All reagents used were of analytical grade and purchased from recognized suppliers. Isoniazid, quinoline-2-carboxaldehyde, and quinoline-4-carboxaldehyde were sourced from Sigma-Aldrich. CuCl₂·2H₂O, ZnCl₂, methanol, ethanol, and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were purchased from Fisher Scientific. These chemicals were used as received without further purification. Solubility and melting point measurements were conducted using standard techniques.

Melting points were determined using a digital melting point apparatus and are uncorrected. Infrared (FT-IR) spectra were recorded on Alpha-P Bruker spectrometer on diamond plate in the range; 450 - 4000 cm⁻¹. UV-Visible spectra were obtained using a UV (200 - 400 nm) and visible (400 - 800 nm) regions. The UV/Vis spectroscopic analysis of the ligands and the metal complexes was carried out in DMSO at room temperature. ¹H and ¹³C spectra were recorded on an NMR V500 spectrophotometer in DMSO and values were reported relative to TMS as internal standard. All spectra and characterization data were compared with literature where appropriate.

The ligands were synthesized by a condensation reaction between equimolar quantities of isoniazid (0.549 g, 4.0 mmol) and the appropriate quinoline aldehyde (0.629 g 4.0 mmol). For ligand L1, isoniazid was reacted with quinoline-2-carboxaldehyde, Scheme 1, while for L2, the reaction involved quinoline-4-carboxaldehyde Scheme 2. The reactions were carried out under reflux in methanol for 4 hours at 70˚C. Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) was used to monitor the reaction progress. The solid products were filtered, washed with cold methanol, and dried in a desiccator.

Scheme 1. Synthesis of N-(quinolin-2-ylmethylene)isonicotinohydrazide L1.

Scheme 2. Synthesis of N-(quinolin-4-ylmethylene)isonicotinohydrazide L2.

To synthesize Cu(II) and Zn(II) complexes, the Schiff base ligands (1.0 mmol) were dissolved in hot ethanol (10 mL) and mixed with a stoichiometric amount of the metal chloride salt (0.5 mmol) in ethanol. The reaction mixtures were refluxed at 80˚C for 2 hours and then left to stand at room temperature overnight. The resulting precipitates were filtered, washed several times with ethanol, and dried between filter papers. The metal-to-ligand molar ratio used was 1:2 (M:L), consistent with bidentate coordination [15].

Antimalarial activity was evaluated against chloroquine-sensitive P. falciparum (3D7 strain) using a SYBR Green I-based fluorescence assay at Centre Pasteur, Cameroon [27]. Parasites were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with human O⁺ erythrocytes at 1% parasitemia and 1.5% hematocrit. Test compounds and controls (chloroquine, artemisinin) were prepared in DMSO and tested in duplicate at 10 µM. The experiment was performed twice independently, and variability is presented as individual assay values in Table 4. After 72 h incubation, parasite growth inhibition was quantified fluorometrically. Percentage inhibition was calculated relative to solvent control (0.1% DMSO).

The principal physical properties are presented in Table 1. The condensation of isoniazid with the respective quinoline aldehydes yielded the Schiff base ligands L1 and L2. The Schiff bases (L1 and L2) exhibited pale yellow and white colors respectively, while the Cu(II) and Zn(II) complexes exhibited distinct color changes, suggesting complex formation. The melting points of the ligands were sharp (L1: 190.4˚C, L2: 237.1˚C), indicating purity, while all complexes showed decomposition temperatures above 300˚C, indicating high thermal stability [28]. All compounds were insoluble in water and alcohols but soluble in DMSO.

Elemental analysis (CNH) data for the ligands and their metal complexes are presented in Table 2. The experimentally determined values of the elements are in good agreement with the calculated values for the proposed 1:2 metal-to-ligand stoichiometry

Table 1. Some physical properties of the synthesized compounds.

Table 2. Elemental analysis.

3.2.1. IR Spectroscopy

The IR spectra of L1 and L2 showed characteristic bands at ~1553 cm⁻¹ ν (C=N), ~1659 cm⁻¹ ν (C=O), and ~3165 cm⁻¹ ν (N-H) [7]. Upon complexation, the ν (C=N) band shifted to lower frequencies (1541 - 1556 cm⁻¹), indicating coordination via the azomethine nitrogen. An upward shift in ν (C=O) suggested participation of the carbonyl oxygen in coordination [29]. New bands in the 420 - 520 cm⁻¹ region were attributed to ν (M-N) and ν (M-O) [30]. Broad bands around 3400 cm⁻¹ in some complexes indicated the presence of coordinated or lattice water, this band was absent in the CuL2 complex [16]. The combined spectral shifts and the appearance of new metal-ligand bands strongly suggested that the ligands act as neutral bidentate donors, coordinating through the azomethine nitrogen and carbonyl oxygen atoms [7][31]. The major IR absorption bands of the compounds are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3. The IR absorption bands of the ligands and the complexes.

3.2.2. UV-Visible Spectral Analysis

The ligands displayed strong absorption bands at: L1: 354 nm (n→π) and L2: ~357 nm (n→π), characteristic of azomethine (–C=N) chromophores, confirming successful Schiff base formation [32]. The Cu(II) complex of L1 (CuL1) exhibited a broad d-d transition at 658 nm attributed to the ²Eg → ²T2g transition typical of distorted octahedral geometry arising from Jahn-Teller distortion [9][33]. In contrast, CuL2 showed a broad d-d band at 661 nm consistent with square planar geometry, which is supported by the absence of an OH band due to water in the IR spectrum [11][34]. Additional bands in the near-UV region (~357 nm) correspond to intra-ligand transitions, confirming retention of ligand chromophores in the metal-bound form [12]. Zinc(II) complexes, being d¹⁰, showed no d-d transitions, as expected. Their spectra are dominated by charge-transfer bands (M→L CT) at 398 - 406 nm and intra-ligand bands around 357 nm [35][36].

3.2.3. NMR Spectroscopy

The ¹H NMR spectra of the ligands displayed diagnostic singlets for the azomethine proton (δ 8.62 - 9.09 ppm) and the hydrazide NH proton (δ 12.39 - 12.42 ppm) [37]. The ¹³C NMR spectra showed signals for the azomethine carbon (δ 146 - 147 ppm) and carbonyl carbon (δ 162 ppm), confirming Schiff base formation [38][39]. No major impurities were detected, confirming the purity and integrity of the ligands.

Based on spectroscopic data and literature [11][12], the proposed structures are as follows:

CuL1 and ZnL1: Six-coordinate octahedral geometry (Figure 1).CuL2: Four-coordinate square planar geometry. (Figure 2(a))ZnL2: Six-coordinate octahedral geometry. (Figure 2(b))

Figure 1. (a) The Cu(II) complex of ligand one (L1); (b) The Zn(II) complex of L1.

Figure 2. (a) The Cu(II) complex of L2; (b) The Zn(II) complex of L2.

The proposed geometries are based on IR, UV-Vis, and NMR spectroscopic data, along with elemental analysis; single crystal X-ray diffraction will be required for unambiguous confirmation.

The parasite growth inhibition for the ligands and complexes was evaluated, and the results are presented in Table 4. All compounds demonstrated > 50% inhibition of P. falciparum growth at 10 µM. The two isomeric ligands showed different activities, with L1 (57.4%) exhibiting greater inhibition than L2 (54.2%). Metal complexation generally enhanced activity compared to the free ligands, except for ZnL1 [20]. The copper complex of L1 (CuL1) was the most active among the synthesized compounds, with 69.0% inhibition at 10 µM. Under the same assay conditions, the reference drugs, chloroquine and artemisinin gave 74.3% and 74.4% inhibition respectively [17]. The enhanced activity upon chelation can be attributed to increased lipophilicity, modified electron distribution, and potential redox activity of the metal center [14][21].

Table 4. SYBR Green I-based parasite growth inhibition.