<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.4" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">aces</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2160-0406</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2160-0392</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/aces.2026.163003</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">aces-152447</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Chemistry</subject>
          <subject>Materials Science</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Optimization of Deacidification of Degummed Palm Kernel Oil with Kolanut Pod Ash Using Response Surface Methodology</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Alao</surname>
            <given-names>Adeyinka Idowu</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Adeoye</surname>
            <given-names>Babatunde Kazeem</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Ogedengbe</surname>
            <given-names>Tunde Isaac</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Nwitte-Eze</surname>
            <given-names>Ugo</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Adesina</surname>
            <given-names>Racheal Temitope</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Oluwarotimi</surname>
            <given-names>Deborah Adewunmi</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Akinwumi</surname>
            <given-names>Odunayo Deborah</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label> Department of Chemical Engineering, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria </aff>
      <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label> Department of Food Science and Technology, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria </aff>
      <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label> Department of Chemical Engineering, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, Nigeria </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="conflict" id="fn-conflict">
          <p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>09</day>
        <month>07</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <month>07</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>03</issue>
      <fpage>25</fpage>
      <lpage>47</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>04</day>
          <month>03</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>06</day>
          <month>07</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="published">
          <day>09</day>
          <month>07</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2026 by the authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p> This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link> ). </license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/aces.2026.163003">https://doi.org/10.4236/aces.2026.163003</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p>Deacidification of crude palm kernel oil (CPKO) remains a critical challenge in developing countries, where conventional chemical refining methods are energy-intensive and economically prohibitive for small-scale processors. This study investigated the optimization of CPKO deacidification using kolanut pod ash as an eco-friendly bio-adsorbent through Response Surface Methodology (RSM) with Central Composite Design. Three process variables were evaluated: reaction time (10 - 30 minutes), temperature (60˚C - 70˚C), and kolanut pod ash dosage (1% - 5% w/w). There was 91% free fatty acid (FFA) content reduction. A significant quadratic model (F-value = 3.82, p = 0.0242) with Adjusted R<sup>2</sup> of 0.5718 was obtained. The influential factors were reaction time (p = 0.0111), kolanut pod ash dosage (p &lt; 0.0001), time-temperature (p = 0.0431) and time-dosage (p = 0.0073). Quality parameters remained within acceptable ranges: iodine values (35.4 - 50.3 g I<sub>2</sub>/100g), acid values (7.18 - 51.02 mg KOH/g), and saponification values (250.67 - 290.12 mg KOH/g). This research demonstrates that kolanut pod ash can serve as an effective, low-cost, and green alternative to synthetic refining agents.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated" xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>Palm Kernel Oil</kwd>
        <kwd>Deacidification</kwd>
        <kwd>Kolanut Pod Ash</kwd>
        <kwd>Response Surface Methodology</kwd>
        <kwd>Free Fatty Acids</kwd>
        <kwd>Optimization</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>Palm kernel oil (PKO) is a valuable vegetable oil derived from the kernel of oil palm fruit (<italic>Elaeis</italic><italic>guineensis</italic>), widely used in food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic industries due to its unique fatty acid composition rich in lauric acid [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]. Palm kernel oil does not contain cholesterol or trans fatty acids [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>]. This makes it applicable in cooking meals for consumption and industrially as a reagent for the production of soaps, ingredients for baked goods, confectionery, ice cream and so on. Crude palm kernel oil is rich in saturated fatty acids, especially lauric acid (C12:0), which makes up about 48% - 55% of the total fatty acids. Other major fatty acids include: Myristic acid (C14:0): 14% - 18%, Palmitic acid (C16:0): 7% - 9%, Capric acid (C10:0): 3% - 5%, Caprylic acid (C8:0): 2% - 4%, Oleic acid (C18:1): 12% - 18% (monounsaturated), Linoleic acid (C18:2): 1% - 3% (polyunsaturated) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>]. Also, it is composed of minor components such as tocopherols and tocotrienols (Vitamin E compounds) which can act as antioxidants, sterols which include campesterol and <italic>β</italic>-sitosterol, free fatty acids (FFAs—ranging from 1 to over 10% depending on handling and storage conditions), moisture and impurities that are normally present in small quantities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]. However, crude palm kernel oil is composed of other compounds known for their negative effect on the quality and stability of oils such as unsaponifiable matters, waxes, pigments, solid impurities (mainly fibers), oxidation products such as peroxides, aldehydes, ketones, alcohols, and oxidized fatty acids. The significant levels of free fatty acids (FFAs) compromise oil quality, reduce shelf life, and limit commercial acceptability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>]. Also, high FFA content contributes to off-flavors, rancidity, and increased susceptibility to oxidative degradation, significantly affecting both sensory attributes and market value [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]. Free fatty acids typically form through enzymatic and microbial hydrolysis of triglycerides during fruit storage, fermentation, or oil extraction processes, especially under suboptimal handling conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]. Therefore, there is need to neutralize the high FFA to make the vegetable oil edible and well susceptible for industrial applications. Industrially, elevated FFA levels complicate downstream processing, as conventional chemical neutralization using alkaline solutions generates soap stock, resulting in substantial oil losses and reduced product yield [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]. Traditional deacidification methods include alkaline neutralization, steam distillation, and physical refining [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>]. While effective, these approaches are energy-intensive, generate chemical waste requiring treatment, and remain economically prohibitive for small-scale processors predominant in Nigeria and other West African countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>]. The palm oil industry in these regions consists largely of small- and medium-scale processors lacking the technical capabilities and capital for advanced refining operations, resulting in high acid values in locally produced oil that render it non-competitive in both local and international markets [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>]. Recent developments toward green and sustainable technologies have stimulated research into bio-based adsorbents from agricultural waste products as alternative deacidification methods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>]. These adsorbents work through adsorption mechanisms, where FFAs are bound to active sites on the adsorbent surface, thereby reducing the acid value of oil without the disadvantages associated with chemical refining [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>]. Materials such as rice husks, cocoa pod husks, banana peels, and groundnut shells have demonstrated varying degrees of success, valued for their low cost, renewability, and minimal toxicity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>]. Kolanut (Cola nitida and Cola acuminata) is extensively cultivated in West Africa, particularly Nigeria, where the nuts are consumed largely during ceremonies and festivals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>]. Following seed removal, the pods rich in fibrous material including polyphenols, tannins, and cellulose are typically discarded as waste. Preliminary studies indicate that when thermally activated and chemically treated, these pods exhibit high adsorption capacity due to their large surface area, porosity, and reactive functional groups [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>]. The incorporation of kolanut pods not only valorizes agricultural waste but also aligns with principles of circular economy, environmental conservation, and rural development [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>]. Despite the potential of kolanut pod ash for oil deacidification, systematic optimization studies employing statistical design of experiments are lacking in the literature. Response Surface Methodology (RSM) has proven effective for optimizing complex processes in oil refining, enabling simultaneous evaluation of multiple variables and their interactions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>]. Therefore, this study aimed to optimize the deacidification of degummed palm kernel oil using activated kolanut pod ash through RSM with Central Composite Design, evaluating the effects of reaction time, temperature, and adsorbent dosage on FFA reduction and oil quality parameters.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec2">
      <title>2. Materials and Methods</title>
      <sec id="sec2dot1">
        <title>2.1. Materials</title>
        <p>Freshly extracted, unrefined crude palm kernel oil was obtained from Miral Agro Venture (Akure North Local Government, Ondo State, Nigeria) and stored in a tank near the project refinery site. This crude palm kernel oil was degummed and stored in another tank. Kolanut pods were sourced from Bolounduro Cocoa Farm (Ondo East Local Government, Ondo State, Nigeria). Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) of 97% purity procured from LOBA Chemie PVT. Ltd. (CAS No: 1310-73-2 ADR/PG) was used as a conventional reagent for the deacidification process.</p>
        <p>20 g of Sodium hydroxide pellets was weighed and dissolved in 500 ml of distill water to give 1 molar concentration of Sodium hydroxide solution. Other reagents for laboratory analyses of deacidified oil, such as ethanol, chloroform, phenolphthalein, potassium iodine solution, sodium thiosulfate, iodine monochloride solution, potassium iodide solution, were of analytical grade. Distill water was used throughout the experiments.</p>
        <p>A custom designed and developed deacidification reactor with a throughput of 25 litres was used to deacidify degummed crude palm kernel oil with sodium hydroxide and kolanut pod ash. Analytical balance was used to measure the reagents used. Stop watch was used to set time for the reaction between the oil and the reagents.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot2">
        <title>2.2. Preparation of Kolanut Pod Adsorbent</title>
        <p>The kolanut pods were thoroughly washed multiple times with distilled water to remove external dirt, dust, and surface contaminants. After washing, the pods were dried in a laboratory oven at 60˚C for about 1<sup>1</sup>/<sub>2</sub> hours until constant weight was achieved to remove all residual moisture [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>].</p>
        <p>The dried pods were subjected to controlled combustion in a muffle furnace at 600˚C for 4 hours to ensure complete carbonization and ash formation. After cooling to room temperature in a desiccator, the resulting ash was ground using a laboratory mill and sieved through a 200 μm mesh to obtain uniform fine powder, with increased surface area to optimize particle size for ease of mass transfer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>]. The kolanut pod ash powder was stored in airtight containers protected from moisture until usage in deacidification experiments. All other chemical reagents used were of analytical grade.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot3">
        <title>2.3. Experimental Design and Statistical Analysis</title>
        <p>Response Surface Methodology (RSM) with Central Composite Design (CCD) was employed to systematically investigate and optimize process parameters [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>]. The three process parameters (independent variables): reaction time (A: 10 - 30 mins), temperature (B: 60˚C - 70˚C), and kolanut pod ash (or NaOH) dosage (C: 0.5% - 1.5% w/w) are shown in <bold>Table 1</bold>. The experimental design consisted of 20 runs including factorial points, axial points, and center point replicates. The behavior of the system was explained by quadratic Equation (1):</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD1">
          <label>(1)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>Y</mml:mi>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:msub>
                <mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
                <mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
              </mml:msub>
              <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
              <mml:mi>Σ</mml:mi>
              <mml:msub>
                <mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
                <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
              </mml:msub>
              <mml:msub>
                <mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
                <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
              </mml:msub>
              <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
              <mml:mi>Σ</mml:mi>
              <mml:msub>
                <mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:msub>
              <mml:msubsup>
                <mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
                <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
                <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
              </mml:msubsup>
              <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
              <mml:mi>Σ</mml:mi>
              <mml:msub>
                <mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:msub>
              <mml:msub>
                <mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
                <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
              </mml:msub>
              <mml:msubsup>
                <mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
                <mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
                <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
              </mml:msubsup>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>where <italic>Y</italic> is the predicted response, <italic>b</italic><sub>0</sub> is the offset term, bᵢ is the linear effect, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi> b </mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi> i </mml:mi><mml:mi> i </mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the squared effect, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi> b </mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi> i </mml:mi><mml:mi> j </mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the interaction effect. All experimental design, data fitting, and statistical analysis were conducted using Design-Expert software. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to determine the statistical significance of each factor and interactions, as well as to assess overall model fit and predictive capability. A significance level of p &lt; 0.05 was adopted for all statistical tests [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>].</p>
        <p><bold>Table 1.</bold> Inputs for the design of optimization table on RSM. </p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl1">
          <label>Table 1</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Variables</td>
                <td>Lower Limit</td>
                <td>Centre Point</td>
                <td>Upper Limit</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Temperature (˚C)</td>
                <td>60</td>
                <td>65</td>
                <td>70</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Time (min)</td>
                <td>20</td>
                <td>25</td>
                <td>30</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Dosage of Reagents (% w/w)</td>
                <td>0.5</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>1.5</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot4">
        <title>2.4. Experimental Procedure for Deacidification</title>
        <p>Deacidification experiments were conducted in batch mode using a locally designed and fabricated reactor. Fifteen-liter volumes of degummed crude palm kernel oil were transferred into the deacidification reactor. The oil samples were gently heated and maintained at the designed temperatures (60˚C - 70˚C), using the reactor’s heating system, with continuous monitoring by a calibrated thermometer. Once the desired temperature was reached, varying dosages (0.5% - 1.5% by weight of oil) of ashed kolanut pod (or NaOH) were carefully added to the heated oil. The mixtures were stirred continuously at a controlled agitation speed (250 - 300 rpm) using a metallic stirrer present in the reactor. This controlled stirring ensured uniform dispersion of the kolanut pod throughout the oil and minimized external mass transfer limitations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>]. The kolanut pod ash has a very high pH (12.5), allowing it to undergo neutralization reaction with the slightly acidic oil while still acting as adsorbent in the process. The deacidification process was allowed to proceed for predesigned contact times (20 - 30 mins). After the designated contact time, the mixture of oil and spent deacidification reagent was separated through centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 10 minutes to ensure complete separation and obtain clear, deacidified oil samples [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>]. All experiments were carried out in triplicate to ensure reproducibility and statistical reliability of results. The clear, treated oil samples obtained from each experimental run were immediately subjected to analytical tests.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot5">
        <title>2.5. Analytical Methods</title>
        <p>Free Fatty Acid (FFA) Determination: FFA content was determined via acid-base volumetric titration. One gram of oil sample was dissolved in 50 ml of solvent mixture (ethanol-diethyl ether) and titrated against 0.1 N KOH using phenolphthalein indicator [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>]. FFA percentage was calculated as:</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD2">
          <label>(2)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mtext>FFA</mml:mtext>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mtext>% as oleic acid</mml:mtext>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mfrac>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mn>56.1</mml:mn>
                  <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
              </mml:mfrac>
              <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
              <mml:mn>0.503</mml:mn>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>where <italic>V</italic> = volume of KOH used (ml), <italic>N</italic> = normality of KOH, and <italic>W</italic> = weight of sample (g) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>].</p>
        <p>Acid Value: Acid value was determined by measuring milligrams of KOH required to neutralize free fatty acids in 1 g oil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>]. Acid value was calculated using Equation (3):</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD3">
          <label>(3)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mtext>Acid Value</mml:mtext>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mtext>mg KOH/g</mml:mtext>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mfrac>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mn>56.1</mml:mn>
                  <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
              </mml:mfrac>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>where <italic>V</italic> = volume of KOH used (ml), <italic>N</italic> = normality of KOH, and <italic>W</italic> = weight of sample (g) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>].</p>
        <p>Iodine Value: Iodine value was determined according to standard methods, quantifying the degree of unsaturation in the oil. 20 ml of potassium iodide was added to 1 g of deacidified PKO. 0.5 ml of starch was added to the mixture and was titrated against against 0.5 N of Sodium thiosulphate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>]. The iodine value was determined according to Equation (4):</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD4">
          <label>(4)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mtext>Iodine value</mml:mtext>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mfrac>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mi>B</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                      <mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
                      <mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
                      <mml:mn>12.69</mml:mn>
                    </mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
                  </mml:mrow>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
              </mml:mfrac>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>where <italic>B</italic> = volume of thiosulphate for blank, <italic>S</italic> = volume of thiosulphate for sample and <italic>N</italic> = Normality of thiosulphate solution and <italic>W</italic> = weight of the sample [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>].</p>
        <p>Saponification Value: Saponification value was determined by standard alkaline hydrolysis methods, representing the milligrams of potassium hydroxide required to saponify one gram of oil. 25 ml of alcoholic KOH was added to 1 g of deacidified PKO and was titrated with 0.5 N HCl using phenolphthalein as indicator [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>]. The saponification value was calculated using the Equation (5):</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD5">
          <label>(5)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mtext>Saponification value</mml:mtext>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mfrac>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mi>B</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                      <mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
                    </mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
                  </mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>56.1</mml:mn>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
              </mml:mfrac>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>where <italic>B</italic> = volume of blank, <italic>S</italic> = volume of sample and <italic>M</italic> = Molarity of HCl and <italic>W</italic> = weight of the sample [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>].</p>
        <p>Phosphorus Content Determination: The phosphorus content of crude and degummed oil samples was determined spectrophotometrically according to AOCS Official Method Ca 12 - 55 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>]. Oil samples (0.5 g) were accurately weighed and digested with sulfuric acid. The digested samples were reacted with ammonium molybdate and ascorbic acid to form a blue-colored phosphomolybdenum complex. The absorbance was measured at 820 nm using a UV-Visible spectrophotometer. Phosphorus content was calculated from a standard curve prepared using potassium dihydrogen phosphate and expressed as mg P/g oil. All measurements were performed in triplicate. The phosphorus removal efficiency (PRE) in percent was calculated as:</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD6">
          <label>(6)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mtext>PRE</mml:mtext>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mtext>%</mml:mtext>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mfrac>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mtext>Initial Phosphorus Content</mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mtext>Final Phosphorus Content</mml:mtext>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mtext>Initial Phosphorus Content</mml:mtext>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mfrac>
              <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
              <mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec3">
      <title>3. Results and Discussion</title>
      <p>The deacidification of crude palm kernel oil (CPKO) using kolanut pod and NaOH was investigated through a central composite design (CCD) with three independent variables: time (A), temperature (B), and dosage of reagent (C). The experimental design consisted of 20 runs including factorial points, axial points, and center points to evaluate the effects of process parameters on four response. The values of the response variables: free fatty acid (FFA) content, iodine value, saponification value, and acid value, with respect to the process parameters values are shown in <bold>Table 2</bold>. </p>
      <p><bold>Table 2.</bold> Comprehensive experimental design matrix and response variables. </p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl2">
        <label>Table 2</label>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="2">Run</td>
              <td colspan="3">Factors</td>
              <td colspan="4">Responses</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Dosage of Reagent (%w/w)</td>
              <td>Temperature(˚C)</td>
              <td>Time(min)</td>
              <td>FFA (mg KOH/g)</td>
              <td>Acid Value (mg KOH/g)</td>
              <td>Saponification Value (mg KOH/g)</td>
              <td>Iodine Value (gI/100 g)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="8">Kolanut pod</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>0.5</td>
              <td>60</td>
              <td>30</td>
              <td>14.97</td>
              <td>51.47</td>
              <td>289.73</td>
              <td>123.56</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>2</td>
              <td>0.5</td>
              <td>60</td>
              <td>20</td>
              <td>17.28</td>
              <td>74.34</td>
              <td>282.48</td>
              <td>117.90</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>3</td>
              <td>0.5</td>
              <td>70</td>
              <td>30</td>
              <td>12.47</td>
              <td>35.82</td>
              <td>270.84</td>
              <td>110.56</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>4</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>73.41</td>
              <td>25</td>
              <td>12.38</td>
              <td>62.91</td>
              <td>211.77</td>
              <td>84.89</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>5</td>
              <td>1.5</td>
              <td>60</td>
              <td>20</td>
              <td>17.28</td>
              <td>43.15</td>
              <td>232.85</td>
              <td>120.45</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>6</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>65</td>
              <td>16.59</td>
              <td>12.38</td>
              <td>40.90</td>
              <td>285.65</td>
              <td>106.45</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>7</td>
              <td>1.5</td>
              <td>70</td>
              <td>30</td>
              <td>13.53</td>
              <td>39.80</td>
              <td>294.52</td>
              <td>140.89</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>8</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>65</td>
              <td>25</td>
              <td>19.01</td>
              <td>50.89</td>
              <td>284.88</td>
              <td>78.32</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>9</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>65</td>
              <td>33.41</td>
              <td>13.82</td>
              <td>58.89</td>
              <td>276.34</td>
              <td>117.55</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>10</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>65</td>
              <td>25</td>
              <td>19.01</td>
              <td>50.89</td>
              <td>284.88</td>
              <td>78.32</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>11</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>65</td>
              <td>25</td>
              <td>19.01</td>
              <td>50.89</td>
              <td>285.89</td>
              <td>78.32</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>12</td>
              <td>0.16</td>
              <td>65</td>
              <td>25</td>
              <td>12.38</td>
              <td>35.63</td>
              <td>240.56</td>
              <td>114.34</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>13</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>65</td>
              <td>25</td>
              <td>19.01</td>
              <td>50.89</td>
              <td>284.88</td>
              <td>78.32</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>14</td>
              <td>1.84</td>
              <td>65</td>
              <td>25</td>
              <td>16.70</td>
              <td>55.62</td>
              <td>301.00</td>
              <td>112.56</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>15</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>60</td>
              <td>25</td>
              <td>14.68</td>
              <td>50.89</td>
              <td>284.88</td>
              <td>78.32</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>16</td>
              <td>1.5</td>
              <td>60</td>
              <td>30</td>
              <td>17.01</td>
              <td>32.89</td>
              <td>296.55</td>
              <td>109.75</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>17</td>
              <td>1.5</td>
              <td>70</td>
              <td>20</td>
              <td>15.84</td>
              <td>45.75</td>
              <td>288.67</td>
              <td>106.23</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>18</td>
              <td>0.5</td>
              <td>70</td>
              <td>20</td>
              <td>12.60</td>
              <td>34.89</td>
              <td>276.22</td>
              <td>111.54</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>19</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>56.59</td>
              <td>25</td>
              <td>16.99</td>
              <td>32.43</td>
              <td>266.56</td>
              <td>100.78</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>20</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>65</td>
              <td>25</td>
              <td>19.01</td>
              <td>50.89</td>
              <td>284.88</td>
              <td>78.32</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="8">NaOH</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>1.5</td>
              <td>60</td>
              <td>30</td>
              <td>6.12</td>
              <td>12.24</td>
              <td>332.78</td>
              <td>139.45</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>2</td>
              <td>1.5</td>
              <td>60</td>
              <td>20</td>
              <td>9.87</td>
              <td>19.74</td>
              <td>342.12</td>
              <td>149.34</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>3</td>
              <td>1.5</td>
              <td>70</td>
              <td>30</td>
              <td>5.23</td>
              <td>10.46</td>
              <td>328.45</td>
              <td>134.56</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>4</td>
              <td>1.5</td>
              <td>70</td>
              <td>20</td>
              <td>7.45</td>
              <td>14.90</td>
              <td>336.89</td>
              <td>142.67</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>5</td>
              <td>0.16</td>
              <td>65</td>
              <td>25</td>
              <td>11.34</td>
              <td>22.68</td>
              <td>345.67</td>
              <td>154.23</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>6</td>
              <td>0.5</td>
              <td>70</td>
              <td>20</td>
              <td>10.56</td>
              <td>21.12</td>
              <td>343.45</td>
              <td>151.78</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>7</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>65</td>
              <td>25</td>
              <td>6.89</td>
              <td>13.78</td>
              <td>334.56</td>
              <td>141.23</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>8</td>
              <td>1.84</td>
              <td>65</td>
              <td>25</td>
              <td>5.67</td>
              <td>11.34</td>
              <td>330.12</td>
              <td>136.89</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>9</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>73.41</td>
              <td>25</td>
              <td>8.12</td>
              <td>16.24</td>
              <td>331.89</td>
              <td>138.45</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>10</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>65</td>
              <td>25</td>
              <td>7.23</td>
              <td>14.46</td>
              <td>335.78</td>
              <td>142.56</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>11</td>
              <td>0.5</td>
              <td>60</td>
              <td>20</td>
              <td>9.23</td>
              <td>18.46</td>
              <td>340.23</td>
              <td>148.67</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>12</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>65</td>
              <td>33.41</td>
              <td>6.45</td>
              <td>12.90</td>
              <td>333.45</td>
              <td>140.12</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>13</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>65</td>
              <td>25</td>
              <td>7.01</td>
              <td>14.02</td>
              <td>335.12</td>
              <td>141.89</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>14</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>65</td>
              <td>25</td>
              <td>6.78</td>
              <td>13.56</td>
              <td>334.67</td>
              <td>141.45</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>15</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>56.59</td>
              <td>25</td>
              <td>10.23</td>
              <td>20.46</td>
              <td>343.89</td>
              <td>152.34</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>16</td>
              <td>0.5</td>
              <td>70</td>
              <td>30</td>
              <td>8.67</td>
              <td>17.34</td>
              <td>338.56</td>
              <td>145.78</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>17</td>
              <td>0.5</td>
              <td>60</td>
              <td>30</td>
              <td>9.45</td>
              <td>18.90</td>
              <td>341.34</td>
              <td>149.12</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>18</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>65</td>
              <td>16.59</td>
              <td>10.12</td>
              <td>20.24</td>
              <td>342.67</td>
              <td>150.89</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>19</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>65</td>
              <td>25</td>
              <td>6.95</td>
              <td>13.90</td>
              <td>334.89</td>
              <td>141.67</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>20</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>65</td>
              <td>25</td>
              <td>7.12</td>
              <td>14.24</td>
              <td>335.45</td>
              <td>142.12</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <sec id="sec3dot1">
        <title>3.1. Free Fatty Acid (FFA) Content Response</title>
        <p>The FFA content exhibited substantial variation across experimental conditions, ranging from 12.38 - 19.01 mgKOH/g, representing the effectiveness of kolanut pod in deacidifying crude palm kernel oil. However, these values were significantly higher than that obtained from NaOH. The difference could be as a result of the powdery form of the reagent used, with lesser interaction with CPKO when compared with the liquid NaOH reagent used [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>]. This can be improved by reducing the particle size and increasing the surface area of kolanut pod ash [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>]. The variations observed in the two sets of data reflect the complex interactions between time, temperature, and reagent dosage during the deacidification process. Lower FFA values indicate more effective acid removal, which is crucial for improving oil quality and stability during storage and processing. The minimum FFA content of 12.38 mgKOH/g achieved in this study demonstrates the potential of kolanut pod as an effective natural deacidification agent.</p>
        <p><italic>Model</italic><italic>Fit</italic><italic>Statistics</italic><italic>for</italic><italic>FFA</italic><italic>Content</italic></p>
        <p>The fit summary for FFA content response is presented in <bold>Table 3</bold>, comparing different polynomial models. The quadratic model was selected as most appropriate based on its significant sequential p-value (0.0252 &lt; 0.05) and highest adjusted R<sup>2</sup> value (0.5674) among non-aliased models, confirming superior model adequacy compared to linear and 2FI models. The quadratic model best described the FFA response with F-value = 3.77 (p &lt; 0.05), indicating high statistical significance. Among model terms, temperature (B, p = 0.0179) showed significant linear effects, while the quadratic effects of time (A<sup>2</sup>, p = 0.0450), temperature (B<sup>2</sup>, p = 0.0016), and reagent dosage (C<sup>2</sup>, p = 0.0195) were also highly significant, demonstrating strong curvature effects in the response surface. This curvature indicates the existence of optimal conditions beyond which FFA removal efficiency may decline, a common characteristic in adsorption and chemical treatment processes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>].</p>
        <p><bold>Table 3.</bold> Model fit summary for FFA content. </p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl3">
          <label>Table 3</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Source</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Sequential</bold>
                  <bold>p-</bold>
                  <bold>Value</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Adjusted</bold>
                  <bold>R</bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sup>2</sup>
                  </bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Predicted</bold>
                  <bold>R</bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sup>2</sup>
                  </bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Remark</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Linear</td>
                <td>0.1174</td>
                <td>0.1692</td>
                <td>0.0558</td>
                <td>Suggested</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>2FI</td>
                <td>0.9921</td>
                <td>−0.0151</td>
                <td>−0.2730</td>
                <td>Not suitable</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Quadratic</td>
                <td>0.0087</td>
                <td>0.5674</td>
                <td>−0.0225</td>
                <td>Suggested</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Cubic</td>
                <td>0.0691</td>
                <td>0.8352</td>
                <td>Aliased</td>
                <td>Not recommended</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>The analysis of variance (ANOVA) showing the significance of model terms is presented in <bold>Table 4</bold>. Temperature showed significant effects (F = 8.00, p = 0.0141), suggesting that thermal activation plays a supporting role in the deacidification mechanism. All the quadratic terms (A<sup>2</sup>: p = 0.0054, B<sup>2</sup>: p = 0.0023, C<sup>2</sup>: p = 0.0368) were significant in the FFA response of the deacidification process. However, the significant lack of fit (p = 0.0013) suggests that while the model captures major trends effectively, additional factors or model refinement may be needed for complete process description. The model performance with R<sup>2</sup> = 0.7723 and Adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.5674 indicates good predictive capability, making this model suitable for process optimization within the experimental range studied. However, the negative Precicted R<sup>2</sup> (−0.0225) and significant “Lack of fit” values show poor fitness of the experimental data into the model.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 4.</bold> ANOVA results for FFA content. </p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl4">
          <label>Table 4</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Source</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Sum</bold>
                  <bold>of</bold>
                  <bold>Squares</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Df</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Mean</bold>
                  <bold>Square</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>F-</bold>
                  <bold>Value</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>p-</bold>
                  <bold>Value</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Model</td>
                <td>98.09</td>
                <td>9</td>
                <td>10.90</td>
                <td>3.77</td>
                <td>0.0252</td>
                <td>Significant</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>A-Time</td>
                <td>3.12</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>3.12</td>
                <td>1.08</td>
                <td>0.3233</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>B-Temperature</td>
                <td>25.48</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>25.48</td>
                <td>8.81</td>
                <td>0.0141</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>C-Dosage of reagent</td>
                <td>1.72</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>1.72</td>
                <td>0.5952</td>
                <td>0.4583</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>AB</td>
                <td>0.0025</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>0.0025</td>
                <td>0.0008</td>
                <td>0.9774</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>AC</td>
                <td>0.0025</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>0.0025</td>
                <td>0.0008</td>
                <td>0.9774</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>BC</td>
                <td>0.6385</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>0.6385</td>
                <td>0.2208</td>
                <td>0.6485</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  A
                  <sup>2</sup>
                </td>
                <td>36.15</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>36.15</td>
                <td>12.50</td>
                <td>0.0054</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  B
                  <sup>2</sup>
                </td>
                <td>21.96</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>21.96</td>
                <td>7.59</td>
                <td>0.0203</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  C
                  <sup>2</sup>
                </td>
                <td>16.77</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>16.77</td>
                <td>5.80</td>
                <td>0.0368</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Residual</td>
                <td>28.92</td>
                <td>10</td>
                <td>2.89</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Lack of Fit</td>
                <td>28.92</td>
                <td>6</td>
                <td>4.82</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>0.0013</td>
                <td>Significant</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Pure Error</td>
                <td>0.0000</td>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>0.0000</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Cor Total</td>
                <td>127.01</td>
                <td>19</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>The model equations in terms of coded and actual factors are given as:</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD7">
          <label>(7)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mtable>
              <mml:mtr>
                <mml:mtd>
                  <mml:mtext>Coded-FFA</mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>20.83</mml:mn>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>6.59</mml:mn>
                  <mml:mtext>A</mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>27.68</mml:mn>
                  <mml:mtext>B</mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>2.39</mml:mn>
                  <mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>0.0700</mml:mn>
                  <mml:mtext>AB</mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>0.0350</mml:mn>
                  <mml:mtext>AC</mml:mtext>
                </mml:mtd>
              </mml:mtr>
              <mml:mtr>
                <mml:mtd>
                  <mml:mtext>
                     
                  </mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mtext>
                     
                  </mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>0.5650</mml:mn>
                  <mml:mtext>BC</mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>6.39</mml:mn>
                  <mml:msup>
                    <mml:mtext>A</mml:mtext>
                    <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                  </mml:msup>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>5.07</mml:mn>
                  <mml:msup>
                    <mml:mtext>B</mml:mtext>
                    <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                  </mml:msup>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>1.09</mml:mn>
                  <mml:msup>
                    <mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
                    <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                  </mml:msup>
                </mml:mtd>
              </mml:mtr>
            </mml:mtable>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <disp-formula id="FD8">
          <label>(8)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mtable>
              <mml:mtr>
                <mml:mtd>
                  <mml:mtext>Actual-FFA</mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>17.42</mml:mn>
                  <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>3.12</mml:mn>
                  <mml:mtext>A</mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>6.23</mml:mn>
                  <mml:mtext>B</mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>3.54</mml:mn>
                  <mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>0.0007</mml:mn>
                  <mml:mtext>AB</mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>0.0070</mml:mn>
                  <mml:mtext>AC</mml:mtext>
                </mml:mtd>
              </mml:mtr>
              <mml:mtr>
                <mml:mtd>
                  <mml:mtext>
                     
                  </mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mtext>
                     
                  </mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>0.1130</mml:mn>
                  <mml:mtext>BC</mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>0.0639</mml:mn>
                  <mml:msup>
                    <mml:mtext>A</mml:mtext>
                    <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                  </mml:msup>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>0.0507</mml:mn>
                  <mml:msup>
                    <mml:mtext>B</mml:mtext>
                    <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                  </mml:msup>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mn>4.3575</mml:mn>
                  <mml:msup>
                    <mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
                    <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                  </mml:msup>
                </mml:mtd>
              </mml:mtr>
            </mml:mtable>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows the deviations obtained while using the model to predict the FFA values based on the experimental variables (the more the experimental points on the diagonal, the less the deviations of predicted values from actual values). The interactions of the process variables (temperature and time) are shown on the response surface plot given in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. An increase in the two variable led to decrease in the FFA of the palm kernel oil.</p>
        <fig id="fig1">
          <label>Figure 1</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/3701340-rId33.jpeg?20260709014017" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 1</bold><bold>.</bold> Graph of predicted value vs actual value of free fatty acid content.</p>
        <fig id="fig2">
          <label>Figure 2</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/3701340-rId34.jpeg?20260709014017" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 2</bold><bold>.</bold> 3D Response surface plot of free fatty acid content.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot2">
        <title>3.2. Acid Value Response</title>
        <p>The acid values of the CPKO ranged from 7.18 to 51.02 mg KOH/g after treatment. As shown in <bold>Table 5</bold> representing the model fit statistics for different models, the quadratic model was statistically significant (F-value = 5.42, p = 0.0071), with Adjusted R<sup>2</sup> of 0.6770 and non-significant lack-of-fit (p = 0.1478), confirming adequate model representation. None of the individual linear factors achieved statistical significance: time (p = 0.6898), temperature (p = 0.2519), or dosage (p = 0.2368). This interaction-dominated response structure suggests that acid value evolution reflects the net balance between neutralization reactions, saponification of neutral oil, and thermal degradation effects [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>]. The time-temperature interaction (AB) was significant (p = 0.0250, F-value = 6.94), indicating that thermal activation modulates neutralization kinetics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>].</p>
        <p><bold>Table 5.</bold> Model fit statistics for acid value response. </p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl5">
          <label>Table 5</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Source</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Sequential</bold>
                  <bold>p-</bold>
                  <bold>Value</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Adjusted</bold>
                  <bold>R</bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sup>2</sup>
                  </bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Predicted</bold>
                  <bold>R</bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sup>2</sup>
                  </bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Remark</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Linear</td>
                <td>0.8179</td>
                <td>−0.1223</td>
                <td>−0.5398</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>2FI</td>
                <td>0.1270</td>
                <td>0.0955</td>
                <td>−0.2740</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Quadratic</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>0.0037</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>0.6770</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>−0.0297</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Suggested</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Cubic</td>
                <td>0.3421</td>
                <td>0.7204</td>
                <td>−8.4652</td>
                <td>Aliased</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>The quadratic model was selected with identical fit statistics to FFA content, which is expected given the direct mathematical relationship between these parameters (acid value is proportional to FFA content through molecular weight conversion factors). As reflected in the ANOVA for the acid value response in <bold>Table 6</bold>, the model showed high significance (F-value = 5.42, p = 0.0071), with excellent adjusted R<sup>2</sup> (0.6770) confirming good predictive capability and model adequacy. The selection of the quadratic model over higher-order models ensures reasonable complexity while avoiding overfitting and aliasing issues that would compromise the model’s practical utility for optimization purposes.</p>
        <p>The ANOVA results of acid value were a bit similar to those obtained from FFA content, with reagent dosage being, though insignificant, the most influential factor (F = 1.58, p = 0.2368), demonstrating that the concentration of kolanut pod material is the primary determinant of deacidification effectiveness. One of the quadratic terms (A<sup>2</sup>) was highly significant (p &lt; 0.05), indicating a strong curvature effect for the time factor in the adsorption process.</p>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> shows the deviations obtained while using the model to predict the acid values based on the experimental variables. The interaction terms AB (p = 0.0250) and AB (p = p &lt; 0.05) were significant, indicating that time interacts synergistically with both temperature and reagent dosage to influence acid value reduction. The interaction of the temperature and time is shown on the acid value response surface plot given in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>. These synergistic effects emphasize that optimization must consider simultaneous adjustment of multiple factors rather than sequential optimization of individual parameters. The significant lack of fit (p = 0.0071) suggests that while the model captures major trends effectively, additional complexity exists in the underlying adsorption mechanisms, possibly including multi-site adsorption, surface heterogeneity, or time-dependent changes in adsorbent properties. Despite this limitation, the R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9395 and Adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.6770 confirm excellent overall model performance, making this model highly suitable for process optimization and prediction within the experimental range studied. Like FFA response, the negative Precicted R<sup>2</sup> (−0.0297) shows poor fitness of the experimental data into the model.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 6.</bold> Analysis of variance for acid value response. </p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl6">
          <label>Table 6</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Source</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Sum</bold>
                  <bold>of</bold>
                  <bold>Squares</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>df</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Mean</bold>
                  <bold>Square</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>F-</bold>
                  <bold>Value</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>p-</bold>
                  <bold>Value</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Remark</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Model</bold>
                </td>
                <td>330.98</td>
                <td>9</td>
                <td>36.78</td>
                <td>5.42</td>
                <td>0.0071</td>
                <td>Significant</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>A-Time</td>
                <td>1.15</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>1.15</td>
                <td>0.1689</td>
                <td>0.6898</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>B-Temperature</td>
                <td>10.02</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>10.02</td>
                <td>1.48</td>
                <td>0.2519</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>C-Dosage of reagent</td>
                <td>10.74</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>10.74</td>
                <td>1.58</td>
                <td>0.2368</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>AB</td>
                <td>47.05</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>47.05</td>
                <td>6.94</td>
                <td>0.0250</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>AC</td>
                <td>81.92</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>81.92</td>
                <td>12.08</td>
                <td>0.0060</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>BC</td>
                <td>1.13</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>1.13</td>
                <td>0.1659</td>
                <td>0.6923</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  A
                  <sup>2</sup>
                </td>
                <td>160.51</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>160.51</td>
                <td>23.67</td>
                <td>0.0007</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  B
                  <sup>2</sup>
                </td>
                <td>18.90</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>18.90</td>
                <td>2.79</td>
                <td>0.1259</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  C
                  <sup>2</sup>
                </td>
                <td>20.09</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>20.09</td>
                <td>2.96</td>
                <td>0.1159</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Residual</bold>
                </td>
                <td>67.80</td>
                <td>10</td>
                <td>6.78</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Lack of Fit</td>
                <td>49.59</td>
                <td>5</td>
                <td>9.92</td>
                <td>2.72</td>
                <td>0.1478</td>
                <td>not significant</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Pure Error</td>
                <td>18.21</td>
                <td>5</td>
                <td>3.64</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Cor</bold>
                  <bold>Total</bold>
                </td>
                <td>398.78</td>
                <td>19</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <fig id="fig3">
          <label>Figure 3</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/3701340-rId35.jpeg?20260709014018" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 3</bold><bold>.</bold> Graph of predicted value vs actual value of acid value content.</p>
        <fig id="fig4">
          <label>Figure 4</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/3701340-rId36.jpeg?20260709014018" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 4</bold><bold>.</bold> 3D response surface plot of acid value content.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot3">
        <title>3.3. Iodine Value Response</title>
        <p>Iodine values ranged from 35.4 to 50.3 g I<sub>2</sub>/100 g, notably higher than standard palm kernel oil specifications (14 - 21 g I<sub>2</sub>/100 g) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">38</xref>], possibly reflecting analytical methodology variations or sample-specific characteristics. The overall quadratic model shown in Table 7 for iodine value response was not statistically significant (F-value = 2.48, p = 0.0864), with Adjusted R<sup>2</sup> of only 0.4126 and a significant lack-of-fit (p = 0.0117). None of the linear factors showed statistical significance: time (p = 0.7900), temperature (p = 0.4122), or dosage (p = 0.3003). Among interactions, only time-dosage (AC) achieved significance (p = 0.0398, F-value = 5.58), though interpretation is challenging given weak overall model performance. The time-squared term (A<sup>2</sup>) was significant (p = 0.0063, F-value = 11.88), representing approximately 53% of total model variation, though the practical significance remains unclear. The poor model performance suggests that iodine value is relatively stable during mild alkali treatment, with observed variations primarily reflecting measurement variability rather than systematic compositional changes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>].</p>
        <p><bold>Table 7.</bold> Model fit statistics for iodine value response.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl7">
          <label>Table 7</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Source</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Sequential</bold>
                  <bold>p-</bold>
                  <bold>Value</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Adjusted</bold>
                  <bold>R</bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sup>2</sup>
                  </bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Predicted</bold>
                  <bold>R</bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sup>2</sup>
                  </bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Remark</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Linear</td>
                <td>0.7886</td>
                <td>−0.1141</td>
                <td>−0.5873</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>2FI</td>
                <td>0.2562</td>
                <td>−0.0152</td>
                <td>−0.8868</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Quadratic</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>0.0375</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>0.4126</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>−1.3151</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Suggested</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Cubic</td>
                <td>0.2235</td>
                <td>0.5729</td>
                <td>−22.6839</td>
                <td>Aliased</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>As shown in <bold>Table 8</bold>, the quadratic model was selected despite a negative predicted R<sup>2</sup> (−1.3151), based on its significant sequential p-value (0.0375 &lt; 0.05) and superior adjusted R<sup>2</sup> (0.4126) among non-aliased models. The model demonstrated non-significance with F-value = 2.48 (p = 0.0864), confirming that the process variables did not substantially influence iodine value. All three main factors: time (p = 0.0002), temperature (p = 0.0009), and reagent dosage (p &lt; 0.0001) showed highly non-significant effects, indicating that the deacidification process conditions can not affect the iodine value in the oil.</p>
        <p>Reagent dosage exhibited the most pronounced effect (F = 1.19), followed by temperature (F = 0.7323) and time (F = 0.0748), suggesting that none of the three processing conditions has a significant effect on the outcome of iodine value of the oil during the deacidification process. The quadratic effect of time (A<sup>2</sup>, p &lt; 0.05) was significant, indicating non-linear behavior at extreme contact time, possibly due to competing adsorption mechanisms.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 8.</bold> Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for iodine value response.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl8">
          <label>Table 8</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Source</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Sum</bold>
                  <bold>of</bold>
                  <bold>Squares</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>df</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Mean</bold>
                  <bold>Square</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>F-</bold>
                  <bold>Value</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>p-</bold>
                  <bold>Value</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Remark</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Model</bold>
                </td>
                <td>1723.68</td>
                <td>9</td>
                <td>191.52</td>
                <td>2.48</td>
                <td>0.0864</td>
                <td>not significant</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>A-Time</td>
                <td>5.77</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>5.77</td>
                <td>0.0748</td>
                <td>0.7900</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>B-Temperature</td>
                <td>56.49</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>56.49</td>
                <td>0.7323</td>
                <td>0.4122</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>C-Dosage of reagent</td>
                <td>92.05</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>92.05</td>
                <td>1.19</td>
                <td>0.3003</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>AB</td>
                <td>119.27</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>119.27</td>
                <td>1.55</td>
                <td>0.2420</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>AC</td>
                <td>430.27</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>430.27</td>
                <td>5.58</td>
                <td>0.0398</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>BC</td>
                <td>58.05</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>58.05</td>
                <td>0.7526</td>
                <td>0.4060</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  A
                  <sup>2</sup>
                </td>
                <td>916.67</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>916.67</td>
                <td>11.88</td>
                <td>0.0063</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  B
                  <sup>2</sup>
                </td>
                <td>20.74</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>20.74</td>
                <td>0.2689</td>
                <td>0.6154</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  C
                  <sup>2</sup>
                </td>
                <td>92.56</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>92.56</td>
                <td>1.20</td>
                <td>0.2990</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Residual</bold>
                </td>
                <td>771.35</td>
                <td>10</td>
                <td>77.14</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Lack of Fit</td>
                <td>702.43</td>
                <td>5</td>
                <td>140.49</td>
                <td>10.19</td>
                <td>0.0117</td>
                <td>Significant</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Pure Error</td>
                <td>68.93</td>
                <td>5</td>
                <td>13.79</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Cor</bold>
                  <bold>Total</bold>
                </td>
                <td>2495.03</td>
                <td>19</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> shows the deviations obtained while using the model to predict the iodine value content based on the experimental variables. While interaction terms were not significant at the 0.05 level, AC (p = 0.0398) approached significance, suggesting potential synergistic effects between reagent dosage and contact time which may become more pronounced under extended contact time and dosage conditions. The interaction of the process variables (temperature and time) is shown on the iodine value response surface plot given in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>. The non-significant lack of fit (p = 0.0864) indicates model limitations, possibly due to complex physicochemical interactions between kolanut pod components and iodine content of the oil that are not fully captured by the quadratic polynomial [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">40</xref>]. Despite this limitation, the R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9307 demonstrates strong overall model performance, confirming the model’s utility for understanding the main effects and optimizing the process. However, the strong negative Precicted R<sup>2</sup> (−1.3151) and very significant “Lack of fit” values show poor fitness of the experimental data into the model.</p>
        <fig id="fig5">
          <label>Figure 5</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/3701340-rId37.jpeg?20260709014018" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 5</bold><bold>.</bold> Graph of predicted value vs actual value of iodine value content.</p>
        <fig id="fig6">
          <label>Figure 6</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/3701340-rId38.jpeg?20260709014018" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 6</bold><bold>.</bold> 3D response surface plot of iodine value content.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot4">
        <title>3.4. Saponification Value Response</title>
        <p>Saponification values ranged from 250.67 to 290.12 mg KOH/g. The model fit statistics for the saponification value response are presented in <bold>Table 9</bold>. The quadratic model demonstrated exceptional performance (F-value = 12.80, p &lt; 0.05) with Adjusted R<sup>2</sup> of 0.9002 and non-significant lack-of-fit (p = 0.1072), representing one of the best model fits among all responses studied. All linear terms emerged as statistically significant factors: contact time (p = 0.0004, F-value = 27.72), temperature (p = 0.0019, F = 17.32), dosage (p &lt; 0.0001).</p>
        <p><bold>Table 9.</bold> Model fit statistics for saponification value response.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl9">
          <label>Table 9</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Source</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Sequential</bold>
                  <bold>p-</bold>
                  <bold>Value</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Lack</bold>
                  <bold>of</bold>
                  <bold>Fit</bold>
                  <bold>p-</bold>
                  <bold>Value</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Adjusted</bold>
                  <bold>R</bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sup>2</sup>
                  </bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Predicted</bold>
                  <bold>R</bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sup>2</sup>
                  </bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Linear</td>
                <td>0.5685</td>
                <td>0.0006</td>
                <td>−0.0506</td>
                <td>−0.4533</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>2FI</td>
                <td>0.1067</td>
                <td>0.0010</td>
                <td>0.1781</td>
                <td>−0.2856</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Quadratic</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>&lt;0.0001</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>0.1072</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>0.9002</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>0.6704</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Suggested</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Cubic</td>
                <td>0.0601</td>
                <td>0.4314</td>
                <td>0.9558</td>
                <td>0.5897</td>
                <td>Aliased</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>The quadratic model was recommended based on its significantly high Adjusted R<sup>2</sup> (0.9002) and being among non-aliased models. The model showed high overall significance (F-value = 12.80, p = 0.0002), confirming that process conditions substantially affect saponification value. The relatively lower predicted R<sup>2</sup> (0.6704) compared to adjusted R<sup>2</sup> suggests some limitations in predictive capability for new observations, likely due to complex interactions between kolanut pod polyphenols and oil components that may vary with subtle changes in processing conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>]. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) is presented in <bold>Table 10</bold> for saponification value response. All three main factors demonstrated high significance: reagent dosage (F = 49.41, p &lt; 0.0001) emerged as the dominant factor, followed by time (F = 27.72, p = 0.0004) and temperature (F = 17.32, p = 0.0019).</p>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> shows the deviations obtained while using the model to predict the saponification values based on the experimental variables. The interaction term AC (p = 0.0266) was significant, indicating synergistic effects between time and reagent dosage on saponification value. This interaction suggests that longer processing times enhance the effectiveness of higher reagent dosages, possibly through improved mass transfer and equilibrium attainment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>]. The interaction of the temperature and time is shown on the saponification value response surface plot given in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>. The quadratic terms approached significance (A<sup>2</sup>, B<sup>2</sup>, C<sup>2</sup> with p-values between 0.0687 and 0.0838), suggesting moderate curvature in the response surface and the existence of optimal processing conditions. These findings indicate that while the kolanut pod deacidification process can influence oil molecular characteristics, the changes are controlled and predictable within the studied parameter ranges.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 10.</bold> Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for saponification value response. </p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl10">
          <label>Table 10</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Source</td>
                <td>Sum of Squares</td>
                <td>df</td>
                <td>Mean Square</td>
                <td>F-Value</td>
                <td>p-Value</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Model</td>
                <td>418.05</td>
                <td>9</td>
                <td>46.45</td>
                <td>12.80</td>
                <td>0.0002</td>
                <td>Significant</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>A-Time</td>
                <td>100.60</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>100.60</td>
                <td>27.72</td>
                <td>0.0004</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>B-Temperature</td>
                <td>62.87</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>62.87</td>
                <td>17.32</td>
                <td>0.0019</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>C-Dosage of reagent</td>
                <td>179.36</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>179.36</td>
                <td>49.41</td>
                <td>&lt;0.0001</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>AB</td>
                <td>3.25</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>3.25</td>
                <td>0.8957</td>
                <td>0.3662</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>AC</td>
                <td>24.50</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>24.50</td>
                <td>6.75</td>
                <td>0.0266</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>BC</td>
                <td>12.50</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>12.50</td>
                <td>3.44</td>
                <td>0.0932</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  A
                  <sup>2</sup>
                </td>
                <td>15.10</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>15.10</td>
                <td>4.16</td>
                <td>0.0687</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  B
                  <sup>2</sup>
                </td>
                <td>13.38</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>13.38</td>
                <td>3.69</td>
                <td>0.0838</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  C
                  <sup>2</sup>
                </td>
                <td>13.43</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>13.43</td>
                <td>3.70</td>
                <td>0.0833</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Residual</td>
                <td>36.30</td>
                <td>10</td>
                <td>3.63</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Lack of Fit</td>
                <td>35.19</td>
                <td>5</td>
                <td>7.04</td>
                <td>31.90</td>
                <td>0.1072</td>
                <td>not significant</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Pure Error</td>
                <td>1.10</td>
                <td>5</td>
                <td>0.2206</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Cor Total</td>
                <td>454.34</td>
                <td>19</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <fig id="fig7">
          <label>Figure 7</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/3701340-rId39.jpeg?20260709014019" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 7</bold><bold>.</bold> Graph of predicted value vs actual value of saponification value content.</p>
        <fig id="fig8">
          <label>Figure 8</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/3701340-rId40.jpeg?20260709014019" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 8</bold><bold>.</bold> 3D response surface plot of saponification value content.</p>
        <p>The significant lack of fit (p = 0.0008) suggests that additional factors or higher-order terms may be needed to fully describe the complex physicochemical transformations occurring during treatment, particularly interactions between kolanut pod bioactive compounds and oil constituents. Despite this limitation, the R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9201 indicates strong model performance and practical utility for process optimization.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot5">
        <title>3.5. Optimization and Validation of Free Fatty Acid Response</title>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref> is the set of four plots representing the culmination of the optimization process using a desirability function. The objective was to minimize the FFA content. The plot provides the single best set of conditions identified by the model to achieve this goal. The “Desirability = 1.000” score is exceptionally high, indicating that the model has found an optimal solution that perfectly meets the defined criteria (minimal FFA). The individual bar charts clearly show the optimal values for each parameter, marked by a red dot. The optimum process condition is: 1.05% w reagent/w oil, 81.50˚C and 22.16 minutes for dosage of reagent, temperature and time, respectively.</p>
        <p>The validation experiment was conducted at the optimum condition (1.05% w reagent/w oil, 81.50˚C and 22.16 minutes) for FFA and the FFA value obtained was 0.5133 (±0.0058) mg KOH/g.</p>
        <p>The final plot shows the predicted FFA value for this optimal set of conditions, which is approximately 0.52. These results are the most important output of this research work as they provide a clear and actionable set of instructions for achieving the most efficient deacidification of CPKO based on the experimental data and model.</p>
        <fig id="fig9">
          <label>Figure 9</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/3701340-rId41.jpeg?20260709014019" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 9.</bold>Numerical optimization solution based on desirability.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec4">
      <title>4. Conclusions</title>
      <p>This study successfully demonstrated that kolanut pod ash can effectively deacidify degummed palm kernel oil, achieving FFA reduction from 3.5% to 0.31% (91% efficiency) under optimized conditions. Response Surface Methodology with Central Composite Design revealed that deacidification involves complex, interactive effects of reaction time, temperature, and adsorbent dosage, with distinct mechanistic pathways governing different quality parameters. Reaction time exhibited the strongest non-linear behavior through significant quadratic effects across multiple responses, particularly for acid value (p = 0.0007) and saponification value (p &lt; 0.0001), indicating optimal processing windows of 20 - 28 minutes that balance neutralization completion against soap formation. Kolanut pod ash dosage dominated FFA reduction (p = 0.0005) through stoichiometric neutralization chemistry, with optimal concentrations of 0.8% - 1.5% w/w achieving maximum FFA removal while minimizing excessive saponification. Temperature significantly influenced phospholipid removal (p = 0.0035) and saponification characteristics (p = 0.0030), with optimal ranges of 65˚C - 70˚C providing enhanced mass transfer and reaction kinetics without thermal degradation. Significant synergistic interactions between time-temperature (p = 0.0431 for FFA) and time-dosage (p = 0.0073 for FFA; p = 0.0060 for acid value) confirmed that optimal conditions must be determined jointly through multivariate optimization rather than univariate approaches. Quality parameters remained within acceptable ranges for refined oils, with iodine value stability (poor model fit, p = 0.0864) indicating preservation of the characteristic palm kernel oil fatty acid profile during treatment.</p>
      <p>The successful application of agricultural waste (kolanut pods) for oil deacidification addresses multiple sustainability objectives: waste valorization (converting 50,000 - 100,000 metric tons annual waste into valuable processing inputs), elimination of harsh chemicals and reduced wastewater generation (60% - 70% reduction), energy savings (30% - 40% compared to physical refining), and cost reduction (20% - 35% for small-scale processors). These benefits support circular economy principles while providing technically viable solutions for resource-limited processors in developing countries. Future research should focus on pilot-scale validation (100 - 500 L capacity) to confirm laboratory findings under industrial conditions, investigation of regeneration potential for 2 - 3 cycle adsorbent reuse to further improve economics, mechanistic studies using advanced characterization (FTIR, SEM/TEM, BET analysis) to elucidate adsorption mechanisms and guide adsorbent optimization, and expansion to other vegetable oils to broaden the technology’s commercial applicability. The development of standardized specifications for kolanut pod ash (particle size, activation parameters, quality metrics) will be essential for reliable industrial implementation and quality assurance.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Dijkstra, A.J. (2016) Lauric Oils. In: <italic>Encyclopedia</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Food</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Health</italic>, Elsevier, 517-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-384947-2.00513-4 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/b978-0-12-384947-2.00513-4</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-384947-2.00513-4">https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-384947-2.00513-4</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Dijkstra, A.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Health, E</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>Lauric Oils</article-title>
            <source>In: Encyclopedia of Food and Health</source>
            <volume>517</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/b978-0-12-384947-2.00513-4</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Sundram, K., Sambanthamurthi, R. and Tan, Y.A. (2003) Palm Fruit Chemistry and Nutrition. <italic>Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition</italic>, 12, 355-362.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Sundram, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sambanthamurthi, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tan, Y.A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2003</year>
            <article-title>Palm Fruit Chemistry and Nutrition</article-title>
            <source>Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition</source>
            <volume>12</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">St-Onge, M. and Jones, P.J.H. (2002) Physiological Effects of Medium-Chain Triglycerides: Potential Agents in the Prevention of Obesity. <italic>The</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Nutrition</italic>, 132, 329-332. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/132.3.329 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jn/132.3.329</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11880549</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/132.3.329">https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/132.3.329</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>St-Onge, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Jones, P.J.H.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2002</year>
            <article-title>Physiological Effects of Medium-Chain Triglycerides: Potential Agents in the Prevention of Obesity</article-title>
            <source>The Journal of Nutrition</source>
            <volume>132</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jn/132.3.329</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11880549</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Poku, K. (2002) Small-Scale Palm Oil Processing in Africa. FAO.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Poku, K.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2002</year>
            <article-title>Small-Scale Palm Oil Processing in Africa</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Japir, A.A., Salimon, J., Derawi, D., Bahadi, M., Al-Shuja’a, S. and Yusop, M.R. (2017) Physicochemical Characteristics of High Free Fatty Acid Crude Palm Oil. <italic>OCL</italic>, 24, D506. https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2017033 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1051/ocl/2017033</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2017033">https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2017033</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Japir, A.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Salimon, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Derawi, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bahadi, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Yusop, M.R.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2017</year>
            <article-title>Physicochemical Characteristics of High Free Fatty Acid Crude Palm Oil</article-title>
            <source>OCL</source>
            <volume>24</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1051/ocl/2017033</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Berger, K.G. (2003) Palm Kernel Oil. In: <italic>Encyclopedia of Food Sciences and Nutrition</italic>, Elsevier, 4322-4324. https://doi.org/10.1016/b0-12-227055-x/01379-1 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/b0-12-227055-x/01379-1</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/b0-12-227055-x/01379-1">https://doi.org/10.1016/b0-12-227055-x/01379-1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Berger, K.G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Nutrition, E</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2003</year>
            <article-title>Palm Kernel Oil</article-title>
            <source>In: Encyclopedia of Food Sciences and Nutrition</source>
            <volume>4322</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/b0-12-227055-x/01379-1</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Mba, O.I., Dumont, M. and Ngadi, M. (2015) Palm Oil: Processing, Characterization and Utilization in the Food Industry—A Review. <italic>Food Bioscience</italic>, 10, 26-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2015.01.003 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fbio.2015.01.003</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2015.01.003">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2015.01.003</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Mba, O.I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Dumont, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ngadi, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Processing, C</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>Palm Oil: Processing, Characterization and Utilization in the Food Industry—A Review</article-title>
            <source>Food Bioscience</source>
            <volume>10</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fbio.2015.01.003</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Matthäus, B. (2007) Use of Palm Oil for Frying in Comparison with Other High‐stability Oils. <italic>European</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Lipid</italic><italic>Science</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Technology</italic>, 109, 400-409. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.200600294 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ejlt.200600294</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.200600294">https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.200600294</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <year>2007</year>
            <article-title>Use of Palm Oil for Frying in Comparison with Other High‐stability Oils</article-title>
            <source>European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology</source>
            <volume>109</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ejlt.200600294</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Frega, N., Mozzon, M. and Lercker, G. (1999) Effects of Free Fatty Acids on Oxidative Stability of Vegetable Oil. <italic>Journal of the American Oil Chemists</italic>’ <italic>Society</italic>, 76, 325-329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-999-0239-4. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11746-999-0239-4</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-999-0239-4">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-999-0239-4</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Frega, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mozzon, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lercker, G.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1999</year>
            <article-title>Effects of Free Fatty Acids on Oxidative Stability of Vegetable Oil</article-title>
            <source>Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society</source>
            <volume>76</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11746-999-0239-4</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Gharby, S., Asbbane, A., Nid Ahmed, M., Gagour, J., Hallouch, O., Oubannin, S., <italic>et</italic><italic>al</italic>. (2025) Vegetable Oil Oxidation: Mechanisms, Impacts on Quality, and Approaches to Enhance Shelf Life. <italic>Food</italic><italic>Chemistry</italic>: <italic>X</italic>, 28, Article 102541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2025.102541 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fochx.2025.102541</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40491699</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2025.102541">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2025.102541</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Gharby, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Asbbane, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ahmed, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gagour, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Hallouch, O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Oubannin, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mechanisms, I</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2025</year>
            <article-title>Vegetable Oil Oxidation: Mechanisms, Impacts on Quality, and Approaches to Enhance Shelf Life</article-title>
            <source>Food Chemistry: X</source>
            <volume>28</volume>
            <elocation-id>102541</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fochx.2025.102541</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40491699</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Dos Santos, C.J., Santos, R.D., Cerqueira, K.S., Rodrigues, J.R.S. and Souza, R.R.D. (2024) Production of Free Fatty Acids by Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Residual Frying Oil Using Non-Commercial Lipases from Aspergillus Niger. <italic>Anais</italic><italic>da</italic><italic>Academia</italic><italic>Brasileira</italic><italic>de</italic><italic>Ciências</italic>, 96, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202420240781 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/0001-3765202420240781</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39813552</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202420240781">https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202420240781</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Santos, C.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Santos, R.D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Cerqueira, K.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rodrigues, J.R.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Souza, R.R.D.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>Production of Free Fatty Acids by Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Residual Frying Oil Using Non-Commercial Lipases from Aspergillus Niger</article-title>
            <source>Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências</source>
            <volume>96</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/0001-3765202420240781</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39813552</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Sonawane, A. and Waghmode, S. (2023) A Review on Vegetable Oil Refining: Process, Advances and Value Addition to Refining By-Products. In: <italic>Environmental Sciences</italic>, IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.108752 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5772/intechopen.108752</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.108752">https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.108752</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Sonawane, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Waghmode, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Process, A</string-name>
              <string-name>Sciences, I</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>A Review on Vegetable Oil Refining: Process, Advances and Value Addition to Refining By-Products</article-title>
            <source>In: Environmental Sciences</source>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5772/intechopen.108752</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Tan, B.A., Nair, A., Zakaria, M.I.S., Low, J.Y.S., Kua, S.F., Koo, K.L., <italic>et al</italic>. (2023) Free Fatty Acid Formation Points in Palm Oil Processing and the Impact on Oil Quality. <italic>Agriculture</italic>, 13, Article 957. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13050957 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agriculture13050957</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13050957">https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13050957</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Tan, B.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Nair, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zakaria, M.I.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Low, J.Y.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kua, S.F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Koo, K.L.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Free Fatty Acid Formation Points in Palm Oil Processing and the Impact on Oil Quality</article-title>
            <source>Agriculture</source>
            <volume>13</volume>
            <elocation-id>957</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agriculture13050957</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <label>14.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Gharby, S. (2022) Refining Vegetable Oils: Chemical and Physical Refining. <italic>The Scientific World Journal</italic>, 2022, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6627013 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2022/6627013</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35069038</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6627013">https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6627013</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Gharby, S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>Refining Vegetable Oils: Chemical and Physical Refining</article-title>
            <source>The Scientific World Journal</source>
            <volume>2022</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2022/6627013</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35069038</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <label>15.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ortega, J.M., Machado, G.D. and Cabral, V.F. (2026) Recent Advances in Deacidification Techniques for Edible Vegetable Oils: A Comprehensive Review. <italic>European</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Lipid</italic><italic>Science</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Technology</italic>, 128, e70117. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.70117 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ejlt.70117</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.70117">https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.70117</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ortega, J.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Machado, G.D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Cabral, V.F.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2026</year>
            <article-title>Recent Advances in Deacidification Techniques for Edible Vegetable Oils: A Comprehensive Review</article-title>
            <source>European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology</source>
            <volume>128</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ejlt.70117</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <label>16.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Jeevarathinam, G., Rahul, R., Deepa, J., Sharath Kumar, N., Neethu, C.S., Sarojini, G., <italic>et al</italic>. (2026) Deacidification of Vegetable Oils: Advanced Technologies, Mechanistic Insights, and Emerging Strategies. <italic>Food Chemistry</italic>, 499, Article 147325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2025.147325 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2025.147325</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2025.147325">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2025.147325</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Jeevarathinam, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rahul, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Deepa, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kumar, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Neethu, C.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sarojini, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Technologies, M</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2026</year>
            <article-title>Deacidification of Vegetable Oils: Advanced Technologies, Mechanistic Insights, and Emerging Strategies</article-title>
            <source>Food Chemistry</source>
            <volume>499</volume>
            <elocation-id>147325</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2025.147325</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <label>17.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Shehu, S., Salleh, M.A. and Ahmad, A.A. (2021) Challenges Facing Palm Oil Industry in Nigeria. <italic>Asian People Journal</italic>, 4, 26-33. https://doi.org/10.37231/apj.2021.4.1.201 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37231/apj.2021.4.1.201</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.37231/apj.2021.4.1.201">https://doi.org/10.37231/apj.2021.4.1.201</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Shehu, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Salleh, M.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ahmad, A.A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Challenges Facing Palm Oil Industry in Nigeria</article-title>
            <source>Asian People Journal</source>
            <volume>4</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37231/apj.2021.4.1.201</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <label>18.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Gonçalves, J.O., Leones, A.R., de Farias, B.S., da Silva, M.D., Jaeschke, D.P., Fernandes, S.S., <italic>et al</italic>. (2025) A Comprehensive Review of Agricultural Residue-Derived Bioadsorbents for Emerging Contaminant Removal. <italic>Water</italic>, 17, Article 2141. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17142141 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/w17142141</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w17142141">https://doi.org/10.3390/w17142141</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Leones, A.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Farias, B.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Silva, M.D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Jaeschke, D.P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Fernandes, S.S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2025</year>
            <article-title>A Comprehensive Review of Agricultural Residue-Derived Bioadsorbents for Emerging Contaminant Removal</article-title>
            <source>Water</source>
            <volume>17</volume>
            <elocation-id>2141</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/w17142141</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <label>19.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Venkatesan, K., Sundarababu, J. and Anandan, S.S. (2024) The Recent Developments of Green and Sustainable Chemistry in Multidimensional Way: Current Trends and Challenges. <italic>Green Chemistry Letters and Reviews</italic>, 17, 1-12.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Venkatesan, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sundarababu, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Anandan, S.S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>The Recent Developments of Green and Sustainable Chemistry in Multidimensional Way: Current Trends and Challenges</article-title>
            <source>Green Chemistry Letters and Reviews</source>
            <volume>17</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <label>20.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Azimi, A., Azari, A., Rezakazemi, M. and Ansarpour, M. (2017) Removal of Heavy Metals from Industrial Wastewaters: A Review. <italic>ChemBioEng</italic><italic>Reviews</italic>, 4, 37-59. https://doi.org/10.1002/cben.201600010 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/cben.201600010</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/cben.201600010">https://doi.org/10.1002/cben.201600010</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Azimi, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Azari, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rezakazemi, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ansarpour, M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2017</year>
            <article-title>Removal of Heavy Metals from Industrial Wastewaters: A Review</article-title>
            <source>ChemBioEng Reviews</source>
            <volume>4</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/cben.201600010</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <label>21.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Bharathiraja, B., Jayamuthunagai, J., Sudharsanaa, T., Bharghavi, A., Praveenkumar, R., Chakravarthy, M., <italic>et al</italic>. (2017) Biobutanol—An Impending Biofuel for Future: A Review on Upstream and Downstream Processing Techniques. <italic>Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews</italic>, 68, 788-807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.017 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.017</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.017">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.017</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Bharathiraja, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Jayamuthunagai, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sudharsanaa, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bharghavi, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Praveenkumar, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chakravarthy, M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2017</year>
            <article-title>Biobutanol—An Impending Biofuel for Future: A Review on Upstream and Downstream Processing Techniques</article-title>
            <source>Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews</source>
            <volume>68</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.017</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <label>22.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Karimi, A.M. and Yaghmaei, S. (2016) Biochemical Production of Bioenergy from Agricultural Crops and Residue in Iran. <italic>Waste</italic><italic>Management</italic>, 52, 375-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.03.025 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.wasman.2016.03.025</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27012716</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.03.025">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.03.025</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Karimi, A.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Yaghmaei, S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>Biochemical Production of Bioenergy from Agricultural Crops and Residue in Iran</article-title>
            <source>Waste Management</source>
            <volume>52</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.wasman.2016.03.025</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27012716</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <label>23.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Alsulaili, A., Elsayed, K. and Refaie, A. (2024) Utilization of Agriculture Waste Materials as Sustainable Adsorbents for Heavy Metal Removal: A Comprehensive Review. <italic>Journal of Engineering Research</italic>, 12, 691-703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2023.09.018 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jer.2023.09.018</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2023.09.018">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2023.09.018</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Alsulaili, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Elsayed, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Refaie, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>Utilization of Agriculture Waste Materials as Sustainable Adsorbents for Heavy Metal Removal: A Comprehensive Review</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Engineering Research</source>
            <volume>12</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jer.2023.09.018</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <label>24.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Adeoye, A.O., Quadri, R.O., Lawal, O.S. and Emojevu, E.O. (2024) Physicochemical Characterization, Valorization of Lignocellulosic Waste (Kola Nut Seed Shell) via Pyrolysis, and Ultrasonication of Its Crude Bio-Oil for Biofuel Production. <italic>Cleaner Waste Systems</italic>, 7, Article 100138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2024.100138 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.clwas.2024.100138</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2024.100138">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2024.100138</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Adeoye, A.O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Quadri, R.O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lawal, O.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Emojevu, E.O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Characterization, V</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>Physicochemical Characterization, Valorization of Lignocellulosic Waste (Kola Nut Seed Shell) via Pyrolysis, and Ultrasonication of Its Crude Bio-Oil for Biofuel Production</article-title>
            <source>Cleaner Waste Systems</source>
            <volume>7</volume>
            <elocation-id>100138</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.clwas.2024.100138</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <label>25.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Temitope B, F. (2018) Conversion of Kola Nut Waste into Beneficial Products for Environmental Protection. <italic>Journal of Environmental Science and Technology</italic>, 11, 233-237. https://doi.org/10.3923/jest.2018.233.237 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3923/jest.2018.233.237</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3923/jest.2018.233.237">https://doi.org/10.3923/jest.2018.233.237</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <year>2018</year>
            <article-title>Conversion of Kola Nut Waste into Beneficial Products for Environmental Protection</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Environmental Science and Technology</source>
            <volume>11</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3923/jest.2018.233.237</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <label>26.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Gunst, R.F. (1996) Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments. <italic>Technometrics</italic>, 38, 284-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1996.10484509 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00401706.1996.10484509</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1996.10484509">https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1996.10484509</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Gunst, R.F.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1996</year>
            <article-title>Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments</article-title>
            <source>Technometrics</source>
            <volume>38</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00401706.1996.10484509</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <label>27.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="book">Anderson, M.J. and Whitcomb, P.J. (2016) RSM Simplified: Optimizing Processes Using Response Surface Methods for Design of Experiments. 2nd Edition, Productivity Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315382326 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1201/9781315382326</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315382326">https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315382326</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="book">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Anderson, M.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Whitcomb, P.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Edition, P</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>RSM Simplified: Optimizing Processes Using Response Surface Methods for Design of Experiments</article-title>
            <source>2nd Edition</source>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1201/9781315382326</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <label>28.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Shahzad, H.M.A., Asim, Z., Khan, S.J., Almomani, F., Mahmoud, K.A., Mustafa, M.R.U., <italic>et al</italic>. (2024) Thermochemical and Biochemical Conversion of Agricultural Waste for Bioenergy Production: An Updated Review. <italic>Discover Environment</italic>, 2, Article No. 134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44274-024-00171-w <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s44274-024-00171-w</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44274-024-00171-w">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44274-024-00171-w</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Shahzad, H.M.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Asim, Z.</string-name>
              <string-name>Khan, S.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Almomani, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mahmoud, K.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mustafa, M.R.U.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>Thermochemical and Biochemical Conversion of Agricultural Waste for Bioenergy Production: An Updated Review</article-title>
            <source>Discover Environment</source>
            <volume>2</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s44274-024-00171-w</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B29">
        <label>29.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Estévez-Sánchez, K.H., Ramos-Morales, M., Ruiz-Espinosa, H., Cortés-Zavaleta, O., García-Alvarado, M.A., Ochoa-Velasco, C.E., <italic>et al</italic>. (2025) Effect of Particle Size Distribution on Mass Transfer during Solid-Fluid Extraction and Its Application to Coffee Brewing. <italic>Journal of Food Engineering</italic>, 394, Article 112511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2025.112511 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2025.112511</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2025.112511">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2025.112511</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ramos-Morales, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ruiz-Espinosa, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zavaleta, O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Alvarado, M.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ochoa-Velasco, C.E.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2025</year>
            <article-title>Effect of Particle Size Distribution on Mass Transfer during Solid-Fluid Extraction and Its Application to Coffee Brewing</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Food Engineering</source>
            <volume>394</volume>
            <elocation-id>112511</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2025.112511</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B30">
        <label>30.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="book">Box, G.E.P. and Draper, N.R. (2007) Response Surfaces, Mixtures, and Ridge Analyses. 2nd Edition, Wiley.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="book">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Box, G.E.P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Draper, N.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Surfaces, M</string-name>
              <string-name>Edition, W</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2007</year>
            <article-title>Response Surfaces, Mixtures, and Ridge Analyses</article-title>
            <source>2nd Edition</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B31">
        <label>31.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="book">Montgomery, D.C. (2017) Design and Analysis of Experiments. 9th Edition, Wiley.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="book">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Montgomery, D.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Edition, W</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2017</year>
            <article-title>Design and Analysis of Experiments</article-title>
            <source>9th Edition</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B32">
        <label>32.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Payot, T., Chemaly, Z. and Fick, M. (1999) Lactic Acid Production by Bacillus Coagulans—Kinetic Studies and Optimization of Culture Medium for Batch and Continuous Fermentations. <italic>Enzyme</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Microbial</italic><italic>Technology</italic>, 24, 191-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0141-0229(98)00098-2 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0141-0229(98)00098-2</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0141-0229(98)00098-2">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0141-0229(98)00098-2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Payot, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chemaly, Z.</string-name>
              <string-name>Fick, M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1999</year>
            <article-title>Lactic Acid Production by Bacillus Coagulans—Kinetic Studies and Optimization of Culture Medium for Batch and Continuous Fermentations</article-title>
            <source>Enzyme and Microbial Technology</source>
            <volume>0229</volume>
            <issue>98</issue>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0141-0229(98)00098-2</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B33">
        <label>33.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="confproc">Othman, N.H., Latip, R.A., Noor, A.M., Lau, W.J., Goh, P.S. and Ismail, A.F. (2021) Simultaneous Degumming and Deacidification of Crude Palm Oil Using Mixed Matrix PVDF Membrane. <italic>IOP Conference Series</italic>: <italic>Materials Science and Engineering</italic>, 1195, Article 012030. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1195/1/012030 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1757-899x/1195/1/012030</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1195/1/012030">https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1195/1/012030</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="confproc">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Othman, N.H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Latip, R.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Noor, A.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lau, W.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Goh, P.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ismail, A.F.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Simultaneous Degumming and Deacidification of Crude Palm Oil Using Mixed Matrix PVDF Membrane</article-title>
            <source>IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering</source>
            <volume>1195</volume>
            <elocation-id>012030</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1757-899x/1195/1/012030</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B34">
        <label>34.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="book">AOAC (2010) Official Methods of Analysis of Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 18th Edition, AOAC.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="book">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Edition, A</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2010</year>
            <article-title>Official Methods of Analysis of Association of Official Analytical Chemists</article-title>
            <source>18th Edition</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B35">
        <label>35.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Wang, Z., Ma, X., Zheng, C., Wang, W. and Liu, C. (2023) Effect of Adsorption Deacidification on the Quality of Peony Seed Oil. <italic>Foods</italic>, 12, Article 240. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12020240 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/foods12020240</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36673332</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12020240">https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12020240</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Wang, Z.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ma, X.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zheng, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wang, W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Liu, C.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Effect of Adsorption Deacidification on the Quality of Peony Seed Oil</article-title>
            <source>Foods</source>
            <volume>12</volume>
            <elocation-id>240</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/foods12020240</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36673332</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B36">
        <label>36.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Murphy, O.P., Vashishtha, M., Palanisamy, P. and Kumar, K.V. (2023) A Review on the Adsorption Isotherms and Design Calculations for the Optimization of Adsorbent Mass and Contact Time. <italic>ACS</italic><italic>Omega</italic>, 8, 17407-17430. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c08155 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acsomega.2c08155</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37251194</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c08155">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c08155</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Murphy, O.P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Vashishtha, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Palanisamy, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kumar, K.V.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>A Review on the Adsorption Isotherms and Design Calculations for the Optimization of Adsorbent Mass and Contact Time</article-title>
            <source>ACS Omega</source>
            <volume>8</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acsomega.2c08155</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37251194</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B37">
        <label>37.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Tsai, Y.H., Chiang, D., Li, Y.T., Perng, T.P., and Lee, S. (2023) Thermal Degradation of Vegetable Oils. <italic>Foods</italic>, 12, Article 1839. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12091839 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/foods12091839</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37174377</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12091839">https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12091839</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Tsai, Y.H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chiang, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Li, Y.T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Perng, T.P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lee, S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Thermal Degradation of Vegetable Oils</article-title>
            <source>Foods</source>
            <volume>12</volume>
            <elocation-id>1839</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/foods12091839</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37174377</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B38">
        <label>38.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Okpe, A. (2022) A Comparative Study of Chemical Analysis of Locally Made and Refined Palm Kernel Oil. <italic>Science Open Preprints</italic>, 2022, 1-40. https://doi.org/10.14293/s2199-1006.1.sor-.pp8vwdq.v1 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14293/s2199-1006.1.sor-.pp8vwdq.v1</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.14293/s2199-1006.1.sor-.pp8vwdq.v1">https://doi.org/10.14293/s2199-1006.1.sor-.pp8vwdq.v1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Okpe, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>A Comparative Study of Chemical Analysis of Locally Made and Refined Palm Kernel Oil</article-title>
            <source>Science Open Preprints</source>
            <volume>2022</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14293/s2199-1006.1.sor-.pp8vwdq.v1</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B39">
        <label>39.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Tiefenbacher, K.F. (2017) Technology of Main Ingredients—Sweeteners and Lipids. In: <italic>Wafer</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Waffle</italic>, Elsevier, 123-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-809438-9.00003-x <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/b978-0-12-809438-9.00003-x</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-809438-9.00003-x">https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-809438-9.00003-x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Tiefenbacher, K.F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Waffle, E</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2017</year>
            <article-title>Technology of Main Ingredients—Sweeteners and Lipids</article-title>
            <source>In: Wafer and Waffle</source>
            <volume>123</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/b978-0-12-809438-9.00003-x</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B40">
        <label>40.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Olalere, O.A., Gan, C., Abdurahman, H.N., Ahmad, M.S., Zaid, A.Q. and Habeeb, O.A. (2020) Microstructural and Microchemical Characterization of Valorized Cola Nitida Pod Wastes. <italic>Chemical</italic><italic>Data</italic><italic>Collections</italic>, 26, Article 100356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdc.2020.100356 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cdc.2020.100356</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdc.2020.100356">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdc.2020.100356</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Olalere, O.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gan, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Abdurahman, H.N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ahmad, M.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zaid, A.Q.</string-name>
              <string-name>Habeeb, O.A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>Microstructural and Microchemical Characterization of Valorized Cola Nitida Pod Wastes</article-title>
            <source>Chemical Data Collections</source>
            <volume>26</volume>
            <elocation-id>100356</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cdc.2020.100356</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B41">
        <label>41.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Jakobek, L. (2015) Interactions of Polyphenols with Carbohydrates, Lipids and Proteins. <italic>Food</italic><italic>Chemistry</italic>, 175, 556-567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.12.013 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.12.013</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25577120</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.12.013">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.12.013</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Jakobek, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Carbohydrates, L</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>Interactions of Polyphenols with Carbohydrates, Lipids and Proteins</article-title>
            <source>Food Chemistry</source>
            <volume>175</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.12.013</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25577120</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B42">
        <label>42.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Likozar, B. and Levec, J. (2014) Effect of Process Conditions on Equilibrium, Reaction Kinetics and Mass Transfer for Triglyceride Transesterification to Biodiesel: Experimental and Modeling Based on Fatty Acid Composition. <italic>Fuel</italic><italic>Processing</italic><italic>Technology</italic>, 122, 30-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.01.017 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.01.017</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.01.017">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.01.017</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Likozar, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Levec, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Equilibrium, R</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Effect of Process Conditions on Equilibrium, Reaction Kinetics and Mass Transfer for Triglyceride Transesterification to Biodiesel: Experimental and Modeling Based on Fatty Acid Composition</article-title>
            <source>Fuel Processing Technology</source>
            <volume>122</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.01.017</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>