<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.4" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">oje</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Open Journal of Ecology</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2162-1993</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2162-1985</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oje.2026.164013</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">oje-151097</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Earth</subject>
          <subject>Environmental Sciences</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Early Recovery of Dry Miombo Woodlands Following Selective Charcoal Harvesting in Morogoro, Tanzania</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Swalehe</surname>
            <given-names>Swalehe Habibu</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Mugasha</surname>
            <given-names>Wilson Ancelm</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Manyanda</surname>
            <given-names>Bernardol John</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label> Department of Forest Resources Assessment and Management, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Arusha, Tanzania </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="conflict" id="fn-conflict">
          <p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>07</day>
        <month>04</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <month>04</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>04</issue>
      <fpage>202</fpage>
      <lpage>214</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>04</day>
          <month>03</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>27</day>
          <month>04</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="published">
          <day>30</day>
          <month>04</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2026 by the authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p> This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link> ). </license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2026.164013">https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2026.164013</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p>Miombo woodlands provide essential ecological services and livelihoods in southern Africa but are increasingly threatened by charcoal production. This study assessed early recovery of dry Miombo woodlands following selective charcoal harvesting in three districts in Morogoro Region, Tanzania. A chronosequence approach was used with 106 plots across fallow ages of 1, 3.5, and 6 years and adjacent unharvested controls. Stand structural attributes, <italic>i.e.</italic>, stem density, basal area, volume, and above-ground biomass (AGB) were quantified, and growth rates were estimated using mean annual increment (MAI) and carbon sequestration. Results revealed that stand parameters increased with fallow age, with stem density rising from about 324 trees ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> in one−year fallows to about 1302 trees ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> in six−year fallows. Volume MAI ranged from 3.45 to 3.90 m3 ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> yr<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>, while carbon sequestration ranged from 1.17 to 1.33 t ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> yr<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>. Although biomass and volume had not yet reached levels observed in unharvested stands, the results indicate strong early recovery and highlight the potential of selective, rotational charcoal harvesting systems to support sustainable woodland management.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated" xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>Selective Harvesting</kwd>
        <kwd>Charcoal Fallows</kwd>
        <kwd>Mean Annual Increment</kwd>
        <kwd>Volume and AGB</kwd>
        <kwd>Carbon Sequestration</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>Miombo woodlands are widely distributed across central and southern Africa covering a total of 2.7 mil km<sup>2</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]. These seasonally dry tropical forests are characterized by the dominance of <italic>Brachystegia, Julbernardia</italic>, and <italic>Isoberlinia</italic> species. In Tanzania, this ecosystem covers about 48.1 million ha representing about 54.4% of the total land area of 88.3 million ha [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>]. Miombo woodlands play a significant role in the adjacent communities. In addition, they provide direct benefits such as timber and poles, as well as non-timber forest products, including honey, mushrooms, and medicinal plants. In addition, they provide important ecosystem services, including mitigating climate change through carbon storage, biodiversity conservation, and watershed protection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>]. </p>
      <p>Due to the heavy reliance of local communities on goods and services derived from miombo woodlands, there is growing concern about the integrity of this critical ecosystem. The primary drivers of degradation include unsustainable charcoal production, agricultural expansion, illegal logging, recurrent fires, and overgrazing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]. It is estimated that more than 80% of Tanzania’s population relies on fuelwood, predominantly charcoal, as their primary source of energy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]. This substantial demand has accelerated forest degradation, resulting in declining forest cover and increased habitat fragmentation. Given the sustained and growing reliance on wood-based energy, this demand is likely to persist for several decades [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>]. This call for intervention is to enhance the sustainable use of miombo woodlands. One of the unique characteristics of miombo woodlands is their capacity to regenerate, which management efforts need to tap into.</p>
      <p>Recovery in Miombo woodlands is driven by a combination of vegetative and seed-based regeneration processes that shape post-disturbance dynamics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>]. Following charcoal production, timber harvesting, or cultivation, vegetative regeneration, particularly coppicing and resprouting from pre-existing root systems, often dominates, enabling rapid shoot growth due to established belowground resources. However, coppicing success varies by species, stump size, and time since cutting, and may decline with repeated harvesting [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]. Seed-based regeneration also plays a critical role, especially where fire or land clearing reduces stump viability, with recruitment influenced by disturbance intensity, light availability, and dispersal mechanisms, including animal-mediated seed dispersal in degraded sites. Nonetheless, regeneration capacity differs markedly among species, and some high-value timber species exhibit poor recruitment, implying that although structural recovery may occur within a few decades, full compositional recovery is slower and may result in long-term shifts in woodland structure and species composition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>].</p>
      <p>These regeneration dynamics directly inform forest management decisions. Accordingly, sustainable management and utilisation of miombo woodlands depend on a sound understanding of stand growth dynamics and post-disturbance recovery processes. A core principle of sustainable forest management is the determination of growth rates to ensure that the allowable cut does not exceed the periodic increment, thereby maintaining a balance between livelihood needs and ecosystem conservation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]. However, tree growth in Miombo systems is shaped by multiple interacting factors. For example, stands at the climax stage typically exhibit lower increments compared to regrowth stands recovering after disturbance. In addition, regrowth performance is strongly influenced by the type and intensity of disturbance, including the degree of seed-bank disruption, fire-related mortality, and the capacity of residual stumps to regenerate via coppicing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>]. Consequently, the nature of resource extraction practices becomes critical in shaping recovery outcomes. </p>
      <p>Selective timber harvesting, for instance, creates canopy gaps, and has been shown not to consistently restore commercially valuable timber species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]. As many target species are light-demanding and may fail to regenerate adequately under partial canopy cover, this potentially favours less valuable species. Conversely, evidence from central Mozambique indicates that logged stands may exhibit greater species diversity than areas recovering from agriculture or charcoal production, likely because logging often leaves residual vegetation and soil structure relatively intact, facilitating faster recovery [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]. In contrast, charcoal production, driven by rising urban energy demand and rural poverty, remains one of the most pervasive degradation drivers in Miombo systems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>]. It involves the selective removal of high-density species for carbonisation in traditional earth kilns, gradually altering stand structure and composition. Sustainability varies by ecological zone: dry Miombo in Zambia is considered unsustainable under current practices, requiring approximately 2.3 ha of regrowth to match the output of 1 ha of mature woodland, whereas wetter Miombo may sustain production under 50 - 55-year cutting cycles [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>].</p>
      <p>Within the context of diverse disturbance regimes and variable recovery trajectories, understanding how particular harvesting strategies shape regeneration outcomes is critical for informed management. This study, therefore, investigates the impact of selective cutting for charcoal production on the recovery of dry Miombo woodlands in selected sites in the Morogoro region, Tanzania. While most previous studies have examined intensive charcoal harvesting that results in extensive canopy opening [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>], this research focuses on a more selective approach in which only species primarily preferred for charcoal are removed, while timber species of all size classes are deliberately retained for future timber production. Although timber species are technically suitable for charcoal, this study assesses the ecological implications of reserving them for higher-value uses. Using a chronosequence approach and data from different fallow ages (1 - 6 years), this study evaluated early recovery patterns and rates under this selective harvesting model for dry Miombo woodlands. Specifically, this study aimed to i) determine stand parameters (basal area, volume and aboveground biomass (AGB)) for each fallow age, and ii) to determine the effect of fallow age on the volume increment and carbon sequestration.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec2">
      <title>2. Material and Methods</title>
      <sec id="sec2dot1">
        <title>2.1. Study Area and Charcoal Project Description</title>
        <p>The study was carried out in villages where the project Transforming Tanzania Charcoal Sector (TTCS) has been implemented by the Tanzania Forest Conservation Group (TFCG) since 2015. The study was conducted in three districts within the Morogoro region of Tanzania, namely Kilosa (503,727 ha), Morogoro (132,620 ha), and Mvomero (336,480 ha), located in Morogoro region (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>]. The study was carried out in the miombo woodlands that are managed by the villages, namely Ihombwe, Ulaya Mbuyuni, and Kigunga in Kilosa District; Misengele and Maharaka villages (6.2864˚S, 37.6667˚E) in Mvomero District; and Matuli and Mlilingwa (6.9463˚S, 37.7047˚E) in Mvuha District. Agriculture is the primary economic activity, comprising both subsistence (93%) and commercial (7%) farming [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>]. Livestock keeping is another significant activity, with cattle, goats, and sheep commonly reared. Free grazing is prevalent in lowland areas, particularly within village lands [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>]. </p>
        <p>The project has developed a 24-year rotational harvesting model based on a checkerboard mapping system within each Forest Management Unit (FMU). In this system, the FMU were divided into harvesting blocks measuring 50 m × 50 m, and only 1/24 of the blocks are harvested each year, assuming that a harvested block will fully recover after 24 years. To promote adequate regeneration, adjacent blocks are not harvested for at least 10 years, thereby creating a mosaic landscape of woodland patches at different stages of regeneration. There was harvesting protocol that were followed in the selected blocks set for harvesting as follows: trees with a diameter at breast height (DBH) of 15 cm or less are not harvested, and at least three trees with DBH greater than 15 cm must be retained in each 50 m × 50 m harvesting block; minimum buffer distances must be maintained between harvesting areas and water sources; harvesting is restricted to slopes with gradients of less than 30%; and high-value timber species such as Mvule (Milicia excelsa), Mninga (Pterocarpus angolensis), <italic>Julbernardia globiflora</italic> and <italic>Mpingo</italic> (<italic>Dalbergia melanoxylon</italic>) are strictly protected. Additionally, individual trees with significant biodiversity value, such as those serving as nesting sites, are excluded from harvesting [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>].</p>
        <fig id="fig1">
          <label>Figure 1</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1381860-rId13.jpeg?20260430031912" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 1.</bold>Locations of the study sites.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot2">
        <title>2.2. Sampling Design</title>
        <p>The study site was divided into two main categories: 1) harvested coupes representing different fallow ages and 2) adjacent unharvested control blocks. Within each selected block, a random sampling approach was applied to establish study plots across Kilosa, Mvomero, and Morogoro district. Four treatment categories were defined based on time since charcoal harvesting (fallow age): 1) blocks harvested in 2015 (6-year fallow), 2) blocks harvested in 2018 (3.5-year fallow), 3) blocks harvested in 2021 (1-year fallow), and 4) unharvested control plots. The selected chronosequence sites were comparable in terms of soil characteristics, fire history, grazing pressure, and prior stand condition, minimizing the influence of confounding environmental factors on recovery patterns [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>].</p>
        <p>A total of 106 plots were established, comprising 79 plots in harvested coupes and 27 plots in unharvested control blocks. At the village level, Ihombwe had 38 plots, of which 30 were harvested and 8 were unharvested; Ulaya Mbuyuni had 28 plots, including 18 harvested and 10 unharvested; Kigunga had 12 plots, of which 3 were harvested and 9 were unharvested. Matuli and Mlilingwa each had 10 harvested plots, Misengele had 6 harvested plots, and Maharaka had 2 harvested plots. In harvested areas, plots were distributed in blocks arranged in a chessboard-like grid following the rotational harvesting system. Each sample plot followed a circular design with a radius of 15 m, with a nested central subplot of 1 m radius.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot3">
        <title>2.3. Data Collection</title>
        <p>Within each plot (15 m radius), all trees with DBH ≥ 1 cm were identified and measured at 1.3 m above ground using a diameter tape for larger stems and a Vernier calliper for smaller individuals to ensure measurement accuracy. The measured individuals were subsequently categorized into diameter classes as follows: 1 = 1 - 9.9 cm, 2 = 10 - 19.9 cm, 3 = 20 - 29.9 cm, 4 = 30 - 39.9 cm, and 5 = ≥ 40 cm. Species identification was conducted in the field by a qualified botanist familiar with the local flora, and uncertain individuals were verified using field reference materials where necessary. In harvested areas, the fallow age (time since harvesting) of each plot was determined from official harvesting records, enabling analysis of post-harvest recovery patterns in relation to disturbance history.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot4">
        <title>2.4. Data Analysis</title>
        <p>2.4.1. Stand Parameters</p>
        <p>Stand parameters of interest included the number of stems (N), basal area (G), volume (V), above-ground biomass (AGB), and carbon stock. These parameters were first computed at the individual tree level and then aggregated to the plot level and converted to per-hectare values by dividing the plot-level totals by plot area for each fallow age and control plots. Tree volume was estimated using the DBH-based allometric equation (1) developed by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>] while above-ground biomass was estimated using equation (2) developed by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>]. These models were selected due to their strong empirical support in miombo woodlands and high predictive accuracy, as indicated by high coefficients of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) reported in their respective studies. Biomass was subsequently converted to carbon stock using a carbon fraction of 0.47 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>], as expressed in equation (3).</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD1">
          <label>(1)</label>
          <mml:math>
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mo>
              </mml:mo>
              <mml:mn>0.00016</mml:mn>
              <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo>
              <mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>B</mml:mi>
              <mml:msup>
                <mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mn>2.463</mml:mn>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:msup>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <disp-formula id="FD2">
          <label>(2)</label>
          <mml:math>
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>G</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>B</mml:mi>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mo>
              </mml:mo>
              <mml:mn>0.0674</mml:mn>
              <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo>
              <mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>B</mml:mi>
              <mml:msup>
                <mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mn>2.472</mml:mn>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:msup>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <disp-formula id="FD3">
          <label>(3)</label>
          <mml:math>
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>G</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>B</mml:mi>
              <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo>
              <mml:mn>0.47</mml:mn>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>Where: <italic>V</italic> and <italic>AGB</italic> are the current volume in m<sup>3</sup> and aboveground biomass in tons, respectively, <italic>C</italic> is the carbon, and DBH is the diameter at breast height. </p>
        <p>2.4.2. Growth Rate</p>
        <p>Growth rates (GR) were estimated using a chronosequence-based approach by comparing mean stand parameters across fallow-age classes. Differences in stand parameters were calculated between successive fallow-age classes, specifically between 2015 - 2021 (6 years) and 2018 - 2021 (3.5 years). The mean difference for each variable was obtained by subtracting the mean value of the younger fallow age from that of the older fallow age. Annual growth rates were then derived by dividing these differences by the corresponding time interval, as expressed in equation (4):</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD4">
          <label>(4)</label>
          <mml:math>
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>G</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:msub>
                        <mml:mi>Y</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mrow>
                          <mml:msub>
                            <mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
                            <mml:mrow>
                              <mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
                              <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                            </mml:mrow>
                          </mml:msub>
                        </mml:mrow>
                      </mml:msub>
                      <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                      <mml:msub>
                        <mml:mi>Y</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mrow>
                          <mml:msub>
                            <mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
                            <mml:mrow>
                              <mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
                              <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                            </mml:mrow>
                          </mml:msub>
                        </mml:mrow>
                      </mml:msub>
                    </mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
                  </mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mo>
                  </mml:mo>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:msub>
                        <mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                      </mml:msub>
                      <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                      <mml:msub>
                        <mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                      </mml:msub>
                    </mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
                  </mml:mrow>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mrow>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>Where: GR represents the annual increment of the stand variable; <inline-formula><mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi> Y </mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi> C </mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi> y </mml:mi><mml:mn> 1 </mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the current volume or carbon stock for the block harvested in year 1; <inline-formula><mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi> Y </mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi> C </mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi> y </mml:mi><mml:mn> 2 </mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mean current volume or carbon for the blocks harvested in year 2. Year 1 or 2 refers to the year the harvesting took place, <italic>i.e.</italic>, 2015, 2018, and 2021.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec3">
      <title>3. Results</title>
      <sec id="sec3dot1">
        <title>3.1. Stand Parameters</title>
        <p>Stem density, basal area, volume, and aboveground biomass varied across treatments. The findings indicate that the number of stems increases with the length of the fallow period, from 323 stems ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> in the reference year (1-year fallow age) to 1301 stems ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> for sites with a fallow age of 6 years (<bold>Table 1</bold>, <bold>Table 2</bold>). Basal area, volume, and aboveground biomass showed a similar trend, increasing from 4.67 m<sup>2</sup> ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> to 9.16 m<sup>2</sup> ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>, 42.87 m<sup>3</sup> ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> to 66.28m<sup>3</sup> ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>, and 29.47 tons ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> to 54.62 tonnes ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>, respectively. The average stem density, basal area, volume and above-ground biomass for the control plots were found to be 664.91 stems ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>, 10.19 m<sup>2</sup> ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>, 93.84 m<sup>3</sup> ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>, and 63.76 tons ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>, respectively. The variation of stand parameters across plots, as indicated by the confidence interval, was large (&gt;30%), particularly for AGB.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 1.</bold>Stand parameters across fallow periods.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl1">
          <label>Table 1</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Fallow age</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>N (stems ha</bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sup>−</sup>
                  </bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sup>1</sup>
                  </bold>
                  <bold>)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>G (m</bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sup>2</sup>
                  </bold>
                  <bold>ha</bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sup>−</sup>
                  </bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sup>1</sup>
                  </bold>
                  <bold>)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>V (m</bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sup>3</sup>
                  </bold>
                  <bold>ha</bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sup>−</sup>
                  </bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sup>1</sup>
                  </bold>
                  <bold>)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>AGB (tons ha</bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sup>−</sup>
                  </bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sup>1</sup>
                  </bold>
                  <bold>)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>6</td>
                <td>1301.69 ± 219.66</td>
                <td>9.16 ± 2.40</td>
                <td>66.28 ± 20.68</td>
                <td>44.98 ± 14.01</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>3.5</td>
                <td>590.04 ± 86.43</td>
                <td>6.60 ± 1.32</td>
                <td>54.19 ± 14.22</td>
                <td>36.78 ± 9.71</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>323.97 ± 91.33</td>
                <td>4.67 ± 1.47</td>
                <td>42.87 ± 14.18</td>
                <td>29.03 ± 9.64</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Control</td>
                <td>664.91 ± 147.743</td>
                <td>10.19 ± 1.97</td>
                <td>93.84 ± 24.78</td>
                <td>63.76 ± 17.03</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>The distribution of stem density, volume, and aboveground biomass (AGB) across diameter classes shows distinctive differences among fallow periods (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). The older fallow had a larger number of stems in the small diameter classes, <italic>i.e.</italic>, 1 - 10 and 10 - 20 compared to other fallow age treatment suggesting the increase in number of trees in these classes with the age of the fallow. Consequently, the number of stems in these classes influenced the increase in volume and biomass in the corresponding diameter classes. The fallow trees harvested in 2021 (short fallow) exhibited a reduction in the number of small-diameter trees. The control sites with no harvesting had large accumulations of volume and biomass contributed mainly by the medium and larger diameter classes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="fig2">
          <label>Figure 2</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1381860-rId26.jpeg?20260430031914" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 2.</bold>Stand Structure across diameter classes by treatment year/fallow age (2015, 2018, 2021, and Control).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot2">
        <title>3.2 Growth Rate</title>
        <p>The average differences in stand parameters between fallow age, MAI, and carbon sequestration are presented in <bold>Table 2</bold>. The findings show that the increase in the fallow period increased the differences in stand parameters from the reference age, except for the number of trees. For example, the basal area at the fallow age of six years differed from the reference age by about 4.47 m<sup>2</sup> ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>, while at the fallow age of 3.5, the difference was 2.56 m<sup>2</sup> ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>. The basal area annual increment was found to be around 0.74 m<sup>2</sup> ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>. The increase in the fallow period from 3.5 to 6 years led to pronounced increases in volume and AGB accumulations, from 12.08 m<sup>3</sup> ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> to 23.41 m<sup>3</sup> ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>, and from 8.20 tonnes ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> to 15.95 tonnes ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>, respectively. On average, the volume MAI and carbon sequestration ranged from 3.45 to 3.90 m<sup>3</sup> ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> year<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> and from 1.17 to 1.33 t ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> yr<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>, with large confidence intervals around the means.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 2.</bold>Effect of fallow period on the stand parameters.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl2">
          <label>Table 2</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Stand variable</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Difference</bold>
                  <bold>(2015 - 2021)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Period</bold>
                  <bold>(years)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Annual increment</bold>
                  <bold>(2015 - 2021:</bold>
                  <italic>per year</italic>
                  <bold>)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Difference</bold>
                  <bold>(2018 - 2021)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Period</bold>
                  <bold>(years)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Annual increment</bold>
                  <bold>(2018</bold>
                  <bold>-</bold>
                  <bold>2021:</bold>
                  <italic>per year</italic>
                  <bold>)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  N (stems ha
                  <sup>−</sup>
                  <sup>1</sup>
                  )
                </td>
                <td>977.72 ± 143.2</td>
                <td>6</td>
                <td>162.95 ± 31.67</td>
                <td>711.65 ± 92.21</td>
                <td>3.5</td>
                <td>203.33 ± 60.21</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  G (m
                  <sup>2</sup>
                  ha
                  <sup>−</sup>
                  <sup>1</sup>
                  )
                </td>
                <td>4.49 ± 3.01</td>
                <td>6</td>
                <td>0.75 ± 0.15</td>
                <td>2.56 ± 0.82</td>
                <td>3.5</td>
                <td>0.73 ± 0.37</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  V (m
                  <sup>3</sup>
                  ha
                  <sup>−</sup>
                  <sup>1</sup>
                  )
                </td>
                <td>23.41 ± 26.74</td>
                <td>6</td>
                <td>3.90 ± 2.31</td>
                <td>12.08 ± 6.12</td>
                <td>3.5</td>
                <td>3.45 ± 1.54</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  AGB (tons ha
                  <sup>−</sup>
                  <sup>1</sup>
                  )
                </td>
                <td>15.95 ± 26.74</td>
                <td>6</td>
                <td>2.66 ± 1.78</td>
                <td>8.20 ± 5.23</td>
                <td>3.5</td>
                <td>2.34 ± 0.98</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  C (tons ha)
                  <sup>−</sup>
                  <sup>1</sup>
                </td>
                <td>7.975 ± 18.13</td>
                <td>6</td>
                <td>1.33 ± 0.89</td>
                <td>4.10 ± 2.11</td>
                <td>3.5</td>
                <td>1.17 ± 0.49</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec4">
      <title>4. Discuss</title>
      <p>This study employed a chronosequence approach to assess structural changes in Miombo woodlands following charcoal harvesting. Unlike conventional charcoal production practices, harvesting at the selected site was conducted selectively, <italic>i.e.</italic>, timber species of all size classes were retained, while non-timber species were harvested only after attaining a minimum DBH of 15 cm. Furthermore, harvesting followed a checkerboard mapping system in which alternating coupes were left unharvested. This spatially structured approach maintains continuous forest cover across the landscape and supports biodiversity by preserving habitat availability and ecological connectivity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>]. This study presents early structural change in miombo woodlands, using a fallow age of 6 years max, utilising 79 plots laid out in charcoal-harvested blocks and 27 plots as controls in unharvested sites. </p>
      <p>The findings indicate a progressive increase in tree density with advancing fallow age following selective charcoal harvesting. This pattern can be attributed to canopy opening created by the removal of selected stems, which reduced competition for light, moisture, and nutrients. The partial canopy disturbance enhanced light penetration to the forest floor, creating favorable conditions for the establishment and growth of light-demanding species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>]. The high stem density in the 1 - 10 cm diameter class, observed shortly after harvesting, is unlikely to result mainly from coppice regrowth. Instead, it reflects successful establishment and growth of seedlings and saplings that advanced into this size class under increased light availability following canopy opening [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>]. For example, it has been reported that some light-demanding trees, such as <italic>Brachystegia spiciformis</italic>and <italic>Julbernardia globiflora</italic>, their coppice shoots could reach 5 cm DBH within 5 - 8 years under favourable conditions, while seedling-origin stems required 10 - 15 years to reach the same threshold [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>]. Nevertheless, comparing the number of trees in the 6-year fallow with the control treatment, the findings indicate that the fallow has more trees (1301 versus 665 trees ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>). The relatively high stem count in the 6-year fallow likely reflects transient recruitment before density-dependent mortality and competitive thinning become pronounced. Studies indicate that tree density often continues to reorganise for decades after disturbance, with trends toward lower stem density and larger mean tree size as competition and natural mortality operate over 30 to 50+ years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>].</p>
      <p>The AGB and stand volume increased progressively with fallow age, reflecting rapid tree recruitment and reduced competition in regenerating stands. In the fallows (3.5 and 6 years), small-sized trees significantly contributed to the rise in AGB and volume, underscoring the substantial influence of early regeneration dynamics. These characteristics have been reported elsewhere [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]. Conversely, as expected, the control plots were dominated by medium-to large-sized trees, which accounted for the majority of total biomass and volume (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). The 1-year-old fallows, despite having lower AGB and volume, displayed a pattern similar to the control, with medium-sized trees contributing more substantially, likely because insufficient time had elapsed for canopy opening to significantly stimulate small-tree recruitment. Despite the observed increase, biomass accumulation in fallows did not surpass that of the control plots, primarily due to the short recovery period. Consistent with previous studies, early successional stands (1 - 10 years post-clearing) are characterised by rapid stem recruitment but relatively low biomass accumulation due to the small size of trees. Biomass accumulation accelerates in intermediate stages (10 - 30 years) as trees grow into larger size classes, and declines in older stands (&gt;30 years) as structural equilibrium is approached. Nevertheless, this trend demonstrates the promising development of miombo in the study site with the applied treatments.</p>
      <p>Growth rates are a key determinant of sustainable levels of forest exploitation, as they indicate a stand’s capacity to recover following disturbance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>]. The results of this study demonstrate encouraging recovery trends in basal area, stand volume, and aboveground biomass (AGB). Few studies have reported the annual increment in basal area. It has been reported that the mean basal area ranges from 0.24 to 0.35 m<sup>2</sup> ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> year<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>, depending on the age of the fallow in Zambia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>]. The reported basal area increment in this study (0.74 m<sup>2</sup> ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) is higher than previously reported values, likely due to differences in harvesting intensity, which allowed the remaining trees to grow rapidly. </p>
      <p>The MAI for volume, an important stand parameter for determining sustainable allowable cut, was estimated to range from 3.45 to 3.90 m<sup>3</sup> ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> yr<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> in this study. These values indicate relatively strong recovery and growth in the regenerating stands. Comparable MAI values have been reported in other studies, where volume and carbon accumulation rates ranged from 1 to 3 m<sup>3</sup> ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> yr<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> in mature miombo stands and 3 to 6 m<sup>3</sup> ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> yr<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> in younger and actively regenerating stands [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>]. The values observed in the present study, therefore, fall within the range typically associated with young, fast-growing stands, indicating that the harvested sites may return to their pre-harvested condition within 30 to 50 years.</p>
      <p>Furthermore, carbon sequestration rates recorded in this study (1.17 to 1.33 t ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> yr<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) are slightly higher than those reported elsewhere for miombo ecosystems. For example, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>] documented sequestration rates of 0.75 t ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> yr<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> in 50-year-old miombo woodlands and 0.9 t ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> yr<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> in 16-year-old miombo fallows, both originating from agricultural fallow systems. The comparatively lower values reported in those systems may be attributed to differences in disturbance history and stand structure. In the present study, the selective harvesting approach left a portion of trees standing, likely reducing competition and creating growing space that enhanced the growth of residual trees and regenerating individuals. In contrast, recovery in agricultural fallow systems typically occurs after more extensive clearing, where regeneration starts largely from seedlings and coppice, leading to slower biomass accumulation during the early stages of stand development.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec5">
      <title>5. Conclusion</title>
      <p>The results indicate that dry Miombo woodlands demonstrate strong early recovery following selective charcoal harvesting. Structural attributes, including stem density, basal area, volume, and above-ground biomass, increased with fallow age, reflecting active regeneration and improving stand conditions over time. The estimated mean annual increment for volume (3.45 - 3.90 m<sup>3</sup> ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> yr<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) and carbon sequestration (1.17 - 1.33 t ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> yr<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) indicates relatively rapid growth typical of young regenerating stands. Although biomass and volume in the fallows had not yet reached the levels observed in unharvested stands within the six-year recovery period, the trends demonstrate the resilience of Miombo woodlands under controlled harvesting regimes. These findings support the potential of rotational and selective charcoal harvesting systems to sustain woodland productivity while maintaining ecosystem recovery and carbon storage.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec6">
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>We are grateful to the Kilosa, Morogoro, and Mvomero districts as well as studied village governments for granting access to the study site and supporting our academic work. We also acknowledge Sokoine University of Agriculture (SUA) for providing the opportunity to undertake this research.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec7">
      <title>Disclosure Statement</title>
      <p>No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Campbell, B.M. (1996) The Miombo in Transition: Woodlands and Welfare in Africa. Center for International Forestry Research.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Campbell, B.M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1996</year>
            <article-title>The Miombo in Transition: Woodlands and Welfare in Africa</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">MNRT (2015) National Forest Resources Monitoring and Assessment of Tanzania Mainland. Main Results. Ministry of Natural Resources &amp; Tourism.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>National Forest Resources Monitoring and Assessment of Tanzania Mainland</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Abdallah, J.M., Abdallah, J.M. and Monela, G.G. (2007) Overview of Miombo Woodlands in Tanzania. <italic>Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute</italic> 50 <italic>Mitmio</italic><italic>mbo</italic>- <italic>Management of Indigenous Tree Species for Ecosystem Restoration and</italic><italic>Wood Production in Semi Overview of Miombo Woodlands in Tanzania</italic>, Morogoro, 6-12 February 2007, 9-23.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Abdallah, J.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Abdallah, J.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Monela, G.G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tanzania, M</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2007</year>
            <article-title>Overview of Miombo Woodlands in Tanzania</article-title>
            <source>Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute 50 Mitmiombo-Management of Indigenous Tree Species for Ecosystem Restoration and Wood Production in Semi Overview of Miombo Woodlands in Tanzania</source>
            <volume>6</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Luoga, E.J., Witkowski, E.T.F. and Balkwill, K. (2004) Regeneration by Coppicing (Resprouting) of Miombo (African Savanna) Trees in Relation to Land Use. <italic>Forest Ecolo</italic><italic>gy and Management</italic>, 189, 23-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2003.02.001 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2003.02.001</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2003.02.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2003.02.001</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Luoga, E.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Witkowski, E.T.F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Balkwill, K.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2004</year>
            <article-title>Regeneration by Coppicing (Resprouting) of Miombo (African Savanna) Trees in Relation to Land Use</article-title>
            <source>Forest Ecology and Management</source>
            <volume>189</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2003.02.001</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Doggart, N. and Loserian, D. (2007) South Nguru Mountains: A Description of the biophysical landscape. TFCG Technical Paper, 11, p 70.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Doggart, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Loserian, D.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2007</year>
            <article-title>South Nguru Mountains: A Description of the biophysical landscape</article-title>
            <source>TFCG Technical Paper</source>
            <volume>11</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Mwampamba, T.H. (2007) Has the Woodfuel Crisis Returned? Urban Charcoal Consumption in Tanzania and Its Implications to Present and Future Forest Availability. <italic>Energy Policy</italic>, 35, 4221-4234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.02.010 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.enpol.2007.02.010</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.02.010">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.02.010</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Mwampamba, T.H.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2007</year>
            <article-title>Has the Woodfuel Crisis Returned? Urban Charcoal Consumption in Tanzania and Its Implications to Present and Future Forest Availability</article-title>
            <source>Energy Policy</source>
            <volume>35</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.enpol.2007.02.010</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Doggart, N., Ruhinduka, R., Meshack, C.K., Ishengoma, R.C., Morgan-Brown, T., Abdallah, J.M., <italic>et al</italic>. (2020) The Influence of Energy Policy on Charcoal Consumption in Urban Households in Tanzania. <italic>Energy for Sustainable Development</italic>, 57, 200-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2020.06.002 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.esd.2020.06.002</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2020.06.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2020.06.002</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Doggart, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ruhinduka, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Meshack, C.K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ishengoma, R.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Morgan-Brown, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Abdallah, J.M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>The Influence of Energy Policy on Charcoal Consumption in Urban Households in Tanzania</article-title>
            <source>Energy for Sustainable Development</source>
            <volume>57</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.esd.2020.06.002</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Chidumayo, E.N. (2004) Development of Brachystegia-Julbernardia Woodland after Clear-Felling in Central Zambia: Evidence for High Resilience. <italic>Applied Vegetation Science</italic>, 7, 237-242. https://doi.org/10.1658/1402-2001(2004)007[0237:dobwac]2.0.co;2 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1658/1402-2001(2004)007[0237:dobwac]2.0.co;2</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1658/1402-2001(2004)007[0237:dobwac]2.0.co;2">https://doi.org/10.1658/1402-2001(2004)007[0237:dobwac]2.0.co;2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Chidumayo, E.N.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2004</year>
            <article-title>Development of Brachystegia-Julbernardia Woodland after Clear-Felling in Central Zambia: Evidence for High Resilience</article-title>
            <source>Applied Vegetation Science</source>
            <volume>2001</volume>
            <issue>2004</issue>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1658/1402-2001(2004)007[0237:dobwac]2.0.co;2</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Mugasha, W.A., Bollandsås, O.M., Gobakken, T., Zahabu, E., Katani, J.Z. and Eid, T. (2016) Decision-Support Tool for Management of Miombo Woodlands: A Matrix Model Approach. <italic>Southern Forests</italic>: <italic>a Journal of Forest Science</italic>, 79, 65-77. https://doi.org/10.2989/20702620.2016.1233776 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2989/20702620.2016.1233776</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2989/20702620.2016.1233776">https://doi.org/10.2989/20702620.2016.1233776</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Mugasha, W.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gobakken, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zahabu, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Katani, J.Z.</string-name>
              <string-name>Eid, T.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>Decision-Support Tool for Management of Miombo Woodlands: A Matrix Model Approach</article-title>
            <source>Southern Forests: a Journal of Forest Science</source>
            <volume>79</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2989/20702620.2016.1233776</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Sangeda, A. and Maleko, D. (2018) Regeneration Effectiveness Post Tree Harvesting in Natural Miombo Woodlands. <italic>Journal of Plant Sciences and Agricultural Research</italic>, 2, Article 10.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Sangeda, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Maleko, D.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2018</year>
            <article-title>Regeneration Effectiveness Post Tree Harvesting in Natural Miombo Woodlands</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Plant Sciences and Agricultural Research</source>
            <volume>2</volume>
            <elocation-id>10</elocation-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Lisboa, S.N., Montfort, F., Grinand, C., Betbeder, J., Sitoe, A.A., Roelens, J., <italic>et al</italic>. (2025) Recovery of Miombo Woodland in Abandoned Lands Post-Agriculture, Charcoal Production and Logging in Central Mozambique. <italic>African Journal of Ecology</italic>, 63, e70066. https://doi.org/10.1111/aje.70066 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/aje.70066</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/aje.70066">https://doi.org/10.1111/aje.70066</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Lisboa, S.N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Montfort, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Grinand, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Betbeder, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sitoe, A.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Roelens, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Post-Agriculture, C</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2025</year>
            <article-title>Recovery of Miombo Woodland in Abandoned Lands Post-Agriculture, Charcoal Production and Logging in Central Mozambique</article-title>
            <source>African Journal of Ecology</source>
            <volume>63</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/aje.70066</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Syampungani, S., Geldenhuys, C.J. and Chirwa, P.W. (2015) Regeneration Dynamics of Miombo Woodland in Response to Different Anthropogenic Disturbances: Forest Characterisation for Sustainable Management. <italic>Agroforestry Systems</italic>, 90, 563-576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-015-9841-7 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10457-015-9841-7</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-015-9841-7">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-015-9841-7</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Syampungani, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Geldenhuys, C.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chirwa, P.W.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>Regeneration Dynamics of Miombo Woodland in Response to Different Anthropogenic Disturbances: Forest Characterisation for Sustainable Management</article-title>
            <source>Agroforestry Systems</source>
            <volume>90</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10457-015-9841-7</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Treue, T., Ngaga, Y.M., Meilby, H., Lund, J.F., Kajembe, G., Iddi, S., <italic>et al</italic>. (2014) Does Participatory Forest Management Promote Sustainable Forest Utilisation in Tanzania? <italic>International Forestry Review</italic>, 16, 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554814811031279 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1505/146554814811031279</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1505/146554814811031279">https://doi.org/10.1505/146554814811031279</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Treue, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ngaga, Y.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Meilby, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lund, J.F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kajembe, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Iddi, S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Does Participatory Forest Management Promote Sustainable Forest Utilisation in Tanzania? International Forestry Review, 16, 23-38</article-title>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1505/146554814811031279</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <label>14.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Nghonda, D.N., Muteya, H.K., Salomon, W., Mushagalusa, F.C., Malaisse, F., Ponette, Q., <italic>et al</italic>. (2024) Floristic Diversity and Natural Regeneration of Miombo Woodlands in the Rural Area of Lubumbashi, D.R. Congo. <italic>Diversity</italic>, 16, Article 405. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16070405 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/d16070405</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/d16070405">https://doi.org/10.3390/d16070405</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Nghonda, D.N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Muteya, H.K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Salomon, W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mushagalusa, F.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Malaisse, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ponette, Q.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lubumbashi, D.R.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>Floristic Diversity and Natural Regeneration of Miombo Woodlands in the Rural Area of Lubumbashi, D</article-title>
            <source>R. Congo. Diversity</source>
            <volume>16</volume>
            <elocation-id>405</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/d16070405</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <label>15.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Chidumayo, E.N. (2019) Is Charcoal Production in Brachystegia-Julbernardia Woodlands of Zambia Sustainable? <italic>Biomass and Bioenergy</italic>, 125, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.04.010 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.04.010</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.04.010">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.04.010</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Chidumayo, E.N.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2019</year>
            <article-title>Is Charcoal Production in Brachystegia-Julbernardia Woodlands of Zambia Sustainable? Biomass and Bioenergy, 125, 1-7</article-title>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.04.010</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <label>16.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ishengoma, R.C., Katani, J.Z., Abdallah, J.M., Haule, O., Deogratias, K. and Olomi, J.S. (2016) Kilosa District Harvesting Plan. Kilosa District Council.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ishengoma, R.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Katani, J.Z.</string-name>
              <string-name>Abdallah, J.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Haule, O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Deogratias, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Olomi, J.S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>Kilosa District Harvesting Plan</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <label>17.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Mtimbanjayo, J.R. and Sangeda, A.Z. (2018) Ecological Effects of Cattle Grazing on Miombo Tree Species Regeneration and Diversity in Central-Eastern Tanzania. <italic>Journal of Environmental Research</italic>, 2, Article 3.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Mtimbanjayo, J.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sangeda, A.Z.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2018</year>
            <article-title>Ecological Effects of Cattle Grazing on Miombo Tree Species Regeneration and Diversity in Central-Eastern Tanzania</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Environmental Research</source>
            <volume>2</volume>
            <elocation-id>3</elocation-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <label>18.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kajembe, G.C., Silayo, D., Mwakalobo, A.B. and Mutabazi, K. (2013) The Kilosa District REDD+ Pilot Project, Tanzania. A Socioeconomic Baseline Survey. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), 33-34.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Kajembe, G.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Silayo, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mwakalobo, A.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mutabazi, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Project, T</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2013</year>
            <article-title>The Kilosa District REDD+ Pilot Project, Tanzania</article-title>
            <source>A Socioeconomic Baseline Survey. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED)</source>
            <volume>33</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <label>19.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Mauya, E.W., Mugasha, W.A., Zahabu, E., Bollandsås, O.M. and Eid, T. (2014) Models for Estimation of Tree Volume in the Miombo Woodlands of Tanzania. <italic>Southern Forests</italic>: <italic>A Journal of Forest Science</italic>, 76, 209-219. https://doi.org/10.2989/20702620.2014.957594 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2989/20702620.2014.957594</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2989/20702620.2014.957594">https://doi.org/10.2989/20702620.2014.957594</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Mauya, E.W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mugasha, W.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zahabu, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Eid, T.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Models for Estimation of Tree Volume in the Miombo Woodlands of Tanzania</article-title>
            <source>Southern Forests: A Journal of Forest Science</source>
            <volume>76</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2989/20702620.2014.957594</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <label>20.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Mugasha, W.A., Eid, T., Bollandsås, O.M., Malimbwi, R.E., Chamshama, S.A.O., Zahabu, E., <italic>et al</italic>. (2013) Allometric Models for Prediction of above-and Belowground Biomass of Trees in the Miombo Woodlands of Tanzania. <italic>Forest Ecology and Manage</italic><italic>ment</italic>, 310, 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.08.003 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2013.08.003</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.08.003">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.08.003</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Mugasha, W.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Eid, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Malimbwi, R.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chamshama, S.A.O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zahabu, E.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2013</year>
            <article-title>Allometric Models for Prediction of above-and Belowground Biomass of Trees in the Miombo Woodlands of Tanzania</article-title>
            <source>Forest Ecology and Management</source>
            <volume>310</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2013.08.003</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <label>21.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">IPCC (2006) 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <year>2006</year>
            <article-title>2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <label>22.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="thesis">van’t Veen, H. (2022) Effects of Transitions in Charcoal Production Systems on Forests and Livelihoods. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Zurich.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="thesis">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Veen, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Thesis, U</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>Effects of Transitions in Charcoal Production Systems on Forests and Livelihoods</article-title>
            <source>Ph.D. Thesis</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <label>23.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Schwartz, M.W. and Caro, T.M. (2003) Effect of Selective Logging on Tree and Understory Regeneration in Miombo Woodland in Western Tanzania. <italic>African Journal of Ecology</italic>, 41, 75-82. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2028.2003.00417.x <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2028.2003.00417.x</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2028.2003.00417.x">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2028.2003.00417.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Schwartz, M.W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Caro, T.M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2003</year>
            <article-title>Effect of Selective Logging on Tree and Understory Regeneration in Miombo Woodland in Western Tanzania</article-title>
            <source>African Journal of Ecology</source>
            <volume>41</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2028.2003.00417.x</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <label>24.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Chiteculo, V. and Surovy, P. (2018) Dynamic Patterns of Trees Species in Miombo Forest and Management Perspectives for Sustainable Production—Case Study in Huambo Province, Angola. <italic>Forests</italic>, 9, Article 321. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9060321 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/f9060321</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/f9060321">https://doi.org/10.3390/f9060321</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Chiteculo, V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Surovy, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Province, A</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2018</year>
            <article-title>Dynamic Patterns of Trees Species in Miombo Forest and Management Perspectives for Sustainable Production—Case Study in Huambo Province, Angola</article-title>
            <source>Forests</source>
            <volume>9</volume>
            <elocation-id>321</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/f9060321</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <label>25.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Mugasha, W.A., Eid, T., Bollandsås, O.M. and Mbwambo, L. (2016) Modelling Diameter Growth, Mortality and Recruitment of Trees in Miombo Woodlands of Tanzania. <italic>Southern Forests</italic>: <italic>a Journal of Forest Science</italic>, 79, 51-64. https://doi.org/10.2989/20702620.2016.1233755 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2989/20702620.2016.1233755</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2989/20702620.2016.1233755">https://doi.org/10.2989/20702620.2016.1233755</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Mugasha, W.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Eid, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mbwambo, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Growth, M</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>Modelling Diameter Growth, Mortality and Recruitment of Trees in Miombo Woodlands of Tanzania</article-title>
            <source>Southern Forests: a Journal of Forest Science</source>
            <volume>79</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2989/20702620.2016.1233755</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <label>26.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="book">Grundy, I., Mushove, P., Shumba, E. and Matose, F. (1996) Regeneration and Management of <italic>Brachystegia spiciformis</italic> Benth. and <italic>Julbernardia globiflora</italic> (Benth) Troupin in Miombo Woodland, Zimbabwe. Oxford University Press.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="book">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Grundy, I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mushove, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Shumba, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Matose, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Woodland, Z</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1996</year>
            <article-title>Regeneration and Management of Brachystegia spiciformis Benth</article-title>
            <source>and Julbernardia globiflora (Benth) Troupin in Miombo Woodland</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <label>27.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Handavu, F., Syampungani, S. and Chisanga, E. (2011) The Influence of Stump Diameter and Height on Coppicing Ability of Selected Key Miombo Woodland Tree Species of Zambia: A Guide for Harvesting for Charcoal Production. <italic>Journal of Ecology and the Natural Environment</italic>, 3, 461-468. https://doi.org/10.5897/jene11.083 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5897/jene11.083</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5897/jene11.083">https://doi.org/10.5897/jene11.083</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Handavu, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Syampungani, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chisanga, E.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2011</year>
            <article-title>The Influence of Stump Diameter and Height on Coppicing Ability of Selected Key Miombo Woodland Tree Species of Zambia: A Guide for Harvesting for Charcoal Production</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Ecology and the Natural Environment</source>
            <volume>3</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5897/jene11.083</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <label>28.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="thesis">Ndalowa, D. (2024) The Potential for Sustainable Wood Harvesting in Malawi’s Miombo Woodlands: Estimating Tree Growth, Biomass Production, and Degradation. Ph.D Thesis, Michigan State University.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="thesis">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ndalowa, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Growth, B</string-name>
              <string-name>Thesis, M</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>The Potential for Sustainable Wood Harvesting in Malawi’s Miombo Woodlands: Estimating Tree Growth, Biomass Production, and Degradation</article-title>
            <source>Ph.D Thesis</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B29">
        <label>29.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Chidumayo, E.N. (1988) A Re-Assessment of Effects of Fire on Miombo Regeneration in the Zambian Copperbelt. <italic>Journal of Tropical Ecology</italic>, 4, 361-372. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266467400003011 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/s0266467400003011</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266467400003011">https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266467400003011</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Chidumayo, E.N.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1988</year>
            <article-title>A Re-Assessment of Effects of Fire on Miombo Regeneration in the Zambian Copperbelt</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Tropical Ecology</source>
            <volume>4</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/s0266467400003011</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B30">
        <label>30.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Green, E.L., Eigenbrod, F., Schreckenberg, K. and Willcock, S. (2016) Modelling Tree Growth to Determine the Sustainability of Current Off-Take from Miombo Woodland: A Case Study from Rural Villages in Malawi. <italic>Environmental Conservation</italic>, 44, 66-73. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0376892916000485 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/s0376892916000485</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/s0376892916000485">https://doi.org/10.1017/s0376892916000485</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Green, E.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Eigenbrod, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Schreckenberg, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Willcock, S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>Modelling Tree Growth to Determine the Sustainability of Current Off-Take from Miombo Woodland: A Case Study from Rural Villages in Malawi</article-title>
            <source>Environmental Conservation</source>
            <volume>44</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/s0376892916000485</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B31">
        <label>31.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Lupala, Z.J., Lusambo, L.P. and Ngaga, Y.M. (2014) Management, Growth, and Carbon Storage in Miombo Woodlands of Tanzania. <italic>International Journal of Forestry Re</italic><italic>search</italic>, 2014, Article ID: 629317. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/629317 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2014/629317</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/629317">https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/629317</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Lupala, Z.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lusambo, L.P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ngaga, Y.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Management, G</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Management, Growth, and Carbon Storage in Miombo Woodlands of Tanzania</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of Forestry Research</source>
            <volume>2014</volume>
            <fpage>629317</fpage>
            <elocation-id>ID</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2014/629317</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>