jmp Journal of Modern Physics 2153-120X 2153-1196 Scientific Research Publishing 10.4236/jmp.2026.177033 jmp-152421 Article Physics Mathematics Vibrotransport Solutions of Wave Equations and Their Properties by Subsonic Velocities 0000-0002-7131-4635 Alexeyeva Lyudmila Alexeyevna 1 Joldasbekov Institute of Mechanics and Engineering, Аlmaty, Kazakhstan

The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

 08 07 2026 07 2026 17 07 743 754 01 05 2026 05 07 2026 08 07 2026 © 2026 by the authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 2026 This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ). https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2026.177033

The vibrotransport sources of disturbances in various media are the most common. They are associated with moving objects of oscillation whose speed can be subsonic, sonic, supersonic, and in media with several sonic speeds (elastic, for example) and transonic. Here, fundamental and regular vibrotransport solutions of the wave equation are constructed, which describe the dynamics of the medium during the movement of a source, which is concentrated at a point, moves at a constant speed V, and vibrates at a constant frequency

ω

. The type of equations depends on the Mach number

M=V/c

, where cis the sound speed in the medium. The value of M essentially affects the type of equations to be solved: elliptical for M < 1, parabolic for M = 1, and hyperbolic for M> 1. Green’s functions are constructed that describe the dynamics of the medium during the motion of a vibration source concentrated at a point in the subsonic range of speeds in 3D spaces. On this basis, general solutions of the vibrotransport equation are constructed under the action of both spatially distributed moving vibration sources and concentrated on moving surfaces and lines. A mathematical description of the Doppler effect with a graphical illustration is given. The constructed solutions allow one to construct solutions to many equations of continuum mechanics and field theory for studying wave processes excited by various types of moving sources of oscillations in media, and should find wide application in solving various engineering and technical problems.

 Wave Equation Vibrotransport Solution Mach Number Green’s Function Fourier Transformation Helmholtz Equations Subsonic Solutions Doppler’s Effect 1. Introduction

The study of wave propagation processes in continuous media and electromagnetic fields leads to the solution of systems of partial differential equations of various types and the determination of their solutions in the form of vector fields that describe various characteristics of wave processes. These can include, for example, displacements and velocities, as in elastic and multicomponent media, or electromagnetic field strengths, the variation of which in space and time allows for the modeling of such processes and their study using mathematical methods.

As is well known, any vector field

u ( x , t ) = ∑ j = 1 3 u j ( x , t ) e j

can be represented through scalar and vector potentials in the form :

u ( x , t ) = grad   φ ( x , t ) + rot   ψ ( x , t )

which describe dilatational and vortex waves in the medium. In isotropic media, they typically satisfy the wave equations:

□ c φ φ = f ( x , t ) ,     □ c ψ   ψ = g ( x , t )

since the wave propagation velocity in such media is always finite and does not depend on the direction of wave propagation. The speed of these waves can vary, as in elastic media, where shear waves, described by a vector potential, propagate more slowly than dilatational waves. In an electromagnetic medium, described by Maxwell’s equations, they are the same. This makes the study of solutions to wave equations necessary and relevant.

Among the active sources of disturbances in various environments, the most common are transport ones, which are associated with moving sources (loads), the shape of which does not change over time, and the speed of movement can be different: subsonic, sonic, supersonic, and in environments with several sonic velocities (elastic, for example), also transonic.

In works -, transport solutions of wave equations and equations of elasticity theory are constructed, and a method of boundary integral equations for solving stationary transport subsonic and supersonic boundary value problems in domains with cylindrical boundaries has been developed. It should be noted that the number of works on the study of the impact of transport loads on the environment has been growing in recent decades due to the intensive construction of high-speed roads and underground transport highways, and has a fairly extensive bibliography, which can be found in articles and monographs -.

There is another class of disturbance sources (acting forces and loads), which is very important for applications, that not only move at different speeds, but also pulsate (vibrate, oscillate) with a certain frequency. Examples include various electromagnetic emitters, moving elementary particles, moving vibratory transport, etc. Therefore, mathematical modeling of such processes, taking into account the type of source, its speed of movement, and vibration frequency, is relevant. Mathematical models of such processes are few and require further development -.

In my article , written in Russian, I constructed vibrotransport solutions of this equation for spaces of different dimensions. Here, we present different subsonic solutions in three-dimensional space for emitters of any form, which may be described by regular and singular generalized functions.

Here, fundamental and regular vibrotransport solutions of the wave equation are constructed in the subsonic case in 3D space. Green’s functions are constructed that describe the wave field during the movement of a vibration source concentrated at a point. On this basis, general solutions of the vibrotransport wave equation are constructed for the action of both moving vibration sources distributed in space and concentrated on moving surfaces and lines. Obtained solutions allow us to construct solutions to many equations of continuum mechanics for this type of moving disturbance sources in media by using scalar and vector potentials (1.1) and have wide applications in solving various engineering problems.

It should be noted that Blokhintsev constructed particular transport and vibration transport solutions to wave equations in 3D space when solving acoustic equations for moving sources to study sound propagation processes in air. However, he introduced vibration sources differently than in this work. Therefore, the solutions constructed here have different forms.

 2. D’Alembert’s Wave Equation and Its Properties

We consider D’Alembert wave equation:

□ c u ≡ Δ u − c − 2 ∂ 2 u ∂ t 2 = g ( x , t ) ,   x ∈ R 3 ,     t ∈ R 1

Here, □ c is wave operator, Δ is the Laplace operator, g ( x , t ) is a locally integrable function. Equation (1) is strictly hyperbolic, and its class of solutions contains functions discontinuous in derivatives. The discontinuity surfaces F in R 4 are the characteristic surfaces of Equation (2.1), which satisfy the characteristic equation in the space R N + 1 = { ( x 1 , ⋯ , x N , τ ≡ c t ) } :

ν τ 2 = ∑ j = 1 3 ν j 2

where ν ( x , τ ) = ( ν 1 , ν 2 , ν 3 , ν τ ) is normal vector to F . It corresponds to a cone of characteristic normal—the sound cone, for which ν τ = ν 4 < 0 . In R 3 such surfaces move with unit velocity over τ = c t :

1 = − ν τ / ‖ ν ‖ 3 ,   ‖ ν ‖ 3 = ∑ j = 1 3 ν j 2

In R 3 , they correspond to wave fronts ( F t ), moving with speed cover time t. The Hadamard continuity conditions are satisfied on them:

[ u ( x , t ) ] F t = 0 ,   [ u ˙ ] F t = − c n i [ u , i ] F t

Here, [ f ( x , t ) ] F t is the jump f on Ft:

[ f ( x , t ) ] F t = f + ( x , t ) − f − ( x , t ) = lim ε → + 0 ( f ( x + ε n , t ) − f ( x − ε n , t ) ) ,   x ∈ F t ,

n ( x , t ) is a unit vector normal to F t , directed in the direction of propagation of the wave front:

n i = ν i ‖ ν ‖ N = grad   F t ‖ grad   F t ‖ ,     i = 1 , 2 , 3

The last equality is valid if the wave front equation can be represented as F t ( x , t ) = 0 under the condition of existence grad   F t . The class of such solutions of hyperbolic equations is called a shock wave. On their fronts, the derivatives of functions and even the functions themselves can undergo jumps.

From the second condition (2.4), follow that on the fronts:

u ˙ − + c n i   u , i − = u ˙ + + c n i   u , i +

If in front of the wave front u ≡ 0 (medium at rest), this equality gives a useful relation at the wave front:

( grad   u , n ) = − c − 1 u ˙ ,   x ∈ F t

Note that the tangent derivatives to the characteristic surface, due to the continuity ofu, are also continuous, i.e.,

γ τ [ u , τ ] F = − γ j [ u j ] F ,   ∀ γ :     ( ν , γ ) = 0

In particular, if γ = γ j = ( − ν j , ν τ δ 1 j , ν τ δ 2 j , ν τ δ 2 j ) , this leads to conditions of the form:

[ − u , τ ν j + u j ν τ ] F = 0 ⇒ n j   [ u ˙ ] F t = c [ u j ] F t

Solutions of the wave Equation (1) that satisfy the conditions on the shock wave fronts are hereinafter referred to as classical solutions.

 3. Statement of the Vibrotransport Problem

Let us consider vibrotransport solutions of the wave equation (2.1).

Definition1. Let us call the source function vibrotransportif it is represented as

g ( x , t ) = g ( x 1 , x 2 , x 3 − V t ) e i ω t

where V is the velocity of the source movement along the X3 axis, ω > 0 is the frequency of its oscillations. At ω = 0 , the source function is the transport function.

If the source function in (3.1) has the form (3.1), then it is natural to look for a solution to the wave Equation (3.1) in a similar form:

u ( x , t ) = u ( x 1 , x 2 , x 3 − V t ) e i ω t

To do this, we introduce the mobile coordinate system ( x 1 , x 2 , z = x − M τ ) , τ = c t , M = V / c is the Mach number.

We call the source subsonic if the Mach number is M < 1, hypersonicif M > 1, and sonic if M= 1.

In the new coordinate system, the solution looks like:

u = u ( x 1 , x 2 , z ) e i w τ ,   w = ω / c

Then, as follows from (3.1), the amplitude of the oscillations is the solution of the vibrotransport equation (VTE):

∂ 2 u ∂ x 1 2 + ∂ 2 u ∂ x 2 2 + ( 1 − M 2 ) ∂ 2 u ∂ z 2 + 2 i   w M ∂ u ∂ z + w 2 u = g ( x , z ) ,   x ∈ R 2 ,   z ∈ R 1

We denote m = | 1 − M 2 | . Then, depending on the velocity of the source, we have three different equations:

Subsonic elliptical for M< 1:

∂ 2 u ∂ x 1 2 + ∂ 2 u ∂ x 2 2 + m 2 ∂ 2 u ∂ z 2 + 2 i   w M ∂ u ∂ z + w 2 u = g ( x , z ) ,   x ∈ R 2 ,   z ∈ R 1 ;

Hypersonic hyperbolic at M> 1:

∂ 2 u ∂ x 1 2 + ∂ 2 u ∂ x 2 2 − m 2 ∂ 2 u ∂ z 2 + 2 i   w M ∂ u ∂ z + w 2 u = g ( x , z ) ,   x ∈ R 2 ,   z ∈ R 1 ;

Sound parabolic atM= 1:

∂ 2 u ∂ x 1 2 + ∂ 2 u ∂ x 2 2 + 2 i   w M ∂ u ∂ z + w 2 u = g ( x , z ) ,   x ∈ R N ,   z ∈ R 1 ;

It is required to construct a solution of these equations for any right-hand sides from the class of generalized slow-growth functions S ′ ( R 3 ) .

 4. Fundamental Solutions of the Vibrotransport Equation—Fourier Transformation

To construct solutions to VTE, we construct the Green’s function—the fundamental solution U ( x , t ) of this equation with the delta function on the right side:

∂ 2 U ∂ x 1 2 + ∂ 2 U ∂ x 2 2 + ( 1 − M 2 ) ∂ 2 U ∂ z 2 + 2 i   w M ∂ U ∂ z + w 2 U = δ ( x ) δ ( z ) ,   x ∈ R 2 ,   z ∈ R 1 ,

which satisfies certain attenuation conditions at infinity, different for each case. Then, using the property of the Green function, we will construct VTE solutions for mobile vibration sources distributed in limited volumes or concentrated on curved lines.

To construct solutions, we use the Fourier transform of generalized functions, which for regular generalized functions from Lebesgue space L 1 ( R 3 ) coincides with the classical Fourier transform:

f ¯ ( ξ , ζ ) = ∫ R 3 f ( x , z ) exp ( i ( x 1 ξ 1 + x 2 ξ 2 + z ζ ) ) d x 1 d x 2 d z f ( x , z ) = 1 ( 2 π ) 3 ∫ R 3 f ¯ ( ξ , ζ ) exp ( − i ( x 1 ξ 1 + x 2 ξ 2 + z ζ ) ) d ξ 1 d ξ 2 d ζ

To restore the originals, we use the properties of linear transformations of Fourier variables in the space of the Fourier transformation, namely :

F − 1 [ f * ( A ( ξ + d ) ) ] = ∫ R 3 f * ( A ( ξ + d ) ) e i ( ξ , x ) d V ( ξ ) = | det A | − 1 ∫ R 3 f * ( ζ ) e i ( A − 1 ζ − d , x ) d V ( ζ ) = e − i ( d , x ) | det A | ∫ R 3 f * ( ζ ) e i ( ζ , ( A − 1 ) T x ) d V ( ζ ) = e − i ( d , x ) | det A | f ( ( A − 1 ) T x ) .

The Fourier transform of VTE (5.1) has the following form:

− ( ‖ ξ ‖ 2 + ( 1 − M 2 ) ζ 2 − 2 w v ζ − w 2 ) U ¯ = 1 ,   ξ ∈ R 2 ,   ζ ∈ R 1

From where it follows:

U ¯ = − 1 ‖ ξ ‖ 2 + m 2 ζ 2 − 2 w M ζ − w 2 , U ¯ = − 1 ‖ ξ ‖ 2 − m 2 ζ 2 − 2 w M ζ − w 2 , U ¯ = − 1 ‖ ξ ‖ 2 − 2 w ζ − w 2 .

The appearance of the original depends on the dimension of the space in which this equation is considered.

Here, we consider the subsonic case V < c , i.e., M< I.

 5. Subsonic Solutions of the Vibrotransport Equation and Their Properties

Let us construct the Green’s function U ( x , z ) —the fundamental solution of VTE (4.1) satisfying the radiation conditions at infinity. To do this, we will find the transformation U ( x , z ) = F − 1 [ U ¯ ( ξ , ζ ) ] using the property of linear transformations of coordinates in the space of Fourier transforms (4.3).

Theorem 1. Green’s function of Equation(4.8)has the form:

U ( x , z ) = − 1 ( 2 π ) 3 ∫ R 3 e − i ζ z e − i ( ξ , x ) ‖ ξ ‖ 2 + m 2 ζ 2 − 2 w M ζ − w 2 d ξ 1 d ξ 2 d ζ = − e i ( w M z / m 2 ) ( 2 π ) 3 m ∫ R 3 e − i ς z / m e − i ( ξ , x ) ‖ ξ ‖ 2 + ς 2 − ( w / m ) 2 d ξ 1 d ξ 2 d ς .

Proof: For M< 1, we transform (4.5) to a form convenient for constructing the original:

U ¯ ( ξ , ζ ) = − 1 ‖ ξ ‖ 2 + m 2 ζ 2 − 2 w M ζ − w 2 = − 1 ‖ ξ ‖ 2 + m 2 ( ζ − w M / m 2 ) 2 − ( w / m ) 2 U ( x , z ) = − 1 ( 2 π ) N ∫ R 3 e − i ζ z e − i ( ξ , x ) ‖ ξ ‖ 2 + m 2 ( ζ − w M / m 2 ) 2 − ( w / m ) 2 d ξ 1 d ξ 2 d ζ = − e i ( w M z / m 2 ) ( 2 π ) N ∫ R 3 e − i z ς e − i ( ξ , x ) ‖ ξ ‖ 2 + m 2 ς 2 − ( w / m ) 2 d ξ 1 d ξ 2 d ς = − e i ( w M z / m 2 ) ( 2 π ) N m ∫ R 3 e − i ς z / m e − i ( ξ , x ) ‖ ξ ‖ 2 + ς 2 − ( w / m ) 2 d ξ 1 d ξ 2 d ς .

Here, we used the substitution of variables ζ = ς m − w M / m 2 . Note that here, under the sign of the integral, there is a Fourier transform of the fundamental solution of the three-dimensional Helmholtz equation:

Δ W + k 2 W = δ ( y ) ,     k = w m ,     y ∈ R 3

The solution of this equation satisfying the Somerfield radiation conditions has the following form, and it is unique :

W ( y ) = exp ( − i k ‖ y ‖ ) 4 π ‖ y ‖ ,     y ∈ R 3

Its Fourier transform has the form:

W ¯ = − 1 ‖ ξ ‖ 2 + ζ 2 − ( k + i 0 ) 2 ,   y ∈ R 3 .

From formula (5.2), taking into account (5.4) and (5.3), the formula of Theorem 1 follows:

U ( x , z ) = U ( x 1 , x 2 , z ) = − e i w m − 2 M z 4 π z 2 + m 2 r 2 exp ( − i w m 2 z 2 + m 2 r 2 ) 5.1. Solutions of Homogeneous Subsonic VTE

Now, we build solutions of a Homogeneous VTE:

∂ 2 u 0 ∂ x 1 2 + ∂ 2 u 0 ∂ x 2 2 + 2 i   w M ∂ u 0 ∂ z + w 2 u 0 = 0 ,   x ∈ R 2 ,   z ∈ R 1 ;

In the space of Fourier transforms, it has the form:

− ( ‖ ξ ‖ 2 + ( 1 − M 2 ) ζ 2 − 2 w v ζ − w 2 ) u ¯ 0 = 0 ,   ξ ∈ R N ,   ζ ∈ R 1 .

The solution of this equation:

u ¯ 0 = β ( ξ , ζ ) δ S ( ξ , ζ )

is a singular generalized function—a simple layer on a surface S on which

( ‖ ξ ‖ 2 + ( 1 − M 2 ) ζ 2 − 2 w v ζ − w 2 ) = ‖ ξ ‖ 2 + m 2 ( ζ − w M / m 2 ) 2 − ( w / m ) 2 = 0.

Here, the density of a simple layer β ( ξ , ζ ) is an arbitrary function integrable on S. Accordingly, its original is a surface integral onS:

u 0 ( x , z ) = ∫ S β ( ξ , ζ ) e − i ( ξ , x ) e − i ζ z d S ( ξ , ζ ) ,     ξ = ( ξ 1 , ξ 2 )

Note that Equation (5.8) is the equation of an ellipsoid centered at the point ( 0 ,   0 ,   ζ = w M / m 2 ) :

‖ ξ ‖ 2 + m 2 ς 2 = ( w / m ) 2 ,   ς = ζ − w M / m 2 .

Solutions of the homogeneous Helmholtz equation can also be used to construct u 0 ( x , z ) :

Δ u 0 ( y ) + k 2 u 0 ( y ) = 0.

Its solutions may be decomposed into series according to spherical harmonics and spherical Bessel functions :

u ( y ) = ∑ n , m a n j n ( k ‖ y ‖ ) P n m ( cos θ ) e i m φ = ∑ n , m a n j n ( k ‖ y ‖ ) P n m ( y 3 ‖ y ‖ ) ( cos φ + i sin φ ) m = ∑ n , m a n j n ( k ‖ y ‖ ) ‖ y ‖ 2 m P n m ( y 3 ‖ y ‖ ) ( y 1 + i y 2 ) m ,   ‖ y ‖ 2 = y 1 2 + y 2 2

Here, P n m ( cos θ ) are the attached Legendre polynomials, θ , φ are angular spherical coordinates. From the formula (15) follows y = ( x , z / m ) :

u 0 ( x , z ) = e i ( w M z / m 2 ) ∑ n , l a n j n ( w c z 2 + m 2 r 2 ) P n l ( z z 2 + μ 2 r 2 ) ( x 1 + i x 2 ) l r l ,

where r = x 1 2 + x 2 2 , the coefficients of a n are arbitrary complex numbers.

 5.2. The General Solution of Subsonic VTE

Let us prove the following theorem.

Theorem 2. The solution of subsonic VTE has the form:

u ( x , z ) = U ( x , z ) ∗ g ( x , z ) + u 0 ( x , z )

If g ( x , z ) is a regular function and g ( x , z ) ∈ L 1 ( R 3 ) ,then

U ( x , z ) ∗ g ( x , z ) = ∫ R 3 U ( x − y , z − h ) g ( y , h ) d y 1 d y 2 d h

If g ( x , z ) is a singular function centered on the surface S: g ( x , z ) = α ( x , z ) δ S ( x , z ) , α ( x , z ) ∈ L 1 ( S ) ,then

U ( x , z ) ∗ g ( x , z ) = ∫ S U ( x − y , z − h ) g ( y , h ) d S ( y , h )

If g ( x , z ) is a singular function centered on the curvel: g ( x , z ) = β ( x , z ) δ l ( x , z ) , β ( x , z ) ∈ L 1 ( l ) ,then

U ( x , z ) ∗ g ( x , z ) = ∫ l U ( x − y , z − h ) g ( y , h ) d l ( y , h )

Proof. Let us denote the V T ( ∂ 1 , ∂ 2 , ∂ z ) differential operator VTE (4.1). Substituting (5.14) into (4.1) and using the convolution differentiation property , we obtain the required:

u 2 ( x , z ) = u ( x , z ) − u 1 ( x , z )

If u ( x , z ) is any solution (5.1), then u 2 ( x , z ) = u ( x , z ) − u 1 ( x , z ) is the solution of a homogeneous VTE. Therefore, u 1 ( x , z ) = u ( x , z ) − u 2 ( x , z ) , i.e., has a similar u ( x , z ) .

 5.3. The Doppler Effect

Let’s denote r ( x ) / z = t g φ ( x , z ) , r = x 1 2 + x 2 2 , where φ ( x , z ) is the angle that forms the radius vector of the point ( x , z ) with axis Z. Then, the Green’s function

U ( x 1 , x 2 , z ) = − 1 4 π z 2 + m 2 r 2 exp ( i w m − 2 z ( M − 1 + m 2 t g φ 2 ) )

As we can see, the phase surface t g φ 2 = a 2 ,   ∀ a . This is a cone:

x 1 2 + x 1 2 = a 2 z 2 = a 2 ( x 3 − V t ) 2 ,   V > 0.

If we fix the observation point ( x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ) and measure the time-arriving signal at this point, then it is described by the function

U ( x 1 , x 2 , x 3 , t ) = U ( x , x 3 − V t ) e i ω t = − exp ( i w m − 2 ( M x 3 − ( x 3 − V t ) 2 + m 2 r 2 ) ) 4 π ( x 3 − V t ) 2 + m 2 r 2 e i ω t ( 1 − ( M / m ) 2 ) .

At V = 0, M = 0, we obtain a fundamental solution to the Helmholtz equation :

U ( x 1 , x 2 , x 3 , t ) = − exp ( i k ( − ( x 3 ) 2 + r ( x ) 2 ) ) 4 π x 1 2 + x 3 2 + x 3 2 e i ω t ,   k = ω c ω = 0 ,   V > 0 ,   0 < M < 1 U ( x 1 , x 2 , x 3 , t ) = U ( x , x 3 − V t ) = − 1 4 π ( x 3 − V t ) 2 + ( 1 − M ) 2 r ( x ) 2 .

This is a subsonic transport solution of the wave equation .

shows the real RU ( xn , zx , M , ω ) = Re U ( x , z ) and imaginary IU ( xn , zx , M , ω ) = Im U ( x , z ) parts of U ( x , z ) by x = xn = ( 1 , 1 ) for different z = zn at Mach number M = 0.1 and frequencies ω = 1 and ω = 10 . In a moving coordinate system, the oscillation frequency increases in front of the source of vibrations and decreases behind it. But in the original fixed X coordinate system, the picture is different.

shows the waveform of the signal at a fixed point on the X3 axis over timet = tn at Mach number M = 0.8 and vibration frequency ω = 10 . Here, RU ( x1,   x 3 , t , M , ω ) = Re U ( x 1 , x 2 , x 3 , t ) , x 3 = 0 , x1 = ( 1,1 ) , t = tn .

It clearly demonstrates an increase in the frequency and amplitude of vibration when approaching a vibration source and, conversely, their decrease when it is removed.

As is well known, the pressure in the air satisfies the wave equation . This phenomenon is called the Doppler effect—an increase in tone (frequency) and volume (amplitude) when approaching a vibration source and, conversely, a decrease in tone and volume when it is removed.

Figure 1. U ( x , z ) at M = 0.1 , ω = 1 ;   10 .

Figure 2. The oscillogram U ( x , 0 , t ) at M = 0.8 and ω = 10 .

 6. Conclusions

Note that wave equations are widely used in the study of wave processes in acoustic, liquid, elastic, and electromagnetic environments as potentials of vector fields that describe their motion. Therefore, the constructed analytical solutions should find wide application in the study of vibration transport processes in such media.

Transport and vibrotransport loads are one of the most common sources of disturbances in environments, and the bibliography of studies in this area has become increasingly extensive in recent years. The obtained results can be used to study the electromagnetic fields of various light emitters and radio wave emitters located on mobile objects (trains, cars, ships, etc.), as well as to solve transport boundary value problems of electrodynamics in limited areas based on the method of boundary integral equations, which the authors plan to do in the near future us-ing the method of generalized functions, similar to [2]-.

 Funding

The work was supported financially by the Committee of Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Grant AP19674789, 2024-2026).

 References Morse, F.M. and Feshbach, G. (2013) Methods of Theoretical Physics. Vol. 1, Ripol Classic. Morse, F.M. Feshbach, G. 2013 Methods of Theoretical Physics Vol. 1 Alexeyeva, L.A. (2008) Generalized Solutions of Boundary Value Problems for One Class of Transport Solutions of the Wave Equation. Mathematical Journal, 8, 1-19. Alexeyeva, L.A. 2008 Generalized Solutions of Boundary Value Problems for One Class of Transport Solutions of the Wave Equation Mathematical Journal 8 Alexeyeva, L.A. (2010) Singular Boundary Integral Equations of Boundary Value Problems of Elastic Dynamics in the Case of Subsonic Running Loads. DifferentialEquations, 46, 515-522. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0012266110040063 10.1134/s0012266110040063https://doi.org/10.1134/s0012266110040063 Alexeyeva, L.A. 2010 Singular Boundary Integral Equations of Boundary Value Problems of Elastic Dynamics in the Case of Subsonic Running Loads Differential Equations 46 10.1134/s0012266110040063 Alexeyeva, L.A. (2017) Singular Boundary Integral Equations of Boundary Value Problems of the Elasticity Theory under Supersonic Transport Loads. DifferentialEquations, 53, 317-332. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0012266117030041 10.1134/s0012266117030041https://doi.org/10.1134/s0012266117030041 Alexeyeva, L.A. 2017 Singular Boundary Integral Equations of Boundary Value Problems of the Elasticity Theory under Supersonic Transport Loads Differential Equations 53 10.1134/s0012266117030041 Egger, P. (2000) Design and Construction Aspects of Deep Tunnels (with Particular Emphasis on Strain Softening Rocks). TunnellingandUndergroundSpaceTechnology, 15, 403-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-7798(01)00008-6 10.1016/s0886-7798(01)00008-6https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-7798(01)00008-6 Egger, P. 2000 Design and Construction Aspects of Deep Tunnels (with Particular Emphasis on Strain Softening Rocks) Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 7798 01 10.1016/s0886-7798(01)00008-6 de Hoop, A.T. (2002) The Moving-Load Problem in Soil Dynamics—The Vertical Displacement Approximation. WaveMotion, 36, 335-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-2125(02)00028-8 10.1016/s0165-2125(02)00028-8https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-2125(02)00028-8 Hoop, A.T. 2002 The Moving-Load Problem in Soil Dynamics—The Vertical Displacement Approximation Wave Motion 2125 02 10.1016/s0165-2125(02)00028-8 Brezhnev, V.A., Abramson, V.M., Zemelman, A.M., Vlasov, S.N., Koulaguin, N.I., Merkin, V.E., et al. (2005) Russian Underwater Tunnels in the System of International Transportation Ways. TunnellingandUndergroundSpaceTechnology, 20, 595-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2005.08.002 10.1016/j.tust.2005.08.002https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2005.08.002 Brezhnev, V.A. Abramson, V.M. Zemelman, A.M. Vlasov, S.N. Koulaguin, N.I. Merkin, V.E. 2005 Russian Underwater Tunnels in the System of International Transportation Ways Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 20 10.1016/j.tust.2005.08.002 Ukrainets, V.N. (2006) Dynamics of Shallow Tunnels and Pipelines under the Influence of Moving Loads. S. Toraigyrov PSU Research Center. Ukrainets, V.N. 2006 Dynamics of Shallow Tunnels and Pipelines under the Influence of Moving Loads Blokhintsev, D.I. (1981) Acoustics of an Inhomogeneous Moving Medium. Nauka. Blokhintsev, D.I. 1981 Acoustics of an Inhomogeneous Moving Medium Grinchenko, V.T., Vovk, I.V. and Matsipura, V.T. (2007) Basics of Acoustics. Naukova Dumka. Grinchenko, V.T. Vovk, I.V. Matsipura, V.T. 2007 Basics of Acoustics Sheng, X., Jones, C.J.C. and Petyt, M. (1999) Ground Vibration Generated by a Load Moving along a Railway Track. JournalofSoundandVibration, 228, 129-156. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1999.2406 10.1006/jsvi.1999.2406https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1999.2406 Sheng, X. Jones, C.J.C. Petyt, M. 1999 Ground Vibration Generated by a Load Moving along a Railway Track Journal of Sound and Vibration 228 10.1006/jsvi.1999.2406 Alexeyeva, L.A. (2024) Subsonic Vibration Transport Solutions of the Wave Equation in Spaces of Dimension N = 1, 2, 3. Bulletin of the NAS RK. Physics and Mathematics Series, 4, 42-59. (In Russian) Alexeyeva, L.A. 2024 Subsonic Vibration Transport Solutions of the Wave Equation in Spaces of Dimension N = 1, 2, 3 Bulletin of the NAS RK. Physics and Mathematics Series 4 Petrovsky, I.S. (1961) Lectures on Partial Differential Equations. Fizmatgiz. Petrovsky, I.S. 1961 Lectures on Partial Differential Equations Vladimirov, V.S. (1978) Generalized Functions in Mathematical Physics. Nauka. Vladimirov, V.S. 1978 Generalized Functions in Mathematical Physics Abramovits, M. and Stigan, I. (1979) Handbook of Special Functions. Nauka. Abramovits, M. Stigan, I. 1979 Handbook of Special Functions