<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.4" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">jep</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Journal of Environmental Protection</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2152-2219</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2152-2197</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jep.2026.176021</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">jep-151837</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Earth</subject>
          <subject>Environmental Sciences</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Assessment of Trace Metal Contamination and Ecological Risks in the Sediments of Lake Kossou and White Bandama River, Angovia Mining Area (Central-West, Côte d’Ivoire)</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0009-0008-6346-583X</contrib-id>
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Achi</surname>
            <given-names>Akissi Marthe Diby</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Oga</surname>
            <given-names>Yéï Marie Solange</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Ahoussi</surname>
            <given-names>Kouassi Ernest</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Biemi</surname>
            <given-names>Jean</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label> Training and Research Unit for Earth Sciences and Mining Resources, Soil, Water and Geomaterials Laboratory, University of Félix Houphouët-Boigny, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="conflict" id="fn-conflict">
          <p>The authors declare no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>09</day>
        <month>06</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <month>06</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>17</volume>
      <issue>06</issue>
      <fpage>439</fpage>
      <lpage>458</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>24</day>
          <month>03</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>09</day>
          <month>06</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="published">
          <day>12</day>
          <month>06</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2026 by the authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p> This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link> ). </license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2026.176021">https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2026.176021</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p>Artisanal gold mining in Angovia (Côte d’Ivoire) exerts pressures on Lake Kossou and the White Bandama River. Six sediment samples (two riverine and four lacustrine) were analyzed for As, Cd, Cu, Zn, Cr, Ni, Hg, Pb, Fe, and Mn using ICP-AES (Hg by CV AAS). Ecological risks were assessed using geochemical indices (Igeo, DCm), the potential Ecological Risk Index (PERI), sediment quality guidelines (TEC/PEC), and Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Sediments show polymetallic (As, Cd, Cu, Cr, Ni, Hg, Fe, and Mn) enrichment relative to the Upper Continental Crust, while Zn, Pb, and Ni remain at background levels. Chromium is the most abundant metal (mean: 145 mg/kg; max: 284 mg/kg). Acidic pH (mean: 5.76) suggests the Acid Mine Drainage process (AMD). PCA confirms the geogenic component (As, Cu, Zn, Cr, Ni, Pb, Fe, Mn) and the anthropogenic component (Hg). Lead shows mixed sources. Geochemical indices indicate low pollution (L1, FL1) to moderate (L2, L3, L4, FL2). Mercury (Er = 107.14 at L3) has the highest individual toxicity, followed by Cd and As. All concentrations of Cd were below the LOQ (&lt;0.2 mg/kg). Using a conservative upper bound substitution (LOQ), Cd’s contribution to the PERI ranges from 14% to 40%, with an individual moderate risk Er = 59. Hence, even without precise quantification, Cd may contribute to the ecological risk. Although Cr dominates the sediment load, its low toxicity factor makes it a minor PERI contributor. However, Cr frequently exceeds the TEC/PEC thresholds and can pose a direct biological threat. The combined use of geochemical indices, the PERI, and SQGs is necessary for environmental management. Close attention should be paid to heavy metal pollution in Lake Kossou and the Bandama River to protect the aquatic ecosystem and the local population.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated" xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>Contamination</kwd>
        <kwd>TME</kwd>
        <kwd>Sediment</kwd>
        <kwd>Angovia Mining Zone</kwd>
        <kwd>Ecological Risk</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>Heavy metal pollution in aquatic environments, linked to rapid industrial and economic development, has become an important issue worldwide due to the high toxicity, abundance, and persistence of these elements in ecosystems. Heavy metal residues can accumulate in aquatic organisms, then enter the human food chain and cause health problems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]. </p>
      <p>In Côte d’Ivoire, the adoption of the 2014 mining code stimulated the extractive sector, but artisanal gold mining also expanded rapidly. Despite government efforts to control it, this activity continues illegally and causes significant damage to watercourses in many regions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>]. </p>
      <p>River sediments are important vectors and reservoirs for heavy metals released into aquatic environments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]. Under ecological disturbances such as a decrease in pH or the degradation of organic matter, sediment-bound metals can be remobilized into the water column, leading to secondary pollution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>]. Heavy metals in river sediments originate mainly from rock weathering, erosion, soil runoff, wastewater treatment, and atmospheric deposition. They are transferred and concentrated in sediments through adsorption into organic matter, Fe/Mn oxides, and sulfides, but they are not permanently fixed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>]. </p>
      <p>Several studies have shown the degradation of river sediments by heavy metals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]. These studies are important and complement each other. </p>
      <p>However, previous studies in the region did not consider the full range of metal contamination (As, Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb, Zn). They also did not assess ecological risk by combining concentration-based approaches (TEC/PEC guidelines) and the potential ecological risk index (PERI) based on intrinsic toxicity. In particular, the role of mechanical ore crushing as a pathway for chromium mobilisation is a potential indicator of mining intensity, which has never been explored. </p>
      <p>The present study focuses on Lake Kossou and the Bandama river, located downstream of the Angovia mining area, where artisanal gold mining is particularly active [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>]. The objectives were to assess sediment contamination by trace metal elements using geochemical indices (Igeo, DCm), the Potential Ecological Risk Index (PERI), sediment quality guidelines (TEC/PEC) for environmental risk, and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for potential sources and correlation analysis among heavy metals.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec2">
      <title>2. Materials and Methods</title>
      <sec id="sec2dot1">
        <title>2.1. Study Area</title>
        <p>The study area is located in the Centre-West of Côte d’Ivoire, in the Marahoué region, more specifically in the Sub-prefecture of Gbégbéssou in the department of Bouaflé. It is geographically situated between latitudes 6˚50' and 7˚15' North and longitudes 5˚45' and 6˚10' West. The hydrological regime of this region is of the attenuated transitional equatorial type. It is subject to a Baoulean-type climate characterized by alternating two dry seasons and two rainy seasons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>].</p>
        <fig id="fig1">
          <label>Figure 1</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/6705677-rId15.jpeg?20260612014541" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Plate 1</bold><bold>.</bold> (a) Industrial mining activities; (b) Artisanal gold mining along the Bandama River [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>]; (c)-(e) Artisanal activities in the Angovia mining zone (photos DIBY).</p>
        <p>This area has a geological framework composed of Birimian and Archaean greenstone belts rich in gold mineralisation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>]. According to the work of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>], these volcano-sedimentary assemblages, separated by older migmatite and granite massifs, form the basement of the region. The presence of numerous porphyry veins associated with this intrusion confirms the importance of hydrothermal processes in the geological structuring of the area. These magmatic features have facilitated the concentration and deposition of gold within Birimian greenstone belt shear structures and zones of high structural permeability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>]. This tectonic setting is characterized by typical magmatic mineralization associated with quartz veins and altered zones rich in sulfides (pyrite, arsenopyrite, sometimes galena and chalcopyrite). It is, therefore, likely to release toxic elements such as Cd, As, Pb, Cr, Zn, Fe, Mn, Co, and Ni [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]. This configuration explains both the existence of the industrial mine located at Angovia and the pervasiveness of artisanal gold mining activities in the area (<bold>Plate 1</bold>). </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot2">
        <title>2.2. Sampling Methodology</title>
        <p>The sampling campaign took place in July 2025 during the rainy season. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows the six (6) sediment sampling stations covering the main aquatic environments subject to artisanal gold mining pressure. These include the following stations: each station represents a single grab sample: </p>
        <p>Lake sites (L1 to L4) are distributed from upstream to downstream in an area of the lake heavily exploited by gold panners. River stations (FL1 and FL2) are located on the adjacent Bandama River, with FL1 upstream and FL2 immediately downstream of the ore-washing areas. </p>
        <fig id="fig2">
          <label>Figure 2</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/6705677-rId16.jpeg?20260612014541" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 1</bold><bold>.</bold> Location of sampling sites in lake kossou and the bandama blanc river.</p>
        <p>Surface sediments were collected from the top five (05) centimeters using a Van Veen grab, in accordance with the reference methods of the Ivorian Anti-Pollution Centre (CIAPOL) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>] applied in the context of marine pollution studies. The samples were packed in hermetically sealed polyethylene bags and stored in a cool box at a temperature of approximately 4˚C during transport to the laboratory.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot3">
        <title>2.3. Laboratory Analyses</title>
        <p>Laboratory analyses were conducted according to procedures defined by CIAPOL.</p>
        <p>Mineralization and metal quantification </p>
        <p>Sediment samples were processed according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>]. They were dried at 105˚C, ground in an agate mortar to avoid metallic contamination, and sieved to 63 µm to obtain a homogeneous fine fraction. Mineralization was carried out by wet digestion in an open system using aqua regia: three parts hydrochloric acid (3:1, HCl, 37%: HNO<sub>3</sub>, 65%) following [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>] and heated until complete dissolution of the target elements. The mixture was heated until complete dissolution of the target element. Finally, the pH of the sediments was measured in a demineralized water/sediment suspension (ratio 1:2.5) using a pH meter.</p>
        <p>The concentrations of metallic elements in the digest were determined by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) using argon as the carrier gas. Iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), arsenic (As), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), chromium (Cr), and lead (Pb) were quantified according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>]. Mercury was determined separately by the cold vapor method (CV-AAS).</p>
        <p>Quality assurance (QA) and quality control </p>
        <p>Laboratory analyses were carried out according to procedures defined by the Ivorian Anti-Pollution Center (CIAPOL) following [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>] requirements for ICP-AES. Precision, assessed as relative standard deviation (RSD), was below 5% for all trace metals (n = 6 per batch). Recovery rates ranged from 94% to 105%. Procedure blanks showed no detectable contamination. Duplicate analyses (n = 6; 100% of samples) confirmed reproducibility. Method detection limits ranged from 0.003 mg/kg (Hg) to 2 mg/kg (Fe). All concentrations are expressed in mg/kg dry weight, with a quantification threshold established at 3 × MDL. </p>
        <p>Substitute method of cadmium </p>
        <p>For cadmium, LOD = 0.05 mg/kg, LOQ = 0.2 mg/kg, all measured concentrations were below the limit of quantification (LOQ = 0.2 mg/kg). However, we are also sure that cadmium is present in the samples. In accordance with [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>] recommendations for ecotoxicological risk assessment and considering the high toxic response factor of Cd (Tr = 30) in the Hakanson ecological risk index, a conservative upper-bound approach was applied using LOQ = 0.2 mg/kg for all samples. The lower bound (LOD = 0.05 mg/kg) would potentially underestimate the actual risk if true concentrations were close to 0.2 mg/kg. This constant value does not reflect a true measurement, but a substitution based on the LOQ. The actual Cd concentrations lie somewhere between 0.05 and 0.2 mg/kg. Because this value is constant across all stations, it was excluded from the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) as it brings no variance. </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot4">
        <title>2.4. Pollution Assessment Method</title>
        <p>To assess sediment contamination and associated ecological risk, the following geochemical indices were used: contamination factor (CF), geoaccumulation index (GeoI), modified contamination degree (DCm) for the pollution level; potential ecological risk index (PERI, Er) and sediment quality thresholds (TEC/PEC) for ecological risk.</p>
        <p>These indices covered seven heavy metals (As, Cr, Cd, Cu, Hg, Pb, Ni, Zn), excluding Fe/Mn, which are major natural components of the terrestrial matrix. This approach, as explained in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>], avoids masking variations in heavy metals that are indicators of mining activities and pose a real risk to aquatic ecosystems. Concentrations of the sediments obtained were compared with those in unpolluted sediments reported in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>] and background reference values (UCC) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>] according to <bold>Table 1</bold>. </p>
        <p><bold>Table 1</bold><bold>.</bold>Concentration of ETMs in uncontaminated sediments.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl1">
          <label>Table 1</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>As</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Cd</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Cr</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Fe</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Mn</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Ni</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Pb</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Zn</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Cu</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Hg</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  Persaud
                  <italic>et al.</italic>
                  (1993)
                </td>
                <td>4.2</td>
                <td>1.1</td>
                <td>31</td>
                <td>31200</td>
                <td>400</td>
                <td>31</td>
                <td>23</td>
                <td>65</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Wedepohl, K. H. (1995)</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>0.102</td>
                <td>35</td>
                <td>30890</td>
                <td>527</td>
                <td>18.7</td>
                <td>17</td>
                <td>52</td>
                <td>14.3</td>
                <td>0.056</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>2.4.1. Müller Geochemical Index (Igeo)</p>
        <p>The geo-accumulation index (Igeo) proposed by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>] was used to assess the level of pollution. It establishes a relationship between the measured concentration of an ETM in the fine fraction of sediments and the concentration at a geochemical background reference value, often derived from the Earth’s crust [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>], by including a factor to correct for lithological variations in metallic elements. It is calculated using the following formula: </p>
        <disp-formula id="FD1">
          <label>(1)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:msub>
                <mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:msub>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:msub>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>log</mml:mi>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
              </mml:msub>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>[</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mfrac>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:msub>
                        <mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mrow>
                          <mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
                          <mml:mo>
                          </mml:mo>
                        </mml:mrow>
                      </mml:msub>
                      <mml:mtext>echantillon</mml:mtext>
                    </mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mrow>
                        <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                        <mml:mrow>
                          <mml:mn>1.5</mml:mn>
                          <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
                          <mml:msub>
                            <mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
                            <mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
                          </mml:msub>
                          <mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
                          <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                          <mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
                        </mml:mrow>
                        <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
                      </mml:mrow>
                    </mml:mrow>
                  </mml:mfrac>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>]</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>where <italic>c</italic><italic><sub>m</sub></italic> (ref) is the geochemical background concentration of element “m”; 1.5 is the correction factor (variable natural concentration). </p>
        <p><italic>c</italic><italic><sub>m</sub></italic>: Measured concentration of element “m” in the sediment sample.<italic>c</italic><italic><sub>m</sub></italic> (ref): Geochemical background concentration of element “m”.1.5: A correction factor used to reduce the impact of natural variability.</p>
        <p>2.4.2. The Contamination Factor (CF) and the Modified Degree of Contamination (DCm)</p>
        <p>The contamination factor (CF) makes it possible to determine whether sediments are contaminated or uncontaminated by heavy metals and indicates the extent of such contamination [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>]. The degree of contamination (DC) refers to the sum of the calculated CFs. The use of this formula is contingent upon considering both metallic and organic pollutants. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>] modified this formula to generalize it and adapt it to the number of pollutants analyzed. The modified contamination level (DCm) is therefore determined at each site by the sum of the contamination factors divided by the number of pollutants analyzed. The values range from one (zero to very low contamination level) to seven (ultra-high contamination level). The formulas are as follows:</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD2">
          <label>(2)</label>
          <mml:math>
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
              <mml:msub>
                <mml:mi>F</mml:mi>
                <mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
              </mml:msub>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mfrac>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mrow>
                        <mml:mo>[</mml:mo>
                        <mml:mrow>
                          <mml:msub>
                            <mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
                            <mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
                          </mml:msub>
                        </mml:mrow>
                        <mml:mo>]</mml:mo>
                      </mml:mrow>
                    </mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
                    </mml:mrow>
                  </mml:msub>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mrow>
                        <mml:mo>[</mml:mo>
                        <mml:mrow>
                          <mml:msub>
                            <mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
                            <mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
                          </mml:msub>
                        </mml:mrow>
                        <mml:mo>]</mml:mo>
                      </mml:mrow>
                    </mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
                    </mml:mrow>
                  </mml:msub>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mfrac>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <disp-formula id="FD3">
          <label>(3)</label>
          <mml:math>
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
                <mml:mo>∑</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>F</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
                  </mml:msub>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mstyle>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <disp-formula id="FD4">
          <label>(4)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
              <mml:msub>
                <mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
                <mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
              </mml:msub>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
                    <mml:mo>∑</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
                      <mml:msub>
                        <mml:mi>F</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
                      </mml:msub>
                    </mml:mrow>
                  </mml:mstyle>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
                  </mml:msub>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mrow>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>where <italic>C</italic><italic>F</italic><italic><sub>x</sub></italic> is the contamination factor for metal <italic>x</italic>; [<italic>M</italic><italic><sub>x</sub></italic>]<sub>(</sub><italic><sub>mes</sub></italic><sub>)</sub> is the measured concentration of element <italic>x</italic>, [<italic>M</italic><italic><sub>x</sub></italic>]<sub>(</sub><italic><sub>ref</sub></italic><sub>):</sub> is the reference concentration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>], <italic>N</italic><italic><sub>x</sub></italic>: the number of pollutants analysed.</p>
        <p>2.4.3. Potential Ecological Risk Index (RI) and Potential Risk for Each Metal Er (Håkanson)</p>
        <p>The Potential Ecological Risk Index (RI or PERI) measures the integrated potential risk by considering its concentration and toxicity response. It is determined by the linear sum of all individual ecological risks (Er). Er allows the ecological risk posed by a contaminant in each sample to be expressed quantitatively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>]; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>] by counting the contamination factor and the toxicity response of the metallic element. These are represented by the following formulas: </p>
        <disp-formula id="FD5">
          <label>(5)</label>
          <mml:math>
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
                <mml:mo>∑</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
                  </mml:msub>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mstyle>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <disp-formula id="FD6">
          <label>(6)</label>
          <mml:math>
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:msub>
                <mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
                <mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
              </mml:msub>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
              <mml:msub>
                <mml:mi>F</mml:mi>
                <mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
              </mml:msub>
              <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
              <mml:msub>
                <mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
                <mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
              </mml:msub>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <disp-formula id="FD7">
          <label>(7)</label>
          <mml:math>
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
              <mml:msub>
                <mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
                <mml:mo>
                </mml:mo>
              </mml:msub>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
                <mml:mo>∑</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
                      <mml:msub>
                        <mml:mi>F</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
                      </mml:msub>
                      <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
                      <mml:msub>
                        <mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
                      </mml:msub>
                    </mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
                  </mml:mrow>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mstyle>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>where <italic>W</italic><italic><sub>x</sub></italic> is the toxicity response coefficient for the heavy metal, as proposed by Håkanson, and <italic>CF</italic> is the contamination factor. Equation (6) reveals the hazards of heavy metals to both human and aquatic ecosystems. The Håkanson toxicity coefficients (Hg = 40; Cd = 30; As = 10; Pb = 5; Cu = 5; Ni = 2; Cr = 2; Zn = 1) were adopted as the evaluation criteria. Risk values range according to <bold>Table 2</bold>.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 2</bold><bold>.</bold> Risk level for potential ecological risks.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl2">
          <label>Table 2</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Risk level</bold>
                </td>
                <td>Low</td>
                <td>Moderate</td>
                <td>High</td>
                <td>Very high</td>
                <td>Disastrous</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>E</bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sub>r</sub>
                  </bold>
                </td>
                <td>40</td>
                <td>40 - 80</td>
                <td>80 - 160</td>
                <td>160 - 320</td>
                <td>&gt;320</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>RI</bold>
                </td>
                <td>&lt;150</td>
                <td>150 - 300</td>
                <td>300 - 600</td>
                <td>&gt;600</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>In this study, the percentage contribution (%) of each metal to the overall risk (PERI) at each monitoring station and across the study area was determined. This enables the risk to be refined and the impact of pollutants to be prioritized, thereby facilitating better environmental management.</p>
        <p>2.4.4. Toxicity Assessment of HEAVY Metals in Sediments Based on the SQGs</p>
        <p>SQGs (Sediment Quality Guidelines) established by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>], developed for freshwater ecosystems, were applied to evaluate sediment quality and the ecotoxicological risks caused by heavy metals in sediment. TEC (Threshold Effect Concentration), a low range value, is the concentration below which adverse effects are not expected to occur. However, PEC (Probable Effect Concentration) is the concentration above which adverse effects are expected to occur more often than not (<bold>Table 3</bold>). </p>
        <p><bold>Table</bold><bold>3.</bold> US Sediment Quality Guidelines (SQGs) for TEC and PEC from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>].</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl3">
          <label>Table 3</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>ETM</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>As</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Cd</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Cr</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Cu</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Pb</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Ni</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Zn</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Hg</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>TEC (mg/kg)</td>
                <td>9.79</td>
                <td>0.99</td>
                <td>43.4</td>
                <td>31.6</td>
                <td>35.8</td>
                <td>22.7</td>
                <td>121</td>
                <td>0.18</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>PEC (mg/kg)</td>
                <td>33</td>
                <td>4.98</td>
                <td>111</td>
                <td>149</td>
                <td>128</td>
                <td>48.6</td>
                <td>459</td>
                <td>1.06</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>2.4.5. Determination of Sources of Heavy Metals</p>
        <p>To identify the common pollution sources, a factor analysis was performed by PCA (Principal Component Analysis), including eigenvector analysis and a correlation matrix. Due to its natural abundance in the country’s soils, particularly in the study area [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>], iron was used as a reference relative to the other heavy metals for determining pollution sources. All statistical analyses were performed using Statistica 7.1.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec3">
      <title>3. Results</title>
      <sec id="sec3dot1">
        <title>3.1. Concentrations of Heavy Metals in Sediments from Lake Kossou and the Bandama River</title>
        <p>The results of the physicochemical analyses of sediments from Lake Kossou and the Bandama River are presented in <bold>Table 4</bold>. They reveal the presence of heavy metals (Cd, Cr, As, Cu, Pb, Ni, Zn, Hg, Fe, and Mn) in all samples, which are generally characterised by significant spatial variability in concentrations. The sediments in the study area occur in a slightly acidic environment with a pH ranging from 5.33 (L4) to 6.14 (L1) and an average of 5.76. </p>
        <p>When compared with the values for the upper continental crust (UCC), the heavy metals (HM) Fe, Mn, As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, and Hg exceed at least one sampling point. Conversely, across all the sediments analysed, lead (Pb) and zinc (Zn) show no such exceedance. The order of abundance of the average raw concentrations (mg/kg) of ETMs in the sediments is as follows: Fe &gt; Mn &gt; Cr &gt; Cu &gt; Zn &gt; Ni &gt; As &gt; Pb &gt; Cd &gt; Hg.</p>
        <p>Arsenic concentrations range from 2 mg/kg (L1, FL1) to 10.8 mg/kg (FL2). L3 and L4 stations also show high levels. Although mercury is present at low levels (0.008 to 0.15 mg/kg), it is characterized by higher values at the lake stations L2 (0.10 mg/kg) and L3 (0.15 mg/kg). Cadmium levels are consistent across the entire sample set. Copper and zinc show a similar trend, with maximum levels at L3 (51.84 mg/kg for copper and 35.65 mg/kg for zinc). Their lowest values are observed at stations L1 and FL1. </p>
        <p><bold>Table 4.</bold> Statistics on the physicochemical parameters of sediments from Lake Kossou and the Bandama River (concentration in mg/kg). </p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl4">
          <label>Table 4</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Station</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>L1</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>L2</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>L3</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>L4</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>FL1</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>FL2</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Min</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Max</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Mean</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Std Dev</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>As</bold>
                </td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>3.86</td>
                <td>7.95</td>
                <td>7.31</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>10.08</td>
                <td>2.00</td>
                <td>10.08</td>
                <td>5.53</td>
                <td>2.91</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Cd</bold>
                </td>
                <td>&lt;0.20</td>
                <td>&lt;0.20</td>
                <td>&lt;0.20</td>
                <td>&lt;0.20</td>
                <td>&lt;0.20</td>
                <td>&lt;0.20</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Cr</bold>
                </td>
                <td>26.99</td>
                <td>64.01</td>
                <td>184.25</td>
                <td>272.17</td>
                <td>40.32</td>
                <td>283.92</td>
                <td>26.99</td>
                <td>283.92</td>
                <td>145.28</td>
                <td>101.50</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Cu</bold>
                </td>
                <td>12.43</td>
                <td>28.13</td>
                <td>51.84</td>
                <td>32.43</td>
                <td>7.44</td>
                <td>39.82</td>
                <td>7.44</td>
                <td>51.84</td>
                <td>28.68</td>
                <td>12.68</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Mn</bold>
                </td>
                <td>283.70</td>
                <td>343.80</td>
                <td>535.90</td>
                <td>502.00</td>
                <td>171.80</td>
                <td>639.90</td>
                <td>171.80</td>
                <td>639.90</td>
                <td>412.85</td>
                <td>146.42</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Ni</bold>
                </td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>11.51</td>
                <td>29.62</td>
                <td>13.28</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>16.40</td>
                <td>2.00</td>
                <td>29.62</td>
                <td>12.47</td>
                <td>7.30</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Pb</bold>
                </td>
                <td>2.00</td>
                <td>2.00</td>
                <td>3.04</td>
                <td>6.93</td>
                <td>3.20</td>
                <td>9.49</td>
                <td>2.00</td>
                <td>9.49</td>
                <td>4.44</td>
                <td>2.51</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Zn</bold>
                </td>
                <td>6.22</td>
                <td>16.02</td>
                <td>35.65</td>
                <td>30.40</td>
                <td>7.82</td>
                <td>25.89</td>
                <td>6.22</td>
                <td>35.65</td>
                <td>20.33</td>
                <td>10.31</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Hg</bold>
                </td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>0.1</td>
                <td>0.15</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>0.01</td>
                <td>0.008</td>
                <td>0.01</td>
                <td>0.15</td>
                <td>0.05</td>
                <td>0.05</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Fe</bold>
                </td>
                <td>5525.20</td>
                <td>18110.24</td>
                <td>50393.70</td>
                <td>70078.74</td>
                <td>9448.82</td>
                <td>66141.73</td>
                <td>5525.20</td>
                <td>70078.74</td>
                <td>36616.40</td>
                <td>25588.32</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>pH</bold>
                </td>
                <td>6.14</td>
                <td>5.6</td>
                <td>5.6</td>
                <td>5.33</td>
                <td>5.96</td>
                <td>5.93</td>
                <td>5.33</td>
                <td>6.14</td>
                <td>5.76</td>
                <td>0.25</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Chromium stands out as the most abundant element. The highest values are observed at stations FL2 (283.92 mg/kg), L4 (272.17 mg/kg), and L3 (184.25 mg/kg), representing concentrations 7 to 10 times higher than those measured upstream (L1, FL1). Its average value (145 mg/kg) is significantly higher than those determined in certain mining areas of the country. However, in <bold>Table 5</bold>, the concentration range is well below that obtained in China and relatively comparable to that of Ghana.</p>
        <p><bold>Table</bold><bold>5.</bold> Comparison of chromium contamination with that in other regions.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl5">
          <label>Table 5</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Locality</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Concentration (Min-Max) in mg/Kg</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Mean</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Reference</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Angovia</bold>
                </td>
                <td>26.99 - 283.92</td>
                <td>145.25</td>
                <td>This study</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Kokumbo</bold>
                </td>
                <td>1.08 - 20.76</td>
                <td>6.35</td>
                <td>
                  [
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>
                  ]
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Bocanda</bold>
                </td>
                <td>12.40 - 48.10</td>
                <td>30.25</td>
                <td>
                  [
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>
                  ]
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Korhogo</bold>
                </td>
                <td>43.24 - 174.98</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="2">
                  [
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>
                  ]
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Tengrela</bold>
                </td>
                <td>59.42 - 60.58</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Bouaflé</bold>
                </td>
                <td>68.31 - 117.52</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                  [
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>
                  ]
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Ghana</bold>
                </td>
                <td>9.84 - 281</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                  [
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>
                  ]
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Chine</bold>
                </td>
                <td>24.1 - 726</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                  [
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>
                  ]
                </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot2">
        <title>3.2. Contamination Factor (CF)</title>
        <p>The average contamination factor values (<bold>Table 6</bold>) obtained from the sediments of the two waterways (Lake Kossou and the Bandama) are in the following order: Cr &gt; As &gt; Cu &gt; Cd &gt; Hg &gt; Ni &gt; Zn &gt; Pb. At the sampling level, Cr shows a considerable level of contamination (FC &gt; 3), while As, Cd, and Cu show moderate contamination (1 &lt; FC &lt; 3), whereas Ni, Pb, Zn, and Hg show low contamination (FC &lt; 1).</p>
        <p>On the river, the average FC values for the eight ETMs that correspond to the modified contamination degree (DCm) range from very low (FL1: 0.66) to moderate (FL2: 2.5). On Lake Kossou, the DCm is very low at station L1 (0.66), low at L2 (1.31), and moderate at L3 and L4 (2.21 - 2.49). </p>
        <p><bold>Table</bold><bold>6.</bold> Contamination factor values for sediments in lake kossou and the white bandama river.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl6">
          <label>Table 6</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>As</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Cd</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Cr</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Cu</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Ni</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Pb</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Zn</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Hg</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>DC</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>D</bold>
                  <bold>C</bold>
                  <bold>m</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>FL1</bold>
                </td>
                <td>1.00</td>
                <td>1.96</td>
                <td>1.15</td>
                <td>0.52</td>
                <td>0.11</td>
                <td>0.19</td>
                <td>0.15</td>
                <td>0.18</td>
                <td>5.26</td>
                <td>0.66</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>FL2</bold>
                </td>
                <td>5.04</td>
                <td>1.96</td>
                <td>8.11</td>
                <td>2.78</td>
                <td>0.88</td>
                <td>0.56</td>
                <td>0.50</td>
                <td>0.14</td>
                <td>19.97</td>
                <td>2.50</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>L1</bold>
                </td>
                <td>1.00</td>
                <td>1.96</td>
                <td>0.77</td>
                <td>0.87</td>
                <td>0.11</td>
                <td>0.12</td>
                <td>0.12</td>
                <td>0.36</td>
                <td>5.30</td>
                <td>0.66</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>L2</bold>
                </td>
                <td>1.93</td>
                <td>1.96</td>
                <td>1.83</td>
                <td>1.97</td>
                <td>0.62</td>
                <td>0.12</td>
                <td>0.31</td>
                <td>1.79</td>
                <td>10.51</td>
                <td>1.31</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>L3</bold>
                </td>
                <td>3.98</td>
                <td>1.96</td>
                <td>5.26</td>
                <td>3.63</td>
                <td>1.58</td>
                <td>0.18</td>
                <td>0.69</td>
                <td>2.68</td>
                <td>19.95</td>
                <td>2.49</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>L4</bold>
                </td>
                <td>3.66</td>
                <td>1.96</td>
                <td>7.78</td>
                <td>2.27</td>
                <td>0.71</td>
                <td>0.41</td>
                <td>0.58</td>
                <td>0.36</td>
                <td>17.72</td>
                <td>2.21</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>FC (Mean)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>2.77</td>
                <td>1.96</td>
                <td>4.15</td>
                <td>2.01</td>
                <td>0.67</td>
                <td>0.26</td>
                <td>0.39</td>
                <td>0.92</td>
                <td>13.12</td>
                <td>1.64</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>At the station level, the highest contamination factors (CF) are observed for chromium at FL2 (8.11), L4 (7.78), and L3 (5.26), confirming its significant contribution to contamination. Arsenic also reaches significant values at FL2 (5.04) and L3 (3.98). Although the average contamination factor (CF) for mercury is below 1, values exceeding this threshold are observed at stations L2 (CF: 1.72) and L3 (CF: 2.63), indicating moderate contamination at these points. Analysis of the CF results indicates polymetallic contamination (Cr, As, Cu, Cd, Hg) of the sediments in Lake Kossou and the Bandama River. Arsenic and chromium stand out due to their high factors. The river station FL2 and the lake stations L2, L3, and L4 are the most affected by this contamination.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot3">
        <title>3.3. Muller’s Geoaccumulation Index (1969)</title>
        <p>The results of this index confirm the trends observed with the sediment contamination factor for Lake Kossou and the White Bandama River. The Igeo values for Ni, Pb, and Zn are below zero at all stations. These values indicate that the sediments are not contaminated by these elements and demonstrate their crustal origin. However, the results reveal slight pollution (0 &lt; Igeo &lt; 1) of cadmium at all stations and of mercury in the sediments at stations L2 and L3. They also show slight (Igeo &gt; 1) to moderate (Igeo &gt; 2) contamination of the sediments by As, Cr, and Cu at stations FL2, L2, L3, and L4. Chromium (Cr) remains the predominant pollutant, reaching the highest pollution level (moderately polluted) at stations FL2 (2.44) and L4 (2.37). These results indicate a significant anthropogenic input of Cr and a moderate input of Cd, Hg, As, and Cu in both waterways. No station recorded contamination classified as heavily polluted (Igeo &gt; 3), which places the overall pollution within a moderate range. </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot4">
        <title>3.4. Individual Ecological Risk Index (Er) and Potential Ecological Risk Index (PERI)</title>
        <p>The results (<bold>Table 7</bold>) for the individual ecological risk factor (Er), which considers the toxicity factor (Tr) of each metal, reveal a different hierarchy from that determined by the geochemical indices (FC and Igeo): an ecological risk dominated by Hg, Cd, and As. Despite its low concentration, mercury has the highest Er values. Its risk is moderate (40 &lt; Er &lt; 80) at L2 (71.43) and considerable (80 &lt; Er &lt; 160) at station L3 (107.14). As presents a moderate risk only at station FL2. Cadmium with its unique value, presents a moderate risk. Its high toxicity factor (Tr: 30) makes it a significant contributor to the PERI.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 7.</bold>Individual ecological risk factor (Er) and potential ecological risk index (PERI).</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl7">
          <label>Table 7</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Stations</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>As</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Cd</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Cr</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Cu</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Ni</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Pb</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Zn</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Hg</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>RI</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>FL1</td>
                <td>10</td>
                <td>58.82</td>
                <td>2.30</td>
                <td>2.60</td>
                <td>0.53</td>
                <td>0.94</td>
                <td>0.15</td>
                <td>7.14</td>
                <td>82.50</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>FL2</td>
                <td>50.4</td>
                <td>58.82</td>
                <td>16.22</td>
                <td>13.92</td>
                <td>4.39</td>
                <td>2.79</td>
                <td>0.50</td>
                <td>5.71</td>
                <td>152.76</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>L1</td>
                <td>10</td>
                <td>58.82</td>
                <td>1.54</td>
                <td>4.35</td>
                <td>0.53</td>
                <td>0.59</td>
                <td>0.12</td>
                <td>14.29</td>
                <td>90.24</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>L2</td>
                <td>19.3</td>
                <td>58.82</td>
                <td>3.66</td>
                <td>9.84</td>
                <td>3.08</td>
                <td>0.59</td>
                <td>0.31</td>
                <td>71.43</td>
                <td>167.02</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>L3</td>
                <td>39.75</td>
                <td>58.82</td>
                <td>10.53</td>
                <td>18.13</td>
                <td>7.92</td>
                <td>0.89</td>
                <td>0.69</td>
                <td>107.14</td>
                <td>243.87</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>L4</td>
                <td>36.55</td>
                <td>58.82</td>
                <td>15.55</td>
                <td>11.34</td>
                <td>3.55</td>
                <td>2.04</td>
                <td>0.58</td>
                <td>14.29</td>
                <td>142.72</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>RI (%) UB</bold>
                </td>
                <td>19</td>
                <td>40</td>
                <td>6</td>
                <td>7</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>25</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>RI (%) LB</bold>
                </td>
                <td>17</td>
                <td>14</td>
                <td>8</td>
                <td>10</td>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>36</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>All other trace metals (Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn) present a low risk (&lt;40) at all monitoring stations. This analysis reveals that Cr is no longer the priority element despite its raw concentration, high “Igeo” and “FC” values. Mercury, cadmium, and arsenic are becoming major pollutants in terms of risk despite their low concentrations. The (PERI), calculated as the sum of the value of Er for each monitoring site, ranges from 82.50 to 243.87. Stations FL1 (82.5) and L1 (90.2) present a low risk (RI &lt; 150), whereas FL2 (152.8), L4 (142.7), L2 (167) and L3 (243.9) demonstrate a moderate risk (150 &lt; RI &lt; 300). The results show a very low PERI upstream (L1, FL1) of the watercourses, contrasting with a high PERI observed downstream (L4, FL2). In the lake area, the highest PERI values directly coincide with the highest mercury levels at L2 and L3. </p>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> presents the relative contribution (%) of each trace metal to the PERI at the scale of the entire study area, calculated with the upper bound (LOQ = 0.2 mg/kg). Cadmium’s contribution rises to 40%, becoming the dominant element, while Hg (25%) and As (19%) remain significant. Other metals (Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn) contribute less than 10% each, with Cr around 6%. This ranking highlights that Cd, Hg, and As, despite their low absolute concentrations, are the major contributors to the overall ecological risk due to their elevated toxic response factors. Conversely, Cr (6%), although present at much higher bulk concentrations, contributes minimally to the total PERI because of its low toxic factor. </p>
        <p>The uncertainty in Cd concentration (0.05 - 0.20 mg/kg) leads to a large variation in its contribution (14% - 40%). In the conservative upper-bound scenario, Er (Cd) = 59 is a moderate risk (40 - 80) for every station. This shows that even without precise quantification, Cd could actively contribute to the overall ecological risk. </p>
        <fig id="fig3">
          <label>Figure 3</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/6705677-rId31.jpeg?20260612014545" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure</bold><bold>2.</bold> Risk contribution (%) according to the upper bound of cadmium.</p>
        <p>These results also show a lack of direct correlation between elemental concentrations and the ecological risk (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). A high concentration does not systematically entail a high risk, and conversely, a low concentration does not preclude a low risk. Mercury, even at trace levels, poses a substantial threat due to its high intrinsic toxicity. </p>
        <fig id="fig4">
          <label>Figure 4</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/6705677-rId32.jpeg?20260612014545" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure</bold><bold>3.</bold>Relationship between the concentration and toxicity of chromium and mercury.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot5">
        <title>3.5. Ecotoxicological Risk Assessment Based on Sediment Quality Guidelines (SQG: TEC/PEC)</title>
        <p>Compared with TEC and PEC according to <bold>Table 8</bold>, the concentrations of Pb, Zn, Ni, and Hg are below the TEC threshold in all samples. These sites might cause toxicity infrequently. For Cu, 50% of the stations have concentrations below the TEC, while 50% are between the TEC and the PEC. It might cause adverse effects occasionally. Arsenic shows a similar profile: 83.33% of stations are below TEC and 16.7% are between TEC and PEC with an occasional adverse effect probability. </p>
        <p><bold>Table</bold><bold>8.</bold> Proportion (%) of ETMs in sediments relative to the TEC and PEC thresholds.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl8">
          <label>Table 8</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>As</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Cd</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Cr</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Cu</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Ni</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Pb</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Zn</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Hg</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>TEC</bold>
                </td>
                <td>9.79</td>
                <td>0.99</td>
                <td>43.4</td>
                <td>31.6</td>
                <td>22.7</td>
                <td>35.8</td>
                <td>121</td>
                <td>0.18</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>PEC</bold>
                </td>
                <td>33</td>
                <td>4.98</td>
                <td>111</td>
                <td>149</td>
                <td>48.6</td>
                <td>128</td>
                <td>459</td>
                <td>1.06</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>%</bold>
                  <bold>less than</bold>
                  <bold>T</bold>
                  <bold>EC</bold>
                </td>
                <td>83.3</td>
                <td>100</td>
                <td>33.3</td>
                <td>50</td>
                <td>100</td>
                <td>100</td>
                <td>100</td>
                <td>100</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>%</bold>
                  <bold>beetween TEC and PEC</bold>
                </td>
                <td>16.7</td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>16.7</td>
                <td>50</td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>%</bold>
                  <bold>Greater PEC</bold>
                </td>
                <td>0.0</td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>50.0</td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>&lt;</bold>
                  <bold>P</bold>
                  <bold>EC</bold>
                </td>
                <td>FL2</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>L2</td>
                <td>L3-L4-FL2</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>&gt;PEC</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>L3-L4-FL2</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>In contrast, chromium presents a much more concerning profile. Only 33.33% of stations have concentrations below TEC, and 16.7% fall between TEC and PEC. However, 50% of the sampled sites were greater than PEC value, indicating that sites could frequently cause adverse effects on organisms.</p>
        <p>Station FL2 (283.92 mg/kg) and L4 (272.17 mg/kg), located respectively at the downstream of the Bandama River and Lake Kossou, show severe contamination exceeding 2.5 times PEC (111 mg/kg). Chromium emerges as the element of greatest concern. Thus, although chromium contributes only marginally to PERI, it could pose a very high probability of frequent adverse effects to living organisms (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="fig5">
          <label>Figure 5</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/6705677-rId33.jpeg?20260612014546" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure</bold><bold>4.</bold> Toxicity level of the metal of greatest concern: chromium.</p>
        <p>Field observations show a strong spatial correlation between high chromium concentrations and the presence of crushers at the sampling sites (<bold>Plate 2</bold>). The appearance of the slurry flowing into the waterway also reflects the intensity of the mechanical crushing of the ore.</p>
        <fig id="fig6">
          <label>Figure 6</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/6705677-rId34.jpeg?20260612014546" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Plate 2.</bold> (a) Abandoned crusher on the banks of Lake Kossou; (b) Sludge discharged into the lake (photos: DIBY). </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot6">
        <title>3.6. Source of Heavy Metals in Lake Kossou and Bandama River</title>
        <p>Two main components with eigenvalues greater than one were determined, explaining 92.03% of the total variance, which is sufficient to account for almost the entire structure of the data (<bold>Table 9</bold>).</p>
        <p>The first component (PC1), with 70.73% of the total variance, has strong negative loadings on (As, Cr, Cu, Pb, Zn, Fe, Mn) and a strong positive loading on pH (<bold>Table 10</bold>). Since iron and manganese are of natural origin and abundant in the study area, their strong association with this metal assemblage indicates that these metals share the same origin. The negative correlation with pH suggests that more acidic conditions favor the mobilization and accumulation of this natural metal assemblage. This component was called the geogenic factor. </p>
        <p>The correlation matrix (<bold>Table 11</bold>) confirms very close links between Fe/Mn and the following elements: Cr (0.99/0.91); As (0.94/0.98); Zn (0.89/0.86); Pb (0.82/0.73); Cu (0.77/0.89); Ni (0.67/0.78).</p>
        <p><bold>Table</bold><bold>9.</bold> PCA eigenvalues and explained variance.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl9">
          <label>Table 9</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Components</td>
                <td>Eigenvalues</td>
                <td>% variance</td>
                <td>Cumulative variance %</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>F1</td>
                <td>7.07</td>
                <td>70.73</td>
                <td>70.73</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>F2</td>
                <td>2.13</td>
                <td>21.29</td>
                <td>92.03</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>The second component (PC2), with a variance of 21.29%, opposes Hg (+0.94) to Pb (−0.73). Hg, which does not follow iron (r = 0.026) and manganese (r = 0.2) indicates a different origin from the local geochemical background. This isolation suggests a point-source anthropogenic input. Although Pb is correlated with Fe-Mn (r = 0.82; r = 0.73) and is part of the natural group on PC1 (0.67), it distinguishes itself on PC2 (0.73), revealing a different input pathway. Thus, Pb has a dual origin: a natural part linked to Fe-Mn and an anthropogenic origin. This component was called the anthropogenic factor.</p>
        <p><bold>Table</bold><bold>10.</bold> Sample contributions (%) to components.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl10">
          <label>Table 10</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>PC1</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>PC2</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>As</td>
                <td>−0.97</td>
                <td>−0.18</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Cr</td>
                <td>−0.93</td>
                <td>−0.36</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Cu</td>
                <td>−0.93</td>
                <td>0.32</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Ni</td>
                <td>−0.86</td>
                <td>0.46</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Pb</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>−</bold>
                  <bold>0</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>67</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>−</bold>
                  <bold>0</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>73</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Zn</td>
                <td>−0.97</td>
                <td>0.20</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Hg</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>−</bold>
                  <bold>0</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>31</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>0</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>94</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Fe</td>
                <td>−0.95</td>
                <td>−0.27</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Mn</td>
                <td>−0.95</td>
                <td>−0.14</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>pH</td>
                <td>0.62</td>
                <td>−0.33</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p><bold>Table</bold><bold>11.</bold> Correlation matrix of heavy metals, Fe-Mn, and pH in sediments from lake kossou and the bandama river.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl11">
          <label>Table 11</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Variables</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>As</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Cr</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Cu</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Ni</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Pb</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Zn</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Hg</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Fe</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Mn</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>pH</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>As</td>
                <td>1.000</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Cr</td>
                <td>0.945</td>
                <td>1.000</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Cu</td>
                <td>0.873</td>
                <td>0.730</td>
                <td>1.000</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Ni</td>
                <td>0.781</td>
                <td>0.619</td>
                <td>0.975</td>
                <td>1.000</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Pb</td>
                <td>0.790</td>
                <td>0.879</td>
                <td>0.392</td>
                <td>0.245</td>
                <td>1.000</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Zn</td>
                <td>0.879</td>
                <td>0.839</td>
                <td>0.938</td>
                <td>0.918</td>
                <td>0.493</td>
                <td>1.000</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Hg</td>
                <td>0.160</td>
                <td>−0.059</td>
                <td>0.615</td>
                <td>0.722</td>
                <td>−0.467</td>
                <td>0.471</td>
                <td>1.000</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Fe</td>
                <td>0.941</td>
                <td>0.994</td>
                <td>0.770</td>
                <td>0.673</td>
                <td>0.824</td>
                <td>0.887</td>
                <td>0.026</td>
                <td>1.000</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Mn</td>
                <td>0.978</td>
                <td>0.913</td>
                <td>0.886</td>
                <td>0.776</td>
                <td>0.734</td>
                <td>0.859</td>
                <td>0.195</td>
                <td>0.910</td>
                <td>1.000</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>pH</td>
                <td>−0.425</td>
                <td>−0.514</td>
                <td>−0.551</td>
                <td>−0.540</td>
                <td>−0.167</td>
                <td>−0.713</td>
                <td>−0.423</td>
                <td>−0.593</td>
                <td>−0.401</td>
                <td>1.000</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <fig id="fig7">
          <label>Figure 7</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/6705677-rId35.jpeg?20260612014546" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 5.</bold> Loading plot of the first two components obtained.</p>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>shows the result of factor analysis for total heavy metals in sediments from Lake Kossou and Bandama River.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec4">
      <title>4. Discussion</title>
      <p>Sediment analysis from Lake Kossou and the Bandama River revealed polymetallic contamination (As, Cr, Cu, Cd, Hg, Fe, Mn), with average values exceeding the Upper Continental Crust (UCC) reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>] and unpolluted sediments from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>]. Lead (Pb), nickel (Ni), and zinc (Zn) do not exceed background levels [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>]. Chromium is the most abundant trace metal. Geochemical indices (CF, DCm, and Igeo) indicate moderate overall pollution with significant anthropogenic Cr input and moderate Hg, As, and Cu inputs. Station FL2 (river) and stations L2, L3, and L4 (lake) are the most affected. </p>
      <p>While Cd, Hg, and As dominate the PERI (84.18%) due to their high toxicity factors, the direct comparison with SQGs identifies Cr as the only element frequently exceeding effect thresholds, thus posing a potential biological threat. These results show a lack of direct correlation between elemental concentrations and the ecological risk: a high concentration (Cr) does not systematically imply a high risk, and a low concentration (Hg, Cd) does not preclude a high risk. </p>
      <p>In the conservative upperbound scenario, uncertainty in Cd concentration (0.05 - 0.2 mg/kg) leads to a large variation in its contribution (14% - 40%). This confirms that, even without precise quantification, Cd could actively contribute to the overall ecological risk. </p>
      <p>The first component (PC1) shows a strong association between (As, Cr, Cu, Pb, Zn) and Fe/Mn, which are naturally abundant in the study area, confirming their natural origin. Consequently, PC1 is interpreted as a geogenic factor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>]. The negative correlation between metals and pH (mean 5.76) suggests their solubilization and mobility under acidic conditions, characteristic of the Acid Mine Drainage process (AMD) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>]. The second component (PC2), dominated by Hg, is interpreted as an anthropogenic factor. </p>
      <p>The use of mercury for gold amalgamation in artisanal gold mining is a primary contributor to mercury contamination. The clear singularity of mercury observed on PC2 of the PCA confirms that its occurrence is not natural and it could be directly linked to gold mining effluent [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>]. Lead exhibits a partially natural background; it may also be enriched by other sources. </p>
      <p>Chromium levels in Angovia (mean: 145 mg/kg; max: 284 mg/kg) are among the highest recorded in Côte d’Ivoire, exceeding values (68.31 - 117.52 mg/kg) reported in Bouaflé [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>], Kokumbo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>] and Korhogo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>]. They are comparable to Ghanaian values (9.84 - 281 mg/kg) in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>] but significantly lower than the extreme levels (24.1 - 726 mg/kg) observed in China [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>]. It likely reflects different geological contexts and anthropogenic pressures. Mercury concentration (mean: 0.05 mg/kg) is higher than at Bocanda (0.001 mg/kg) in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>] but lower than at Ity (0.51 mg/kg at Yinhi and 0.33 mg/kg at Douhou) in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>]. These results suggest either less intensive use of mercury or dilution within the watercourses.</p>
      <p>Artisanal gold mining generates large volumes of waste (waste rock, tailings, and fine refinery residues) that mobilize metals through geochemical and mechanical pathways. Sulfide oxidation generates acidity, releasing trace elements such as As, Cr, Cu, Fe, and Mn. Excavation, crushing, and grinding produce fine particles bearing trace metal elements (ETMs) that are readily transported to watercourses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">38</xref>]. The strong spatial co-occurrence of crushers and high Cr levels indicates that crushing intensity is a key driver of sedimentary Cr enrichment. Moreover, exposed sulfide surfaces from crushing accelerate oxidation, and the acidic condition further enhances metal solubilization and transfer to the water column [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>]. Consequently, while the geochemical background explains the natural presence of metals, mechanical crushing could be one of the factors contributing to their abundance and mobility. </p>
      <p>With the exception of Cd (not quantified), polymetallic enrichment (As, Cr, Cu, Hg) occurs at stations L2 - L4, reflecting lacustrine accumulation. Station FL2 (river mouth) shows the highest Cr, As, and Pb, receiving runoff and leachates from artisanal gold mining [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>]. Iron and manganese are abundant at all stations, particularly in the downstream section of the watercourses. </p>
      <p>This study is based on a single sampling campaign conducted during the rainy season, which does not allow us to document seasonal variability. A conservative upper-bound approach was applied for cadmium due to analytical limitation (value &lt; LOQ). Nevertheless, the results reveal sediment degradation and ecological risks that could indirectly expose local populations. Multi-seasonal sampling, using ICP MS combined with an integrated approach (sediment-water-biota), is needed to refine the assessment of environmental and human health risks. </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec5">
      <title>5. Conclusion</title>
      <p>Artisanal gold mining in Angovia leads to polymetallic sediment contamination, with moderate ecological risk dominated by Hg and As. Unquantified Cd may also contribute; under the conservative scenario, it reaches 40% of PERI (Er = 59). Chromium is present at high levels, yet its low toxic response factor makes it a minor contributor to the PERI. However, its exceedance of toxicity thresholds (TEC/PEC) is likely to pose a direct biological threat. The combination of geochemical indices, the PERI, and sediment quality guidelines is therefore necessary for effective environmental management, including the protection of Lake Kossou, the Bandama River, and local populations. </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec6">
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>The authors thank the Laboratory of Soil, Water and Geomaterials (LSSEG) of Félix Houphouët-Boigny University (Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire). Our thanks also go to the Ivorian Anti-Pollution Centre (CIAPOL) for data analysis.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="report">World Bank (2020) State of the Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining Sector. Global Report, p158.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="report">
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>State of the Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining Sector</article-title>
            <source>Global Report</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Institute for Security Studies (2023) Artisanal Gold Mining in Côte d’Ivoire: Environmental and Health Impacts. Pretoria: ISS Africa.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Artisanal Gold Mining in Côte d’Ivoire: Environmental and Health Impacts</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Guo, B., Liu, Y., Zhang, F., Hou, J., Zhang, H. and Li, C. (2018) <italic>Environmental Science and Pollution Research</italic>, 25, 3695-3707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0680-0 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11356-017-0680-0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29168132</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0680-0">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0680-0</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Guo, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Liu, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhang, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Hou, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhang, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Li, C.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2018</year>
            <article-title>Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 3695-3707</article-title>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11356-017-0680-0</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29168132</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Bhuyan, M.S., Bakar, M.A., Rashed-Un-Nabi, M., Senapathi, V., Chung, S.Y. and Islam, M.S. (2019) Monitoring and Assessment of Heavy Metal Contamination in Surface Water and Sediment of the Old Brahmaputra River, Bangladesh. <italic>Applied Water Science</italic>, 9, Article No. 125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-1004-y <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13201-019-1004-y</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-1004-y">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-1004-y</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Bhuyan, M.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bakar, M.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rashed-Un-Nabi, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Senapathi, V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chung, S.Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Islam, M.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>River, B</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2019</year>
            <article-title>Monitoring and Assessment of Heavy Metal Contamination in Surface Water and Sediment of the Old Brahmaputra River, Bangladesh</article-title>
            <source>Applied Water Science</source>
            <volume>9</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13201-019-1004-y</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ahoussi, K.E., Yapo, A.P., Kouassi, A.M. and Koffi, Y.B. (2020) Surface Water Sediments Characterization Using Metallic Trace Elements (MTEs): Case of the Artisanal Gold Mining Sites of Kokumbo (Côte d’Ivoire). <italic>Journal of Environmental Protection</italic>, 11, 649-663. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2020.119039 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jep.2020.119039</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2020.119039">https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2020.119039</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ahoussi, K.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Yapo, A.P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kouassi, A.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Koffi, Y.B.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>Surface Water Sediments Characterization Using Metallic Trace Elements (MTEs): Case of the Artisanal Gold Mining Sites of Kokumbo (Côte d’Ivoire)</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Environmental Protection</source>
            <volume>11</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jep.2020.119039</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="thesis">Kouadio, L.M. (2023) Contribution to the Evaluation of Contamination Levels in Water and Soils of Clandestine Artisanal Gold Mining Sites and Removal of Metals (Hg, Pb, Cd) and Arsenic from Polluted Waters Using Clays from Côte d’Ivoire. Doctoral Thesis in Physico-Chemistry of Inorganic Materials, University Félix Houphouët-Boigny, 231p.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="thesis">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Kouadio, L.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Hg, P</string-name>
              <string-name>Materials, U</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Contribution to the Evaluation of Contamination Levels in Water and Soils of Clandestine Artisanal Gold Mining Sites and Removal of Metals (Hg, Pb, Cd) and Arsenic from Polluted Waters Using Clays from Côte d’Ivoire</article-title>
            <source>Doctoral Thesis in Physico-Chemistry of Inorganic Materials</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ngom, N.M., Mbaye, M., Baratoux, D., Baratoux, L., Ahoussi, K.E., Kouame, J.K., <italic>et</italic><italic>al</italic>. (2022) Recent Expansion of Artisanal Gold Mining along the Bandama River (Côte d’Ivoire). <italic>International</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Applied</italic><italic>Earth</italic><italic>Observation</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Geoinformation</italic>, 112, Article 102873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2022.102873 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jag.2022.102873</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2022.102873">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2022.102873</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ngom, N.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mbaye, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Baratoux, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Baratoux, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ahoussi, K.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kouame, J.K.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>Recent Expansion of Artisanal Gold Mining along the Bandama River (Côte d’Ivoire)</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation</source>
            <volume>112</volume>
            <elocation-id>102873</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jag.2022.102873</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">N’goran, K.P.D.A., Kouassi, N.L.B., Diabate, D., Ouattara, A.A., Kinimo K.C., Yao, K.M. and Trokourey, A. (2022) Pollution and Ecological Risk Assessment of Traces Metals in the Sediments of Gold Mining in Savanna District (Korhogo and Tengrela), Côte d’Ivoire. <italic>Science Journal of Chemistry</italic>, 10, 61-72.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Kouassi, N.L.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Diabate, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ouattara, A.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Yao, K.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Trokourey, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>Pollution and Ecological Risk Assessment of Traces Metals in the Sediments of Gold Mining in Savanna District (Korhogo and Tengrela), Côte d’Ivoire</article-title>
            <source>Science Journal of Chemistry</source>
            <volume>10</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Zoumana, T., N’Guessan, L.B.K., Assemian, A.S. and Kouassi, K.E. (2022) Ecological and Human Health Risks Assessment of Chromium in Soils around Artisanal Gold Mining Area: A Case Study in Centre-West Côte d’Ivoire. <italic>International Research Journal of Pure and Applied Chemistry</italic>, 26, 9-22.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Zoumana, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Guessan, L.B.K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Assemian, A.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kouassi, K.E.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>Ecological and Human Health Risks Assessment of Chromium in Soils around Artisanal Gold Mining Area: A Case Study in Centre-West Côte d’Ivoire</article-title>
            <source>International Research Journal of Pure and Applied Chemistry</source>
            <volume>26</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">Mbra, K.C., Assi, K.J.L. and Kouadio, A.M. (2022) Level of Contamination of Surface and Groundwater by Artisanal Gold Mining Activity in the Department of Bocanda (Centre-East of Côte d’Ivoire). <italic>Revue de l</italic>’ <italic>ACA</italic><italic>REF</italic>, 4, 197-212. https://revues.acaref.net/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2022/04/Koffi-Claude-MBRA.pdf</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Mbra, K.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Assi, K.J.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kouadio, A.M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>Level of Contamination of Surface and Groundwater by Artisanal Gold Mining Activity in the Department of Bocanda (Centre-East of Côte d’Ivoire)</article-title>
            <source>Revue de l’ACAREF</source>
            <volume>4</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Claon, J.S. (2004) Exposure to Mercury, Arsenic and Selenium in the Aby Lagoon Ecosystem (Côte d’Ivoire): Assessment of Health Risks for Riverside Populations. State Doctorate in Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Abidjan (now University Félix Houphouët-Boigny), Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Claon, J.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mercury, A</string-name>
              <string-name>Sciences, U</string-name>
              <string-name>Abidjan, C</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2004</year>
            <article-title>Exposure to Mercury, Arsenic and Selenium in the Aby Lagoon Ecosystem (Côte d’Ivoire): Assessment of Health Risks for Riverside Populations</article-title>
            <source>State Doctorate in Pharmaceutical Sciences</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Goula, B.T.A., Srohourou, B., Brida, A.B., N’Zué, K.A. and Goula, G.D. (2007) Characterisation of a Hydrological Drought by Precipitation Index: Case of the Marahoué Watershed (Côte d’Ivoire). <italic>Afrique Science</italic>, 3, 103-116.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Goula, B.T.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Srohourou, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Brida, A.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Goula, G.D.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2007</year>
            <article-title>Characterisation of a Hydrological Drought by Precipitation Index: Case of the Marahoué Watershed (Côte d’Ivoire)</article-title>
            <source>Afrique Science</source>
            <volume>3</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Milési, J.P., Ledru, P., Feybesse, J.L., Dommanget, A. and Marcoux, E. (1992) Early Proterozoic Ore Deposits and Tectonics of the Birimian Orogenic Belt, West Africa. <italic>Precambrian</italic><italic>Research</italic>, 58, 305-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9268(92)90123-6 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0301-9268(92)90123-6</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9268(92)90123-6">https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9268(92)90123-6</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ledru, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Feybesse, J.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Dommanget, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Marcoux, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Belt, W</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1992</year>
            <article-title>Early Proterozoic Ore Deposits and Tectonics of the Birimian Orogenic Belt, West Africa</article-title>
            <source>Precambrian Research</source>
            <volume>9268</volume>
            <issue>92</issue>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0301-9268(92)90123-6</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <label>14.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="thesis">Biemi, J. (1992) Contribution to the Geological, Hydrogeological, and Remote Sensing Study of Sub-Sahelian Watersheds. State Doctoral Thesis, University of Cocody.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="thesis">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Biemi, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Geological, H</string-name>
              <string-name>Thesis, U</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1992</year>
            <article-title>Contribution to the Geological, Hydrogeological, and Remote Sensing Study of Sub-Sahelian Watersheds</article-title>
            <source>State Doctoral Thesis</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <label>15.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="book">Castaing, C., Billa, M., Milési, J.P., Thiéblemont, D., Le Metour, J. and Egal, E. (2003) Explanatory Note for the Geological and Mining Map of Burkina Faso at 1/1,000,000. BUMIGEB Edition, Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières (BRGM).</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="book">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Castaing, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Billa, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Metour, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Egal, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Edition, B</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2003</year>
            <article-title>Explanatory Note for the Geological and Mining Map of Burkina Faso at 1/1,000,000</article-title>
            <source>BUMIGEB Edition</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <label>16.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Coulibaly, Y., Boiron, M.C., Cathelineau, M. and Kouamelan, A.N. (2008) Fluid Immiscibility and Gold Deposition in the Birimian Quartz Veins of the Angovia Deposit (Yaouré, Ivory Coast). <italic>Journal of African Earth Sciences</italic>, 50, 234-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2007.09.014 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2007.09.014</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2007.09.014">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2007.09.014</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Coulibaly, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Boiron, M.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Cathelineau, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kouamelan, A.N.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2008</year>
            <article-title>Fluid Immiscibility and Gold Deposition in the Birimian Quartz Veins of the Angovia Deposit (Yaouré, Ivory Coast)</article-title>
            <source>Journal of African Earth Sciences</source>
            <volume>50</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2007.09.014</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <label>17.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">CIAPOL (2018) Technical Procedures Manual of the Central Environmental Laboratory (LCE): Protocols for Sampling and Physicochemical Analyses. Sub-Directorate of the Laboratory.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <year>2018</year>
            <article-title>Technical Procedures Manual of the Central Environmental Laboratory (LCE): Protocols for Sampling and Physicochemical Analyses</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <label>18.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Association Française de Normalisation (2006) Soil Quality—Pretreatment of Samples for Physico-Chemical Analysis (Standard No. NF ISO 11464). Boutique AFNOR.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <year>2006</year>
            <article-title>Soil Quality—Pretreatment of Samples for Physico-Chemical Analysis (Standard No</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <label>19.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Association Française de Normalisation (1995) Soil Quality—Extraction of Trace éléments soluble in Aqua Regia (Standard No. NF ISO 11466). Boutique AFNOR.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <year>1995</year>
            <article-title>Soil Quality—Extraction of Trace éléments soluble in Aqua Regia (Standard No</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <label>20.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Association Française de Normalisation (2009) Water Quality—Determination of selectted éléments by Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES) (Standard No. NF ISO 11885). Boutique AFNOR.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <year>2009</year>
            <article-title>Water Quality—Determination of selectted éléments by Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES) (Standard No</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <label>21.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">U.S. Environment Protection Agency (2000) Water Supply Guidance Manual (EPA Publication No. 816-R-00-003). Office of Water.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <year>2000</year>
            <article-title>Water Supply Guidance Manual (EPA Publication No</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <label>22.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="report">European Food Safety Authority (2021) Guidance on Harmonised Methodologies for Human Risk Assessment of Combined Exposure to Multiple Chemicals (EFSA Scientific Report). <italic>EFSA Journal</italic>, 19, e07033.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="report">
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Guidance on Harmonised Methodologies for Human Risk Assessment of Combined Exposure to Multiple Chemicals (EFSA Scientific Report)</article-title>
            <source>EFSA Journal</source>
            <volume>19</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <label>23.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Birch, G.F. (2017) Determination of Sediment Metal Background Concentrations and Enrichment in Marine Environments—A Critical Review. <italic>Science</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>the</italic><italic>Total</italic><italic>Environment</italic>, 580, 813-831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.028 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.028</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27986324</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.028">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.028</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Birch, G.F.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2017</year>
            <article-title>Determination of Sediment Metal Background Concentrations and Enrichment in Marine Environments—A Critical Review</article-title>
            <source>Science of the Total Environment</source>
            <volume>580</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.028</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27986324</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <label>24.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Persaud, D.R., Jaagumagi, R. and Hayton, A. (1993) Guidelines for the Protection and Management of Aquatic Sediments in Ontario. Standards Development Branch. Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Energy, Toronto, Canada, 27p.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Persaud, D.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Jaagumagi, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Hayton, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Energy, T</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1993</year>
            <article-title>Guidelines for the Protection and Management of Aquatic Sediments in Ontario</article-title>
            <source>Standards Development Branch. Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Energy</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <label>25.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Wedepohl, K.H. (1995) The Composition of the Continental Crust. <italic>Geochimica</italic><italic>et</italic><italic>Cosmochimica</italic><italic>Acta</italic>, 59, 1217-1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(95)00038-2 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0016-7037(95)00038-2</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(95)00038-2">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(95)00038-2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Wedepohl, K.H.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1995</year>
            <article-title>The Composition of the Continental Crust</article-title>
            <source>Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta</source>
            <volume>7037</volume>
            <issue>95</issue>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0016-7037(95)00038-2</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <label>26.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Müller, G. (1969) Index of Geoaccumulation in Sediments of the Rhine River. <italic>Geojournal</italic>, 2, 109-118.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <year>1969</year>
            <article-title>Index of Geoaccumulation in Sediments of the Rhine River</article-title>
            <source>Geojournal</source>
            <volume>2</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <label>27.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hakanson, L. (1980) An Ecological Risk Index for Aquatic Pollution Control. A Sedimentological Approach. <italic>Water Research</italic>, 14, 975-1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(80)90143-8 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0043-1354(80)90143-8</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(80)90143-8">https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(80)90143-8</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Hakanson, L.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1980</year>
            <article-title>An Ecological Risk Index for Aquatic Pollution Control</article-title>
            <source>A Sedimentological Approach. Water Research</source>
            <volume>1354</volume>
            <issue>80</issue>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0043-1354(80)90143-8</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <label>28.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Abrahim, G.M.S. and Parker, R.J. (2008) Assessment of Heavy Metal Enrichment Factors and the Degree of Contamination in Marine Sediments from Tamaki Estuary, Auckland, New Zealand. <italic>Environmental Monitoring and Assessment</italic>, 136, 227-238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9678-2 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10661-007-9678-2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17370131</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9678-2">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9678-2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Abrahim, G.M.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Parker, R.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Estuary, A</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2008</year>
            <article-title>Assessment of Heavy Metal Enrichment Factors and the Degree of Contamination in Marine Sediments from Tamaki Estuary, Auckland, New Zealand</article-title>
            <source>Environmental Monitoring and Assessment</source>
            <volume>136</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10661-007-9678-2</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17370131</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B29">
        <label>29.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Zhu, H.N., Yuan, X.Z., Zeng, G.M., Jiang, M., Liang, J., <italic>et al</italic>. (2011) Ecological Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Sediments of Xiawan Port Based on Modified Potential Ecological Risk Index. <italic>Transactions</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Nonferrous</italic><italic>Metals</italic><italic>Society</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>China</italic>, 22, 1470-1477. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1003-6326(11)61343-5 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s1003-6326(11)61343-5</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1003-6326(11)61343-5">https://doi.org/10.1016/s1003-6326(11)61343-5</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Zhu, H.N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Yuan, X.Z.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zeng, G.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Jiang, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Liang, J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2011</year>
            <article-title>Ecological Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Sediments of Xiawan Port Based on Modified Potential Ecological Risk Index</article-title>
            <source>Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China</source>
            <volume>6326</volume>
            <issue>11</issue>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s1003-6326(11)61343-5</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B30">
        <label>30.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">MacDonald, D.D., Ingersoll, C.G. and Berger, T.A. (2000) Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems. <italic>Archives</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Environmental</italic><italic>Contamination</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Toxicology</italic>, 39, 20-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002440010075 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s002440010075</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10790498</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s002440010075">https://doi.org/10.1007/s002440010075</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>MacDonald, D.D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ingersoll, C.G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Berger, T.A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2000</year>
            <article-title>Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems</article-title>
            <source>Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology</source>
            <volume>39</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s002440010075</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10790498</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B31">
        <label>31.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Vennetier, P. (1971) The Natural Environment of Côte d’Ivoire (Memoir No. 50). ORSTOM Center.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Vennetier, P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1971</year>
            <article-title>The Natural Environment of Côte d’Ivoire (Memoir No</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B32">
        <label>32.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kapia, S., Rao, B.K.R. and Sakulas, H. (2016) Assessment of Heavy Metal Pollution Risks in Yonki Reservoir Environmental Matrices Affected by Gold Mining Activity. <italic>Environmental Monitoring and Assessment</italic>, 188, Article No. 586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5604-9 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10661-016-5604-9</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27663878</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5604-9">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5604-9</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Kapia, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rao, B.K.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sakulas, H.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>Assessment of Heavy Metal Pollution Risks in Yonki Reservoir Environmental Matrices Affected by Gold Mining Activity</article-title>
            <source>Environmental Monitoring and Assessment</source>
            <volume>188</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10661-016-5604-9</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27663878</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B33">
        <label>33.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Zhang, J.W. and Liu, C.L. (2002) Riverine Composition and Estuarine Geochemistry of Particulate Metals in China—Weathering Features, Anthropogenic Impact and Chemical Fluxes. <italic>Estuarine</italic>, <italic>Coastal and Shelf Science</italic>, 54, 1051-1070. https://doi.org/10.1006/ecss.2001.0879 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/ecss.2001.0879</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1006/ecss.2001.0879">https://doi.org/10.1006/ecss.2001.0879</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Zhang, J.W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Liu, C.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Features, A</string-name>
              <string-name>Estuarine, C</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2002</year>
            <article-title>Riverine Composition and Estuarine Geochemistry of Particulate Metals in China—Weathering Features, Anthropogenic Impact and Chemical Fluxes</article-title>
            <source>Estuarine</source>
            <volume>54</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/ecss.2001.0879</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B34">
        <label>34.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Telmer, K.H. and Veiga, M.M. (2009) World Emissions of Mercury from Artisanal and Small Scale Gold Mining. In: Pirrone, N. and Mason, R., <italic>Mercury Fate and</italic><italic>Transport in the Global Atmosphere</italic>: <italic>Emissions</italic>, <italic>Measurements and Models</italic>, Springer, 131-172.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Telmer, K.H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Veiga, M.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Pirrone, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mason, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Emissions, M</string-name>
              <string-name>Models, S</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2009</year>
            <article-title>World Emissions of Mercury from Artisanal and Small Scale Gold Mining</article-title>
            <source>In: Pirrone</source>
            <volume>131</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B35">
        <label>35.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Johnson, D.B. and Hallberg, K.B. (2005) Acid Mine Drainage Remediation Options: A Review. <italic>Science of the Total Environment</italic>, 338, 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.09.002 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.09.002</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15680622</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.09.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.09.002</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Johnson, D.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Hallberg, K.B.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2005</year>
            <article-title>Acid Mine Drainage Remediation Options: A Review</article-title>
            <source>Science of the Total Environment</source>
            <volume>338</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.09.002</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15680622</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B36">
        <label>36.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Akcil, A. and Koldas, S. (2006) Acid Mine Drainage (AMD): Causes, Treatment and Case Studies. <italic>Journal of Cleaner Production</italic>, 14, 1139-1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.09.006 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.09.006</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.09.006">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.09.006</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Akcil, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Koldas, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Causes, T</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2006</year>
            <article-title>Acid Mine Drainage (AMD): Causes, Treatment and Case Studies</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Cleaner Production</source>
            <volume>14</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.09.006</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B37">
        <label>37.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="thesis">Djade, P.O.J. (2021) Impact Assessment of Artisanal Gold Mining on the Environment and Health: Ity Mining Area Case. Zouan-Hounien Department (West of Ivory Coast) PhD Thesis, Félix Houphouët-Boigny University.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="thesis">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Djade, P.O.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Thesis, F</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Impact Assessment of Artisanal Gold Mining on the Environment and Health: Ity Mining Area Case</article-title>
            <source>Zouan-Hounien Department (West of Ivory Coast) PhD Thesis</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B38">
        <label>38.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Blowes, D.W., Ptacek, C.J., Jambor, J.L., Weisener, C.G., <italic>et al</italic>. (2014) The Geochemistry of Acid Mine Drainage. In: Holland, H.D. and Turekian, K.K., <italic>Treatise on Geochemistry</italic>, Elsevier, 131-190.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Blowes, D.W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ptacek, C.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Jambor, J.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Weisener, C.G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Holland, H.D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Turekian, K.K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Geochemistry, E</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>The Geochemistry of Acid Mine Drainage</article-title>
            <source>In: Holland</source>
            <volume>131</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>