<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.4" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">fns</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Food and Nutrition Sciences</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2157-9458</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2157-944X</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/fns.2026.176032</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">fns-152158</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Biomedical</subject>
          <subject>Life Sciences</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Factors Associated with Failure to Achieve Minimum Dietary Diversity among Women and Children under Five Years in Yangambi, Democratic Republic of the Congo</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0009-0003-3970-1912</contrib-id>
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Mutombo</surname>
            <given-names>Hervé Tshiosha</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Likwela</surname>
            <given-names>Joris Losimba</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Tepungipame</surname>
            <given-names>Alliance Tagoto</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label> Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Kisangani, Kisangani, Democratic Republic of the Congo </aff>
      <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label> Department of Nutrition and Health, Center for International Forestry Research and World Agroforestry (CIFOR-ICRAF), Kisangani, Democratic Republic of the Congo </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="conflict" id="fn-conflict">
          <p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>26</day>
        <month>06</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <month>06</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>17</volume>
      <issue>06</issue>
      <fpage>471</fpage>
      <lpage>487</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>04</day>
          <month>06</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>23</day>
          <month>06</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="published">
          <day>26</day>
          <month>06</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2026 by the authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p> This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link> ). </license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2026.176032">https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2026.176032</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p><bold>Introduction:</bold> Food insecurity remains a major public health problem worldwide, characterized not only by insufficient food intake but also by low dietary diversity. This situation particularly affects women and children under five years of age and constitutes a major determinant of malnutrition. In the Democratic Republic of the Congo, low dietary diversity remains common, especially in rural settings such as Yangambi. This study aimed to analyze the factors associated with failure to achieve minimum dietary diversity among women and children under five years of age in Yangambi. <bold>Methods:</bold> This analytical cross-esctional study was conducted from january to april 2026 in Yangambi, Tshopo province, Democratic Republic of the Congo. This study included 614 women and their children under five years of age selected using a two-stage cluster probability sampling method. Sociodemographic, socioeconomic, environmental, and dietary date were collected using a structural questionnaire. Data were analyzed using STATA version 13. Associations between dependent and independent variables were assessed using binary logistic regression. Results were expressed as Odds Ratios (Ors) with 95% confidence intervals, and statistical significance was set at p &lt; 0.05. <bold>Results:</bold> A total of 614 women and their children under five years of age were included in the study. Failure to achieve minimum dietary diversity was observed among 55.54% of women and 84.53% of children. After multivariate adjustment, the main factors associated with failure to achieve minimum dietary diversity were the educational level of the household head, marital status of the household head, woman’s age, woman’s physiological status, child’s age, amount spent on food, and household hunger index. <bold>Conclusion:</bold> Failure to achieve minimum dietary diversity remains high among women and children under five years of age in Yangambi. It is mainly associated with several sociodemographic, nutritional, and socioeconomic factors. Strengthening nutritional interventions and food security programs targeting vulnerable households appears necessary to improve dietary diversity in rural areas of the Democratic Republic of the Congo.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated" xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>Minimum Dietary Diversity</kwd>
        <kwd>Women</kwd>
        <kwd>Children under Five Years of Age</kwd>
        <kwd>Associated Factors</kwd>
        <kwd>Democratic Republic of the Congo</kwd>
        <kwd>Yangambi</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>Food and nutritional insecurity remain a major public health concern worldwide, currently exacerbated by economic crises and climate disruptions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>]. Food insecurity is not limited to insufficient food intake but also includes the consumption of poor-quality and undiversified diets [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]. Low dietary diversity is a major determinant of malnutrition, particularly among women and children under five years of age [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]. Recent evidence from low- and middle-income countries has shown that higher dietary diversity is strongly associated with improved micronutrient adequacy, better nutritional status, and overall health outcomes among women and children [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>].</p>
      <p>Globally, approximately two billion people suffer from micronutrient deficiencies, a large proportion of which is linked to monotonous diets [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]. In sub-Saharan Africa, the prevalence of low dietary diversity remains high, affecting approximately 22.5% of the population in 2022 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]. Recent studies conducted in sub-Saharan Africa have consistently reported low dietary diversity among women and children, particularly in rural settings where poverty, food insecurity, and limited access to diversified foods remain major challenges [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]. According to the 2023 IPC analysis, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) continues to be severely affected by chronic food and nutritional insecurity, with 40% of the population identified as vulnerable [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>]. Studies conducted in 2014 and 2018 showed that more than 80% of children aged 6 - 23 months did not meet the minimum dietary diversity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>].</p>
      <p>In Yangambi, difficult socioeconomic conditions directly contribute to inadequate and poorly diversified diets among women and children [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>]. For women, minimum dietary diversity is defined as the consumption of at least five food groups, while for children, dietary diversity reflects the variety of food groups consumed during the previous 24 hours and is commonly used as an indicator of dietary quality and nutrient adequacy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>].</p>
      <p>Although the relationship between various factors and dietary diversity has been documented at the international level and in several African countries, few studies have specifically explored the factors associated with minimum dietary diversity in local contexts in the DRC [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>]. This study aims to analyze the factors associated with failure to achieve minimum dietary diversity among women and children under five years of age in the town of Yangambi, Democratic Republic of the Congo.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec2">
      <title>2. Methodes</title>
      <p><bold>Study</bold><bold>Setting:</bold> The study was conducted in the town of Yangambi, located in Tshopo Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>]. The town is predominantly agricultural, and the population mainly relies on subsistence farming, livestock rearing, fishing, and small-scale trade [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>].</p>
      <p><bold>Study</bold><bold>Population:</bold> The study population consisted of women and children under five years of age living in households in Yangambi.</p>
      <p><bold>Study</bold><bold>Period:</bold> The study was conducted between January and April 2026.</p>
      <p><bold>Study</bold><bold>Design:</bold> This was an analytical cross-sectional study aimed at analyzing the factors associated with failure to achieve minimum dietary diversity among women and children under five years of age in Yangambi.</p>
      <p><bold>Sampling:</bold> A two-stage cluster probability sampling method was used. Accessible villages were defined as villages that could be reached during the study period and where household enumeration was feasible. Villages were randomly selected from the list of eligible villages in Yangambi to constitute the study clusters. Within each selected cluster, households were selected using a systematic sampling procedure. In households with more than one eligible child under five years of age, one child was selected randomly to avoid intra-household clustering. A total of 614 households meeting the inclusion criteria were ultimately enrolled in the study.</p>
      <p><bold>Sample</bold><bold>Size:</bold> The sample size was calculated using Cochran’s formula, based on a prevalence of 41% of chronic food insecurity reported by the IPC 2023 in the DRC, with a precision of 5% and a 95% confidence interval. After accounting for a design effect of 1.5 and a 10% non-response rate, the final sample size was 614 women from 614 households, each with one child under five years, distributed across 30 clusters of 20 households each.</p>
      <p><bold>Inclusion</bold><bold>and</bold><bold>Exclusion</bold><bold>Criteria:</bold> Women and children under five years living in the selected households who provided consent to participate and whose household heads gave authorization were included in the study.</p>
      <p><bold>Data</bold><bold>Collection:</bold> Data were collected using a structured questionnaire covering the sociodemographic, socioeconomic, environmental, and dietary characteristics of women and children under five years. Dietary diversity was assessed using a 24-hour dietary recall method. For women, minimum dietary diversity was defined according to the FAO Minimum Dietary Diversity for Women (MDD-W) guideline as the consumption of at least five out of ten food groups during the previous 24 hours. The food groups included: grains, roots and tubers; pulses; nuts and seeds; dairy products; meat, poultry and fish; eggs; dark green leafy vegetables; vitamin A-rich fruits and vegetables; other vegetables; and other fruits.</p>
      <p>For children, dietary diversity was assessed based on the number of food groups consumed during the previous 24 hours. Infants aged 0 - 5 months were excluded from dietary diversity assessment because WHO recommendations promote exclusive breastfeeding during the first six months of life, making dietary diversity indicators not applicable to this age group. Therefore, dietary diversity analysis was restricted to children aged 6 - 59 months. In this study, consumption of at least five food groups was considered adequate dietary diversity among children. The dietary diversity assessment among children aged 24 - 59 months was performed to explore dietary patterns among all preschool children in the study area, where malnutrition remains highly prevalent.</p>
      <p><bold>Data</bold><bold>Processing</bold><bold>and</bold><bold>Statistical</bold><bold>Analysis:</bold> Data were entered into Excel and analyzed using STATA version 13. Categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages, while quantitative variables were summarized as means ± standard deviations or medians with interquartile ranges. Associations between dependent and independent variables were assessed using binary logistic regression. Results were expressed as crude and adjusted Odds Ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals. Statistical significance was set at p &lt; 0.05.</p>
      <p><bold>Ethical</bold><bold>Considerations</bold><bold>and</bold><bold>Conflicts</bold><bold>of</bold><bold>Interest:</bold> The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Kisangani. Administrative authorizations were obtained from local authorities. Informed consent was obtained from participants prior to data collection. Data were anonymized and handled confidentially. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec3">
      <title>3. Results</title>
      <p>Sociodemographic, socioeconomic, and environmental characteristics of the surveyed households.</p>
      <p><bold>Table 1</bold> presents the sociodemographic, socioeconomic, environmental, and nutritional characteristics of the respondents. The mean age of household heads was 40.70 ± 11.71 years, and 88.27% of households were headed by men. More than half of the women did not achieve the minimum dietary diversity (55.5%), while this proportion reached 84.5% among children under five years of age. Infants aged 0 - 5 months were excluded from dietary diversity analyses because they were expected to be exclusively breastfed according to WHO recommendations.</p>
      <p><bold>Table 1.</bold> Sociodemographic, socioeconomic, environmental, and nutritional characteristics of the respondents.</p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl1">
        <label>Table 1</label>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Variables</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>N = 614</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>(%)</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="5">
                <bold>Sociodemographic</bold>
                <bold>characteristics</bold>
                <bold>Age</bold>
                <bold>of</bold>
                <bold>household</bold>
                <bold>head</bold>
                <bold>(years)</bold>
                <bold>Mean</bold>
                <bold>±</bold>
                <bold>SD</bold>
              </td>
              <td>40.7 ± 11.7 (18 - 71)</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>&lt;29</td>
              <td>117</td>
              <td>19.06</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>30 - 44</td>
              <td>269</td>
              <td>43.81</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>45 - 59</td>
              <td>183</td>
              <td>29.8</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>≥60</td>
              <td>43</td>
              <td>7.33</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="2">
                <bold>Sex</bold>
                <bold>of</bold>
                <bold>household</bold>
                <bold>head</bold>
              </td>
              <td>Female</td>
              <td>72</td>
              <td>11.73</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Male</td>
              <td>542</td>
              <td>88.27</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="4">
                <bold>Educational</bold>
                <bold>level</bold>
                <bold>of</bold>
                <bold>household</bold>
                <bold>head</bold>
              </td>
              <td>None</td>
              <td>104</td>
              <td>16.94</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Primary</td>
              <td>307</td>
              <td>50</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Secondary</td>
              <td>172</td>
              <td>28.01</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Higher</td>
              <td>31</td>
              <td>5.05</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="9">
                <bold>Occupation</bold>
                <bold>of</bold>
                <bold>household</bold>
                <bold>head</bold>
              </td>
              <td>Agriculture</td>
              <td>308</td>
              <td>50.16</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Public sector employee</td>
              <td>65</td>
              <td>10.59</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Trader</td>
              <td>64</td>
              <td>10.42</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Fishing</td>
              <td>49</td>
              <td>7.98</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Artisan</td>
              <td>39</td>
              <td>6.35</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Livestock farming</td>
              <td>31</td>
              <td>5.05</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Hunting</td>
              <td>28</td>
              <td>4.56</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Forest exploitation</td>
              <td>23</td>
              <td>3.75</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Public sector retiree</td>
              <td>7</td>
              <td>1.14</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="4">
                <bold>Marital</bold>
                <bold>status</bold>
                <bold>of</bold>
                <bold>household</bold>
                <bold>head</bold>
              </td>
              <td>Monogamous</td>
              <td>430</td>
              <td>70.03</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Polygamous</td>
              <td>111</td>
              <td>18.08</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Separated</td>
              <td>39</td>
              <td>6.35</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Widowed</td>
              <td>34</td>
              <td>5.54</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="5">
                <bold>Woman’s</bold>
                <bold>age</bold>
                <bold>(years)</bold>
                <bold>Median</bold>
                <bold>(P25–P75)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>32 (25 - 41)</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>&lt;29</td>
              <td>255</td>
              <td>41.53</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>30 - 44</td>
              <td>249</td>
              <td>40.55</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>45 - 59</td>
              <td>91</td>
              <td>14.82</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>≥60</td>
              <td>19</td>
              <td>3,09</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="3">
                <bold>Woman’s</bold>
                <bold>physiological</bold>
                <bold>status</bold>
              </td>
              <td>Pregnant</td>
              <td>115</td>
              <td>18.729</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Lactating</td>
              <td>184</td>
              <td>29.967</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Non-pregnant, non-lactating (NPNL)</td>
              <td>315</td>
              <td>51.302</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="5">
                <bold>Child’s</bold>
                <bold>age</bold>
                <bold>&lt;</bold>
                <bold>5</bold>
                <bold>years</bold>
                <bold>Median</bold>
                <bold>(P25 - P75)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>29 (8 - 47)</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>0 - 5 months</td>
              <td>125</td>
              <td>20,36</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>6 - 11 months</td>
              <td>48</td>
              <td>9.82</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>12 - 23 months</td>
              <td>100</td>
              <td>20.45</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>24 - 59 months</td>
              <td>341</td>
              <td>69.73</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="4">
                <bold>Household</bold>
                <bold>size</bold>
              </td>
              <td>6.118 ± 1.665 (2 - 10)</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>≤4</td>
              <td>154</td>
              <td>25.08</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>5 - 7</td>
              <td>323</td>
              <td>52.61</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>≥8</td>
              <td>137</td>
              <td>22.31</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="2">
                <bold>Household</bold>
                <bold>status</bold>
              </td>
              <td>Non-native</td>
              <td>215</td>
              <td>35.02</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Native</td>
              <td>399</td>
              <td>64.98</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="6">
                <bold>Village</bold>
                <bold>of</bold>
                <bold>household</bold>
                <bold>origin</bold>
              </td>
              <td>Yalikombo</td>
              <td>164</td>
              <td>26.71</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Yaselia</td>
              <td>142</td>
              <td>23.13</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Lilanda</td>
              <td>114</td>
              <td>18.57</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Weko</td>
              <td>70</td>
              <td>11.4</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Yaekama</td>
              <td>69</td>
              <td>11.24</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Yalisombo</td>
              <td>55</td>
              <td>8.96</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="4">
                <bold>Socioeconomic</bold>
                <bold>characteristics</bold>
                <bold>Average</bold>
                <bold>monthly</bold>
                <bold>household</bold>
                <bold>income</bold>
              </td>
              <td>75,000 [50,000 - 150,000] (30,000 - 350,000)</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>&lt;75,000 FC</td>
              <td>325</td>
              <td>52.93</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>76,000 - 200,000 FC</td>
              <td>257</td>
              <td>41.86</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>&gt;201,000 FC</td>
              <td>32</td>
              <td>5.21</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="2">
                <bold>Child</bold>
                <bold>contributing</bold>
                <bold>to</bold>
                <bold>household</bold>
                <bold>income</bold>
              </td>
              <td>No</td>
              <td>261</td>
              <td>42.51</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Yes</td>
              <td>353</td>
              <td>57.49</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="10">
                <bold>Main</bold>
                <bold>source</bold>
                <bold>of</bold>
                <bold>household</bold>
                <bold>income</bold>
              </td>
              <td>Agricultural products</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>(V + P)</td>
              <td>307</td>
              <td>50</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Salary</td>
              <td>65</td>
              <td>10.59</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Trade</td>
              <td>64</td>
              <td>10.42</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Fishing (V)</td>
              <td>49</td>
              <td>7.98</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Artisan work</td>
              <td>39</td>
              <td>6.35</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Livestock (V + P)</td>
              <td>32</td>
              <td>5.21</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Hunting (V)</td>
              <td>28</td>
              <td>4.56</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Gathering + firewood</td>
              <td>23</td>
              <td>3.75</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Aid/donations</td>
              <td>7</td>
              <td>1.14</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="3">
                <bold>Trend</bold>
                <bold>in</bold>
                <bold>annual</bold>
                <bold>household</bold>
                <bold>income</bold>
              </td>
              <td>Decreased</td>
              <td>539</td>
              <td>87.79</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Stable</td>
              <td>63</td>
              <td>10.26</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Increased</td>
              <td>12</td>
              <td>1.95</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="4">
                <bold>Estimated</bold>
                <bold>amount</bold>
                <bold>spent</bold>
                <bold>on</bold>
                <bold>food</bold>
                <bold>(FC)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>40000 [23,000 - 60,000] (10,000 - 130,000)</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>&lt;20,000 FC</td>
              <td>117</td>
              <td>19.06</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>20,000 - 50,000 FC</td>
              <td>275</td>
              <td>44.79</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>&gt;50,000 FC</td>
              <td>222</td>
              <td>36.16</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="3">
                <bold>Main</bold>
                <bold>use</bold>
                <bold>of</bold>
                <bold>household</bold>
                <bold>income</bold>
              </td>
              <td>Direct food consumption</td>
              <td>228</td>
              <td>37.13</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Sale to purchase food</td>
              <td>146</td>
              <td>23.78</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Men’s personal needs</td>
              <td>60</td>
              <td>9.77</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="5">
              </td>
              <td>Children’s education</td>
              <td>46</td>
              <td>7.49</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Purchase of household goods</td>
              <td>43</td>
              <td>7.00</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Family health care</td>
              <td>43</td>
              <td>7.00</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Purchase of clothing</td>
              <td>36</td>
              <td>5.86</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Debt repayment</td>
              <td>12</td>
              <td>1.95</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="2">
                <bold>Environmental</bold>
                <bold>characteristics</bold>
                <bold>Access</bold>
                <bold>to</bold>
                <bold>safe</bold>
                <bold>drinking</bold>
                <bold>water</bold>
              </td>
              <td>No</td>
              <td>397</td>
              <td>64.66</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Yes</td>
              <td>217</td>
              <td>35.34</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="4">
                <bold>Main</bold>
                <bold>source</bold>
                <bold>of</bold>
                <bold>drinking</bold>
                <bold>water</bold>
              </td>
              <td>River water</td>
              <td>220</td>
              <td>35.83</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Pumped borehole</td>
              <td>217</td>
              <td>35.34</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Unprotected well</td>
              <td>103</td>
              <td>16.78</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Locally protected well</td>
              <td>74</td>
              <td>12.05</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="3">
                <bold>Nutritional</bold>
                <bold>characteristics</bold>
                <bold>Minimum</bold>
                <bold>dietary</bold>
                <bold>diversity</bold>
                <bold>for</bold>
                <bold>women</bold>
              </td>
              <td>4 [3 - 6] (2 - 9)</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Not achieved (&lt;5)</td>
              <td>341</td>
              <td>55.54</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Achieved (≥5)</td>
              <td>273</td>
              <td>44.46</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="3">
                <bold>Minimum</bold>
                <bold>dietary</bold>
                <bold>diversity</bold>
                <bold>for</bold>
                <bold>children</bold>
              </td>
              <td>3 [2 - 4] (1 - 7)</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Not achieved (&lt;5)</td>
              <td>519</td>
              <td>84.53</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Achieved (≥5)</td>
              <td>95</td>
              <td>15.47</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="4">
                <bold>Household</bold>
                <bold>hunger</bold>
                <bold>scale</bold>
              </td>
              <td>1 [0 - 3] (0 - 6)</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Little to no hunger (0 - 1)</td>
              <td>340</td>
              <td>55.37</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Moderate hunger (2 - 3)</td>
              <td>130</td>
              <td>21.17</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Severe hunger (4 - 6)</td>
              <td>144</td>
              <td>23.45</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="4">
                <bold>Nutritional</bold>
                <bold>status</bold>
                <bold>of</bold>
                <bold>women</bold>
              </td>
              <td>25.3 [23.6 - 26.1] (20.1 - 26.36)</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Normal</td>
              <td>505</td>
              <td>82.25</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>MAM</td>
              <td>102</td>
              <td>16.61</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>SAM</td>
              <td>7</td>
              <td>1.14</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="4">
                <bold>Nutritional</bold>
                <bold>status</bold>
                <bold>of</bold>
                <bold>children</bold>
              </td>
              <td>12.6 [12 - 13] (11 - 22.6)</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Normal</td>
              <td>328</td>
              <td>53.42</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>MAM</td>
              <td>244</td>
              <td>39.74</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>SAM</td>
              <td>42</td>
              <td>6.84</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p>Moderate or severe hunger affected 44.6% of households. More than half of the households had a monthly income below 75,000 Congolese francs (52.93%), with a median monthly income of 75,000 francs (interquartile range: 50,000 - 150,000 francs). Over half of the children under 18 years contributed to household income (57.49%), and the majority of households (87.79%) reported a decrease in their income compared to the previous year.</p>
      <p>Agriculture was the main source of household income for half of the households (50.00%). Some households spent less than 20,000 Congolese francs per month on food (19.06%), with a median monthly food expenditure of 40,000 francs (interquartile range: 23,000 - 60,000 francs). Additionally, 37.13% of households primarily used their income for direct food consumption.</p>
      <p>More than half of the households lacked access to safe drinking water (64.66%). The main sources of water supply were river water (35.83%) and pumped boreholes (35.34%). More than half of the women did not achieve minimum dietary diversity (55.54%), with a median dietary diversity score of 4 (interquartile range: 3 - 6; range: 2 - 9 food groups). Among children under five years, 84.53% did not meet the minimum dietary diversity, with a median score of 3 (interquartile range: 2 - 5; range: 1 - 7 food groups).</p>
      <p>Regarding nutritional status, global acute malnutrition (moderate and severe acute malnutrition) affected 17.75% of women and 46.58% of children under five years of age. Multivariate logistic regression of factors associated with minimum dietary diversity among women.</p>
      <p><bold>Table 2</bold> presents the factors associated with minimum dietary diversity among women after multivariate logistic regression. After adjustment, the educational level of the household head remained significantly associated with women’s minimum dietary diversity. Only women whose household heads had a higher education level were 22 times more likely to achieve minimum dietary diversity (aOR = 21.88; 95% CI: 4.13 - 115.97; p &lt; 0.001) compared to those whose household heads had no formal education. However, primary (p = 0.416) and secondary (p = 0.066) education levels showed no significant association with women’s minimum dietary diversity after adjustment.</p>
      <p><bold>Table 2.</bold> Factors associated with minimum dietary diversity among women (multivariate logistic regression).</p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl2">
        <label>Table 2</label>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Variables</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>n</bold>
                <bold>(%)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Crude</bold>
                <bold>OR</bold>
                <bold>(95%</bold>
                <bold>CI)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>p-Value</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Adjusted OR (95%</bold>
                <bold>C</bold>
                <bold>I)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>p-Value</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Educational</bold>
                <bold>level</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Primary</td>
              <td>307 (50.00)</td>
              <td>2.15 (1.33 - 3.48)</td>
              <td>0.002</td>
              <td>1.31 (0.68 - 2.50)</td>
              <td>0.416</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Secondary</td>
              <td>172 (28.01)</td>
              <td>1.73 (1.03 - 2.92)</td>
              <td>0.039</td>
              <td>2.13 (0.95 - 4.74)</td>
              <td>0.066</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Higher</td>
              <td>31 (5.05)</td>
              <td>35.77 (8.03 - 159.40)</td>
              <td>&lt;0.001</td>
              <td>21.88 (4.13 - 115.97)</td>
              <td>&lt;0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Marital</bold>
                <bold>status</bold>
                <bold>of</bold>
                <bold>household</bold>
                <bold>head</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Polygamous</td>
              <td>111 (18.08)</td>
              <td>1.89 (1.24 - 2.89)</td>
              <td>0.004</td>
              <td>2.09 (1.23 - 3.56)</td>
              <td>0.007</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Separated</td>
              <td>39 (6.35)</td>
              <td>0.51 (0.25 - 1.04)</td>
              <td>0.245</td>
              <td>0.77 (0.33 - 1.83)</td>
              <td>0.77</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Widowed</td>
              <td>34 (5.54)</td>
              <td>0.41 (0.18 - 0.89)</td>
              <td>0.026</td>
              <td>0.72 (0.23 - 2.21)</td>
              <td>0.562</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Woman’s</bold>
                <bold>age</bold>
                <bold>(years)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>30 - 44</td>
              <td>249 (40.55)</td>
              <td>1.44 (1.01 - 2.05)</td>
              <td>0.042</td>
              <td>1.70 (1.06 - 2.73)</td>
              <td>0.027</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>45 - 59</td>
              <td>91 (14,82)</td>
              <td>1.39 (0.086 - 2.25)</td>
              <td>0.182</td>
              <td>3.32 (1.62 - 6.78)</td>
              <td>0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>≥60</td>
              <td>19 (3.09)</td>
              <td>1.72 (0,68 - 4,39)</td>
              <td>0.254</td>
              <td>11.52 (3.31 - 40.11)</td>
              <td>&lt;0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Woman’s</bold>
                <bold>physiological</bold>
                <bold>status</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Vulnerable (pregnant or lactating)</td>
              <td>299 (48.71)</td>
              <td>2.06 (1.49 - 2.84)</td>
              <td>&lt;0.001</td>
              <td>3.41 (2.19 - 5.31)</td>
              <td>&lt;0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Household</bold>
                <bold>hunger</bold>
                <bold>index</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Hunger</td>
              <td>274 (44.63)</td>
              <td>0.22 (0.15 - 0.31)</td>
              <td>&lt;0.001</td>
              <td>0.23 (0.15 - 0.34)</td>
              <td>&lt;0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Type</bold>
                <bold>of</bold>
                <bold>drinking</bold>
                <bold>water</bold>
                <bold>source</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Pumped borehole</td>
              <td>217 (35.34)</td>
              <td>1.69 (1.16 - 2.48)</td>
              <td>0.007</td>
              <td>0.75 (0.42 - 1.36)</td>
              <td>0.349</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Unprotected well</td>
              <td>103 (16.78)</td>
              <td>2.13 (1.32 - 3.43)</td>
              <td>0.016</td>
              <td>2.91 (1.69 - 5.02)</td>
              <td>&lt;0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Locally protected well</td>
              <td>74 (12.05)</td>
              <td>0.47 (0.026 - 0.87)</td>
              <td>0.016</td>
              <td>0.46 (0.24 - 0.89)</td>
              <td>0.022</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p>The marital status of the household head also remained associated with women’s minimum dietary diversity among polygamous households (p = 0.007), whereas separated (p = 0.552) and widowed (p = 0.562) statuses showed no significant association after adjustment. Women living in polygamous households were twice as likely to achieve minimum dietary diversity compared to those in monogamous households (aOR = 2.09; 95% CI: 1.23 - 3.56; p = 0.007).</p>
      <p>Women’s age remained significantly associated with minimum dietary diversity after adjustment. Women aged 30 - 44 years, 45 - 59 years, and 60 years or older had respectively 2 times (aOR = 1.70; 95% CI: 1.06 - 2.73; p = 0.027), 3 times (aOR = 3.32; 95% CI: 1.62 - 6.78; p = 0.001), and 12 times (aOR = 11.52; 95% CI: 3.31 - 40.11; p &lt; 0.001) higher odds of achieving minimum dietary diversity compared to women under 29 years of age.</p>
      <p>Women’s physiological status remained strongly associated with minimum dietary diversity after adjustment. Pregnant and lactating women were three times more likely to achieve minimum dietary diversity than non-pregnant, non-lactating women (aOR = 3.41; 95% CI: 2.19 - 5.31; p &lt; 0.001).</p>
      <p>Household hunger index also remained significantly associated with women’s minimum dietary diversity (p &lt; 0.001). Women living in households experiencing hunger had significantly lower odds of achieving minimum dietary diversity compared to those in households with little or no hunger (aOR = 0.23; 95% CI: 0.15 - 0.34; p &lt; 0.001).</p>
      <p>The type of drinking water source was also associated with women’s minimum dietary diversity after adjustment. However, the use of a pumped borehole showed no significant association after adjustment (p = 0.349). Multivariate logistic regression analysis of factors associated with children’s minimum dietary diversity.</p>
      <p><bold>Table 3</bold> presents the factors associated with minimum dietary diversity among children under five years of age after multivariate logistic regression. The educational level and marital status of the household head remained significantly associated with children’s minimum dietary diversity (p &lt; 0.001). Children living in households headed by separated individuals were significantly less likely to achieve minimum dietary diversity compared to those in monogamous households (aOR = 0.02; 95% CI: 0.002 - 0.23; p = 0.001).</p>
      <p><bold>Table 3.</bold> Factors associated with minimum dietary diversity among children under five: Multivariate logistic regression.</p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl3">
        <label>Table 3</label>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Variables</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>n</bold>
                <bold>(%)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Crude</bold>
                <bold>OR</bold>
                <bold>(95%</bold>
                <bold>CI)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>p-Value</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Adjusted</bold>
                <bold>OR</bold>
                <bold>(95%</bold>
                <bold>CI)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>p-Value</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Educational</bold>
                <bold>level</bold>
                <bold>of</bold>
                <bold>household</bold>
                <bold>head</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Primary</td>
              <td>307 (50.00)</td>
              <td>1.54 (0.72 - 3.29)</td>
              <td>0.269</td>
              <td>0.04 (0.01 - 0.215)</td>
              <td>&lt;0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Secondary</td>
              <td>172 (28.01)</td>
              <td>2.41 (1.10 - 5.28)</td>
              <td>0.028</td>
              <td>0.12 (0.02 - 0.61)</td>
              <td>0.010</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Higher</td>
              <td>31 (5.05)</td>
              <td>9.89 (3.71 - 26.41)</td>
              <td>&lt;0.001</td>
              <td>0.10 (0.01 - 0.79)</td>
              <td>0.028</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Marital</bold>
                <bold>status</bold>
                <bold>of</bold>
                <bold>household</bold>
                <bold>head</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Polygamous</td>
              <td>111 (18.08)</td>
              <td>1.67 (1.01 - 2.81)</td>
              <td>0.045</td>
              <td>0.82 (0.35 - 1.94)</td>
              <td>0.66</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Separated</td>
              <td>39 (6.35)</td>
              <td>0.46 (0.14 - 1.54)</td>
              <td>0.207</td>
              <td>0.02 (0.002 - 0.23)</td>
              <td>0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Widowed</td>
              <td>34 (5.54)</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Woman’s</bold>
                <bold>age</bold>
                <bold>(years)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>30 - 44</td>
              <td>249 (40.55)</td>
              <td>2.38 (1.44 - 3.95)</td>
              <td>0.001</td>
              <td>3.28 (1.21 - 8.93)</td>
              <td>0.020</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>45 - 59</td>
              <td>91 (14.82)</td>
              <td>1.88 (0.96 - 3.69)</td>
              <td>0.067</td>
              <td>2.11 (0.55 - 8.13)</td>
              <td>0.28</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>≥60</td>
              <td>19 (3.09)</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Woman’s</bold>
                <bold>physiological</bold>
                <bold>status</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Vulnerable (pregnant or lactating)</td>
              <td>299 (48.70)</td>
              <td>1.63 (1.05 - 2.54)</td>
              <td>0.031</td>
              <td>7.41 (3.21 - 17.11)</td>
              <td>&lt;0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Child’s</bold>
                <bold>age</bold>
                <bold>(months)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>12 - 23 months</td>
              <td>100 (16.29)</td>
              <td>0.37 (0.11 - 1.27)</td>
              <td>0.115</td>
              <td>0.32 (0.06 - 1.61)</td>
              <td>0.165</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>24 - 59 months</td>
              <td>341 (55.54)</td>
              <td>1.91 (0.78 - 4.66)</td>
              <td>0.157</td>
              <td>5.57 (1.64 - 18.92)</td>
              <td>0.006</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Estimated</bold>
                <bold>monthly</bold>
                <bold>food</bold>
                <bold>expenditure (FC)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>20,000 - 50,000 FC</td>
              <td>275 (44.79)</td>
              <td>0.74 (0.39 - 1.42)</td>
              <td>0.375</td>
              <td>1.01 (0.42 - 2.43)</td>
              <td>0.984</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>&gt;50,000 FC</td>
              <td>222 (36.16)</td>
              <td>1.83 (0.99 - 3.39)</td>
              <td>0.053</td>
              <td>4.38 (1.08 - 17.68)</td>
              <td>0.038</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Household</bold>
                <bold>hunger</bold>
                <bold>index</bold>
                <bold>(IDFM)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Hunger</td>
              <td>274 (44.63)</td>
              <td>0.17 (0.10 - 0.31)</td>
              <td>&lt;0.001</td>
              <td>0.25 (0.12 - 0.53)</td>
              <td>&lt;0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Type</bold>
                <bold>of</bold>
                <bold>drinking</bold>
                <bold>water</bold>
                <bold>source</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Pumped borehole</td>
              <td>217 (35.34)</td>
              <td>1.91 (1.14 - 2.16)</td>
              <td>0.014</td>
              <td>0.72 (0.23 - 2.23)</td>
              <td>0.564</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Unprotected well</td>
              <td>103 (16.78)</td>
              <td>0.58 (0.25 - 2.77)</td>
              <td>0.191</td>
              <td>0.57 (0.21 - 1.58)</td>
              <td>0.281</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Locally protected well</td>
              <td>74 (12.05)</td>
              <td>1.33 (0.64 - 2.77)</td>
              <td>0.450</td>
              <td>8.87 (2.92 - 26.92)</td>
              <td>&lt;0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Woman’s nutritional status (MUAC)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>MAM</td>
              <td>102 (16.94)</td>
              <td>0.47 (0.23 - 0.97)</td>
              <td>0.041</td>
              <td>0.40 (0.15 - 1.11)</td>
              <td>0.078</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>SAM</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
              <td>
              </td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p>Women’s age remained significantly associated with children’s minimum dietary diversity after adjustment. Children of women aged 30 - 44 years had three times higher odds of achieving minimum dietary diversity compared to children of women under 29 years (aOR = 3.28; 95% CI: 1.21 - 8.93; p = 0.020). However, no significant association was observed for women aged 45 - 59 years after adjustment (p = 0.280).</p>
      <p>Women’s physiological status remained significantly associated with children’s minimum dietary diversity after adjustment. Children of pregnant or lactating women were seven times more likely to achieve minimum dietary diversity compared to children of non-pregnant, non-lactating women (aOR = 7.41; 95% CI: 3.21 - 17.11; p &lt; 0.001).</p>
      <p>Child’s age was also significantly associated with minimum dietary diversity after adjustment. Children aged 24 - 59 months had six times higher odds of achieving minimum dietary diversity compared to those aged 6 - 11 months (aOR = 5.57; 95% CI: 1.64 - 18.92; p = 0.006). No significant association was found for children aged 12 - 23 months after adjustment (p = 0.165).</p>
      <p>The estimated monthly amount spent on food remained significantly associated with children’s minimum dietary diversity. Children from households spending more than 50,000 Congolese francs per month on food were four times more likely to achieve minimum dietary diversity compared to those from households spending between 20,000 and 50,000 francs (aOR = 4.38; 95% CI: 1.08 - 17.68; p = 0.038).</p>
      <p>Household hunger index remained significantly associated with children’s minimum dietary diversity after adjustment. Children from households experiencing hunger had significantly lower odds of achieving minimum dietary diversity compared to those from households with little or no hunger (aOR = 0.25; 95% CI: 0.12 - 0.53; p &lt; 0.001).</p>
      <p>The type of drinking water source was also associated with children’s minimum dietary diversity. Children from households using locally protected wells had nine times higher odds of achieving minimum dietary diversity compared to those using river water (aOR = 8.87; 95% CI: 2.92 - 26.92; p &lt; 0.001). However, the use of a pumped borehole (p = 0.564) and women’s nutritional status (p = 0.078) were not significantly associated with children’s minimum dietary diversity after adjustment.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec4">
      <title>4. Discussion</title>
      <p>This study aimed to analyze the factors associated with failure to achieve minimum dietary diversity among women and children under five years of age in the town of Yangambi, Democratic Republic of the Congo. The results revealed a high prevalence of inadequate minimum dietary diversity among both women (55.54%) and children under five years (84.53%) in Yangambi. After adjustment using multivariate binary logistic regression, several variables remained significantly associated with failure to achieve minimum dietary diversity among women and children. These included the educational level of the household head, the marital status of the household head, women’s age, children’s age, the household hunger index, and the amount spent on food.</p>
      <p>The high proportion of women and children who did not achieve minimum dietary diversity observed in this study is consistent with findings from several studies conducted in sub-Saharan Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>]. In Ethiopia, Sitotaw <italic>et</italic><italic>al.</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>] also reported a high proportion of women failing to meet minimum dietary diversity, while Nikièma <italic>et al.</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>] in Burkina Faso observed low dietary diversity among children.</p>
      <p>In the DRC, previous surveys have already shown that more than 80% of children aged 6 - 23 months did not meet the minimum dietary diversity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>]. These findings may reflect the difficult socioeconomic conditions in Yangambi, characterized by a strong reliance on subsistence agriculture, limited dietary diversification, and restricted access to micronutrient-rich foods.</p>
      <sec id="sec4dot1">
        <title>4.1. Educational Level of the Household Head</title>
        <p>After multivariate analysis, the educational level of the household head remained significantly associated with minimum dietary diversity among both women and children. Among women, those living in households headed by individuals with higher education had a significantly greater likelihood of achieving minimum dietary diversity compared to those in households headed by individuals with little or no education (aOR = 21.88; 95% CI: 4.13 - 115.97; p &lt; 0.001). Among children, the educational level of the household head was also significantly associated with minimum dietary diversity after adjustment.</p>
        <p>Children living in households headed by individuals with primary (aOR = 0.04; 95% CI: 0.01 - 0.21; p &lt; 0.001), secondary (aOR = 0.12; 95% CI: 0.02 - 0.61; p = 0.010), or higher education (aOR = 0.10; 95% CI: 0.01 - 0.79; p = 0.028) had a significantly lower likelihood of failing to achieve minimum dietary diversity compared to those in households with no formal education. These findings are consistent with those reported by Sitotaw <italic>et al.</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>], Nikièma <italic>et al.</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>], and other studies conducted in similar African contexts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>], which found that the risk of inadequate dietary diversity was higher in households headed by uneducated individuals.</p>
        <p>This association may be explained by the fact that a higher level of education improves nutritional knowledge, household resource management, and access to economic opportunities that facilitate the acquisition of diverse foods. Higher education also enables a better understanding of appropriate dietary and nutritional practices for women and children.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot2">
        <title>4.2. Marital Status of the Household Head</title>
        <p>Multivariate analysis showed that the marital status of the household head remained significantly associated with children’s minimum dietary diversity, but not with that of women. Among women, those living in households headed by separated individuals had a lower likelihood of achieving minimum dietary diversity compared to those in monogamous households; however, this association was not statistically significant (aOR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.23 - 1.83; p = 0.757).</p>
        <p>Among children, those living in households headed by separated individuals had a significantly lower likelihood of achieving minimum dietary diversity (aOR = 0.02; 95% CI: 0.002 - 0.23; p = 0.001). A similar trend has been reported in some African studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>]. This situation may reflect the socioeconomic challenges associated with marital separation, which can reduce available resources for children’s food and nutrition.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot3">
        <title>4.3. Woman’s Age</title>
        <p>The results of the multivariate logistic regression showed that women’s age remained significantly associated with minimum dietary diversity among both women and children in certain age groups. Among women, those aged 30 - 44 years had a higher likelihood of achieving minimum dietary diversity compared to those under 30 years (aOR = 1.70; 95% CI: 1.06 - 2.73; p = 0.027). This likelihood was even higher among women aged 45 - 59 years (aOR = 3.32; 95% CI: 1.62 - 6.78; p = 0.001) and among those aged 60 years or older (aOR = 11.52; 95% CI: 3.31 - 40.11; p &lt; 0.001). Among children, those living in households headed by women aged 30 - 44 years also had a significantly higher likelihood of achieving minimum dietary diversity compared to those living with women under 30 years (aOR = 3.28; 95% CI: 1.21 - 8.93; p = 0.020).</p>
        <p>However, this association was not statistically significant among women aged 45 - 59 years (aOR = 2.11; 95% CI: 0.55 - 8.13; p = 0.280). These findings are consistent with results reported in several African studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>]. This may be explained by the fact that older women generally have greater experience in household food management, better socioeconomic stability, and a stronger understanding of nutritional practices that support dietary diversity.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot4">
        <title>4.4. Child’s Age</title>
        <p>In the multivariate model, the child’s age remained significantly associated with minimum dietary diversity. Children aged 24 - 59 months had a significantly higher likelihood of achieving minimum dietary diversity compared to those aged 6 - 11 months (aOR = 5.57; 95% CI: 1.64 - 18.92; p = 0.006). In contrast, this association was not statistically significant among children aged 12 - 23 months (aOR = 0.32; 95% CI: 0.06 - 1.61; p = 0.165). Similar findings have been reported in several studies conducted in comparable nutritional contexts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>]. This may be attributed to the gradual introduction of a more diversified diet among children aged 24 - 59 months. Unlike most studies that focus exclusively on children aged 6 - 23 months, our study also explored dietary diversity among children aged 24 - 59 months because of the persistent burden of malnutrition observed among preschool-aged children in rural areas of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. This approach provided additional information on dietary patterns in older children, although the dietary diversity indicator has been more commonly applied to younger age groups.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot5">
        <title>4.5. Woman’s Physiological Status</title>
        <p>After adjustment using multivariate logistic regression, women’s physiological status remained significantly associated with minimum dietary diversity among both women and children. Pregnant or lactating women had a significantly higher likelihood of achieving minimum dietary diversity compared to other women (aOR = 3.41; 95% CI: 2.19 - 5.31; p &lt; 0.001). Similarly, children living in households with pregnant or lactating women also had a higher likelihood of achieving minimum dietary diversity (aOR = 7.41; 95% CI: 3.21 - 17.11; p &lt; 0.001). These findings are consistent with results reported in several African studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>]. This observation may be linked to the special nutritional attention given to pregnant and lactating women and their children, as well as nutrition education programs targeting these vulnerable groups.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot6">
        <title>4.6. Household Hunger Index</title>
        <p>The household hunger index remained significantly associated with minimum dietary diversity among both women and children after adjustment. Women living in food-insecure households had a significantly lower likelihood of achieving minimum dietary diversity compared to those in food-secure households (aOR = 0.23; 95% CI: 0.15 - 0.34; p &lt; 0.001). Similarly, children from households experiencing hunger also had reduced odds of achieving minimum dietary diversity (aOR = 0.25; 95% CI: 0.12 - 0.53; p &lt; 0.001). These results are consistent with findings from several studies conducted in Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]. This may reflect the limited access of food-insecure households to sufficient and diverse foods, thereby reducing dietary quality for women and children.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot7">
        <title>4.7. Monthly Amount Spent on Food</title>
        <p>According to the multivariate logistic regression, the estimated monthly amount spent on food remained significantly associated with children’s minimum dietary diversity. Children living in households spending more than 50,000 FC per month on food had a significantly higher likelihood of achieving minimum dietary diversity compared to those in households spending less than 20,000 FC (aOR = 4.38; 95% CI: 1.08 - 17.68; p = 0.038). However, this association was not statistically significant in households spending between 20,000 and 50,000 FC on food (aOR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.42 - 2.43; p = 0.984). A similar trend has been observed in several African studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>]. This may be explained by the fact that a higher food budget improves access to a wider variety of nutrient-rich food groups.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot8">
        <title>4.8. Strengths and Limitations of the Study</title>
        <p>This study provides recent data on the factors associated with failure to achieve minimum dietary diversity among women and children in a rural setting that is poorly documented in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The use of internationally recognized nutritional indicators and multivariate analysis made it possible to identify the main factors associated with minimum dietary diversity in Yangambi.</p>
        <p>However, the cross-sectional nature of this study does not allow for the establishment of causal relationships between the factors studied and minimum dietary diversity. Some of the information collected was based on participants’ self-reports and may be subject to recall bias.</p>
        <p>In addition, certain categories were poorly represented, which may explain the high odds ratios observed for some variables. Despite these limitations, this study provides valuable information that can help guide nutritional interventions and public health policies aimed at improving dietary diversity among women and children in Yangambi and in other similar contexts in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. An additional limitation of this study is that dietary diversity among children aged 24 - 59 months was assessed using an adapted dietary diversity approach. Although this enabled the exploration of dietary diversity among all preschool-aged children, this indicator was originally developed for younger children and should therefore be interpreted with caution. Furthermore, some adjusted odds ratios were relatively large and associated with wide confidence intervals, which may reflect the small number of observations in certain categories.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec5">
      <title>5. Conclusions</title>
      <p>This study revealed a high prevalence of failure to achieve minimum dietary diversity among women and children under five years of age in Yangambi. The main factors associated with this situation were the educational level of the household head, the marital status of the household head, women’s age, children’s age, women’s physiological status, the household hunger index, and the amount spent on food.</p>
      <p>These findings highlight the need to strengthen nutritional interventions and food security programs targeting vulnerable households, through improvements in socioeconomic conditions, nutritional education, and access to diverse diets in rural areas of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. </p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">Issiaka, D. and Doukkali, P.R. (2025) Sécurité Alimentaire et Développement de L’agriculture. https://www.academia.edu/download/45631436/Rapport_Danioko_Issiaka.pdf</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Issiaka, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Doukkali, P.R.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2025</year>
            <article-title>Sécurité Alimentaire et Développement de L’agriculture</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Godfray, H.C.J., Beddington, J.R., Crute, I.R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J.F., <italic>et al</italic>. (2010) Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People. <italic>Science</italic>, 327, 812-818. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185383 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1185383</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20110467</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185383">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185383</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Godfray, H.C.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Beddington, J.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Crute, I.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Haddad, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lawrence, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Muir, J.F.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2010</year>
            <article-title>Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People</article-title>
            <source>Science</source>
            <volume>327</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1185383</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20110467</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Pinstrup-Andersen, P. (2009) Food Security: Definition and Measurement. <italic>Food</italic><italic>Security</italic>, 1, 5-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-008-0002-y <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12571-008-0002-y</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-008-0002-y">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-008-0002-y</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Pinstrup-Andersen, P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2009</year>
            <article-title>Food Security: Definition and Measurement</article-title>
            <source>Food Security</source>
            <volume>1</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12571-008-0002-y</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Verger, E.O., Le Port, A., Borderon, A., Bourbon, G., Moursi, M., Savy, M., <italic>et al</italic>. (2021) Dietary Diversity Indicators and Their Associations with Dietary Adequacy and Health Outcomes: A Systematic Scoping Review. <italic>Advances</italic><italic>in</italic><italic>Nutrition</italic>, 12, 1659-1672. https://doi.org/10.1093/advances/nmab009 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/advances/nmab009</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33684194</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/advances/nmab009">https://doi.org/10.1093/advances/nmab009</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Verger, E.O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Port, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Borderon, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bourbon, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Moursi, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Savy, M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Dietary Diversity Indicators and Their Associations with Dietary Adequacy and Health Outcomes: A Systematic Scoping Review</article-title>
            <source>Advances in Nutrition</source>
            <volume>12</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/advances/nmab009</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33684194</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Sitotaw, I.K., Hailesslasie, K. and Adama, Y. (2017) Comparison of Nutritional Status and Associated Factors of Lactating Women between Lowland and Highland Communities of District Raya, Alamata, Southern Tigiray, Ethiopia. <italic>BMC</italic><italic>Nutrition</italic>, 3, Article No. 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-017-0179-6 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40795-017-0179-6</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32153841</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-017-0179-6">https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-017-0179-6</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Sitotaw, I.K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Hailesslasie, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Adama, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Raya, A</string-name>
              <string-name>Tigiray, E</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2017</year>
            <article-title>Comparison of Nutritional Status and Associated Factors of Lactating Women between Lowland and Highland Communities of District Raya, Alamata, Southern Tigiray, Ethiopia</article-title>
            <source>BMC Nutrition</source>
            <volume>3</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40795-017-0179-6</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32153841</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Nikièma, V., Fogny, N.F., Salpéteur, C., Lachat, C. and Kangas, S.T. (2021) Complementary Feeding Practices and Associated Factors of Dietary Diversity among Uncomplicated Severe Acute Malnourished Children Aged 6-23 Months in Burkina Faso. <italic>Maternal</italic><italic>&amp;</italic><italic>Child</italic><italic>Nutrition</italic>, 17, e13220. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13220 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/mcn.13220</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34075726</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13220">https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13220</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Fogny, N.F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lachat, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kangas, S.T.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Complementary Feeding Practices and Associated Factors of Dietary Diversity among Uncomplicated Severe Acute Malnourished Children Aged 6-23 Months in Burkina Faso</article-title>
            <source>Maternal &amp; Child Nutrition</source>
            <volume>17</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/mcn.13220</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34075726</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ahmed, K.Y., Agho, K.E., Page, A.N., Arora, A. and Ogbo, F.A. (2022) Trends and Determinants of Minimum Dietary Diversity among Children in Sub-Saharan Africa. <italic>Public Health Nutrition</italic>, 25, 1-12.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ahmed, K.Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Agho, K.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Page, A.N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Arora, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ogbo, F.A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>Trends and Determinants of Minimum Dietary Diversity among Children in Sub-Saharan Africa</article-title>
            <source>Public Health Nutrition</source>
            <volume>25</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Melesse, M.B., van den Berg, M., Biesbroek, S., Trijsburg, L. and Brouwer, I.D. (2023) Dietary Diversity and Nutritional Adequacy among Women and Children in Low-and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. <italic>Nutrients</italic>, 15, Article No. 950.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Melesse, M.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Berg, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Biesbroek, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Trijsburg, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Brouwer, I.D.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Dietary Diversity and Nutritional Adequacy among Women and Children in Low-and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review</article-title>
            <source>Nutrients</source>
            <volume>15</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Arimond, M., Wrottesley, S.V., Becquey, E., <italic>et al</italic>. (2021) Simple Food Group Diversity Indicators Predict Micronutrient Adequacy of Women’s Diets in Low-and Middle-Income Countries. <italic>Journal of Nutrition</italic>, 151, 2455-2467.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Arimond, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wrottesley, S.V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Becquey, E.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Simple Food Group Diversity Indicators Predict Micronutrient Adequacy of Women’s Diets in Low-and Middle-Income Countries</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Nutrition</source>
            <volume>151</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO (2023) The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2023: Urbanization, Agrifood Systems Transformation and Healthy Diets across the Rural-Urban Continuum. FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO, 316 p.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>FAO, I</string-name>
              <string-name>FAD, U</string-name>
              <string-name>NICEF, W</string-name>
              <string-name>Urbanization, A</string-name>
              <string-name>FAO, I</string-name>
              <string-name>FAD, U</string-name>
              <string-name>NICEF, W</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2023: Urbanization, Agrifood Systems Transformation and Healthy Diets across the Rural-Urban Continuum</article-title>
            <source>FAO</source>
            <volume>316</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Herrador, Z., Perez-Formigo, J., Sordo, L., Gadisa, E., Moreno, J., Benito, A., <italic>et al</italic>. (2015) Low Dietary Diversity and Intake of Animal Source Foods among School Aged Children in Libo Kemkem and Fogera Districts, Ethiopia. <italic>PLOS</italic><italic>ONE</italic>, 10, e0133435. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133435 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0133435</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26203904</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133435">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133435</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Herrador, Z.</string-name>
              <string-name>Perez-Formigo, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sordo, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gadisa, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Moreno, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Benito, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Districts, E</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>Low Dietary Diversity and Intake of Animal Source Foods among School Aged Children in Libo Kemkem and Fogera Districts, Ethiopia</article-title>
            <source>PLOS ONE</source>
            <volume>10</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0133435</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26203904</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kolliesuah, N.P., Olum, S. and Ongeng, D. (2023) Status of Household Dietary Diversity and Associated Factors among Rural and Urban Households of Northern Uganda. <italic>BMC</italic><italic>Nutrition</italic>, 9, Article No. 83. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-023-00739-4 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40795-023-00739-4</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37430346</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-023-00739-4">https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-023-00739-4</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Kolliesuah, N.P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Olum, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ongeng, D.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Status of Household Dietary Diversity and Associated Factors among Rural and Urban Households of Northern Uganda</article-title>
            <source>BMC Nutrition</source>
            <volume>9</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40795-023-00739-4</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37430346</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Amugsi, D.A., Dimbuene, Z.T. and Kimani-Murage, E.W. (2022) Women’s Dietary Diversity and Household Food Security in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Nationally Representative Surveys. <italic>BMC Public Health</italic>, 22, Article No. 1148.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Amugsi, D.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Dimbuene, Z.T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kimani-Murage, E.W.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>Women’s Dietary Diversity and Household Food Security in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Nationally Representative Surveys</article-title>
            <source>BMC Public Health</source>
            <volume>22</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <label>14.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">IPC (2023) Analyse IPC de l’insécurité alimentaire chronique en République Démocratique du Congo. IPC Global Support Unit. https://www.ipcinfo.org/fileadmin/user_upload/ipcinfo/docs/IPC_DRC_Chronic_Fo od_Insecurity_Jul2023_report_french.pdf</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Analyse IPC de l’insécurité alimentaire chronique en République Démocratique du Congo</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <label>15.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">Ministère du Plan (2025) Questionnaire Unifié des Indicateurs de Base du Bien-être (QUIBB RDC). Ministère du Plan, Democratic Republic of the Congo. https://plan.gouv.cd/doc/QUIBB%20RDC_0.pdf</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Plan, D</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2025</year>
            <article-title>Questionnaire Unifié des Indicateurs de Base du Bien-être (QUIBB RDC)</article-title>
            <source>Ministère du Plan</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <label>16.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Nkonde, C., Audain, K., Kiwanuka‐Lubinda, R.N. and Marinda, P. (2021) Effect of Agricultural Diversification on Dietary Diversity in Rural Households with Children under 5 Years of Age in Zambia. <italic>Food</italic><italic>Science</italic><italic>&amp;</italic><italic>Nutrition</italic>, 9, 6274-6285. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2587 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/fsn3.2587</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34760257</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2587">https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2587</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Nkonde, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Audain, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lubinda, R.N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Marinda, P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Effect of Agricultural Diversification on Dietary Diversity in Rural Households with Children under 5 Years of Age in Zambia</article-title>
            <source>Food Science &amp; Nutrition</source>
            <volume>9</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/fsn3.2587</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34760257</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <label>17.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ouedraogo, D.S., Compaore, E.W.R., Ouedraogo, O. and Dicko, M.H. (2024) Associated Factors of Dietary Diversity among Schoolchildren in Plateau Central Region of Burkina Faso: A Cross-Sectional Study. <italic>BMC</italic><italic>Nutrition</italic>, 10, Article No. 91. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-024-00896-0 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40795-024-00896-0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38918872</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-024-00896-0">https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-024-00896-0</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ouedraogo, D.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Compaore, E.W.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ouedraogo, O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Dicko, M.H.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>Associated Factors of Dietary Diversity among Schoolchildren in Plateau Central Region of Burkina Faso: A Cross-Sectional Study</article-title>
            <source>BMC Nutrition</source>
            <volume>10</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40795-024-00896-0</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38918872</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <label>18.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="confproc">Sibhatu, K.T., Krishna, V.V. and Qaim, M. (2015) Production Diversity and Dietary Diversity in Smallholder Farm Households. <italic>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America</italic>, 112, 10657-10662. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510982112 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1510982112</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26261342</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510982112">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510982112</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="confproc">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Sibhatu, K.T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Krishna, V.V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Qaim, M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>Production Diversity and Dietary Diversity in Smallholder Farm Households</article-title>
            <source>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America</source>
            <volume>112</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1510982112</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26261342</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>