This is a cross-sectional descriptive quantitative study conducted from August 7 to November 22, 2023 among healthcare workers.

The study population consisted of all healthcare professionals working in the maternity wards of the university hospitals (Yalgado Ouédraogo, Bogodogo, and Tengandogo) in Ouagadougou. This included midwives, physicians, and nurses. The population size was estimated based on the hospitals’ action plans. Healthcare professionals meeting the inclusion criteria were selected for this study. Namely: agreeing to participate in the study, being present at the time of the study and having at least 3 years of seniority in the position for doctors in specialization and at least 1 year for doctor, midwives and registered nurses. Seniority at the position is an important factor to consider when understanding the institutional environment. Indeed, it allows respondents to provide relevant opinions on our research topic because they have a comprehensive view of the study framework, working methods, and difficulties encountered, enabling them to make suggestions.

The study covered the 3 university hospitals in the city of Ouagadougou, which are at the third level of the national health pyramid.

Indeed, Burkina Faso has a three-tiered pyramid-shaped health system in terms of healthcare provision.

The first level consists of two tiers. The first tier includes health and social promotion centers (CSPS) and medical centers (CM), the second tier of care is represented by the Medical Center with Surgical Unit (CMA) or district hospital (HD).

The second level comprises regional hospital centers (CHR). The third level comprises university hospital centers (CHU). It is the highest level of reference for specialized care [19]. Of the four university hospitals in the city of Ouagadougou, three (03) offering gynecology and obstetrics services were selected for the study. These were the university hospitals: Yalgado Ouédraogo, Bogodogo and Tengandogo.

The hospitals were selected by reasoned choice, taking into account the range of activities carried out and the administrative organization of these establishments.

The three (3) sites were selected based on their level within the healthcare system. These centers represent the third level of the national healthcare system and offer gynecological and obstetric services. Their structural and organizational environment, as well as their range of activities, provides a favorable framework for conducting this study.

For healthcare workers, exhaustive sampling and a consecutive recruitment method were used.

The total sample was estimated at 317 healthcare professionals at the time of the study. This estimate was made based on the 2022 statistical yearbook, action plans and additional information gathered from the coordinators of maternity care units within the study area (Table 1).

Table 1. Staff numbers retained by the university hospital for the study.

After applying the inclusion criteria, 169 out of 317 healthcare professionals participated in the study, representing a participation rate of 53.31%. The distribution of respondents by hospital and professional category is shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Distribution of staff surveyed by university hospital during the study.

Data collection was carried out using a questionnaire administered in French. A pre-test was conducted with 32 healthcare professionals, representing approximately 10% of the total sample.

Following this pre-test, training was carried out for three (3) investigators.

The questionnaire was structured around information relating to the availability, application and monitoring of the implementation of standards and procedures and care protocols.

Indeed, the availability of operational procedures is a prerequisite for their dissemination, adoption, and use by healthcare professionals. Furthermore, the application of operational procedures, standards, and protocols allows for their evaluation by healthcare professionals, their periodic review, and their continuous improvement.

Monitoring the implementation of standards, procedures, and protocols ensures their application. It serves as a control and evaluation mechanism. This monitoring encourages their application and facilitates the detection and correction of any shortcomings.

Theavailabilityandapplicationofstandards,proceduresandprotocolsconcerns: this is the existence and accessibility of normative documents on quality of care and patient safety in accordance with a list of normative documents disseminated by the Directorate of Quality of Care and Patient Safety, policies, standards and protocols of reproductive health care from the Directorate of Family Health, care protocols developed and validated by clinical services, the mechanism for developing and revising standards and protocols and procedures, compliance with standards, procedures and care protocols by caregivers, and the existence of operational procedures for the application of standards and protocols, the existence of protocols and procedures on clinical transmission.

Monitoringtheimplementationofstandards,procedures,andcareprotocolsconcerns: The existence of a formal mechanism for monitoring the implementation of care standards, procedures, and protocols, and the existence of a mechanism for training new staff and trainees in the application of standards and procedures. These variables were selected in accordance with the quality framework and standards. and charters for improving the quality of maternal and neonatal care in health facilities in Burkina Faso.

These variables are essential factors in the application of a standardized model of clinical transmission.

The data analysis was carried out as follows:

For dichotomous variables, proportions were calculated through the scores of “0” or “1” corresponding respectively to the “No” or “Yes” responses that were collected.

For the open-ended questions, to allow for the calculation of proportions, the responses were grouped by unit of significance.

The Epi info software version 7.1.6 allowed us to perform data analysis after cleaning the database.

The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee under number 2023-03-065. Authorization for the study was also submitted to the general management of the hospitals involved. Participation was voluntary, requiring the signing of an informed consent form. Anonymity was guaranteed, and availability constraints were taken into account to ensure continuity of services.

A total of 169 healthcare professionals from the three hospitals participated in the study. Midwives comprised 81.06% of the participants. The mean age (standard deviation) was 41.12 (6) years, with a range of 36 to 55 years. The mean length of service of the respondents was 15.14 (4.83) years, with a range of 8 to 26 years.

Table 3 presents details on socio-demographic characteristics.

Table 3.Distribution of healthcare workers surveyed in the university hospitals of Ouagadougou according to socio-demographic categories.

Regarding normative documents on quality of care and patient safety, according to all respondents, no guidelines or standards on quality of care were available in maternity wards. Furthermore, no respondent was aware of any such normative documents. Only standards and protocols for emergency obstetric and neonatal care, validated by department heads, were available and displayed, according to all respondents. However, according to 50.88% of surveys, the displayed standards and protocols were not always up-to-date with the latest recommendations in Burkina Faso. The system for developing care protocols and procedures was unknown to all respondents, and none had ever participated in the process. There is no protocol that guides handover during shift changes between care teams. Handover practices varied from one team to another, from one department to another, and from one hospital to another, according to all respondents.

No operational procedures are available to guide caregivers’ practices, according to all respondents. The reasons for variation in practices were workload, insufficient supervision and evaluation of care practices (48.52%), insufficient training (40.20%), motivation (36.68%), and neglect (35.50%). All respondents stated that no mechanism for reviewing existing care procedures was in place in their department.

There is no formal mechanism for monitoring the implementation of care standards and protocols, according to all respondents. Indeed, according to all providers across the three hospitals, no evaluation has been conducted. Professional and supervisory practices regarding the quality of care, taking into account written and oral communication, have not been implemented in the last three (3) years. Therefore, all respondents reported a deficiency in the application of care standards and protocols to ensure quality care for mothers and newborns.

According to all respondents, the training of new staff and trainees on the application of care standards and procedures remains informal. However, all respondents expressed their commitment to implementing a standardized clinical handover protocol. The lack of formalization and the absence of a protocol for clinical handover were identified by 93.49% and 98.22% of respondents, respectively, as obstacles to its effective implementation.

Care standards and protocols refer to the official documents that guide healthcare professionals’ practices. Indeed, every healthcare facility must have all the standardized procedures and protocols in place to ensure quality care and patient safety [12]. However, there is no communication procedure or protocol between healthcare professionals, nor any standardized document on quality of care and patient safety. Information sharing is informal and inconsistent. Similar findings have reported a lack of Specific written or form-based methods are used to facilitate verbal transmission, resulting in significant variability in the quality and content of transmissions. However, according to the same study, respondents were very supportive of implementing standardized protocols [20]. Also in India, insufficient protocols have been identified as an obstacle to the implementation of handover in hospitals, with practices varying from one professional category to another [21]. In Indonesia, the results of a comparative study in three hospitals revealed disparities in the availability of handover scan procedures. According to the study’s findings, only one of the three hospitals had implemented standard handover scan operating procedures as part of its accreditation process. However, these procedures were not always followed by healthcare professionals [22].

The importance of using standardized and formalized approaches that have yielded conclusive results has also been highlighted by studies [22]-[25]. Indeed, since 2007, the WHO has recommended the universal use of SBAR (Situation Background-Assessment-Recommendation) for all transmissions, not just medical ones [6].

The primary objective of standardization remains to structure communication interactions between partners. This improves mutual understanding and fosters a shared approach to care, which in turn guarantees continuity. Indeed, this continuity requires that the work performed by one or more caregivers be identified, understood, reviewed, and then enhanced and transformed, in a sense, by the work of other caregivers. This is achieved through the transfer of information and knowledge, always for the benefit of the patient [6]. Standardizing TC is a means that will allow its implementation and evaluation as a professional practice.

Monitoring the implementation and updating of care procedures is a requirement of the quality framework [14]. This monitoring and updating will ensure that healthcare services are provided in accordance with current standards. Several mechanisms can be implemented for this purpose. Evaluation of professional practices (EPP). It is an integral part of efforts to promote the quality, safety, effectiveness, and efficiency of care by empowering the various stakeholders. It encourages healthcare professionals to reflect on their practices, particularly by motivating them to engage in a continuous improvement process for the overall care of patients [26]. This approachis also a requirement in Burkina Faso [12]. The results of this study revealed insufficient monitoring and supervision of healthcare providers regarding compliance with operational care procedures. The same was true in Indonesia and The Gambia, where inadequate monitoring and supervision mechanisms and procedures were identified as an obstacle to the implementation of care procedures [20][23].