<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.4" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ojog</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2160-8806</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2160-8792</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojog.2026.166086</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ojog-152235</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Medicine</subject>
          <subject>Healthcare</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Screening for Urinary and Anal Incontinence during Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period in Senegal</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Diouf</surname>
            <given-names>Abdoul Aziz</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Gomina-Pampali</surname>
            <given-names>Lionel Ulrich</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Gueye</surname>
            <given-names>Khalifa Ababacar</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Sène</surname>
            <given-names>Mouhamet</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Diallo</surname>
            <given-names>Moussa</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Dia</surname>
            <given-names>Anna</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Touré</surname>
            <given-names>Youssoupha</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Diouf</surname>
            <given-names>Alassane</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label> Department of Gynecology-Obstetrics, Centre Hospitalier National de Pikine, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar, Senegal </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="conflict" id="fn-conflict">
          <p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this article.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>01</day>
        <month>06</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <month>06</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>06</issue>
      <fpage>921</fpage>
      <lpage>928</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>01</day>
          <month>06</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>26</day>
          <month>06</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="published">
          <day>29</day>
          <month>06</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2026 by the authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p> This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link> ). </license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2026.166086">https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2026.166086</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p><bold>Objective:</bold>To assess the frequency and screening modalities of urinary incontinence (UI) and anal incontinence (AI) in women during pregnancy and the postpartum period at the Centre Hospitalier National de Pikine (CHNP). <bold>Methods:</bold>A single-center, ambispective, descriptive and analytical study conducted at the maternity unit of the Mother-Child Center of the Centre Hospitalier National de Pikine from February 1 to April 30, 2025. All patients who delivered a pregnancy of ≥22 weeks of gestation during the study period and agreed to participate were included. Data were analyzed using R software version 4.4.1. <bold>Results:</bold>Out of 864 deliveries, 796 patients were included. The mean age was 28.4 ± 6.1 years. The prevalence of incontinence during pregnancy was 42.7% (pure UI: 36%; mixed incontinence: 5.9%; pure AI: 0.75%). The prevalence of postpartum incontinence was 26.1% (pure UI: 14.3%, pure AI: 0.75%, mixed incontinence: 11.2%). On multivariate analysis, factors independently associated with postpartum UI were: history of UI (aOR = 3.26; 95% CI: 1.76 - 6.10), incontinence during pregnancy (aOR = 6.49; 95% CI: 4.16 - 10.4), instrumental delivery (aOR = 73.1; 95% CI: 8.90 - 999), and fetal macrosomia (aOR = 2.60; 95% CI: 1.40 - 4.91). Spontaneous remission was observed in 54.5% of patients with postpartum UI and 50.5% of those with AI. <bold>Conclusion:</bold>Urinary and anal incontinence are common during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Macrosomia and instrumental deliveries are the main risk factors. Systematic screening and early pelvic floor rehabilitation in at-risk patients are essential.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated" xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>Urinary Incontinence</kwd>
        <kwd>Anal Incontinence</kwd>
        <kwd>Pregnancy</kwd>
        <kwd>Postpartum</kwd>
        <kwd>Pelvic Floor</kwd>
        <kwd>Risk Factors</kwd>
        <kwd>Senegal</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>Pregnancy and childbirth represent periods of profound anatomical, physiological, and hormonal changes. Among the frequently neglected complications with major impact on quality of life are urinary incontinence (UI) and anal incontinence (AI). Although common, these conditions remain largely underdiagnosed and undertreated, due to the taboo surrounding them and an often unjustified minimization on the part of both patients and healthcare providers.</p>
      <p>UI, defined as any involuntary loss of urine, affects up to 40% of pregnant women and up to 33% in the postpartum period [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>]. AI, characterized by involuntary loss of gas, liquid, or solid stool, affects approximately 5% to 15% of women during pregnancy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>], with notable worsening after complicated deliveries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>]. Both conditions most often reflect pelvic floor dysfunction, whether due to obstetric trauma, muscular or nerve dysfunction, or pre-existing weakness.</p>
      <p>In sub-Saharan Africa, epidemiological data on this topic remain scarce. To our knowledge, no study had specifically assessed the factors associated with UI and AI during pregnancy and the postpartum period in the Senegalese context. This gap justified the present study, whose primary objective was to assess the frequency and screening modalities of UI and AI in women during pregnancy and the postpartum period at the Mother-Child Center of the Centre Hospitalier National de Pikine (CHNP).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec2">
      <title>2. Materials and Methods</title>
      <sec id="sec2dot1">
        <title>2.1. Study Setting and Design</title>
        <p>This was a single-center, ambispective (symptoms occurring during pregnancy were collected retrospectively at postnatal consultations; postpartum symptoms were assessed prospectively at Day 2, Day 15, and Day 45), descriptive and analytical study conducted at a level III hospital in the suburban area of Dakar, from February 1 to April 30, 2025.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot2">
        <title>2.2. Study Population and Inclusion Criteria</title>
        <p>All patients who delivered at CHNP — vaginally or by cesarean section — a pregnancy of at least 22 weeks of gestation, and who agreed to participate in the survey during the study period, were included. Patients who did not provide consent were excluded, as were those who could not be reached by phone during postpartum follow-up.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot3">
        <title>2.3. Data Collection</title>
        <p>Data were collected during three scheduled postnatal consultations at Day 2, Day 15, and Day 45 after delivery. A standardized case report form was completed for each patient, including the following variables: age, gravidity, parity, history of UI or AI, mode of delivery (vaginal or cesarean), type of delivery (spontaneous or instrumental), presence of episiotomy or perineal tear, newborn birth weight, occurrence of urinary leakage or involuntary loss of gas or stool, their context of occurrence (on exertion, at rest, or mixed), and their management.</p>
        <p>Symptoms occurring during pregnancy were collected retrospectively at postnatal consultations, while those occurring after delivery were assessed prospectively up to 45 days postpartum. Screening was based on a standardized interview conducted by a gynecologist. Participants were systematically questioned about involuntary loss of urine, gas, or stool during pregnancy and the postpartum period.</p>
        <p>Persistence of UI or AI was defined as symptoms lasting beyond 45 days after delivery. Spontaneous remission was defined as the complete disappearance of symptoms within 45 days postpartum without pelvic floor rehabilitation.</p>
        <p>Data were entered on the KoBoToolbox platform by a single investigator (gynecologist) to limit interviewer bias, information bias, and inter-observer variability.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot4">
        <title>2.4. Operational Definitions</title>
        <p>Macrosomia was defined as birth weight ≥ 4000 g. Multiparity referred to 4 to 5 prior deliveries, and grand multiparity to more than 5. Mixed incontinence refers to the coexistence of UI and AI in the same patient.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot5">
        <title>2.5. Statistical Analysis</title>
        <p>Statistical analyses were performed using R software version 4.4.1. Quantitative variables were described using mean, median, standard deviation, and extreme values. Qualitative variables were described using frequencies and percentages. For bivariate analysis, Pearson’s chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, and bivariate logistic regression were used according to applicability conditions. A multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to study significant associations. Variables with p &lt; 0.2 in bivariate analysis or recognized in the literature were included in the models. Firth’s regression was applied in cases of small sample sizes. Model quality was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and the ROC curve (AUC = 0.837 for the UI model; AUC = 0.840 for the AI model). The statistical significance threshold was set at p &lt; 0.05. Results are expressed as adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec3">
      <title>3. Results</title>
      <sec id="sec3dot1">
        <title>3.1. Population Characteristics</title>
        <p>During the study period, 864 women delivered at the Mother-Child Center of CHNP. After applying exclusion criteria (2 refusals, 17 unreachable, 49 unavailable phone numbers), 796 patients were included in the analysis.</p>
        <p>The mean age was 28.4 ± 6.1 years (median: 28 years; range: 14 - 47 years). The 20 - 29 age group was the most represented (51.4%). The mean gravidity was 2.73 ± 1.7. Paucigravidae constituted the majority category (41.8%). Nulliparous women accounted for 34.3% of the study population.</p>
        <p>Of all included patients, 57.5% (n = 458) delivered vaginally and 42.4% (n = 338) by cesarean section. Among vaginal deliveries, 94.1% were spontaneous. Episiotomy was performed in 27.9% of patients and perineal tear occurred in 21.6% of cases. Birth weight was normal in 67.7% of cases; 9.1% of newborns presented with fetal macrosomia.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot2">
        <title>3.2. Types of Incontinence</title>
        <p>The overall frequency of incontinence during pregnancy was 42.7% (n = 340), distributed as follows: isolated UI (36%; n = 287), mixed incontinence (5.9%; n = 47), and isolated AI (0.75%; n = 6). Stress incontinence was the predominant type, accounting for 91.9% of antepartum incontinence cases (<bold>Table 1</bold>).</p>
        <p>In the postpartum period, 14.3% (n = 114) of patients presented with pure UI, occurring mainly between Day 3 and Day 15 (93.5%). Isolated AI affected 0.75% (n = 6) of patients, appearing predominantly between Day 3 and Day 15 (85.1%). Mixed postpartum incontinence was found in 11.2% (n = 88). In total, 26.1% of patients (n = 208) presented with postpartum incontinence.</p>
        <p>Table 1. Frequencies of antepartum and postpartum incontinence (N = 796).</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl1">
          <label>Table 1</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Type of incontinence</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Antepartum n (%)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Postpartum n (%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Isolated urinary incontinence</td>
                <td>287 (36%)</td>
                <td>114 (14.3%)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Isolated anal incontinence</td>
                <td>6 (0.75%)</td>
                <td>6 (0.75%)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Mixed incontinence</td>
                <td>47 (5.9%)</td>
                <td>88 (11.2%)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Total incontinence</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>340 (42.7%)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>208 (26.1%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot3">
        <title>3.3. Management and Outcomes</title>
        <p>For postpartum UI, spontaneous remission was observed in 54.5% (n = 110) of patients, pelvic floor rehabilitation was required in 25.5% of cases, and symptom persistence beyond 45 days was found in 17.3% of patients. One case of surgical treatment was reported.</p>
        <p>For postpartum AI, spontaneous remission occurred in 51% of cases, pelvic floor rehabilitation was required in 30.5%, and symptom persistence was observed in 18.5% of patients.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot4">
        <title>3.4. Factors Associated with Postpartum Incontinence</title>
        <p>On multivariate analysis, factors independently associated with postpartum UI were (<bold>Table 2</bold>): history of UI (aOR = 3.26; 95% CI: 1.76 - 6.10; p &lt; 0.001), presence of UI or AI during the current pregnancy (aOR = 6.49; 95% CI: 4.16 - 10.4; p &lt; 0.001), instrumental delivery (aOR = 73.1; 95% CI: 8.90 - 999; p &lt; 0.001), and fetal macrosomia (aOR = 2.6; 95% CI: 1.40 - 4.91; p = 0.002).</p>
        <p>Multiparity was associated with an increased risk of postpartum AI without reaching statistical significance (aOR = 2.22; 95% CI: 0.54 - 10.3; p = 0.XX). Factors independently associated with postpartum AI were: history of UI (aOR = 2.18; 95% CI: 1.04 - 4.53; p = 0.039), presence of incontinence during the current pregnancy (aOR = 4.66; 95% CI: 2.61 - 8.68; p &lt; 0.001), instrumental delivery (aOR = 20.9; 95% CI: 2.93 - 260; p = 0.002), perineal tear (aOR = 2.57; 95% CI: 1.23 - 5.36; p = 0.012), and macrosomia (aOR = 2.31; 95% CI: 1.19 - 4.43; p = 0.013).</p>
        <p>Table 2. Factors independently associated with postpartum urinary and anal incontinence (multivariate analysis).</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl2">
          <label>Table 2</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Risk factor</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>aOR</bold>
                  <bold>UI</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>95% CI UI</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>aOR</bold>
                  <bold>AI</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>95% CI AI</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Multiparity</td>
                <td>4.16*</td>
                <td>1.24 - 15.1</td>
                <td>2.22</td>
                <td>0.54 - 10.3</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>History of UI</td>
                <td>3.26***</td>
                <td>1.76 - 6.10</td>
                <td>2.18*</td>
                <td>1.04 - 4.53</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Incontinence during current pregnancy</td>
                <td>6.49***</td>
                <td>4.16 - 10.4</td>
                <td>4.66***</td>
                <td>2.61 - 8.68</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Instrumental delivery</td>
                <td>73.1***</td>
                <td>8.90 - 999</td>
                <td>20.9**</td>
                <td>2.93 - 260</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Fetal macrosomia</td>
                <td>2.60**</td>
                <td>1.40 - 4.91</td>
                <td>2.31*</td>
                <td>1.19 - 4.43</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Perineal tear</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td>2.57*</td>
                <td>1.23 - 5.36</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>* p &lt; 0.05; ** p &lt; 0.01; *** p &lt; 0.001. UI: urinary incontinence; AI: anal incontinence; aOR: adjusted odds ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec4">
      <title>4. Discussion</title>
      <sec id="sec4dot1">
        <title>4.1. Incontinence Frequencies</title>
        <p>The frequency of UI during pregnancy in our study (41.9%) is consistent with international data. Dinç (2018) reports a prevalence of 40% among 750 pregnant women in Turkey [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>], and Bø <italic>et al.</italic> (2012) found 41.7% in a multi-ethnic Norwegian cohort of 823 patients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>]. Regarding antepartum AI, our frequency of 6.6% (isolated AI + mixed) is slightly lower than the 10.3% reported by Solans <italic>et al.</italic> (2010) in a cohort study of 949 women [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>], which may reflect underreporting related to the taboo nature of this symptom.</p>
        <p>In the postpartum period, our UI rate of 25.4% is comparable to the 26% (95% CI: 21% - 30%) reported by the meta-analysis of Dai <italic>et al.</italic> (2023) encompassing 28,303 women [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>], as well as the 33% from the systematic review by Thom and Rortveit (2010) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>]. The postpartum AI frequency of 11.8% falls within the 4% - 39% range reported at 6 weeks postpartum in the systematic review by Villot <italic>et al.</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot2">
        <title>4.2. Mode of Delivery and Perineal Trauma</title>
        <p>Instrumental delivery emerged as the factor most strongly associated with postpartum UI (aOR = 73.1) and AI (aOR = 20.9). These results, although characterized by wide confidence intervals due to small sample sizes (n = 27), are consistent with the literature. The meta-analysis by Barca <italic>et al.</italic> (2021), including over one million women, demonstrates that vaginal delivery increases the risk of UI (OR ≈ 2.17) and AI (OR ≈ 1.53) compared to cesarean section [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>]. A recent prospective Nigerian study confirms that vaginal delivery multiplies the risk of UI by 2.8 and that of AI by 2.1 compared to cesarean section [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]. The JAMA study by Blomquist <italic>et al.</italic> (2018) reports an increased risk of sphincter disorders after instrumental delivery (HR ≈ 1.75 for AI) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>].</p>
        <p>Perineal tear was significantly associated with postpartum AI (aOR = 2.57; p = 0.012), confirming the deleterious role of obstetric injuries on sphincter function. Episiotomy, however, was not significantly associated with incontinence in our study, likely because the majority were median or mediolateral episiotomies without sphincter involvement.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot3">
        <title>4.3. Fetal Macrosomia</title>
        <p>Fetal macrosomia was significantly associated with antepartum UI (OR = 7.44; 95% CI: 3.61 - 15.33) and postpartum UI (OR = 4.96). These findings are consistent with those of Zhu <italic>et al.</italic> (2023), who showed in 1575 women that high birth weight was correlated with increased UI in the third trimester [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]. Yang and Liao (2022) reported that birth weight ≥ 4000 g multiplied the risk of stress UI by 2.59 and that of AI by 3.01 in the early postpartum period [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>].</p>
        <p>The pathophysiological mechanism involves increased mechanical pressure on the pelvic floor during gestation, greater stretching of the pudendal nerve during expulsion, and a longer second stage of labor, increasing the risk of muscular and nerve injuries.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot4">
        <title>4.4. Parity</title>
        <p>Antepartum, nulliparous women constituted the most affected category by UI (34.43%), which is consistent with Dinç <italic>et al.</italic>, who found a higher frequency in nulliparous women (41.7%) than in multiparous women (20.3%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]. This observation is explained by the initial exposure of the pelvic floor—which has never undergone distension—to the constraints of pregnancy. Postpartum, however, pauciparous and multiparous women became the most represented, reflecting the dose-dependent effect of successive pregnancies and deliveries on the weakening of perineal structures.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot5">
        <title>4.5. Strengths and Limitations</title>
        <p>Our study has several strengths: a large sample size (n = 796), a rigorous analytical approach including multivariate analysis with Firth’s regression, and being the first Senegalese study to jointly assess UI and AI during the perinatal period.</p>
        <p>Its limitations include: 1) underreporting bias related to the taboo nature of the subject; 2) data relying on interviews without validated objective tools (pad test, anorectal manometry, standardized questionnaires such as the ICIQ); 3) absence of adjustment for certain potential confounding factors (BMI, gestational diabetes, duration of labor, tear grade); 4) absence of longitudinal follow-up beyond 45 days postpartum.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec5">
      <title>5. Conclusion</title>
      <p>Urinary and anal incontinence are frequent complications of the peripartum period, affecting 42.7% and 6.6% of women respectively during pregnancy, and 25.4% and 11.8% in the postpartum period in our cohort. Fetal macrosomia and instrumental delivery are the main independent risk factors. These results highlight the urgent need to integrate systematic screening for perineal disorders into prenatal and postnatal care, to educate women to break the taboo, and to promote early pelvic floor rehabilitation in at-risk patients. Optimizing obstetric practices—particularly the management of indications for instrumental deliveries and monitoring of pregnancies at risk of macrosomia—also represents an essential lever for reducing the incidence of these complications.</p>
      <p>Multicenter longitudinal studies with objective measurement tools are needed to clarify the long-term course of these disorders in the Senegalese context.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec6">
      <title>Ethical Considerations</title>
      <p>All participants were informed of the study objectives and provided free and informed consent prior to inclusion. Confidentiality and anonymity of collected data were guaranteed throughout the research process.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Dinç, A. (2018) Prevalence of Urinary Incontinence during Pregnancy and Associated Risk Factors. <italic>LUTS</italic>: <italic>Lower</italic><italic>Urinary</italic><italic>Tract</italic><italic>Symptoms</italic>, 10, 303-307. https://doi.org/10.1111/luts.12182 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/luts.12182</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28675636</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/luts.12182">https://doi.org/10.1111/luts.12182</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <year>2018</year>
            <article-title>Prevalence of Urinary Incontinence during Pregnancy and Associated Risk Factors</article-title>
            <source>LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms</source>
            <volume>10</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/luts.12182</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28675636</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bø, K., Pauck Øglund, G., Sletner, L., Mørkrid, K. and Jenum, A. (2012) The Prevalence of Urinary Incontinence in Pregnancy among a Multi‐Ethnic Population Resident in Norway. <italic>BJOG</italic>: <italic>An</italic><italic>International</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Obstetrics</italic><italic>&amp;</italic><italic>Gynaecology</italic>, 119, 1354-1360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03435.x <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03435.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22827706</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03435.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03435.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Sletner, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Jenum, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2012</year>
            <article-title>The Prevalence of Urinary Incontinence in Pregnancy among a Multi‐Ethnic Population Resident in Norway</article-title>
            <source>BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynaecology</source>
            <volume>119</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03435.x</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22827706</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Johannessen, H., Wibe, A., Stordahl, A., Sandvik, L., Backe, B. and Mørkved, S. (2014) Prevalence and Predictors of Anal Incontinence during Pregnancy and 1 Year after Delivery: A Prospective Cohort Study. <italic>BJOG</italic>: <italic>An</italic><italic>International</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Obstetrics</italic><italic>&amp;</italic><italic>Gynaecology</italic>, 121, 269-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12438 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1471-0528.12438</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24021090</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12438">https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12438</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Johannessen, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wibe, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Stordahl, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sandvik, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Backe, B.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Prevalence and Predictors of Anal Incontinence during Pregnancy and 1 Year after Delivery: A Prospective Cohort Study</article-title>
            <source>BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynaecology</source>
            <volume>121</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1471-0528.12438</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24021090</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Parés, D., Martinez-Franco, E., Lorente, N., Viguer, J., Lopez-Negre, J. and Mendez, J. (2015) Prevalence of Fecal Incontinence in Women during Pregnancy: A Large Cross-Sectional Study. <italic>Diseases</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>the</italic><italic>Colon</italic><italic>&amp;</italic><italic>Rectum</italic>, 58, 1098-1103. https://doi.org/10.1097/dcr.0000000000000471 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/dcr.0000000000000471</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26445184</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1097/dcr.0000000000000471">https://doi.org/10.1097/dcr.0000000000000471</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Martinez-Franco, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lorente, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Viguer, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lopez-Negre, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mendez, J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>Prevalence of Fecal Incontinence in Women during Pregnancy: A Large Cross-Sectional Study</article-title>
            <source>Diseases of the Colon &amp; Rectum</source>
            <volume>58</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/dcr.0000000000000471</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26445184</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Solans-Domènech, M., Sánchez, E. and Espuña-Pons, M. (2010) Urinary and Anal Incontinence during Pregnancy and Postpartum: Incidence, Severity, and Risk Factors. <italic>Obstetrics</italic><italic>&amp;</italic><italic>Gynecology</italic>, 115, 618-628. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e3181d04dff <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/aog.0b013e3181d04dff</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20177295</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e3181d04dff">https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e3181d04dff</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Pons, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Incidence, S</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2010</year>
            <article-title>Urinary and Anal Incontinence during Pregnancy and Postpartum: Incidence, Severity, and Risk Factors</article-title>
            <source>Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology</source>
            <volume>115</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/aog.0b013e3181d04dff</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20177295</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Dai, S., Chen, H. and Luo, T. (2023) Prevalence and Factors of Urinary Incontinence among Postpartum: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. <italic>BMC</italic><italic>Pregnancy</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Childbirth</italic>, 23, Article No. 761. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06059-6 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12884-023-06059-6</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37898733</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06059-6">https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06059-6</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Dai, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chen, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Luo, T.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Prevalence and Factors of Urinary Incontinence among Postpartum: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</article-title>
            <source>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth</source>
            <volume>23</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12884-023-06059-6</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37898733</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Thom, D.H. and Rortveit, G. (2010) Prevalence of Postpartum Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review. <italic>Acta</italic><italic>Obstetricia</italic><italic>et</italic><italic>Gynecologica</italic><italic>Scandinavica</italic>, 89, 1511-1522. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016349.2010.526188 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3109/00016349.2010.526188</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21050146</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3109/00016349.2010.526188">https://doi.org/10.3109/00016349.2010.526188</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Thom, D.H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rortveit, G.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2010</year>
            <article-title>Prevalence of Postpartum Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review</article-title>
            <source>Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica</source>
            <volume>89</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3109/00016349.2010.526188</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21050146</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Villot, A., Deffieux, X., Demoulin, G., Rivain, A., Trichot, C. and Thubert, T. (2015) Management of Postpartum Anal Incontinence: A Systematic Review. <italic>Progrès en Urologie</italic>, 25, 1191-1203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2015.06.002 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.purol.2015.06.002</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26162323</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2015.06.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2015.06.002</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Villot, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Deffieux, X.</string-name>
              <string-name>Demoulin, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rivain, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Trichot, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Thubert, T.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>Management of Postpartum Anal Incontinence: A Systematic Review</article-title>
            <source>Progrès en Urologie</source>
            <volume>25</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.purol.2015.06.002</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26162323</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Barca, J.A., Bravo, C., Pintado-Recarte, M.P., Asúnsolo, Á., Cueto-Hernández, I., Ruiz-Labarta, J., <italic>et al</italic>. (2021) Pelvic Floor Morbidity Following Vaginal Delivery versus Cesarean Delivery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. <italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Clinical</italic><italic>Medicine</italic>, 10, Article 1652. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081652 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/jcm10081652</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33924472</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081652">https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081652</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Barca, J.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bravo, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Pintado-Recarte, M.P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ruiz-Labarta, J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Pelvic Floor Morbidity Following Vaginal Delivery versus Cesarean Delivery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Clinical Medicine</source>
            <volume>10</volume>
            <elocation-id>1652</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/jcm10081652</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33924472</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Nnaji, H., Ugwu, E., Obi, S., Agu, P., Dim, C., Ezugwu, E., <italic>et al</italic>. (2025) Effect of Mode of Delivery on Incidence of Urinary and Anal Incontinence after Childbirth: A Prospective Cohort Study of Nigerian Women. <italic>Nigerian</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Clinical</italic><italic>Practice</italic>, 28, 978-987. https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_150_25 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4103/njcp.njcp_150_25</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_150_25">https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_150_25</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Nnaji, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ugwu, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Obi, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Agu, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Dim, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ezugwu, E.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2025</year>
            <article-title>Effect of Mode of Delivery on Incidence of Urinary and Anal Incontinence after Childbirth: A Prospective Cohort Study of Nigerian Women</article-title>
            <source>Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice</source>
            <volume>28</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4103/njcp.njcp_150_25</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Blomquist, J.L., Muñoz, A., Carroll, M. and Handa, V.L. (2018) Association of Delivery Mode with Pelvic Floor Disorders after Childbirth. <italic>JAMA</italic>, 320, 2438-2447. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.18315 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1001/jama.2018.18315</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30561480</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.18315">https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.18315</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Blomquist, J.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Carroll, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Handa, V.L.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2018</year>
            <article-title>Association of Delivery Mode with Pelvic Floor Disorders after Childbirth</article-title>
            <source>JAMA</source>
            <volume>320</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1001/jama.2018.18315</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30561480</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Zhu, J., Si, J., Zhao, L. and Liu, W. (2023) Association between Infant Birthweight and Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength: A Population-Based Cohort Study. <italic>BMC</italic><italic>Pregnancy</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Childbirth</italic>, 23, Article No. 266. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05511-x <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12884-023-05511-x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37076810</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05511-x">https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05511-x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Zhu, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Si, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhao, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Liu, W.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Association between Infant Birthweight and Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength: A Population-Based Cohort Study</article-title>
            <source>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth</source>
            <volume>23</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12884-023-05511-x</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37076810</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Yang, F. and Liao, H. (2022) The Influence of Obstetric Factors on the Occurrence of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction in Women in the Early Postpartum Period. <italic>International</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>General</italic><italic>Medicine</italic>, 15, 3353-3361. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijgm.s355913 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2147/ijgm.s355913</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35368797</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2147/ijgm.s355913">https://doi.org/10.2147/ijgm.s355913</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Yang, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Liao, H.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>The Influence of Obstetric Factors on the Occurrence of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction in Women in the Early Postpartum Period</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of General Medicine</source>
            <volume>15</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2147/ijgm.s355913</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35368797</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>