation of infant foods, particularly red beans with 19.05% and black beans with 21.40%, which degrade less than white beans, which have a solubility index of 34.60% and can be used in bread or dough products. </p>
        <p>The oil absorption capacity of different bean seed flours ranges from 81.65% for black beans, 89.60% for white beans, and 100.95% for red beans. These values are higher than those found by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>], who obtained values ranging from 58.33 to 68% for Voandzou flours grown in the Department of Korhogo. Good oil absorption capacity helps to emulsify and stabilize mixtures in nutritional food formulations or the agri-food industry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">38</xref>]. The oil absorption capacity of different bean seed flours ranges from 81.65% for black beans, 89.60% for white beans, and 100.95% for red beans. These values are higher than those found by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>], who obtained values ranging from 58.33 to 68% for Voandzou flours grown in the Department of Korhogo. Good oil absorption capacity helps to emulsify and stabilize mixtures in nutritional food formulations or the agri-food industry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">38</xref>].</p>
        <p>The swelling power of bean seed flours ranged from 117% to 650.41%, with white bean seed flour having the highest Swelling power. The values obtained in this study are higher than those obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>], with percentages ranging from 174.11% to 192.34% for Voandzou seed flours and similar to the results obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>] 400 to 600% with cassava flour. The high swelling power of bean seed flour, particularly white bean seed flour, shows that this flour has a good capacity to absorb water from food formulations, which could directly influence the texture and consistency and, above all, increase the volume of finished products such as bread, cakes, and porridges made from these flours. </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec4">
      <title>4. Conclusion</title>
      <p>The objective of this study was to compare the nutritional and functional potential of flours derived from three varieties of beans consumed in the Korhogo department (Côte d’Ivoire) with a view to promoting their use. The results of this study showed that white bean seed flour was richer in protein, fiber, crude ash (and therefore minerals except iron), and polyphenols, and also had a higher swelling capacity and solubility index than red and black bean seed flours. The biochemical composition of white bean seed flour could be of nutritional interest for local food programs, particularly for the prevention of mineral deficiencies. Red bean seed flour had the highest iron and flavonoid content and a higher oil and water absorption capacity than black and white bean seed flours. This richness could be of nutritional interest for local food programs, particularly for the prevention of trace element deficiencies such as iron. Regular consumption could also help neutralize free radicals, protect cells from premature aging, and prevent certain chronic diseases such as cancer, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. The interesting functional properties of white and red bean seed flours in this study make them ingredients of choice for the formulation of food products, including infant flours, bean-enriched doughnuts, and various baked goods. Finally, the black variety had the highest energy value compared to the red and white varieties. The high carbohydrate content of black bean seeds could contribute significantly to energy supply. Black beans would be an excellent choice for the formulation of energy-rich foods that could help combat caloric malnutrition, especially in rural areas. Overall, the flours from the seeds of the three bean varieties studied had low lipid content and could therefore be recommended for a low-fat diet.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ranilla, L.G., Genovese, M.I. and Lajolo, F.M. (2007) Polyphenols and Antioxidant Capacity of Seed Coat and Cotyledon from Brazilian and Peruvian Bean Cultivars ( <italic>Phaseolus vulgaris</italic> L.). <italic>Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry</italic>, 55, 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf062785j <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/jf062785j</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17199318</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jf062785j">https://doi.org/10.1021/jf062785j</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ranilla, L.G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Genovese, M.I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lajolo, F.M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2007</year>
            <article-title>Polyphenols and Antioxidant Capacity of Seed Coat and Cotyledon from Brazilian and Peruvian Bean Cultivars (Phaseolus vulgaris L</article-title>
            <source>). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry</source>
            <volume>55</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/jf062785j</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17199318</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">FAOSTAT (2020) Cultures et produits animaux. https://www.fao.org/faostat/fr/#data/QCL</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>Cultures et produits animaux</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Martinez Meyer, M.R., Rojas, A., Santanen, A. and Stoddard, F.L. (2013) Content of Zinc, Iron and Their Absorption Inhibitors in Nicaraguan Common Beans ( <italic>Phaseolus vulgaris</italic> L.). <italic>Food Chemistry</italic>, 136, 87-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.07.105 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.07.105</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23017396</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.07.105">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.07.105</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Meyer, M.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rojas, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Santanen, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Stoddard, F.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zinc, I</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2013</year>
            <article-title>Content of Zinc, Iron and Their Absorption Inhibitors in Nicaraguan Common Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L</article-title>
            <source>). Food Chemistry</source>
            <volume>136</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.07.105</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23017396</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Hedjal-Chebheb, M. (2014) Identification des principes actifs des huiles essentielles de quelques résineux et plantes aromatiques de provenance Algérienne et Tunisienne. Etude de leur activité biologique à l’égard d’un insecte ravageur des graines stockées, Callosobruchus maculatus F. 1775 (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Thèse de Doctorat, Université Mouloud Mammeri de Tizi ouzou, p. 99.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Hedjal-Chebheb, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Doctorat, U</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Identification des principes actifs des huiles essentielles de quelques résineux et plantes aromatiques de provenance Algérienne et Tunisienne</article-title>
            <source>Etude de leur activité biologique à l’égard d’un insecte ravageur des graines stockées</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Geil, P.B. and Anderson, J.W. (1994) Nutrition and Health Implications of Dry Beans: A Review. <italic>Journal of the American College of Nutrition</italic>, 13, 549-558. https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.1994.10718446 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/07315724.1994.10718446</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7706585</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.1994.10718446">https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.1994.10718446</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Geil, P.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Anderson, J.W.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1994</year>
            <article-title>Nutrition and Health Implications of Dry Beans: A Review</article-title>
            <source>Journal of the American College of Nutrition</source>
            <volume>13</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/07315724.1994.10718446</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7706585</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Olopade, A.A., Akingbala, J.O., Oguntunde, A.O. and Falade, K.O. (2003) Effect of Processing Method on the Quality of Cowpea ( <italic>Vigna unguiculata</italic>) Flour for Akara Preparation. <italic>Plant Foods for Human Nutrition</italic>, 58, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:qual.0000040353.90798.a2 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/b:qual.0000040353.90798.a2</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/b:qual.0000040353.90798.a2">https://doi.org/10.1023/b:qual.0000040353.90798.a2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Olopade, A.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Akingbala, J.O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Oguntunde, A.O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Falade, K.O.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2003</year>
            <article-title>Effect of Processing Method on the Quality of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) Flour for Akara Preparation</article-title>
            <source>Plant Foods for Human Nutrition</source>
            <volume>58</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/b:qual.0000040353.90798.a2</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Zhang, X., Zhang, Z., Shen, A., Zhang, T., Jiang, L., El-Seedi, H., <italic>et al</italic>. (2024) Legumes as an Alternative Protein Source in Plant-Based Foods: Applications, Challenges, and Strategies. <italic>Current Research in Food Science</italic>, 9, Article 100876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100876 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100876</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39435454</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100876">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100876</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Zhang, X.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhang, Z.</string-name>
              <string-name>Shen, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhang, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Jiang, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>El-Seedi, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Applications, C</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>Legumes as an Alternative Protein Source in Plant-Based Foods: Applications, Challenges, and Strategies</article-title>
            <source>Current Research in Food Science</source>
            <volume>9</volume>
            <elocation-id>100876</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100876</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39435454</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Archange, L.M., Fabrice, Z.A. and Abdoulaye, T. (2025) Enquête ethnobotanique sur les variétés de haricot ( <italic>Phaseolus vulgaris</italic> L.) commercialisées dans la région du poro, au nord de la Côte d’ivoire. <italic>European Scientific Journal ESJ</italic>, 44, Article No. 196. https://doi.org/10.19044/esipreprint.8.2025.p196 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.19044/esipreprint.8.2025.p196</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.19044/esipreprint.8.2025.p196">https://doi.org/10.19044/esipreprint.8.2025.p196</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Archange, L.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Fabrice, Z.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Abdoulaye, T.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2025</year>
            <article-title>Enquête ethnobotanique sur les variétés de haricot (Phaseolus vulgaris L</article-title>
            <source>) commercialisées dans la région du poro</source>
            <volume>44</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.19044/esipreprint.8.2025.p196</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Xu, B.J. and Chang, S.K.C. (2008) Teneur totale en composés phénoliques et propriétés antioxydantes des haricots noirs Eclipse ( <italic>Phaseolus vulgaris</italic> L.): Influence des méthodes de transformation. <italic>Jo</italic><italic>urnal of Food Science</italic>, 73, 19-27.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Xu, B.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chang, S.K.C.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2008</year>
            <article-title>Teneur totale en composés phénoliques et propriétés antioxydantes des haricots noirs Eclipse (Phaseolus vulgaris L</article-title>
            <source>): Influence des méthodes de transformation. Journal of Food Science</source>
            <volume>73</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">AOAC (1990) Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 684 p.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <year>1990</year>
            <article-title>Official Methods of Analysis</article-title>
            <source>Association of Official Analytical Chemists</source>
            <volume>684</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Wolf (1968) Manuel d’analyses des corps gras. Azoulay, 519 p.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <year>1968</year>
            <article-title>Manuel d’analyses des corps gras</article-title>
            <source>Azoulay</source>
            <volume>519</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">AFNOR (1986) Recueil de normes françaises, corps gras, graines oléagineuses, produits dérivés, AFNOR, 527 p</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <year>1986</year>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">FAO (2002) Elargir la base des ressources alimentaires grâce aux plantes indigènes. 295 p.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <year>2002</year>
            <article-title>Elargir la base des ressources alimentaires grâce aux plantes indigènes</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <label>14.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">CEAEQ (2013) Determination of Metals. Argon Plasma Ionization Mass Spectrometry Method. MA 200-Met 1.2, Revision 4, p. 24.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <year>2013</year>
            <article-title>Determination of Metals</article-title>
            <source>Argon Plasma Ionization Mass Spectrometry Method. MA 200-Met 1.2</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <label>15.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Singleton, V.L., Orthofer, R. and Lamuela-Raventós, R.M. (1999) Analysis of Total Phenols and Other Oxidation Substrates and Antioxidants by Means of Folin-Ciocalteu Reagent. <italic>Methods in Enzymology</italic>, 299, 152-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0076-6879(99)99017-1 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0076-6879(99)99017-1</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0076-6879(99)99017-1">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0076-6879(99)99017-1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Singleton, V.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Orthofer, R.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1999</year>
            <article-title>Analysis of Total Phenols and Other Oxidation Substrates and Antioxidants by Means of Folin-Ciocalteu Reagent</article-title>
            <source>Methods in Enzymology</source>
            <volume>6879</volume>
            <issue>99</issue>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0076-6879(99)99017-1</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <label>16.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Meda, A., Lamien, C.E., Romito, M., Millogo, J. and Nacoulma, O.G. (2005) Determination of the Total Phenolic, Flavonoid and Proline Contents in Burkina Fasan Honey, as Well as Their Radical Scavenging Activity. <italic>Food Chemistry</italic>, 91, 571-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.10.006 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.10.006</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.10.006">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.10.006</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Meda, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lamien, C.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Romito, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Millogo, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Nacoulma, O.G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Phenolic, F</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2005</year>
            <article-title>Determination of the Total Phenolic, Flavonoid and Proline Contents in Burkina Fasan Honey, as Well as Their Radical Scavenging Activity</article-title>
            <source>Food Chemistry</source>
            <volume>91</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.10.006</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <label>17.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Phillips, R.D., Chinnan, M.S., Branch, A.L., Miller, J. and Mcwatters, K.H. (1988) Effects of Pretreatment on Functional and Nutritional Properties of Cowpea Meal. <italic>Journal of Food Science</italic>, 53, 805-809. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1988.tb08959.x <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2621.1988.tb08959.x</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1988.tb08959.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1988.tb08959.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Phillips, R.D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chinnan, M.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Branch, A.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Miller, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mcwatters, K.H.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1988</year>
            <article-title>Effects of Pretreatment on Functional and Nutritional Properties of Cowpea Meal</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Food Science</source>
            <volume>53</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2621.1988.tb08959.x</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <label>18.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Anderson, R.A., Conway, H.F., Pfeiffer, V.F. and Griffin, E.L. (1969) Roll and Extrusion Cooking of Grain Sorghum Grits. <italic>Cereal Science Today</italic>, 14, 372-376.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Anderson, R.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Conway, H.F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Pfeiffer, V.F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Griffin, E.L.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1969</year>
            <article-title>Roll and Extrusion Cooking of Grain Sorghum Grits</article-title>
            <source>Cereal Science Today</source>
            <volume>14</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <label>19.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Sosulski, F.W. (1962) The Centrifuge Method for Determining Flour Absorption in Hard Red Spring Wheat. <italic>Cereal Chemistry</italic>, 39, 344-350.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Sosulski, F.W.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1962</year>
            <article-title>The Centrifuge Method for Determining Flour Absorption in Hard Red Spring Wheat</article-title>
            <source>Cereal Chemistry</source>
            <volume>39</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <label>20.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">N’Guessan, Y., Bedikou, M., Zoue, L., Goualie, B. and Niamke, S. (2015) Physicochemical, Nutritive and Safety Evaluation of Local Cereal Flours Sold in Areas of the District of Abidjan-Côte d’ivoire. <italic>Journal of Applied Biosciences</italic>, 83, 7579-7594. https://doi.org/10.4314/jab.v83i1.8 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4314/jab.v83i1.8</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4314/jab.v83i1.8">https://doi.org/10.4314/jab.v83i1.8</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Guessan, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bedikou, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zoue, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Goualie, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Niamke, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Physicochemical, N</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>Physicochemical, Nutritive and Safety Evaluation of Local Cereal Flours Sold in Areas of the District of Abidjan-Côte d’ivoire</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Applied Biosciences</source>
            <volume>83</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4314/jab.v83i1.8</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <label>21.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Touré, N., Oulai, D.P., Tiekpa, W.J., Oupoh, B.B. and Cissé, M. (2025) Effect of Germination and Roasting Process on Biochemical and Functional Properties of Pigeon Pea ( <italic>Cajanus cajan</italic>) Seeds Cultivated in the Gontougo Region, Cote d’ivoire. <italic>American Journal of Food and Nutrition</italic>, 13, 48-55. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajfn-13-1-5 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12691/ajfn-13-1-5</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.12691/ajfn-13-1-5">https://doi.org/10.12691/ajfn-13-1-5</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Oulai, D.P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tiekpa, W.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Oupoh, B.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Region, C</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2025</year>
            <article-title>Effect of Germination and Roasting Process on Biochemical and Functional Properties of Pigeon Pea (Cajanus cajan) Seeds Cultivated in the Gontougo Region, Cote d’ivoire</article-title>
            <source>American Journal of Food and Nutrition</source>
            <volume>13</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12691/ajfn-13-1-5</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <label>22.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Aremu, M.O., Olaofe, O., Basu, S.K., Abdulazeez, G. and Acharya, S.N. (2010) Processed Cranberry Bean ( <italic>Phaseolus coccineus</italic> L.) Seed Flour for the African Diet. <italic>Canadian Journal of Plant Science</italic>, 90, 719-728. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps09149 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4141/cjps09149</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps09149">https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps09149</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Aremu, M.O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Olaofe, O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Basu, S.K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Abdulazeez, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Acharya, S.N.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2010</year>
            <article-title>Processed Cranberry Bean (Phaseolus coccineus L</article-title>
            <source>) Seed Flour for the African Diet. Canadian Journal of Plant Science</source>
            <volume>90</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4141/cjps09149</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <label>23.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Osorio-Dı́az, P., Bello-Pérez, L.A., Agama-Acevedo, E., Vargas-Torres, A., Tovar, J. and Paredes-López, O. (2002) <italic>In Vitro</italic> Digestibility and Resistant Starch Content of Some Industrialized Commercial Beans ( <italic>Phaseolus vulgaris</italic> L.). <italic>Food Chemistry</italic>, 78, 333-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0308-8146(02)00117-6 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0308-8146(02)00117-6</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0308-8146(02)00117-6">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0308-8146(02)00117-6</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Agama-Acevedo, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Vargas-Torres, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tovar, J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2002</year>
            <article-title>In Vitro Digestibility and Resistant Starch Content of Some Industrialized Commercial Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L</article-title>
            <source>). Food Chemistry</source>
            <volume>8146</volume>
            <issue>02</issue>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0308-8146(02)00117-6</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <label>24.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Turan, M., Kordali, S., Zengin, H., Dursun, A. and Sezen, Y. (2003) Macro and Micro Mineral Content of Some Wild Edible Leaves Consumed in Eastern Anatolia. <italic>Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica</italic>, <italic>Section B</italic>- <italic>Soil &amp; Plant Science</italic>, 53, 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/090647103100095 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/090647103100095</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/090647103100095">https://doi.org/10.1080/090647103100095</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Turan, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kordali, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zengin, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Dursun, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sezen, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Scandinavica, S</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2003</year>
            <article-title>Macro and Micro Mineral Content of Some Wild Edible Leaves Consumed in Eastern Anatolia</article-title>
            <source>Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica</source>
            <volume>53</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/090647103100095</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <label>25.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Okoronkwo, K.A., Nwagbaoso, O.C. and Okoronkwo, B.C. (2020) Chemical and Amino Acid Composition of African Breadfruit ( <italic>Treculia africana</italic>). <italic>International Network Organization for Scientific Research</italic>( <italic>Inosr</italic>) <italic>Applied Sciences</italic>, 6, 1-10.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Okoronkwo, K.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Nwagbaoso, O.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Okoronkwo, B.C.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>Chemical and Amino Acid Composition of African Breadfruit (Treculia africana)</article-title>
            <source>International Network Organization for Scientific Research (Inosr) Applied Sciences</source>
            <volume>6</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <label>26.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ilić, A., Prvulović, D., Kolarov, R., Gvozdenac, S., Medić-Pap, S., Danojević, D., <italic>et al</italic>. (2024) Nutritional Composition and Antioxidant Capacity of Common Bean ( <italic>Ph</italic><italic>aseolus vulgaris</italic> L.) Core Collection. <italic>Studia Universitatis Babeș</italic>- <italic>Bolyai Chemia</italic>, 69, 135-150. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbchem.2024.2.10 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24193/subbchem.2024.2.10</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24193/subbchem.2024.2.10">https://doi.org/10.24193/subbchem.2024.2.10</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Kolarov, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gvozdenac, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Pap, S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>Nutritional Composition and Antioxidant Capacity of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L</article-title>
            <source>) Core Collection. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Chemia</source>
            <volume>69</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24193/subbchem.2024.2.10</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <label>27.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Chávez-Mendoza, C. and Sánchez, E. (2017) Bioactive Compounds from Mexican Varieties of the Common Bean ( <italic>Phaseolus vulgaris</italic>): Implications for Health. <italic>Molecules</italic>, 22, Article 1360. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22081360 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/molecules22081360</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28817105</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22081360">https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22081360</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Mendoza, C.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2017</year>
            <article-title>Bioactive Compounds from Mexican Varieties of the Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris): Implications for Health</article-title>
            <source>Molecules</source>
            <volume>22</volume>
            <elocation-id>1360</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/molecules22081360</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28817105</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <label>28.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Awoyinka, O.A., Ileola, A.O., Imeoria, C.N., Olumakinde, S.T., Oladele, F.C. and Asaolu, M.F. (2016) Functional Properties and Nutritional Quality of Some Wild and Edible Bean in Nigeria. <italic>OALib</italic>, 3, e2411. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1102411 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oalib.1102411</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1102411">https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1102411</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Awoyinka, O.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ileola, A.O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Imeoria, C.N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Olumakinde, S.T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Oladele, F.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Asaolu, M.F.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>Functional Properties and Nutritional Quality of Some Wild and Edible Bean in Nigeria</article-title>
            <source>OALib</source>
            <volume>3</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oalib.1102411</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B29">
        <label>29.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Slavin, J. (2013) Fiber and Prebiotics: Mechanisms and Health Benefits. <italic>Nutrients</italic>, 5, 1417-1435. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu5041417 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/nu5041417</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23609775</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/nu5041417">https://doi.org/10.3390/nu5041417</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Slavin, J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2013</year>
            <article-title>Fiber and Prebiotics: Mechanisms and Health Benefits</article-title>
            <source>Nutrients</source>
            <volume>5</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/nu5041417</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23609775</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B30">
        <label>30.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Celmeli, T., Sari, H., Canci, H., Sari, D., Adak, A., Eker, T., <italic>et al</italic>. (2018) The Nutritional Content of Common Bean ( <italic>Phaseolus vulgaris</italic> L.) Landraces in Comparison to Modern Varieties. <italic>Agronomy</italic>, 8, Article 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8090166 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy8090166</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8090166">https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8090166</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Celmeli, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sari, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Canci, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sari, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Adak, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Eker, T.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2018</year>
            <article-title>The Nutritional Content of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L</article-title>
            <source>) Landraces in Comparison to Modern Varieties. Agronomy</source>
            <volume>8</volume>
            <elocation-id>166</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy8090166</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B31">
        <label>31.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Diallo, K.S., Koné, K.Y., Soro, D., Assidjo, N., Yao, K.B. and Dago, G. (2015) Caractérisation biochimique et fonctionnelle des grains de sept cultivars de voandzou ( <italic>Vigna</italic><italic>subterranea</italic> (L.) Verdc., Fabaceae) cultivées en Côte d’Ivoire. <italic>European Scientific Journal</italic>, 11, 1857-7881. https://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/6277</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Diallo, K.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Soro, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Assidjo, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Yao, K.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Dago, G.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>Caractérisation biochimique et fonctionnelle des grains de sept cultivars de voandzou (Vigna subterranea (L</article-title>
            <source>) Verdc.</source>
            <volume>11</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B32">
        <label>32.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Xu, B. and Chang, S.K.C. (2009) Total Phenolic, Phenolic Acid, Anthocyanin, Flavan-3-Ol, and Flavonol Profiles and Antioxidant Properties of Pinto and Black Beans ( <italic>Phaseolus vulgaris</italic> L.) as Affected by Thermal Processing. <italic>Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry</italic>, 57, 4754-4764. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf900695s <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/jf900695s</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19492791</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jf900695s">https://doi.org/10.1021/jf900695s</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Xu, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chang, S.K.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Phenolic, P</string-name>
              <string-name>Acid, A</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2009</year>
            <article-title>Total Phenolic, Phenolic Acid, Anthocyanin, Flavan-3-Ol, and Flavonol Profiles and Antioxidant Properties of Pinto and Black Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L</article-title>
            <source>) as Affected by Thermal Processing. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry</source>
            <volume>57</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/jf900695s</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19492791</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B33">
        <label>33.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Rodríguez Madrera, R., Campa Negrillo, A., Suárez Valles, B. and Ferreira Fernández, J.J. (2021) Phenolic Content and Antioxidant Activity in Seeds of Common Bean ( <italic>Phaseolus vulgaris</italic> L.). <italic>Foods</italic>, 10, Article 864. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10040864 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/foods10040864</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33921060</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10040864">https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10040864</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Madrera, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Negrillo, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Valles, B.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Phenolic Content and Antioxidant Activity in Seeds of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L</article-title>
            <source>). Foods</source>
            <volume>10</volume>
            <elocation-id>864</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/foods10040864</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33921060</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B34">
        <label>34.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Luthria, D.L. and Pastor-Corrales, M.A. (2006) Phenolic Acids Content of Fifteen Dry Edible Bean ( <italic>Phaseolus vulgaris</italic> L.) Varieties. <italic>Journal of Food Composition and Analysis</italic>, 19, 205-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2005.09.003 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jfca.2005.09.003</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2005.09.003">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2005.09.003</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Luthria, D.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Pastor-Corrales, M.A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2006</year>
            <article-title>Phenolic Acids Content of Fifteen Dry Edible Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L</article-title>
            <source>) Varieties. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis</source>
            <volume>19</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jfca.2005.09.003</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B35">
        <label>35.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Boateng, M.A., Addo, J.K., Okyere, H., Adu-Dapaah, H., Berchie, J.N. and Tetteh, A. (2013) Physicochemical and Functional Properties of Proteinates of Two Bambara Groundnut ( <italic>Vigna subterranean</italic>) Landraces. <italic>African Journal of Food Science and Technology</italic>, 4, 64-70.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Boateng, M.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Addo, J.K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Okyere, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Adu-Dapaah, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Berchie, J.N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tetteh, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2013</year>
            <article-title>Physicochemical and Functional Properties of Proteinates of Two Bambara Groundnut (Vigna subterranean) Landraces</article-title>
            <source>African Journal of Food Science and Technology</source>
            <volume>4</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B36">
        <label>36.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ayo-Omogie, H.N. and Osanbikan, A.A. (2019) Comparative Influence of Dehulling on the Composition, Antioxidative and Functional Properties of Sorrel ( <italic>Hibiscus sabdariffa</italic> L.) Seed. <italic>Food and Nutrition Sciences</italic>, 10, 148-173. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2019.102012 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/fns.2019.102012</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2019.102012">https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2019.102012</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ayo-Omogie, H.N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Osanbikan, A.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Composition, A</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2019</year>
            <article-title>Comparative Influence of Dehulling on the Composition, Antioxidative and Functional Properties of Sorrel (Hibiscus sabdariffa L</article-title>
            <source>) Seed. Food and Nutrition Sciences</source>
            <volume>10</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/fns.2019.102012</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B37">
        <label>37.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Oulaï, D.P.P., Kodjo, N., Bamba, M.S. and Niamké, L.S. (2025) Nutritional and Functional Composition of Two Voandzou Varieties Produced in the Korhogo Region (Côte d’Ivoire). <italic>Journal of Chemical</italic>, <italic>Biological and Physical Sciences</italic>, 15, 293-305.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Kodjo, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bamba, M.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chemical, B</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2025</year>
            <article-title>Nutritional and Functional Composition of Two Voandzou Varieties Produced in the Korhogo Region (Côte d’Ivoire)</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Chemical</source>
            <volume>15</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B38">
        <label>38.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Adebowale, K.O. and Lawal, O.S. (2004) Comparative Study of the Functional Properties of Bambarra Groundnut ( <italic>Voandzeia subterranean</italic>), Jack Bean ( <italic>Canavalia ensiformis</italic>) and Mucuna Bean ( <italic>Mucuna pruriens</italic>) Flours. <italic>Food Research International</italic>, 37, 355-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2004.01.009 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodres.2004.01.009</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2004.01.009">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2004.01.009</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Adebowale, K.O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lawal, O.S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2004</year>
            <article-title>Comparative Study of the Functional Properties of Bambarra Groundnut (Voandzeia subterranean), Jack Bean (Canavalia ensiformis) and Mucuna Bean (Mucuna pruriens) Flours</article-title>
            <source>Food Research International</source>
            <volume>37</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodres.2004.01.009</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B39">
        <label>39.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Charles, A.L., Chang, Y., Ko, W., Sriroth, K. and Huang, T. (2004) Some Physical and Chemical Properties of Starch Isolates of Cassava Genotypes. <italic>Starch</italic>- <italic>Stärke</italic>, 56, 413-418. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.200300226 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/star.200300226</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/star.200300226">https://doi.org/10.1002/star.200300226</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Charles, A.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chang, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ko, W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sriroth, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Huang, T.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2004</year>
            <article-title>Some Physical and Chemical Properties of Starch Isolates of Cassava Genotypes</article-title>
            <source>Starch-Stärke</source>
            <volume>56</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/star.200300226</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>