<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.4" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">gep</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2327-4344</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2327-4336</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/gep.2026.144006</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">gep-150651</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Earth</subject>
          <subject>Environmental Sciences</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Accurate Determination of 232Th through 208Tl Using Ultra-Low Background Gamma Spectrometry in Environmental Matrices</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Khan</surname>
            <given-names>Abdul J.</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Syed</surname>
            <given-names>Umme-Farzana</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Costello</surname>
            <given-names>Cynthia A.</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label> Laboratory of Inorganic and Nuclear Chemistry, Division of Environmental Health Sciences, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, USA </aff>
      <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label> Bureau of Environmental Radiation Protection, New York State Department of Health, Empire State Plaza, Albany, USA </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="conflict" id="fn-conflict">
          <p>The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>01</day>
        <month>04</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <month>04</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>14</volume>
      <issue>04</issue>
      <fpage>92</fpage>
      <lpage>105</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>14</day>
          <month>03</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>05</day>
          <month>04</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="published">
          <day>08</day>
          <month>04</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2026 by the authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p> This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link> ). </license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2026.144006">https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2026.144006</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p>Accurate measurement of thorium-232 (<sup>232</sup>Th) in environmental samples is essential for geochemical research, ecological monitoring, and radiological safety. Because <sup>232</sup>Th emits gamma radiation at a low probability, its activity is often estimated from short-lived daughter isotopes such as <sup>2</sup><sup>2</sup><sup>8</sup>Ac, <sup>2</sup><sup>12</sup>Pb, <sup>2</sup><sup>12</sup>Bi, and <sup>208</sup>Tl, assuming secular equilibrium. This study used ultra-low-background high-purity germanium (HPGe) gamma spectrometry to measure the <sup>232</sup>Th activity in certified reference materials and environmental sediment and soil samples. The 2614.5 keV gamma line of <sup>208</sup>Tl provided the most accurate and consistent results, although corrections for true coincidence summing (TCS) effects were necessary. Gamma lines from <sup>228</sup>Ac and <sup>212</sup>Pb exhibited minimal summing losses, which helped verify equilibrium-based measurements. Statistical analysis confirmed consistency across all daughter nuclides, validating the use of <sup>208</sup>Tl and related decay products for <sup>232</sup>Th determination. This method proves effective for routine environmental analysis and regulatory compliance.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated" xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>&lt;sup&gt;232&lt;/sup&gt;Th</kwd>
        <kwd>&lt;sup&gt;208&lt;/sup&gt;Tl</kwd>
        <kwd>Soil</kwd>
        <kwd>Sediment</kwd>
        <kwd>Ultra-Low Background Gamma Spectrometry</kwd>
        <kwd>True Coincidence Summing</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p><sup>232</sup>Th is a naturally occurring, long-lived radioactive element essential in environmental radioactivity, geochemistry, and nuclear fuel research. Measuring it directly via gamma spectrometry is difficult because of its low gamma emission. Instead, gamma rays emitted by decay products like <sup>2</sup><sup>2</sup><sup>8</sup>Ac, <sup>2</sup><sup>12</sup>Pb, <sup>2</sup><sup>12</sup>Bi, and <sup>208</sup>Tl are used for indirect detection under the assumption of secular equilibrium. The activity of <sup>232</sup>Th is determined by analyzing characteristic gamma-ray peaks from these decay products, such as the prominent 238.6 keV peak from <sup>212</sup>Pb, the 338.3 keV, 911.2 keV, and 968.97 keV peaks from <sup>228</sup>Ac, the 727.3 keV peak from <sup>212</sup>Bi, and the 583.2 keV and 860.6 keV peaks from <sup>208</sup>Tl ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]). These peaks can be influenced by other radioactive elements like <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>235</sup>U, and <sup>238</sup>U, which are often present in samples containing <sup>232</sup>Th. While these decay series peaks are generally reliable in gamma spectrometry, spectral interference and true coincidence summing (TCS) corrections are often necessary ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>]). In environmental samples with low activity, positioning the source close to the detector improves counting statistics but increases TCS, which impacts accuracy. Corrections for TCS are significant in near-geometry detection due to cascading decay transitions ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]). Studies show that the 338.3 keV peak of <sup>228</sup>Ac is least affected by interference, making it a preferred marker for <sup>232</sup>Th. </p>
      <p><sup>208</sup>Tl is particularly useful because of its intense 2614.5 keV gamma emission (~99.8%), which is easily detectable and less affected by matrix effects. However, relying solely on this marker can be problematic if secular equilibrium is not established or if interference corrections are insufficient. Its presence also contributes to natural background radiation. Monitoring its levels helps assess radiation risks to humans and ecosystems, particularly in areas with high natural radioactivity, such as monazite-rich soils and uranium mines ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>]). </p>
      <p>Thorium is relatively immobile in the environment, making it a useful tracer for geochemical processes such as sediment sourcing, weathering, erosion, and particle transport in waterways. <sup>232</sup>Th and its decay products, such as <sup>228</sup>Ra and <sup>228</sup>Ac, are used for sediment dating, particularly short-lived radionuclides in the <sup>232</sup>Th decay series, to estimate recent sedimentation over decades to centuries. Thorium also plays a key role in monitoring nuclear materials and non-proliferation efforts. Although not fissile itself, thorium can be converted into fissile <sup>233</sup>U in reactors. Tracking it in environmental samples helps detect illegal nuclear activities or contamination. Elevated thorium levels in soils may indicate industrial pollution or phosphate fertilizer use. The activity concentration of <sup>232</sup>Th ranged from 15.3 ± 2.24 to 58.3 ± 4.92 Bq∙kg<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> in topsoil and river sediments from the Jinding Pb-Zn mine catchment in Southwest China ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>]). In sediment samples from Novaya Zemlya in the Russian Arctic, <sup>232</sup>Th activity ranged from 21.11 ± 1.27 to 46.15 ± 3.61 Bq∙kg<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>]). <sup>232</sup>Th measurement supports environmental cleanup near mines, waste sites, or nuclear facilities ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]). Agencies such as the EPA and IAEA monitor radionuclides like <sup>232</sup>Th in drinking water, soil, and building materials to ensure safety standards. This paper discusses correction methods for accurately measuring <sup>208</sup>Tl activity to reflect <sup>232</sup>Th levels in low-background gamma spectrometry, comparing these results with other decay products such as <sup>228</sup>Ac, <sup>212</sup>Pb, and <sup>212</sup>Bi.</p>
      <p>The novelty of this study lies in the systematic metrological evaluation of multiple gamma emissions within the <sup>232</sup>Th decay series under ultra-low background conditions, with particular emphasis on the analytical performance of the 2614.5 keV emission of <sup>208</sup>Tl. While this high-energy line is often avoided in close-geometry measurements due to true coincidence summing (TCS), the present work demonstrates that, when rigorous summing corrections are applied using GESPECOR ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]) simulations, the <sup>208</sup>Tl line provides superior statistical precision and analytical reliability for environmental thorium determination. This study therefore establishes a practical methodology for reliable <sup>232</sup>Th quantification in environmental matrices using ultra-low background HPGe gamma spectrometry.</p>
      <p>The primary objective of this study is to establish a metrologically robust methodology for the determination of <sup>232</sup>Th in environmental matrices using ultra-low background HPGe gamma spectrometry. The analytical performance of selected gamma emissions from <sup>228</sup>Ac, <sup>212</sup>Pb, <sup>212</sup>Bi, and <sup>208</sup>Tl is systematically evaluated based on 1) agreement with certified reference values, 2) inter-line consistency within the decay series under secular equilibrium, and 3) statistical precision following correction for true coincidence summing (TCS). These criteria provide a quantitative framework for identifying the most reliable gamma-ray indicators for routine environmental analysis.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec2">
      <title>2. Theory</title>
      <p><sup>232</sup>Th decays into stable <sup>208</sup>Pb through a series of alpha and beta emissions involving various short-lived isotopes, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. <sup>208</sup>Tl is produced via beta decay of <sup>2</sup><sup>12</sup>Bi (~36% branch) and has a short half-life. Its presence and activity strongly depend on upstream equilibrium, especially involving <sup>2</sup><sup>2</sup><sup>8</sup>Th and <sup>2</sup><sup>12</sup>Bi. <sup>208</sup>Tl decays through a cascade of photon emissions over picoseconds or nanoseconds as given in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>]). Some excited states of <sup>208</sup>Pb, populated during <sup>208</sup>Tl decay, can de-excite by internal conversion (IC) rather than gamma emission. During IC, inner-shell electrons (usually K or L shell) are ejected, resulting in characteristic X-ray emissions as outer-shell electrons fill the vacancies, such as Pb Kα (~74 keV) and Kβ (~85 keV) X-rays. These events are often accompanied by a β<sup>−</sup> particle and/or gamma photon, notably the 2614.5 keV gamma line. When a γ-ray or β particle triggers a coincidence in a surrounding or coupled detector (like a scintillator or plastic veto), and a low-energy X-ray is detected within the coincidence window, the system can veto the low-energy event.</p>
      <p>Secular equilibrium occurs in a decay chain when the parent isotope’s half-life is much longer than its daughters’, and the system remains undisturbed for several half-lives, allowing activities to synchronize. Under these conditions, each daughter decays at the same rate at which it is produced, leading to equal activities across the chain. Achieving secular equilibrium in natural samples requires that the sample remain sealed for at least 5 - 6 half-lives of the intermediate daughters. To ensure secular equilibrium within the <sup>232</sup>Th decay chain, samples were sealed for at least three weeks before counting. At this timescale, short-lived progeny such as <sup>2</sup><sup>12</sup>Pb (T<sub>1/2</sub> = 10.64 h) and <sup>2</sup><sup>12</sup>Bi (T<sub>1/2</sub> = 60.6 min) are fully equilibrated within 2 - 3 days, while longer-lived <sup>224</sup>Ra (T<sub>1/2</sub> = 3.66 d) and its progeny, including <sup>208</sup>Tl, approach equilibrium within 15 - 20 days. </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec3">
      <title>3. Materials and Methods</title>
      <p>At the Wadsworth Center of the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH), we have been conducting low-background gamma spectrometry for over thirty years ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]). This technique is used for diverse applications, including environmental, food, air, and water monitoring, facility surveillance, as well as health physics and homeland security. Low-background gamma spectrometry is suitable for measuring samples with very low activity, such as water or chemically separated materials. Typical projects involve the mandated analysis of radium in drinking water ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>]) and the monitoring of cesium at nuclear sites. Additionally, we serve as a reference laboratory and participate in radiological exercises. In this study, we used high-purity Germanium coaxial detectors (HPGe) GX13023 XtRa, with 140% relative efficiency from Mirion Technologies (Canberra) Inc. The detector features a copper cryostat and end cap. Its top entry window is made of 0.62-mm-thick carbon composite, enabling sensitivity to photons down to about 10 keV. The detector is housed inside a three-layer lead shield: an outer 7.6 cm (3″) layer of Boliden lead with 20 Bq∙kg<sup>−1</sup><sup>210</sup>Pb content; an inner 7.6 cm (3″) layer from Plombum Firma-Laboratorium (Kraków, Poland), &lt;3 Bq∙kg<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup><sup>210</sup>Pb, and &lt;1 mBq∙kg<sup>−1</sup><sup>40</sup>K; and a 2 cm-thick Alpha-grade lead inserts </p>
      <fig id="fig1">
        <label>Figure 1</label>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2173743-rId11.jpeg?20260408104045" />
      </fig>
      <p><bold>Figure 1.</bold> Thorium series (→alpha emission; ↓beta emission).</p>
      <p>by Pure Technologies (Tequesta, FL, USA), with an alpha emission rate of 0.0007 counts/hr/cm<sup>2</sup> and 0.01 ppm <sup>40</sup>K. The Ge detector chamber is purged with boil-off nitrogen from its Dewar to limit radon ingrowth and its progeny. Details about the spectrometer’s low background features are documented elsewhere ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>]). The lead shield is topped and flanked by a 6-panel plastic scintillator muon shield, each panel 5.1 cm (2'') thick, one side divided into two for cryostat access. Made of BC-408 plastic scintillator (Saint-Gobain Crystals, Newbury, OH, USA), each panel contains two hemispherical photomultiplier tubes (Model 9900, ET Enterprises, Rockaway, NJ, USA). The entire setup is enclosed in a steel room with 15.2 cm (6'') thick walls of pre-World War II steel (Dixie Manufacturing Co., Baltimore, MD, USA), situated beneath a 47-story building that provides approximately 33 meters of water-equivalent (mwe) shielding from cosmic muons. The signals from the scintillator panels are synchronized via high-voltage bias, then combined, preamplifier, amplified, and discriminated to produce a 40 μs TTL gate. This gate vetoes the Ge detector signals processed by the Lynx Digital Signal Analyzer (LYNX). </p>
      <fig id="fig2">
        <label>Figure 2</label>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2173743-rId12.jpeg?20260408104045" />
      </fig>
      <p><bold>Figure 2.</bold><sup>208</sup>Tl decay scheme ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>]).</p>
      <p>Sediment samples (S1 - S4) were collected between 2018 and 2023 from the shoreline of the Lake Ontario boat launch, specifically at the water-land interface. At each location, approximately the upper 2 cm of surface material was collected and sieved in the field to remove coarse debris and stones. A topsoil sample (~500 g) was collected from a backyard site at a depth of approximately 15 cm (6 inches) and similarly sieved to remove gravel and larger particles. In addition, a soil sample from the IAEA-2006 proficiency testing (PT) exercise was included. This PT material was previously milled, sieved to &lt;0.1 mm, and homogenized to ensure uniformity.</p>
      <p>All environmental samples were air-dried, homogenized, and transferred into counting containers corresponding to two geometries: a 49 mL jar and an 800 mL Marinelli beaker. For the 49 mL geometry, approximately 50 - 60 g of sample was used, whereas for the 800 mL geometry, sample masses ranged from 1000 to 1200 g. Samples were hermetically sealed and stored for at least four weeks prior to counting to ensure the establishment of secular equilibrium within the <sup>232</sup>Th decay series.</p>
      <p>Gamma spectrometric measurements were performed using an ultra-low background HPGe detector. Counting times ranged from 60,000 s to 240,000 s, depending on sample mass, geometry, and activity level. Each sample was measured in duplicate, and the reported activity values represent the mean of the two measurements to improve counting statistics and reproducibility. The relative difference between duplicate measurements was typically less than 5%, confirming good measurement reproducibility. </p>
      <p>Secular equilibrium was verified experimentally by comparing activities derived from multiple daughter radionuclides (<sup>2</sup><sup>2</sup><sup>8</sup>Ac, <sup>2</sup><sup>12</sup>Pb, <sup>2</sup><sup>12</sup>Bi, and <sup>208</sup>Tl). Equilibrium was considered established when the activities agreed within ±10% or within combined 1σ uncertainties. This criterion was satisfied for all samples analyzed. It should be noted that <sup>208</sup>Tl is produced via a branching decay of <sup>212</sup>Bi, with a branching ratio of approximately 36%. However, under conditions of secular equilibrium, the activity of <sup>208</sup>Tl is equal to that of its parent <sup>232</sup>Th, as the branching fraction is inherently accounted for in the decay constant governing its production and decay. Background spectra were acquired for 240,000 s under identical conditions.</p>
      <p>Method validation and quality control were performed using certified reference materials (CRMs), including IAEA-447 (Moss Soil), IAEA-412 (Pacific Ocean Sediment), and IAEA-385 (Irish Sea Sediment), as well as the PT sample. These materials ensured traceability and accuracy of the analytical procedure. Detection limits were calculated following the formulation of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>] for the critical level and detection limit, incorporating counting statistics of both sample and background spectra and accounting for unequal counting times, with modifications as described in ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>]; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>]). </p>
      <p>Efficiency calibration was performed for both counting geometries using a mixed gamma-ray standard traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) over the energy range of 50 - 1840 keV. Efficiencies outside this range were obtained by extrapolation. The total uncertainty of the efficiency calibration included contributions from the certified source activity and counting statistics. Sample-specific corrections for density and true coincidence summing were calculated using the Monte Carlo-based GESPECOR software ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]), and the resulting correction factors were applied to the measured peak areas prior to activity determination.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec4">
      <title>4. Results and Discussion</title>
      <sec id="sec4dot1">
        <title>
          4.1. Understanding the
          <sup>232</sup>
          Th Decay Series and Measurement Strategy
        </title>
        <p>The quantification of <sup>232</sup>Th by gamma-ray spectrometry is inherently indirect and relies on the accurate determination of its short-lived progeny under conditions of secular equilibrium. Owing to its long half-life (T<sub>1/2</sub> = 1.4 × 10<sup>10</sup> y), <sup>232</sup>Th decays through a well-defined sequence of alpha and beta transitions terminating in stable <sup>208</sup>Pb. Within this decay chain, <sup>2</sup><sup>2</sup><sup>8</sup>Ac, <sup>2</sup><sup>12</sup>Pb, <sup>2</sup><sup>12</sup>Bi, and <sup>208</sup>Tl are of analytical importance due to their relatively intense and well-resolved gamma emissions. Under secular equilibrium, the activities of these daughter radionuclides are equal to that of the parent <sup>232</sup>Th. Consequently, reliable determination of <sup>232</sup>Th can be achieved through measurement of selected progeny gamma lines, if equilibrium conditions are verified and appropriate corrections such as coincidence summing are rigorously applied. This indirect approach constitutes the foundation of high-resolution gamma spectrometric analysis of thorium in environmental matrices.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot2">
        <title>4.2. Metrological Validation Using Certified Reference Materials</title>
        <p>Method accuracy and traceability were assessed using three certified reference materials (IAEA-385, IAEA-412, and IAEA-447). Activities were determined independently from multiple daughter radionuclides (<sup>2</sup><sup>2</sup><sup>8</sup>Ac, <sup>2</sup><sup>12</sup>Pb, <sup>2</sup><sup>12</sup>Bi, and <sup>208</sup>Tl) to evaluate internal consistency within the decay series. Across all reference materials, the measured <sup>232</sup>Th activity concentrations exhibited excellent agreement with the certified values as shown in <bold>Table 1</bold>. Deviations remained within one standard deviation of the reference uncertainties for all evaluated gamma lines, demonstrating both trueness and precision of the analytical protocol. The concordance among activities derived from different progenies further confirms the establishment of secular equilibrium in the reference matrices and validates the multi-line quantification strategy. Among the evaluated emissions, the 2614.5 keV gamma line of <sup>208</sup>Tl provided the highest metrological performance. Ratio analysis yielded a standard deviation of 0.0122 presented in <bold>Table 2</bold>, indicating superior reproducibility and minimal inter-matrix variability. Quantitative comparison between certified and measured activities based on this line demonstrated near-perfect agreement.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 1.</bold><sup>232</sup>Th activity (Bq∙kg<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) in certified reference materials.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl1">
          <label>Table 1</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Parent Nuclide</td>
                <td>Daughter Nuclide</td>
                <td>Energy (keV)</td>
                <td>Intensity (%)</td>
                <td>IAEA-385 (33.8 ± 0.9)*</td>
                <td>IAEA-412 (36.3 ± 3.5)*</td>
                <td>IAEA-447 (37.3 ± 2.0)*</td>
                <td>PT</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <sup>232</sup>
                  Th
                </td>
                <td>
                  <sup>228</sup>
                  Ac
                </td>
                <td>270.24</td>
                <td>3.46</td>
                <td>37.4 ± 6.1</td>
                <td>36.3 ± 1.8</td>
                <td>41.1 ± 4.1</td>
                <td>438 ± 35</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>338.32</td>
                <td>11.3</td>
                <td>33.7 ± 2.8</td>
                <td>37.9 ± 1.2</td>
                <td>34.6 ± 1.7</td>
                <td>472 ± 18</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>911.20</td>
                <td>25.8</td>
                <td>34.0 ± 4.6</td>
                <td>36.4 ± 0.9</td>
                <td>35.5 ± 1.0</td>
                <td>446 ± 23</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>964.77</td>
                <td>4.99</td>
                <td>34.1 ± 4.6</td>
                <td>35.6 ± 1.6</td>
                <td>36.9 ± 2.3</td>
                <td>428 ± 23</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>968.97</td>
                <td>15.8</td>
                <td>33.6 ± 2.4</td>
                <td>35.3 ± 1.0</td>
                <td>35.4 ± 1.2</td>
                <td>443 ± 15</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>Mean ± 1σ</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>34.0 ± 0.6</td>
                <td>36.3 ± 0.5</td>
                <td>35.6 ± 0.7</td>
                <td>448 ± 08</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <sup>212</sup>
                  Pb
                </td>
                <td>238.63</td>
                <td>43.6</td>
                <td>34.9 ± 2.0</td>
                <td>37.7 ± 1.8</td>
                <td>36.4 ± 1.1</td>
                <td>460 ± 14</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <sup>212</sup>
                  Bi
                </td>
                <td>727.33</td>
                <td>6.67</td>
                <td>33.9 ± 4.1</td>
                <td>36.1 ± 1.5</td>
                <td>36.6 ± 2.1</td>
                <td>435 ± 20</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <sup>208</sup>
                  Tl
                </td>
                <td>583.19</td>
                <td>85.0</td>
                <td>34.4 ± 2.0</td>
                <td>36.0 ± 1.0</td>
                <td>35.0 ± 1.2</td>
                <td>439 ± 14</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>860.56</td>
                <td>12.5</td>
                <td>32.1 ± 4.4</td>
                <td>35.0 ± 1.6</td>
                <td>32.2 ± 2.1</td>
                <td>409 ± 23</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>2614.5</td>
                <td>99.8</td>
                <td>33.7 ± 2.0</td>
                <td>36.6 ± 0.9</td>
                <td>36.7 ± 1.1</td>
                <td>ND</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>Mean ± 1σ</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>34.3 ± 0.7</td>
                <td>36.2 ± 0.6</td>
                <td>35.5 ± 0.8</td>
                <td>431 ± 11</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>*Certificate value.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 2.</bold> Significant test for the gamma energy line for <sup>232</sup>Th measurement.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl2">
          <label>Table 2</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Gamma line</td>
                <td>Mean ratio</td>
                <td>Std Dev</td>
                <td>t-Statistic</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>p-</italic>
                  Value
                </td>
                <td>
                  (
                  <italic>p</italic>
                  &lt; 0.05)*
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>2615 keV</td>
                <td>0.9964</td>
                <td>0.0122</td>
                <td>−0.5107</td>
                <td>0.6604</td>
                <td>No</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>583 keV</td>
                <td>1.0394</td>
                <td>0.0239</td>
                <td>2.8571</td>
                <td>0.1038</td>
                <td>No</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>861 keV</td>
                <td>0.9793</td>
                <td>0.0487</td>
                <td>−0.7365</td>
                <td>0.5381</td>
                <td>No</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>727 keV</td>
                <td>1.0513</td>
                <td>0.0425</td>
                <td>2.0901</td>
                <td>0.1718</td>
                <td>No</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>239 keV</td>
                <td>1.075</td>
                <td>0.0415</td>
                <td>3.1315</td>
                <td>0.0886</td>
                <td>No</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>338 keV</td>
                <td>1.0473</td>
                <td>0.0654</td>
                <td>1.2532</td>
                <td>0.3368</td>
                <td>No</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>911 keV</td>
                <td>1.0444</td>
                <td>0.0359</td>
                <td>2.1429</td>
                <td>0.1654</td>
                <td>No</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>*Statistical test of gamma-line-derived activity ratios (n = 5 environmental samples).</p>
        <p>Quantitative comparison between certified and measured activities derived from the <sup>208</sup>Tl (2614.5 keV line) demonstrated excellent agreement within the combined measurement uncertainties for all investigated reference materials. To further illustrate the internal consistency of the gamma spectrometric determinations, the activities of <sup>232</sup>Th derived from individual daughter radionuclide gamma lines are presented graphically in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> for the certified reference materials IAEA-385, IAEA-412, and IAEA-447. The figure compares activities calculated from the gamma emissions of <sup>2</sup><sup>12</sup>Pb (238.6 keV), <sup>2</sup><sup>2</sup><sup>8</sup>Ac (338.3 keV), <sup>2</sup><sup>12</sup>Bi (727.3 keV), and <sup>208</sup>Tl (583.2 and 2614.5 keV) with the certified <sup>232</sup>Th values for each material. The measured activities from all daughter radionuclides agree closely with the certified values within their respective uncertainties, demonstrating the absence of significant systematic bias and confirming the validity of the efficiency calibration and coincidence summing corrections applied in this study. In particular, the results obtained from the high-energy <sup>208</sup>Tl 2614.5 keV emission remain consistent with those derived from lower-energy gamma lines, despite the larger coincidence summing corrections required for close-geometry measurements. The graphical comparison highlights the validity of the multi-line approach and further supports the use of corrected <sup>208</sup>Tl emissions as reliable indicators for the determination of <sup>232</sup>Th activity in environmental matrices. For IAEA-385, the measured value (33.7 ± 2.0 Bq∙kg<sup>−1</sup>) was statistically indistinguishable from the certified value (33.8 ± 0.9 Bq∙kg<sup>−1</sup>). Similarly, IAEA-412 yielded 36.6 ± 0.9 Bq∙kg<sup>−1</sup> compared with the certified 36.3 ± 3.5 Bq∙kg<sup>−1</sup>, while IAEA-447 showed 36.7 ± 1.1 Bq∙kg<sup>−1</sup> relative to 37.3 ± 2.0 Bq∙kg<sup>−1</sup>. The agreement between the measured and certified activities derived from the <sup>208</sup>Tl 2614.5 keV gamma emission is illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>. The figure compares the activities obtained for the certified reference materials IAEA-385, IAEA-412, and IAEA-447 with their corresponding certificate values. The results demonstrate excellent agreement within the reported uncertainties, confirming the reliability of the efficiency calibration and the accuracy of the coincidence summing corrections applied to the high-energy <sup>208</sup>Tl emission. This comparison further supports the suitability of the 2614.5 keV gamma line as a valid analytical indicator for the determination of <sup>232</sup>Th in environmental matrices.</p>
        <fig id="fig3">
          <label>Figure 3</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2173743-rId13.jpeg?20260408104046" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 3</bold><bold>.</bold> Comparison of <sup>232</sup>Th activity concentrations determined from individual daughter gamma line in certified reference materials.</p>
        <fig id="fig4">
          <label>Figure 4</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2173743-rId14.jpeg?20260408104046" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 4</bold><bold>.</bold> Comparison between measured and certified <sup>232</sup>Th activity concentrations derived from the <sup>208</sup>Tl 2614.5 keV gamma emission for the certified reference materials IAEA-412, IAEA-4447, and IAEA-385.</p>
        <p>In all cases, the differences between measured and certified values were well within the combined standard uncertainties, indicating the absence of significant systematic bias. The relative deviations were below ~2%, confirming the trueness of the method and the adequacy of efficiency calibration and coincidence summing corrections.</p>
        <p>These results substantiate the metrological reliability of the applied gamma-spectrometric protocol for accurate <sup>232</sup>Th determination in environmental matrices. The negligible bias observed across distinct matrices demonstrates the validation of the calibration and efficiency correction procedures. Although the <sup>208</sup>Tl 2614.5 keV line requires coincidence summing correction due to cascade emissions, the corrected results confirm its suitability as a primary analytical indicator for <sup>232</sup>Th. Its high emission probability and low spectral interference make it particularly advantageous for trace-level environmental analysis.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot3">
        <title>4.3. Application to Environmental Sediment and Soil Samples</title>
        <p>The validated methodology was subsequently applied to shoreline sediment and soil samples (S1 - S4 and BS) to assess natural <sup>232</sup>Th activity under environmental conditions. Activities derived from <sup>2</sup><sup>2</sup><sup>8</sup>Ac, <sup>2</sup><sup>12</sup>Pb, <sup>2</sup><sup>12</sup>Bi, and <sup>208</sup>Tl were internally consistent, ranging from 20 to 26 Bq∙kg<sup>−1</sup> presented in <bold>Table 3</bold>. The close agreement among daughter-derived activities provides strong evidence for secular equilibrium within the decay chain in all investigated samples. The absence of systematic discrepancies between low- and high-energy gamma lines further indicates that matrix-dependent self-attenuation and efficiency corrections were appropriately accounted for.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 3</bold><bold>.</bold><sup>232</sup>Th activity (Bq∙kg<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) in sediment and soil samples.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl3">
          <label>Table 3</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Parent Nuclide</td>
                <td>Daughter Nuclide</td>
                <td>Energy (keV)</td>
                <td>Intensity (%)</td>
                <td>S1</td>
                <td>S2</td>
                <td>S3</td>
                <td>S4</td>
                <td>BS</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <sup>232</sup>
                  Th
                </td>
                <td>
                  <sup>228</sup>
                  Ac
                </td>
                <td>270.24</td>
                <td>3.46</td>
                <td>24.0 ± 0.7</td>
                <td>22.5 ± 0.9</td>
                <td>22.8 ± 0.7</td>
                <td>24.5 ± 0.7</td>
                <td>30.8 ± 2.5</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>338.32</td>
                <td>11.3</td>
                <td>24.2 ± 0.5</td>
                <td>20.2 ± 0.5</td>
                <td>21.3 ± 0.5</td>
                <td>24.4 ± 0.5</td>
                <td>24.7 ± 1.1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>911.20</td>
                <td>25.8</td>
                <td>24.9 ± 0.4</td>
                <td>21.1 ± 0.4</td>
                <td>23.0 ± 0.4</td>
                <td>24.0 ± 0.4</td>
                <td>22.9 ± 0.8</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>964.77</td>
                <td>4.99</td>
                <td>23.4 ± 0.6</td>
                <td>20.2 ± 0.7</td>
                <td>22.2 ± 0.5</td>
                <td>22.9 ± 0.5</td>
                <td>23.6 ± 0.7</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>968.97</td>
                <td>15.8</td>
                <td>24.5 ± 0.5</td>
                <td>20.6 ± 0.5</td>
                <td>22.3 ± 0.5</td>
                <td>23.2 ± 0.5</td>
                <td>22.9 ± 0.9</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>Mean ± 1σ</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>24.3 ± 0.2</td>
                <td>20.7 ± 0.2</td>
                <td>22.4 ± 0.2</td>
                <td>23.8 ± 0.2</td>
                <td>23.5 ± 0.5</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <sup>212</sup>
                  Pb
                </td>
                <td>238.63</td>
                <td>43.6</td>
                <td>23.6 ± 0.4</td>
                <td>20.7 ± 0.3</td>
                <td>22.4 ± 0.5</td>
                <td>23.9 ± 0.5</td>
                <td>23.6 ± 0.7</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <sup>212</sup>
                  Bi
                </td>
                <td>727.33</td>
                <td>6.67</td>
                <td>23.4 ± 0.5</td>
                <td>21.0 ± 0.5</td>
                <td>22.8 ± 0.5</td>
                <td>22.7 ± 0.4</td>
                <td>21.1 ± 1.6</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <sup>208</sup>
                  Tl
                </td>
                <td>583.19</td>
                <td>85.0</td>
                <td>24.0 ± 0.3</td>
                <td>20.4 ± 0.2</td>
                <td>22.4 ± 0.3</td>
                <td>22.8 ± 0.3</td>
                <td>22.0 ± 0.7</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>860.56</td>
                <td>12.5</td>
                <td>20.1 ± 0.5</td>
                <td>18.7 ± 0.6</td>
                <td>20.3 ± 0.4</td>
                <td>20.2 ± 0.4</td>
                <td>27.6 ± 2.0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>2614.5</td>
                <td>99.8</td>
                <td>26.2 ± 1.8</td>
                <td>ND</td>
                <td>27.4 ± 2.3</td>
                <td>24.1 ± 1.7</td>
                <td>24.1 ± 0.8</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>Mean ± 1σ</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>24.0 ± 0.5</td>
                <td>20.1 ± 0.2</td>
                <td>21.8 ± 0.2</td>
                <td>22.1 ± 0.2</td>
                <td>23.3 ± 0.5</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Sample S1 exhibited the highest mean <sup>232</sup>Th activity (24.3 ± 0.2 Bq∙kg<sup>−1</sup>), whereas S2 showed the lowest (20.7 ± 0.2 Bq∙kg<sup>−1</sup>). The relatively narrow activity range suggests limited spatial variability and reflects natural geochemical heterogeneity rather than anthropogenic enrichment.</p>
        <p>Overall, the measured concentrations fall within typical background levels reported for uncontaminated soils and sediments, supporting the interpretation that thorium in these samples is of lithogenic origin.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot4">
        <title>4.4. Statistical Assessment of Gamma Line Consistency</title>
        <p>To quantitatively evaluate internal consistency within the <sup>232</sup>Th decay chain, activity ratios were defined for each gamma line as the ratio of the activity derived from an individual gamma emission to the mean activity obtained from all evaluated gamma lines for the same sample:</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD1">
          <label>(1)</label>
          <mml:math>
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:msub>
                <mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
                <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
              </mml:msub>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mo>
              </mml:mo>
              <mml:mfrac>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
                  </mml:msub>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mi>Ā</mml:mi>
              </mml:mfrac>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>where <inline-formula><mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi> A </mml:mi><mml:mi> i </mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the activity determined from gamma line <italic>i</italic>, and <inline-formula><mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:mi> Ā </mml:mi><mml:mo></mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the arithmetic mean activity derived from all gamma lines for that sample.</p>
        <p>For each gamma energy, the distribution of ratios across all environmental samples (S1 - S4 and BS, <italic>n</italic> = 5) was analyzed. A two-sided Student’s <italic>t</italic>-test was applied to test the null hypothesis:</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD2">
          <label>(2)</label>
          <mml:math>
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:msub>
                <mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
                <mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
              </mml:msub>
              <mml:mo>:</mml:mo>
              <mml:msub>
                <mml:mi>μ</mml:mi>
                <mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
              </mml:msub>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>against the alternative hypothesis:</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD3">
          <label>(3)</label>
          <mml:math>
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:msub>
                <mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
                <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
              </mml:msub>
              <mml:mo>:</mml:mo>
              <mml:msub>
                <mml:mi>μ</mml:mi>
                <mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
              </mml:msub>
              <mml:mo>≠</mml:mo>
              <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>where <inline-formula><mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi> μ </mml:mi><mml:mi> R </mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo></mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the mean ratio for a given gamma line. A significance level of α = 0.05 (95% confidence level) was adopted.</p>
        <p>As summarized in <bold>Table 3</bold>, none of the evaluated gamma lines exhibited statistically significant deviation from unity (p &gt; 0.05), confirming the absence of systematic bias among activities derived from daughter radionuclides and supporting the assumption of secular equilibrium. Although the 238.6 keV (<sup>2</sup><sup>12</sup>Pb) and 727.3 keV (<sup>2</sup><sup>12</sup>Bi) lines approached the significance threshold (p = 0.0886 and 0.1718, respectively), the deviations remained within expected analytical uncertainty and do not indicate disequilibrium or methodological deficiency.</p>
        <p>Among the evaluated emissions, the 2614.5 keV gamma line of <sup>208</sup>Tl exhibited the lowest standard deviation as shown in <bold>Table 2</bold>, indicating superior precision and minimal inter-sample variability. This statistical behavior reinforces its reliability and supports its preferential use in high resolution, ultra-low background gamma spectrometric determination of <sup>232</sup>Th, provided that appropriate coincidence summing corrections are applied.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot5">
        <title>4.5. Influence and Correction of Coincidence Summing</title>
        <p>True coincidence summing effects were systematically evaluated using GESPECOR simulations as presented in <bold>Table 4</bold>. Significant summing losses were observed for the 2614.5 keV and 583.2 keV emissions of <sup>208</sup>Tl, with correction factors decreasing to 0.7733 in the 49 mL geometry. This corresponds to potential count losses of up to 22.7% for close detector-sample configurations.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 4.</bold> Coincidence summing corrections calculated by GESPECOR in gamma energy lines.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl4">
          <label>Table 4</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Nuclide</td>
                <td>Energy (keV)</td>
                <td>Intensity (%)</td>
                <td>49 ml</td>
                <td>800 ml</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <sup>228</sup>
                  Ac
                </td>
                <td>338.32</td>
                <td>11.3</td>
                <td>0.95158</td>
                <td>0.95886</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <sup>228</sup>
                  Ac
                </td>
                <td>911.20</td>
                <td>25.8</td>
                <td>0.96099</td>
                <td>0.97248</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <sup>212</sup>
                  Pb
                </td>
                <td>238.63</td>
                <td>43.6</td>
                <td>0.99974</td>
                <td>0.99990</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <sup>208</sup>
                  Tl
                </td>
                <td>583.19</td>
                <td>85.0</td>
                <td>0.80062</td>
                <td>0.84460</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <sup>208</sup>
                  Tl
                </td>
                <td>2614.5</td>
                <td>99.8</td>
                <td>0.77330</td>
                <td>0.82323</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>In contrast, emissions from <sup>2</sup><sup>2</sup><sup>8</sup>Ac (338.32 and 911.20 keV) and <sup>2</sup><sup>12</sup>Pb (238.63 keV) exhibited minimal summing effects, with correction factors exceeding 0.95, indicating negligible cascade interference. These results emphasize the critical importance of rigorous summing corrections for high-energy cascade emitters, particularly in close-geometry measurements. When accurately corrected, the 2614.5 keV peak retains its analytical superiority, combining high emission probability, minimal background interference, and excellent counting statistics.</p>
        <p>Although the 2614.5 keV gamma emission of <sup>208</sup>Tl provides superior statistical precision and minimal spectral interference, its application may be limited in low-activity samples where the peak is not detectable or when strong coincidence summing corrections introduce additional uncertainty. In such cases, lower-energy emissions from <sup>2</sup><sup>2</sup><sup>8</sup>Ac (e.g., 338 keV) or <sup>2</sup><sup>12</sup>Pb (238 keV), which exhibit negligible summing effects, may provide more reliable estimates. Therefore, a multi-line approach remains essential for robust <sup>232</sup>Th quantification under varying measurement conditions.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec5">
      <title>5. Conclusion</title>
      <p>This study highlights the effectiveness of ultra-low background high-purity germanium (HPGe) gamma spectrometry in accurately measuring <sup>232</sup>Th in environmental samples. By analyzing various gamma-emitting daughter radionuclides such as <sup>2</sup><sup>2</sup><sup>8</sup>Ac, <sup>2</sup><sup>12</sup>Pb, <sup>2</sup><sup>12</sup>Bi, and especially <sup>208</sup>Tl under secular equilibrium, <sup>232</sup>Th activity can be reliably determined even at low levels typical of natural soils and sediments. Of all the gamma lines studied, the 2614.5 keV emission from <sup>208</sup>Tl yielded the most accurate and consistent results, with minimal variation across certified reference materials and environmental samples. Although this line is affected by true coincidence summing (TCS), applying proper correction factors restored measurement accuracy without reducing sensitivity. Other lines, particularly from <sup>2</sup><sup>2</sup><sup>8</sup>Ac and <sup>2</sup><sup>12</sup>Pb, showed trivial summing effects and supported the activity estimates, further confirming the equilibrium assumption. The consistent activity measurements of <sup>232</sup>Th across multiple gamma lines, combined with statistical analysis and summing corrections, demonstrate the validity of this method for routine environmental radioactivity evaluations. The results endorse using <sup>208</sup>Tl, alongside other thorium progeny, as a dependable tracer for <sup>232</sup>Th in soil and sediment samples, with applications in geochemical tracing, environmental monitoring, and radiological safety assessments. This method therefore provides a reliable analytical approach for routine environmental monitoring and regulatory compliance applications.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec6">
      <title>Authorship Contribution Statement</title>
      <p>Abdul J. Khan: Project Design, Conceptualization, Methodology, Data Analysis, Data curation, Writing-Original Draft, Literature Survey, Supervision; Umme-Farzana Syed: Sample Preparation, Review and Editing; Cynthia A. Costello: Sample Collection and Distribution, Review and Editing. </p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Abbasi, A., Algethami, M., Bawazeer, O., &amp; Zakaly, H. M. H. (2022). Distribution of Natural and Anthropogenic Radionuclides and Associated Radiation Indices in the Southwestern Coastline of Caspian Sea. <italic>Marine Pollution Bulletin, 178,</italic> Article 113593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113593 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113593</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35344732</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113593">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113593</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Abbasi, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Algethami, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bawazeer, O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zakaly, H.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <elocation-id>113593</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113593</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35344732</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Currie, L. A. (1968). Limits for Qualitative Detection and Quantitative Determination. Application to Radiochemistry. <italic>Analytical Chemistry, 40,</italic> 586-593. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60259a007 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/ac60259a007</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60259a007">https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60259a007</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Currie, L.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1968</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/ac60259a007</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">García-Talavera, M., Laedermann, J. P., Décombaz, M., Daza, M. J., &amp; Quintana, B. (2001). Coincidence Summing Corrections for the Natural Decay Series in <italic>γ</italic>-Ray Spectrometry. <italic>Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 54,</italic> 769-776. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0969-8043(00)00318-3 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0969-8043(00)00318-3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11258526</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0969-8043(00)00318-3">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0969-8043(00)00318-3</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Talavera, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Laedermann, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Daza, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Quintana, B.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2001</year>
            <volume>8043</volume>
            <issue>00</issue>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0969-8043(00)00318-3</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11258526</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">González-Fernández, D., Garrido-Pérez, M. C., Casas-Ruiz, M., Barbero, L., &amp; Nebot-Sanz, E. (2012). Radiological Risk Assessment of Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials in Marine Sediments and Its Application in Industrialized Coastal Areas: Bay of Algeciras, Spain. <italic>Environmental Earth Sciences, 66,</italic> 1175-1181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1325-0 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12665-011-1325-0</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1325-0">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1325-0</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Casas-Ruiz, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Barbero, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Nebot-Sanz, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Algeciras, S</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2012</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12665-011-1325-0</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Khan, A. J., Semkow, T. M., Beach, S. E., Haines, D. K., Bradt, C. J., Bari, A. et al. (2014). Application of Low-Background Gamma-Ray Spectrometry to Monitor Radioactivity in the Environment and Food. <italic>Applied</italic><italic>Radiation</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Isotopes,</italic><italic>90,</italic> 251-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2014.04.011 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apradiso.2014.04.011</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24836905</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2014.04.011">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2014.04.011</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Khan, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Semkow, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Beach, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Haines, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bradt, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bari, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apradiso.2014.04.011</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24836905</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Khan, A. J., Syed, U., Roselan, A. L., &amp; Costello, C. A. (2023). Uranium Series Disequilibrium and Precision Measurement of Radionuclides Activity in Sediment Sample Using Low Background Gamma Spectrometry. <italic>Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 11,</italic> 119-140. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2023.1110010 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/gep.2023.1110010</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2023.1110010">https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2023.1110010</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Khan, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Syed, U.</string-name>
              <string-name>Roselan, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Costello, C.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/gep.2023.1110010</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Khan, A. J., Torres, M. A., Haines, D. K., Bari, A., Hoffman, T. J., &amp; Semkow, T. M. (2020). Destructive and Nondestructive Determination of <sup>226</sup>Ra and <sup>228</sup>Ra in Drinking Water by Gamma Spectrometry. <italic>Journal of Environmental Protection, 11,</italic>257-268. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2020.114015 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jep.2020.114015</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2020.114015">https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2020.114015</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Khan, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Torres, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Haines, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bari, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Hoffman, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Semkow, T.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jep.2020.114015</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Martin, M. J. (2007). Nuclear Data Sheets for A=208. <italic>Nuclear</italic><italic>Data</italic><italic>Sheets,</italic><italic>108,</italic> 1583-1806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2007.07.001 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nds.2007.07.001</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2007.07.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2007.07.001</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Martin, M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2007</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nds.2007.07.001</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Rogers, V. C. (1970). Detection Limits for Gamma-Ray Spectral Analysis. <italic>Analytical</italic><italic>Chemistry,</italic><italic>42,</italic> 807-808. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60289a010 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/ac60289a010</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60289a010">https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60289a010</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Rogers, V.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1970</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/ac60289a010</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Semkow, T. M., Parekh, P. P., Schwenker, C. D., Khan, A. J., Bari, A., Colaresi, J. F. et al. (2002). Low-Background Gamma Spectrometry for Environmental Radioactivity. <italic>Applied</italic><italic>Radiation</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Isotopes,</italic><italic>57,</italic> 213-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0969-8043(02)00085-4 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0969-8043(02)00085-4</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12150281</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0969-8043(02)00085-4">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0969-8043(02)00085-4</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Semkow, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Parekh, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Schwenker, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Khan, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bari, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Colaresi, J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2002</year>
            <volume>8043</volume>
            <issue>02</issue>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0969-8043(02)00085-4</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12150281</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Sima, O., &amp; Arnold, D. (2002). Transfer of the Efficiency Calibration of Germanium Gamma-Ray Detectors Using the GESPECOR Software. <italic>Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 56,</italic> 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0969-8043(01)00169-5 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0969-8043(01)00169-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11839061</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0969-8043(01)00169-5">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0969-8043(01)00169-5</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Sima, O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Arnold, D.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2002</year>
            <volume>8043</volume>
            <issue>01</issue>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0969-8043(01)00169-5</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11839061</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Sima, O., Arnold, D., &amp; Dovlete, C. (2001). GESPECOR: A Versatile Tool in Gamma-Ray Spectrometry. <italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Radioanalytical</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Nuclear</italic><italic>Chemistry,</italic><italic>248,</italic> 359-364. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010619806898 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/a:1010619806898</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010619806898">https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010619806898</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Sima, O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Arnold, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Dovlete, C.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2001</year>
            <fpage>101061</fpage>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/a:1010619806898</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Souza, I., Pennafirme, S., Santos, N., Domingues, A., Silva, A., &amp; Lima, I. (2025). Investigation into Radionuclides Presence and Radioactivity Levels in Coastal Sediments Proximate to the Almirante Álvaro Alberto Nuclear Power Plant. <italic>Applied</italic><italic>Radiation</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Isotopes,</italic><italic>225,</italic> Article 111940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111940 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111940</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40513359</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111940">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111940</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Souza, I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Pennafirme, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Santos, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Domingues, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Silva, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lima, I.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2025</year>
            <elocation-id>111940</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111940</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40513359</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <label>14.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Strom, D. J., &amp; Stansbury, P. S. (1992). Minimum Detectable Activity When Background Is Counted Longer than the Sample. <italic>Health</italic><italic>Physics,</italic><italic>63,</italic> 360-361. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-199209000-00016 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00004032-199209000-00016</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">1644575</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-199209000-00016">https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-199209000-00016</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Strom, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Stansbury, P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1992</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00004032-199209000-00016</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">1644575</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <label>15.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Wang, Q., Wang, H., Ma, Y., Wang, J., Su, W., Xiao, E. et al. (2023). Geochemical Distributions of Natural Radionuclides in Surface Soils and Sediments Impacted by Lead-Zinc Mining Activity. <italic>Ecotoxicology</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Environmental</italic><italic>Safety,</italic><italic>263,</italic> Article 115210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115210 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115210</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37418943</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115210">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115210</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Wang, Q.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wang, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ma, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wang, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Su, W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Xiao, E.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <elocation-id>115210</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115210</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37418943</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <label>16.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Yücel, H., Köse, E., Esen, A. N., &amp; Bor, D. (2011). Correction Methodology for the Spectral Interfering <italic>γ</italic>-Rays Overlapping to the Analytical Peaks Used in the Analysis of <sup>232</sup>Th. <italic>Applied</italic><italic>Radiation</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Isotopes,</italic><italic>69,</italic> 890-897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2011.02.027 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apradiso.2011.02.027</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21398134</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2011.02.027">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2011.02.027</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Esen, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bor, D.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2011</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apradiso.2011.02.027</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21398134</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <label>17.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Yushin, N., Jakhu, R., Chaligava, O., Grozdov, D., &amp; Zinicovscaia, I. (2023). Natural and Anthropogenic Radionuclides Concentration with Heavy Metals Analysis of the Sediments Collected around Novaya Zemlya. <italic>Marine</italic><italic>Pollution</italic><italic>Bulletin,</italic><italic>194,</italic> Article 115346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115346 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115346</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37536080</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115346">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115346</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Yushin, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Jakhu, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chaligava, O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Grozdov, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zinicovscaia, I.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <elocation-id>115346</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115346</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37536080</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>