<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.4" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">jct</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Journal of Cancer Therapy</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2151-1942</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2151-1934</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jct.2026.175026</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">jct-151454</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Medicine</subject>
          <subject>Healthcare</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Epidemiological, Clinical, and Therapeutic Characteristics of Gestational Trophoblastic Disease in Eastern Madagascar: A Retrospective Study at a Tertiary Referral Center</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Randriamanovontsoa</surname>
            <given-names>Niaina Ezra</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Ranaivomanana</surname>
            <given-names>Mampionona</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Razakanaivo</surname>
            <given-names>Malala</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Hasiniatsy</surname>
            <given-names>Rodrigue Emile</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Rasolonjatovo</surname>
            <given-names>Jean De La Croix</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Rafaramino</surname>
            <given-names>Florine</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label> Faculty of Medicine, University of Toamasina, Toamasina, Madagascar </aff>
      <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label> Faculty of Medicine, University of Fianarantsoa, Fianarantsoa, Madagascar </aff>
      <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label> Faculty of Medicine, University of Antananarivo, Antananarivo, Madagascar </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="conflict" id="fn-conflict">
          <p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>19</day>
        <month>05</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <month>05</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>17</volume>
      <issue>05</issue>
      <fpage>280</fpage>
      <lpage>289</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>21</day>
          <month>04</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>23</day>
          <month>05</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="published">
          <day>26</day>
          <month>05</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2026 by the authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p> This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link> ). </license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/jct.2026.175026">https://doi.org/10.4236/jct.2026.175026</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p><bold>Background:</bold> Gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) comprises a spectrum of pregnancy-related disorders with marked geographical variation in incidence, being more frequent in low- and middle-income countries. Data from eastern Madagascar remain limited. <bold>Objective:</bold> To describe the epidemiological, clinical, paraclinical, and therapeutic characteristics of GTD managed at a tertiary referral hospital in eastern Madagascar. <bold>Methods:</bold> A retrospective descriptive study was conducted over a six-year period (January 2019 to December 2024) at the University Hospital Center of Analankininina Toamasina (CHUAT). All patients diagnosed with GTD based on histopathological findings and/or biological follow-up were included. Data were collected from medical records and analyzed using descriptive statistics. <bold>Results:</bold> A total of 53 cases of GTD were identified, including 42 hydatidiform moles and 11 cases of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN). The mean age was 29 ± 8.5 years, with a predominance of women aged 20 - 29 years. Vaginal bleeding was the most common presenting symptom (31/53). Initial serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels exceeded 100,000 IU/L in 27 cases. According to FIGO scoring, 6 cases were classified as low risk and 5 as high risk. Uterine evacuation by curettage was performed in 41 patients. Chemotherapy was administered in all GTN cases. Complete remission was achieved in 41 patients, while 3 deaths were recorded. Subsequent pregnancy occurred in 13 patients. <bold>Conclusion:</bold> GTD remains a significant health concern in eastern Madagascar, often diagnosed at advanced stages. Despite resource limitations, favorable outcomes can be achieved with appropriate management. Strengthening early diagnosis, pathology services, and follow-up systems is essential to improving prognosis.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated" xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>Gestational Trophoblastic Disease</kwd>
        <kwd>Hydatidiform Mole</kwd>
        <kwd>Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia</kwd>
        <kwd>FIGO Score</kwd>
        <kwd>Madagascar</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>Gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) encompasses a heterogeneous group of disorders arising from abnormal proliferation of placental trophoblastic tissue. It includes benign entities such as complete and partial hydatidiform mole, as well as malignant forms collectively referred to as gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN), including invasive mole, choriocarcinoma, placental site trophoblastic tumor, and epithelioid trophoblastic tumor.</p>
      <p>The global incidence of GTD varies widely, with higher rates reported in Asia, Africa, and Latin America compared with Europe and North America. However, epidemiological data remain scarce in many low-resource settings, including Madagascar, particularly outside the capital region.</p>
      <p>Although GTN is highly sensitive to chemotherapy and associated with excellent cure rates, delayed diagnosis, limited access to diagnostic tools, and challenges in follow-up contribute to increased morbidity and mortality in low-resource settings.</p>
      <p>This study aimed to describe the epidemiological, clinical, paraclinical, and therapeutic characteristics of GTD managed at a tertiary referral hospital in eastern Madagascar over a six-year period.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec2">
      <title>2. Methods</title>
      <sec id="sec2dot1">
        <title>2.1. Study Design and Setting</title>
        <p>A retrospective descriptive study was conducted at the Department of Gynecology and Oncology of the University Hospital Center of Analankininina Toamasina (CHUAT), a tertiary referral hospital in eastern Madagascar.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot2">
        <title>2.2. Study Period</title>
        <p>January 2019 to December 2024.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot3">
        <title>2.3. Study Population</title>
        <p>All patients diagnosed with GTD and managed at CHUAT during the study period were included.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot4">
        <title>2.4. Inclusion Criteria</title>
        <p>Patients were included if they met at least one of the following criteria:</p>
        <p>Histopathological confirmation of hydatidiform mole or GTN. Availability of complete medical records: A “complete medical record” was defined as a file containing at least: demographic data, clinical presentation, serum hCG measurements, treatment information, and documented outcomes.</p>
        <p>In cases without histopathological confirmation, hydatidiform mole was diagnosed based on typical clinical presentation (vaginal bleeding after amenorrhea), markedly elevated serum hCG levels, and characteristic ultrasound findings such as a “snowstorm” appearance.</p>
        <p>The diagnosis of GTN was based on FIGO criteria, including one or more of the following:</p>
        <p>Plateau of serum hCG levels over at least three consecutive weeks.Rise in serum hCG levels over two consecutive weeks.Persistence of detectable hCG beyond 6 months after molar evacuation.Histological diagnosis of choriocarcinoma.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot5">
        <title>2.5. Data Collection</title>
        <p>Data were extracted from medical records and included sociodemographic characteristics, obstetric history, clinical presentation, serum hCG levels, histopathological findings, FIGO score, treatment modalities, and outcomes.</p>
        <p>Low-risk GTN patients (FIGO score ≤ 6) were treated with single-agent chemotherapy, primarily methotrexate-based regimens.</p>
        <p>High-risk patients (FIGO score &gt; 6) received combination chemotherapy, most commonly EMA-CO protocol when feasible.</p>
        <p>Criteria for switching from single-agent to combination therapy included:</p>
        <p>Plateau or rise in hCG levels.Clinical or radiological evidence of disease progression.</p>
        <p>After uterine evacuation, patients were monitored with weekly serum hCG measurements until normalization, followed by monthly monitoring for at least 6 months.</p>
        <p>Complete remission was defined as normalization of serum hCG levels maintained for at least three consecutive weeks. Recurrence was defined as a subsequent rise in hCG after normalization. Subsequent pregnancies were identified through follow-up records and patient reports.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot6">
        <title>2.6. Statistical Analysis</title>
        <p>Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Quantitative variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, and categorical variables as frequencies and percentages.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot7">
        <title>2.7. Ethical Considerations</title>
        <p>Confidentiality was maintained, and institutional authorization was obtained.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec3">
      <title>3. Results</title>
      <p>A total of 16,755 medical records were screened across two departments of CHUAT. Among these, 5 were excluded due to incomplete data, including missing key variables such as serum hCG levels, treatment details, or outcome information. Finally, 53 cases of gestational trophoblastic disease met the inclusion criteria and were retained for analysis. These included 42 cases of hydatidiform mole (79.2%), primarily managed in the gynecology-obstetrics department, and 11 cases of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia managed in the oncology department.</p>
      <p><bold>Table 1.</bold>Sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics (n = 53).</p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl1">
        <label>Table 1</label>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Variable</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Category</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>n</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>%</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="4">
                <bold>Age (years)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>&lt;20</td>
              <td>7</td>
              <td>13.2</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>20 - 29</td>
              <td>24</td>
              <td>45.3</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>30 - 39</td>
              <td>16</td>
              <td>30.2</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>≥40</td>
              <td>6</td>
              <td>11.3</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="5">
                <bold>Occupation</bold>
              </td>
              <td>Farmer</td>
              <td>17</td>
              <td>32.1</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Housewife</td>
              <td>13</td>
              <td>24.5</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Shopkeeper</td>
              <td>13</td>
              <td>24.5</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Student</td>
              <td>5</td>
              <td>9.4</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Others</td>
              <td>5</td>
              <td>9.4</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="4">
                <bold>Gravidity</bold>
              </td>
              <td>Primigravida</td>
              <td>9</td>
              <td>17.0</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Paucigravida (2 - 4)</td>
              <td>35</td>
              <td>66.0</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Multigravida (5 - 6)</td>
              <td>5</td>
              <td>9.4</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Grand multigravida (≥7)</td>
              <td>4</td>
              <td>7.5</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="5">
                <bold>Parity</bold>
              </td>
              <td>Nulliparous</td>
              <td>13</td>
              <td>24.5</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Primiparous</td>
              <td>11</td>
              <td>20.8</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Pauciparous (2 - 4)</td>
              <td>24</td>
              <td>45.3</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Multiparous (5 - 6)</td>
              <td>3</td>
              <td>5.7</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Grand multiparous (≥7)</td>
              <td>2</td>
              <td>3.8</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="2">
                <bold>History of abortion</bold>
              </td>
              <td>Yes</td>
              <td>20</td>
              <td>37.7</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>No</td>
              <td>33</td>
              <td>62.3</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="3">
                <bold>Index pregnancy</bold>
              </td>
              <td>Molar pregnancy</td>
              <td>50</td>
              <td>94.3</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Normal pregnancy</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>1.9</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Miscarriage</td>
              <td>2</td>
              <td>3.8</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="4">
                <bold>Contraception</bold>
              </td>
              <td>None</td>
              <td>21</td>
              <td>39.6</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Oral</td>
              <td>8</td>
              <td>15.1</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Injectable</td>
              <td>20</td>
              <td>37.7</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Implant</td>
              <td>4</td>
              <td>7.5</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p><bold>Table 1</bold>summarizes sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics. Most patients were aged 20 - 29 years (45.3%). The majority were paucigravida (66.0%) and pauciparous (45.3%). A history of abortion was reported in 37.7% of cases. The index pregnancy was a molar pregnancy in 94.3% of cases. Contraceptive use was absent in 39.6% of patients.</p>
      <p><bold>Table 2</bold> (<bold>Table 2(A)</bold> and <bold>Table 2(B)</bold>) presents clinical and paraclinical findings. Vaginal bleeding following amenorrhea was the most common presentation (58.5%). Serum hCG levels ≥100,000 IU/L were observed in 50.9% of patients. Notably, histopathological examination was unavailable in 77.4% of cases. Among the 11 patients with GTN, 2 presented with metastatic disease, with involvement of the lung in one case and the bladder in another.</p>
      <p><bold>Table 2.</bold> (A) Clinical presentation; (B) Paraclinical and prognostic features.</p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl2">
        <label>Table 2</label>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="4">
                <bold>(</bold>
                <bold>A)</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Variable</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Category</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>n</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>%</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="7">
                <bold>Clinical presentation</bold>
              </td>
              <td>Bleeding after amenorrhea</td>
              <td>31</td>
              <td>58.5</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Persistent bleeding after molar evacuation</td>
              <td>8</td>
              <td>15.1</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Vomiting</td>
              <td>6</td>
              <td>11.3</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Vaginal expulsion of molar vesicles</td>
              <td>3</td>
              <td>5.7</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Elevated hCG</td>
              <td>3</td>
              <td>5.7</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Hemoptysis</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>1.9</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Hematuria</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>1.9</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="4">
                <bold>(</bold>
                <bold>B)</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Variable</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Category</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>n</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>%</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="3">
                <bold>hCG level (IU/L)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>&lt;10,000</td>
              <td>9</td>
              <td>17.0</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>10,000 - 100,000</td>
              <td>17</td>
              <td>32.1</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>≥100,000</td>
              <td>27</td>
              <td>50.9</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="4">
                <bold>Histopathology</bold>
              </td>
              <td>Hydatidiform mole</td>
              <td>6</td>
              <td>11.3</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Invasive mole</td>
              <td>2</td>
              <td>3.8</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Choriocarcinoma</td>
              <td>4</td>
              <td>7.5</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Not available</td>
              <td>41</td>
              <td>77.4</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="2">
                <bold>FIGO score</bold>
              </td>
              <td>≤6</td>
              <td>6</td>
              <td>54.5</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>&gt;6</td>
              <td>5</td>
              <td>45.5</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p>hCG = human chorionic gonadotropin.</p>
      <p>Given the clinical and therapeutic differences between hydatidiform mole and gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, treatment modalities and outcomes were analyzed separately. The results are presented in<bold>Table 3</bold><bold>(</bold><bold>A</bold><bold>)</bold> and <bold>Table 3</bold><bold>(B</bold><bold>)</bold>.</p>
      <p><bold>Table 3.</bold> Treatment and outcomes according to disease type. (A) Hydatidiform mole (n = 42); (B) Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (n = 11).</p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl3">
        <label>Table 3</label>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="4">
                <bold>(</bold>
                <bold>A)</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Variable</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Category</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>n</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>%</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="4">
                <bold>Initial management</bold>
              </td>
              <td>Manual evacuation</td>
              <td>5</td>
              <td>11.9</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Uterine curettage</td>
              <td>35</td>
              <td>83.3</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Vacuum aspiration</td>
              <td>2</td>
              <td>4.8</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Hysterectomy</td>
              <td>0</td>
              <td>0</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="4">
                <bold>Outcomes</bold>
              </td>
              <td>Remission</td>
              <td>35</td>
              <td>83.3</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Subsequent pregnancy</td>
              <td>10</td>
              <td>23.8</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Death</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>2.4</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Lost to follow-up</td>
              <td>6</td>
              <td>14.3</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="4">(B)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Variable</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Category</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>n</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>%</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="3">
                <bold>Initial management</bold>
              </td>
              <td>Uterine curettage</td>
              <td>6</td>
              <td>54.5</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Hysterectomy</td>
              <td>2</td>
              <td>18.2</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>No surgical management</td>
              <td>3</td>
              <td>27.3</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="2">
                <bold>Chemotherapy</bold>
              </td>
              <td>Single-agent</td>
              <td>6</td>
              <td>54.5</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Combination</td>
              <td>5</td>
              <td>45.5</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="4">
                <bold>Outcomes</bold>
              </td>
              <td>Remission</td>
              <td>6</td>
              <td>54.5</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Subsequent pregnancy</td>
              <td>3</td>
              <td>27.3</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Death</td>
              <td>2</td>
              <td>18.2</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Lost to follow-up</td>
              <td>3</td>
              <td>27.3</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec4">
      <title>4. Discussion</title>
      <p>This study provides one of the few detailed descriptions of gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) in eastern Madagascar, highlighting important epidemiological, clinical, and therapeutic characteristics in a low-resource setting.</p>
      <sec id="sec4dot1">
        <title>4.1. Sociodemographic Profile</title>
        <p>The mean age and predominance of women aged 20 - 29 years are consistent with findings from other low- and middle-income countries, reflecting peak reproductive age [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>]. Although extreme maternal ages (&lt;20 and ≥40 years) are recognized risk factors, their lower representation in this cohort may reflect demographic patterns and fertility distribution in the study population [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>].</p>
        <p>The predominance of patients with low socioeconomic status, particularly farmers and housewives, reflects structural inequalities in access to healthcare. Similar observations have been reported in sub-Saharan Africa, where delayed diagnosis is often linked to limited access to reproductive health services and reduced health literacy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]. These determinants may contribute to late presentation and more advanced disease at diagnosis.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot2">
        <title>4.2. Obstetric History</title>
        <p>The majority of patients were paucigravida (66.0%) and pauciparous (45.3%). While some studies report increased GTD risk in multiparous women, the relationship between parity and GTD remains inconsistent across populations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]. A history of abortion was reported in 37.7% of cases, comparable to findings from other African series, although causal links between prior pregnancy loss and GTD are not firmly established [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>]. Notably, the index pregnancy was overwhelmingly a molar pregnancy (94.3%), consistent with the known epidemiology of GTD, where hydatidiform mole constitutes the most frequent entity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>].</p>
        <p>Contraceptive use was suboptimal, with 39.6% of patients reporting no method, while injectable contraception was the most frequently used (37.7%). This pattern mirrors national trends in Madagascar and other sub-Saharan African countries, where access to modern contraceptive methods remains limited [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>]. Although contraceptive methods are not directly associated with GTD risk, limited access to family planning and reproductive health services may contribute to delayed diagnosis and suboptimal monitoring of early pregnancies.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot3">
        <title>4.3. Clinical Presentation, Paraclinical Findings, and Prognostic Features</title>
        <p>Clinically, vaginal bleeding following amenorrhea was the most common presenting symptom, consistent with classical descriptions of GTD [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>]. Persistent vaginal bleeding after molar evacuation was reported in 15.1% of cases, highlighting the need for close post-evacuation surveillance. Less frequent symptoms included vomiting (11.3%), vaginal expulsion of molar vesicles (5.7%), and persistent or rising serum hCG levels (5.7%). Rare presentations, such as hemoptysis and hematuria (each 1.9%), may indicate metastatic disease and underscore the potential severity of GTN in advanced stages [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>].</p>
        <p>However, the high proportion of patients with serum hCG levels ≥ 100,000 IU/L suggests a substantial tumor burden at diagnosis, likely reflecting delayed presentation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]. Serum hCG measurement remains the cornerstone for both diagnosis and follow-up, particularly in settings where histopathological confirmation is limited [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>].</p>
        <p>A major limitation of this study is the absence of histopathological confirmation in 77.4% of cases. This finding highlights significant constraints in pathology infrastructure in low-resource settings. Although diagnosis based on clinical presentation and hCG dynamics is acceptable in certain contexts, the lack of histopathology may lead to misclassification, inadequate risk stratification, and potential deviations from optimal management [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]. Similar challenges have been reported in other developing countries, emphasizing the urgent need to strengthen pathology services and standardize diagnostic pathways [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot4">
        <title>4.4. Therapeutic Management and Clinical Outcomes</title>
        <p>Regarding therapeutic management, uterine curettage was the mainstay of treatment and remains the standard initial intervention for molar pregnancy worldwide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]. This procedure allows rapid evacuation of trophoblastic tissue and facilitates subsequent monitoring. However, it carries risks such as hemorrhage, uterine perforation, and infection, particularly in settings lacking ultrasound guidance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]. Despite these risks, curettage remains widely used in low-resource settings due to its accessibility, cost-effectiveness, and feasibility compared with more advanced techniques, such as minimally invasive suction evacuation or hysteroscopic techniques, which may not be available [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>].</p>
        <p>Chemotherapy was administered in all patients with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN), in accordance with FIGO risk-adapted protocols [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]. The high remission rate observed in this study is consistent with the well-established chemosensitivity of GTN, even in metastatic stages [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]. These findings demonstrate that adherence to standardized treatment protocols can yield favorable outcomes, even in resource-constrained environments.</p>
        <p>However, loss to follow-up remains a significant concern, affecting 17.0% of patients. This issue is commonly reported in low-resource settings and may compromise long-term outcomes, including detection of relapse and monitoring of subsequent pregnancies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]. Strengthening follow-up systems and patient education is therefore essential.</p>
        <p>Recent evidence has also highlighted the importance of long-term surveillance, as patients with a history of GTD may have an increased risk of subsequent malignancies, although this risk remains low [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]. Additionally, advances in imaging and diagnostic strategies have improved disease characterization and management in high-resource settings, but these innovations remain largely inaccessible in many low-income countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>].</p>
        <p>Overall, this study underscores the dual reality of GTD management in low-resource settings: while effective treatments exist and outcomes can be favorable, major challenges persist in early diagnosis, access to histopathology, and continuity of care. Addressing these gaps is essential to further improve patient outcomes in Madagascar and similar contexts.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot5">
        <title>4.5. Strengths and Limitations</title>
        <p>This study provides valuable data from an underrepresented region and contributes to the limited literature on GTD in Madagascar. However, this study has several limitations. Its retrospective design and single-center setting may introduce selection bias, particularly as a tertiary referral center likely receives more severe cases. Additionally, exclusion of incomplete records may have introduced selection bias. The high proportion of missing histopathological data limits diagnostic accuracy. Finally, loss to follow-up may affect the reliability of outcome assessment.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot6">
        <title>4.6. Implications for Practice</title>
        <p>The study underscores the importance of early diagnosis through improved reproductive health education and access to ultrasound and hCG monitoring. Strengthening regional reference centers and implementing standardized follow-up protocols could further improve outcomes. Additionally, enhancing access to family planning services may reduce the frequency of unmonitored pregnancies and facilitate early detection of abnormal gestations.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec5">
      <title>5. Conclusion</title>
      <p>In eastern Madagascar, GTD predominantly affects women of reproductive age with limited parity and low socioeconomic status. Hydatidiform mole is the most common presentation, often diagnosed late. Despite resource limitations, adherence to standard surgical and chemotherapeutic protocols yields favorable outcomes. Strengthening early detection, patient follow-up, and reproductive health services is essential to further improve prognosis.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ngan, H.Y.S., Seckl, M.J., Berkowitz, R.S., Xiang, Y., Golfier, F., Sekharan, P.K., <italic>et al</italic>. (2021) Diagnosis and Management of Gestational Trophoblastic Disease: 2021 Update. <italic>International Journal of Gynecology &amp; Obstetrics</italic>, 155, 86-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13877 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ijgo.13877</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34669197</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13877">https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13877</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ngan, H.Y.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Seckl, M.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Berkowitz, R.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Xiang, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Golfier, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sekharan, P.K.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Diagnosis and Management of Gestational Trophoblastic Disease: 2021 Update</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of Gynecology &amp; Obstetrics</source>
            <volume>155</volume>
            <fpage>2021</fpage>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ijgo.13877</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34669197</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Gullo, G., Satullo, M., Conti, E., Ganduscio, S., Chitoran, E., Kozinszky, Z., <italic>et al</italic>. (2025) Gestational Trophoblastic Disease: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Updates in Light of Recent Evidence: A Literature Review. <italic>Medicina</italic>, 61, Article No. 1642. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61091642 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/medicina61091642</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61091642">https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61091642</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Gullo, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Satullo, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Conti, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ganduscio, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chitoran, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kozinszky, Z.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2025</year>
            <article-title>Gestational Trophoblastic Disease: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Updates in Light of Recent Evidence: A Literature Review</article-title>
            <source>Medicina</source>
            <volume>61</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/medicina61091642</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Coyle, C., Short, D., Jackson, L., Sebire, N.J., Kaur, B., Harvey, R., <italic>et al</italic>. (2018) What Is the Optimal Duration of Human Chorionic Gonadotrophin Surveillance Following Evacuation of a Molar Pregnancy? A Retrospective Analysis on over 20,000 Consecutive Patients. <italic>Gynecologic Oncology</italic>, 148, 254-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.12.008 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.12.008</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29229282</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.12.008">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.12.008</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Coyle, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Short, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Jackson, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sebire, N.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kaur, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Harvey, R.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2018</year>
            <article-title>What Is the Optimal Duration of Human Chorionic Gonadotrophin Surveillance Following Evacuation of a Molar Pregnancy? A Retrospective Analysis on over 20,000 Consecutive Patients</article-title>
            <source>Gynecologic Oncology</source>
            <volume>148</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.12.008</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29229282</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Berkowitz, R.S. and Goldstein, D.P. (2009) Molar Pregnancy. <italic>New England Journal of Medicine</italic>, 360, 1639-1645. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmcp0900696 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1056/nejmcp0900696</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19369669</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmcp0900696">https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmcp0900696</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Berkowitz, R.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Goldstein, D.P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2009</year>
            <article-title>Molar Pregnancy</article-title>
            <source>New England Journal of Medicine</source>
            <volume>360</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1056/nejmcp0900696</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19369669</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Randriamaroson, N., Razakanaivo, M., Andrianandrasana, N.O., Solofonirina, Z.A. and Rafaramino, F. (2020) Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: Clinical and Therapeutic Profile in Madagascar. <italic>Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology</italic>, 10, 946-956. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2020.1070089 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojog.2020.1070089</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2020.1070089">https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2020.1070089</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Randriamaroson, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Razakanaivo, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Andrianandrasana, N.O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Solofonirina, Z.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rafaramino, F.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: Clinical and Therapeutic Profile in Madagascar</article-title>
            <source>Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology</source>
            <volume>10</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojog.2020.1070089</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Felemban, A.A., Bakri, Y.N., Alkharif, H.A., Altuwaijri, S.M., Shalhoub, J. and Berkowitz, R.S. (1998) Complete Molar Pregnancy: Clinical Trends at King Fahad Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. <italic>Journal of Reproductive Medicine</italic>, 43, 11-13.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Felemban, A.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bakri, Y.N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Alkharif, H.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Altuwaijri, S.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Shalhoub, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Berkowitz, R.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Hospital, R</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1998</year>
            <article-title>Complete Molar Pregnancy: Clinical Trends at King Fahad Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Reproductive Medicine</source>
            <volume>43</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Sebire, N.J., Foskett, M., Fisher, R.A., Rees, H., Seckl, M. and Newlands, E. (2002) Risk of Partial and Complete Hydatidiform Molar Pregnancy in Relation to Maternal Age. <italic>BJOG</italic>: <italic>An International Journal of Obstetrics &amp;</italic><italic>Gynaecology</italic>, 109, 99-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.t01-1-01037.x <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.t01-1-01037.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11843379</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.t01-1-01037.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.t01-1-01037.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Sebire, N.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Foskett, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Fisher, R.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rees, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Seckl, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Newlands, E.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2002</year>
            <article-title>Risk of Partial and Complete Hydatidiform Molar Pregnancy in Relation to Maternal Age</article-title>
            <source>BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynaecology</source>
            <volume>109</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.t01-1-01037.x</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11843379</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Moodley, M. and Marishane, T. (2005) Demographic Variables of Gestational Trophoblastic Disease in Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa. <italic>Journal of Obstetrics and</italic><italic>Gynaecol</italic><italic>ogy</italic>, 25, 482-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443610500171102 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/01443610500171102</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16183585</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01443610500171102">https://doi.org/10.1080/01443610500171102</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Moodley, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Marishane, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kwazulu-Natal, S</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2005</year>
            <article-title>Demographic Variables of Gestational Trophoblastic Disease in Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology</source>
            <volume>25</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/01443610500171102</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16183585</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">United Nations (2019) Contraceptive Use by Method 2019: Data Booklet. United Nations.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <year>2019</year>
            <article-title>Contraceptive Use by Method 2019: Data Booklet</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Berkowitz, R.S. and Goldstein, D.P. (2012) Clinical Practice: Molar Pregnancy. <italic>The New England Journal of Medicine</italic>, 366, 921-932.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Berkowitz, R.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Goldstein, D.P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2012</year>
            <article-title>Clinical Practice: Molar Pregnancy</article-title>
            <source>The New England Journal of Medicine</source>
            <volume>366</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Lukinovic, N., Malovrh, E.P., Takac, I., Sobocan, M. and Knez, J. (2022) Advances in Diagnostics and Management of Gestational Trophoblastic Disease. <italic>Radiology and Oncology</italic>, 56, 430-439. https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2022-0038 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2478/raon-2022-0038</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36286620</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2022-0038">https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2022-0038</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Lukinovic, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Malovrh, E.P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Takac, I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sobocan, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Knez, J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>Advances in Diagnostics and Management of Gestational Trophoblastic Disease</article-title>
            <source>Radiology and Oncology</source>
            <volume>56</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2478/raon-2022-0038</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36286620</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Chawla, T., Bouchard-Fortier, G., Turashvili, G., Osborne, R., Hack, K. and Glanc, P. (2023) Gestational Trophoblastic Disease: An Update. <italic>Abdominal Radiology</italic>, 48, 1793-1815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-03820-5 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00261-023-03820-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36763119</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-03820-5">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-03820-5</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Chawla, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bouchard-Fortier, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Turashvili, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Osborne, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Hack, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Glanc, P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Gestational Trophoblastic Disease: An Update</article-title>
            <source>Abdominal Radiology</source>
            <volume>48</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00261-023-03820-5</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36763119</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Munyakarama, B., Koushik, A., Leduc, V., Healy-Profitós, J. and Auger, N. (2025) Association of Gestational Trophoblastic Disease with Subsequent Development of Non-Trophoblastic Cancer. <italic>International Journal of Gynecology &amp; Obstetrics</italic>, 168, 1305-1311. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15976 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ijgo.15976</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39425609</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15976">https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15976</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Munyakarama, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Koushik, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Leduc, V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Auger, N.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2025</year>
            <article-title>Association of Gestational Trophoblastic Disease with Subsequent Development of Non-Trophoblastic Cancer</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of Gynecology &amp; Obstetrics</source>
            <volume>168</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ijgo.15976</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39425609</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>