<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.4" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">aim</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Advances in Microbiology</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2165-3410</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2165-3402</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/aim.2026.164010</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">aim-150798</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Biomedical</subject>
          <subject>Life Sciences</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Production and Evaluation of a Forest Litter and Jatropha curcas Cake-Based Biofertilizer Developed through Anaerobic Fermentation</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0009-0007-7015-8849</contrib-id>
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Pale</surname>
            <given-names>Dagoro</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Kiba</surname>
            <given-names>Delwendé Innocent</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Bissiri</surname>
            <given-names>Souleymane</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Compaore</surname>
            <given-names>Cheik Omar Tidiane</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Nikiema</surname>
            <given-names>Mahamadi</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Christen</surname>
            <given-names>Pierre</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Maiga</surname>
            <given-names>Ynoussa</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label> Laboratory of Microbiology and Microbial Biotechnology, University Joseph KI-ZERBO, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso </aff>
      <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label> Soil, Water and Plant Laboratory, Institute of Environment and Agricultural Research, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso </aff>
      <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label> IMBE, Aix Marseille Univ, Avignon Univ, CNRS, IRD, Marseille, France </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="conflict" id="fn-conflict">
          <p>There are no conflicts of interest.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>01</day>
        <month>04</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <month>04</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>04</issue>
      <fpage>186</fpage>
      <lpage>204</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>29</day>
          <month>11</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>17</day>
          <month>04</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="published">
          <day>20</day>
          <month>04</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2026 by the authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p> This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link> ). </license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/aim.2026.164010">https://doi.org/10.4236/aim.2026.164010</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p>The excessive use of chemical fertilizers leads to soil degradation and water pollution. Microbial biofertilizers have gained attention for promoting sustainable agriculture while protecting the environment. Fermented Forest Litter (FFL) is an organic fertilizer made by fermenting solid agricultural residues under anaerobiosis. It contains diverse microbial communities that can enhance plant growth. This study aims to evaluate the potential of FFL supplemented with <italic>Jatropha curcas</italic> cake. To achieve this, FFL mixed with <italic>Jatropha</italic> cake was produced through solid-state fermentation and then activated by submerged fermentation. The chemical and microbiological properties of FFL and Non-Fermented Substrate (NFS) were analyzed. A germination test was conducted on tomato, okra, and maize using activated FFL (aFFL). Before fermentation, NFS had a pH of 6.38, an electrical conductivity of 2.53 mS/cm, 241 mg/kg ammonium, 672 mg/kg soluble phosphorus, 582 mg/kg nitrate, and 4662 mg/kg soluble potassium. FFL had a pH of 4.35, an electrical conductivity of 4.64 mS/cm, 1948 mg/kg ammonium, 2003 mg/kg soluble phosphorus, 66 mg/kg nitrate, and 4864 mg/kg soluble potassium. FFL showed no presence of coliforms or <italic>Salmonella</italic>. At a concentration of 2%, aFFL improved the germination index of okra, tomato, and maize, with respective values of 429%, 92.5%, and 127.6%. These results suggest that fermented forest litter supplemented with <italic>Jatropha curcas</italic> cake has promising potential as a biofertilizer.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated" xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>Biofertilizer</kwd>
        <kwd>Solid-State Fermentation</kwd>
        <kwd>&lt;i&gt;Jatropha curcas&lt;/i&gt;</kwd>
        <kwd>Seed Cake</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>Since the mid-20th century, the demand for food has been steadily rising due to the exponential growth of the global population [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]. In addition, recent decades have shown an accelerated deterioration of arable land worldwide, with up to 55% of the world’s arable land affected by degradation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>]. To boost agricultural yields and meet food demands, farmers implement various fertilization management practices. The primary practices used in modern agriculture rely on mineral fertilization and synthetic plant protection products [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]. Although these methods increase crop production, they unfortunately have several limitations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>]. Besides their high costs, mineral fertilization and synthetic protection pose risks of food contamination, environmental pollution, negative effects on microbial diversity, and declining soil fertility [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>]. In response to these increasing threats, soil fertilization management based on microbial use has gained significant attention. Extensive research has been carried out to assess the ability of microbial biofertilizers to promote plant growth. As a result, several microbial biofertilizers have been developed and marketed globally. The main benefits of microbial biofertilizers include organic matter decomposition, molecular nitrogen fixation, protection against plant pathogens, tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses, and the production of plant growth hormones [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]. Through these mechanisms, biofertilizers help reduce environmental pollution, combat environmentally transmitted diseases, and significantly improve the quantity and quality of agricultural products. Despite these advantages, microbial biofertilizer technologies still face challenges related to formulation, storage, application techniques, and adaptation to local environments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>]. Innovative strategies are needed to overcome these issues and foster the development of sustainable, environmentally friendly agriculture. Thanks to their interactive capabilities, microbial consortia are excellent candidates compared to microbial monocultures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>]. </p>
      <p>Fermented forest litter (FFL) is a biofertilizer obtained through the anaerobic fermentation of forest litter, agro-industrial residues, and unchlorinated water, which serves as a source of lactic acid bacteria. The FFL production process is a biotechnological method for producing microbial consortia. This technology subsequently spread to Latin America and Asia. It offers the advantage of allowing the selection of a wide variety of microorganisms, promoting the development of agroecology, and reducing farmers’ dependence on chemical fertilizers. Produced in more than 50 countries and used in approximately 130 countries worldwide to date, fermented forest litter is less commonly used in several African countries, including Burkina Faso [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>]. </p>
      <p>In addition, the development of the agro-industrial sector is generating biomass waste, including that from <italic>Jatropha curcas</italic>, which is used to produce biofuel. The process of extracting the oil generates a considerable amount of residue, including shells and cake. Indeed, one ton of <italic>Jatropha curcas</italic> L. seeds can produce up to 650 kg [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]. The cake has a protein content of 55% to 64% and an energy value of 19% to 48% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]. It also contains essential amino acids like leucine, isoleucine, valine, and threonine, making it a nutritious source suitable for microbial growth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]. </p>
      <p>Several studies have been conducted on the chemical, biochemical, and microbiological characterization of FFL [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>], and some of them have reported their effects on crops [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>]. However, to our knowledge, little has been done on the quality of FFL in relation to agricultural residues such as <italic>Jatropha curcas</italic> cake. We hypothesized that using the residue in the production of fermented forest litter could lead to the development of a quality biofertilizer, which may contribute to waste recycling and to sustainable agricultural production. This study aims to evaluate the biofertilizing potential of fermented forest litter made from agro-industrial waste, including <italic>Jatropha curcas</italic> cake.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec2">
      <title>2. Materials and Methods</title>
      <sec id="sec2dot1">
        <title>2.1. Collection of the Components Used for the Production of Fermented Forest Litter</title>
        <p>The study was conducted in the Kadiogo region of Burkina Faso. This area is characterized by a Sudano-Sahelian climate, savanna vegetation, a dry season from November to May, and a rainy season from June to October with an average annual rainfall of 935 mm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>]. <italic>Jatropha curcas</italic> cake was collected from the Belwet industrial unit in Ouagadougou (12˚22'33.8"N - 1˚32'31.0"W), forest litter from the classified forest of Gonsé (12˚26'20"N, 1˚19'40"W), and millet bran. Water was collected from the Loumbila dam (12˚29'14"N, 1˚24'28"W), and the source of lactic acid bacteria was from the “La Vache Enchantée” dairy (12˚23'5"N - 1˚31'30"W). </p>
        <p>The collection sites were chosen based on the absence of risk of chemical contamination that could inhibit microbial growth during fermentation. The Gonsé forest is classified and is characterized by an absence of human activities likely to generate chemical contamination. The Belwet unit extracts oil from <italic>J. curcas</italic> seeds using a pressing technique that does not involve the use of chemicals. The Faso cereal processing unit specializes in the processing of agricultural products without the use of chemicals. The “La Vache Enchantée” dairy specializes in the collection and sale of cow’s milk in the city of Ouagadougou. The Loumbila dam is a source of surface water used for drinking water production in the town of Ouagadougou, outside the influence of human and agricultural activities. </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot2">
        <title>2.2. Formulation of the Mixture for the Production of FFL</title>
        <p>Forest litter is the basic material used in the production of FFL [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]. <italic>Jatropha curcas</italic> cake was used as a carbon source due to its high protein content. Fresh milk was used as a source of lactic acid bacteria to ensure the natural quality of the lactic acid bacteria source. Millet bran was used as a source of starch.</p>
        <p>The process of fermented forest litter preparation was carried out in two successive fermentation stages [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]. The first stage is based on an anaerobic batch fermentation, and the second stage consists of activating the solid fermented mixture obtained from the first step by fermentation in a liquid medium. To this end, the various components were mixed in appropriate proportions (<bold>Table 1</bold>). </p>
        <p><bold>Table 1</bold><bold>.</bold> FFL production substrates and their proportions.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl1">
          <label>Table 1</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Constituent</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Quantity</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Jatropha seed cake (g/L)</td>
                <td>270</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Forest litter (g/L)</td>
                <td>200</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Millet bran (g/L)</td>
                <td>27</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Fresh milk (mL/L)</td>
                <td>67</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Dam water (mL/L)</td>
                <td>370</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Following a specific order and in a container disinfected with 70% alcohol, 200 g/L of forest litter was mixed with 270 g/L of <italic>Jatropha</italic> seed cake and 67 g/L of millet bran before adding a mixture of 67 ml/L of fresh milk and 370 ml/L of dam water (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p>
        <p>For the activation step, the substrates used are solid LFF and sugarcane molasses, each at a concentration of 25 g/L, and dam water. Thus, to prepare 250 mL of activated LFF, 6.25 g of sugarcane molasses was mixed with 100 mL of dam water before adding 6.25 g of solid LFF. The reaction medium volume was composed of dam water. After homogenization, the bottle was tightly sealed and placed at room temperature for a one-week fermentation period. In accordance with the activation period, solid FFL was activated in seven (07) 250 mL bottles. Each day, one bottle was used to measure pH and electrical conductivity.</p>
        <fig id="fig1">
          <label>Figure 1</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2272238-rId19.jpeg?20260421042027" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 1</bold><bold>.</bold> Order of mixing substrates for FFL production.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot3">
        <title>2.3. Assessment of the Quality of FFL</title>
        <p>2.3.1. Sampling</p>
        <p>Samples of NFS, the solid FFL, and the activated FFL were collected for analysis. For the microbiological analysis, 100 g of each sample was collected in a sterile bag and stored at 4˚C. The samples for chemical analysis (100 g) were taken and stored at −20˚C to avoid any biochemical activity that could modify the chemical parameters. For the activated FFL, 50 mL was collected in a sterile glass bottle and stored at 4˚C for microbiological analysis, and in a polyethylene bottle stored at −20˚C to determine the chemical parameters.</p>
        <p>2.3.2. Chemical Analysis</p>
        <p>The pH and the electrical conductivity of the samples were determined using the method described by Marois <italic>et al.</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]. Changes in pH and electrical conductivity were assessed during the seven-day FFL activation period. A sample/demineralized water suspension in a ratio of 1/5 (m/v) was analyzed using a portable pH/EC/TDS/temperature meter (Hanna instrument, Romania). </p>
        <p>The organic carbon was determined using the organic matter incineration method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>]. </p>
        <p>The total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and total potassium of the samples were also determined using the Kjeldahl method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>]. Total nitrogen and phosphorus contents were determined by colorimetry using the SKALAR flow analyzer (segment flow analyzer, model SANplus 4000-02, Skalar Holland) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>]. Total potassium content was determined using a flame spectrophotometer (Jenway PFP7 flame photometer) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>].</p>
        <p>The water-soluble nutrients were determined from a distilled water extract of NFS and FFL samples in a 1:20 (m/v) ratio [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>]. From the extracts, nitrates were measured using a spectrophotometer at 410 nm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>]. Soluble phosphorus and ammonium were measured using the colorimetric method with the SKALAR automatic analyzer, and the total potassium was measured using a flame spectrophotometer.</p>
        <p>2.3.3. Microbiological Analysis</p>
        <p>The microbiological quality of NFS and FFL was assessed through the determination of total coliforms, thermotolerant coliforms, and <italic>Salmonella</italic> spp. Total and thermotolerant coliforms were determined using Chromocult Coliform agar [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>]. <italic>Salmonella</italic> spp. were evaluated in accordance with AFNOR standard NF 08.052. </p>
        <p>In addition, daily monitoring of lactic acid bacteria, yeasts, and molds was carried out during the activation of FFL. </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot4">
        <title>2.4. Seed Germination Tests Using the Activated FFL</title>
        <p>To assess the phytotoxicity of activated FFL, crops commonly grown in Burkina Faso, such as maize (<italic>Zea mays</italic>), tomatoes (<italic>Solanum lycopersicum</italic> L.), and okra (<italic>Abelmoschus esculentus</italic>) were used [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>]. </p>
        <p>The activated FFL is filtered using a 0.5 mm sieve, and the filtrate was diluted to concentrations of 2% and 5%, the concentrations commonly used in agricultural practices [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>], for the germination test. A randomized complete block design was adopted and carried out under laboratory, day, and night temperature and light conditions based on three treatments with two (02) replicates each: activated FFL at 2%, activated FFL at 5%, and a sterile distilled water solution (control) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>]. Ten (10) seeds from each crop were placed in a 90 mm diameter Petri dish containing a Whatman paper disc. The dishes were watered every two (02) days with 5 ml of each irrigation solution for 07 days.</p>
        <p>Germination rate (GR), radicle elongation (RE), and germination index (GI) were determined according to the following formulas. </p>
        <disp-formula id="FD1">
          <label>(1)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mtext>GR</mml:mtext>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mfrac>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>
                  </mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>
                  </mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>
                  </mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>
                  </mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>
                  </mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>
                  </mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>
                  </mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>
                  </mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>
                  </mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>
                  </mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>w</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mfrac>
              <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
              <mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <disp-formula id="FD2">
          <label>(2)</label>
          <mml:math>
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mtext>RE</mml:mtext>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mfrac>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mtext>
                      </mml:mtext>
                      <mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mtext>
                      </mml:mtext>
                      <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mtext>
                      </mml:mtext>
                      <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mtext>
                      </mml:mtext>
                      <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mtext>
                      </mml:mtext>
                      <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                    </mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mtext>
                      </mml:mtext>
                      <mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mtext>
                      </mml:mtext>
                      <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mtext>
                      </mml:mtext>
                      <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mtext>
                      </mml:mtext>
                      <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mtext>
                      </mml:mtext>
                      <mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mtext>
                      </mml:mtext>
                      <mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
                      <mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
                    </mml:mrow>
                  </mml:mfrac>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
              <mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <disp-formula id="FD3">
          <label>(3)</label>
          <mml:math>
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mtext>GI</mml:mtext>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mfrac>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mtext>Germination rates</mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
                  </mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mtext>radicle elongation</mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
                  </mml:mrow>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mfrac>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot5">
        <title>2.5. Statistical Analysis of Data</title>
        <p>A paired t-test, with a significance threshold of p &lt; 0.05, was performed on Jamovi software to compare the means of the chemical parameters before and after fermentation. The relationship between the different parameters was established according to Pearson’s correlation. An ANOVA was performed using XLSTAT software version 2016.02.27444 at a significance level of p &lt; 0.05 to compare the mean values of the germination indices and root elongation for the different dilutions of activated FFL for each species.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec3">
      <title>3. Results</title>
      <sec id="sec3dot1">
        <title>3.1. Chemical Characteristics of Raw and Fermented Substrates</title>
        <p>The chemical characteristics of the non-fermented substrate (NFS) and fermented forest litter (FFL) are shown in <bold>Table 2</bold>. The average electrical conductivity of NFS and FFL is 2.53 to 4.64 mS/cm and 6.38 to 4.36 for the pH, respectively. The paired t-test indicated that the variation in pH was not statistically significant (p = 0.072 &gt; 0.05). At the same time, the variation in EC is statistically significant (p = 0.018 &lt; 0.05). The paired t-test showed that these variations are not statistically significant. </p>
        <p>The average organic matter and carbon content, as well as the average C/N ratio, changed from 766.229 to 736.644 (g/kg), from 445.482 to 439.277 (g/kg), and from 16.03 to 14.94. According to the paired t-test, only the variation in organic matter content was statistically significant (p = 0.042). </p>
        <p>The average contents of ammonium, nitrate, soluble phosphorus, and soluble potassium ranged from 241.17 to 1948.48 (mg/kg), from 672.60 to 2003.25 (mg/kg), and from 4662.13 to 4864.83 (mg/kg). The t-test showed that the increase in ammonium and soluble potassium content was statistically significant (p = 0.004 for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext> NH </mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mtext> 4 </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> + </mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and p &lt; 0.001 for K). The average nitrate content varied from 582.0 to 66.2 (mg/kg). The t-test showed that this decrease was statistically significant (p = 0.023). </p>
        <p>The relationships between the different parameters are shown in <bold>Table 3</bold>. Positive and statistically significant correlations were found between ammonium content and EC (Pearson’s r = 0.994 and p = 0.004), nitrate content and pH (Pearson’s r = 0.996 and p = 0.004), and soluble phosphorus and ammonium contents (Pearson’s r = 0.965 and p = 0.035). The relationship test also showed a negative correlation between pH and EC (Pearson’s r = −0.996 and p = 0.004), pH and ammonium content (Pearson’s r = −0.990 and p = 0.010), between nitrate content and EC, and nitrate content and ammonium content (with Pearson’s r = −0.998 and p = 0.002), between soluble phosphorus content and pH, and soluble phosphorus content and nitrate content (Pearson’s r = −0.956 and −0.960 and p = 0.044 and 0.040, respectively). </p>
        <p><bold>Table 2.</bold> Chemical characteristics of the unfermented mixture and FFL.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl2">
          <label>Table 2</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Parameter</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>NFS</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>FFL</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>p</bold>
                  <bold>-value</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>pH</td>
                <td>6.38 ± 0.22</td>
                <td>4.35 ± 0.015</td>
                <td>0.072</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>E.C. (mS/cm)</td>
                <td>2.53 ± 0.16</td>
                <td>4.64 ± 0.1</td>
                <td>0.018</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Total nitrogen (g/kg)</td>
                <td>30.30 ± 0.12034</td>
                <td>30.21 ± 0.00611</td>
                <td>0.609</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Total phosphorus (g/kg)</td>
                <td>5.05 ± 0</td>
                <td>4.73 ± 0.105</td>
                <td>0.205</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Total potassium (g/kg)</td>
                <td>14.60 ± 2.04055</td>
                <td>15.54 ± 0.78483</td>
                <td>0.590</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>O.C. (g/kg)</td>
                <td>445.31 ± 9.22487</td>
                <td>439.28 ± 0.022.98</td>
                <td>0.642</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>C/N</td>
                <td>16.02 ± 0.13</td>
                <td>14.70 ± 0.4</td>
                <td>0.153</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>O.M. (g/kg)</td>
                <td>766.23 ± 16.89877</td>
                <td>736.44 ± 18.87292</td>
                <td>0.042</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <mml:math display="inline">
                      <mml:mrow>
                        <mml:msubsup>
                          <mml:mrow>
                            <mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext>
                          </mml:mrow>
                          <mml:mtext>4</mml:mtext>
                          <mml:mtext>+</mml:mtext>
                        </mml:msubsup>
                      </mml:mrow>
                    </mml:math>
                  </inline-formula>
                  (mg/kg)
                </td>
                <td>241.17 ± 7.83</td>
                <td>1948.48 ± 19.52</td>
                <td>0.004</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Soluble P (mg/kg)</td>
                <td>672.60 ± 32.6</td>
                <td>2003.26 ± 237.25</td>
                <td>0.097</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Soluble K (mg/kg)</td>
                <td>4662.13 ± 608.1</td>
                <td>4864.83 ± 608.1</td>
                <td>0.001</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <mml:math display="inline">
                      <mml:mrow>
                        <mml:msubsup>
                          <mml:mrow>
                            <mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext>
                          </mml:mrow>
                          <mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
                          <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                        </mml:msubsup>
                      </mml:mrow>
                    </mml:math>
                  </inline-formula>
                  (mg/kg)
                </td>
                <td>582.00 ± 25</td>
                <td>66.15 ± 6.16</td>
                <td>0.023</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Legend: NFS (Non-Fermented Substrate), FFL (fermented forest litter), E.C. (electrical conductivity), O.C. (organic carbon), C/N (carbon/nitrogen ratio), and O.M. (organic matter). <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext> NH </mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mtext> 4 </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> + </mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (ammonium), P (phosphorus), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext> NO </mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn> 3 </mml:mn><mml:mo> − </mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (nitrate), K (potassium).</p>
        <p><bold>Table 3</bold><bold>.</bold> Correlation matrix between the chemical parameters of solid FFL.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl3">
          <label>Table 3</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>pH</td>
                <td>E.C.</td>
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <mml:math display="inline">
                      <mml:mrow>
                        <mml:msubsup>
                          <mml:mrow>
                            <mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext>
                          </mml:mrow>
                          <mml:mtext>4</mml:mtext>
                          <mml:mtext>+</mml:mtext>
                        </mml:msubsup>
                      </mml:mrow>
                    </mml:math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <mml:math display="inline">
                      <mml:mrow>
                        <mml:msubsup>
                          <mml:mrow>
                            <mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext>
                          </mml:mrow>
                          <mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
                          <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                        </mml:msubsup>
                      </mml:mrow>
                    </mml:math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </td>
                <td>Soluble P</td>
                <td>Soluble K</td>
                <td>O.M.</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="3">E.C.</td>
                <td>Pearson’s r</td>
                <td>−0.996**</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td rowspan="3">
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>ddl</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>p-value</td>
                <td>0.004</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="3">
                  <inline-formula>
                    <mml:math display="inline">
                      <mml:mrow>
                        <mml:msubsup>
                          <mml:mrow>
                            <mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext>
                          </mml:mrow>
                          <mml:mtext>4</mml:mtext>
                          <mml:mtext>+</mml:mtext>
                        </mml:msubsup>
                      </mml:mrow>
                    </mml:math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </td>
                <td>Pearson’s r</td>
                <td>−0.990*</td>
                <td>0.994**</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>ddl</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>p-value</td>
                <td>0.010</td>
                <td>0.006</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="3">Nitrate</td>
                <td>Pearson’s r</td>
                <td>0.996**</td>
                <td>−0.998**</td>
                <td>−0.998**</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>ddl</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>p-value</td>
                <td>0.004</td>
                <td>0.002</td>
                <td>0.002</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="3">Soluble phorus</td>
                <td>Pearson’s r</td>
                <td>−0.956*</td>
                <td>0.942</td>
                <td>0.965*</td>
                <td>−0.960*</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>ddl</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>p-value</td>
                <td>0.044</td>
                <td>0.058</td>
                <td>0.035</td>
                <td>0.040</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="3">Soluble potassium</td>
                <td>Pearson’s r</td>
                <td>−0.259</td>
                <td>0.284</td>
                <td>0.180</td>
                <td>−0.223</td>
                <td>−0.035</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td rowspan="3">
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>ddl</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>—</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>p-value</td>
                <td>0.741</td>
                <td>0.716</td>
                <td>0.820</td>
                <td>0.777</td>
                <td>0.965</td>
                <td>—</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="3">Organic matter</td>
                <td>Pearson’s r</td>
                <td>0.700</td>
                <td>−0.725</td>
                <td>−0.649</td>
                <td>0.680</td>
                <td>−0.459</td>
                <td>−0.864</td>
                <td>—</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>ddl</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>—</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>p-value</td>
                <td>0.300</td>
                <td>0.275</td>
                <td>0.351</td>
                <td>0.320</td>
                <td>0.541</td>
                <td>0.136</td>
                <td>—</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="3">Organic carbon</td>
                <td>Pearson’s r</td>
                <td>0.539</td>
                <td>−0.502</td>
                <td>−0.414</td>
                <td>0.469</td>
                <td>−0.365</td>
                <td>−0.702</td>
                <td>0.728</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>ddl</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>2</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>p-value</td>
                <td>0.461</td>
                <td>0.498</td>
                <td>0.586</td>
                <td>0.531</td>
                <td>0.635</td>
                <td>0.298</td>
                <td>0.272</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot2">
        <title>3.2. Evolution of Chemical Characteristics during the FFL Activation Process</title>
        <p>During the activation of FFL, the pH gradually decreased from 5.09 to 3.98 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). The electrical conductivity increased slightly, from 3.52 to 3.77 mS/cm.</p>
        <fig id="fig2">
          <label>Figure 2</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2272238-rId38.jpeg?20260421042029" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 2</bold><bold>.</bold> Evolution of pH and electrical conductivity during the process of FFL activation. </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot3">
        <title>3.3. Microbiological Quality of NFS and FFL</title>
        <fig id="fig3">
          <label>Figure 3</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2272238-rId39.jpeg?20260421042029" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 3</bold><bold>.</bold> Evolution of pH and electrical conductivity during the process of FFL activation.</p>
        <p>The results of microbiological analyses of NFS showed a total coliform concentration of 3.75 × 10<sup>5</sup> CFU/g of substrate and no <italic>Salmonella</italic>. After fermentation, the results of microbial analyses showed a total reduction in the total coliform load and no <italic>Salmonella</italic> in FFL. </p>
        <p>The results of the evolution in lactic acid bacteria, yeast, and mold loads are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. These results show that on the first day of activation, no growth in lactic acid bacteria, yeast, or mold was observed. From 24 hours after activation until the last day, the concentration of lactic acid bacteria increased from 1.44 × 10<sup>8</sup> to 4.5 × 10<sup>9</sup> CFU/ml, and the concentration of yeast and mold varied from 3.7 × 10<sup>5</sup> to 5.1 × 10<sup>4</sup> CFU/ml.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot4">
        <title>3.4. Relationship between the Evolution of Lactic Acid Bacteria, pH, and EC during FFL Activation</title>
        <p>Relationships between the parameters of lactic acid bacteria load and the chemical parameters of active FFL are shown in <bold>Table 4</bold>. A negative correlation is found between the evolution of pH during activation and changes in electrical conductivity (Spearman’s rho = −0.703, p = 0.039), as well as the evolution of lactic bacteria concentration (Spearman’s rho = −0.750, p = 0.033). These correlations suggest that the gradual decrease in pH during activation is associated with the fermentation activity of lactic acid bacteria. Indeed, the growth of lactic acid bacteria generates lactate, which decreases the pH. </p>
        <p><bold>Table 4</bold><bold>.</bold> Correlation matrix between the parameters of lactic acid bacteria load and the chemical parameters of active FFL.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl4">
          <label>Table 4</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>BL (UFC/ml)</td>
                <td>pH</td>
                <td>E.C. (Ms/cm)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="3">BL (UFC/ml)</td>
                <td>Spearman’s rho</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>ddl</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>p-value</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="3">pH</td>
                <td>Spearman’s rho</td>
                <td>−0.750*</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>ddl</td>
                <td>5</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>p-value</td>
                <td>0.033</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="3">E.C. (mS/cm)</td>
                <td>Spearman’s rho</td>
                <td>0.396</td>
                <td>−0.703*</td>
                <td>—</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>ddl</td>
                <td>5</td>
                <td>5</td>
                <td>—</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>p-value</td>
                <td>0.811</td>
                <td>0.039</td>
                <td>—</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot5">
        <title>3.5. Seed Germination Affected by FFL</title>
        <p>The results of the germination tests are reported in <bold>Table 5</bold>.<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4(A)</xref> shows the radicle elongation of the germinated seeds, and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4(B)</xref> shows the germination index of the seeds. At a concentration of 2%, the activated FFL showed a germination rate of 95% for okra and tomato and 100% for maize. The average root elongation was 5.25 ± 0.04 mm, 3.15 ± 0.3 mm, and 12.67 ± 0.7 mm for okra, tomato, and maize, respectively. The germination index was 429% ± 29.7% for okra, 92.5% ± 1.6% for tomato, and 127.6% ± 8.93% for maize. At a concentration of 5%, the activated FFL showed a germination rate of 90% for okra, 95% for tomato, and 100% for maize. The root elongation was 8.2 ± 0.24 mm for maize, while no elongation was noticed for okra and tomato. The germination index was 82.24% ± 3.54% for maize. </p>
        <p>After adjusting the acidity to the neutral pH (pH = 7), FFL diluted to 2% showed a germination rate of 85% for okra, 95% for tomato, and 100% for maize. The average root elongation was 6.4 ± 0.19 mm for okra, 5.2 ± 0.07 mm for tomato, and 16.3 ± 0.47 mm for maize. The germination index was 465% ± 0.35% for okra, 151.8% ± 13.14% for tomato, and 164.5% ± 7.09% for maize. FFL diluted to 5% showed a germination rate of 100% for okra, 95% for tomato, and 100% for maize. The average root elongation was 7.1 ± 0.47 mm for okra, 2.9 ± 0.11 mm for tomato, and 13.6 ± 0.35 mm for maize. The germination index was 612.63% ± 22.83%, 85.5% ± 8.31%, and 136.73% ± 1.61% for okra, tomato, and maize, respectively. </p>
        <fig id="fig4">
          <label>Figure 4</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2272238-rId40.jpeg?20260421042029" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 4</bold><bold>.</bold> Root elongation of seedlings (A) and seed germination index (B). </p>
        <p>With the control, the germination rate was 95% for okra and 100% for tomato and maize. The root elongation was 1.23 mm, 3.23 mm, and 9.93 mm for okra, tomato, and maize, respectively. The germination index was 100% for all crops. The comparison of the germination indices showed a significant difference between the different FFL solutions and the control for okra seeds (0.01 &lt; p &lt; 0.001). For tomato, only the germination index of the 2% FFL solution at neutralized pH showed a significant difference compared to the control (p = 0.004). For maize, the 2% FFL solution at neutral pH and the 2% solution at acidic pH showed a significant difference compared to the control (p = 0.019 and p &lt; 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the seeds’ germination rate in the controls and the values obtained when the seeds were watered with the various activated FFL solutions (<bold>Table 6</bold>).</p>
        <p><bold>Table 5</bold><bold>.</bold> Root elongation and germination index (A: acidic; NA: non-acidic).</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl5">
          <label>Table 5</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>Treatment</td>
                <td>Mean</td>
                <td>Standard error</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="5">Okra GI (%)</td>
                <td>FFL 2% A</td>
                <td>429.00</td>
                <td>21.0000</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>FFL 2% NA</td>
                <td>465.01</td>
                <td>0.2485</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>FFL 5% A</td>
                <td>0.00</td>
                <td>0.0000</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>FFL 5% NA</td>
                <td>612.63</td>
                <td>16.1404</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>control</td>
                <td>100.00</td>
                <td>0.0000</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="5">Tomato GI (%)</td>
                <td>FFL 2% A</td>
                <td>92.49</td>
                <td>1.1085</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>FFL 2% NA</td>
                <td>151.79</td>
                <td>9.2935</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>FFL 5% A</td>
                <td>0.00</td>
                <td>0.0000</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>FFL 5% NA</td>
                <td>85.51</td>
                <td>5.8768</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>control</td>
                <td>100.00</td>
                <td>0.0000</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="5">Maize GI (%)</td>
                <td>FFL 2% A</td>
                <td>127.58</td>
                <td>6.3179</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>FFL 2% NA</td>
                <td>164.48</td>
                <td>5.0115</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>FFL 5% A</td>
                <td>82.24</td>
                <td>2.5058</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>FFL 5% NA</td>
                <td>136.73</td>
                <td>1.1403</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>control</td>
                <td>100.00</td>
                <td>0.0000</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="5">Okra RE (mm)</td>
                <td>FFL2% A</td>
                <td>5.25</td>
                <td>0.1500</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>FFL 2% NA</td>
                <td>6.37</td>
                <td>0.1333</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>FFL 5% A</td>
                <td>0.00</td>
                <td>0.0000</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>FFL 5% NA</td>
                <td>7.13</td>
                <td>0.3333</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>control</td>
                <td>1.23</td>
                <td>0.0250</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="5">Tomato RE (mm)</td>
                <td>FFL 2% A</td>
                <td>3.15</td>
                <td>0.2000</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>FFL 2% NA</td>
                <td>5.15</td>
                <td>0.0500</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>FFL 5% A</td>
                <td>0.00</td>
                <td>0.0000</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>FFL 5% NA</td>
                <td>2.92</td>
                <td>0.0750</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>control</td>
                <td>3.23</td>
                <td>0.1667</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">Maize RE (mm)</td>
                <td>FFL 2% A</td>
                <td>12.67</td>
                <td>0.5000</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>FFL 2% NA</td>
                <td>16.33</td>
                <td>0.3333</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="3">
                </td>
                <td>FFL 5% A</td>
                <td>8.17</td>
                <td>0.1667</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>FFL 5% NA</td>
                <td>13.58</td>
                <td>0.2500</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>control</td>
                <td>9.93</td>
                <td>0.1000</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p><bold>Table 6</bold><bold>.</bold> Correlation between the parameters of lactic acid bacteria load and the chemical parameters of active FFL.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl6">
          <label>Table 6</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>Okra GI</td>
                <td>Tomato GI</td>
                <td>Maize GI</td>
                <td>Okra RE</td>
                <td>Tomato RE</td>
                <td>Maize RE</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="3">pH</td>
                <td>Pearson’s</td>
                <td>0.518</td>
                <td>0.822</td>
                <td>0.601</td>
                <td>0.532</td>
                <td>0.810</td>
                <td>0.602</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>ddl</td>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>3</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>p-value</td>
                <td>0.371</td>
                <td>0.088</td>
                <td>0.283</td>
                <td>0.356</td>
                <td>0.096</td>
                <td>0.283</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec4">
      <title>4. Discussion</title>
      <sec id="sec4dot1">
        <title>4.1. Chemical Characteristics of Solid FFL</title>
        <p>The results showed a non-significant decrease in the pH and a significant increase in the electrical conductivity following the fermentation of the substrates. Marois <italic>et al.</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>] reported a decrease in pH and an increase in electrical conductivity after fermentation of FFL based on forest litter from two different climates. In addition, the results revealed a negative correlation between pH and conductivity. This negative correlation indicates that an acidic pH promotes the mineralization of the organic matter and the release of ions (phosphate ions, potassium ions, ammonium ions, bicarbonate ions, etc.) by the endogenous microorganisms during the fermentation process. This release of ions increases the electrical conductivity. Indeed, Ajaweed <italic>et al.</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>] reported that a high ion concentration leads to an increase in electrical conductivity. The decomposition of organic matter by endogenous microorganisms, which can lead to increased electrical conductivity, contributes to making nutrients available to plants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>]. However, increased electrical conductivity can lead to increased salinity, which would negatively impact nutrient absorption by plants. Indeed, Nikiema <italic>et al.</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>] reported that when it exceeds 4 dS/m, electrical conductivity can reduce plants’ ability to absorb water. The EC value obtained with the FFL (4.64 mS/cm) was roughly equal to this threshold value. Adverse effects on soil physicochemical properties and soil microbial community metabolism associated with high soil salinity have been reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>]. Diluting activated FFL before application can help mitigate the adverse effects of high salinity. The production of organic acids by lactic acid bacteria can lead to a decrease in pH in the fermentation medium. Lowering the pH has many advantages for FFL. An acidic pH during fermentation promotes the elimination of pathogenic microorganisms by weakening the cell wall and inhibiting several metabolic activities. In addition, a decrease in pH due to the production of organic acids promotes the solubilization of nutrients like inorganic phosphates by chelating metal cations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>]. The chemical composition shows that the average total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and total potassium contents decreased from 30.30 to 30.21 (g/kg), from 5.05 to 4.73 (g/kg), and from 14.60 to 15.54 (g/kg), respectively; but these variations are not statistically significant. These results show that the fermentation did not have any significant effect on the total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and total potassium. Organic matter, organic carbon, and C/N ratio content decreased by 29.585 (g/kg), 6.205 (g/kg), and 1.09, respectively, but not statistically significant. However, the NPK content of FFL may contribute to enhancing its fertilizing capacity. The organic matter content (75.5%) and C/N ratio of the solid matter of the produced FFL show that it is of good quality for composting [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>]. For the water-soluble nutrients, the fermentation significantly increased the ammonium and the soluble potassium contents, representing 1707.31 (mg/kg) and 202.70 (mg/kg), respectively. The nitrate content decreased, corresponding to a decrease of 516.0 (mg/kg). The increase in ammonium content could result from the mineralization of organic nitrogen during the fermentation process. Indeed, Chen <italic>et al.</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>] reported that during the degradation of organic matter, certain microorganisms convert organic nitrogen (osamines and amino acids) into ammonium. The high ammonium concentration at the end of fermentation could be explained by the high protein content of the cake, coupled with the high enzymatic activity of microorganisms capable of degrading organic nitrogen. In fact, <italic>Jatropha</italic> seed cake has a protein content of 57.3 to 64.4% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>]. On the other hand, the loss of nitrate can be explained by denitrification during the fermentation process, a phenomenon in which nitrates are converted into molecular nitrogen under anaerobic conditions by denitrifying bacteria. Mahmoud <italic>et al.</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>] reported a very significant loss of nitrate during anaerobic fermentation in connection with the addition of organic matter to the fermentation medium. Ammonium and nitrate are the forms of nitrogen that can be assimilated by plants. A mixed supply of ammoniacal nitrogen and nitrates is very favorable for nitrogen absorption by plants, which improves photosynthesis and carbon metabolism [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>]. Ammonium, which is present in high concentrations in the developed FFL, could be converted into nitrate in the presence of oxygen, which would help regulate the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext> NH </mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mtext> 4 </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> + </mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> /<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext> NO </mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn> 3 </mml:mn><mml:mo> − </mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio. The increase in soluble potassium content could result from the endogenous microbial activity of the biomass mixture. Microorganisms mineralize organic matter and convert the potassium present in the medium into a water-soluble form [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>]. The increase in soluble phosphorus content after fermentation is not statistically significant but could be explained by the mineralization of organic phosphorus during fermentation by certain microbial groups [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>]. Organic phosphorus is converted into water-soluble forms such as hydrogen phosphate (HPO<sub>4</sub>) and phosphoric acid (H<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>) by biological means so that it can be assimilated by plants. Positive correlations were observed between ammonium content and electrical conductivity, and between soluble phosphorus content and ammonium content. The positive correlation between ammonium content and electrical conductivity may indicate that as the ammonium content increases, the soluble ion content also increases. The positive correlation between ammonium content and soluble phosphorus content may indicate simultaneous release of these elements following mineralization. Ammonium and soluble phosphorus contents were negatively correlated with pH. These correlations show that acidic conditions promote the availability of ammonium and soluble phosphorus. This justifies biological activities such as fermentation and the degradation of organic matter by the endogenous microbial community. The developed FFL showed better levels of soluble elements (ammonium, soluble phosphorus, and soluble potassium) after the fermentation. These elements are the main nutrients for plants. Additionally, the microorganisms responsible for the various changes during fermentation may have several properties that help plants grow. Furthermore, FFL supplemented with <italic>Jatropha</italic>seed cake exhibited higher electrical conductivity compared to FFL supplemented with wheat bran produced by Marois <italic>et al.</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]. The FFL supplemented with <italic>Jatropha</italic> seed cake may be richer than the FFL supplemented with wheat bran. </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot2">
        <title>4.2. Microbiological Quality of Solid FFL</title>
        <p>The prepared FFL is characterized by the total absence of coliforms and <italic>Salmonella</italic>. Valdes <italic>et al.</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>] reported the absence of coliforms and <italic>Salmonella</italic> in fermented forest litter in Cuba. The total reduction in coliform concentration may be related to the acidic pH of the medium, as well as the chemical composition of the medium. These results suggest that natural selection occurred during the fermentation. This demonstrates the safety of fermented forest litter and guarantees its sanitary quality. </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot3">
        <title>4.3. Quality of the Activated FFL</title>
        <p>The activated FFL showed a high concentration of lactic acid bacteria compared to yeasts and molds. The presence of lactic acid bacteria in high concentration, yeasts, and molds in activated FFL is a key factor in FFL’s effectiveness as a biofertilizer. Thanks to their metabolic capacity, these microbial groups have many properties that promote plant growth. The mechanisms of the plant growth-promoting properties of lactic acid bacteria are based on the degradation of organic matter, the production of growth hormones, bioactive molecules, and other secondary metabolites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">38</xref>]. </p>
        <p>Furthermore, the presence of these microorganisms may explain the changes observed in the physicochemical characteristics of the FFL. </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot4">
        <title>4.4. Effect of FFL on Seed Germination</title>
        <p>A comparison of the different FFL solutions and the control showed a significant difference between the germination indexes for okra. For tomato, only the germination index of the 2% FFL solution at neutral pH showed a significant difference compared to the control. For maize, the 2% FFL solutions at acidic and neutral pH showed a significant difference compared to the control. For all crops, there was no significant difference between the seed germination rate of the controls and the germination rate of seeds watered with the various activated FFL solutions. According to Finch-Savage &amp; Footitt [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>], temperature, humidity, light, and oxygen are factors that can influence seed germination by modulating enzyme activity during the germination process. At acidic pH, only 2% FFL improved the average root elongation and the germination index compared to the control for okra and maize seedlings. At a concentration of 5%, activated FFL inhibits the development or causes root rot in seedlings, resulting in a germination index of zero. Our results show that at a concentration of 2%, active FFL improves the germination index of okra, compared to the control. For tomato and maize, at the same concentration, activated FFL only improved the germination index after adjusting the acidity of the solution to neutral pH. At a concentration of 5%, activated FFL only improved the germination index of okra after adjusting the acidity to neutral pH. Given that the germination index was determined based on the germination rate and root elongation, the active FFL solutions used had effects on root development. These effects may be related to the salinity, the pH, ammonium content, etc., of the activated FFL solutions used. However, no statistically significant correlation was observed between pH and germination index or root elongation. Milon <italic>et al.</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">40</xref>] reported that acidity can hurt root growth. This acidity alters the roots’ ability to absorb nutrients and thus reduces root elongation. The effect of active FFL solutions may be mainly based on chemical characteristics other than pH. According to the work of Kong <italic>et al.</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>], electrical conductivity, organic carbon, dissolved nitrogen, ammonium content, potassium, zinc, and copper content are factors that can negatively influence the germination index. In our study, the chemical characteristics of the FFL solutions used were not determined. In fact, laboratory germination tests have shown promising results. However, the approach used in Petri dish experiments does not necessarily reflect performance in complex soil conditions. </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec5">
      <title>5. Conclusion</title>
      <p>This study enabled the production and evaluation of the potential of forest litter fermented with <italic>Jatropha curcas</italic> cake. The fermented mixture had improved levels of ammonium, soluble phosphorus, and soluble potassium, as well as improved electrical conductivity. The evolution of the chemical characteristics at the end of the fermentation indicates the presence of a microbial community in FFL capable of promoting plant growth. Indeed, the FFL showed a high concentration of lactic acid bacteria. The germination tests demonstrated that the aFFL can enhance the germination index, particularly when its acidity is neutralized by dilution before application. These results demonstrate that the produced FFL increased nutrients beneficial to plants and a microbial community with plant growth-promoting properties, which can be utilized as a biofertilizer. The use of FFL supplemented with <italic>Jatropha</italic>cake solution diluted to 2% can improve seed germination. However, this solution could improve seed germination more effectively if the pH of the solution is adjusted with an alkaline solution before application. </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec6">
      <title>Authors’ Contributions</title>
      <p>PALE, D.: conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, and drafting the article; KIBA, D.I.: conception and design, analysis and interpretation of data, and drafting the article; BISSIRI S.: conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, and drafting the article; COMPAORE, C. O. T.: analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the article; NIKIEMA, M.: conception and design, analysis and interpretation of data; CHRISTEN, P.: conception and design, analysis and interpretation of data, and drafting the article; and MAIGA, Y.: conception and design, analysis and interpretation of data, and drafting the article.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec7">
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>This work was supported by the Research Institute for Development through the JEAI Jatro-Agro project. We wish to thank Noufou TAPSOBA, Kévin Stanislas BATIONO, Massiribi Bintou BARRO, and Tkianter Ernestine Sandrine, students at the Microbiology and Microbial Biotechnology Laboratory of Joseph KI-ZERBO University, for their appreciated contribution to the completion of this study.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Pandey, N., Kamboj, N., Sharma, A.K. and Kumar, A. (2022) An Overview of Recent Advancements in the Irrigation, Fertilization, and Technological Revolutions of Agriculture. In: Bahukhandi, K.D., Kamboj, N. and Kamboj, V., Éds., <italic>Environmental Pollution and Natural Resource Management</italic>, Springer International Publishing, 167-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05335-1_11 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-031-05335-1_11</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05335-1_11">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05335-1_11</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Pandey, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kamboj, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sharma, A.K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kumar, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Irrigation, F</string-name>
              <string-name>Bahukhandi, K.D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kamboj, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kamboj, V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Management, S</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>An Overview of Recent Advancements in the Irrigation, Fertilization, and Technological Revolutions of Agriculture</article-title>
            <source>In: Bahukhandi</source>
            <volume>167</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-031-05335-1_11</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Prăvălie, R., Patriche, C., Borrelli, P., Panagos, P., Roșca, B., Dumitraşcu, M., <italic>et al</italic>. (2021) Arable Lands under the Pressure of Multiple Land Degradation Processes. A Global Perspective. <italic>Environmental</italic><italic>Research</italic>, 194, Article ID: 110697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110697 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envres.2020.110697</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33428912</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110697">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110697</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Patriche, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Borrelli, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Panagos, P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Arable Lands under the Pressure of Multiple Land Degradation Processes</article-title>
            <source>A Global Perspective. Environmental Research</source>
            <volume>194</volume>
            <fpage>110697</fpage>
            <elocation-id>ID</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envres.2020.110697</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33428912</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Gamage, A., Basnayake, B., De Costa, J. and Merah, O. (2022) Effects of Rice Husk Biochar Coated Urea and Anaerobically Digested Rice Straw Compost on the Soil Fertility, and Cyclic Effect of Phosphorus. <italic>Plants</italic>, 11, Article No. 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11010075 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants11010075</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35009079</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11010075">https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11010075</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Gamage, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Basnayake, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Costa, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Merah, O.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>Effects of Rice Husk Biochar Coated Urea and Anaerobically Digested Rice Straw Compost on the Soil Fertility, and Cyclic Effect of Phosphorus</article-title>
            <source>Plants</source>
            <volume>11</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants11010075</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35009079</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kumar, S., Diksha, Sindhu, S.S. and Kumar, R. (2022) Biofertilizers: An Ecofriendly Technology for Nutrient Recycling and Environmental Sustainability. <italic>Current</italic><italic>Research</italic><italic>in</italic><italic>Microbial</italic><italic>Sciences</italic>, 3, Article ID: 100094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmicr.2021.100094 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.crmicr.2021.100094</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35024641</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmicr.2021.100094">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmicr.2021.100094</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Kumar, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Diksha, S</string-name>
              <string-name>Kumar, R.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>Biofertilizers: An Ecofriendly Technology for Nutrient Recycling and Environmental Sustainability</article-title>
            <source>Current Research in Microbial Sciences</source>
            <volume>3</volume>
            <fpage>100094</fpage>
            <elocation-id>ID</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.crmicr.2021.100094</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35024641</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Nosheen, S., Ajmal, I. and Song, Y. (2021) Microbes as Biofertilizers, a Potential Approach for Sustainable Crop Production. <italic>Sustainability</italic>, 13, Article No. 1868. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041868 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su13041868</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041868">https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041868</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Nosheen, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ajmal, I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Song, Y.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Microbes as Biofertilizers, a Potential Approach for Sustainable Crop Production</article-title>
            <source>Sustainability</source>
            <volume>13</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su13041868</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Du, T.-Y., He, H.-Y., Zhang, Q., Lu, L., Mao, W.-J. and Zhai, M.-Z. (2022) Positive Effects of Organic Fertilizers and Biofertilizers on Soil Microbial Community Composition and Walnut Yield. <italic>Applied</italic><italic>Soil</italic><italic>Ecology</italic>, 175, Article ID: 104457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2022.104457 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2022.104457</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2022.104457">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2022.104457</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Du, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>He, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhang, Q.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lu, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mao, W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhai, M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>Positive Effects of Organic Fertilizers and Biofertilizers on Soil Microbial Community Composition and Walnut Yield</article-title>
            <source>Applied Soil Ecology</source>
            <volume>175</volume>
            <fpage>104457</fpage>
            <elocation-id>ID</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2022.104457</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Rai, P.K., Rai, A., Sharma, N.K., Singh, T. and Kumar, Y. (2023) Limitations of Biofertilizers and Their Revitalization through Nanotechnology. <italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Cleaner</italic><italic>Production</italic>, 418, Article ID: 138194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138194 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138194</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138194">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138194</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Rai, P.K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rai, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sharma, N.K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Singh, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kumar, Y.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Limitations of Biofertilizers and Their Revitalization through Nanotechnology</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Cleaner Production</source>
            <volume>418</volume>
            <fpage>138194</fpage>
            <elocation-id>ID</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138194</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Aguilar-Paredes, A., Valdés, G. and Nuti, M. (2020) Ecosystem Functions of Microbial Consortia in Sustainable Agriculture. <italic>Agronomy</italic>, 10, Article No. 1902. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10121902 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy10121902</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10121902">https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10121902</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Aguilar-Paredes, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Nuti, M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>Ecosystem Functions of Microbial Consortia in Sustainable Agriculture</article-title>
            <source>Agronomy</source>
            <volume>10</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy10121902</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Terre &amp; Humanisme (2021) Manuel de la litière forestière fermentée. Editions du Rouergue, 128 p.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Manuel de la litière forestière fermentée</article-title>
            <source>Editions du Rouergue</source>
            <volume>128</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">Amsallem, I. and Tréboux, M. (2014) Tourteau de jatropha: Perspectives et contraintes pour la valorisation. http://jatroref.iram-fr.org/IMG/pdf/Rapport_Final_Jatropha_eSud_071014.pdf</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Amsallem, I.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Tourteau de jatropha: Perspectives et contraintes pour la valorisation</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Belewu, M.A. and Sam, R. (2010) Solid State Fermentation of <italic>Jatropha curcas</italic> Kernel Cake: Proximate Composition and Antinutritional Components.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Belewu, M.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sam, R.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2010</year>
            <article-title>Solid State Fermentation of Jatropha curcas Kernel Cake: Proximate Composition and Antinutritional Components</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kannoju, B., Ganapathiwar, S., Nunavath, H., Sunkar, B. and Bhukya, B. (2017) Plausible Exploitation of Jatropha De-Oiled Seed Cake for Lipase and Phytase Production and Simultaneous Detoxification by <italic>Candida parapsilosis</italic> Isolated from Poultry Garbage. <italic>Bioresource</italic><italic>Technology</italic>, 225, 215-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.065 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.065</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27894040</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.065">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.065</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Kannoju, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ganapathiwar, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Nunavath, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sunkar, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bhukya, B.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2017</year>
            <article-title>Plausible Exploitation of Jatropha De-Oiled Seed Cake for Lipase and Phytase Production and Simultaneous Detoxification by Candida parapsilosis Isolated from Poultry Garbage</article-title>
            <source>Bioresource Technology</source>
            <volume>225</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.065</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27894040</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Marois, J., Lerch, T.Z., Dunant, U., Farnet Da Silva, A. and Christen, P. (2023) Chemical and Microbial Characterization of Fermented Forest Litters Used as Biofertilizers. <italic>Microorganisms</italic>, 11, Article No. 306. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020306 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms11020306</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36838270</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020306">https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020306</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Marois, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lerch, T.Z.</string-name>
              <string-name>Dunant, U.</string-name>
              <string-name>Silva, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Christen, P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Chemical and Microbial Characterization of Fermented Forest Litters Used as Biofertilizers</article-title>
            <source>Microorganisms</source>
            <volume>11</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms11020306</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36838270</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <label>14.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Gutierrez, A., Rébufa, C., Farnet Da Silva, A., Davidson, S., Foli, L., Combet-Blanc, Y., <italic>et al</italic>. (2024) Biochemical and Microbial Characterization of a Forest Litter-Based Bio-Fertilizer Produced in Batch Culture by Fermentation under Different Initial Oxygen Concentrations. <italic>World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology</italic>, 40, Article No. 353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-024-04155-z <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11274-024-04155-z</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39419849</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-024-04155-z">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-024-04155-z</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Gutierrez, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Silva, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Davidson, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Foli, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Combet-Blanc, Y.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>Biochemical and Microbial Characterization of a Forest Litter-Based Bio-Fertilizer Produced in Batch Culture by Fermentation under Different Initial Oxygen Concentrations</article-title>
            <source>World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology</source>
            <volume>40</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11274-024-04155-z</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39419849</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <label>15.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Zoumman, A.M.A., Fernandes, P., Gueye, M., Chaintreuil, C., Cournac, L., Kane, A., <italic>et al</italic>. (2025) Exploring Microbial Diversity in Forest Litter-Based Fermented Bioproducts and Their Effects on Tomato ( <italic>Solanum lycopersicum</italic> L.) Growth in Senegal. <italic>International</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Plant</italic><italic>Biology</italic>, 16, Article No. 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijpb16020055 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijpb16020055</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ijpb16020055">https://doi.org/10.3390/ijpb16020055</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Zoumman, A.M.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Fernandes, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gueye, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chaintreuil, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Cournac, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kane, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2025</year>
            <article-title>Exploring Microbial Diversity in Forest Litter-Based Fermented Bioproducts and Their Effects on Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L</article-title>
            <source>) Growth in Senegal. International Journal of Plant Biology</source>
            <volume>16</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijpb16020055</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <label>16.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Fournet, F., Rican, S., Vaillant, Z., Roudot, A., Meunier-Nikiema, A., Kassié, D., <italic>et al</italic>. (2016) The Influence of Urbanization Modes on the Spatial Circulation of Flaviviruses within Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso). <italic>International Journal of Environmental</italic><italic>Research</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Public</italic><italic>Health</italic>, 13, Article No. 1226. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13121226 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijerph13121226</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27973402</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13121226">https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13121226</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Fournet, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rican, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Vaillant, Z.</string-name>
              <string-name>Roudot, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Meunier-Nikiema, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>The Influence of Urbanization Modes on the Spatial Circulation of Flaviviruses within Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso)</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health</source>
            <volume>13</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijerph13121226</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27973402</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <label>17.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Burgos Hernández, T.D., Slater, B.K., Shaffer, J.M. and Basta, N. (2023) Comparison of Methods for Determining Organic Carbon Content of Urban Soils in Central Ohio. <italic>Geoderma</italic><italic>Regional</italic>, 34, e00680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2023.e00680 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geodrs.2023.e00680</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2023.e00680">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2023.e00680</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Slater, B.K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Shaffer, J.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Basta, N.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Comparison of Methods for Determining Organic Carbon Content of Urban Soils in Central Ohio</article-title>
            <source>Geoderma Regional</source>
            <volume>34</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geodrs.2023.e00680</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <label>18.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Tabbasum, S., Akhtar, M., Sarwar, N., Tipu, M.I., Ikram, W., Ashraf, A., <italic>et al</italic>. (2020) Relative Effectiveness of Phosphorus and Potassium along with Compost and Organic Acids on Maize Crop Grown in Calcareous Soil: A Multivariate Analysis. <italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Soil</italic><italic>Science</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Plant</italic><italic>Nutrition</italic>, 21, 437-449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-020-00372-1 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s42729-020-00372-1</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-020-00372-1">https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-020-00372-1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Tabbasum, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Akhtar, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sarwar, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tipu, M.I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ikram, W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ashraf, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>Relative Effectiveness of Phosphorus and Potassium along with Compost and Organic Acids on Maize Crop Grown in Calcareous Soil: A Multivariate Analysis</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition</source>
            <volume>21</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s42729-020-00372-1</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <label>19.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Sommer, S.G., Kjellerup, V. and Kristjansen, O. (1992) Determination of Total Ammonium Nitrogen in Pig and Cattle Slurry: Sample Preparation and Analysis. <italic>Acta</italic><italic>Agriculturae</italic><italic>Scandinavica</italic>, <italic>Section</italic><italic>B</italic>— <italic>Soil</italic><italic>&amp;</italic><italic>Plant</italic><italic>Science</italic>, 42, 146-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064719209417969 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/09064719209417969</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/09064719209417969">https://doi.org/10.1080/09064719209417969</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Sommer, S.G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kjellerup, V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kristjansen, O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Scandinavica, S</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1992</year>
            <article-title>Determination of Total Ammonium Nitrogen in Pig and Cattle Slurry: Sample Preparation and Analysis</article-title>
            <source>Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica</source>
            <volume>42</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/09064719209417969</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <label>20.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Tilvikiene, V., Kadziuliene, Z., Liaudanskiene, I., Zvicevicius, E., Cerniauskiene, Z., Cipliene, A., <italic>et al</italic>. (2020) The Quality and Energy Potential of Introduced Energy Crops in Northern Part of Temperate Climate Zone. <italic>Renewable</italic><italic>Energy</italic>, 151, 887-895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.080 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.080</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.080">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.080</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Tilvikiene, V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kadziuliene, Z.</string-name>
              <string-name>Liaudanskiene, I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zvicevicius, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Cerniauskiene, Z.</string-name>
              <string-name>Cipliene, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>The Quality and Energy Potential of Introduced Energy Crops in Northern Part of Temperate Climate Zone</article-title>
            <source>Renewable Energy</source>
            <volume>151</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.080</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <label>21.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Castaldi, P., Garau, G. and Melis, P. (2008) Maturity Assessment of Compost from Municipal Solid Waste through the Study of Enzyme Activities and Water-Soluble Fractions. <italic>Waste</italic><italic>Management</italic>, 28, 534-540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.002 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.002</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17382530</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.002</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Castaldi, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Garau, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Melis, P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2008</year>
            <article-title>Maturity Assessment of Compost from Municipal Solid Waste through the Study of Enzyme Activities and Water-Soluble Fractions</article-title>
            <source>Waste Management</source>
            <volume>28</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.002</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17382530</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <label>22.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Seyrek, G.C., Sahin, O., Demir, K. and Gunes, A. (2024) Nitrate Accumulation and Mineral Nutrition of Lettuce under Varied Light Emitting Diode Lighting. <italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Plant</italic><italic>Nutrition</italic>, 48, 1425-1438. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2024.2443114 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/01904167.2024.2443114</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2024.2443114">https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2024.2443114</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Seyrek, G.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sahin, O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Demir, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gunes, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>Nitrate Accumulation and Mineral Nutrition of Lettuce under Varied Light Emitting Diode Lighting</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Plant Nutrition</source>
            <volume>48</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/01904167.2024.2443114</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <label>23.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Tran, T.T., Scott, A., Tien, Y., Murray, R., Boerlin, P., Pearl, D.L., <italic>et al</italic>. (2021) On-farm Anaerobic Digestion of Dairy Manure Reduces the Abundance of Antibiotic Resistance-Associated Gene Targets and the Potential for Plasmid Transfer. <italic>Applied</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Environmental</italic><italic>Microbiology</italic>, 87, e02980-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02980-20 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aem.02980-20</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33931422</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02980-20">https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02980-20</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Tran, T.T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Scott, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tien, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Murray, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Boerlin, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Pearl, D.L.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>On-farm Anaerobic Digestion of Dairy Manure Reduces the Abundance of Antibiotic Resistance-Associated Gene Targets and the Potential for Plasmid Transfer</article-title>
            <source>Applied and Environmental Microbiology</source>
            <volume>87</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aem.02980-20</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33931422</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <label>24.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Waongo, M., Laux, P., Coulibaly, A., Sy, S. and Kunstmann, H. (2024) Assessing the Impacts of Climate Change on Rainfed Maize Production in Burkina Faso, West Africa. <italic>Atmosphere</italic>, 15, Article No. 1438. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15121438 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/atmos15121438</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15121438">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15121438</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Waongo, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Laux, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Coulibaly, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sy, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kunstmann, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Faso, W</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>Assessing the Impacts of Climate Change on Rainfed Maize Production in Burkina Faso, West Africa</article-title>
            <source>Atmosphere</source>
            <volume>15</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/atmos15121438</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <label>25.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Yang, Y., Wang, G., Li, G., Ma, R., Kong, Y. and Yuan, J. (2021) Selection of Sensitive Seeds for Evaluation of Compost Maturity with the Seed Germination Index. <italic>Waste</italic><italic>Management</italic>, 136, 238-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.09.037 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.wasman.2021.09.037</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34700164</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.09.037">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.09.037</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Yang, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wang, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Li, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ma, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kong, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Yuan, J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Selection of Sensitive Seeds for Evaluation of Compost Maturity with the Seed Germination Index</article-title>
            <source>Waste Management</source>
            <volume>136</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.wasman.2021.09.037</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34700164</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <label>26.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ajaweed, A.N., Hassan, F.M. and Hyder, N.H. (2022) Evaluation of Physio-Chemical Characteristics of Bio Fertilizer Produced from Organic Solid Waste Using Composting Bins. <italic>Sustainability</italic>, 14, Article No. 4738. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084738 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su14084738</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084738">https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084738</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ajaweed, A.N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Hassan, F.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Hyder, N.H.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>Evaluation of Physio-Chemical Characteristics of Bio Fertilizer Produced from Organic Solid Waste Using Composting Bins</article-title>
            <source>Sustainability</source>
            <volume>14</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su14084738</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <label>27.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Thepbandit, W. and Athinuwat, D. (2024) Rhizosphere Microorganisms Supply Availability of Soil Nutrients and Induce Plant Defense. <italic>Microorganisms</italic>, 12, Article No. 558. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12030558 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms12030558</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38543610</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12030558">https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12030558</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Thepbandit, W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Athinuwat, D.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>Rhizosphere Microorganisms Supply Availability of Soil Nutrients and Induce Plant Defense</article-title>
            <source>Microorganisms</source>
            <volume>12</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms12030558</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38543610</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <label>28.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Nikiema, M., Somda, M.K., Ouili, A.S., Ouattara, A., Compaoré, C.O.T., Barsan, N., <italic>et al</italic>. (2025) Assessment of the Agronomic Value of Digestate from Cashew Nut Shell and Cow Dung Anaerobic Digestion. <italic>Discover</italic><italic>Applied</italic><italic>Sciences</italic>, 7, Article No. 290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-025-06506-3 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s42452-025-06506-3</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-025-06506-3">https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-025-06506-3</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Nikiema, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Somda, M.K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ouili, A.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ouattara, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Barsan, N.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2025</year>
            <article-title>Assessment of the Agronomic Value of Digestate from Cashew Nut Shell and Cow Dung Anaerobic Digestion</article-title>
            <source>Discover Applied Sciences</source>
            <volume>7</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s42452-025-06506-3</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B29">
        <label>29.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Xie, W., Yang, J., Gao, S., Yao, R. and Wang, X. (2022) The Effect and Influence Mechanism of Soil Salinity on Phosphorus Availability in Coastal Salt-Affected Soils. <italic>Water</italic>, 14, Article No. 2804. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14182804 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/w14182804</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w14182804">https://doi.org/10.3390/w14182804</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Xie, W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Yang, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gao, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Yao, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wang, X.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>The Effect and Influence Mechanism of Soil Salinity on Phosphorus Availability in Coastal Salt-Affected Soils</article-title>
            <source>Water</source>
            <volume>14</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/w14182804</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B30">
        <label>30.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Billah, M., Khan, M., Bano, A., Hassan, T.U., Munir, A. and Gurmani, A.R. (2019) Phosphorus and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria: Keys for Sustainable Agriculture. <italic>Geomicrobiology</italic><italic>Journal</italic>, 36, 904-916. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490451.2019.1654043 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/01490451.2019.1654043</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01490451.2019.1654043">https://doi.org/10.1080/01490451.2019.1654043</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Billah, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Khan, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bano, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Hassan, T.U.</string-name>
              <string-name>Munir, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gurmani, A.R.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2019</year>
            <article-title>Phosphorus and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria: Keys for Sustainable Agriculture</article-title>
            <source>Geomicrobiology Journal</source>
            <volume>36</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/01490451.2019.1654043</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B31">
        <label>31.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Chen, M., Huang, Y., Wang, C. and Gao, H. (2020) The Conversion of Organic Nitrogen by Functional Bacteria Determines the End-Result of Ammonia in Compost. <italic>Bioresource</italic><italic>Technology</italic>, 299, Article ID: 122599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122599 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122599</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31865156</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122599">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122599</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Chen, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Huang, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wang, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gao, H.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>The Conversion of Organic Nitrogen by Functional Bacteria Determines the End-Result of Ammonia in Compost</article-title>
            <source>Bioresource Technology</source>
            <volume>299</volume>
            <fpage>122599</fpage>
            <elocation-id>ID</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122599</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31865156</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B32">
        <label>32.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Makkar, H.P.S., Aderibigbe, A.O. and Becker, K. (1998) Comparative Evaluation of Non-Toxic and Toxic Varieties of <italic>Jatropha curcas</italic> for Chemical Composition, Digestibility, Protein Degradability and Toxic Factors. <italic>Food</italic><italic>Chemistry</italic>, 62, 207-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0308-8146(97)00183-0 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0308-8146(97)00183-0</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0308-8146(97)00183-0">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0308-8146(97)00183-0</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Makkar, H.P.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Aderibigbe, A.O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Becker, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Composition, D</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1998</year>
            <article-title>Comparative Evaluation of Non-Toxic and Toxic Varieties of Jatropha curcas for Chemical Composition, Digestibility, Protein Degradability and Toxic Factors</article-title>
            <source>Food Chemistry</source>
            <volume>8146</volume>
            <issue>97</issue>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0308-8146(97)00183-0</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B33">
        <label>33.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Mahmoud, A., Hamza, R.A. and Elbeshbishy, E. (2022) Enhancement of Denitrification Efficiency Using Municipal and Industrial Waste Fermentation Liquids as External Carbon Sources. <italic>Science</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>the</italic><italic>Total</italic><italic>Environment</italic>, 816, Article ID: 151578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151578 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151578</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34774960</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151578">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151578</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Mahmoud, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Hamza, R.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Elbeshbishy, E.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>Enhancement of Denitrification Efficiency Using Municipal and Industrial Waste Fermentation Liquids as External Carbon Sources</article-title>
            <source>Science of the Total Environment</source>
            <volume>816</volume>
            <fpage>151578</fpage>
            <elocation-id>ID</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151578</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34774960</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B34">
        <label>34.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Yang, Z., Yan, H., Liu, H., Yang, L., Mi, G. and Wang, P. (2025) Enhancing Crop Nitrogen Efficiency: The Role of Mixed Nitrate and Ammonium Supply in Plant Growth and Development. <italic>Biology</italic>, 14, Article No. 546. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14050546 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/biology14050546</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40427735</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14050546">https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14050546</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Yang, Z.</string-name>
              <string-name>Yan, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Liu, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Yang, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mi, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wang, P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2025</year>
            <article-title>Enhancing Crop Nitrogen Efficiency: The Role of Mixed Nitrate and Ammonium Supply in Plant Growth and Development</article-title>
            <source>Biology</source>
            <volume>14</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/biology14050546</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40427735</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B35">
        <label>35.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Zeng, X., Liu, X., Tang, J., Hu, S., Jiang, P., Li, W., <italic>et al</italic>. (2012) Characterization and Potassium-Solubilizing Ability of <italic>Bacillus</italic><italic>circulans</italic><italic>Z</italic><sub>1</sub><sub>−</sub><sub>3</sub>. <italic>Advanced</italic><italic>Science</italic><italic>Letters</italic>, 10, 173-176. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2012.3726 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1166/asl.2012.3726</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2012.3726">https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2012.3726</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Zeng, X.</string-name>
              <string-name>Liu, X.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tang, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Hu, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Jiang, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Li, W.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2012</year>
            <article-title>Characterization and Potassium-Solubilizing Ability of Bacillus circulans Z1−3</article-title>
            <source>Advanced Science Letters</source>
            <volume>10</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1166/asl.2012.3726</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B36">
        <label>36.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Gao, J., Chen, Z., Wang, C., Fang, F., Huang, J. and Guo, J. (2020) Bioavailability of Organic Phosphorus in the Water Level Fluctuation Zone Soil and the Effects of Ultraviolet Irradiation on It in the Three Gorges Reservoir, China. <italic>Scie</italic><italic>nce</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>the</italic><italic>Total</italic><italic>Environment</italic>, 738, Article ID: 139912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139912 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139912</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32531607</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139912">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139912</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Gao, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chen, Z.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wang, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Fang, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Huang, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Guo, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Reservoir, C</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>Bioavailability of Organic Phosphorus in the Water Level Fluctuation Zone Soil and the Effects of Ultraviolet Irradiation on It in the Three Gorges Reservoir, China</article-title>
            <source>Science of the Total Environment</source>
            <volume>738</volume>
            <fpage>139912</fpage>
            <elocation-id>ID</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139912</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32531607</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B37">
        <label>37.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Valdes, A., García, Y., Álvarez, V. M., Samón, A., Pérez, E., Serrano, J. O., Rodríguez, Y. and Berenguer, A. (2020) Efecto de microorganismos eficientes, autóctonos de Guantánamo, Cuba, en indicadores bioproductivos y hematol &amp; oacute; gicos de precebas porcinas. <italic>Cuban</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Agricultural</italic><italic>Science</italic>, 54, 365-373.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Valdes, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Serrano, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Berenguer, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>Efecto de microorganismos eficientes, autóctonos de Guantánamo, Cuba, en indicadores bioproductivos y hematol &amp; oacute; gicos de precebas porcinas</article-title>
            <source>Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science</source>
            <volume>54</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B38">
        <label>38.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Mohd Zaini, N.S., Idris, H., Yaacob, J.S., Wan-Mohtar, W.A.A.Q.I., Putra Samsudin, N.I., Abdul Sukor, A.S., <italic>et al</italic>. (2022) The Potential of Fermented Food from Southeast Asia as Biofertiliser. <italic>Horticulturae</italic>, 8, Article No. 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8020102 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/horticulturae8020102</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8020102">https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8020102</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Zaini, N.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Idris, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Yaacob, J.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wan-Mohtar, W.A.A.Q.I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Samsudin, N.I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sukor, A.S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>The Potential of Fermented Food from Southeast Asia as Biofertiliser</article-title>
            <source>Horticulturae</source>
            <volume>8</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/horticulturae8020102</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B39">
        <label>39.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Finch-Savage, W.E. and Footitt, S. (2017) Seed Dormancy Cycling and the Regulation of Dormancy Mechanisms to Time Germination in Variable Field Environments. <italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Experimental</italic><italic>Botany</italic>, 68, 843-856. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw477 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erw477</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28391330</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw477">https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw477</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Finch-Savage, W.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Footitt, S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2017</year>
            <article-title>Seed Dormancy Cycling and the Regulation of Dormancy Mechanisms to Time Germination in Variable Field Environments</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Experimental Botany</source>
            <volume>68</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erw477</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28391330</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B40">
        <label>40.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Milon, A.R., Chang, S.W. and Ravindran, B. (2022) Biochar Amended Compost Maturity Evaluation Using Commercial Vegetable Crops Seedlings through Phytotoxicity Germination Bioassay. <italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>King</italic><italic>Saud</italic><italic>University</italic>— <italic>Science</italic>, 34, Article ID: 101770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101770 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101770</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101770">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101770</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Milon, A.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chang, S.W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ravindran, B.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>Biochar Amended Compost Maturity Evaluation Using Commercial Vegetable Crops Seedlings through Phytotoxicity Germination Bioassay</article-title>
            <source>Journal of King Saud University—Science</source>
            <volume>34</volume>
            <fpage>101770</fpage>
            <elocation-id>ID</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101770</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B41">
        <label>41.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kong, Y., Zhang, J., Yang, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, L., Wang, G., <italic>et al</italic>. (2023) Determining the Extraction Conditions and Phytotoxicity Threshold for Compost Maturity Evaluation Using the Seed Germination Index Method. <italic>Waste</italic><italic>Management</italic>, 171, 502-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2023.09.040 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.wasman.2023.09.040</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37806158</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2023.09.040">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2023.09.040</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Kong, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhang, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Yang, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Liu, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhang, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wang, G.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Determining the Extraction Conditions and Phytotoxicity Threshold for Compost Maturity Evaluation Using the Seed Germination Index Method</article-title>
            <source>Waste Management</source>
            <volume>171</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.wasman.2023.09.040</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37806158</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>